HomeMy WebLinkAboutordinance.council.052-88
ORDINANCE NO. ~ c:L
(series of 1988)
AN ORDINANCE RE-ESTABLISHING THE LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
CHARGED BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 68 (SERIES OF 1985), TO THE EXTENT SAID ORDINANCE
IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE FEES AND PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED HEREIN
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has adopted a policy of
annually reviewing the Planning Office's land use application fee
structure to insure that it remains in line with the costs of
service provision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the current
fee structure for the processing of land use applications, which
is contained in Ordinance No. 68, Series of 1985, accurately
reflects the current costs of providing the necessary level of
services associated with the city's Code Administration function
and therefore desires to re-adopt said fees; and
WHEREAS, the various land use application which may be
submitted to the Planning Office, based on the newly adopted
provisions of the Aspen Land Use Regulations, can be categorized
into the following review processes:
I. GMP/Subdivision/PUD/SPA
1. conceptual Submission
2. Final Submission
II. SUbdivision/PUD/SPA
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Final Submission
III. All "Two Step" Applications
IV. All "One Step" Applications
V. Consent Agenda Items/All Staff Approvals
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office has determined the total cost
of the City's Code Administration function, which includes the
cost of processing land use applications, responding to routine
public inquiry, and initiating minor code amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a BASE FEE
should be established for each type of review process which, when
considered in relation to the number of applications expected
during the forthcoming year, will have the effect of offsetting
100 percent of the total cost of the Code Administration
function; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 67, Series of 1982, City
Council provided for ADDITIONAL BILLINGS to cover the additional
cost incurred by the ci ty when the processing of a land use
application by the Planning Office takes more time than is
covered in the base fee structure and desires to re-establish
said billings as set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
Engineering, Environmental Health and Housing Departments, as
land use referral agencies, should charge fees to offset the cost
of their review activity, which fee should be collected by the
Planning Office.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1
That the categories of review processes, base fees and Planning
Office average time requirements for the processing of land use
2
applications are established as follows:
Cateqorv
Planning Office
Hours
Base Fee
I. GMP/Subdivision/PUD/SPA
1.
2.
Conceptual Submission
Final Plat
20
12
$2,700.00
1,650.00
II. Subdivision/PUD/SPA
1. Conceptual Submission 14 $1,900.00
2. Final Plat 10 1,350.00
III. All "Two Step" Applications 11 $1,500.00
IV. All "One step" Applications 5 $ 700.00
V. Consent Agenda Items/All Staff Approvals
1. Minor 0-2 $ 50.00
2. Significant >2 100.00
VI. Referral Fees - Environmental Health or Housing
1.
2.
Minor Applications
Major Applications
2
5
$ 50.00
125.00
VII. Referral Fees - Engineering
1.
2.
Minor Applications
Major Applications
2
5
$ 80.00
200.00
section 2
That the Planning Office staff be required to keep an accurate
record of the actual time required for the processing of each
land use application by the Planning Office and that ADDITIONAL
BILLINGS will occur commensurate with the additional costs
incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the
Planning Office takes more time than is covered by the BASE FEE.
In the event the processing of an application by the Planning
3
Office takes less time than provided for in section 1, the
Planning Office shall refund the unused portion of the Base Fee.
section 3
That the following guidelines for the administration of the fee
structure hereinabove are established.
1. Fees charged for the processing of applications which fall
into more than one category will be cumulative; while the
fees charged for the processing of applications within the
same category will not be cumulative. In the event that the
fees which result from cumulation are found by the Planning
Office to be excessive in relation to the number of hours it
is anticipated to require to process the application, the
Planning Office may waive the cumulation requirement.
2. ADDITIONAL BILLINGS will be based solely on processing time
spent by members of the Planning Office in the processing of
an application.
3. ADDITIONAL BILLINGS will be computed at the rate of $85.00
per hour of additional Planning Office staff time required;
while refunds of unused hours will be made at the rate of
$135.00 per hour of time.
4. The Planning Office shall establish appropriate guidelines
for the collection of ADDITIONAL BILLINGS as required.
5.
This fee structure shall be reviewed annually as part of
City of Aspen's budget hearing process and should
adjustment be required, they shall be accomplished
Ordinance of City Council, to take effect on January 1.
the
any
by
6. The Planning Office shall identify, prior to or at the time
of submission of a land use application, whether the
application is to be referred to the Engineering,
Environmental Health and/or Housing Departments. The
Planning Office shall also identify whether the application
constitutes a minor or a major referral, based on the number
of hours which will be required to review the application,
and charge the applicant for each referral accordingly.
ADDITIONAL BILLINGS AND REFUNDS shall not apply to the
computation of referral fees.
Section 4
This Ordinance and the re-established fees set forth hereinabove
shall take effect on January 1, 1989.
4
Section 5
It is the intent of this Ordinance that the fees and procedures
set forth herein shall supersede the provisions of Ordinance No.
68 (Series of 1985).
Therefore, Ordinance No. 68 (series of
1985), is hereby repealed to the extent that it is inconsistent
with the provisions of this Ordinance.
section 6
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or
unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
Section 7 ~
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on thj~y1 at ,,~
5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by law by
the City Council of the City of Aspen on the~ day of
~
, 1988.
~ ~A--
William L. stirling, Mayor
ATTEST:
~o1~lerk
5
/9'~
FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this
~ ,1988.
ATTEST:
reso.fees
day of _
~~
William L. Stir ing, ~;or-
6