The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20030709ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 9, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO NOON - SITE VISIT - 135 E. Cooper Ave. meet there. 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes - III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. Project Monitoring . VII. Staff comments: Certificates of No Negative Effect issued (Next resolution will be #16) VIII. OLD BUSINESS //r / A. 311 S. First - Minor Review - (continue publichearing to August 13, 2003) B. 470 N. Spring Street - Major Review - (continue public hearing to August 27,2003) 5:10 C. 114 Neale Ave. - Final - Public Hearing /0 /6 5:40 D. 320 W. Hallam - Final - Public HearingÂ¥ , 7 IX. NEW BUSINESS A. None X. WORKSESSIONS 6:10 A. 135 E. Cooper 6:40 B. Begin discussing annual awards .00 XI. ADJOURN PROJECT MONITORING Jeffrey Halferty 428 E. Hyman (former Sportstalker Store) 213 W. Bleeker (Schelling) 101 E. Hallam (Gorman), with Neill 216 E. Hallam (Frost/Auger), with Mike 735 W. Bleeker (Marcus), with Teresa 922 W. Hallam 110 W. Main (Hotel Aspen) 118 E. Cooper (Little Red Ski Haus) 432 W. Francis - Minor Neill Hirst 434 E. Main (Hills) 409 E. Hyman (New York Pizza building) 205 S. Third 101 E. Hallam (Gorman), with Jeffrey 635 W. Bleeker 110 E. Bleeker Mike Hoffman 950 Matchless Drive (Becker) 216 E. Hallam (Frost/Auger), with Jeffrey 513 W. Smuggler (Harman) 633 W. Main (Dart) 920 W. Hallam (Guthrie) 640 N. Third Teresa Melville 232 W. Main (Christmas Inn) 323 W. Hallam (Rispoli) 513 W. Bleeker 735 W. Bleeker (Marcus), with Jeffrey 515 Gillespie (Bone) 501 W. Main Street (Christiania Lodge) Valerie Alexander 216 E. Hallam (Frost) 533 W. Francis (Gibson) 232 W. Main (Christmas Inn) j 1 L}-\)0 \.Cat (AU Derek Skalko 135 W. Hopkins 302 E. Hopkins 501 W. Main Street (Christiania Lodge) j fl~ / 4Â£6~\Â« #-tct v 331 W. Bleeker LONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: HPC Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit o f notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staff presentation Applicant presentation Board Questions and Clarifications PH opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion /1.#/0/42-.,fRA/&6/2/Sifi MEMORANDUM .Â¢%*am.%4~~*.*t~~.il#.21 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie-Ann Woods, Community Development Director 06H A FROM: Katie Ertmer, Assistant Histoic Preservation Planner James Lindt, Community Development Planner RE: 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Lot 2- Major Development, (Final)- Public Hearing DATE: July 9,2003 SUMMARY: HPC granted Conceptual approval for the construction of a new home on this historic landmark lot split property at its regular meeting on April 23,2003. Because the entire site is designated on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures," the proposed building must receive HPC approval and must comply with the "City o f Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and the Land Use Code. This is an application for Major Development (Final.) APPLICANT: Henry and Lana Trettin, represented by William Sharples, ShoP Architects and Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-002. ADDRESS: 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-15A (Moderate Density Residential) MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's 1 conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Staff Finding: Final review focuses on selection of building materials, architectural details, and lighting. A list of the design guidelines relevant to Final Review is attached as "Exhibit B." At Conceptual approval-, HPC recognized that the topography of the site and location of the building were considerations when evaluating how the proposed structure fits with the context of the historic building. However, the property was created through the Historic Landmark Lot-Split process, which is a benefit for historic properties. Therefore, it is still , considered a landmark lot and HPC must evaluate the application as such. HPC must decide whether it meets the guidelines regarding new structures on lots created by landmark lot-splits and find compatibility with this particular historic resource. The discussion in Chapter 11 regarding new buildings states, "Rather than imitating older buildings, a new design should relate to the fundamental characteristics of the historic resources while also conveying the stylistic trends of today." The discussion also mentions ways to do this, which include "basic mass, form, and materials." While it was determined that the property' s location and. topography (which is located downhill from the historic resource) provide more flexibility with the massing and form, Staff finds that the new building should still relate to the fundamental characteristics of the historic resource. Staff finds that because the massing, shapes, and forms of the new building'are significantly dissimilar to the historic structure, the material palate should at least reflect some of the character of the historic miner's cottage. Staff finds that the use of horizontal, hardwood siding --~*Seii,ix j is appropriate and is complimentary to the horizontal . -Â· -Â·Â·~~ T-Â· 'Â·EP:-**Â·'â‚¬D27 Â·Â·Ul# clapboard siding on the historic structure. However, . Â· -Â·Â· -~33KES:139 Staff has concerns with the use of the weathered I.-.'.#I.*2Â£1'U....- Corten steel. mr/EggN=,3,1,11 ./.#.imp'W/&Mull 41/ ....Ami An example of this material from the applicant's ~ packet is shown here: imirMilixisiriFLillillivilililligmillima:kiN 2 The Gotten is to be applied to the roof and some wall surfaces as illustrated in the following elevations. (The proposed locations of the Corten are the darker shaded areas.) ,8,1& IME~,071Â·;EneD ..00. SCHEÂ·7!NRO. oveR VENTâ€¢l.ArION Wl, cE ---grE-L---r,-ESSÂ»m -t-t -4. =a.-=i=k=,~ tig,tj gu-0-n.No - --0.Â£-z~Â·CÂ«E-KIE rÂ·t. ~312.Â·Â·u~â‚¬1~ 263-4 26.SN i..: loW t IN....0 I.- r 1.1 604*3 h 111 ~l -1--, i: 0-i.1 :'434;,hy i. 11 1 1 -Al ..11 W...6.~.00 P'LAN~ING C,1 1~r 2}Jittl/~2.112: 4+4,--4-u-&Â·-424Â»(li~~44 144*3 -ARIMOOI.â€¢â€¢al LOOR SUBST*. Â·--/-- --r- & I = + - - . - .--- :---<.-- ''- --- ~--/. A 1 - I r _-1 \ ./.-78410./ 91 le 'tÂ·- O ' RETAIN~NGW~L Â·----7 64 7.2 lut & - il ' ' IÂ· VJM W-ri''J/.0~/:AA:a'tÂ·i, --~-Ir-J Â·--.~---2.~Â· 12~--~Â·~~.'-- -- - ' 1 0. 94 EMENTS*~UGH' .-/ .I 1 0 rl Â·1 214$.AUTY Â· 1 - CÂ©NCRETE 847' 9'.- c----1 NE ~----1 South Facing -~7,7-y7337...-:r~&~*A##Or -IF ' i. L. ~., ~Â»j~~ [2--7~ 'Git# I~~f,1 Mt.Â· '1-..1-I. tr:.u.Â·Â·i:-4-)1,6..Â· Â·' 1.1.!41..Ily- 1.1 .1- .... .-- p---:11 A- ---Â·.-1- :3--77 liBÂ·i.: :h:Â·.FALÂ·t :l ,Â·.Ll... Ld. Ld., Lul.; iN irr- A:.,tz::'- Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·, i [44*,3 --K= -i-EttR~:~~h~r-1 ~ .4'~'LLi '~L-6 S~'1E+I 1-11,-7.1~Â£3T~*56Jfi- ILE=---=-- *-*-=-~f Fa 0 -3-2--99-7 - 11 1 1 North Facing 14...Rene.â„¢2..Co...8.900, oveN ve=no~ e..Â«i .CE AND WATER SHIIEL' ON 31â€¢ goo ,â‚¬A,Di,ING - -- 6 -----Â· -~8'HAAO*000.-:HooN,*7 ~WAmING OVER HIGH TEMP SEL~ AOHEIVE *-1.7 -a 111!(17 ICE' 4 WATER alÂ«ELI AMO 14- PLYWCXXO i'Rif.-,':t-UÂ·~?~IÂ·Â·93>441- - -----~ ~ ~- -- - -5 1 - - ... . . - -- -- - SUBSTRIATE 1.Jl_c_Â¥ I -. --- mâ€¢ou CleARÂ· LOW IÂ· 1/SULA.O W4~ DOUBLE G.2, 0 .NICOW VW T. 44'06ACCO '4498 ' 0 40Â·-Utal I ,.. : - bift, 4%93..I- L.140.I' -- - ' 4 ' L_- 929 4 16 b 41 1 ~0-c=Â·EF-EFfb,Â· .1-- ... - -- i 4 - r- --1; 4=. --- West Facing (Neale St.) The following guidelines are.in question: 3 Irm 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. o Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. 1 Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. While the Corten will not have a shiny finish, Staff finds that the industrial nature of the rusted surface and the proposal to use it over such a large portion of the structure is inappropriate for a building on a landmark lot next to a small, finely detailed miner's cottage. The building will be part of the immediate context of the Victorian. (See elevation relationship of the view along Neale Street.) Staff finds that the mateial does not compliment the historic building and is quite distracting. Despite the character of the site there should be some relationship between the two buildings. Staff finds that other than the limited amount of horizontal wood siding, there is nothing that relates to the fundamental characteristics of the adjacent historic resource. Since materials must make this connection, an alternative to the rough appearance of the Corten steel should be considered and should be replaced with something more similar to the scale and finish of what is found on the historic cottage. Staff has concerns that allowing this project to go forward as proposed, without any relationship to the historic home, may set a precedent to disregard the guidelines for new structures on landmarked lot split properties on future projects. In terms of other Final review matters, the applicant has provided a lighting plan and pictures of the proposed light fixtures. Staff finds the locations of the lights and .light fixture styles to be acceptable. The applicant has also provided a landscaping plan, which includes what vegetation will have to be removed to allow for the construction of the residence. This is provided to HPC for information only. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed use of the Corten rusted steel is an inappropriate material and recommends continuing the hearing for a restudy. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to continue the hearing to (a date certain.)" (There is a prepared resolution attached if HPC wishes to support the proposal.) Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated July 9,2003 B. Relevant Design Guidelines C. Application 4 Exhibit B- Relevant Guidelines 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Lot 2, Guidelines Relevant to Final Review of the New House Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry . feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. o Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain builaing styles. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve* historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. o Retaining historic planting beds, landscape features and walkways is encouraged. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. o Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. o Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. o It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. Site Lighting 5 00 0 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features. o This includes the arrangement of trees, shrubs, plant beds, irrigation ditches and sidewalks in the public right-of-way. Building & Roof Forms 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. o Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. Materials 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. o Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. o Use of highly reflective materials is discouraged. Architectural Details 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. o These include windows, doors and porches. o Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. o o This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. , o Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 6 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE NEW HOUSE LOCATED AT 114 NEALE STREET/17 QUEEN STREET, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, LOT 2, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 2003 Parcel ID #: 2737-073-83-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Henry and Lana Trettin, represented by William Sharples, ShoP Architect and Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects, have requested Major Development approval (Final) and Variances from the Residential Design Standards for the new hguse located at 114 Neale Streeâ‚¬17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review; and WHEREAS, for Final Major. Development Review, the HPC. must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the proj6ct's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. per Section 26.415.070.D.4.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Katie Ertmer, Assistant Historic Preservation Planner, in her staff report dated July 9,2003 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be continued for further review; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on July 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application after a duly. noticed, public hearing, took testimony, found the application to meet the pertinent standards, and approved with conditions the application by a vote of to THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves Major Development (Final) for the new house located at 114 Neale Street/17 Queen Street, Historic Landmark Lot-Split, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, with the following conditions, finding that the review standards are met: 46q jÂ»- Lu All /1'etasc.~&,4 -,U--~24;~j l. HPC staft and monitor must approve the type and location of al exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 2. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 3. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 4. ~Â·The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this proj ect. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building pennit. 6. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 1 Q r~,u- ll- 67 66<~ Aoled f~ 7.. The applicant will pave Queen Street in front- of their property to a width of ~â‚¬. twelve (12) feet, to be measured from the center of the right-of-way and-provide a stabilized gravel shoulder. l1jt i _ *) i nets 8. The applicant shall submit a plan for the driveway line of sight improvements to approved be approved by the City Engineer. The curb cut is to be constructed to the City of + 1 Aspen's Engineering Standards. 9. The applicant will correct the location of the handicap ramp on the corner Neale and Queen Streets if the City Engineer determines it necessary. 1 v - 4-~atii.,~ L~4.- l.-Â«.alz>,e<-- M#tu Â·4&#----0~ /k..a-45&*Â·-- APPROVED'BY THE COMMISSION at fts regmar meeting on'~e 9th day of July, ~ 2003. 4 - Â· EFE Ger -29% i L)&6-4 L.L Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk SHoP ARCHITECTS LIST OF DRAWINGS 2UL] LAmr 3/TH STAEET NO. 2 NEWYOQK,NYMM P. 212.889.90/5 A000 TITLE SHEET 2. 212.869.3886 EMAIL~ STLIDIOâ‚¬~SHOPARC.COM A097 SITE PLAN A098 FOUNDATION PLAN Amcilirr:cÂ·, oF Accom.: RIED ARCHITECTS A099 FOUNDATION DETAILS A100 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN PO 80x 1 aul 41 2 NORTH MILL ....Er As/EN, 00 81/12 A101 GROUND FLOOR PLAN PM. 97[3.920.9225 IX. 970 920 7723 A102 SECOND FLOOR PLAN EMAIL IKR~ 120 f-. N Er A103 EXTERIOR PATH LIGHTING & ROOF PLAN A104 EXTERIOR LIGHTING & REFLECTED CEILING PLAN .......... E..1.... BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC All0 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Alll EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS 1.5 CHAMIER' STIEET, FL. 3 NEW YORIC, NY 1UUL}7 P. 212 2114 2025 rx. 212.334.5528 A120 TRANSVERSE SECTION A121 SITE SECTION ./.11/NICAL ENGINCCI RADER ENGINEERING, INC. 4U69I ....WAY 6 ./,TE /1 ..... CO .162. PH. 97..845.791. rx. 9'/[J.E,45. '/b22 Â£~LIC. AgE n 1[ PQOPERTY OF 'rHE ARC,I,TECr. Til[ ARCI,IltcT'-0 DIUW,~INGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND AEL,~TCD O/1-1/RS REVISIONS: NO. DATE DE'CRI/11Â¤N 6 e ff-//// +00 /e 7 0/011)TE 5 KEY P~: f Tit /0/ â‚¬ Â£> m a. Lone Pine Rd ~< Gibson Av No'.i â‚¬Le' r)16-0 26# 004 Â¥100 2// t <& 00 / .4 7 4 00 TRETTIN RESIDENCE 17 QUEEN STREET St- st 2 9.93 TRETTIN RESIDENCE ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 Smith St 0*0 puppy 0\0 -0 0 S 17 QUEEN STREET CUENT 0 6 iD ..5 0 G - 491,4 ' 40% ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 9- -1- 2 0 0 41 0 0< 4 8 2 4 Goo SCALE: 1/4" 7 1'-0 CHECKED av: DAXE. Or.25.03 DRAWN & ff-\---- 0-NG TIV 40 Â»6 â‚¬ 0;, TITLE SHEET 0 OAAWING NUNDEZA: ADOO â‚¬> A.cil./c' SHoP ARCHITECTS 20/ EAST 3714 STEET NO. 2 Â£ 1 11 M ~ NEW YORK, NY 1UU 16 kiNM STREET'. rx. 212.889.3686 EMAIL: Sru D,0~06,10,'Alac.COM R,0 W *I UNXNO-~ M. 212.889.900 ' - ./'I -t--I/.1. \Â».66.-CE'.A---14* 1 f U 4442<uÂ»41 RIED ARCHITECTS 41 2 NoRTH MÂ¢u. ST"ET MO BOX 1 au: AS'EN, CO .1612 PH. 9'/0.92..9225 '4Â«4494444Â« #>Â« rx. 9Â·/U.92U.'/723 -/ STNUCTURAL ENGINECA: /-6*F BURE] HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 9-2 #e-%* \ M'kbic=' 0'. 1:.~ ~\ 0 1 U. C......5 .......... 23 1 ~daff .CONF'2-T---91't , \ - ~~----._ NEW Yon:K, NY lOUUÂ·/ 1 Il d 'JI, 7 1 Fâ€¢,4.21 2.204.2125 r.. 212.334.5528 -'4* L. 4 i 2 5# l' C ):#1. - 7- , l.â€ž \. - -- - .EC~IANICAL ENGINEER: - IU -Â¢2%*MILE> --22 7 A RADER ENGINEERING, INC. - 5. 4[Jâ‚¬,90 tÂ·lIGHWAY 6 SUITE /1 \I Avtâ„¢. 00 8162[1 ~ ~.Â£ 141. 90/U.8345.Â·/alu r.. 970.845 7522 U ~ 1 "- /4 --------~ \ .. \-- T.,[ 1,1 1 -h.\ 1 1 / t\\\ \\\\ Alcit,TEcT's DRAw-Gra, Spccinc~noNS, AN' I.L,~TED --7 -- 4/~& \ D OCUMENT' AA [NOT TOOCUSE O " THE Ow.ER O. - -ry b \ \ Al OT/Els :\. .-h \\% \ \\\ 0 4 -, 10 REVISIONS: NO. DATE DEscallâ€¢TION 1 9 '- 9,1 1 I \JUR h 4 . \ U ir lfÂ«. . im==11 + or=l - I- :%44 --F'.34 - % 2 3 11\ 1 r * 9-- AL / 4/ 1 " i U %1. \ - Nolm 1 :12 -Â« .1..NZ------ -'!iliii~iÂ·}1!~il'i:~!' "'; ~.!: 11 Il -1 :Â·'4 Fr ? TRETTIN RESIDENCE 17 QUEEN STREET )11 U - ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 / 7911 1, - i 4- l.- - I . -3_7 222-6 - 1 11 , CUENT e f - / 1 - .cr :-----0., 7894 - -- I'\ 9 /11 . l \ ((t % -7897 // 1 \ k \\ h \-4 : \ r; 61*/ - .. DATE: ./.25.03 DRAWN E]Â¥: - O â€¢AVE-O 01*=Vâ€¢ pl.m-\ : SCALE: 1/1 8.- 1-0 CHECKED BY: Â»filitÂ«~.r.:.F~'JIT-:.. \ DRAWING TITLE: 09 .1.~.429*#*2*-'~.Rpm.- - &-i--X< 2005 Ir Fâ€¢AVDÂ·.INr SITE PLAN gUy EN STREET pÂ© W./ UNI/OWN D./wING NUM'El 0 10 25 50 A097 ET. ET. FT. - ./illu.... M.GEâ€¢,0â€¢C â€¢ ---- 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/11\ AA[:11,-rEcT: 0# ]11 1,\ SH/P ARCHITECTS ~ /1 I i i p i i :Ull [As' 17, M ST'Er-r N.. 2 r :' 1" 31 / NEW YORK. NY 10016 ... 212.8.9.9005 rx. 212.889.3686 1 // 1 EMAM-~ STUDIORSHOPARC.COM f -1,1.15 _7.915.117 -761-4' EXISTING-GRADE - - --] 1 1.0.W / TOW] 1 \ 4,1 2- - f f * i - 1 pi. 9'/LI.920.9225 RIED ARCHITECTS <2 I g ~ P. Elox 1 2]0 ".Ii. / 412 NORTH MILLSTREET ASPEN, 00 E31612 Ix. 97/.920.7723 7915.1/ fl ELAB ON GRA L (79[ls FINJSLÂ® . 7 L_ --lill --Ill - EURO HAPPOLO CONSULTIN[3 Â£6.*i UJ TYPE-(B)RL-1 milDETAL= . ST;aUCTURAL ENGINEER . UDIANT !1LAUNG INSLAB ~-1 4 ~ l' ..5,6* , ENGINEERS, PC 9 9.07.- Â« f / row I ... 212.3/4.2.2/ L 1 - 7-- J 54 1 105 .....Els .....& .... NEw Yor,KI NY 1 Ill.JU7 O ....12.3/4.5528 GRADE BEAM: RE, ER TO L~ 1 3,4 RADER ENGINEERING, INC. 7911:16' . 4UE,9O HIGHWAY 6 SUITE El -------- 9 R DRivI-WAY , 1 9 0/ r.. 97...45.7/22 4- 1 111'L RLI NI CONCRETI & SLABONORAbc:agos,IN SL* 4 - - I T.O.W 0 1- AVON. 00 81620 TYPL.(A}RE-HERIOULTAI. M -815.1 r ~ / pi. 970.845 7910 020/ ALL COUNNS ARE SET AT , 'j 51 71- \ TOP 01 CONCRETE WALLS ~ I u~.LESS OTIâ‚¬RVWISEL j ~ .=1 CASF IN PLACE 1 - 1 r -CAS' IN PLACE NOILD . -1 0 704) BLAM POCKET - - BEAM POCKET -=r 1 \ TOPOf CONCRETE-Â£18 r-T- 9, 1 /14/0/ DEAM Ill./.0 ALL COLL-NS '113 SCIT ' 1[_ .--~11 , IMLESS 'THERWISE Â· / CuÂ¢31, ARE niE PNE]FEI~T-r OF' 7}it *Ar-~+ITECT. TH' AACiliTICTS DRAWINGS. IP[CIFICA-11]NS. AND RELATED Â·Â·Â· 1, d L .+r N PLACE CONCRETES 'Ail .FER TODEIAL 11/A099 \// \ REVIES INS i. ... DATE DEÂ·scm,pno. -li. r o... N i i --CAS T IN PLACE -70/1 1 / 7912 \ BEAM POCKET I , 7994_16 ---1 1 1 '0. - \\.\ I . .48 r.55 L - 11/ 12 : 1 4 SLAB (Â»1 GRADE:*894' F IN SLAB> 4 16 \ \\ TYPE . 03) RL I LR TO DETAL f 7 0- 7 7 1 RADIAN[ }ILAIING IN SLAB Â«\Â«N\1 i li 'LA....... i. (790&Â·FIN. SCAB) 'Â£ ---- 1 1 1 |REFERT*la . i / i I~- ' - -. -Â·- ' I Â· TYPE-(B) - \~ OPENING F OR SKYLIGHT N,OVE T - 7910 -7 ~~Â« I --1- \ 1 / ? 1/ 1 -7909- 3 .1 PAOJECT ~Â· Z9~=16Â· L ~ - Â«4% 1 NOATH 7904.16Â· T O W-# 00- --- TRETTIN RESIDENCE 7 I -- --- 17 QUEEN STREET i -79(-,),3 | ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 N :LABONGRADE.(7904Â·,IN, SLAB} 4 --/.r 1YPEÂ·.REFC.100/1/L CAST IN PLACE CO STAIR REI LI~ _ ~. BAIM' HEAVING.INg-43 lo OLIAL. 11/Aollg - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1- t\\ Glu,SS: (7904Â· 1 IN.GRADE) 4 1 (D 1 f 1 OT FO R L -3 CONS-r~BICT*IN F* .-99 * T JLAOL f?21 31 1 1=- DATE: ./.25.03 DRAWN ./ MO (0 ID PURPOSES SCALE 1 /4" 1-0 C~ECKED BY: WWS i i .... 03) R. 1 L. 10 OCTAL DRAwING T, TLE: LAP POOL (7900Â· FIN SLAB) 4 FOUNDATION PLAN 79[14 lE . $ low . _fâ„¢Ual' ~~7 ~ TOW 1 - -2.%1 1 \ (POOL DITAILS'OBE D'[LIMINED) \ 3 \ 7907 1 / CO 1 Â«f ~ 0.- - - 7.0- 7Â®5 75Â· T OW \\\\ \ AO98 a Â»/ - 7906.75 1\0/ /900 1 1 Dll S 7 6'51 " 11VAA DNINIV13hl 4 Â»Â»2*NÂ«*633Â»33\ )IlliHINW, r r L. AACIi,TE[=7: SHoP ARCHITECTS NLT :It *T U CAST IN PLACE CONIETE 2/0 LAS' 371-H STREET No. 2 :1 NEW Yoll, NY lu.16 STAIR ,-- ./. 212.8.9.9/05 0 0 00 1 0 0 1 rx 212.889.3686 VERTICAL 'AR AI RETAINING C WALL PORT loNi Â¢#15. OC. VERTICAL BAR AT RCTAINING WALL- I - HORIZONTAL BAR A 1 VLRi ICALBARAI RETAININGV*L PORIION:#4@15-OC 00 O 0 RETAINING WALL Polr,(14 F'OR liON #4@15'CMC 05 @15Â· OC AACI,irUCT OF RECORD: MI,JIBARAT REIAINING WALL ~ PORTION #4*15-OC RIED ARCHITECTS HORIZONTALBARATTOP Â£ e HOR I ONTAL BAR A 1 Ra l'ING WALL 0 HORIZONTAL BIlli RETAINING WALL PORTION OF FOOT ING Â·mi . U 41 Z NORTH MILL STIEET in,â€ž,râ€žIALBARAT REI-NOWALL m -I -i- 1 0 -I'll"'Tk..... . i.[RTICALBARATIOWER.0/110/0/ 1 -c L=~~2 T.T T Â¢~12 0. 9 P.'11ON:.5 @15-OC PORTIONÂ·#5Â¢015'OC Po 80X 1 30: 1 ,/ ./.EN. CO .1612 4 a ... 970.92..9225 9 %1 21 4 0 VEjUICAL 8AR Al LOWL' PORTK,NOF b rx. 97..92[3.7Â·/23 VE R 1 ICAL BAR IT L OWER l'OR I ION { }I . 2 . 11 1- VERTICAL BAR #4 @12' O C i RETAININGWALL .@15Â·OC FOOING .@12-OC 00 0 0 R. AININGWALL :.@15-0.I Â· EMAILI V.'(d'Or.NET E.01 WAY 10 F ORM FOUND.JONAUk' - HORIZONTAL- BARAT TOP PORHONOF - 110,1/ONIAL BAR .1 1OP PORUION OF - HORION TAL BAR AT ICF PORTION 01 ./RIZONrALBAR #5Â¢017 100'NG:#6Â¢0170' FOO]ING:#6Â¢01.0/ FOOT ING .6 *1 r O C. i OC ST'UCTURAL EN'INCER . . . 1 . . .10, 00 3i BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ~ -HORIZONTAL-BARAI [OOTING Â·84 HORLZ~!IALBARA'+0011!4!Gz#4 . FORIZONIAL-8~AdFOOTING #4 C 0112- OCEACIi WAY TOI ORM ,-. - - - F.12 OCLAOIWAYrOFC- i ~~~,~12-OC E-HWAYTOFC)~ ENGINEERS, PC 4/ 1 OUNDATIONMAI r(JUNDAr IONUAT 41Â¥ E OUIDATION MAI - : I .1, 7 1 ..PE VE'TICAL DOWEIS #5 @ ./ - . _ OC 9 - -7 -- 6 -8-- -Bild O 0 1 U. CHAMBERS STREET, FL. 3 : I + I . . 9 NEW YoH. NY 1 UU.7 00 0 00 " 0 60 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 2_/ O HORLZONTAL BAR/1 ./. 212.Uu..2.25 . I 4-- _ ,~ FOOTING:Â¢2)#6 ./. 212 1/4.5/2/ 2'= , I ./ I 7. . 2/ 5Â·~â€¢ 1'6- MECIMMCAL INGINCOU RADER ENGINEEAING, INC. GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTESÂ· GENERAL- NOTES: GENERAL NOIES: 4/69. Hillwl' I Su,rE El GENE'IL NOTES PROVIDE VERTICALCONâ„¢CL JOINrS Al 25Â·OC -IROVUL VLRI ICAL CONTROL JOI/1 S Al 25-0 / -PROVIDE VERTICAL CONTROL JOINTS AT 25Â·OC -PROVUE VE RI ICAL CONTROL JOIN1 S AT 790 C PROVIDE VERTICAL CONâ„¢OL JOINTS A' 2yoc AVON. CO /1628[] Â·PROVIDE 1 /2- x 8- ~ICHOR BOLTS AT 16- O C PROVIOL 1/2-xer ANCHOR BO,-1 SA, 16-OC PROVIDE 1/2- x r AN.1012 'OUS AT 16- O C -PROVIoLly/8-ANCHOR801'SAI 16Â· OC M. 9Â·/LI.845.'/910 -PROVIDE 1/2- x 8~ ANCIÂ«JR 80LTS AT 16-0.C ALL REINFORCING BAR 10/AINTAIN 3~101/IMUMIC}VLR ALL RUNF ORCING BAR TO MAIMI AIN 3- MINNK- COVER -N L REINFORCING BAR YOU~JNTAN 3~ MIN.LNCOVLR -ALL RUNI ORCING BAR TO MAWTAIN W MIN.UM COVER rx. 9Â·/LJ.845.'/522 -AL REINFORCING BAR ~O MAINTAIN ' MIN/1-COVER gh RETAINING WALL TYPE CE) ~ RETAINING WALL TYPE (D) ~ RETAINING WALL TYPE (C) ('yj RETAINING WALL TYPE (B) 13 RETAINING WALL TYPE (A) ~..~,/ SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0' SCALE: 1/2 = 1'-0" \~ SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-(r ~ SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0' THE ARCHITECT'/ DAIWING' / PECI. C An ON S, AND 12ELATED Crl,CAS. #30OWELÂ¢*15~OC TYPICAL REVIS)53: AT,LITRANS[IONS NO. DATE DISCAIP.ON CONIÂ·ZETE SLAB , "BARAT 15- OC 1 ~2Â· EXPANSION JOINT %#'. 3LAB \4.&==1 1 - PROVIDE #4 DOWELS INIO - ./ASTER REINFORCEMEN' i\ CONCRETE SLAB ADJACENT CONCRL I L SIDE REI LR TO DETAL: 1014 .-- I en,40[ NAM Â· -\>; 64-7 1 WALL. BAR SIZE AND LOCATION I. 1 ~>44:5=b i 441[*DV,MIFABI~C - 10/0/ IOOTING TOALIGN 1.-EEXPANSION JOINT WfTH ADJACENT WALL #48,AR*6-OC F OOTINGS - HO~AINTAL ...,. 4- V,â€¢POR BARRIER - - HOR.ON'll/AR U OC - /6 @ 9-0/ ./ \1 1 1 - GRAVEL BASE Â·Â· - 22]Pu -- ~ ~ OMIT :..1-41 K[:Â¥ PLAN: FTiA: - 11 .-- - -Fl - 1 =VCI 9-9 -11Â¢~ dk= /0-- . -r------, fl Nom . L. .--. . . .4 PROJECT~ r. G....NOTES 1'7 ALL KIM-OACING BAR TO MAINrAIN N.IMN COVEJ~ BENER~.IKITES REFIRTD AACHTECTUU,L DETAIL 91Â·EET A77 FOR STAIR G[NER,L NOrES .SIONS nE,IR~0 AAC,~ITEC~~~R~ IX TA,1 S}*r'*T,FORm,la GENERI!,1 NOTES 01,1.13(maN. -ALL REIN FORCING BAR 1 0 MAIN 1 AIN 2- M IN .l- COVER ALL KINrORCING BAR& Miâ€¢,INT,NyMNIMNOOVE-F2 soIl TO e[ col,VACTED ILLL 1YPC (A) 5- UN~ILIN TH!â‚¬10[SS 171'E .. 5- -MUMJM//09Â«'2 GENERAL NOTES: -/I=HER TOARCH:ILI[URALIErAIL: SI IC. A?? fOR STAIR TYPE (B) 4-1},CK~SS T... [....n,C-** -ALL REINFORCING BAR 10.Allâ€¢n.~13Â·MIN.WAA D-ENSIONS, TRETTIN RESIDENCE /-1 GRADE BEAM SLAB CONSTRUCTION ~ TYP. REBAR CONFIG. ~ TYP. FOOTING AT PILASTER /-3 REBAR CONFIG. AT CONC. STAIR 17 QUEEN STREET ~.~ SCALEÂ· 3/4- = 1.-0" SCALE: 33/41 - 1-0" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'--0" ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 ~~...,/ SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-0" I 1 C.'ll' 1- --9 1 1 1 1 9 - LINE OF 1 0 1 1 OAT OMI OMIT WALL FOUNDATION NATE 9 -1 (+2T) - REINFORCING BAR #5@12- O C DATE~ 06.25.03 DRAWN BY: - #6 HORIZON'AL I #I '101112/NIAL BAR @ 9- OC .AR *9 0 C irLil.Im- | -FOOING 1/PIC.. | TYPICAL Lr- SCALE: AS NOTED Ci,ECKEO $ 1 REINFORCEMENT V.TH 90 d...END IYPICAL ev . ff IYPICAL ~ ..1./. FOUNDATION AND SITE r STRUCTURAL DETAILS - R + 7 1.1 .-.- VERTIC,0,1 .. . .. MWING NU-JEA ~,0R0Â»rrAL BARTTES . 6 â€¢ d @12' E-JALY S.Aan GENERAL NOTES: -Al I RFINFORr.ING'Al? TA ./INTAIN....I.CrM R AO99 ~ PILASTER: REBAR CONFIG. rit STEP FOOTING CONFIG. SCALE. 3/44' = 1'-0' - SCALE: 1/2 = 1'-0' 'AXIMUM 'EIGIT 1}-013: 1'~Pll//4 ANcilirrcT: 1\ 1 i \ 1 i \\t i 111 ~ \\\\ ./. 212.8/9.90/5 SHoP ARCHITECTS 1 4 \ N 2OU EAST :7/. STAEECT No. 2 N.w Y......10.16 1 ./.Ill./89./686 - 1///~ 1 EM.112 5TUDIC~SHOPARC.COM 1 1 \ l RIED ARCHITECTS AncHirccÂ·r o. .ccon.: | ~ 41 2 NORTH MILL ST"ET 20 A// i ~ 3 <1 2 li EMAIL: ./440.-In pO 8OX 1 :JU: - / Unt 2 ... A.PEN, CO .1612 ... 9Â·/0.9211.9225 _ _ ~ 0.970.9/U.'/*/2/ 1 1 1 1 \ XI BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING | ~ ENGINEERS, PC \ \ NEW Yoll, NY 1/Â¤07 Â£ r. 21....34 5528 I P. 212./.4.2/2/ CRAWL SPACE / ~ \ RADER ENGINEERING, INC. AVON, 00 81620 41]690 HIGHWAY E SUITE U I l | rx. 970-845.7522 FH. 970.6345 '791U 1 .0. 1 11 4431 / i )1 A./ MECHANICAL- DOCUMEZNTS ARC NOT TO OE USED THE OWNER OA A.Cill-TrCTS DAAWINGS, ....1,1...ONS, AND ./LATED 0Y rÂ· .J...7 r i (/, 1 on,EAs. Ina NTERTAINME A-22 4 1 \\\ i ~ZZE _ _ -1 i 1 11 1 \ -- 1 RE VI StroN/: / 1 1 -4 \ 1 / 1 -11,---9 -- 1 Â«Â«1 -,; NO. DATE DEGCRIF'nON /j LANDING .â€¢ - - .1 --4. 4 7904 , 1 1 11 - 1 1 01 1 l- 1 --411 1 - BASEMENT LEVEL ~ \0 I I %KEY PLAN: (1,240 sqft.) \.\---- -------- //IN\\ fÂ»f 1 1 ~ Â«- - -- --- -- - -% 8 #3 6 1 - 7910 -- . \ \ A \ il \ 1 f \ 1 3 \ 2 - - - 1 \ - No=TH - - . ~ /1909 - - 1 1 19 --- j (Wh -I _ - ---1 \ IT--7- fibl 1 11 1 Le-IA 11 1-- -7902% i 17 QUEEN STREET TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 /_21- '1'~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 744 1 EL 7904 GRASS COURT iOLIENT X..79('91 ~ \i u 06.25.[13 DRAWN ./: - 3 SCALE: 1 /4" 'LO" CnECKED ByÂ· - IOAAWING TITLC: BASEMENT PLAN ------ ------ 49 1\ ------- DAAWING NUMBEA: 1-F- i / -Nk- \\\\ A1OO 7901 C /3-f I IiI - 1 [ R.O.W WIDTH U 1 /--f P - --------- 1 11 1 It ---- 1907 4,2 412~------- --- -~0 --- 1 i 1 1 1/ 1 c 64 BOAE'*Lk / / 1 1 1 f /: - s 026151" 22.-1/31-_f--_62.C 9 / - , 0/ AN 0 . 1 <0 1 / 0 4 - 7-----_ - 0 \J / -- 50 2.0 0(XÂ© L / 1/ 1 \J / / 1 \, 1 - - g - / 1 i \\\ -----i / O0 00 1/ 2-3 1 l -3 - - I , 1 / - 1 m j ' 11 -/ PE r===- .... 1 & 29 0.-7 AIE~ , Z 6 5 Plo I /- 001 /. CD - ------ --- 3- i - - i / L / f-- 0 \4 -- 1 11 1 L 4 PI- OZ Â·---- --4 m 1 [ '1 D m> 3 0 m ENTEITA, I B -7 4 1 11 1- --1 -%= 1 -- m 14 - 8 -- 7-- -- - /--fr . - - 01 1 - ir--3 1/ 1 f \ 1*/1---2-0.-rfUL _1-LI-_ ~ 1 - 6 O 1 0 / 310-.Â·TUF~[~[~~ 1 1 /1\ f 1 \ i L. - - - /49 1 -1 4 5 ,/--/--hÂ»//---- N 3001700 E 1 64757 : . < - -11- --- 3 / //, 5/ 1 -I ,/ 2 1 7 7 2- SHED -WOOD RETAINING WALL-~~~ f / 1/ / f /0/// /// /// 1// f f f /4/.///Of //1 ///: /.// // /./ / , - 0 0 I m im ..00Â»01-1 Mm 9 F : U' 2 I 5 /6 8 % 5 =1/2!81:g: ZC : IE Z a:m:Ams 2:%& S ~ iliE Zo & ~ 22mat 0 0 : on 9 m Â·00 r * I TIP : :.agz & 3 Em' m D 99'to M KN r 0 + c = Z gza:94 UN. li :*1 -t~ 1 1 GR" 2 9 Z EmH N J 1 1-1 m Â« -1 - ~~ --BIO - . m - r- / ------------ U Â¥ 2250 ~ 4 0 8 3 91 g m CCEd -1 9 . C.Z < Z :90+199 O 1/R:42 0 .VE, 0 E% AT-21 n 0 ij~~ I -- im 7 M 0 t @&2' 81 65: : 4 0 6-:*22% 0 W E : In , 0 -1 I 6/00.2 I R - g QUI 0 -:C : z m g jÂ»9}56 c 2 li Jug .O 000 r 0 0 01/=-1 Z C :2MPd: 3 N 1 m mii,In z Â·00*ZÂ· 5 0 Z i Â».7 #21(/1 EL. 7905.16 GARAGE l06X Â¥,tÂ»Â«lm. BEDROOM 'URPITY.O M(M)N~A 10Od 1706l. 13 BEDROOM 219 dn p.11 SN#kIC lIZ Z j, LOLV lkIROO SSVME) ZL9L8 OOV80100 'NE}dSV 1 97/ I 1 1/1 U[/ 1 10 k \ \ \ i 11'F W ARCHITECT: \ \11 \19 SHoP ARCHITECTS Â£7 5' ke \ \ r~ , :dUL.1 E-AsT 37TH SmÂ£Â£Â·r No. 2 NEW Yol l. NY 1 U. 1 6 \ 1 PROPOSED k \ / / 1 j 11 ./. 212.8/9.9//5 ~ ~\ WOOD PLATFORM rx. 212.889.3686 :/1,111'1 1 \ \ \ 1 -11 / 1 1 //' li <.1 1 1 \ RIED ARCHITECTS | - 1 ' .Acilirt,=r OF R[:come: R 1 ' 2 821 -3 1-- Â»39 -7 1 I 4 P- 8-1 3-3 41 2 No/r. MILL STNEET 15'-6' 29 I .......0 81612 . 1 (Err ' 1' \ r.... 990.920.9225 / i u. 9Â·/..92/.7/23 \ EMAIL- VK'(&'OF.NET 4// 1 KITCHEN 1 BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 0,00 - 1 U 5 C HAMBERS STQEET, FL. I 1 ...E v 0 m *0 10 = /0 1 NEW YORK, NY 1 [JUU'I ./. 21 2 ./4 2 U 2b 1 \O Px. Ell.:314.55261 LANDING 1 4 RADER ENGINEERING, INC. 1 1 1 li 6 rx. 9'/LI./45.7522 E - ' 4/69/ Fill'WAY ' S.ITE /1 AVON. CO 8I62U M. 970.84/.791/ -- U f.gu- [-1 1\ L f *\ AN LIVING I .,dild; i MASTER BED h\\ 7 4 - 4 4(Â«11\4 OT,IC.G. + - - 1 L -----11 REVISIJNS: \ - DATEE DE'CLAIPTION --- j: 11 Â· - --- Nx . A-1 " -~ -0-22- 1 \ 4. '1/1 " 41.1 --%PA -' 1 J_ 7904 ~ 1 i i 't :l ~5 F ---=.7-%2 - 11.1. .4\\1 BENCH . /1 i. 'fv #- - 1 \ \ 1 1 - - -/ -1.:\14 \ - - METAL- RAILING L Lin --1 909- --~1 ~1 = N[]AT,i ----i.------1.------- -----------2121 1 \ 1 \\\ 17 QUEEN STREET 1 1i.I 1,1 ; 1 : 4 1, IL -t; TRETTIN RESIDENCE 7909 liG> - ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 --1 / 91 , e - ,# j .- CO r- 1 44 1 'Ti ~ Â· f ~ GRASS COURT . ';~ ROOF DECK ' , IN )-t m / ,; (ELEV.) '1 1 p Wl ~ -- BENCH 0 1 Â·' 10 7901 ~ \\4 -t Z :1: W Lo o 11 1 4- - ~Â£-r~~~~~~~7 -1 - DATE~ 06.17.03 DRAWN BY: SCALÂ£: 1/4" = 1'-O" C~ECIKED 5Â¥: DN 14R i / 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN b~Avt,Â«G TI,LE 1 \\\ --- 19Â£10Â· N fl I Un DI~IA-ING NUM.11-A Al 02 7901 i ft i - )- -1 -43411 ~. 1 \ I AACHITECT: N-%4999.3.Xy-84Â·*. _ - / 9. , #4 \\ 20/ LAIT 21Â·/TH ./.EET No. 2 \ SHoP ARCHITECTS vov \ 794 - LU UJ PH. 212.839.90.5 NEW Yoll, NY lilli rx. 212.889.aa[36 - \ \ 7% 404 EMAILK ST.'10*HOFARC.COM f- r)'.8,3 4 ,/ -------- f\\4 .ANC, irrucT or R[-coRD: RIED ARCHITECTS CO \\ li 412 NORTH MILL STIEET .0 \ LU ~ J i ASPEN. CO 81612 M. 970.920.9225 ) 5 l j \,1-,1 rx. 9'/U.920.7'/2~1 PO Box 1 30:3 ~-J- _ ' 1 -_. - (0 EMAIL: V./67/0/.NET Sl / - g. -\ / ..1 4 ./ 1 / i J L._1=7/ -ri i STAUCTURAL ENGINCEm~ 4 43 e 79067----7/ ,- .4 - - ~ _-- ,--~ --- ~\ $ BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING liz - . -%% --- - . - 3 , 92 4479 / ENGINEERS, PC 7-Â·--1/i ___--0=-22\ ' =rz-- - - + 1 , u, -#77% - -- 1 i r,5 \ 13 t 0 105 CHAMEENS STREET, FL. 3 - NEW Yon'.NY 1 /0.7 i - _ ' I. 212.3/4.2.25 .i . 6 _ _.-.Â£%< ~ ' _ f t ~_ r.. 212./34.5/2/ - I - - O . 1 -Upr' RADER ENGINEERING, INC. - --- Â«f - - -- 1 4 - r-- - - 14. 4 U 69U HIGHWAY ' SUITE El 1 \\\ - ----~_ AVON, 00 816520 - \-4 6.(\441\\ --- -- ... 97.1.845.Â·lilli ~STOR~0 6 i jv ,- - ex. 9'/U.845.75,2~ --- - . ,Â«~lilli\- 11 . - -- \ 1% 1:4 - --r \ - 7904 / ./.:lf' Ii..'j.j l':Il.: !11: 1 - .-- - +.31/;..bL- 1 hi. - - * ~:'0:~Â£3114.Wd.it":l'i''I ~~~~i~''~2.- - 4 ~ ~ ~ - -- . 11, AJ i -;.1141.;p; AlÂ·ld.1 '.lili:1.7 IiircE=2~Izz=ziftzbzd~ -11.,1 44:2\~~~Li- 09Â«--1 \ 1 Â·r----- _Â©V\j'\19/7x 11 1 1 , /1 11 ~ 1 hir. 11.\\ \\\ \N\ OTIÂ·,Cl@ ~ii:;Il.ll.n.F?.1Â»Al..:.~1'' 1 11 - 7903; -.+19:~;.ig.~4_Eli d./ i fl, ' fil ,9 f REVI..laNS: 11 1 , , 7902 ;~ El MI I jIM 9 1 NO. DATE 0[scy,ipno. CRISSCOURI , - i \1 1 / 1. ~ .1Â» 1 , 1 1 1, ' 1 - 11 lili 1 1 1.. 11.1 11 1 1 \ # IL 4 lit%:\\1,:1Iii=..t..6I-...:tilcuttalt:' 1 ULV-=\;~ : TIll Â¢-3\ l 'i ..11 /11 ,Â·11.1 0 3/ U'UN 2 1 Iti~~ 121 #= 1 H 1 1 1 lilli l ND' rÂ¥, 7901 ~ 40 i~~~j~Â£~~~ \ Â«- . -- 1.. - < \1 Â» - | 4 'if i -0 32\ . *- 730 -- '-Â£ N - -.4.\*. *777Â·Â·- )- W- TRETTIN RESIDENCE - 17 QUEEN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 - %11 - a.4 - 5 0 1 -- - - -- - --- 1 11 / A ,> / - 7898 --\\ C i .6/ f 1 0 / - C.INT 49/ J 1 242>; %% -z#*pis -2-*~1~252-' ASPHALT - \ 20,4,61\ 'Ill i - / f 7 0 ftÂ» \ 1 OATE~ 06.25.03 DRAWN Ely: 041 .zo /:). 0 1 \Ell \A // \ 7 / S CALC 1 /8, 1 1'. .11[CKED SY 9 -, DRAWING TITLI: '4444/ f PAVED DRIVE i 63<tiotot:2>Â»7<.rr~~~1'CE 10764. Nt< i %1 Attift *~1~2~EJT~-r**344 EXTERIOR PATH LIGHTING ROOF PLAN i ./ 4:1.4....~.41 . 21:96.:964 4.22:i~~ti~~4::3'Q,3-1-1. --- LIGHTING FIXTUFE LEGEND 49Â«40\40 ....1: 301919$Â«9 40441.hoÂ«:f.ti~f..i./2/ 0/ ~71-~~.,~11~~11~'1~.~~.~L~*43?0Â¢9,Â«Â»toÂ«\49'to~joitt ~ F.. &12= DRAWING NUNDE' S ~x--00~ 9194\\.:fotf:ftÂ«fÂ«Â«0Â«0:>4.tv<ZSSSARbit~ft>f~~ t# BoGEopp.4447\24 Â«149Â«\44\4944Â»Â»NutioN A103 f R.O.W WIDTH UNKNOWN~ 96.58' - ic I . i/, ANcli,Tccr: * SHoP ARCHITECTS 11 \ 1 1~1\/rl - N.w Yoll, NY 1 U. 1 6 ./. 21....9.9//5 200 EAST 37TM STAEET No. 2 1 ./.Ill.8/9.236/6 1 /V L 7 I EMAIL! al LIDIO~SHor'AAC.COM Cl RIED ARCHITECTS 1 3 412 Nonâ„¢ MILL STREET 2 -- MO tiox 1 Jul 1 Of ...... CO .161/ PH. 9Â·/U.92/.9225 Ill 5 3 | , z 1 i. Sâ„¢UCTUI:AL ENGINEER l'O ~ ENGINEERS, PC BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING -- i 1 05 0./18/12/ STREET, FL. 3 f- 1 1 , 1 r'H. 21 2.334.2025 NEW Yol.. NY 100]07 F2n 790~ 1 -1 RADER ENGINEERING, INC. /u 69U ..HWAY 6 SUITE /1 <- 1 Avol. CO 81620 M. 970.845.791 U i rx. 97[1.845.Â·/522 1 \ 1 4 1 11 - 1 \ \1-/ -1\ / 4 /1 -\\- 1 - i / rl 1.-Â»N. % 1,AleWOODSHÂ»IG ..3>- j UNDER EAVE. \\--1 51 11 on,Ems. P14oJECT~ OA Fc,A TMC COMPLETION OP 1-~IS PROJECT m .9 14Â» A 6 . -- 2, , . ./.1/10.S: \ f \1 /1 ---11 - . I NO. DATE D[Ic,glpno' a= Fl 1 1 l 1 1 h / /1 i Â»st 1 / 1 - 7910 1. KEYPLAN~ /1 -1 1 - 1 / I d *1 1 -\ 8- (30 / No/TH 1 1 -naurn 1 1 21 tt TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 17 QUEEN STREET ~ ~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 \ 28 I CUENT I \ \\N\. ~(] ~ El W 1 01 U] ~ Ir] 1 \ i z: , : i 1 .... ./.25.CO DRAWN BV: 1 SCALE: 1/4. - 1'-O. CHICKED ./ 1 1 / DNAWING TITLE: \ / 1 T 2 Â©024.1*C "14, heavy een"W"'rn, beled.â€¢.1*te ein*f,rah , 1 EXTERIOR LIGHTING 1Â£9x & , REFLECTED CEILING PLAN -h--- ~ ~~~~ DRA-NG NUMBEA ..- /1 (.3 0)~! f 1 ---- 2 LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND <t LSI Ugh~ng ./.ns - Sq- Se,les 7901 24â€¢ Leng' f Ch : KILLI_ -: i ~ Fl contact.dielonned.heavygaugeek,n~R.ln,,b-d-~te-*h O,Adoor Soc- l fearves compresson 54],ing to ens*re proper 1-r,p Sendble'Ind c.,Ir 1,/Ir /*c,bonall /9er 3.424-)110... UL Imtcd for der.Ins 1 \ 1 24 - i LSI Lighting Â»-8 - S..lies Ouldeor Sod~t felwtâ€ž139 compresmion 9pr~g to en,91,e proper -Â·p 394(481 1 !0/np A1O4 1 1 Ss-blas,tertclearLexanpolycarbenate~immer 4r Lergul c - 1% % MEI NIN IÂ¥13 C, WALK CON J U . 1 b..1,1 , AÂ¤CI 11~ECT: 1 ~<KI el: 'Â» .Â·., ';Â·â‚¬ 1, 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED 42.30 SHoP ARCHITECTS -:..~.t~.IR'%71 9/9/#bg 2 UU LAST :'/TH STmEET NO. 2 ~ 793*_ TOP-OF RQPF CORE-TEN ROOF OVER . 9#.L -6~ma'.F-Â©4 ./. 212. 61.9 :36136 NE. YORK, N. 1/.16 hr/Bl\~1 r.. 21 .1,39.90.5 VENTALATION SHEET, ICE 1.4 42 QUJ.*34* 1% AH'A AND WATER SHIELD ON 33/4' ifitÂ». .,'.L.49*,94/3- PLYWOOD SHEATHING ~ \Â· '- 2 1.3.~~~- , + -9 -1-*61__ fft-f-\. ~ n.\ ..\\:K.\ j. 1 1- 0 1 .LÂ·-1. ) 1 1- Â·.tÂ·;Â·Â·1 L Â·-1-1. \ r I. /.-- 1 1Â· fb_i.ls.zi-a.~Â«~~**t7t~~t~~ ' ! , 1 , r, 5Â·.:ir...4---\-Â·---\---tuÂ·.iu_\- -4/--61 3--~ 1 -41Â· ., '1 Â·Fl '440 ~ ~*Â¤344*44Â« jul 1 tupnd"#04 7*4*4 1 P. i , : ..,,kjg> .9*,41#4*,30 .4 CLEAR LOW'E' INSULATED : 1 L 1 1 , %873%,M.r- '/62 ~TLI. RIED ARCHITECTS 1/4' DOUBLE GLAZED ' 1 1 !1- Of 41 2 No/TH MILL STREET Â·Â· ..llc?Â·'.4423Â«2 WINDOW WITH HARDWOOD PO Box 1 30:3 -Â· St. ,t Ase'EN. CO 81612 - --â€¢ g../.=441:..211=/*ta- 94,OR:0,44"+ .t ; E 1 1 2 tâ‚¬1 I .. rvi. 970.92U.9225 rx. 9Â·,U.92LJ.'/7221 1 - - t< 94.-"-1~,2.-I,-11.1%. 63*43.4,%Â£0*47 EMAIL: VKR<~12â‚¬lr.NET 5/4"xâ‚¬i" HARDWOOD ; '' ~ ' 6 4 4,Â·%W $ '11 PLANKING ON lx2" f 14Â»2-Â»44429 . Inuc r.... E..1/[IR FURRING OVER HIGH f IA -= ---- -- -- - - BURC] HAPPOLD CONSULTING TEMP. SELF ADHESIVE - Â»42 -- -2 .2,:.Â·4?:413 94ftâ‚¬@tii,~Â·:.Ii,I~ ~ 'j- ENGINEERS, PC ICE & WATER SHIELD ----- -Â·Â· - - - ~ 7915' 2ND FLOOR ~~~-- ~ f.'..3~ f ji Â·c, ~ 494*k'titriÂ· f ~-- AND 3/4" PLYWOOD -- SUBSTRATE 1/5 ChIAMEIEAS STAEET, FL.3 - -- -----p-- ------~ N E W YO RK, NY 1000'7 24 -- --0 Â·: i. , :. M ' j f &\94 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED 1 , 424,1 0 r.. 212./34.5526 CORE-TEN OVER SITE + - - -- RETAINING WALL SL - -- - SL / -- MECHANICAL INGINEEIC RADER ENGINEERING, INC. . 406/U .le.WAY 6 SurrE /1 AvoN. CO 8162U 2 7905' GROUNDIFEOOR 1 1 1 1 1' t--121 E-1 J ~U _] ~ ~; ' - - / I ' r.- 90/l.i-/41t Â·/b:22 1 1 1 Â»-4 1 1 1 --_- BASEM TS IGH FINISHED QUALITY CONCRETE SITE WALL --Â·- 7~01' GRADE Sucil AAC TI,/2 PROF]{El,Y OF T},[ ./Cli,-rECT. -DIE A.Cil,TECT'/ DIAW,NGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND RELATED On ICERS. REVISIONS: /3-~ SOUTH ELEVATION NO. DATE DE'Cel/Tl[IN \3110/ SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 2 7930' TOP OF ROOF KEY PLAN: -- 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED CORIE-TEN ROOF OVER VENTALATION SHEET, ICE AND WATER SHIELD ON 33/4" K -rÂ«-3 -' : PLYWOOD SHEATHING (TYPCAL) -/- Â·-Â·S :f-:uz:up-*;. r- ' t WI : .--3 ./.6, , ;,i Â·i '\. A L#r 4-.J il Â· Â·.Â·.. 5/4'xe HARDWOOD PLANKING ON _____ lx2" FURRING OVER HIGH TEMP NoAn{ ' i / RA/'bÂ·I '-71Â·rri. r i ~ i ~ -4 l X 16: L ~ t-4 F SELF ADHESIVE ICE&WATER SHIELD AND 3/4' PLYWOOD PAOJECT: lu.liLitÂ·~~' ; <~_.iij~~Â·~~ ~~ ~ SUBSTRATE (TYPICAL) 1 '- CLEAR: LOW'E' INSULATED 1/4' \ DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW WITH r-- -4-. f 1 HARDWOOD FRAME (TYPICAL) TRETTIN RESIDENCE 1 -- I ~ L ,-1, 1-'j- Â«ff.--#FlTJ--~ i--1 f 1 17 QUEEN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 -- --: 9-4 /// 7915' 2ND FLOOR 1 1 1 1 - 16 GA. PRE WHEATHERED CORE-TEN OVERHANG AT GARAGE (BEYOND) CUENT 7905' GROUND FLOO DATE~ 06.25.20/3 ./AWN MY: SCALE: ~ /4 =- 11-01" C.ECICID .Â¥ Wwl 7901' GRADE DRAWING TITLE ELEVATIONS ~07\~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1M"= ~'-0" AllO 44-1.,Al/3.....i Jim All:/1/EcT SHIP ARCHITECTS ~ 7930' TOP OF ROOF - ---- '141-,1----- 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED CORE-TEN ROOF ZLILI LAST 217Â·r. SÂ·rn EET No. 2 NE-Yon'.Nvluull OVER VENTALATION SHEET, ICE AND WATER r'H. 212.889.9UUS .i =33'-:9-42.-2.3--3.1'495Â·5~Â¤~ rx. 21 2.889.:3686 SHIELD ON 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING C:k. ...,5 'A~~.409.0 ..â‚¬â‚¬48%Â»=--M~~1- IEMAIL 'll.,Cl@........COM ----- - 5/4"xe HARDWOOD PLANKING ON 12 4 '-1-tift.,t~> C.ritt~ -1 -~- FURRING OVER HIGH TEMP. SELF ADHESIVE ICE & WATER SHIELD AND 3/4" PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE RIED ARCHITECTS P IR It, Fl r. 1 1 - CLEAR: LOW 'E' INSULATED 1/4' DOUBLE PO BOX 1 aclu i > t. 4 M - 11.1 ..1,~ D., 1 4 1 2 N.... MILL STREET \<til\1.- f .1 GLAZED WINDOW WITH HARDWOOD FRAME AsrEN. 00 81612 1 -- 9:0.92[19225 (TYPICAL) rx. 97..920.772/ M 11!'1! PÂ·,1'1.t: EMAIL V./9/0/.NET 7915' 2ND FLOOR 1111.1111:!. -- ----- BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING - ENGINEERS, PC , Â· - lus CHAMBEAS STFEET, FL. 3 -NEW YORK, NY 10007 P.. 2,2.3/4.2.25 s=-GARAG *R-WITH--- - , .- r.. 212./.4./.28 ~ 0 ]SIDING AN[r~-- - LI- THER STEEL OVERHANG -- '--- <-1 L ELL] D _1] ME....,CAL ENG,NECI: - _ENTRY_ 11 --- ~ -------Â·- --~- RADER ENGINEERING, INC. DOOR -- - . - 1 4U89U .Il.WAY 6 SUITE /1 7905' GROUND FLOOR Â· 1- ->5.Â·.1 f4 f-34-1 P.I.3 I 1 Â·4* BEYOND --- 1 PH. 97[1.845.791' rx. gÂ·/L].1145.7522 FINISHED QUALITY CONCRETE SITE WALL -~7901' GRADE SUC,1 AAC Â¥11[. PAOF'[F,TV OF Tilt ARCHITIC-r. T~IE on,/An. (1-)WEST ELEVATION NO. DATE DESCRIP.ON REVISIONS: A111~ SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED CORE-TEN ROOF OVER VENTALATION SHEET, ICE AND WATER SHIELD ON 3/4" KELI PLAN: __Â£ 7930' TOP OF ROOF ~ PLYWDOD SHEATHING (TYPCAL)- 7 - _ --.45.....a....Â·-:-Â·Â·plasÂ· Â·Â·Â·a. 5/426" HARDWOOD PLANKING ON .....71.J.*94-Et~~~~~~c:Â·--Â·.Li_Â»Â¥.1&415*251%31*- fit-5215â‚¬-ia--Â·. ...-- -~_F~4~3*91=22#*-173*i.:E lx2" FURRING OVER SELF ADHESIVE, HIGH TEMP. ICE & - WATER SHIELD AND 3/4' -t--;*Xt' =I-:-E- P.. Nomm PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE (TYPICAL) --- CLEAR: LOW'E' INSULATED 1/4" f f DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW WITH - HARDWOOD FRAME (TYPICAL) - --Â·----Â·=- TRETTIN RESIDENCE 17 QUEEN STREET 4 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 METAL_ HANDRAIL 1 A 13Rk#E4%25-ES -Â·212- -- -~7915' 2ND FLOOR _ ,5,i : 1 Â· ' -LE=i.Filtlit--4 7-~2Â·-Â·F--3 - - - i ' -Ip --~--r- .+1-Trj.Z--RETN..: -- ---Â·-- :- --------- - - HARDWOOD STAIR TO ROOF DECK - CUENT _7905'GROUND-FLOOL____ - 7--DATE: 06.25.03 DRAwâ„¢ I.: C.ECKED ./ WWS DIAWING TITLE: /1 7901'GRADE ELEVATIONS g2'j EAST ELEVATION Alll <Al 11 ~ SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" ARc,irrccTÂ· SHoP ARCHITECTS 2/0 [All ./r' STREEr NO. 2 NEwYom/,NY'uull P.. 212.8/9.9/05 rx. 21 2.19.3686 AACHITCCT 9.[COADÂ· RIED ARCHITECTS 412 No/TH MILL ./.Ell PO Box laUU A. PEN. C. 81/12 PH. 97/.92..9225 rx. 97...2L1.Â·7Â·/223 Irmuclu'll EN.1/c//: auF=20 HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 1 U. C....... S.-I'll. F.. 3 NEW Yon'. NY 1 U.07 r,H./92.034.2025 rx. 212.334.55263 MCCIIANICAL INGINEE' RADER ENGINEERING, INC. 49. 4U/9/ Hi[-WAÂ¥ 6 SuITE El SKYLIGHT: LOW'E' INSULATED Avol. CO /1620 , 71%1'. 0/ DOUBLE GLAZED WITH A. Â· UÂ·Â·Â·Â·fi t. M. 97/.845.7910 Ave,>Â·' 0- rx. 970.84b.Â·7b22 PRE-WEATHERED CORE-TEN 44' 3-+ FRAME â‚¬~MECF.Â·,39 16 GA. PRE WEATHERED 7930 TOP OF ROOF CORE-TEN ROOF OVER ..28Â»04 VENTALATION SHEET, ICE 9 ..\ ''r- tÂ·OR#'b AND WATER SHIELD ON 3/4" -7--- - -- .94Â»4942 : .94-2*f.3.2.. 1 SUC,1 ARE THE PROPEITY OF TILIC AACHITICT. RE PLYWOOD SHEATHING , 1 - 11 \N #' ;44*r. 3 0~ncias. CLEARÂ· LOW'E' INSULATED 1/4' DOUBLE GLAZED 4 Â»42,2/.4,1" 11 Â« WINDOW WITH HARDWOOD itz# 7 71~84#mip REVISIONS: 5/4"E HARDWOOD FRAME (TYPICAL) PLANKING ON 1â„¢2" FURRING NO. DATE DEL$,P TIC]N OVER SELF ADHESIVE HIGH TEMP. ICE & WATER SHIELD METAL HANDRAIL SUBSTRATE I ' 2 2.-ry.-iclÂ·.3 - . - - / . 03 1 1 1 HARDWOOD STAIR TO Â£ <1240 LJ.2 7915 2N D FLOOR ROOF DECK 1 1 1% CLEAR: LOW'E' INSULATED 1/4- DOUBLE GLAZED . fl WINDOW WITH HARDWOOD / b.4 ~ SL. ! SL. ~ .42 ~ - FRAME (TYPICAL) 6 1 m 1 ~ -I -- 41 HARDWOOD EXTERIOR - ---- -- - ---- i; r=T=====r- ./ DECK (TYPICAL) ' ~. ii 1 7905 GROUND FLOOR Â· ---j -- GRASS COURT - T 4 1 NEC~~ -f --2 EL 1 1 E P.Â°,CeT: CONCRE I E POOL WALL ~ ~ ~ -1__r' TRETTIN RESIDENCE WITH ORNAMENTAL 11 GRASS LANDSCAPE ----5-+-,4-- - 11.1 r., 1-AP POOL 17 QUEEN STREET '. N ~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 E- 1 r -7 CUENT 7894 BASEN'ENT ILEI DATE: ./.25.00 DIAWN EÂ¥: SCALE: 1 /4" = 1 V CHECKED BY WWS ORAVANG TITLf: TRANSVERSE SECTION /73 TRANSVERSE SECTION ...WING NUMIC' \3120/) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" A120 AACM:TECT- SHoP ARCHITECTS 2 UU EAST /7 T. ST REET No. 2 NEWY....NY 10/16 P.. 21...89.9//5 0. ~512.1389,3686 E MAI L ~ ST LI D 10 ~SHOPAnt\COM AR[=~11-rECT OF RECORD: RED ARCHITECTS 41 2 Noll. Mill S..... PO Box 1 3023 As/EN, CO 81/12 M. 990.920.9225 rx. 9'7/.92UL'/723 EMAIL: v.'~lor.NET STRUCTURAL ENG-'ll BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC 1 IS ........ STIEET. FL. 3 NEW YORK. NY 100.7 M 212 3/4 2U25 rx. 212.334.5528 M..1/NICAL INGINEEN RADER ENGINEERING, INC. 4[J69. Hil'WAY 6 SUITE /1 AVON. CO 81620 ./. 97...4/.Â·/91. 0. 970.84/ 7522 SUCH AAC .4E /**OPERTÂ¥ OF T}IE A.2CI,ITECT. THE AIRCI 11TCCT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND RELATED OnIERS. ~ EL +7946.39 TOP OF ROOF MINERS COTTAGE -# C A[/1/1/Ns: ~ El. +7930.16' TOP OF ROOF_NEW RESIDENCE No. DATC OCE;CA,/nON KEY FL_AN ~ ~ El.+7901 GRADE 773 1 4 h % 411 4. 3 -d -5 1 -4-di i.0 3 32 2 0,1 i. 0 1 0 -4 0 â‚¬ 4 11. 11 1 11 NORTH PROPERTY LINE SETBACK SETBACK PROPERTY LINE /'~Pj SITE SECTION 17 QUEEN STREET TRETTIN RESIDENCE ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 \429 SCALE 1/16"=1'-0" 1-- - 0 10 FT. 25 FT 50 FT. CUENT DATE: 06.25.0:3 DRAWN 8Â¥: SCALE:= 1/16' -- " d C,â€¢CCI<Ec Ir: 0/AMN' lilli: SITE SECTION [Â»4AWING NU~13541 A 121 It Â·:*.- IrY arME' MEMORANDUM :45*%&44*4.94 91=74 /:i 2 ' 1. ....= TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 320 W. Hallam Street- Major Development Review (Final)- Public Hearing DATE: July 9,2003 f SUMMARY: The subject property is a 3,000 square foot parcel that was created as the result of a recently approved historic landmark lot split. It contains a Pan Abode hdme built in 1966. The application proposes an 826 square foot addition to the rear of the 600 square foot Pan Abode home. Conceptual approval, a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a window bay on the addition; a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard for a lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of the one required on-site parking space were approved on May 23,2003. The conditions related to the design were that: 1. Windows and skylights will be evaluated at Final review. 2. The architect is to revise the connector piece between the old and- new construction so , that it slips under the eave of the existing Pan Abode roof. 'The packet includes responses to these issues as well as all other matters related to FinAl review. Staffrecommends approval be granted with conditions. APPLICANT: Judy Haas, owner, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001. - ADDRESS: 320 W. Hallam, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family residence. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to 1 the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the stajf analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect Of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the HPC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter listoric structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would-the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? The property is significant as an example of housing built early in Aspen's history as a ski town, at a time when economy and simplicity were desirable. Kit homes like this one were inexpensive and quick to build. Although the structures were machine produced, they still reflected the same American West iconography of the older true log structures in town. The Pan Abodes simulated traditional log construction and referenced its important details. Key features of Pan Abodes are that they are typically single story, with a low-pitched gable roof. They sometimes have deep eaves, and usually have exposed rafter tails. The flat surface of the machine shaped, tongue and groove logs are central to the building's character. - Window openings are spare and usually horizontally proportioned, and wood trim is used to finish out the window openings. The building plans are simple rectangular forms, with smaller additive elements. Detail and decoration are minimal. This particular Pan Abode stands in a neighborhood where there is a reasonably strong Victorian context, including the two Victorian era homes to the west and one across the street. Historic cottonwoods still line this side ofthe block. The small scale of this home, its materials, and low pitched roof form are anomalies on the block, however this modestly sized building is in no way 2 intrusive. A small addition can be reasonably made to the structure without a negative impact on the character of the area. There are no apparent alterations to this Pan Abode from its appearance in 1966. An addition constructed behind it, and distanced from it with a connector should not negatively affect the Pan Abode's integrity score. Any architectural changes permitted to happen to the historic house itself will need to be carefully weighed to insure that integrity is not compromised. The project represents a build out of all but a small amount of square footage allotted to the site, so no significant projects would be anticipated to affect this site in the future. Design Guideline review The lot split approval for this property established some parameters that affect the current application. In recognition of HPC having granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus for the future redevelopment of this home and the adjacent Victorian, the Pan Abodd became a designated historic structure and cannot be demolished. .The maximum floor area for all construction on the Pan Abode lot was set at 1,500 square feet. A 2' west sideyard setback variance and a 2' combined sideyard setback variance were granted to accommodate the Pan Abode's existing location. The building is slightly crooked on the lot. Although the site plan included in the HPC's drawing set shows the Pan Abode square to the lot lines, the architect intends to maintain its skewed placement. Final review deals with details such as the landscape plan, lighting, fenestration and detailing, selection of new materials, and technical issues surrounding the preservation of existing materials. A list of all of the design guidelines that staff finds are relevant to Final Review is attached as "Exhibit B." -2 Planned alterations to this historic home are the in kind replacement of the existing window units and roof, and installation of a skylight on the western roof slope. Staff has no issue with replacing the roof, which is an important maintenance issue, as long as the material is detailed to match what is on the Pan Abode now. With regard to replacing the window units and adding a skylight, the guidelines are: 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. o Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/ mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. o Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. o Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the windowÂ· components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. o A -historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a. historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The application does not discuss the condition of the existing windows, or explain why replacement is necessary. Running through the integrity scoring sheet for Rustic style buildings, staff scores 320 W. Hallam at 86 points, including the impacts from this proposal, except for window replacement. Replacement of all of the windows could drop the score by lib to 5 points, but the property would still pass threshold. In the case of a post-war structure such as this one, . the original window units may not have the same craftsmanship that HPC is trying to retain on Victorian homes, however, there should be more discussion about this aspect of the proposal. If the windows can be replaced, details and cut sheets will needto be approved by staff and monitor to verify that the replacement is as exact as possible. Staff does not support the addition of a skylight on the roof of the Pan Abode, particulaply one that is not flush with the roof plane as required by guideline 7.3. HPC has not allowed skylights to be installed on the historic portion of any building in the recent past. Moving on to the new construction, HPC expressed concern at the Conceptual hearing with the way that the codnector roof is flush with the Pan Abode roof plane. The architect has provided information in the packet explaining the technical reasons for this decision. Although guideline 10.10 generally discourages tying into historic eavelines, the justification in this case is understandable, and the condition will not be visible from the street. The guideline is: 10.10 Design an.addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 4 Staff finds that the materials selected for the addition are appropriate and compatible with the Pan Abode. The board should discuss the glazing proposed in the street facing gable end. Staff believes that the transparency created by this glass will help to minimize the difference in roof heights between the old and new construction when viewed from the street. The same may not be true though of the skylight proposed to run along the ridge. It seems as though highlighting the spine of the roof on the addition may call attention to the difference in roof heights. Guideline 7.3, above, applies. Staff finds that overall, this is a successful project that will provide a good example of how Pan Abode structures can be preserved and expanded. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval for 320 W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of 3.5' to alIow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing Â·Â· condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and . approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode and along the ridge of the new addition are not approved. 5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or 5 without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amouÂ·nt of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 8. Â·A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original. materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 4 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas ofthe existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist.Â· No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be ~ removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions o f approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet o f the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 0, 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 6 "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 320 W. Hallam, Final Review" Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. o Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. Priu ate Yard 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. o If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. Materials 2.1* Preserve original building materials. o Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place, o Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. o Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longder retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. o Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. o Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. o Always prepare a good substrate. .Prior to painting, remove damaged Â·or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer, using the gentlest means possible. o Use compatible Â· paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints ~ without a primer coat. Roofs 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be.considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. 7 o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the.plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing -historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materidls such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. o If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non-reflective finish. 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detract from the historic appearance of the building. 6 A metal roof material should have an earth tone and have a matte,- non-reflective finish. o A metal roof with a lead-like patina also is an acceptable alternative. o Seams should be of a low profile. o A roof assembly with a high profile seam or thick edge is inappropriate. Building Relocation 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. o On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a modest miner's cottage is discouraged because it would be out of character. o Where a stone foundation was used historically, and is to be replaced, the replacement should be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. o Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. Building Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the_historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic f style should be avoided. 8 o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques . that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of. architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Lighting 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. o Do not wash an entire building facade in light. o Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the dame area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-oflway. 9 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR 1MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT P, BLOCK 42, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-14-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Judy Haas, represented by Derek Skalko, 1 Friday Design Collaborative, has requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 320 * W. Hallam Street, Lot P, Block 42, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inveritory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 9,2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standaids, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at thbir regular meeting on July 9,2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Final) approval with the following conditions: l. HPC has approved a 1.5' side yard setback variance for the east side yard to accommodate a bay window on the addition, a 3.6' side yard setback variance for the west side yard if it is needed for the lightwell, a rear yard setback variance of 2.5' and a combined front and rear yard setback variance of13.5' to allow the addition to be pushed back from the historic cabin, and a waiver of one parking space. 2. A sample of the roof material, and details of how it will be installed to match the existing condition must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Cut sheets of the proposed replacement windows, and confirmation that they match all dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible, must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 4. The proposed new skylight on the Pan Abode alut ch:Tric .Mgfof the gaia,-addition-are not approved. Â· -5. A structural report demonstrating that the Pan Abode can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. The applicant will provide HPC staff and monitor with a plan for how the housemover proposes to lift the building, for review prior to submittal of a building permit. The approach chosen, whether it be to move the house with its original floor system, or without, must be demonstrated to result in the removal of the least amount of historic exterior materials, and the least damage to the building possible. -* 7. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building pennit application. 8. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 9. The applicant must submit a preservation plan with the building permit indicating what original materials appear to still exist on the structure, and what treatments will be used to retain them. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are knowd and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtin a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. â€¢ramir-.E,-1.i~.i're APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July, 2003. \ Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk D. 320 Oak Lane Aspen, CO 81611 1 frid a y Phone: 970.544.0695 .Ap Fax: 970.920.7822 dÂ·esign 94'NPOWS coliabo ratl.e ,9 loil UGH T- To: The Aspen Historic Preselvation From: Judy Haas, Owner 320 W. Hallam St. Commission Derek Skalko, Principal 1 Friday Design Collaborative Fax: Date: June 10 2003 Phone: 970.920.5090 Pages: 1 Re: 320 West Hallam Street - Pan Abode CC: Judy Haas Dear Amy, Katie & Members of the Commission, Attached you will find the following information pertaining to HPC Final Review of 320 West Hallam Street. We hope you find the packet helpful in explaining our proposed project material choices, lighting fbdures, and door and window locations. We thank you all for your time in reviewing the information and look forward to working with you through the construction of this project as we anticipate to begin this coming September. This induded infonnation is as follows: Explanation Diagram of the Proposed Bridge Condition: We felt this should be included to further assist in explaining Why the height of the connection is flush to the existing pan-abode roof (even in its current state, we feel strongly the proposed connedion adheres to HPC Design Guideline 10.7 in its entirety) and why we feel the best solution is the proposed solution. Exterior Ughting Specification & Location Diagram: We plan to have two exterior lights on the proposed addition (both of which are to meet UBC Code Requirements) The specific fixture, dimensions, and the exact exterior locations are diagrammed accordingly Exterior Materials Palette Diagram: Colour renderings labeled accordingly to proposed material selections forthe exterior surfaces. Architectural Drawings Packet: Cover Sheet Plans (Lower, Main, Roof & St. Context) Existing & Proposed Survey Plats (Site Plan) Proposed Elevations Project Vicinity Map Proposed Sections Existing Pan-Abode Conditions (Plan & Elevations) Proposed Window & Door Schedule Thank youvegmum. - ,_U-L r*re.4,42'.0'~*9~ Principal, 1 Friday Design Collaborative ./Bme.Dill connection area: explanation osed link bet'.' sting pan ructure and t itruction Ased as a flush on for the reasons tollowing a the properly has tree that has been re.,.., C 2... are Proposing a link that is as f 9- the tree as possible while .eggn guideline 10.7 being 0,Â·_i u n , paration lenght one story in height. and ' -otting itself back from the existing :onstruction a minimum of 1. all of these 4 . ; i:â‚¬-~7~~m ..< -spects would be visually noticable, lowering the roof condilion would nol m building cod n all building IM-II7 E-81 . on in the city c 1 mUS| form to ) states that im height -0" must be achieve , space uned habitabl- Â»e.1 1:599:.: diagrams, wi lE)006,~ 1.xrul ,- i imurn conditu city would be ly to the upper > 3 gh: Of 71-0 the reason this is ali c=.e is due to the low nature of the inte . iitc 'e,ghts of the pan-abode structure for this case :s 6'-8- at the sides :se keep in mind most victorians twri- functional: section . 9.1 L. The guidecines are traditionally used for) average interior plate heights between 9' and 11'-6" even miner's cabins in this town typically range from 84 to 8'-9' in observations aking into you would nately solutely rooted ng condition C : . exiqting -9 051 logicalo .., ' ir Â·-fl'UfF:rP- â€ž. due to the fact the bu -' M fy/. i. the structure below roofline you I Ide lincoln logs, with . e roots struck support originating in i, ,ss members r tile overlapping wall co stlon. By tying , r - El 1,11 & 162'M j !0 tie in below the ex : roof at a inmimurn, which once a Jfds Â»' j: / 1 lack of interior height. : ~1*[ 1- L - 11,Â§6*:.22 - 11$%06: Â¢ : Â·c detail condition that p' 1.21: t 1 , jl WOON,t r#XPOR freeze thaw ice damn 931-la Â·r water penetration wh construction meet. bc b +V,Â·vable to the p 11 .- -111 Â·.j pt.'r Doil non-functioning: section ~ .serve cot'onwood:' 9 -0 ... .Â· a .co ti, r llc].I. IÂ·Â·11Â· FIL. i nonwood i t 1111:Li,I- + ~ - 1/jill.:11 --614'~t -It'll'kil. 4-'. - ' 4% 11:11 , .. 1-#IC- i:'Jt~r,~fÂ¢! 1 11 ...4-, 1 1 1 1 1 7,Zm; 1 . -I- Â»--'. . ~ - *24.9.-q~444- 1 2.uilt,glit/'ll/'19/: . -:-~11'.41~ - : Â·1-Â·3- . rial"Rk. - z :''f. r,IL'Â·!rorr**Whii -1-~Â·Â·rti~ _ - 1 1 1 - P 6 2 1 PROPOSED ROOF_PLAN B c'~ = I E 'It :-4 'i Â·rlows for bette, /Â· ,/9\\ m.k, 9.4 0 11 . 2 2 '7-1 # exterior light fixtures 1. - 1 . . .L ..2 h 4/ Â·.1 'f /1 two exterior RAB incandescent / [ 1-'1 11 1 ~ . I I .-/ ..lilli 7 jelly-jar/ with metal cage fixtures R i & j. will be used on the new addition ft li A : M . , 11 0 -1 the fixture and its dimensions 2 : 1.t are pictured and highlighted 4.- 9- 4Â®. 8 : accordingly below - 1'1 re .... 1'.4 1){i?.1 H F ~ '4 -1 41 1--'\ - 14 1 t. 1 9 V. ) 4 7 .A; G Â· r-Â·Â· r -' rÂ·ipps = Â¥[-' / ...1[ 7 A B 1-- 2 t 1 LE h- 7 N /Er.- E i , - D ABCDEFGHI VXBR100DG 9-5/8 9-1,8 6-7/8 4-1/8 3-3/8 4-1Â£4 5-1/8 7-1/8 24.4 23.5 17 5 10.5 10.8 10.5 13.0 18.1 VXBR100G 10-1 /4 9-1/8 7-1/2 4-3/8 3-3/8 4-1/4 5-1/8 7 26.0 23.5 19.0 11.1 10.8 10.5 13 0 17 8 VXBR10OP (PW) 8-1/4 3-3/4 4-1/4 5-1/8 7 21.0 10.8 10.5 13 0 17.8 VXBR200DG 11-1/4 10-5/8 8-5/8 5-3/8 4-1/4 4-1 /4 5-1/8 8-1/8 28.6 270 21 9 13.7 10.8 10.5 13.0 20.6 VXBR200G 11 -7/8 10-5/8 9-1/8 5-3/8 4-1 /4 4-1/4 - 5-1/8 8 30.2 27.0 23.2 13.7 10.8 10.5 13.0 20.3 VXBR200P (PW) 10-5/8 4-3/4 4-1/4 5-1/8 8 . 97 Fk - 1AQ 1 2, 4 19A on G judy haas residence --~pl-1-LL-L==1-1-v"filirri----------'~ 2,10 r.Â·.i .,,lion p.$ 6 22*tri f IFIRI li=2611 1 I i 5 -- ? I 1 li ... -~ 8.1 proposed east elevation ( east elevation on variance request) note. window has been altered from rendering - refer to architectural elevations for upper 4,3~ window r-EIMFIT --1 r r~-i .1 // 1. T .... t* proposed courlyard elevation 1 1.- ....g '11 exterior materials 1 kai-wai translucent panels proposed alley elevation (rear yard for variance) 2 cedar shigles 3 1*6 redaimed barnwood siding 4 rusted corrugated metal sheetng 5 refirished pan-abode extenor 6 1 x4 clear statned cedar 7 exposed aggregate concrete 8 efco anodized atuin,nuin storefront system 9 leian transticent sheeting 10 pella dad window systern 11 pella wood -ndow systern 12 standing seam metal roof,ng 13 quartum wood door system c % .61 9 t 5 . I . t r - , proposed west elevation (west elevation on variance request) 1-2 proposed landscape plan Aâ€¢VOENT 0009 0 , r--~1... -O 0 SHED 1/2/61.In we are proposina a minimal landscape tor the prolect atthe current time due to 99/2-.-3.:'Â· the very limited space available on the site j the current and neiahboring historic lots are primarily kentudky blue grass as thev now exist. all areas indicated, bv the light 0 roposed to maintain this as a j m?&17bfuearass or grass approprate for the aspen clinfate 1 -0 r---e--1 all circles in forest Green represent existing trees that will reman] on the proposed site the circles with red dots in the center are required to siay in accordance with the direction of the aspen parks department i il i ' all areas hiahliahted in tan to be repr sentative 1 - of areas propoZed to have sporadical~ i ' 1 .' r. set natural flaqstone pieces. the Dath to the Dan-abode entrv (towards the botrom of the P + 2 3 4 aae) is currenOy a concrete walk tflat follows thisame line ot orientation, so no changes to the direction of the path are intended 1% L the prosed path to the entry from hblitim - 7 F currently measures beteen 3 and 3 -6' Il 21-1 j we intend to maintain this wi~and would more than likely be between & 3'-0" 0 I f 1 -- +I ' 1 -0, 11 Ii=11 $ i i 1 1 1 ha-X & 0 3 1.- " 11 , 1 .. 11. ' . 11 N ' ----- ---V - 1 & t.-fle'll k -29 0 . ..Al . 'SUM.r 1- -1 ' - 641 0% 33 ~ image of flagstone proposed sklight depiction for 320 west hallam we have included this photograoh in tbe review packet to bettet halp dep!ct the proposed skylight,for tne addition.. as the phptograph indicates svkliaht detail as progosed for 320 west,hallam the skylight protruaes above the photdaraph taken frohl liPC award win nina ridgelihe 6 residdhce completed in 2000 by studio b frchitects we would also. like tQ state where this residence is situated on a corner lot 320 west hallam rests between two structures both 6 hiaher than our intended construetio'h. Visibly. it will be difficult to actuallv see any Dortion oi 320 s Skylight from the primary viewing lines on west hallam street t' e. le 1 . .. 4 , k ----- 0 Â¥ .4 1 V * - .* I 4, . . 1 I . h ' 1% k 04 4 413 I .Itt :LI - ./r / I JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE 320 west hallam street I aspen I colorado HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL REVIEW DIRECTORY INDEX July 9th, 2003 OWNER: JUDY HAAS A.0 COVER E,HEET / CONTACT REFERENCE /FAR CALCULATIONS po box 330 LOT LINE AD.18TMENT PLAT aspen. colorado 81612 SURVEY tel q-70 425.6548 Al.0 VICINITY MAP - 320 4,0EST HALLAM PROPERTÂ·r tel (studio) 470 .425.5540 AI.5 PROPOSED SITE AND TOPOGiKAPHIC PLAN Fax 110.425.5540 Al.0 EXISTINB HISTORIC CONPITIONS DOCUMENTATION A2.1 LOWER 1 MAIN LEVEL. PROPOSED PLANS A2.2 PROPOSED ROOF PLANS 4 CONTEXT ELEVATION 2.-ElLe--MIEl ONE FRIDAY DESIeN COLLABORATIVE, 116. A,31-3-2 FPROPOSED ELEVATION5 derek m. skaiko; principal designer A4.1 RJILDING SECTIONS judY haas: project designer Alo.1 ~1114[J>O;N 1 DOOR SCHEDULE 320 oak lana tal q-70.5Oq.0645 aspen, colorado 51611 Fax q-10.420.7822 #h #7 f 11 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS: eLENPWOOP STRUCTURAL 4 CIVIL; INC. jim romeo; professional engineer consulting structural engineers .. 11 1 2425 south gÂ·ard avenue, suite 102 glen.ood springs, colorado BI601 L tel 410.q28.005 Fax q10.q28.4504 GENERAL CONT.E._6111.E-Â· y design collaborative,llc. > FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Zoning: Re Lot Area: 3000 91. FT. IJ ~~li~|I -Lut ---/-44'-i.--1 EAS -- Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1,500 SG. FT. LEU-11.11 8-fl -11Â©3 JIÂ»UVEVfmi3UUrffrÂ»ve~~43*rfil Gross Area (Et) 11111 lili--[ITTT-T[TFFIFT[7TFIrT-ffIT-Tr~TrTITiUfflnTT,1~f~#r'hYNTThfffer-rMÂ·AYi9M 0 Main Level 1=66&41 111111 Illill 11'ULL[IELJ~ (Included: Pan-abide 1,376 1 main level addition) "Be- , Loier Level 150 A (8.1 percent of lover level (16.4 countable) countable to~ards FAR) TOTALS 1,454.q ~-Â·'8~u'~.~1~I Il IBL-t--F-Â«-1-9--Â«29_ ~ 1 Notes - - -- 1,454.4 < 1,500 - FAR IS OK A The lower level (600 sq ft h pic,9 cor,slsts of a sqÂ· footage of .011 orea 20 * 3,[7 x 44. 9, depth. The lorer level also cont/*5 0 tight w/11 01 3' x q'-6 x 6'62 In depth. bringhg th& total mil sur-Face orao of the lorler level to 50+75.5 sq feet of 3urfaca /rea. Of this total. the Ilight -11 crea cid 6â€¢ of perÂ·Imeter crea arotr,d the structure /11: be exposed. brk,glng the /9/sure pertentoge to 415-5 sq. ft. ach ./.Its forÂ· 5.ISE /4/scre to ba used ag/A FAR- t UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT Ll N SCALE ALLEY 1 INCH = 10 FEET sr,B 0 5 10 15 20 BLOCK 2 wl, . _ CS agF Daso. r - - ---uzE-,a.QZSÂ· Â·=~ LOT . â€¢40 44*47 4 -1 - .j 2 40 E 0â‚¬â€¢st 960. ! 2 j . n i - W. n ELEC & COMM i EASEIâ‚¬IT 6â€¢ 4 LOT . k 8< 52â€¢ PG 820 N.M j 1 i i . i . i ~- -L i 22 / i 1 loT te : 0 \ i f LEGEND & NOTES O f-[kIND SUnEY â€¢OUENT REMA WI TH CAP AS hOTED 2 5702/ 1 , N SPIKE [R P-K NAI L SUR\â‚¬Y CONTR[1 ViC'.4 .CtiaKm 9 * gk Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ~ LOT p POSTED ADDRESS IS -30â€¢ AND 320 IST NALâ€¢â€¢ ST ' 65040,40â‚¬ Nkmr 1 4 22 -G- W]OD FEICE / -le- M RE FENCE \%4 4 #oid*A 4 a O UTILITY BOX CITY /OUENT 4 & 92. / SET CORMER IC 4 REBAR W]TH RED CAP 16129 11-9-02 2.. - n. i LOT 0 19 - i - ... . 3 1 co-ITMENT Â£ Pc T-170861 TITLE INF-ORIMAT]ON WAS FURNES,â‚¬D BY, PITKIN C[UNTY TITLE. INC. 43. DATED liE 27 2002 4 ,44 / , S,Oer 4*0 ~~ CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 9 41.-Â¥ r . j ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED -r i PIC 2-27 CITY [r ASPEN. CALLS IN C ) /RE RECCRD FRDI TIâ‚¬ 1959 0/FICAL *P , THE IC i i 1 j - . capi- I m .. i 59.99... W. / 3/ 'Al./. . . .41 0, *0,41 i Â¢N, 30091!.60 -1Â£, v,7.0 WATER -n VALVE ~ 28' ~7 -C Int- sr c.,c ...0 0 IFIk VALL - InÂ»E 6-_L 0/ 4 f IMPROVEMENT SURVEY . Qu'lie . c,Â¥~~Z 'r ]FFEST 41Â£1,4~f PI TKI N COUNTY, COLORADO LOTS N. 0. & P. BLOCK 42, CI TY & TOWNSI TE OF ASPEN, STREET PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. ACCOMIC To C[*.[FII LAV Â¥[U I.IST CDOâ‚¬NCE ANY LEGAL ACTI I 210 1 GALINA STREET IA'. lp[.1./ DEFECT i â€¢ TH! S 'LAT . THI H 1,~42Â£ rEARS AFTER ./ Fl RST Di SCCÂ·.ERÂ£D SuCH DEFECT. i N â‚¬ C.NT. 1- Aâ€¢ff .Cll .ED ASPEN. C[10 81 61 1 A Alff IEFECT IN TIC S PLAT DE Cliâ‚¬NCED ICE THAN TEN YEARS PHOâ‚¬ /FAX ( 970) 925-3816 /201 1% ITE / 11â‚¬ CERTIFICATIM SIC'.i ICREIÂ»i E-MAIL clovehiper-1/0.coM ~ SHEET 2 OF 2 job ra. 32155 M]M 25. 2002 UHL HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT N A Â»m SCALE St~ -1+LEy * * 1 INCH = 10 FEET # BLOCK ~2 ., B - Dâ‚¬* 0 5 10 15 20 I >/,/ 9,14 DED '?M?h-%0;2~ "~ i I. ..1 Lot - - 4 .i - .i 2 48 . i i COF .2 N . R i j i i Â· l -- / PATIO LOT 6 12 *A . 0 1 2 -2* i 16' .2 - /* LEGEND & NOTES . i i O /[11â€¢10 SL~EY IOUâ€¢â‚¬NT REEW? 61 TH 0/ AS <TED 2 Stapp / 4 .% / .' - ..1 b. SPI KE [N P-K NAI L S,nâ‚¬r CONTRCK- 4/crap,- ~ Â® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER POSTED ADDRESS 11 - 304 AND 320 6[ST Pâ€¢~LAN ST. â€¢ i i i & -lAâ€žÂ· (3â‚¬ -8- &00 D FENCE 1 - 4 RE FENCE 20-=Cei=9.-~ O UT] LI TY BOX CITY OXIT ! . '~ 1 SET CORER .1 4 REMR WITH RED CAp 16129 11+02 gel â€ž.-4 j tor S- Q Sh 4.7,4/3 - ly Â· i TITLE WORMATION WAS FLENISIED BY, PITKIN CCUITY TITLE. INC. / CO,elITMENT NO. PCT-17086L 42 DATED= Uâ‚¬ 271 2002 4 1 /4, 4 -:.. *2. ~. . ~ / Â·~~ CONFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED -- .:. : I ~ DECIDUOUS TREE CALIPER SIZE AS N]TED Â¥EL c- m -r 1 1 CITY [r IspE,i CALLS IN < > IRC RECORD FACI Tâ‚¬ 1939 [FFICAL - I TE 11 1 9.- 1 1 c#ew Â£' 64â€¢Jr : 1** .,4Â¢. i Â· M9O.00, 4400, â€¢ 1,416 i (4 7 300911/V) WAro, VA~#D tET :Â£95 -4 C' t-â€¢ COâ‚¬1 0** 1 OUTTER 1. sy[.â‚¬ WALL - DIE Wâ€¢~U I MPROVEMENT SURVEY ../ke1 #*ST aw/= 41Â£1,4 CITY & TOVNSI TE OF ASPEN, LOTS N, 0. & P. BLOCK 42. PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO STREET PREPAIRED BY ACCERDI * TO CEL[*U,00 LAV YÂ·DJ 1â€¢UST CCMâ‚¬,CE ANY LIGN- ACTIOâ€¢ 210 1 GALINA STREET ASPEN SURVEY ENGI NEERS, I NC. DASCD PCÂ»,1 ./ DEFECT 1 N THI S PLAT . TH] N TI,LE TEâ€¢.RS ./ER .11 ASPEN. CC]La 81611 A RST DI SCO.CRO) 1Â£11 IO-ECT. I N 2 EX/. MY ANY EN[Â»1 1.â€¢SED lkÂ»,1 ANÂ¥ DEFECT i N 714 S PLAT IC CDOÂ·Dâ‚¬ED IERÂ£ in- TOI Â¥[ARS FROM Tiâ‚¬ ITE [r TIC CERTIOCATICÂ», SIC, Iâ‚¬EEC* PIOâ‚¬/FAX ( 970) 925-381 6 E-MAIL. claveecsper,Ir.fo.coa SHEET 2 OF 2 Job n. 321 55 hOV 25. 2002 â€¢.422* .U 1 d des gn collaborative,llc. 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 phone (970) . 309.0695 fax (970} .920 7822 ....11 defek@:tudlobarchltects net O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COUABORATIVE LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT ~fÂ¢f' PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN CONTAÂ»ED ON ... DOCUMENT IS THE COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT â„¢E PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY N THIRD ST Ale ALL- OTHER RISEN'ED RIGHTS. DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COAIION LAW STATUTORY --i- COPYRIGHT 2003 - I 1 19 GNOOBS N 1 1 7 / :4 4 :'fi *94 Rev. Ccr-J,*ion *sued-: WINN MAP 320 W. HALLAM ST Sheet #. / 1 3 VICINITY MAP : 320 WEST HALLAM STREET - 0 SCALEÂ·NO SCALE REPRESENTED eouep!9@H seeH pnp lealls OZE p'33 weAA ~u~~d~sHV ~ 40 19 INÂ¥11Â¥H M W FRANCIS ST ~ ~~~~~~~~~ on the enlargement or red lcÂ¢ion. repres/nlation The ac:curasv may change ofthe feaIUmS depicted and Is not a legal ~~ This map//awing/image i a graphical fepresentation pyright 2003 CÂ·ty cf Aspen/Pitkin C ounty f d 4~~~~3> .....i...< design collaborative,llc. E-------------------------------------------3 320 oak lane aspen coloredo 81611 m Er/3 phone (970) 309 0695 f a x (970) 920 7822 | 1 ENTRY I KITCHEN BEDROOM i , ih ..1....tud'obarchltect..net DeL 1 4, 1 0 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN -- r-TE O 322 222=ZIZE=ZE 41 t. COLLABORATIVE LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTANED ON â„¢IS DOCUMENT IS â„¢E PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. NO PART OF EE ---EFEESEEEBESEEE.EBEEE*4 EErEBEEEREE 1 THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR I! [ tj'~ JIll: i Fl ]I ComED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATME LL.C. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATME LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL- COMMON lAW STATUTORY At ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS I__ ~j~~~~~~ 6~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- - jA-; .u~ -~---Ill-i-~1~p~ -1 r- ----------------- ------------------ -1 LIVING AREA OFFICE i ....i ..C,V'E / 1 3 EXISTING PLAN - PANABODE (33 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - (HALLAM STREET) /51 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION A-HIS SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0' E----11 ~C~HI~ SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0 A-HIS SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0" r R...111â‚¬ ..C'- 11 21.22 z_- - - 4 4 4 4 1 1 22 -2.22.22 43Â»~ i~ - -9 Conshction msue d' Â·- D M Â¢EtING CONDITIONS /23 EXISTING ROOF PLAN - PANABODE /43 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION - ( ALLEY VIEW) (61 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 2 HALLAM STREET ~ SCALE : 1/4, = 1'-0" ~H~ SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1'-0" \~-HIS,/ SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· Sheet#. A-WIC Punct IZENAFÂ° eouel)!sabl seeH Xpnr .g 1 .. 24.7 tri= 7 l.-2) (23 (/24) 3 7 2. d | |~ f I desgn collaborative,Ilc. i | i F-___ -| 11 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 phone(970.309.0695 1 1 -------1 ~ fax (970) .920.7822 '. 0- 1 //-/ â€¢-mali 1 dailk@itudlobarchlt'cl~.net 1 -5--- i 18 R L -1 = 10Â·+17 / \/ 1 \ *11 D v_~wi/P ~ m ~ Â· MECHANICAL . :VII / O 2003 ONE FRIDAYDESIGN COLiABORATIVE L LC - 11- - -- il Â· Â· THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT - CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE L- . - PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORADVE LLC NO PART OF- BEDROOM 1 -21 32 THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR COPIED WrTHOUT â„¢E PRIOR WRITTEN . =i -21.-- : 1 COLLABORATM2 LLC Ofâ‚¬ FRIDAY L- lili. PERMISSION OF ONE FR! DAY DESIGN 1 ------------- DEESIGNI COLLABORAIVE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY 2 .1 ~1 .AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, ----- COPYRIGHT 2003 1 141 . -----I 1 E--7 -r--1-7 / 9 1 0 -___~ - '' 7 1 .1/1 1--1=-j \(391 67 ~ ~~ BATH~---~ \ MECHANICAL L. CLOSET 2'4 - 08 rim /7-1 1 1 L,D L/ L, 6. d. 1 /1 3 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN Mil/ SCALE: 1/4- = 1,4- 1 7 1*11 f CC 1 , ..1 .43 AJ A43 1 1% (1,-4 2 1 1 Â· C Li W . './ I L~-----O r : VJ,Jrra -6 01 --- 11~211~ ,;6~1 i .ngEL i .._ â€ž44.- 1 Dil 0 -- * LIi/!!92.-8524 . f ~ KITCHEN ~ 9Â¥] iE] 1 2/1 /7-J , 4 7(Â°1 (CÂ·OURTYARD ~3 1 L 0 -=-V=--2.- r- -4-7.2-Â·l_- ----4-- [~Â©O- n - - -~ -~\ 5 1. . L/ - -[ai]- -.iaa - 1-3 - ft _._* f Â§ :ilmil 1-~82 ~ 5 ~| ~-' VIJ 0 It.4..........'./0. K TCHEN ISLAND h G" ,~:*ovyog-13 ? h Â· 1]ii] eATHERINS AREA le j .=,1 GE>..41 - 1 I __- | ~GA ~ ...2-2-21--2-IDE..0-71.- : LI, J L.MO DININe AREA i i] \2// BRIDGE ..1 F 111 '94 t 1 , 7.- 11 V / i 4 ..SH 1 EE - REF 1 _23'----KTm-DIE---1 t.-7-392~3--- -- - e e Re,- I -DIT--Illrn-llr-ntr-- ~ -- Construction 19 1 1 11 0 issue date: L. Dra- 1 PR@8?ED PLANS 320 HALLAM STREET /1 1 1 ,1 1 2/ /23 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN LE.~ 25-, 4 45 1 &2 A2.1 SCALE : 1/4- = 1'4= 0 = J EF~ FEP 11 i-2.1 aas Residence m==Eâ‚¬10 ev 'Er 7 26 4 - a 31 y 1 19.-3. , 1 4.-6. 1. I 5.-3. 7 | des gr, collaborative,Ilc. -J55:~537 #t *LT~ - 41/ - - f *24~~ |'-52 33+-11-58. . 320 oak lane aspel colorado 81611 r--------7 phone (970) . 309.0695 f a x (970) . 920. 7822 / \ derek@61,Idlobarchllect6 net I ' I / I./2.-toÂ·.el: 1 0 2003 ONEFRIDAYDESIGN n MECHANICAL 1 8-IllÂ· /12 - Col-LABORATIVE LIC L E 7 - - - - J - ~1 1 1 1 â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONT/rED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE - PROPERTY OF ONIE FRIDAY DESIGN BEDROOM = ~ PEN - , THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COLLABORATIVE LLC. NO PART OF LI Ggl . 1.1 -I COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN R COLLABORATIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY --- - - 1 9 RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC SHALL I 1 14\\j S ----E AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, 2 COPYRIGHT 2003 I N - MECHANICAL ff* BATH CLOSET ~/ ~ = 18 1 98 mr 1 r 1 .13 U 6% | 1 1 ~~ fill Â¢ 1, 21'-4Â· 151-10' 14'-2' 2 22' | 01) 30' , W , 3-1 1 .6 0 1 Â· pÂ· 1 - - (i) (i) CE, CE, 2-, 23 1 1 E /1 3 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN 3 CIO SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0- 0 EY- - r I * 7 2 rcol , 00 1 .41 .4.1 2. 99 + tf 30' , W 1 31 4 6'-24. . 44. 41.4. ,2-:r , , 11 - 4Â· q, 8.-56. 4-4Â· , n'-14Â· -2.-51' 5-2~~'â‚¬ 3'-03â€¢ 2'-5.- ' W. R.0 11.1,2-61. 11-04. . .. 11 f ..1.- 3 ./ ./.e , 11 12-*12- 76. UÂ¢-7 TA-1'~Z~ -Mnd l... -1 4 :-!Y 1 ;0 0 7 1 - 7 0 ..' J I -2{IZZ- F- itittilill -TO!!=RIrlE ~.~/ 10 . -------7. - m~ â‚¬6â‚¬Er L 2] 44J = 9 ~EFF Fi LIVING AREA 1 KITCHEN 9 3 <!21/ .2... I At 7--rn-, 0 -1,1 1 737-> 21 -1, - t./:X - 1 M 0 .:0 .4 = :,1 g 7% A ,11 6 i <i>/ 1 Â« 99-92 A l 1 1.1~2 f' r Â°--/- 1 h ~ COURTYARD ,- %3/ :L ... h ..1. ~- 1 : ~, - - [SE- 7 CE I / â€ž ' --' !4. 4 I1e 4 99 1 . 11 \ m iÂ«Â·NO r ing=...-.1 .. 31" Rit_ i]0 T.,i UU 61 11711'POPNIPF=0-Â¥3 3 4 -r [-1 ~ 1% TGEN ISLAN~ BATHERINS AREA 1 /133\\ :12 1 : 3 1. 1 127 j .10 11 Al [*ir- j . -wim 1-7.Â«1...1.- --- 1 ---7 .,. 0/ -4 .. MY!2-88=A / r I In (El BRIDGE 1,UU ' DININe AREA ~ en 7 < ~ /~HALL Ls /83 23 "\ 11 // -_ 'le, |_ 20.1...r-J =-LE-___-7. /ED --7- 1, 2-r--1 - 1 ! 2 --- h L / 012 -v--- e W : v ,_i _- *--53 4 .4 -, 6 *1 , / bÂ® bt. - e ---7 --.--- f ~ L (i> Rev. i , 5'-4I LIm'-C . 4'-2' f 3'-_jÂ· * 2.-5~ , 6-6. ,2'-3- , 3Â· L L i'-1 ,.2.-66. Ill p'-56.. Drm"'le: 1 g#*n 'sue de,~0: u Â·Â· - w Â· , PROPOSED PLANS 1'-63' 93Â· 5~â€¢ 3~' 13' , 22 320 HALLAM STREET 1 27 h /1 L, (23PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN L~ 4 , CE , 4 , 4. ~A2.1/ SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0Â· A-2. I E Judy Haas Residence pl.9 190/\A - uedsÂ¥ Jo *1!0 7 f r Se C..1 D. A4J M.1 M.1 1 d /-21 a L / 1_.2 y design collaborative.!Ic. 1 1 320 oak lane aspen colorado 81611 MLLE FOR 'AS 'IREf'l-ACE phone (970) . 309.0695 fa x (970) . 920. 7822 -- derek@studlobarchltects.nst & 2 ....11 - 2 - 1 , ;1 -11 1 ' .-L' 1 Lt,3.<T n 0 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1,11 11 1 111: !1 1 COLLABORATIVE L.L. C 11 11 .lili 0-lip 11 1,- 1 .ANEL// TO BE AF-LIED THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 111 1111 1 11 16 1 CEP,R -'./.% rv OVER TOF CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE 1 If I|'| 1 '10 iIi q# PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE L.LC NO PIRT OF ! 1 11 1 1 lilli Ill 1 111~1111 :Pll THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 11111~~1 1~1,~ ~1 1 - /7 PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN -- 11 , 11 1 1 :lilli 1 11 1 11 1 11 COLLABORArVE L.EC. ONE FRIDAY 11 1 1 --/ DESIGN COLLABORKInâ‚¬ LLC. SHALL 11 1 RETAIN All- COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED IGHTS CEDAR SHINGLE' COPYRIGHT 2003 ' 1 1 iL~i )flarl,~ij~~~ x v 1 " _ '11 1 + 612=22=- + lili 1 1 |I 121 11 1 1 1 ~11 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 11 E- - - ~~~ --I #4-f-ti m~-j - Â£ 11 1 1 11 1 j 1 1~ -7 ./~ 1 1 1 lilli 11 1 11 - 1 1 -It ' ~\ 211PROPOSED_*OPERLAN ~3 , ---, t c ~ (2 , ~...' ~ SCALE: 1/4â€¢ = 1'-0â€¢ - , 431 , CE. L (3' 1 L 1 41 i1 r Li.. 1 .23~ 1/ LE 1 1 1 1 11 11 lili 11 1 1 X 11 1 11 11 1 1 ', LE]-11 ' 1 1 1 111 1 1 11 'f 11 1 11 114 I ul l i 1 1 11 2 - 111 . 1!1 46 525% i ll 11 1-1 |Re..1 MI 1 1 Il Con'bucton 11 I!I iasuedate Drawing Tnie PROPOSED ROOF PUN & CONTEXT ELEVATION Sheet I (23 PROPOSED CONTEXT ELEVATION: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET A-2.2 SCALE : 3/16 = 1'-0- B seeH Pnr f r i f T T f f L d design collaborative,llc. 1 T.O. KAI-,NAL SKYLIetÂ·rr 320 oak lane 7 ELEV. 1101Â·-6- (AF:PROXJ aspen colorado 81611 t| 1~| ~~~~~|I, i alivl-"-W,910"551' ,,|, ,:|||lilllIllIlllIlll~~Illl IllIlll Â¥ ELE'. liDÂ·-41- (APPROX) f a x (970) . 920. 7822 Â£ T.O. R JIPeE MEAM phone (970) 309.0695 1 ....11 derek@stullobarchltects nat bULLLULL[GULBULLULLELL_LULLU_LL[111 I" 'I 'll' " lilli' I'll 'I " "'lll]UL-1111111-1 | | COLLABORATIVE L.L.C. 011>W UULLUU-1111LLLULLULLUMULILI O 2003 ..FRIDAY DESIGN IN 11.11 1Lil-LLLittlLLLUULUL[UUULUULULLLUULLUU_Uti.[1- 1 1 Ill-11] 1.-LU_1_El.L1L1LLL!1-LLE_.131111[1111]LlL[111_1Ulli_1111]ldtilll-Ul ~ COUABORATIVE LL.C. NO PART OF CONTAINEDONTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT i T.O. PLATE MAIN GABLE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 111 1--El-I-Fll-[TT.TTT~E[~E~TT--FT-Er[TTITT-[1--F%m-TT-Ir7TT~ Kidup*a-- â„¢IS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN 1 T.O. PLA-TE BRiOSE LOW PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LL.C. ONE FRIDAY P +7+4#.=44 T;'1"11 6"--:4 Ht[=%=r'.'- p... . DESIGN COLLABORATIVE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATlJTORY 2 'll#- 141Â· Eli -- 1 .....11 AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS. COPYRIGHT 2003 7TT7U 4,1 91 3-11 1 KAL-w 1 T.O. PL-re MAIN LEVEL 1 ELEV. 100'-O. 11 & /13 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - ADDITION 9221 i ~ SCALE : 1/4" = 1'4= I 2 1 1 11 11 k TO. CONG. LOILER LEVEL ~~ LL-,ZZZzzzZZZIZEZZIEZZIZIEZZE*-I 3. - - -EEEUTGrW- E m I R a n ~ f 3 0. A TO. KAL-+NAL SKYUGH' EL//.)Mtl/RIOXJ -'*1- i r Ii -Fi T-r-ri -Ti-TTETITTTI-TITEE-T]17-QUI_[.gna:1&m~kmgk__1-_._L_1__1-_JT[1'TTY-fil - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~7,0. RIDGE BEÂ»1 ELIV.Im-#'AF'F'ROXJ ~=~**Â£Â·*FÂ·*W-Pfft--mÂ»ryM . T.O. F'LATE FORCH CUTBACK 11%11'-1*~1111 li il 11 il It 11 li Il 11 Illl 11 Hil 11 lifi ll HMM Il li 11 li li 11 Il li lll il 11 li li 1-1- 11 -1 *811111 LUT,1.11 IT li li IT Il il IT 11 Il l ! il l, 1, 11 il l i li il r i g il l i ll-.1LLLIL-1.EEOCIEEQI] ~ ~ 1- 41.- lili-lili 1 1 1 1 L il--2 liL Â·Â·.r-1.L.--LW1...L-U-U-1.LlU.WW-J-L-lli~.L~-~~-~--~-Lt-Li-161.L-6-u-u.~1U- 1_1L1L[1_ abl-OM - KAÂ·WIL 51415HrS(9!EM T.O. /LATE MAIN 6ABLE 7 1 11 " 1 1 11 1 1 1 1-1 1 lili 1.- ELEV. 1/1'-9 i ' -| 7--77- r r-T-p- -i il - 1 T.O. PLATE BR]PaE HI/H . 1.1 1 0 â€¢, ,Â·Â· A. ' I,!.!:I: ' IiÂ·,dk 1 111 11~11'lill ~. 113 2%1.5 0 - 1 1 2,Â·29' ...1 1 1.1 L U, 7-1-=.. / L-21 1 77 1 1 ./1, 1,#2[1-I 0 41 ? A r - 6 -hi 403 111 irap,5 1 11 \ 1=IM< )1 1 501*F , \ 1 11*K 000# 9OE 1 bmt#* , 6 TO. PLYO. MAIN LEVEL./ BRIDGE r- --- ----rt--------- -t--14 'r d711 2}113*1~ 1 .1.111 111 1 1111 /HI 1 lili.1 - /- :111111\. 111 :lili / IP I ll4665*Ill |w.Ull' I issue d/te Con5tnudion 14~L===1 4&23 11 LL==94 / TO. CON/. Lie/Trâ‚¬LL /ASE - Drawing TIe: ADDITION ELEVATIONS A T.. Coble. LorER LEVEL- 2 HALLAM STREET Sheet / c23 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION - ADDITION A-3.1 \45/ SCALE : 1/4 . 1'-0- ADD eouep!seh~ seeH Xpnr puE' ls@M - uadsÂ¥ Jo 61!0 i 7 1 f l 5 r f 14\\ PROPOSE TO REMNE EXISTING FLUE 1 1 PROPOSE TO DO SK'LI'HT TO ROOF ~5333~~ PROPOSE TO REPLAGE EXISTINe ROOF A T O KAL-+NAL St</LIGHT 1 ELEV. 114'-6 (APF'R/XJ design collaborative'llc. -k T.O. R]DIE BEAM Â¢ E PROPOSE TO 1~Â·PRNE EXISTINe FASCIA | ----ii. Role 29 320 oak lane * T.O. PLATE PORCH CUTBAGK aspen colorado 81611 ELEV. 115-81/y - - - 2 _ ~ phone(970).309. 0695 PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTIN6 FUNDOâ€¢1 fax (970) .920 7822 1, En I â‚¬,1 LOCATION AND SIZING rl]TH UPel~DEEP ....I der'k@'tudloblrchite't. net ~-*Â«199 CLAD OR hOOP YINDIVE er- MAU=/CTITER TO el DETERMINED M.L_ION PATTERN TO MATCH EXISTIN6 GONE>ITIONS O 2003 ONE In,DAY DESIGN PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISTINS STAIRS COLLABORATIVE U.C I TD. R.All MAIN GABLE - -- Ent MORE APPROPRIATE ISTORIC SOLUnON -91 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT e i Le. PLATE PlNING eUMPÂ»-aUÂ·T ' CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORAIVE LLC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAYBE USED OR COPIED WnHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN I31 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - HALLAM ST. FACADE COLLABORA'IME LLC. ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATME LLC. SHALL SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS. COPYRIGHT 2003 1 TO. PLMID. MAIN LEVEL. -ELEVTE;zar rl------- PROPOSE TO REMOVE E><19//6 FLUE 4-1 1 1 . 2 - PROPOSE TO REPLACE EXISINI ROOF 11 1 -1 1 PROPOSE TO IMF'ROvE EXISTINe FASCIA 11 + 1 11 --~-~--~~1_--â€žU*2;~~-r-~ 1 1 1 5 1 1 I lili 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 11 11 E----3 1 11 A T.0. CONG LIGHTyâ‚¬LL BASE NE[F -- - .-'EE*22====tt==312*337===3----==E~ PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISTÂ»*S rlhDOM CZEZZL E==2-1 --â€¢'wy. --Ill LOCATION AND SIZING WTH EPS,RADED L~ Lu=11.....L...2,11~~~~~2=====tt==22=+1*4~;EL,Di En=======2311 CLAD OR WOOD WIDC/6 BÂ¥ MAL,=ACTUâ‚¬ER I T O C<Â»0. LC*â€¢UR LEVEL- -1 7 ELEV. 84'-4' 1 TO ENE 051Â·ERMthED MA_LION PATTERN TO HATCH EXISTINe CONDInONS tu-I--4-3- - OREEFINISHPAN-~0[JE SIN /1 3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (FACING ALLEY) - ADDITION SCALE : 1/4' = 1'-0" -a a /43 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE I SCALE : 1/4 = 1'-0- g I M '7 '11 1 -Fh P 1,7 - 9 r , MIâ„¢ 7'-0~ ANTERIOR DIMEIGION AT LOIN SIDEE) '- --W#-MW:2~Za- M (/AI,ECTION EL-EIENT. COÂ»â‚¬CTOR PIECE TO TIEE T.O. KAL-PIll SKÂ¥116HT ~ 1*11 INTO EXISTINe PAN-A!300[ ROOF CONDITION CUE ff- ---*-EEKE'*TA....J ----==I,IEYM..i.ti==--CP-~2==~ 1 TO BIAL[DINe COOEE 1â‚¬16+IT HINI,UÂ·15 4 FOR LEAST T.O. 54106[ BEAM --<--I Â»kXNT OF INPACT TO PENDINS ICE EUILCUP e. TELEV. 118Â·-4Â· 6-â€¢PRoxj ./.1.%/ Â»9-:41F=-,ilfÂ«F=Â¥ai:MÂ»UL CZ~% 1 Ht--1 1 Il ' Â·.Â·Â· Â· 1 E-dotti- 1.<fliU3:0~Lal~-.MMn'----111 TO HoRE ASI*EnCILLY PES,RABLE LOCATION CCE] r m , 0 11.1 I==M>MII 1Â· TU ,- ..4!r- - r Il flzm_L___Ul rM-~ In=-Â·2%431; 11-~4'libt~11122~ REPLAGE EXISING INDOW W[â„¢ LARIER pliNDOW STÂ·fLE Of ~HDOW TO REMAIN OINSISTENT /TH ALL ENDO#5 TO BE REPLACED LU-11 1 ~211211'~Ilk==211 1 T.O. PLATE PINING 84/-arT 1 0 1 1-,O. PLATE BRIDIE HIGH 1 7 ELEV+ tolue 9/4' 'amplir . ELEV. 10/'-0- c53 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PAN-ABODE - ALLEY FACADE 10, . b T./.PLATE BRIC,65 LOM 97. SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0' . 1,caTOM Feap, f. I TO. MÂ»13. MAIN LEVEL/ BRIPIE -PROPOSE TO AD VIUS,rt TO ROOF - - PROPOSE lo lal,4~E BISTIO FUE 11 71---------------3---------1-1 - PROPOSE TO REPLAOE EX]STINS ROOF= 1! 11 11 'Re..1 1 Corwtrucbon 11 1 - PROPOSE TO MAINTAIN EXISH)46 INDOW msue date.- 1 T.O. CONG. LISHTrel EASE LOCAT,014 AND SIZINe MUTH UPIRADE/ [hwing T. ---9'MEV.fl-TB 1 QUE=~ [32. 12Â·JÂ·z 20 HALUM STREET CLAO OR WOOD IN[,096 By MAL.FACIURER ADDITION ELEVATIONS I T.O. GONG. LOWER LEVEL TO DE DETERMINED - - ----~7-Ey'JiWW- -- PROPOSE TO REFIN191 PAN-ABODE STAIN Sheet / (23 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ( FACING HALLAM STREET) - ADDITION -I A-3.2 SCALE : 1/4- = 1'-0" (63 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PAN-ABODE ADD â€¢ ~.2ySCALE-: 1/4' 2 1'-0" lam Street Judy Haas Residence M -ue sv Joil!0 d a 0/ KT' des gn collaborative.llc. 320 oak lane 1 1 aspen colorido 81611 phone (970) . 309.0695 I T.O. KAL-MAL SK,1.4/HT fax (970).920. 7822 V ELEV. illÂ·-C (PROX) ': I I I I III 1 1 1 1 . ELEV. 118-1. 6â€¢PFROX.,1 COLLAeORATIVE LLC. ,6 7.. RIC>65 dara.@6 -* & h'.cts.ne i 1 O 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN NTENT CONTA!*ED ON THS DOCUMENT IS T}Â·E WÂ·TE: ALL /110361016 1 HEI,SHTS FOR PROPERTY OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN PAN-ABODE SECTIONS TO BE Valf IEP .. .. . COLLABORATME L.L.C. NO PART OF IN r,El_D BY CONTRACTOR COPIED Â¥mHOUTTHE PRIOR VmITTEN 5 THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR 06 T/. PLATE MAIN I~LE PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABOiNTIVE LLC. ONE FRIDAY 9 ELEV. leeÂ·-3' RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY Â·Â· Â· Â·Â· Â· Â·Â· Â· Â·Â· â€¢ I W~Mil.,ING al#. DESIGN COLLABORATWE LLC SHALL - . . f .~ ~_ i .-- ---1 + En:=t:~PE HI COPYRIGHT 2003 AND ALL Oâ„¢ER RESERVED RIGHTS, - \ 1 4 i t/ -- . LI\/ he AREA i ~ KITCHEN -- eATHERINe AREA I L _ 2 10.'FE L BRIDÂ¢g F V ~ I F?fi .RTAIR MUI) 1 VANITY -2-7 e.v!-H - GE] ,-' [E] . / 4- / 1 12 -L J - - . w- ,--v--, Â·>--vi ",L_,~-,--â€¢1'- - - - -- ~ la__ i fl A T/. PL/0. MAIN LEVEL ---~0Â« I 1 1 1 I I I ' l r'~ I i I 1 1--1 1 Il I InI- I II I- Il I---t-ZIE=r# 1 I--I-)[=3 I ELEV. 100Â·-O / 1 F 1 0 11 1 [23 1 .::1 1 /11 11 \ 11/ 11 11 \- BEDROOM 1\ 11 1 1 ~ DEN ...0 .03 lili 11 / %0 24 1 1./ -Â£2 CO 11 1 /1 h LONG AXIS SECTION: AA (ENTIRE PROJECT) : 'll E SCALE : 1 /4= = 1'-0Â· _ I TO. CONC. LOrâ‚¬R LEVEL Z r-11 - CIO r 0 N â€¢ CO /7 /13 /13 I T.O. KAI-AL SKILI.H. 7 ELEV. 111'-6Â· 6APFROX.) 7 , 1% tart, / ELEV. 10'-4 6~~PROXJ 4 Int. ) NOTE: ALL. 01~â‚¬NSIONS 4 HE,6+'rrS FOR , 7 11*L PIN-ABIDE SECPONS TO BE VERIFIED NOTE, ALL /MENSIONS â€¢ HE:eHTS FOR 1 IN Fla.O 5Â¥ CONâ„¢A,fOR I ~~~~~~1 h n PAN-ABOOE SECHONS â€¢ LINI< BET,EEN her! CONITNUCTiON / EXISTING CONIXTIONS L - .....S.I. t- 1-- 7 TO BE VER]FIED IN FIELO BÂ¥ CONâ„¢,eTOR I TO. PLATE MAIN IABLE 2 W.I.FJ ' Vt#NING el.1--OUT - ~ ELEV. 108'-3Â· 6 TO. PLAÂ·TE BRIPSE HISH =L 6 7/. PLATE fAN ///f ELEV. 108'-8 3/4' 6/.1/J KITCHEN ~EN .O HAU,/ I 1 ELEV. taT-2- N..FJ A TO. PLATE /10% L.C. 22- 2-4= Y ELEV. 108Â·-0- 0/JFJ [HE] ~- ; BR*(SE =r - CLOSET 6ATHERING AREA ~ -1 Hnn - ./ =6 - ~ 1 - ...0 re MAIN LEVEL/ BR'36E 06 TÂ£, -. PAN Ae<002 - 06 Tfl FLMO. MAIN LEVEL./ aRIC>em i Â· b _ _ ~~~ ~ ~i --~~~~~ LF Fl FV. 100'-0~ 7 ELEV. 100.-7 W.I.FJ . ELEV. 100Â·-0~ 1 ' / 1 ' ' 3 11 I - L L -SINE 11 r 11 I ~...~| NOTEE: FouhDATION â€¢ câ€¢U-L SPACE ExiST,% 1 1 -I MA:f REPLACE PaÂ»PATION I FLOOR FoR 3 Â£4/lAir FLOORPACK TO BE PETERMINES 9 IJPON DISCUSSION E ENSINEER Rev. li __LIZE~ BEDROOM CLOSET Cor,strucbon Issue date LL - 6 TO. GONG. LkSHÂ·r,â€¢El_ BASE 7 ELEV. 'll'-loâ€¢ ~L~~G SECTIONS - I LO. CONG. LOPER LEVEL L 1 ELEV. 89 -01Â· 320 HALUM STREET Sheet # (23 CROSS SECTION: BB (PAN ABODE) (3>CROSS SECTION: CC (BRIDGE) (43 CROSS SECTION: DD (ADDITION) = 0 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0 ~M.1/ SCALE : 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· A4.1 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0Â· . eouep!Sehl seeH Apnr puE' 1seM - uedsÂ¥ JO 61!0 , I ~:~ ) % C V<C 5/: : 4Â·< 2/I f d a SPECIAL CASE CUSTOM INDOnS - SCALE 1/4' â€¢ GOÂ· JUDY HAAS RESIDENCE: 820 FNEST HALLAM STREET MINDOR SOHEDULE y SYMBOL Role+4 OF'ENINe EAD HEISHT PRO DETAILS UPE MANUFACTURER MODEL NOTES T.O. PLY'10. PER r,XH SITUATED FLOOR JAMB SILL HEAD NUMBER design collaborative'llc. 63 0 2-69. A-1 2'-113/4" x 5Â·-5 3/4 8'-0' FROM T.O. F .LO R L GLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 9565 - GASEME aspen colorado 81611 10'-46' 320 oak lane phone (970) . 309 . 0695 41/2- 4 142- 4 |/2~ |'Al , I'-i- 4' A-2 2-11 3/4 x 5Â·-5 3/4' 8-0" FROM T.O. F . LO R LV CLAD UNIT - CASEMENT PELLA 3565 - CASEM T fax (970) .920.7822 6 ....11 8 2'-5 3/4 x 2'-5 3/4 e'-3" FROM T.O. P YND M IN A . LVL. CLAD UNIT - FIXED PELLA 2429- FIXED de'lk@:tudlobarchltects nat 17[ 11 elli 19 ULL__IMI 0 4Â·-2 3/4" x 4'-2 3/4Â· 8'-3" FROM T,O. P 90. M IN A , LVL. CLAD MA-LED UNIT - (2) FIXED/ (2) PNNINe FELLA (4)-2525 (2) 2525 FIXED 1 (2) 2525 AFWNING: SEE ELEVS 0 2'-6 3/4" x Â¢1'-0- 41'-3" FROM T.O. P PO. M IN AO . LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO DRAFYINe. A-10.1 EFCO CUSTOM-PULLED AIO.I - El=00 403 SERIES - ANOPIZED ALUM. FIN H 0 2003 ONE FRIDAY DESIGN 1 11/ \ 1 E 10'-4 1/2" x 4'-0 q'-3- FROM T.O. Pe. MIN LVL. CUSTOM: REF TO DRAWINe= A-10.1 EFOO CUSTOM-MULLED AIO.I - ErGo 403 SERIES - ANODIZED ALUM. FIN COLLABORATIVE L.L C. 1 - I la_11===*-La I F TRIANGLE: AIO.1 BOTTOM OF FRA Ne RI E ISTS. CLAD UNIT - FIXED PROFILLIT CUSTOM-CHANNE REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.FJ THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT 6-1 -4 . ~ 7--TIrrill'ETFIziZE-711--1 1 6 2'-4 1/4" x 3'-0 3Â·4 - FROM T.O. P Ve. M IN . LVL. CLAD UNIT - FIXED PELLA CUSTOM 6LAZINS TO BE COMPATABLE PV GAS APPLIANG PROPERTY OF ONEZ FRIDAY DESIGN CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUME*r IS THE H 6'-O- x 6'-1 1'-9- FROM T.O. Pe. 5 IDGE Vt. KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM MAL-)NAL CUSTOM REFER TO A10.1 FOR KAL_-AL LAYOUT TH]S INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR ~ \ h.v---n/ COLLABORAIVE LLC. NO PART OF COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRn-rEEN 1 Qtr h liD 1 -9 F 1 11'-1. X a'-O. 8'-3" FROM T.O. P YND. M IN A .LVL. KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-MAL- CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KAL-WAL LAYOUT PERMISSION OF ONE FRIDAY DESIGN COLLABORATr/E LLC. ONE FRIDAY J IT-0- xi'-O- Â¢1'-3" FROM T.O. P Pe. M IN .LVL. KAL-MAL PANELING SYSTEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO AIO.1 FOR KALÂ»VAL LAYOUT DESIGN COLLABORATNE LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS K 2'-5 3/4= x 12'-1 3/4 15'-3- FROM T.O. Fe. MIN P. LVL. CLAD MULLED UNIT - (4) FIXED/ 0) A INS PELLA (5)-242Â¢! (4) 2929 FIXED Â¢ (1) 2924 AFNNINe: SEE El-EVS COPYRIGHT 2003 ASSEMBLY-CUSTOM ROUe,+ OP'ENI,eS TO BEV. 1. F L e'-3 3/4- x 2'-1 3/4 10'-3- FROM T.O. IN A P. LVL. CLAD MULLIED UNIT - (3) FIXED PELLA (3)-2525 (3) 25225 FIXED: SEE ELEVATIONS M 4'-O' x 11'-O' SKYLIGHT LOCA AS I DICA P ON LAN KAL-FAIAL PANELING SÂ¥STEM CAL-PAIAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V..F R.0.11'-1. PAN-A 1'-10" x 4-ID (V.I.FJ 6'-10Â« FROM T.O. .F. PAN ASO E MOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED/ APNNI PELL-A CUSTOM - 1,41003 REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-8 5'-3" x 4'-10(V.I.F) 6'-10'FROM T.O. F. PAN ABO E WOOD MULLED UNIT - FIXED,/ Antl PELLA CUSTOM - Â»1002 REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.FJ PAN-6 4'-2" x 2'-10 (V.I.Fj b'-10 FROM T.O. F. FAN ABO E MOOD MULLED> UNIT - (2) CASEMENT FELLA CUSTOM - ~100[2 REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.LF) PAN-D 5'-10 3/4- x 5'-6 -1/8 6'-10- FQOM T.O. F. PAN ABO E FOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA (2)-3565 (2) 3565 MULLED FNOOD GASEMENT - SEE ELEVS 1 .AbEUU 1 1 595Â¥rnr--~ PAN-E 2'-2= x 2'-22" 6/.\F:j 6'-10' FROM T.O. P. PAN ABO E YWOOD CUSTOM UNIT - AFNNING PELLA CUSTOM - MOOD REFER TO AID.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.FJ 1Â«211 PAN-F 40-1- x 2'-10' 6/.1.F) 6'-10' FROM T.O. F. PAN ABC) E WOOD MULLED UNIT - (2) CASEMENT PELLA CUSTOM- INOOD REFER TO AIO.1 FOR LAYOUT (SIZE V.I.F.) PAN-6 6.-eÂ· * 2,-eÂ· 91<Â¥LleHT LOOA AS I DICA D ON LAN KAL-MAL PANELINe SÂ¥STEM KAL-MAL CUSTOM REFER TO PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT V..F. ~ ~; ~ Bg@ 0 0 f 11' ~up~ CD TI. 05 E co .59 C ~ KAI_-MAL â„¢ANBLUCENT P/NELING SÂ¥STEM (O co 2ru) 2, 2 u CD J -11[Pr HAAS RESIDENCE: 320 VEST HALLAM STREET DOOR SCHEDULE 1 121 ./6 1 SYMBOL ROUGH OPENING HEAP THICKNESS LEAF DIMENSION MANUFACTURER HANDING MODEL NOTES MXH HEIGHT ARDMARE MATERIAL STYLE IN X H NUMBER 7-10- Ra , 5'-9 .0 , L Ea Ea mal , EQ , EQ N 002/A 3'-5- X 1 1'-I. PASSASE LUMICITE CUSTOM TB.D. 3Â·-4" X 7-0- T.B.CP. RH CUSTOM: LUMICITE INTERIOR PIVOT POINT POOR 41 Â¤111--1--Al 0028 22Â·-10- X 1'-i" PASSASE MAPLE SOLIP 1 3/4- 2'-a~ X 1-0 TB.O. LH 003/A 2'-10- X -1'-1" 1'-I. PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 13/4- 2'-8- X 1'-0' T.B.P. LH 1122111122111221 111*31*21 003/S 7-6" X -1'-1 " 1'-1. PASSAeE 64-AZINe EURO-6 Te.D. 2'-9 X 7-0" T.Se. RH CUSTOM: EURO GLASS SHOrIER DOOR 005/A 3'-2" X 1'-1' 7'-IÂ» SECURITY MAPLE SOLIP 1 5/4- 3'-O X 1-0- T.5.0Â· RH CHECK FOR FIRE RATINe REQUIREMENTS 41-2- Re 22'-2' RO. lot/A 9'-O 5/4' x 1'-I" 1.-1. PASSAeE CLAD FRENSH 1 1/8. 3'-0- X 6'-10 PELLA RH 3662 FELLA GLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH SLAZINS 1 Ea Ea 102/A 2Â·-ID- X 7-3 1-3 PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4- 2'-8- X -12-0. T.B.D. LH 102/5 2'-10- X -1'-3- 1'-3. PASSA6E MAPLE SOLID 13/4- 2'-a" X 7'-O- T.B.D. SLIDI INTERIOR SLIDING TRACK DOOR 103/A 2'-8" X 7'-3- -1'-3 PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4 2'-6 X -7'-O T.BO. SLIDI POCKET INTERIOR SLIDINe POCKET DOOR 104/A 2'-10" X 7'-1" 1'-1- PASSASE 6LAZIN6 EURO-GL 113.0. 2Â·-4" X 7-0- T.B.O. RH CUSTOM: EURO 6LASS SHOWER POOR 106/A 2'-8' X 1'-3' 1'-3. PRIVACY MAPLE SOLID ISA" 2'-6- X 7'-0- T.B.D. SLIDIN INTERIOR SLIDINS TRACK DOOR 105/A q'-0" X 1'-3 -7'-3. SECURITÂ¥ MAPLE FRENCH TB.D. (3) Bt-O' X -7'-O' al.IANTUM FOLD! 6 TRACK QUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDING TRACK NOTE: ALL EXISTINe PAN-ABODE MINDOMS 110/A q'-0- X 8'-3 5'-3. SECURITY MAPLE FRENCH TB.D. a) 3Â·-0Â· x a'-O- QUANTUM FOLDI TRACK GUANTUM 3 PANEL FRENCH FOLDING TRACK TO BE REPLACED BY SIZE AND MULLION LAYOUT AS INDICATED. ALL ROUGH OPENINGS 113/A 3'-O 3/4' X 8'-3" 8'-3. SECURITY CLAD FRENCH Ila' 3'-0- X 8'-0- PELLA LH 3bq6 EXTERIOR CLAD FRENCH DOOR MITH 6LAZING TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR 4 MINDOM 11543 6'-0" X -1'-3' -1'-3- PASSAGE MAPLE SOLID 1 3/4Â· (2) 3'-0- X 1'-0- T.B.O. POUB SLIDING INTERIOR DOUBLE SLIDINe TRAOK DOOR MANUFACTURER IN FIELD 'Rev. 1 Construction 1:sue data,- Dral./. WINDOW & DOOR 118.PECIALCONDITION_WINDOWS (23 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES: 320 WEST HALLAM STREET SCHEDULE C~,y SCALE: 1/4- = 1'-0 \A10.1/ SCALE : NO REPRESENTATIVE SCALE Sheet#. - 10.1 -f \A - ed V Jo 410 f mi = CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Fu ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS Charles L. Cunniffe, AIA Principal Janver C. Derrington, AIA Principal July 2,2003 Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 RE: Major Historic Development Ferer Residence 135 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy, As the authorized representative of the Applicant for the referenced project, we hereby request a work session with the Historic Preservation Commission on Wednesday, July 9 to present the proposed development plan and get feedback. We understand that the commission members will meet at the subject property at noon for a walk around, and then reconvene at 4 pm for discussion. It is the intent of the Applicant to add to the existing historic residence and rear yard guest cottage so as to create a duplex. We have reviewed the Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines and believe our proposed design is in keeping with the intent of the various standards. For example, the mass and scale of the addition to the historic residence on the entry street fagade has been articulated to clearly define it by providing an all glass staircase enclosure behind a large spruce tree, which will be preserved. The two-story living space to the west is narrower and shorter than the existing residence and has the proportions and elements of the typical Victorian Aspen residence while using more contemporary but compatible materials and detailing. The roof shapes will be broken into residential scale segments and have metal roofing that differentiates from the historic but will not compete. The addition will be attached to the west and part of the south fagades of the historic residence, which do not face either street on this corner lot. It will be 610 EAST HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.5590 fax: 970.925.5076 info@cunniffe.com www.cunniffe.com ASPEN â€¢ STEAMBOAT â€¢ TELLURIDE â€¢ VAIL Page 2 of 2 July 2,2003 Amy Guthrie attached to the one-story cottage by a one-story screened porch with the roof serving as a deck for the larger historic duplex unit. Most of the additional space to the smaller "cottage" duplex will be in the basement. Both units will have a full basement as shown on the attached drawings. The existing structures will be jacked up in place while the basement is constructed. A one-car garage will also be added on the southeast corner of the lot and the open space will be suitably landscaped. There are numerous mature spruce and pine trees, lilac bushes, etc., and all will be preserved except for one spruce tree on the west property line next to the garage ramp of the neighboring multifamily dwelling. The only Residential Design Standard that cannot be met will be the entry of the historic residence, which is only 7 feet behind the porch columns, not 10 feet. This will require a variance, along with some existing and proposed setback encroachments. We look forward to meeting with you and the HPC members on July 9. Sincerely, dulc-4 Charles L. Cunniffe, AIA Principal Enclosures MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Annual HPC Honor Awards DATE: July 9,2003 HPC's 15th annual Historic Preservation Honor Awards will be held at the Wheeler Opera House on August 25th or 26th. Below are photos of all significant HPC projects that have been completed in the past year. There is no set number of awards that are granted. Generally, the awards are given to recognize excellent projects that involve restoring and/or adding onto a historic building, or new construction in the historic districts. Some years the board presents the Welton Anderson Design Award that recognizes an architect's contribution to Aspen's built environment, or the Elizabeth Paepcke Award for an individual's efforts to promote interest in local history or historic preservation. The nominees are: '' fdÂ»'r . </ Â·0Â· 2,1 ..r::*F:/44 + LT.77 rtifir.*Mt.4 . 411' .136 3.r' + '#40\ i .7- lew -11- m . fb ' 4 . . 1.. 323 W. Hallam â€¢ . 4 ./ k fil: . 7 1112: - I. I i . I +I 323 W. Hallam-rear *%t~!E I . -. 1 \A.3*. ~~.4.U7:77:<7*1Â¥~ ~f~?i r I â€¢-T- â€¢0. 1~B~~111 FAUE,J#WI- .. ... -64- 5 308 Park- historic home r - T -m * - r 4 -4. 1 - Â¥ -Li .. VA t. __ i . * Z L -- 111 :+AL -22-12 -Fu t t: urâ€ž. 71 Mt t 4<*t.*TE- i/ill///11 1 1 k.,1-1 ~ -1 4,#~P- dilli 308 Park- new construction -MU.: 4.:AL 1 1 6"fl,lt.-* Â«.W:"P 11"//1 : *.-0 ilip./1 I 'Â¢4~/filli, Ie . ...944-. 4 't *4'~'~ ':M" r- 121 :-2 9. ,.1,4. I # I J'f<51 4 1 . 91 I*Â¥P...t,WIP ./- I 4 11 g T-7 4 - 4 * ._fl i ** 9 4:j.Â· 6~1 ..............Â£-/1 - Little Red Ski House, 118 E. Cooper 4 4 '.19 K . . .4 ; ' 4 1 4 '. 1 1 1 +. 7 14 . . 1,-. ... P' ail.m ~~Ii .1F'* er.5/ 1 . al... 1 4 .'ll *. 428 E. Hyman Â¥ I. ~1-/ A, 1// + Â· . tit .1 c..62~ I ..... ~Â¥.Â¥Cirr.*~0~-~+3*2FT&Ic,jt~:t.?073,+~~ 633 W. Main- from side ...... ,- i 7