The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.220 E Hopkins Ave.A102-02220 E Hopkins DRAC PIN 273707328007 Case No A102-0 9.Acu A' 1 i 9 i N 19 33- 613 1%001 1 CASE NUMBER A102-02 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-28007 CASE NAME 220 E Hopkins DRAC PROJECT ADDRESS 220 E Hopkins Ave PLANNER Sarah Oates CASE TYPE DRAC OWNER/APPLICANT SSM Land Acquisistuin Company, LLC REPRESENTATIVE Aaron Hoffmans/Lipkin Warner Deisgn & Planning DATE OF FINAL ACTION WITHDRAW CITY COUNCIL ACTION 01/24/2003 PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 01/24/03 BY SARAH OATES PARCEL ID: ]2737-073-28007 DATE RCVD: ~12/06/02 # COPIES:~-- CASE NO~A102-02 CASE NAME:~220 E Hopkins DRAC PLNR:|Sarah Oates PROJ ADDR:~220 E Hopkins Ave CASE TYP:|DRAC STEPS:~ OWN/APP: SSM Land Acquisist ADR12121 Kirby Dr #99 C/S/Ze ~Houston/TX/77019 PHN:~ REP:|Aaron Hoffmans/Lipkin Watit ADR:~23400 Two Rivers Rd C/S/Z: ~Basalt/CO/81621 PHN:~970-927-8473xl FEES DUE:~$500 D FEES RCVD:| STAT: r- REFERRALS] REF:| BY| DUE:| - 1 MTG DATE REV BODY PH cNOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTIONij +7+1--2,n...,n CITY COUNCIL: 1/Ju/7.:ioÂ·25, REIVIARKS | lâ€ž1.11-1")~r;L,v>--n PZ: BOA: CLOSED: 116*(29Y: 1 <975~~-7 Â« 1-':-9--Â·aDr*35, DRAC: L-/ PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK.PG):~ ADMIN: Aaron Joseph Hoffmans, 02: 12 PM 1/24/03, Quadrant Project: PZ meeting Feb. 4th Page 1 of 1 From: "Aaron Joseph Hoffmans" <AHoffmans@lipkinwarner.com> To: "Sarah Oates" <SarahO@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Quadrant Project: P&Z meeting Feb. 4th Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:12:28 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-ECS-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean Sarah, I was just informed by David Warner that Sara Morgan has declined her design review appeal to P&Z. You may remove us from the docket. Sorry for the inconvenience. We'll proceed with the current plan under permitting review. Please contact me if you have any question or comments. Thanks, Aaron Joseph Hoffrnans Lipkin Warner Design and Planning Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 1/24/03 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods. Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson. Deputy Planning Director 50 FROM: Sarah Oates. Zoning Officer DATE: February 4.2003 RE: Residential Design Standard Variances for 220 E. Hopkins SUMMARY: The subject property is a 5.981 square foot lot in the Office (O) zone district. The applicant sought and received approval in June 2002 for a change in use to allow for residential use in what had been a mixed-use building. The applicant initially proposed a remodel of the mixed-use building but now the applicant is proposing an entirely new structure and will be mitigating for affordable housing requirements and will meet the relevant setback requirements as the previous structure was non-conforming. The applicant requests a variance from the Residential Design Standards related to built- to-lines. secondary mass and lightwells. The requirements for these standards are as follows: k The "build-to-lines" standard requires that on all parcels smaller than 15,000 square feet, at least 60Â°% of the front fai:ade shall be within five (5) feet of the front yard setback. > The "secondary mass" standard requires that at least 10% of the above grade square footage is in a mass that is detached, or linked by a subordinate element, from the principal residence. This proposal does not include a secondary mass. k The "lightwells" standard requires that all areaways, lightwells, and/or stairwells on the street facing fagade of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the frontmost wall of the building. APPLICANT: SSM Land Acquisition Company. LLC, represented by Aaron Hoffmans of Lipkin Warner Design and Planner. The application is included as Exhibit A. LOCATION: 220 E. Hopkins, Lots P & Q, Block 74, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: Office (O). SITE DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is a single-family home on a 5,981 square foot Office (0) lot. The applicants are proposing to maintain the same configuration as the previous building on the lot, which was set back on the lot. The configuration is not consistent with three of the Residential Design Standards as outlined below. Residential Design Standards Waiver Requested: The following text and graphic are applicable excerpts from the Residential Design Standards. Secondary Mass. All new structures shall locate at least 10% of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from A..'1:' I _ ------g. the principal building, or .*.166<.Ar *1/-_~~, IA linked to it by a subordinate 41----1/0 -/ connecting element. _Â»b- Accessory buildings such as r>/- - ---- - garages, sheds, and Accessory Dwelling Units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. The garage is the secondary mass in this illustration. It is connected to the principal building by a subordinate element (such as a linked pavilion), which demonstrates how this standard can be met. The site plan does not meet the Residential Design Standards because no secondary mass is proposed. The house does not meet this standard. and is instead configured as a single mass. Build-to lines. On parcels or lots of less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60Â°M, of the front fu<ade shall be within 5 feet of the Yes, No. Yes. minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, at least 60% VEFT of both street facades of the building shall be within 5 feet of the minimum setback lines. Porches may be used meet the 60% standard. 2 The proposed liouse, as shown in the enclosed site plan (Exhibit "A") is set back approximately thirty (30) feet from the front yard setback and clearly does not meet this standard. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or , stairwells on the street facing - facade(s) of a building shall --In be entirely recessed behind - the frontmost wal ofthe Yes ILd building. ---- No The applicant is proposing two (2) lightwells forward of the street facing fagade of the house and therefore needs a waiver from this standard. REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.222. in order to authorize a variance from the Residential Design Standards, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a finding that Standard 1 and Standard 2 or 3 are met. hi response to the review criteria for DRAC variance(s). Staff makes the following findings: 1. Standard: The granting o f the variance(s) is in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Response: The granting the variance does not create a development scenario which is in greater compliance with the AACP. Residential buildings which meet the Residential Design Standards are more in keeping with the AACP because of the positive, pedestrian scale given to the Aspen streetscape. 2. Standard: The granting of the variance(s) is a more effective method of addressing standard in question: or, Response: The applicant is seeking to maintain this current property's relation to the street. The current (now demolished) house is setback on the lot and the applicant is seeking to maintain the same open space on the front of the lot as currently exists. Staff finds that because the applicant is proposing a new single-family building that the applicant should meet the current standards and code requirements. 3 3. Standard: The granting of the variance is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Response: The lot configuration is a traditional townsite lot with 100' in length and 59' (short of the standard 60') in width and there are no site- specific constraints. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Residential Design Standard variance requests for build-to lines. secondary mass and lightwells be denied finding that review standards have 11Ot been met. RECOMMENDED MOTION (all motions in the affirmative): 1 move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2003 granting a variance from Section 26.410.040(A)(2). Build-to-Lines, Section 26.410.040(B)(1). Secondary Mass and Section 26.410.040(C)(4), Lightwells finding that the review standards in Section 26.222.010 " have been met for the construction of a single family home at 220 E. Hopkins. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Application 4 .m 23400 Two Rivers Rd. . 44 â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8473 LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & P].ANNINC;. LLC Basalt. Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 Transmittal Date: December 5,2002 TO: Sarah Oates City of Aspen Zoning Officer From: Aaron Hoffmans Re: Quadrant Project - Design Review Appeal application + fee Pages: 3 page(s) total Via: OSM CC: Notes: Sarah: Enclosed is the application (attachment 2 - Land Use Application and LWDP proposal letter) and fee. Thank you for making copies ofthe 11 x 17 sheets on file. Let me know if addition information is needed. Thanks, ~T~~VVr-7 'er-~2-M> ~aron Joseph-Hoffmans , / 970/927-8473 x13 ahoffmans@lipkinwarner.com 01.P&Z variance app.so.ali.doc Page 1 12/5/2002 DEC-02-2002 MON 11:39 AM FAX NO, P, 03 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Q#,01 rÂ»<t Yrt')244- Location: %20 E. Ho'PA N.5 1 Go-rs PkQ , gloo#'901,~ 6-1-*61 + Towr-de 0-~ *=fÂ«4 (Indicate street addreA, lot & block numder, legal description whdre appropnatc) APPLICANT: Name: 5471 1.-0"d Aclpt k.rhaln (Jewxf a.v,2 1 LU-. Address: 212 1 Kirbp Dr., *19 +lowstoM, TX 9-9.01 9 - Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Aarn, 1-1.44*'t aws; 61'Fld,iM Warvier- 1304.20,~ 4 Plpâ€¢cin-5 - Address: 28100 1-600 Kive,vg yoad *44 ; 13*sal-L. 60 9,6151 Phone#: 190 - 929 - 64*9 / x /5 PROJECT: [3 Conditional Use [3 Conceptual PUD D Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) gl Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment Â£ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Dcmolition GMQS Exemption Â£ Subdivision D Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes ~1 Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallarn I..ake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane C Lot Split D Temporary Use 0 Other: D Lot Line Adjustment D Text/Map Amendment TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 51Â£ attaohoo( Sk-get- Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S frc<D- El Pre-Application Conference Summary j Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form E Response to Allachmerit #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of aLI written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. 1 1 U U 0.0 Im 23400 Two Rivers Rd. n -.4 Basall, CO 81621 T 970 927-8473 02 LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & Pl.ANNING. LIC www.lipkinwarner.com F 970 927-8487 Design Review Appeal Variance Proposal INFORMATION Project: Quadrant Project Location: 220 E. Hopkins Variances: 26.410.040 A2 - Build-to-lines: At least 60% of the front fagade shall be within 5-feet of the front yard setback. 26.410.040 Bl- Secondary Mass: At lease 10% of the total above grade square footage must in a mass completely detached or linked by a subordinated linking element. 26.410.040 C4 - Lightwells: Alllightwells on the street facing fagde shall be entirely recessed behind the front most walls. INTRODUCTION This proposal is a request for variances to the residential design standards, which will allow a design to more appropriately address the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan. We recognize different design approaches can meet the residential design standards but instead chose a design representative of Aspen's design philosophy. As a note, concurrent with this proposal we have app]ied for permit using the same design modified not to require a variance. However, we feel the project with the above variance is the best and most appropriate solution. ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Aspen favors designs that honor, reflect and enhance the historical context and influences of existing buildings and built environment. This is especially true with designs that celebrate spaces between buildings, particularly in the public realm, i.e. streets, plazas, parks and private yards, which are recognized as more important than the buildings themselves. We subscribe to this philosophy and feel our design does too. DESIGN PROPOSAL The site in question is that of the old Quadrant Bookstore. It was notable for its almost "rural" feel with a small red farmhouse like building set at the back of its lot. It seemed to be a house left behind by the more recent development of downtown Aspen, and a welcome anachronism. The Quadrant bookstore building itself was not historic but the yard in front of it became an endearing part of the Aspen town fabric. Why did that quirkiness work there when the design guidelines promote aligning buildings along the front property line is hard to say. One reason might be the almost harsh juxtaposition of the commercial element of the downtown, represented by the building to the east, meeting the residential element of the rest of the block. Another might be the Victorian house to its west (with the observatory on top), which opens up to the Quadrant yard and which achieves a more picturesque presence because of the yard. As an alternative to the site plan that we have submitted to the building department, which places the house along the front the property line, we propose placing the house along the rear property line. The new design is not a replica ofthe old store nor is it strikingly similar to the old store. It does, however, borrow from that building. Indeed, it may not be of any interest to you or even pertinent to this discussion but elements ofthe original Quadrant and the "feel" of its yard were important guides for us. We are sympathetic to that history. Allowing the design to respond to the exiting neighborhood fabric and accepting the front setback variance places unusual site-specific constraints on the design with respect to the other variances. Moving the building back displaces the "secondary mass" because the type of outbuilding the guidelines promotes are typically set to the back themselves. A consequence then of having the building along the rear property line is the exclusion of a secondary mass. The same was true with the original Quadrant. In addition, locating the new lightwells in front of the porch allows the basement to function and in turn minimizes the volume above grade keeping it in the scale and character of the existing neighborhood fabric. These proposed lightwells are built into the structure of the house. One is part of a patio and the other is of minimal depth and covered flush to the ground. Those lightwells could be placed in back, but that would serve only to move the house further forward. Considering that the lightwells as designed avoid the "gouged-out basement patio" look, which the code is meant to discourage, and because they promote the open front yard, the lightwells become an important element of the overall design. CONCLUSION Approval of the above variances allows the design/ new residence to better reflect the intent and philosophy of the AACP Design Quality verses a residence that solely responds to the Land Use Code residential design standards. The variances will allow the new residence to honor and respect the existing neighborhood fabric, the preexisting fabric of the property and maintain the spirit of Aspen's "messy vitality". 01.variance proposal.P&.Z.ah.doc Page 1 12/5/2002 DI P PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 220 EAST HOPKINS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES FOR BUILD-TO-LINES, SECONDARY MASS AND LIGHTWELLS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, February 4,2003, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, 130 S. Galena Street, to consider an application submitted by SSM Land Acquisition, requesting approval of a variance from the City of Aspen's Residential Design Standards to waive Sections 26.410.040(A)(2) Build-To-Lines, 26.410.040(B)(1) Secondary Mass and 26.410.040(C)(4) Lightwells. The property is legally described as Lots P & Q, Block 74, of the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Sarah Oates at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5441, saraho@ci.aspen.co.us. S/Jasmine Tygre, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 16, 2003 City of Aspen Account Resolution No. _ (SERIES OF 2003) #ir-:f / RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCES TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR BUILD-TO-LINES, SECONDARY MASS AND LIGHTWELLS FORWARD OF THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE FOR LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 74, 220 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-28007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from SSM Land Acquisition Company, LLC, owner, represented by Aaron Hoffmans of Lipkin Warner Design and Planning, for variances from the Residential Design Standards Lots P and Q, Block 74.220 E. Hopkins; and, WHEREAS, the property located at 220 E. Hopkins is a 5,981 square foot lot. located in the Office (O) Zone District. and currently is a vacant lot; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(A)(2), Build-to-Lines, Standard 26.410.040(B)(1), Secondary Mass, and Standard 26.410.040(C)(4), Lightwells of the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff's findings to the Design Review Appeal Board pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Board; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standards 26.410.040 (A)(2), 26.410.040(B)(1) and 26.410.040(C)(4) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Board as it applies to the build-to-lines, secondary mass and lightwells; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals o f the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds toi or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on February 4, 2003 the Planning and Zoning Commission, which also served as the Design Review Appeal Board, approved variances from the Sections 26.410.040(A)(2), 26.410.040(B)(1) and 26.410.040(C)(4) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to secondary mass for 220 E. Hopkins by a vote of_ to _ (-) to (_). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, ALSO SERVING AS THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a single-family residence at 309 N. Third Street, Aspen, Colorado. is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(A)(2), Build-to-Lines, Section 26.410.040(B)(1), Secondary Mass and Section 26.410.040(C)(4), Lightwells of the Residential Design Standards finding that the review standards have been met. Section 3 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated iii such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4 This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement o f any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5 If any section subsection. sentence. clause. phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 4,2003. 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: City Clerk g:\home\saralic,\planning\drac\220ehopkitisreso LJ ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (Eh ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 22--0 (23 p~c, nk-- ,\Aj~ , Aspen, co SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: .996/ , 200- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 31 1.,LYZ- s 4 u oll (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L/ /g Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public headng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community ~ Development Department, which contains the information descibed in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment o f a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. *gnature The foreeoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before metbis 3 7 day of - 12>--u-- , 20013 by ~ )-Â·a ngtt- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 220 EAST HOPKINS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ;TANDARD VARIANCEL FOR BUILD-TO-L[NES, My commisfion expires: Lt/,25:*~ k SECONDARY MASS AND LK;HTWELLS 694'.: 306'Â£) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wil] be held on Tuesday, February 4, 2003. at a meeting to begin at 4:3 ) p.m. before the Aspen - Mi Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Citieg Room, 13(1 S. Gatena Street. to consider an appli Notary Public U f SA f ?4,9 i cat ion submitted by SSM Land Acquisition, re- U a i: 047-US i questing approval of a variance from the City of .o ) Aspen's Residential Design Standards to waive ,+ A Sections 26.410.04(KA)(2) Build-To-Lines, .....2/f 26.410.040(B)(1) Secondary Mass and 26.410.040(C)(4) Ughtwells. The property is legal- H'441635* ly described as Lots P & Q. Block 74, of the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Sarah Oates at the City of Aspen Community Development De- partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920- ATTACHMENTS: 5441, saraho@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Jasmine Tygre, Chair Aspen Planni .g and loning Commission COPY OF THE PUBLICATION Published in The Aspen Times on January 18, 2003.(9952) PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 41 .fÂ» 7 , '2-0 6372-% 521 CODE REVIEW: FAK - CALCULATIO ... ee* Quadrant tproject 5FACE FAK hak APPLICABLE CODES LOWER LEVEL 1993.33 298.99 SEE BELOW 0 1 UNIFORM BUILDING COPE - 1997 MAIN LEVEL 1441.89 1441.89 A 2 UNIFORM FLUMBING CODE - 1997 GARAGE 269.90 9.25 (260.65 EXEMFO : N : NATIONAL FLUMBING CODE - 1997 NAT]ONAL ELECTRIC CODE - 1999 OFFER LEVEL 1027.30 1027.30 CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE - 2002 ROOF STAIR 21.57 21.57 3 ing ABFEN/FITKIN COUNTY ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE -1999 220 E HOPKINS AVE. USE TYFES TOTAL 4,753.99 2,799.00 ASPEN, COLORADO . ~ 220 E. HOPKINS GROUP K DIVISION 3 - DWELLING JOB SITE TYPE y -NK ALLOWABLE FAR 3,200.00 ZONING FAR REMAINING 401.00 OFFICE BASEMENT/ EXFOSED WALL CALC -4 TOTAL WALL SURFACE 1557.00 2[(49'-10')+(40'-0")](81-811) 2 6 7.44 LIGHTWELL WALL SURFACE (11 19'-6" (6'-8") 130.00 (2115'-8. (6'-8' ) 104.50 4 4:' 7.-1 tr-Â«2 TOTAL 234.50 FACTOR 234.5/1557.0 = .15 , VICINITY MAF - ASFEN BASEMENTFAR 298.99 (.15) 1,993.33 LD @1 E9 ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS AKCHITECTUKAL SYMBOLS INDEX OF DRAWINGS - FKOJECT DRECTORY E - 00 IU 111 z DRAWING 9CALE DRAWING TITLE CLIENT %@11 RIGID INS ~ - BUILDING SECTION NF Tl.1 NONE TITLE SHEET SAKA MORGAN R E ~ FOAM UKETHANE INS. 6- 6UILDING DETAIL 2121 KIRBY DRIVE #99 SUKYEY 1.10 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY HOUSTON, TX 77019 1 WA' BATT INS. (33 EXTEKIOK ELEVATION A uaÂ·=i'-a' SITE FLAN AKCHITECT A-/L-~'*. A21 - A2.2 1/4.=1'-0' FLOOR & ROOF PLANS V t,3.1,2.2 114!1-1=' REFLECTED CEILING PLANS LIFKIN WARNER DESIGN AND PLANNING ~ TOF SOIL Fy INTEKIOK ELEVATION A5.1 1/4"=1'-0" EXTEKIOK ELEVATIONS 23400 TWO RIVERS ROAD #44 AG.1 1/4"=1'-0" BUILDING GECTIONS F.0 00X 2239 AM ASSEMELAGES BAeALT, COLORADO 81621 ~ BACKFILL (gh- - - CONSTRUCTION GRID 11/2"=1'-0" i U.2-8.8 11/2"=1'-0" BUILDING DETAILS 970/927-3473 (8487 FAX) 95* EARTH 45- ASSEMBLAGE TAG (SEE AS.1) GENERAL CONTRACTOR ELEVATION MAKK 570/544-4662 RIENKS CUSTOM HOMES : ~ GRAVEL & 969 T.O.FLY. W SITE:102.5 970/927-5431 FAX ': -Â· ' CONCRETE IWEi:iifil ROOM TAG 1 106 1 Â©TRUCTURAL ENGINEER FATILLO ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS ~ WOOD -CUT 91 CABINETKY TAG 715 GRAND AVE. GLENWOOD SFRINGS, CO. 81601 42 9HINGLE ROOF (e DOOK TAG 970/946-9695 (4921 FAX) 42* EFDM ROOF e WINDOW TAG 501Le ENGINEEK HEFWORTH FAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 COUNTY KOAD 154 ~ METAL ROOF GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970/945-7988 (8454 FAX) EE WOOD BIDING DAIE 1861.E,IKE~510~1 MECHANICAL ENGINEER 1 ..al .Ex,0//:Be 4% SHINGLE BIDING BEAUDINGANZE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. 110 EAST BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD 5UITE 202 AVON, COLORADO Â©1620 | 11 BOARD SIDING BKIF 9701949-6108 (6159 FAX) 34- METAL GKATE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTe MT. DALY ENTERPRISE *Ef STONE MASONKY 23400 TWO RIVERS KD. 340 BASALT, CO. 81621 591"VA~ Z.//iq â€¢,-%0,110 eCALE 970/927-3138 (5487 FAX) f.--:9 6 f"Â·..m N :. # Lâ€že Â£ 1 STONE MASONKY-CUT 0 W691.9 9 bly SURVEYOK TITLE SHEET SOFKIS ENGINEERING 502 MAIN NOV 2 1 2002 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 970/704-0311 (0313 FAX) BUILDING DEPARTMENT ASPEN Tl.1 9NINNV 14 9 N 1030033 1NVNOVAD 22 -9-5 9 - 100 2- IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE/TOPOGRAPHY MAP OF' SSM LAND ACQUISITION COMPANY, L.L.C. A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LOT P AND Q BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN 94_ COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Â»Â«ta // f f f =th \ , / EXIS'RNÂ¢ EDGE OF 9 1 .. TELEPHONE RISER ~ 1 ~-7---Â·-22 PK SHINNER L\ ZE=3.-s~ f ~ 1 1 E ut- --41<<13-14#2"ENGÂ£9*4**Fnl~ . r - /Â·41 1. .9-.--ZIL:.- / 1 Gr 1 1 1 1 TELEPHONE RISER S ~~ CATV ~~RS<y. -Â».,-,0- ALLEY 8.1 / 0-Â«ff 75-09'~1- - -Y* Â«.0~.. - 3iqltz=L 2/97- / 7. 434\- 4Â«* s. CAA\U :.09Â». 8 59.86Â· 01 4 2EX(jSBNG ASPH+1.r ft / 1 Â·19Â»- FOUND PK SHINNER 21.01 1 Ensâ„¢G FENCE .1 0 - ---STIE CITY OF ASPEN ILLEG 8.0 1 PROJECT BENCHMARK ~ VICINITY MAP / i -- 4482; 07.2' ._~- ELEV. 7907.230 ~ 72 METER <r .1 19 V .fr/ve/4/, L 95 1 EASEMENT < GRAVEL PARKING AREA . -9-2*6Â»kyâ‚¬%91 v jSHI# U770*7--. 8314/P466 LDTS P AND Q. 1 . - 70 ' 3 TRANSFORMER BLOCK 74, 1 1 , t PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 4.9. 7 3.1' ,/ CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN CONC. PAD 1, 1 - 0. COUNTY OF PITKIN OPKINS R.R. liE 21=n:La- 4*1 ~ sTATE of COLORADO U 1 Â· LANOSCAMNG I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEVENT LOCATION (r.) I 220 447 EXISaNG EDN- , ~ I IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE 1 *es -SPÂ» 1 1 CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING. LLC 4 ., 2.3 <** 21*25/ -%/ EXISnNG FENCE (SE) FOR 32*_I.,LND_-8Â£9112IlQLGQMEAbm.-I.L.LA 4 TEXAS I.IMITED WARil.Frr COMPANY AND PrriaN COUNTY TITIA 051'-: 1% 9 1 lit:Zk:~_ ~iÂ»:-- 0 ~ 6,Â£1 THAT IT ES NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT. AND IT IS AOT 1 42 ~f~~1 1 ----~-- ' ~ < TRACE.BUILDIX.OR OTHER ETURE IMPROFÂ£*ENT LINES. i TO BE RELIED ON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF \ 41 31 R.R FE 1 FURTHERMORE STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE 4 %1 1 1 16'11111 1,1 ILINDSCAANG / 9Â·Â£ UtOSEÂ»*ENT ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE. QgDnta-11.22U 4 11 1,1 1, 11' &(TYP) 1 Ar'Un m Â· 1 EXCEMr UTILITY CONNECTIONS. ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE lill 1 l 80!INDA-R,C 0, THE PARCEL EXCEPT AS SHOIN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED - rÂ« PREMISE. EXCEPT AS INDICATED. rAND THAT THERE IS NO 2. 11 ~ APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN Of.KNY EASE*ENT CROSSING i OR BURDENING ANY PART,*5Â§*494@CEL EXCEM AS NOTED. 05.9. \ k l 42<fdieh 1 ~ aÂ«41 *MA //'- 1 \ ~\ MARK S' *KLER Har##'92 ANO STEP 11/" l / / 2 % 74,ks 18 '%2?AL uey N * NOTESÂ· .4==>r â‚¬39 ' 1> DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 16, 2002. BLOCK 74 ' 5981 BETWEEN THE NORTHWEST CORNER oF IDT Q AND U 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: OCTOBER 18. 2002 Rtir A. ACRES t AOJONERS WALK UGHTS 11 (rvi) 1 2-.-------4 .ON< 4 1 3) BASIS OF BEARINGÂ· A BEARING OF S 75â€¢09 11" E 06.7 -ERSâ„¢G FENCE X *l BUILDING BY A FOUND P. K AND SHINER ILLEGIBLE. AS SHOWN. FOUND BAR CAP , THE NORTHEAST OF LOT P BOTH BEING MONUMENTED LS. #24303 / 07.3 - --- 3 1 1 4) BASIS OF SURVEY: THE 1959 G. E. BUCHANAN OFFICAL MAP 06.f b 9.47 -- --1- ~ PEPARED BY ALÂ°INT SURFEE Of LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 74, 07 THE CITY OF ASPEN, THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY Cd,IC,l S'DEWALK + r CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PROVIDED BY CLIENT. STR 41 4 07 S ....1 3 4 'I--,2- -..- O 4 i DOCUACENTS OF RECORD. AND THE EXISTING PROPERTY 0-' ENCROACk~EMT " i CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. AS SHOWN. , 24 1 4 h z 14 . / FOUND P. K AND SHINER AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7906 ~-,, 5) BASIS OF ELEVATIONÂ· AN ELEVATION OF 7907 23' ON THE '4 ~ .,~ 1 ' ~i~,/ -- 9 ESTABLISHED PROM THE /998 c/TY op ASPEN Co/aouR Â«1 qÂ» 0 / DATUM (NAVD 88). WATER SHUT OFFF ~ EISDNG ED -Il-.. EWSANG UNDERGROUND ABER OPTIC CABLE As> Ct CE Qr -Â«*44 92-- r 6) CONTOUR INTERVAL ONE m FOOT Alr ... L. ~47// \\Â«\ . 7) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH // I \ \'\ OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENYS OF RECORD. FOR ALL 7Â§L x BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING. LLC (SE) TO DEFERMINE %906 INPORMATION AWARDING EASEWLVTS. RIGHT-Of- WAY AND/OR TITLE oF RECORD SE RELIED UPON THE ~ INC CASE NO. PCT16643,Â·2. EFFECT,VE DATE: TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE JANUARY 2. 2002 - - 8) THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATION. RESTRICTIONS. COVENANTS AND EAS EMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. 1 -- UTILITY LEGEND 3 -1- < HOPKINS Â«\---ff/11/zÂ«\41 AVENUE \\i-- - GRAPHIC SCALE CATI-CATÂ»- EXISING UNDERGROUND CABLE T. V. -E-â‚¬-i. EXISING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC --- % 1 \ ( IN FErr) - r. Â£,<,#m"#Al/*#Bblf ' m : 9~/m r.4 -6 \ 1 tnch -0 X - 2 - 99 --- EX]5'~4~~1'~ ~~1 ID ~t- E=/ â‚¬1 - EXIST~IG UNDERGROUND WATER EXENNG EDGE OF CURB UNE ASÂ»"Al 7 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC ~ EXISMNG W 1Â¢0Â¥1 1 2002 --Ti--UT- EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE i,~ m N '' r rce 4 1 / CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 0- CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 ASPEN 1,0.1 'CC~oâ€¢HG TO /01,~RADO LAI YOU â€¢IU5T C(*14" #.EGAL AaCN BASED OPOâ€ž 41~ DGE. IN rWIS SURVEY WITHIN hâ€¢REE yEARS A- 0../7 ./OVEQ SUC,1 DEFIC IN NO r~NT ./t *I' ACTION (970) 704-0311 --- IUMEN'Â·r~ A,'AI4 '. BUILD[NG-DEPARTMENJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - \ t 1 / 1 0-- \ -,-7 1 - 1- 1 \ 6 0 3 INE -~----- -- -- J i ,- 1 FRFERIY I .4 A - - -r-j ~ 1 / 1 J 5ETBACK w, , ~ LINE --- 1, _T- 1 , Hod: --4.-ir !: j It 5 m 1 ~/ Lf \\ 4M = -- 'g .3 2 Q ~ 9 i ~fl %1 1 111 '1 , - 1\'. - ' 6 8 - .1 1. 1/ 1 -N. 1 >.... : 7900 1 W=Ed, ,/\10 12 /1,1-1 11 42'll Or Jj F F .~ ~ 11~F' - fh . 91 -2=Â·-- -_ C \ 2 "*-- Â·Â·---LOGL------Â·Â· Â·---------- ---/ . 11 1 =Ed t. , I. 4 4.1 1 / \19 1 4 , ~Â»'2.+EEIP] % m % 1 . " , -r-09 1 .=Af- -' r i' Z L_.F- ' 1 ED ' 2-1 IIi ... 1&4 1/=l- L . i 1 1 '' / wÂ·n '1 - 1, Â¥ (\ '' 1 1 â‚¬Â· d r \ *:-4.) *IA ; tu % --~J) = -r- ------------------'---------4-_me---1 < WAy 1 am PR'r#*r f -- -_ -- _JI-m,*8GE_54'-2-19'--------v- -- 71 ~ 1 , nov, LINE - - - # Y. > < C? -0 id Ika-=: 0 E-Â£-4 g rn F r--> <~ L W tr QUADKANT PROJECT - DP 0 4 D LIPKIN WARNER DES]GN A PLANNING Â·2Â£ 220 E HOFKINS 2 9 ABFEN, CO. 81621 23400 TWO RIVERS RD *44 T: 970.927.8473 P OBOX 2239 FÂ· 970.927.8487 BASALT, CO 81621 W .Pkin....Â·- ~ ~ 1143N1'ZIVd30 DNI01100 13 7- 2-OC72- I fem .Oe* ... 10 -4. 4 . rey= V ~A~.1~~~_~ Ae.1 *al 2 4 e 1 FLOOK WRAIN F-HOr IIATEK TINIa 1 1 -OR,~iN TO SEWAGE MECH. FLUE U. DrrWEU DKYWELL---1 10OILE'/ n ImMA M. WALL i /-12 ./.1 8/ .. - - 41 0 00' Iig =y05-' ' , el 1 I.KI 00 ' / --7 - --' 1~ . 3 ... 1 6 AZ.1 9 1 .ix 3 --N i Ae -/ X.- A6.1 - . 2 ' : pa ixi 0-- 1 i./--ELEC,SECURITY. ' ' ' 4 ),71 1/2, 4 Fir 1 1 1 7.7 0 4 --IllgE- --------- .- - M V K .52~ 1 0 ON 1 7 e .11 R. 1-E220 - - -1 1/ro,r lilli 11 0~~01Â·n~u ~ Favamb L FNrf 1 1 NE-~003253.6 '&% LEII n ===1 Â· /7, STAR PEK UIC 1.1/ |BTRRI 1 - :. -609 ir-r teel 0 47 5 1 <Et -1 @ 1 1 i~- -U-ai - - 0 93 1-1 14 0 .all.- -19 --ill.-1--Il---- 1 OrMD U- 2 P 1 1 ~6 ./.*-O/ T.0 FLY' UJJ. 1 , AL.1 L- 00 'Er' + Ae.1 4 Ae.1 - L - - - - - - Â¥ 2711 tz: /=,Le, r . 1 A.6.1 - 1/ 1 - ~ ~~ 4 ' 11.- Â¥ 4 .- 1 4 4- 7 - ~ ) Â£~ag-91/2~ T.O.CONC Z LUZ 17 4-11 5 :40 1 IU 1 | 005A 1 0 < RE - - - -- 4 0-- - 4 - -- L . ' VENT Â¥14 1 ---- Ri3TI DZ N * *al . / a P[ENUM 1* N 103* 9 . LEM.1 3 -0 \ 3 4 1/7 4, OE A ,u~u,-, 1068 . 1 . . 16/0.. 1 1 1 1 0 *A 1=A- A5.1 -4 14 61 < 0 Â·5 J g f~ Â·- 0 1*P s U '4'DE Â· u,R.,rr 72/9 D I 4- 1 ek BA " Â·Â· [2*21 0 /09,'PER 0040 , 102 1 3 1 . 1 11~1' I ' ~ STUDY 1 N =1 . 1 11 4, 0 1 - 1 103 102D s L -1 J 5 -!leKOO 14 3 - V. 005 . 0 - 1/ 102A | e 4.-1. 1-7 - -20 -- - ~ --~- G>-- - 1 0"4+ Â® tose * a ------- --- - e r r-- 41/ Â· 1 r-/ Â· 0035 y at. 5-9 -1 - .11 - 2- 2 .4. .- 4. Mul i 34 ------ ------- -e: -- . M MO~ O 3 03. 1 1, 1 , 1 1 e . a.9 EMEKGENCY EMERGENCY ~ 004!D EGRESS 41 EGREM 06. 2106 - -Â»Â· 6 1 4 1 Ph#11!%Â£4 1 437 1 i Â® Laur -L~~~GISILR i ' i.-7!L:~I.4,49-97,b#4~144+1-41:ilhAINN _ ' 4--Â·-L-L, -,1 14 4 . 1 1,11 'â€¢,1 ,!d!.1--11 . C ,Â·E' u./.c , .., 1,t",~r [Triftil,,-I'I",114#'.,- LLI, :4-Il_~I+Liut:--44142*[f":-:il!Â·jilt[!7 /-01/7 r 1 1%' 310.4 UF " 40 I /4. . , EG*EIS LADDER MÂ£ | 1 UGHT WELL | L---UGHTWELL FEK U.04 YO.4 4 EOKESS GKATE 1 EGIESS G#UVE E A,3. 17 1/ / 4-40- 1 1/4' . . 1 & 6 '41 0 6 09 ~ 0 , V 1OWERLQVELYLAL=====_______________________~ MAIN LEVEL FLAN BADEMENT & MAIN LEVEL NOV 2 1 2002 FLOOR FLANS ASPEN AZ 1 EL/8Â·LZ6 SMWAIN OAILL 00,Â£7. Â©DE Li111111113 d NINKÂ¥1.1 7 NDIS]a M3NHVAI ~Â« 1 103Â£0 ...010rl 13-1 . 2-C=22- r .m *n 0 0 9 1 1 5 1/7 , 1 2 4 '3 | Ae.1 *837 Ae.1 x ' inew : , 1 1 R,~NGE HOOD /010/ 0----31 1 - - m -~ A:Â·Lii *IÂ·~iÂ· :IT:Â·... --- 8 Â·iw i, ~-r:iÂ· ~,~i, :i-M-,RI~~ -2=f~===Â· Â£+ 5----=- - 3> -f'' 11 - 1 11 11 92 -11-1 ' dIN) I' ~li~ I'l 'I;' 19MI,4"hillhl'll li ill' Ig -- - --.- , 1 1 I 3 7 '' 3 1 3 1 , - ~ 4 9* 4 14 41/2Â» w 7194 3.* 1 ~ 1 - b !%' ~ DÂ·i~, ,~i.:Â· ii:~id ~ii~,~~4~I'Â·'i~,~!~~'I:~~Â·I~I'lii,i~,;i'liI'li~!1;1~11~1111:111111~1~1111~11,1,~1~11~4 -- 3 Ae.1 , 94 , r 3 -L Il'il,i'Â·i.'~Â·-+, ,~~fw*w:44 ('.11.1-.t~~11-1 1,111,1111;11111,1 111 -- -9, Ae.1 ,I 321 11 Ae.1 1 48 1 68 lie lie Te I leli e 0-- -3 - 4 1 1 4- " 3 11 - '- ==E __ ,, ~ .= 1 q' 4 11 41 1 1 ZOE 1 2 N ' ' 1.2Gil i 1 20iD LJ _d A .1 1 M. W/C ~ _ " 1 izola F 5 4 ' it DN | KNING & i EFFEA . ,/IROOF 1, =r. 7.+, Â§6 1=F Lal . VEN' \ 7 FEK Ut(J *I * I U. 11 -1003.33 .k *6*Â£.r,ILM. - 1 1 M â‚¬1 -608 5 . V ill t. 7919t, , e ~ 3 (* ----- r , + I _~ _ _I _ I. g ' 201/ _ Â©31 11 1 4 1 4 .414 h.' I Bill I A 1 SUNDINCE./.5 Aa.1 4 --LIP,Ibll i|;111|11'11 lili i .. Aal - - 7. /2~/2 HOTTUe 9 A63 4 -lgrt-= e L K â€¢ EL . OFERMLE , ~ L /1 INÂ«, 904*a 1 211_, .: 66 i ----- 7. 5 7- 1- 1 .r 1 - ' - ~ 5. WEST ~ii@11 '11 1 -1- 1 029 1 Â»k/ 120:A L.21_ â‚¬)- - - ----- 1 e- 1 1 - - --= - ~E -4 - 'f~ .-r- r - t 1 L i J -%- ~ R VENT vIA KOOF 2 (*~0 r - 1 -3 3/4' /1\ 9 1 1 41 01 -1 4'-61/4' 7- 3 4Â· -4 I - 1 t,Evil I 11-11 1 - .......1 11 9 1 I Â£ 41 -Ii=ill--- Ill1 ~: 1 1 2 , .Il * 68 MASTER BEDROOM ,~ bllk ~ 1 1, lie ~~ 201 f r- 1 -"OF=â€¢Â·E - 1 2 | MOTOglZED MOrMIZED MOrDRIZED .m worog,ZED dor lei ' 1 1 1 .1-1 7 - '.1 - Â· 91 - ' -1-4 - 5 --- - -...6 39-,- -4, - , 4, .4 1,1 1\ 1/ 4 N~ -Eft, a' - It/7 1 f. i k .* 1 1111!111'11 :11 11 ~~ 1~ 1111~ 1 ' 1111111 11.11 11Â®111111 1!1~, I ' 'I 'l l 11111 141111114. 11 F ll~ 1,1.11,11 1 'Â»41-3 - 0 .11 1 k:~ '~E All'kil: AY iu #p .":i~[' 19,il 118 ~1 ~1:!~1~1,~~~'~111~,~'Â·,~ ~10 1,11. LY|~~;1@1~~|~,~ I 9I~I,~~~'~|i: ~~P, b~fu ~~4 1-1 ~,94 ~~t ~~||i: r ~~4-.'1 1 ~f ~'Â· |~~~ b bil I , 1, Ii, , 1 I 'l /11 . 1,1 libl I 6 Â· I -4 4 , ' ~ '-q - 'i ' - 1- 'A 1~11,1 /19,111 ~ 1 111 111,1,111, ~ 411 1~1111121 ~111111Â£ 1 1 41 ~11' All i~ IA 1[Wi' i '" M I -1 0 r 1 1 rh 1 --1 f 1111: 11; 111 lilli .:; lilli:':111 9 1 ' 2 11 1, . 0 1 1 - '1 4,~ 0 0 115'-0 117.0.FLY. IIJARDe]Le - 3 3 5. OATH I | - I r. 4-1 3. 5-8 - 201' 1 5.ICL~T ' hi ' , 1. 63 - DECK WALL 1/. 4 ' 2 1 11 11 1 11 t lili 11 41 -1 011. 6 14Â® - 1,/ I _ 1 - 2 . 4 1 1 +Lf \ 1 . ~ODSHINGLEROOF ~ ,~~GAIED,META,LROOF | | 1 4-------il--4 1 ERM KOOFING 1 1 1 11 | AA HEATTAPEAREA , A 1 1 6 21 Â© Â® .9 6pg 9 9 SNOWCLIPS ~ ~ 9 40 2 7 4 79 51464Â¥ GUAR// 7 7 STBERS UFFER LEVEL PLAN- 1. L__251Â£_3 RECS:v cu MAIN LEVEL & ROOF DECK LEVEL FLOOR FLAN & NOV 2 1 2002 ROOF PLAN ASPEN FED BUILDING DEPARTMENT IL==_--31 EL,Z LE&'0L6 ## Cni SH)Ant Obi,I 00,â‚¬Z LBÂ·*1 LZB'OL.6 6EZZ X08 0 12049 '03 'N3JGV NINNV'id 'P ND/93/ MINITY,H NIN,1-1 io~ro-JJJ]-NIV~~~~~~~~ UE E ttgTE 00 11Â¥SÂ¥ 4 0 0 e , 9 5 a ~ 5. ~ 1. 221 I 1 1 i | 2 | 4 | 1 .De HI. tz /\6.1 1 | | ' Ae.1 N A&.1 i ,-6. RIDGE HT, 14.017FIZEA 11- ~ HEIGHT LIMIT -- 111.11.11 11 4111111 li'MI' LI':! lilli 111 11 lili 111 lili 11.1 .. 25Â· /00'0E EaSTING Ge.DE \ Â· Â· . _ _ C&'%2;Â¢WLIiair i ':Ddli.!,F-Il--ri._,-:Im--'''T "11-"''I-17---' =lrÂ·- -- ---- WD. SHINGLE ROOF -1 1.- 1,1 1 -1 11. -11-- 11 - - -1.. 1 4 1 - -+Lrl . - - - 1 4.-101 A.., PLATE HT ' 1 1 J WIN. HO. r 1 1 V r.-11* 1 ; , , .- w - + - ----------------1--~ WIF,15CIA&11â„¢. 1 1 MN. 111 1 y,.. 1 1 510!NG 1 1 f RIDGE HT "9 jeL.KIRE-MI OOK HP- 11 -le =12 3 +Eq:I h--r-! 5 1 2 .31 MN. HO. 5._ _ - /'f' v'll'.61/2. 1. 1 ~ T NATE HT. 121.1 E 10:21 rim rim -J .- LE L I.i Cues .5. FLUE z[ FLUE TIED TO ROOF ~ 52| CLASS "9- FLUE - | T -FLUE TIED TO ROOF 31 . - 34 1 L-4--1 lx4 RIM i Ll_1_2-2 BUNKLEVEL 115'-/1/4' T .SUB. BUNKL L ii r::Â· *N ~ _, wl. SHINGLE KOOF 9 115'-e .0. BUB. FL - f ] 43 A - MTL FLEHING 2 ~~===~ 1 â€¢/- .....#.... v.,W=N-Iow, 1 -wL,jâ€¢J'- T PLATE HT 1 l ,\ 47 - WIN. HO CORRUGM ED MI ROOF - -. WIN. HO. 1 -Â· r. 2 lÂ· ir 1 - r-r-1 1 I e .- - A I 11 ! . .-----. - '. 1 !111111111 1 1 111 1 11 11 :#R/38 1 Ill - 1 lx_ 11â„¢ AS KEQI 2 1*6 FISCIA I IN - 7- 'Ell - MÂ·rl FLASHING ., ILL FLASHING - 1 4 1 11 111 111111 11 â€ž 11 11 11 â€ž1 1 1 1 -1- lili 111 111 -- . 1 11 4 U 1 2 -- L J'14 1-' 7 - - 1-1 - -1 #- -1-i-, - JI| LiI- -' 4-- - - - - ~ - - - - - - 14. UP~R F .LEVEL ./. IUM. FL H 'ATEli ---_ _ _ ___ ~__~__.~_ ,..__I_-c_ _.__!__'ll'_-_1_'___.- ... --'.--- _--~-- -'-'-- Il~~ WIN, 9 i =r' -2~IN. 10 = CEED GUTIER & mi --1 *TRIM - -- - LL--1 EEf 6- -*unWELL COWNSIOUT 111--- : 6 EHEE 1 = -PIALIN TO DRYWELL -PerN TO DKYWELL GUrrER & 1 DOW+ISFOUT -- - I ---.--- --.-- CORRUGATEDIL T T - 1 d 31 1 1 1 *-1 1->491 - /Â¥41. UB SEVEL 1 ----- ---- 1 1--1 ------- SIOING --- ---- - - --- .- -5!DING ~Â· - - '10.GUID 7 5 ! 1 1 5 Â· -- 3 -- COLUMN & DIWKET - ---_--_-- ~ WO.OECKFASCIA - 1 ------ STONE INEZEK - 1 i --- -- ---- -- --- -- AJ| MAINFLOOILEVEL,| - ---------- -1 MAINFLOOKLEVEL,1.6. Â»,thil~INFL LEVEL 4 1 - -- ~ --~ --- ----- - -- MAINFLOOKLEVEL v r.,.#~0 SUB. Fly - - , ,1, 11)00' T.0. SUB. FL 7 W F100â‚¬10. SUB. EL ~ Â· . ./.. 90 .FL V . WIN -WIN. 0 -=- --r-- FINÂ¢IHEDGI<IDE ~/ - u WD. PECK FA5CM 4 Ii%-2 ~ - 1 - 9 ' ~U-DECKFASCIA 1 1 1 - ' 1 i ~, Exlen,,0 G!6.DE-/ i I D STONE VENEER L---1- STONE ~ENEEK &1 ~ ... --I-- .1 n- --- -ril ----~ 1 : d W 4 iNT H 4 1 1,4 - ,â€¢,~~, ,,1 ....=/=- 1 2@'' ' Av-v=.416 33:7.' --- 4 Ve, KAI BEVEL i J i ~ FINISHED GKADE -~ ~ i ' 1 0 11 1 T ::2 T N i ST ::~ T: - , 11 61 4TFU 1 1 1 . 1 , Â· ZOI U-- Ve | L RFLOQ,~EVEL __--low#=A=.24 LOWEK FLOOR LE ___________________ ______________ -,____ u______ 1 -____- ______-- LOWER FLOOR LEVEL T. CON, 09'-7' T.0. CON . , , 0. ONC. \- M Z LU ~h WEeT ELEVATION 9rA, 2 1/4~,I'Â·~ /7\ DOUTH ELEVATION ICALE 1/4 =1'/7 <2 \49- 1.1 1 5 0 0 0 06.0 0 0 00 13' 5 < 4 | 2i 44.1 1 , Ae.1 , Ae.1 , r--L- HEIGHT UMn D P /.w KIDGE IT. 25' ABCME EXISTING GRADE B.I- - 1 1 + ny 14 F,â€¢,SCIA & TKIM ----- - FlATE K. 17/1 . Â· L. HEIGHT LIMIT WI). 9HtNOLE 510*IG -- , 10-11 12 L I r 29 ABOVE )576 GI<~[)E 1 WIN. 110 ..1 6 (6455 Â·5* FLUE ./r-,1.L_ FLUE RE/ 10 KOOF 2 I ~42:qua~.:'~,bi~~'Â·I~I,d.~f#~4.::&:p.~IM#31;~!.i~1~~:1:~4.111.~i:'~,~!ill~Il|;1|~'F;:w.p~.~1,.112- - - I -66=1 - -r- -1 1 - M. 91!NGLE SIDING R! I /Â·Lâ€¢;â€ž-C..26...&â€¢4,1.i -~.,I.I.I.kle:/4..Ak,LIâ€¢uâ€¢,bu~48-149.*,;IN~~wâ€¢A,b~~JI;,4/.I,Â·.'IÂ·Â· 1 ~ MATE H. WIN. Ele. Â· i'-: 1- 1 1- WIN. Ho 1,710. r 1 11 Ixe F~CiA & TRIM ' ,: ' 4:': f 4 2 i, ': MTL FLABHING MTL Flj,SHING , i , B / -1.--- 11 -â‚¬. TO. B. Fl FIRE PEFT ITROI + i L-j - OFT LEVEL i .14#1 S b 111 billi NE '11 N 11 111 .11 11 1 1 11~ 1 . i~ , : Tt- : 00. 00. - M.Al HT. 1- 1 --- -- 5 -- - -- WIN. HD 114Â·11/2 -- +41'I IIi' 17-r-941 1 - -111 11 1:111 11 1 1 1 1-7 !Â·11 1 fill,IP "11 4 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 1 .11 '111 ; 1 11 1 â€ž 11 1 k-Â·Ir,1 z---m__ ~~, q~ I, A,I, ~~:,IINI,0lilimii i~i~~i,I ,I ~,~~1!1 111.1 1 1111â€ž111111 ;.lili.., MTL FLA5HIN,3 w. 11 1 1 1 1 lilli i , /1 J 1% 11! Plt' . r NU-eÂ» r.0. SUB. FL 1 . Il ~'' 111 11 k'11111, 11 1 111 11 11 1 11 . 4.11 -1-4.--.6,4â€ž_48â€¢:=62 - MEK FL LEVEL OFFE' FL LE L Â· W'-t fl[ Â·Ir~I'Â·4~@JH/=' % ~~ A T-If' 1 '" " I""ll! 1 1 Il!* 4 1 111114 11111 1 1111 LL"Â·'Â· * ''-'ily'.Â· p r i ----- cr'i. j_111'-'1'1~1.JI- ~|-L~L_"i, '' 3~~_lil~,t klÂ¢ Ii:11Â·11 111 ~11'i 1 11.1,1,1,1,u 1,1.1,1 1 1,11'I,11,1 11-1 1111,1,14A Il na-/ T. . SU/. FL. 1%7-6 .0. SU/Fl ' - ------ 1, 111 --- ______~_____ 'a-) a -Â·---- - --------- MI -4 ---------~ PLATE HT. WN. HO. MN. -- _ GUT-TER & . W. GUTTEK & , -=----- [Fiell -HAIN TO OKYWELL _ -DRAIN TO DKYWELL -- - T--0 -~ ~14~p--- 1----~--~-*----F w-ga~ Â·Â· 0 -- 49/GUI I ____ -- -7 1Â»4 TntlM 44.1.4 .2==2=1_-_~I/_2~I=-rT-2-_ 6- 05 -- - 4- 1410. RAB BEVEL -- 6 0 m-~--+~----- -I- W.------ aD,N<; -1 4 '/0. Im BEVE I 4' WO. RAD DEVEL - ROING - - 7 ----- 8 5Â©ING - 10 0 -------- 11 --- 8 -- - - =-- - - -,--=-=- ----- - -- 1 MAN FL LEVEL ~ M*PUXXLEMEL 4 ------ -, GAI/JELEVEL A E LEVEL _ -...... ... 1 T ,- 8. FL ......-- Il ---Ill__________-_______- g. 1/2, ..coâ€¢c, 99-9 T .CONC , , , e# 1 : I - - All,1- 1 , ---- 1 FIRIE DEPT L.=t .....7 ~ - 7 .. u__-_____WI. DECK FA5CIA ei :~z~z~ z:z z z,z ~: ~LI zizz z= z=z z:zi=Izz= 2.22 zE zz=ZE==: 1: 2== 22=21 :rzz:ZI=ZEZZ:ZZEZEZZ------- --- -- L _10 FINISHED G~DE 1 51'RINKLER | ~ ~-FINISHED GKADE -- 56 Z Z -tz +P 1 \-+ EXITING GRADE ~ ~ - -~ 1 4- EX,SnNG GRADE L------4--~- STONE VENEER 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 21 1 1 ~ EXTERIOR 11 ' ' | LOVER FLOOg LEVEL J" 761 LOMER FLOOR LEVEL. 1-9 k U ' J . ' ' , U ELEVAAONS || I-!=GIEK_ELLBE1. J 1 9,84-7T.O. CONC---I -- --------------- ------------------------------ - -' Â¥1'9Â¥=CONC L 8 - F.0, CONC. i IL-J 4---i......------ NOV 2 1 2002 - i ~ EAST ELEVATION /~\ NORTH ELEVATION 9 1 4,=rÂ·rf IL=35.1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT LRt9 F---2 ~11 Â¥ MDISIC! HINEVA, 1330036 '00 'NEWGY