HomeMy WebLinkAboutordinance.council.019-90
.
,I
'.-
"
~'
,
"
~-
ORDINANCE NO. Jq
(Series of Imy--
AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "RE: 1990 WA'fER SYSTEM FIRE PROTECTION
RATE AND CHARGE REVISIONS"; AMENDING DIVISIONS 2 AND 3, ARTICLE
III OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: BY AMENDING SECTION 23-62 TO ESTABLISH A
CREDIT FOR CHARGES PREVIOUSLY PAID FOR WATER SERVICE CONNECTION;
AND AMENDING SECTION 23-58 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING UTILITY
INVESTMENT CHARGES; AND AMENDING SECTION 23-101 FOR THE PURPOSE
OF INCREASING THE RATES FOR FIRE PROTECTION
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Comprehensive Water
Management Plan to guide the improvement of its water system; and
WHEREAS, the City Councl.l established equivalent capacity
units (ECU) and utility investment charges (UIC), as the basl.s of
equitably apportioning the cost of the approximately $9.0 million
in improvements to the water system made pursuant to the Compre-
hensive Water Management Plan which were determined as necessary
to accommodate growth; and
WHEREAS, the City Council made provl.sions in the Compre-
hensive Water Management Plan and by Ordinance for eliminating
fees for the connection of employee housing onto the water system
of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires that those activl.ties
generating growth also create new employee housing units; and
WHEREAS, eliminating the utility investment charge for
connecting employee housing unl.ts onto the water system and
adJusting those charges for other users accordingly, wi~l fairly
and equitably accomplish the goals and objectives of the city
:-
.e
e
council wl.th regard to the development of the water system and
employee housing; and
WHEREAS, the resident senior citizens on fixed l.ncomes have
paid for water system improvements in the prior years, whl.ch
l.mprovements are capable of supportl.ng additional growth in the
future; and
WHEREAS, the City has established by Ordinance adjustments
and rebates of monthly water rates to resident senior citizens on
fixed incomes; and
WHEREAS, many homes and businesses within the city limits of
Aspen, Colorado, are being sUbstantially remodeled or entirely
removed and replaced by larger structures; and
WHEREAS, for structures which have been substantl.ally
remodeled or removed and rebuilt, monetary credit towards the
utility investment charges would be given only to the extent the
charge was actually paid by the landowners or the predecessor of
the landowner; and
WHEREAS, there is a necessity to establish an increase in
the existing level of utility investment charges; and
WHEREAS, there is a necessity to increase the rates charged
for fire protection service as the capital and operation cost of
this service is thl.rty percent (30%) of the entire cost of the
water systems.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
2
e
e
"e
section I
That Chapter 23, Article III, Division 3, section 23-62 of
the Municipal Code of the city of Aspen, Colorado, be and hereby
is amended by adding a new subsection 23-62(c) to read as fol-
lows:
"Sec. 23-62 (c) .
(c) In the calculatl.on of the utility Investment Charge to
be paid by the owner of residentl.al or commercl.al
structures which are to be substantl.ally remodeled or
rebuilt, the utility investment charge shall be the
charge determined in accordance with Section 23-58 for
the completed structure, minus the amount of any
connection or investment charges actually previously
paid by the landowner or the predecessor of the land-
owner for connection of water service to the existing
structure or structures on the property. Where struc-
tures are not substantially remodeled or rebuilt but
are merely renovated or less than substantl.ally
remodeled the utility investment charge shall be the
charge determined in accordance with section 23-58 for
a new connection having an ECU rating equal to the
difference between the new ECU rating of the structure
and the former ECU rating of the structure; provided,
however, that new water conserving devl.ces are
installed in the structure which meet the City stan-
dards for new water using devices.
(I)
'Substantial remodel' shall be defined as the
increase by fifty percent (50%) in the water uSl.ng
capacity of new watE!r using devices or fixtures
installed on a property, as measured by the ECU
rating of the existing and proposed structure(s).
(2)
'Rebuilt' shall be defined as the removal and
total reconstruction of a structure on a parti-
cular piece of property.
The calculation for the credit to be given for
property on which the structures are substantl.ally
remodeled or rebuilt shall take into account the
amount actually paid for utility investment
charges, EQR charges, connection charges, system
development charges, tap fees and plant investment
fees in the records as maintained by the city. If
(3)
3
'e
no such records are maintained or it is impossible
to determine the credit to be given, the credit
shall be as calculated by the Director of the
Water Department of the city, taking into account
the following in addition to other criteria deemed
relevant:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
:e i.
(4)
a
.
Size of the water main servicing the area;
size of the service line to the property;
size of the meter installed;
Age and use of the building;
Date of original connection to the City water
service.
History of fixture installations and
upgrades;
Fees charged to similarly situated customers;
Any verifiable and relevant records of the
applicant;
Consideration other than money (e.g., water
system upgrades, easements or water rights)
given to the city in exchange for the charge
for tap connection or net benefit to the
water system; and
j. Unamortized capital expended for improvements
to the system since the date of connection
which has not been recovered by the water
rates paid by the landowner.
In the event the landowner disputes the amount of
credit to be given, he shall request and pay the
costs of arbitration of the issue by the Manager
of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District.
The conclusion of the arbitrator shall be final if
the land is located within the incorporated limits
of the city of Aspen. The City may decline to
connect water service, at its discretion, for
customers outside of the City of Aspen at the
credit established by the arbitrator."
4
'e
,e
Ie
section 2
That Chapter 23, Article III, Division 3, section 23-
101(a) (5) of the Municipal Code of the city of Aspen, Colorado,
be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
n(5) A fire protection charge of $1.24 per ECU per month
with a service area factor of 1.0, multiplied by the
applicable service area factor set forth in Section 23-
42 (b) ."
section 3
That Chapter 23, Article III, Division 2, section 23-58(a),
23-58(b), and 23-58(d) of the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen, Colorado, be and hereby is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 23-58 Utility Investment Charqes.
(a) The utility investment charge per each equivalent
capacity unit (ECU) for each service area shall be as
set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
(b) The total utility investment charge for a customer
shall be the customer's ECU rating multiplied by the
charge in paragraph (d).
(C) [Remains as currently se~ forth in Municipal COde.]
(d) utility investment charges are designed to cover the
additional cost of new facilities necessary to service
the growth projected by ~he Aspen/pitkin County Growth
Management policy Plan for the service area within
which the applicant's utility service is to be located.
For the purpose of utility investment charge computa-
tl.on the following fees shall be assessed per ECU:
Service Area
utility Investment
Charqes per ECU
Service Area I
Service Area 2
Servl.ce Area 3
Service Area 4
Service Area 5
3585.00
7390.00
9855.00
3810.00
4925.00
5
'e
e
'.
I
service Area 6
Service Area 7
Service Area 8
8060.00
4925.00
Reserved
The total utility investment charge shall be the
utill.ty investment charge per ECU multiplied by the
number of ECU points for the utility connection applied
for by the applicant."
section 4
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or
unconstl.tutional in a court of competent jurisdict~on, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and shall not affect the validity of the remainl.ng
portions thereof.
section 5
A pub
c hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the
~
~":;3-r 0(
day of ~
1990, in the city council
./
I
Chambers, Asp n City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by
th?JCit~_ Council of the city of Aspen on the ~ day of
U,:pu..t..J , 1990.
Mayor
ATTEST:
~a2;~ ~ k, ,
Kathryn sp!Kocn, city Clerk
6
.
Ie
e
e
FI~ALLY adopted,
f'/J{lL~
o
ATTEST:
passed and approved this //tt~, day of
~ k,,-
,city Clerk
"~~~
William L. stirYing, Mayor
7