The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.651 Pfister Dr.A019-03 r' ,.. \ CASE NUMBER PARCEL In # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY A019-03 2735-112-09044 MCC PUD Amednment, Lot 44 Lot 44 Maroon Creek Club James Lindt PUD Amendment Eiffel Properties LLC clo Wodehouse Builders Wodehouse Builders 3/21/03 Approved wi Condition 3/24/03 J. Lindt Lot-99 651 flc72-4 'DE Cce). : A D lq- 03 - Maroon Creek Club Lot~|FUD Amendment , 21, - 2735-112-09-044 A019-dl 62- NIP *03 . MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner J- RE: Maroon Creek Club Insubstantial PUD Amendment to allow for construction entrance outside of the Building and Development Envelopes on Lot 44, of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD DATE: July 14,2003 SUMMARY: Eiffel Properties LLC, represented by Mike Fedishan of Wodehouse Builders, has applied for an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD to allow for temporary construction access to occur outside of the building and development envelopes on Lot 44, of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD. 1 he Applicant previously gained approval of an administrative amendment to the PUD to allow for an access way to be utilized between the development envelope on the vacant, neighboring Lot 43 into the building enveloped on Lot 44 for the purpose of temporary construction access to the back of the structure being built on Lot 44. However, the Applicant has now requested to use a strip of land just to the southeast of the development envelope on Lot 44 as a temporary construction access to the rear ot the structure as is marked in red on the site plan that is attached as Exhibit "13" STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has reviewed the site and has found that the area just to the southeast of the development envelope on Lot 44 is devoid of native vegetation. Because the area to be used for temporary construction access is already devoid of native vegetation, staff believes that the proposed construction operations would not significantly harm the site. The Parks Department has been consulted regarding the proposal and have expressed that they feel that it is acceptable as long as the Applicant is required to re-vegetate the disturbed area with an approved native seed mix. Therefore, staff has proposed a condition of approval that requires the Applicant to re-vegetate the area outside of the building envelope to be disturbed with a native seed mix that has been approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to obtaining a final zoning inspection on the residence located on Lot 44. Additionally, the Parks Department did request that they be called prior to utilizing this access way to inspect the tree protection fencing erected around the drip line of the existing Fir tree to be preserved that is identified in green on the site plan attached as Exhibit "B". Similarly, staff has proposed a condition of approval that voids the previous amendment that allowed for construction access between the development envelopes on Lots 43 and 44. APPLICANT: Eiffel Properties LLC. 1 .. LOCATION: Lot 44 of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD ZONING: Rural Residential PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan showing the proposed construction access to Lot 44 is attached as Exhibit "B". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed insubstantial PUD amendment to allow for temporary construction access to occur to the southeast of the development envelope on Lot 44 as is depicted on the site plan attached as Exhibit "B". APPROVAL: 1 hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Maroon Creek Club PUD as proposed with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall erect construction fencing to protect the landscaping that has already been planted outside the building etivelope on Lot 44 and around the drip line of the mature Fir tree that is identified in green on the site plan that is attached as Exhibit In" . Additionally, the Applicant shall fence the remainder of the development envelope to ensure that the disturbance is confined to the area denoted in red in Exhibit "B". This construction fencing shall be inspected by the Parks Department prior to accessing the building envelope in the manner proposed. 2. The Applicant shall re-vegetate the area disturbed by the construction access to the satisfaction of the City Parks Department prior to receiving a final zoning inspection on either of the residences to be constructed on Lots 43 and 44. The seed mix for re-vegetating the disturbed area shall be approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to planting. 3. Approval of this amendment voids the approval given for the previous amendment that allowed for construction access between the development APPAnlopes on Lots 43 and 44. . , l 20 (~IUAOb date 7//44* 3 Jolle, Ju10;Ann Woods, Community Developnlent Director 2003 COMMUNITY[ba .=râ€ž ulriECTOR CITY OF ASPEN 2 07/16/2003 14:21 19705445011 WODEHOUSE LOT 44 PAGE 01/01 JUL-18-2003 WED 01:18~ FAX NO, P. 04 ACCEPTANCE: 1, asa person being or rÂ®resenting the applicant, do hereby agree to the condition ofthis approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. ' 2,144 0,1 Â· 641 dat.7-Â£6-03 Properly Owner or Alithorized Representative ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review (Criteria and Staff Plndings Exhibit B -- Site Plan Showing Area ofthc Revised Construction Access to Lot 44 3 .. EXHIBIT"A" Parcel ID No. 2735-112-09-043 Zone District: Rural Residential PUD Reviewed By: James Lindt Date: 7/8/03 Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, ~ Amendment to PUD Development Order: The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. f~The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. [3' The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. w The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. O The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. w The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. w The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. t~~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. 1 w The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project' s original approval or which requires ranting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements 07, i :1''te.3 15 52 9709209779 WODEHOUSE BUILDERS PAEE e4 3 9 , .â€¢.,2.L'.7 w 9 .. 1 1 k 1 1 iiI''f: Â·.4 . ... N 44 \ ; 1 '. . 0, i. 1 .9 0 0 ' Jel -': , 42 ti 19 -/ti 44 . 1 , . 4 t 9 11 1 f .â‚¬.rÂ¥-97413. i .l ' 46@~8%> *. 4 44 -1-+ 1 1 1 hi / , ft 1 WAA \'.- 1 95114$21226*1-4 04*ex - 7-l~ 1,1 >L-?528%8=2=2%:eSA ; h&,3/ 71< --1 6% 4%-- . 1 1--ILL ' 1 , , 4 %-4 5 91\YA'â€¢05-'**/ ,Â· 42232$400 -zz::~, Â· -1- 3-1 d *Â»- 1 --thÂ« ~ 11 B 14 . \Â» , ni i,) , ------ 1 if j '? , ~ 1 --/ C. â‚¬ 1 -3/ 4, 0 'i j.-t. 1 1 ff I 1 / r\â‚¬0 -*, 74--.-Dem - 19Â» 1.MA? r --': 1 , / 1 -9 < 10 L: Â»-L----1 ---11% W gÂ£6# 4...1 - - e. I. , - 71,â‚¬19 *194*)0:9* . 4 02*\'f j \= i : f-f~ Â· I .11 -212=h 1 10 1 VA i ' i '} 1 1' ~RY nd \1~~ . r -- 1, ---* f \f t,, -4~Lf 1 i ,PÂ«12'%5~r- 2 -77- ' 4 ?22 .VIA@'gc ,14 c Â» -: -4 9 c j,Gy' ~ 3 -2/bÂ·Â« r jit* . .4/Alir 4 -c e %-- 11â€¢161.8 0 yarrn 1,5,. Â· rc .Â¢ V 357- \5# \ 9\ 8 - f Iâ‚¬/I4.'Kb,OÂ£ .-1 -74.4 -4.-- - -- , 4. 1 1 1=26 4 1. t L l. -- Â· 3 * ---042- c/g ased [~Â£:01 Â£~~~~1-Inr :9969 026 026 :se~Ossv + 984nl uteTiI'CM :&9 lues 40 39Vd SM3GlInEI 3SnOH3GOM 6LL60560L6 80:EI 8003/VI/2-0 07/14/2003 13:08 9709209779 WODEHOUSE BUILDERS PAGE 02 Sent By: William Lukes + Assoc ills; 970 920 6986; Jul-1Â«02 10:36AM; . Page 1 /3 WiLLIAM 1UKES . ASSOCIATES PROilâ‚¬I- MANAGE M.}:N'r ARCHIT' E CTUrE 14 July 2003 Dlena Golls Wodehouse Builders 307 UBC: Sulte L Aspen, Colorado 81611 rei Maroon Creek Club Lots 43 and 44 Site and Architecture Review Committee Approvals Djana: Thb will confirm that i have admIntsbatively approwd the enclosed request for access dated July 10, 2003 as the representative of tile Site and Architecture Review Committee [SARC] of the Maroon Creek Club Matter Association. The approval is subject tolhe folloÂ¥,ing conditions: 1 Suitable fencing must be installed on beth aldes of the access route from the street bo the building envelope on Lot 44. 2. The Constfuction and Completion Guaranty and lhe associatedfinancial security which:Â·rein effect for Lot 44 wili now apply tothis work and any use of Lot43 as well. 3 Wlitten approval for Glis request must be obtained ffom the City of Aspen 4. The tenns of the Final Approva} fetter datnd May 22, 2003 remain in effect 5. My letter of June 2 approving a previous request for access and aborage is hel'eby voided, although we will conelders,nother mquestforwlf~ter-timestorageor, Lot 43 which la integmledwith thisaccess arignment. ! would adso like to remind you that approval of the exterfor matedals and colors has flotteen cornpltsd; the purpose ofthe Jung 6 deadline in the approval was to ensure timely closure of this process and we would like to have the sample mviaw process completed by July 25 at the latest MAROON CREEK CLUB MASTER ASSOCIATION Ske and Architecture Raview Committee -(44 William Lukes AIA Arch#ectural Advlsor to SARC 1'0> i 1- â€¢ 9. b 11<.. 3.*Â·9 1//71 N C.1,1 1,11 -1 5) I copies: Gary Albert, President, MCC Master Association Brian Martin SARC and Scott Enâ€¢An, MCC Ab.,7 Hal Dishler ,47.'wio.6.09 F,/ gz<).69/G 07/14/2003 13:08 9709209779 WODEHOUSE BUILDERS PAGE 03 sent By: William Lukes + Assoc~; 970 920 6986; Jul-1 4~10: 37AM ; Page 213 . - J "1 0 2///P / 3 wuDEHOUEE E*JILDEN~ PAGE 02 -'..14 0 I.li Wodehouse Builders - Aspen, LLC CHANGE SKETCHES No. 00001 3074. AAK Phone (970) 920.0039 Asi~ln. CO 816; 1 Fax : (~70) 92e-97?9 .- TITLE: Lot 44 Access Option, DATE: 7710/03 PROJECT: Maroon Creek Lot 44 JOB: LO r4-402 TO: Acto. Bili Lukcs William Lukes & Assoc. PO Box 8289 S rARTED: Aspen, CO 81612 COMPLETED: Phone. 920.6929 Fax: 920-6986 REQUIREDÂ· 7/17'03 REMARKS: Dcar BAL In reoponie to your letter dated 25 Junc 2003, we have now completed the installation o flhe sod a: reque#d by Scott Ezwin: and applied Iike natural seed as per Maroon Creek Club's requimments. We are currently walering this area. and the ground EO'yer should be sprouting soon. Please note that the sod area is actually onthe golf course:~ 0195,11(Tlt. Regarding Ths need zo completely screen Lot 43 U we use it for access and storage, fit tbis timt we feel that it is nci in thÂ·Â¢ best in-#%51 ofthe ow,3(I to plant all the trÂ«5 to *reen Until the final design for the house is further a]ODY 50 we do not intend to use Lot 43 until the golf season 16 complete. This does leave us with ar. access problem to the east side ofthe house Due to *e dqign ofthe house, we ait uyinB W get 2mother acce# Mound the south end of thc building. See the attached sketch for what we are proposing. 1. Make a temporary access from Pfister Drive at the south side ollot 44. Insiall atemporary- culieit anddrivc *033 the existing ditÂ©h 2. Use the area ro The south of the tree to drive around the jouth side of thc house m access the east side of the house. 3. Upon complction of the work on the east side of the house (Backfili, Stone Veneer, and Final lundscaping) the access drive and the calvert Will be removÂ¢d and the ditch and arress no Pfister Drive would be returned to its existing condition. This option woutd keep all of our work on Lot 44 which is already scmened toni the golf coufse. We have discussed this option with 11* Pauks Department regaiding access allouild Ilic tree. They have visited the site aud agree chic we will not damage the tree with this access. The city currently feels that this option can be approved. bur would like MCC:s tÂ·esponse. Could you mease revitw this option and let 115 know if this would be agrecable to Maroon Creek Club? Please cal] if j'ou have any questions regarding this cc. David Crossim,d, David Gibson t..7 7 WODEHOUSE BU~DERS 307,0nit L Aspen Airport Business Center, ~SPEN, CO 81611 tel: (970) 920-0039 / fax: (970) 920-9779 / E-mail: @spen'Ewodehousebuilders.corn '. 'F 200 San Miguel River Dr., P.O. Box 3049, TELURIDE,.CO 81435 (970) 728-3525 / FAX(970) 728-6165 / E-mail: wb@wodehousebuilders,com Fax Cover Sheet DATE: 7-/6-03 TIME: 042 0 FAX #: 900- 5439 TO-' James k in~+ FROM: M,te fia biken RE: A 0+ 4 4 Alarown C.ve:C k CC: Number of pages including cover sheet: Z . fav)183~ here k LA>ur 5/9MJ COD V -1-4>14 1,/bu C $/1 I0/I0 39Vd Dt, 101 3Sn0H3G0M II05t'*50L6I EE:t'I E00Z/9 I/L0 .. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Aspen Community (970) 920-5090 Development (970) 920-5439, fax Department 3X To: Mike Fedishan From: James Lindt Fax: 544-5011 Pages: Phone: Date: 7/16/03 Re: MCC Lot 44 Amendment CC: [] Urgent C] For Review U Please Comment [] Please Reply C] Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi Mike, Here is the approved decision notice for the construction access outside of the building envelope. Please sign the third page and fax it back to my attention. My fax number is 920-5439. Thanks, James . .. MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner .3-L. RE: Maroon Creek Club Insubstantial PUD Amendment to allow for construction staging outside of the Building and Development Envelopes on Lots 43 and 44, of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD DATE: June 10,2003 SUMMARY: Eiffel Properties LLC, represented by Mike Fedishan of Wodehouse Builders, has applied for an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD to allow for construction access to occur outside of the building and development envelopes on Lots 43 and 44, of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD. The Applicant would like to temporarily utilize an area between the building envelopes of the two lots to access the rear of the proposed residence on Lot 44. More specifically, the Applicant would like to build the driveway proposed for Lot 43 and access the building site on Lot 44 from this driveway through Lot 43's building â€ž envelope while constructing the proposed residences. The area that is proposed to be utilized is marked in red on the site plan that is attached as Exhibit "B". STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has reviewed the site and has found that the area between the building envelopes on Lots 43 and 44 is devoid of native vegetation. However, the Applicant has already landscaped outside of the building and development envelopes pursuant to a requirement for the golf course screening that was approved on the two lots as part of the original PUD landscaping plan. Because the area to be used for construction access is already devoid of native vegetation, staff believes that the proposed construction operations would not significantly harm the site. The Parks Department has been consulted regarding the proposal and have expressed that they believe that it is a good idea for the Applicant to use the area between the two (2) building envelopes to access Lot 43 during construction because it will channel the construction disturbance into a central area for the two (2) lots. Similarly, staff believes that some of the construction parking problems that would typically occur on a cul-de-sac such as Pfister Drive will be alleviated by using the building envelope of the neighboring Lot 43 as a staging area for the construction on Lot 44. However, the Parks Department did request that a condition be placed on the approval that requires that protective construction fencing be installed around the landscaping that has already been planted outside of the building envelope. Moreover, the Parks Department has requested that they be called to inspect the construction fencing prior to commencing construction activities. Furthermore, staff has proposed a condition of approval that requires 1 the Applicant to return the area outside the building envelope on both of the lots to it's existing state prior to obtaining a final zoning inspection on either of the residences. APPLICANT: Eiffel Properties LLC. LOCATION: Lots 43 and 44 of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD ZONING: Rural Residential PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan showing the proposed construction access to Lot 44 is attached as Exhibit "B" RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed insubstantial PUD amendment to allow for construction access to occur between the building envelopes on Lots 43 and 44 as is depicted on the site plan attached as Exhibit D. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Maroon Creek Club PUD as proposed with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall erect construction fencing to protect the landscaping that has already been planted outside the building envelopes on Lots 43 and 44. This construction fencing shall be inspected by the Parks Department prior to accessing Lot 44 through Lot 43. 2. The Applicant shall re-vegetate the area outside the development envelopes that is to be used for construction access to the satisfaction of the City Parks Department prior to receiving a final zoning inspection on either of the residences to be constructed on Lots 43 and 44. The seed i-nix for re- vegetating the area shall be approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to planting. 40 rÂ· rm râ„¢4 rh & 77,1.- r-IR -74 4 I.- t. / JUN 1 1 2003 Re_ a,tlb> date Gll, lo-5 COMMUNITYDEv L., r,Â·-c.f< i Dk{El;1-Oft Jul~Ann Woods, Community Development Director CITY OFASPEN 2 ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the condition of this approval and certify the information provided iii this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. %%74-4- A463 date J> l Propert>42t~r or Authorized Representative ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Site Plan Showing Area of Construction Access to Lot 44 00 EXHIBIT "A" Parcel ID No. 2735-112-09-043 Zone District: Rural Residential PUD Reviewed By: James Lindt- Date: 6/10/03 Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: 51 The proposed amendment does not change the use or character ofthe development. W C[he proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. r U The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Gl The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. 31 The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. r a The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. 3 The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. 2 The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. 9 The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires ranting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements 06/10/2003 07: 37 9709209779 WODEHOUSE BUILDERS PAGE 01 ' MAY-12-2003 15:39 FROM ~0: 9709209779 P.002 fli 4 ~)( ~-lltb~-y 42/ b f #a 1&-) j CD ~ Â© ~ ~riveway Access 62244~p~lf -~ 1 1 4 1 p f l . - AID= \ 03â€¢ 6? 45'9*530133 Yor / A ic 07 -9 Lill. 9231IR#\12.1 1 7 - 2,Â· 1. 1000 4- 7.get, -~ 1 r ,LCOJ.39 ? 1 +1-9 . 1--1_ \AI81 '21 5_*E , 1~ 2 1 1 1- r i * f -1 - '- \ 110,74 . .-t i .1 l rop -\ 1 . -1, r ' 4 , Lx red{ng lift. 1 4 4, 1 X \ 40* =11 4 b 'i. Â§\* 4.- 1 ..4 i *@A 4 \'MaN \ \ 1 1 4-Frellp -1 0 -:~ ~1- i \-,1,1 MTS \ 4 64-fri/Al e t\ 1 \ Ar)*es-Neke \ 1 1 . L44;~~;p--1 E' iii j - \ \ \1 I- i dj 1 1 l.0 \ \6\ 1 +F 7- . 1 - - 1 -1 : 1 1 .. , 4 \ 0 - +23'24 1\ 1\ - 2 ,> '8 1, t i i J Â¢ j i \ '911 \ 9 1 71- f elyp ejâ‚¬1 i 2 11 2 0 24' 09 --liembl ' 4- -1 1 1 , A Â¥,:,B iÂ¢ R-pbgr â‚¬ Cp<p 424 pine \1\ \ \ \ 1 - ~Â·; 10 Mdrked 4229132 J i ' 2 -7---=..2..h*. .. CASE NUMBER A019-03 PARCEL ID # 2735-112-09044 CASE NAME MCC PUD Amednment, Lot 44 PROJECT ADDRESS Lot 44 Maroon Creek Club PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE PUD Amendment OWNER/APPLICANT Eiffel Properties LLC c/o Wodehouse Builders REPRESENTATIVE Wodehouse Builders DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3/21/03 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Approved w/ Condition BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 3/24/03 BY J. Lindt .. PARCEL ID: j 2735-112-09044 DATE RCVD: ]03/14/03 # COPIES:1 CASEN NO~A019-03 CASE NAME:~MCC PUD Amednment, Lot 44 PLNR:1 4 PROJ ADDR:] Lot 44 Maroon Creek Club CASE TYP:IPUD Amendment STEPSi OWN/APP: Eiffel Properties LLC ADR |307, Unit L AABC C/S/Z: |Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:1970-920-0039 REP:~Wodehouse Builders ADR:~307, Unit L AABC C/S/Z:|Aspen/CO/81611 PHN~970-920-0039 FEES DUE:~ FEES RCVD:~All fees due STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:| BY] DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 1 1 | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL:~ REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED: | ,-:f 'S BY: DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: 'jj~,1; 2#'EC' c.t<(c: 1-*< .. MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner CY-4 RE: Maroon Creek Club Insubstantial PUD Amendment to Approved Landscaping Plan on Lots 43 and 44, of the Maroon Creek Club PUD DATE: March 17,2003 SUMMARY: Maroon Properties Inc, Eiffel Properties LLC, and the Maroon Creek Club LLC. represented by Mike Fedishan of Woodhouse Builders, have applied for an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD to amend the approved landscaping plan for two (2) of the lots on the North Bench of Tiehack. The Applicants are requesting to amend the location of some of the approved landscaping to better screen the residences to be built on Lots 43 and 44 from the Maroon Creek Club Golf Course and Highway 82. The approved Maroon Creek Club Landscaping Plan requires that the owners of Lot 43 provide landscape screening on the southwestern side of the thirteenth (13th) hole ofthe golf course. However, during the golf course construction, the thirteenth (13th) hole was shifted to the northeast of where it was approved to be constructed. Given the shift in the placement of the thirteenth (13th) hole, the Maroon Creek Club requests that the required landscaping be provided on the northeastern edge of the development envelopes of Lots 43 and 44 rather than on southwestern side of Lot 43 as was approved in the Maroon Creek Club PUD. Lots 43 and 44 have the same owner Eiffel Properties LLC. Eiffel Properties LLC. has given consent for tile Maroon Creek Club to apply for a PUD amendment to allow for the required landscaping to take place as is shown on the landscaping plan attached as part of Exhibit STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment to the approved Maroon Creek Club landscaping plan and feels that the proposal would better allow for the required landscaping to serve as screening as was originally intended in the County Approvals given the change in the location of the thirteenth ( 13% hole. The Parks Department has reviewed the proposed amendment feels that the proposed landscape plan that is attached as Exhibit "B" incorporates appropriate species. In addition, the property owners of Lots 43 and 44, as well as, the Maroon Creek Club LLC. have all consented to the proposed amendment. Therefore, staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed amendment to the approved Maroon Creek Club landscaping plan to allow for landscaping outside the building envelope that is consistent with the proposed landscaping plan that is attached as Exhibit 13". 1 .. APPLICANT: Maroon Properties Inc, Eiffel Properties LLC, and the Maroon Creek Club LLC. LOCATION: Lots 43 and 44 of the Maroon Creek Club PUD ZONING: Rural Residential PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved. approved with conditions. or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." In addition. the proposed planting plan has been attached as Exhibit "B". Referral agency comments are included as Exhibit -C". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed insubstantial PUD amendment to amend the approved landscaping plan for the Maroon Creek Club to allow for the required landscaping that was to be provided on Lot 43. to be provided on both Lots 43 and 44 pursuant to the proposed landscaping plan that is attached as Exhibit "B . APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Maroon Creek Club PUD as proposed with the following condition: 1. The landscaping to be installed outside the development envelopes on Lots 43 and 44 shall be consistent with the representations made on the "planting plan" that is attached as Exhibit "B". 2. The applicant shall not plant the three (3) Bristlecone Pine Trees that are proposed .just south of tile driveway intersection with Pfister Drive to prevent them from encroaching on the right-of-way. c 14 2 (134- date *4/03 Jdfie Ann Woods, Â¢Blmunity Development Director V Apr} iD'-% . i r- - ATTACHMENTS: 1 Â· 4..' '4' TL LJ Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Planting Plan MAI 21 7003 Exhibit C -- Referral Comments COMMUNITY DEvc..iÂ·:â€¢ell l.)1Htl;il)H CITY OFASPEN 2 .. EXHIBIT "A" Parcel ID No. 2735-112-09-043 Zone District: Rural Residential PUD 2735-112-09-044 Date: 3/17/03 Reviewed By: James Lindt Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26.445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: ~The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. 61''The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. ~The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. [5~The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. I<The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. ~f The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. <The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. ~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. 114 The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project' s original approval or which requires ranting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements LOT 45 / NATNE GRABS SEED*16 WHERE DISTURBED, r X M EN. - 8080.46' 5 (* 1 l Fnd PK & Washer / - e ~ f-- EX. MR --'.. i 4 + \ U i ...... I LOT + i 18Â» CMP .. 2.2.ZAL ~ 10.64' - - 3.:bxIF-'....34,- EXISTING TRE Mel NAUVE SHRUI , ~\ \ %4? 0 EX. FIR {{D I + I - 36" / 0 A . A e 24' P Â¢ 7- /0~ . f Â· 1 4~/ , \ ' '9 0% 0. A *-r n â€ž 4 ---- * . ACK PIPV --- \. ---- 44> Ctifi 1 i 44,6 l\39 O -0 1 0 1 I I \ TEPS U\WN ~ -\ . A , y Gâ‚¬) , /DRIVEWAY , 'v TeRRACE , ! GREATROOM : i ~ , 0 / ENTRY .liN , \+8075,0 \ \ 1 0' \ 3 1 A. / \ / \ HOUSE , 1 7, \ 0)1 0 i . '1 Irl A/-99-,MIF CIFI h *+7 -/.1 Tti ~~ ~ , n \ /Ah*. & r \\ i YUÂ¥e/A+641 \ / / HOUSE \ \\ i â€¢ T F ~ \\ 6 N FLA6STONE FIELD \ < 44;~-~~ , J> U TRENCH - ) 1 f j 4, CA**0-\ \\-pfrAN WITH PARK<NO : E j . 06*v64 . 1.. 1.4-W/DN 4 CRON COVER . F * Â« - b vtÂ·CY . , i u-- , GARAGE : 6 FT. WIPE FLAGST'ONC ' - 14 -- rN I I f WALKWAY -R> MUPROOM ~ I ON Co' SUB -SLAB ir-- 1 â€¢ 3 i 1 '1 LAWN 2â€¢% 4. ttÂ»t l. FU EX. FIR /*)1 <'' |~UNMSTURFED / A 31\ \ *\ --I AREA / 1 -2\--7.1 \ 0 1 SPA ' ~ j ./r" Vul*,~9<9 \ 10 B , - #~4*44~ < Te %31// \ . pom - 0 . eat~ 14 - . . Â¥ 41- --- ------- 440 --0 Al ~ 1.- 1 / 1* a F*L-1 -,- --* T:\., \3AD\%~SE,ED -x< 1, 0 / 0 AREA . . I. 44 --I-'- . / ---I ------*- --.. t PMEA ENDELMANNU (ENOLEMANN SPRUCE) 4.V /2 TO /5 FT. HEIGHT, TYPICAL (5 TOTAL iN TH/S AREA) 8 9 ->1.1 3444 31 I Â» /qi/> PONDANDSPA -SEE DETAIL WEW ON'THCS PLAN LOT 43 Â£4* Brian Flynn. 09:57 AM 03/12/2003 , Re: Lot 44 Page 1 of 1 0 . X-Sender: brianf@cemmons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:57:46 -0600 To: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Brian Flynn <brianf@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: Lot 44 Ce: aaronr@ci.aspen.co.us James, We reviewed the landscape plan for the property and feel it is an appropriate plan meeting all of the demands from the club and city. The species and locations of plantings are good with one point of caution. The plan calls for 3 Bristlecone Pines around the entrance of the driveway. We would encourage the applicant to consider keeping distance from the ROW in the event of over growth the City will be obligated to trim these trees depending on the future layout of the ROW. All in all the plan is acceptable. At 03:57 PM 3/11/03 -0700. you wrote: Thanks Brian. Just to clarify. are you alright with the proposed landscaping in addition to the dry wells? At 02:23 PM 03/11/2003 . you wrote: James. quick note about Lot 44 in Maroon Creek PUD. I met with the builders and discussed the new location for the dry wells. After reviewing the plans for landscaping and locations of the dry wells Parks has concluded that this is an appropriate request for variance. Brian Flynn, Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen. CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) Brian Flynn, Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) Printed for James Lindt <james!@ci.aspen.co.us> 03/12/2003 , - =866~;J~~J~-16*/Ifw--DEHousE Lor r A. ... -, :13}1 t Â·.:Â·; Â» 72.1,99%,A 02/02 .,-;~ . - 7 1 .â€ž MAROON CREEK CLUB m aub arcle Â· Aspen Cotorado 816I1 â€¢ te*bonÂ¢970 920 I533 â€¢ .facsimito 970920Â·1095.~ ~~~~tÂ·..Â·,i.' .. i i , 2 i'.Â·. ~ March 11,2003 : .._- :i: ..-- f,To: James Lindt Froin: Maroon Creek Club Homeowners Association : Â· :~ ~~ Re: Fin'l Approval for Drywelllocations 'I~ :Dear James, ; - i 'Â·Â·., This letter is to notify you ofthe approval given for Lot 44 positioning ofthe drywell locations.: Bill Lukes has been told about the changed locations ofthe drywells, as : I ~ 0 : â‚¬ ::outlined by Schmueser/Gordon/Myer, engineers for this project, and his only concern A -: }was thatÂ·Â·the ttee plahting would be impacted by this new location. The builder has 7 :addressed Bill' s concerns and agrees that the drywells will not interfere with the planting. v :Wc-therefore give our approval as requested per your department. 341- Scott Erwin 1~ j - ~ ;f; General Manager/COO & pey ~24 074/lue/(Â»4611 10 ) 50(* G#\1)ZE t. ....... i. - ~ - Locudscajoict/4 /3/41 1-1-:Â· . '-f r /1)0)0 FOFÂ¢ 1 4~_ 1 4--L . + .1 f . .. MEMORANDUM TO: Joyce Ohison, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner ij~~% RE: Maroon Creek Club Insubstantial PUD Amendment to allow Drywells outside the Development Envelope on Lot 44, of the Maroon Creek Club PUD DATE: March 10,2003 SUMMARY: Eiffel Properties LLC, represented by Mike Fedishan of Wodehouse Builders, have applied for an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD to allow for two (2) 1,000-gallon drywells to be installed just outside of the western extent of the development envelope on Lot 44, of the Maroon Creek Club PUD. The applicant has provided a drainage report from a licensed Engineer that requests that the drywells be located at least twenty (20) feet from the foundation of the residence to protect against water damage to the foundation. The approved foundation is located approximately eighteen (18) feet from the edge of the approved development envelope, and therefore, the drywells cannot be located within the approved development envelope. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed amendment to allow for Lot 44 to locate two (2) 1,000-gallon drywells just outside of the western extent of the approved development envelope has been reviewed by the City of Aspen Community Development Engineer. The Community Deve[opment Engineer concurs that the drywells should be located approximately twenty (20) feet from the foundation. Moreover, staff be[ieves that there is no significant native vegetation that would be disturbed where the proposed drywells are to be located. Thus, staff feels that it is appropriate to allow for the two (2) 1000-gallon drywells to be located at most five (5) feet outside the approved development envelope in the general locations that are represented on the grading and drainage plan that is attached as Exhibit "B". Therefore, staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed amendment to the development envelope on Lot 44 to allow for the two (2) drywells to be located just outside the approved development envelope. APPLICANT: Eiffel Properties LLC. LOCATION: Lot 44 of the Maroon Creek Club PUD 1 , .. ZONING: Rural Residential PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." The proposed grading and drainage plan and the drainage report completed by Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer has been included as Exhibit "B". Referral agency comments are included as Exhibit "C". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed insubstantial PUD amendment to the Maroon Creek Club PUD to allow for two (2) 1,000-gallon drywells to be installed just east of the approved development envelope on Lot 44. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Maroon Creek Club PUD as proposed with the following conditions: -- 1. The two (2) proposed 1,000 gallon drywells shall be installed within five (5) feet of the approved development envelope in the general location that is represented on the grading and drainage plan that is attached as Exhibit "B". r_joÂ»c,1-&~-- date 6/11/05 Joycl Ohison, Community Development Deputy Director ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Grading and Drainage Plan and Drainage Report Exhibit C -- Referral Comments 2 .. EXHIBIT "A" Parcel ID No. 2735-112-09-043 Zone District: Rural Residential PUD Reviewed By: James Lindt Date: 3/10/03 Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: E~-The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. W The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. M The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. 6<<The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. Iv The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. ly The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. CJ'The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. 0 The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. w The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires ranting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements .. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER -- Â·- -Â·- 1 law 6TH. SUITE 200 P.O. Box 2 155 0 0 BOX 3088 ENGINEERS & suEVE-Â·0=3 GLENWOOD SPERINGS, CO 8 1 601 ASPJEN. CO 81612 CRESTED BUTTE. CO 8 1 224 970-945-1004 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX. 970-945-5948 Fx: 970-925-4157 0 970-349-5358 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 27,2003 yd.9 ..~9.~.I~,EJ~4;. TO: Dave Gibson, AIA 026.â‚¬AD 41..1. tk H ;A Gibson Architects FROM: David M. Kotz, P.E. ~ 29921 j NION 4 â‚¬-27-m,/ f RE: Maroon Creek Club, Lot 44> ular.....,.,..,~,4--: Drainaqe Review" h,VAL E N\Oi-27' SGM was retained by Gibson Architects through Robert Adams of Noble Design Studio (NDS) to review the drainage design proposed for Lot 44, Maroon Creek Club as shown on the NDS drawing #L-1 dated 02/12/2002. The primary purpose of thjs drajnage review was to ensure that the golf course tee areas would not be adversely affected by the proposed on-lot work. It is my opinion that the proposed work, with consideration of the items below, will pose minimal threat to downstream areas. Appropriate temporary erosion control measures need to be in place during construction. This review is based on SGM's previous work in master planning project drainage and on the general civil engineering practices we usually apply to residential drainage. My comments are as follows: 1. SGM's Master Plan drawings indicate that Pfister Drive will intercept drainage from the east. Our design drawings show the curb inlet and 18" CMP draining the cul-de-sac area north of the lot, but also show an 18" CMP cross culvert, which delivers flow to a swale constructed along the southern lot lines. The culvert and swale do not appear on Sheet L-1. I assume this drainage was routed further to the south. 2. Sheet L-1 shows an existing cobble swale that is called out to remain in place. Per Robert Adams, this swale is not fed by any cross culvert on Pfister Drive and is probably just an abandoned irrigation ditch. This swale will intercept flow from the narrow strip of land east of Pfister Drive and, from a drainage perspective, serves only to divert a small drainage area away frorn the house. A 12" driveway culvert will be adequate to convey flows from th js small area. I would recommend 18" of minimum cover over top of this pjpe, or encasing it in concrete or flowable fill. Originally, I was concerned about large amounts of runoff being conveyed towards the driveway, then possibly migrating in the subgrade gravels down towards the house. I am now less concerned because of the small drainage area, but the entrance to the culvert should be sealed with a barrier of on-sjte clays, rather than imported road base or screened rock. .. 4-1 February 27,2003 Mr. Dave Gibson Page 2 3. My drainage calculations indicate that runoff amounts from the paved areas and roof tops could exceed capacity of a 4" drain line if it were installed on a relatively flat slope of say 1%. I would Fecommend that the pipe draining the driveway trench drain around the north side of the building be increased to 8" in djarneter and installed on a slope of greater than 1Â°/o. The drain line around the south side should also be at least 6" in diameter and installed at a slope greater than 1%. To preclude the chance of any surface water runoff backing up into the foundation drain system, SGM recommends having a drywell dedicated for the foundation drain system and routing surface runoff and roof drainage to other areas. In some cases, the drywell could be installed such that an overflow (either out the rim or through a pipe) would be at an elevation lower than the foundation drain. This would prohibit water from backing up into the foundation drain, and combining flows at the drywell would be acceptable. 4. The drywells as shown on Sheet L-1 are, in my opinion, possibly too close to the foundation of the residence (although I have no information on bottom of footjng elevations). I spoke with Steve Pawlak of HP Geotech, who did the soils investigation on this lot. He indicated that the on-site soils were clayey in nature and that the drywells may not percolate at very high rates. Thus, an acceptable overflow path should be provided. Regarding placement of the dr-ywells, Steve indicated that a distance of '20 feet from the foundation would probably be sufficient. It is my opinion that HP Geotech should view the foundation excavation and they should look at the drywell placement while they are there. Based on available information, 1 believe the drywell overflows should be routed to join with the flow from the 18" CMP outlet draining the Pfister Drive cul-de-sac. Sheet L-1 does not show the outlet of this drainage north and east of Lot 44. The assumption would be that the flows from this culvert are properly handled through the golf course. The increase in runoff, due to construction of impervious areas on this lot, is inconsequential. 5. Finish grade contours should direct runoff away from the house in accordance with the recommendations of the sojls report. This will be difficult to do with the wall area east of the residence. The wall designer should include sufficient drainage behind the wall to the 4" drain as shown on Sheet L-1. Weep holes through the wall may be directed towards drain inlet locations. 6. Adequate precautions should be taken to prevent drain lines torn freezing. This will include installing lines below frost depth, say five feet, and heat taping segments of line dropping to that elevation. 7. The trench drains placed at the entry area shoujd be at least a few tenths below the garage and entry area. The trench drains should not be tied into the foundation drain system. .. 4-4 February 27,2003 Mr. Dave Gibson Page 3 8. The SGM drywell detail typically has a cast iron manhole access placed eccentrically on the lid, with steps down the side of the drywell, 9. The drainage swale ajong the southeast of the development envelope should be rerouted to coincide with the drywell overflow and direct flow northward to combine the cul-de-sac flows, if possjble. If the above items are implemented with consideration for on-site field conditions, I believe there is minimal chance that the proposed drainage design would adversely affect the golf course. Appropriate temporary erosion control measures need to be in place during construction. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. DMK lec/2003-125.001 CC: Robert Adams, ASLA, 19351 Highway 82 Carbondale CO 81623 ==J X-Sender: brianf@ comInons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:23:04 -0600 To: jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us From: Brian Flynn <brianf@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Lot 44 Ce: aaronr@ci.aspen.co.us Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed James, quick note about Lot 44 in Maroon Creek PUD. I met with the builders and discussed the new location for the dry wells. After reviewing the plans for landscaping and locations of the dry wells Parks has concluded that this is an appropriate request for variance. Brian Flynn, Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) 03/11/2003 04:16 ~ZEkÂ¢15412 WODEHOU~T 44 PAGE E 03/04/2003 10:24 -9709209779 WODEHOUSE-BUILDERS PAGE 01 ./#*34*44*.0,2, WODEHOUSE BUILDERS 307, Unit L Aspen Alrport Business Center ASPEN, CO 61611 * (970) 920-0039 / fax: (970) 920-9779 / E-mail: aspenewodehouiebuiÂ·ders.corn 200 San Miguel River Dr., P.O. Box 3049, TELLURIDE, CO 151436 (870 728-3525 / FAX(970) 728.6-165 / E-rn,11' wb@wodehousebuilde s.corn Fax Cover Sheet DATE: 3- I l r 03 TIME. FAX#:_ 1*,A 10Â·. J ome_ A j, n<VÂ¥ FROM: /}liKe &) U) 04 knie RE: _26*vâ€¢ />fe /6 **1/'ht L CC: - Number of gages including cover sheet: 22 tt d dmie f I hope -thl l/ViLL 9.0-8,sify ~Â°ur nuf fa, 93 th f t) deep 1,0 14Â·1 Q'LA,we,14 -~- 4<*\â‚¬,W+ - t 11,7* 5 .. Al#, 17,2~4* t 3 79 5479 ...m. &3Â¥*t.. Brian Flynn. 09:57 AM ~2/2003 , Re. Lot 44 Page 1 of 1 Exh & 6 ,'1 9 y X-Sender: brianf@commons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed. 12 Mar 2003 09:57:46 -0600 To: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> From: Brian Flynn <brianf@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: Lot 44 Ce: aaronr@ci.aspen.co.us James, We reviewed the landscape plan for the property and feel it is an appropriate plan meeting all of the demands from the club and city. The species and locations of plantings are good with one point of caution. The plan calls for 3 Bristlecone Pines around the entrance of the driveway. We would encourage the applicant to consider keeping distance from the ROW in the event of over growth the City will be obligated to trim these trees depending on the future layout of the ROW. All in all the plan is acceptable. At 03:57 PM 3/11/03 -0700, you wrote: Thanks Brian. Just to clarify. are you alright with the proposed landscaping in addition to the dry wells? At 02:23 PM 03/11/2003 . you wrote: James. quick note about Lot 44 in Maroon Creek PUD. I met with the builders and discussed the new location for the dry wells. After reviewing the plans for landscaping and locations of the dry wells Parks has concluded that this is an appropriate request for variance. Brian Flynn, Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) Brian Flynn. Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> 03/17/2003 4) 5150 1.G Pt Yo i u 6-U- Ull- DRA/N /NLET GRA-1-~ BEUSED FOR ALL DA,w~ i-- COVERS. ' exhi b 4 9 58 .--I.-*.. I 8070 -----"-- 213.48 / 8060 , .. --7 66 66 5/ \ I \ , '. I. i I I \ -1 ' . . < \ a I 1 , \ Â¢ i ' \ 1 I I \\ 56 L 1 " l 1 \Il \ ~ , <v--\4 -~7534<~;t.-A "Dre EXÂ· FlA 1 -- W /J'-179%29 / 311 p\,de 54 /\,i 8070 2/ V i & 68 \ . 66\ ,/ , i y--Ii, 2 / i . % 4--- -7. 1 I I / % t _ze 1 -Pr / / / t , ~8060 i t / 16 ( 1 1 ) \ ---~ , 52 , / f 1 / / */ \ i , , #; /4~_--r-r~-r-. lii \ f i , , 1 i / / /0 1 ' 4. ' , + 1 r.. Â»-- STEPS FROM 4RACE , i, /// / 11--/-0 \ \t GRISE#ZATY *-. l,t - 49 ~ Â£ 5 71:64>3 AT 12~ W. TREAD /11, //1 2/1/r-/ i t ~ LP \ 1.1I;:6 % 1.1 1/ : \ ---1 r*Aue 1 j I ) r * , 1 1 / / ; GREAT ROOM , 1714 +1071.G / f 6 / 1 11 \1 ENTRY ' + 8075.0 \001 7 f :* .#2 5 1 ;:' . HOUSE V 6/ : 1 1 # â€¢ i J \Ill.1 G" DRAINL/NE, TYP. ,/ 1 f i /\ 1 1 / 4 175 1 / / BE 3 /f '1' \ 1 1 / 6" DRAIN INLEE ' 1 1 5 1/ -t WITH COVER. TyP. 1 , 1 : + \ 1 1 ?/ 1 t /2 % 43 MUDROOM PATH & t 1 1 ENCH DRAWS (4") WITH IRON COVERS \~8~r \ i 1 UE NTO EXTERIOR PRAINAGE SYSTEM 1 1 ..< i Y (1-0 PRy WELLS)- SETELEVATIONOFTOP 1\/ \\ 1 1 GRATE 2//ofhs (R.) BELOW DRM/EWAy SURFACE / 11 1 1/f V / 8.. i,\ 1 0 ti t I.1:il â‚¬ i i /; \ SPA 44/ q 39 '/ 1 6 h'% 11 1 1 1 14 \ ; 1 1 t 1 5 1 * / '. -4 '.4 10 5 OAL AMELANCH{ 10 5 GAL RtiUS TYPHL 333.48' --4-28301 \\\\ 40 A GAL PEROVSK/A, 1 1 ---9 1 \ \ FOR DETACLED PLANT(NG OF DK/VE,1 \ ~ SEE DETA/L LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEE \ \ I..-j 1 . 11 1 1 .. r- 1 5-14 \ \ \ GOLF COURSE EASEMENT AREA r -*-4 E CD ; CD CO M '41 : BI,4 Â£ I / 1 /41 /.r, ../ / PICEA ENCELMANNII (EN6LEMANN SPRUCE) 14.. ., 4:( /) /5 TO N FT. HEIGHT, TyPEAL 1 r , \JfÂ·K. / .01 j>11 PMEA ENGâ‚¬LMANNI (ENGLEMANN SPRUCE) ~~5*7~6 zo To 25 Fr. HE,OHT. TypiCAL 4>7 16/ / 71-4 / 71 ~-I . C 1... 1 r, 1 1 1 STONE WALL + 28" - 1, 11 1 ,Â·17\ i 74 NÂ« 1 .-Ip. .' . .- ././ )LF COURSE [--1 s,#/3/#O/I PUMP EQUA)MENT ~ ~ ST# il r - A POND *114& 1 4:36 - 4 Wil -ti;*Ad 1 .... â€ž .------I'Â£.,' 355.00' 3.1=:~- il#./f *-p --4 ,<. Jl.I 432.95' 9 -,U, WATERFALL ---~ LOW NAUVE DWAR GRASS SEED(NO SPRU b L /3/1-6 0, WD SPA AND POND PLAN VI Tee Box /1 11 \ ~ ov~~ 3 . 904 002 1 l . w 6 44.6 / ..1 u 0-93 to ' 44Â»9/ / PÂ»Lat-0.02 0 -T+rri-TriTn1111~~111111* NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 LOT 45 NAT<VE GRASS SEEDING WHERE D(STURBED, TYP. / i / 1 1 / TBM EN. Â·- 8080.46' ; h J / / Fnd PK & Washer , / F-- CK. FIR 1 j .-I.-I--Pll.-I--I- i -------T LOT 44 1 18' CMP ~ 42.21AE. ~ 10.84' ---Il.- - .... - / rfl,79 - n 1. ! EXfSTIN6 TREES V<\; NAUVE SHRUBS \ Brush line , EX, AR 0 \ ..0 " 36" ,Â«1- , D 2. \ P / I " 6 :1 ..Â¥99* 14â‚¬ 0 0 1 0. * D. JE 1< PIPT ' ---- 0 W . . \. 1 h 0 0771 L 0-'O 00 0 1 -0 1 '195 1 t STEPS LAWN \ / / i DRIVEWAY \ 1- TERÂ·RACEÂ· 1 / 1 6 REAr MOM : 4 ~ , 1 1 'trÂ»\ 1- 41 9 1 / la ENTRY / 1422- & . , \ + %015Â» 0, >(D . 7 1 \ \ 1 / HOUSE \ \ eA - / 7, \\\ 0- \ 1. 1// . . T F\ / \ FLAGSTONE FIELD 6 1 1 ~ G' TRENCH â€¢ M 1 /-- / -*DRAINI WITH PARK/NO j . \ It.44--3 1 1/1 2 IRON COVER . $ j . GARAGE \ 1 TA ' / (43/ 1\ G FE WIPC FLAGSTONE; 4 NALMVAy 20 MUPROOM 1 ' j ~4 01\1 cv 30 -SLAB ~ ~ 0 1 j .AL "4/ LAWN %1 EX. FIR ~ i l UNDISTURBED ,/N\ \ \ SPA . ! F . Â· Â« Tee Box . 07\ 1 )114-- 3- 0 + 0 /// - pot - e*,NU, 42Â· 2*-4 Â¥ , c .4 j f\Â«/ . 4. XÂ«, 1 vi J 43Â« : \4~01 1'=Mat..L#Â»X FJ 1 -/. Â¥ 'AL,F' c--1 : DEV. EN ~ #X U-\DYUUBBED je< 14, ) i /6 . ffi * AREA . . i// 447 -*.- / ......--- . ---Â» 41 0 61*-- -- / PMEA ENOELMANNU (ENOLEMANN SPRUCE) /2 TO /5 Fr. HEiGHT, TyPICAL (5 TOTAL /N TH/S AREA) 41(3 8 CKJ PONDAND SPA -SEE DETAIL WEW ON'TH/S PLAN i Â· 7 4~' 1 0 1 LOT 43 Uft 0 /1 ~h,4Lr~ MAR-05-2003 WED 05:25~WINDRIVER TREES FAX 1\~709839833 P, 01 f_ Il NOBLE DESIGN STUDIO 3 44* +- -932 379 :-94 T f / To: fm 1 *E- FED 19=4.\AA)~ ~ COMPANY: COODE:1* l)%â‚¬- (Boll.,DEFD FAX #: 44-4 627 1 1 DATE: AUU+ 51 2Â£70 37 5 : 390 FROM: -12064 4- ip 149 TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER: fb SUBJECT: bor 44 AtiA /0-DÂ¥*EFLÂ» E-eV leâ‚¬D DR>(tdal_- LocÂ«oue . A-0 K- 24 -DAVE KeTZ-- 4 *j? 6â‚¬29 TE+ ~4[295 'PA<tu LAK-- 9 4 5-- 10â‚¬1 bÂ«'Â£70 47â‚¬â€¢2 *pcar 4Â·k)*<Uab Â¥-vUU'LÂ» ek) ~-Po~u L]*,CL< *IDâ‚¬37 07 731)+ 7)MY,cHRA-ER 92112~-_ 8 - PLEASE CALL (970) 963-0744 OR (970) 963-7027 WITH TRANSMITTAL PROBLEMS. HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 - PH 970.963.7027 â€¢ FAX 970.983.9( -1 / , I W --1 , / 1 % 1 . :~,, ebAsh '26 , , - 11 56 SWN-Â£ TD iNTERCEPT # 1 1 2. SURFACE RUNOFF CL- ' r 0 .. 1/ i; #64/z#(~-Liia,, % 7<rib=OWL - 3- â€ž 1/\_,JA_-g -11" 1 \ E ( Ex. AR i )~ 1, % 1 K L /- -- 1000 6ALL-ON DRYWELL 36~ ,/, ~ ' , */,0//re.L 681 ~ 8 OVERFLOW TIES INTO EXISTING / \ % / V=ID-n - ' HANDLES FOUNDATION DRAIN DNL 8070 * !8" 0.17' Fleet :1'L DE SAL / , \ ' 86&0 ; ! 52 1 1 <. , 11 f , ' , / . f . J I . 1 1,6. I , i , / 1. 1, I . / 1 J 1 f ' 0 , SWALE TD INTERCEPT- ' -n ' % / 1 66, SURFACE RUNOFF ; : ' /1 . 1 1 ' ' / , 1 J / , I 1 ' STEPS FROM Te?BRACE ; '' ''' / I. 1 t / , I i I GRISERS ATTRT. Â¢, C ~ 1 5 TRE'iDS AT 72~ W. TREAD , 4 w 4 -1 TO 9Â£Â£ 1 IL ; GREAT ROOM â€¢fon 4 1 , f 3 1 1000 6ALI_6N DRYWELL /11 / +07/.6 : , , HANDLES GUTTER DRA/NS, Â«-J / , /1 ONTRy \ix i LANDSLAPE DRAINS, SMALL . sa?50 , 1 POND AND SPA DRAIN 1 I \ 1:1 0 0 , U , 1 lili,I HOUSE , p ) 1 il 2/. 1 11 ~-BE i F L V DRAJNLINg, Typ, 1 > . \ 1% f 1 11 6- DRAIN INULT, ' 1 1 1 1 1/ f 5.0 RAGE MUDROOM PATH 1/ 1 - TRENCH DRAINS 00 WITH IRON LOVERB , 1/. 6 1, % 1 - TIE INTO EXTERLOR DRAINAOâ‚¬ SYSTEM ' , *5 0-0 DRY WELLS) / 4 \11 1 1 1 / 1 r Â· / \ rFFA , '1 1 41 .'' ~ r' 1 U 1 SPA '4 1\ ' ../. 1 1 11 MAR-05-2003 WED 05:25 PM W~IVER TREES FAX NO, 9~9833 1 . 0 -- . 0 GRAVELAND FILL ABOVE TOP MANHOLE TOP TO ALLOW FOR LADDER ACCESS I'll=fil]*Ft=IHI=Ill E '11'01-1,1. trk/*AbBSNAIRK- 92 Â° C 1 TO 1 -1/2" WEEPHOLES FOUNDATION DRAIN INLET C ($ET BELOW ELEVATION. / 1-4 , OF FOUNDATION DRAIN Â«~ TO INSURE PROPER (93*2 /2" CULVERT FPE UNDER DRNEWAY DRAINAGE) 19~ O 0 0.. O Wl TH M/N. 18" ALL BETWEEN TOP OFPIPE AND CONCRETE DRNEWAy SURFACC DRA/NLINE NOTES 1953* 0.0 -0 0 4- FOR RVE FT. OUT FROM hNFLOW AND OUTFLOW i OF PNE, COMPACT (TO Â¥5%) ENTRY AND ENTRY ZONES OF 0 SLOPE ALL EXTER fOR DRAIN LINES M/N. 1-//2 PERCENT 06) 0 0 0 0 121 9'-4" PfPE Wfl-H ON-SfTE CLAYS AND THEN UNE SURFACES EDGES WfTH ON-SITE COBBLE TO ALLOW FOR POSITf VE PRAINAGE TO PRYWELL 2) SET ALL EXTERfOR LANDSCAPE DRAIN PIPES A MIN<MUM -O 0 0 0 OF 40" BELOW F/N#SH SURFACE (BELOW FROST LiNE) 3) usE HEAT TAPE FROM TOP OF DRAIN CNLETS DOWN TO 1.i O- 0 0.0 -- 1-12' SCREENED ROCK Fnd #5 Rebar and Plastic Cap . ~ FROST UNE D.EPTH (48") Marked L.S. 20133 /k / I ' *1 4) SDR 24 PIPE To BEUTfLIZED FOR DRANNLiNES, BLACK --r Â· I % DRAN\1 /NLET GRATES TO BE USED FOR ALL DRANW UNLET Â«Â» O<0-0 0 W'10604*Ed:~ COVERS. 33349----- T M Elv. - 8080.46' h LOT 45 0 0 0.0 t * ryxrk.Â£- - 120.00 nd PK & Washer -4 0 br O \10 -*--n~-~ 1. \ .4 l \ 1. 4*Ry - b 1 .1 Â£ . v 1 j / t 1 -* \ \4'-0. \ CÂ» ~ " , 58 -------I- LOT 44 76 / 8060 i ..--Â·- 178 8070 i. . 1%83,0 1Â» 1 1 2.22/\C. 213.48' B 74 , 0r l \ 1 1000 GALLON '; WI i / 65~ 66 _...64---627 3 \ CAPACITY TANK 11 18Â» CMP \ i / \ 1 \0 \\ 3 FT.H,4 FT. W CONCRETE RINGS Frid#5 Re - and PIEelic Cap 2 ed L.52083 \ t \,1 477 4 ' h SURFACE RUNOFF 56 SWALE TO iNTERCEPT CONC. BASE , '070-6, 1 , 1/ ' % ' I -Al 95% COMPACTED ROAD BASE AT BOTTOM 0 \ li , .fâ‚¬RAÂ·Â«r..V \U / \ \ , 1 EX, 13'F \ 1000 GALLON DRYWELL 1 '. S / : \ 36" ; , 1-=Bow. : HANDLES FOUNDAnON DRAIN ONLY 0/ 1 % 1 ' " ~ 8670 0~ 1 t~/ - OVERFLOW TIES PROPOSED DKYWELL DETAIL , 66\ 1 / '/ SWALE AS /NDEATED 75 74 \ \ , 1 , ' - .----- / - DRYWELL TO BE SET AT A t-, * 79 ' 1 L-- 1 1 % t , i' .'' '-f:% 1 . / DEPTH BELOW FOUNDATION DRAN ' 40 90 3 / \ U- --- 52 / TO ALLOW FOR POSfTIVE FLOW . 1 \ 1 , / FROM FOUNDATION DRA/N INTO *76- j ' / i 1 '0 // 0/ 40 / 'f 1 \ /: J i. 0 .,%.~ 1/ / N ~ 1 7 / I EXISTTN6 401524Â£ SNALE 76 ' m REMAIN : V ' 4\ \ 66~ 1 6 1 7 / / ' SWALE TO INTERCEPT 4 4 1 , , 111 5 SURFACE RUNOFF / Tee Bo 5 PRIVEWAY EDGE / 1 \ 1 STEPS FROM 7-*RACE ; , 1, 1 11 1 :.:E \' ~ ~ G Rm##S AT f Pfr. j PRAIN INLET (G') TyP., i ),, 1 .25:. \ 1 5 TREAPS AT 12~ W, TEâ‚¬Ap /' 1000 GALLON DRYWELL i ..' i \1 1 , , 1 1 \ 1 2-7 HANDLES GUTTER PRAINS, 1 il / 1 f' WRAPPED DRAIN 4'14 --$1 1-*BiÂ¥iCE , ' LANDSCAPE DRAINS, SMALL ' 944. PERFORATEVADS ~f / '1 +A?j ' // //t t///- 1 1 / , I--I DRA/EWAy GREAT ROOM -lw-4 .t, 1 1 PIPE MTH"Dy.tiN- ./ON.G / 64*RD) BCÂ¢liND WALL 1 -* \ 3 4 - '' ENTRY ' ' - OVERFLOW TIES PROPOSED ~ 0, 0< < DE < < DRYWELL TO BE SET ATA Fn Poss le Buried Corner \ â‚¬ A ,Â«.l/4 PONDAND SPA DRA/N IZETALMIN6 WALL , 0 SWALE AS NDMATED 5-1/Â£ Fr. M. MAX / 1 1 '\ 4 '1 DEPTH BELOW FOUNDAT/ON DRACN 1 ./ A O SEE DETAILON,/' 3 SHEET L-4 ,2 5 1 1 ''1 'p k , 1 ~ TO ALLOW FOR POSIT/VE FLOW 1 --1 1 ~. - - ~ FROM FOUNPANON DRA/N CNTO 1 /3 Â£ # , / 1 G' PRAINUNE, TYP. 2 ~ Q'/ 1 1./ 14 6 1 , BE , , Ln 1 1 ,/ DRYWELL Rock Wall 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 , Â· \, PARKIN61 1 \ - l ~4 4 13-- Nath .1 A # X +Al(DE MUPROOM PATH 1 1 11.. WITHÂ£:OVER. lyp % p ' '1 ' 1 V 4\ 6 I f 8090.-- -~_ / ,1 4Â»\.1 l~, TRENCH DRAING Â¢40) MTH (RON COVERS \g~gpa f ; /4. / 1 1: , t - 716 0\ITO EXTER<OR DRAINA66 SYSTEM 1 1 ( ' " 1 TV, sois.2554 (rD DRy WELLS) - *TEUEVATION OFTOP 3 1 *irp 6RATE 2/loths (0.) BELOWDRIWWAy SURFACE / ~i~ '' ~1~ " ' Fncl #5 Rebar and PIastic Cap ' EXISTiNG ---- 4~I / 0 Rock Lined ~ \1 <) EK. FIR {/ 1,4 / / 1 ''/ / t.rl //-1 --- Marked L.S. 20133 , h 0 1 I 2\ 1 \ SPA 0 / m\ / 1 14 1 ---- . 1 ' 1 , 4Â· i It ' Ditch , \ 1 5 1, % ) I lÂ¢LA- \ 1\ 1 ~ ~y90-1 *.1/2(1--- .. 1 / --- , 1 1 4. 1 \ I 2 0 1 1 P / N. , l , b --- 1 , ..4,5. - 3 0 4 f / Tee Box / \090 Â£ 1 -ze.-- < -- e , f \ \/ \ 211 11 $ \.87 ' CE. -=2 1==repit O 8 1 8\ / 1 1 . 4 f i \ >i 432.95' 11 , \ Â»f - \'. \ \ 1 ~ 1 \ I \1 k-- i - 0- DRANLINE. Typ. h , #11 # ' 'I. \11 1 - 0" Avc : 5 11 1 \4 0 - / < ///4/1/7 /. 2 1-- 1, \11 1 555.09 / C 11 % 94----7 , ' 0 4.11 1 / / , 'll , --/ ~ ~It ~ ---Â·--7 1 All i /% ' "P". ~ DEV. ENVELOFF 11Â· : 4 i ..0 \ 1 , \ , - \ \\11 % 1,% 1 \,W.1. 1. 1 , 1 , ' \ --,--1 .\ I 1 '' , ~ I 1..\. ''' 4, t , 1 \ C \ T 8090 \ \\ 86 84 82 8880 1 'C '' 62 8060 68 1 \---I--\ , \ 0 --# 74 1 . % --- 7 5 ' . 78 . --- 94 92 g 76 , O I ''64, \. 66 1 \ \ 68 m 8 8070 9, b ' 72 2, 0 9.1 Â«904 NORTH --r- GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 43 20 0 10 20 40 80 ( 1N FEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. - 0 in. REVISIONS El FFEL PROPERTIES DESIGN RA PROJ. NO. 02.2.2002 DESCRIPTION ' DATE APPROVED RA NO. DRAWN ' CHECKED GRAPING AND DKA/NA66 PLAN LOT 44 MARDON CREEK CLUB NOBLE DES,GA STUOf.O FLD.BK.NO. SHT 1 OF 5 SHEETS ASPEN, COLORADO 6/4// ile ( PAGE I, I . ~ ATLAS DWG. NO. 0 0 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 0 0 . . . 0 â‚¬0-Â£0-Â£0 GRAVEL AND FILL ABOVE TOP MANHOLE TOP TO ALLOW T// -1|||-1 - 11-lili=ILU=::mil1..........1 .... / FOR LADDER ACCESS 1111=1[1]*11-[12[8*11 112 111141,1- 1 TO 1 -12' WEEPHOLES FOUNDATION DRAIN INLET C ($ET BELOW ELEVATION. - OF FOUNDATION DRAIN ~o o o o ,,4 64: TO INSURE PROPER R- A-- /2" CULVERTPA>EUNDER DRIVEWAY DRAINAGE) M:%80 0 0 40 'LE Wn-H M#\1. 38" FILL BETWEEN TOP OFPMPE I* 0000 a AND CONCRETE DRIVEWAy SURFACE, DRAINLINE NOTES FOR F/VE Fr. OUT FROM WFLOW AND OUTFLOW OF PIPE, COMPACT GO 95%) ENTRy ANDENTRY ZONES OF O SLOPE ALL EXTER fOR DRAIN LINES MIN. /-//2 PERCENT (%) MPE WHH ONÂ«rE CLAYS AND THEN UNE SURFACES EDGES r *~ O 0 0 01/ ~ 91-4" WITH ON-SITE COBBLE 1/.-O 0 0 ON.W TO ALLOW FOR POSCTIVE PRANWAGE TO DRYWELL 2) SET ALL EXTER#OR LANDSCAPE DRAf N P/PES A MiN<MUM - -------- + OF 40" BELOW F/N/SH SURFACE (BELOW FROST UNE) 1-- -- 6-0-0 0 0 '52MldS- - 1-1/2' SCREENED ROCK Â·Â· 4 USE HEAT TAPE FROM TOP OF DRA/N /NLETS DOWN TO Fnd #5 Rebar and Plastic Cap . ~/ ' ~ FROST LINE DEPTH (48") Marked L.S. 20133 Â· 4 ./ \ r .4 J 4) SDR 24 MPE TO BEUTIL/ZED FOR DRAIN LINES, BLACK < 6 DRA/N /NLET GRATES TO BEUSED FOR ALL DRAIN iNLET O 0 - O 0 COVERS, reÂ» - I \ , I . T M Elv. - 8080,46' , LOT 45 0 0 0.0 120.00 O 4 01 Q nd PK & Washer I---I . .1 4. . \ i. Ct--- t , 1 4'-0" j CD k ' 58 LOT 44 8070 F / 8060 1 ----Â·-= 2.22AC. *4 / / CAPACITY TANK \ 0-b i \ 1 1000 GALLON N 78. CMP 68 66 _-64----62-- 1 ..R 1 1 il 1 . 1, I' 3 FT.H,4 FT. W CONCRETE RINGS 1 Frid#5 Reba and PkEÂ·lic Cap M ed LS20133 - -,4--T 1 , -i 11 \ f e. I & SWALE TO INTERCEPT CONC. BASE , Â£99â€ž ~ i ' SURFACE RUNOFF / /% 1 95Â°/*COMPACTED ROAD BASE ATBOTTOM // : 4 t) U \ 1 0 \ 0 I /1, %\ \ EX. B ' /000 GALLON DRYWELL /'I , % \ /1 \ :.03 S t 36" , O/ :1 HANDLES FOUNDAT/ON DRAIN ONLY i \ 1 - ~t 170 \< 54 / - OVERFLOW TIES PROPOSED DKyWELL DETAIL 1 / ,./ SWALS AS NDMATED 8 7974 68 - 66 , i / =I-- , , \' . , , e , \ \ 1 / - DRyWELL TO BE SET ATA / f. 1 7 \ r~-- L ~ ~,/ DEPTH BELOW FOUNDATION DRACN 1- , 060% , 6 -- 4 52 / TO ALLOW FOR POSfTIVE FLOW -- 1 1 , \. 1, .--- i ~ ~ ' '/ FROM FOUNDAT<ON DRA/N INTO \ '1\ i @1 / PRYWELL - \ 1 1 ' 1 i :243 / 1 1 & r ' \ .f' '' 10% 1 \ f i .% / f j i .' t 1 / 1 I ' EXISU,46 COBBLE: 59~ ' \ 1 ' / 1 , , 76,,9 TO REMAN :V e I i / 66* ' li/ SWALE TO INTtERCEPT Tee Bo 1 1 ...4 1,1.5 111 6 ; ' ~ ' ' ~ SURFACE RUNOFF , PRIVEWAY Â¢5065 t' \ , 1 STEPS FROM TMFRACE Ilit ?i ::4'. \' \ . 3 321 t' 1 PRA,N iNLET &') TyP. , i , )~ ~ 2% 1 ~ ~ GR~SCIASATY *T, , 1 1 ' 5 6 % 02~.4 , 5 7#6463 AT 1# W. TREAp - 000 GALLON DRYWELL 1... 1 ' 1 4 4 r j i ; /1//f :-- h HANDLES GUTTER DRAWS, O , 4'WRAPPEADRAIN' -, 56 -1 wmwg -4,~ 7 l.Â¢4" pERFORATEPADS & , /~ ~'S 4\9\ DRIVEWAY \ / --- GREAT ROOM 97,-(, JAWN ~ t ' ./ 401110 PIPE WiTH "DpAIN- '~ . t# \ju, 1 \ 1 j _ ~ ~ LANDSCAPE DRAINS, SMALL 8 Jk . ' 641<RD) 8,5Â¢1(ID WALL N y _ - ENTRY //it ~ / // POND AND SPA DRA/N % - OVERFLOW TIE~OPOSED I liN / 1 I. 44 4 i: . . 76: -,L J- Re.75.9 DE ~ ' SWALE AS /ND/64-19 RETAINING NALL --:,*,- , Xi ti , 1 - DRYWELL TO BM~T AT A Fn Possible Buried Corner 1% ' 9 L. .< Di// % 1~ i 5-1/2' Fr. HT. MAX / 5 , 1 HOUSE 9 11 / 4. 1 -SEE DETAiL ON/' ~ , \ V \ ' //1 1 DEPTH BELOW FOUNDA-NON DRArN \ 2/ ' \ 40?~%40- \ SHEET L-4 f' 1 2 \ TO ALLOW FOR POS/TfVE FLOW < < 1, PARKING,# 7<*1 \ \ 1 ; G" DRAINLINg, TyP. 0 ,/ ~ BE ~ ~, Â« 3 1 11 , FROM FOUNDATION DRAIN fNTO *tp \ Rock Wall DRyWELL U' DRAIN INLET â€¢ j . - 1 1 El ,/ TW 808&,1 /7 15.-- 1 WHH (01â‚¬R, Typ. 1,1 W Q /,It %(84 , ..1 GARAGE MUDROOM PATH ,/ 1 $ 1 ': 1/24 7. ~8'' 1 ~f 1 1 1 41 5, 1 1 /1, +8075.OCP 0- 1 ~> ' 'd ' 8090Â·---- 1 ~/ C /9 TRENCH DRAINS (4") WITH IRON COVERS 1 UPPER ~ 1 DECK - TIE WTO EXTER<OR PRAINA6E 61(STEM \ ri f . ~ 1 TW sole.25+ frop#y WEL.iLD)-SETELEVATIONOFTOP ~ ~ i / 6RATE 2/loths (f ) BELOW DRAâ‚¬WAy SURFAEI Fnd #5 Rebar and Plastic Cap EXIS-UNG --- -6~. 6 \/ \ i ~ Fl R i / ) /5 ? - /.1 1 Rock Lined \~T '0. Marked L.S. 20133 A, A \ 1 --* Ditch I h1 , ; A ~- i- 0 - 7 - \ SPA 46/ , A Il i ./:/-' / : p --. 1 1, 1 1 : 1 , \?4 \3Â»L// i 441 11 1 - 1 t' /\1 1 ~ f~ ~ Tee Box / b 1 P *-- , .3 Â¢ 4 92 m \63 i -\L , 3%3~ 1 1 - 1, I , '/.6 4 11 \ ---1-1 1 -- 1 1\\ 9 4% i -\--U / ; <61. 1 ~ -4.-0.-- .933 ' \ li~ 1 ,. // ' 9 / 1, -i---- - 355.OQ' 432.95' 1 \\ 91\ : \ X. C 7%0 Â»-19997 )\ t 111 \ / 11 ' \1~ 1 1,0" Plvc i '.- \ \1 1 . 11, le ... 1 \ 1 l 1 At . 1 1,1 %\ '34 i 3 \1 0 -L r 8" DKA(NUNE. Tye. 1 11 1 , ':' '' 1 1 / If 1 11 1 / 94 -- In , \11 i.. 1 . 1 /--7 1 6 : i---~â‚¬q.**0~--F , w \ -- Â£ / t '\ 111 ..~, \.. S 1\/--r , , , 7 , . ~ 1 \ \.' I ~ ~ ~ Tee Box T 1 11 \1 2 \ 11 1 . 1 , 1 , \\ , ~ 1 , '1 64 88 86 84 812 8060 68 / \ p M 8880 < < 5, --j~ --- -- , 9492 g \ ~.. 74 1 , 1 % 78 0 76 64 66% \ \ 68 es ' 8070 \ 72 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 43 20 0 10 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. - 0 in. REVISIONS EIFFEL PROPERTIES DESIGN RA DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED PROJ. NO. 02. 12.2002 No. DRAWN RA GRAPING AND DRA/NA66 PLAN LOT 44 MAROON CREEK CLUB NoeÂ« DESIGN STUDIO Â· ' L CHECKED SHT 1 OF 5 SHEETS FLD.BK.NO. PAGE ASPEN, COLORADO B/G// ATLAS DWG. NO. MARCH 2003 Common Area K 7.909- Â£0-EO-Â£0