The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20030226ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION February 26, 2003 SISTER CITIES MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO NOON - SITE VISIT - NOON 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes - January 8th and February 12, 2003 III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. Project Monitoring VII. Staff comments: Certificates of No Negative Effect issued (Next resolution will be #5) VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. None IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Election of new Vice-chair B. 114 Neale St. - Conceptual X. WORKSESSIONS A. 819 E. Hopkins Ave. XI. ADJOURN OJECT MONITORING Rally Dupps 302 E. Hopkins 110 W. Main (Hotel Aspen) 232 W. Main (Christmas Inn), with Teresa 501 W. Main Street (Christiania Lodge) 118 E. Cooper (Little Red Ski Haus) 110 E. Bleeker 640 N. Third Jeffrey Halferty 428 E. Hyman (former Sportstalker Store) 213 W. Bleeker (Schelling) 101 E. Hallam (Gorman), with Neill 216 E. Hallam (Frost/Auger), with Mike 735 W. Bleeker (Marcus), with Teresa 922 W. Hallam Neill Hirst 434 E. Main (Hills) 409 E. Hyman (New York Pizza building) 205 S. Third 101 E. Hallam (Gorman), with Jeffrey 635 W. Bleeker Mike Hoffman 950 Matchless Drive (Becker) 216 E. Hallam (Frost/Auger), with Jeffrey 513 W. Smuggler (Harman) 633 W. Main (Dart) 920 W. Hallam (Guthrie) Teresa Melville 232 W. Main (Christmas Inn), with Rally 323 W. Hallam (Rispoli) 513 W. Bleeker 735 W. Bleeker (Marcus), with Jeffrey 515 Gillespie (Bone) Valerie Alexander 216 E. Hallam (Frost) 533 W. Francis (Gibson) verek Skalko 135 W. Hopkins 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Directorf~i) FROM: Katie Ertmer, Assistant Historic Preservation Planner RE: 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Lot 2- Major Development, Conceptual- Public Hearing DATE: February 26,2003 SUMMARY: Approval was granted on this site for a historic landmark lot split, and HPC completed final review of the rehabilitation plans and addition to the existing miner's cottage. The current application involves the design of a new, single-family residence and an accessory dwelling unit on the newly created lot. Because the entire site remains listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures," the proposed building must receive HPC approval and must comply with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and the Land Use Code. The maximum allowable floor area, 3,945 square feet was established through the lot split. The applicant is also asking for variances from the Residential Design Standards in the Land Use Code regarding Garage Doors, Covered Entry Porch, One Story Element, Secondary Mass and Inflection. APPLICANT: Henry and Lana Trettin, represented by William Sharples, ShoP Architect and Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects. PARCELID: 2737-073-83-002. ADDRESS: 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-15A (Moderate Density Residential) MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submitta! materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's 1 conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. The procedures for the review of Major Development projects include a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. A list of the design guidelines relevant to Conceptual Review is attached as "Exhibit B." This memo will discuss only those that staff finds are not met by the proposal. One chapter of the guidelines, Chapter 11, relates specifically to building a new house on a landmark lot. Staff finds that there is conflict with all six standards in this chapter that address conceptual issues: Building Orientation 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. o The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. In sorne cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. Mass and Scale 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 2 00 0 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. Building & Roof Fonns 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. o They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. o Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. STAFF ANALYSIS: The general comments that introduce Chapter 11 state that the design of a new house on a landmark lot is to reinforce the basic visual characteristics established by the historic resource. This includes the historic building' s siting, relationship to the street, basic mass, form, materials, scale, and overall simplicity of design. It is said that a strong connection between the two buildings in terms of these elements is more fundamental than the architectural style of the new construction. In fact, once these relationships are clearly established, the guidelines support contemporary design for new buildings. Staff is concerned though, that overall, the proposed house may not be creating those key ties to the miner's cottage. Guideline 11.1 requires that the entrance to the new house be oriented to the street and that the building be parallel to the lot lines. Staff has some concern that the orientation of the new house is facing Queen Street, which is significantly different than the historic building's. Additionally, the garage doors are oriented toward Neale Street, which detracts from the basic visual characteristics established by the Miner' s cottage. The cottage' s front faGade faces Neale Street and its garage is on King Street, which establishes a very different pattern of orientation from that being proposed. Guideline 11.2 requires a functional front porch and a clear entry into the building. One of the statements is that the porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen historically. The porch on the historic house is small and typical of the miner's Cottage. The one on the new house is larger, and travels the length of the front of the house and has a deck above. Overall, the porch does not provide a strong connection to the historic resource. 11.3 and 11.4 require that the house be in scale with the historic building by breaking the mass down into similarly sized modules, and that the front plane of the building not be taller than the historic resource. The entire structure of the proposed new residence 3 000 00 appears as one large mass. Staff finds that there is a sense of "inflection" on the north elevation of the residence, but overall, the house is not sympathetic to the small scale of the miner' s cottage, which could be achieved, even in a modern architectural style, by having several masses to the structure. 11.5 states that the forms of the new house must be similar to those found on the historic building. Staff finds that overall the forms and the composition ofthe forms that make up the new house are much more complex than found on the historic house. 11.6 requires the use of roof forms that are similar to those used traditionally, particularly gable and hipped roofs. This house has very contemporary, asymmetrical roof designs, which are not sympathetic to the roof structures of the historic resource. Staff cannot \ support this as being sympathetic to the historic house. While the proposal meets guideline 11.10 that discusses the distinction of old and new buildings, staff finds that the proposed new house has too many characteristics that are different than the historic house, which prevents a finding that they are related. There is significant room for creativity and re-interpretation of historic forms in the new house. However, it must be remembered that this is a landmark lot and HPC must be confident that the new house has been clearly influenced by the adjacent miner's cottage. The issue is not whether the proposed house is a good work of architecture when viewed on its own, but whether it meets the design guidelines and HPC's philosophies about what creates compatibility with a small, modest, 19tli century home. The project certainly requires staff and HPC to reflect on the boundaries of their philosophies in this regard. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER AREAS OF THE LAND USE CODE: The Historic Preservation Commission is permitted to grant variances from the Residential Design Standards per section 26.410.040(D) and 26.222 of the Land Use Code. The Applicant is requesting the HPC to grant variances from some of the Residential Design Standards in section 26.410.040 of the Code regarding new development. A copy of this section of the code is included in the exhibits with this memo. According to section 26.222.010 appeals for exemption from the Residential Design Standards should identify why the exception would "(O yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan, and (2) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, or be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints." Staff finds that there are no unusual site specific constraints related to this property. Therefore, it will be evaluated on requirements (1) and (2). The requested variances will be addressed one by one: 26.410.040(B) (1) Secondary Mass: All new structures shall locate at least ten (10) percent of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached .from the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. 4 Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds, and accessory dwelling units are examples Of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes Of secondary mass shall be defined as an element not less than six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height of not more than nine (9) .feet. Staff response: There is no mass completely detached from the primary structure or any connecting element in this proposal. There is an Accessory Dwelling Unit incorporated in the design. However, the ADU is connected to the primary residence by a deck located above the ADU, which is not a subordinate element. The intention of the standard is to respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by breaking up the massing. Staff does not find the design to meet the intent or dimensional requirements of the standard. Therefore, staff does not find it warrants an exception from this standard. 26.410.040(C) (2b) Parking, Garages, and Carports: the front fagade of the garage or the frontmost supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet furtherfrom the street than thefrontmost wall of the house. Staff response: The garage doors do not meet this standard, as they are flush with the east fagade of the structure. Architecturally, the garage doors blend in with the fagade that faces Neale Street and do not dominate the residence. However, this side of the structure is the only one with a public sidewalk and the design does not meet the pedestrian friendly intent of the standard because it creates a curb cut in a primary sidewalk and creates a wall that is not human scale. Staff does not find the design of the garage doors meets the criterion for an exception to this standard. 26.410.040 (D) (lb) Covered Entry Porch A covered entry porch offifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6'), shall be part of the front fagade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one story in height. Staff response: The proposal has architectural features that can be interpreted as a covered entry porch. However, the Standard requires the porch to be not more than one story in height and the proposal has a deck above what would be considered the front porch, which makes it a two-story feature. Staff finds the proposed front porch area does not face a major street and is human scale or pedestrian friendly and therefore, does not meet the criteria for a variance from the standard. 26.410.040(D) (2) One Story Element: All residential buildings shall have a one-story street .facing element the width of which comprises at least twenty (20) percent of the buildings' overall width. For example, a one-story element may be a porch roof, architectural projection, or living space. Staff response: The proposed residence does not have a one-story element that faces either Queen Street or Neale Street. In regard to a variance from this standard, the proposed design is not in greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area 5 Community Plan, nor does it better address the intent of the requirement, which is to provide human scale and enhance the pedestrian experience in relation to the structure. 26.410.040 (E) (2a) Innection Ifa one (1) story building exists directly adjacent to the subject site, then the new construction must step down to one story in height along their common lot line. If there are one-story buildings on both sides of the subject site, the applicant may choose the side towards which to inflect. Staff response: The north facing side of this property is adjacent to a one story Miner' s Cottage. Staff finds the north side of the proposed new structure is entirely one story and meets the criteria for inflection. Therefore, there is no need for a variance from this standard. There were questions from the staff regarding the parking space for the ADU, which is proposed to be located off of Queen Street. After consultation with the City Engineer, it was determined that there needed to be a restudy of the location of this parking spot. The applicant will present a new proposed location for this parking spot at the hearing. The Subdivision Exemption Plat for 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split contains two notes, 7 and 12, stating that access to the site should be off of Queen Street unless certain safety standards are met and approved by the City Engineer. Staff and the applicant' s representative, Suzannah Reed, consulted with the City Engineer regarding this issue. The City Engineer determined that they could have the access of Neale Street if adequate line of sight safety zones are provided for the driveway. The curb cut and driveway are to be constructed to the City of Aspen's Engineering Standards. The applicant is also required to pave Queen Street in front of the property 12 from the center of the right of way to the provide a stabilized gravel shoulder. If it is determined necessary, the applicant must also correct the location of the handicap ramp at corner of Neale and Queen Streets. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is unable to make a recommendation that the project complies with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 11.1 through 11.6, which are all of the points of direction that apply to a Conceptual application for a new house like this one. In particular, the issues around scale, massing, and building and roof forms of the new house, are large enough that staff feels the proposal requires significant restudy. The proposal is also asking for significant variances from the Residential Design Standards of the Land Use Code. Staff was unable to find sufficient justification for recommending variances from the standards regarding the garage, one-story element, secondary mass, and covered entry porch. If the design were closer to compliance, or if there was some additional information needed that HPC felt was not available at the hearing, continuing for restudy would be justified. Unless HPC finds that to be the case, a motion to deny, with clear findings about the areas where the project is out of compliance, is appropriate. 6 RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2003 approving the Major Development (Conceptual) application for 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Lot 2." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated February 26,2003 B. Relevant Design Guidelines C. Section 26.410.040 (B)(C)(D)(E) of the Land Use Code D. Application 7 Exhibit B 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Lot 2, Guidelines Relevant to Conceptual Review of the New House Building Orientation 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. o The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. o The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. Mass and Scale 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. o The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. o The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. Building & Roof Forms 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. o They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. o Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. Driveways & Parking 14.17 Design a new driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. o Plan parking areas and driveways in a manner that utilizes existing curb cuts. New curb cuts are not permitted. 8 000 00 o If an alley exists, a new driveway must be located off of it. 14.18 Garages should not dominate the street scene. See Chapter 8: Secondary Structures. 14.22 Driveways leading to parking areas should be located to the side or rear of a primary structure. o Locating drives away from the primary facade will maintain the visual importance the structure has along a block. See Chapter 8: Secondary Structures. 9 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) FOR THE NEW HOUSE LOCATED AT 114 NEALE STREET/17 QUEEN STREET, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, LOT 2, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 2003 Parcel ID #: 2737-073-83-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Henry and Lana Trettin, represented by William Sharples, ShoP Architect and Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects, have requested Major Development approval (Conceptual)and Variances from the Residential Design Standards for the new house located at 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission is allowed to grant Variances from the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020(D) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer determined it was appropriate to have access to the site from Neale Street as long as the safety conditions agreed to by the City Engineer and the Applicant are met and that this determination met the requirements of the Subdivision Exemption Plat for 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Plat Notes numbers 7 and 12; and WHEREAS, Katie Ertmer, in her staff report dated February 26, 2003 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be denied; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on February 26,2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of to THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves Major Development (Conceptual) and Variances from the Residential Design Standards for the new house located at 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, finding that the review standards are met, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant will pave Queen Street in front o f their property to a width o f twelve (12) feet, to be measured from the center ofthe right of way and provide a stabilized gravel shoulder. 2. The applicant will submit a plan for the driveway with line of sight improvements to be approved by the City Engineer. The curb cut and driveway are to be constructed to the City of Aspen's Engineering Standards. 3. The applicant will correct the location of the handicap ramp on the corner of Neale and Queen Streets if the City Engineer determines it necessary. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of February, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Request For Variance From the Residential Design Standards (Prepared by SHoP Architects, PC on behalf of Lana and Henry Trettin, for their HPC application dated February 26,2003.) Variances are requested on the following design elements for the residence to be located on Lot 2,114 Neale Street / 17 Queen Street Historic Lot Split. Garage Doors Facing Neale Street. Â· Placement of the garage entrance off of Neale Street allowed the house be organized in a more compact form, making it possible to reduce its visual impact on surrounding neighbors. A garage that would be entered from the Queen Street side would require the building volume to project further out from the hill and towards the south, with the potential result of disruption of the neighbors' sight lines to the mountains. Â· There is no traditional street grid or clear neighborhood pattern along Neale Street. As a result, the impact of the garage door on the east elevation of the residence would not have any immediate impact on the street or neighboring buildings. Covered Entry Porch Â· There is no traditional street grid and no clear pattern of covered entry porches existing along Neale Street. The house does incorporate a 6'-0" wide by 9'-0" high portal entry that faces Neale Street and is attached to a porch element that extends along the south elevation of the house which faces Queen Street. One Storey Element Â· Architectural elements such as windows, an entry portal, and modulation of the deck wall screen over the Accessory Dwelling Unit serve to delineate the one storey elements within the elevation along Neale Street. Windows are located in this elevation to further reinforce the human scale at the street. Secondary Mass Â· The proposed house is geometrically sub-divided into two different bars. The main living volume runs east to west across the site and contains bedrooms, kitchen, living and dining areas. The service volume is oriented north to south along Neale Street, and contains the garage, studio workshop spaces, and the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). Along Neale Street these two volumes have been blended together with a roof deck and wood wall screen over the ADU to create an open air space off the main living area with views towards the mountains. The surface of deck wall screen along Neale Street is modulated to further delineate the mass of the main residence from the secondary one storey mass of the ADU. Inflection Â· The miner's cottage is sited well up the slope from the proposed house, is approximately 90 feet away and is at an elevation approximately 16'-0" higher. As result, it is not relevant for the massing of the new residence to share a geometric relationship with the cottage. - Proposed Development Compliance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines. (Prepared by SHoP Architects for Lana and Henry Trettin on behalf of their HPC application (February 26, 2003.) from Chapter 11 New Buildings on Landmarked Properties / Historic Landmark Lot Splits 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. Â· While main entry into the residence is via a porch walkway on the south elevation wall facing Queen Street, the porch is accessed from a 6'-0" wide by 9'-0" high portal on the Neale Street elevation. The entrance to the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is also located on the Neale Street side. Â· The house has been designed parallel to three of the four lot lines; the line to the west, along Neale Street, organizes the ADU and garage, while the line to the east organizes the bedroom and kitchen spaces. Since a traditional street grid does not exist in this location the house was not arranged to any particular grid system. 11.2 In a residential context clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. Â· The primary entrance of the new building occurs along the south-facing wall. A porch defined by a wood walkway and cantilevered deck above defines the entry zone into the main residence. Â· The wooden walk is 6'-0" wide, which is in scale with historic porches found in Aspen. Â· The wooden walkway is oriented south to Queen Street, with views of the Aspen mountains beyond. An additional walkway has been designed to take visitors from the guest driveway to the main entrance of the house. MASS AND SCALE 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. Â· While the house is larger than the miner's cottage located on the upper lot resulting from the historic lot split in 1998, the proposed house is geometrically sub-divided into two different volumes. The main living volume runs east to west across the site and contains bedrooms, kitchen, living and dining areas. The service volume is oriented north to south along Neale Street, and contains the garage, studio workshop spaces, and the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The miner's cottage is sited well up the slope from the proposed house, is approximately 90 feet away and is at an elevation approximately 16'-0" higher. Â· The house has been sited into the hill to allow access to grade from the second floor kitchen and main living space. The house's placement into the hill also minimizes obstruction of views from the miner's cottage and other residences to the north to the mountains to the south. . 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. Â·It is not appropriate to design the primary plane in the front of the house to a similar scale as the miner's cottage primarily because of the difference in distance and elevation between the two houses. Â·In addition to the single story covered walkway along the ground floor, the second floor is also isolated as a single story element by the exterior cantilevered wood deck and the roof's overhanging eave. BUILDING AND ROOF FORMS 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property Â· The scale of the proposed house will appear small relative to the other buildings in the neighborhood. This will be accomplished through the horizontal expression of the roof and walls, and the siting of the house into the hill, which will minimize its height in comparison to the surrounding houses. Â· The roof does not project upward significantly from the house, as a result it should not disrupt views from surrounding residences towards the mountains in the south. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similarto those seen traditionally in the block. Â· A shallow roof slope is used specifically to relate to surrounding houses and to provide a deck area off the living and bedroom spaces on the second floor. Â· Eave depths are kept to a minimum except for along the south elevation where it is necessary to provide shading from the sun. Â· Geodesic dome or A-frame geometries are not being considered in the design of the residence. 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. Â· Roof materials over the accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) will be concealed by wooden deck surfaces. Â· It is proposed that cor-ten steel will be used in the roof surfaces. The rustic nature of this metal material will eliminate any possibility of reflection and be in keeping with a range of color local to the region. MATERIALS 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. Â· The house is a wooden structure, and wood will be the primary exterior cladding material. Wood planking is oriented in the horizontal direction to give the house a horizontal reading in the landscape. In addition to these formal considerations, wood is the primary cladding member on many of the surrounding homes. Â· While glazing is planned for the south-facing elevation, no highly reflective materials are currently being considered. Â· Concrete will be used in the construction of the lap pool and retaining wall structures integrated into the house. A wood siding formwork is being considered to accentuate the wood siding lines and horizontal nature of the house. Â· The simplicity of the forms and details in the house are reinforced by the use of the materials and there is no attempt to use materials which will increase the perceived scale of the structure. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. Â· The exterior of the house will have horizontal wood siding. The miner's cottage has similar detailing. Â· The exterior of the house is designed to be understood as a single surface treatment. Details will be primarily minimal wood to wood connections. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. Â· The house will be new and distinct, and will not blur the distinction of old and new buildings. Â· Highly ornamental moldings, etc. are not being considered. Land Use Application THE CITY oF AspEN PROJECT: Name: Trettin Residence Location: Lot 2,114 Neale Street / 17 Queen Street Historic Lot Split (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) APPLICANT: Name: Henry and Lana Trettin Address: 3350 Ocean Park Blvd. Phone #: (310) 396-9500 Fax#: (310) 399-5130 E-mail: htrettin@imavideo.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: William Sharples, SHoP Architects; Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects Address: 200 East 37th Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10016 Phone #: (212) 889-9005 x 205 Fax#: (212) 889-3686 E-mail: wws@shoparc.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Historic Designation E Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) U Certificate of No Negative Effect E Demolition (total demolition) E Certificate ofAppropriateness Â® Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Vacant empty lot resulting from a Historic Lot Split in 1998. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) A 3036 square foot single family residence with a 420 square foot Accessory Dwelling Unit. Total square footage is 3456 square feet. FEES DUE: $2520.00 m El / r General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO D Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? 0 Il Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? Il Il Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? ~ In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration o f a National Register of Historic Places property in order to quali fy for state or federal tax credits? 1 0 this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are Ifyes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) O 0 If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: Rehabilitation Loan Fund Conservation Easement Program Dimensional Variances Increased Density Historic Landmark Lot Split Waiver of Park Dedication Fees Conditional Uses Exemption from Growth Management Quota System Tax Credits Dimensional Requirement Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Trettin Residence Applicant: Henry and Lana Trettin Project 114 Neale Street / 17 Queen Street Historic Lot Split Location: Aspen, CO 81611 Zone R-15 A District: Lot Size: 15,160 square feet Lot Area: 13,517 square feet (subtracting easements and percentages for slope) (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: nia Proposed: nia Number of residential units: Existing: nia Proposed: nia Number of bedrooms: Existing: nia Proposed: 4 Proposed % of demolition: n/a DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: nia Allowable:3945 st Proposed: 3456 sf Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: nia Allowable: 25'-0" Proposed: varies <25'-0" Accessory Bldg.: Existing: nia Allowable: nia Proposed: nia On-Site parking: Existing: nia Required: 3 Proposed: 3 % Site coverage: Existing: nia Required: nia Proposed. 18.3% (2477/13517) % Open Space: Existing: nia Required: nia Proposed: 72.8% (9840/13517) Front Setback: Existing: nia Required: 25'-0" Proposed: 58'-0" Rear Setback: Existing: nia Required: 10'-0" Proposed: 20'-0" min 35'-0" max Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: nia Required: 35'-0" Proposed:126'-0" Side Setback: (east) Existing: nia Required: 10'-0" Proposed: 10'-0" Side Setback: (west) Existing: nia Required: 10'-0" Proposed: 16'-4" Combined Sides: Existing: nia Required: 20'-0" Proposed: 26'-4" Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: _n/a Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): _ n/a Matrix of The City of Aspen's Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements To review full procedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of The City of Aspen Building Code, Historic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple step applications, do not replicate submission materials. Two copies of the application are required for a Certificate of No Effect, 15 copies are required for each meetingall other review. Also note that an electronic version of all text documents is required in a .txt, .doc, .wpd, or .rtf format. Application Fees Type of Review Notice Requirements Requirements Deposit Fee Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Designation 1-9,11,12 50 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council Consult with Historic Preservation None Exempt Development $0 Officer to confirm exempt status Certificate of No Negative Effect 1-9,14,15,16 $290 None Minor Development 1-10,16,17,18,37 $500 Posting Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (b) Development under 1,000 s. f., $1,205 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Conceptual 1-10,14,18,19,20,21,37 / Development over 1,000 s. f., $2,405 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Final 1-10,17,22,23,37 Paid at time of conceptual 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Substantial Amendment 1-10,17,24,25,26,37 $500 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Demolition 1-9,27 $2,405 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Relocation 1-9,28-35 $2,405 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,205 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Rescinding Designation 1-9,36 $1,205 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council KEY 1. Contained within a letter signed by and/or other graphic materials that document 29. A written explanation of the type of the applicant, the applicant's name, its physical characteristics. relocation requested (temporary, on-site or address and telephone number, and 13. Identificationofthe character-defining off-site) and justification for the need for the name, address, and telephone features that distinguish the entity which relocation. number o f any representative should be preserved. 30. A written report from a licensed engineer or authorized to act on behalf of the 14. Verification that the proposal complies with architect regarding the soundness ofthe applicant. Section 26.410, Residential Design building, structure or object, its ability to 2. The street address, legal Standards, or a written request for a variance withstand the physical move and its description, and parcel from any standard that is not being met. rehabilitation needs, once relocated. identification number of the 15. Elevations or drawings of the proposed 31. A conceptual plan for the receiving site property proposed for development. work. providing preliminary information on the 3. A disclosure of ownership of the 16. Photographs, building material samples property boundaries, existing improvements parcel proposed for development, and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately and site characteristics and the associated consisting of a current certificate depict location, extent and design of the planned improvements. from a Title insurance company, or proposed work. 32. Evidence of the financial ability to attorney licensed to practice in the 17. An accurate representation of all major undertake the safe relocation, preservation State of Colorado, listing the names building materials and finishes to be used in and repair of the building, structure or object; of all owners o f the property, and the development, depicted through samples or site preparation and construction of necessary all mortgages, judgments, liens, photographs. infrastructure through the posting of bonds or easements, contracts and 18. Scaled elevations and/or drawings ofthe other financial measures deemed appropriate. agreements affecting the parcel, and proposed work and its relationship to the 33. Supplementary materials to provide an demonstrating the owner's right to designated historic buildings, structures, sites understanding of the larger context for the apply for the Development and features within its vicinity. relocated property and its impact on adjacent Application. 19. Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) properties, the neighborhood or streetscape. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map or addition(s) depicting their form, including 34. If the applicant does not own the receiving locating the subject parcel within their height, massing, scale, proportions and site, proof from the site's property owner of the City of Aspen. roofplan; and the primary features of all the willingness to accept the relocated 5. A site plan depicting the proposed elevations. building, structure or object. layout and the project's physical 20. Supplemental materials to provide a visual 35. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking relationship to the land and its description ofthe context surrounding the the necessary approvals to place the surroundings. designated historic property or historic district building on the identified receiving site. If 6. A site improvement survey including at least one (1) of the following: the site is outside ofthe city limits, certified by a registered land diagrams, maps, photographs, models or verification that the building will be surveyor, licensed in the State of streetscape elevations. preserved on its new site through a formal Colorado, showing the current 21. Preliminarv selection of primarv building action of the other jurisdiction or a status of the parcel including the materials to be used in construction preservation easement. current topography and vegetation. represented by samples and/or photographs. 36. A written description of how the property (This requirement, or any part 22. A statement, including narrative text or does not meet these criteria for designation. thereof, may be waived by the graphics, indicating how the Final 37. A lighting plan indicating the location of all Community Development Director Development Plan conforms to exterior light fixtures and site lighting, and if the project is determined not to representations made or stipulations placed as cut sheets for each type of fixture proposed. warrant a survey document.) a condition of the approval of the Conceptual Light fixtures must comply with the "City of 7. A written description of the Development Plan. Aspen Historic Preservation Design proposal and a written explanation 23. Final drawings ofall proposed structures(s) Guidelines" and meet the City Lighting Code. o f how the proposed development and/or addition(s) included as part of the complies with the review criteria development at W' = 1.0' scale and The City of Aspen Historic 24. A revised site plan Preservation Design Guidelines 25. Revised scaled elevations and drawings relevant to the development 26. Photographs and other exhibits to illustrate application. the proposed changes. 8. Additional materials, 27. Written documentation that the Chief documentation, or reports as Building Official has determined the building deemed necessary by the an imminent hazard, g narrative text, Community Development Director. graphic illustrations or other exhibits that 9. Completed Land Use Application provide evidence that the building, structure Form. or object is of no historic or architectural 10. Dimensional Requirement Form. value or importance. 1. Site or historic district boundary 28. A written description and/or graphic map. illustrations of the building, structure or 12. Property or district description object proposed for relocation. including narrative text, photographs Public Hearing Notice Requirements Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from the matrix found in this application packet. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper by the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to provide an affidavit at the hearing that posting took place. 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it, and to provide an affidavit at the hearing that posting took place. The names and addresses of property owners who will receive notice by mail shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. Subdivision applications also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. Proof of notice must be provided at the public hearing. General Summary of Historic Preservation Review Process (Please see Section 26.415 of the Aspen Municipal Code for more detailed information.) 1. An application is first transmitted to the Community Development Director to determine if it is complete. A complete application for a Certificate of No Negative Effect may be approved by the Community Development Director with no further review if it meets the requirements set forth for that type of work in the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. For all other types of reviews, the applicant shall be notified in writing whether the information is complete or if additional materials are required. 3. A date for a public hearing on a complete application will be scheduled before the HPC. Notice of the hearing shall be provided as required in the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. City Community Development Staff will review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. 5. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The order of proceedings at the HPC meeting are as follows: 1. Applicant and public are sworn in 2. Staffpresentation 3. Commission member questions 4. Public comment 5. Commission member comments 6. Applicant response/clarification 7. Commission motion and vote 6. The HPC will approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is a one-step review, and it is approved, the HPC will issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. If the application requires submittal for a final review, materials must be prepared and submitted according to the processes described above. A project that receives final approval will be issued a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. 7. HPC decisions are final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as provided in the Aspen Municipal Code. For Major Development, Demolition, or Relocation, a resolution of the HPC action will be forwarded to the City Council to allow them an opportunity to "call up" the decision if they feel there has been an abuse of discretion or denial of due process. No building permit can be issued for construction of the project until the thirty (30) day "call up" period has expired. 8. For Historic Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split, the two types of historic preservation reviews in which City Council makes the final determination, staff will prepare a report including the recommendation of the HPC, and a hearing will be scheduled before Council. Council will evaluate the application to determine if the review criteria are met. The Council may approve, disapprove or continue the application to request additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. . 9. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project they approve. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If the applicant requests a change to any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to the full HPC. 10. Before an application for a building permit can be submitted, a final set of plans reflecting any or all required changes by the HPC or City Council must be on file with the City. Any conditions of approval or outstanding issues which must be addressed in the field or at a later time shall be noted on the plans. 11. Once a Development Order has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. . I. 11 2-016-03 , 1 ATTACHMENT 7 1 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 114 pep,te *T Â· 11 tfugew 607 2 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Ma IA>A,f 440 0 *te-9 , 200.3- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) SUBEN WAâ€¢+ 128{ P (name, please print) I, being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the Itt*day of 820%04â€¢9 , 200 3 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. )~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. L</r l AWLJI A i AY ~116lla *re v) V The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this ~ ~ zdAy 1 - f.z. of FEE,9-U A 21.A, 2003, by 90Â£-gel\/ dZ/+1/df-Z-(7 fip, -- * ::?fi . 3 3 -<r.. 7~- L WITNESS MY HAND AND OFRICLAI; SEAL J My commigRion expires: /6/>30104: EQ UI13/K 0Â£016_ Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 11 ' . L . I . .1- U . ..LE i.0119 .-* . .1,44 'f .0 4. 4 *. 1 U4 2 - *2* * 1 r- 1 4 2 PLACE E; - - t . ... 1 ..8 2 . .1. ./.- A --It -* . -- . . 1 64 2 -1 ' I XVIM' 4/ 1 - - Gli 1- L 1- h. - -S ..2,5*#19""NIA& -A- â‚¬- t< 1 41 Â· 1. 4 2 1 Â«Â¥4 ' ... . r 22.- 4 /4- : 3 1 4 *147 fat : i T .., 2- 0 1 -1 :,8 /1 I /Â£.&/ 4 4 - - * 74 => . :--,1-A~/0- . 8 4 g 'M A . - -I- 4 . - 1 . 2- - - - -*2,~ *,"M- â‚¬'B -16. I - = 17/ ...... I '. ' :64:*~*Â·34.Â·...1 .. ~#:s- b'. 0 I. J :. Elip 1 411 L .... B18 The Aspen es â€¢ Saturday-Sunday, February 8-9,2003 PUBLIC NOTICE 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE l'UBLIC N()TICE PL-EASE TAKE NOTICE: That the Board of County NOTICE OF PUBLIC TRUSTEE'S SALE RE: 114 NEALE STREET- MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ()RDINANCE N(). 6 ORDINANCE No. 8 Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado. at a NO. 03-()2 (CONCEPTUAL), AND SPECIAL REVIEW TO VARY SERIES OF 2003 (SERIES OF 2003) regular meeting November 6,2002, and after a du- To Whom it may Concern: This Notice 'is given THE ADU [)ESIGN STANDARDS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ly-noticed public hearing, adopted the following with regard to the following described Deed of NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing COUNCIL APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVEL COLINCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, Resolution: will be held m Wednesday, February 26,2003 at a 01'MENT (1'UD) AMENDMENT TO AMEND TllE TI) F.XTEND TIlt: TIMEFRAME IN WHICH TiltE Trust: PLATTED DEVI.1.01'MENT ENVELOPES ON 1.()13 19Â«)VISIONS 01Â·' 01<DINANCE 10, SERIES OF 2002, Approving the Crystal Island Ranch SubdiviÂ· Original Grantor of Deed of Trust (Borrower): meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen 1 AN[) 2 OF THE MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVI- SIIAL.1. BE APPLICABL.E. Historic Preservatioti Commissicin, Counen SION / PUD. CITY OF ASI'EN. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City 01 sion/ PUD Conceptual Subinission, 1041 Hazard Christopher Busk Chambers, City Hal], 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to Parcel ID: 2735-1424]94)02 Aspen directed the Community Development Di- Review. Special Review and GMQS Exemption for Original Beneficiary 01 Deed of Trust: consider an application submitted by Henry and 2735-1424)94)(}1 rector to propose amendments to the Municipal Richard Jelinek, Debbie Jelinek, Duck Meadow A Americor Funding Corporation Lana Trettin, requestint approval for Major De- WliEREAS, the Community Development Code to implement new regulations regarding the LLC, Duck Meadow B LLC. DJF Ranch, Inc. Current Owner of the Evidence of Debt secured velopment (Conceptual); to vary residential de- Department received an application from the Ap- (|emolition of Milti-lamily residential buildings in Copies of the full text of the Resolution are by the Deed 01 Trust: Colorado Federal Savings sign standards relating to garage doors. covered plicant, Jennifer ancl David Stockinan. represent- the City of Aspen: and, available, during regular business hours, in the Bank (87.2% undividled interest), and Dennis entry porch, one story element, secondary mass, ed by Kevin Mortey of Robert Trown & Associ- WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1.()4.060, Clerk and Recorder's Office, 530 East Main. Suite Lightbown and Judith Dubey (12.8% undivided in- and inflection: and Special Review to vary the ates, Inc.. requesting the Planning mid Zoning amendments to the Municipal Code were at>- 101, Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5157 terest) ADU design standards. The property is located Commission and City Council grant a I'latined proved by City Council by adoption of Ordinance Jeaiiette Jones Date of Deed of Trust: at 114 Neate Street/17 Queen Street. Lot 2, City Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to amend 41). Series of 2002, effective for a period of ninety Deputy County Clerk July 3,2001 and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal is for the the platted development envelopes on l.ots land (!)0) days: and, 2 of the Maroo,1 Creek Club: and WIIEREAS, the Community Development Di- Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on Febru- Recording Date of Deed of Trust: construction of a new. detached house with a ary 8,2003. (0045) WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning rector recommended extension of the time peri- July 5.2001 floor area that would be permitted for a single- Con,mission has reviewed and considered the de- (,(1 iii which Ordinance 4(), Series of 2002, applies family house in the R-15 zone district. hi accord- velopment proposal under the applicable provi- by sixty (6(J) days, for a total of one-hundred-fifty County of Recording: Pitkin PUBLIC NOTICE Reception No. of Recorded Deed of Trust: 456209 ance with Section 26.410.020 of the Land Use sions of the Municipal Code as identified herein. (150) days, to permit timely consideration of re- SHERIFF'S NOTICE OF SALE Code, the Historic Preservation Commission will has reviewed and considered the recommenda- vised code provisions and for the purpose 01 pro Book and Page of Recorded Deed of Trust: none IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR THE serve in the capacity & Design Review Appeal tion of the Community Development Director, moting the goals of the Aspen Area Conimunity You are hereby notified tliat the legal owner of an Committee. COUNTY OF Pm(IN, STATE OF COLORADO and has taken and considered public comment at Plan and protecting the public health, welfare, Evidence of Debt. dated July 3, 2001, in the origi- For further information, contact Katie Ertmer at a duly noticed public hearing: and Civil Action No. 01 CV 1381 and safety: and, nal principal amount of $250,000, which is se- the Aspen/ Pitkin County Community Develop- WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Com- GOLDEN CAPITAL INVESTMENTS. INC., and WIIEREAS. City Couticil reviewed and con- cured by the Deed of Trust described above, has ment Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO mission recommended to the City Council appro- sidered the recommendation of the Community LARRY SMITH, Plaintiffs val, by a vote of four to two (4-2) for a Planned Development Director and comments from mem- filed written election and demand for sale as pro- (970) 920-5177, katiee@ci.aspen.co.us VS. AQUARIAN FILMS, LTD., LACHLAND FRENCH vided in the Deed of Trust. The outstanding prii 1- s/Rally Dupi)s. Chair Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to amend bers â€ž1 tile public: and, the platted development envelopes on LoU; 1 and and STEVEN COLLIN. Defendants cipal balance (exclusive of interest and any other Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 2 of the Maroon Creek Club: and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Under a Writ of Execution entered December 31, charges properiy allowable linder the documents Published in The Aspen Times on February 8, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen City Council nance 40. Series of 2002, as hereinafter described, extension of the applicability time period of Ordi- 2002 evidencing the debt) due and owing upon the Evi- 2003.(0048) finds that the development proposal meets or ex- meets or exceed all applicable standards and that in the above entitled action, l am ordered to sell dence of Debt secured by the above-described ceeds all applicable development standards and the following property Deed 01 Trust being fc,reclosed was $249.781.73 that the approval of the development proposal. the approval is consistent with the goals and ele- Lot 7, Block 2, Aspen Grove Subdivision, Accord- as of January 6.2003. PUBLIC NOTICE with cond#tions. is consisteiit with the Noals and inents of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this NOTICE OF PUBUC TRUSTEES SALE elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and ing to The Plat Thereof Recorded September 3. THE FOLLOWING-DESCRIBED PROPERTY ]S l'ublic Trustee Sale No. 03-01 WHEREAS. the City of Aspen City Council Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the pro- 1963 in Book 2A ALL OF THE PROPERTY ENCUMBERED BY THE To Whom It May Concern: This Notice is given finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessa- motion of public health, safety. and welfare and at Page 291. County of Pitkin. State of Colorado LIEN OFTHE DEED OF TRUST. with regard to the following described Deed of ry for the pronnotion of Public health, safety, and shoukl be adopted as an emergency Ordinance a.k.a 400 McSkimming Road, Aspen. Colorado See Exhibit A attached hereto, Trust: wellare: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY pursualit to Secticâ€ž14.11 of the City Charter. 81611. together with all existing or subsequently erected Original Grantor of Deed of Trust: Owen Minney WHEREAS, the City of Aspen City Council, I shall offer for public sale to the highest bidder, or affixed buildings, improvements and fixtures: Original Beneficiary of Deed of Trust: by a vote 0,1 - to Lo, approves a Plan- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN. COL- [or cash. at public auction, all the right, title and all easements. rights of way, and appurtenances: Arthur D. Pease lied Unit Developinent (PUD) Ainendment to ORAL)0. THAT: interest of the defendant(s) in said property on all water, water rights and ditch rights (including ThiÂ· provisions of Ordinance 4{). Series of 2002. Current Owner of the Evidence of I)el)t secured ainend the platted development envelopes 011 Section h March 4, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. o'clock at the Pit- by the Deed of Trust: Arthur D. Pease Lots 1 and 2 of the MaiÂ·<>on Creek Club: and stock in utilities with ditch or irrigation rights): Date of Deed of Trust: June 1,1998 WHEREAS, the City of Aspen City Council shall lie elfective lor une-hundred-fifty (150) days kin County Courthouse Front Steps, Aspen, Col- and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating Recording Date of Deed of Trust: August 2,1998 finds that this Ordinance furthers and is liecessa- from its adoption date of November 12, 2002, ex- orado. NOTICE: THIS MAY NOT BE THE ARST LIEN. to the real property, including without limitation County of Recording: Pitkin ry for the promotion of public health, safety. and cept that the definition of demolition, as defined in Ordinance 40. Series of 21}02. shall not apply to all minerals. oil. gas, geothermal and similar mat- Book and Page of Recorded Deed of Trust: welfare. Signed January 21, 2003 Book No. N/A Page No. N/A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY single-(Emily and duplex residences. The defini- ters, Robert C. Braudis also known and numbered as TBD Seven Oaks Reception No. of Recorded Deed of Trust: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COL- tion 01 demolition in the land use code prior to Sheriff of Pitkin County, Colorado 417652 ORADO ON THE 241-11 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2003, the adoption of Ordinance 40. Series 01 2002, Published in The Aspen Times on January 25. Road, Carbondale, CO 81623. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the le- THAT: shall apply to single-lamily and duplex residen- February 1, 8. 15. 22. 2003. (9986) THE LIEN OF THE DEED OF TRUST BEING Mal owner of an Evidence of Debt dated June 1, Section 1: ces, FORECLOSED MAY NOT BE A ARST LIEN. 1998. in the original principal amount of Pursuant to the procedures and standards set Section 2: PUBLIC NOTICE THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that 1 $300.000.00, which is secured by the Deed of forth iii Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the The City Council hereby finds that an emergency RE: LOTS 1 AND 2 MAROON CREEK CLUB, PLAN- witl, at 10:00 AM o'clock a.m. on the date of Trust described above, has filed a written Notice requests tor a Planned Unit Development (PUL)) exists consistent with Section 4.11 of the City NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMEN[)MENT February 26,2003, at the SOUTH FRONT DOOR of Election and Demand for Sale, as provided in Amendment to amend the platted development Charter in that the adoption of this ordinance as said Deed of 'frust. The outstanding principal bal- envelopes on Lots 1 and 2 of the MaiÂ·oon Creek an emergency ordinance is necessary to preserve NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing of the Pitkin County Courthouse, 506 East Main ance (exclusive of interest and any other charges Club is approved with the following conditions the health. peace or safety 01 the public. Accord- will be held on Monday, February 24, 2003, at a in Aspen, Colorado, sell at public auction to the properly allowable under the document(s) evi- stated herein: ingly this ordinance shall become effective imme- meeting'to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen highest and best bidder for cash, the said real dencing said debt) clue and owing upon the Evi- 1. Prior to recordation of an amended subdivi- diately City Council. Council Chambers, City Hall. 130 S. property and all interest of the Grantor(s) and dence of Debt secured by the above-described sion plat, an access easement shall be granted to Section 3: Galena Street, to consider iii application submit- the Grantor(s)' heirs, successors and assigns Deed of Trust being foreclosed was $300,0(]0.00 the owner ol Lot 1 Maroon Creek Club Sulxlivi- This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litiga- ted by David and Jennifer Stockman, requesting therein. Cor the purpose of paying the indebted- as 01 January 3, 2003. sioii across Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Subdivision. tion and shall not operate as an abatement of any approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) ness provided in the Evidence of Debt secured by The following-described property is all of In addition. a note shall be placed on the plat re- action or proceeding now pending under or by Amendment to amend the platted develcipnient the property encumbered by said Deed of Trust: quiring that the structure I,itilt on Lot 2 be re- virttitÂ· 01 the or{|inances repealed or amended as the Deed <4 Trust. plus att (,riwy:' fees and the t.x See I:ihibit A .,11;ched litÂ·retoand striÂ·tril 111 .inÂ· ti, 11.{100 %(ittartÂ· f.Â·iÂ·t per liliÂ· appli- htÂ·ItÂ·,il provided. and the salmÂ· shall 1,1Â· ( 1,11(11,i t. envelopes (,f 1 01. 1 and 2 1,1 the flarnim ('reiÂ·k . 898 E HOPKINS LLC ARNOLD ELIZABETH // BARNES JONATHAN A 1800 MOLER RD 2154 WEST ADDISON #28 265 RIVERSIDE DR C BUS, OH 43207 ~ CHICAGO, IL 60618 BASALT, CO 81621 BAUTSCH MARY BECKER JANICE / BENENTITHOMAS 1982 BLUE MTN RD 72 ADLER AVE 17 SUMMIT AVE LONGMONT, CO 80504-6211 SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 KENNEBUNKPORT, ME 64046 BLAINE BARBARA J BLATT ROBERT ~ CAMPBELL JOHN E 417 WINCHESTER 10925 REED PARK HWY STE 200 900 E HOPKINS AVE APT ~ GLENDALE, CA 91201 CINCINNATI, OH 45242 ASPEN, CO 81611-2077 CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC CITY OF ASPEN i DART ELIZABETH / OHIO CORPORATION 130 S GALENA ST / 747 GALENA ST <# PO BOX 51 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AKRON, OH 44309 DE CRAY MARCELLA TRUSTEE DIAMOND PHILIP E FRANK FREDERIC QPRT / 30 COMMONWEALTH AVE ~ 2 TOPSIDE WAY ~ 12 TRILBY BRANCH / SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 LONGWOOD, FL 32779 F E DAVID & SHEILA / GAECHTER ANN E & WILLIAM R GIRVIN LINDA A //' 701 TERN POINT CIR / PO BOX 285 / 414 N MILL ST BOCA RATON, FL 33431 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLUCK STACY E < GREENWOOD WILLIAM S ISAAC THOMAS D REV TRST C PO BOX 865 PO BOX 4778 - /, 975 KING ST , - M ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOHNSON SALLYANNE C KAPPELI ERNST ~ KASABACH JACQUELYN A PO BOX 5050 PO BOX 1962 PO BOX 4166 C / ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAWRENCE LARRY & MARA LEWIS LORA J HOEBEE LIPSEY WILLIAM S 9642 CLAIBORNE SQ , 935 GIBSON AVE / 414 N MILL ST ~ LA JOLLA, CA 92037-1159 < ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOESCHEN LEE A & LINDA A / LOO MONA B TRUST /< MAPLE CHARLES A & BRYCE M 0602 W SOPRIS CREEK RD ~ 31841 SEAFIELD DR 927 GIBSON AVE BASALT, CO 81621 MALIBU, CA 90265 ASPEN, CO 81611 I , MCCAFFERTY PEGGY MEADOWS JEAN R & STANLEY H MEGA VIVIAN / 900 E HOPKINS #6 538 HILLSIDE DR / 1982 BLUE MTN RD A CO 81611 / HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 LONGMONT, CO 80504-6211 I . Â¥ NICHOLS GARY T & LUQINDA C & ~ MICKEY JAMES & MARLENE MOLITOR RONALD A & JOAN A 931 GIBSON AVE KENNETHE 1 8696 SWAN P O BOX 8116 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 19\LAMAZOO, MI 49009 ~ 3 ASPEN, CO 81612 , OLSEN DARELYN ANDERSON PL&AINC NUDELL KAREN J 1999 REV TRUST C/O SYNECTICS SFS INC ~ A NEBRASKA CORP 29929 EASTVALE CT / 1775 SHERMAN ST STE 1350 9727 SPRING ST , AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301-4422 DENVER, CO 80203 OMAHA, NE 68124 PARRY SUSAN LYNN ' ' PAUL CAROLYNk / RESTAINO THOMAS j i TRUSTEE OF TRUST A PAUL TRUST 977 QUEEN ST 72 ADLER AVE /*' 2415 MORENA BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 '< SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 RIVER HOUSE LLC COLO LLC ' ROTH JOSEPH R & ELIANNE V i SHAFFRAN STANLEY R & KANDI LYN C/O US CABLE CORP 28 W GRAND AVE / PO BOX 6451 0164 LUPINE DR ' SURFSIDE, FL 33154 ASPEN, CO 81611 /' MONTVALE, NJ 07645 S- BARBARA ANNE %/ SHOAF JEFFREY S ~ SMITH E GARLAND JR <c 11138 AQUAVISTAST#22 PO BOX 3123 900 E HOPKINS AVE #10 NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91602-3119 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 + 4 SNOW ORCHID LLC STEELE JULIANNE B / THOENY BRET F /4< 1125 SAN MATEO-DR / i 41 AVE DE LA GRANDE ARMEE - 619 ARIZONA AVE MENLO PARK, CA 94025 75116 PARIS FRANCE SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 VARE DARLENE DESEDLE T~UST VARE EDWIN C / , VICENZI GEORGE A TRUST / 1024 19TH ST #7 22 WILDROSE AVE PO BOX 2238 / SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 GUILFORD, CT 06437 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEISMAN FAMILY LIMITED ~ WESTER KEITH < WOODS ELIZABETH A TRUST PARTNERSHIP WOODS ELIZABETH A AS TRUSTEE 900 E HOPKINS AVE #9 WEISMAN ENTERPRISES C/O PO BOX 1046 ASPEN, CO 81611 2626 W LAKE AVE ASPEN, CO 81612-1046 ~ MI POLIS, MN 55416 ZWAHLEN LISSA L // 619 ARIZONA AVE SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR NO. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 Fx. 21 2.889.3686 , EMAIL: STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BURC] HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC f 105 CHAMBERS STREET , FLOOR NO. 3 j / / lilli ' NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 /\ Fx. 212.334.5528 EXHIBITJ-h %% l. 1% 1 4., 26, 0~ NEALE STREET 7 \\7\ \ R.Ci W WIDâ„¢U~KNOINN \\// 1 1 i â‚¬ ~~* i i THESE DRAWINGS ARE s INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS / 7-- . V 1 I SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OFTHE 5 01 W 1 ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITEC<S 1 1 % if \ 1 - .- 0 1 ' m 0 - _ i DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND 1 RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO 11 1 --- \ / CONC -, / OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, 1 / , BE USED BY THE OWNER OR - -- 916Â£ - / \ -- / r-- 0-- 1 FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, ----- \*11 - 1- 1 OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS .........../.' rkK _; /l< 1 ~ f/% /Â»Â« 4 1~ .5.. :.. 11 /, -- / 1F - PROJECT BY OTHERS. 7920 1 -- // / \ ////// /// /// //f ' 2 /\\% ////06,04/\\ :.....::..... c 84./F N ISSLE: - NO. DATE DESCRIPTION .// 1 f ~-71-UL_ -/-7 / i#11 \1 ; f 4 4-6 iG>--- "2225<: /// // %\ / , 1 \11/ // / ,// 4 4/f/// 1 1(10 \ 7Er----t, / / 1 j\01 -i: 9.4 1 11-1-plo 1/jfor// //,1 k izm /2 y :.:.::..:..:. t 13 f/ / 1 1-Crv 1 tic 1-4/f 1/Â«f ff 1111 41[L PROJECT: lig- 1 4. â€žâ€ž. .02- v , 1 / l 44,2/1 1 S $ I \741 j , 401 .ts ~ .Ell '1 _u_ r ~~ 4% 1: TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 / 4 ASPEN, COLORADO \\ 2 y : I / 1 \ o 74â‚¬- 1 44 -----L. ..2 63Â· .-/ 2 I I I--L;*-I / , L. rwt,x l O 1 -fost â‚¬ 1/ '3 DATE'. 01 3103 DRAWN BY: YH 637-93-73-1 - 91 -0-- -- il.ZEÂ¥-----\ \\\ i /\ h f T 1 / 1 /2-6 - 2- - - --- ---if~ t 5 3/1//-,1-1 -, N 10â€¢2*WE %// SCALE: 1"=254 CHECKED BY: SHED DRAWING TITLE: AINING.AU *-- 1 3 ROOF PLAN j j 61111 \ 1 1 1 1 ~h~ ROOF PLAN \0102j SCALE 1"=25'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: 0 10 FT. 25 FT. 50 FT. A1O2 - 1.- *0/ 133hlliW3300 \ 'L-2 1 ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. GO ~. \ 1 - . 20'-11 FLOOR NO. 2 Fx. 21 2.889.3686 -4 1 - ~~/~~ PH. 212.889.9005 1 1 7907 . - ./ j; 1<3 EMAIL: STUDIO@SHOPARC,COM 200 EAST 37-r-H STREET NEW YORK, NY 10016 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECH. 1 ~.1 BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING -- BENCH | ENGINEERS, PC 11Â·-2" ~' i liE~/~ ,-E i ~ 0 FLOOR No. 3 7906 -SKI STORAGE 1 OS CHAMBERS STREET 9 XI ; MUD AREA r : 19~ 2 NEW YORK, NY 10007 - 9.1 - Â· WORK TABLE ~~ A kE = 9 -14 f)~ Fx. 212.334.5528 g PH. 212.334.2025 TRENCH DRAIN ' & STORAGE , g 1 EXHIBIT r-7- \O R l 18 11 1 IU-fli. ---17H / un j I~ ~ O 4 --1/71111 Â·Â· I i - pi 1 2-2 4 -O-3 N GARAGE _ - 0f f MURPHY BED - 'THESE DRAWINGSARE 7905 fe - - ,\L<j\\ INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS w SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE 1 09-6 i K ~IU ~- 4-Â·-lf/-9 2///f / - : 1 DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND k - BE USED BY THE OWNER OR EL. 790516 - ~ RELATED DOCUMENTSARENOTTO ~ ~00~~~~~ ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S - OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, I.1 2 EL 7905.16 FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS BEDROOM ~ BEDROOM 3EDROOM ---' 4 -===2=31- PROJECT BY OTHERS. - - \Nif ENTRANCE I < FOYER - ISSL E: STORAGE - 1. 1 - - 1: NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 7904 - Z I 1 3 EL 7905.16 '15 10'-7" - STUDIO ~~~~ ,[ 5,-0Â» 10'-4" - 7910 \.~ PROJECT: WORKSHOP i'/ ~; 1 --- 7903 1 1 1 N TRETTIN RESIDENCE 44041 ASPEN, COLORADO 17'-11Â· EL. 7904 10>n / # 7902 GRASS COURT me\] ~ EMPLOYEE'S QUARTERS 3 DATE: 01.31.03 DRAWN BY: YH ~ SCALE; 1"=10'-0' CHECKED BY: A- DRAWING TITLE: 'LO 1 5 -1 7901 4 1% 2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN P I I 1 00 ....py~'./.lit;Â·Â·. r ''- ~Â·'~ -~.'; ti'~'~'~, Â·'-Â· ~Â· k ..1:':;,i, 1.~1 ; -.....1-- --------------- 1 -f<Bitswl/â‚¬1~41Â·~~ Â·RAi.-::'~,713 ' . f 1 LI A) 3U twi #--AL 4 - :Â·: ..: '4: I Â£:6..2:f~. Â· 19'-10" ~ UP SR - 2-il\Ill 0 790 1 63 ~ ~ DRAWING NUMBER: \ 4 A1OO \ 19 j 6'51"W 62. 9' ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR NO. 2 LIST OF DRAWINGS NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 FX. 212.889.3686 A000 TITLE SHEET EMAIC STUDIO@SHOPARC.COM A001 SITE PLAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: A002 VIEWS AT SITE EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING A003 VIEWS OF NEIGHBORING HOUSES ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR NO. 3 A010 PERSPECTIVE VIEW- QUEEN STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 A011 PERSPECTIVE VIEW- NEAL STREET FX. 212.334.5528 A100 GROUND FLOOR PLAN A101 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A102 ROOF PLAN All0 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Alll EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS A120 LONGITUDINAL SECTION SUCH ARE THE PR 0 PERTY OF THE A121 SITE SECTION ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. ISSLE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION b j PROJECT: 4 4 50 0 6 +~ e / SITE_ 8 TRETTIN RESIDENCE /0<> '*4 4 * 2~ ASPEN, COLORADO Lone Pine Rd 74- 0 0 -7 60 004 Â¥100 00 ///Â« ' + 1 Gibson Av Smith St 0,0/1/ I TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 94 9& DATE: 0131 03 DRAWN BY: JEC 4 SCALE: CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: -/ 1- #/ 0 ( 1/190 Ov 114 NEALE STREET puppy 09. -% C. TITLE SHEET ,[he f# . '6, b 0 -24 9%9% t. .,0, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 0 44,0 0(2 4 8 4 00 06 /4* 0 3, 4 0 DRAWING NUMBER: Aooo â‚¬> ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. - -600% ~ 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR No. 2 NEW Y[JRK, NY 1001 6 PH. 212.889.9005 Fx. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIO@SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 -MAPLE-LN ENGINEERS, PC Fx. 212.334.5528 CHLESS DR 4 0 GIBSON THESE DRAWINGS ARE e ~~1-\~ SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OFTHE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS ~ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NCITTO ~~0 ~~ PROJECT BY OTHERS BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS 0 ISSUE: NO. DATE DESCRIPTION \Â» 6- C, Plird') 00 0 43 PROJECT: 6 TRETTIN RESIDENCE t>&4, . ./- ASPEN, COLORADO JEC 6.- ! ~~-- DATE: 01 31.03 DRAWN BY: QUEEN ST- 1"=150'-0' CHECKED BY: 1 -,0 DRAWING TITLE: Oe, SITE PLAN 9 09 47' dr/ <t' 4 111 DRAWING NUMBER: o~ 200 FT AOO1 . SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. ARCHITECT: Â·t<89â€¢1~ -lf r 11Â·1':, 4 ' - 1 â€¢d 200 EAST 37TH STREET Â· FLOOR NO. 2 NEW YORK, NY 1Â¤C]16 PH. 212.889.9005 Fx. 212.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: A EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC '*6""'*4 <* 11 . ~ 24% 4 Eitil 9 .4 9 f ., '* 1...< 4 0 Au#J/'At:* ta 24146,3 1 OS CHAMBERS STREET Â·4 jigm*,.,6:FI.Wj,#Zill:82 j,til FLODR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 Px. 21 2.334.5528 .....V. .....9.W~ U'-.-e....Il.- *194 - ..., . f..imill" taill....../JI 3/"~.Il 44,1 7- - VIEW ~ VIEW ~ THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE , ..1 RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND BE USED BY THE OWNER OR 10 4646Â· - 31*L OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. ~ ... -*tm*-4- ISSLÂ·E r ./ .41. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 2 - ..riKUI'll/11':49,il#. t-i.UG, , I ''4 , F 9,7 - tel'" ;' \ 4-/ :4 4 12 4Â·~~ ~ Â·0. ' ' 4446- 1 ~'*3,/ 4 N44... 1, , 777&9 . 4,>' Â· *104 5.6.-AE Â¥7Â¢2 .9 . . 1 4 PROJECT: 4 - ~ i 12~ - d . ' 43â‚¬*2. . :14 4.%Â· 4,Â· ,.. * i 9 TRETTIN RESIDENCE * + 1* -= - t - ASPEN, COLORADO .... I -Ah.1 DATE: 01.31.03 DRAWN BY: JEC VIEW ~ SCALE: NO SCALE CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: VIEW ~ VIEWS AT THE SITE 4 -.-*,- ay,j. -.1 clill-- il ' L.4091 : Â·r - i , ' illl Â· r ./ 7 . 61 f .7 /1.' 4 . *t . , .1 4 /5 .-5 4 49#pr i' /4. ** . MotÂ¥ ...0 0' t.Â· & h. 1 t:Â»1:L.Al*jeti:4 ' "92 1 , Â¥912 11 1 L.%4446&.41'*i ' - 4 - <// '..1. 1 ts . .. '. 4 - I ... I I . .1,~ -. ' DRAWING NUMBER: 42~4*3.iltiar 1- 2 + , Pt- /4 Â·1*ire,~, 1 I. 1Â·iÂ· , . , ' 11 ?.3/... 46,/ AOO2 ... .~L VIEW ~ VIEW ~ ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET 100, - FLOOR No. 2 .. 4-J - ' r. 4 -1 5 Â· . NEw YORK, NY 10016 - i ~ ~ PH. 212.889.9005 ' . . C Fx. 212.889.3686 ,+C- . ~ , ...4 -0 . '. 6 9, ' I r-- ... . '11 /4 ' 0 t ...4 ' 1.- I EMAIL: STUDIO@SHOPARC.COM 4, # & STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ...1 7 '' . 'RÂ· r r . EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING -4 - ENGINEERS, PC . I ': 2 2. =>--Ji 105 CHAMBERS STREET . FLOOR No. 3 1 NEW YORK, NY 10007 - PH. 212.334.2025 FX, 212.334.5528 I . ' - '4 - @4 ' ed,k .2,~ 1% -, 7:h. ./. 1. 44 . Â·1'. asua. 1*46/4 2.-:. - Wk)* THESE DRAWINGS ARE 91~ . VIEW ~ VIEW ~ VIEW ~ INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ~l' " f'Â· 1. RELATED DOCUMENTSARENOTTO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, i . OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS - PROJECT BY OTHERS. 4.L -- 24: + | 1 ' . I No. DATE DESCRIPTION ISSL E' .Â«Tâ‚¬*â€¢ I , ' 1.., . -"I~ 1/ 4 . -- ...1 \A ..7.. 241% 2 1 1 ~1 7 lt' 4- 1 # 6 -. L.- - 4 - 11- .4 1. Il" aip ;J/Mg//i1m/L. -~ .. ...at. 34 ----i- 4 -1.-B . ./r j ' i 1 PROJECT: - - TRETTIN RESIDENCE ASPEN, COLORADO â‚¬4 VIEW ~ VIEW ~ VIEW ~ DATE: 0131,03 DRAWN BY: JEC SCALE: 1" =100'4 CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: VIEWS OF VA 7- \ 014\ ' ' U.,- NEIGHBORING HOUSES 1 \1 le:01\J A-- 1%9 \rbA>143 X4 4 (44>(~ 1- ~4.44 1 b 3 h Â»43 Â« 1-1-lou 1 1 1 .DÂ¥9 u. J- \ ~48822%%** ~w-U , -11 f\~tÂ« h . 4 DRAWINGNUMBER: rk:'06 A0O3 - VIEW * ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR No. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9OOS FX. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING Â« ENGINEERS, PC 1 05 CHAMBERS STREET -~yot FLOOR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 1 0007 PH. 212.334.2025 FX, 212.334.5528 44 r F.-47*,tr/44 - 4.37 c:3Â« -U~ bl / 3 â‚¬94 t==D THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITED<S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED & 4-,AQDAY- 5==90--1 a==:~~ 0 0 24 DOCUMENTS ARE MOTTO BE USED BY PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION 19-lb- />h - OFTHIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. 414< # ~4 42*8 - - I ISSUE: Â«$49-45 .,u 11 \\ 032 1 NO. DAÂ·rE DESCRIPTION . r 1 1 1 0 1 Pet $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...X'~-* 1 %~fl > 54=3 CC = h. 36\.f i TH.41-1*# 14 ,Â·j-~ -St- :.lip -- --- --:~1(-3 -i~ '1 M / 1Â« 1 1 1 =~ - 22=--=~ -< 3 Ffi. '~ ~ PROJECT: *-01 4 I / ~~ ~~~31~ ~ ASPEN, COLORADO - --4-2331 TRETTIN RESIDENCE -- 4< 1-J 7 r .~ DATE: 013103 DRAWN & KMK /1 // Â» 4. SCALE: Notto Scale C~ECKED & 1- - DRAWING TITLE: " PERSPECTIVE VIEW , QUEEN STREET DRAWING NUMBER: AO10 94>99 ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOo R No. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 FX. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL- STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR No. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 FX. 212.334.5528 THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY r i 123 THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER f PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT. OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. ~.197 14*z * ~* Abayjll,~ Uttt~~~~~~ ISSUE N. DATE DESCRIPTIÂ¤N 1 1 1 0 13â‚¬43473*EN~Â·4Â» C=D A T to 41 1 - tt~jfjtinr~~~1 *l PmoJECT: a_/FIE 1Â»Â»==4==3Â«In-94- 1-9-- - * 9 0 4242Â«4 1 ..1 Â»ft Lt TRETTIN RESIDENCE .FZy 71>' E AlÂ¥ -%/ki--+444~ ASPEN, COLORADO - ft~ 6- 7Mt Int rttlhazz==zzl ..1 - /~ 1 7, 1 Â£2=:. DATE: 01.3103 DRAWN & KMK ----Â«Â«2=======3393*bulld 0 0 SCALE Notto Scale C.ECKED BY -rfe____-------n=r=> -- _- -/- Li-r- DRAWING TITLE: .tb C \t=:l=ZilMEr'EL----.0-,~ , ..,Â·:--EEEi 1-2322-1 , - MEauu====-L51 PERSPECTIVE VIEW --2--:21*41 4Â»-32-- NEAL STREET -=E--$.5m- DRAWING NUMBER: AO11 \ ARCHITECT: / 11 4 1 Ir \ \1141 SHDP ARCHITECTS, P.C. ; 449 L / 200 EAST 37TH STREET 20-11 FLOOR NO. 2 \\ . . NEW YORK, NY 10016 1 . C) 1 Fx. 212.889.3686 41 ~ PH. 212.889.9005 1 1 f / f 4 \ ; EMAIL: STUDIO@SHOPARC.COM f b \ L N I Thi( .\)3 3 BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING 1 1 2. - 7!14 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: 1 jo 4% MECH+ \ \\ ~ BENCH | ~ | ~ ENGINEERS, PC I55 105 CHAMBERS STREET 3/7 42 1 1 31 1 10 FLOOR No. 3 MUD AREA 0tfu--- 0 -7906 - 19\ SKI STORAGE NEW YORK, NY 1Â¤C]C)7 -- pH. 21 2.334.2025 11 1 1 JE= - 44 - ~ Px. 212.334.5528 - * 120( \ WORK TABLE \ 1 W TR NCH DRAIN & STORAGE \. ' ~~-~- % 1 rji f-~1- -- It 117 - O Â» PULP~- 1116 ~FEE*=:=6.-1 ~ ~ ~ * - , ,~p - i I/~fla m C U 1Â«111-11 1 6 1 4 01 -FOLE* 112Â»*-1 0 -===S,=El GARAGE 3;4 79057 4 1 4-Ui 8 â€¢4Â·* 9 - 1 // 1 3 - g L i i THESE DRAWINGS ARE MURPHY BED INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OFTHE **** 1 1 ~2=~///94,4 ~ ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S uj u J 1 111 - 1 2 \ 1 63 trt: e 8-*'4 j h \ // 1\ LU 1 --1.--1-1---/---# L- - \~ BE USED BY THE OWNER OR DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND -94- li - a RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO - ___ l~ ~ BEDROOM - - 1 <t 1Â«~\ - OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, EL. 7905.16 4 1\/ FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, 3 --- - / I -- - -- ~1~-1 BEDROOM 1 4 - ~ -- N~ 2%-~C .1~*N\- OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. 2 ~ ENTRANCE C / STORAGE - - ISSL E: - 1% No. DATE DESCRIPTION - j jj7904 ---- --1 1 71 41/1 01 /CL u ill -f I ; .1 EL. 7905.16 11'Â·C. | | 7010 --{\ ~9~~~J~<Nx ~=PROJECT; 1 Â»/ 1 1 1 1 STUDIO 5-0" | 10'4 f WORKSHOP ~< ~ ,~1'~ " , . ~ ~. __- 11\\ 1 X TRETTIN RESIDENCE 11 ASPEN, COLORADO 1 1 \..5 f ' EL 7904 1 - 14?. Â«Â«-9 *J-7902 1 f / GRASS COURT -794 EMPLOYEE'S QUARTERS DATE: 013103 DRAWN BY: YH - - ~ SCALE: 1"=10-0 CHECKED BY 11 141 ik- DRAWING TITLE: I 11 - 1 LO 2.-7901 , GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1 | 7 ~1 ~4 ~02 ~~ ~ 1. 1 \\ ji \ 11~ IE & u ~ Tl--- - -- < 6'.:. L-~ \ 4 ig Z S Ge , Â· f \\ 1 m UP 6R / /90(1 C / 1 DRAWING NUMBER: 1 A1OO - W il l L 1 4-j 39014'20"W 9658' ARCHITECT: SHOP ARCHITECTS, P. C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR NO. 2 ~ NEW YDRK, NY 1 0016 .- CONCRETE PAD ~ PH. 212.889.9005 20'-11" 12-10 / t, FOR FUTURE ADDITION 3 Fx, 212.889,3686 39 4 / 1 ~-Â«%-,V *W-* BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING EMAIL: STUDIC)~SHOPARC.COM / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET 0 DUMBWAITER | - p 4 KITCHEN - - NEW YORK, NY 10007 1 - FLOOR No. 3 x / PH. 212.334.2025 - ~ Fx. 212.334.5528 b f el. BAR - --- X \ 9Â«41 -1 holle e .-i -29'-7 -ru f L -2 1 0.-1 THESE DRAWINGS ARE b. LIVING - INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT+S SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE FIREPLACE ~ Lt -~-FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS - MASTER BED ~ ~ PROJECT BY OTHERS. 1- , - No. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 j 7 ISSLE i / L- Â°0f'H j- -1 '.....$.J J U 1 - ~L- METAL RAILING PROJECT: / d / TRETTIN RESIDENCE ASPEN, COLORADO DATE: 013103 DRAWN BY: YH GRASS COURT SCALE: 1"=10'-0 CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: /1 f~ 9 / SECOND FLOOR PLAN f f. L~-- // 2111 DRAWING NUMBER: A1O1 ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR NO. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 Fx. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIC]~SHOPARC.COM ~ STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC el \ 1 05 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 1 OOC]7 PH. 212.334.2025 1 Fx. 212.334.5528 9--- 0-0# -JI NEALE STREET adw VA[mi U.NOW~ t 1 1 1 N 1, - , / -41bJ- / 904.,,. -Â«- 11 Ip - 4 / ': /*ill ___/- f / if //fic f//fox//4/ 0/ ./ / 4 /1 / 1.394 SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE 2,1,111 , Al' 1 - ' ./f 8 / - i INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS f li if_ THESE DRAWINGS ARE 11 / r f 0 3 39>>f /--1 I ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S 11 \ , 43 1 f DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND /1l , .f x c St.--*5-x-RE=------ - RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO 0 5../ ///A t ~ BE USED BYTHEOWNER OR S 33030'12nÂ¥ 77 87Â· - 6 - OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, \ --1--Dan=/ 1 FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, 1 1.FA-- - PROJECT BY OTHERS. //1---- OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS - 911.fy'RN - - f 1 ISSLE / NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 44*13,01 / 1 j I I -4 ---- 1 M y \ ' 1 i -- -TU---1:031 ./ +'*. /~~m/~ v,4/76%&<-- epa-- l / /\ f/':'.,0/",11 / 1 ./ / \ " 1 1Â« iu- .1,'h 14 4w I ,, MIA ,/ I / .//// //D ji // 1/ j 11 1 1 14 1, /* , f>304 j - - / j 2==44==~. 1~ /\ 111 //1 57/ 0/9/ /// /Il ~ 1/ 1 / m . df + 7 ~ k41-i,z â€ž,4,,fi,11 m -- _ , A 1 04 1 0 //< flj,\1 9. rn- 6% 1 Â°f f j-1-2< .1,IiÂ«0 -/:3 u 03- -1 PROJECT: i2 y#3 I 11 1 91"ir Â° 1 -<Ladivm A M //. .1.--. i I)~ 4 4 / 1 1 / /1 --*/ / 94 / // //1 \ \\ Â° \ v 2 Y -1.-Â« 1 2 /// //1 - - /1 f 41 1// \ .. 4 ' 2 TRETTIN RESIDENCE - L 1% lit ASPEN, COLORADO 21- 11 i -- --1- Â£ 1 t n-Â·A 4 -/ < i - m . $ M -'*1-- , / 1,4 2,4~- 1 i ..j , 01 3103 DRAWN BY: YH j ..i.-95/ y1 \ 1-/2.-; it SHED 3 1/ / / SCALE: 1Â·=25'-0 CHECKED BY: N 1....E .7/ , 1 *9* DRAWING TITLE: ~ ROOF PLAN 1 1 f 7/ ~ f / 9 1 1%~ ROOF PLAN \3102,/ SCALE 1"=25'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: 0 10 FT. 25 FT. 50 FT. A1O2 133B1S N33nÂ¤ ARCHITECT: hNIL., SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 5 =13 J 0, 1- J 200 EAST 37TH STREET .1 , 1 -:% 4, FLOOR No. 2 NEWYORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 82793016'IREQEBOOE__ Fx. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM 414;. i. 1 ~ , STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: lilli !!Ill .-,22<.,....1 1 11..\96Â«'/,/9 -*3--1 -'p- - Â·rr .,-c ...'u,FY-y'.9,7 BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING tElÂ»42 ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET -- C FLOOR Nc]. 3 *2/ NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 Fx. 212.334.5528 UAW'.41 '93-Â·'- *' ' 'Â»ret ' El. +7915.16' 2ND FLOOR . -- . 11'*.lp,~ 14944 24*44Â£ -- W h Y? 4.t"M as'* 9 1,21 _ THESE DRAWINGS ARE \ INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS El. +7905.16' GROUND FLOOR - ----- - SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OFTHE - ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND El. +7901' GRADE RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. ISSUE No. DATE DESCRIPTION /h SOUTH ELEVATION *110,/ SCALE 1"=10'-0" PROJECT: El.-37930.16'TOP-OFROOF &~ ~ t..1 .1 \ 1! 1 TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 1 ---lk.,4 i.. fi. 4. i'; It W-- -1 ASPEN, COLORADO ,13Â¥Â·=-16 .Â· ew-& ' ' 2 - 4% 1 2 156Â«2*$ . 6. - 1 . ...1 1 i it:-- r.1:1 34*:9 YH -- 4*3.Â» ---- 1 - DATE~ 013103 DRAWN BY: 94344-' '. .' -'4 -1,2 SCALE: 1"=10'4 CHECKED BY: f ' ~1 --~~~~ ~ El.+7915.16'2NDELOOR 59*-Â·.Â·. Â· Â· 0 DRAWING TITLE: SOUTH AND NORTH ELEVATIONS _El.-+7995.16'GROUND_ELOOR_ EL+7901'_GRADE rn NORTH ELEVATION DRAWING NUMBER: \A110,/ SCALE 1"=10'-0" AllO &5&* ARCHITECT SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET i EL +7930.16' TOP OF ROOF FLOOR No. 2 NEW YoRK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 FX. 21 2.889.3686 -- EMAIL: STUDIC]~SHOPARC.COM - STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 212.334.2025 Fx. 21 2.334.5528 ak El. +7915.16' 2ND FLOOR +I-- W-M WW - i El. +7905.16' GROUND FLOOR - -- ----- ---- --_ - , 1 _- THESE DRAWINGS ARE --- - INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S 4 El.+7901' GRADE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS. ISSUE: rih WEST ELEVATION N [3. DATE DESCRIPTION *111j SCALE 1"=10'-0" PROJECT: .k El. +7930.16' TOP OF ROOF - TRETTIN RESIDENCE ---- ASPEN, COLORADO DATE: 01 31 03 DRAWN BY: YH SCALE: 1"=10'-C' CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: i El. +7915.16' 2ND FLOOR - - EAST AND WEST - - ELEVATIONS i El. +7905.16' GROUND FLOOR 1 El.+7901' GRADE ~2) EAST ELEVATION DRAWING NUMBER: *111j SCALE 1"=10'-0" Alll 40 ARCHITECT: SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR No. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 21 2.889.9005 Fx. 212.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIO~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: EURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOOR No. 3 WINDOW WALL - NEW YORK, NY 10007 SKYUGHT PH. 212.334.2025 MASTER BEDROOM Fx. 21 2.334.5528 SKYUGHT ~ El. +7930.16' TOP OF ROOF . . . Â· Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· 1 L.-4---71=94% 1 1 1 1 T r T-1- 1-1 1-- T - 1 - -T--1 -1- 1 1--1- 1-- 1 -7]=Emmb--- U //-1-LL---13 1 -1 1-1--1 -1- 1 -1- 111 1_l'F-ifilUICE ff:''. IJ THESE DRAWINGS ARE CONCEALED - -r 1 4 INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE DRIVEWAY LIGHT 0-%1 , ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT'S '4 -3---1 1 DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO 82:440 ~ El. +7915.16' 2ND FLOOR - OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, 5-F 1-2-M J-- BE USED BY THE OWNER OR 11 9 1 11 0-- 32 - 11 FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, i PROJECT BY OTHERS. OR FORTH E COMPLETION OF THIS 9---1 e R k---t F-Â« Im ISSLE 1 14 - v NO- DATE DESCRIPTION I ' ~ El. +7905.16' GROUND FLOOR 1 L (Aff- -~dtat 1 1 ~ El. +7901' GRADE PROJECT: TRETTIN RESIDENCE ASPEN, COLORADO ~h~ LONGITUDINAL SECTION ~41.5/ SCALE 1"=10'-0" DATE: 0131.03 DRAWN BY: JEC SCALE: 1"=10'-0' CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: LONGITUDINAL SECTION DRAWING NUMBER: A12O ARCHITECT: Â¥ SHoP ARCHITECTS, P.C. ' 200 EAST 37TH STREET FLOOR No. 2 NEW YORK, NY 10016 PH. 212.889.9005 Fx. 21 2.889.3686 EMAIL: STUDIC]~SHOPARC.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 105 CHAMBERS STREET FLOmR NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10007 PH. 21 2.334.2025 Fx. 212.334.5528 THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS C]F SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCH ITEC<S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE NOTTO BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS, FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT, OR FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS ~ El. +7946.39' TOP OF ROOF MINER'S COTTAGE PROJECT BY OTHERS. TE ISSLE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION Â»46#9 U~--~1111~11111 .k El. +7930.16' TOP OF ROOF NEW RESIDENCE . fÂ»- 1.- Â»77' 01- S- ~ ..3 - 34-; 6//13.--m Lr hiliv vili~* ' PROJECT: TRETTIN RESIDENCE ~ El. +7901' GRADE ~ ASPEN, COLORADO 11 1 1 1 1 1 1:11 111 1 S B M L L Z 1 4 2 j m i DATE: 013103 DRAWN BY: YH i ' 1 1 91%*.I 0 1 0 0 4.00 %1 1 %1 t 1 4 0 I â‚¬ SCALE: 1Â·'=25'-0' CHECKED BY: DRAWING TITLE: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK SETBACK PROPERTY LINE SITE SECTION ~F-h~ SITE SECTION ~421/ SCALE 1"=25'-0" j 0 10 FT. 25 FT. 50 FT. DRAWING NUMBER: A121