The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.315 Dean St.A110-01~,f.~~,00.~' i 2737-182-85-001 A110-01 6/'-44 -0,0.r~ St,-Regis Telcom(Verizon Wireless) - 4 \,..~315 E. Dean Street - 544 NED # 014 ~2.003 A . C 1 l L / 1 CASE NUMBER Al 10-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-85-001 CASE NAME St. Regis Telecom (Verizon Wireless) PROJECT ADDRESS Â¢ 315 E. Dean Street PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE Telecom OWNER/APPLICANT Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership REPRESENTATIVE Closser Consulting LLC DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11/28/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Approved w/ Condition BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 12/3/01 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID: ~2737-182-85-001 DATE RCVD: |11/12/01 # COmEE~.~-- - -CASE NO~Al 10-01 CASE NAME:~St. Regis Telecom (Verizon Wireless) PLNR: 1-r' rack IM e'.33 Â£121(~ PROJ ADDR:]315 E. Dean Street CASE TYP:|Telecom STEPSNI OWN/APP: Colorado RSA No. 3 ADR~8350 E. Crescent Park C/S/Z: |Greenwood Village/ PHN*303)721-3566 REP:~Closser Consulting LLC ADR:~4305 Darley Ave. C/S/Z:]Boulder/CO/80305 PHN1(303)554-1432 FEES DUE:~500 D 180 E FEES RCVD:~680 STAT: F REFERRALS| REF:~ BY~ DUE: ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED I'....'ll'.I , , DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| 11 / -23/0 I CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED: 1 1 ** BY: RTI- 211\04 DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: Appre>i)eÂ£3 u.;;>02%a, tte?itti / 7-14< O/1,A 42 06 -n ux- L MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician CIJI_ RE: Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Facility - St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. DATE: November 20,2001 SUMMARY: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, represented by Closser Consulting, LLC, has applied for the installation of telecommunication equipment to be installed on the roof of the St. Regis Hotel located at 315 E. Dean St. on behalf of Verizon Wireless - a telecommunication service provider. The parcel is located outside of the Commercial Core Historic District and is not within any of the Mountain View Planes. The application proposes six (6) panel antennas mounted to the side of the easternmost penthouse of the St. Regis Hotel and two equipment cabinets. The proposed antennas will extend five (5') feet above the roof and be painted to match the brick of the St. Regis Hotel. The equipment cabinets will be attached to the interior of the existing parapet wall and will not extend above the parapet wall. The proposed antennas and equipment will be barely visible from the street on the corner of Mill St. and Dean St. The corner of Mill St. and Dean St. is the vantage point that has the highest pedestrian traffic around the hotel. The proposed antennas would be slightly more visible from the corner of Monarch St. and Dean St., however, this vantage point has a much lower level of pedestrian traffic. Staff feels the proposed application meets the standards for telecommunication equipment, pursuant to Section 26.575.130. Attached are the relevant criteria. Also attached is the application, containing a picture of the proposed equipment. Staff recommends The Community Development Director administratively approve this application with conditions. APPLICANT: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, owner. Represented by Closser Consulting, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless. LOCATION: 315 E. Dean St. (Roof of easternmost penthouse). ZONING: Lodge/Tourist Residential PUD (L/TR PUD) 1 LOT SIZE: 121,626 Square Feet. CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Mixed Use, Commercial and Lodging. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities: The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A". Referral Agency comments have been included as Exhibit "B". The application has been included as Exhibit "C". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve the Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions: APPROVAL: I hereby approve the Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of the St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. with the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy ofthis approval shall accompany tlie building permit application. 2. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit if there is a disturbance of the public right- of-way during construction. 3. The applicant shall obtain a Temporary Encroachment License during construction if the public right-of-way is to be used for construction storage. 4. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan if there is an encroachment on the public right of-way that affects the normal traffic flow. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application shall beadhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions 6. The applicant shall paint all antennas the same color as the building. 0 1 0Â».6- , date l/6-9/01 1 L Jjj~ Ann Woods, AICP ~mmunity Development Director N0V29 *440/V/TYDEVELOP' 2001 2 CITY,OFASPEV ~GICÂ¥? MENTn,a- 12 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 3 Exhibit 2~ Telecom. Equipment F. Review Standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City' s safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe, or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole), and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one- hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff Finding: The six (6) proposed Verizon Wireless Antennas will be roof mounted and painted to match the existing faGa(le of the St. Regis Hotel. The proposed antennas wiII be co- located on the same building as several other telecommunication antennas. The proposed antennas are at least one hundred (100) feet from any other building containing telecommunication equipment. The proposed equipment cabinets will be fully screened from view. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1. Height. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height o f the given zone district, whichever is more restrictive. In addition: a. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls, and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. b. If the building itself exceeds the height limitations o f the zone, and such excess height was legally established (i.e., granted a variance, approved by PUD, etc.), then the combined height of the building and antenna shall not exceed the maximum height allowed by such approval unless determined by the Community Development Director to be suitably camouflaged. c. If the building is constructed at or above the zone district's height limit, or if combined height of the building and the antenna would exceed the applicable height limit, the additional height of the antenna must be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of conditional use review, Section 26.425.010, unless determined by the Community Development Director to be suitably camouflaged (in which case an administrative approval may be granted). d. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130(F)(5)) below. Staff Finding: The St. Regis Hotel was legally approved to exceed the height limit in the L/TR zone district by receiving PUD approval. The proposed panel antennas will only extend five (5) feet over the roof and will be painted to blend into the building. Staff believes the proposed equipment meets these standards given that they are painted the same color as the building to camouflage them from sight. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Architectural Compatibilitv. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted, or as required by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible, and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff Finding: To the extent practical, the antennas are compatible with the architecture of the building. No monopoles or significantly obtrusive equipment will be visible from the street and staff is not recommending any screening measures be implemented other than painting the antennas to blend with the building. The panel antennas will be slightly visible from the street. The equipment cabinets will not be visible from the street because they will be hidden by the existing parapet wall. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. Compatibility With the Natural Environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography, and other natural features, and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridge(s) or ridge line(s); an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized, and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission' s regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff Finding: The proposed location is not affected by ridgeline, 8040, or mountain viewplane restrictions. The applicant has committed to meeting FCC regulations regarding the operation of wireless service facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Screening. Roof and ground mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping, and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment' s design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees, or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). b. For ground mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures, or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff Finding: The proposed support equipment cabinet will be fully screened from view. No additional screening is recommended. The antennas will be visible but shall be painted to blend into the building. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Lighting and Signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down- directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. b. Light fixtures, whether free-standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. d. The telephone number(s) to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Staff Finding: The applicant is proposing no lighting or signage related to the proposed telecommunication facility. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable to proposed application. 7. Access Ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with, or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for ernergency services rnust be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. c. The proposed easement(s) for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff Finding: The equipment is not proposed in an area of required vehicular circulation. No new easements are required to be recorded to accommodate the proposed telecommunication facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Property Owner/Applicant: SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (d/b/a St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611) do Starwood Hotels & Resorts Trust 2231 E. Camelback, Suite 410 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Applicant for Wireless Telecommunications Facility: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, a Delaware partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless 8350 E. Crescent Parkway, 4th Floor Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Representative of Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, dlbla Verizon Wireless: Ann S. Closser/Gloria Brown Closser Consulting, LLC 4305 Darley Avenue Boulder, CO 80305-6027 Telephone: (303) 554-1432 Facsimile: (303) 494-0826 Description of Proposal: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") proposes to construct a cellular telecommunications facility on the St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado. The property is owned by SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. As shown on the enclosed site plan, all components of the facility will be located entirely on the rooftop of the hotel. Six panel antennas (approx. 1' wide x 4' tall) will be placed on the roof of the easternmost penthouse. The tips of the antennas will extend 5' above the penthouse. Verizon was unable to place the antennas on the penthouse walls because of existing VoiceStream antennas and reserved space for future VoiceStream antennas. The antennas cannot be placed on the west penthouse walls. The west penthouse is lower in height and RF signals would be blocked by other architectural features of the hotel. The landowner will not allow antennas to be located on the hotel walls. "Whip" antennas cannot be used at this facility. Whip antennas are omni-directional and transmit radio signals in all directions. This site will provide additional capacity to meet increased customer demand for service in the local area- which demand cannot be handled by Verizon's existing facilities. The signals from omni- directional antennas at this location would interfere with Verizon's existing Aspen cellular site. Verizon proposes to paint the antennas a "light brick" color to match the brick of the hotel and existing antennas. Verizon's equipment will be located in two equipment cabinets mounted to an interior parapet wall, with adjacent space reserved for two future cabinets. The cabinets will not extend above the parapet wall and will not be visible from ground level. The St. Regis Hotel location was carefully selected to not only meet customer demands, but also to conform as closely as possible to the City's regulations. This location corresponds to the City's first site selection preference and its preference for collocation. (City of Aspen Land Use Regulations ["Regulations"], Â§ 26.575.130.E.2 and 7) The (property is zoned L/TR with a PUD overlay. Wireless telecommunications facilities are allowed in this zone district subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. (Regulations" Â§ 26.575.130.E.1). The facility is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Regulations (Â§ 26.575.130.A): All antennas and equipment will be located on the hotel rooftop. As illustrated on the enclosed photosimulations, the antennas will be visible from discrete areas. The view from Monarch and Dean was selected as the vantage point most visible to the greatest number of people. The view from Mill and Dean illustrates the minimal visibility of the site. As a practical matter, the antennas will not be visible from most areas in the City. Verizon's equipment cabinets will not extend above the building parapet and will not be visible. The hotel rooftop is an existing telecommunications site (currently supporting the facilities of at least two wireless carriers on its rooftop), thus avoiding the unnecessary proliferation of facilities. Response to Review Standards (Regulations Â§ 26.575.130.F: 1. Setbacks. a. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas are concealed from nearly all ground level , locations by existing hotel architectural elements. The antennas will be painted a "light brick" color to match existing antennas and the brick color of the hotel. Verizon believes that any additional architectural element surrounding the antennas would create greater bulk and result in additional visual impact. b. Not applicable. c. Verizon's facility will be located on the same building as existing wireless facilities. d. Verizon's antennas will not extend beyond property lines or into a front yard area. 2. Height. a. Verizon's antenna will not exceed five feet above the penthouse to which they will be attached. b. Verizon's antennas will not exceed the relevant height limitations. c. Not applicable. d. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the building rooftop. The cabinets will not extend above the building parapet and will not be visible. 3. Architectural Compatibilitv. a. Verizon's facility will not require the construction of an additional structure. Equipment cabinets will be located on the building rooftop, beneath the level of the parapet. The cabinets will be of equal quality and similar in nature to existing wireless equipment cabinets and other existing rooftop equipment. b. Verizon's antennas will be painted to match existing antennas and the light brick color of the hotel. Related equipment cabinets are discussed above. c. Not applicable; the equipment will not be mounted to the building wall. d. Not applicable; the facility will not include a monopole. e. Utilities to the facility will be run underground. Cable runs to the antennas and equipment will not be visible from ground level. 4. Compatibility with the Natural Environment. All components of Verizon's facility will be located on the St. Regis Hotel rooftop and will not dominate the landscape or present any silhouette on a ridge line. a. Not applicable. b. Not applicable; there will be no ground-mounted components. c. This modest facility will have little, if any, effect on surrounding view planes. d. In accordance with Verizon's FCC license to provide cellular service in Aspen, this facility must comport with all FCC regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. 2 5. Screening. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the rooftop, fully screened by existing parapet walls. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas will be painted to match existing antennas and the hotel walls. The antennas will be visible at ground level from only very limited areas. a. Not applicable; no monopole will be utilized. b. Not applicable; there will be no ground-mounted components. c. All cables to the facility will be completely concealed from public view. d. Not applicable; no fencing will be utilized. e. The visual impact of the facility will be mitigated as discussed above. 6. Lighting and Siqnage. Not applicable; no lighting or signage will be utilized. 7. Access Wavs. a. Not applicable; the installation will have no ground-mounted components. b. The facility will be secured from access by the general public (locked access to the hotel rooftop); through its lease with the property owner, Verizon will have 24-hour access to the facility in the event of emergency. c. Easements for ingress and egress and electrical and telephone service currently exist and are recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 3 1 Closser Consulting Limited Liability Company 4305 Darley Avenue Boulder, CO 80305-6027 Tel. 303.554.1432 Ann Closser Fax 3()3.494.0826 Gloria Brown Email: aclosser(*idcomm.com November 9, 2001 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS James Lindt, Planner City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St., 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless Application for approval of Wireless Telecommunications Facility at St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (Verizon Project Name: C03 Aspen Highlands - Alt 1) Dear Mr. Lindt: Enclosed are two copies of the following documents, which constitute the application of Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC for approval of a wireless telecommunications facility at the St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado (the numbers correspond to the items listed in the July 18, 2001 Pre-Application Conference Summary): (1) Land Use Application; (2) Proof of Ownership (two sets of title work, evidencing fee title vested in SLT Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company); (3) Fee Agreement, signed by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC; (4) Copy of letter signed by the property owner, authorizing Verizon to proceed with this application and setting forth the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the representatives authorized to act on behalf of the property owner/applicant (we will submit the originally signed letter upon receipt); (5) Certificate from Title Insurance Company of the Rockies setting forth the street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgment, liens, easements, contracts and agreements, and demonstrating the owner's right to make this application (see no. (2) above); (6) Check in the amount of $680.00 to cover the City of Aspen's application review fee; (7) Two copies of all documents listed are enclosed; (8) Vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen (included on site plan); (9) Site plan, including roof plan illustrating existing and proposed facilities; (10) Photosimulations (two "before and after" views), one view from Mill and Dean Streets and the second view from Durant and Monarch Streets; and (11) Written description of the proposal, addressing relevant review standards (see enclosed site plan for graphic illustrations) James Lindt Page 2 November 9, 2001 In addition, two copies of the following documents are enclosed in response to Attachment 4, Specific Submission Contents: (1) Site plan (see no. 9 above); (2) Site Improvement Survey; (3) Landscape plan - not applicable (no ground-mounted components); (4) Elevation drawings or before and after photographs (see nos. 9 and 10 above); (5) Lighting plan - not applicable (there will be no lighting of Verizon's rooftop facility); (6) Structural Integrity Report regarding towers (not applicable; no tower will be used); (7) FAA and FCC Coordination: (a) Not applicable (the facility is not near an airfield) (b) Pursuant to Verizon's FCC license, the proposed facility must and will comply with all FCC regulations governing radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions (8) Not applicable - the facility will be collocated on an existing wireless telecommunication services facility; (9) Not applicable - the location of the facility corresponds to the City's first site selection preference; and (10) Verizon is currently planning one additional facility in the Aspen Airport Business Center. Verizon is working with Pitkin County in connection with this proposed facility. Thank you for your consideration of this application. I understand the Verizon submittal will be reviewed administratively. Thank you in advance for expediting the City's processing of Verizon's application. Please let me know (303-670-8702) if you require further information or documentation, and we will respond immediately. Very truly yours, Glotia Brown Assistant to Ann S. Closser Igb encls. cc: Ms. Jane Johnson, Verizon Wireless b . k.41 1, 1 ...,â‚¬19 il Li: 3 47*....' t4 5,â‚¬./#FM' a ~254;9 . A'. 2,4 4 fÂ¥.135 I#kilillillillililliMfitliv t 7../.*60 ER;~7 04Â· . .Â®51 limil.qi, 4 .A **' t. i QI#JYÂ¢)412'11 2 1 Wrt//Ell~~*< 16:;ZI ! 1. I. U -Il 77:51 . E I . . 4.ls,L'* --472,4, '2 . *r , f ...7-W 44 -*Â¥ 2. 14 S.;W. - 26 - A..LAMES.:*.7 ..flie.. r. ; 6%14*7 - . - .1 F. C . -, A-=.... fir 4 40~- ~91:0447.. , mmwn 40,1 ~& $ r; ; f k-4â‚¬18 + W . a Mill--1/1 7 - - -It - I - 666 EXISTING VIEW' Â»-, 4.44 N-" . lL .0. ~~.r 9. EU . 0% - $ F k. . ... , :3 1//P34/411% -, . i *0914:3% ~ a . 1, 1 ~Â·Â·'i . Jib , 9.Ek-JAJA1vrv,7, I J 1. . 2 -F F -' 1.' 1 .0 YOLI,1 1 1 ' < , 241. b.4 ,~ act . =t -I F1- ' 3.- -3 *456.'-6 &-11,1 /#, 1 . . 4 24 1 .,-4.-UN u.,-â€¢ 9. -9.illi -9 . 1 11Â· 222Â¥ -h 11 1 - 24 ft Za I t 7.. 1 4 . . ulÂ£*t# \ 10*044/ittesÂ£98:'lo . 3. *, .0, .4 1 1.@g, ..1 7,4. -1 % 4- i ' *li.gulbijwbog#JJ*eâ€¢/4 : i.1417'llid..BAI'/M- . 37./.~1.. . 2 lititilitt' ai 1 1*4417* -6.: . 1 ..1.1/*91 r.,LE PROPOSED VIEW S~Ul.AtIONIS ILLUSIRATM: '-LAPPEAHAN[CE U~Y vARY 9/10/01 Dul TO COITRUCTION MET HOOS TIME OF [* AWILATHER u/ CO3 ASPEN HIGHIANDS CELL SITE SIMULATION VISLIL E~MRO-ENTS INC IS MOT RESPONSIBLE FOR vamATIONS I;Visual Environmelts MILL AND DEAN LOOKING WEST CONSTRUCTION VR010901 0ETÂ¥4=EN T * EX..1 ..APPEAIâ€¢~CE OF COMPLEFED 303 6881880 9%,4 visenv corn 0 .1 I 1 I. I %< I .+ , 4'' 1,4 5%/ fâ€¢.,~,2 44:.Â·Â« 14 4 '2 : Â·'t... L.Â· Â·1, ~ti 4,%1 ~it ,-7, Â¢ * ->114~6. . , . i 4 -Ll//de'lilli.../ \ r @\1 . J. - 1 m,6 - -099 --0-- 1/9.-I.1 lllÂ£'4~ 4 ~~~f - \AL - 1 17'11.1,1 . 1-1 1 -. 14--/-"i~ -IIIL 216%1illÂ¢~ 1 6 - -17rl ,. -- 1 . ' 4 1 , M-M T-Â· EXISTING VIEW 1/. 4..1 ..'.2 . 4 r.- t, 1'. 1 , 4, 44. A ...2 .(. 14'51 f,114 0 it : 14 p 4/,1 i . 7 ., 1 L, .1, . 15 ; 94 A : 31, ,., - 45. .,vi 4 r . C\*41\ ~ C-rhii.Â· â€¢ , 1-1 - - f '1 1 -9-Sllil . A mtÂ° r -- I. 1 ,1,\ , .. '-38~ ~ .t,11 1 . 41. .4 - .6.11 .1, ' r ! 1: il .III .. 4 4 1 tr . 44.1. 1,1~.71; u-.11( PROP()SED VIEW S-ULATill IS ILLUST MTIVE: FIWL APPEARANCE MAY VARY 910,01 DUE TO CONS' AUCTION MEr HODS I */ DAY AW //EATHER CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS CELL SITE SIMULATION VISMLENRQI,ENTS INC lilli RES,UISIBLEMOR VAR-log SVIsual Environments MONARCH AND DURANT LOOKING SOUTH CONSIRUCTION VR010902 BETV.4=kiT* .HIBIT ./APPEAR~CE OFCOMPLE TED 303 688 1880 w-. visen. com = / Â·,~15-4 ItÂ»' e lealÂ»j , _ %,c i 1, E k.f d I I- M. . LJ. r kil 1 1 1 '1|10111 ; "'"m 1 .7 .te=,4 ir -1â€ž/ Â£ - ~r * ~ r L ~ t lir i rr - . 4 11-1/: 11$/re.6-L f r.- 'tr## -r,1 , IM i F W J . 3/9 4 1 k â€¢ - 0 -.i , FT- 7/2, - ,-I Ut- 6 15 90'r ; nm.t -f#Vt *7 f =irt .1- Mw,m i j '. ; = . ~:~ ' il.- ..I- - 1 - /- .- 1 -2*1.4 29&4/ 6&0 0 -- A '.'6* +Jit :gy-- 2 7.4 Mxk m 4 1 - --- EXISFING VIEW Â£~4-â€žfi/ -- - wt ,#Of,ggi , / -4 U 1 1 r 4 4 1. . 1.411 liz~~~~Er k.1 Â·11 ' 1.E k +- 1 - + V: 1 1 1 + Ii- , rr . - -- r ' W.' 4 fI; 01 JO~ 4 - 7~ F 14, + 1: :.1 1 2Â¥1 - I p ".t ' #AÂ· = .U'_4 Â·6 Zi-- -4 044 197- *- - ar ~!_ ~*3 "L .--- b ./--- - I... 4, a . rruit,Fai , -- ' â€¢r.4 â€¢ 6 --- PROPOSED VIEW SI,AULA HON IS ILLUS ! HA [IVE HNAL APPEAHANCE MAY VARY 11/20,01 OUt 10 C)61 RUCIIONME:UOUS Talt CÂ» l*v AM) -A,Ht:R C03 ASPEN HIGHIANDS CELL SITE SIMULAnON VIS*LE-HO/EMIS INC ISNOIRESPONSIBLE~ORVAR-0~6 EVI- Emironmens GALENA ST. LOOKING NORTHWEST C/Â»STRUCTION VR011104 UE T-E N 1 HS EX E T AN) Apti leâ€žCE . COMPLE .0 303 688 1880 w,w viseiv com -1 -1-- 13 -Â· 13,2'21 33: 36 e.02 Re Vortzon Wireless Application lor Wirelemi Tejecommunicatioos Facility at thâ€¢ St. Regi. Hotel~ 31 S Eutit Dean Str..t, Aspen, CO ARIMQi!&8Ileti The ntilme. address iand teiephone number of the owner of the property which is the subject ot thâ€¢ â€¢boveÂ·d~iertbed applicaljon is: SLT Aspen Â¤â€¢an Stmet Ll C 40 Statwood Hotels & Re,orts Tru:st 2231 E. Carrilback Road, Suite 410 Phoenix, AZ 85016 (914)640Â·8100 I hamby ButhertzÂ® Verizon Wireless (VAW,r LL.C, 8350 Last Cmscelt Parkway, #400. Grolnwood Village, CO 80111, (303Â·721-3566}. and its agent Closser Consulting Limited LIability Company, 4305 Darley Avenue. Boulder. CO 80305-6027, (303-654-1432),to proceed with Ile application to the CRY of Aspen to allow a wifeless telecommunications facil}ty al the St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81011. SLT Atgpen Dean Street LLC dAble St. Regis kigtel \/)1 i LExnle-_r Â¥ 1 By - t ul& Dated. . _ ,2001 3056702838 => EXECUTIVE OFFICES , TEL=970544/191 10/26'01 15.44 TOTA_ 2.32 130 S. Galena S Aspen CO 81611 Aspen/Pitkin (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax Community Development I Department 3X To: Gloria Brown From: James Lindt Fax: (303) 494-0826 Pages: Phone: Date: 12/3/01 Re: St. Regis Telecom. Approval CC: [] Urgent C] For Review El Please Comment [3 Please Reply C] Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi Gloria, Please find attached a copy of the approval document for the St. Regis Telecom. Application. You will be required to obtain a building permit prior to installing the antennas. Please present this approval document when you apply for building permit. Thanks, James Lindt . 7934.0 E 501.15 7 7940+K VERIZON WIRELESS vo. 8- . S 0- (03-ASPEN HIGHLANDS ALT. NO. 1 60 30 ~ -PROJ. NO. 2841317089 1. % . SCALE: 1'= 60' --* CURB % 4 Nl<5~9 4 7915- MONARCH STREET 0 X 7950.7 P.O. BOX 91217 , 7938.8 BELLEVUE, WA. 98007-9217 04 -<L X 7954.4 0 7928.8 4 2 --. 21 10% CONCREE 79 6.1 f NE 793 3 9 7940 #0 7930.1 \ NlS.49 bo"E 193.20' L &2 4 A, %ES- 4 4 0 81 f 2 r- OVERPASS 9 , r.Â»-, / a S14*36'00"W 9 5 24 40 C 2 b v .4 02 0 - 0 24 Ar 24~ Ar ee ' S14'50'49 "W 125.00 OP \ O. (O \ AE C . / r,4 Â§ O 4. 40 j % % 2.-2Â»-CFF*m P -w-/blege 2~ l ~* 2 EASEMEN 0) - /00 01 4 ER PLACHMENT 6 0 1 2/4 0 49 PeROA T . , N 02 26 26 2 222 5 4 Slab,au/- - LEGAL DESCRIPTION - - 40>#Tr- 1*% 1 1 4 LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PLAT ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT 0-* DEVELOPMENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED OCTOBER 3, 1988 IN PLAT --- U/ll STREET 4 BOOK 21 AT PAGE 35 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO FILED JULY 1, 1989, IN PLAT CUR8 47 BOOK 22 AT PAGE 85, DECEMBER 28, 1990, IN PLAT BOOK 25 AT PAGE 49, SOUTH OCTOBER 1, 1992, IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGE 71 AND FEBRUARY 9, 1993, IN PLAT G, BOOK 30 AT PAGE 65. MILL STREET $14*50'49"W TOGETHER WITH THE NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING g 4 25.00 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, AS CREATED DEFINED AND ESTABLISHED BY ~75.09'11 "E S EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN MOUNTAIN CHALET ENTERPRISE, INC., A COLORADO 2 CORPORATION AND SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Ck, NOTES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 2989 IN BOOK 604 AT PAGE 184. 0 NOnCE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL 6 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ACPON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU 1, CREIGHTON R. MOORE, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO HER*(i,&0,TIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREON FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. IS TRUE AND CORREQ*44HIE#F~>4Y KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ...... y G:.:46 0)~ THIS IS NOT A "LAND SURVEY PLAT" OR " IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT". THIS SURVEY AND THE ACCOMPANYING / BOOK 443 DESCRIPTION(S) ARE NOT INTENDED FOR PURPOSES OF TRANSFER OF TITLE OR SUBDIVISIONS OF LAND. ~ JOB# 37-01 A A r '8 ~ 9 *Zi â€¢06 S : 1-= BEARINGS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE PER THE RECORDED PLAT AS REFERENCED IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED HEREON. ~ CUOORE %44,2..........:94:14* CREIGHTON R. MOORE 1 RIVILAI\ID SURVEYING 4, *AL LAKO, PLS NO. 10945 ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN-GPS CONTROL. ~ P.O. BOX 745153, ARVADA. CO. 80006-5153 '444â€žâ€žâ€žHâ€ž~~0â€ž~ OCTOBER 9, 2001 PHONE (303) 422-1918 FAX (303) 423-2190 A T DURANT AVE CURB D: \ACAD12\STREGIS.DWG 10- Illl4t Stamp l COS - ASPEN n-GH-LANDS U .. \ ~ .. o architecture o planning o Interlora TÂ· REX Architex 146 Madison + Suite 200 Derwar Colorado 80206-5023 COS = ASPEN HUGHLANDS CELL SOTE Dwhgs 00Â® 388-2918 + fax (303) 3886888 and Specilica#* as re#unents of se,pice are ~~emah the property of the ArÂ¢Ntect #hether ZONI Il NG APPROVAL DRAWOINGS . the Frojact for with hey are made ;3 executed or not reproductle copies~ of DrawÂ» and Spedficatjons for Wormadon and reference h cornection v.ith the Oinert use and 000#anoy oflhe Plfect The D,av,Ilgs and S,oe cibations shal not be used by the 0*nar on other project~ for adc#t~ns to *is Project or for the corrnleion of tfis Project by otters Bovicad the Aic#tect is not h defadt inder #18 Ageemant e,Â©ept by ageement h *Iithg and Wth approlate conlpensation to the Arettect OWNER: SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET, LLC 8 c/o STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORT TRUST PROJECT SUMMARY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THE DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK OF THE CONTRACT i VERBAL SUMMARY: WITHOUT FORCE AND EFFECT ON REQUIREMENTS OF i CAN BE SUMMARIZED AS FOLLOWS. SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TELEPHONE CMRS SITE FOR VERIZON WIRELESS, INC, KNOWN AS 003-ASPEN HIGHLANDS", WORK WILL INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A (2) EQUPMENT CABINETS (PLUS ROOM FOR 2 FUTURE CABINETS); SIX (6) PANEL ~ ~ ANTENNAS ATTACHED TO THE EXISTING ROOF PENTHOUSE; NECESSARY COAX 4 FROM THE ANTENNAS TO THE EQUIPMENT CABINETS; NECESSARY CONDUIT AND CABLES FROM THE EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO THE ELEC/TELCO SOURCES, El . 1 .. Ilillibillilli'-Â«4 Ui ~Â·. ~ Â· ~.Â· -~ .I t.Â·~ ,Â·:-.~~Â·.Â· J....Â·~i.Â·Â·~.n~ f:,Â·%Â·M~::,31.5.p:.r;.-.5Â·444:it~~24,4.~.~:Â·:2Â·~':i45,-sittiff~5--,4.L- 'f t, i ...7. , hiÂ·14 -1 -- -- e *72Â·2 Ji ~ INDEX OF DRAWINGS -8 D:Â§ SENN PROJECT DATA TZ TELE SHEET . ...,.1 6 312 Ir li i 19 15 3~* 42 ~ ADDRESS Zl SITE PLAN @101% & C ZP ROOF PLAN - 0 6 1 :18 i -~ % 315 E DEAN STREET e &Â§ 1 D ASPEN, COLORADO D ELEVATIONS 82838 00 r N g GLENWOOD SPRINGS e -- ~ -PmeN-GebINiY C-,-1-7 61 A .spe.n .em a I JURISDICTION EXIT HWY 82 ZONING CATEGORY: 1-70 &5131 lili 1-/TR (LODGE/TOURIST RESIDENTIAO; PUD OVERLAY J 04 00 =EZE Project Title APPROVAL C03 4. NEW CONSTRUCTION ~ CELLULAR EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE &60 THIS SPACE IS RESERVED FOR SIGNATURES OF INVOLVED PARTIES TO INDICATE .ASPEN HIGHLANDS' THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS AND HAVE APPROVED THEM. CHANGES INITIATED AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN HEIGHT 40- MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS, ANTENNA SITE 5'-0" ABOVE (8 PARAPET WALL 1 9 315 E DEAN STREET NO. STORIES NA <~\ CITY OF j ASPEN, CO, D GROSS BUILDING AREA 300 SQ. FE \~ ASPEN ~ 4 PITKIN COUNTY 22 --22 1 ~1 0~01 COLORADO SITE n Px Owner Â»--- date Â£ C Issue Date 5.9.2001 Â«4\3% Dave Kennard, RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless date Date Revisions iN. Lam, Dahl, PM2 - Project Manager, Vedzon Wreless date 1 1 NORTI-1 Sheet 1 of 1 VICINITY MAP , SCALE: NONE CY) T Z .. Â£126-Z0096 3 ........ Stamp 11 L~I .. A .. o archltioture I Planning o Interlore TÂ· REX 1 Architex 146 Madison + Suite 200 Denver Colorado 802OG-5023 (303) 388-2918 + feD< (303) 388-5838 NOTE: Drawings Cha#*09 ard Spechicabons as returents of ser#ce 0% and shal rernah the property of the ArÂ©Ntect whether the Project for *ch they are made is executed or not. The 06're stal be perrritted to retah oopies, hck.[*U reproducible cople& of Drawhgs and Spedfcations for Wormation and reference h cornection wim the O,nerb use and ocamancy of UN ADject The D,an*os and Â®e- ,< SURVEY INFORMATION BASED ON TNE DRAWING for addions to #13 Project or for the corrnietion of ttls ~ croatbons shal not be used by the 0â€¢,ler on other projacts, Project by others pro~ided the Architect is not h defadt PREPARED FOR VOICE STREAM WIRELESS ~22~1**449;ilh- INSTALLATION AS MEASURED BY- JOHNSTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ON 53.19% I 1 ALL INFORMATION 16 FOR GRAPHICAL REFERENCE ONLY AND WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO i BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. P- - 1 1 1- 1 A - 2% 11 - -- l -- 0d i / J <- - _ â€ž4-=;766) ~~ iw fp/ ---- 1 m* 1 *-- 8 413 34 / Â».. 'i 1 7 - - Â· 1 U 1 81 I I -L , f.-'.~~ ..-.'.IÂ·'4-~â‚¬.Â·2, Â·.. m .1 - 1 -' - E24 '04 \ .e : I -- W/ .2-1* CN/6.4377"t 1 1 % C 41 - - NE*10- 5// - Â£ 3/ \ Pa 5-Â§113 i'Â·5* IN - 7 C- 1 ~1 -CE)\FFERâ„¢X:Â»TOP- CE) PENTHOUSE +5 .- 8.1 Est Â§@ i'Â·VE S b 0Â·la: 8,Â§1 Efit 46/5 0 -614.2927,10 11 ~~ 21 -1 Zi ~ O L\ â‚¬4 11 - ~06~"W ~ 1/ -1- f~ i =t i i 9: k :1 87-8/' - ; ig/2 4.1 4Â·4 P Â¢ 9 1 91 (65'44 1 3 mul aal l el 0 1:1 %2 It 1 lili 8.1 m CE) VOICE STREAM ~ ~ CE) LOUER ROOPTOP ~ 1 4 l EGAm=verr LOCATION L (615*44'1"' 1- \ - 814: . UJ) Project Trtle Â¥'ROPOSED VER\ZON 33CEÂ»U. C03 ---- Ammfok O EQUIPMENT LOCATION ) ~ ;1 'ASPEN HIGHLANDS' 1 4 - cioz#6 / 1 / ANTENNA SITE ~ 1 -1 - 459% 40(le. Mte" ASPEN, CO, 1 11 315 E DEAN STREET 1 Â«42* COLORADO 1 /i,/2 PITKIN COUNTY -1%2%2 Le N 40722'- / \ 1 --- 1-----'*-8 Issue Date I / 5.9.2001 ,/6449' 614'50'49'411 Date Revisions 1 2500,- \ (614-15'44"E) ~ 615'09'll"E 423' rh SITE PLAN 30'-0" Sheet_1_of 3 Z1 .. ssele]!AA L 26-10086 .... Stamp 4 CE) ELEC. LINES / .. 1 m. CE) BA6 LI*S o architecture o planning o Interlor' CE) VOICE STREAM COAX ' . TÂ· REX Architex 1 Â· Denver Colorado 80206Â«)23 146 Madison + Suite 200 Drawings 003)888-2918 + laoc (303) 386-6838 j . 1 Â· < CE) HYAC EQUIPMENT i 1 Drawhos and Spedfications as tabÂ·unents of sente are and shal,emah the preperty of the Arcitact whether 1- Â· . .1 the Project for w#*ch they am rnade is executed or not Tte 0,Â·ner shal be pen-ritted to retah copies. hcLK*g ~~2204,1ZtnX CE) VOICE STREAM t. . EQUIPMENT 4 LEASE AREA I Â· us@ and occlloancy of the aoject 1he Drav.*05 and Spe- ciScations shal not be leed by the Owner on other project4 / . ulder Vis Aggiâ€žnent emept by ageement h 44 and Project by others pro~ded the Arctitect is not h default 1 Â· ~ for addtons to llis Roject or for the cory,Netion of this - approlate corÂ®ensabn to the Arcimot t t tik t -9 j < CE) LOWER ROOFTOP O CO 0 --CE) UPPER ROOF:TOP - A . O Ik : 0( CE) R VENTS, TYP. l 1.4*c' : 2 Â·3>1: 1 i (D 0 0 .8:: 1 CE) BRACES, TYP. k 0 O 5 -24 CE) 3" OMNI (DI PO ) - Wip ANTENNA \..4. 9' CE) 355 .01/2,1 Tv ANTENNA O < CE) ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL ,0 - 596â€ž < CE) V.S. ANTENNA 13' u '. .6 14 : ~04#12ET PROPOSED VERIZON EQUIPMENT - >* = :. f get-~ . , .4.14 .: -..... L . -- I. I : I CE) 9.6 Â·Â·Â·:- L . A...e.:14.. R-,6 20%%2%**40%4 .. t.. '.Â· 4.~~Ov:...: :.,â€¢.0.â€ž1~;-L;.tÂ·, ;3..Â·44Â· ;,<:CE) 10'>ab"â€¢ aMNi ,&%Â·'4*~3. : :. 1 -AN#NN,1 8 ... I I li Â§ 3 5 PROPOSED VERIZON PROPOSED VERIZON :' .',..:iÂ·Wi':47.AiÂ·.9.0:f . m (0 ' 52 i i I# 1 1 f 1 1 e 91 1 . ANTENNA SECTOR ANTENNA SECTOR -.~- ~ - ...... 4 h ~ 03'. 0. . 80 FOR $ -L t @ i % 1 3 .4 3 p -842~5~ 9 3 0 8 0, a) .21 4 0 03 N cio CE) a. ANTENNA - I 1 /\ \ NQIEL j--4-- ~ PAINT ANTENNAS TO BLEND em.m ' 621mlilll FUTURE VERIZON EQUIPMENT / W/ CE) PENTHOUSE WALLS PROPOSED VER\ZON Â»30' LEASE AREA (210'4) 1 it . \ 1 0 1 // / Project 11tle \\ U / C03 Â»ASPEN HIGHLANDS' / < CE) V.S. ANTENNA T --L- I - 11 4 FROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA SITE 1 ANTENNA SECTOR 1 i 315 E, DEAN STREET ~ 1 ASPEN, CO. CE) V.S. ANTENNAS > PITKIN COUNTY 81.4,1 COLORADO CE)*5. CABLE CI4A 13'-4" 912,; 12..2 - Issue Date t---1 W 1 -1 40 - I 5.9.2001 11'-1144 1 Date Revisions /3'-4. 1'*71,1 &42001 ZbAnter,la Dimensions E2501 1-Antenna Location ' Sheet_2_of 3 ENLARGED ENLARGED CT) ROOF PLAN rih ROOF PLAN Z2 ~22,/ 1/4â€¢. 1,-0â€ž . 1 .. LLZLS X08 '0' LL26-L0096 'WA '3nA31138~ -iaoeds Suiuoz . . . 0 0 . Stamp , AJ1 .. /A o *fohttectuie , < .. o planning o Interlore TÂ·REX 1 Architex 146 Madison + Suite 200 Denver Colorado 80206-5023 PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS- -- ~PROPOEJED VERIZON ANTENNAS-- Â¢303) 888-2913 + fax (303) 3884838 PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS-- ; 4 1 1 <-8 WNIP ANTENNA J 6 1 84'-0. AL ~ Drawings 1 CE) VS. ANTENNAS -v-4lt 61 2 n 7 n, 41 -FEJANTENNAS~ i 4 1 - 2721~,Â¤2*Hwevid== 1 tmt:N:UNM reprock,cble copies, of Drewhgs and Specifications for - 6 12*FIEW-413- use and occloenoy of the Ploject 1he Dfawlo and Spe- i ~ ciftabong shal not be used by the Oâ€¢rer on oth, projects afÂ©,mation and reference h cornection #th the 81*8 i CE) VOICE STREAM EQUIPMENT - :_ for addtions to Dis Project cr for the corrÂ©letion of tis CE) PARAPET WALL 11-111&1411*4 Project by ethan provijad te Arcrdlect is roth default ux der this A{yeemenl ecept by a{Feelnent h Mativ and wlth appro~te oorÂ®ensalion to the Architect L------------------ -1--r- - - - --- il -4-----L -1 6 1 All = = = 11 PENTHOUSE - PENTHOUSE - CT) NORTHEAST ELEVATION /-7~ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION KErw-=-1'-ei .... 0) a. m /31 bIQ:Imi PAINT ANTENNAS TO BLEND Â·Â·~- Â·'. )~~:Â· c~'IL -:~ -~-~1... P.:fâ‚¬'~~Â·71Â£?;..4 - ~1.id,{Â·~Â·iÂ°Â·1--;Â·9j.?itÂ·Â·.~~4.Â· .~~ .iÂ·~-~~ ~ -Wil. W/ (E) PENTHOUSE WALLS 7:till =~ h C PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS o c L 2 + 6 i f 3 u li 1 <- CE) WHIP ANTENNA 84'-0" < CE) VOICE STREAM EQUIPMENT F PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNAS-) 19'-01 PROPOSED vERIZON WALL- & CE) PENTHOUBE TMPENTHOUbE~ 9~ #f 1/1159 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT (E) PARAPET WALL CE) PARAPET WALL 2 - 8 I Ll-1 Ll_I LLJ Ll-3 1 L._______________-_____-------------- -___--_.---_....~*93*3*El---------1---------------------------------------------------3--_--(gLL:PgM-N2!5___-_---- _--_..............J ' UM m i 021211111 Project Title C03 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .ASPEN HIGHLANDS. 11 ANTENNA SITE A f ! i ' 315 E DEAN STREET ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY ~ COLORADO i~ t.. + 1,1 54 0 Â®Â® Â®00 00Â® Â® 0 0Â®00 00Â®00Â® Â® 0 [1 00Â® 0 0 ONÂ® Issue Date i i It 5.9.2001 Date Revisions L1 625I)1 -Antenna Location i 1 2! C) NORTHEAST ELEVATION Sheet 3 of 3 . ~582"-:-7-En Z3 . ssele]!AA ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for --a- wireless-telecommunication facility (hereinafter, '1 HE PROJECT). APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establi,hes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment ofall processing fees is a condition precedent to a detcrinunition of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because 01' the Nize. miture or scope of the proposed project. it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest ot the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial dcposit und to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a nionthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees lie will be bencilted by retaining greater casli liquidity and will make additional payments upon nolification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are inairred. CI'l'Y agrees it will be benefited thtÂ·ough the greater certaint> of recovei ing its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete proclh.hing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the I'lanning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings fur project consideration, unless current billings are paid in juli prior to decision. i Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiker of its right to collect full fees prior to a detennination of application completeness, APPLICANT sh,111 pay an initial deposit in the ainount â€ži S_-6.8-0._ _-_ which is for __ . ____ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing ofthe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be niade within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICAN 1 iurther agrees that failure to pay such acct-ued costs sliall be grolinds for suspension of processing. and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing Imve been paid. CITY OF A %14Â·N APPLICANT Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC C 1 . //TE 8,: Hy.. C 'r---.eâ‚¬.20 /f, Lx__ .Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: bAY 1 b CAFM.P BELL- , A Mailing Address: Dpgeerious U Meed,71 8350 E. Crescent Pkwy., #400 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 g:\sup port\forms\agrpa> as,doc 1/10/01 / ; 4( E-; 1~ 4 -*.i. r LS' 0 4/1 P-r LIL1 I__3 d Ell . , //7109.4 1 9 -,1 ?,6.5 - ht .114-- -â‚¬;- f '9 - 1, f f '1 :1 11- 115 4 1.k 1 rt 4 J L..1 ---1-- Â·Â·Â· 15(?,5. 4 1 .4 I Ill â€¢! - 7 f Al Â£*C li,1-, 46 r E.IL W. 4-- - .4. 202 LJCY ,-FT- . 4 -! -& .- - - -- /W// r . 9'4-rk k. 0.7- b. I : .-;/0- 03 a A.414 ' '*4 i - - 7 .F:52.=4 8* 7 '*Me,4 ' 0 00/**k '4#,1947*Ar 69?~ EXISTING VIEW ./79/&14'fer/Aptjad--_1 ---J 1 . / .4 %â‚¬m/Â· . j. r - -,1,-'1 1 - 1 1' â€¢ ~ ~ - i - 4< ~ I_~]_ ; ~1~' ..,k'... m,>-% <I r -~ 7 -1 li 'Â¥-M- ir.i .. 1101: 7<- 1: mi Â· r LA 4 ~,44 1 & -w y Nv 947 . : . p 'tÂ· :4.14 - 1 1)4-Â»*A'.. -79 i e . 5 .â‚¬4/e. 112}4: 71..re. -2 2,2,.i -- 91-12 '.~~~tifia= 94, *~ PROPOSED VIEW S&*UUUIONISILLUSTRAIM: 'INALAPPEARANCEMAÂ¥VAHÂ¥ 11/20/01 LU: ID CO~ 1RUCTION ME nOUS T -E OF DAÂ¥ AM) V,1:A THE=H CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS CELL SITE SIMULATION VISi,~l k,IRRO-ENTS INC IS NOT RESIOISIBLE FOR VARMI INS NVIi,N Emironmet GALENA ST. LOOKING NORTHWEST co'/TRUCIKON VR011104 . :EN 1% ...1 ANDAPPEA.'CE:OF COMPLETED 303 688 1880 -vÂ·.4 vise # cofr 4=2 -44 '43'P . 9 1,4 1 .. .. / . 1 *4 :11 :&.pi~*I f~.4.L~Â£ ~4 0, 0 ME *12Â£ , u * , 5. 3'.1 - 1 11 4 7 I I 1 4 '3 2 4 I V. 767Â£".SIC, S..1 : 14/, . 1 / t -r. 1 , .4. 7/ 4 ,-/ - s. 42*:*'l,FJf 27Â·Â·34 ,$ 4 2,14&:2-4,43 0.- 11 7, i- ... '. -1.2-, - af"":6 -- - 1//i#YX".- r,.. .. brt:*242 - .di'-Iqi UL -- .... r . 41*â€¢. tâ€¢ 1-.~ ./.- 1r,1 9 : L .r illii~llll~b k ~: JIIL I.*El i / 1/9..lf- f.. I .....E="L 347 4 11 1 1 - . 0 9- yu, I - 2./11 . y.ES,2.1 An A 4 - .1- . 1 T i 23* -- filill 1.r 98' :19'tÂ»Wl - 77Â·. - - -42 . X=44, 2 1 ~* ' 1.-~d - t.<21 31 Â¥*Â·'-6mliar/613*Uslilk -4 , bgbf-'<htÂ£~.0 *r' 4- -:. 1 #LI/â‚¬ ; J 7 1 161% tt'! 1 ri r f ..:*~.:, Iss, - - 1 -pla E\ISTING VIEW - 14/i '1Â¥4.L'. . 4 El . 4. ' 1 4'111Â¢. - ....= ,~ * .7 , 6. â€¢ dri~-' 341 1 / / :/a -Â·1 ':-:, p.1 1 - 1,0*9 1 74 7.*.i ; P , 6/ .52 4 1 4,.br, - 1./AA.. I .r 11.~Â£,pff ''*~;4 + 9 7 21 - U.- 9 4~.A 4% k '417'/712=1! I~ -- 1*9 YÂ¢ . -â€¢ al~:1â€¢ 1 L . , i V'l"Vi 4 Fl/" r -- .'.f'-><#M i 'FE-'52 id....LK . . 362* <2/1/1/il,4,0 , - 11 1 V., V. . 44'.' I. ./ I I 6 . 1 - - 21- , .1 T P 16. ' EL #/- =-'Trk'. 7/T :'~7625231(*:~ .2 -a. . .i- 4 4 h.,04.-F â€¢.4 '/d--rka .J 22â‚¬ 4 *.,7 4--33, , , -t.fa- 22 9 . 7'V. 1"i ..4L . - .,21.Â·p- -i J;... 4 el~ -. -' . - 1. .1. 4 .4, J - 1 b-=2% -al......~f-.6/ Lil - 1 1%4-:EFE - - V - . PROPOSED VIEW DUE . CONSTRUCT,ON ME T HODS T,AE OF OW AND ~EA,WER SalULA l ION IS IL LUS 1 1%â€¢1 !VE ~1-L A~4â€¢i:Al-Â£E -Â¥ vARÂ¥ 9/10'01 CO3 ASPEN HIGHIANDS CELL SITE SIMULATION VISWL EIMRO-ENTS INC G NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR VARIATIONS %Visual Environments MILL AND DEAN LOOKING WEST .n.N T.S EX 1(181 T *APPEAR~CE OF COMPLEn:D 303 688 1880 *wv. .isen. colÂ· C..IRUCT'N VR010901 ' 0 . 1,1 .../. & I .2. Xi Â· * .4 *4 4 ;14 .$46 i; 4 7 â‚¬ 14,7.' f '24, ~'.~ij- 1- 44 .. . . Â· 1:4 v. Â· .6 1 t~ 16 'e '. * 43 1 r., 4 . . - '17tk IiÂ«tr .\--1: ;, j .11â€ž,EN,/ 1 7. c ' 311 /, 4~, J-=....I.. - at Â¢ 61,11 j r A r j."~11 41 - . , '3- '3 J M '. 114 , 1 1, .' ..Ll 1 + 4 1 :G: 1 9 Â®f &,111 Letir: 3 4 .16 - 4 - .1/- EXISTING VIEW - * . .r p. . I . Â· 44 :4 3 .*.I~ 12 9%'I f 4,%:14~1~1:-'7-ttl i, 1.. t . 4. ' I . 4 . ...14 - Ill'.mi~.allit 171 --4- 21 . r --- 1,11 1 . ,!111, 10!,N E. . 7 ' r 1/ 41 k ~ lie 4/ 1 ------ PROPOSED VIEW 90â€¢IULAT IONIS ILLUSTRATNE FI-LAPPEARA,Â«SE * #F-. a/10/01 * . CCÂ»â‚¬ T RUCTION MET 1Â«}CS 'NE C~ [~Â¥ AI ~,EATHER CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS CELL SITE SIMULATION VISEMRO-ENTS IFâ‚¬ 'fOT RESPONSIeLE~ORVARIATIOM; Visual Environments MONARCH AND DURANT LOOKING SOUTH CONSTR~110. VR010902 .EEN THIS EXHIBIT A,I}APPEANI.U.COMPLE:TED 303 688 1880 w- visen. corr 11#1 : 4 9 1/'/Bu/4419&Baa/* U UL 4--4494$47*:a#k 91*068;-V#kdi~qm#Nip# * ~3'44-4tai4**46:~-Â»â€¢ ~~134- '**0;~73'344~~ ~1 ~.,tÂ¥%2:* Closser Consulting I.imited Liability Company 4305 1),u-Ic, .Avenue Boulder, CC) 8(1305 6()27 Tel..503.554.1432 .\:in Clos<cr Fax 303.494.0826 (;lori.i Brown 1 1111.li h :lch )% scr(if, illcomin.co' November 30, 2001 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS James Lindt, Planner City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St., 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless Application for approval of Wireless Telecommunications Facility at St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (Verizon Project Name: C03 Aspen Highlands - Alt 1) Dear James: Enclosed are two prints of an additional photosimulation illustrating the proposed Verizon Wireless facility at the St. Regis. As requested, this photo was taken from the new Grand Aspen hotel location. Please contact me (303-670-8702) after you and the Planning Director have had an opportunity to review this simulation. Thank you. Very truly yours, Gloria Brown Assistant to Ann S. Closser /gb encls. cc: Ms. Jane Johnson, Verizon Wireless MEMORANDUM TO: Plans yere routed to those departments checked-off below: V........... City Engineer 0........... Zoning Officer 0........... LIousing Director O........... Parks Department 0........... Aspen Fire Marshal 0........... City Water O........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District O........... Building Department O........... Environmental Health O........... Electric Department O........... Holy Cross Electric 0.H-'--. City Attorney O........... Streets Department 0........... Ilistoric Preservation Officer O........... Pitkin County Planning FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5104 Fax-920.5439 - RE: Verizon Wireless Telecom Facility Installation St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. Parcel ID. 2737-182-85-001 DATE: November 12, 2001 COMMENTS: Please return comments to me by November 21,2001 No DRC required unless engineering requests it. Thank You, James Lindt Propertv Owner/Applicant: SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (d/b/a St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611) do Starwood Hotels & Resorts Trust 2231 E. Camelback, Suite 410 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Applicant for Wireless Telecommunications Facilitv: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, a Delaware partnership, dlbla Verizon Wireless 8350 E. Crescent Parkway, 4th Floor Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Representative of Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, dlbla Verizon Wireless: Ann S. Closser/Gloria Brown Closser Consulting, LLC 4305 Darley Avenue Boulder, CO 80305-6027 Telephone: (303) 554-1432 Facsimile: (303) 494-0826 Description of Proposal: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") proposes to construct a cellular telecommunications facility on the St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado. The property is owned by SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. As shown on the enclosed site plan, all components of the facility will be located entirely on the rooftop of the hotel. Six panel antennas (approx. 1' wide x 4' tall) will be placed on the roof of the easternmost penthouse. The tips of the antennas will extend 5' above the penthouse. Verizon was unable to place the antennas on the penthouse walls because of existing VoiceStream antennas and reserved space for future VoiceStream antennas. The antennas cannot be placed on the west penthouse walls. The west penthouse is lower in height and RF signals would be blocked by other architectural features of the hotel. The landowner will not allow antennas to be located on the hotel walls. "Whip" antennas cannot be used at this facility. Whip antennas are omni-directional and transmit radio signals in all directions. This site will provide additional capacity to meet increased customer demand for service in the local area- which demand cannot be handled by Verizon's existing facilities. The signals from omni- directional antennas at this location would interfere with Verizon's existing Aspen cellular site. Verizon proposes to paint the antennas a "light brick" color to match the brick of the hotel and existing antennas. Verizon's equipment will be located in two equipment cabinets mounted to an interior parapet wall, with adjacent space reserved for two future cabinets. The cabinets will not extend above the parapet wall and will not be visible from ground level. The St. Regis Hotel location was carefully selected to not only meet customer demands, but also to conform as closely as possible to the City's regulations. This location corresponds to the City's first site selection preference and its preference for collocation. (City of Aspen Land Use Regulations ["Regulations"], Â§ 26.575.130.E.2 and 7) The (property is zoned L/TR with a PUD overlay. Wireless telecommunications facilities are allowed in this zone district subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. (Regulations" Â§ 26.575.130.E.1). The facility is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Regulations (Â§ 26.575.130.A): All antennas and equipment will be located on the hotel rooftop. As illustrated on the enclosed photosimulations, the antennas will be visible from discrete areas. The view from Monarch and Dean was selected as the vantage point most visible to the greatest number of people. The view from Mill and Dean illustrates the minimal visibility of the site. As a practical matter, the antennas will not be visible from most areas in the City. Verizon's equipment cabinets will not extend above the building parapet and will not be visible. The hotel rooftop is an existing telecommunications site (currently supporting the facilities of at least two wireless carriers on its rooftop), thus avoiding the unnecessary proliferation of facilities. Response to Review Standards (Regulations 4 26.575.130.F: 1. Setbacks. a. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas are concealed from nearly all ground level locations by existing hotel architectural elements. The antennas will be painted a "light brick" color to match existing antennas and the brick color of the hotel. Verizon believes that any additional architectural element surrounding the antennas would create greater bulk and result in additional visual impact. b. Not applicable. c. Verizon's facility will be located on the same building as existing wireless facilities. d. Verizon's antennas will not extend beyond property lines or into a front yard area. 2. Height. a. Verizon's antenna will not exceed five feet above the penthouse to which they will be attached. b. Verizon's antennas will not exceed the relevant height limitations. c. Not applicable. d. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the building rooftop. The cabinets will not extend above the building parapet and will not be visible. 3. Architectural Compatibility. a. Verizon's facility will not require the construction of an additional structure. Equipment cabinets will be located on the building rooftop, beneath the level of the parapet. The cabinets will be of equal quality and similar in nature to existing wireless equipment cabinets and other existing rooftop equipment. b. Verizon's antennas will be painted to match existing antennas and the light brick color of the hotel. Related equipment cabinets are discussed above. c. Not applicable; the equipment will not be mounted to the building wall. d. Not applicable; the facility will not include a monopole. e. Utilities to the facility will be run underground. Cable runs to the antennas and equipment will not be visible from ground level. 4. Compatibility with the Natural Environment. All components of Verizon's facility will be located on the St. Regis Hotel rooftop and will not dominate the landscape or present any silhouette on a ridge line. a. Not applicable. b. Not applicable; there will be no ground-mounted components. c, This modest facility will have little, if any, effect on surrounding view planes. d. In accordance with Verizon's FCC license to provide cellular service in Aspen, this facility must comport with all FCC regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electi-omagnetic frequency emissions. 2 5. Screening. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the rooftop, fully screened by existing parapet walls. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas will be painted to match existing antennas and the hotel walls. The antennas will be visible at ground level from only very limited areas. a. Not applicable; no monopole will be utilized. b. Not applicable; there will be no ground-mounted components. c. All cables to the facility will be completely concealed from public view. d. Not applicable; no fencing will be utilized. e. The visual impact of the facility will be mitigated as discussed above. 6. Liqhtinq and Siqnaae. Not applicable; no lighting or signage will be utilized. 7. Access Wavs. a. Not applicable; the installation will have no ground-mounted components. b. The facility will be secured from access by the general public (locked access to the hotel rooftop); through its lease with the property owner, Verizon will have 24-hour access to the facility in the event of emergency. c. Easements for ingress and egress and electrical and telephone service currently exist and are recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 3 . . COMMITME: SCHEDULE A GLORIA BROWN CLOSSER CONSULTING LLC 799 SNYDER MOUNTAIN RD EVERGREEN CO 80439 1. Effective Date: June 19, 2001 at 7:00 AM Order No. 406951 -C DW/lc Customer Reference 2. ALTA Owner' s Policy Amount: $ Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED 3. ALTA Loan Policies Amount: $ Proposed Insured: Proposed Insured: Amount: $ 4. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company issued by: Owner's Premium: $ THE TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC. Lender's Premium: $ 517 E HOPKINS AVENUE Add'l Lender Chg: $ ASPEN CO 81611 Add'l Charges: $ FX 970-920-4052 Tax Certificate: $ 20.00 PH 970-920-4050 DENVER 303-595-8463 Endorsement Chg: $ TED Charges: $ 175.00 TOTAL CHARGES: $ 195.00 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I , COMMITMENT Plat id No. 18-1 SCHEDULE A (continued) Order No. 406951 -C 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is covering the land in the State of Colorado, County of Pitkin , described as follows: Lot 1, FIRST AMENDED PLAT ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, according to the Plat thereof filed October 3, 1988, in Plat Book 21 at Page 35 and Amendments thereto filed July 1, 1989, in Plat Book 22 at Page 85, December 28, 1990, in Plat Book 25 at Page 49, October 1, 1992, in Plat Book 29 at Page 71 and February 9, 1993, in Plat Book 30 at Page 65. Together with the non-exclusive easement for the purpose of providing vehicular and pedestrian access, as created defined and established by Easement Agreement between Mountain Chalet Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado corporation and Savanah Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership recorded October 4, 1989 in Book 604 at Page 184. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No. 406951 -C Section 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to wit: 1. Release of Mechanic's Lien of Christiansen, Inc. in the amount of $51,769. as evidenced by Statement of Lien recorded October 17, 2000, at Reception No. 448035. 2. Deed from SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED. NOTE: Duly executed real property transfer declaration, executed by either the Grantor or Grantee, to accompany the Deed mentioned above, pursuant to Article 14 of House Bill. No. 1288 - CRS 39-14-102. 3. Evidence satisfactory to the Company or its duly authorized agent that all dues and/or assessments levied by the Homeowners Association have been paid through the date of closing. 4. Evidence satisfactory to the Company or its duly authorized agent either (a) that the "real estate transfer taxes" imposed by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979), and by Ordinance No. 13, (Series of 1990), of the City of Aspen, Colorado have been paid, and that the liens imposed thereby have been fully satisfied, or (b) that Certificates of Exemption have been issued pursuant to the provisions thereof. A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT PURSUANT TO 1983 C.R.S., 39-1-102 (14.5). NOTE: Corporations that do not maintain a permanent place of business in Colorado, and individuals, estates and trusts that do not reside in Colorado may be subject to a Colorado withholding tax on the sale of real property in the amount of $100,000.00 or more. The withholding tax will be the smaller of two percent (2%) of the sales price or the net proceeds from the sale of such real property. The tax will be withheld by the title company and remitted to the Colorado Department of Revenue unless the seller executes an affidavit confirming the exemption of the transfer from this withholding requirement. (Continued) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . REQUIREMENTS (continued) Order No. 406951 C- NOTE: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's Office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half inch. The Clerk and Recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. The requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. THE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT AN ADDITIONAL SEARCH OF THE RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO FOR JUDGMENT LIENS, TAX LIENS OR OTHER SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR INVOLUNTARY MATTERS AFFECTING THE GRANTEE OR GRANTEES, AND TO MAKE SUCH ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS IT DEEMS NECESSARY, AFTER THE IDENTITY OF THE GRANTEE OR GRANTEES HAS BEEN DISCLOSED TO THE COMPANY. NOTE: THIS COMMITMENT IS ISSUED UPON THE EXPRESS AGREEMENT AND UNDERSTANDING THAT THE APPLICABLE PREMIUMS, CHARGES AND FEES SHALL BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT IF THE APPLICANT AND/OR ITS DESIGNEE OR NOMINEE CLOSES THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED BY OR OTHERWISE RELIES UPON THE COMMITMENT, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND SCHEDULES OF RATES ON FILE WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Section 2 EXCEPTIONS Order No. 406951 -C The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: Any loss or damage, including attorney fees, by reason of the matters shown below: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any other facts which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the Proprietor of a Vein or Lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded April 4, 1884, in Book 11 at Page 65. 8 Assignment of Easement between Ralph P. Melville and Marian H. Melville, as Assignois and Mountain Chalet Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado corporation, as Assignee, recorded December 29, 1975, in Book 307 at Page 88. 9. Easement and right of way to construct, operate and maintain an underground facility for vehicle parking, conference rooms and other lodge related uses, as granted by Savanah Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership to Mountain Chalet Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado corporation by instrument recorded October 4, 1989, in Book 604 at Page 184, said easement being more particularly described therein. 10. Contract for Electric Service between Savanah Limited Partnership and Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. recorded April 14, 1992, in Book 674 at Page 355. (Continued) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I . . EXCEPTIONS (continued) Order No. 406951 -C 11. Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement between the City of Aspen, Colorado and Savanah Limited Partnership, recorded October 3, 1988, in Book 574 at Page 792, August 15, 1990, in Book 627 at Page 457, September 23, 1992, in Book 689 at Page 317, January 7, 1993, in Book 699 at Page 978 and February 9, 1993, in Book 703 at Page 221. 12. Covenant Designating Parking Spaces for Employee Use recorded December 14, 1992, in Book 697 at Page 499. 13. Easement and right of way to construct, reconstruct, repair, change, enlarge, re-phase, operate, and maintain an underground electric transmission or distribution line, as granted by Savanah Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership by Aspen Enterprises International Inc., a Colorado corporation, as general partner to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. by instrument recorded January 25, 1993, in Book 701 at Page 818, said easement being ten (10) feet in width. 14. Any and all leases and tenancies. 15. Easements and restrictions as shown on the Plats of said subdivision. 16. Aspen Mountain Trail and eight foot alpine trail as shown on the plats of said subdivision. 17. Easements and rights of way for sewer, gas, water or similar pipelines and appurtenances, and for electric, telephone, cable and similar lines and appurtenances, and to use such roadway for public emergency vehicles and the right to divert public vehicular traffic during emergency situations as reserved by the City of Aspen in Ordinance No. 14 (Series of 1985) recorded June 26, 1985, in Book 488 at Page 717. 18. Covenant and Agreement Regarding Compliance with Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement between Savanah Limited Partnership, a District of Columbia limited partnership, and SLT Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, recorded January 15, 1998, at Reception No. 412581. 19. Lease between SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, d/b/a The St. Regis Aspen, a Delaware limited liability company, Lessor(s), and Voicestream PCS II Corporation, Lessee(s), as evidenced by Memorandum of Lease recorded November 3, 1999, at Reception No. 437363. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1, APPLICANT has submitted to CITY ati application for a,wireless telecommunication facility (hereinafter, TI IE PROJECT). APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment ofall processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the qize. nature or scope of the proposed project. it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certaility of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable tor CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the I'lanning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount ofS 680 which is for hours of Community Development staff time, ami if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. and in no case will building. permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC By: Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: 3//1,4 DAÂ·v / b c.,v~PSâ‚¬LL., i~ Mailing Address: Dpent-TIONS U l~664,70 /6 8350 E. Crescent Pkwy., #400 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: James Lindt, 92().5441 DATE: 7.18.01 PROJECT Verizon Wireless Telecom Facility REPRESENTATIVE: Gloria Brown OWNER St. Regis TYPE OF APPLICATION One Step - Wireless Telecommunication DESCRIPTION: Applicant would like to install 6 panel antennas and telecom equipment on St. Regis Land Use Code Section(s) 26.575.130 Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Repicw b> Staff for compliance with criteria. If application is not consistent with criteria, conditional use review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is needed *ublic hearing). Review by Historic Preservation Commission is required for any location on a historic sti-ucture or u ithin a historic district. Public Hearing No. Unless appeal of criteria is heard by Planning and Zoning Commission Referral Agencies Engineering Planning Fees Planning Deposit Minor ($500) Referral Agenc> Fees: Engineering, Minor ($180), Total Deposit $680 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $205/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1, Proof of ownership (for parcel on which facility will be located) 2. Signed luc agreement. 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. (The property owner is the applicant. Wireless service may be authorized to represent owner.) 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur. consisting of a current ccrtificatc from a title insurance company, or altonicy licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names ofall owners of the property, and all mortgages. judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the pat-ec]. and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review of the application. 6 2 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. 7. An 8 1/2" b> 11- vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Roof plan uith proposed facilities. Roof plan with existing facilirics. 9 Additional materials as required by the specific review. Please refer to the code language in your application packet for tlic specific submittal requirements. 1 0, A Kritten description ofthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. Process: Submit application. Planner reviews and makes recommendation to Com Dev Director. lf application meets the criteria set forth in Section 26.575.130 then director approves. If application does not meet the criteria. then application is sent to tile Planning and Zoning Cominission for Conditional Use Review. After Planning process is completed. the applicant must still obtain a building permit before installation. Dihclaimer: 'The foregoing summan is advison' in nature onl> and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning. which is subject to change m the fulltle, and upon factual represelitations that inay or may 11Ot be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right