The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.200 Sesame St.A102-01Review 1 j . 5~*M/Â¢03 Ajee, - G 2 -- 1. Ft , -- - /1.0- A 4---'- .. CASE NUMBER A102-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-074-01004 CASE NAME 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review PROJECT ADDRESS 200 Sesame Street PLANNER Sarah Oates CASE TYPE 8040 Greenline Review OWNER/APPLICANT Alain Degraeve REPRESENTATIVE Bill Pollock DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1/29/02 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. #2-2002 ADMIN ACTION Approved w/ Condition BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 8/12/02 BY S. Oates .. MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: h>........... City Engineer 0........... Zoning Officer 0........... Housing Director NU ........... Parks Department -+g......... Aspen Fire Marshal City Water -8 ........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District 0........... Building Department O........... Environmental Health O........... Electric Department O........... Holy Cross Electric City Attorney O........... Streets Department O ........... Historic Preservation Officer 0........... Pitkin County Planning FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5441 Fax-920.5439 RE: 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review DATE: November 1. 2001 REFERRAL SCHEDULE DRC MEETING DATE:(note time: 1:30-3:00) November 14, 2001 REFERRALS DUE TO PLANNER: November 30, 2001 Thank you, Sarah - LAND USE APPLICATION ~ PROJECT'- Name: PEF~EVE FEE/DEW LEE Location: 2.00 665& ME S.TR Â£-10- E 5UAJAJÂ¥ PAW-* NOMH 'SUBblv, (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: At-A/,4 PC-6.12* EVE- Address: 200 4 â‚¬75 A 0.1 E 07; Phone #: 94 4 - C> 1 11 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: B/1 w.1 , Wl *bLI--OCAC of ZONI E 4 'A.P4-+411 = L=ruiz-E Address: Bo. 169 2.5- 0% A & PEN, co Phone#: 444- 9041 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~ Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD ~ Conceptual Historic Devt. ~ Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) E Final Historic Development 01 Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. ~ GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition El GMQS Exemption U Subdivision ~ Historic Designation 2['- ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ~ Lot Split El Temporary Use l Other: E Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) ,&71~Ik:Ms : 77Â·/P-Â£25 15CP,po/1/\ BCS/PEDUZLET PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 7122227 699 :T-le:>.:Lt -Ftlkk Le# 64 A:*TrÂ»1 - NU-DAN L 2!>NE +AOPE- BEP ~ EAT?Â·1 ,â‚¬XMARD'.,6. A. 8.7-H 4 APPING A 661-AGE 1-lave you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 31 Pre-Application Conference Summary [Â£,Â· Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form ' Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents ~ Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Abplication Nll .. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and ALAIrt FEE, TAâ‚¬VE (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 2-0 2 66 A,46 4~F-XE~- (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ /39,5 V which is for Cp.00 + hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing o f the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANy By: By: Julie Ann Woods - ==~ Community Development Director Date~ '01 Â£-t 1 01 V 1 Mailing Address: 9.0 BOK ici 93 Ate.3 %161 L g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 .Â£ 0 0 -do ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project. PC&:42,4.EVE- F.!551 ]PEN,LE Applicant: +LA lk) PEG'F,A SvE Location: ZOO .5/6 6-70 E- 57-, Zone District: p ./4 Lot Size: /46,9-4- 4Â·~ , Lot Area: 15-BEE - /7 32, 4,,TU# CA60'116uf) - 3 5-76, (Zd /viAX fo 12. 9.07'E) -- 10,521 4 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,' fot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number o f bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 2% 1 8 Allowable: 5 33% Proposed: 3130 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 6 1 Allowable: 1 5 Proposed: 1-'F Access. bldg. height: Existing: - Allowable. - Proposed: - On-Site parking: Existing. 5 Required: 1 Proposed: 1714>5-6 % Site coverage: Existing: 11 Required: Proposed: ,9.1 % Open Space: Existing: 39 Required: - Proposed: & D. S Front Setback: Existing: Z.f Required: 29 Proposed: 2 â‚¬ Rem Setback: Existing: /0 Required: /0 Proposed: 10 Combined F/R: Existing: 3 9 Required: 35- Proposed: 5 6 Side Setback: Existing: 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Side Setback: Existing: 1 0 Required: 15 Proposed: 10 Combined Sides: Existing: 1-0 Required: 2 0 Proposed: 2-0 Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: DEGRAF-VE ALAIN SUB:SUNNY PARK NORTH LOT:5 Account: R004670 Card 1 of 1 PO BOX 7975 Tax Area : 001 Parcel: 273707401004 Situs: 200 PARK CIR ASPEN 81611 Company: 001 ASPEN CO 81612 Acres: .36 CONSTRUCTION DETAIL - RESIDENTIAL Occurrence 1 I)ate: 05/22/2001 20010522000 ACT_YEAR_BLT 1987 ACT YEAR_BLT Bldg Value this Card 519400 BEDROOMS 0 AREA TO 400 SUMMARY Value Override BATHS 0 AREA TO 50 HEATING_TYPE 4 AIR DUCTED Land 1300000 0 HEATING_FUEL 4 ELECTRIC Extra Feat 3300 0 Building 519400 0 AIRCOND 1 NONE 1822700 0 ARCH_STYLE 3 2 STORY NOTES Total CONST_QUAL 3 GOOD T 12 EXTERIOR_WAI, 15 WOOD SD GO INTERIOR_WAL 25 BASE FLOOR 25 BASE ~ ROOF_STRUCTU 3 GABLE/HIP ROOF_COVER 9 CEDAR SHAK NEIGHBORHOO 102100 NORTHEAST OF ASPEN BUILDING_TYPE 121202 E ASPEN 12 (DEP 04) ABSTRACT_COD 1212 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEMEN EFF_YEAR_BLT 1987 EFF_YEAR_BLT FRAME 2 WOOD FRAME ROOMS 1 ROOMS USE_CODE 1000 RESIDENTIAL DEP04 1987 YEAR - 1987 UNITS o uNrrs Rept# i, f Date Q/U V/I Sale Price (he~*r:32 Sub Cd ACTUAL EFFECT HEATED 426509 l.426509 12-JAN-1999 U I SFA 1133 1133 1133 12970 W/B 516 129 0 E/P 130 91 0 FFA I541 1541 1541 , Â§291,0T0 GBI 624 156 0 Total 3944 3050 2674 0 Rate 131.69 170.30 194.24 0.00 Code Occur Desc bldg eff_year adjust use_cd Units Rate Value Notes XFOB_CODE 1 APPL T-12 1 1987 0 1000 1 3,300.00 3300 Code Sub Cd Occur Desc nbhd landsize adjl adj2 adj3 Units Rate Value Notes 1112180 LAND_L 1 NE ASP BLUE 102100 .36 0 0 0 1 1,300,00 1300000 DEGKAEVE ALAIN SUB:SUNNY PARK NORTH LOT:5 Account: R004670 Abstract Summary PO BOX 7975 Parcel: 273707401004 Tax Area : 001 Situs: 200 PARK CIR ASPEN 81611 Company: 001 ASPEN CO 81612 Acres: .36 ABSTRACT SUMMARY Override Override Code Classification Actual Value Assessed Value Actual Value AssesRed Value 1112 SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND 1300000 119000 1300000 119000 1212 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROV 522700 47800 522700 47800 Total 1822700 166800 1822700 166800 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Directorâ€¢Â·j~~' FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer--421 RE: 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision 8040 Greenline Review DATE: January 29,2002 SUMMARY: The applicant, Alain Degrave, represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture, has applied for 8040 Greenline approval for an addition to the single family residence. The applicant is proposing the addition of approximately 780 square feet of floor area. The 8040 Greenline standards primarily concentrate on the effects of site grading, the ability for the property to be served with utilities and fire protection, and the visual effects of the resulting development on the mountain backdrop of the City. The Community Development Department has received referral comments from all relevant departments and those are reflected in Staff s analysis and recommendation. The applicant is also requesting a four (4) foot, six (6) inch variance from the height requirement in the zone district, which is twenty-five (25) feet. The need for the variance arose through a request from the Fire Department to provide for a forty-five (45) foot turning radius for a fire truck turnaround. The actual height of the building has not been altered from the original set of plans, but because the Fire Department requested the garage be stepped back five (5) feet the grade from which the height is measured has changed, creating a need for the variance. Currently, the road width and turnaround area is inadequate and providing this turnaround will actually help rectify a dangerous situation. The applicant has also been asked to mitigate the problems of inadequate access for emergency vehicles by sprinkling at least a portion ofthe building and adding fire detectors. Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review and the height variance for the proposed addition at 200 Sesame Street, with conditions. APPLICANT: Alain Degrave. Represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture. LOCATION: 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision. 1 .. ZONING: R-15 PUD. PREVIOUS ACTION: An administrative lot line adjustment was approved between Lot 5 and Lot 7 (accessed from above) in 1999. REVIEW PROCEDURE: 8040 Greenline Review. With a recommendation from the Planning Director, the Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed development based on the corresponding criteria. Variance. With a recommendation from the Planning Director, the Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed development based on all three corresponding criteria being met. STAFF COMMENTS: 200 Sesame Street is the first of two houses located on a dead end street at the base of Smuggler Mountain Road. The lot has steep slopes and the floor area has been reduced due to the percentage of slopes over 20%. There is an existing single-family house to the south and to the northeast, which is accessed off of a separate driveway further up Smuggler Mountain Road. Sesame Street is a substandard street and the Fire Department has requested several changes to the site plan to allow for emergency access. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review and height variance for 200 Sesame Street, with the following conditions: 1. The Building Permit application shall include: â€¢ A dust and noise mitigation plan. â€¢ Slope stabilization analysis. â€¢ Mudflow analysis. â€¢ Indemnification of rock fall areas. â€¢ Avalanche Hazard study. â€¢ Soil Hazard study. â€¢ Drainage study and mitigation that detains rain and snowmelt run-off and is routed on site. These facilities shall be shown on the drainage plan and approved prior to the application for building permit. 2 .. â€¢ A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department for the removal or relocation of trees as per Section 13.20.020 of the Code. â€¢ Erosion control plan. â€¢ Adequate landscape plan showing how erosion will be mitigated. â€¢ A water tap permit for a tap sized for the required fire suppression systems (for both the fire hydrant and suppression within the structure) and for the domestic use. â€¢ A tap permit from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and all applicable fees. â€¢ A site plan showing the garage being set ten (10) feet back to accommodate a forty-five (45) foot turning radius. 2. The Site Improvement Survey submitted at the time of building permit submittal shall include the following: â€¢ All of the utilities shall be shown. â€¢ The Surveyors Certificate needs to state the accuracy of the survey. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a sprinkler system and new fire alarm system are required for the new portion of the structure. 4. Sesame Street shall not be narrowed in any way during construction and any modifications to the road are to meet the City of Aspen's engineering standards. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy "No Parking signs are to be put in 55 place at the entrance of the road so as the dissuade people from obstructing access to Sesame Street. 6. Prior to building permit issuance a new service line shall be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the new 12-inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence shall be re-tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6-inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. 7. Prior to building permit submittal the applicant shall determine the location of the service line from Lot 7, Sunny Park North to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on the northwest corner will impact the neighbor's sewer service line. 8. These conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit set and all other drawing sets used for construction. The primary contractor shall be provided with a copy of this Resolution and shall submit a letter as part o f the building permit application stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. 9. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered 3 .. conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the 8040 Greenline Review and a variance from the twenty-five (25) foot height limit by four (4) feet and six (6) inches, for the expansion of the single-family residence at 200 Sesame Street, with the conditions included in Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 02-_21" ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application d.\home\saraho\planning\esa\200sesame_MEMO.doc 4 .. Exhibit A 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision STAFF COMMENTS: 8040 Greenline Review 26.435.030(C) 8040 Greentine Review Standards. No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. Staff finding: 200 Sesame Street was developed in the late 1980s so the issue of suitability of the development is not really applicable. No indications of problems related to the above standard have been observed or noted. The slope of this site does suggest that engineering considerations be incorporated into the development plans to accommodate slope stability. Staff has included conditions requiring the City Engineer be given information relating to mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and soil toxicity. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. Staff finding: Due to the steepness of the site, the development plans must incorporate adequate drainage mitigation measures for both during and after construction. The City Engineer has requested a drainage report and plan be submitted and approved prior to an application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department. Staff has included the drainage requirement from the City Engineer as a recommended condition. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Staff finding: The development is not expected to have any affect on the area's air quality 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff finding: As stated above, as development already exists on this parcel the design and location are not an issue. The addition is compatible with the original development. Staff Comments page 1 .. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff finding: The applicant is required to meet setback requirements for the zone district, therefore the disturbance will be limited to those areas. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff finding: The site is too small to accomplish clustering. The access way serves two homes and does represent an efficiency. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff finding: The building height and bulk are minimized and the addition is compatible with the existing structure. The applicant is proposing an addition of approximately 780 square feet for floor area. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff finding: The applicant will need to make changes to the existing water line to accommodate a fire sprinkler system and satisfy the regulation of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. Conditions of approval have been included in the approvals to assure compliance. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff finding: The applicant has had to make some minor changes to the original proposal to assure adequate access for fire protection. The proposed garage will be setback ten (10) feet to provide for a forty-five (45) foot turning radius. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. Staff finding: This parcel is not specified in the AACP: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan. STAFF COMMENTS: Variance 1. The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title. Staff finding Staff Comments page 2 .. Granting the variance is consistent with the goals of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code. Life, health and safety requirements are part of the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. The grant of the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure. Staff finding: The Fire Department and the applicant have agreed to the minimal allowable emergency vehicle turnaround area and the variance will allow for reasonable use of the parcel through improved access and safety. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan the terms of this title to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Staff finding: There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to this parcel. Approval was granted to 200 Sesame Street and the adj acent lot with substandard access to both sites. This has created a life and safety hazard and the fire access turnaround will allow the applicant and neighbor to enjoy rights that are commonly enjoyed by other parcels, that of emergency vehicle access. C:thorne\saraho\planning\esa\200sesame_EXa.doc Staff Comments page 3 .. -Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Sy Kelly * Ch airmail John Keleher Paul Smith * Treas FranL Loushin Michael Kelly * Secy Bruce Matherly, Mgr December 6, 2001 Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 200 Sesame Street Dear Sarah: The prbposed developed lies within the service area ofthe Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and is currently served by the District. Service to the development proposed is contingent upon compliance with the District' s rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the District office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant should determine the location ofthe service line from Lot 7, 0131 Smuggler Mountain Road to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on north west corner would impact the neighbor' s sewer service line. All of the utilities should be shown on a site improvement survey. A tap permit, which estimates fees, can be completed once detailed plans are made available to our business office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Sincerely, ~v --44-FLÂ«-Â·Â·4-- Bruce Matherly District Manager 565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537 Stephen Ellsperman 08:05 AM 1 1/12/01 -0700, 200 Sesame St Page 1 of 1 .. X-Sender: stephene@commons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:05:27 -0700 To: saraho@ci.aspen.co.us From: Stephen Ellsperman <stephene@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: 200 Sesame St X-ECS-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean The following are my comments for the 200 Sesame St. 8040 Greenline: - An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during the construction process. - An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. Stephen Ellsperman Natural Resources and Construction Manager (970)920-6010 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/12/01 .. MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: November 27,2001 Re: 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Innsbruck PUD at their November 14 ,2001 meeting, and has compiled the following comments: General 1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we assume the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that proposed development is feasible. The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems and delays related to approvals tied to "issuance of building permit." 2, R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way, the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license requirements. Site Review 1. Site Drainage - Requirement -.The foundation drainage system should be separate from site storm drainage system. Rain and snow melt runoff must be detained and routed on site. These facilities must be shown on drainage plans and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely. This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and re- vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow 2. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter - Requirement- sidewalk, curb, and gutter must be designed using the City of Aspen design standards which are available in the City Engineering Department. 3. Fire Protection District - Requirement - Fire Protection District requests the following revisions be made: .. Page 2 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street a. A sprinkler system and a new fire alarm system is required for the new portion b. To accommodate fire truck needs of a 45 feet turning radius, the garage is to be pushed back 10 feet. This will be subject to approval by the planning and zoning commission c. The existing road (Sesame Street) is not be narrowed in any way d. No parking signs are be put in place at the entrance to the road so as to dissuade people from parking in a way that blocks the entrance to Sesame Street e. Clarify the Legal address of the Street 4. Transportation - Requirements- The information were forwarded by Transportation department: a. No Comment 5. Building Department - Requirements - The following requirements were forwarded by the Building Department: a. No comment 6, Parking - Requirement - The following requirement has been forwarded by the Parking Department: a. No comment 7. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Engineering Department: a. Improvement Survey â€¢ The Surveyor Cert. needs to state the accuracy of the survey (1:10000) b. A dust and noise mitigation plan is to be submitted during construction c. No construction materials are to be stored on the public ROW d. The following studies are to be performed to comply with 26.435.030 C â€¢ Slope Stabilization analysis â€¢ Mudflow analysis â€¢ Indemnification of rock fall areas â€¢ Avalanche Hazard study â€¢ Soil hazard study â€¢ Drainage study and mitigation e. The road is to meet the City of Aspen's engineering department standards f. Water is have a minimum pressure of 40 p.s.i. .. Page 3 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street Information - The following information has been provided by the Engineering Department: a. The submittal of the construction plans to Engineering Department for reviews prior to application for building permit will benefit the developer and will facilitate timely processing of the Building Permits. 8. Streets Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Streets department a. No comment 9. Housing Office - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Housing Office: a. No comment 10. Community Development - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Community Development Office: a. Comments will follow 11. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster Coordinator: a. No comment at this time 12. City Environmental Health Director - Requirements- The following requirements were made by the Environmental Health Director: a. Will have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site. 13. Parks - Requirement- The following requirements have been made by the Parks Department. a. An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during the construction process. b. An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. .. Page 4 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesanne Street 14. Utilities: - Water: City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code b. I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to accommodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an installation. A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. - Wastewater: Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - The following was provided by the Aspen Consolidated Waste District: a. In the construction of the rock wall on the north side of the property, care should be given to locate and not interfere with the sanitary sewer service that runs in the same general area to Park Ave. from the neighbors house to the north, 0131 Smuggler Mt. Road. - Construction: Work in the Public Right of Way .. Page 5 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: Approvals 1. Engineering: The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way. 2. Parks: The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920- 5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance. 3. Streets: The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways. 4. Permits: Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department DRC Attendees Staff: Sarah Oats Applicant's Representative: Bill Pollock Richard Goulding Nick Adeh Ed Van Walraven Mark O' Meara In Page 1 of 1 .. To: saraho@ci.aspen.co.us Subject: Review Comments--200 Sesame St Remodel Cc: edv@ci.aspen.co.us, nealg@ci.aspen.co.us Sarah, I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to accomodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an installation. A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Phil Overeynder Utility Director x5111 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/5/01 Lee Cassin, 02:43 PM 11/1/01 -0700, Re: 200 Sesame Page 1 of 1 .. X-Sender: Ieee@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:43:41 -0700 To: Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: 200 Sesame Sarah, Not for a planning application, unless you want to let them know they'll have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site. Thanks, Lee At 03:00 PM 11/1/01 -0700, you wrote: Lee-- We have a planning application in for an addition to a house at 200 Sesame Street--does something special need to happen if it is part of the Smuggler Superfund site? just let me know. Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-5441 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/1/01 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION AT 200 SESAME STREET, LOT 5, SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN. Parcel No. 2737-074-01-004 Resolution #02-_QA WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Alain Degrave, owner, for an 8040 Greenline Review for an addition to the single- family residence at 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.435 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, after a recommendation by the Community Development Department and consideration of comments by relevant referral agencies, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions. or deny an application for an 8040 Greenline Review based on the criteria that are set forth in said Section; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, and the Pitkin County Community Development Department reviewed the proposal and provided comments, and the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on January 29, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a to 0_) vote the 8040 Greenline Review for 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision, City of Aspen, with the conditions described herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review for 200 Sesame Street, with the following conditions: 1. The Building Permit application shall include: â€¢ A dust and noise mitigation plan. â€¢ Slope stabilization analysis. â€¢ Mudflow analysis. â€¢ Indemnification ofrock fall areas. â€¢ Avalanche Hazard study. â€¢ Soil Hazard study. â€¢ Drainage study and mitigation that detains rain and snowmelt run-off and is routed on site. These facilities shall be shown on the drainage plan and approved prior to the application for building permit. â€¢ A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department for the removal or relocation oftrees as per Section 13.20.020 ofthe Code. â€¢ Erosion control plan. .. â€¢ Adequate landscape plan showing how erosion will be mitigated. â€¢ A water tap permit for a tap sized for the required fire suppression systems (for both the fire hydrant and suppression within the structure) and for the domestic use. â€¢ A tap permit from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and all applicable fees. â€¢ A site plan showing the garage being set ten (10) feet back to accommodate a forty-five (45) foot turning radius. 2. The Site Improvement Survey submitted at the time of building permit submittal shall include the following: â€¢ All of the utilities shall be shown. â€¢ The Surveyors Certificate needs to state the accuracy of the survey. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a sprinkler system and new fire alarm system are required for the new portion of the structure. 4. Sesame Street shall not be narrowed in any way during construction and any modifications to the road are to meet the City of Aspen's engineering standards. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy "No Parking" signs are to be put in place at the entrance of the road so as the dissuade people from obstructing access to Sesame Str%et. ' SF DCCLUdÂ»714--7 6. Prior to issuance a new service litie shall be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the new 12-inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence shall be re- tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6-inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. 7. Prior to building permit submittal the applicant shall determine the location of the service line from Lot 7, Sunny Park North to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on the northwest corner will impact the neighbor' s sewer service line. 8. These conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit set and all other drawing sets used for construction. The primary contractor shall be provided with a copy ofthis Resolution and shall submit a letter as part of the building permit application stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. 9. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. [kitij~in-1,i.:@.0 .. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 29,2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy, Deputy City Clerk C:\home\saraho\planning\esa\200sesPZ_RESO.doc ARCHITECTURE INC. P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 970.544.9041 WILLIAM SHARRAR POLLOCK ARCHITECT office: 970.544.9041 cell: 970.948.9921 bill@zone4architecture.com . PARCEL ID: ~2737-074-01004 DATE RCVD: ~10/29/01 # COPIES:~ ~~" CASE NO|A102-01 CASE NAME:~200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review PLNR: 15CL#Uk Oclas PROJ ADDR:~200 Sesame Street CASE TYP:~8040 Greenline Review STEPS:1 OWN/APP: Alain Degraeve ADR~200 Seame Street C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~544-0111 REP:~Bill Pollock ADR:~PO Box 2508 C/S/Z: |Aspen/CO/81612 ' PHN:~544-9041 FEES DUE:~ 1395 D FEES RCVD:| 1205 D 190 E STAT: ~---- REFERRALS~ REF:~ BY~ DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| l,12740=03 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| pz: 99Â«7 -02--034 BOA: CLOSE[lglÂ»Â«: 1 6 -042< DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PL:~(BK,PG):| ADMIN: ./. .. ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION-Minutes-January 29,2002 PUBLIC MEETING: 311 SOUTH FIRST STREET-CITY SPONSORED CODE AMENDMENT Bob Blaich opened the public meeting. Fred Jarman introduced the applicant Paul Sandler and architect, Raul Gawrys. Jarman explained the purpose of this meeting was to request that the P&Z sponsor a code text amendment to allow the ability to pay cash-in-lieu for affordable housing, which was currently unavailable in the RMF Zone District when there were 2 free market units on a certain size lot. Jarman stated that if the commission granted the sponsored code amendment, this would come back with the substance o f the application. Jarman noted that this was available in all o f the other residential zone districts. No public comments. Ron Erickson stated that this was a terrific idea; he asked if the applicant would pay for staff time. Jarman answered that they indeed would. Joyce Ohison reiterated the process that the commission would sponsor the code amendment and staff would be initiated for a text amendment. MOTION: Bert Myrin moved to approve P&Z sponsor the Code Text Amendment. Ron Erickson seconded. APPROVED 6-0. PUBLIC HEARING: 200 SESAME STREET-8040 GREENLINE and HEIGHT VARIANCE Bob Blaich opened the public meeting on 200 Sesame Street. Notice was provide<f for the variance portion of the request. Sarah Oates distributed a revised P&Z Resolution #02-02 adding the variance criteria. Oates stated that this was an 8040 Greeline review and variance request from the height in this zone district. 200 Sesame Street was located within 100 feet ofthe 8040 Greenline, which was the area 150 feet below 8040 and anything above it in elevation required a review because the area was considered an environmentally sensitive area. This required a heightened level of review by Planning & Zoning. Erosion control, avalanche issues as well as visual impacts were reviewed. This application was referred to the Fire, Parks, Engineering, Utilities Department and the Aspen San District. These department comments were reflected in the conditions of approval. Emergency access was the biggest issue because of the turning radius for ambulances and fire trucks. Oates said that the road was 14 feet wide and most roads were 20 feet wide; the fire department needed a 45-foot turning radius. The owner and fire department worked out the required height 3 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION-Mi~tes-January 29,2002 variance; the garage entryway was cut back. Staff recommended approval with the conditions as outlined in the resolution with the change in wording from prior to building permit to certificate of occupancy. The applicant noted that it was 8 feet not 5 feet. No public comments. MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the 8040 Greenline Review and a variance from the twenty-five (25) foot height limit by four and one-half (4M) feet for the expansion of the single-family residence at 200 Sesame Street with the conditions included in P&Z Resolution #02-02 finding that the criteria have been met. Roger Haneman seconded. Roll call vote: Myrin, yes; Kruger, yes; Haneman, yes; Buettow, yes; Erickson, yes; Blaich, yes. APPROVED 6-0. PUBLIC HEARING: MISCELLANEOUS LAND USE CODE AMENDMENTS Bob Blaich opened the public hearing. Sarah Oates provided the notice, which David Hoefer stated met the jurisdictional requirements for the P&Z Commission to proceed. Oates noted the proposed code changes were to Sections 26.104.100, Definitions; Section 26.222.070(B), DRAC Meetings, Hearings and Procedures; Section 26.304.060(E)(3), Public Notice; Section 26.312.030 (IF)(2), -Nonconforming Structures/Uses; Section 26.410.040(B)(1), Secondary Mass; Section 26.440.070(B), Specially Planned Area Agreement and Recordation; Section 26.445.070(A), Recording a Planned Unit Development Plan; Section 26.480.030(A)(2)(e), Subdivision Exemptions; Section 26.480.070, Subdivision Agreement; Sections 26.510.040(E), 26.510.060 & 26.510.080(C), Signs; and Section 26.610.020(D), Park Development Impact Fee as proposed by the Community Development Department. Oates said that these were changes to some small deficiencies in the Land Use Code and that Chris Bendon would be working on the whole code. There were the addition of 2 definitions and a modification to another one. There was now a differentiation between an awning and a canopy. Bob Blaich asked if that had anything to do with the Caribou Alley. Oates replied that it did not. Ron Erickson stated that a canopy was approved in the Caribou Alley and it grew to a roof with doors. Oates responded that was still under review. The public notice requirements, Section 26.304.060(E)(3), were made simpler by having a 15-day notice for all public hearings instead of different day requirements 4 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND A HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR AN ADDITION AT 200 SESAME STREET, LOT 5, SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN. Parcel No. 2737-074-01-004 Resolution #02-02 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Alain Degrave, owner, for an 8040 Greenline Review for an addition to the single- family residence at 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.435 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, after a recommendation by the Community Development Department and consideration of comments by relevant referral agencies, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for an 8040 Greenline Review based on the criteria that are set forth in said Section; and. WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, and the Pitkin County Community Development Department reviewed the proposal and provided comments, and the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, Section 26.314 of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that an application for a variance from the dimensional requirements o f the code can be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if it is part of a consolidated process; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26. the appropriate decision making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes. goals, objectives. and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 3. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms of Chapter 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights would be deprived absent a variance, the Board considered certain special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions ofthe applicant. WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on January 29,2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission, which also served as the Board of Adjustment, approved by a six to zero (6-0) vote the 8040 Greenline Review and four (4) foot, six (6) inch height variance, . I .. per Section 26.314 of the Land Use Code, for and addition to 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision, City ofAspen, with the conditions described herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Staff recommends approval o f the 8040 Greenline Review for 200 Sesame Street, with the following conditions: 1. The Building Permit application shall include: â€¢ A dust and noise mitigation plan. â€¢ Slope stabilization analysis. â€¢ Mudflow analysis. â€¢ Indemnification of rock fall areas. â€¢ Avalanche Hazard study. â€¢ Soil Hazard study. â€¢ Drainage study and mitigation that detains rain and snowmelt run-off and is routed on site. These facilities shall be shown on the drainage plan and approved prior to the application for building permit. â€¢ A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department for the removal or relocation oftrees as per Section 13.20.020 ofthe Code. â€¢ Erosion control plan. â€¢ Adequate landscape plan showing how erosion will be mitigated. â€¢ A water tap permit for a tap sized for the required fire suppression systems (for both the fire hydrant and suppression within the structure) and for the domestic use. â€¢ A tap permit from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and all applicable fees. â€¢ A site plan showing the garage being set ten (10) feet back to accommodate a forty-five (45) foot turning radius. 2. The Site Improvement Survey submitted at the time of building permit submittal shall include the following: â€¢ All of the utilities shall be shown. â€¢ The Surveyors Certificate needs to state the accuracy of the survey. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a sprinkler system and new fire alarm system are required for the new portion of the structure. 4. Sesame Street shall not be narrowed in any way during construction and any modifications to the road are to meet the City of Aspen's engineering standards. .. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy "No Parking" signs are to be put in place at the entrance of the road so as the dissuade people from obstructing access to Sesame Street. 6. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy a new service line shall be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the new 12-inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence shall be re- tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6-inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. 7. Prior to building permit submittal the applicant shall determine the location of the service line from Lot 7, Sunny Park North to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on the northwest corner will impact the neighbor's sewer service line. 8. These conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit set and all other drawing sets used for construction. The primary contractor shall be provided with a copy of this Resolution and shall submit a letter as part of the building permit application stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. 9. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 29,2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy, Deputy City Clerk C:\home\saraho\planning\esa\200sesPZ_RESO.doc .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -2-00 5â‚¬54904655 4 T-Â· , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: .b A,L 2 9 4 , 200 1- STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) ~A) 1 L.-L- 1 A,vvâ€¢Â·1 5 L.L.-0 C-IC- I, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the fullowing manner: Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtaind*Dtk Community Development Department, which was made of is#tibje, '29.20<,~ waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two02) inches widdÂ·7 ~ and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed o f letters notÂ· T less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at ledst ten (10) days'/ ~l, ~ prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of '2Â·--~ , 200 , to and including the date and time of the publip,~ hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto, . Â·" 2~16 Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) o f the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners o f property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners ancl governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (contimied on next puge) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description oti and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen ( 15) days prior to the piiblic hearing on sLich amendments. 0 yL../MUL Signature The foregoing 'Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before Ipe this,2 9 day of 3- 'Ul U.o_ ,- 3 , 200.2-,by Loil lican 3 71'(72- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My-commission expires: Mcire k 30& 0006 04*f - ---3 ------- i TIFFANY: : WANCURA : N-6Â¥FF-ublic )) S. .U ...0 036>c. -6.. 1- e.... Of.0.6Lv ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 1 114 .- 6.-1 4 1 ./' ~But_~01\CE DATEa~m:st 1 - , TWAE&34Â£- i- PLACEMAZF"* 4 4 PURPOSE +fi VÂ¢*UÂ·HtE l'G mAmpt FA Flat nuut. 9:th*5985. e . ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AGLEY JOSEPH A ANSON DAVID G AUTHORITY 424 PARK CIR #TH5 1120 OAK ST - PAT 5 530 E MAIN ST #001 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPA, CA 94559-3341 ASPEN, CO 81611 BENTLEY CARL F BERNARD RANDY BIRACH KAREN 427 PARK CIR 100 HARKNESS RD 122 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 PELHAM, MA 01002-9776 ASPEN, CO 81611-2414 BOYD JEFFREY R BRAINARD LOUISE BRIGHT GALEN PO BOX 8361 PO BOX 11354 PO BOX 1848 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 CALK LAURA E BUREK DEBORAH J CARSON BARBARA WILLCOX DENNIS AS JOINT TENANTS 'PO BOX 812 PO BOX 10298 722 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2472 CHAUNER RONALD M & JACKIE L CITY OF ASPEN COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA SHEFFER 130 S GALENA ST 500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT PO BOX 8782 ' ASPEN, CO 81611 WASHOE, NV 89511 ASPEN, CO 81612 COOKMAN WILLIAM THOMAS CUNNINGHAM CAITLYN E CUNNINGHAM PAMELA M 508 PARK CIR 425 PARK CIR #Al 502 MIDLAND PK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DAY ISABEL T & ESTER T DEGRAEVE ALAIN DICKENSON GWEN F 120 TURTLE COVE PO BOX 7975 312 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-9610 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 DODINGTON SUSAN M EPLER ANDI E ETTLINGER JARED P W/ GODWIN 221 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 785 PO BOX 10936 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FISHER CONSTANCE A FORNELL PETER J FUENTES DAVID & KATHARINE D 330 ANAYA RANCH RD 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 302 MIDLAND PARK PL GALISTEO, NM 87540 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 UON SARA B GLOOR JOHN L . GRIFFITHS THOMAS W ..101 MIDLAND PARK PL 500 PARK CIR 504 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. HAGEN CATHERINE ANNE HECK JAMES C ~ HIGGINS PAUL 210 MIDLAND PARK PL B-10 PO BOX 8416 303 MIDLAND PARK PL #C-3 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGHT NEIL C & SEWELL KATHRYN HOUBEN CYNTHIA MICHELE HUA VINH 520 E COOPER AVE PO BOX 9616 PO BOX 8513 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 KARAUS LINDA MARIE & GREGORY JOHNSON SHAEL UND 80% INT KOCH KATHRYN S & JOHN F DONALD PO BOX 3549 304 MIDLAND PARK PL C-4 510 PARK CIR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KOLBERG JUDITH A KRIEBEL KATHLEEN LUU TONG KHON 501 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 910 435 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 MAC CRACKEN SCOTT R & MARISA POST MCPHEE JAMES MICHAEL MERZBACH NINA PO BOX 10821 401 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3465 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MORK HALBERT L FAMILY TRUST MOYER MARY NARAT BENJAPORN 77 ASPEN WAY 424 PARK CIR #6 FLAT 9 22 RED LION ST ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 LONDON WC1R4PS, UK NEW STEPHEN E & KORI A JT NICHOLS SCOTT A PATTEN DAVID N 821 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3035 810 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PAULIDES BROOKE A PAULIDES HERBERT B & CAROLYN F PENDLETON MARGOT ROSE PO BOX 11023 160 CONCORD RD 424 PARK CIR TH-3 ASPEN. CO 81612 LONGMEADOW, MA 01106 ASPEN, CO 81611 PERSIKO DEBORAH & FREDERICK JT PIERCE ROBERT KING PITKIN COUNTY TENANTS POBOX 3118 ~ 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 710 MIDLAN PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816 1 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 TER JEANNE MARIE ROSEN JANE . ROSS MATTHEW N . i MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 9853 212 MIDLAND PARK PLACE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 , .. ROWARS CHARLES M SALTONSTALL ANDREW C ' SIEGEL BARRY & SHARON L 4990 SW 52ND STE 201 PO BOX 9802 210 SESAME ST DAVIE, FL 33314 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 8161 I SMUGGLER RACQUET CLUB SMISEK LINDA L E SMITH KATHLEEN M C/O SUE COOK 429 PARK CIR C-3 1023 WILLITS LN PO BOX 8788 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 STRAUB GRETCHEN A SPECK KIM JENNIFER SPONAR ANTON K AND JUDY BESTIC JEFFREY B PO BOX 9912 222 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 2267 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2486 ASPEN, CO 81612 SULLIVAN ANNE T & COLSON JOHN D VALLEY DOUGLAS J WAGAR RICHARD H ASPEN TIMES C/O 111 MIDLAND PARK PL#All 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX E ASPEN, CO 8 I 611-2413 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WALDRON K BRENT WEBSTER DAVID H WELDEN TODD E & DEBORAH C COATES REID & WALDRON C/O ; PO BOX 10362 503 MIDLAND PARK PL #E3 720 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 . WELLS JOSEPH EDWARD WILSON FREDRICK C 602 MIDLAND PARK PL F-2 100 S SPRING ST STE 2 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-2067 .. 7 0 -N E ARCHITECTURE 4 0 Ph 970.544.0041 F 970 544.4885 Date: 4 1- l L To: *A Â» 4 oA73-5 Fax: 12 0 - 443 9 From' j' LL- Fouo 6-R- pages: .*5 (Including cover sheet) Re: 1>876%4124â‚¬ fl F V A F-1A N *C Comments Signed: N:\20= 4\*merâ€¢1*rm:\f=-blekdoc 1/1 .. Summarv L An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site. The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was 8' in front of the two floors above it. However during a preliminary meeting for an 8040 Greenline Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It was agreed that by Pushing the garage back into the hill, until it is flush with the floors above, the turn-aroundÂ» space would be created. By doing this the height limit was exceeded by approximately 4'-6". Although the original design'â€¢ height has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.(See attached drawings) Responses to the "Standards applicable_to variances" A. 1 The encroachment of the height limit is "consistent with the purposes and goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan". This variance is in response to these 'goals and objectives", particularly the goals of fire safety. 2. The variance is for a minimum amount of height needed for L approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design has not changed. 3@. The height encroachment has been caused by creating a fire truck tum-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a fire truck turn-around space on this sloping site with an existing residence is cause to define the parcel the as having .special conditions and circumstances". 3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truck tum- around will also the serve the neighboring parcel. B. 1. See attached 2. To deny the applicant a variance would be to deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district .. 3. Construction staging shall be undertaken in such a manner so as to minimize any neighborhood disruption. 4. Not applicable 5. Not Applicable C C r I Y. ----*--K-2/Im . 6 rz, 919 --------- / Elly 9/4/P t* i i , 465'ts.le --- ----_-- rih WEEr ELEVATION L_/ SCALE: 1/6.-1.-0. ~-1-N : Â»FA H j 1.14 25'-4,OVE 2*lell,0 ORAGE -A, M,OPON,1 2~ ROOF A.E. ov E)* HEOHT -1141 0 =439 1 \J F "*60.1 AMS. D GRADE 1 1 --3- 1 1 1 <h..... 1 1 1 1 A-------- -1- -_----~ 1- ----- ---1 I L_------ _~'~%-~zh=----r-in -1, r ELE + 966 Le --1- 1 1 L PRE'*10.rS LOC.4-71Â£34 CF GA~AGE 4-31~ 1 2-IE CF ExeTâ€¢.5 GRADE BELCW -IPPCÂ·hl - 1 11 1\ ! r 11 L PREÂ¥1015 -OCATIOâ€¢ CF i BACK Â©F 6.69,01 ~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4".l'-0- j j j .. Z O.N E ARCHITECTURE 1 N C. P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 97 0.5 44.9041 TRANSMITTAL To: 5 Aâ„¢t o Al-M From: bill Foll-666 Date: l~%~01- Project: Dâ‚¬&fL,tvâ‚¬- Sent Via: Pell v e+7 Copies To: Attached: IAT - VAB- i AN Gâ‚¬ To F-- D e&(LA EVE-- Comments: 1 9- 894 # I- 1 : 1 ...3 4 V cu Signed: 1 L.- . f. Â¥.1 I C:\Zone 4\general\forms\iransmittal.dot 1/1 ASPEN i 01-1 KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ZONE "1.1 1-1 ARCHiTECTURE INC. P. O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 970.544.9041 To: Sarah Oates - City of Aspen Zoning Officer RE: Height Variance for the Degraeve Residence Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision 200 Sesame St. Aspen, Co Summary An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site. The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was 8' in front of the two floors above it. However during a preliminary meeting for an 8040 Greenline Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It was agreed that by pushing the garage back into the hill, until it is flush with the floors above, the "turn-around" space would be created. By doing this the height limit was exceeded by approximately 4'-6". Although the original design's height has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.(See attached drawings) Responses to the "Standards applicable to variances" A. 1. The encroachment of the height limit is "consistent with the purposes and goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan". This variance is in response to these "goals and objectives", particularly the goals of fire safety. .. 2. The variance is for a minimum amount of height needed for approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design has not changed. 3a. The height encroachment has been caused by creating a fire truck turn-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a fire truck turn-around space on this sloping site with an existing residence is cause to define the parcel the as having "special conditions and circumstances". 3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truck turn- around will also the serve the neighboring parcel. B. Not Applicable William S. Pollock Representative to Mr. Degraeve 1- I I &#U ---------- 6 T.O. CONC P ELEY. 968'-0' Â¢ lEe 5.34-0-Â· Â© WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1 '-0 MTN 1 Â»Ph H LINE 25''AeOvE EXISTINF BRAPE (AT MIPPOINT/ 1//1 \ L ROOF AREA OVER HEIGHT LIMIT . \ 4 r 2,Â·ABOVE FINISHED GRADE 1 11\\1 1 1 4 TO FWP. 7 ELEv elli.0 E-------- -1- ---------- -------t 1 XXX --1 1 1-------- Â¢ Un.B'-0. E--- -______I__-____7___________-__- 7--T-773 1 1 L PREVIOUS LOCATION OF; GARAGE 11 1 1 lili ~ LINE CF EXISTINa GRADE BELOW MIDPOINT ~ Ill I PREVIOUS LOCATION OF 111 | BACK OF GARAGE L -_____L___________1 1\ li Â® NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" -- 62/*419,117#W/J\ \4 - . â‚¬ 7 ,. _6~7608 61Bitte 1 1 1 - b Peâ‚¬'â€¢4.Gwa Aâ‚¬ 5. /1/1'lei - I .41- ~ 1 1 1 .. October 24, 2001 Community Development City of Aspen 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 To The Community Development Dept. o f Aspen, William Pollock ofZone 4 Architecture, Inc. (license # B-3329) will act on my behalf for the 8040 Greenline Review. For contact information refer to the following: William Pollock Zone 4 Architecture, Inc. P.O. Box 2508 Aspen, CO 81612 P 544-9041 F 544-4885 ThaÂ® You, Xi;iCijI323-----> 200 Sesame St. Aspen, CO 81611 P 544-0111 .. 1 October 24, 2001 Community Development City of Aspen 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 To The Community Development Dept. of Aspen, A. Development description: The new development consists ofa three level addition to a six (occurring at half levels) level home. The addition will include a bedroom, bathroom, master bathroom, wine room, laundry room mechanical room, garage, and storage area. A patio area with spa is located between the existing home and the proposed addition. The addition is to be located on the north side of the existing home. The new addition will be oftypical wood frame construction with stone and wood siding. The roof material will be bronzed (dark matte finish) copper. The existing roof will be re-roofed to match. B. The following are the responses to the 8040 Greenline Review Standards: 1. A three bedroom residence now exists on the parcel on which the proposed development, an addition to the existing home, is to be located. To my knowledge the construction history ofthe original home did not reveal any hazardous or toxic soils. There also exists an access road and home up-slope (within 50'-0") from the proposed addition. The neighboring homes' proximity will help reduce greatly if not eliminate any rock fall or avalanche danger. The applicant shall re-vegetate, where necessary, to stabilize soils. 2. The proposed addition will not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. As stated above the location ofthe home up-slope shields the proposed addition from any significant watershed, etc. to begin with. 3. Not applicable .. 2 4. The new development is compatible with the terrain because it is not significantly changing the grading adjacent to it. 5. Grading has only been changed two areas which access the exterior, the bedroom and garage. Besides the entry wall to the bedroom and garage entry wall, natural grade will be maintained within 24" of original elevation. 6. The proposed addition has been located such that the garage is in close proximity to the access road. The garage is also located under a second level thus reducing grading and maintaining more open space. 7. The two upper levels facing the street are set back from the fagade ofthe garage to minimize the mass and building height ofthe three levels. By stepping the upper levels back from the garage the structure also blends in with the "mountain character" by following the slope ofthe site. 8. All utilities presently exist at the site. The existing home is currently connected to the City of Aspen water and sewer system. The proposed addition should not add any significant amount ofwater pressure. 9. Adequate roads to serve the development already exist and have been (and will be) properly maintained. 10. The ingress and egress ofthe existing access road is not being affected by the addition. The existing access road will remain "as is". 11. Not applicable - No trails designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan exist on the site William Pollock Zone 4 Architecture, Inc. ACS.rlliN 151.15'UTKIL; 2:SUBU1 Vltill)N CITY OF ASPEN *op #~ VICINITY MAP 40 8 SCALE: 1" = 1000' &-i SP . /VER , ~ SMUGGLER UPPY 4.74 . Sl TE HALLAU ST. Yh Â· 0 g WN 'r#Ve . ~ :.tal 70 0 . Hâ„¢ NA g 6 9 w'& 9 ..2 COO ER VE. 0 0 DU ANT AVE. -J W I z 5 1 DEAN ST. %400% 0 5 9 1 Â». 0 ST. 0 4. 4 \42 * d \ EA5r*000 RD. 9 ASPEN O MOUNTAIN 82 - SKI AREA 4- r-1 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU f-111Â§T 01Â§00VER Â§UGH DifEOT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY AOTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 'I ~ . NIVINnOM 03Â¥ 180:1 .. ZONE 1--Ir L_ ARCHITECTURE INC. P. O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 97 0.5 44.9041 To: Sarah Oates - City of Aspen Zoning Officer RE: Height Variance for the Degraeve Residence Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision 200 Sesame St. Aspen, Co Summarv An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site. The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was 8' in front of the two floors above it. However during a preliminary meeting for an 8040 Greenline Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It was agreed that by pushing the garage back into the hill, until it is flush with the floors above, the "turn-around" space would be created. By doing this the height limit was exceeded by approximately 4'-6". Although the original design's height has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.(See attached drawings) Responses to the "Standards applicable to variances" A. 1. The encroachment of the height limit is "consistent with the purposes and goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan". This variance is in response to these "goals and objectives"; particularly the goals of fire safety. .. 2. The variance is for a minimum amount of height needed for approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design has not changed. 3a. The height encroachment has been caused by creating a fire truck turn-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a fire truck turn-around space on this sloping site with an existing residence is cause to define the parcel the as having "special conditions and circumstances". 3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truck turn- around will also the serve the neighboring parcel. B. Not Applicable William S. Pollock Representative to Mr. Degraeve 01//111 0 ~ TO. Flup. Y ELE/. 911'-0' fT 6 T o. CONC V ELE.. S.8 -0 Â¢ 1&51&1... /Â© WEST ELEVATION (*-,J SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" /42-N : 9,-12% H LINE 25'Â·ASOvE ExISTING ORACE (AT MIPPOINT) -2 ~-755502Â¤~ ROOF AREA OVER HEIGHT LMT Ill 'll F 2DÂ·ABOvE FINISHED GRADE 1 1 \~ 1 1 --00- 1 1 & T O. FUÂ©. L ---______L__________ 7 ELEv '511'-0' 1 1 --1 1 \\ Va- - _ _ - - _ _ I f)T/ CONC L 4-af-<7 --T- 7 7 T ELEv 86,BE-01, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I-- -- -- -- -- -- --~ 11 PREvIOUS LOCATION GP GARAaE 1 1 11 1 1 lili ~ LINE CF EXISTING GRADE BELOW MIDPOINT 1 111 1 IL 1 1 11 PREVIOUS LOCATION OF BACK OF GARAGE L_____ _~1_ ___________ 1 1\ 11 Â© NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ---4 44 r ' i 4% 1 - 497 1 I.Lf- ' 1~***131 05 4% rÂ« j#.-.~3.- ...t ../4 9349 i./ilii"/.r ili~'mill/'.- i_i-i./- 1. ..1 & 1 1 . 1 ,) iÂ¢. .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #A102-01 Before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions o f the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: January 29,2002 Time: 4:30 P.M. Owner for Variance: Representative for Variance: Name: Alain Degraeve Bill Pollock Zone 4 Architecture Address: 200 Sesame Street P.O. Box 2508 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81612 Location or description of property: 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Variances Requested: The applicant is requesting a variance of four (4) feet and six (6) inches from the twenty-five (25) foot height requirement to provide for a fire truck turnaround. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: NO: X The City o f Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Jasmine Tygre, Chairman .. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Sy Kelly * Chairman John Keller Paul Smith * T reas Frank Loushin Michael Kelly * Secy Bruce Mallierly, Mgr December 6, 2001 Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 200 Sesame Street Dear Sarah The proposed developed lies within the service area of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and is currently served by the District. Service to the development proposed is contingent upon compliance with the District' s rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the District office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant should determine the location of the service line from Lot 7, 0131 Smuggler Mountain Road to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on north west corner would impact the neighbor' s sewer service line. All of the utilities should be shown on a site improvement survey. A tap permit, which estimates fees, can be completed once detailed plans are made available to our business office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Sincerely, 044-- .1.-/ ~Â»*1.--l--tr-- Bruce Matherly District Manager 565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537 Stephen Ellsperman, 08:05 AM 11/12/01 -0700, 200 Sesame St Page 1 of 1 .. X-Sender: stephene@commons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:05:27 -0700 To: saraho@ci.aspen.co.us From: Stephen Ellsperman <stephene@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: 200 Sesame St X-ECS-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean The following are my comments for the 200 Sesame St. 8040 Greenline: - An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during the construction process. - An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. Stephen Ellsperman Natural Resources and Construction Manager (970)920-6010 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/12/01 .. MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: November 27,2001 Re: 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Innsbruck PUD at their November 14 ,2001 meeting, and has compiled the following comments: General 1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we assume the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that proposed development is feasible. The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems and delays related to approvals tied to "issuance of building permit." 2. R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way, the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license requirements. Site Review 1. Site Drainage - Requirement -.The foundation drainage system should be separate from site storm drainage system. Rain and snow melt runoff must be detained and routed on site. These facilities must be shown on drainage plans and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely. This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and re- vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow 2. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter - Requirement- sidewalk, curb, and gutter must be designed using the City of Aspen design standards which are available in the City Engineering Department. 3. Fire Protection District - Requirement - Fire Protection District requests the following revisions be made: Page 2 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street a. A sprinkler system and a new fire alarm system is required for the new portion b. To accommodate fire truck needs of a 45 feet turning radius, the garage is to be pushed back 10 feet. This will be subject to approval by the planning and zoning commission c. The existing road (Sesame Street) is not be narrowed in any way d. No parking signs are be put in place at the entrance to the road so as to dissuade people from parking in a way that blocks the entrance to Sesame Street e. Clarify the Legal address of the Street 4. Transportation - Requirements- The information were forwarded by Transportation department: a. No Comment 5. Building Department - Requirements - The following requirements were forwarded by the Building Department: a. No comment 6. Parking - Requirement - The following requirement has been forwarded by the Parking Department: a. No comment 7. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Engineering Department: a. Improvement Survey â€¢ The Surveyor Cert. needs to state the accuracy of the survey (1:10000) b. A dust and noise mitigation plan is to be submitted during construction c. No construction materials are to be stored on the public ROW d. The following studies are to be performed to comply with 26.435.030 C â€¢ Slope Stabilization analysis â€¢ Mudflow analysis â€¢ Indemnification of rock fall areas â€¢ Avalanche Hazard study â€¢ Soil hazard study â€¢ Drainage study and mitigation e. The road is to meet the City of Aspen's engineering department standards f. Water is have a minimum pressure of 40 p.s.i. Page 3 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesanie Street Information - The following information has been provided by the Engineering Department: a. The submittal of the construction plans to Engineering Department for reviews prior to application for building permit will benefit the developer and will facilitate timely processing of the Building Permits. 8. Streets Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Streets department a. No comment 9. Housing Office - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Housing Office: a. No comment 10. Community Development - Requirements - The following requirements have been provided by the Community Development Office: a. Comments will follow 11. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster Coordinator: a. No comment at this time 12. City Environmental Health Director - Requirements- The following requirements were made by the Environmental Health Director: a. Will have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site. 13. Parks - Requirement- The following requirements have been made by the Parks Department: a. An erosion control plan must be submitted as par-t of the building application package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during the construction process. b. An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application package. Page 4 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street 14. Utilities: - Water: City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code b. I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to accommodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an installation. A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. - Wastewater: Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - The following was provided by the Aspen Consolidated Waste District: a. In the construction of the rock wall on the north side of the property, care should be given to locate and not interfere with the sanitary sewer service that runs in the same general area to Park Ave. from the neighbors house to the north, 0131 Smuggler Mt. Road. - Construction: Work in the Public Right of Way Page 5 of 5 November 27,2001 200 Sesame Street Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: Approvals 1. Engineering: The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way. 2. Parks: The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920- 5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance. 3. Streets: The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways. 4 Permits: Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department DRC Attendees Staff: Sarah Oats Applicant's Representative: Bill Pollock Richard Goulding Nick Adeh Ed Van Walraven Mark O' Meara In Page 1 of 1 .. To: saraho@ci.aspen.co.us Subject: Review Comments--200 Sesame St Remodel Cc: edv@ci.aspen.co.us, nealg@ci.aspen.co.us Sarah, I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to accomodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an installation. A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Phil Overeynder Utility Director x5111 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/5/01 Lee Cassin, 02:43 PM 11/1/01 -0700, Re: 200 Sesame Page 1 of 1 .. X-Sender: Ieee@comdev.ci.aspen.co.us X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:43:41 -0700 To: Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Lee Cassin <leec@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: 200 Sesame Sarah, Not for a planning application, unless you want to let them know they'll have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site. Thanks, Lee At 03:00 PM 11/1/01 -0700, you wrote: Lee-- We have a planning application in for an addition to a house at 200 Sesame Street--does something special need to happen if it is part of the Smuggler Superfund site? just let me know. Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-5441 Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us> 11/1/01 .. MEMORANDUM TO: lillie Ann Woods. Community Development Director FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer 13 RE: Degraeve Residence, 200 Sesame Street, 8040 Greenline Exemption DATE: January 4,2002 SUMIUARY: Alain Degraeve. owner, has applied for an administrative exemption from the 8040 Greenline Review to enclose a deck and add a dot-Iner that will result in a 68 square foot increase in floor area. The deck is located the southern side of the second floor and there will be no change to the building footprint. The applicant has applied for a 8040 Greenline Review for a more significant addition on the north side of the residence which is scheduled in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 29.2002 but the applicant would like to commence with the dormer addition immediately. Staff anticipates all outstanding issues as it relates to the referral departments will be dealt with during the complete review and the referral departments have agreed this is acceptable. Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve this exemption with conditions. APPLICANT: Alain Degraeve, owner. Represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture. LOCATION: 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision. ZONING: R-15 PUD. BACKGROUND: The applicant has previously received approval for a lot line adjustment with the neighbor to the northwest, on Lot 7. Sunny Park North Subdivision. The applicant is also seeking 8040 Greenline Review approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a more significant addition. STAFF COMMENTS: Because development is proposed within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the 8040 Greenline. the proposal is subject to review under Section 26.68.030 of tile Land Use Code. Section 26.68.030(B), Exemption, states that "the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from 8040 greenline review if the following standards are met: 1 1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the jloor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent. Staff Finding: The existing structure has a floor area of 2548 and the applicant is proposing to add 68 more additional square feet of floor area. The increase is just over 2%. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which apermitwould be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said section. Staff Finding: No trees will be affected by this development. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion enid sedimeintation. Staff Finding: The proposed development is on an existing deck. There is no geologic hazard and the development will not result in an increase in erosion or sedimintation. RECOMMENDATION: This application meets the review criteria for an exemption from the 8040 Greenline Review by the Director. Staff recommends the Director approve this exemption with the following two conditions: 1. The applicant shall maintain site drainage on-site during and after construction to prevent sediment loaded run-off. 2. Construction materials, staging, and parking must be contained on-site. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this 8040 Greenline Exemption for the Degraeve Residence, 200 Sesame Street with the two conditions listed above. <kl~ 1-- A., c-jilib Date 1 / 7 le, Â¥ ie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Apo 1 p Al . 1 L,4 1,/~0 JAN ~ Â£ Â·-3.# . 4202 ASPEN 2 I f 5 &1 4. -6 f t 0 ..4 1-1 1 ' /4 p , 0\ 'A tk 0 , 0-Â«07.-Â· 4â„¢, 1 - b-8 1 , A 00 N V... , rat / PÂ».Â« J tc >; t~ R R * 10 23 / 7 : 2 , --1----4 - ' 1 i al J IT 7\.U ' A. 2 00 1 . f \ 1 / f f , , 4/6/ C . *f#---1 - 0 1 liti - 1 25 1 1 f -4 1 / 1 2 0.- EP) 6 OF t- fACâ‚¬ 81= LEVEL t 91% (/ - i l 1 . 1 , 2-14 - 1 - 1 . 1 i 1 1 \ 11 1 4 .12 , B 11 1/ 7% 1 --C,9-73-tz- / Y j '&.12*7 . e ; 1 .4.- , k.. , 1 0 7l \ -Il : I . AO// 7'QM> peviezil ~ ~ 1 0â‚¬71>tr*Z>/4 -4 2 / i Â· 1/ 7 h F /9 1 1 - I 1 11 f f 0/ \ Â«t..3 \ -34...13- f 1 / : .' -#< I- ' . .D, ; 1-2 )/ 1. 4 . + A\\\ 2-.fr-Â».Â«13 I i, ./ 1 1 . Â£12 --- -- ----9,4. 4--rj-, 1 4-- Ii-~--- . 1 f 22-1, . 4 2% r fne>R--Fl .-5,4 i - 30ALÂ· ~- >r -71-__flf '1- ' :--,7. ~ 1 y f ' ;.*-*i~~- *OULDEL < 6% LE,TitleÂ· +40/9* \ FqE174IN/N 6, \ 0/AU- 1\1* 1 -1.-.-0 1....1.-27. 91 1 , r- 4 :AX 1 \ t~ , i - 4 Â« X r- 1.: -1 1 f ! i 1 . P.Z.)/i i 1 Â»\ : 1 \ 1 ZO.NE 11 . 1 f 8 - p72O7*563 Â»eADNG , 1 1 K , ~~~T-~ f f , 2 706Â»0~va, 966/164~ 41,6 20,-5 'r- - - 1 Z 1 J ' ' t LÂ£'~ 5 - 'bul-*HT 'FAÂ®+ iÂ·Â·LOTâ„¢ r NT 0 4 0 A (h ./ 1 ARCHITECTUREI h/ 1 f â€ž 'r// 0>. 5/ \\\/ A \ \ \ \ 3 // \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ -- \ / \ 30' \ \ 7/ 7 \ \ \ \ \ A T.O- CONC \ 1 1 EL. 92>8'-0 \ 1 \ // Ef \ 1-9 PROeERTY LINE \ \ 96,2 I - _-29*2~-- / â€¢6 T.o. GONG r EL_ 955'-0. \ - I-- - -- - -- ~ 0 - -~--~ - 1 - / / /ff V'. I ' , -Â«/9 11 1 3 .6 - 1 1~ . GARAGE \03 1 1 \\ li h \. \ /O>\ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAIN .k TO. CONC Â»\ i \A' EL. 958Â·.0,Â·. t. I / 4 NORT,f' ' DEGRAEVE RESIDENCE 1/8"=1'-0" 1 - LOT 5 SUNNY PARK NORTW \ fl, ' 1 \ 1 11% NOTES: ./ 4 1. DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FEMMING AND ROUGN OPENING U.N.O. / / 2. WALL LEGEND- ./ UALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED ==== ZO.N -''~ ' NEW WALLS I / SETBACK Â·\~ O , / ARCHITECTURE iÂ«1 0 0 0 POSSIDLE FLAT AREA --1 R.ATEÂ·WEIGHT e'-0- APP 7'h ~ '~// dÂ¥ 1 / l SMADED AREA REPRESENTS ~ Â· ,# i j , â€ž1 0>j AT ELE'/LTION 916'-b" ~ , /E4~>44EAT-N-GLO EXISTING TOILÂ¢T ' \ '9( el-66Â®TR-C r vERIFY LOCA]ION ~ j/ L GAS APPLIANCE 8 1 1/ W N *1-ATE WEIG+IT 91-1,1 2 1. , -L ' ---------- f--f =gap- 9 - 3 / DIRECT yENT ' 7 FIREPLACE 4. C .1 / / 1 77 1 rk -21 T.4 CONC .10 // \ 2/ =2~221.-Il --1//3 /' 1 1 1-71 // N || | ~) + T.O. CONC \\ 4 SMOKE V EL. Ser.0â€¢ ~\,~~ 11 / 1 %4 / DETECTOR \ --l = -8-2.4( f'Jlrp. \ 1 / \\ '3 2 933 ~ 64 FURRINa I \\ // 1 . 1 11 / \ Ly---------- l %:=If ----4,1 -1 \ 11 i / 1 2 k - F---41 1 -31 9 79 \ _Ii \ aEDEFC)11 9 1 PLATE UE{QUT 10'-1" AFF 7 -DN r - 11 11 \\ e 1 + 11 . T.O. PLY 1 3 / f EL. STÂ·.0- 0% 1 .2 BATE 2 V V XI\1 I / . WEAD WEIGWT B'-0" \ /N-1 -C=I- Â« A (/4 / 1 /3 -----ir#~Grir--27 - HALL -1-_,if 1 -M JL-,1--3 11 I I DETECTOR TYP \ - 1= 1 -- LINEN MEAD WEIGHT 8Â·4" TO. CONC 4 b ~ SILL WEIGHT 3'-6" - \ ' W / " TTP ALL ROOMS ExCPT BATH - r.zi.-ril I f ./ ~~=d LL, ___j jJ 3 SED~ 9 -|~ \ --1 4 I \ 1 1 /47.N 4 /55>' i ' ~~- ExISTING FLOOR \0E 4 1, //1, .,A JOISTB â€¢ 16" O.C. | 1 3 / _L 1 1' r 7 L_4~4. / 1 /./ \\ 1 1 1----1, 7 ~ ' 2 412 0 \>/ 1 , \ 7 . / /1 // 0 /-4,-7--7 / -. PLATE HEIGHT 9Â·-6 1/2" AFF _ -~ 7 -- T / MASTER SUITE / 14 1 < 13 1 4 t,Ir-1 \ 1 0 1 .2 f -21 -1 -21 -~ \ \â‚¬/ 000 \\ 1 ..1 ! li i / '1,=.=-Cl / \ MASTER mATW , 1 \ 02* \\ 0 / D \./ f \ \ 1 4 1 / \ / / \ 1.-/ /04 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -4 .4 NORDÂ·~~ DEGRAEVE RESIDENCE 1/8" mi'-0" \ LOT 5 SUNNY PARK NORTW / / b* ZONE Iiru ARCHITECTURE 0. h 1 04 4 Â¢ UL- 2 e //1 \1\ 1. i \ 4 f ExISTING UlÂ©OPSTOVE , \ 130.o \ FAMILY ROOM ; OEZIQ# \ 0/1 Â» \ \ ' J TO. CONC N 6 T.O. CONS 7 EL. 912Â·-0 1 f EL. 9680-0" Â¥71-tup ill \ 1.122-16 ENTRY / -- *70 - f FP- f - F'ROPERTY LINE , ~ COUNTERTOPS TO j/ LIVING ROOM Ly<X:aS up N RESURFACED ~~~ EXISTING WOODSTOVE --j~ ~-_32&~~ -- \ 40 - V 0 LO. CONC 7 EL. 968'-0 ur. - \ DN - DININ~OOM / 2 0 : EMIEr '1 â„¢114 \ f ' Y EL. 964.-0- 6 T.O. PLLY i ~ COVERED PORCW 0 / / 3 1 /,987/ 4 -2 tal / Â«i 1 \ Â« 1~ \ ~~3>j MAIN LEVEL FLOOR FLAN \ NORT14<3/ DEGRAEVE RESIDENCE 1/8..1,-0,1 4 LOT 5 SUNNY PARK NORTH 1 / / / / NOTES: .Â» I. DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMING AND ROUGH OPENING UN.O 2. WALL LEGEND>- Z O.N E l WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED z==z SETBACK j Y-Ip NEW WALLS I i ARCHIT~C TU RE Â«I FFÂ·0â„¢â€¢532 . S<Â«rl#46. 0 0 . 06 1 -- 1 F 91 1 11 11 \\ 11 11 \\ 11 1 11 11 \\ I 11 il \\ *r 1-- 11 . \\ \\ A 4 11 1 1 1 â‚¬A 1 1 1 1. \ 93 0 0 0 11 11 11 1 \ 2 4 11 1 11 11 1 r- =41 I li /1/ 14~ LE- 1 11 11 1 91 1 1 1 4 7 1 \\ 11 Oil \ 1 0/ 11 i N F /// / 1 1 11 11 Z // 1 11 1 // 4%%. 6Â« 1 11 /0 \\1 00 11 9 41 11 //i 'L_ 1 1 -/ 1 // 1 - // // +58 // \ /A \\ \ 2/3 / // // // 11.Vi U.. <D~*1Â»-1 -61,1.er--1 AG i 7 Z O.N E '2<2SF: Pt-AN/ . 7///L1F- - I ARCHITECTURE 41 3 -0- Â« AH PH R 1 13 gllt *13 li, 11 In . N .4 to , R -11 4 i- 4 ' 4 . , 96 1 '16 - lit 1 1,912~r-f! A i ' Nlic- - J 'tf , ....1 --11 '11.1.' Â· , 1!1 - -ar,72'erlÂ·.7 Â·~'-U~-13NL~| F!1|11111!11Â· -1 11 1} ./EJ>W,gÂ·te'. k'... ~~~.L.' ' 1 3.94.**1:94 Â·Â·'.Â· ~ Â·Â·1Â·,~r:.CA~M72~r~~taN% 4 ,) -7. ' 3 1 ixÂ·-7 = &: ~.~~ ~, i.. ,~ ' I~hpz>'~g.a.W.7.D,ICi-.2-â€¢â€¢p - .rr -.%..t . 1.1. 1.,Yit.,Â«~Â· - i ~T'~.Â· ,;t ~Â·,1 ~ Li'~4U~111 g. p.... W.... 4....I- 9 qb' 17-/ ,.ill[P' tef'YCL'ki'# 111! .... I'. ..,=j -1 ''/. r.-2 ' V Ill! i .1 i n \ 1 'tÂ·f ' I .1 d I 40 1 - h. 101 4 1--4 "44%.A 4, 1 1\14111.1, i:,1.:t i A - 1.}J 1-6-j- i-i I LJ.;i.. 4 , 1. ,Â£ ~ [, :1 1-44* '1111 1 I ' fdll{It 1 Yi, , 113* - 1 1 v-' < LL .U f//J ' 11 ...1 -' ,Â·1#,11 Â·Â·Â·rÂ·.-- M}ml!1*11! , 1 A ; r' 41 ,\ - { 11 I - 1 '4 # -1 fl ~ 1.1/ 2 -4 1: !Â£ 1 1- 4 ~+4--iA v 6,7. '0 J- 39L,Kjl~ 2Â£ 6443- i H 48 r <64%1-1210,Ufli 1 1 9 uâ€¢ I. t L Wr 1-1 1. ir 11 1 Fn~ A .I .r & t k .84,1 "17~ '1 '1 +'...9..4- .., 11 /1 ,{ 11-*ad 1 1 1 0% V- '6.k.. , 1 , 1 A'\ Ar=.Pro ~.4 Â· 1.Ti 114A~=tÂ«]P 1 1 \4 , %3 h , ' 16 k ". I ' '; Lf I. 1 2\ 1 , A 41.-" N %1Â·,1 i -*Tht= 0 i /7,1 \ 41 - 1///11 \\\ V 1 '*I -*. 4-'. i rq Ill'1111 __j 7, 9 1 1 1 ~. t-642-- - - 1 FF~ LAMMa=t 'M 4 Â£ 1, l \\ , I 1/ I .# 7-:7 1 *il -I. 0 6- /11 W' 1, r 1 1 1. /11 4 - 1 1 \ r f, 1 1 lillill' Ill -442-*: tÂ·Â· -.Â·Â·4~ 4 EffÂ·:,9 Â· i ~Â·ot 111:.j 111 1*1!11Â» -1----1 1 \\ 11 7 1 ;7 ~ tid.1/>.~&-'- \~-Th--&-1.Fi w-1,1 K ~1*1%6:11lli.116=2:r.-_ikt,/j 11...4 -A: I $ f'; - 1/1, 1 1 1 Â·Â· ' .*-1 -91, . le..T , 14: t :111 ~ r-â„¢- - JljjILE #th. 1 1 h L *-4 f U tbal g I',l// ' ':V,1. i. kI i F f .D. 1 1 Â£ 1 ' /' I r n--Â·----41Â·1 1 ; '.A I -.-I -7*-4tÂ¥/ r - f ' 't I , 1. lilli!H It , i.111.- , 1. I . lili t#â€ž.Â¢r:- .11 1 1 11 1 .- 1 1 . If:, 1 ./0 . f 1 I nFl '1 f , , All, i! 1, 1 / Â£ P ' -7 1[1 /1,1--&"2.~JLi/l- 1 ,-1 i /3 '1 , P Â«Uy / A , 5 t 'i 11 11 1411 *t*:. 1-11 6 3 1, 11 /1-Tr 1 .1 . ,.11 H t.EL--4 2 bÂ·-94 1 -M Y- 1 0 . Eyn103 1IHOWV .... A '#%- P I 44' I ..# Â·92=.1 . ___ Vt,Vld/Vin/- ../. t,LL T.--"' 4.*420--44 ~1 â€ž ~ Â· 'Â«"valll, - - - .F -251149#1 1 I E r--746'471 0 - -r.Â«. 11 2 - - -1,Â· 7 1 2 0- f ... I L-3-1//38#L i_-_ - ' S M /27Â©11 ./ 7.0. P//9 FL , 4-1 ------- -~----I 7 1 .~- 1-2; M-. _j--~..4.1 ~.->-~ ~ - a r..5 - l 1 1 1 a ry- : - --1 - - ------ ~~~~~~__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~__~ -~ 7Â»Fm/FL f aa= 7768 Loi, ~ .i' t.. b 'J; 4.,-4.f } La ' 41Â¤ I t~LA' M rE-J l Â£ 45-2-32 . }1 tÂ»t,. t_.1, 11 I i - 7.0 SLA/5 - 1 ,--1 I. I . ... . ' 64 = 7962>'Â«' T NOMT-IM EDE>j/Knot-4 Peey=Aâ‚¬Ye Met,* Ybu =- i-Di / Z O.N E ARCHITECTURE .... axis11146â€¢ 171*fbseD f App/rloeÂ¢ & -rt .q-W.W .3 Â»1\1 (041 U-" rcy-4 11- ---Mbdjaidbitt--tipdA ......#.0- 1. 1-- - --2-2-Â»Â«7.4 ir--9 1 j -, .- f 1 ' -- - -4 H j iii . -1 W<gli.&1~VAI#GU~li t -k>--â‚¬24= 7 1 - r- 2 Ip. FW FZ-.- -6 I - -i _- - a-,= 1977 029" A 1 1 1- -- - 710.. FEN- - 1 60 K.7 966.90"- -2 -- 7-6661-- ELEVAT/ofÂ·4 266Â«AEVE FeD z o.N E . ~ ARCHITECTURE EXISTING CONDITIONS - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: ALAIN DEGRAEVE PROPERTY Ronge Beg. End. Areo Percent 9.01'{ LEGEND FOR LOT & Range Statistics L LOT 5, SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION 2 20.00 29.99 2879 18% =M:=r" 1 0.00 19.99 3815 24% CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 3 30.00 44.99 5047 32% /1.!J, , vi lit 4 45.00 VERT 4114 26% SHEET 1 OF 1 LOT BOUNDARY 15855 100% // if /1 1\/ 4 10 / 57 1 \\\ j WAS CALCULATED BY INTERPULATING THE EXISTING THE SLOPE ANALYSIS FOR THE HOUSE FOOTPRINT AREA , CONTOURS ON THE HOUSE PERIMETER THROUGH THE FOOTPRINT AREA. LOT 7 lili . A 4/ SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVSION & L ~1\1 1 L 1 1/ L 1 11 1 1 1 1 ,- 1 i I/ lJ i c ./. iUJJ\\\\\ z 1 ~ i j , ' 11 9 1 1 0, // i /Il' It 1 VAl 1 1 \ \ \ \ 1 NÂ·Ul // f 1% /7 f, 11,Â»,L / 6 /2 F~DP?EMR 4 ; / 91 8 .11.- 9 #/re 1 1/l<f/1- c.p us.PI 44 - j.j-h# 4 14117/ -111 11411 ij-727 7,4-1 / PROJECY' BENCHMAR~ l~ ~~ ~ 2/ U /4 / I #3 1 FOUND REBAR & 4 < ~~ ~ f f f f ~ i CAP 1 9 #OR#43 1 Â·fr f .- Â·~ * 449,4 1(9442:'-V/4411,49 T 27'A-j-724 1 1 - 9- 1 -4 11 11 1 ~Â»Â«*Â©69 71'rbi 1 -A ..,111 4 09, r.4, 4.- 9. 1 iÂ·, i i.1, Y I t -yl ,-al-74.tr.,/ i , 1 DJ 1 4,11 f --*'1 1, ~~- 1 444-L, 1 k 1, ON, ACCORDING TO THE F LOTS 5 & 7, SUNNY ORDED JANUARY 11, 1999, SPEN EL 'URVEY CERTIFICATE TPROVEMENT LOCATION 'RIS ENGINEERING, LLC. T. LLC.. AND PITKIN 'HE IMPROVEMENTS ON 410 ON THIS DATE, 'ILITY CONNECTIONS, 1 JNDARIES OF THE AT THEREARE NO SCRIBED PREMISES BY ING PREMISES, lT THERE IS NO 9 ANY EASEMENT DART OF SAID PARCEL, fORE STATE THAT HAM EASEMENTS OF 1 RESERVATIONS, Ul HYM N A /L_- #28643 4,4, ( IN FEET ) 1101 VILLAGE ROAD, SUITE UL-GB . lib I i> .: 11 V . 11 Iwiul U D 1 kill 2/11 IN 1 ununu Dfair,1 li 5 U.CLIA NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL Â£ ~ 58. j 21' 50.00' 32.89' 54.95' N 49Â°15'07" E 66Â°40' 10" ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS 1 inch = 10 ft AfT[Ii YOU AllaT DIBOOVEN Â§UON D[f[OT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY AOTION CARBONDALE; COLORADO 01620 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. (970) 704-0311 97027 03/09 41 ....9 .. /... 7*~*tmÂ·Â· , GRAM; MEIO=1 00 4 0 I I :: M 111 " \ .. .0 J 41 - P 20 : 1* 1111 0 I-:.I. 0 RBI 0 0 D,) - ./ - D , 0 7.r 2 , - . -D. .,. ' r .. C. I .6 0 - I. .. . 0 3 .. .. . I - . 4 41 . A 0 . 1 - .. . - 4. C, .6/ D D ... 0. . D : D 0 D .. , . D . . 0 0 . . . 0 ... I ':. 0 " , , 0, 0 ,1 , ., 0 .. , I . ... . . 0 , ,f, 4 0 :, 0 .a. 1 ,4 0 ' ' '1 , i. . ., *7 1 .:I, . ., 9 0 , , .. ,. ..0 , lit 1 0 ... 0% : , ... . I , I . " .. ... I : 0. 0 . I .1 I. , I , . . 0, I - , . 11 0 . 8 1 1 , . 4 4 0.0 . , ..,., , . I % 0 00.0 , I , 4 4 .1 r . O . :eDi. 0 0 ., 0 1 0 0 , .. ; , .. .. I :/I'l' 0 , .1 .1.. 0 . i , I , 0 . p :0 I.'I , lilli .' I' 1 , I ..... 1 0. / . I . , . ,,, , ; 1 .. 1, . . 1 , , , 1 0 1 , : , , I .. , ./..0 . . - D.- , '. 1.b , I , me"NI'lli.. 49 . :,0 1 . 1 0 ..2. I , f, , . .. . Al I'l iii' 4 Il y . 0 .. ... A I .. 0 - 1 1 1 . . . - 0 A