The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1390 Snowbunny Ln.A099-02CASE NUMBER A099-02 PARCEL ID # 2735-013-11007 CASE NAME 1390-1392 Snowbunny Ln Design Review Appeal PROJECT ADDRESS 1390-1392 Snowbunny Lane PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE Design Review Appeal OWNER/APPLICANT Alice Brien REPRESENTATIVE EJD Enterprises (Ed Daniel) DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1/21/03 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Approved ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 1/24/03 BY J. Lindt 4,- PARCEL ID:~2735-013-11007 DATE RCVD: ~ 11/27/02 # COPIES:~1 CASE NO|A099-02 CASE NAME:~1390-1392 Snowbunny Ln Des gn Review Appeal PLNR:|James Lindt PROJ ADDR:~1390-1392 Snowbunny Lane CASE TYP:~Design Review Appeal STEPSi OWN/APP:~Alice Brien ADR~305 Oregon Trail C/S/Z: ~Aspen, CO. 81611 PHN:]970-429-0123 REP:|EJD Enterprises (Ed Daniel)ADR:|PO Box 4315 C/S/Z:IAspen, CO. 81612 PHN:1970-379-0123 FEES DUE]500 D FEES RCVD:~500.00 STAT: F REFERRALS] REF:| BY] DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED i DATE OFFINAL ACTION:~ 1/21/03 CITY COUNCIL:~ REMARKS| PZ: Approved BOA: CLOSED:|1/24/03 BY: ~J Lindt DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department -. This Development Order, hereinafter "Order . is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights. this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Alice Brien, 305 Oregon Trail. Aspen. CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 1, Block 2, oftlie Snowbunny Subdivision Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property DRAC Variance from Single Stall Garage Door Standard Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #5, Series of 2003, 1 /21/03 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) February 1,2003 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) February 2,2006 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued iii accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 1St day of February, 2003, by the City of Aspen Community IÂ®yelopment Director. 00e Ann Woods, Community Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 1, Block 2, of the Snowbunny Subdivision by resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 5, series of 2003. The approval allows for double stall garage doors on both of the duplex units. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/ City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times on February 1,2003 Resolution No...~5 4 (SERIES OF 2003) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR DOUBLE STALL GARAGE DOORS AT 1390 AND 1392 SNOWBUNNY LANE, LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735-013-11-007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Alice Brien. seeking a variance from Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards, requesting relief from the single stall garage door requirement for 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane, Lot 1, Block 2, of the Snowbunny Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the subject property contains 16,662 sq. ft. and is improved with a duplex and two accessory dwelling units; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant' s proposed application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards Section of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with the residential design standard set forth iii Land Use Code Section 26.410(C)(2)(f), Garage; and, WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff' s findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to garages: and, WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; 4 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested variance, recommended approval of the requested variance from the residential design standards to allow for double stall garage doors; and, WIIEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on January 21. 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeal Committee, approved variances from the single stall garage door standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residential Design Standards for Lot 1, Block 2, ofthe Snowbunny Subdivision by a vote of â‚¬ve to Ate (5_-1-3. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 That the proposed variance from the single stall garage door residential design standard for the duplex located at 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane, is hereby approved pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.040(C)(2), to allow for the double stall garage doors to be maintained on both duplex units. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 21.2003. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair Planning and Zoning Commission ATTEST: Jackie Lothian. Deputy City Clerk 5 N.b. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeals Committee THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 6{6)ic Cotlf Me*4 Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director 440 n------ FROM: James Lindt, Planner <i~ Poit lo jele/141 Â£ lil , ckeY- (3*tile\12 RE: 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane Garage Door Variances afprefbA 04-2 DATE: January 21,2003 5- 1 l/AF'll*Ze AFfygunFed APPLICANT: Alice Brien, Represented by ; *44Â«14 Ed Daniels. 42*- 4 t' f. i./ 1.....3 PARCEL ID: 2735-013-11-007 .4 i./6..1004 ;fililTIillillillililililiM ADDRESS: 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane .5 3'Â·.211*1;6:121'lill<*it.i'"Ill/'11:iNillitwriIill'lia ZONING: R-15 (Medium Density Residential) ~'4,~,9, *i~ '*-~~"~~~~~~~~ 71/15'rilawl'll'll CURRENT LAND USE: New Duplex eÂ·..2.. i,1 .1., ; 1 , .....'11Â¥,TI.~ PROPOSED LAND USE: The applicant is ~Â· ' seeking a variance from the residential 1 design standards to allow for both units of 4 y .,4 1 0 4. the newly constructed duplex to maintain .2111 -1.0. I . double stall garage doors. The residential - design standards that are established in Land 19Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·'Â·Â·*' *:,6,200*.J,;;.*17-. Use Code Section 26.410 require that any residential use that does not have access from Above Photo: View of the westernmost an alley or private road shall have single-stall garage door from Cemetery Lane. garage doors. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant. Alice Brien. seeks a variance from Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards to allow for double stall garage doors at 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific standard.) All applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC) to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Background: Alice Brien ("Applicant"), represented by Ed Daniels of EJD Enterprises ("Contractor"), are requesting approval for a variance from the Residential Design Standards. Specifically. the applicant is requesting a variance from the following standard: Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(f) Parking, Garages and Carports. For all residential uses that do not have access from an alley or private road, the following standards shall be met: The garage doors shall be single stall doors. The applicant has received approval of building permit plans (see approved site plan attached as Exhibit "B") that show the garage doors on both sides of the proposed duplex as containing single stall garage doors as the residential design standards require. Double stall garage doors were constructed on both units as can be seen in the photo included at the beginning of this memorandum. The applicant feels that the approved configuration of the garages will not allow for a safe turning radius out of the garage stalls. Therefore, the applicant requests a variance from the residential design standards to allow for the garage doors to be maintained as double stall garage doors with the appearance of single stall doors. Staff Comments: The vehicle entrance to the newly constructed duplex is located off of Snowbunny Lane. The driveway swings around the easternmost side of the duplex and enters the garages from the north as can be seen on the site plan that is included in the application. The entryway to the two garages faces the rear of the property. Thus, practically speaking the driveway acts in a similar fashion as an alley and the garage doors are not going to be seen extensively from either Cemetery Lane or Snowbunny Lane. Therefore, staff does not believe that proposed double stall garage doors are contrary to the intent of the "Parking, Garages and Carport" standards which are intended to "minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile by placing parking, garages. and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist . Furthermore. the garage doors have been designed in a manner that gives them the outward appearance of being two (2) single stall garage doors. For information purposes, the Cemetery Lane Character Area Plan that was adopted by City Council in 2001 included a survey of some of the Cemetery Lane Residents regarding the appropriateness of certain residential design standards. The above-mentioned survey included a question that asked the residents if they felt that the single stall garage door requirement was appropriate for the Cemetery Lane neighborhood. The survey results indicated that a majority of the residents that were surveyed felt that the single stall garage door requirement was not appropriate and in character for the Cemetery Lane neighborhood. 2 Nonetheless. the single stall garage door standard still exists in the land use code and currently applies to all residential properties within the City of Aspen. As has traditionally been the case. staff finds it difficult to support a residential design standards variance request on a lot that is not substandard and is greater than 15,000 square feet. Therefore, staff does not feel that the proposed variance application technically meets the review standards to vary the residential design standards. Staff believes that there are no site-specific constraints on the property that would necessitate the need to grant a variance for the garage doors. The site is relatively ilat and contains more than the required minimum lot area in the R-15 Zone District in which it is located. Moreover, staff does not feel that the proposed variance better addresses the issue that the garage related residential design standards respond to. Staff acknowledges that the applicant does appear to have a turning radius problem in accessing the garages that would be alleviated by allowing for the double stall garage doors to be maintained. Ilowever, the need for the variance has been created by the design of the residence. Staff feels that the applicant could have pushed more of the above grade square footage in the westernmost unit towards Snowbunny Lane. which would have made allowances for the garages to be setback further from the rear property line and would have given more turning room for entry into the garages. Staff cannot support the proposed variance requests because we do not feel that the application technically meets the standards for granting relief from the residential design standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the variance request. RECLOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): 1 move to approve Resolution No. 053 Series of 2003, approving a variance from Residential Design Standards to allow for double stall garage doors to be maintained on the garages at 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane finding that the review standards have been met". ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Approved Building Permit Plans Exhibit C -- Application and Plans 3 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS SECTION 26.410 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards at a public hearing if the variance is found to be: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or. c) clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. 26.410.040 Parking, Garages and Carports The intent of the following parking. garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. The code specifically indicates that for all residential uses that do not have access from an alley or private road, the following standards shall be met: 1. The garage doors shall be single stall doors. In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, staff makes the following findings: a) If granted, the exception would yield greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; and, Staff Finding Staff believes that the variance being requested from the single stall garage door requirement does not vary in this situation from the intent of the residential standards that speak to garages and carports. In this situation, the double stall garage doors face the rear of the property and cannot be viewed from Snowbunny Lane and can only slightly be seen from Cemetery Lane. However, staff does not feel that allowing for the double stall garage doors to remain will yield greater compliance with the goals of the AACP than would providing single stall garage doors to meet the requirement on the site. Staff does not believe that this criterion is met by the proposal. b) More effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or, Staff Finding Staff believes that the proposed variance to allow for the double stall garage doors does not negatively affect the duplex's compliance with the intent of the garage related residential design standards. The subject garages face the rear of the property and cannot be seen from either Snowbunny Lane or Cemetery Lane. The intent of the residential design standards relating to garages is to ensure that the location and design of a garage is such that it does not 6 become the focal point of the street facing facades of a residence. Staff does not believe that in this situation the proposed double stall garage doors have considerable interaction with the street. However, staff cannot make a finding that granting the variance will more effectively address the issue that the garage related design standards respond to than if the applicant had met the single stall garage door standard on the site. Therefore, staff does not believe that this criterion is met by the proposal. c) Is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. Staff Finding Staff does not believe that the site contains any unusual site specific constraints given that it is relatively tlat and contains more than the minimum amount of lot area that is required by the underlying R-15 Zone District. Staff feels that the turning radius problem has been created by the design of the duplex. Staff believes that the applicant could have fit the same amount of square footage on the site. created more room to turn into the garages at the rear of the duplex. and still complied with the required setbacks by pushing the westernmost duplex unit closer to Snowbunny Lane. Therefore, staff does not believe that this criterion is met by the proposal. 7 EXP 11-,1 /6 4 0 pi i J I ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Alt<< 8 r 1 (2 Location: 1 370 / 39-2- Der).oh c/Bil./ LC 2-0/ 4 13/ock 2 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legafdescription where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: A i te < Ar, e/V Address: 02,3-~ ,-prf - A.% /her.", 92 4/ 2_ Phone #: 1-/29 -/O Y 6 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: BID <toronsâ‚¬'5 LE-<31 to)A-ntelh Address: 4 3,5- AJ p e-4 914)1 Phone #: 3 77- 0/2.3 PROJECT: Â£ Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD ~1 Conceptual Historic Devt. U Special Review U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development < Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA ~ Minor Historic Devt. U GMQS Allotment E Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ~ Historic Demolition U GMQS Exemption U Subdivision ~ Historic Designation U ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split El Temporary Use U Other: C Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) ~}A-Al i.ver-< Af> p.,0 4< rf k 0,1 2 -3 IN QJ\C 9 ay-Ac; e Â»10Â£, 1 9 e AJ I , S 4 Â¥ e> 4 A u 0/ r 9 . 1 0,2/v'Wej rma<01 1-07 Veki,cles 6/As 9-Â¢7 65 + '9- A t- PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) L.)e J) Aue OUS<Al-<\ 9,i b<hi-* 406,-<, e.;u CA-ck sieR, 4-0 /0,0 k 4, k 2 -toue /'loOF-5 6/0 c'Grts id f 3- 6.2- , \4 2. r, (en,v wc~ 6 2 3 c C' p ~ <414 2 2 nl (4,1 k , L /442 ~ Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ â‚¬00 Depos' 1- Â£ Pre-Application Conference Summary %1 Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Jan 16. 2003 10:00AM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS No.3001 P. 1/1 J 111 b,li.N A11'11< A Nil]17 1: C'l'S. liiL. Mr. James Lindt Aspen/Pitkin Department ofCommunity Development Via.Fax RE: Snowbunny Duplex 1390 & 1392 Snowbunny Drive, Aspen Dear James: With regard to the garage doors for the above project, the approved permit set shows single-width garage doors per Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. In the field, it became apparent that vehicular access to the garages was more restrictive than anticipated. In order to improve this access without increasing the amount of driveway area (thus reducing the amount of landscape area and possibly complicating drainage #suLs) the garage doors in each unit were changed to double width. The doors have been detailed to appear as two single width doors side by side and it is not apparent that they are double width except when they arc in the open position. Note also that the doors face, the back ofthe propetty and are not clearly visible from either Snowbunny Lane or Cemetery Lane, and that the total Width of each door is within the 24' feet specified in the Design Standards. Given the above we respectfully request that a variance to the Residential Design Standards be granted. I am available for your questions or comments. Sincerely, CO:.4 MiÂ« L. John Muir, A.I.A 201 Main Street, Suite 904, Cut=ldale, cobrado 81625 rhone: (970) 704-9750 Fax: (9701.724-91Â§78MER..imE@Ee?i.*t <k ..E . 3 9*4~Â»2 -56--n 7 -8 - I crKLLA+Le 04-0~z-, -)*LINA ~45.2*-62 4 ~621 /Er- Â»Â£,26 9- 074 4 ,~9+2Â© 'O. ,~1 / 3-13 < t 3 If S n D\00 6 0.~ A.I Ad, Ll . A gÂ»42 â‚¬41 Z[~4<6KEO -Mv 40Â« C,4,---14 e.+ Aepo~ e_ 91/46 . IT Mk-kes =, F â‚¬ 4-9 - r 4- c. 9 6/+ 1 64 + -D- - + 4-3.- 3 4 A 4-9 2 . I (4 0 La El i t e -I 0, 3 n A- A e AL (LE (. e. nLe-ecitc.,1 7: A~0*Â°ve L , C.,/ Nov 1 26 . 2002 5 :24PM -rJOH N M b I R ARCH i TECTS ,No.2 7 3 5Â·1 ? 2/2 . D 4'-(7 13'-70 8 0 0 3 . -- 1 6 1 /4\4 1 1 /,42Â«4\~0 / 48.412*44 1 - 1 // 111111. 1:1 1 ./.-/ 4 1 U-1111 9 4,(/ < / # . '4-'LA 2 5 '|iM k.i--[1- ~Illl TI 1 Al//.1 - 1- P try / 1 --r, 0 11// \\ 1 73 1 01 .\VE 1 -/\ . t 1 ''â‚¬10 1 N / 1 1 -- -- -- Er--- 1 - 1,9 11 /-1 le--7- 1- 11 /11 1 \ 111./4 11 1<,(3)~ . ---7 -Â«11 -0 11 \--1 1 .2 = 1 1 1 .1 'll 1/.1 . 11- dr- .-- --- r7 . . - 12-7--lk | 1 .-. Â«-////. .I -/Ii.7t; . ZI:35A / 4#=91 5 vy r -~ 9 11 1 Enp*9 / \ 111 h f 4.94 . 4-1 f \1 - Â«2-1 i FAI \\'A LL_UL,JU I. 7 i /if, 44- -14 A \ Aput- /1\ - \ t. r i n ~ 2 1 4; i r --- --Â©r-V-H 1-I -p.___-__2_-LtÂ·EC~3,4 -- 7//./ I 1 -- DJ e LA T- A C U'vl UÂ· u N il A 1- - - Nov 26 2002 5:23PM JOHN MUIR ARCHITECTS , 6 0 ;. 1/ L No. 977g D 1/9 1 <15 ~ A.,4 44' -4 -1- - - 3:-4lz -- 8'-0 \8 -Â¥lt . 4 C.- '; 1 L ----- -A 1 42' 1 lit -- / 3*,ClÂ«h 1 1 /( 1.:':'471'' 1,4 ! IA I._I_.~,i i.,Ili.~~1111!111*1111*11,9 1.~ G Ill Ill tiLLIEI C...1 1& 111 -1-L-h li ! <,w lyi i I i ~ i y l 1 1 1.11111 1, i i'Lly I i i p ~il,li '11-LUnill , a - r,t j Bri;11 11 1!1 vt<4 ':),1 !11 1.11111 31 11 ' !1 Il I.lgi~.I lillil l , 1 3 It 1,1, 'IL- I I ll' It 11 lillill .1 / 1 %+12.4 111 '91' It/>' / /1- A, lub t 1| I llÂ·r~1 lil i.Â£19 vÂ·M )thilip' AN, 1 1 U \1> 1 1 1 1 1 1 i l'ill - -- - , 1---- - 1 1 . 1 1\ 1 i -4 1 1 -1. ./ 1 1 i 1 CE, 1%\ 40 i -9 : e--L -Â» 1 Â· , - 1 # # 4.-0,; I _Â· I--7 , lu .1 1 11 . 1 . I , 1 1- -:11 41' 1Fbet - --i- 1-/1- - 2&--4-~*-p ' 1 I 14#9* [44[Tf[f[Tn ~PffiE ~Nnff[EI~ ~ 32%--- 1 . *94 1 2Cnil r t-- 4-(-nrfelk,a 1117- 6 _ 1 1 - - 1 Er - 14_-,1~ 5 1 1 1 E Ast i /1 0 21, 1 Cl U A; 4 -1 B 1 --- 20'1'0~3 ' 4Â¢31Â¥.4. SE-Jj_LE-5--- ../1 il ili IM , OCCelf. 5~ 2â‚¬fgH 31 953314 24 0 *FAff 452#RU 33 3' A- 4-AÂ· Afttle tofUErs, 1% 2~3401â‚¬36-R-*MIet, 1 11-~~ â‚¬!Et* 12 51= D. Fle-r * 15 9%11 -- -- L. e <lit)4 .20 -5 , . 9.LJLE -- /5 L' F\Ne M e t:'tt..te A- 05' S F'MLES 31 6 BrAZLE. prrE _ Â¢ 4: 334&11:Â£13 to 11Â·~ sreÂ·&Pg~r~i il, f %]Ale 58 4, /erred 40 12* A him -SH INC. OKDE< NOÂ· 27355 wha ~~ f'IKÂ£~*145.-1 CÂ»3Â»le .sogver: 208 MAIN ~REEr 51-EW 7 TLE OF- .w.Â·434?21[s~ ~:' 79.- 1 %'tig '30 NiN& 3Â· As,r'EN CARBONDILE ColoKADO 816Z3 6, 19Â·: 5443:Â£ tz thbas g.Â°* g g. 3*5 (8705 704-9750 - ~ 2 Â·..749*KtÂ· 4.. f 6 3 *brER (970) 704 0287 ~ 14Â·9-Â· 41.7344** N.Ixte FUDâ€¢ 5 83'12' z#'C fll.75 **COAD' 5 64Â·01Â·00-C 1Â£0 DO' #*S *1: '1 rÂ°~*> 'Vt:t ~M&n - - I M- 1 1 0. Â¢*4â‚¬47 1 914* 1 ,tftftÂ· ....I~AkÂ·.-22.. \Â» Vi . ./-h .-â€žÂ· ,=Â»73 - Â·Â·'. 4.r.Â· AUF h\\ == / '21: . l.orT 2 'P,OrÂ· i k.** 1/ ---h \\ ..>r N â‚¬*fel- lei ; 494 ' - --1,0 W 1 W 0.Â»- + R=---4.1 41, , I. 2-. 1.- 1 -] L._ C - __ __ -91 1 i--4-- 1 - 1 --- r L. JUN 14 , 4 / â€ž 1/ 1 - -1.=21%11,1 ---7 DU,Â£14ntl 1 --X+%- if i 1-w*44' tiÂ»**11 &'./ 1.4'â€¢~wÂ· 91'- 0,4 f , 0--- / - / le.â‚¬Dll 11 ; 11 1 7-, f r / b, 1 N T-f-1 i l -1 .60 f / \ --J , 1 1, 1 i XMANEITI rk#obalMFAT y //ft S 601 2 Z 1!4 I : 1 '' 1 1 Â«917- A-dÂ« 2 i -- t -\2/40 h L.Ab EXP W 0 _1(L E--3 1 2 10.0-- " q 45 4/7802. 45Â» A 2, 29 / 21 - , 1 8 1 Ntt 0 6. " r--- 0 h + Ct --=== -- . 7 1 \ t 117 - -Â·1-716 9.-lort.t-Gtiof- ----11- --3:-,4.....1.-l ~< -1 - ZZ-1 Z Fy *n 14 0 U+ Il .:1, Â£2 p,.:Ae, OF ke.ANMe, feurir) Mort,MitÂ·1,5 Ma artowrt 0 15 14 4.47 â€¢Creâ€¢ca ~ _ .. # /1 SUAVE.YOKLS CLArifICATE' Cu 34* 02 1 13 9 0 11 Lol I 00 El . Â¥ q- Â£ ME.MyY GRTIFT Irtit IMI 5 10â€¢â€¢r ,<IUrv<rtLY Dtr ICTS A StÂ»Ej VOE Uâ€žÂ·*A M# surowisiorn ON Ark " 110 014 Oil %Â»1*16217Ky=29==F=lf Â»ilt *M,â€¢a. WEKE ral) 0 -0 rbt U. 0 0-C[|ALLY VATH,M THE tpot..Ir-nâ€¢Mf'LIME'b Of O 21 . O, ~ 4Â¢N:KkeaVE DESQUe[-O Pke UTY t*1.11 AS SA:WIN f # 8 *# 730ipwm42'@fl5%&#Â©341%!rle'Â·115- TE HtMOM Trit LOCATIOM Arlt) 01MCMSÂ©MS \ 'bit Imt=.- ..71, \ Ols 14 0 0% 0,4 j L*%)91?EgalÂ¥+ , 06Â£40â€¢0: 94 84'0/ 00Â· 4 /14.07' 1 & CALC. N *1' 00' 50â€¢W 84.1' I \ ~ L. AEÂ©1710#k PAFÂ¥,1441 j /Â£.r 3) i----- ttif: 4 L. -3 --4- +-Â· - Â·- Â·- 4 /trIMY- SUMVEZ3AMC rIA - I '910 L.,F--. I ill "1 ; g "I i HOT ES, ; --1-Â· -u- r-/ -Â·.Â·-Â·..... -- 3491150 x107 LUE i *.2. 0. 5, Ik 255 fâ‚¬* rmitanvE. co,tri4116 1, stÂ£ C" St n"* m' P>'Clthl i H,c,ul,â€¢T lori. . 3 SEE *B. 2.%5.8.16 FCA 40.1:IECTOML COMTKOL 0.-NO 4. ACCOROING TOL957$.Â£.M.A. STUDY PANEL 203 OF 325 SITE PL/?4 TH, S PROPERTY NOT WITHWN FLDOO HAZARD AREA- & BEE ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION ORDER Nt 40242& C orrE FOR OTHER MATTERS â„¢AT MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTYÂ· t HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON JANUARY 8 & 993 A VISUAL I .2201 INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER NY SUPERJISION OF THE ABOVE paojecr DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 140 CHANGES WERE FOUND EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. L _iNO"P.NNY- _ _ ALP'NE SURVEYS,INC. JAN,tARY 12,1993 BY, 1S Al.1 Cmâ€¢A Lartili Tul. unrrov.*ir aÂ»vtÂ·f Job No 10-51 LOT 1, DLOCK. 1, SHOWMUNMY 5UZÂ©VIMON ' - T &.F: Drafted 5 6 90 5 g NOISIAI HAJONS Z N)0792 1,01 0 00 0 040 -- -----l ----- - ----------_L--___=MLE ---- --- 1 --1- ---4-7 ./milli er-oÂ· 1 ill--W--- I-.-ilÂ£m --r----r----' 1 1 -1 -03 'le... ,url._L --- Â· i _-r-T~~--U-j4,-,â€žu- 1 i E..1-Â»13Â·Lu_*.4.-1.2 1 - 1 LI i --.11_-In-2. ~ 4\ - -*-i--** --+--r7--ill' 1 208.,MIN 3-ERJEET I CalEC)NDALE,JOLORADO All23 (970) 704-97% rhonÂ¢+ (970) 704-9750 -1 - 1--tzttic 1 870) 704-0237 1 '' ;'1 , i Â· 7--r r , -,1,aJI-FL _ 1 + Fix: 0 Â£-~tut: Jmardsoprts.net \ 2-27-21- 121*1- 11-Â»*-4 4 -... r---li--7 -- I r-Â·' 1 ---.<77/EL-~---- - I pIF-- /'PJ -91*ZIA L '1 - 1 1(21 -ill-imjE'rsl# 9.- 11 /*11 - 2 6 11-t- '7~ZIUZZIL 1 1 1 :61 1.1 11 1- 1 --'1[-1-0 - 11Â»11 -- 41<:11~ 31 .11 /1' 1 11 11-1--*-------z--- -Â»2 ~L .......5-- =-,1 _ 116=211 - -2924Â»- ---- 2:--1-} --4. .-1~ " _' u.op,ER (70Â· 91* ---- 7%72Â£trÂ«ly , =12-44-6 r==10 V -7*= ar A.~V=.22=w - 11 1~ 1 1-=/ t EID .4 .-b== 'Â«9711 1 3~139 9 - .# ,miQ ~ ~44'Al -L 24 - 1 1 9Â»â„¢ 1 %*m)1 -- Â·--abi lli M , 10Â· I G 3%97 ----- 1 r $ 1.11 Â· ~27 rl Â®'i# ILA 71 . 01 2927 - 9 94 3**; 1*, 1 : ; 9 11 fl 1 ':zer-1 1 0-- '1 Â»eze:-. jDP- ----- -724 \I E ir.9 (fo.PU) Al' - ---1 1* h-74 { =Â«El .i - ' -6- P i .,4 EL - *722 L-1-1 122.93.11.64 2,-v~-~.~~47=5*Â·21* s m.- --- INIEZE[[E=mmE 1 1 -- F- Â· - 2*=Â·e:226 124-'41 WAW LEVEL :'Pir W~ Â£ - 51Â·99 q . 7 20 1 2 L e I Â¤A --3 1 % Â§8 * ~ 0 - WEBT ELEVATION e 71 1 =HI It j 1 ill 1 4Â·--------A~.~=J.Z*. Zi 1 1 ,-05. 1 8-9 \ 1-1 4'-9 CA U] KEYNOTES ND] 1 12 =11 LU (Ir. W.y BOARD WOOD SLDING 1 -7 -1 \ 1/0 1/4 1 E STONE 5 1.11 1!r .. 11, --- 1 1 E WED/U.V SPL'r CEDÂ»? SH/NGLES Z m /2 ~ CORREGATED 4,27-AL. 900/-Â·NG - -35 4,11 1 -- -i i 1 --4-4 ~ 7/MER ACCEÂ¥7-5 3 fl ; EL-,230Â· 1 1 1,1 ----------'- Al.- _ _ _._/0*.1 -0/# N )-- -6-LurÂ·frtt~.L.4~c :,11 1. 1, ;111 1 '~I'~'i~"~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~r 'ir-,-, ~''~~~JRIEN-- 1 EL.'/9 6. V Â· i'' '2.LiLL.!1.~LTU' 1 !,i ____~I-~Sr-~7 1 2 1 4 118 El 1 DATE i PERMIT 04.02101 1 ~ 4 11'11 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 11 1 Al --&.A---- 1 5 6 121 k 1 4 11 -F ukl 1 1 '11 1 i; .1 ilÂ· 41 1 1 1 11.11 0 ' UPPER (7-,0. PLI.) 1 ! wi---7 43ZLEA-1 EL-)(39-e \1 ------- - t i ---- - -- - 1 -4-3 - r-1-11-7-1 ,( 1 1 1 OU~ING 5 c -EMO377'll 9/-1 1 + D.1-5 04 Col Â»14 e \11 1 /EL-9947 MAIN (TO PLY) d,h t o D -i 0 9 n -1 no,=cr 1 ' 2., d ~ 1 0 i. O 6 ~ 2 15 1 -- 1 SNOWD UNNY ELÂ·98-e- Â£1 i I 3- P.Ne EL-xxÂ·Â·r V' .: i __NORTH (CEMETArn ELEVATION NOISIAIGE[fl XEIEIdfla ~4 ~~~ Â· + f>>Â¥449?'li:,F.~?cl.~ %9 34% 0 1 1 1-1 J . OUVUOUOD 'NE[dSV MOR 9,2 Af *#***,P BQ'Â£ Eii 5 NOISIAIGURS ANNRE[KNONS E N307[iI 2 107 2 M A#!1 H 1 } i 3\ 1 111 4 -~410. 2 3 1 lEi 5 20-= Xaldfla ANNEMENONS i .-w .A-,2......1.... , C; f r h - 't: fil . G 9 i Â§ % Â¢ 333 3 1. 2 -,1 I S . 4 & 8 lid 1 i1. 2 L @I 3 0 '.1 . Â·-I L. t k 6- 19 42 V U, 1 4 . 1.2'.Re< 5% 21% 3 55?!:, I %2 W .13 2.1 6 3 41 % 1 -5 + 84*: L Â·Il & b 0 h & O *.4.1 0 6.1 0!41/ 2 -:Eoc 4. It - . L 1 /'E ' a C 1 1 \ 90 11 8 1-El Eli L_-1 '840-le $ I . - ' -1- Â·hg r , i r.7 I iÂ·,0, 1 14 J . 1 1 -- \ -- - 1[2 ~ -Litil 1 2~IL 2 11 \ - 1 1-k=U 1 1%41 1 - 1 1 Â©n 1 1 4 - I /6 . itÂ® i Ii-iÂ·...,11~ ,1 !11 1 - 02/ .--7.. 111!1! 1.L i -<-*11!11 1, i ---1 111 . -: i 1 - i ~ 1~__-1-1-~ ...69%.,- .~-- - 1 _I *N -1.-- - 2 - ~ . [R - 4 U- --- - - -- -AÂ· /,I, . 1 I ./-1 - ---0-Ill----I----------f---- 1 . r===24 - 1 1 -1 4-J 1 lEt=1 & ; 1 1 J ~-7- N Wy 1 -1 -.../ r.- lit 1 2- =...99 Lly E i \ ~7 ~ ~ ~ 17 / 0 < 'i I~4;4~~~ 1 . 1.Â·''f-9 - t- lit" il rJr 1!1 - 9/ VI , 1 f 1/1,1,1 1 - 11'Â· '1 ir, 1 1 , 1 ~ ~ UL-Jl% 1, 11 1 7 11 - 1 1 11 li i l 4/911 ! 11 / 01 \ GA -- ' i 4, U /11 /41-4 1 - 1/ 1 Lul i itj<, .1.,= ~ Â¥ -- 1 + hj J ,_ 111-j-_rÂ»i _ ) 11 <i.-;.1.hiff///> â‚¬ 11 --5 f F-VTFJJ-~rf- - ; . .$ 415 -41* 1 i {=1 1 ~,P,I,dv 1 1 40/ 1-~ 4 11 1 IttÂ·-2Â«1 -11 1*1 -5, & ; lf_= :~f[Â©i ; ---t-~~-14 1 U N t~% 2 1 1 - 0, 1 ~--Â» IL T ti Â« ij_14- _L---- 9 1 i "9 lj;El lig-~L i 1.-~ \3 ' i'L L.â€¢|~71\"1 ~ ' -' -: rOr fo _- 1 - -- i ~i_-i__ ;i--- '3411;10Â£;fEE E-Â«63-l'%-pA 99---471-3-13---2 +---tritt * 9 Erifif~Ft'titipth-+9~37rfc-4430,4 , -- 3--_ _ w 2~ 7-1-nim~~gbi-rrifi1,Â£ 213Â£JP.,41&2~2& 1 1 1 4/Â» 1 4-=-.-- --- i 1 j j 1 I All ~ 49%1 - -- ~[I'li- ~ip 7-r==0 -7,1 If}lill{,[~T [f-,=39 ' 11 14 ' 1 --132it A-4-1-nirr-f-I-~ / 1 1 / 1 / 1/ - /1 1 1 1 i/ 1 // i./1 r/1 M 1 \ 61.Da / / 1 1 LEJ j i h . 3 9 4 77 r./ ~ 4 j 9 2 59 i Ub /2 X iii 213? 4 twik 41 1 8 E- 2Â· 411 55/ f/, 1 cu.h . 5,14 1.11/ 9 3 63 11 1 614 12> i 4 4 4 -Â£1 EIBUI# 2, 2 2 2 8 &!d /11/14 /14 14 Â· tu I Â· 4; Cl â€¢ lu 4 444 ~tic#,1 ,-1 -1.1Â£N 4-9. f.::: '.. ..C,9.ire.51-#71EI~4#66 .'i.2,5.'ezid,TE##57"E,-*0, *Â¥*24%Â¥*iKN*4~~2?~&â‚¬~2~~;~U~~0~=f=.......~ IC'te-~0 ON}0!3 0[>DI 08'04 1/WN'.7 \ ODul .b .1 y C rel / R \ . '. 1 m....1;6. 4*. - 17â‚¬.Â·.. (2Â»\ ~ ~0 ~ 7 \~x4~~3*Nx ~~~ ~ /4,|!dv Â·Â·'~.4Â·Â· , / 1 01Â»10-6 0 cir i Mi / -7'N / il / 7141 9. (3) Â® t / FA/ , 7 c tiy~l U -~ ; -- .. LÂ®j-Â«f-~ ~~ 2 7 - fu. ' 9-- E / , 4 \ / /,/7 f -1.1 - , / /, 2- - e - i It , , I \ - ~,L, 0 JL ,.- , ~~ ~ - L c jif7 ./. ' ** 0-, b - - 41Â· - ' 1 1 22222~9-2 - = , i 0'' r [.4 -7 2 1, 1. . 7 / 21@42, '4, 2Â£ .Ju 'fi) ~ 1 7/21 N 1 1 z= -;#4 -Â·44 3 04 1 Aut-f i -- -1 1 C - 1, 2-ic-j---11 - lk-Â«LIJ-- 1 ft / 1 [ 1 2 1 j 1 1,1 - 1 -J ; 4 29Nc { - l~* ~3~-1~ f ic -AUU 1 1 ,- - - 1 / /9 3.4 ; '2 XI 1 1 - frÂ© f ,: --ir.. c. i L / ..//1 41/ 14Â«. *% - 1121Â»:-10 ------- h 1 , 1 L 1 1 , 1 Opmp ' . 4/ ....) '- gle=-~ -~ - - 60 cla %%* 41,4 0. 0 1 91 3 . n --7 + 1 . 7 / 4-1 ilw f 'Â¥r\M 4 4, t. . < N / C v .. 2 1 : 6 . i Â© fa 4~2~ io . - # k -4 4, I '21 Â» - e h~ 1 f - . 1 - 1 -- 31 =3 0-1 - - - 1 .Â·Â· i l r-- - 1 -- . -9Â·eli- . r ---- 24- 46 7 - 111 r . -\ . \ / 1 I 1Â«1 - - - 1 1 ,-/ f *. 1 19 Y.\1 - , 0, 11.1-. - i N.. - 1 a '1019-40Â«.~41Â· Ir.061 2-, --9.c:~ ,Â·Â· -\i~. ~ 1.=~ LU 4. 4. i Â·. -4 & 4 /0, I ' I =1 -b ' i Â·ir , , 11 den:â€¢" lo,S';4%3*W Â·.12 ,, 4 (R} 7--- 0 1 41 Y " .,p -. m A-2 6 . 1 .14 9 *l f . PE.E.\Lkg~'~48&., 2...:Â· Â·Glyy -Â·Â·:tp,-: - "~59640+ br"TE--7 222%7:I #i I. Â· 4"Ajiti - â€¢ . ch.1 1 .\ , - , IL I & Ir.. a.1 F '1 -1 jsixÂ® 0 " . f. vie 71-1 11 -24-1.1 : 9/ LL-1-1 : 11 . 1 11\ -- IR 5Er-7 4 1 9 Lg m T .1 ) - ..f.mt" I =... & ft- 1/ 1 1 --- Ii't .44\ l. 1 5 g 11 11 j 1 3/7- " ;4 .let ' I , 4 (Â¥14 1 W41 l J 1.1. L . 1 . 8 36--A I lâ‚¬ C 11 01 4 ... 11 1 , m Vt Y 9 078<W + u &*,72.*IzE#L--0'fÂ·t.'Â·>%%4' .0,4-3- Â¥ '12 9 2 .12 r 4 Â· Â· 01 . n, /pl 1, i 1 r 4 9 -9---------- - - -- ---4---_562-31 Li MLIT 0 0 - -- f[/ . /=. .' 11. 1 . .. 8 2X 4 ,- n i .- 2,!P .7 0 @ . 4 0 e 2,7 -EL . 4 11 - 9%44Â©j Â£20 - 9-9 52 1 -p : â€ž,i: 1 L~--~ --. , Â©tww o Â¢,41% 01.0 f.-2 *Fll k - HA@RRL PER '97 UBÂ£. \ 41 %1 6/? 0 54\ ~ r '.114* .:1 1 1.5MN.,/ '1 1 BRes Al 1 .IN$ .1 1 1, 1 14_ _t '1 1 04,*:~ ' , 14 mm 1._-11 1 I W'. I irovE. 10)0 , 1 14 1 11 11 11 .h j e f f -- ff - i 1 , R -- ' 1 -, /22\ :,8 4/, A g ' 2//- M i (9 % .------ --1.-113-! fil 5 2# 2]9) ~i g~ )111---~- "---- i 11 111-1 -*LJ\;b /911 1 Z 6 .4 - 25~ .,1. Al / 58 lib i 412 Sal N 1 1,4 1 'T. 2 'll CD Â· rdEM:Â»ir 4 4 m 4 - : 92 i n r,1 # ,-TÂ· - 2=44-4, n. rn R --- - A , 1 1 . r I U) Â«p I * 7 r--1 1--- 1 iÂ·1 M '[A - K L'GhT weLL \ 1' 1 to, 1----4 :--4 - I El.-,1 4- 4 if' i v. i 6-9 1 ' â€¢ aff 611 Â· ~ 1 1 --- , - 8 3-84' i 2 032 N. 1 1 1 1 ! 5.74 .!L ' , 2 6' ~ 2-07 | 1 1 1 .13 U i. bÂ· b- 2.7 5Â·3 , -4Â· 1 : 1 el.,1 1 '. ---- |- 1 9 44Â® m -6- 6 O 44)20 0 0 p-f>A L j f a h C.) 0 ''OCEC.D SNOW/BUNNY DUPLEX G-4 - im :301 E:6 I I f 3 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 SNOWBUNNY SUBDIVISION 4 09 &20 ./.* ,&&9 232 ASPEN, COLORADO : 3: 6821 - 9 0 1 1 0 0 * 88"61'""MI'll"-7f neMONS 06Â£ Ny-12 -13/~3-1 /4~VPY ~~ ANNIRIO NA C.UUk)NibALE 'll 'r - .Il@ A,444>' 7* 4 ~.4, IP, 4 47..6. / 9. "rdet: ' I I ./ I .4,1 4.'.. , I . 4& 11 ---4 Al"WI * 4 .2/4 k= f Â» lill.& U. 3 -f.3 A + .i_ 4- ./ I e 'AS>h '~ tl ~ 71 -'t Lir......2 -...1. .. * A &,5,15),9// 4.-a. 46 4 tq W 1,~, C *4% i~ IL-~ki-17'3 *~ . h.. 4 - $ I. - 'f: C.9, 1 . 1 -%&, .. /4 4 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Aspen Community (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax Development Department iltÂ«i leaf to Fax Eqt Do u i f af PO) Sov ~f-5>15 To: Ed Daniels From: James Lindt 01,1 1 24 ibf / 6Â»- Fax: Pages: Phone: Date: 12/19/02 Re: 1390 Snowbunny Variance Review CC: Standards Il Urgent U For Review U Please Comment Â£ Please Reply O Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi Ed, Please write a written response to the review standards for a variance and return them to me by January 6th The 2 review standards are attached. The following is an example as to how to structure the responses: Review Standards: 1. The variance would yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan. Applicant Response: 2. The variance request more effectively addresses the issue of problem a given standard or provision responds to, or is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Applicant Response' Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1390 & 1392 SNOWBUNNY LANE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VAR1ANCE FOR DOUBLE STALL GARAGE DOORS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday,.lanuary 21, 2003. at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.iii. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room. 130 S. Galena Street to consider an application submitted by Alice Brien, requesting approval of a variance from the City of Aspen-s Residential Design Standards to allow for double stall garage doors to be maintained on both units of the duplex at 1390 and 1392 Snowbunny Lane. The property is legally described as Lot 1. Block 2. of the Snowbunny Subdivision. For further information. contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. CO (970) 920-5095, jameslfici.aspen.co.us. S/Jasmine Tygre, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published iii the Aspen Times on January 4.2003 City of Aspen Account