The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.69 Cloud Nine Ln.A018-03Nine Lane Minor PUD Amendment A018-03 69 21 Oul d /V & 6Â£ â‚¬ 2-v~ --4 20<set 4 q s - 4 71 C {646 A , *. Lyu /- 0,%2/3'JJJ.3&!.41,6.t~Ed 9 [ C (0 41 A), 0-~ L Â» 84 13'b '-09 99 0 6*J ,);w LA 1 f .. CASE NUMBER A018-03 PARCEL ID # CASE NAME Cloud Nine Land Deck Project PROJECT ADDRESS 69,79,91,99 Cloud Nine Lane PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE Minor PUD Amendment OWNER/APPLICANT Larson, Chi,Ferreira, Cook REPRESENTATIVE Jeff Halferty DATE OF FINAL ACTION 6/25/03 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 6/25/03 BY J. Lindt .. PARCEL ID: ~ DATE RCVD: ~03/12/03 #COPIES:~- CASE iii)IA018-03 CASE NAME:ICIoud Nine Land Deck Project PLNR~James Lindt PROJ ADDR:~69,79,91,99 Cloud Nine Lane CASE TYP:~Minor PUD Amendment STEPS1 OWN/APP: Larson, Chi,Ferreira, ADR,69,79,91,99 CioÂ£EL C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:1 REP:|Jeff Halferty ADR:]215 S. Monarch St C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~970-920-4535 FEES DUE:~ FEES RCVD:|$500.00 STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:| BY| DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ ~ ~ 2-9 F 9 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS< PZ: 1 \, BOA: CLOSED:| -;Z /~.Â· ; IZDY: 1 - J ..&; DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: A A, ic#-t: C ~ 66 l .. MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Plannerci RE: Highlands PUD Clarification- Affordable Housing Deck Allowance DATE: June 6,2003 APPLICANTS: Cloud Nine Lane Affordable Housing Unit Owners LOCATION: Block B, Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD ZONING: R/MF PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100(A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. BACKGROUND: The owners o f all o f the affordable housing units in Block B, o f the Aspen Highlands Village PUD have applied for an insubstantial PUD amendment to the approved Aspen Highlands Village PUD to build larger decks on the rear of their affordable housing units. The approved PUD allows for decks to be exempt from floor area calculations up to 15% of the maximum floor area allowed for the units. The PUD further states that, "the floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall include the area under the horizontal projection of roofs or floors, when the roof orjloor exceeds five (5) feet". Moreover, the PUD also indicates that, "these architectural projections are exempt for flve (5) feet of the perimeter of each story of the structure". The City Zoning Officer has interpreted this to mean that any deck area under a roof overhang that does not extend more than five (5) from the exterior wall of the structure is exempt from allowable FAR and does not count towards the 15% exempt deck area requirement. Therefore, each o f the affordable housing units in Blocks A and B are allowed up to 15% of their allowable FAR in exempt deck area and the area under a roof within five feet of the exterior wall o f the building is completely exempt (does not even count towards the 15% exempt deck area). STAFF COMMENTS: The Thunderbowl Neighborhood consisting of Blocks A and B, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD was allowed a total of 24,750 square feet of non-exempt floor area for fifteen (15) affordable housing units. This provides an average allowable floor area of 1,650 square feet for each affordable housing unit. Based on an allowable FAR o f 1,650 square feet for each of the affordable housing units, an allowable deck area of 247 square feet per unit 1 .. would be exempt from FAR calculations. Therefore, staff believes that the proposed request to allow for the affordable housing units to construct larger decks is consistent with the FAR exemptions for decks that are allowed in the original PUD as long as the individual decks are under 247 square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that the proposed application meets the review standards for approving an insubstantial amendment to a PUD. Therefore, staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve the proposed amendment to allow for the decks on the affordable housing units in Block B, of the Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to be expanded up to a total of 247 square feet per unit. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial PUD amendment to allow for the affordable housing located in Block B, of the Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to construct larger decks with the following conditions: 1. Each deck expansion shall require a building permit. Additionally, each deck shall be limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR dedicated for each unit as is to be determined by the City of Aspen Zoning O fficer at the time of building permit. The fifteen percent (15%) deck requirement shall be calculated based on the methodology for calculating deck area that is set forth in the Aspen Highlands Village PUD (language attached as Exhibit "C"). 2. The applicants shall use fire resistant building materials that are to be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to building permit issuance. 3. No portion o f the proposed decks shall encroach into the utility easement that runs parallel to Thunderbowl Lane or any other recorded easement unless first obtaining written consent from the party in which the easement benefits. 4. An applicant wishing to construct a larger deck than they currently have shall obtain a letter of consent from the Condominium Association prior to applying . e for a building permit. rÂ©qi:,u Â»O<4v 5. All decks shall be constructed entirely within the approved building envelopes Prl r designated for each ofthe respective units. 9002 30% 9,5 * Â·06 COMMUNITY DEvE,Z rtaiNTDIHE.Â· 4 CLÂ« LL/.0-NA- date ~/250'713 4910, 0210 J~*Ann Woods, Community Development Director ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best ofmy knowledge. date Highlands Village Affordable Housing Condominium Association 2 .. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Aspen Highlands Village Affordable Housing Association Letter of Consent Exhibit C -- Aspen Highlands Village PUD Deck Calculation Methodology 3 .. Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings Insubstantial PUD Amendment. The Community Development Director may authorize an insubstantial amendment to an approved development if the proposal meets the following review standards: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the use or character of the final planned unit development. The approved PUD gives the affordable housing units an allowance of exempt deck space equivalent to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR for the units. Therefore, staff feels that the proposal is simply using the exempt deck space that they were provided in the PUD approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding: The amendment does not increase the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not affected by this alteration to the PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced by greater than three (3) percent as a result of the proposed amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the o ff-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The applicants are not requesting an amendment to the existing or required number of parking spaces. Staff finds this criterion notÂ· to be applicable. .. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. In addition, the applicants are required to either not build in recorded easements or obtain written consent from the agency in which an easement benefits prior to constructing a deck in an easement. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing changes to a commercial building. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing a change in the residential density. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: The proposed amendment is consistent with the project' s original approval. The approved PUD gives the affordable housing units an allowance of exempt deck space equivalent to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR for the units. Therefore, staff feels that the proposal is simply using the exempt deck space that they were provided in the PUD approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. June 2,2003 James Lindt City of Aspen Bldg. Dept. 130. S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Aspen Highlands PUD- Deck Allowance Dear Mr. Lindt: Please consider this letter authorization from Aspen Highlands Affordable Housing Assoc. for the units included in Block #of the association to be authorized and permitted to build decks as stated in the PUD clarification agreement. The following listed homeowner' s shall be included in the PUD clarification approved on April 29, 2003 for deck additions that comply within the guidelines ofthe stated PUD agreement. No deck shall exceed 15% of the total sq. footage of the dwelling unit it is attached to and shall comply with the city of Aspen building codes. APPLICANTS TO BE INCLUDED: #10- Mei Luong, 18 Edward & Carolyn Sciarrone, 21 Dominic & Emily Lanese, #37, James Baker & Sandy Wampler, #56 Jim & Jill Pomeroy, # 58 Michelle & Fleming Trane, # 49 Dylan Regan, #46 Todd Stewart & Lisa Bouchett, #66 Nik & Susan Budsey, # 72 Bob& Darnell Langley. Sincerely, *02 fkÂ»-li Paul Twohig President, AHAHV <' ~ ~' 1 < *L %124 0 G shall be graded in general compliance with the Accepted Grading Plans as depicted by Drawings L-204 and L-205 (Thunderbowl and____ I Maroon Creek Neighborhoods Grading Plans). Refer to the definit~ of Accepted Grade. Lots in Blocks A and G may be further gr~ consistent with development activities allowed within Activity~ Building Envelopes. Finished Grade for Blocks A and G will be .9=====22â„¢a~~je~*E.nalm grade established in conjunction with the construction*of a si ~ '- Tfamily dwelling unit or other structure. Finished Grade for all other Blocks in Aspen Righlands Village and *~re.. the lower portion of the Aspen Highlands Ski Area is generally depicted by the following grading plans. ?22= Blocks B&C (East Townhouses and Affordable Housing) - Drawing =206. L-201, East Townhouse and Affordable Housing Grading Plan. :UN:imi Block D - (Village Core and lower portion of Aspen Highlands Ski Area) - Drawings L-200 and L-202, Site Plan and Village Core Grading Plan) r 1. Aspen Highlands Ski Area - The lower portion of the Aspen Highlands Ski Area will be graded as depicted by Drawing L-200, Site Plan. Blocks E and F (West Townhouses and Affordable Housing) - Drawing L-203, West Townhouse and Affordable Housing Grading Plan. Gross Leasable Area - Commercial Space is that area measured from the inside of finished walls. Floor Area for R-15, R-30, & AH Zones - The sum of the gross horizontal surfaces of each floor of a building or structure. In calculating Floor Area, the following applies: a. General. Floor Area measured for the purposes of determining allowable Floor Area shall include all area measured from the outside face of framing or other primary wall members or from the center line of walls separating adjoining units of a building or portion thereof. Veneer facades up to eight inches in thickness shall be excluded from the calculation of Floor Area; that portion of a facade which exceeds eight inches shall be included. Fireplaces, elevators, stairs and similar features are included in the Floor Area on each floor. b. Roof overhangs and decks. The Floor Area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall include the area under the horizontal projection of roofs or floors, when the roof or floor exceeds five (5) feet. These architectural projections are exempt for five (5) feet of the perimeter of each story of the structure. Architectural 1 projections may project up to ten (10) feet and still be ~ 8 .. exempt, so long as the total perimeter space for a floor is less than or equal to the total area allowed for the five (5) foot exemption. This exemption cannot be used to transfer space between floors. c. Decks, balconies, stairways and similar features. Structures that exceed thirty (30) inches above Accepted. or Finished :1 Grade, and that are not covered by a roof or architectural , - projection from a building,.are exempt from Floor Area for up to fifteen percent (15%) of the maximum Floor Area allowed. Any areas in excess of fifteen percent (15%) of allowed area shall be counted toward Floor Area. d. Spaces below Accepted Grade for principal single family and duplex residences. Spaces below Accepted Grade, up to a maximum of twenty (20) feet in depth and which include no more than a single story, are exempt from Floor Area calculation up to a maximum of 4,000 square feet of Floor Area. Floor Area ~ below Accepted Grade which exceeds the 4,000 square foot ' exemption provided herein or is more than twenty (20) feet in 1 depth shall count toward the calculation of allowable Floor Area. If any part of the below grade space is exposed above Accepted Grade (such as walk-out basements, walls or courts) the entire below grade area shall be included in the Floor Area calculation; except that window wells and egress areas as required by the Uniform Building Code may be provided without 1 affecting this exemption. The foundation wall or footing may I ~ be exposed to the minimum degree required to comply with the Uniform Building Code pertaining to foundation design without affecting this exemption. Up to ten (10) percent of any particular below grade wall surface may extend above Accepted Grade and still be exempt from the calculation of Floor Area so long as the Finished Grade covers the surface that would otherwise be exposed. Garages up to seven hundred fifty (750) square feet may be incorporated into below grade space and shall not affect this exemption so long as the only sections of building so exposed are directly related to the garage structure. e. Garages and carports. Garage and carport Floor Area shall be exempted up to a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) _square feet. On a lot which contains a duplex, garage and carport Floor Area shall be exempted up to a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet per side. All garage or carport space in excess of the exempted areas shall be included as part of the residential Floor Area calculation. When a single family or duplex dwelling exceeds the allowed Floor Area, the exempt garage space shall be reduced by subtracting the excess Floor Area from the exempt garage space. f. Crawl space. Crawl spaces shall be exempt from the calculation of Floor Area, even if exposed above Accepted Grade, so long as 9 .. MEMORANDUM TO: .Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: James Lindt, Planner ~31- RE: Highlands PUD Clarification- Affordable Housing Deck Allowance DATE: April 29,2003 APPLICANTS: Erik Larson, Walter Chi, Marcelo Ferreira, and Brett Cook, represented by .jeffrey Halferty LOCATION: Lots 8-11, Block B, Aspen Highlands Village PUD ZONING: R/MF PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: Insubstantial amendments to an approved PUD may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.100(A), PUD Insubstiintial Amendments. BACKGROUND: The owners of Lots 8-11. Block B, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD (69 Cloud Nine Lane, 79 Cloud Nine Lane, 91 Cloud Nine Lane, and 99 Cloud Nine Lane), have applied for an insubstantial PUD amendment to the approved Aspen Highlands Village PUD to build larger decks on the rear of their affordable housing units. The approved PUD allows for decks to be exempt from tloor area calculations up to 15% of the maximum floor area allowed for the units. The PUD further states that, "thelloor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall include the area under the horizontal projection of roofs or floors, when the roof or floor exceeds .five (5) .feet". Moreover, the PUD also indicates that, "these architectural projections are exempt for jive (5) .feet of the perimeter of each story of the structure ". The City Zoning Officer has interpreted this to mean that any deck area under a roof overhang that does not extend more than five (5) from the exterior wall of the structure is exempt from allowable FAR and does riot count towards the 15% exempt deck area requirement. Therefore, each of the affordable housing units in Blocks A and B are allowed up to 15% of their allowable FAR in exempt deck area and the area under a roof within five feet of the exterior wall of the building is completely exempt (does not even count towards the 15% exempt deck area). STAFF COMMENTS: The Thunderbowl Neighborhood consisting of Blocks A and B, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD was allowed a total of 24.750 square feet of non-exempt floor area for fifteen 1 .. (15) affordable housing units. This provides an average allowable floor area of 1,650 square feet for each affordable housing unit. Based on an allowable FAR of 1,650 square feet for each of the affordable housing units, an allowable deck area of 247 square feet per unit would be exempt from FAR calculations. The applicants have all proposed decks that are under 15% of their allowed FAR if the area that is under a roof overhang is exempted out as is allowed by the PUD. In addition. all of the proposed decks are within the approved building envelope for the units. Moreover, the Sanitation District has been consulted and has determined that the ten (10) foot wide utility easement located on Lots 8 and 9 is for sanitary service lines that benefit the units. Therefore, it is only required that the applicant obtain approval of the condominium association to construct a deck within this easement. That being the case, staff has required the applicant to submit a letter of consent from the condominium association at the time of building permit submittal to allow for the decks to encroach into the easement. In addition. the owner of Lot 8 has amended his proposed deck plan so that no portion of the proposed decks will encroach upon the utility easement that runs parallel to Thunderbowl Lane that contains a main waterline. The applicants have obtained the approval of the Aspen Highlands Village Affordable Housing Association (attached as Exhibit "C") to construct the proposed decks on the subject properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that the proposed application meets the review standards for approving an insubstantial PUD amendment to the PUD. Therefore, staff recommends that tile Community Development Director approve the proposed amendment to allow for the decks on Lots 8-11, Block B, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to be constructed as proposed on the site plan and elevations attached as Exhibit "B" with the conditions of approval that are set forth below. APPROVAL: 1 hereby approve this insubstantial PUD amendment to allow for Lots 8-11, Block B, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to construct the decks on the rear of the affordable housing units with the following condition: 1. Each deck shall be limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR dedicated for each unit as is to be determined by the City of Aspen Zoning Officer at the time of building permit. The fifteen percent (15%) deck requirement shall be calculated based on the methodology for calculating deck area that is set forth in the Aspen Highlands Village PUD (language attached as Exhibit "D"). 2. The applicants shall use fire resistant building materials that are to be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to building permit issuance. 3. No portion of the proposed decks shall encroach into the utility easement that runs parallel to Thunderbowl Lane. 2 .. 4. The owners of Lots 8 and 9 shall obtain a letter of consent from their Condominium Association prior to building permit submittal to allow for them ra trID to encroach upon the ten ( 10) foot wide utility easement within which their ~9Fvj v '0 decks are proposed. This utility easement benefits the Condominium Association. 6 Zoe HMENT DIRECTOH <Eil,~- ojÂ·4~_c date 6-1 B (03 N let-~ ASÂ» 2150<Ann Woods, Community Development Director CO~U#~ Of~CCEPTANCE: 1. as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. date Bret Cook, Owner of Lot 8 date Marcelo Ferreira, Owner of Lot 9 date Walter Chi. Owner of Lot 10 date Erik Larson, Owner of Lot 11 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Application Exhibit C -- Aspen Highlands Village Affordable Housing Association Letter of Consent Exhibit D -- Aspen Highlands Village PUD Deck Calculation Methodology 3 .. Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings Insubstantial PUD Amendment. The Community Development Director may authorize an insubstantial amendment to an approved development ifthe proposal meets the following review standards: 1. A change iii the use or character ofthe development. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the use or character of the final planned unit development. The approved PUD gives the affordable housing units an allowance of exempt deck space equivalent to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR for the units. Therefore, staff feels that the proposal is simply using the exempt deck space that they were provided in the PUD approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding: The amendment does not increase the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not affected by this alteration to the PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced by greater than three (3) percent as a result of the proposed amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one ( 1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The applicants are not requesting an amendment to the existing or required number of parking spaces. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. .. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. In addition, the applicants have received consent from the Condominium Association to construct the decks within the utility easement on Lots 8 and 9 that contains sanitary service lines. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing changes to a commercial building. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The applicants are not proposing a change in the residential density. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: The proposed amendment is consistent with the project's original approval. The approved PUD gives the affordable housing units an allowance of exempt deck space equivalent to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR for the units. flierefore, staff feels that the proposal is simply using the exempt deck space that they were provided in the Pt-JD approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax DATE: 4/27/03 TO: Community Development Department Planning Office Attn: James Lindt FROM: Jeffrey RE: Aspen Highlands Cloud Nine Lane Deck Request Lots 8,9,10 and 11 Aspen, CO, 81611 We have addressed the setback issue to conform to the existing setback to the south as requested for Lot 8 (Cook Property). Area of Decks Lot Number Name Gross Area Area Under overhanq Area of net deck Lot 11 500 sq. ft. 290 sq. ft. 210 sq. ft. Larson Name Gross Area Area Under overhanq Area of net deck Lot 10 363 sq. ft 115 sq. ft. 247.6 sq. ft. Chi Name Gross Area Area Under overhang Area of net deck Lot 9 288 sq. ft. 48 sq. ft. 240 sq. ft. Ferraria Name Gross Area Area Under overhanq Area of net deck Lot 8 500 sq. ft. 270 sq. ft. 230 sq. ft Cook .. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Cl-oub 4/dE- 64+LE bak Pu]Eer Location: $4 69 79, 9 1.19 CZ-oub Al,Ug Â£04dE (Ind~cate street adkess, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) LL)'A 7,9 to + 1 l 48- Aw\b. ?LA1- 0 {- 81,86,6, 8 APPLICANT: AlrEd Â»l,ALAJbs 4,1-1-4-Â£6IE ~tab 4-402-648% Mous, 44 12:Ds. 1~- 1 Name: Etik LAÂ·ka.1, 41 Aul-EL (41, AlAEâ‚¬a-0 AE.*-a 2* geer Cod>k- Address: (09,99,41 2 99 66Â·ove> J,UG LAWE. Aps#j to 2/4// Phone #: 439- 303 '92-9-9994, 54Â£/-4995-- 51/4.- 740.9 1 , REPRESENTATIVE: Name: -3- uff Hrt,--Fee-Ty Address: pir 4, 1111 0 4-Pat -01-. 4{Â«80 U Phone #: 400- 4<-39 PROJECT: Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD El Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ~1 Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA Â£ Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption U Subdivision U Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split U Temporary Use D Other: U Lot Line Adjustment C Texl/Map Amendment TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 9,24 LE FAÂ·,Fl 1 L,v Dâ€¢ p Lix AGUS ,dip- PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 13><TelibR_ DEÂ£,6 < Au- 8â‚¬ZÂ»LO 6.5" #Ec441-- ~ Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 52,0 U Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form D Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. mmmmmm , To Snowmass Vii age L..Â«:z:Ho,se Â·-' ~ and Glenwood Springs A- /0.9--7-*--* w 4 4 2 l 4 h Starwood \If 1 1 1 t- , 7 f ~1 0 1 i ~% White River 44Â« X~ . ofest ' . 4*%. e#f 7- National '?22.. , >14 . 'L l// / SOX ~ASM'~'Â«4 Â°4451% \4 1 04 1 073\ 1 \ t 2 Â© 3 To Snowmass S % 4.f .4 ..1-1 A Village k 4 %; 1 4 - A\-E 19 (unpaved / ~ 4 11 3 \ fÂ·b -(3% \4 le i ~ 8 4 Asuen, u pin:in Co 1...'. 4 : A#M 18$ *A writer UP . \44 V> 4 % 4.eke 1 - 2 9 N*" Â£ .r t \ h, i 4,>S -- 1 4 444 .=eÂ»!09 U- e . Â¢ E I 4. 24 4 8 Â¢0\\\ 11 ./ : 14 t4'7'-0-Â·-~~~ stage nd _._ ~ ~ \ -4 i i -0: m li t, A %4 4 5 / :Â«zo, -gld m' 4-yi '' 1.1%69*.. , i 1 35 Buttermilk /? .-h~~du-_Â¢~Regny Ln ~ 3 4941 5299*613% R ' 1 /4 Or Â·33'Â»~ &unny ct 4=Â»32?â‚¬* 1 ; /8444 0 44\#t Ceâ€žy g/%97 1%~ L - 3-, \ of: "~~84, Aspen ' t 11- to i Â·b... 1 01 4 , 4, Golf Course e .r-r 4 6,27 : 01 , e. JA~ I ... S 11' t'-* --- .1 ~Â¥17 -4 White Rwer 3 ~ 1,4>A< 4 Â£ 4 44: 9 Aspen /182 -p National 9. e 4 i %23,41 yf Forest 1 7 ! j Maroon CreekuÂ·4 .4& , : 2 04 â‚¬*,/ 1, A 6 Ign - 5 1.15 i %99 0/1EÂ» + 0 .- 1 e-.Â· I , 00 + \ up ' 3,3 \.2.t; 51~ t. Midd- ..:1:8, 9 Sthol - 27 e j i Â° i .1 in,1,8, 17#Mic 1 *-~ LMountain 6114 1 8 a &~ks M 1,4 6Â·/Elem 41-9 c, 4 1 A Â· 7/ School p.4 ~ 7/ hx F f â‚¬ ..3 7 1 0 2 1 1* 7 Â·'insievers Cir p,*0/-5 3~E@;64 ' 14-2, 8~.52.4@li-4 Â« i 0 .1 j $640 2 hm" et + A ''65-\,2 a ' /tiscle, 48Â£*15 - 7 .Â· 'fl \8 1 */p. 0 -ve 9 U. 2/ ./4, Â¥G/--3 449%:4 1 0(2,/r/* C 461,6 611.1& LU. 1. 3.il;Icpt 29Â»Of/* f i Steeple ts~~~*B6Dr .ihuntt~~In-3Â¢t-'ASpen ~ flb wmÂ·ieni,0, Highlands National Far ...5. 044 Forest 2 -9.MEHâ‚¬o Cloud Nine Lane Deck Project ~ Homeowner Listing for Proposal 1. Erik J. and Janet L. Larson as Joint Tenants 69 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 11, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456879 2. L. Chi and Walter D. Chi as Joint Tenants 79 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 10, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456879 3. Colleen Delia and Marcelo Ferreira and Joan Delia as Joint Tenants 91 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 9, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 4. Bret A. Cook and Carmie G. Cook as Joint Tenants 99 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 8, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 hi . 12'-6" .. 6'-3. f f . . .. ... I. . 1 1 .... .. . 1. ..... 36~' -ALL HA~D UL X . . . 0. 1 .... ..... .. 36" TAL_HAND RAIL 'Â·. .MATCH DETA.IL. i .............. .... ......... I ............ I ........... l - ~\ eATE STEP 24-4~ji .. I I CHI CLOUD NINE DECK -~MA' LOT IO DA= 4/15/03 Jeffrey hallâ€¢rty dealgn 215 a MONARCH ST STE 202 a.pen,oa '1011 970.020.4838 20'- 1" 1,Â¥g-ILI -1~6 -WOM 1 'Â»/9 HT-~PEW- te U-Â¥6/21*1 749144 t . l i ./1 ./ i,1 h 11 .- -1--tlk Lf/Tr.4 4 JV'- ~_ __22.1 1 *- - . I f i 1 F (U . . m , 3. 11 j 1 \ /l -71: /1. 11 11 1 1 :X //i /--- 1/ --Hvq - ~ . NT\X ' r *- LY1- - . 1,24 4 \ f f 1 - -944 d -d .....- . -- , -4- i fli t - 774 r fir L &17 1 . ~ 2 -4- 9% . D >Lol /.. I >ro K 1 â‚¬ 1 1 1 1 1,_! 1L I .~| 2, 1. i 1 \ 1 -6.-1 *...... 1 1 \ il 1 '11 2 VOX ittbr \ i 1 1 ri 1 1 1 Â£ gr- 11 la j . 7, 1 1 // 1 1 1,1 1 Jil - a 1 V VF- 4 1 11 '211.,4 + 6 -0 - i - k-fÂ«11+?r --1 j, i .Prt - 1 1 1/ m Tr"-1. r. - ./ 4 \ . t - 1 0 11 j .01<,44/ It, 1 1 1 :11 1 1 i }1 *Vot/-',,. ~ + jj~d- i - T I \ \1 tl - P. , , 11 9 4 %. Cv- Z. lit j ' r It 0 1 - \A /1Â· *J- ~ 1 tl Y t 1. 11 , Y ij / \ 1 1/ 1,11 1 U 1 - 1 ir 1 -EleÂ« m A 0 : .Ei , b~L 1=. \\ ./ N .: 4 * Nk . I \41 -1 , , 4 81 1 I h \... \ 4 97% L.hAÂ« .= Â¥ 1 , N .VA L -g 1/5/ tft- . I- '' . 1 1 , 4- Tri , - *ex 1, - h f/\61 f 10 1 /- 1 1 37 -........ - 22$- -- vr - , 1 1 i .'/ 8 ii+' . N~/ N- \ T \ , . ----dfi \ / I . 361 i e \\ 1% , 1 - -lia"~44 1 \\ ' 't 1 \ ..... - wÂ·, -Tr--/1---/_.-- . . .. l C f 19/ 1 // . 1 1 -tâ€¢er'â€¢F.... -- Ill . .4&.210-7 -/ -I-\ , . ~,0,=1 A. . *El/ 610.5.5 Â¥AA AGS -2=QEL PMR- t-- -,.UaLU__ ilbw Akâ‚¬/A Applt[04 1 . A .. TP-t *Â« <filtÂ¥.11 ~~Â¥9Â· y' 4 . MEMORANDUM To Development Review Committee From: John Niewoehner, Community Development Engineer, DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: April 10,2003 Re: April 9/03 DRC Meeting Minutes: Cloud 9 PUD Amendment to Install Decks Attendees: James Lindt, Community Development Department Ed Van Walwaven, Fire Department Tom Bracewell, Sanitation District Jannette Whitcomb, Environmental Health Brian Flynn, Parks Department Denis Murray, Building Department John Niewoehner, Community Development Department At the April 9,2003 meeting, the Development Review Committee reviewed a proposal to allow larger decks for four units at the Cloud 9 Condominiums. DRC COMMENTS: Sanitation District Comment: The utility easement shown on the plan appears to be for sewer services. If so, the only the Condo Association needs to give permission for decks over top of the service lines. The Sanitation District does not become involved. Water Department Comment (via e-mail): The Cloud Nine deck proposal will be in conflict with an easement for the Maroon Creek Pipeline. The proposed plans show an encroachment for the deck within the easement area on Lot 8. The plans need to be adjusted to eliminate this encroachment, eliminating any footings or above ground structures. This facility is one of two pipelines which provides water supply to the entire City and any encroachment is unacceptable. The deck must be shortened on the Thunderbowl Lane side (southwest) so that the deck does not encroach into the water easement that runs parallel to Thunderbowl Lane. Parks Department Comment: Highly recommend stilt construct on. Obtain tree removal permits if necessary. Fire Department Comment: At the time of building permit, if the Fire Department determines the decks to be highly susceptible to wild fire danger, fire resistant building materials will be required on the perimeter of the decks. /DRC/Cloud9-Decks 0 0 8048 Erik J. and Janet L. Larson 69 Cloud Nine Lane Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-1160 February 19, 2003 Paul Twohig, President Aspen Highlands Village Affordable Housing Association Aspen, Colorado Re: PUD Amendment To the Board Members: We are seeking approval from the Board to go before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission to seek a PUD Amendment required to build our decks located at 99,89,79, and 69 Cloud Nine Lane. We presented our design/plans to James Lindt at the Planning Department and the process needs to go to P&Z. James tried to get it through administrative review/approval but we need to take it to the next step. This process is not a FAR issue. If you approve, please indicate as such by signing in the space provided below and date. tn*ely/9 / 1 '4 A It ./7 jul, v Â«< O 01- / Erik J. lirson .1 -<7.. â€¢ f i.tte _4 - 06-1.- 63 Paul Twohig, President U Date Mar 24 03 02:09p ~freu Halfertg Design (970)925-6035 p.2 03/21/2003 FRI 08:16 FAX @002/003 Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Paul Smith * Ch,1irm:in Frank Low.,hin Michael Kelly * Vice- Ch:Dr Roy Hollow,ty John Keleher 4. Sce/Treas Bruce Matherly, Mgl MEMO TO: Jeffrey Halferty FROM: Tom Bracewell DATE: March 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Cloud Nine Decks Dear Jeftery, I have identified the location of the ACSD main sanitary sewer lines in both Thunderbowl Lane and Cloud Nine Lane on the map you faxed with the approximaw 440 - 9%-- ...- - manholes and have shown the main lines with a dashed line. I've shown the approximate locations of the sanitary service lines, which are privately owned by the individual owners or the homeowners/condo association, for Lots 8,9,10 and I 1 with dotted lines. It appears the easement in question exists for the Service lines for Lot 8 and Lot 9. Therefore, the encroachmonts or licenses to build into these easements must be granted by whom ever owns the common area, (i.c, the individual owners, or homeowners/condo associations). Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, Thomas R. Bracewell Collection Systems Superintendent 365 N. Mill St., A+I.,en, CO 81611 / (970)023Â·3601 /1Â·A X i,)70)9.15Â·'5;7 1 A*PEN ~ WRErr PAID 3,4ETT PAID CITY OF ASPEN c REP NO. DATE REP 2< z.e~ bl 4 -4 H I J>D BE NO *24 di m 4 003% 1 Filed for record the day of ,A.D. , at 0'clock M. RECORDER. d Reception No. By DEPUTY. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 4 THIS DEED, Made on this day of August 13, 2001 0 between HINES H[GHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP .t..esâ€¢ Â· 3 17' 7 ii of the county of PITKIN and State of Colorado , Grantor(s), (y H - and ~~' ERIKJ. LARSON AND JANET L.LARSON, aS Joint Tenants ? 1 1 S t ~ whose legal address is : P.O. BOX 3121, ASPEN, CO 81612 j of the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado , of the Grantee(s): : j WITNESS, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of C $236,300.00 ) i *** Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 *** DOLLARS { the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these 1 presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee(s), their heirs and assigns forever, all the ~ ; real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of t PITKIN and state of Colorado, described as follows: LOT 11 FOURTH AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCK B ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES, PHASE 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 23, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 456880 AND THE j DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 25, 2001 UNDER RECEMION NO. 456879. j COUNTY OF PITKIN i STATE OF COLORADO also known as street number 69 CLOUD NINE LANE, ASPEN, CO 81611 TOGETHER with all and singular and hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining & and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right % title interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor(s), either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained 1 premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with appurtenances, unto the Grantee(s), ~ their heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor(s). EXCEPT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, AND EXCEPT THOSE MATTERS AS ~ SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT 'A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. 11- 11-111111-11--111111111111111-11 08/20/2001 09:49A 457738 PageÂ· 1 of 4 5.LUA CA.S PITKIN COLTY CO R 20.00 D 23.63 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor(s) have executed this deed on the date set forth above. 457738 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 08/20/2001 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP /1 - 4 / 1 BYÂ·~*SPE~I)H(;ML#N]0 SKIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE : C~~~1{1Â°ipEN~*k'PARTNER BYhRbmEr]Chmkc,JR., VICE PRESIDENT 90 1 AA ~ STATE OF Colorado ) }SS. County of PITKIN ) 8 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of August 4 2001 by ROBERT E. DANIEL, JR., VICE PRESIDENT OF ASPEN HIGHLANDS SKIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE : CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OP HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP My Commission expires 08/19/2001 )~j%sosis.5..~E'Ad i My commission expires 1, *ID /1, 0 Witness my hand and officiat seal. 47220 (52/1665 (Ag.</ Â§71( 2,4 3- i _M I 9 41274)"\ N0,fty Pubyfc\ 9 :0 2 ~ Name and Address of Person Creating Newly Created Legal Description ( 38-35-106.5, C.R.S.) .Nd=@#;'r ~ Escrow# Q382206 When Recorded Return to: ERIK J. LARSON AND JANET L. LARSON 2 ~ Title# 0382206 P.O. BOX 3121, ASPEN, CO 81612 1 Form No. 16,Rev 4-94. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Photographic SPEC.WD.OPEN) -k ~ .. CITY OF A#th CITY OF ASPEN HRETT PAID WRETT PAID REP NO. DATE REP NO. ~bl /12(ea Wit \ fli H UY le O Filed for record the day of ,A.D. , at o'clock M. RECORDER Reception No. By DEPUTY. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made on this day of August 03, 2001 D. F : between HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP i of the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado , Grantor(s), and L.CHIANDWALTERD. CHI, as Joint Tenants whose legal address is : 79 CLOUD NINE LANE, ASPEN, CO 81611 of the County of MTKIN and State of Colorado , of the Grantee(s): 1 WITNESS, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( $236.300.00 ) *** Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 *** DOLLARS t the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee(s), their heirs and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of . PITKIN and State of Colorado, described as follows: f LOT 10 i FOURTH AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCK B i i ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES, PHASE 2 1 it ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 23, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 436880 AND THE 8 DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 23. 2001 UNDER RECEMION NO. 436879. 6 . : 4 COUNTY OF PITKIN J STATE OF COLORADO ~ 2 atso known as street number 79 CLOUD NINE, ASPEN, CO 81611 & & TOGETHER with all and singular and hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining 36 and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remai Aders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right -i title interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor(s), either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained L premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; 1 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with appurtenances, unto the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor(s). EXCEFT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FORTHE YEAR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, AND EXCEPT THOSE MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT "A" ATI'ACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE 457320 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 08/08/2001 ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor(s) have executed th I s deed on the date set forth above. HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNER~09 457320 BY: ASPEFNJHDANIÂ»KIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE 11111.1111111111-1..[..- lili 1111111111111111 08/08/2001 11:37t BY: R~RT E. DANIEL, JR., VICE PRESIDENT ~.~~~~~~~~~ CORPO~00.61#NERAL PARTNER Page: 1 of 4 DAVIS SILL'A PITKI,Â· 21â€ž-IY CÂ·J R 20.00 0 23.63 STATE OF Colorado ) iss. County of PITKIN ) i 8.1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on th 8 day of August 03,2001 5 by ROBERT E. DANIEL, JR., VICE PRESIDENT OF ASPEN HIOHLANDS SKIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP My Commission expires My commission expires 08/19/2001 ra .il.1 /707%\ Witness my hand and official seal. ~ ~~ ~ HEIDI Â·, ubl ic / I ERICA j ~ l/ i GORBITZ /4, ~ dIL .... dk# Name and Address of Person Creating Newly Created Legal Description C 38-35-10~~~~~~~ N~iOF cgh:#1 Escrow# Q382208 When Recorded Return to: L. CHI AND WALTER D. CHI & Title# 0382208 1 79 CLOUD NINE LANE, ASPEN. CO 81611 -: Form No. 16,Rev 4-94. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Photographic SPEC.WD.OPEN) fi- â€¢Av.'.V-'ll .............. I M+F:&): M OF ASPE~ WRETT PAID 01-rY OF ~EN riRETT PAID DATE 1 -REP- DA E REP f 0%- 230 (*u Nb \.1 l c c O% 430 4 NE 1 2 1 1 \ 1 Filed for record the day of ,A.D. , at o'clock M. RECORDER. 3 Reception No. By DEPUTY. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made on th i s day of August 09,2001 1 between HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2 of the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado , Grantor(s), : and i COLLEEN DELIA AND MARCELO FERREIRA AND JOAN DELIA, as Joint Tenants : j / jj 6.2 e whose legal address is : P.O. BOX 3427, ASPEN, CO 81612 }: of the County of PITK]N and State of Colorado , of the Grantee(s): WITNESS, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( $236.300.00 ) i *** Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 *** DOLLARS i ? the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these : r presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee(s), their heirs and assigns forever, all the J real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado, described as follows: L LOT 9 1 FOURTH AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCK B 1 ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES, PHASE 2 & ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 23, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 456880 AND THE % f DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 25, 2001 UNDER RECEFrION NO. 456879. i k { COUNTY OP PITKIN E 1 STATE OF COLORADO 7 also known as street number 91 CLOUD NINE, ASPEN, CO 81611 TOGETHER with all and singular and hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining I i and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right : title interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor(s), either in law or equi ty, of, in and to the above bargained LE i premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; t TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with appurtenances, unto the Grantee(s), g their heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, 4 and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons K j claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor(s). f EXCEPT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, AND EXCEFr THOSE MATTERS AS j SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT MA' ATTACHED HERErO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. 457894 11 11 lilli lilli 111-I Page: 1 of 4 08/23/2001 02:50P 3 61Lk IA CAL .S r ITKIÂ·, COUNFY CO R 20.00 D 23.63 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor(s) have executed this deed on the date set forth above. 457894 8 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 08/23/2001 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE j - BY: ASREÂ¥ WOHCA!%09 SUING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE " coRPG!&4!pf,9Â£Â¥MB'Â£ PARTNER W I h.4. y 'm AY: ROBErt E.'MANUEL, JR,, VICE PRESIDENT 9W 30 ~-~II==~*#ATE OF Colorado ) )99. County of PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of August A, 2001 by ROBERT E. DANIEL, JR., VICE PRESIDENT OF ASPEN HIGHLANDS SKIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE ~ CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP My Commission expires My commission expires ~ 08/1W2001 7 ~.9./.6.9.~A Witness my hand and official seal. / 75 N~y Publ,M\ 8Â»1 60-,C. 2 - 1% 7 U U it Name and Address of Person Creating Newly Created Legal Description Â£ 38-35-106.5, C.R.S.) i~ Escrow# Q382204 When Recorded Return to: COLLEEN DELIA AND MARCELO FERREIRA AND 0 # Title# Q382204 JOAN DELIA 1 1 P.O. BOX 3427, ASPEN, CO 81612 4 Form No. 16,Rev 4-94. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Photographic SPEC.WD.OPEN) .. CHY OF ASPEN WRE1T PAID Cib~*, 40 No, \-2- 01 4 2 Filed for record the day of ,A.D. , at o'clock M. RECORDER.~i' 4 Reception No. By DEPUTY. ~i SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 4 THIS DEED, Made on this day of August 10,2001 M between HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP b- P Ly 17 j of the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado , Grantor(s), tp C 3. Ci.? j and j BRET A. COOK AND CARMIE O.COOK, as Joint Tenants whose legal address is : 99 CLOUD NINE LANE, ASPEN, CO 81611 ) of the County of PITKIN and state of Colorado , of the Grantee(s): WITNESS, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( $236.300.00 ) *** Two Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 *** DOLLARS ' the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these j presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee(s), their heirs and assigns forever, all the 2 real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of j PITKIN and State of Colorado, described as follows: l LOT 8 : FOURTH AMENDED PLAT OP BLOCK B ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES, PHASE 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 25, 2001 UNDER RECEMION NO. 456880 AND THE DECLARATION RECORDED JULY 25, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 456879. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO also known as street number 99 CLOUD NINE LANE, ASPEN, CO 81611 TOGETHER with all and singular and hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or fn anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right title interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor(s), either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with appurtenances, unto the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor(s). EXCEPT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, AND EXCEPT THOSE MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERErO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. 457831 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 08/21/2001 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor( s) have executed th i s deed on the date set forth above. HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COR*Â¢F,low GF~RAL PARTNER BY: AsEEN 02(5!WLAP*i~~IING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE BY:'RUBERT E. DAAREL. JR., VICE PRESIDENT ,AM l 457831 STATE OF Colorado ) ~11 1111 ~~1 1~1111~1~11 08/21/2001 03:ZZP )SS. Page: 1 of 4 County of PITKIN ) SILVIA DÂ· WS PITK.,Â· CLU.TY CO R 20.00 0 23.63 8 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of August Jd, 2001 by ROBERT E. DANIEL, JR., VICE PRESIDENT OF ASPEN HIGHLANDS SKIING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP t My Commission expires My commission expires 08/1 W2001 /2,5,5~?:~~04, Witness my hand and official seal. //./, â‚¬ .4 Q /~ 9...............,1 14!14 /40/n \,\UC fl â‚¬51-Â· Notary blic V..... 46/4 ) M ti 1 Name and Address of Person creating Newly Created Legal Description ( 38-35-106.5, C.R.S.) ...,4 8 1 14;,>............ 2 3 Escrow# Q382201 When Recorded Return to: BRET A. COOK AND CARMIE G. COOK 5 ' Title# 0382201 -â€¢,e--r-ri,Irrr-Irr--Â·Â·Â·-~~L=.__1=n=11 - /1_21Â£11 4 Form No. 16,Rev 4-94. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Photographic SPEC.WD.OPEN) oom, ~/,7.rÂ·rfl~T-g"~- 4- -941/U),vt./ss ~ .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax DATE: 3/12/03 attachment 7 TO: Community Development Department Planning Office Attn: James Lindt FROM: Jeffrey RE. Aspen Highlands Cloud Nine Lane Deck Request Lots 8,9,10 and 11 Aspen, CO, 81611 We have addressed the development review standards. We feel the proposed development will meet the design review standards put forward In the A. A. C. P. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale, site plan massing and volume with tha surroundings located on the parcel. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a not be negatively noticeable from the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development enhances and does not detract from the character of the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development would like to request to change the allowable F.A. R. percentage limitation from 15 % to 30 %. The development will not detract from the goals outlined in the A.A.C.P Yours Truly, Jeffrey ~ .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax DATE:3/12/03 TO: Community Development Department Planning Office Attn: James Lindt Minor P.U.D Amendment Aspen Highlands Cloud Nine Lane Deck Request Lots 8 ,9,10 and 11 Aspen, CO 81611 Review Standards: Minor PUD. The development application for Minor PUD complies with the following standards and requirements. We feel we have addressed the areas outlined by the goals in the A.A.C. Plan. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the character of existing land in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development does adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. .. N.A. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics ofthe property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man=made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character ofthe proposed PUD and ofthe surrounding area. N.A. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. ' b) The varying time periods of use, wheneverjoint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced ifthere exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development, .. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced i f: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed developmentÂ·will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location ofany proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. C. Site Design. The proposed developmentÂ·complies with the following criteria: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity ofthe town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contnbute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of , vehicular and pedestrian movement. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and servicevehicle access. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features ofthe subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: .. 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment ofexterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility ofthe building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character ofthe proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development is: 1. compatible with or enhance the visual character ofthe city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less- intensive mechanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. F. Lighting. 1. Alllighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropnate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. .. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. Ifthe proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria is met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design ofthe common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit ofthe various land uses and property users of the PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number ofyears) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. N.A. H. Utilities and Public facilities. N.A. Existing , I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: May 07 03 10:15a Otte & Cote C.P.A.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 P.2 May 06 03 10:34a Jeffreq Halfert9 Design 1970}925-6035 P.2 MAY-06-290] TUE 10:09 AM FAX NO, K 02 MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM. James 1.indt, PlannetÂ·QY'~ RE: Highlund; PUD Clarification- Alfordnble Housing Deck Allowance DATE: April 20.2003 APPLI(JAN-IS: F.rik Larson, Watter Chi, Marcelo feneira. and Brett Cook. rcpiesented by Jeffrey 113!ferty LOCATIOF Lots 8-1 1. Block B, Aspen Highlandr Village PUD ZONING: R/MI: PCD REVIEW PROCEDURE: insubstantial amendments to .In approved PUD may be approved. approved with conditions. or denied by *c Communily Development Director. pursuant to Section 26 445.100(A). PUD Inxub,fantiÂ«l Amendmenls. BACKGROUND: The owners of Lots 8- 11, Block 11, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD (69 Cloud Nine 1 mne, 79 Cloud Nine Lane. 91 Cloud Nine Lane. and 99 Cloud Nine Lane), have applied for an insubMantiii PUD Rincird,nent zo the approved Aspen Highlands Village l'UD to build Inrgo decks on Ihc rear of ilieic affordable housing units. 1 hc approved l'UD allows for decks to bc exempt from flour area Calculations Up to 15% of the maximum floor nrca allowed for tho units. The FIJI) further statcs that, " the Jloor nron Of a building. or portion thereof, not provided with surrorm<ling ex#*rior woll, shall include the firea under Ihe 6(,rconint projection of roots or foors. when 11,6 roof or flomÂ· cxcce,is jive (5) per. MeiÂ·cover, the PUD also indicates that, "the.w archi,Â·cÂ·/urol projecÂ·tion., r,re exenv" for five 63) fcef rd- 64Â¢ perimeter of Â¢och .m,ry of whe wruciure", The City Zoning Oflicer has interpreted this to mean Ulat any deck area under a roof overhang that does not extend more than five (5) from the cxterior warl 01 the structute is exempt from allowable FAR and does m,t Count towards the 15% oxenipt deck twum requirement. Therefore. cach ofthe affordable hoilsing unhs n Blocks A and B are alowed up to 15% of their }Illowable FAR in exempt deck area And the nren under a mof within five feet of the exterior wall of the building is Colnp~el ely exempt (does not even count towil#15 Ihc 15% exempt deck area). STAFFCOMMEN'tNt The Thunderbowl Ncighborhood consisting of Blocks A and B. of #hc Aspen Highlands Village PUt) was allowed n total of 24,7S0 square feet or non-exempt floor area for fillecn 1 2 Ma, 07 03 10:158 Otte & Cote C.P.R.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 P.3 .. May 06 03 10:342 Jeffreu Halfertbi Design (9701925-6035 P.3 MAY-08-2003 TUE 10:09 AM FAX NO, P. 03 ( 13) affordable housing imits. 1 his provides an avorage allowable floor orea of 1.650 squire feet for each :,fordable housing unit. Based on an allowable FAR 01 1,650 square fuel l'or cach of the af[-ordable hollsilig Units, an al [owable deck area of 247 square red per unit would bc ci<empt fium FAR calculations. Thc applicants have all proposed decks that arc under )5% of iheir allowed FAR if the area that ix under a roof overhang is exemptcd out as is allowed by the PUD. lit addition. all of the proposed decks arc whhin the approved building envelope for thc units. Moreover. the Sanitation Dislrict has been consulted and has dclcrinined that (he ten CIO) foot wide utility cascmetit located oti Lots 8 and 9 6 for smitary service lines {lial benefit the units. Therefore, it is only :'cquired 11711 41~ applicant obtain appioval of ow coildominium aw,ociotioâ€ž to construct a deck within this eascment. That bemg thÂ¢ CASC, staff luis i equirell the applicant to subinit a lette, 01 consent from the condominium association at ilie thuc or 1%,ilding permit Submittal to allow for thc decks to mic, oach into the easement. M addition. :he owner of ho! 8 has amended his proposed deck plan so that no porrion or the proposed decks will cncroach L,pon the Utility eacemelit fhal funs parallel 10 Thunder-bowl 1.ane th.lt contams a Inain waterline. Thcapplicants have obtained the approvÂ·M oilhe Aspen Ilighlands Village Affordable Housing Association (attached as It*l,ibit "C") to construct the proposed decks on the subject properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes thai the proposed application meets the review standards for approving an insnbstantial PUD amendment to the PUD. Therefore, slail' tccommends thal the Community Development Director approve the proposed amendment to al}ow for the decks on 1.01; 8-11, Block R, or the Aspen 1 lighlands Village PUB to be conslructed as proposed on 1110 site plan and elevarions #tiaohed os Exhibit .B. with the conditions of approval Out ore sci Ibith below. APPROVAL: I hereby appcove this insubstanful FUD amendment lo J )low for Lots 8-11. Block B, of the Aspen 1Â·lighbnds Village PUD to construct the decks on the rear of the a froidable housing unics with the following condition: 1. Bach deck shall be limited to fincen percent (15%) of ihe Allowable FAR dedicaled for each unit as is lo bc determined by ihe City of Aspen >:01â‚¬ng OfliÂ©or at the time of building permit. The fineen percent (15%) deck 1-uqi,ircment shall be calculated based on 1[le methodo{ogy for cafculating deck arca tliat is set forih in ihe Aspen 1 lighlands Village PUD (lot,guage allacticd as Exhibit "D"). 2 The applicants shall use fire resistant building materials thal are to be aporoved by the Fire Marshal prior to building permit iskuance. 3. No portion of ll,e proposed decks Sholl enÂ¢roach into the utility easement that runs Darallcl to'lhunderbowl Lane. 2 3 Mag 07 03 10:163 Otte & Cote C.P.A.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 p.4 .. MAV 06 03 10:34a Jeff'rew Halferty Design (9701925-6035 P.4 MAY-08-2003 TUE 10:09 AM FAX NO. P. 04 4. The owners of' Lots 8 and 9 shall obtain a kiter of consent from their Conclominium Association prior to building permit subiniltal to allow for tlicin ~~ Aj ) to encroach upon the ten CIO) foot wide utility entement within which their decks air proposed. This utility eosement benelits the Condominium AssoÂ©incion. % 1003 :.5)*lox â€žerowle 40Â·-4.eyel Â£~*Ann Woods. Commumly Development Director FAM/' E\TeAPTANCE; j, as a porson boing or represerling the applicant, do hereby agree lo tile conditlons of this approval and Certify the infor,Yinlion provided in this apptioatioi, is correct to the best of iny knowledge. *4.44. /14Â£ date 5-6-03 Bret Coo~ WwocAof Lot 8 d.te 25. C - 73 Madlcia F.~;EuzZ#â€¢d oriollg L/t,fe,;1#PE,--c--~Â·.datc 326-03 'Fliv#5(303>01. Lot 10 2620MtmÂ·/ 6.0 5-- 4. )3 trik l,arson, Owner of Lot 11 ATTACHMEN IS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings 13xhihit B -- Applkation Exhibit C -- Aspen I lighlands Village Affordable Housing Association Letter of Consent Exhibit D -- Aspen 1 lighlands Vill: ge PUD Deck Cniculation Mechodology 3 4 May 07 03 10:16a Otte & Cote C.P.8.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 P.5 .. Mag OG 03 10:348 jeffrey Hall'erty Design {970}925-6035 P.5 MAY-06-2003 TUE 10:09 AM FAX NO. P. 05 Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings 1nsubsti,ntial PUD Amend,nent. '1 he Community Develop,nent D}rector may authofize an ilisubstantial amendment to an approved developmentif the proposal meets the followilig review standards: 1. A change in the usc or churacter ofthe development. Rt,!Tlimdinx: Staffdoex not believelhal the proposed amen(lincnt is inwnsistent with the use or charneler of the tin.il planned unit develnpment. The approved PUD <ivCs ilic 111'thidable 11014Â¢ing units an allowance of exempt Occk spnce equivalent to fifteen percent (15%) of the allowable FAR for che Units. Therefore. staff feels that the proposal is simply using ihe exempt deck space that they werc provided iâ€ž the PUD approval. StaIT finds this criterion to bemet. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in Ihe overall coverage of structures on [he land. Staff Finding: The uniendment does not increase the overati coverage of structures on the land. Staff finds this wilerion not to be applicable, 3. Any :,mendmcilt thal substantially incrascs trip generation rates of ttic proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infiastructure arc not nflb.cled by this ntleration to the PI,ID. StafT linds this criterion Dot to he applicable. 4. A reduction by gwater i han thrce (3) pet cent oftile approved opell Space. Staff Findina: The amount of open Rpace will nol be reduced by greater than three (3) percent iw~ a restilt 01-the proposcd amendment. StuiT finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater tban one (I) rereent of the ollistreet parking and loading space. Staff Findin*i The applicants ard not requcslag an amendment m the exisimy or required number of parking spaces. Staff finds this criterion not to he applicable. 5 May 07 03 10:16a Otte & Cote C.P.A.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 p.6 .. Mat, 08 03 10:358 Jeffrev Halferts Design (9701925-6035 p.6 MAY-06-2003 TUE 10:10 AM FAX NO. P. 06 6. A reduccion in recuired pavement widlhs or rights of-wJy Ii,r streets and cascrnents. Stiff Finding: The applicants ArÂ© not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. In addition, che Applicants have leteiv:d enlifent from the Condominium Association to construcl the decks within the utility ensemant on Lots 8 ;ind 9 thal Contains sanitaly bervice lines. Slafffinds this criterion to bc mel. 7. An increase of greater thai, Iwo (2) percent ill the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial liti;}dings Suff Finding: Tbc opplicants arc not proposing chunies to a commercial building. Staff finds this cliterion not to bÂ© applicable. 8. Anincreasc by grealer than one (1) percent hi the approved re. idential density of the drvelormetit. Staff Findjng: The nprtlivancs nre not proposing n ch.mgc in the residential density. Slaff finds thls criterion not to be applicable. 9. Atiy change whichis inconsistent with a condition or rep,Â·esentation of thc project's original itpproval or wllich requiiÂ·es UNÂ·anting a funher variation from Thc project's npproved use or dimensional requirements. S,Aff Finding: The proposed amendmetil is convistent with the project' s original nppiÂ·ovaL The upproved PUD gives Ule affordable housing units on allowance of exempt deck space equivalent to lil)ecul percont (15%) of the allowable VAR fer the units. Fherefore, staff feels iliat the prorosal is simply using 1]Ic exempt deck space tha[ they were provided in the PUD approval. Stal'llin[15 thi5 criterion to be mel. 6 Mas 07 03 10:16a Otte & Cote C.P.A.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 P.7 .. # Aspen Hightands Village Association 715 W Main Suite 304 Aspen, CO 81611 Tel: 970/920-2248 May 2nd, 2003 Erik Larson 69 Cloud Nine Lane Aspen Highlands Village Aspen, CO 81611 Re Final Submission Deck at 69 Cloud Nine Lane Dear Erik, Thank you for your submittal presented at the Aspen Highlands Design Review Board (DRB) meeting on May 1 1 2003 to discuss the Final Design Submission for your deck at 69 Cloud Nine Lane. The Board hereby approves the revised deck plan based on the design and materials information provided at the DRB meeting It is assumed, based on your word, that permission is granted from the entities stated in the Conceptual Design Approval letter dated August 28*,2002. If you have any questions you may contact me at 920-2248 or Deborah@Beachresource.com Sincerely, 4244- Deborah Pnnce The Aspen Highlands Association for Beach Resource Management .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax DATE: 4/27/03 TO: Community Development Department Planning Office Attn: James Lindt FROM: Jeffrey RE: Aspen Highlands Cloud Nine Lane Deck Request Lots 8,9,10 and 11 Aspen, CO, 81611 We have addressed the setback issue to conform to the existing setback to the south as requested for Lot 8 (Cook Property). Area of Decks Lot Number Name Gross Area Area Under overhanq Area of net deck Lot 11 500 sq. ft. 290 sq. ft. 210 sq. ft. Larson Name Gross Area Area Under overhanq Area of net deck Lot 10 363 sq. ft. 115 sq. ft. 247.6 sq. ft. Chi Name Gross Area Area Under overhana Area of net deck Lot 9 288 sq. ft. 48 sq. ft. 240 sq. ft. FerraMa Name Gross Area Area Under overhang Area of net deck Lot 8 500 sq. ft. 270 sq. ft. 230 sq. ft. Cook Mar 24 03 02:09p Jeffreg Halfertg Design (9701925-6035 P.1 03/21/2003 FRI 08:15 FA~ @001/003 1 Aspen Consolidated NanitÂ¢dion Digirict 565 N. Mill St. Asprii, CO 970,925Â·3601 hx: 970-925-2537 , FACHIMILIE TRANSMISSION TO: 4 6 eÂ¥ re / FROM: -7-A }7%. r.bi<ACEU&1Â§- I COMPANY: _-AAL F *47 061/70 DATE: _ 3Â·2 /- 03 FAX NO: 92. P &03 7 NO. OF PAGES: 3 RE: Urgent __ Fol Review _ Please Comment.__ Please Reply Pleue liccycle_ 1 i Mar 24 03 02:1Op JeffreV Halfertg Design (970]925-6035 p.3 03/21/2003 FRI 08:16 FA]I~ 0003/003 Mar 20 03 12:26p Jeffreks Halferts Design (Sll)925-6035 - / 4 N., y' I . .. 1)4â€ž -- ,~ I ... 06* f Lgâ‚¬ 7 ~06 93 AC , r , ' i .AZZ> ==231?44, Â¢ I l~ 3 Â·Â· . f 94/ 04 -- .4 .4 1 1 1 440. -4 r Ut#Ry ---' 44 1 Eommant ( ./.- *.4 . 1. 1 lA\ 14'. . â€¢ 2:/ CA 5. UÂ¢,7* 'Â· 0 Â£03â€¢menÂ¢ ' ~ // 4, 0 (Plot B 47, Pg U ' :St - â€¢<ft 94 14 I .'' 20 t. 8 I ..1 ' 11/ ..< - . n.f .1 >119% \ h I . :.4 . G . , te 0 AG; 1 . %30 9 \ . A k \ 44' ; Lot= o .3 ~ \ 1 . 1 0.060 AC 52 * 3 . A 4,- .,2 1 1 \ 1 #t:+ 1 1 . 1 53 r.,4 74'* til#9 r 1%~ ,\ \ % -10.-- k./' . ' 1 43 48, bi/.2 - . 1 ' 1 \, ' â€¢t 1 . I t 9 , 1 , 1 1 - ....6 r~ . a \\ 0.064 AC 't /4 \ 1. 0 . 1/ it tt \ 1 1 .. . 1.1 4 1 1.ial 1 ./-1 Am".0/007 1 m. . 904Â£4 ' ./ 11 to' Lot 8 -AC- 4 - , LJ~-t i '1 : j :, 1 1 11 r Vtâ€¢trvf f -4.4 - 4 6 1,1 - dA 7-0 4. 1 .7,4,#, 0 1 1 --L-'all 1 3. - OPSÂ« . .. wc117@ci.aspen.co.us, 01:08 PM 04/14/2003, Deck Application Update To: wc117@ci.aspen.co.us From: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co,us> Subject: Deck Application Update CC Bcc: Attached: Hi Walter, I just wanted to give you quick update on your deck application. I have asked Jeffrey Halferty to change the deck plan for Lots 8 and 9 and resubmit it to me because Phil Overeynder (Water Dept.) said that he could not approve of the decks going in the utility easement as they were originally drawn. So, I am in a holding pattern on this until I get the revised drawings from Jeffrey. If you could, please let your co-applicants know the situation. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jarnes Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> 1 .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax DATE:3/12/03 TO: Community Development Department Planning Office Attn: James Lindt Minor P.U.D Amendment Aspen Highlands Cloud Nine Lane Deck Request Lots 8 ,9 ,10 and 11 Aspen, CO 81611 Review Standards: Minor PUD. The development application for Minor PUD complies with the following standards and requirements, We feel we have addressed the areas outlined by the goals in the A.A.C. Plan. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen A rea Community Plan. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the character of existing land in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development does adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. MEMORANDUM ~ To Development Review Committee From: John Niewoehner, Community Development Engineer, DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: April 10,2003 Re: April 9/03 DRC Meeting Minutes: Cloud 9 PUD Amendment to Install Decks Attendees: James Lindt, Community Development Department Ed Van Walwaven, Fire Department Tom Bracewell, Sanitation District Jannette Whitcomb, Environmental Health Brian Flynn, Parks Department Denis Murray, Building Department John Niewoehner, Community Development Department At the April 9,2003 meeting, the Development Review Committee reviewed a proposal to allow larger decks for four units at the Cloud 9 Condominiums. DRC COMMENTS: Sanitation District Comment: The utility easement shown on the plan appears to be for sewer services. If so, the only the Condo Association needs to give permission for decks over top of the service lines. The Sanitation District does not become involved. Water Department Comment (via e-mail): The Cloud Nine deck proposal will be in conflict with an easement for the Maroon Creek Pipeline. The proposed plans show an encroachment for the deck within the easement area on Lot 8. The plans need to be adjusted to eliminate this encroachment, eliminating any footings or above ground structures. This facility is one of two pipelines which provides water supply to the entire City and any encroachment is unacceptable. Parks Department Comment: Highly recommend stilt construction. Obtain tree removal permits if necessary. Fire Department Comment: At the time of building permit. f the Fire Department determines the decks to be highly susceptible to wild fire danger, fire resistant building materials will be required on the perimeter of the decks. /DRC/Cloud9-Decks Maw 07 03 10:158 Otte & Cote C.P.A.s, P.C. 970-925-1160 .. May 06 03 10:333 Deffrev Halferth, Design :9701925-8035 p. 1 MAY-DS-2003 TUE 10:08 AM FAX NO, P. 01 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 {970) 920-5090 Aspen Community (970) 920-5439. fax Development Department Fax M-tn, Ent/, Ult;' n To: Jettey Halferty From/ James lindl F :tx: 925-6035 Pages: Phone; Date: 5/603 Re: Highlan(is Decks Cct El Urgent D For Review O Ple.so Comment 0 9!â€¢as, Reply O Pleaâ€¢â€¢ Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi Jeffrey, Here is the bnal approved copy ol lhe Highlands Deck Amendment. Please have the owners of Lots 8- 11 Sign page 3 of the memo end return it to me. This insures that kiley accept the conditions of approval Please letme know Ifyou have any questons Thanks, James 1 . 1 6 I Vt\1 9./ th I /f r.rifillillillillillillillhA villillililir Â¢ / m .1 1 â‚¬ p 1 -~17*~p- ..=2- 1 11./. ir I f 211%4 f ' -1,4,-..F- w r. . 'A, '.'. '.4 - 9.-M#r-- - - ............ '11..... firr .rr 4 k b / 1 -, 9 . 4 .9 ./ i G.Â» ..... 1 / IpÂ· 1 ...%...... f 42Â¥ - 7- .'lillilliplillilliellifillillimillillillillillillilig *f I ~ F .41; .1 ..4,1 14Â¥ + 4, --- ~ : Iill--&.-/1.-I ~.4 U $ 00'LE,1 *t b>1~ fr, + $14-~ I t. L & 2*-- . i t. 1- 4 11Lf . - 11 , .. . 'Â« ~\~ ~,~f~~Â·~:~11,~f~~~ I. 9. t f Â·O 11 : - ---------' 1 'til , . ftÂ»:'Â·â€ž ~7 1. - ,)644 <19: 9 al 76 '\ Ill 20. Access 19%0 .,1 0 j . 03K 219 9 2 4 Lot (BK. 684Â»& . m 4 , (BK. 734 PÂ© 68 0.064 Au~** ~ 4 4. 4 90 7 . . I COMMO 1, Ail v h. i #,3-4 1 .. . ,: C 44... Â· /41: V t. J 'l. 1, 0 1 . 4. *6 0 , 9 /7 r, 7 r a. 1 Â¥03 - -. 'y Â¢ r m ,Â¢6 Lot 7 Al U '1 1 1,/ rÂ¥ 0 n P- 0/693 AC 6 CIO t, " 1 , , . 0 / / - C1 dÂ», 17 ' I ' I ' r ..1, Nk . I fil ~4, 't 1 ji-172 ./ 1 , f 2/ 4~ ~t, A/ S.,9{ f ' ..1,/ A .\. L 9' , 1 1 6>; ' i. il,0 1 I. J 1 1.-/4/5-. 4/CP. . 1 1 -4 7' Umity RO I â‚¬7 c 2 i 7/ t Â· - 'th/ L Easement 5' m,7* h .- e f, . 8, R C.'ii.: a. .. (Plat Bk 47, Pg 1) 1 0 ...1 // Easement i Z .k .B i* , ..i .. 1 /7 1 Ja 1 1 1 ., ; 4~ ~d~~~ . 1 1.- '. I IC' . 4 11 t 1 L Ii-! 1%) . ; 1 c- AC' # I *: 0. - f. ~ , JUR.,f; i ~ Ch 4.49' . \41 . 0 ./ 00Lt t, 21 1 , I % I 'll , I 4446 Lot:. 10 3 2., . 1 '' j l AC 4/ \ . 1 1 4 \ J k 33 / \ , : A 01*744 - 7 1 , 1 1 Â· t ' E /4, 1 45*Se: / ov Â¥ 44 65 '. - 1 1 ill, . 1 \ 1 11 ,. . ./ 1 1 t 9 - it\ 40 f 0 4 : , 11/6 - 9 -0.064 AC \2 , 4 1,11 I n \ n / '. a 1 \ 1 % 4 ,0 % . ..2 40-2, i 11. 1k / . 1 . 4 , ; 43 ' 1.4 '. I /0 1 ,- - 1 0 1 1 >11(.,4 ' N58.09'00â„¢ / 70.290 - 1 , i â‚¬4 i= hd. bh ....6 } 10 1 --Ill . , I . 1 , 4 Â¢* Lot 8 Â® o Â· 552 '3 FF AC 44*.S t -... 111 . , 11 1 ' 1 1 145 A e IN+VEPT+41-- 1'- H Â· 1 /0 2 . ' :L . <â€¢1 /7.7 . 41 4 . 41 1 3*Wd,...:,1. . 1 1 1 111 1 14% 3 - ,i li 20' 847*04*88 2 , J .% i~ t ~ 1 , , 1 ~ It I, 423 Pa' M 1 -4,6 4,2, , 6; 1 1 21 -. *14'* 1/, 641:, 1.. 91'Zillits,BA#:.8, o . lu C31 1 1 ' ' I --%- ~%.Â·Â· ~Â·,Â· -_ , t ~4 ti 1 ------ , 1 1 ...3 - f Â£1 / + f L 1, ' 1 J .1.1 44#Â·. L \.\ -- 't ' ' . -, . / . , .:124.4 I ' - - !11 4%,f 1 n '' 1 - *32 . \.0, .1 444 7 ta\ ~\fnet sign--a_ 0 , , ~ f E Pee>*c- p'/A14, \ ' Â· Â·Â·441 621/1â‚¬/ PLA++ \1 1 N. 1 -4 00 ' .\ % 0 , '' \ 6 214.it#* % t 'Ad. Rebar \ & Cap IS 2376 4,...i~ \. ..1.1 1 I , \ .. 1. 41'" \ I ' 4'Â· '1. 881'0~187 411~ \ 2. 5. . ..' . "6Â». =4'M~;al,â€žâ„¢ff.iâ€žâ€ž'V 9*'*~~Â· ? I 11;7, 1F'. -4,49 ... \ #' '04 11*6*1:.*4 -1 ,; , , ;.:.,2,9, ' 2 4 44<$4&*0 ..4.\ \AVF-;?f :11. Â· Â·Â·, 'Ft *' . .1, '41.90 06 K. 1 l'., r 'c: :Â¢1 : ..1.* . U Ni Â»20' Ace- 3r 4 rt , 4,6. / (BK 2197 i % 1 (BK. 684*& f' Lot W f v , 0.064 Ath 4* A 734 But?68 4 2 00 2 COMMO ./ .1 Ve / h ..4 1 L..41 - firh fi,f /~ 7 h.t ~' ' 4 ..,7. 1 7.1 D j IT; Lqt 7 .4 /: m 0 9 7--7 -*+ 4// 0?693 AC ' :3 (10 ' . 81 bu f ./ 0 64 32>N- 4 C.-I- f el ah, i ' 244-4 4 L) r. / , I , , i b e / 4< O. .L ~4 70 11 1 */1 -42.. . w.4 1 . -I-/- ./.- I - . 1 4142 111 01 L \ Easement 5' Utility ' 2 53'e 1 /4%\ ~;;,/ Easement 6 .0 44: h. 1 '4 ./ 4, 0 99% , ls. 11 'iM . / 0 NE' Ati.* . (Plat 8* 4/ Pg U :/ ~i. 4'A . ~ ... 1 1, 2 \ 24 1 1. .3 0 0 , -Q- 2 4: 7, Ar. 6: 1 t 113 - - 5-1 -1#- Â·Â· 4, 0. AC 1 1 . Na ' 1 . ' 1 SÂ·j 59*2?-11 ' A ~14\ 4/0 'I k 1 . Lot. 10 '. I \>, h' 2'/ \ Â·h i i , , I r , AC 9 ' iii 141.,7, 4 / 0 42. 1 L f ; 4 ..M'.1 44 -G % a 1 42*604 r '9 ,\ 0 f 'N 4 1 1 /- 1 i 48,64. 1 1 / ' 4 t 9 ..LL Â· ~~ 1 1 , 1 ,% e#& , 0.064 AC n 4 1 1 Â·' L 40 L \ \ ~11\4 1 1 1... 1 - 4 ! 4 :4 1 '0. 90 1 No#'00'00/Ir ' i E i #ZE .... . Il 70.29' - *MP#, i ' 1 1,51 1 Fnd. R 0 . ap 6 4/Â·t Lot 8 L r--2 --1 1 ! *Â·1 , )4/ d 1 1 1 i 12}ZIÂ· AC .y:TR,94,1 --- ; 449; Ldhâ€¢, , 410Â¢*444*. - . 1 (l '4*<P~705 - ' 1 4 4 4,1 \ , i / , lili r. -... ~ f ' , 20' *4<46 09 * 44,2128â€¢ :l i i 0>4 , lir 4+4 .-22- 2 8.961--- A edit*' 1 .Vitsj~, 1.wwalkÂ»3 , 1 #.* I (31, '0 1 I Pt- 45.2 .Â® 4.7 --e-----~4 aÂ»*- 1 ' 1 f , ~ 4 *Ir: ;,i ; - Cati... e i : , -FR21. -I,~ il 1 1 %00% i k< Â·' U. r 4 , 11 .4 0. "29/ , 11 - 1 1 1 C :I '' 4 '9:2 LT T 17 , ,; 4 . . t. h \~ lili 4 . , 64 1 1, 1 18 . 1 L.1,0 ; 11 1 1 1 , 1 .. '. 1 0/ a , 1 - '4 1 1 I 1, d V- -~- 11 : 4 . 1 1 \ Â·t \ , 1, . I 1 .. 1 '~Stmet Sign-ZZL. Â· i / 4, 4'/1â‚¬/ ~UAI+ 11 N. 1111# i Â«1PO \ ~ fâ‚¬.6.1 0 "Â· 6 Â·- A,d. Rebar .,.4 i.ft/VÂ·. Â· I . . 4.,,V'~ k,/ -â€¢.,. . S8140*187.39 es Drowoff 4-4 . .. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Cl-out> 0/4 6 64-UE bak PUJ-Ec-T- Location: 54 69 99, 9 / 99 24096 Alida LAWEE (Indcate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) LL>Â·A Tr,9.10 + i l 411 AMb. ?Lic Ok ELÂ«L B APPLICANT: Alpal ~:,ALA.063 VIa-4-tok F)Ub 4402-64865 Mous,wie 22:s. 1~6, 2- Name: E-tik LA*60 4, \,t Aul-rA- C.1-1, Al*Eta-O ABet-El ta, 812er Co~k- Address: 69, 79,41 2 99 01/ove> 2,06 LAAE, Aspej j 1,p F/*// Phone #: 939- 303 '92-9-9994, 5144- 6,195-. 59Â£/- 7442 7 1 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1-eÂ¢P Hol--1-Â·Ey T 9 Address: 3 i %- 22, TU b r\.AeÂ£ H 91- , A-126,-1 Phone #: .4-20.- 49 85' PROJECT: Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) El Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption E Subdivision E Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversionf Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane E Lot Split U Temporary Use D Other: U Lot Line Adjustment C Text/Map Amendment TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 9,24 PE FAMILy DI, f LEÂ® Akus,Al- PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) EXTEL, bRL- DEdÂ£, C ALL- 862Â»LO 6.5" #a6Â·A/7- ) Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 52><D El Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. muumm El .. Erik J. and Janet L. Larson 69 Cloud Nine Lane Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-1160 February 19, 2003 Paul Twohig, President Aspen Highlands Village Affordable Housing Association Aspen, Colorado Re: PUD Amendment To the Board Members: We are seeking approval from the Board to go before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission to seek a PUD Amendment required to build our decks located at 99,89,79, and 69 Cloud Nine Lane We presented our design/plans to James Lindt at the Planning Department and the process needs to go to P&Z. James tried to get it through administrative review/approval but we need to take it to the next step. This process is not a FAR issue. If you approve, please indicate as such by signing in the space provided below and date. < Erik J. LdYson /1 ./ p -- cP/=2 7 -63.3 Paul Twohig, President L' Date 0 . 2 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Ee-1 k l.â€¢425 0 0 WAclaz- C#, PI*2Â£81.67 AECei 24 Â£ J , (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1508Â·r' th,k 1. - APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 1GD 4,*16.Jbtllam- 72> 13uel.-6 e-kl-Eet# Â£ ba--4.s (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ SAD which is for 2,5~ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case proc,*gi,Ity have been paid. . CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 'Â¢ .. L 21=32 *69-n dE</ u. By: By: Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: 3~5-l 03 Mailing Address: 84â‚¬50 4 - 76 8 0 * 3 1 2- C ~ AÂ»J CAÂ·1' - 11 Clout> 01 â€¢16 LA.1% *5 fe.1 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doe tke#ae.4- 768:k 3427. Aspe,J 1/10/01 0024-- - 99 604Â»6 41.16 LA-tt~ Asped //29 .14 ; Stewart -1Â© 1. To Snowmass ge 'L- /-Â»se Â·, ~ and Glenwood Springs 14~U /,fr.'Er--\1.%. /,i 4 ,/5 C--M=Z~#/(31 4 such- I ./ Â£ 1 1 Starwood j k IR It 82 2 4 I 10 3 2/7 \ 44 1,4,+C.f, , WI,ite River \ 4% FDFOst Nitional 3 11 ..066- 1 4. \\ 1/ %444 L %* tÂ» A To Snowmass ~-Â«23 1 Village :irh\ 4 Â© ..0 1Wk : 1'.~ Â¢.1\9*.24.~3%, . (unpaved/, m .road) / i ~i ~.. :41.10 15 f i â‚¬15 \ iD, 1 14 m Ai,704 32*;SS 1 - . 994 1 . 1% 04 --r, 1 , 1. -- , 4 F â€ž:p /~30, s -- 1 42 .. ffadges, -~BEDI = X f i i - f .3, 171 <7 , % 1 24%34,~ -- -'. #***/ 98911...._ 1 '4194 =t r / /1 h. 6:71 4. t, A â‚¬>4, ~ =,4 Â£ i \\6 4% .. Mi {6*OP %11.1 & 725/7 1%18*&& Mi,BEEEM?r M t, i 5 0 uttermilk (1, y n 2Â§90Â»unny ~ SeÂ»~ f Y 00 yfÂ·45(e~ Aunry Ct 43% Sieâ€žâ€¢3>216 \,2 ki@*0 9 I '4\ \45%44 Â£ - v;Fr \2> '%4*, ~24 0 Or 9 < d:*: .i V ./. 40 y'll'. - A ' ~*P. Aspen 9 1. **' Goif Course f j 471-4 09 -f *09 -.-P#lid ty 31 3 4, $ /4 31 i ,/ f * S:1 "h. \ 11.04 19 3 10 \~ -4 Whlt.River - 2 National 4 6 1-9/t Aspen k$&92 6* r Foiesl ht E- 2 Maroon Creek Rd -4 r -4 2, 3 /1 # 9 941 1!E-/-* 45 E' al .:-5 1 i Schoy W~ r 0 r **f%_ 7--* 4, 9 ? 04 Gy / 4 ' 30,/C. :2 1 , ic#'104.- Â· 0 . * 2.3 1-Mountain 3/14 E I .' 0~. b t o'fl "491 ~ ~Efem & e - 0. M 1.4. K 2 }sc~oci 4 1 .4- fl:k-A I I 0 A- \ .~12~ R , / % 4.~Sievers Cir *irr. ;f 000/4,54 ' / >42, stueÂ»j~i-w~- 1*~P f '461,9, 1 7,0, et ~ f / 6%-. / 9 /Cascade 218Â£209.05 V ... 1. Â· 7 \P -7/6 \E, 929'6:<x-02 421.02, 1. 29,/ 7,9642*k ja 9- 2 LK i C Loub JIL]Â£ LO , Ify-T<36 5 Â·4~4/4 1 ex 't. 2. Â¥ -5 ~Stedple) t fmor Thundâ‚¬[bi)<fASpell i~ Whiteniâ€¢e, A f~~ Nattenal Highlands 22 74 A# 411<4 Forem le. t -BE*001 .**#.- I .* .. Cloud Nine Lane Deck Project Homeowner Listing for Proposal 1. Erik J. and Janet L. Larson as Joint Tenants 69 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 11, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 2. L. Chi and Walter D. Chi as Joint Tenants 79 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 10, Fourth Amended Plat o f Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 3. Colleen Delia and Marcelo Ferreira and Joan Delia as Joint Tenants 91 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 9, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 4. Bret A. Cook and Carmie G. Cook as Joint Tenants 99 Cloud Nine Lane, Aspen Colorado Lot 8, Fourth Amended Plat of Block B Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D. Affordable Housing Residences, Phase 2 According to the Plat thereof recorded July 25,2001 under reception No. 456880 And the declaration recorded July 25, 2001 under reception No. 456879 _ 4 11, , 1 f , r , 77 /// \\\ i . 1 0 "MI 0 / L---- 1 94 1 \ AI/8615- li \ \ -~-SEL J X , /: 9 Â»tf \ g 4- , 40 O i 2 '' 'll bppER PRE&WRE--~ 2 ' " Â«'~ ~ ~ LZONE- - 49 4 2 THU VDER OWL ' f ._ 08"W -" hÂ· t " . 14 4 - 0Â« 7 65:~ 9 -- 0 07. 2 SEE VILLAG ./ MECHANI - 2 M 1,j LANS OR ~ e - I 0 /1 C S IDE â‚¬ 42-44 TIE IN TO 906 J 6 --- 9 LD 0 OLD MAROO CREEK PIPEL / EXISTING WATER <3426 (T , 4 / 46 1 , tJ- WE 16 41 O% /' i / 80,0 ~2> Â»/ 88"W 4 I ;Â» FH 1. 1 \01 r / /1 PROSPE Â¢55Â«- 2 \O\ \ ,\/ / f'/.-..--- \Ar,// Â£ 2 Ill./.1LJ %521 1 1 f 4F ./.-.i .--.- 0 80 Ho 44 - ~B l~ACBM\4 /'....: / 4 , / 11 0 2 k / <t / , O j . / --i 2 , -3 / / / 1 4 4 EL_r 40 // 6 21-77 /.p / ilÂ¥,3 1 67. 2 44 7-- O 0 + 414 WY " .f 1 .' > p 'J I , 4 . . .7 i./ _-,/''~1~ # Ve' 1 9 \ WV - 4 \ 60 7 + 0 / ' A V WV \ 1 CONNECTION TO HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION WATER, SEE SHEET U20 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. BER REVISION NUM- 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 ASPEN HIGH-LA-RDB 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 & I - ,--... 2 REVISED PER ACSD, HWSD, & COA 2(y Wet- Ecâ€¢-n-'W- A 11 11.,6 .. ~B HT<,7.Ab .... =D. \ K. 4 /L'.4 . '9/. I. ' ./ ' f. /. . - ..'.1.. )1-â‚¬ 'Â¢ 1 1 - 1 4.7 1 I .. i.*r.:.tÂ·2 .,41;24 J Â·Â·it Â· f 0 8/ '16 :.. 20' A,â€¢U.'N 4444 ---- l i... . , :.0 Â· (BK. 2199'a e l â‚¬01* 1 (BK. 684 'PO. 9- 1 (BK 734 Pa"S~ U ~.- Lot; Q Â£ .r â€¢41: 41 0.064 Aing * ,>fi,7 40, . e , ' r r COMMO 0.58. f 7 to I. smels 4 W.3 .04 / 9 '' ' e S.9 r- *1 00 . , ..i .. * -7.72 j Â·.t., ,/ - 'Oâ€¢ 0 <* . .3, â‚¬7 -ro4't:f . f ~. 0, i r i--Li_ u , ~ > .Al eÂ« j O 6 1 e / ,/ ' \ A i - - v. .05,/ ' ' 2 10/6 1---_ j e 2,0 ' i :.. Â£1340 7' Utility l P /,9 13 \ Easement 5' Utility , 1.e 1 Easement - 41 01 4 (Plot Bk 47, Pg 1) & , 1 .* 412% 1 i 1, 2 0 1% 1 â€¢ Â·td- 43 b Orit 1 Lot 112 I' r 4,(0 I. 0*2 AC N 1 VT r 0 , 1 2:= , .1. 1 .4 \ -67" 1 7 5.78' 1 I ___I-' 31 I % 1 A. l/,rE=<h 444Â¢ Lot /10 > -, 1 \ %\1. . i ] , ?01 , - \ \1 F 0.060 AC &/ 0 4 bit A. 1 0 1d -1 4 1 a..Â¥ / '*D -18'- */ 10 . j - 2 47 /4 44 d â‚¬4 % 3 112/ 1 11 3 1413 u I i - 1 1 1 I 1 1 L 3 i . O ' --Â·.,_ D , I -0.064 AC m ' 4 4 * lo ' 1 4. . bbi 05\ to IF \I 79. I ..1- 1 N58*09'007 ... Elit ' -;- - -Mt ; P 76.29' \ 1,6,1 !i J' 1 2 U ..ft. I / R 1 Uâ‚¬/u*'-1 , Fbd. Re V 7, . 4 Lot 8 ' . 0 1 & Capl i 1 4 [-3 ..... 1 , 1 , , - /' . - P.0Â£16 AC 1 Lt 1 f /771 1 1 ,/ 44# r kill 4*Â«711 1 \ . 0 -cLLL it La //1//1 \ 111 1 1 , '. I --Si~gunpA , 20' t. i i 1\ . i 1 9 lif.ON,i,2/ 02--222-24967_ _. (aa 1 1, 4<2%09, la 42,969-0-9-- L A '51 ---0 -* i ! \ â‚¬74\ L / \ - O --_ ' 'j , 1 / n X 28Â©4<-- Put>~ EL lStreat Sign- \ N. I '21 Ad. Rebar & Cap LS 2376 \ 3 sal Â·00'18 7 -4 (6 921* ,TÂ¥ LiZ Nj34'13'49. E ..: P. 7*979441, 1. + fl f !,....1 'i':RS,)4, ' 10(,PLV. / .61.. . *95647nFO ' , 74; 16 ':. N , / r 2 1/.0,41 (BK. 2197,4 < Lot; 6 ~ (Bl 684'#& (BR. 734 PU"gh 1 Â¢ it; i f, O.064 A(X 6 -- 54 9 'Iâ€¢ r. 4 ' r COMMO 4/ b. 1 . /16 41 '-* t ./ 0.56 , .. I ) 4-7 0 1 k -- - , 1 . '04 rd -- 0 . I ' 7 m n e sq r- 0093 AC / -'ll.1,<11'..Â£,6-cr . , , 4204/ , - 0 p Al A 7 9 4 4 , 44 - ti . 'A" , /1 Ct. .. , I t e , i V e'.1 . I i 4/40 D / * 2 0 - 1 4. \4 6 -. 1 1 Easement 5' Utility 1 1 .Iii / 5 - /4 4 Easement 1 Â»14. /3, (Plot Bk 47, Pg 1) : - 41 --' V 1 f .i :Â§:Â£* 1 /, I N ') 9 A , ...t,; /b â‚¬11 4 Â¢ 4- /., o \ ~6 47.24 , 1 0- 3. t 114 '11 M Â·. ..3 1 0. AC 404 1 1 r L. , 1, 1 6' ' ' CA 1 A \ 1 2 5.78) 't ' 1 1 9.1 \ 1 I ; Lot â‚¬ 10 7 4, 0.060 AC ~ \ il f 1 ' e.1 0, - 6/ 4 4 4 , 4"~ F+re \ *, ' age &,2.4 -94 1 -10'- .: 4 004 - 'al rÂ» \ r 680 Â¥ .4 /1 , 1 #04 . h.Â· 41 %#Ak i J \ \\ I , 4 1 \. %\%\ t 9 _ e i \ \ m 0 â‚¬ e\ : ' U .064 AC /0 R I - 1 \ 1/ OREA -Â· \ l, , 5 -, 4 44 1 I 11 1 L. /2 . N58'09'007 11 \ ': i .'. ,,4 Â·At ' il .:.Are, / 0 76.29' , 'N (-4 1 - Ill:, d ~ Atd. 808, 31 :4. I v 4 ' Q & Cap IS 1 Lot 8 O E- ./0,--1 11 i 1 1 1 0 1 437 i --. 1 ,; -f/*~f@,/4 /r//~71\ 1 / 1!1 1 20' ' /22/0" 11 11 0 1% C L / 1 ----rj--.9~'92, ~ 1 11 45:4:98 bi. 1 1 8 Cb 2 d 96'' 1 1% --492' ' '54259*iFir---Ch ~ ~ ~ C31 ~ / , 1 0-.~ \ , 4. 1 - / -. -0 - -- \ / 21''f , 1 -EZE.1-!1*9~ ~Street Sign- 0>1,1,2/ Fl,+4-1- \\1-S:; 2,0\ N, . 0 <1 h d. Rebar & Cap LS 2376 ty 4.Â¥41Â·2. 1, 1, -\ Sal Â·09 '18, t~ i C1 .. V F It .. 0 I . - 1 ,Prr~, _t ~ ~l L i~ 1 V Of ,i ty< , 11, 10 c ge -t- Pl m d,Si It ll C f le,- 0 1(11 5 1/ 1 1, r-1 Â£ f 1 1 ---..,-A'. .....+.-" *1/6:~r/1.4/1./A \ 11 /23L z 34 I 1 1 kl # 642,4 j 61*- tÂ» i 1 I Â¥ r ' Li 4 1 Â» /5 42<1 /5,5/ h ' - .124 . K\%. 4, < A 1....4 .. â€ž - % 1 J /i \\i /3 P V - ' i ->Ck , f il~ r, 5 // 4,19-1-9-1~.--1. - -21 / - t - 1-1-7-- -7 1.- +P 0--n, '4,1.- . -- it.-1 z' 1 /7/ - ----1 . . 1 1 11 . .1 1 1 1-1 Il-llit - - 41&12107 /1 '2.LIJ-â€ž..clu.,..._ _ .. , --/ A<. 9 ./I.-. 4.--,/-.- . . *131/&25 . ' 1 o I ' Â¥ DAAkt 41 * P*NL_ ileÂ»/ 1:bcÂ« Applt[04 , ./ I A b. 24': , +3:~12. -- 1 1 N Â« 4 01 19 1 4 1 - 1= i j - L--1 R f . - -4.- F. ME 1 1- I 1--L 9 VUL_ 1 1 9\ - , .. 1 (4 -: *1~X- --2 \ Li // 7 -17--77-11- 1-2-TII_ 1-7 -7 , t'' 1 ' . n ./ 4 f 1 13= -1,32F-:~ 1. 1 \ /1#f - 1"44.- iL 'IÂ·t--- 04 t - I " . 1. ' 1 I ./ t . 1 14 --!< .40- . "WRWO-! 1?rea- I / Ek'/ 777 . i r A x ..in j Di?%2 - -I, - . /0.~ t I 1 1 4, 1 \ EN,â‚¬>r.11 1. 4---7 - 1Â· *j 0 j. ----/- .I-... - *._ .-m 1.-- ~ f-THUNDEUOM,L 0- 11 k - 11 \ 02. 3 .*49â‚¬1 i 1 Ifpt--- ~ /. / 1 > / I : \ ' 1. , , -/ ./. 5. f P.Cd I v ~h i , 'fl:g / f I. 1 \ Â· F.;:~~ ,-f~&~ ' 4. 46,9 /1.- - 1 I P t. 90 t'i.iÂ·:.~0ie :Â· 4 -~ t Â¢63 , . '' 1 I . -lueE. I . li 6/V f & 1 .,4..- I"I: + . */966 &*2& 5 2:31% i 3 17 31%11 : 1.4 2. , f Lt;ofM ~.. Â·Â·0Â· ~' L '71*f dih- Fil 3, Â·- i ~ * f ' 444 \ \ /1 'i 20 i 3 I \ 1 1 40.0 .-....1 \ 1 1 cjv >,2.12> i 1 kY N.'' .W 4 1 1 l. i 1 t. . 1 ] t. \ m (...0 '.* 6 .3"1 4, 1 , 01&h-4.0: -1 : 1.9, ~4 3 ~.0,,Â¢6 $ /.:th: f ;3,?, .':f..~ Â· #' .23'031 i.;ig.'% . Â·Â·Â·Â·=: ' Â·Â· 1.9 'M I 1 1 W 51~~,1 44. 6 P .aim l. 1. : ~1'' :i.F f -1:. . E'*it / t'iÂ·iÂ·:,.~ft V ' 0.1, 1 1 A '/.1.1 Fi it ; 1 .11{ : t. 1111 ' iÂ· 1 4/ 1 . 1 7.51 0 1 ..11 :' . |4 Â·'34Â·.f. b , 6 20 3 .ig b -, *,41 Â· , 4 0 - i. 4 2, 1 er â€¢ (01 L 'r, . / 40 64 3 ..4 0 , b 0 ENGINEERS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. ~ SURVEYORS sac % 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 N i A SPE CX , Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 4 ..1 t. 7071.- 73 2. 1,4/ 450. i i (970) 945-1004 (FAX 945-5948) t SCHMUESER .1 V a, ..., i I '9 I W ~1 GORDON MEYER e Aspen, Colorado (970) 925-6727 . '01, . 1!; F..t'im *.4 CUD 7 : .... ..iÂ·ZM'itEA'~Trt'3-77Â·'Â·-2.tÂ·,6:Z2~Â·1Â·.'mâ‚¬r 2:1:CI -StÂ·- _:Int.3.nt<Â·27Â·~+t-2,~Â·-2 1~e =Â·Â·:21. frUU*LUd.Trij~11-1 .'â€¢12.7...1:m~- 99'75:.-70&='.'1.-rF.Â·.'4415,4,1.-VEVe,A-:Â·-c-?:73*8;avwp-#-7- Â·Â·F-I.P"r'.9491#M.*6~â€¢Ia,4~4*0,;r.9*;44.46*42 223~CU'.-'~ Â· 7 Â·2 '. ..'W Â·-.1 -1.-1-' - .- L :1 t , .14 t 46 i 1 \ 1 11 'll ' 9 4 f.1-42-r - i lili 1 11 1 0 ~ Â¥It\-tf-4 r 9 01< .for =i# ' 11 , 10 1 ill 1 1 i 4 11 F h , 9-3, 1 -' IJ. 4 L -\ 1 t 42 .1-1 iv-[-1-1 j U 1 gi--1 2 Â£ 1 1 kÂ»A-'-ilifinatrl-- i -t--P~"i..~.-- -211Â©1 1 1* -4 /,1 â€¢~-- ././.-// r /. V / 141 1 ' 2Â«4_ Â· 1,11 12 = /} 74 1 1 i -U / \Rui' 9 # _9 r --- 71:42 --- E '4 M. 1 t \Art-r' 1 1 11 7 11 f _Elen_ r A !tf : \VA / 7 .07 Ix\20. le'l fr.4/ i /11 13 - - 1 1- .<.fl 91Â©--- Lf i.z-ill L~- + - \DN- 0.-2 - 7.12 / 4 1 .- lk,-1-44k / 1-9/1 J ..1- r / l'j /// P i \.// 1 41 k 25/ 4 . 4 A r /2 7 ' 1 - 7 1/---0-{ 29 = - .2 , \ L /; 1.- 1 1. 1--T'*4-- *4 0 4. Fi liN 7 Â·*,11210-7 Â· - *46 6109.5 . Â¥ DAAk-L, 1 -21=221_ b. Pe,41__ ..0-1*LL=L_ 16/ Av 0.. -1---...1/04-friA' Appit[04 4 : 1~i-tid ./'"*.V.... . 1.1-1 1 f It 41 1 ip A 1 -271 b v Wf Â»' go , . er, 1 v %73 f == L-j f 'P L. 1 00/L -. r *_u= 1 4 r~ 4 1 JJ -\ ---7Â£- , j i- F --la -, 1 ..... L 1 1 1; pw,k_ ' 1 / - //Cr. 1 -- 34. i ii ~94'77-1 - ~4 l li Â» U--3- \6 x ....4. t 1 ! 1// 11// 1 fi 15 -7 * TT- 17 t ke' 4 3 .1\ 1, -- 2,0 -1 1 XNX -t 1-1 1 . U>/ \\ Yt77--- T n I 1 r 7 1-- 21 // 9 Irmh, 4 1 . -: h - 4 -1 r - - r'. ,... ~ 7 vf 'r r* et,eybr,10,0 -E-2-1 1 , ..3. , tÂ·.L.sE.r....,#., ,~~. L L *4 - - 0 - '.. MCS E VJJOXI-) -- -I# 44 , /1 .// / - COMMON 3 1 S47'35'0071 20.56' 2201' -114. -/ 1, h I TBIoc~~ --~~~ 7 / to \ 1/-/ 1 = .31 AREA - End. Rebar I I t~ Block C ~*-7--'1,~~~ -21,390' 26.ss' 23.59' & Cap -- -1â€ž.4-- - .10' Sewer / A J Blnek H I / ~ - 0.026 AC....._ 00 - - re 10' 7 Esmt. (BK. 628 PG. 12) / 5 % (Plot Bk 47, Pg 1) / / 1 44.01 -I *. .ASPEN HÂ»fLANDS 1/<LAGE N 5Â£33*12' W _ N 5839'45~ W , / / 0 37.70' \ - /9 N .b ' P /1 \- 0 4,4. ,\ 4 84 % 6 / 44\ 1 (BK. 219 PG. 141) 20'Access & U87/0, Esmt.x / ~~20' 6' Dru,nage \ Â£. :-4,-*.:. t; '. 5 (BK. 684 PG. 174) i~ H Â» 2!j Â®* ~cul~~014(orner -=2 *-<~ \41.~rt\. \,1 / i. Easement (BK 734 Pa 6877 (PLAT BK. 47 PG. 1) r , f ; / .) Po,re/ 1 // 2 </ '&/ E-_. , i , ,- ' 1- , I n M Lot 4 , ~< $ w ,/- R 4 i !i 20' '420, 0/ ./. \\ , // 4 61. 7- b a h. 0 ~ 1,13 - ~~ ' 0.088_.Ac * 6 loti5 \ 1 / + / ' da 4- V ' ..1 ) '--1, / 4 , 11 R % . L \ // th' 411 11 4 / 0.092 AC , *i I U ..... b 20' Access & Ut/7* Esmt. Lot 3 \ \C .\ Block E |i b ' " C ~ ~, 0,078 AC '~ Fnd. Rebar 11 Â· . / /7 / 11 / U f .10 :. \ i // / '7' f 22 " p to. ./ ' 16! (BK. 684 PG. 174) (BK. 219 PG. 141) 1 & Cap < Pen=.f / ., IA- Â· ~ ' ' ~ L/ 11 ,1 Lot 4 e 11 - (BK. 734 PG. 687) r / 0/ / 0.064 AC\~-4 : j /, &0 0 0 -r,\ i & 2 t . , 0% 7 > COMMON AREA r, I\' 9 /1 1 4 / .14 h 11 i i V ,/ /1 r .u C ........ 1 11 d N # N 0149/ Le ..\ / ... / %2 //.2 49/ 05 1.- . - ,/ .7 ..1,, <f' /,/9//~.,4 7 ... / 14 , -97 -~ 0.567 AC i / f ' -1 1 - N $ t /. . -- ; 44 51.- --- . 0 /, 4 ~ VICINITY MAP i, ,+ - / 1 DRO N K S. I E , 3 NOT TO SCALE Cy, - - h. . 00 /7 .093 AC '% 0 4/ POB %0 . 1 . , Cloud Ny I //., Cl \ F -- 0 - ., ./ d. v ' 4 / // /1 -- 46. N. ~114% /\4. - 4 /2 - f 10 -11 /4 7.. /1 - 71 â‚¬3 1-1 IT i (1r 11 $ fb 3.3 C~5/e / LEGEND Al.Â·. / : .:. A-4 4â€¢ !11 10 11 , n \,f I.: / / 4/) \ /' ,~ 11 ~,1 b*itfixt V 4, 1 0, , \ I 4, 4.44 6 1 1 21 'P -. .1,L JiL JIL ,1. yl ;25,.A. JIL -]Il (l_,2,1..M.Al >4.4. ...3, ->,< IZILLCIL - .94. / All , 1 , 1 44> 46. ib I ,\. N It / - 7<44(/ - \11\ e 1 FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 1 , .Â· I I 1-$11 -W m a m ,/,i // 1--AL-- / 1 k . --Â· C.ZIZE--~ . 2,3 Lit. L.2 LliL.,i V -11. k _3 -.i- U J!1.- ~L , ~ - ' . cP*. / 1 1 <. 10 -m n 01 11711 42 1 0111'31 ~Â·" / . 1,0 1 1 .. 1 ~ SET NO. 5 REBAR WITH CAP, LS 20133 6 , 10, I"" 0 1 . 8. Â« /. 1, f.--1 3.- 7' Ut#* Â· 01 1 L 61 i . h , / 1 1 / ~ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 5' Utility , E 3 e 1 j N 215 Easement 92/ 4 Â· i Mat 8* 47 Pg 12 'â€¢41 * ,>' *4 , .-~/ = 47~ i . ~=5.... ~~ -Â· ~ . Easement 41 . 1 VA\. I / ~f ELECTRic PEDESTAL VAULT, OR SITCH BOX O - -.. Â·,- , 0 2- A $ a ! 6 Â·- v < Lot 1 4 I ./ b.-22 '1%59 r.. f'. / 41 44\ 13.~ \/ 1 .~ t h . . 0.080 AC f 1 3. 1 4 1 :1 0, 0 1 \41 *4 WATER VALVE P. t.. A 4 â‚¬Â£- IC FIRE HYDRANT 'i ~.4:~* /4&- Ac - - ; // e H 4 . #Ff Lgit 1 L :1 / .4 t.aW' \ I 'lilli r. :11 1\ r * WATER SERVICE COMMON I! -- i Lot 13 1.9 0)592 AC Sp' 41 0 '~ !' ~ R 5.78t / j *1 AREA 6) SEWER MANHOLE - 94,% ' <P 11 f / \0.066,7 /f' \ 1 1 ! I P 0.157 AC (te ' ' '/ 1 'b \It' r 1 / Â· Â· .1 , * SEWE h DE"AUL W / -A, j 9 CED' Ary \1, 11 . , ' U U / 1 1 / -ft 1 - 1 1 A Lot: i 0 3 it % I n, c~.K~1.4% . A. 1 \.hi " \ 4,> I r' 1 -, 11 GRAPHIC SCALE 6 0<4/.b _ * 0.060 AC 9 rl.,9. - ---- f . ,Â· O\ \ ,>CS. 1 51.4 .,.1. Ilti..#0, .' 0 .. // r .0 i l I. ,% I ..: ~4' e.--T# # 4ot 14 / \ , 8 0. 0 10 m 1\/ 1 -- N .. /':,241\ 0 , 19 Â·04 41% \/ 2 0 1 t&\ A I 4 - 4 80 10' Druinage //r' \ /; >24 > , // 01, 4, 1 ~ ~,1 ~ 4 1 1 , 4 1Â¥:3 61 * - 1 Easement 0.068=-AC-_ / 3.19' \\ I Â· I A Z 911 -10'4, , 8, 4 G. --- - A lt\3 L - r U 0. 0/6 tr, --t-- 57- -JL-4- .- + 0 --- - le I ~~. -- - #4 0. < 10.5,1 1 rivq ~ 0, , '4 \ p..7/ 9, / 1 1~ -~ ) fi \1\ ,# /~/4 Lot 2342% , 49*- v 0 P .. Fnd. Rebar & Cap ~ ~ N ~ U , f \ . , 1 :\ \11 f 74/2 3 , . Ot 9 143 , / 84# . ,\ 1, 5.41'__-.-e=-- : Â°~064 AC 0 L , t CURVE TABLE \4|81.94. '~ 1./e â‚¬ \ en \1' i~~ '1 1 0 r -- 4- / /,01 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING 1 I V / :2 6 ' f N 0 01 243.45 21.74 10.88 21.73 $8718'43"W 5-07'00" a , C2 20.00 25.86 15.09 24.09 N52'49'59"E 74'04'29" 2 i ~ 7- 1 1 ' il C3 130.00 50.35 25.50 50.04 62653'327 Lot 15 f-7. ,/ f COMMON AREA L* 81 n A68-0g'00, F, 0.078 AC 2-41Â»=me. 1/ 314 /6 C4 130.00 48.11 24.33 47.83 948*35'24"W 21'12'08" ,~\ 5 Jti* 0.254 BC,# 4, C5 200.00 19.01 9.51 19.00 361'54'501Â¥ 526'460 7. , 06 200.00 58.07 29.24 57.87 57257'20-W 16'38'13- < ~ !2 1 1 1 1 \ % 1 1 Phd. Rebar - 1 1 1.1 1 11 # *d / P \=/ 11 J 76.29' 1 (Put ek 'f' Pg '11 1 4- , IN -r , 0 0 i 4 1 1 .4 1 1 C7 165.00 66.84 33.88 66.38 N8707'16â„¢ 23'12'35~ 75.902 . - 07 - 00 f. r--1 & Cap LS 2376 S02'24'257 1 , Â· C8 165.00 37.27 18.72 37.19 N69'02'4274 12 6'33" i , - .26/ 1271 ,-J . . 1 & 1 --9 + il Â® ' I i * 2. C9 165.00 35.12 17.62 35.05 N56'28'367 .8 - \ / -. '44 '5 1 ' Lot 8 Clo 165.00 29.47 14.78 29.43 N45'15'44"W 1914'05Â» m. 1 4 1 --- U \ 54.90' - / 20' UOHO/7 0/Bek - , -=-r-- A AR -=14- Lg , 111 AU-53'357 -- ---- , 1 1 f 1 - I ' Â· v.wv/rAC--- Cll 165.00 35.72 17.93 35.65 N3356'37*W 1224'09~ 0 ---- -- i . III C12 165.00 57.94 29.27 57.64 Nt 741'00'W , 9, m/-. - r.7, 1 , C13 165.00 57.58 29.09 57.29 N02'22'22Â»E 1959'40" U, --:.4-1 11-4>i ~ - i 847=04'28~ 1 C14 177.74 59.76 30.16 59.47 N2T00'04"E 19'15'45" .& W \\1 1 1 , 1, C / Plat Book 47. Page 1 111 ,- -- 1 , 0 C15 140.00 65.82 33.53 65.22 N44'54'04*E 2556'15" \ --c4- -- 1 1 1,1 Â·-. , Ilil 1 .1 C16 20.00 25.77 15.02 24.02 S21'27'427 7348'59* ta 1 3 00 2 ~ AC i \ 7 \\ 1 - E-Street Sign -,' C17 251.73 34.20 17.13 34.18 N!173'151Â¥ 747'05Â» ' i \\ ; V I ... C18 20.00 34.07 92.85 30.10 S25'45'17Â»E 9T36'54Â» 1 1, C20 100.00 61.12 31.55 60.18 S40'33'48'W 3901'16~ .%12 9 41 / 2.E ' 2 i 31.92 021 170.00 53.62 27.03 53.39 968'13'347Â¥ 189'13Â» ea#* 6.02 A \ . 0 1 ' 7 J --275=cEÂ«-- =.. C22 170.00 11.91 5.96 11.90 579*16'031V 62 fi-Yi a e r D C23 135.00 44.22 22.31 44.02 N89'20'351Â¥ â‚¬3, i ' \\ /0 /l l C24 135.00 67.23 34.33 66.54 N65'41'3574 28'32'0 f 3.,00 I : <---- c:7 ~02 C25 135.00 80.62 41.55 79.42 NJ<19'097 34*12'53' n \ , C26 135.00 48.64 24.59 48.37 N06-53'26"W 2438'32* --- ---- , / h t, f C27 135.00 21.06 10.55 21.04 N07'54'01"E 856'21~ C28 147.74 35.84 18.01 35.75 N1919'11'E 1353'58" ' -<11% (31. 89/ i . 22,0- -e-- --- - --% / H 84 -56 ~ ~ 1 It 2. .. 1 ' i i .) .jil 44 / C29 147.74 15.74 7.88 15.73 N2919'18"E 6-06'17 / , 1 C30 110.00 36.77 18.56 36.60 N41'57'06*E 19'09'17" End. Rebar C31 20.00 34.18 22.97 30.17 579'30'49Â»E 97*54 '55- & Cap 00.5.601 .47' //2 , -- 0... \ -e C33 251.73 54.63 27.42 54.52 N36'46'221Â¥ 1726'01" C34 243.45 134.15 68.83 132.46 N5846'33"W 31*34'22~ C35 100.00 1.95 0.97 1.95 S5837'57'W 1'07'01Â» 4,2 1.*t , /.K - Coax / I. .42 . / I - --I . I a I. \. 11 1 } 06 223.45 49.28 24.74 49.18 N88=55'407Â¢ 12-38'1â‚¬ - 442 C37 223.45 154.51 80.49 151.45 N62*47'587 39'37'10' - I 4.0 4 C38 231.73 82.63 41.76 82.19 N32'46'277 20'25'51Â» 09 125.00 89.21 46.60 87.33 N5749'10*E 40*53'25~ C40 162.74 56.82 28.70 56.53 1422-22'19*E 20'00'16~ C41 150.00 290.85 218.64 247.38 N43'10'41 -W 11 1'05'45" ,~ ' ' ~~ C42 185.00 71.30 36.10 70.86 970'13'571Â¥ 2704'59~ ~Street Sign- i (43 115.00 119.83 66.00 114.48 529*20'2414 59'42'06Â» /1 \ 1 'fy ' C44 50.76 118.12 117.65 93.21 N5732'22Â»W 13319'25" 0$,, , / LINE- TABLE- - 1.88'-- LINE LENGTH BEARING 20/:/ 42\ Ll 12.30' .'.. 508'21'17*E . lAP: I Â£79 ... A Fnd. Rebar 12 13.45' N80*32'177* . Fnd. Rebar & Cap IS 2376 & Cap LS 9018 - O . 1 \ . A 1 W. 0 J ./. / '" ~ ~ 9 I I N S56-32'12"W d 1 10.87' \ 4 S81~00'18â„¢ 4 / : . 8.90' / l According to Colorado Law, you must SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER NUM- REVISION DATE BY Job No. 921840-01 .9 Notice: BER commence any legal actihn based upon any ~ defect in this survey within three years after 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 i AHF R U.D. Pburth EkÂ»" 4,7 DCW Affordable Housing (4 '12 m you first discover such defect. In no event Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 6-25-01 may any legal action based upon any defect 4 in this survey be commenced more thon ten (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Amended Plat years from the date of the certification shown SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER Aspen, Colorado (970) 925-6727 Townhome Residences ch-b/kb-fp2.dwq hereon. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS E-mail: survey@sgrn-inc.com L 0 0 0 0 0 9 44 R '1 Ease Q: \1992\92184Q-01\dwg\ah-blkb-fp2.dwg Tue Jul 10 12: 56: 07 2001 SLJ Ch\1992\921840-01\dwg\ch-b/kb-fp2.dwg Saved: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:47pm Plotted: Tue. 10 Jul 2001 12:56pm tmoore