The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.ec.400 W Hopkins Scott Building.1977 1""'\ .'if' ',..;...._.c._._ M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Staff (HC) RE: Scott Building Final Subdivision Plat Approval for Condominiumization DATE: June 8, 1977 , This is a request by Dr. Russell Scott (represented by Attorney Jeffrey Sachs) for final approval for the condominiumization of the existing Scott Building on Lots K through S (9 lots) in Block 38. A detailed description of the project is attached in our letter of June 8, 1976._ The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary plat on May 17, 1977 with the same conditions as outlined below: 3. 1. The applicant has submitted the attached information on the occupancy of the apartment units. Dr. Scott's home is located in the large three bedroom apartment on the third floor of the building. Approximately six persons are employed by Dr. Scott in the office portion of the building. Certain of the apartment units are restricted for use for housing with the office portion of the building; and are contained in the improvement agreement. It is clear that Dr. Scott intends and has rented the apartment units for long-term rental housing. A maximum six-month lease restriction together with a 90 day notice to existing tenants to purchase the units at market value is required. 2. The final plat and Improvement Agreement have been approved by the City Engineer. Seventeen (17) parking spaces and a common area for the benefit of the owners of the Scott Building are included on the plat. The building grounds have been attractively landscaped. ~h:%~~.;'~~g~~~~fZ:t;~~ 4. 5. /h /Mk,,~ RkfO. , '"'" I~ I"" ^ r:i MEMO FROM: HAL CLARK PLANNING DEPT. DAVE ELLIS "', CITY ENGINEER ~~ ,':. TO: DATE: June 9,1977 RE: SCOTT BUILDING SUBDIVISION - FINAL REVIEW In reviewing this final plat only a few items were found to. be deficient. A recording certificate is necessary, the transIormer easement should be an electric and communications easement, and this change should also be noted in the grant of easement. In regard to the subdivision agreement I would like the section of the municipal code referenced in paragraph 4 and a clearer definition of the proposed improvements. Considering the minor nature of the above changes I would recommend final approval contingent upon these changes to the plat and agreement. I"" ~ SACHS & HERSHEY JEFFREY H. SACHS MARTIN H. HERSHEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 720 EAST HYMAN STREET-"; SUITE 303 ASPEN, COLORADO B161t (303) 92!S~e813 A5$OC'o\TEO OFFICE' uns L1NCOLN CENTER l!IU1LOI~G 1660 LINCOLN STREET DeNVER, COLORACO 80284 (303) 892.e330 June 8, 1977 Mr. Hal Clark Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Ci ty Hall 130 South Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Hal, /' In accordance with your request, I have detailed below the current occupancy status of the eight units included in the Scott 3uilding located at 400 Nest Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. Unit No. Sq. Ft. Current Use 1 1,369 Employee Housing (HcClosky) 2 993 Employee Housing (Longfield) 3 206 Employee Housing (Vacant) 4 517 '4edical Office \ 5 1,543 Medical Office . " 6 289 r1edical Office 7 993 Scott ~esidence 8 3,209 Scott Residence 9,119 JHS/mmd I"" ~ MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVE ELLIS ~ CITY ENGINEE DATE: July 22, 1976 RE: Scott Building Fence Encroachment After inspecting the site the engineering department has no objection to the slight encroachment on the southeast corner of the property. The property line is only a few inches behind the back edge of the sidewalk at this location. However on the northeast corner there doesn't seem to be any compelling reason for the encroachment and we would recommend against it. In this location the property line is 14 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk and because of their size the cottonwoods are not threatened. Any encroachment should be subject to the city's standard conditions and the applicant should pre- serve the integrity of the city monument at the southeast corner of the block. - . .1 .... ..-., l'l HEf10RAtlDUl1 RE: Scott Building Condominiums - Conceptual Subdivision Approval DATE: June 8, 1976 This is a request for conceptual subdivision approval for the condominiumization of the Scott Building on Lots K through S (9 lots) in Block 38. The zoning for the property is R-6 and as such the building is a non-conforming use. The building con- tains the following uses: ./:?:' 1. A medical office - 1450 square feet. 2. Seven (7) apartment units consisting of two (2) studios; one (1) one bedroom apartment; two (2) two bedroom apart- ments; and t~ (20 three bedroom apartments. TVJO The building is 11,866 square feet in size. The Planning Commission originally considered this application on October 6, 1975, and tabled the request pending additional information concerning parking requirements and the lot area to be assigned to the building. On June 2, 1976, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted approval to the request. The building is a non-conforming use and as such the R-6 density or parking requirements do not apply. The Planning Office has administratively determined that it \./ould be appropriate to evaluate these criteria accordinq to the requirements of the R/HF zone. Accordingly, the follovting figures refJarding l'1inimul'1 land area and parking spaces have been calculated: R/J1F ZONE DENSITY REQUIWiEilTS 2 studios = 1000 x 2 = 2,000 lone bedroom = 1250 x 1 = 1,250 2 two bedroom = 2100 x 2 = 4,200 2 three bedroom = 3630 x 2 = 7,260 Office = 1:1 F.A.R. 1450 - 1450 -- 1,450 i" + TOTAL AREA REQUIRHlENT 16,160 square feet R/MF PARKING REQUIWIENTS R/MF requires one/bedroom for residential uses. Other uses are by review. 2 studios = 1 x 2 = 2 spaces lone bedroom = 1 x 1 = 1 space 2 two bedroom = 2 x 2 = 4 spaces 2 three bedroom = 3 x 2 .- 6 spaces Office = 3/1000 x 1450 = 4 spaces + TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIREJ = 17 spaces The Planning Officereconm~nds that conceptual subdivision approval be granted subject to the rel]uirement that six (6) lots be allocated to the Scott l1uildinC] leavinC] separate lots K, L & M for development under the R-6 lone. ^l~o. that 17 parking spaces be provided to serve the Scott l~lIildin'l Condollriniuns. MEMO TO: FROM: D'A,TE: i"""'\ 1"\ l ,"" HAL CLARK PLANNING DEPT. DAVE ELLIS ,~~ CITY ENGINEER \7Z-- May 25, 1976 RE: SCOTT BUILDING -CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION REVIEW The engineering department recommends approval of the conceptual plat on June l~ The only comment we have is that the acreage shown on the plat is for only 3 lots (0.27 5ac.) instead of the. total 9 lots (0' 6198ac). . [ "I "! .., l~ f I t~ I, , , 1 'i. ~,-....,,_.-.';.!, ft""':. f"'\ , MEMORANDUI1 :TQ: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Staff (HC) RE: Scott Building Condominiums - Conceptual Subdivision Approval DATE: June 8, 1976 This is a request for conceptual subdivision approval for the condominiumization of the Scott Building on Lots K through S (9 lots) in Block 38. The zoning for the property is R-6 and as such the building is a non-conforming use. The building con- tains the following uses: 1. A medical office - 1450 square feet: 2. Seven (7) apartment units consisting of two (2) studios; one (1) one bedroom apartment; two (2) two bedroom apart- ments; and three (3) three bedroom apartments. The building is 11,866 square feet in size. The Planning Commission originally considered this application on October 6, 1975, and tabled the request pendi ng additi ona 1 informati on concerning parking requirements and the lot area to be assigned to the building. On June 2, 1976, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted approval to the request. The building is a non-conforming use and as such the R-6 density or parking requirements do not apply. The Planning Office has administratively determined that it would be appropriate to evaluate these criteria according to the requirements of the R/MF zone. Accordingly, the following figures regarding minimum land area and parking spaces have been calculated: 2 studios lone bedroom 2 two bedroom 2 three bedroom R/MF ZONE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS = 1000 x 2 = = 1250 x 1 = = 2100 x 2 = = 3630 x 2 = 2,000 1,250 4,200 7,260 1,450 Office = 1:1 F.A.R. 1450 - 1450 + TOTAL AREA REQUIREMENT 16,160 square feet R/MF PARKING REQUIREMENTS R/MF requires one/bedroom for residential uses. Other uses are by review. 2 studios = 1 x 2 = 2 spaces lone bedroom = 1 x 1 '" 1 space 2 two bedroom = 2 x 2 = 4 spaces 2 three bedroom = 3 x 2 .- 6 spaces Office = 3/1000 x 1450 = 4 spaces + TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 17 spaces The Planning Office recommends that conceptual subdivision approval be granted subject to the requirement that six (6) lots be allocated to the Scott Building leaving separate lots K, L & M for development under the R-6 zone. Also, that 17 parking spaces be provided to serve the Scott Building Condominiums.