The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.501 Sneaky Ln.A014-02- 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review-- 1 1 , 5 2-AA 0â‚¬0 4-<1(03 S -- A 2 - kl M 7 -u O --- 0-z - - TE 1 -- 94 2 -3- CASE NUMBER A014-02 PARCEL ID # 2735-122-20002 CASE NAME 501 Sneakv Lane Stream Marain Review PROJECT ADDRESS 501 Sneakv Lane PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE Stream Marain Review OWNER/APPLICANT 501 Sneakv Lane LLC REPRESENTATIVE Alan Richman DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3/19/02 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. #11-2002 ADMIN ACTION ADDroved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 3/20/02 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID:~2735-122-20002 DATE RCVD: ~2/13/02 # COPIES:r- - CASE NO|A014-02 CASE NAME:~501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review PLNR~James Lindt PROJ ADDR:~501 Sneaky Lane CASE TYP:~Stream Margin Review STEPS:~ OWN/APP: 501 Sneaky Lane LL ADR~1111 Lincoln Road, st C/S/Z: Miami Beach/FL/331 PHN:|(305)538-8558 REP:~Alan Richman ADR:~PO Box 3613 C/S/Z: Aspen/CO/81612 f PHN19*1125 FEES DUE:~500 D 180 E FEES RCVD~680 STAT: F- REFERRALS~ REF:] BY| DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 11 - % 33[flq loa- DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ pz: â‚¬ 26.0," fl- 7-COE- CLOSED:| 3/aft_ BY: LI 1,-44(0\- DRAC: BOA: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: 71-j*CollÂ©-cl C3 56 A~ e - 4 ell,A/\ 1 ~V Le f s 12 2 4 -6 4 4 6 EX A -60 pub /4-2 J il- 0 ovz OF 93'6+ LAV.â‚¬aux- dia %/,9 Â« Appdovq(g 1952 -35- - -06-9--- - l.lb o ul ~977- - A.juMi Â« Â»lfâ‚¬ 1440 fEr (3601(4/0.(,14 2 5- back 00 7-0-6 -7-0-5 4 /00 * - M C> 1*uea 62 20/10 1/â‚¬ di 4 - 012-_ l 0091- loe O P U.ja 4--vicpc o u i 1 42 c S i' 1 f -f-Â« AC. T H 5 - c- (4 8/ 4 )' 3 4 3 4) (Of I lic 96102(c~i - ~e_ ~- - i_ j , 6 0/ 0 4 4 b DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. 501 Sneaky Lane LLC.. 501 Sneaky Lane, Aspen. CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 2, Parry Subdivision Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Stream Margin Review Approval for Bedroom and Dining room additions totaling 836 SF Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #11-2002. 3/19/02 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 30.2002 Effective Date ofDevelopment Order (Same as date ofpublication ofnotice of approval.) March 31,2002 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 30th day of March, 2002, by the City of Aspen Community n-1-----+ ni-7ctor. 1 - Joyce pjllson, Lommunity Development Deputy Director Resolution No. 11 (SERIES OF 2002) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 SNEAKY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735-122-20-002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 501 Sneaky Lane LLC, represented by Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting Stream Margin Review approval for a 836 square foot addition on property located at 501 Sneaky Lane in the City o f Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is a 47,466 sq. ft. lot located in the R-30 PUD Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer, the Parks Department, and the City Fire Department reviewed the development proposal for 501 Sneaky Lane and provided written referral comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval ofthe Steam Margin Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the Stream Margin Review request, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request for two additions totaling 836 square feet and a deck addition at 501 Sneaky Lane with the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall provide upland tree protection fencing in the form of Panel Fencing around the drip line of all vegetation to be saved on site within 10 feet of the building envelope. The Applicant shall call the City Forester for an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur within this zone during construction activities. 2) The Applicant shall place construction and silt protection fencing along the Stream Margin area for protection of the Castle Creek corridor before any construction activities are to begin. The Applicant shall submit a detailed riparian fencing plan detailing the protected area along the riverbank prior to the application of building permits. City Forester must be called for an inspection before any construction activities begin. 3) The Applicant shall submit a plat prior to recordation at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder indicating the proposed building envelope for review and approval by the Community Development Director and City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall submit an outdoor lighting plan and exterior lighting cuts sheets that demonstrate compliance with the City of Aspen Lighting ordinance at the time of Building Permit Submittal. Section 2 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 4 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 19, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. ~ f (SERIES OF 2002) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 SNEAKY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735-122-20-002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 501 Sneaky Lane LLC, represented by Alan Riehman Planning Services, requesting Stream Margin Review approval for a 836 square foot addition on property located at 501 Sneaky Lane in the City of Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is a 47,466 sq. ft. lot located in the R-30 PUD Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer, the Parks Department, and the City Fire Department reviewed the development proposal for 501 Sneaky Lane and provided written referral comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval o f the Steam Margin Review with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the Stream Margin Review request, by avote of to c - 3, and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request for two additions totaling 836 square feet and a deck addition at 501 Sneaky Lane with the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall provide upland tree protection fencing in the form of Panel Fencing around the drip line of all vegetation to be saved on site. The Applicant shall call the City Forester for an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur within this zone during construction activities. 2) The Applicant shall place construction and silt protection fencing along the Stream Margin area for protection of the Castle Creek corridor before any construction activities are to begin. The Applicant shall submit a detailed riparian fencing plan detailing the protected area along the riverbank prior to the application of building permits. City Forester must be called for an inspection before any construction activities begin. 3) The Applicant shall submit a plat prior to recordation at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder indicating the proposed building envelope for review and approval by the Community Development Director and City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall submit an putdrr 1*hting plan and exterior lighting cuts sheets that demonstrate compliance'ji~*KI ViA;Ale of Building Permit Submittal. Section 2 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 19, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 3,/A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Community Development Deputy DirectorNFt\3 - - t~(9 3537 FROM: James Lindt, Planner(j-1~ -1 1 1.- C i RE: 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review /H/1 DATE: March 19, 2002 Applicant: 501 Sneaky Lane LLC. Representative: Alan Richman, ~ rear addition ~ Richman Planning Services Illillillillillillill~lillillillilill lillw: 34 Zoning: R-30 PUD . Nikt. r n.. + g.. 4 Lot Size: 47,446 Square Feet 49 4 .1. <1 7 Land Use: Single-Family Residence Request Summary: The applicant is * Area of proposed requesting a Stream Margin Review side yard addition Approval to make an addition of 8- approximately 836 square feet to the 14.9-- existing single-family residence. .. .A'.. .. BACKGROUND: The Applicant is proposing an 836 square foot addition of a dining room and a bedroom to the existing single-family residence at 501 Sneaky Lane. The existing residence contains approximately 4,579 square feet of FAR. In 1983, stream margin review approval was received to construct the existing residence on the subject parcel. Subsequently, in 1992 a stream margin exemption was approved to allow for several small additions to the existing structure. The subject parcel is located within 100 feet of the high water line of Castle Creek and requires Stream Margin Review approval. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for development within 100 feet of the high water line of Castle Creek. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed addition meets all of the review standards set forth in Section 26.435 of the City Land Use Code. The applicant, in consultation with the City Engineering Department, has determined that the top of slope of Castle Creek on this parcel is identical with the 100 year floodplain. Stream Margin Review Standard 26.435.040(C)(8) requires all new development to be setback fifteen feet from the top of slope of Castle Creek. The closest that the proposed addition is to the top of slope is twenty-three feet. The applicant is proposing that no trees are to be removed and no regrading is to take place as part of the construction of the additions. Staff has identified during a site visit that the area being proposed for the addition is fairly flat and currently contains a landscaped yard area. There is really no natural vegetation existing where the addition is proposed. The applicant is proposing a building envelope be established as is shown on the plat entitled "Improvement Survey and Stream Margin Review" that is attached as Exhibit "C". The building envelope that the applicant has proposed does not appear to contain any natural vegetation. The area within the proposed building envelope mainly consists of planted blue grass for landscaping purposes. Staff approves of the proposed building envelope and feels that confining construction operations to within the proposed envelope will limit any disturbance to the natural riparian area. Staff is requiring a condition of approval (Condition No. 3) that a plat showing the building envelope be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer and then recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder' s office. The Parks Department has reviewed the proposed application and requests that the applicant place barrier fencing around the proposed building envelope and silt fencing on the river side of the barrier fencing during construction to protect the riparian area from run-off erosion. City Forester, Stephen Ellsperman is also requiring that the applicant place upland fencing around the driplines of existing trees to be saved that are near the building envelope. A condition (No. 2) is proposed that requires the applicant to provide the City Forester with a construction fencing plan at the time of building permit and that the City Forester do an inspection of the fencing prior to commencing construction activities. A condition (No. 2) has also been proposed that requires the applicant to mitigate in the form of re-vegetation for any disturbance to the riparian zone identified within the proposed building envelope. Staff feels that the proposed addition will not have a major impact on the riparian area. An existing tree line (as shown on the survey attached in Exhibit "C") that runs along the river is a good natural boundary that prevents expansion into the riparian area. The line of trees prevents development in the sensitive natural area. Staff believes that the proposed addition meets all of the Stream Margin Review Criteria. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this Stream Margin Review application with the conditions listed in the resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. | ~, Series of 2002, approving with conditions, a Stream Margin Review request for additions to the existing residence of up to 836 square feet for the addition of a bedroom and a dining room at 501 Sneaky Lane." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Referral Comments Exhibit C -- Application EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS The proposed development is located within an environmentally sensitive area described as a Stream Margin and is subject to Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed addition to the single family residence is to be constructed entirely within an established building envelope which is located on a developable portion of the lot, and which is not located in the Special Flood Hazard Area and in no way will increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. Staff finds this standard to be met. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement." Staff Finding Staff finds that this proposal is directly consistent with Goal E "Protect and enhance the natural environment," in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP). The proposal does not encroach on any existing native riparian area and does not affect Castle Creek' s watercourse. Staff finds this standard to be met. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to remove any trees or alter the existing grade ofthe site. The Applicant, the City Engineer, and the Planning Staff have agreed on where the proposed building envelope should be located and it is shown on the survey attached as Exhibit "C". Staff has required, as a condition of approval, that the applicant place silt fencing around the building envelope for the entirety of construction until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Staff has also required the Applicant to provide tree protection fencing in the form of Panel Fencing around the drip line of all vegetation to be saved on site. The Applicant shall call the City Forester for an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur within this zone during construction activities. Staff finds this standard to be met. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff Finding The proposed development itself will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river. The Applicant shall be required, as a condition of approval to place Construction and Silt Protection Fencing along the Stream Margin area, around the established building envelope, for protection of the Castle Creek Corridor before any construction activities are to begin. The Applicant shall submit a detailed riparian fencing plan detailing the protected area along the riverbank prior to the application for building permits to the City Parks Department for review. City Forester must be called for an inspection before any construction activities begin. The Applicant acknowledges that pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. Staff finds this standard to be met. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the nood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. All structural development will be restricted to the proposed building envelope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain. Staff Finding There is no proposed development within the one-hundred-year floodplain. Staff finds this standard to be met. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes). Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing any landscaping within fifteen feet of the top of slope or the high water line. The area affected by the proposed development is landscaped with planted grass. No native vegetation exists in the area of the proposed addition. Staff finds this standard to be met. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes). Staff Finding The Applicant has designed a building envelope that is set 15 feet back from the top of slope coincides with the 100 year floodplain) that has been verified by the City Engineering Department. The applicant has also provided a "profile sheet" as shown on the improvement survey in the Application (Exhibit "C") that shows the proposed addition is located back from a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, 11owers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation. Staff Finding The Applicant has not provided a landscape plan because they are proposing no new planting outside of the building envelope. The Applicant is also not proposing to remove any trees on the site. Staff finds this standard to be met. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. Staff Finding The Applicant has committed to comply with the City of Aspen Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and that all exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope. The City Zoning Officer has concluded that the Applicant may provide a lighting plan and cut sheets can be submitted at the time of building permit submittal. This has been included as a condition of approval. Staff finds this standard to be met. 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff Finding The Applicant has provided site sections showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. These are attached to the application in the plan sets. In addition, the City of Aspen Engineering Department has verified the top of slope for this property. Staff finds this standard to be met. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. (Ord. No. 47- 1999, Â§3) Staff Finding The Applicant has indicated that they are not aware of any wetland areas on the subject site. MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: March 1,2002 Re: 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin The Development Review Committee has reviewed the 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin at their February 27,2002 meeting, and has compiled the following comments: General 1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we assume the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that proposed development is feasible. The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems and delays related to approvals tied to "issuance of building permit." 2. R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-ofway, the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license requirements. Site Review 1. Site Drainage - Requirement -.The foundation drainage system should be separate from site storm drainage system. Rain and snow melt runoffmust be detained and routed on site. These facilities must be shown on drainage plans and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely. This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and re- vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow 2 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter - Requirement- sidewalk, curb, and gutter must be designed using the City of Aspen design standards, which are available in the City Engineering Department. 3. Fire Protection District- Requirement - Fire Protection District requests the following revisions be made: Page 2 of 5 March 1,2002 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review a. No comments at this time 4. Transportation - Requirements- The information were forwarded by Transportation department: a. No comment at this time 5. Building Department - Requirements - The following requirementswere forwarded by the Building Department: a. No comment at this time 6. Parking - Requirement - The following requirement has been forwarded by the Parking Department: a. No comment at this time 7. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Engineering Department: a. The top of slope is an accurate for that particular area and coincides with the 100 year flood plan Information - The following information has been provided by the Engineering Department: a. The submittal of the construction plans to Engineering Department for reviews prior to application for building permit will benefit the developer and will facilitate timely processing of the Building Permits. 8. Streets Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Streets department a. No comment at this time 9. Housing Office - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Housing Office: a. No comment at this time Page 3 of 5 March 1,2002 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review 10. Community Development - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Community Development Office a. The applicant complies with the land Use code in regard to the stream margin review 11. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster Coordinator: a. No comment at this time 12. City Environmental Health Director - Requirements- The following requirements were made by the Environmental Health Director: a. No comments at this time 13. Parks - Requirement- The following requirements have been made by the Parks Department: a. There are no detailed design standard submitted for the stream margin protection barricades referenced in the report. Where will this fencing be situated and by what means? How will this fencing " protect residual run-off and erosion"? This fencing shall consist of a barrier fencing at the edge of the building envelope. Beyond this barrier fencing shall be silt fencing installed to the City of Aspen standards. Additional erosion control measures may be necessary depending upon the site. b. Along with a stream margin barricade system, there also needs to be an upland native vegetation and tree protection fencing installed. This will protect other areas on the property outside the stream margin form construction damage. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan. There will be no storing of construction materials of any kind beyond this fence. c. Despite the applicant's intent, to not cut or disturb any trees, two trees denoted on the report and site plan are indeed in the constructionarea and will be impacted around section A. The root systems of the adjacent trees is of paramount importance and some of the construction and landscaping boundaries proposed will affect root zones. An approved tree removal permit is required prior to construction. d. Mitigation in the form of re-vegetation will be required for any disturbance to the riparian zone identified to be outside of the 15' set back. e. All disturbed areas around section A of the development will be required for re-vegetation of an approved native seed mix based on site evaluation by the City Forester or his designee. This will require a follow up site visit after the spring thaw before any construction activity. 14. Utilities: Â· Page 4 of 5 March 1,2002 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review - Water: City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code - Wastewater: Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - The following was provided by the Aspen Consolidated Waste District: a. No comment at this time - Construction: Work in the Public Right of Way Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: Approvals 1. Engineering: The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way. 2. Parks: The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920- 5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance. 3. Streets: The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways. 4. Permits: Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department Page 5 of 5 March 1, 2002 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review DRC Attendees Staff: James Lindt Applicant's Representative: Alan Richman John Niewoehner Brian Flynn Richard Goulding MEMORANDUM TO: James Lindt, City Planner FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer le> RE: 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review DATE: February 22,2002 501 Sneaky Lane is located in the R-30 Zone District which has the following dimensional requirements: Setbacks: Front Yard - 25 feet Side Yard - 10 feet Rear Yard - 15 feet The 47,446 square foot lot has an access easement and areas under the high water line which must be deducted from the lot size for the purpose of calculating FAR. Based on the application, the lot size is 30,438 square feet and the allowable floor area is 5,426 square feet. The lot reduction calculations as well as floor area calculations will be verified at the time of building permit application. Residential Design Standards The applicant appears to meet the Residential Design Standards for the proposed additions based on the elevations submitted with the Stream Margin application. Stream Margin Review Exterior lighting is required to meet Section 26.575.150 of the Land Use Code. Per the Section 26.575.150, the applicant is required to submit a lighting plan with the ESA review. Staff feels a lighting plan, with cut sheets, can be submitted at the time of building permit submittal. The proposed additions to 501 Sneaky Lane are sufficiently outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from top of slope. All of the dimensional requirements will be verified at the time of building permit. AU. 12..Mew 7 AutktÂ£~1* 5 Muita â‚¬* 3613 AaM.. 61.46 91612 740.49400 (970) 920-1125 February 14, 2002 Mr. James Lindt, Planner City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 501 SNEAKY LANE LLC STREAM MARGIN REVIEW APPLICATION Dear James, This is an application for stream margin approval to modify the existing single family residence located on Lot 2 of the Parry Subdivision, City of Aspen, more commonly known as 501 Sneaky Lane. The Parry Subdivision is a two lot subdivision, approved by the City of Aspen in 1978. The final plat for the subdivision is recorded at Book 6, Page 124 of the Pitkin County records (see attached copy of plat). Lot 2 consists of approximately 47,446 square feet of land, and is zoned R-30 (PUD), making it a conforming-size lot of record. This application is being submitted by 501 Sneaky Lane LLC, the owner of the property (hereinafter, "the applicant"). Proof of the ownership of the property is provided by Attachment #1, the title insurance commitment and the special warranty deeds. Authorization for Alan Richman Planning Services to represent the property owner for this application is provided by Attachment #2. A pre-application conference was held with you on 11/28/01 (see Attachment #3, Pre- Application Conference Summary). Based on this meeting and subsequent contacts with City staff, you confirmed that the following land development approvals are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations to accomplish this project: Stream Margin Review for an addition of more than 10% to the floor area of an existing structure located in proximity to the Roaring Fork River; and Vested Rights for the project. The following sections of this application identify the standards of the Aspen Land Use Regulations that apply to these development approvals and provide a response to each standard. First, however, an overview description of this development proposal is provided. Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Two Development Proposal This is an application to make an addition of approximately 836 sq. ft. to the existing single- family residence located on Lot 2 of the Parry Subdivision. The existing residence contains approximately 4,579 sq. ft. of space that counts as floor area pursuant to the Land Use Code. The maximum allowable floor area on the lot is 5,426 sq. ft., meaning that 847 sq. ft. of floor area remains to be developed on this property. This lot has been subject to stream margin review by the City of Aspen on two prior occasions. Following is a brief summary of those land use applications. In 1983 the owner of Lot 2, Mr. David Han, requested stream margin approval to develop a single family residence on the property. Stream margin approval for Lot 2 was granted by motion of the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 16, 1983. The only condition applied to the approval was that construction of the house was required to comply with the standards of the stream margin regulations (see memo to City Planning and Zoning Commission, included as Attachment #4). In 1992, a subsequent owner of the property, Ms. Sandra Read, applied for stream margin approval to make some small additions to the existing residence. Because the additions would increase the tloor area of the residence by less than 10%, the application was approved administratively, by the Planning Director, on March 24, 1992. The only conditions applied to this approval were that disturbed areas be re-vegetated, and construction runoff into Castle Creek be prevented by implementation of a site drainage plan (see staff approval memo, included as Attachment #5). The applicant proposes to make some further additions to the existing dwelling on the property. These additions are shown on the site plan and can be described as follows. First, the applicant proposes a small addition (509 sq. ft.) to the south side of the house, which will be used for a new bedroom. Second, the applicant proposes to make an addition on the west side of the house (327 sq. ft.), and to extend the remaining deck in this area. Floor plans have been provided in this application booklet. Table 1, on the following page, provides an evaluation of the lot area, floor area, setback and other zone district standards that apply to this property. It shows that the proposed additions will be in compliance with all of the underlying dimensional standards of the R-30 zone district. The following section of this application demonstrates how the application will comply with all of the applicable standards of the stream margin review section of the Code. Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Three TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT'S COMPLIANCE WITH R-30 ZONE DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Requirement (3 â€žle St:imhird pr, )1"i'+9,1 Minimum Lot Size 30,000 sq. ft. 47,446 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling 30,000 sq. ft. 47,446 sq. ft. Unit Minimum Lot Width 100 feet +/- 196 feet Minimum Front Yard 25 feet +/- 38 feet Minimum Side Yard 10 feet +/- 44 feet Minimum Rear Yard 15 feet +/- 80 feet Alaximum IIeight 25 feet 25 feet Nlininium Dntance Ileti, een 10 feet Not applicable 11â€ž11,]ingâ€¢, on the Lot Pereent of Open Space No requirement Not applicable Maximum Allowable Floor Area 5,426 sq. ft. (based on a net 5,415 sq. ft. lot size of 30,438 sq. ft., after required deductions) Off-Street Parking 2 spaces per unit 2 sp aces Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Four Response to Criteria for Stream Margin Review Because the applicant proposes development that is located within 100' of the high water line of Castle Creek, this development is subject to stream margin review. The applicant's responses to the standards of Section 26.435.040 C. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations are as follows: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or offsite which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. Response: The site plan depicts the limits of the 100 year flood hazard area, as scaled from the 1987 Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) study. This mapping illustrates that the 100 year flood hazard area (which corresponds to the top of the stream bank) is located approximately 25 feet from the edge of the proposed deck expansion area. Based on this mapping, we were informed by the Community Development Department that it would not be necessary for us to obtain a report from a professional engineer responding to this standard. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement". Response: A pedestrian and recreation easement was previously granted along Castle Creek for the length of this property, and is shown on the plat of the Parry Subdivision and on the site plan. The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan recommends that trees not be cut along the Roaring Fork River, that the River not be filled in, and its banks not be graded. It also recommends that disturbed areas be brought back to as natural a state as possible, including the use of native plant species. The proposed additions to the existing house will comply with these policies, in no trees will be removed along Castle Creek (or anywhere on the property), and the Creek and its banks will not be altered in any manner. Although the perimeter of the property is covered with many trees, the applicant has carefully planned the proposed additions so that no trees and no area along the stream bank will be affected by the construction. Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Five 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance Of Certificates Of Occupancy. Response: The proposed development will not involve the removal of stream bank vegetation, nor will stream bank slope grade changes be made. The area of the proposed house additions has been shown on the site plan. The applicant will barricade around this area to prevent disturbance of the rest of the site and will leave those barricades in place until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the development. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Response: The development will not interfere with or change the river course, nor will it cause pollution of Castle Creek. There will be no changes to the existing grade of the property, nor new paved areas developed. Drainage from the new roof and deck area will remain on the site and will not be routed toward the river. The hot tub will be drained within the building envelope. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Response: No such alteration or relocation is proposed, so no written notice is required. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood canying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Response: Since no alteration or relocation is proposed, no guarantee is required. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100)year floodplain. Response: No work is planned within the 100 year floodplain, so no such permits are necessary. Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Six 8. There is no development other than approved vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within 15 feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. Response: The site plan identifies the top of the stream bank, which corresponds to the 100 year floodplain line. This delineation was confirmed in the field during a site visit with the applicant's surveyor and a member of the City Engineering Department. The site plan shows that the entire addition to the house will occur outside of the 15' setback. The addition will be no closer than 25' from the top of the slope. 9. All development outside the 15 foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director, utilizing the definition of height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. Response: A site section is shown on the site plan, as required by criterion #12, which demonstrates that the proposed addition will not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. The site section shows the top of the bank, the 45 degree angle from ground level and the proposed residence. This drawing shows that all of the proposed addition will occur below the 45 degree angle. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation. Response: This property is already quite well landscaped, with many mature trees, considerable shrubbery, and established ground cover. The areas where development is proposed to occur are presently yard areas, covered with planted grass. Measurements taken on-site by the project architect and project planner demonstrate that no trees will be affected by the proposed additions. Given these facts, the applicant has not produced a separate "landscape plan". Instead, the site plan contains a note that states: No trees are to be disturbed. No grades are to be changed. All grass (outside of the perimeter of the new building footprint) is to be replaced. Those statements represent the applicant's landscaping commitments/landscape plan. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downcast, with no lights directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. Response: The applicant agrees to comply with these standards. Mr. James Lindt February 14, 2002 Page Seven 12. Site sections drawn by a registered landscape architect or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. Response: These site sections have been provided and have been described under criterion # 9, above. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Response: The site plan provides an identification of the edge of the creek. We are not aware of any wetland or riparian areas that are associated with the creek. Vested Rights Pursuant to Section 26.308 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests that this development be granted vested rights status. Conclusion The applicant has responded to the applicable standards of the Aspen Land Use Code applicable to the project, pursuant to direction given by the Community Development Department during pre-application meetings. Sufficient evidence has been provided of the project's compliance with said standards and the applicant has made commitments in order to ensure that the proposed development will mitigate all of its impacts. If you require any additional information, or clarification of the statements made herein, please feel free to ask and we will respond in a timely manner. Very truly yours, ALAN RICHMAN PIANNING SERVICES Alan Richman, AICP EXHIBITS . ~~~ ATTACHMENT #1 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: November 1, 2001 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT16365F 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 2,600,000.00 Premium$ 2,412.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Re-Issue MICHAEL WERNER (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 Premium$ 100.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Companion TO BE DETERMINED Tax Certificate: $10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: H. MONTGOMERY LOUD and PAULA LOUD 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT 2, PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof recorded June 28,1978 in Plat Book 6 at Page 124 as Reception No. 205766. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT .. SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patents recorded in Book 55 at Page 32 and 35. 8. Easement and right of way for waterline as set forth in Deed recorded December 10, 1959 in Book 189 at Page 320. 9. Easement and right of way for roadway as set forth in Deed recorded February 18,1963 in Book 201 at Page 180. 10. Right of way for ingress and egress 40 feet in width as described in Deed recorded August 19, 1964 in Book 208 at Page 512. 11. Easement granted to Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District recorded May 17,1978 in Book 348 at Page 112. 12. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded June 28, 1978 in Plat Book 6 at Page 124. 13. Overlap of adjacent property as disclosed on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated October, 2001 as Job No. 23022 14. Any rights, interest or easements in favor of the riparian owners, the State of Colorado, The United States of America, or the general public, which exist, have existed, or are claimed to exist in and over the waters and present and past bed and banks of the Castle Creek River. 011 Y uk ASPEN -'rt ' V, nwr- 6..ir WRETT PAID i 45'D . 08 HRETT PAID OATE F.zip 1 DFIE Rfp No. 1 40 2--- \37Â¢2~ 11816~, 2'37 4,2/- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made January 8,2002 between H. MONTGOMERY LOUD AND PAULA LOUD of the County of PITKIN and State of CO, of the first part, GRANTOR and MICHAEL B. WERNER '' , i> Al DE L /' whose legal address is: 1111 LINCOLN ROAD, MIAMI BEACH4 FL 33139 ofthe County of D'id,. State of FL, of the second part, GRANTEE WITNESSETH, That the said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable considerations, to the said parties of the first part, in hand paid by the said parties ot the second.part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed and by these presents do grant, bargairrsell, convey and confirm unto the said parties of the second part, its successors and assigns forever, all the following described lots or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of PITKIN and State of COLORADO, to wit: LOT 2, PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof recorded June 28, 1978 in Plat Book 6 at Page 124 as Reception No. 205766. 462629 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 01/08/2002 Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances there-unto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claini and demand whatsoever, of the said parties of the first part, either in law or 13 equity, of, In and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND thL- TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. And the said parties of the first part ter themselves, their heirs and assigns do covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, their successors and assigns, the above bargained 1*mises In the quiet and peaceable possession of said parties of the second part, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, by through or under the said panies of the first part to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. The singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITAQSS WHEREOF, life said parties of the first part have hereunto set their h#nd(*and seal(s) f 4 \ 1 -LL l.,LÂ· A - A H. MO~TGO,MERY LOUD PAULA LbUD 462629 STATE OF _COLORADOJ Â®Ellilli illi litilia ill littill lit illit till ilit 01/08/2002 11:25A SS Page: 1 of 1 COUNTY OF_PITKIN SILVIA DAVIS P'ITKIN COUNTY CO R 5.00 0 260.00 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of JANUARY,2002. By: H. MONTGOMERY LOUD and PAULA LOUD WITNESS my hand and official seal Notary Public .. my commission expires: Â· Â· - It l'403 . A..O 4.14:Â·9.9,b>Â·.'22 Return to =.el <4Â·- 02 COLO JOHN KELLY DATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ My Coii,0-i,6-L~; E;*235 ll/0lt2003 533 E. HOPKINS '3RD FL ASPEN, CO 81611 / 9365 F #26 00",t /4 0 2 Reat 461-7 68- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made this 6 -r jlay of January, 2002 between MICHAEL B. WERNER REVOCABLE TRUST RESTATED JULY 18, 1991 and DANA WERNER ("Grantors") whose legal address'is 111;Lincoln Rd., Suite 400, Miami Beach, Florida, -// 33139 and 501 SNEAKY LANE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("Grantee") whose legal address is ;Â®> ~,F~lo~J'*t>7 3'Â£SZ~%2tkll~112*,"Â£; ,@2Â£44, Â·F)â‚¬r>,4 3.34 WITNESSETH, That the Grantors, for and in considerati~n ~rthe sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, described as follows: LOT 2 PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof recorded June 28, 1978, in Plat Book 6 at page 124 as Reception No. 205766. Together with any and all water and well rights situate on, used on, or appurtenant to the above described property. o SUBJECT TO AND EXCEMING: Real Property taxes for 2002 payable in 2003, all other &f matters of record affecting title to the above-described real property. ~~ - r~ TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto Â¤ ~ 4 belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, m 0-5 rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantors, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, do covenant and agree that theyshall and 1 will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or 8.92 persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantors. ti :.4 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed this deed on the date set forth Egi bad'Werner MICHAEL B. WERNER REVOCABLE TRUST RESTATED JULY 18, 1991 By JB-Â¥w,A/~ Michael B. Werner, Trustee STATE OF COLORADO ) , COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this %<y January, 2002 by Dana Werner and Michael B. Werner as Trustee of the Michael B. Werner Revocable Trust Restated July 18, 1991. WIFFE~MIE HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. â‚¬14&.. 0.18wank 'Notary Public My Commission expires: 7/10/3 2. Di9<9~89'2~arr deed Z.wpd 533 5. klefth-Â° A-of. 3*0~.0( 9~U I.*-- *5fs,n, 8Â© 9 /6/1 REP.(3 NO. 1,(033 CITY OF ASPEN NO.4 i? FFROI~RETT 462-763- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made this * &32day of January, 2002 between MICHAEL B. WERNER, C'Grantor") whose legal address is 111(Lincoln Rd., Suite 400, Miami Beach, Florida,33139 and MICHAELB. WERNER REVOCABLE TRUST RESTATED JULY 18, 1991 and DANA WERNER (collectively "Grantee"), whose legal address is 11ULincoln Rd., Suite 400, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the Grantee, their heirs, personal representatives, grantees, successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, described as follows: LOT 2 PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof recorded June 28, 1978, in Plat Book 6 at page 124 as Reception No. 205766. Together with any and all water and well rights situate on, used on, or appurtenant to the 4 above described property. 50 r. ~3- EÂ·t . SUBJECT TO AND EXCEMING: Real Property taxes for2002 payable in 2003, all other Â© g matters of record affecting title to the above-described real property. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto ~ ~ belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, ~j rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever ~ - ~-, of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the , a hereditaments and appurtenances; 41, MO- TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, their heirs, personal representatives, grantees, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, and assigns forever, agree that he shall and will WARJUNT AND FOREVERDEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, their heirs, personal representatives, grantees, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole as any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. 8 ~h.â‚¬9*u,~,~ Michael B. Werner Q 83 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~'1&day January, 2002 by Michael B. Werner.. WITAMISdpAW HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. L o. 89*- 2/ .9 < KAREN C. ~ \BOHANNON / Notary Public S\. 1% My Commission expires: ~~/0 /~02_ DADa cc warr deed.wpd 533 E. W,fÂ·U- Aut , 7-AU.< 44.1 CITY OF ASPEN REP e NO. 4 722 FROM HRETT ATTACHMENT #2 Mr. James Lindt, Planner City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 501 SNEAKY LANE LLC STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Dear James, We hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services to act as our designated representative with respect to the land use application being submitted to your office for our property, located at 501 Sneaky Lane. Alan Richman is authorized to submit a stream margin application for an addition to the existing house. He is also authorized to represent us in meetings with City of Aspen staff and the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application, please do so through Alan Richman Planning Services, whose address and telephone number are included in the application. Sincerely, 4 3/ rÂ»%~ V Michael B. Werner Revocable Trust, Member Dana Werner, Member 501 Sneaky Lane LLC 1111 Lincoln Road, Suite 400 Miami Beach, Florida 33139 305-538-8558 ATTACHMENT #3 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: James Lindt, 920.5104 DATE: 11.28.01 PROJECT: 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review REPRESENTATIVE: John Kelly OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 Step. Stream Margin Review DESCRIPTION: Proposed addition to existing house within 100 feet of the river. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.435.40 Stream Margin Review. 26.710.80 Low Density Residential Zone District (R-30) 26.410 Residential Design Standards Review by: Staff for complete application, Development Review Committee for technical considerations, Planning and Zoning Commission for Approval determination. Public Hearing: No. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $500 Referral Agency Fees: Engineering Referral $180 Total Deposit: $680 To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, addresi and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant statirs 2 2 name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Signed fee agreement. 4. Pre-application Conference Summary. 5. A site improvement survey with topography at two foot contours, and the river top of slope (consult with City Engineering Department for determination method) and one hundred year flood plane. 6. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City ofAspen. 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 8. A copy of the recorded documents which affects the proposed development. 9. Proof of ownership. 10. Additional materials as required by specific review. Please refer to the application packet for specific submittal requirements or to the code sections noted above. 11. 12 Copies of the complete application packet (items 1-10) Process: Apply. Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to Engineering for referral comments, often taken to Design Review Committee. Case Planner takes to staff meeting for recommendation. Case planner writes memo of recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Planning and Zoning Commission makes final determination on application. ' Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 30 -2 -F Â» ATTA' ENT #4 A 3 9-=, 1 - MEMORANDUM ' TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Han/Eastern Winds Stream Margin Review DATE: August 16, 1983 Location: Lot 2, Parry Subdivision (the first lot north of Castle Creek on Sneaky Lane, across from the City Shop Building). Zoning: R-30 PUD. Applicant's Request: Special review approval to construct a. dwelling unit within 100 feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. Referral Comments: No comments were received from the City Attorney's Office. The Engineering Department reviewed the application ' and made a site inspection and has several suggested plat changes. Stream margin review does not require , the filing 'of a plat; however. A new developnient plan must be submitted showing the 100 year flood- pla~n. No existing vegetation within the 100 year floodplain shall be removed or disturbed in the course of construction, and no construction techniques shall be employed which could contribute sediment to the stream. Planning Office Review: The building site is very flat and will require almost no grading. All existing vegetation is being retained. There will be no effect on the stream channel or sediment ].oads in the stream. The site grade will not alter existing grade points of the lot, so the existing drainage conditions will be retained. . A pedestrian easement is shown on the plat along the river's edge, useable for fisherman and hiking pur- poses. The criteria of Section 24-6.3 are as follows: , (1) No building shall be located so as to be within a flood hazard area designated-by the U. S. Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Report for the Roaring Fork River. This proposal is outside the flood hazard area. It is no closer than approximately 30 feet to the 100 year floodplain line. (2) In the event there is a trail designated by an Â·approved trailÂ· plan within the development site, such trail shall be dedicated for public , use. There is no trail in the trail plan that involves this property and the easement along the rj.ver bank is indicated on the plat. :l t,.. tr, Memo: Han/Eastern Winds Page Two August 16, 1983 (3) All attempts should be made to implement the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. This property is along Castle Creek and is not affected by the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. (4) Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. As mentioned earlier, all existing vegetation is being retained and site grades will not be altered. (5) There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no activity shall be allowed which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. Again, the house is being built on an open, flat area of the lot. Grading will be very minimal, with no effect on the stream channel or sediment load. (6) All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollution and interference with the natural changes of the stream, and to enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature. This is a very buildable lot with all vegetation located away from the building site and near the stream bank. The stream is not being adversely affected in any apparent way and the provision of pedestrian access will allow more than just the property owners to enjoy this segment of Castle Creek. Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval of construction of this single family house on Lot 2 of the Parry Subdivision as presented with the condition: 1. Compliance in the construction phase with the criteria of Section 24-6.3. An .Cli- + Irrill-' .-* r -- u c,/ * ____ ATTACHMENT #5 ~- 0 a MEMORANDUM , 1 TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer --71 1 , THROUGH: Diane Moore, City Planning Director ~ t FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner~(~~~v RE: Read Stream Margin Exemption DATE: March 20, 1992 SUMMARY: Planning staff recommends approval of Stream Margin Exemption for the enlargement of an existing residence, with conditions. APPLICANT: Sandra Read ~ LOCATION: 501 Sneaky Lane-3 ZONING: R-30 APPLICANT' S REQUEST: The Applicant wishes to make several additions to her home. Along the river side of the house a portion of the first floor wall will be moved out 4', a second level wall will be moved out 6', and new deck will be added. On the northwest sidef one portion of the wall will be extended 4' from its existinf location. The garage on the northeast corner of the house will be reconfigured and expanded. Because portions of the at grade expansions fall within the stream margin review area (100' from the high water line), the Planning Office must approve the proposal prior to issuance of a building permit. Some of the new floor area within the home will be accomplished .by adding second level area within the existing vaulted volume of the home. See site plan and application text, Attachment "A". REFERRAL COMMENTS: The Parks Department states that no tree removal permits arek required for this project. Engineering made requests for the establishment of a building envelope on this site, revegetation, dedication of a fisherman's easement, and historic run-off protection. In a March 18 response to Engineering's comments, the applicant stated that she does not wish to create a building envelope. As establishment of a building envelope is not a code requirement, Planning will not include this in the conditions of approval. The applicant offered to remove an existing pedestrian/recreational easement in exchange for a f isherman' s easement, but staf f does not believe this to be advantageous to the City. She does acknowledge that revegetation will occur on disturbed ground and that * construction run-off will be prevented from going into Castle Creek. Additionally, a 1,000 gallon dry well will be installed to handle on-site drainage. Please refer to Attachments "B" and 'Ic't . STAFF COMMENTS: Portions of his project take place within 100' of the high water line of Castle Creek. However, exemption from full Stream Margin review is possible when the following standards are met: 1. The proposal does not add more than 10% floor area of the existing structure or more than 25% of building exempt from floor area calculations. RESPONSE: As mentioned above, portions of the floor area expansion take place within the existing foundation by the intrusion into upper level vaulted ceilings or raising the roof. The foundation coverage (building footprint) is approximately 2,800 s.f. The proposed foundation expansion within the 100' review area is approximately 220 s.f., or an 8% increase. Based on the intent of the stream margin reviews and exemptions within the, code, staff believes the foundation or site coverage expansion should be the crucial limiting criteria. The application points out that within the review criteria for stream margin exemptions, two applications of expansion are used. In Section 7-504 B.1. uses the term "floor area" and Section 7- 504 B.5 uses the term "ground coverage" . Understanding the intent of the exemption allowance, which places reasonable limits on stream margin development not requiring full review by the Planning Commission, the impacts of ground coverage expansion should be considered in addition to the raw floor area expansion of a proposal. Existing floor area on the parcel is approximately 3,250 s.f. with proposed floor area expansion of 1,500 s.f. Please see page 2 of the application. 2. No trees will be removed, or required removal permits are granted. RESPONSE: No trees will be removed within the 100' review area. However, one pine will be relocated without requiring a permit. 3. No portion of the expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than the existing development. RESPONSE: The closest existing development to the river is decking at 31.5' from the bank. No portion of proposed structural addition, either deck or foundation, is closer to the river than this distance. 4. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope, if one has been designated through prior review. RESPONSE: There is no approved building envelope for this site. 5. The remodeling or expansion will cause no increase to the ground coverage within the Special Flood Hazard Area. RESPONSE: The proposal is located completely outside of the 100' floodplain as determined by Rob Thomson on March 20, 1992. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Stream Margin Exemption for the Read Residence expansion as represented in this application with conditions. I hereby approve the Stream Margin Exemption for the Read Residence expansion as proposed, with the following conditions: 1) Revegetation is required for any disturbed soil on the site. This shall be inspected by Planning or Engineering staff prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 2) Construction run-off into Castle Cree'k shall be prevented by implementing a site drainage plan approved by Engineering staff prior to issuance of a builiding permit. ' C~n /1 Â»ULÂ© O Vl iLL 4 74 4- Drand Moore, City Planning Director Datd Attachments: "A" - Application Text and Site Plan "B" - Engineering Referral Memo "C" - March 18, 1992 Response to Engineering Memo MAPS AND DRAWINGS 91 2 :30 4~ 1% r 1% f//7 41 ."5*/Im 05 NS,AUN 2% , b flftÂ· 4-1 4 $. ,- Al 4# 4 444.,d // * 1 /eu, 1,0 '-: 'Â» .40*464 /45 0 b e PH u/ENU Y// Â«/-4.-'..4.24?W Pea p x-6*4 i ,# j b, #08* - 4 -%.'4*I,/~ . 9. 1. 770 --44014 6-st,1 411.''k 11 4 f / '6*lb /7 Ci ,#~*.442.,1/hV %** 76#6~-L 6. , o Silver Queen ' v Â» j jl j tf le \ \ #2 * se#<4 ~9 Goii-ddla V '. A 7Â·4't- 1 0 4 0;* f,'r 4 Nite.J..ic:4 I.-1-/-- Ji ' 1 r/) 1 f 5 9004 2. r 8- 1 /7 9 #riftgoÂ¢l' .Ar*:14- /$ %74 ,- , ,--- -, 444' .7 46 ..1 (71 - + | Uk= h 8 :71, 1 : 1 4 /,r'Â»Â· , %/ /'78 Â·Â·i.p 1 44&22 2/ ~if# ja O C mt,1- %= / /A i 4,441444% 5,3,42 & 5 (J Â·@ E * .~07>X*.W ed 'ihei:L... 1-1 1 2 f -1--4-- 1 1 g IE e gj.,1- -44 j C <~4,~1 4 0, -.4,14Â·+mI # 1 '441 r j 4.2.e.* 21 a, - 1 y.5 1 44.,ek. / 6*-1---,- -- Â»1 05 . X PH *Mopeew 1 40 4,Â» 1 3 1 C .4 j '..I-*Â£*M-I. p......m.. , 1 -y*,~ [ 4 :AR 1 Rivar Dr-9.- Bl,Cli 1 -,4- -b. "1:f,33%52%%%, +Â» 41 ' n/*142 0"61,1?1 *. 70.1rvr , - -..~ 413> 0 ... r k Castle Creek Or 62 power i. , .9....,â€ž03 Y. -'it k Â· :.. 19 Ja ueptoH /~ 1/5, m \ 3,- Gemete #Ln~~~~-~ - 1.2 ... ~i' :, dj.'- 1.-tÂ» ,/, )444,6 U 11. ' A Jm....0.- 1 - 3 1,1 f. 4 -, to . Pltkj Mesa Dr '/*' 0- r_.f & , 1 11 0 11 1 (01 11 -1 ~ 4 -,2%2444 - 1 1 11 . :8 al *#----- - 1 1 & V e /0 N /3 al 12 l /0 1,/.4 9 i li 3.3 \ -R-'29JJ 4 I lip,el: F/1 - d- - . - m A. i h ul 304'WOH 46* U twl<)97 /14 / j LOT I â€¢ }OWNERÂ· =]eme- 5r~O0,1, 0-2 ' Â· r, 00(4, Ae,rEAa- ILOT 2 â€¢~ OWNEK â€¢ 1Â¢(ft#Â© Eaeock.1,46 Pler N,KnONâ‚¬L whly 7 \ OU0Â·â‚¬/ '1/~5/0/V,60*334 *iN, c:koe,~,w ecle. ~ ~ 1 ~ rA s Â£,cr N76~Â©41 } tÂ»W ' 1 . C D WIDE 1 6,4~NT- 43.51. 1 - NarrM UNE OF *4 USSLEIK ST*ZET EXTENDED M + i\ \ -U CRUK 90IVISI* \ FINAL PLAT <&95101TPa,*700'35>*E 77â‚¬Ot PARRY SUBDIVISION CWNEK- m , 501-54'44*E 772. 71 2!AlKA K. GUL:Ci< 1 r-- 4 % SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4 NW 14 AN'D IN THE NE 1,4 *aaâ€¢Rlt# *%J#M /17 i + ' ' -Trrzrji-* / 1 \ 2&?230.&27* Â£ 1 / - i 1 Tioe, Knew 6/ rM / /1 2.% 1 \ SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12. TOVENSELIP .10 SOUTH, RANGE ,\ 0 fri / 1% Xt 7 (A. 50 UNR.Al-rn) LÂ»IP 85 W-EST OF TEE SIXIE..PR-IN.CZVAL NEER][DIAN. ONNERD. 1CITY -~0/ ASPEN. Â£EOR.ADD / 1/ ISeEL W., NAKY e, 6*I<DN M., 6 iii Â¢ rt.,1. VAN[DEMOCK ' 11 '43 d Fral 6 M- .,W= *<ew i I 96 054Â¥U, COLOMAER 80220 y / 1; 1 PA 1.Ul<"firb J \ OWNER AND SJOCIV[CEK ., NESENERÂ·AND SURaft]R tr- 60â€¢SE ER,Â¥2 8â€¢ 5 40 040Â»h MET 1,4313Â¢ 11~CO MAN~enâ‚¬NT- 4 Lor i \ 46 j B tee< 1-77 '(000 11% 26 ~ 1OD\L /BEA 81.TpÂ·CM m.rr. 1 / h / L 1 AREANCeLLCAZIK. -4440 , aft\ 242*2Â° f 'Cal at611 ---- i t 3*.7,Â·t';' 1 ./ hREA IT,4 râ€¢1'Alt M.aW.-5?52.34 j %\- \ --- , 1 44 -- AgjeRTY DEDCRIPTtON ANC) GE,hir OF thUMN-15 39,377.75 te.rr. ~ Â¥ E \ SATEMENT Or aÂ©DIVIO,Ohi PI . \ 7 1 ATK,cT or LÂ»10 ellurmo INTME =mÂ·sâ€¢<Fr KNOW All. VEN 5,1,â‚¬et me!*N?5 111*Nrs=Ree QUARrele cy-mt Nal#*er QUACK ,#41Â£> INÂ·-1'HE BRANT NRRY A!49 5â€¢,ROD# MigrT 9%#5Â¥ 00,99 \ \f\ 0Â¥50570412 10*NbMIP !0 SOUTH, MANSE Se, â€¢=Per'Y, 1, S NOMIHriM:m QUARTO< or THE .bOUTHW[5r (DUM?CK -1Â¥ItCWNCE# OP'Trte ,#00*f Ce<21*S> REXL 10Â» #teyr OF THE (SXTH *11*R#L MERTPIAN c:14 oF ,Â©PEN, PITKIN COUNT4, COLok,NX), Mb,KE MJ{ly D tÂ©t~~,FlÂ·~g~ e~~ --a ./. 26 OZIFBED ADIOLLOWSâ€¢ -EN, og.Â·TY â‚¬* Piâ„¢IN, *mtord=:twr3 r- 6 0 *16Â·1 LINE J a,UL.efi,351743Â£- 5<TDIDE[P 2) fÂ·+DRED< *ANT 13 1,â‚¬ Crrf Cr Ae,FD,1 1+4E SMISINNINS /r A ~UINT- MNS -niC INT~'1<34 J g- NON - DCUJ!58% 5,40â‚¬NT 1Olt A.Jel.{C MISM- OFF ~ L--meiee_wpi_-Â«-0 \R 4 1 %01#.42&2(SLAR#f&*522 -4 6 t 1 -TMENGE 645,36'W ~ FEU AONG T'Mr 502=1&326~ fit~ --u)43â‚¬~5~'94 -..<1FC 8 V JO' 1 5994'445 E 775.79 $ HEREFX *ANT 15 1,12 M.ELC MXIME PURECEIS SED,104 Q A 1954 U S. e,~KnO Qâ€¢4; ter, -436:4'44&\ 5 1 \ -!FENCE 2233*=tk) OF LOTt 1 ANIP 2- CriNED Wal[N TNE 5!MI)<Ir CAOTLE CECEK /25 2,ve tvtfRDCD NOW EXCIED la --+4~7 <49#2**.4 'fv ' THENCE 516Â·4#t (20.24 Fl=r Kighe &410 ,440 AD eHOWN AND NcyleD +4ERD,Ii -/ vil m \ CENITERÂ·UNT TKIENCE &54Â°43 E 0.08 PErr Kiet bÂ«) .0 HEREe r <Be, N r t 1 ! N E kie .IC Un L a m * C 1184 Â» CIN'TfEINE 10 -10Â£ IN;mate,}CN Wn}-t 83,- W.2 61Â© LIM trag.Dir,NCrtht TEN full- 1 - C\ ha THE NOTTH UNg CF FR+:LiS 2fâ„¢CT WIC;r Ve!~EN* tix{54â„¢HEAD C.ZiNRC AND EXTENDED *25'â„¢C' . 1'.* r 0/Nlt=LI[â‚¬ Â· -IHENCE- 584Â°431:6 23'7.cle r~- ACNE, ti.NE) -0 59 HIOZBY Â®RANT 10 THE pUBLIC unume, m-:=L / 1 \1\\ 3 313-- m A 11 3 1 Q ~~-itINCE 48/14Â¥E 46(DO Forr)6*Chie *40 RDâ‚¬:laNS> OFâ€¢ eAL Mt;P~Â¥ Â»10Â·1 ,â€¢Rf Lâ€¢2EL=O CENTERLUAZZ ,Â© JnLITY EDâ‚¬O.!EN:t) Ch -ltlf iN.r,Fe O 1- . \4\ \ ~k,,Â·~ gi ta r / :-t 1 < -IHENCE NG(recy= 69,02> râ€¢En FLAm, AÂ¢> E,ect,154-!b Od 'llÂ·lt 1!45FLLA1Â¤4 AVP 1 0 19Â¢NCE 2%4*5,3/2-253 ~th LiNE 191AINT".54Â»Cer Cy URSÂ·rtte,ANC) CMAN,Ar>E n 1 e' MACL.:Te Â· -mgm}*ER 441*1 THE REâ€¢17 -Clavt ir V Cr FK.*Cle) El,REET e.-!ENOCD 414113Ft,646 -:REB ANP *Ritrt; 1MIZN-Efe 0 I W W'51'E012'f - wrrb -11Â·,2 Ferfl'mUAL- Fidefr Cr ING</95 Mpv . 14 leaL,AREi 47 445,74 2. Pr Ul AND WPLICMMPET sy Suar, UNE- 641 1 p >1 8- le -TtiDÂ£:5 A&30'eeld JeW.41 rmEr, tSREES !Â©â€¢e iNeriCUAMON, bll,#'TWI~ANCE 7'rit>Â£= =imoN/191!m)=Rl UNm FIMEN'lt AND Re:rs 54,.1 eâ‚¬*149 N 13 AlmA IN Gellf CREEK -4013 AKEA N PRNNT[ 1,0.8 -901 1,70 - CY Â©MUeelfrp. INUT EXTENUMP A MOEIDN,AKE. AN) !6UINT )41NNESâ‚¬V' 0 1 1 dgeâ„¢\ 3 ~ k 4~,7, IN PlÂ·)21.M KaW. -22Â¢05.25 O 92 \10\ NCT ARM 24145.79 29.r'r TRIENCe N75Vt' ) 11'W <54.Ge Feer At.:DIAÂ» Ddi:;) 4 Fexcer 20Â©*Er Â»Ic rettl aa=,5 92*MENT- 1 4 i Z NJETH UNC -!O IME FOINT CF 525*>:4'46,Â· 10 1KE OWNERSP. -rHetle 64Ele./.O eebed, or \49\ C;20.Â·Mi:*5 2.â€¢278 /â€¢Clecb, MORE Ott L!:Se. 1OPfi , *10 2 . MAgle, Â©ceÂ£* Â·2 04, Alâ€¢427011'41 \Sm \ E r ON#te, 72,2 WEIRD AND AÂ¢06NS OF LANDS LYINS NOK'1715*L>Â¥ 2, PARÂ©Â¢ eteCMÂ©tON 1 0 144@ 19 1 1 3 4 UNPLKITED IAND 7146 PLAT E~JCSM -THE Ute Or eNCARY LANE' 1 8 lin 1 i OWNeX - SUPÂ©/Crat CEKFirIGATE NX. PCâ„¢tti WMOM .34 -:HE. Z* OF THE RECTE*ret or' WIUAA LEE **XMT \ \1\ 1- , \6.\ NOTE' \ Al 4 86,18 ALOWECK 1, due rÂ· Re#CR â€¢male=le:p L.Ke =u~â‚¬0t., Al,L AS 6-Â·C-1 AND hette ME*tObi. L,HlerIED Ferttoht St/ (UNING 02 glÂ®HT-Or WAY DAUAe, 30(a 702'38 HOtsÂ¥' c~XMFY -4T i M,4/6 Ft]Â¥EP-~,9 FLATCy 1RR< teeaVISION, 1,Â·1~T lt,C 10*wtht 01 -IHE 1:40*inÂ·IT /Â® RS)05[D IN ecox Ouretor Dol.NO,KY Ro,0 AND OnHER rral)185 .14* 1~44 ~'Â©2;14~ m\ .21 2. *T P<. 00 10 IN/LOCD 11" 4 6 t mW241* ~~mY ~~Nml, 6%227~ffw4stri. 2/ U M #*t@~ 602*Farba-Â« AND MHAT Â»C 0267Â¤3] trm *40 -'kir 17405 el , n 9 804/ #Wgy#% *r~A#*406 s,Al<A R. SULICK Of /4 , Ang.4 MA"' 1,\RRY, O..St C I k ~Mt#Â·r*4*4 ~~ 4 1 97*, -Ft-UL 32* ARTICLE EX. 27*TE Or aOLORNX) as : WAOWNGDÂ·4 10 221 ; * \Jm Nevel,1 UNc or â€¢MÂ»icieÂ· f / Ca,*Â·re,,0, Proei k ar, ..~ AF r gatk, L.S. 9164 Fi ?1:Dit[SÂ»* 13'*merr 7 tueÂ©VA,OM AtÂ© e ~2-7- =X7rhd~P e 'Ve vte: IBe_Â£21Â£04010 .LE .49-18 0Â¥ *MT<Dr e'#Pre fe Â·KNJWbeeZD *gaZZ 6307 c AN=N CllY COUNCIL GaiRBE 62*rr Ba.RRY AND chmaty'KI Wtkn- 10Â®r. 10*,6. - & 2-2 6 te,1 + ~4 457 N m / AEAL AND AOCEPTANCE. . WIWEet, Prr HAND ANE) OFFIDALCAL. , .*k -IHIS CCeDÂ¥204 FLAT OF- F,VÂ®r' tueOVCION ANC) MYÂ¢câ€¢*ticiti{*# Â©Qi<m- i,Gi. cs. Â£ 9/0 - .f 941~~<~ti yh r 4- 1 Lfâ‚¬8 12.3%*.5=2:2:=Afc"mr= A , A 'la,4.2.* ' I~Â°F.hh."t-N TP'L Le# <re...-rvo- 1 t eutt e / 4 47 105 / / AL*w 1622&*<ffc=~ 90%&/ -9=1*7% 0510 20 204050Â® 70 BOFT t clÂ¥2 CU*7- Â· 25 7 1 0 / 4-4 0/4/ AÂ·[60*& ~~--~~lc .., e,9 CITY ENGINEERM AFFROWN- 13,RKS> APPROVAL SCALE. 1.-20 1 1 :49 4%-- .43/#&A,F. / 4,1 %* 44,16(ty\1 /4*<5 .'t..9.fl.4,102-(3#9' --- AFFIe)'ED er-,%Â·ECFr( Mtâ‚¬!ACLK Â¢91<7'A#EN,~~EE AFffÂ©,2.5 2341'JEitSEMA#Thâ‚¬NT Of fÂ»43&,CITT or 1,116Â·SUB@Me:K:* 1NT- 0- egiE Â£*LEDMICION Wâ€¢m 14* ti:*~,~*3*PLRE Or MEE *1243*eCM Web 9*EEN AZIMLJO,1 WJ:le . CWNEK + \~ F)Â£'Pet ..04*- 1 litÂ¢*kn --- or COIDKADD -THIC>_.gaermy aft.z@â€¢~--r ,#54, 111â‚¬3261 (WOFC<10â€¢Â¥L__...t'78. errl Or.,er=N 30 1 -/-/ c \~2*WL-1- 20 SCUTH EN.ZNK SPRCET P=0452,0. AWEN, CZYÂ£*em *41 V][CIN][TY MAP 13# Miv f ~ ./- 2 Â¢174' ENSINkeR... 1=MT =ri---- 7 Â·*V I UNFLATTED LAND PLAWN]NG 6 30NINS P 4 16 ~Â·" -~~F~ff ~ COMMISSION APAÂ«NAL N~FlÂ»EE MOK REC]ORDING 01*NEKâ€¢ MI-â„¢ 0415 HAMmollf 3000 COWÂ¢*00 AWENUE -INIS OUE[)!V{SON PWa' PARIer' 8080#15Â©hi We 11}tel MT or-PARRY#u*,~eiON 15 /022,1CD rog 44 \ AFT. 230 APPNEC),CID erÂ·7HECUVCY,efs' PLANNire FILING IN-1*â‚¬OmereFfHECEÂ«*MP MQZ)*$49F %i <tri- r#*2 ~912 - \ 1 =ULD.C=Â£-CO 505 cavt;AteeON Thle-22-OA'farL--,U,661_....2975Â· 2111:IN al.NlY, 0012804;10. *1ID-N-~2( g,:,JWM., 1118, IN.1 0<4 - AlÂ· f-r...0~ '- 4 i N ~ i tk .4.Â· d",4~Amic, 2@57GU 1! OiNKMAN i 6,/6 61*Â£6 CITY etiope, 1 agE=E22~~ 3 Abtft=- , . -14 2 *fi'L - i \188851 .... 3%-â‚¬915 1 -1 . - JCB Na-)567Â·2 f boo K U ray_ 1 Â£_ '1. 17 .t4%* 1.14 . ~ 1 1Â£:,T I â€¢ fÂ©WNEKâ€¢ Morm,r 01;'fiZiat , ,-- MotEâ‚¬, 0,wq, AWDACZ}Sul . ' fLOTZ A CWNCKâ€¢ -MIGMAÂ© 2!IAROODJ, 48 MEr NATOÂ«. ~NE j ene. / l ) ;rAs rAT N78'09'If .(Pe l \~ ouap/ VA,3/ON,00)(,3,~ aFEN, 0081,1, -- - 026/104'r NOCH UNE OF *MUGEAIX SIEET CXTEikED V- 4 435Â· i . Lar 1, 4 ' aM'54'46'/ 775 79 e!5TLE CRZEK 901Â¥1:04 ; FINAL PLAT OWNEK. . it . :IA,KA R. 0WUCK 1 1~~-w---- .-- CK-Etr410. sÂ»,00=,t 77&77 teurt 1.00 454 1 PARRY SUBDIVISION Us. eess GAr (1954) I j Â¥4~%=61:'R.' 1--/4 SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4 NW M AND IN TEE NE 1/4 / 0 / i 1% M SW 1,4 OF SECTION 12. '1'OWNSHIP --le SOUTH, RANGE 4 / t < , UNFLATTO LAMP 85 WEST Cy TE[E SIXIE.PRINCE*fAL MERIDIAN. 3 V \70\ & MME ~N~ WEON M., OWNEMO â€¢ CITY Oy *SPEN. -mleRADO 3-6 , i , 0 -ZI k 4 11 63& 11Â§\ Cle,\ 1 1400 MON,â€¢,00 03â€¢.RKWW DENVEK, 0OtOMADO 80220 / ' CWKICK AND SUBOIVICZ~ 1;7[Seat.Â·~40 838WZYDR 2Â¢ 6 Lar i \ 4 7 \hs f.a aCK 1130 9. t. GOEE 68*r B~REY AND Â©ASÂ»4 1Â¥11â‚¬rT *Mkrf lm-CO Mâ€¢NAGndENT teCD< 1-77 A z \ A:FEN, COUJ~CO 60â€¢ 1 ~ 61&11 303Â·9519 5092 /4 ~ 0*LEB~TLECNCI< ~~09 wr. \ 1,3 \ -3|4 GR:iNâ€¢ZR('1**2% =rr \ r'.3 i .'444Ld'Â· p . i WAN, A:.1 MEN Dr'-'MED, FeeZNÂ·P511Â·i,Nreslier 'III 1:444'm: ... * . ' 5DKTEMENT OF OUDOMÂ©ION / \ 1 1 ..11 lili lili ii'illitilizi t- 1 PICPERTY DEDCRIPTION AND GRANT OF EASÂ£MEN-m ATM,CT or LAND &7UNIC) IN -FMr- 2Â£1.31rloâ€¢Â£El" Ql#TEN Cr-HE MCel'*er QL,~IEA AND IN-IME ele.NT DRRY NO C~NOD'N U.grr #ger BONS 1 1 1/ \B \ NC]griEAN CRUARTEK CDr-Thi[ tramiWEST Â©UNETEK 1HCOW'blne> Or'TME *M Seceles> Fl~iL CE 2*Et\ON 12, 100*-%Â¥' 20 ta.rfet. met 86 \ Ref'r OfÂ· TME aXTH Mel,408#L MER;01~N, (DIN cr 0 AÂ©PEN, FITKIN COUNTW, CatiCÂ»Do, Molt MJILY 8 HEREBY m.gr Â»40 tiOMNÂ©E -1Â¥,(r Kal. egregN IMENCRIM UNE Cl' 590Â§6,LOK snizer =Xr=rl[ZO 2> 1-113â‚¬Dr SIMANT 1011-12 Crf Crâ€¢ A,PrN Â·THE 0~CAME) At) ~liolvb . =JfTS=Â©3*W==429== SeS NNUNG /â€¢T A MDINT- 1046 11MC INÂ·Â·rOC~mC,4 or MtoT,Ly /NOTME CrNWKUNC <7 C,~LE CRZE NON- DCUJÂ©ME 5*2O104T 10, A,BLIC *16,(r orr *UND.3%YuÂ©%~37%LaNÂ° W.*i 1 -411~%61#B< $ F 401' ea9541 440 C 775.79 1~ 1 ~366$*Airtit#/61#~% TMENCE 64Â©991 1 FECE ,Â«NG ThE l gr , ------------<meÂ»- 1 c~NIERLINIE <OF'Ca~r C'96 E,9][MZ>4-T OVEnt AND ,â€¢12%055 41.1*â€¢32â‚¬ "51,0,45 l'HENCE 517Â°141'N 99.Â·< reC-,40* Cr LOB ! AND 1 CriNE, Wmilll 10 BeD OF ~~2393â‚¬44>~ %%\ 372 CRUE* 0 %140 g,WetRME> Aty, 5#15pb 1-1-ENEr Â©ti~g f&.24 Feer MaNS SND 14Â© 245 EkOJM Â»AD ~Â·CZD Â¥(EkÂ»\i t 4 \ CDN,UNC -T-KEKEE .ee*Â°495 0.03 FEET Ate:43 6%0 .9 212*2~282At-~411Ir 14 C]947ZRLNE 331,â‚¬'NÂ¢iZtemON \41-11-1 THE NORjH CNE of FRATÂ£16 5?TNCT MHÂ·Cr 5,â‚¬/MEN' tleoateD C.EcrRE Atfle TELCMÂ·CNE LIN,=, \- 1-3% tf?Dâ‚¬ED \R'e:9/522< i le i - # 94 / f \3\ ......=ZI INE Â· 1 - Wdl- 1HENCEL 554Â°43'c. 2307.05 FEm- Ate,49.SNO -THE>CZ Â»OR .00 Fal-ACKÂ» 542 29 921%67'16Qi,5/#*rk:*7%-t==3 CENIRL.11'27 ,Â© Uni. 17 5*CHEJITC> 1412Â£ KLT:it/Af NS 7HENCE NG**50% 89.02> r!=s- PL-Â·41 Ae, 5443(48-5 Â©lelÂ¥-15 1NtillkLLATEry AMP 1HENCE NOS#*dE 4105 FEET%Â·0-:Mti IviNNtÂ·eNCE CP 'Jeuvelt,ANP ,SM.,913!: 1 6 \ 81$ * -1 r.~ 1 + tt NetteOON Wilr! 2.40 , LINZ r,C L:-Tle&' -213En-!5/ 41Â·Tb.i THE REEMT -1:27R!,A \1 \ LOT 2 .- < OF â€¢3.*CAS 81EYET C.Â·JEN[zo INTUFÂ·,11â‚¬ 1Â¥WUS ANP KEel.Zrt ..Â· Â·tarqÂ·-IE;2 *!Th -THE FERre'l.,At_ Re-FT- cy INGe Tvj: ANIP 0 - 174 SREeÂ© TEN: INDDKU.â€¢.1104, WN,12'UNCE 2 f 1Â¤0\L. AREAÂ· 47,445.74 eQ. rr -THENCE NCYNÂ·LÂ·W 1 56.2 eEE- trrhE ANE} ePLICCAACNr S. al.-ti Ubart, 6,0 AREA IN Clellf CE<EK -4073 INTEReE(InON NIP-1 3,~IC KG~Â·FM UNE Pae,â€¢YXIS AND Ra-!TÂ© 544..1- ee UnLIZtp :14 - 00- f \4*A %8 " me-t =w. -90,I.1 O ttlt > r.l cr eÂ»Al)ed,LEr- 0-T,Ze; eXi'DICeD A NOÂ®ON,â€¢*LE Â·412 FA,Â©047 UW>*NZK, NET AMA 24115.78 29.rE 1 1 - THENCE N.75â„¢' 04 164.(09 fâ‚¬Er AU>'13 5.10 94, 0 *~~ ,Â·gn. N 8.)BUS R,aW -2~45.25 ~ ~'~t~'~' * k WEeTURLY Are- L.Na tiME FOINT OF ECE,Nht#421Â£ 1 112 1 co:*INF 4 2.278 /(Erâ‚¬y, kÂ·JOKS JIt 1.15Â©25. * . t CM.NER) 1112,2 +,Ele, ANIP AÂ®ate OF L.ANCD / -#b _PLAIN garâ€¢ j WING NICKThERC# 3 akitleÂ·( St,SAVIEâ€¢ON 4 Wb,Ch N ret @W cr TME RE:ZEâ‚¬NtN OF >f 40 111\ Z. t < UNFLANED WID INk, PLAT 9.x:4 7,+E (imE Or ':ZNCARY LANE' D 06.Not- suRveroles crxrlnc,â€¢TE P&/ ACC/tti 1. /644 1\ \4 0 #66*# 1. UUâ‚¬5 r RAGER REE@1151to,mo 1,4â‚¬7 :UND:004 AL,L /5 6,12WN ANCD NJTEC> tÂ·IE~mON. GALL/6 30(At -7*238 HERte~r COmfY -~IAT 1 rtâ€¢,t: PKEPARS71,Â® PLATCy LkliaTED RDICION, O / ~-9%~1*ww= ~ ~1 4~ i t RZZIJNNI%% -mi:218=2 1%56 MMY.Favt 4&5*LE Â¢jerEK \ 1\ tr 231 AT MAG;a feD * CD 4: 425//5:Â£6#4% %*9F,04 RZ3'kt~, 66*Â£#47 M~,PP<K 5Uer)ME40,4 2\ ~22-#96%~%*%. 1 1Â· A. Pam 41 AND IMAT 1HC FLKMAD <fle[ AND 1Hr â€¢43405, 0...45'g - 2/ 7â‚¬ \ 1 4 itt 41 fs. k egÂ®m kit*f fAF*Y,OwPveR~~ CON,DRM 10 -NZE SÂ»1<253 ON -IHE GZLNE' IN eÂ» V /4/ 2 / 016 1 434 j 1075, 3,11.1 * Aenct.2 el. 01*1-C Or COLOKADO e NIC]REÂ»CE WITH OXIWCO KCV== STPWIED wkÂ©ARÂ¥;an.1 ~gi\ t A * LUÂ·,12 Or ~Â»Ce / CCUâ‚¬V Cr Â¥'I-IKZN 499*14 4 4 1 & Br, 1 , < arkÂ£17- 2*71:r,490 - - ~ <1*/4/ e Â»/1 3 %12 1 0 @RANTOP SMÂ¢504Â£,AS WABAONJVI#kED*5E~t> 50010 Jdp - Bcock, L.5. 9104 -IHE FOREeD#Â·G CITAAEUr,fr cle el)Â¢Bile,KiN AMP ME THS /91400Â¥0!'Â· _ 1,LW-_,19-3 8Â¥ .: 15207 tg ZifC 6 7 4%391 AÂ©PEN CITY ODUNCIL Stlee WAR BARRY AND CN@$19'41 M~77 Â¥Â®f'. Â¢~ / Abc> &422 ped & 04\ w \ 6 6 ./* 3* 0 ,NMMROAAL AND KXIFEANCL . WITWEZe kff' MAND ANÂ© OFFUAL Â©UL. in t're , r w â€¢* e 1Hte trie)0Â¥29(44 M./AT Cy luef eLeOÂ¥1204 ANC) -&â‚¬ emNâ‚¬F cyr speever& Aft 0 14Â¥ CO*litleM*4 2*IKE,4 â€¢47. 1, 7 980 _. <Uh:,4~ . .-1, jr, 0,7 4 ,-4 ~467* V- . ,442.xx,Â£~> 2~IME Â»Pa4Â¢01Â¥ DiV#,il~% __~OL [Ar CFT'dh'"Ak i 1512.- f , .CAL:Z// 1 6 1 0 5 10 X aa 40 80 40 To aorr MM 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 -- 4.81 0, 10'r. --6444 CITY 046!NEEK'b Arf'lek frae MPRO#â€¢L MALE- 1'-00' 120 A 4/4 4 Â¢r 6 /jt>Â« f~~~Â©Â¢~~\â‚¬f\ 19Â¢2 ti.EDÂ©/2,01 %12[ M*RefÂ· *Weete~ *Â·D 2Ml~ ue. te *244 4-*) . D~;52*r&#~#FLF 4#VIELV ELiMUnl MAJ<K'. CWNS< â€¢ i -< or couÂ»09 4Â·1~LUiki:*v' atihi~_,S7 ~ Dker 4 r trw- / Crâ„¢ Or,er'EN // 2,0 es:urM 6,4.ndA sierET P.J:01,829# - +806\, <SM*Fin SAM ,~t: c!-R aaÂ·hz VRJINITY MAP 74 -/1. 1. UNPLATTED LANED PLANNING 4 mNN3 OWNICMâ€¢ COMMISSION APPRCh/AL hOCaÂ°*!Â»ICE FOR REX*DING \\4 ' SETâ„¢ L.14â€¢IC HWUOUR. THIS eueOM/ION PWCr PARIEÂ¥ 8020MeloN '0645 'THS PLAT OffMK)6160%810# IS,ACFECD FOR iÂ·OR Â· 4 .. 24~6&#4"Ago Â£"AVul: APPIO8 OrTHECTVOF,el?94 PLANNif PFUNS IN IHE O179CE 00"MHECERK.4149 1~320#4,OF \ co.AwleÂ©laN -TMIÂ©~2.-DAY or.-6(UNL-,17& PrTION Clou#TY, ColaMPO, 1Â¥11*L.~Lmef 0!L~114, \~ 1 1 'U .0 '46~,4,0,52:U 2037- I li CHAJKMAN 1 ~0&Â¥F ..:L Ctrik Â»42 Egâ„¢JET C\TV or'OPS .....................--......... --- \\\\ Aby '- â€¢B \ Â· 9.\ \ :1% \ / 4 7 1 *4 . I > -a - J Ze}<018Â·67Â·2 1 ' W 69.15 E-book (.6- role- 1 4-7 ./ ---- \ i \ ' \\1 ~ LEGEND AND NOTES 1Â·.20 O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED N O UTILITY BOX 20 40 â€¢ SURVEY CONTROL. TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BYÂ· ONE POOT CONTOUR'S 1 1 ~ u COUNTY TITLE INC A CASE NO PCTI6365f DATED: SEPT 200 LOT 1 ~ SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 2/02 1 1 1 1 2 1 9184 -- i i U / - 0 57Â· w 1 4 55 A OF ARI L 4 / / 20,5 5 % / / /1 . 1 .mp{~MEEmt:Ge/52 - - /0. \ XFMR N or 42 W 11.80Â· 0 ' ./ ID 0 1 r=du-u . ./ ./ : ~*TUY&),g#%.-555 '06 \ 4.. â€ž0'r ./4 . 4_ GRAVEL. 1 ~ 4 k / F.-2 le DR i vE i J ,~~â€¢rt~,-1 . 40Â· PRIVATE ACCESS AND 1- 1 44' 1 -~T-1 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT INCLUDES 81( 201 AT PAGE 180 /1011 / L ACCESS EASEMENT AND - 1/0 1., GRAVEL DR:VE V \ & 348 PG r,2 SEWER EASEMENT .18' I .09 AND PARK 5 fâ‚¬4 .3 â‚¬ -1 < 1 J' lk. 1 1 /~1. 66<41 ~ SEE BOOK 707 IT PAGE 220] ~ 1 . ~4 FOR HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ,Â© C.L. d.abl f,/ / h 0/ RELINQUISHMENT IU --5 21<:ETIOfl .i A.. 1 1 1 1 5 13' 6. ~1 00 9-,1/1\ , 1 J ex 1 - 1 I \ 1 / 1-5.46 ..c. n 0 .. 2 / /\ 3 LOT 2 . \ 1 1 -- 1 \ 2 . - 5 a ~-3- N~ AREA - 47.446 SO Fr. ./- -417* z o $ . \1 - 1-4 ~ g ~~stÂ° .' GRAVEL \ 2 RECORD OVERLAP ,~ ~ ~~ ITCH HEAD GATE :t / DECK, HOUSE 55 DRIVE & | Fle-62 1 - \ Ill 2 / 1 1 1 -3 > /,6, / .' .-. -. I. 2 Â» 1 \ \ I EDGE OF /10*4 so 1 21 7 / rf- Â· re-~ p,wÂ·Â·--- --Â· -- . ,j % TREES -1 *'\ f / 9.i : . . *18,1 1 fo i >,97 'g / ILL 100 - 1 1 ./ =sop= 1 04 11 i : E)05;Tb 9 0 P50â‚¬S' DECK-Â· 4,â€¢rn.6 /7// ~ - , >. L I. 440 - . U 0 - SECTIO H. 0 - ' 1 . . ---2-ee:Nr- 78? â€¢2-d' 41> 0 ; :p 1-4-~ 1 - 4444 O WEL . _ . -1 f 0 \/t /v, P' 9 CERTIFICATION Gisele T 1 2 'lip~LgNS:l9~EJkN~LÂ·*23&.RtAMÂ©#RTY DE~~~0~~DI~~E~C~~TE 0 *.5-Â· BASED ON THE,#6#240 ##'ee#*i MS SHOWN. IND THAT THERE ARE NO , 4. 5% \ 1 (90 - - 8 1Â·gle, AMÂ¢'ID 28 21*UKUS/ .4 D 1 SCREPANC Ing@INMB!0107<MINDARY L I NE CONFL I CTS ENCROACHMENTS .$#ee;&:A~.1 / FRIENAINÂ¢E~'AND...00aIMMT,$.Epl RECORD NOT SUPPL IED TO THE 46 EASEMENTS 0*(*119'0~*fcal F I ELD EÂ¥ I DENCE OR KNOWN TO MEE .... I.-% 4, .... ~.,Uâ€¢'Â·â€¢C. EXCEP T AS *5*lear SHaWN tamE'~ROUND UT ILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND 4 -.91- WI TH THE *t'OF 7AE BURveeÂ¥ BELOW SURVEYOR ,125*(4Rbdil/THIZ~BRVEY I Vol D UNLESS WET STAMPED TOP F SLOPE CS JOO YE,~ FLOOD PLAIN AND ~ ~~ 4.p j JEr HOWORTH Â»WOGUMÂ·5947 <22, 4 4: I. 25947 ~ Ptl D WAY FROM C TY OF ASPEN FEMA MAP (SCALE , /0. 4 1 A ./ 2 r 66/-- , * 9 - -fzz -- 4. 0 1 00 00.e / 5 6* 0% f 16 WIDE WATER L IE EASEMENT ' -- - yVE RHER.--425!DENCE= '800* :39 PAGE 320) .- ~25947 30 34.59 W C (e - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BRIDGE f t oF UOT 2. PARRY SUBDIVISION. ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 28 1978 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 124 AS RECEPTION NO. 205766. _ ~ - CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF P MIN STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALINA STREET AVEN COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 LAW YOU MUET CO!*aCS ANY LE-L J08 Â· ~~~Â·- ~~~E:{Fis* DATE 2/02 23022A - 1~~~ / l~ 3At-rj . BAKER FALLIN 4//-21 >097Â·1 Ac,0'72Â»Â¢ ' -5Â·27 45.t . <t ASSoct-Kra INCOWjÂ«*1:ED ARCHIECIUKEAND PLANNING JoHIR.BAKER AIA RICHARD A. Fxi,UN 4=-g_. ~ ~=101 - HARRY A. Grne IÂ»ms R WmvER 1 *E*>-- -Â» '4 . R.=Rav#295**e*r i , ~Â¥:2==EÂ»2.7 19 1 ASPEN, COLOkADO 81611 30 SAWMILL COURT P. 11 970/925-4252 1 , 1 FAx 970/925-2639 Poer OFIcE Box 2902 t 1 )471=4 1 - ------- -- - + ' Fil970/963.2359 s r. x LM - ~1 | â‚¬ GUI,1,00' SPR[NGS. CO 81602 41 4 2#41'Af 1, | 970/963-2305 | ~ /.7 v -w~Lizerfallin-com -2Â»056--1=..1 E- -1 -1114-=..74*%:Â»mippt--- -, - 1,1_ , fÂ°i - 12.--_57<22*4:'fAL,FE Ak._ 1' ..2.~ 'LL=--DiHOZL=~621*L-1---_23~1--Â· - 1 13 . i ./%/// 1 4 4- Ly 1 1 4 4*m~ge~Â»Cly=37227-=nn..22-7I-77_. ..... 1 - ------- -- 1- -4 --- =t /1. a 1. ~Â»7â„¢9.luâ‚¬.1.Â§-_.3_ 2--i~g*Â«Â», Rup g *I=ex-4- 220,4---- --2-*-rE-aWM*Z.INB-2-41__.~ _ ___ __ }- ra' st- . - -- Â·' _=s~r[Gle=zi._ - -- 1. _.li 1 1 ENT.NEXYâ‚¬%2.-7- --- ' ~';' 1 34 , 1 276,fi-Z---- 6- L. i 1 1.. -=20Â¥6=1 . It i 3 11 1 f- -%2%15-Elt40 71= -- i ~ i -3 -Ic.ri.Elll._22 _ j ' ' Â·Â· , 1-_ --1-2 1 3 2,/ , 11 1 11 0 1 Ill 1/1 i -1-Li TEL/ZE,EP_UI_~_. : -ege-1.Ine....._-- - 1 -44-4 1-=go r =LzetnEK<32560745 L.29Â»1 1 __bo~d<F-7 It "L=U : -i Â» 1./4...1--il -414/9~31 1 -=48*4*09//Ma....1- ./Cl lili 1 4714 T-1 i * 2 1.1 2 9 i rn I' 6 n T :117 1 1 -4== ------ ,=46.* - ...0< *F-7-N 'r:98~-*.,.1/Z 1 1 =P- F _nk - j \ f -/ D -7 : 1 1 8 44 , 11 L=-2 -# 77<,.. -L'% ~1_u '. -_ 1- -=~ 2 1, * - A ...~w~Uale*h~,bk~,-i i 1+7 ' =1~*7~1~~*~~~46'.M~:*~~~ '~ (3>3 h . 11 'Ill , 1Â»fATEU 7 7.- 'Ial:k--:8%840- -FT- - -4 \ '1 . 1 4 7 Itt -S' . V It i.1 * , I ~._ f=exii< L:~~222- 1 . 11 b.. 1 - r . 1.1 .:' I - 11 31-.-.-i----- ------ ---- - 1-r-lf --- 1[ 1 | t VISIONS 11 .t -Zim*E.--- f 1, 0 ~ 1L Imjrn-,u=IIZ,ECIZEhAmISCEZZL~~~2-~--I-- .-- _. ~~ _ --- I : __. /8 NUMBE]i Â·2(26 r L-- A--- H _21-_ _DATE... 1%2:481.,34.-00 M 1 0-0 ... DRAWN BY _JAVy' 2.-1,A L..17 _t t'h, 2%--33.1.0 >r-1- .w( -.- 2~-rzl- -ED.JILE_.- -6.-CD -ID._L.77.1 0 -PH -2-,_.-0 --_- ... ' 2- flme=Br MAP 1-7 Â©D-1.B-- 0.23 ~ 1 _ or 1 1 9'h:+44 J\.22)01~Â·4 \-47\0Â»4 ---- --1-1/9 'd.-tÂ« . T C--QUO Ar<'C> Â£2 .._ _ 1.. J 1 -- OF SHEEIS . AssoaKIEs INcoppoRÂ£Eg ARCHnECIURE AND PLANNING FT:T---1 R?CHARD A. FALLIN HARRY A. GARNER - *- ~ ..-/ 1* Joix E. BAKâ‚¬L AIA i Jans R. WEAVER 33=11 m ~ 7 4Â» 8-[LU-IN 11--_---_ IÂ«=i H 30 SAWHILL COUM i ASPEN, COWRADO 81611 Fa970/925-2639 970/925=1252 ' Foer On= Box 2902 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ,---------1 970,'963-2305 : ' F.ix 970/963-2359 i LLIZIZEZLEZzlttlt-=1#%*i ~. - '- .- - I- . 41 1 1 !1// I E \\11 I 1 n m F 1 -_-__ ~ 1, -- m B EE / u:6*757--4 - - u5ria BhiLL Â· i :Â· Â·r- - 7/ -_t--EN5211_._ *660 --Â·Â·-2;qlâ‚¬TE:5 2 -- - 1 -zE/CEE#HIL -WIN-.._ ... __ _ ~ __U~,x.,1_he--- U NE' 1 1 1 -- - - - - - 1 1 1 4 1 111 --~---ill, . 1-K% 4 ----4 -- - - -4------ ---- ----- -- --1-L---4. ---- - 3-Z~_ . 1.21_--.--CL- f..El.:.--U .6.-I._ L.Olf-774 -15 -Af --/I-rT--- t *-tÂ»at--Â·-- UÂ»-12- AEU 2 1 1 1 010 11 1 1 -10Â«2 6~--=7---2 . [2! , . murn9- r- ......M- 1 It Pqotl- 1-U*ifÂ·*LIMe 7.- u! 1 1*6423 j 1 _.MEN#TA#E 1 -11 11 - t --3-7-; / E-#-- -1 I L -fAP----- - I 11 ILL 71 1 11 1 1 41 1 --~7.,att 2.711_~ InE-im 141 Ill i al ~ 7 k li' + 1 b I *&*#.42 1. .+ I I IRI!11.. Â£ 1111/]11 .- - i 1 -1 1 Ill -zE=*2 +0,4- 1 1.!9~ 11 = 1 11 1-4 1 -4-L 4- 1 P Ii-<'-2 A 4 --* 4 2 1 ---- -- JOB NUMBEN â‚¬139- 11*fiC-_FSÂ©_2*,fSDE Mil 11 - 1 1 Â· ' 1 - 1 CIECKEIi BY- AAE_' 7-7 2-2 -- - V _.cruÂ«orz~es'cz-LorLÂ·41 56.-t J.~2167-AsT_-99\,....MX>1Tr0n=A_-___ _. ~- Fy#ip-U.~,1841- -2/ZE*445Â£738AC 474;/71-'ElmÂ·*------- 7--1 -- ~~71-97_5-- 2-.-In-1- _-9 .12_L--15.-U_Af Tf--I.~- 4EID+Vf.2177 --- - Irt_~--2-flit--I- .iff fi ----~ ~- Â· 12*4*-1...1411.2622___12 LEL_2./.--1 D i V 1-1 D DÂ£?LIXEA FALLIN .. ASSOCLUES I,iCORPORArED ARCHrrECIURE AVI F>LiNIMG 67Â«Â»11 - JOIN R.BAKER, AIA Ric/ARD A.IALUN \-\Â«// -r ; ~7K~ HARRYA.G.gNER JAMES R. W.IMER rh 5 -- .1 -,MS:6.*L -+2Ef%/dk--2-2=- I ~A-#-4 433%Â» 0= //tv// **2..t Â»re'Â»-1- 30 Sj,MILL Courr AEFEN. 0010800 816U . S.IL__r<MUY ,-i-,1 K - )bz 970/925-4252 6/.2-- Ax 970/925-2639 POE ONFICS BOX 2992 a 41' GLE'WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 'CAÂ·leAL..- -/ht -,Â·lakerfaI].om 1-1 1'11Ii ~kifil-HIER]ill#40##EFE,Er:.I- /0,18$/ ~~~~ - - Fax 970/963-2359 970/963.2305 -4 -', + -- â€¢fâ€¢ .r ~ 11~k._Â£~ rk=~aut.uziN .=0 . 4\ . r - ' f .U.12 1. , .Â· t=-1 77 / i ill\ 1// / 1. - 11 1/ i 9 -4 -- --- ~ ~it ~ ~ 11 '1 24 4.-0 1 1 11 ;11 \//1'f # -0ecT -1-/---------'-i--zatwr,gWZI- ~**=*622~r'*,re--- - 7 1. 1. U- . , b - .* 2:6,=ll,2~u_,4(=Â£_._.'k2.e\25.-96.-_-4-_._-- - 1 '.11 1 1 H 1 1 , r f 11 1- ' ~ ' i .. 1 ~-: ---. -I ). ~ .#. -/ V V ->B~*Dt-/2 r/\NIMP?/r>rÂ»gl Â©comed p'iÂ«FDEB-217--751-74&MÂ£*F~~--:ACIP-rrl-,R--7.--Â·---9 ----- - .. 2/7;44 .4, p '/40 a l1Â·-77' -- - - f REVISIONS Jon NURBER- -,ZIZUT - DATE Fea 42272 1 DRAWN BY JAW -~- - - 1 -ChmcxED BY 808 - - U OF SHEEIS MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: City Engineer Zoning Officer Housing Director ............. Parks Department I. ........... Aspen Fire Marshal City Water Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Building Department Environmental Health Electric Department Holy Cross Electric City Attorney Streets Department Historic Preservation Officer Pitkin County Planning County & City Disaster Coordinator FROM: James Lindt, Planner Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5095 Fax-920.5439 RE: 501 Sneaky Lane Stream Margin Review DATE: 2/20/02 DATE OF DRC MEETING: 2/27/02 REFERRAL SCHEDULE APPLICATION SENT OUT TO REFERRAL AGENCIES* 2/20/02 WRITTEN REFERRALS DUE 3/6/02 Thank you, James Lindt ATTACHMENT 1 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen, pursuant to Ordinance 57 (Series of 2000), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner' s time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until ali costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. y>J/\ ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and50\ 4 v.2.,AB~ L.-Av~Â·.t L.L. C (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 6-4*ta- hkA<LbÂ» (Ltv &211 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 600 which is for 4~#3-< hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By:c, L./ U U 1,19 / ' V ,- Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: j , A-4 \ 2 1.- Mailing Address: 1 1,\ L,# 00 i * 0-0 ..9, 4 *,4<. lIt D D U11 \Aâ€¢â€¢i FLA-c,4 \ FLO,t<00 33\31 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 r=y, il r \ A ~ LEGEND AND NOTES 1.-20' O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED ~ I 1 UT ILITY BOX Cl 0 20 40 TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: ONE FOOT CONTOURS + SURVEY CONTROL A PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. CASE NO. PCT 16365F DATED: SEPT. 11 2001 LOT 1 SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 2/02 . TREE \ f 9184 -- - -- -- S 87' 5 57- E 134.55' BASIS OF BEAR I NGS 1 -- -- -- 1 20151 -- / /13\ \ /0. \ XFMR N 07' 42 * W 11.80 i. .1 - \ 0/ben \ / / in\ . </le DRIVE j Ula l GRAVEL 3 40' PRIVATE ACCESS AND m -- 1-1 \44*\ PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT Z 1 \42 1 1 INCLUDES BK 201 AT PAGE 180 -1 / ACCESS EASEMENT AND o GRAVEL DRIVE 4 AND PARKING BK 348 PG 112 SEWER EASEMENT /14// 4 J ~ 0 < m SEE BOOK 707 AT PAGE 220~ m u 01 do FOR HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC /'76 a RELINQUISHMENT . 1 16- 1 1--m 1 AO.\ 1 0> 9%6 5.3 <0 / E\\A\ 184. 35.48' W.C. ~<~ \ 5 \\.0. U. 1 20 g WE Â¢4! 1 / /\ 5 LOT 2 -- ADDRESS -501- *ALK :96= AREA - 47.446 SO.FT. ./- , /%1 S - > 1 < < RECORD OVERLAP DITCH HEAD GATE DECK HOUSE 55 DRIVE m ' GRAVEL I a ellimill 1 5.5 0, 4 0 / 1 4,1 g * 2 -Â» Ir 1 dil / 0 0 \\ EDG~ - \>t~ 0 / 50 W TREES ~ . _ . \IN 13 * \ 1- 1 0 g,2 0 SILL 100 - CÂ© j M . 9ECK 25 . 2 ~- TR~ESOF ~ ~-4 Â· - 4 i 00 \\ + j / 20) /9/ W- \ 2 \ / 1 Z to A C l. Cky *%/f \1 \\\19 1 O WELL 8 ~ ' /04 4\\ . \ 1 / ~ c~ ~~/' Â© CERTIFICATION 0 632 ~" THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS O%. \11 \ FIELD SURVEYED DURING prUT'~~ Qut.COI 2002 AND IS ACCURATE / /1 0 \\ L BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO -- 6,#640>4.2 - 1 4 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. 14. -- EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. 1 , â‚¬ EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND / APPURTENANCES. AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EX THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE S*\\~~i@%94, VEYOR BELOW. 1 /1 .,r k., DATED: .009~OR<'4.6.22> QUi Yalf'%74 1-4 4 P JOHN M *~*RT:594Â·1 ~2.f 1.1 %41 â‚¬Â¥ t./ 6 TOP OF SLOPE IS 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND ~ , 11/ -4 FLOODWAY. CITY OF ASPEN FEMA MAP (SCALED) 9/4.21 ue, '/N +4 25947 Ry 24#' 'S~ -F- \V / JO 4 -4- 16 WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT i (BOOK 189. PAGE 320) - 25947 30 34.59' W.C. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND ~ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BRIDGE OF LOT 2. PARRY SUBDIVISION. ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 28. 1978 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 124 AS RECEPTION NO. 205766. CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN DATE JOB YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERT I F I CAT I ON SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 2/02 23022A SURVEYOR. 99 1 \ ---.-i \\ A - 1 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 1Â·Â·Â·. 1.0- . 0 1--20 r. O UT ILITY BOX EY 2/02 F i--red 19WFÂ»*EP b'MM,r KA A PA,-1061 ' 1 IiI Ce:Kh 004.+ / 5..? 94 S CALE 9= 2-d' Am'rtail - I - 12209- rexr. -1 116.1 7 2 ) GIll .-7-Jâ‚¬:tytte 7621= ji..0,0. 'ION HE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 512< )AILY .2002 AND IS ACCURATE S SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO DARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. DROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND *F RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE iIRVEY I S VO I D UNLESS WET STAMPED i BELOW. 6.2,512 MC 2 T SURVEY AND GIN REVIEW )RD I NG TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED ,T PAGE 124 AS RECEPTION NO. 205766 PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH SALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 mila: wi, ir,l Q .1-A i r,+ ini FII , r,!.Cl y Ccal,e AFTER 40#rRIP,GRarÂ¥6=M DEFECT . IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION . DATE JOB BASED UPON ANY DERECT J N HIS PLAT BE COMMENÂ¢ED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THEÂ·OATEFOF, THE CERT IFI CAT ION SHOWN. HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION-13'Â¥*W IF NOT Â·WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 23022A SURVemRÂ·. . ~. ~ - 2/02 u t~ ' ' '~ 7 I â€¢ 0 .1 . DO 0 - D 0 .4 1 . I .. 1.1 1 . 1 . .0 0 0 .1 D . C . .... -:, 0 1 D . 4 /Â£0 v ,-li .-1 4 . i. a , D- il- , D .. D : 0 4 .4 0 . 0 0. . . 0 .- .... L. ---a~ il 0- #, 1 - a ....... 'y*# filliliHilillilligilleilillilillrillillillillia m."1'--- I E. les,il........1 8 1 1 .f@ I .~ J T " I . 0 . r . . , %0~ 4 - 1 1.4 1 11 1 C ,\ 11 D. D 0 10 9 77 - =.0 D . . . 1$ , I .... I O Â· -- -- 2%)31.0 f I '- . i ./ 4 1. 46< 1 0 D . 0. 1 0 0. 0 0. 00 , A r . U .* . I . D .. I . . .0 . f /4 0 .. 4..0 4 ... . I I. 0 I . - - 1 \[ r 1.4 * \ - 1 \N 1 " 5 1 i.-it Â«11 \ 1 A I. .... . 1 . . 0 .. 0 . .. D. $'. . ' ' ''- ' '' I LEGEND AND NOTES 1 -20 0 FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED : H*' ~ 0 UT ILITY BOX 4 SURVEY CONTROL 0 20 40 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. ~ ~ TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: CASE NO. PCT 16365F A SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 2/02 ~ ' LOT 1 ~ ~'t DATED: SEPT. 11. 2001 \\ i b: / 1 , i 9184 - \ i i r-- - - - - 1 S 87'05'57 i 4.55' BASIS OF BEARI GS // 20151 - -- 1/ --0 4 i /I 3 1 _ 4 1 ~FluIR N 07 42- W 11.80 =t , 1.1 i 4 t. Tod _ 2 - / 8 -*ra~rfgACE:-4< - - -J 8 R rMâ„¢â€¢EP 15Â· ~ -*~- GRAVEL 1 * 1j Â· I,â€¢Ppt,Â·Â·tâ‚¬~4Â· .. ; 6*er ZA i / < *eff DRIVE i / * 40. PRIVATE ACCESS AND .4 - - -- - JEF ~'y<Ze' 19' , /1 1 . 1 * t. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ,/ , , 77.J< Â¢/4 /1 1 - INCLUDES BK 201 AT PAGE 180 .OECK.1 E p , 130 -4 rwF ACCESS EASEMENT AND ~~-~ 3 ~ GRAVEL DRIVE BK 348 PG 112 SEWER EASEMENT . 18' AND PARKING .' \45. 1 ",4 4 02 9 0 1 . 4 9/ FOR HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ~> 1 SEE BOOK 707 AT PAGE 220_~Â·.1 ili ~ ~ ~ \ 4 1~ 1 ~ . O461TLE CREEK / I , 1 RELINQUISHMENT GA . 1 >- i / 1 i 5 6 2.,TIOH - A. _... â€ž ----scrte Yan* ~2 40+~ ~ I a.z-Â·,Â·. ~ 5 3 / 8 \9 / /2#37 9 10.5 u. 184. 35.48' W.C. i % j \\.0. F 10 -9 0 LOT 2 - N a. P ADDRESS -501 - __ AREA - 47.446 SO.FT. ./- / m \ * - FIALK DW -0 I E ~ _. 2 ~-D I TCH HEAD GATE = - GRAVEL 1 RECORD OVERLAP ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ flol . ..... 1.J- V m g LE DECK HOUSE 5.5 DRIVE - r lit o 8.5' . - i l. 0Â£ 2313,W. 2-1. - i Ch 41 -4 0 - 1 0 1 9 Agernet-J .23 . 1 & 0 1 / M Q r. /d /1e . 2 - . 1- - - . d .-I I ' 1 61060 1220 ' rea -- TREES / 0 -I--* 016, ~._~ ~ EDGE OF \ 4 009 50 + f. Â¢ 1 7 9 9 91' lie) ,- 14 .F SILL 100 - M ' EDGE OF ~ ~ ~~ 9 LiU M 0 ... e 4. 98 & ..1, 0 0 1 / M i - SECT \ o H B f , -i 2 - ' St:ALE 76"= 1 1-0" . / f \\ 12. - l. Â» CERTIFICATION 01 3, 1 04 - 4 1 \01- \ t \\\ A ) TF~~L~N~st:~~~tÂ°,204Â§,i"TH~T~LM5 227RTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 098 \31 M,yrei 5 -- // '~ O BASED ON THE<*2Â®3 8Â¥**#SCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 7002 AND IS ACCURATE -- D I SCREPANC I ~ CON INDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS . f /1, â€¢% 0 * EXCEPT AS aE!*Eer SHOWN.â€¢alt;ElmROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND 98,864*~ - 1\ \ 98 / . .tÂ·0 -rite(9/AUÂ¥ *88 plÂ·Â¥fugeep EASEMENTS 0*id;*~*4*U FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. 2 * -*40 6065,59 2,FUE To 85 4,1,â€¢+42'60 APPURTENAI*Ea'ANC. MMUÂ·*F RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE T SURV0*If BELOW. WITH TI~ *F- F~ SURVEYOR *RE? XC TH ISESBRVEY I S VO I D UNLESS WET STAMPED t J .4 14 --97-2%3 % e : -- ~4\ f . DATED: 4/ 01Â¥412 /.+ 141 avi L./ Jel M. HOWORTH'93UJUSE\Y,33947 . 9 L.1 di c <t TOP F SLOPE IS 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND 25947 ~J FL D WAY FROM CITY OF ASPEN FEMA MAP (SCALE ./ \\J ;4'* , /-69 --4 1 900- 43, Q yoy ,/ e --4 501 00. - - -Trj -- - - N=:a )- 2 7 7% 49.- --- - 60 0% ~- - WELANE: 4 - RE.51DENCE - .00004 1/ 5 89* ~ 16' WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT (BOOK 189. PAGE 320) -- ~ --_ ~ 25947 30 - 34.59- W4Â£. - y - ---------- --- m IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND ; STREAM MARGIN REVIEW ., f. BRIDGE ~ OF LOT 2. PARRY SUBDIVISION. ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 28. 1978 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 124 AS RECEPTION NO. 205766. CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN ' v STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 %81'13&:B=RBPg: IAYD@EdÂ°o~A~HI~UP~~~TW_â„¢R~'fY~~~ Â·AFTER YOU .FI RST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT, IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION DATE JOB - ?UR N~81- mi 8%?ECIF 1 ~H~HURP'ATCÂ·~? ISf~~~~DH~~NTW~ttETEN CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 2/02 23022A Â· :' SURVEYOR. S 0Â¥ 31Â¥AINd \ 1 1 A ~ LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED UT ILITY BOX [I] 0 20 40 a SURVEY CONTROL ONE FOOT CONTOURS 1 1 0. TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: A PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. CASE NO. PCTI 6365F DATED: SEPT. 11. 2001 LOT 1 SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 2/02 -- 9184 / -- 1- 1 --- -- U S 87' 05.57 E 134.55' BASIS OF BEARINGS 4 -1 .. 1 1 / 0 1 / 20151 < IL lf" / /101 /0. \ XFMR N 07- 42 * W 11.80 0 4 ..1 . $ 0 / lod ~ ~ Gla~ MLRED \nt \ 4/ GRAVEL Ill e.ae.r gA / -48 DR I VE , KPArto,-1 1 1 40 * PRIVATE ACCESS AND 4, /,//.201 {91 ~ -% 649*- 1 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT :: 2 % ~ 13[~~E~A~~-~ ~DPAGE 180 ' ~ ' Ill GRAVEL DRIVE BK 348 PG 112 SEWER EASEMENT ' 08=1<1 - tod 16' 10%01 1 AND PARKING gel ..4. 43 < m 49// SEE BOOK 707 AT PAGE 220_,21 I ~ O - --- - 94 .. ... 0/j FOR HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ~,~ p 1 6*6TLE =gat:K (3 41 RELINQUISHMENT GA- / El ~m~ 40 1 a-z- f . 9%.6 1 5 52,TIOH A s CALE 16% 1Lo" ' , 44 5.3 <0 -1& / 9 t08. 4- ~ 184. 35.48 W.C. f & 1 0' ~0 . ' 0 20.9 23'3 1 / / /i E LOT 2 2/4*1 ADDRESS -501- ~ -- M 063 3 0 - 2 RECORD OVERLAP ~ 1 & ~ AREA - 47.446 SO.FT. ./- / EIS - 91 KLK fE / 200k z %,=D ITCH HEAD GATE m DECK HOU SE ss DRIVE ' 0 , d z Â· GRAVEL 1 11. 3 Â· 110 Mr 10 0 \\~1~2 8.5 - 1 4 4 0 14 4 -1 0 ul ACAT,0.1 0 8 ./ 1 > 01 1 LU T - 3'/6' 2 VT-164 5 --21 l * e . ..1 i I EDGE OF - ~ \ .peflD P~Crr 5.0 ./7/4. Â· 100 ' Â· I. TREES \944-- 1 f. 11 H 9.2 9 , 018' ~01~ ~~X ;/ ~ SILL 100 - 9.11 EDGE OF I w m F TREES ~ 01 - b,0 -44' 7/l:i . DECK O 1 . 4,â‚¬TLE dâ‚¬ete:K. , \ / 0 4 a Al 20,7 .00 4/W- ZI / \\1 /, 1 1 \ '04 - \\\ e 1 9 .000004 O WEL .- 6 / \ / / 0 1 Â· ~ CERTIFICATION 44 T else x 1 f THE UNDERSIGNED S 9 THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 44 2 Â· 49 4 / *sb*_ i i L -- FI ELD SURVEYEr,.,elt,~#~1~111,11.4,1 FEAR< )NZY .2002 AND IS ACCURATE ' 1 BASED ON THEAR#6 ~04Â¢U?JE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO \ 98 - HZ> TEEE:9 69412, 202: PÂ» UKeâ€¢BC, 4 01 S CREP ANC 1,0(92~Q~il~~~%ID.ARY LINE CONFL I CT S . ENCROACHMENTS. NG.,444-1 APPURTENAIRESÂ°)AND DOCUMBIES.Â®F RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 1,40 eN,Â·Dete ABL TD E36 "6" ,te , EASEMENTS @ReÂ·EION ..4 FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. EXCEPT AS *iMIÂ¢~t SHOWN. '212Â¥GROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND 4.4 ///~ .91- SURVEYOR EREEXC61'SE#t/THISESURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE 5&61:OF -TRE SURVF** BELOW. O â€¢b. >2 / Â»i . 5 143'hee.0006Â» r -AN / < desv~ Â» N- 1 4 JO H. HOWORTH' "04.,mustÂ»B947 cp . - ,-tmaÂ¥ 411\040> .e. t<f TOP F SLOPE IS 100 YEAR FLOOD PLA IN AND --~ < 9 25947 FL D WAY FROM CITY OF ASPEN FEMA MAP (SCALE 9 / 0 :I'.6 <91 68//0 q r--- 5 0 .-I --- 0 00 / 9 + 9 4 16' WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT 0.4 / - (BOOK 189. PAGE 3201 - 25947 30 34.59 W.C. y L___ --- WERNER 11251DENCE m I IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND ~ ~ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BRIDGE : OF LOT 2. PARRY SUBDIVi SION. ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 28. 1978 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 124 AS RECEPTION NO. 205766 CITY OF ASPEN , COUNTY OF PITKIN " STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED BY 0 0 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 8t6II NOT ICE: ACCORD I NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION DATE JOB BASED U*ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 2/02 23022A SURVEYOR.