The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.38996 Hwy 82.A061-98Aspen Country Inn PUD Amendment 61 CE 2,"i 1 & 1 1. 4 *31 PARCEL ID:~2735-112-02852 DATE RCVD: ~07/28/98 #COPIES:11 CASE NO~A06198 CASE NAME:~Aspen Country Inn PUD Amendment PLNR:|Chris Bendon PROJ ADDR:~38996 Hwy 82 CASE TYP:~PUD Amendment STEPS1 OWN/APP: Housing Dept. ~ ADR~530 E. Main C/S/Z:~Aspen, CO 81611 PHN:~920-5050 REP:~Dave Tolen ADR:1530 E Main C/S/Z:~Aspen, CO 81611 PHN1920-5050 FEES DUE:~2160 Cd) + 110 (e) REQUES FEES RCVD~2270 REQUEST TO WAIVE STAT: F REFERRALS~ REFI BYI DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED S, /8.1& 1 792. .7 r' 1 21. ,, 99 0 L. ~L ~r DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 4 0 C - CITY COUNCIL: 7412&2,4 REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED :1 /0.3 BY: 1 CAA DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: PLAT (BK.PG):~ ADMIN: 1:; -O -94> 49 4 44 , OVVI -, - . 1~PN:97 *404 1 724 .Â«14/QQO (\ tb- 9/ 'AllÂ¥ *1.44, - 14 r\*'ft- vairt 46 9-- 9- s#'0~ Â«t) ~2*- Pe- '* %,4 - - 11+V{05> gel[/ ft , '1144 - 'm\[ 21 / 1Â«lm- 92 0 0 9 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Amy Margerum, City Manager Julie Ann Woods, Acting Community Development Director FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner RE: Aspen Country Inn Substantial PUD Amendment, Subdivision Amendment, and Rezoning -- Second Reading & Public Hearing DATE: September 28,1998 SUMMARY: The Aspen Country Inn is an affordable housing development approved for 40 residential units. The project was reviewed through the PUD, Subdivision, and rezoning processes. Subsequent to the approved development order, the final sale altered the property boundaries. Also, after purchase the applicant realized a structural complication which requires the western residential wing to be raised by 6 inches (net). The reduced property size essentially nullifies the project because the building does not fit within the dimensional requirements established in the PUD process. The applicant is seeking to alter these dimensional provisions to allow the project to proceed as it was originally conceived. The applicant also wishes to improve some of the lower units in the western wing by creating walk-out areas. These units are to be partially below grade. For this purpose, the height limit needs to be increased to 31 feet. Although the net height increase for structural reasons is only 6 inches, the gross is measured from the base of the walk-out. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the number of units or to the method in which they will be allocated. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council approve this amendment to the Aspen Country Inn PUD, Subdivision and Rezoning. ISSUES FROM PRIOR HEARING: The City Council requested a project update from the applicant. Dave Tolen will provide an update of the project during the hearing. 1 .. APPLICANT: City of Aspen. Represented by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. LOCATION: Aspen Country Inn, 38996 Hwy. 82 (just west of the Pomegranate Inn). ZONING: Affordable Housing (AH1-PUD). LOT SIZE, AREA, FAR, USES: Approved by Ordinance 16, Series 1997 (attached as Exhibit B). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this amendment. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Final PUD, Subdivision, and Rezoning. The City Council may approve Final PUD's, Subdivisions, and Rezoning requests at a public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a public hearing. BACKGROUND: The applicant gained PUD approval from City Council by Ordinance 16, Series of 1997. This Ordinance specifically created the dimensional requirements for the property. The contract for purchase at the time allowed the seller to alter the exact property boundaries. The seller did alter the boundaries which created several incongruencies with the approved development plan. Any changes which affect dimensions can only be approved by the City Council through the final PUD process. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Ordinance 16, Series of 1997. is attached as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council amend Ordinance 16, Series 1997, in the following manner: 1. Sections One and Two: The Official Zone District map shall reflect the correct parcel boundaries and zoning subsequent to the boundary changes between the Aspen Country Inn (ACI) parcel and the Maroon Creek Club (MCC). The ACI shall be zoned AH1-PUD. The MCC shall be zoned Park-PUD. The Community Development Director shall use the final plats filed by these parties as the basis for determining the parcel and zoning boundaries. 2 .. 2. Section Four, Condition # 6: The language in this condition shall be replaced in total with the following language: a. Minimum distance between buildings No requirement b. Maximum height 30' to the peak of the original lobby area, thirteen (13) feet to the eastern-most edge of the building, and twenty-two (22) feet to the point twenty (20) feet from the eastern-most edge of the building. Thirty (30) feet for the remainder of the original lobby area. T-wenty-four (24) feet (changed from 22') for the East and South residential wings. Thirty-One (31) feet (changedfropm 22') forthe West wing. The elevator tower may be twenty-seven (27) feet high from finished grade. (changed from 22') c. Minimum front yard 100' (no change) d. Minimum rear yard 14' (changed from 15') e. Minimum side yard 10' (changed from 25') f. Minimum lot width As represented on the final plat (no change) g. Minimum lot area 133,000 square feet (changed from 169,884) h. Trash access area 10' wide minimum (no change) i. Internal foor area ratio No requirement (no change) j. Minimum percent open space 2594 (no change) 3. The City Council shall extend the period in which the final plat may be recorded to 180 days after this amendment is approved by the Council. This development order shall be void after this established time period. 4. The applicant shall install a new fire hydrant, remove or otherwise abandon the underground fuel storage tank, remove unnecessary and broken light fixtures, and make the appropriate arrangements for lighting the bus stop as required by the City Engineer. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments. Exhibit B -- Ordinance 16, Series of 1997. (previously approved) Exhibit C -- Development Application. Exhibit D -- Pending Ordinance 36, Series of 1998. 3 .. EXHIBIT A STAFF COMMENTS ACI AMENDMENT #1 STAFF COMMENTS: AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONE DISTRICT MAP In reviewing an amendment to the text of this title or an amendment to the official zone district map, the Commission and the Council shall consider: A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this title. Staff Finding: The amendment will correctly assign those zone districts to the appropriate lands. B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements Of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: The project was found to be in compliance with the AACP and was approved by City Council. This amendment does not affect that original finding. C. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics. D. The effect of the proposed amendment on traffic generation and road safety. E. Whether and the extent to -which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and -whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such facilities, including, but not limited to, transportation facilities, sewage jacilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities, F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in signiftcant adverse impacts on the natural environment. G. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community character in the City of Aspen. H. Whether there have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel or the surrounding neighborhood -which support the proposed amendment. Exhibit C - Staff Comments, page 1 .. Staff Finding: No significant changes to the zoning are proposed. The amendment is "cleaning- up" the Official Zone District Map to reflect the altered property boundaries and does not affect the provision of public services, the safety of roads, or significant natural features of the site. The change is necessary to correctly reflect the amended property boundaries. The change is not in conflict with the public interest. STAFF COMMENTS: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The applicant has submitted the appropriate content for public review of this amendment. A development application for a PUD must comply with all standards and requirements for PUD. Because the project is not being altered from its original conception, other than dimensional requiorements of the site, only those criteria have been included. At the Commission' s request, staff can review all of the criteria for a PUD. Dimensional Requirements. The dimensional requirements shall be those of the underlying zone district, provided that variations may be permitted in the following: a. Minimum distance between buildings; b. Maximum height (including viewplanes): c. Minimum front yard d. Minimum rear yard e. Minimum side yard. f Minimum lot width; g. Minimum lot area; h. Trash access area,' i. Internal floor area ratio; and j. Minimum percent open space. If a variation is permitted in minimum lot area, the area of any lot may be greater or less than the minimum requirement of the underlying zone district, provided that the total area of all lots, when averaged, at least equals the permitted minimum for the zone district. Any variation permitted shall be clearly indicated on the final plat development plan. Staff Finding: Dimensional requirements in the AH1 -PUD zone district are established via the PUD process. The applicant is proposing these requirements be established as follows: a. Minimum distance between buildings No requirement b. Maximum height 30' to the peak of the original lobby area, thirteen (13) feet to the eastern-most edge ofthe building, and twenty-two (22) feet to the point twenty Exhibit C - Staff Comments, page 2 .. wings. Thirty-One (31) feet (changed fropm 22') for the West wing. The elevator tower may be twenty-seven (27)feet high fromfinished grade. (changed from 22') c. Minimum front yard 100' (no change) d. Minimum rear yard 14' (changed from 15') e. Minimum side yard 10' (changed from 25') f. Minimum lot width As represented on the final plat (no change) g. Minimum lot area 133,000 square feet (changed from 169,884) h. Trash access area 10' wide minimum (no change) i. Internal foor area ratio No requirement (no change) j. Minimum percent open space 2594 (no change) The Council should, as a condition of approval, amend the dimensional requirements for this parcel as described above. This language has been included in the staff memorandum and the proposed Ordinance. ~TAFF COMMENTS: SUBDIVISION A development application for subdivision review shall comply with all Subdivision standards and requirements. As previously reviewed and approved by the City Council, the Subdivision will comply with all standards and requirements The applicant has prepared a plat for review by the City Engineer. The plat was prepared in response to Ordinance 16 and shows the amended property boundaries. No other alterations to the Subdivision are proposed. Exhibit C - Staff Comments, page 3 .. 1 Application for a PUD Amendment for the Aspen Country Inn Submitted by Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority 28 July 1998 .. July 23, 1998 Mr. Stan Clauson, Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: ASPEN COUNTRY INN PUD AMENDMENT Dear Stan: Attached please find twenty-one (21) copies of a PUD amendment application requesting an amendment to the PUD approved on May 5, 1997 for conversion of the Aspen Country Inn to affordable housing. Five (5) full-sized sets of application drawings are also being provided for your use. Also enclosed is one (1) copy of the following, as requested in the pre-application meetings â€¢ A list ofthe property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the property. The Housing Authority hereby requests that the City waive the land use application fee for this project, since it is a 100 percent affordable housing project. Should you have any questions or need any additional information during the period of staff review ofthis application, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your department's assistance while this application was being prepared and for your continuing attention to this project. Very truly yours, ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY - Dave Tolen, Executive Director APPLICATION CONTENTS Application for PUD amendment Exhibits: 1. Dimensional Requirements Form 2. Site Plan with Proposed Modifications 3. Building and Footprint plan with Proposed Modifications 4. Elevations and proposed Heights 5. Landscape Plan Changes 6. City Ordinance 97-16 Granting Rezoning, PUD, Subdivision, Exemption from Growth Management 7. Site Locality Map 8. Pre Conference Summary 9. Proof of Ownership and Legal Description ~ LAND USE APPLICATION ~ PROJECT: Name: As,- Ce-4 -Ir- Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: AsT--P:41 4 ca_j~ _A0--614J ~770- 4.-â‚¬.~~ \ Address: 52Â£> 12. FL-:1 61. 4,2.1 CO <2161\ Phone #: 390 - 920 - 5150 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Lig; j --26 len Address: 553 62. 94&. 9. 41- CE) %16 11 Phone #: Cric>. 920 - 30 5 0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): - ~1 Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD I) Conceptual Historic Devt. g Special Review % Final PUD (f/UD Amendment) I) Final Historic Development ~ Design Review Appeal C Conceptual SPA m Minor Historic Devt. E GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) C] Historic Demolition 01 GMQS Exemption I) Subdivision C Historic Designation ~1 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream D Subdivision Exemption (includes m Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane E Lot Split Il Temporary Use C] Other: ~ Lot Line Adjustment El Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) â‚¬et. =-AR-/W e <' A 99\I col-raM L' c. vuck> A--J. 41Â£.4- 5- lk< 4.r- C,-43 -311 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 56.c. a.t~o-cul : A ?f F ;u- C, g 3>KE) AB -4-4- L, 4 L_ tbr- 0-1,7 -IÂ«, Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $~1 JZI"Pre-Application Conference Summary C Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement w 02; 9. A 8~-Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form ,02-Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents [2~Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents ,~JD-R:esponse to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application .. I. Application Request This is an application to amend an approved PUD for the Aspen Country Inn (38996 Highway 82; a legal description is attached as Exhibit "A"). The application is being submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (hereinafter, "the Applicant"), The original approvals for the conversion ofthe Aspen Country Inn to affordable housing were granted by City Council on May 5, 1997. The Applicant intends to remodel the Aspen Country Inn so that it can be occupied as affordable housing. This will be accomplished by combining the relatively smalllodge rooms within the existing building into larger dwelling units that comply with the affordable housing guidelines. The applicant proposes to create 4 studio units, 34 one- bedroom units, and 2 two-bedroom units for a total of forty (40) dwelling units. Priority shall be given to qualified senioys for between twenty-four and forty of these units. The Applicant needs to adjust several aspects o f the original PUD agreement to meet changing conditions. These minor changes are outlined in Section III: Review Standards for An Amendment to an Approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). To illustrate these changes, this application contains the following drawings: â€¢ Site Plan â€¢ Architectural Elevations; and â€¢ Floor Plans A pre-application conference was held with representatives of the City on 20 July 1998 (see Pre-Application Conference summary, attached hereto as Exhibit B). Based on this meeting, it was confirmed that an amendment to the approved PUD was required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations to complete this project. II. Project Description The subject property was originally part ofthe Maroon Creek Club subdivision and PUD that was adopted on July 15, 1993 by Pitkin County Resolution 93-104. According to the Maroon Creek Club Final Plat and Subdivision Improvements Agreement, the Aspen Country Inn was to be demolished. However, during the PUD approval process, the County authorized the owner to use the Aspen Country Inn as housing for project construction workers. The applicant wishes to continue using the Aspen Country Inn as affordable housing. In pursuit of this goal, the City of Aspen entered into a contract to purchase the Aspen Country Inn from the Maroon Creek Club during annexation negotiations. In order to complete the purchase transaction and to allow the Housing Authority to move forw'ard with re-development, an application for rezoning, PUD, subdivision, GMQS exemption .. and scenic foreground review was submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority on February 11, 1997. The application was approved on May 5, 1997 by the Aspen City Council. At the time of approval, the Maroon Creek Club retained the right to adjust the property 11, boundaries based on the location of the golf cart path. The subsequent 1-md-purchase l.1/ negotiations resulted in a revised legal description that leaves the site-considerably smallQI In addition, struci Umblems with the existing west wing have become apparent since ~approval. This has resulted in changes to the approved PUD. These changes are considered substantial and require an amendment. The following section of this application addresses the review standards for an amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) III. Review Standards for An Amendment to an Approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) The following review standards have been affected by changes to the approved PUD: " 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. " Response: As part of the purchase agreement with the Maroon Creek Club, the site area has been reduced significantly. The approved PUD application listed the area of the site as 3.9 acres (169,884 square feet) with 20,160 square feet of land coverage. According to the new plat, the site is currentl*.3.23 acres or 131424 square feet. While there has been a slight decrease in the building footprint 719,296 square feet) due to design changes, the reduction in the site's total land area means that land coverage has increased from 11 percent to 14 percent of the site. ~ Since the increase in overall coverage is due to a reduction in the site area and not an increase in building area, there is no change in the scale of the project or its impact on surrounding land owners. The applicant requests approval for the new site boundaries and for the increased land coverage. - "4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent Of the approved open space. Response: According to the approval ordinance, the required minimum percent open space is 25 percent of the site or 42,471 square feet. In the proposed design, area structures, sidewalks and patios, parking and entry road, and the existing access road total 54,130 square feet of the site. Despite the decrease in the overall site area, the total area 0 . of open space is 78,210 square feet or 59 percent of the site. Therefore no amendment is requested for open space. "9. Any change whichisinconsistentwith a condition orrepresentation oftheproject's original approval or which requires granting afurther variationfrom the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. There are several changes that are inconsistent with a representation of the project's original approval. These are illustrated in the attached drawings and are described below. Setbacks Due to changes in the property lines, the site no longer fits within the approved setbacks outlined in the PUD in three locations. The approved rear yard distance is fifteen (15) feet. At the eastern edge ofthe East wing, the rear yard measures fourteen (14) feet and six (6) inches. The approved side yard setback is twenty-five (25) feet. At the southern end ofthe South wing, the side yard measures fourteen (14) feet and ten (10) inches. On - the west side of the lot, the dumpster enclosure is within the twenty-five (25) foot required setback. The setback changes are minor and are acceptable to the adjoining property owner, the Maroon Creek Club. Berms along this property line will offset visual impact ofthe narrower boundary, The dumpster enclosure (8'L x 10'W x 8 1/2 H) is located five (5) feet from the corner ofthe stairwell, and 14 feet from the closest unit. The enclosure will also be eleven (11) feet from the existing property line. (00~ The applicant requests a rear yard setback change to fourteen (14) feet and a side yard ~0@itback often (10) feet. Building footprint The approved building footprint was 20,160 square feet. The new building footprint will decrease to 19,290 square feet. This change is due to a reconfiguration of the building. - In the new design, the pyramid roof and the existing common area located in the lobby will remain. Retaining the pyramid roof, designed by Fritz Benedict, will address neighbor concerns about the accepted design. The pyramid shape will break up the straight lines of the square buildings. In addition to its architectural advantages, retaining the lobby area will provide a space for residents to congregate informally and hold events. While examining the building, it was determined that the west wing lacked structural integrity. This entire wing will be demolished and replaced. The new building will fit almost exactly into the footprint of the existing building. .. Floor area According to the approved proposal, the floor area for the building was 42,350 square feet. Under the new plan, the floor area is 41,795 square feet. There is no proposed increase in floor area. During design, it was determined that the east wing would not support a second story. To offset the loss of space, the South wing, which is already two stories on the east side, will have a second floor added to the west side. The Applicant requests approval of these floor area and structural changes. Height The original approval allowed a maximum height of thirty (30) feet to the peak of the original lobby area, eleven (11) feet to the eastern-most edge of the building, and twenty- two (22) feet to the point twenty (20) feet from the eastern-most edge of the building. Additional height requirements were thirty (30) feet for the remainder of the original lobby ~ area, and twenty-two (22) feet for all other residential wings. Changeitg-lbULasÂ£.auL - South wings do not result in any change the approved height requirements. _ .. On the West wing of the building, a seven (7) foot deep excavation on the front of the building will provide more light and better access to the bottom floor apartments. Measuring from the base o f this excavation will produce a total height of thirty (30) feet eight (8) inches for most ofthe building. In addition, we needed to install an elevator shaft for accessiblity. Measuring from surface, this creates a roof height of twenty-seven (27) in the area of the elevator shaft. Since the approved height limit for this building is twenty- two (22) feet from surface, these heights will exceed the approved maximum height by eight (8) inches and four (4) feet respectively. Neither roof line is within the line of sight for residents of the Pomegranate Condos. The highest part of this wing, the elevator shaft, will not be visible behind the lobby pyramid. The height change in the West Wing results in an actual change, as measured from ground level, of an additional eight inches. This is a result of deeper floor joists in the first and second floors. <The Applicant requests that maximum height for the west wing be restricted to twenty- ~ seven (27) feet for the elevator shaft,measured from ground level adjacent to the elevator, ~ and thirty-one (31) feet for the rest of this wing, measured form the area excavated in I front ofthe wing. Landscaping - The landscaping originally depicted in the earlier site plan has been modified to decrease the amount of impervious surface. Under the old plan, the entire area between the two buildings was covered with brick and sidewalks lined the parking lot. Under the new plan, several changes will be made. Six (6) foot wide sidewalks will run along the front ofthe .. East wing of the building, This alignment will provide quicker access to the building's interior. Instead of covering the entire area between the wings with an impervious brick surface, an eight (8) foot sidewalk will be placed on the west side of the open space to provide access to the west wing. In addition, plantings will be placed between spots 36 and 37 to break up the parking lot mass. A second space for a dumpster and turn around for a dump truck will also be placed at the east end of the parking lot. Snow storage will remain at the west end of the parking lot. The Applicant requests approval ofthese landscaping changes. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Aspe.â€¢ (1>-7<.r -~IJ,1 4 , Applicant: Ai\,1 l.24\C'.1 Cou, -87 Ho.,Mi-'1 A,..0-~14 cpi 49 Location: 38 9 9 6 91 4. 2 2 Zone District: Ablt-'POD Lot Size: 1 33,42u Lot Area. 133,4 24 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. P[ease refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NIA- Proposed.Â· A* i Number o f residential units: Existing: 90 Proposed: 40 Number o f bedrooms: Existing: 41 Proposed: 4 'r Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 44 DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 412,35-0 Allowable: Proposed: 4 1,795 Principal bldg. height: Existing.* sce =44. Allowable: Proposed: se. =46 . Access. bldg. height: Existing: N~ Ar Allowable: Proposed: N j A On-Site parking: Existing: 43 Required: Proposed: 4 3 % Site coverage: Existing: 11Â©70 Required: Proposed: / 4 90 % Open Space: Existing: 7 st Required: Proposed: S 9 7. Front Setback: Existing: /00 Required: Proposed: /00 Rear Setback: Existing: / 5 Required. Proposed: 14 Combined F/R: Existing Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: 2 5 Required: Proposed: / 0 Side Setback: Existing: Required: , Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments: N A Variations requested: 0 Vic MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council r. .0 E-k j ' THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directot~/F FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner 8 1 i .A RE: Aspen Country Inn Substantial PUD Amendment, Subdivision Amendment, and Rezoning -- First Reading DATE: August 24, 1998 SUMMARY: The Aspen Country Inn is an affordable housing development approved for 40 residential units. The project was reviewed through the PUD, Subdivision, and rezoning processes. Subsequent to the approved development order, the final sale altered the property boundaries. Also, after purchase the applicant realized a structural complication which requires the western residential wing to be raised by 6 inches (net). The reduced property size essentially nullifies the project because the building does not fit within the dimensional requirements established in the PUD process. The applicant is seeking to alter these dimensional provisions to allow the project to proceed as it was originally conceived. The applicant also wishes to improve some of the lower units in the western wing by creating walk-out areas. These units are to be partially below grade. For this purpose, the height limit needs to be increased to 31 feet. Although the net height increase for structural reasons is only 6 inches, the gross is measured from the bottom of the walk-out. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the number of units or to the method in which they will be allocated. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council approve this amendment to the Aspen Country Inn PUD, Subdivision and Rezoning. APPLICANT: City of Aspen. Represented by Dave Tolen, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. LOCATION: Aspen Country Inn, 38996 LIwy. 82 (just west of the Pomegranate Inn). 1 4 0 0 ZONING: Affordable Housing (AH1-PUD). LOT SIZE, AREA, FAR, USES: Approved by Ordinance 16, Series 1997 (attached as Exhibit C). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this amendment. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Final PUD, Subdivision, and Rezoning. The City Council may approve Final PUD's, Subdivisions, and Rezoning requests at a public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a public hearing. BACKGROUND: The applicant gained PUD approval from City Council by Ordinance 16, series of 1997. This Ordinance specifically created the dimensional requirements for the property. The contract for purchase at the time allowed the seller to alter the exact property boundaries. The seller did alter the boundaries which created several incongruencies with the approved development plan. Any changes which affect dimensions can only be approved by the City Council through the final PUD process. %TAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Ordinance 16, 1997, is attached as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council amend Ordinance 16, series 1997, in the following manner: 1. Sections One and Two: The Official Zone District map shall reflect the correct parcel boundaries and zoning subsequent to the boundary changes between the Aspen Country Inn (ACI) parcel and the Maroon Creek Club (MCC). The ACI shall be zoned ALI1-PUD. The MCC shall be zoned Park-PUD. The Community Development Director shall use the final plats filed by these parties as the basis for determining the parcel and zoning boundaries. 2. Section Four, Condition # 6: The language in this condition shall be replaced in total with the following language: a. Minimum distance between buildings No requirement b. Maximum height 30' to the peak of the original lobby area, thirteen (13) feet to the eastern-most edge of the building, and twenty-two (22) feet to the point twenty (20) feet from the eastern-most edge ofthe building. Thirty (30) feetfor the remainder of the original lobby area. Twenty-three (23) feetfor the 2 .. East and South residential wings. Thirty-One (31) feetfor the West wing. The elevator tower may be Twenty-seven (27) feet high fromfinished grade, c. Minimum front yard 100' d. Minimum rear yard 14' e. Minimum side yard 10' f. Minimum lot width As represented on the final plat g. Minimum lot area 133,000 square feet h. Trash access area 10' wide minimum 1. Internal foor area ratio No requirement j. Minimum percent open space 25% 3. The City Council shall extend the period in which the final plat may be recorded to 180 days after this amendment is approved by the Council. This development order shall be void after this established time period. 4. The applicant shall install a new fire hydrant, remove or otherwise abandon the underground fuel storage tank, remove unnecessary and broken light fixtures, and make the appropriate arrangements for lighting the bus stop as required by the City Engineer. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinace No.,~2 upon first reading." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments. Exhibit B -- Ordinance 16, series 1997. Exhibit C -- Development Application. 3 1ft '11 1 4 Ijk li ii i r - . 1 ,1 . 401/0 0 - 1111 .CA i )99,7.0 *44 49 - riot JOYÂ·v -94 /3 ty k,v, A id -950#*N f F#1 t~ 74 M % tftrp ' 74,9 $ 42& Crt nÂ»,321- -â€ž% -3-mop %419 13Â· Â» 1Â»19/:, t-â„¢4))Â»30 ),9*791)0gv - '734/ 1 9 0:tÂ¥ 4 i 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission f 4-J THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Direct~Of FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner d[.1 RE: Aspen Country Inn Substantial PUD Amendment, Subdivision Amendment, and Rezoning -- Public Hearing DATE: August 18,1998 SUMMARY: The Aspen Country Inn is an affordable housing development approved for 40 residential units. The project was reviewed through the PUD, Subdivision, and rezoning processes. Subsequent to the approved development order, the final sale altered the property boundaries. Also, after purchase the applicant realized a structural complication which requires the western residential wing to be raised by 8 inches (net). The reduced property size essentially nullifies the project because the building does not fit within the dimensional requirements established in the PUD process. The applicant is seeking to alter these dimensional provision to allow the project to proceed as it was originally conceived. The applicant also wishes to improve some of the lower units in the western wing. These units are to be partially below grade. For this purpose, the height limit needs to be increased to 31 feet. Although the net height increase for structural reasons is only 8 inches, the gross is measured from the bottom of the landing. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the number of units or to the method in which they will be allocated. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council approve this amendment to the Aspen Country Inn PUD, Subdivision and Rezoning. APPLICANT: City of Aspen. Represented by Dave Tolen, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. LOCATION: Aspen Country Inn, 38996 Hwy. 82 (just west of the Pomegranate Inn). ZONING: Affordable Housing (AH1-PUD). 1 LOT SIZE, AREA, FAR, USES: Approved by Ordinance 16, Series 1997 (attached as Exhibit C). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this amendment. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Final PUD, Subdivision, and Rezoning. The City Council may approve Final PUD's, Subdivisions, and Rezoning requests at a public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a public hearing. BACKGROUND: The applicant gained PUD approval from City Council by Ordinance 16, series of 1997. This Ordinance specifically created the dimensional requirements for the property. The contract for purchase at the time allowed the seller to alter the exact property boundaries. The seller did alter the boundaries which created several incongruencies with the approved development plan. Any changes which affect dimensions can only be approved by the City Council through the final PUD process. ~TAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." Ordinance 16 is attached as Exhibit "C." The application has been included as Exhibit "D." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council amend Ordinance 16, series 1997, in the following manner: 1. Sections One and Two: The Official Zone District map shall be amended to reflect the correct zoning subsequent to the boundary changes between the Aspen Country Inn (ACI) parcel and the Maroon Creek Club (MCC). The ACI shall be zoned AH1-PUD. The MCC shall be zoned Park-PUD. The Community Development Director shall use the final plats filed by these parties as the basis for determining the zoning boundaries. 2. Section Four, Condition # 6: The language in this section shall be replaced in total with the following lang351 to ~3' a. Minimum distance between buildings No requirement - b. Maximum height 30' to the peak of the original lobby area, eleven (11) feet to the eastern- most edge ofthe building, and twenty-two (22) feet to the point twenty (20) feet from the eastern-most edge of the building. Thirty (30) feet for the remainder of the 2 original lobby area. Twenty-two (22) feet for the East and Southresidentialwings. Thirty-One (31) feetforthe West wing. The elevator tower may be Twenty-seven (27) feet high from finished grade. c. Minimum front yard 100' d. Minimum rear yard 14' e. Minimum side yard 10' f. Minimum lot width As represented on the final plat g. Minimum lot area 133,000 square feet h. Trash access area 10' wide minimum i. Internal floor area ratio No requirement j. Minimum percent open space 25% 3. The City Council shall extend the period in which the final plat may be recorded to 180 days after this amendment is approved by the Council. This development order shall be void after this established time period. 4. The applicant shall install a new fire hydrant, remove or otherwise abandon the underground fuel storage tank, remove unnecessary and broken light fixtures, and make the appropriate arrangements for lighting the bus stop as required by the City Engineer. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to recommend City Council approve the amendment to the Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, and Rezoning of the Aspen Country Inn with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Deprtment memo dated August 18,1998." 2324124 b 7,10) at Â· C e. 4.Â·e - 4/ I ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Ordinance 16, series 1997 Exhibit D -- Development Application 3 0 0 DRAFT MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Project Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineer From: Ross C. Soderstrom, Project Engineer Date: August 10,1998 Re: Aspen Country Inn PUD Amendment Review Physical Address: 38996 Highway 82, City of Aspen, CO Legal Description: Part of Parcel B, Maroon Creek Club Subdivision, City of Aspen, CO [Sec. 11, TlOS, R85W] Parcel ID No.: XXXX-XXX-XX-XXX After reviewing the above referenced application and making a site visit, I am reporting the combined comments made by the members of the DRC: 1. Changes in Conditions: If the proposed use, density, or timing of construction of the project change, or the site, grading, drainage, parking or utility plans for this project change subsequent to this review, a complete set of the revised plans shall be provided to the Engineering Dept. for review and re- evaluation. The discussion and recommendations given in this memorandum apply to the application and plans (received June 8, 1998) provided for this review and such comments and recommendations may change in response to changes in the use, density, or timing of the construction of the project, or changes in the site, grading, drainage, parking or utility designs. The applicant will be required to complete the standard requirements and conditions associated with the form(s) of development requested in the application. 2. Recordation of Revised Subdivision Plat: The revised subdivision plat for Parcel "B" of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision needs to be recorded as the earliest possible time to bring the prior approvals into the public record and the Pitkin County Assessor's records. The property on which this development is proposed presently appears to be part of Parcel "B", the golf course parcel, and does not appear to exist as a legal lot or parcel unto itself. The property containing the Aspen Country Inn must be created as a lot or parcel prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. Bicycle Trail: The Parks Department requests that the 10 ft wide bicycle easement be widened to 14 ft in width and that the alignment be field verified to better fit the proposed site plan and to minimize 1 OF 3 DRCM2498.DOC DRAFT mi Memo: Aspen Country Inn PUD AmenmÂ·nent Review DRAFT conflicts with vehicular traffic at the entrance to the development. Since the bicycle trail is intended to serve as a commuter route the wider trail width is safer and more functional. 4. Tree Permit: The applicant need to request a tree removal permit from the City Parks Department and mitigate impacts to existing trees that are removed or damaged. The site plan appears to include sufficient areas to mitigate/replace trees scheduled for removal. 5. Fire Hydrant: The owner should schedule replacement of the existing Pacific State fire hydrant located on the property in front of the east wing with a Mueller fire hydrant through the City Water Dept. 6. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District: The owner will need to verify with the District the condition of the existing sanitary sewer service to the property and comply with the normal standards for additional services. 7. Bus Stop Lighting: Holy Cross Energy Association previously disconnected and removed the street light which was formerly located near the bus shelter on the highway in front of the property. The applicant should make arrangements to provide lighting (fixture, ifneeded, and electrical power) for the bus stop. (The property is in the Holy Cross Energy Assoc. service area.) 8. Underground Storage Tank: The underground storage tank located at the northeast corner of the property (and partially on the Pomegranate Condominium property to the east) should be properly removed or abandoned in place as required by state and city standards. To protect the property owners the proper documentation should be completed and filed with the appropriate state offices and the county Environmental Health Dept. 9. Landscape Lighting: The unused and broken landscape lighting fixtures and associated electrical circuits located in the landscaped area in the highway right-of-way should be removed. 10. Improvement Districts: The property owner is required to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing public improvements which benefit the property under an assessment formula. The agreement would be executed and recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. As-Builts: Prior to C.O. issuance the building permit applicant will be required to submit to the Aspen/Pitkin County Information Services Dept. as-builts drawings for the project showing the property lines, building footprint, easements, encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the property boundaries and any other improvements. 2 OF 3 DRCM2498,DOC DRAFT Memo: Aspen Country Inn PUD AnÂ·6799Ynent Review DRAFT 11. Work in the Public Rights-of-Way: Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way and easements, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from: City Engineering (920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping and grading, within public rights-of-way; Parks Department (920-5120) for vegetation species and placement, and irrigation systems; Streets Department (920-5130) for mailboxes, street and alley cuts; and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way from the City Community Development Department (920-5090). DRC Meeting Attendees: Applicant: Dave Tolen and Lee Novak, Pitkin County Housing Office Staff & Referral Agencies: Chris Bendon, Ross Soderstrom, Rebecca Schickling, Bill Earley, Tom Bracewell 3 OF 3 DRCM2498.DOC DRAFT , -- i J-v u l. v- W - ... Â·v up v-'.Â· 1..'U ..+A., uâ€¢Vl./-v 9 -4~0Â·UtÂ·â€¢U~/'U~Vl..~OV~0'~0'U~'Â»19'0'01~'UU-|.,-'Ur<D'UN>VO'J'Â·C/UQ>041,Â·g<.511Â·<.D-UUUN.tkL,~0'l.719C1OOLI.Pyotl!,t75ULU'JYPOQAye.kiWIA.>43Â·9tO\719043)0z 3471%715\.)tj*Dle>\ m.,4Â·,i AÂ·ak -=- -ESÂ¢,h-Â»..3 . '71 ir.,il, 4,1 1.500 .,ari ff:ff---(Â«iÂ· 1 1 /35-11/ 23*6,2/7 19 // '' 1 1./. 82221, Sull.1 1,11 -2- . - 2 - Vi ilk I| c I.. It,14 1 ()H ; I e -cl I....:14 . SNOWMANS SKI .1 --- A,heroft (,1.-61 10.1 :'Â«0 .4*#73% â€¢>\'A)/48Â®>. 7,7\Zr.Â»29 24-/ 4$ ~ / . . Â· -flbÂ¢*"' 3, ASPEN 11IGHIANDS f - Vf&Y~%&~~*4 b.â€žc-j---- , ti iN ?h ,~i*!0-. 4.4.f 5/3 * 4 TA< f -<-42 k . ===&. ,-A,dr.1 j :S '5/ 01.--r: 4. 1,Url'ERMII.K 1~2.~0~~"4~<:Ii.9~~4~~~~~j--29â‚¬144*ju f //ki*~ P .4:- - 4-6) 4,-J Â·\I NIOUNI'AIN 9 ..,336>,30' - ' -~ ?3-0 -3 i Â«~ t#* /Â«<582.. 1 t-le/1-) ",9,~i",4â€¢ Â· 4 -_-=, ~~ 0/ 4 M' 15ir,i|~t>,i ttl~ aift, ' '0622,--L --7169433&~rE&-iic,~~5~R~~,1- --/ 1 -1 -â€¢ MARION CREEK LODOE I"ATIÂ¢'EA~I LODGE \.5 11â€žc 7,870 n Suntinli. 9.900ft. C.-.,Â·, , Vemul rl,c 2.0,0 fl. ASPEN }UGH - k> *. mED--- -' -977~~ - - 1 -'&.C' ASPEN VAIUy PRUNCE OF SCâ€ž00. 9/1 ' u CONDOMINIU",/ Â·- <. -: - - ~'> > ~- -b~ Phklik Counly Airport </ - lip- C-* Counl, Can- 4 -~.. Â· Sk<Z_ w- 12 --21101--\21=\-1-IÂ»\--OA--tI-\--L---'-1 1 .URS' ,/>'-3 - 1--1 _1--4-1-- L-*-rE-L-\ --\-1--A--1=\ \\ N- metery Lam, .â€ž-*...,i' r*,4' , . / '' Fit/- /0, ,/ f / 1 4 .Â»4:f.,556:K#fi;*ifF:- i - 4 \4 'r-2 Lt - - \P - .~nuac- C:â‚¬7' 14' r -O 1 -- , i. <#&4GTZZrb-- fr~-Â»Â»27-- City of Aspen Nli':r 3 1 .... ----n--vkfilucm . *-<<r.EI-/.jT/ ... - a. . 2 * I.< C 0 0 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Chris Bendon, 920.5072 DATE: 7.20.98 PROJECT: Aspen Country Inn PUD Amendment #1 REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Tolen, Terry Kappeli - APCHA OWN-ER: APCHA TYPE OF APPLICATION: 2 step DESCRIPTION: Substantial amendment to an approved PUD, Subdivision Land Use Code Section(s) 26.84 Planned Unit Development - Final 26.88 Subdivision - Re-plat Review by: Planning and Zoning, City Council Public Hearing: Yes, P&Z and Council. Applicant must post property and mail notice at least 10 days prior to hearing, or at least 15 days prior to the public hearing i f any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application . Applicant will need to provide proof Of posting and mailing with a affidavit at the public hearing. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks, Zoning Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Major ($2,160) Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($110); Total Deposit: $2,270 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $180/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proofofownership 2. Signed fee agreement 3. Applicant' s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the propert:y, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review ofthe application 6. 20 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. HPC = 12; PZ = 10; GMC = PZ+5; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff= 1 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) Proposed Plat. 9. Additional materials as required by the specific review, Please refer to the application packet for specific submittal requirements or to the code sections noted above. 10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. 12. Copies of prior approvals. Copy of Final PUD Ordinance (included) Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. . - -JuL.27.1998 10:44AM GARFIELD & HECHT NO.480 P.2 .. ....14 U.U.4 , 4 11 TLEâ€ž .. --â€ž -- - No. 5831 9, 1/3 .. I.ey 111111111111111111 lilli lili lilli 111111111 mil 11111111 Recorded al â€¢1009 11/14/1007 02:41/ CORR ONE ORVIS SIt.VZ Reception d 1 of 3 N 10.00 D 0.00 N 8.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RECORDING REQUESrED BY: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Andrew V. Hecht, Esqlire Garfield & Hechz. P.C. 601 East Hyman Avemae Aspen, CO 81611 CQRRECTION TO GENERAL WARRANTY DP.En Maroon Creek Limilnd Liability Company, a Colorado limited liabilky company, e as Grantor under thai cextain General Warranty Deed (the 9General Warnanly Deed-) recorded p) at Reception Nonber 405840 of the real property records of the Clerk & Recorder of P*kin * County. Colorado make Ihis correction to General Wanamy Deed (the -Correction Deed-) in order to correct the legal description Containcd in the General Warranty Deed- It is the intention 9 of the Grantor and GranzeÂ¢ to correct the legal description contained in the General Warrancy ~ ~~~Eleed. The General Warranty Deed made effective July 30, 1997. shall read as follows: Maroon Creek Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited liability company, â€¢Â£ Grantor. for TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand U B $87paid- hereby sells and conveys to Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority whose address is 530 " 020â€¢= Main Street, lower level, Aspen, Colorado 81611, the following real propere, in rhe County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; to wit As set forth oIl Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein 10 by reference 9 with aII its appur=names and warrants title to the same SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING: as ~ * N set forth on Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. I"lini ta SIGNED this 628"lay of_ nr*,60, . 1997. 81=El MAROON CREEK I.IMrrED LIABILITY COMPANY. a Colorado limited liability ames Fears*fr., 11410 r 9 1 ASPENLPETTAIN ~UNTY HOUSING *080 Z L - i I -Pir \ C "yog-.1Â£0.Ulz: 1 - (Gf~and TRIs: 770.14 -*464 5rATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PITEIN ) .--11-2.~~~ The forcring Ge=ral Watrauty Deed was acknowledged before me this .7 â‚¬ 2..Â·' -,44' *1Â§@~ , 1997 by James T. Pc=rce Jr., Manager of Maroon Creek Liniied Liability f~lorado lirnired liability company. Poot-le Fax Note 7671 &10 1486/9 ro â‚¬04 elsâ„¢ 42*1,0 *m-7:Fln 222't <S;k-2~ COE+44'Al,It PrerÂ·le , Phone * Fi + -- OF ASPEN JUL.27.1998 10:44AM GARFIELD & HECHITLE NO.480 P.3 I ...6 4.11 W W Wl' 1 6 No. 0631 f, 2/3 0 0 i limil HIll ilini Illil lili lim Elli Ill â€¢Ill lili ilil 418,51 11/14/1997 02,41P CORA DEE DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 18.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PrrKIN ) /7 The foregoing Geagl Wargot, 1722,1 was acknowledged before me 43 26~ 44# day of -6/044 6-L-, 1997 by Â·L;4 al d 13 6/. as ,Â£20 ew*,Abâ€¢- Of Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Ailthority -ED $ ric-44 WITNESS my band and official seal. My commission expires: -7 f 2.2- Â°143:u Notary Public V C.\AVIAMAROON~DOCS\ACLG*D. 4 MitTE,SEN j ~ OR *M ; ' JUL.27.1998 10:45AM GARFIELD & HECHT NO.480 P.4 I â€¢ UU .44 . 1 1 8 419 U Vull L 1 1 L TLE No. 6831 P. 3/3 i . , EXHIBIT .A. A parte# of jan* sdtuated m Section 11, 70-nsh},5 10 Saue}. Range 85 We=t af the 6*h Aâ€¢Iawk We,Adicm said .c,tel s W.0 ..tuoted .ithin Gelf Cou,se Pe,e.# 79- of th. Ak..câ€¢, Creek Club SuadAWnion and P.lill. r,co,â€¢ded :n Plet 809& 33 ot Asgâ€¢ 4, ANM,7 County. Cokpe,do. being morâ€¢ pe.rticular,> dageribid as folbows= 8*Mi,w:iwg ve C poat en the n=*Miny nounde.y et joid Go# Cavrsâ€¢â€¢ Pe/c,4 13: alâ€¢o bâ€¢4689 the =wthe,1, right-of -10, al Caleyete St=Zo Highâ€¢,cy Ne. 82 fr-n IDâ€¢ch the Wle.t 1 /4 ee.ner of Section 1 7 biats S 3221 ~57* W 284Â£172 fact t#teâ€žce teÂ«,41/,g soad high-cy ,Â·0,â€¢t-of--,y :r,l S JO-04'07- W 257.51 feet th-em S 2720*18- E 44.58*: thence, S 6{3-ASO~ E 7 68.50 1..t S 29-03*53- W 727.37 foot ther,c= 4 61'2857- E 154.10 feet the,IÂ¢. N 272~24' E 138.23 foot thence S 60'32!~32- E 4.7.08 feet; thence N 30-06*31* E 269.67 Feat te c point en the sauthe,Py Aght-of--Cy Of Code'=do WÂ¥,-cy No. 82. e,#2.e bee,g tne ne,Â·thiestert, cofner of the PS,nogr=nate Pa,ect thence clortg scid higA-:ty right-of--sy nne N 6048'CO- W 402-01 W to the point of hegihnir>g containing 3.036 acm=, ge discribed_ i mill mi mli imll illi limmlill milm mi lili 418888 11/14/1117 02:41/ CORR OCE 0*VIS %1671 3 .â€¢ 3 R 18.00 0 8.Se N O.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO .. ,5. i + 444 920 - 1 L.,4 vvLM5.1 0Â£0- 41 1- 4 O.LL 4 4 1 :94-Â© . '11 I 1 2- 4-L * 6 2Â£-4 i (AÂ»--c:> 141 Â»/ 1 6 40~644: c-- cLal.1-2 Â£ 4-. L actÂ»S . k 1 6 5 *w trees 1 4-1- 0- 4 L.~e., 1,_ ' 11 % Â¢- 7 GlvÂ»-; 2,2- - Trk< 4 03201 4 !1 It I A I '07) 11 40 1 'PA Â» [ 11_-6 La 4 -rfÂ· -9 -1- -4 - - .-- 1.-- . . 1 1 17 S 61'28'57* E 156.10' 9 C 0 tr 1 \ \ 1 1- \ \ W'bi @XLVT Ferl~â€¢M TJL- N 0 J -1 1 6--4 2 S60-4307"E 166,500 4(198' ~ N603832 4 0 4.,6~< ' 'e &WI W ' I ''''' * X 7 24 4 + 1 4 k '40 + 1-77411;1-1.~111 2 Al- 444.9~76 +P#P 25'-2' 1- I i, - -16. i _ --9: + 0- 'I 111 -Iii 1-24.-1110.-1.' 1 C# 11 .1-f . , -t--11,==r''ti/2:~~N~*,7.-z-,0 1 '1 4 -.Â» veâ€¢ v 'i ' 'i, r i. ~ _.,LTiA/ti-'AdkA I ;025002* . r L | I ||Ii |~ |44' /~~4~~~4 VII I -r,=19 .,IL;'I 'llip-L VIâ€¢ 2~;w~t-' 1 . ...... .......:.. 'Fir,-Ir-*'79lt-*f.-al -t.3Â¥! IT J #u 11 r-:UF. Hew cow.TBOLM'or.4 Ex 69â€¢r Tb U 12*4106441*0 COUNTRY INN PARCEL 3.036 AC* i U- 4 1â‚¬6.- 2 91 cle_ \(wis S 01'53~20- E 201.50' Ril_ 10404' S 6048'00~ E 402.01 I-- - COLORADO ' STATE HIGHWAY 82 Z *, A (lt.~Â£7 0- 4 01Â£ it <g* fly~dt- 091'90 3 .*Z,92.61 N 49*692 m .ff.gaoÂ¢ 8-- ---Â£~' S 30'04'Or W 257.51' . 1 - ... Il 1 I . ' 4 I - .... Al 14 i.. 1.1 1 ./. iâ€¢ ivu IN U .L_ \ ' - I. 11,1 -REE LEGEND 1 1 . *50+Fl - 1 1 GOE COURSE ~ 1:pj Â«2 1 - -smes!:5 1 luANnT, 1 _Ort-, . - L ~ w EXIS-ING SPRUC. NA 1 +34 ,; 1 .1 '2564'V . 1 - .I ie. ~ ~ i~ ./0.0/220 /4/= , .. | EXISTING LAWN 1 . ~ '1 ~ ~COTCH PINe 2 1 c :R= Z 41. e .6TING .SPel OR POPLAR NA . | L r M EDGE OF EXISTING 2 'j T I~ , 4 n p.oÂ·o.:c â€¢sÂ·e. s. - m an g U VEGETATION - 5 1 .boo N . 1 coe :C) 1 4 ' CL. 2 4 - i Â£ 1., il . I 'j 8 P'Â°PORD ConoNWOOD a c _ L - I 1 / 1,4 I ff d I' ...i .s.NG CRAN--C NA ~* i . ,-1-- O .LOWE9ING SHMWa DS 1 1 - *â‚¬46 COMMUNITY GARDEN , ~ .~.~4 - -Â· ~"IÂ« 1 \ EXISTING CART PAT- -1 24 . I . . . . :.ii ~t) Â¢4 [Â» : .1 < - . 1 E-: 12*1 9 Sen[)53 GRASSES ' 2 11,14 .- fics/$ "Arti./i ED & 1 1 "r 4 -t~>1.-2.-'.-7-- I TREES TO SE REVCVED - h Â· Ph ~1 ' EXISTING SOCCIES .:ze, ReASON MO' eMOVAL / Â»1 RATIO f 0.-~.ft / 1 ' ' I ./IST-/CON' ./. . CALIPE~ WIT)41/ ./. C./ISRUCTON - S.le.NG h 4.1, 11 1 L_.1 Ll}-- - ~Â«= L_1 ./ CÂ·â„¢Â¤CAL; ~' C==1 1 . Â· 4 / /, I ) .. 2 1-7- 1-- F--1 - 1. 1'l' *22~'6 4 14 - '0>*11 1 , -4 1/ 1/433\ - 2 BRIST-_/CON' .... 4 1// CAL]Pll WITH. NEW CONSTRJCTION , Â· -O....CLI .'NI . V. CA.... GROWING UNDE. 8/STING EAVELINE /. . CA_!.'R 3!StASED NO ';TIGAnON ~EQUâ„¢ED 'f-; ..XuAL)5 , ser' . "%*4.-----I< 09Â« *Â· Sle-//91 2294 ..%0 - E , . i lili. I L ASPEN 'U.-i-5.5/ t. 7 CA-1/5. .:T-NK Ne. CONSTRIC--10/ : ' 4 0 CA_.Il WITHIN /5/' CONSTRIC--10/ W .... N.* CON'TRIC-10' C e' Spluct Sac'' --// 1 *11444 0 1-4 1--1 1 .1 1, 1 7' POPLAR . CA_:.El ..r-,4 ./. CINS-/IC-10/ -' -/ 1 1 . â€¢4' CA.Pt' WIRÂ»IN NeÂ¥/ CONS-RUCTION , 1/ 2 pe.-AR - CALlIEâ€¢ 4 + . + ..>-3-,,....% \\45 - I:flly...:--' . 4%'#N < LÂ»\ . I . le=GeÂ».Â·7<--I.j , /h . 9 1 - i i. A.Pe/ 10 CA-~PeR W!TH'/ Ne. DCÂ·N:RUC.~ON c,Ap=4=n (PACCIC 'I L. 0 4 1 1 1 Z I 4 47/.,Ar<! 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 0 .417 1 111, IIi 1 .1// 1 l -4*Zi~) mi ~ ~ ~ i g j ' 1 !1 :Iii J 8 IMVING - 1111.11 Ir-p:CAJ ~ . , 8' C..... Wl-HI' Ne. CON+-RUC-O>Â· 1 ~j 111.1, ..bj 1 1 11 11 42 /. 12 "DEN Mul--ST// r CALIPIR WT'.4 ./. CONSTRJCNON V \, : CALIPIR WrTHIN Ne'.4 CONS=%ON O- 4 /1 C. . I \ 1/ '. 1: / a . S...CE 3- CAL./. NC IT:G~-10/ 950'21RED 4 4\112/ , ~ 9 1 1 2. 1 - ED ixvi z . I I - 5 1 ~ ~ 'vm: // / ( 44 ' Sâ€¢â€¢Ruce 2 Â·Â·/2 CALIP'M N. 4/7:GAT./ RIC...C 41 lil 1,011/â€ž /1 4 1 1 11 ,+2/ ; ; le ' sp ..&_ 3- CALIPeR NC u!7:GITION 'ragl~IC 141. \\ lili H..1 1 I 'l -1 lilli!1] /...1 111111 d I Â· 1. . â€¢V- I 7 : li:23- -__ --L~_ 1-2-21 1 139/3 GRASSES Â· CA: ........Â» ' I ---- 1 . E.0 . . .....ING ThfZ . ./ ..CH-/ 7.CAL 4.:23% -ir =504 Â· Ins I,_;/. 3 14 41 9-rÂ·-21 1- f -1 '*721*. 'A / Â· ,-Ht **- to/ I. 6'V- *â€¢11 | . .. r-Ir-1 Â»6 y Yex,1 3/. . . :/1 f ....,\ 41.122*%â€žR . gu. 1 fir 9 - Di . 3 5. . , 1 ,~-: . .. .L .athra 20. I - .. A .. - . Â· . n>a-* -,Â·rL- Â»al 27 7 Â¢ r . ht I .' Â· . i - -ROCK RETAINING I ..fi . Prpr *39* >4Â«V-9/2. Â»w= t:ey. :Â»263 . 3/ 129%9Â·. 1.--/\24 4 -- . :. ..04*. ,*- 67~, Â·~'V~~A,~VQ.f . %1/I-4) Cli/t 9: 1 211 . SEEDED GRASSES .SPM'OU/GO C>WI ~ 1 , . 't'Â· 1*'..1Â£56~ I -*- + - ~ ' 1 . .. I .- . , f ; I I 0 1/ 7 .. . i! - b 11 '.cz ' 42 4$ 1 ILA. R . 1 NORâ„¢ . . - 4 Â· - . 1 2/5 1 1 1 4 1 - Ae ' 90"-3 - A- r-Â»*-1-77 -. N r.0 'C= LA ~# A _ : PLAN LS.1 - 61Â·r l :Of./f K 1 -1 1 )' 1, 1 42;)1:IM,JU.tikiN)1 1 UNE Â£26 048 SJâ€žI~U.11tjaV ~1,1Â¥)6(1Nvrt NNI ANLNA(DO 1 00 FC OOVN0100 Nads - 31 -1 h ~P - J ~ 2 --- .I./--*-&. 1- . i r 1-4 \ 141 i N i - U "-1 1 1 Ii\[.1.1\: LEGEND r173.Â·11 MAROON CREEK GOLF COURSE AnnA.I.'.B....r= =Â»00004- 1 i 1 AN.....Il-/,0 M.1.... HOLE NO. 6 FOCOTPRINh--_~Â·~4(6<46.i~ , 52~- 7' ji~~: Rlilid A- Bedi J- R. Batr, ALA 96Â«Vxk= i i 9~Â»< EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN m 1 4Â»2Â·143/4 2 22 X.<999<vx/Ot . F.33/771 1- -I-I.....m EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED -2--... 1 493Â«,6 1 9 Lu 1 412625'.ABR.2~6 . -~-CONC. TILE .-C .xt - . NEW FOOTPRINT *- . DECKING -4--- 1 #wx CART PATH 2 . to / >6<)0<j r -40 6~ 9 \\ XXX><24 NI---Ill- .Ill-- - -3 -EP-m91'=,In, _, 7..,... 7-lzz:z.~ 1- ' iti i /4,1,1 1 1 2 /,/402Â«Â»050Â«ok,z smmAÂ»Â»/ : 8 3 STORY 1 . 7#iffili lÂ»4232284-E; FÂ» 1 19Â·" , .2 1 "17fl ./ ./ //,/ri rt..21 L___1 4 \ GARBAGE F- -iN x , P i ~ DUMPSTER ~ ~ ~ NEW O 01 NEW r- FOODTPRINT l ,-, /91-443 1 0% 9=374. 1 1 113'12 |11.10 ~ 9~ 3| 1 1 61 3~2 64t itw 1 1 /11'llklil'ju/ Ul'll 111!11 U=1 i 1 1 / 11 1 lilli IT ,-11 1 11<~'/-3 111 i 1--/// < 1 1 14 1,5 1 1, ~ 11112 181:01 21 :27 23 1 f j 43 ~ 42 , 45 ~ 44 35 | 30 < 37 ~ | 36 ' 33 1 34 j 33 ~ 1 1- 1 1 L.C.:~ 11 1 ' 1 i i i ' i ~ // Illim'151111 1 \ SNOW 04 0 GARBAGE~141 STORAGE 0,3 L _ DUMPSTER < ~APPROVED P.U.D. SETBACK UNES PROPERTY UNES COUNTRY INN PARCEL EXISTING 3.036 ACi BURIED FUEL TANK ~ 27'PUD. - --- -- - - --il - ------- - L --- -*-- - --- -*Ii *li9 --i - Ili------- EX}SDNG ACCESS FOR POMEGRANATE CONDOS I.----I---I.---.-Il.- 1.--- RBVIEK]NS 1 \ 6' ACCESS _r \ ~ EASEMENT BUS STOP ._.--- ~ ~, # (FOR FUTURE \ BIKE PATH) NO. 711 JOB NUMBER -- ACCELERATION LANE DECELERA1'ION LANE -----iliq-<-)-1-<--j---- DATE FOR FU TURE APPROVAL FOR FUTURE APPROVAL DRAWN aY BY C.D.O.T. 8Y C.D.O.T. SITE PLAN 5 CIEEKED BY COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82 3*ZEEr Nt'MBER 1" = 50'-0" Apowny NupsnoH 4 c-1 MODIFIED 2ND FLOOR 8943 651. FT. C 0 2 7.1 MODIFIED =- 2nd FLOOR 6504 SQ. FT. n 1-4 T Art EXISTING ~ 2ND FLOOR, MAIN 5603 SQ. FT. ExISTING 2ND FLOOR, WEST 6344 SO. FT. 3 MODIFIED , leT FLOOR I2149 SQ. FL Ij//// C i 3 4 El MODIFIED 1ST FLOOR 6504 50. FT. EXISTING 1ST FLOOR 12534 SQ. FT. , '.. n --1 . 1 4 J -fI-11 Cl-1 ~ EXISTING 4 V 2ND FLOOR, WEST 6344 SQ. FT. EXISTING SQUARE FOG>TAGES MODIFIED / BASEMENT 65Â¢>8 60. FT. MAIN WEST - UNMODIFIED 2ND 5603 6344 % BASEMENT MAIN 586 SQ. FL IST 12534 6344 BASE 586 6344 1 TOTAL 18123 + 19032 = 31155 MODIFIED SQUARE FOOTABES MAN WET EXISTING J 2ND 8943 6504 FZ/7 BASEMENT WEST 6344 SQ. FT. IST 12149 6504 BASE 586 6509 TOTAL 22218 + 1951-1 = 41195 -- 1 Aspen Country Inn JI E., 1% |1 .. Z L / Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority 11 i 51 2: '2 ~..?t --mt .*11'PYâ€¢ 1 11 "=.23. ....- *rt., R \1<.UN-i I..\1 -[.1\ i '&....7. 11.)'X...D 10- R. all=. AU 8.1-d A. P,h 225 ---....1 N ".....1 Â¥~Â®* Pline / 1 - ... ...) , . I ,4 I . POMEGRANATE CONDOS -7 EXOST{ING POIMIEGRANIATE ININ -Ill--- 1 EXEWDING SUGHT - LONIES U .El / \ I I , I :\ Â¥.90 plane--TF- 1 *<- -3 - Z-r * r h \ POMEGRANATE CONIDOS Existing ~ Grade NEW POMEGRANATE ONIN . - PROPOSED MODOEDÂ©ATOONIS Ke NU,-ER DAI'H DRAWN Ir ClmCIED NY 3,1EIT ,RIM=32 OP SHafTS 1,5-,GL uuI Kiluno o u dsV Apowny BulsnoH Klunoo 11!d-uodsv lie-,0â‚¬ .. 1 - < t,4. ---iliiâ€ž,- 1 THE CITY oF AspEN February 2,2000 , Aspen School District 0199 High School Road Aspen, CO 81611 Gentlemen The City of Aspen Council has scheduled a public hearing Monday, March 13, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, on the Aspen Highlands Village annexation. The purpose of the hearing is to determine and make a finding whether the area proposed for annexation is eligible for annexation. Please call the City Clerk' s office at 920- 5060 if you have any questions. Sincerely Kathryn S. Koch City Clerk Enclosure Resolution #7, 2000 Petition for Annexation By certified mail 130 SOUTH GA[.ENA STREET Â· ASPEN, CO[.ORAL)0 81611-1975 Â· PHONE 97().920.5000 Fu 970.920.5197 Printed on Recvcled Paper r --li~FF 7 ~ PUBLIC NOTICE ~ DATE ' 2 4 TIME u jÂ°/ PLACE L PURPOSE -- car n I , 71'EU.7 j u..'J, ' _/rw .. Attachment 8 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E) 1, -TER{w Appet. , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the 04kday of '.SA.,13.-~ 0 , 199.8 (whichisl- O days prior to the public hearing date of 912 8 - 9 f j 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the <7 ~*day of 6>t.~0Â·~ . 199-1., to the Ofialay of 'SÂ¢0~96 Â· , 199 S. (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. M.Â£9 14.2/0 Signaturd (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 9 day of uÂ·P-fv u . 1991 by -1-*ro Naffe'( ~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL -Â·, . , Mytommission e/epirft: 1- 12-00 .. Notary Public ~ 00 0 ZOLINQT/SEPH T CITY OF ASPEN DIAMOND SARAH JEAN 960 STAGE RD 130 S GALENA ST PO BOX 4627 ASPEN, CO 8161] ASPEN. CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 PITKIN EXCHANGE HOLDINGS OF ORWICK DANA B STANFORI) BA RBARA MOORE ASPEN LLC 0004 WINNEGAGO RD PO BOX ]Il 601 E HOPKINS AVE BETHESDA, MD 20816 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 RE]SINGER DEBORAH & EDWARD ANDERSON GREGG R ALBERTA TRUST PO BOX 12127 PO BOX 358 1301 THOMAS PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT WORTH, TX 76107 WALHART REALTY CO POMEGRANATE DEVELOP CO HEDR]CH VIRGINIA E TRUST (50%) 0/0 WALLEN WILLIAM L IV CO WALLEN KATHLEEN 1240THORNAPPLELN PO BOX 2484 56-980 MERION NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 ~ ASPEN, CO 81612 LA QUINTA, CA 92253-5022 NICHOLSON JOHN J WILLIAMS GENEVIEVE LEE BARTHOLOW TED O & CYNTHIA B C/O GUILD MGMT CORP 299 FIll.MORE 3837 CARUTH BLVD 99] 1 W P]CO BLVD PENTHOUSE #A DENVER, CO 80206 DALLAS, TX 75225 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 GARRETT GLORIA WILLIAMS GINNY L HEDR]CH JON P & MEREDITH N PO BOX 844] 160 CHERRY ST 1240 THORNAÂ¢PLE LN ASPEN, CO 81612-8441 DENVER, CO 80220 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 FALCONE LEONE J ' EASTON EDWARD W 11 GREEN BAY RD 300 GRECO AVE LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 CORAL GABLES, FL 33]46 MARC)ON CR-EEK LLC 10 CLUB CIRCLE ASPEN, CO 8]6] 1 publit LJof-i Ce- 5-4&,1- 4 -f-[9Â·'S~. ge"[) (c- . 81 Â©fly .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ASPEN COUNTRY INN REZONING, SUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, September 28, 1998 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by The Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority requesting a substantial amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development for Lot Line Adjustments affecting the property size and dimensional requirements. All other aspects of the approved PUD will remain the same. The property is located at 38996 Highway 82. For further information, contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5072. s/John Bennett. Mayor Aspen City Council Published in the Aspen Times on September 12,1998 City of Aspen Account Housing Office City of Aspen/Pitkin County 530 East Main Street, Lower Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5050 Fax: (970) 920-5580 MEMORANDUM To: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director AUS 2 5 1998 Stephan Kanipe, Chief Building Official AS r . - ..INT CC: Sara Thomas, Zoning Officer _ .w'. 1'.'. U.\â€¢ ' FROM: Terry Kappeli, Director of Property Management RE: Aspen Country Inn Request for Demolition Permit DATE: August 25, 1998 SUMMARY: The Aspen Country Inn is an affordable housing development which has been approved through PUD, subdivision and rezoning processes. Subsequent to the approval, the final sale allowed the seller to adjust the property boundaries resulting in a PUD amendment request for dimensional revisions. We have not requested to change the number of units, but have encountered structural complications which will require us to demolish the entire West wing along with the original demolition of the old kitchen prep area and part of the front desk area. Planning and Zoning has approved the dimensional amendment to the PUD. City Council has also granted approval at first reading by Consent Agenda August 24, 1998. City Council second reading is scheduled for September 28, 1998. We would /1 like to request that you issue a demolition permit as soon as possible prior to - (Ah W F Council second reading so that we may get a jump on the winter season. The Federal funding available to this project requires that we conform to timeframes fner 11, â‚¬wp that are currently very tight. YÂ» The final plat is in preparation to be presented to engineering in conjunction with Maroon Creek Club and the Pomegranate plats at which time we will be submitting final construction drawings for permits before we proceed beyond the demo phase. Thank you for your consideration with this request. 1 j \ 1 tan: 1 1 r.rt 1\11 Â«L 1, 2'lovE E>151NG AW,#ALT. - s WriESPE \6330' ~ - Hj h ....%=" 21 1-lovE eÂ©enAl)<b A}*1â‚¬JR 00,10,Â£-TE PA~41 --,- WAROON CÂ¥â‚¬BC 11 eMOvE GAB 610Â»41 TANK APÂ© All *0000*mc) I HOLE NA B 5,1 N ACCORDANCE Ut-IH MVEÂ»*40 AOENCLEÂ». OCU' COURE CCM*-TB,VeWT PAÂ¢5. ECT. A>t ALL CO,trZ,1!WeD 11 1, 1 EXasâ„¢C ! 4, â‚¬1CM *TAND.5 WAU N IT; ENtl,El, le 14 1 : w ID<torma ACC556 *145 -O KEMAN St:ms --1 (rrp) ,) MOCiFY eER'I ro AOCCr,OPATE )4311 ENtier. 1 '{9 f 05741 6 1 U â€¢8109Â£ PITINE $19)CUM INCUDÂ® fellÂ©AlleS, 7, 1 k FRArnÂ«F+~Â·26, tlBOHANICAL. PLJ/81,4 -t>Ele:â„¢fcAL , i> #IN L---1- - - - - - - MEMB. CAP 111 UnED AS 5,404*1 01 1,Â·E rEC,WjcAL If 4 .a. - 1 1 L. i-_ .-I P.ECTED PRIOR 10.1-1 C. m.,UTION. ~ PLUÂ·eAE., AND n ECTÂ®CAL DRALING# 0,4, AO PAâ„¢ C 0 n Â·f= 1 0 ..W /r A I W Â¥2910Â¥Al- CF f,OCFN, N THID AFEA MAY DIvel.VE AbearDS U #*4 I ".4/ 4--- - -spial'QZI ju.JOL- FIEL-Ta. MEMPY' 1566,ICE Aie F<TENT OF Ma<,7,5 MATEMAL5 C 44 \ Ca41*INN@ Aae,Te, PR,oR ID DErkly,6Â¢,L SEE hai 40.98' / - :0-4 X 191 ln7~UU~tI~ Aaaearce 0110Â¥ AVALABLE 1*04,011 1*112 CONSINIGHCN . '-- - bl' F~1~693;32 /7 4* 0--- 7 *YU%0 /, . f 2' 6 2- -\~~ 10 U TAKIM N 16* 1â‚¬00/4 ANDD'yofAL. 0Â¥MAI:0A1.8 b. 9 MAFUGe<*DMIOVIDE A UNinmt pezc-,MON C, 11Â« 5TEN . --1(215134/Ry/< 9 /t<u/NÂ·> Â·Al CZNTAINre AG~10105 1 /0742, 9, NEMOVE MOT TUB %7/0 \ .' < 11) Alycvt Â£2,4.7 TmEES SHCUN PI<2110-1 FelAAWN, IREED 4 : X I ~ I. I I S/.t g*94 417 . /7744~ ,,9 MO~ DAMME- t Orf tt~mut~*-4 1.77= ug : f 1 R#FORQMIR)dlidl h, r /mp.) CU f / 4 2 - - .i.Ill---I. (1106'2&=66*f=9~2J~% ~.# 1 RK- 488. PS. 375 WI,11 mp.) Efesm,G <6 N~HAU G LEG,END :2. - f 823 .............C 0 --Il- %M Iti 43 <51 I â€¢ -Ir.' l - 'PRCM]GY U)14 â€¢ 1-/" M ///'//li zie' 3.036 ACi (30 1 0 c I# 1 * -- . e... -/ PC 491 - - -1 E-_ 1 s Anr VA.& T J / 7 1 >\ < :- -- =At -,AF - - 1 -u-p -1 : 1 // 0 -1 -116 .2-<L-/last. -T: A~2293~<--izi-- - - S 60* EASCNE,ir -110'Za (ne luf'* 97 1111 AA,1310)u / BAL MIN) 6- Nt, Pit p,AGO- r or CGET/# .6. WAR00111 CrED[ Clim FEMCâ‚¬ SUNNI 7*04 SITE PLAN Â© 1 ' = 20'-0- COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82 DI.O FAUE 82 Â£