The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.616 E Hyman Ave.0073.2015.ASLU- ~0073.2015.ASLU 616-E HyMAN AVE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: ESA EXEMPTION: GMQS ALLOTMENT - ADMIN 2737-182-12-005 . sCRY,Y./3 7/Le .; ~~ S eÂ© 1 k â‚¬3 te IR External Media Located Here M-007561 . RMMI PATH: G/DRIVE / MASTER FILES/ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LAND USE CASE DOCUMENTS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0073.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 182 12 005 PROJECT ADDRESS 616 E HYMAN AVE PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION GMQS ALLOTMENTS, ESA EXEMPTION, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC DATE OF FINAL ACTION 01.27.16-WITHDRAWN CLOSED BY DEB PATTISON 06.15.16 0073.2015.ASLU 2737-182-12-005 .1 *26%' - -- I a Permits f Elle Edit Record Navigate FArm Reporks Format Iab Help . ~ E * 42) R>< , e 4 4 - i 41 +1 =d ia--, i 11 1 , .4 C Â£1 86 lump 1 ** , E * | 0 . ~ ~r ~ Main~ Custom Fields ~ Routing Status ~Actions ~ Routing History ~ Fee SummarN Â·,1 41 41 (3 ~ 0 + . m 2 9 [b La ..P .0 *Â·. Pe,mit type aslu , Aspen Land Use Permit # E073,2015.ASLU Address 616 E HYMAN AVE ~] Apt/Suite City ASPEN S tate CO - Zip 81611 El Permit Information 0 W -- gÂ· 1 Master permit E Routing queue aslul 5 Appded 08/05/2015 â€¢ 7r Prolect Q Status pending Approved - (D 1_1 1 Description GMQS ALLOTMENT -ADMIN, ESA EXEMPTION, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW Issued - i REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSALADDING 219 SQ FT OF NET LEASABLE AREA i PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-005 Closed/Final Â¥ , Submitted MITCH - 970-925-7819 Clock Running Days O Expires 07/30/2016 - Submitted via v Owner Last name FURNGULF LTD 03 First name JEREMY FLUG, PARTNER 616 E HYMAN AVE - ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970] 925-2496 Address ~ Applicant C] owner is applicant? m contractor is applicant? Last name IAAS LAND PLANNING LLCI-3 First name MITCH 420 E MAIN ST STE 10-8 Phone [970] 925-7819 Cust # 25346 E Address ASPEN CO 81611 Email MITCH@HLPASPEN.COM Lender - AspenGold5 (served robertg 1 of 1 SPAIn PAI D $4,550.00 CHECK #4134 08/05/2015 RECEIPT #39001 1 Ll 51 ,Â· 5 0 / (O p- De 4 414 (~ Â·f . - e [f2424--~ ~GE:-] Justin Barker From: Mitch Haas <mitch@hlpaspen.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 1:45 PM To: Justin Barker Subject: Fwd: 616 E Hyman Hi Justin. Per the emails below, yes. we are okay with calling the 616 E Hyman Avenue land use application officially withdrawn. Please let me know if you require a separate letter or something more formal than this email. Best regards, Mitch Mitch H..s Haas Land Planning, UC 420 East Main Street, Suite 10-B Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Email: mitch@hlpaspen.com h~ Please consider the environment before printing this email Confidentiality note' The above email and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and/or privileged. The information is for the use of the individual or entity originally intended It you are not the intended recipient. any disclosure- copying. distribution or use of this information is prohibited If this transmission is received in error. please immediately notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments if any Begin forwarded message: From: Steven Ferrell <steven@qulftech.corn> Subject: RE: 616 E Hyman Date: January 27, 2016 at 1:01:56 PM MST To: Mitch Haas <mitch@hipaspen.com> Hi Mitch, I alsothought we had already killed the application, but yes, please let him know that itcan be officially withdrawn. Best regards, Steven From: Mitch Haas [mailto:mitch@hlpaspen.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:20 AM To: Steven Ferrell <steven@gulftech.corn>; Steven Ferrell <steven@gulftech.corn> Subject: Fwd: 616 E Hyman 1 Steven: Please see the email from Justin Barker below. Do I have your authorization to tell him "Yes, the land use application is officially withdrawn"'? Frankly, I thought we had already done this but I guess not. Please let me know. - Mitch Mitch Ha.: Haas Land Planning, LLC 420 East Main Street, Suite 10-B Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Email: mitch@hlpaspen.com b~ Please consider the environment before printing this email Confidentiality note: The above email and any attachments contain mtormation that may be confidential and/or privileged- The information is for the use of tile individual or entity originally intended- If you are not the Intended recipient- any disclosure copying. distribution or use of this information is prohibited If this transmission is received in error, please Immediately notify the sender and delete this message and Its attachments if any Begin forwarded message: From: Justin Barker <Justin.Barker@cityofaspen.com> Subject: 616 E Hyman Date: January 27, 2016 at 10:15:32 AM MST To: Mitch Haas <mitch@hlpaspen.com> Hi Mitch, It looks like the permit forthis has been issued. Are we okay to consider the land use application officially withdrawn so I can close it out? Thanks, Justin Barker AICP I LEED Green Assoc I CNU-A Senior Planner I City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law If you are not the intended recipient. please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it Further. the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable, the information and opinions contain in 2 Justin Barker From: Mitch Haas <mitch@hlpaspen.com> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:23 PM To: Justin Barker Subject: Re: 616 E Hyman Perfect and thank you for being thoughtful about this. By the way, can you have a laptop at Council for us to use tonight re: 411? Mitch Haas Sent from my iPhone Please excuse typos On Sep 28,2015, at 12:55 PM, Justin Barker <Justin.Barkercalcitvofaspen.com> wrote: Hi Mitch, The proposed skylights will not need a P&Z review, so I will go ahead and remove that from the agenda. As far as the GMQS exemption goes, we believe it will not need it, but I would like to have Claude review the permit to verify this. I think the best course of action at this time is to leave this case open until the permit is reviewed. Once we verify that the net leasable remains we can withdraw the case. In other words, we will plan on not writing any exemption, and will withdraw the entire case once everything is verified in permit. Does this sound acceptable? Justin Barker AICP 1 LEED Green Assoc 1 CNU-A Planner I City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it ts addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further- the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen- If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future. and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. From: Mitch Haas [mailto:mitch@hlpaspen.coml Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:47 AM To: Justin Barker 1 Cc: Steven Ferrell; Rosenstein Subject: 616 E Hyman Hey Justin. Okay, I have everything squared away with my client at 616 E Hyman (Gulfco Bldg). So long as they are good to go with the 4 new skylights on the front 'pitched" portion of their roof and two of the same type of skylihgts on the rear "pitch," then they are good to go without needing any hearing before the P&Z. With the plans they now have in for building permit, they also no longer need the GMQS Exemption (please confirm this with Claude) as they are not adding any need leasable area (no longer "capturing" the old common area hallway) and. since those GMQS exemptions are cumulative over time, we see no reason to confuse the property file by having an unused exemption granted should they ever choose to use it in the future. In other words. there's no reason to grant it now since they aren't using it and wouldn't want to be put in a position down the road to have to prove the granted exemption was never actually used. In summary. if you can confirm for us that the skylights are no issue and that the building permit plans showing them will not cause a problem or hold-up, then we can go ahead and withdraw from the P&Z agenda. Also, if you can confirm with Claude and let us know that there i no need for the GMOS Exemption, then we can also go ahead and withdraw that request. With these two items confirmed, it seems we'll be all set. Thanks in advance, and please let me know i f you have any questions. Best regards, Mitch Mitch H..s Haa: Land Planning, LLC 420 East Main Street, Suite 10-B Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Email: mitch@hlpaspen.com 1~ Please consider the environment before printing this email Confidentiality note: The above email and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and/or privileged The information is for the use of the individual or entity originally intended If you are not the intended recipient. any disclosure, copying. distribution or use ot this information ts prohibited. Ifthis transinission is received in error. please immediately notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. it any 2 GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 / ,-/4-*, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .---Ukk-*U 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN. CO 81611 1 i HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 N I Xr W 5Â¢47 FE 1 3-0 9 0005/29/13 ji ' 1 1 ~- _ _RETURN TO SENDER | n U $ 2-1. L i AÂ·.<C C' 4 2 . -Â·Â·Â· . .1.1â€¢.A,;2 6% ADCRESSE{) 1/ : 12 l. ii BC:.5161119D238 81.6,14:24843Â·' -*- ,:jÂ·gdp.":"h-1 z.:!.LdiÂ·brÂ·j]-illi i,Nj'+N ff, ,-i-'f'.1 Â£2079-13337-113-42 d GR,AND JUNCTION CO 815 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 S. GALENA STREET DAN*' 4,0,-,00 ASPEN. CO 81611 ...all-.# t.#w-â€¢. 18 SEP 2015 4/1.#.Ae"n PA-KlN ROW CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA S SPRINGS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 8 0 2 2 2 * Â·â€¢, â€¢Â· ~~ ~ ./ 1 0 k~ 9 BOA,1 $22-rÂ· 1 - -U} RETURN TO SENDER i~ UNri AIMED UNABLE*TO FORWARD SC: 81611190230 40/ c.* . / 01 43- -, I - :111:*i,::12,1,1<:0.$:"iltit:.''Irt'i' 1%11,1-Â·iÂ·Â·Â·Â·,,i;i!,'iÂ·i 1/ii: 1 1 L - , 1#105- 16 - 4 Â£ i i 3 -'?? i.. iii/'i'Â·':Â·!'.f: #''l.5.6.11% il If COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GR,iÂ£\DJID ..]Llt,J CrlON c:ir.1 81.5 -0"*--**'*'*~- 130 S. GALENA STREET ,01% PWV 2 1 -*-*4 ASPEN. CO 81611 18 SEP it --*43 -Na-'ll 620 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 620 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 Â¢-4 rk 882 7â‚¬ 1009 0009/29/16 iF C R AS 1 1 Â·2 9 >-Â·94â‚¬Â·ilÂ¥>%Â»t 4.% 6-C: 0 1.61119-11232 8.18.1 5*fid ~2*19182 *2079-15661-18-42 4 : *+415,4%13:1::,4'1- i.. : - . I .1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRAND JULNe-riÂ·oN co 81.5 5~-*42--0--~- 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN. CO 81611 18 SEP 2015 PM 2. 1.. ***"-"'4 -=-~~~~~~-4 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 601 E HOPKINS AVE i ASPEN, CO 81611 7,7 9 9 - # f. 1 .i Â£ t 802 5E 1089 0089/23/13 ~ 33.33 1, f..9.0 fESSED 1_._,4 1 a L. I 51â‚¬113 4,423.0 '~ 5 1 -a~tâ‚¬-1Â£~ 9.8 2 ---- 4 " 1 4,1,0,0 -414.44 GRAMID JUNCTION CO 8115 4'~41 tu,1,1-0*0*,-Li~*L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 S. GALENA STREET /0-444 %,Â»,~~0â€ž00,Â£ . -22.----t- 18 SEP 201.5 PM 2 T ./~"'~f~--4~~~~~~~~ ASPEN. CO 81611 : J,-8. CRANDALL BUILDING CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 630 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 N I XI E 802 72 1009 1-8 01.{3 i Â°' -1 r 1 4 3 I RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN j i UNABLE TO FORWARD sc: 81611190230 -* 2079-i4941 -1 0 - ,i o 0 - r .- li 4 41, 6 A 61~%%*0 2 lill!11}lilittijiti~1*ji,1!31;il~Ii;,~flisilittltilft},it!('Ii!;i .- W-.J Ii,/It/4,~, *4//*I-.*f Nvâ€ž_*/1 GRAND JLH*In.01!48 CO'13115 ... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $*** - ./.'- -4~1' 130 S. GALENA STREET I rrl, /9 '-f'. ..9.-" ./ 1 0,00/404,4 1'44/4--4,'40'0*â€ža-,1,41},"64-M" ASPEN, CO 81611 c.........4 44--* 4.I'...+ 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 708 3RD AVE NEW YORK, NY 10017 NIXIE 18-3 4.1 'vc-1 A-â‚¬ 4 7 4 f p : 1 6 1 W / V O / 6 0 ./ /4, .3 2 T4% 4%%taTO 518.-DER ...----- L. - Aul KNOWN UNÂ·ABLE TO FORWARD BC: 81611199'30 42079-1466 -18-43 I W- - - gE Eleviargawl Ddbdq/i- . )2 - ' , ' 1/ f 3 111 0- 1 ''* t>/3 41 -= 1 111 - -U> ~ s N J - ./ C -r*1 7 -C :9 - = -0'.--4 4,6 - 'GRANT*_JUA'CÂ¥ION <30 v..,# 9 1 C I *.* ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 S. GALENA STREET .-4#ht,~0~1't:5,--42Â·#-M 1.8 SEP 2015 PM 2. 1. /-- ,#M. -ud...I-J/..'ll-I'll ASPEN, CO 81611 -0..#4.....#- aMd / WM SN-WMAgs LLC / 556 FIFTH AVE #2440 NEW YORK, NY 10110 NIXLE 101 52 1809 0010/07/15 ~ 'j RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: Blt,11190230 *2079-12644-18-43 s Ht Â§41:94?9@9 P Â£ 1 9 1 i I i l i I e i i i ti iii il * 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 i i i i j & : a 1 1 1 & 1 1 ' ' i i ! 5 t i i i 1 1 P GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 -*--4/-~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'KI#<-Adildis 130 S. GALENA STREET 18 SEP 2015 PM 2 L ,..,Â·*"2]3% ~-ZI~" ASPEN. CO 81611 4-- ..1#212.** >.- 1 1 - HUGHES GREGORY 208 S SPRING ST #1 ASPEN, CO 81611 94 i Al m 68Â£ 1 r. luE= 00 10/01 / 15 , I ~ RETURN TO SENDER Al-TEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD ) ~ 82: 81611190230 *2079-15663-18-42 ~ ' , a':illk" A 8*Ailg#*2429 2 'jillililitilitillitili:'lli,11'115,Â£11$1'11!31'1111-jiatilijAI!; 1 1 V /*#MI-'ll/4, ..111,)--a. GRAND JUNCTION CE> 815 --#0--1*-f~-4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12 SEP 201.13; 71 1 ..9..... .# 130 S.SALENA STREET .*.F-% 4.*....#1...,Ed,#28"LU"A'. ASPEN, CO 81611 44-,#//MZBSE,##iX<6//-- 4 49 * J ASPEN BROWNSTONES CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 707 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 NIMIE E'92 72 1004 8889/29/15 'bu 1 Vtr,Nvi<At,1-6 AS ADDet. St.D BC: 2161 1198230 , ....4,11Â£912.1,29!19.82 itÂ·,5 z!: f' ; '~- ~ 11 . '1 Imt ri.[1.1- '0 ' 1'?3 ~'~ i''A'''~''r.' 9 11:- r , G 5, 't ' r :/ $ w&:Â»0*t'Yl'*DÂ»429. COMMUNiTY DE'VELDÂ· nvi..,4 i Â£34*.A,14 13 JL.JNCi-]fON CO. 815 /'-4*0,_~;,~,,/'27*- 11,1/1 130 S. GALENA STREET ,--n---1.-I-- 522./ w..,,Ill'.-_ ASPEN. CO 8164 4* 1. 5 PN; 2 T Â·0 *4â€¢44 "0~~'~'e,â€¢Â¢'0'18)Willaill 18 SEP -71'.1 f 1./.7, PITKTN CENTER CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 802 22 1 822 0039/29/15 1 1 | RETURN TO SENDER Iii UNCLAIMED UNABLE TO FORWARD 21 1 SC: 81611190230 *2270 :i:j#.zilti'{!ifit{4%.1â€ž.1.4.1,vi..ili. ~ 3 1 1,5 6,3 5076,1 6 742 } iÂ·Â·~~' Iit./'733*iii'Â·I _le''',3/'/,e.'I::' . r vaS ''4*077. ~ '62<31~-4~i'. Clk,/Â£139Â·4#F ... + I ,di#.4100~31 fla =f-,1 -A f 4*10110'l 1 *hâ€¢* 9.18 *--1'11 4 06' 7.- I.tvo"WE#%'* PARA' 1.144 HAI 1 11.19 , -- r ~MilFx. -' ......urlâ€¢4% illi ..49'AN.WE 14&&1.&91'." 1- 40//.3 f..1 7.1 1.Â· w ~5 ~trui. % 'f..4*64 . 4~ 11 2 0 t- t*#3 34 4~ 0"AM.k-:424.Vi *24 : ~ - '*i* 5 3;*2 t_M '1 f 8*4â€¢!Ea I.42Â£'1~JAN#*'44 5 t...7~b 1 1~tili~l &,4, ifir illill 1 d. - ,/0. /0 - d -.. 9-/- .0. . ~ 411 ~ f 1/4 .6 -L 29*" 1 12?y. 141 Wt*.60, a,ap"*bual ...â€ž... / 0 ~/BaY 44 7 7 Ili // e AU*0e#*~0~ /1"10/,%36,ill//1.7, *f.: r..44., r=air, j~ .2 AS a.. 6 6-12* t;1* I e ..1, '2 - ~~-,132.v i:.i~.â‚¬fft:~ ~,~ - A.:11221.5,71 - 7 , *t r .-/ - W -4 er:.5 0 0, il- . ' I 4,0 Y "' /1424 9 2. 9 1 . ..2 â€¢2 .i'r 39&-R, i.., . ./.r#////-. -i Â¥.,9.* - ,%1% f - 1*4F i,Â«i ; .4 45<MAIL - .9 .,3)04 rt . 0, - MLA 0*~ ?Ai 4 0 %:*AA -1,031'tr "942~0272 ..2, ...1*ltuf#YI..2,=42!Wfig-i 326.gie I.-/F * 1 -izi~ ' Aft//0 - -- - --- 4 Â¢00 1 - imin ..,185,5112 Eaw- ...+ 141_.15&19*a*--446*4-;= .--- 1 1 -97 0 1.L- - 1/tr147 Â· l.. 1.-'.l . --- ..nez:Ii#=eoripen-ty*Â·r-- -_ 7 -i ~.~'. r. r - 9.-@. . -- i =r, ... 0 33 7--1. a - - , 4 - ...:- I . I 4 31,4,9 + . 1 9 v 4. '. - ' 70:41 I .. l. 1 r. e . 4 : 1 . 4 2 - I j 1-2# - R-,6. t.1 GA!** - < . 3 : ,-&,4 â‚¬7 latrft.% - 8 1:-1 e , 4 ./1 * 9 F.1 i -I -ir' ' Â¢ - 44> . . L i I V " . .. - 4 934 . r k Â¥ d - .,3. ..4 - - ,-1 1 1 -:. L .I 4- 4 & 44- . 41 ._c r - 4' * - 11#j - m , IL - 41 ' . - I I -*) A ' 9. 6 D- '" 1 - 2 + I 5/ Â£ ** 44,1 Â¢* L p 1 -*$ 9 - I 1 4 a I h ..' Â£ - 49 4 -- -.... . Â£4 . a ~ - A.*4 , I. â€¢ :6+ - fir /2 _4 y 1.- I i v.8 ' - . 1 ja t A .~ - ..4 2 4,39 5 -* r_, j#*X 11 1 G A HEIGHT LIMIT --_-_ -_---1 1 128'.0 * T.0. PARAPEr: Vil.F ' ~r REMOVE EXISTING Wl NDOWS I ,r--- REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOOR REMOVE EXISTING SLIDING DOORD 127 - 5 3/4â€¢ 1 4 ~ f-~~ -E..REMOVE EXISTING ROOF. SOFFIT AND 2LLE- _/ - WOOD FASCIA rll------ 1 1 90 0//f//2 r i 10 01- ' /\ 1 / - REMOVE EXISTING WOOD FASCQA rr-- - -1 /1\ 11 \ / I \ A/ 2 / / -- REMOVE EXISTING PAINTED ! r \ ' 91- 11 \ 1 ... Â°LASTER WALL F:NISH 11/, .1 1 ./.\711/ 9 REMOVE EXISTING HALF WALL ets ..%- AND AWN INGS, TfP. FOR ALL it (Af.fi) 1 1 ~ iLLE 1 . / f />14 1 W I 1 1/ 1 I / FJ , ~ T.O, FINI. fLR Mt UPPER LEVF!Â·' Vil,i 4 112 -0 3,4 - 0 #- 1 El n FLMÂ·-=Â»:46=Â·{ For-U=,296444*22-3-1--4144- ZiNI,-LEED- rp- -+'7--fL.,6 , 5/--EZEtC<LifEffl.51'=61a.*Arjra~-.,l#Qs-/1 /:= twÂ·V-Â· 4-~-4Ze*6=1- *--- DEMO OSITING AS SHOWN ) TO REMAIN - pnog&)~~~~~11; ~ #' ~ALATJ2WJLLU -- al STING STONE WALL t'ZE<321/5.$ *- EXISTING CMU PARAPET 2 1Cli~1Ill 1111 1 IL 4 %=1 -P 111 14-1- 1[1 71-7"64#- C/ TO REMAIN :1.-f'EVE:izz~-L~Elmll_. Â·Â»37Â·CZE, -3., . fx - ~7-=:2& 1- -v 1 L ....1 114 1 1 .. km/ , 100 -O 1 T.O. FOOTER PER STRICT. V LF 1 Â¥ 88Â· O, 9 9 A HEIGHT LIMIT / 7 128Â·-0Â· - _ _ 6 T.D. PARAPErÂ·vip, f 127' - 5 3/r LILI t - --OF WITH, - EPDM MEMBRANE * 0 27 - - DEMO EXISTING WOOD FASCIA w * 7 1 ~ Art mle-lf DEMO WINDOW 6 1 --/ 41 _-A,OWINDOW 1f - DEMO EXISTING PAINTED PLASTER WALL 1 ----- EXISTING CMU PARAPET TO REMAIN - 0- - - DEMO EXISTING ROOF 1 1 1 - - - 1 Â·710 FIN. FLR it UPPER LEVEL. V I,F 7 112Â· 0 3/4â€¢ i 1 - DEMOWINDOW&DOOR. ~ j ~r--- DEMO WINDOW 1 - 1 : l . 1 : !~-Â·- DEMO DO]pe 1 - 1, , 1 ~ Â· - _~~~.....~~--~ DEMO WINDOW L...1 0 4 ' --[7 7.-Inr<---311-Â«30 -- EXISTING CMU WALL 1 1 1 , 1 1 .1 1 11! 1 1 1 .. [r---=11 i : 1 ' 1 1 i IÂ· IJ 1 ' 1 1/ [ L_---WWO_-_-1 1 1 1 1 < 1 11' 1 - 1 1, I. 1 . . 1 1 1 .1 I Â£ 4 L -W ; I-1LL L - - -- .- In.---/ 4 \\ !1 . 1 1 lilli, . 1 1. 1 T O. STRUCT, at MAIN LEVEL: I. LF, 1 100' - 0Â· L TO FOOTER PER STRUCT. i V I.F. , f 88.-0. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: GIGâ€¢ E 4Â© rNM A-\P.-2- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4442.F G, e- 4.1 3,0 f An , 2 01-SJ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, AÂ»Tith â‚¬ c-CA.-,--CA (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the-City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: W~Publication ofnotice.- By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the __ day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice Was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the "' 4 PE< ' ,- Â·-property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of .â€ž. ,, , property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County asthey .~ appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A 1.-11 -1 k .1.-_, copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) f' Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners o f real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signatdi-e The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this / 7 day ofâ‚¬*r kNM 6-C' ' 201fb by A}n Â·WA SccÂ»â‚¬-V- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 616 E. Hyman Avenue WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Public Hearing: October 6, 2015, 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 616 E Hyman Avenue My comInission expires: alles,! 1 (r Legal Description: PID # 273718212005, Lots N & O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen Description: The applicant is proposing to update exterior materials and fenestration, and change the pitched roof to a flat roof. Land Use Reviews Reg: Commercial Design Re- . U 44Â«------ view Notary Public Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning Com- Alml~Int: Ferngulf. Ltd., A Colorado Joint Ven- 1 - L h,re, rep~sentedby Haasland Planning, LLC , KAREN REED PATTERSON More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of NOTARY PUBLIC Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, STATE OF COLORADO justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. #TTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: NOTARY ID #19964002767 Published in the Aspen Times on September 17, My Commission Expires February 15,2016 2015.(11531762) UBLICATION I-nUIUUIWIn OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 THE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 31.2015 Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 616 E. Hyman - Commercial Design Review t and have reviewed it for completeness. El Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~4 Your Land Use Application is complete: c If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdf of the application. 2) 9 additional, complete hardcopy of the application 3) Review deposit of$4,550.00. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, hEAnifer ]~lan, Deputy Planning Director City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No ><_ Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential / Affordable Housing Yes U No Commercial j E.P.F. Lodging ''24"C'Â¥ci, JUL 3 0 2015 CE: 1 22.: 3/EN ./OR~i: I HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 420 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 10-8 - ASPEN, CO 81611 - (970) 925-7819- MITCH@HLPASPEN.COMI Aspen Planning and Aspen Community To: Thru: Date: July 31,2015 Zoning Commission Development Department (P&Z) Subject: 616 East Hyman Avenue Commercial Design Review Section 1: Introduction: Please consider this letter, its exhibits and the accompanying plan sets to constitute a formal request for Conceptual/Final Commercial Design Review approval for a remodel of the building located at 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen. The property is legally described as Lots N & O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen (Parcel Identification Number 2737-182-12-005). It is a 6,000 square foot lot in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District. In 2013, the applicant received approval for a similar remodel but which also included a third floor residential addition to the building (see Resolution No. 9, Series of 2013, attached to this application as Exhibit 5). That approval's vested rights are valid through April of 2016. Since then, the applicant has decided that a much more modest remodel of the second floor and the exterior falade would be a better course of action for the property and the surrounding area. This new proposal includes a modification of the roof form on the front and the back from a mansard-type roof to a flat roof. There will be no change to the height of the existing building, whereas the vested approval allows a third story with a maximum height of 38 feet. The current proposal also calls for changes to the existing glazing, as well as some additional glazing. Most of the other changes are to the interior of the second floor, and not subject to this review. Finally, because the net leasable area will be increasing by only 219 square feet (i.e., less than 500 square feet) and there will be no change to the FAR, it is requested that the Community Development Director administratively approve the GMQS portion of this proposal. In accordance with the attached Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Community Development Deputy Director Jennifer Phelan (see Exhibit 3), the applicant is applying for a combined (Conceptual and Final) Commercial Design review, which is permitted because of the limited scope of the changes that are now being requested. The building footprint is not changing, and this application does not change the Public Amenity Space percentage that currently exists or that was previously approved (430sf). 616 E. Hyimm Commercial Design Review Application Page 1 Additionally, the applicant has spoken with Liz O'Connell at the Environmental Health Department and understands that she is satisfied with maintaining the arrangements of the Reciprocal Trash and Recycling Agreement between this property and the adjacent CCA Building at 620 East Hyman Avenue, which is attached as Exhibit 6. This application is divided into four sections. This section provides a brief introduction to the application, while Section II describes the existing conditions of the project site and environs. Section III outlines the applicant's proposed development, and Section IV addresses the proposed development's compliance with the applicable review criteria of the Code. For the reviewer's convenience, all pertinent supporting documents are provided in the various exhibits to the application, which include: â€¢ Exhibit 1: Land Use Application, Dimensional Requirements and HOA Compliance Forms; â€¢ Exhibit 2: Proof of the Applicant's Ownership; s Exhibit 3: Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Jennifer Phelan; â€¢ Exhibit 4: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HI-.P), and Poss Architecture and Planning (Poss) to represent the applicant; â€¢ Exhibit 5: Prior Approvals; e Exhibit 6: Reciprocal Trash and Recycling Agreement; e Exhibit 7: An executed application fee agreement; and, â€¢ Exhibit 8: Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within three- hundred feet of the subject property. In addition, architectural plans for the existing and proposed conditions have been prepared by Poss Architecture and Planning and accompany this application. While the applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Code and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application, questions may arise which require further information and/or clarification. Upon request, HLP will provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the review. Section II: Existing Conditions The building at 616 East Hyman Avenue is a 2-story, commercial building on a 6,000 square foot lot that is situated on the north side of East Hyman Avenue between Hunter and Spring Streets. The subject property is legally described as Lots N and O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, and is owned by Furngulf, LLP, a Colorado Limited Liability Partnership (the applicant). The existing structure was built in 1969 (per County Assessor records) and features moss stone on the first level in three sections that are split by glass and awnings. This tall, one-story part of the building that is at the property line abutting the sidewalk features a deck above, and the moss stone rises to a height allowing it to serve as the deck railing. Also on the street level, at the southwest corner of the property, is a laiidscaped garden and walkway (the existing public 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Review Application Page 2 amenity space of approximately 22.2'D x 19.4'W, or 430.68 square feet) that leads to the main entrance of the building, which is setback approximately 22.2 feet from the property line. This setback part of the building also features large glass windows. The second level of the building is skinned in 1970's style stucco and dark, heavy wood and is setback entirely behind the pedestrian amenity space. The roof is flat and defined by a thick soffit line behind which a synthetic shingle roof slopes up to another, slightly higher (approximately 4 feet) flat roof. Three "bubble" skylights and what appears to be a chimney project from the upper roof and are visible from the street. Concrete wing walls project above the roof on both sides of the building. The same roof form is visible on the alley side as well, where there are six parking spaces at grade. Upon entering the front of the building, there are stairs and decl<ing wrapped around the perimeter of an atrium to provide access to the basement level and second floor. The basement level is comprised of commercial space, as well as circulation areas, storage, and a bathroom. The street level contains commercial spaces, storage areas and a bathroom. The second floor contains the offices of Gulfco Ltd and a large deck above the one-story area adjacent to the sidewalk. The current commercial net leasable space totals 9,574st of which 3,498sf are on the basement level, 3,472sf are on the main level, and 2,604sf are on the second level. The total commercial Floor Area is approximately 8,302sf (1.384:11 while current codes establish an allowable commercial floor area limit of 9,000sf (1.5:1). There is no free-market residential or affordable housing on the property. The accompanying plan sets include existing conditions floor plans. The existing conditions include the vested approvals as well, and those are depicted in the plans provided herewith as part of Exhibit 5. Section III: Project Description/The Proposal The current remodel plans maintain the footprint of the existing building and include a modification of the roof form (on the front and the back) from a mai-lsard-type roof to a flat roof, essentially extending the flat roof out to the face of the building walls below. There will be no change to the height of the existing building, whereas the existing approvals allow for a third story free-market residence and a maximum height of 38 feet. The proposal also calls for changes to the existing glazing, as well as some additional glazing. The majority of other proposed changes are to the interior of the second floor. The reconfiguration of this interior space will result in 219 square feet of additional net leasable area. The total FAR of the building will not change. The existing dumpster and the six parking spaces on the alley will remain as is. In fact, there is no change proposed to the overall existing site plan, and no change to the lower level floor plan. The changes to the main level floor plan include a new staircase and railing going up to the second level, a new front door, a new window on the alley side of the building and new window sills. 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Review Applicatioii Page 3 On the second level, several doors and windows will be removed and replaced. One additional grouping of windows is proposed on the second level of the alley side of the building. Additionally, the existing street-side awnings will be removed. With the awnings removed, the wall will be filled in to provide a consistent falade and height, and new awnings will be applied, as shown on the south elevation drawing/ rendering in the plan set. The existing deck will remain. On the roof, four of the existing skylights will be retained, while seven others will be removed. As mentioned above, the sloped portions of the existing roof will be eliminated to extend the flat roof out to the building facades below. Please refer to the submitted plans set for details and renderings of the proposed design. Section IV: Review Requirements In light of the foregoing, this application is submitted pursuant to the following sections of the Code: 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures; 26.412, Commercial Design Review; 26.430, and 26.710.150, Commercial (C-1) Zone District. The applicable provisions are addressed below. Commercial Design Review Approval Section 26.412.050 of the Code provides the review criteria for Commercial Design Review and states, in relevant part, that the proposed development must comply with the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, as well as the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. The proposed development is located in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District. The design standards of Section 26.412.060, as well as the Commercial Character Area Design Objectives and Guidelines are all enumerated below in itaticized print, and each standard is followed by a description of the proposal's compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. A. Public mnenity space, Creative, well-designed public places und settings contribute to mi nt tractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district Und U pleasmit pedestrian shopping Und entertainment atmosphere. Pliblic 61/lenity Con take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial cirens. On parcels required to provide pltblic amenity, pursurint to Section 26.575.030. public amellity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable. according to the procedures herein and according to thefollowing standards: 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Review Applictltion Page 4 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site pliblic a//lenity sti.#)~ciently allowfor a variety of uses and nctioilies to occur, considering miN expected tenmit and future potential temmts und uses. 2. The public muellity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this diaracteristic, public seating, outdoor restnurmit senting or similar active Uses, slinde trees, solar access, view orientation und simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-toffy are encoitraged. 3. The public mizeitity und the design and operating diaracteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way und uses contribute to mi inviting pedestrian ent?ii'onment. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrimi space created bly ilifflls, side(palks or ndjncent propertÂ·j, or such driplication does not detract froni the pedestrian environment. 5. Any variation to the design and operational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the piti'pose oftlie public nnienity requirements. There is currently an area measuring 19.4'W x 22.2'D, or 430.68 square feet, that provides qualifying public amenity space on the subject property. This 7.2% of the 6,000sf lot area supplies public amenity space iii the form of a walkway and a landscaped garden at the southwest corner of the property. The proposed remodel will, in no way, decrease this space, however, there is no practical opportunity to increase this space or provide additional public amenity space while maintaining the existing footprint of the building. The development proposed in this application involves only a modest remodel, not a redevelopment of the property. Therefore, no additional public amenity space should be required. Additionally, Resolution No. 9, Series of 2013 approved the existing 430 square feet of Public Amenity for that remodel, which was a much larger proposal that included a third-story addition; said approval maintains vested rights. B. Utility, delivery und trash service provision, When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building nre well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success of the district. Poor logistics of one (1) building can detract from the quality of surrounding properties. E#icient delivery mui trash areas are important to the filliction of alleyionys. The folloming standards sliall apply: 1. A utility, trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated along the alley meeting the mininmm standards established by Section 26.575.060, Utility/trash/recycle service areas, unless otherwise established according to said Section. 2. All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property and along the alley. Easements sliall allow for service provider access. Encronchments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical mid should only be necessary when existing site conditions, such as all historic resource, dictate such ellcroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. 3. Delivery service areas shall be incorporated along the alley. Aity truck loadingfacility shall be an integral component of the bililding. 5/wred facilities are highly encouraged. 616 E. Hy,iian Coiumercial Design Review Application Page 5 4. Mechanical ex/must, including parking garage ventilation, shall be rented Nirough the roof The exhaust equipment shall be located asfar nway#om the street as practical. 5. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting shall be acconinlodated internally within the bllilding and/or located on the roof minimized to the extent practical mid recessed behind n parnpet wall or other screelling device such that it shall not be visible #om n public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New bitildings shall reserve adequate spaceforfuture ventilation mid ducting needs. (Ord. No. 13,2007, Â§1) As mentioned above, the applicant has spoken to Liz O'Connell at the City Environmental Health Department, who has stated that she is satisfied with maintaining the arrangements of the Reciprocal Trash and Recycling Agreement. (See Exhibit 6.) The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines (the "Commercial Guidelines") set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The Commercial Guidelines are organized to address the different design contexts that exist in the City. These distinct settings, or contexts, are defined as "Character Areas," within which variations exist among the physical features that define each area. The proposed development is located ill the "Commercial Character Area," one block east of the Commercial Core. Per the Commercial Guidelines, all development projects should achieve the following design objectives: â€¢ Promote an interconnected circulation system that invites pedestrian use, including a continlious street and alley system and a respectfor the nati.iral topography; e Promote a system o.f public places that support activities, including public amenity spaces, compatible landscaping and paving, and unobtrusive off-street parking; and s Assure fhal buildings JU together to create a vibrant street edge that reinforces a sense of appropriate scale, The Commercial Character Area largely mirrors the Commercial (C-1) Zone District, which forms the immediate fringe of much of the Commercial Core Historic District (CC). Building heights and materials in the C-1 zone vary. Storefront design and display is a less dominant characteristic than in the CC area. The street wall is less defined than in the CC, and building facades are sometimes set back or include front yard space. The purpose of the Commercial (C- 1) zone district is stated in Section 26.710.150(A) of the Code as follows: ...to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor, opportunities Â®r affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the CC and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented [emphasis added] through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the Commercial Core, the ability to occupy the Grolind Floor with o.ffices, and a separate Chapter in the Commercial Design Guidelines. 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Reviezo Application Page 6 Compliance with the C-1 zoning, its dimensional requirements and the Commercial Design Guidelines, therefore, inherently ensures provision/implementation of a successful transition from the CC to the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Following are the adopted key design objectives in the Commercial Character Area: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Strengthening the definition of the street edge in a manner similar to the Commercial Core is desired. At the same time, the Commercial Area is a place where more variety in design is encouraged. Imitating historic styles is not an objective, but re-establishing a sense of a stronger jitndanientcil framework will enhance the itiban qualities ofthis area and is a priority. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Greater retail presence at the street edge should be achieved to ensure an enhanced street vitality and an enriched and more urban definition of the commercial street jtontage. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the commlinity's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the .fundaniental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, bill with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined, A stronger street fligade definition shoidd be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. 5. Reflect the variety iii building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in jilture development. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains iniportarit, bill should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elenients that should be used. While the proposal's compliance with the C-1 Zone District inherently assures its contribution toward a successful transition from the Commercial Core to the adjacent residential neighborhoods, the Design Guidelines stress strengthening the sense of relatedness between the Commercial Character Area and the Commercial Core. The subject block of East Hyman Avenue includes on its north side (from east to west): the remodeled, AspenModern designated, three-story, mixed-use Crandall Building; the mixed-use Tamarawood Building (home to L'Hostaria) with an exposed lower level and two stories above grade; the subject property; the mixed-use, AspenModern-designated Ellie Brickam Building (home to Charles Cunniffe Architects) with two-and-a-half existing stories above grade and another aproved; and the two-story offices of Aspen Sotheby's International Realty. The south 616 E. Hjinan Coililizercial Desigii Review Application Page 7 side of this block on East Hyman Avenue includes (from east to west): the four-plus story Aspen Art Museum, the three-plus story mixed-use Muse Building; and the two-story Offices of Garfield & Hecht, for which there is an approval for three-story, mixed-use redevelopment that is slated to occur soon. This block resides roughly at the center of both the C-1 Zone District and the Commercial Character Area. Very appropriately, this long under-appreciated block has become one of the most exciting, eclectic in contemporary design, mixed-use areas of the City. The heavy mix of professional office space with mixed-in retail and residential uses, plus the strong civic presence of the Art Museum truly present the realization of this area's adopted goals relative to both use and design. The proposed modest remodel to the 616 East Hyman Avenue property is in perfect harmony with the character of this block in terms of design variety, mass and scale, and varied building heights, while maintaining the same footprint as the existing building. Outlined below is each of the Commercial Character Area's Conceptual Review Design Guidelines in italicized print, followed by a description of the proposal's compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. 1.1 Orient aprimary entrance toward the street. â€¢ A building should have a clearly defined primary entrance. â€¢ Providing secondary public entrances to commercial spaces is also encouraged on larger buildings. The existing building has clearly defined primary entrances that are all oriented toward the street. The proposed remodel will retain the entrances and enhance their orientation to the street with more inviting and obvious awning designs. 1.2 Maintain the established town grid in all projects. â€¢ The network of streets and alleys should be retained as public circulation space and for maximum public access. â€¢ Streets and alleys should not be enclosed or closed to public access, and should remain open to the sky. All streets and alleys will be retained and will continue to provide maximum public access. No streets or alleys will be enclosed or closed to public access. The building footprint is being maintained. Internal Walkways 1.3 Public walkways and through courts should be designed to create access to additional commercial space. Â· These niay be shops that face onto walkways or couityards. e See also: Public Amenity Space design guidelines. 616 E. Hwman Commercial Design Review Application Page 8 The public walkway that leads to the primary entrance on the property will be retained in the remodel. The interior courtyard design is also maintained and will continue to provide access to additional commercial space. 1.4 Develop an alleyfaqade to create visual interest. â€¢ Use varied building setbacks and changes in materials to create interest and reduce perceived scale. â€¢ Balconies, court yards and decks are also appropriate. â€¢ Providing secondary public entrances is strongly encouraged along alleys. These should be clearly intendedfor public 1/Se, but sitbordinate in detail to the primary street-side entrance. The proposed new materials, as well as the replaced and additional glazing will create more visual interest than the building currently provides along its alley side. 1.5 The visual impacts of structured parking should be minimized. The access shall be: â€¢ Located on an alley when feasible or a secondary street, designed with the same attention to detail and materials as the primary buildingfavade, and integrated into the building design. 1.6 Structured parking should be placed within a 'wrap' of commercial and/or residential uses. The visual impacts of the parking area will remain as is and will continue to be six (6) at grade, surface spaces. No structured parking is proposed Public Amenity Space 1.7 A street-facing amenity space shaH meet all of the following requirements: â€¢ Abut the public sidewalk â€¢ Be level with the sidewalk Â· Be open to the sky â€¢ Be directly accessible to the public e Be paved or otherwise landscaped 1.8 A street-facing public amenity space shall remain subordinate to the line of building fronts in the Commercial Area. â€¢ Any public amenity space positioned at the street edge shall respect the character of the streetscape and ensure that street corners are well defined, with buildings placed at the sidewalk edge. â€¢ Sunken spaces, which are associated with some past developments, adversely affect the street character. Where feasible, these should be replaced with sidewalk level improvements. 1.9 Street facing amenity space shall contain features to promote and enhance its use. These may include one or more of the following: â€¢ Street furniture â€¢ Public art e Historical/interpretive marker The existing public amenity space (walkway and lai-tdscaped garden), will not itself be altered or iii any way changed as a result of the proposed project. No other public amenity spaces exist on the subject property. The existing landscaped area will be preserved but will be more cleanly and better framed than is the case today. As proposed, no additional public amenity space is required with the remodel. 616 E. Hymmi Commercial Desigit Review Application Page 9 1.18 Maintain the alignment offacades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much ofthefacade of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ A minimum of 60% of the jtont faqade shelli be at the property line. Â· Locating an entire biiilding front behind the established storefrom line is inappropriate. 1.19 A building may be set back from its side lot lines in accordance with design guidelines identified in Street & Alley System and Public Amenity Space guidelines. Since the project proposes only a remodel, as opposed to a redevelopment, the existing alignment of facades will continue unchanged. The footprint of the building is not changing but already meets this standard. That is, the property has 60 feet of street frontage and the existing laiidscaped area is only 19.4 feet wide; therefore the portion of the front facade at the property line measures 40.6 feet wide, which is 67.67% of the property frontage. 1.20 Building fagides shall be parallel to the facing street(s) and primary entrances shall be oriented toward the street. 1.21 Orient a new building to be parallel to its lot lines, similar to that of traditional building orientations. . The .front of a primary structure shall be oriented to the street. The existing building and the proposed remodel's facades are parallel to the street and primary entrances are oriented toward the street. 1.22 Building faÂ¢ade height shall be varied from the farade height of adjacent buildings of the same number of stories by a minimum of 2 feet. â€¢ If an existing structure is three stories and 38 ft. mil for example, then adjacent neiv intl N may be three stories, but must vary iii faÂ¢ade height by a mininium of 2 D. 1.23 A new building or addition should rejlect the range and variation in building height of the Commercial Area. Â· Refer to the zone district regulations to delermine the maxinium height on the subject property. â€¢ A minimum 9 ft. floor to ceiling height is to be maintained on second stories and higher. The maximum height in the C-1 zone district for properties on the north side of the street is established at 28 feet for two-story elements and 36 feet for three-story elements of a building, which may be increased to 38 feet through Commercial Design Review. This proposal does not require Commercial Design Review variation of the height limit. As noted earlier in this application, the existing approval for this property allows for a 38-foot high building, while the currently contemplated remodel complies with the 28-foot limit for two-story buildings. 1.24 Height variation shotild be achieved using one or more of the following: â€¢ Vary the building height in accordance with traditional lot width. â€¢ Set back the upper floor to vary the building fagade profite(s) and the roof forms across the width and the depth of the building. â€¢ Vary the Rigade (or pal'apet) heights al the .front. â€¢ Step down the rear of the building towards the alley, in conjunction with other design standards and guidelines. 616 E. Hy/non Commercial Design Review Application Page 10 This proposal preserves the existing footprint building form and landscaped area. Compatibility with the predominant development pattern of the Commercial Character Area is achieved. A vertical orientation appropriate for a commercially oriented building is achieved in the window designs and solid elements that frame them. 1.25 On sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths, the fagade height shall be varied to reflect traditional lot width. â€¢ The.fagade height shall be varied to reflect traditional lot width.â€¢ Height should be varied every 60 ft. minimuni and preferably every 30 ft. of linear frontage in keeping with traditional lot widths and development patterns. â€¢ No more than two consecutive 308. farade modules niay be three stories tall, within an individual building. â€¢ A rear portion of a third module may rise to three stories, if the .front is set back a minimum of 40 feet from the streel fagade. (e.g. at a minimum, the front 40 feet niay be no more than two stories in lieight:.) The subject property does not comprise more than two traditional lot widths, rending this guideline inapplicable. 1.26 Buildings on sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths shall achieve a minimum of two of the following: â€¢ Variation in height of building modules across the site â€¢ Variation in niassing achieved through upper floor selbacks, the roofscape.form and variation in upper floor heights â€¢ Variation in building fagade heights or cornice line Since this site is comprised of only two traditional lot widths, this standard is not applicable. 1.27 A new building should step down in scale to respect the height, form and scale of a historic building within its immediate setting. 1.28 New development adjacent to a single story historic building that was originally constructed for residential use shall not exceed 28 ft. in height within 3Gft. of the side property line adjacent to the historic structure within the same block face. This development does not involve any new buildings and there are no single-story historic buildings adjacent to this property. The two-story fagade mass of the subject building is lower in height than that of the adjacent structures on both sides. 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: 0 -Variation in height at internal lot lines. . Variationin the plane of the front.favade, 0 Street fagade composition. ' Variation in architectural detailing and niaterials lo emphasize the building niodule, 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Review Application Page 11 No new buildings are proposed for this property. 1.30 The detailed design of the building faccide should reflect the traditional scale and rliythm of the block. The proposed development involves only a remodel of the existing building. Maintenance of the existing character and form reflects the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the streetfaÂ¢ade. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street faÂ¢ade in the strength and depth of modeling,fenestration and architectural detail. This building will maintain the existing footprint and will undergo only a remodel. The overall design of the building is virtually the same as what currently exists, albeit updated. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a mininium Â°f 9 feet fromfloor to ceiling on all Boors This is not a new building but rather a remodel of an existing structure. Nevertheless, appropriately scaled floor-to-ceiling heights are provided as all levels maintain at least 9 feet from floor to ceiling. The perceived height of the street level is maintained through the placement of awnings above the storefront windows and entrances. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upperfloors. The awnings, ground floor storefronts, and setback of the second floor will aid in clearly maintaining distinction between the street level and the second floor. The awnings will appropriately increase the perceived height and relative scale of the ground floor. 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level retail frontage. As mentioned above, this is not a new building. Nevertheless, the remodel will maintain and enhance its street level retail frontage. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tai! third floor. A third level is no longer proposed for this property. 1.37 The first floor faqude should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. The first floor fagade has been designed to concentrate interest at the street level with large storefront windows and awnings that help to create a distinction from the setback upper floor. Only the highest quality of design, details and materials will be employed. 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Review Application Page 12 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level. The retail entrances are at the sidewalk level. 1.39 incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for ali new structures. This is not a new structure, but the remodel plans maintain the atrium that serves as an airlock. 1.40 Window area along the jirst floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street faÂ¢ade area when facing principal street(s). The window area along the first floor is more than 60 % of the exterior street facing fagade. 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to niaintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. The building design will maintain and enhance the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. 1.42 Design of thefirst.floor storefront should include particular attention to the following ' The basic elements (ind proportions of storefront design s Depth and strength of modeling o The palette of materials and finishes used iii both the structural framework and the storefront window s The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience ~ The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character * The use offighting to accentuate visual presence As previously mentioned, this is a building remodel. 1.43 Retail frontagefacing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage, adjusted for the scale Of the space. There is no retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys. 1.44 A larger building should reflect the traditional lot width in the form and variation of its roof. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. The proposed development involves only a remodel with regard to the exterior of the building, and the roof will continue to be flat. The inappropriate Mansard portions of the existing roof form will be eliminated. 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Reviezo Application Page 13 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality und range of materials seen traditionally â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the Jacade â€¢ Convey a human scale â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in niaterials seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: â€¢ High quality in durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette Only high quality, durable materials will be employed, with the vast majority of surfaces being either stone, wood, or glass. The proposed materials are depicted iii the plans set provided with this application and samples will be presented at the hearing. 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from tile street faÂ¢ade(s) should be more subdued than the primary faqades. There is no longer a third floor being proposed for this property. 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building and area. Please see the proposed Site Plan. There will be no change to the existing landscaping. Parking Section 26.515.030 of the Code provides the number of required off-street parking spaces for each type of use and explains that an existing deficit of parking may be maintained when a property is expanded or redeveloped. The existing building has 9,574 square feet of net leasable commercial space, which results in a requirement for 9.574 off-street parking spaces. Currently, the building has six spaces that meet the dimensional requirements and restrictions of Code Section 26.515.020(A). Therefore, there is a parking deficit of 3.574 spaces (9.574 minus 6). This deficit is permitted to be carried forward to the remodel proposed for the building. The proposed remodel will have 9,793sf of net leasable commercial space, which results in an off-street parking requirement of 9.793 spaces. Since the existing deficit of 3.574 spaces can be carried forward to the proposed remodel pursuant to Code Sections 26.515.010(B) and 26.515.030, the applicant is required to provide 6.22 spaces (9.793 minus 3.574). Six (6) total spaces can be provided on-site while accommodating the shared dumpster. Therefore, the applicant will pay cash-in-lieu of 0.22 parking spaces (6.22 minus 6), as allowed by-right 616 E. Hymmi Commercial Design Review Application Page 14 pursuant to Code Section 26.515.030, in the amount of $6,600.00 ($30,000 per off-street parking space per Code Section 26.515.050(B)(1)) at the time of building permit issuance. Court House View Plane Number One As demonstrated on the Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers, the Court House View Plane Number One intersects 616 East Hyman Avenue at the southwest corner of the property. The height of the view plane as is crosses the subject property exceeds the 38 foot height limit of the C-1 Zone District; therefore, by more than complying with the C-1 Zone height limit this proposal inherently complies with the Court House view plane restrictions enumerated in Section 26.435.050 of the Code. The proposed structure measures less than 28 feet in height. GMQS Requirements Code Section 26.470.060.5 states the following: Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development. The minor enlargenient of a property, structure or portion of n structure for cominercinl, lodge or mixed-use development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Developmeitt Director based on the following criteria. Tlie additional development of uses identified in Section 26.470.020 sliall be deducted from the development ceiling levels established pursualit to Section 26.470.030 but shall not be deducted j)'om the respective annual development allotments. a. The expa.lision involues no more tlifin five-hundred (500) square feet of net lensable spnce, no more tliffil two-littlid-i'ed-fifty (250) square feet of Floor Area, and up to tioo (2) additional hotel/lodge units. The exponsion involves no residential units, No employee mitigation shall be required. This shall be cumulative and shall include administrative GMQ5 approzwls granted prior to the ndoption of Ordillance No. 22, Series of 2013. The proposed remodel will only increase the net leasable area by 219 square feet while the overall FAR will remain the same. Additionally, the proposal involves no residential units and no new hotel units. As such, the remodel qualifies as a minor expansion under the terms of the above-cited criteria and, pursuant thereto, requires no employee mitigation. The difference between the existing and proposed net leasable area must receive a GMC?S allotment. Therefore, a commercial net leasable area allotment of 219 square feet is hereby requested. Section 26.470.030.D of the Code states that the annual allotment for commercial uses is 33,000 square feet and there is adequate net leasable area remaining in the 2015 allotment pool to accommodate this 219 square foot request. As required by the above standard and all GMQS reviews, Section 26.470.050(B) of the Code provides the GMQS General Requirements and states that: 616 E. Hymon Commercial Design Review Application Page 15 All development applications for growth nitinagement review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth nmnagement review based on the following generally applicable criteria Und the review criteria applicable to tlie specific type of development: 1. 514*cient growth management allotments are available to accommodate tile proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Section 26.470.030.D of the Code states that the annual allotment for commercial uses is 33,000 square feet and there is adequate net leasable area remaining in the 2015 allotment pool to accommodate this 219 square foot request. 2. The proposed development is compatible with laild uses in the surrounding area, as well tls with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. As discussed at length throughout the foregoing, this proposed, small commercial remodel in the C-1 Zone District is highly compatible with land uses in the area. 3. T/ie development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. The proposed development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the C-1 Zone District. 4. T/ie proposed development is collsistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Planned Development - Project Review approval, as applicable. The necessary Commercial Design Review approvals are requested by this application. No HPC reviews/approvals are required. 5. Unless otherwise specijied in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of nfordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursitant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, A#ordable housing, at a Category 4 rate ns dejined iii the Aspeii/Pitkiii County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units nt n lower category designation. If cm applicant chooses to use n Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criterinfor Administrative Extinguishment of the CertÂ¢cnte. As mentioned above, and as " otherwise specified in this [GMQS] Chapter, no employee mitigation is generated by or required of this proposal. 616 E. Hlfiiwn Commercial Design Reviezi) Application Page 16 6. ABordable hollsing net livable area, for which the fillishedfloor level is at or above nattiral or finished grade, (plitcheuer is higher, sliall be provided in mi miloillÂ·it equal to nt least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net lionble aren, for (tillich Ilie finished floor level is nt or above ilatill'ill or finish.ed gl'flde, Tilticliever is higher. Affordable housing sliall be approved pursuant to Paragrapll 26.470.070.4, Affordable 1101{sing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate ns defined iii the Aspen/Pitkin County Holising Autliority Gitidelines, ns mnended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at n lower category designation. A.#brdable housing units that Gre being provided absent n requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted nt any level ofa#ordability, including residential occupied. If mi applicant diooses to lise n Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as illitigaNon, pursitant to Chapter 26.540, sitch Certijicate shall be extingitished pursuant to Cliapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administratizle Extingilisliment of tile Certificate, litilizing the calculations iii Section 26.470.100 Employee/Squnre Footage Colipersion. This standard is not applicable since the proposal does not include any free-market residential units or free market residential net livable area. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public in#astructure, or such additional demmid is lilitigated throitgh improvelize-lit proposed ns part of tlze project. Public in~mstrticture includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy und Collummication utilities, diwinage control, jire and police protection, solid waste disposal, pctrking and road and trmisit services. There will no additional demand on public infrastructure as a result of the proposed remodel. Exhibits: 1. Land Use Application, Dimensional Requirements & HOA Compliance Forms 2. Proof of Ownership 3. Pre-Application Conference Summary 4. Authorization Letter 5. Prior Approvals 6. Shared Trash and Recycling Agreement 7. An Executed Application Fee Agreement; and 8. Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property. 616 E. Hyman Commercial Design Reviezo Application Page 17 ECEIVE C EXHIBIT JUL 3 0 20IJ VEN 5 1 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 6 1 6 E Ugrnan Comyyro cal DE j j ~p if?v leto Location: 616 6.11~man, Ave, Ajpm,, Le-1-5 Nq;Ofloctoft Cllul 1-Towns,k of (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) AT)(2.0 Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2131- \7.1-11.-009 APPLICANT: Name: filtnlulf, LLF A Colorado Limcated (lab,hj~ Patinerth#f Address: (016 E. HAA FOGr Ager)llc, Aspen, 00 */Al Phone #: (9101 9 323 -/ 9 9 6 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Haaj land P lanri, o %-1 L Lo, Address: 410 6 Motri 3-trect 304-r /0-8 , Asper), Co YIGN Phone #: (9 -10 ) 9 333 - -1% 1 01 mi#ch rahlpaspen c.0,,n TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment - AdvniA Â· U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Nlap Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane exemphon ~}E[ Commercial Design Review El Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: El Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 2-04 commercial builchn(f In the 6-1 fore PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ffloct-051 redâ‚¬ t-el opment paposal add,08 0-101 5%,laty fre 1 of Re 1 {20\ ba bl e dre CL Â· Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 41 9-5-D El Pre-Application Conference Summary N Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement lEi Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans thatare largerthan 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. Â®mÂ® El ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM project: 616 6,- t~ynAr @de v-el oprnent (CoyrwrerÂ¢,44 1)23 1 771 Eeofe~) Applicant: 76X ft/1(ju -- , l-t P , A (blo YA-d.,6 / im ~tr: A /Actb j.~ i 7-~ farfr, M milÂ© Location: 8 6 6. 1-kj Knin i/ve j /kperi f Zone District: C- Lot Size: (.0 1 00 0 3-2 Lot Area: - (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing.4.911 proposed: 937 9 3 ( 2.1 9.50 imarc\50 Number of residential units: Existing: 0 Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): N/4 DIMENSIONS: 4 9*8*flin1 Floor Area: Existingf~bo 'l-ilowable: ~ ODO 4 Proposed: 3 13036f Principal bldg. height: Existing: ~-Â·~ Allowable: ~Â·~ Proposed: ~~ Access. bldg. height: Existing: 4/~ Allowable: 1\)(A proposed: NiA ''/1 On-Site parking: Existing.' ~9 Required: \0, L F Proposed: G % Site coverage: Existing: N /A Required: N/A proposed,.Â· M~k Â°/0 Open Space: Existing: 7.2-70 Required: 10 /0 Proposed:'13-1 o Front Setback: Existing: N (A Required: N ~ A Proposed: N < A Rear Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: \ Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Exist ing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: 1, Required: ~ Proposed: â€ž Distance Between Existing N~A Required: 1,<~ Proposed: t'#~ Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Noyle variations requested: Nov')â‚¬00, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: Furngulf, Ltd,, a Colorado Joint Venture Property Owner ("1"): Email: steven@gulfcoltd.com Phone No.: (970) 925-2496 Address of Property: 616 E Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Co (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) Â® This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this documentlia public docu~i'&at. Owner signature: 9W1,Ull date 7~29|2619 Owner printed name: JEREM,1 FCIa, PAITA K or, Attorney signature: 2-- date: 9/24 N.oisT 220 L\Â» 4 - 1 1 Attorney printed name: 3,4/2-7- i./OH/YOJ (*zG/1 B) October, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 EXHIBIT PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: May 4, 2015 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT22283P3 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: FURNGULF, LTD., A COLORADO JOINT VENTURE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: Lots N & 0, Block 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: /8-4. 0/)04.- tabbiesÂ· SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Exceptions and Mineral Reservations as contained in the Patent to Aspen Townsite recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216. 8. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded November 8, 2012 as R~eption No. 593786 as Resolution No. 20-2012. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded May 8, 2013 as 13*ception No. 599325 as Resolution No. 9-2013. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Reciprocal Trash and Recycling Agreement recorded June 26, 2014 as Reception NQ- 611Â®1 and recorded October 21, 2014 as Receptign Ng: 614726. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRAN*ACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS FILE ARE AS FOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 2021 012 333 REFERENCE:PCT22283P3/PROFORMA EXHIBIT E CITY OF ASPEN 1 _3__ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 970.429.2759 .1-,tri~#, DATE: April 23,2015 PROJECT: 616 E. Hyman, Exterior Remodel ,- + 4 -- 2.-* h. R 2 -4 - REPRESENTATIVE: Mitch Haas JUL 3 0 2015 C 'EN DESCRIPTION: - - tr r The applicant was previously approved for a remodel and addition to the building. Since then, the applicant has determined that a more modest interior remodel of the second story and exterior fagade changes is the preferred development direction. The proposal modifies the roof form of the second story on the rear and front of the building from a mansard type roof form to a flat roof. Due to the limited scope of changes (materials vs. mass), the applicant may apply for a combined Commercial Design review, allowing a two step process to be combined into a one step process before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please note that notification of council (providing an opportunity for call-up), for the combined review, is required once an application is submitted. As part of the remodel, a portion of non-unit hallway is proposed to be converted to net leasable area. The representative for the project has indicated that the amount is small and can be approved through a separate, administrative review which is necessary to permit a combined Commercial Design review. The project will need to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission per Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review, and is located in the Commercial Character Area. It appears the project may be within the Courthouse View Plane and it will need to be verified by the applicant hat any changes to the building do not infringe upon the view plane. The applicant will need to address, by way of site plan, elevations, and other graphics or means as necessary, how the changes relate to the Commercial Design standards illustrated in Chapter 26.412 as well as the City's Commercial Character Area as posted on the City of Aspen's website in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. A link to these documents is included below. Additionally, the site plan should show the trash and recycling area as approved through a recorded agreement between the neighboring property. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412.040 Commercial Design Review, Review Procedure See Also: Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines A copy of the Land Use Code is available at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and.Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines can be found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenVPIanning-and-Zoning/Current-Planning/ A copy of the Land Use Application is available at: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/OMocs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Iand%20use%20app%20form.pdf Review by: Staff for complete application Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of Commercial Design Review Public Hearing: Public Hearing Planning Fees: $4,550 for 14 hours of staff time (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) Total Deposit: $4,550 To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. O Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Â£ Applicants name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 1 HOA Compliance form (Attached) O (Bocumentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in /N\t~~the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: /http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Department#/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- ~ Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should e,ovit 0 Lbe included with the application. 94?R) Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Il A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. Il An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. m 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. El Total deposit for review of the application. m A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Il A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. EXHIBIT City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 616 East Hyman Avenue (PID# 2737-182-12-005) Request for Commercial Design Review Approval To whom it may concern: As applicant for the above requested approval for 616 East Hyman Avenue, Furngulf Ltd, a Colorado Joint Venture, hereby authorizes Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) and Poss Architecture and Planning (Poss) to act as designated and authorized representatives for the preparation, submittal and processing of the application requesting the approval listed above, as well as, any additional entitlement needs that may be associated therewith. HLP and Poss are also authorized to represent Furngulf Ltd iii meetings with City staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Aspen City Council. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review, please do so through Haas Land Planning, LLC. Yours truly, *#41 Furngulf, Ltd A Colorado Joint Venture 616 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 By: JEKEMN FL-14 Title: 7ArÂ®Ek - RCV EM: D- G. &S. 3-1+-98 :3: 30!':d ; ULLFCO. 1,'in. D.G.aS.:4 2 - 1 JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT I THIS AGREEMENT is enteced into as of ~2 day of April, 7984 by and between Martin Pluge Victoria F. Aybar and Jeremy!3. Flug, i hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Venturers" ind indi- vidually as a "VentureV'. 1 I. FORMATION. 1-1 Formation: The Venturers do hereby form 4 Joint Venture pursuant to the Uniform Partnership Law of Colocldo. 1.2 Name: The name of the Joint Venture shall] be Furngulf, Ltd. i 1.3 Character of Business: Thc Joint Venture 'shall carry on the buainess of investing in real property and o~ther investment activities as it may deem appropriate. The Joint Venture may transact such other business as may be necessary and incidental to ils principal business or businesses. 1.4 Principal Place of Business: The principaa place of business and the principal office of the Joint Venture shall be located at 616 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611.1 The Joint Venture may also maintain such other offices at such other places as the Venturers may deem advisable. 1.5 Joint Venture Property: The Joint Venture~s prop- erty shall be held in the name of the Joint Venture. II. CAPITAL. 2.1 Capital .Account: An individual capital acÂ¢ount shall be maintained Ect each Venturet. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the Venturers shall Contribute tto the capital of the Joint Venture the assets set forth ~pposite their names on Schedule A, attached hereto. The Venturerk agree that the fair market value of the assets so contributed, 25 of the day of such contribution, are as set forth on Schedule A. 2.2 Interest: No interest shall be paid on anQ cgpital contribution of any Venturer. I i -----'-----rr-:-c- RO' BY: D. G. 6':S. ~ 10- 11, - 53â‚¬4 : :3: 5014 GLLFCO. LTD. D. G. &,S.:# 8 2.3 Additional Capital: Additional capital m~y, from time to time be contributed to the Joint Venture by the Venturers in such total amounts and proportions aa shall be unanimdusly agreed opon by the Vent:Orers. 2.4 Negative Capital Accounts: Upon kerminati'on of the Joint Venturee if any Venturer has a negative balancd in' his capital account, such balance shall De a debt from the Vdnturer to the Joint Venture and the Venturer shall be obligated ito make additional contributions to the Joint Venture capital to irestore his capital account to zero. & III. ALLOCATION OF JOINT VENTURE GAINS, INCOME,1 EXPENSE, DEDUCTIONS AND LOSSES. 3.1 Allocation of Gain= Gain on the sale of Jfint Venture property shall be allocated to each of the Venturers in proportion to their capital. accounts as computed on the first day of the taxable year to which such income, expense, loss or deduc- tien is properly allocable. 3.2 Other Items of Income, Expense, Loss or. Dejuction: All other items of income, expense, loss or deduction shall be allocated to each of the Venturers in proportion to their capital accounts as computed on -the first day of the taxable year to which such income, expense, loss or deduction is properly alloca- ble. IV. SALARIES AND DRAWINGS. 4.1 Salaries and Drawings: The Venturers shall have such salaries, drawings and expense accounts as may be unani- mously agreed upon by them. V. DISSOLUTION AND TERMINATION. i 5.1 Dissolution: The Joint Venture shall dissblve upon the occurrence of the earliest of the following events: (a) The death or disability of a venturetr provided. however, that the remaining Venturers may agree~ to continue the Joint Venture. -2- : 11. Re BY: D. G. Â©S. :U)-14-96 .3:SO P,3 GULFCO. LTD. -Â· [). G. 65. : 1/ 4 (b) The voluntary filing of any petition~in bankruptcy by a Venturer or involuntary adjudication of & Venturer as bankrupt or insolvent, or the application by a Venturic for, or his consent to, the appointment of a receiver, truatee 02 liquidator of all or a substantial pact of his assets, cd any u substantially similar action on the pact of a partner, PRovided, however, that the remaining Venturers may agree to continue the Joint Venture. (c) The sale of all or substantially all 'of the property of the.Joint Venture, unless the Venturecs unanimously ' decide to purchase or otherwise acquire additional proper.ties with the proceeds of such sale. (a) The withdrawal of any Venturer, provilded, / however, that the remaining Venturers may agree to continbe the Joint Venture. 1 5.2 Termination: In the event of dissolutioR,!unless the Venturers agree to continue the Joint Venture as provkded in Section 5.1, the Venturers shall wind up the affairs of the Joint Venture and the Joint Venture shall be terminated as provided herein. 2 (a) In the event of a termination of the joint Venture the Venturers shall sell or otherwise liquidate all of the Joint Venture assets as promptly as is consistent with ob~aining a reasonable value therefor under the circumstances (except.to the extent that the Venturers determine to distribute any ass*ts of the Joint Venture to a partner or Venturers in kind), shall allocate the proceeds of such sales to the Venturers' capital accounts pursuant to Sections 3.1 und 3.2, and shall discharge all | liabilities of the Joint Venture in the order of prioritylprovided by law, including all costs relating to the dissolution: Minding up, liquidation and distribution of assets, and shall distiribute the remaining assets in the order set forth in Section 5.j(b) below. -3- Rn EY : D. 0. CS. :10-14-96 3:517* : GULFCO. LTD. Â· D. G. 63. ; 0 5 (b) After providing for all other liabilitied of the Joint Venture, any liabilities of the Joint Venture to tle Venturers. other than oIl account of their interests in J~int Venture capital or profits, shall be satisfied. The remhining assets of the Joint Venture shall then be distributed asi follows: (i) In the event any assets of the Joint~ Venture are to be distributed to the Venturers *in kind, the net hair mar- ket value of such assets as of the date of dissolution shall be determined by independent appraisal or by agreement amon~ the Venturers, and the Venturers' capital accounts shall be Adjusted in the same manner and proportions as if the assets had I~Deen sold for such fair market value and the proceeds allocated to~the Venturers; capital accounts. (ii) Subject to the provisions of Section 2.4 with respect to negative capital accounts, the amount of leach Venturer's capital account as determined under Section 542(b)(1) shall be distributed to such partner. (C) Upon completion of the winding up, liquidation and distribution of assets, the Joint Venture shall be deemed termi- Rated. IV. MISCELLANEOUS, 6.1 Accounting: The Joint Venture shall keep its books and records on the cash method of accounting and shbll adopt the calendar year as its taxable year. 6.2 ~Banking: All funds of the Joint Venture shall be deposited in its name in such checking or savings account! or accounts as shall be designated by the Venturers and all Oith- drawals therefrom shall be made upon checks, drafts or wite transfers signed by any Venturer. 6.3 Records: At all times during the continuance of the Joint Venture, the Venturers shall keep or cause to b~ kept full and true books and records of account. All such books and records of account sholl at all times be opened to inspection by the venturers during normal business hours. -4- RCV HY:D. G.Â©S. :10-14.-90 3:51PM ULLFCO. LTD. -, D. G. dS. : 4 6 6.4 Employees: The Joint Venture may employ ~such firms, f/ corporattions. or persons as the Venturers deem advisable~ for the operation of the Joint Venture business. 6.5 Assignment; Successor in Interest: No Venturer may assign, pledge, hypothecater or in any manner, transfer his 0 interest in the Joint Venture without the consent of the| other Venturers, provided, however, that nothing shall preventi the interest of any Venturer from being assigned, pledged, encumbered, or ctherwise hypothecated to any other Venturer herein, lo a member of a VenturerÂ°s immediate family, or to a lineal descendknt of a Venturer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Venturer shalle without the consent of any other Venturer, have the right to appoint a successor in interest to succeed to his interest in the Joint Venture upon his death. Ir the surviving Venturer$ agree to continue the Joint Venture as provided in Section 5.1(a)< such 1 successor in interest Shall become a Venturer and shall }le bound by all of the terms of this Joint Venture Agreement. 6.6 No Election from Subchapter K: Each partq hereto agrees with respect to this Joint Venture Agreement not to elect to be excluded from the application of Subchapter K of Chapt{er 1 of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. 6.7 Governing Law: This Joint Venture Agreemdnt shall be governed, interpreted and enforced in accordance With ithe laws of the State of Colorado. 6.8 Successors and Assigns: This Joint Ventude Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit 'of the parties signatory hereto, their heirs, successors, transf~erees, # personal representatives and assigns. 6.9 Entire Agreement: This Joint Venture Agre~ment contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes any prior understanding and/or written or oral agreement. All ~' representations and agreements, whether oral or written, are contained herein. -5- RC\, BY: D. G. 45. t10-11 -96 : 3:51PM : Cil'Li CO. LTD. D. G. ES. :# 7 6.10 Severability: Should any provision hereoq be held to be invalid, the same shall not affect in any respect bhe va- 4 lidity of the remainder of this Joint Venture Agreement. i 6.11 Headings: The headings contained in this Voint Venture Agreement are for reference only and shall not be; con- v strued as part hereof, nor shall they affect in any way *e mean- ing or interpretation hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executedl as of the date first Stated above. 74Â»' Martin Flug 7,1 2 - lA UJÂ·Â«Â»AGAJ- i Victoria F. Avbar Jt~. 7lutifi)~ ~ -6- 1 RCV GY:D. G.&3. ./0-IÂ·1Â·,863 8:51PM : G[ 1-FCO, LTD . - D.G.&53 - : 17 13 1 1 SCHEDULE A Venturer Capital Contribution Martin Flug Victoria F. Aybar Jeremy J. Plug 1 i FIRST AMENDMENT TO = PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF FURNGULF LLP THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of the 4% day of October, 1996 by and between MARTIN FLUG and JEREMY J. FLUG (together, the Â°Partners"). RECITALS A. The Partners are parties to the Joint Venture Agreement dated as of the 10th day of April, 1984 (the "Partnership Agreement"), and currently are all the partners of the partnership established under the Partnership Agreement (the "Partnership") . The Partnership is a partnership formed pursuant to the Uni form Partnership Law of Colorado. B. The Partners desire to amend the Partnership Agreement to provide for the registration of the Partnership as a Colorado registered limited liability partnership and to adopt certain other changes. AMENDMENT The Partnership Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1, Each occurrence of the terms "Joint Venture", "Venturer" and "Venturers" shall be replaced by the terms "Partnership", "Partner" and 19?artners", respectively. 2. Section 1.2 is amended to read as follows: "1.2 The name of the Partnership shall be "Furngulf LLP". 2. New Sections 1.6 and 1.7 shall be added and shall read as follows: "1.6 Registration as Limited Liability Partnership. The Partnership shall register with the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado as a registered limited liability partnership pursuant to section 7-60-144, Colorado Revised Statutes ( 11 CRS" ) The Partnership shall make such limited liability partnership reports as required by section 7-60-149, CRS. In accordance with section 7-60-144(5), CRS, the Partnership shall be for all purposes the same entity that existed before it registered as a registered limited liability partnership." "1.7 Limited Liability of Partners. Except as ~- expressly provided herein, the liability of the G.\DATA\PUBL\LNEM\D546010.1 October 22, 1996 5:25pm partners for debts, obligations and liabilities of, or chargeable to, the Partnership shall be limited to the { fullest extent permitted by section 7-60-115(2), CRS." â€ž 3. Section 2.4 shall be amended to read as follows: '12.4 Capital Accounts Deficits. Upon termination of the Partnership, no Partner shall be obligated to restore the amount of a deficit in such Partner's capital account.H 4. A new Section 4.2 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: "4.2 Limitation on Distributions. A partner may not receive distributions from the Partnership in excess of those permitted by section 7-60-146, CRS." 5. A new Section 6.12 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: "6.12 Indemnification of Partners, Employees and Agents. The Partnership shall indemnify any person made a party to any proceeding because such person is or was a partner of the Partnership against liability incurred in any such proceeding, and shall advance expenses incurred in such proceeding to such person, to the fullest extent permitted under law, except with respect to acts not performed in good faith or not consistent with this Agreement. The Partnership may indemnify and advance expenses to an employee or agent of the Partnership to the same extent as a partner or to a greater extent if consistent with law." 6. A new Section 6.13 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: 116.13 Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person other than the Partners." Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the original Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed thip Amendment, to be effective as of the day and year first abovg written, notwithstanding the actual date of execut,Yon. h fl /--/ /7 44 - I D l -11 ~ 1 b Date of Execution Maktin Flug --ji U' f m ~ 2-<- 1 9 b Date of Execution -3- RECEP- 4: 593786,11/ r'=m- 09:57:51 AM, @ 1 OF 11, R $61.00 Doc Co(~Â§ 5 RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit~- RESOLUTION NO. 20 (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION CONSISTING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 616 E HYMAN AVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS N & 0, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parce/ ID: 273718212005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Conceptual Commercial Design Review to remodel the existing building and add a third floor addition for a project that will include a mix of commercial space, affordable housing, and free-market residential; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended the Applicant amend the proposal to better comply with the Commercial Design Standards with regard to height and for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 16, 2012 and continued to October 30tll , the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012, by a six to one (6 -1) vote, approving Conceptual Commercial Design Review; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page I of 3 Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Conceptual Commercial Design Review with the following conditions: A. The Subdivision and Final Commercial Design Application shall include a third story addition not to exceed 38 feet in height, as represented in the attached exhibit. B. All other underlying dimensional requirements, except for height, shall be met at Final Commercial Design Application. C. The existing Public Amenity space is approved at 430 sq. ft. Drawings illustrating the Conceptual Commercial Design Review are attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution. Section 2: Engineering The applicant shall address compliance with the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan as part ofthe Subdivision and Final Commercial Design Review. Section 3: Parks Any changes to the Public Amenity, shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department as part of the Final Commercial Design Application. Section 4: General The applicant shall comply with all applicable City of Aspen Codes. Nothing in this conceptual approval negates the Applicant's requirements to meet other sections and requirements o f the Municipal Code. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page 2 of 3 Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 30th day of October, 2012. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNINE ~ AND ZONING C(Â¥9?11SpON: 6 2- Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Erspamer, Chhir ATTEST: 5#44Â£,6*YEU-/ Lothian/Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: roofplan, sections and perspectives Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 9 (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION CONSISTING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 616 E HYMAN AVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS N & O, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 273718212005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LIP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Conceptual Commercial Design Review to remodel the existing building and add a third floor addition for a project that will include a mix of commercial space and free-market residential; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended the Applicant amend the proposal to better comply with the Commercial Design Standards with regard to height and for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 16, 2012 and continued to October 30% the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012, by a six to one (6 -1) vote, approving Conceptual Commercial Design Review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Final Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Reviews for the previously described project; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended to approve the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, RECEPTION#: 599325, 05/08/2013 at 11:21:18 AM, 1 OF 23, R $121.00 Doc Code Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the following land use reviews with conditions: A. Final Commercial Design Review. Any building permit application for the redevelopment of the site shall be for a building that substantially duplicates the representations made before the Planning and Zoning Commission and included as Exhibit 1 of this resolution. All underlying dimensional requirements, except for height and trash/utility/recycling areas, shall be met and verified at building permit submission per Exhibit 2. Prior to building permit application, applicant shall amend the floor plans to include an airlock entry for each tenant space entry (but not a common entry) or provide a comparable measure for heat loss prevention acceptable to the Building Department. Roof mechanical shall be grouped and screened together on the roof. B. Special Review. A reduction in size o f the trash/utility/recycling is permitted to be reduced to the dimensions and layout shown in Exhibit 3 of this resolution. The area shall solely be used for trash and recycling purposes. C. Growth Management Reviews. The growth management reviews for Expansion or New Commercial Development, New Free-Market Residential Units within a Multi-family or Mixed-use Project, and Affordable Housing are approved. This permits an increase of net leasable commercial and office space on site, not to exceed 580 sq. ft., and the development of one free-market residential unit of up to 2,500 sq. ft. of net livable area. The proposed net livable size of the residential dwelling of over 2,000 sq. ft. requires the extinguishment of a historic TDR prior to the issuance of a building permit These approvals permit the remodel and redevelopment of a three story mixed-use building containing net leasable commercial and office space and one free-market residential unit with a maximum building height of 38 feet and a 430 sq. ft public amenity space. Section 2: Building Permit Application Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 2 of 7 The Applicant, the Applicant' s General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission requirements, the requirements of this Resolution, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following as applicable: A. A copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission resolutions approving the project. B. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. C. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. D. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. E. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. F. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. G. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. H. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 3: Affordable Housing. As represented, the proposal expands the net leasable commercial and office space by 580 sq. ft. and creates a new free-market residential unit (represented at 2,479 sq. ft ofnet livable area). Based upon these numbers, the affordable housing mitigation required for 1his project is 2.71 FTEs at a Category 4 level, which are approved to be mitigated with Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. The applicant may mitigate at a lower Category level by converting the category designation of the credit pursuant to the Land Use Code. Final net leasable and net livable numbers, as well as the mitigation required, shall be verified at building permit Certificates of Affordable Housing shall be extinguished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the subject project. Section 4: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 3 of 7 Section 5: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 *dition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Section 6: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 7: Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru an oil and sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to building permit. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). Any glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion o f the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines and within 3 feet vertically below an ACSD main sewer line. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 4 of 7 Section 8: Environmental Health The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regards to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware o f when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements and noise abatement. Wildlife protection/enclosures for the trash and recycle area is required. Section 9: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City' s Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 10: Parks Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW - requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. Parks is concerned with any improvements to the sidewalk area. The applicant has indicated that the existing street tree planting is to remain in place. Careful consideration to the location and installation o f utilities will determine the success of this desire. Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal, the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20, this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits, If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the refiew of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage o f construction backfill, storage o f equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are-to commence. As referenced in Chipter 13.20 - - - - Section 11: Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and pid at building permit issuance. Section 12: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to this resolution shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the development order. Resolution No, 9, Series 2013 Page 5 of 7 No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper o f general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries o f the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots N and O, City and Townsite of Aspen and commonly known as 616 E. Hyman. Section 13: Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are appended hereto and are, by references made to them, incorporated into this resolution as if fully set forth herein: â€¢ Exhibit 1 - Schematic elevations, square footages and floor plans â€¢ Exhibit 2 - C-1 Zone district standards â€¢ Exhibit 3 - Approved trash and utijity area Section 14: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 15: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the resolutions repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior Resolutions. Section 16: I f any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereo f. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd dayof April, 2013. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 6 0 f 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ' f $ t ~ 41-Â·66- 62, - Â£ \r ' 1 1-k-'*<-'- - - Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney LJ Ergpamer, Chair Ryâ€¢n Wzlter sckeicl, \Ace Clt'~i r ATTEST: 1 5.1 k j\A.\In *kie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 7 of 7 Ng,Il: ALL EXISTING ON-SITE VEGETATION IS TO REMAIN NOTE: ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND/ OR REPLACED TO THE EXTENT AND IN THE MANNER 27-21/4" , REQUIRED BY THE PARKS AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. i i \ 1 rworosED b PARKING EXISTING PLANTER 1 1 if'lliC AA,ENNY IHe) 1 . V SPACE) , . ~ I 1 0 11 - - - 11 2 r \ el \ r 1 2 \: 2 RAMP , 1 . 'OPE: 1 K) 12 ' i ly' 1 .... t P:ebu \ ~ ~ 0 PROPOSED i ':I I SERVICE YARD 2 M: GROUND-LEVEL ~ BUJIDING FOOTPRINT ~ 0.0 CIIANG[ rpoM.. ~ 232 $ PROPOSED EXISTING TO PROPOSFD) 42: PARKING / / 11 E BUILDING 1 {ABOVE) n I ~ PARKING 1 20 . PROPOSED I M . 1 11 52[CIF TB O 1 * it , PARKING 1 r PROPOSED I 4 .. .. 1 B ca:A: PROPERTY LINE - 17-71/2- ' 26 -ty ~ ~, 7-41 1/2 ,~ PROPERTY LINE 2 -0' / 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 6I6 E HYMAN ./ENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 8)6ll poss 07-i--1 ./12 ......:1~ S CHEMAT ]C DES JGN, SiTE PLAN '0, â€žIT ..IM ...T .1... CÂ¢,0â€¢Aii -11 16 -=- C., 2/15/2013 A5 HYMAN AVENUE A311V PROPOSED: NEW WAL' fF (5HOWN IN GRAY) PROPO&ED: NEW IEVATOR 7 ill EXIS;ING | ' ' 1 1 'TRIUM . EXISTING IOPEN TO ABOVE) , Â® COMMERCIAL -.* - PROPOSED: NEW CORRIDORU - SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS 1 liu -2 21 1 1 ./ -f t<..-0 Â· EXISTING COMMON BATHROOM . 7 ~ 1 L.-1 l 1 EXISTING COMMON aATHROOM 3 Â® 2 I EXISTING/NEW MECHA/44 1- 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 6~6 E HYMAN A~ ENUE *PEN. COLORADO 8 I 61 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN - PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL 10, 1.,1..'.11.{11 â€ž,1. mâ€ž... .'.,1 0 4 8 16 0%â€ž Mi;*:# 2/15/2013 A6 111"0'.,4,3,11","10" r-PROPOSEDÂ· NEW WALLS {SHOWN iN GRAY] ~ PROPOSED NEW t...'OR / ~ 1 : mly. EQUIP. U PROPOSED PARKNG ./ .# ROOM 11 EXISTING Â·EXISTING f PLANTER O *TRIUM (PUBLIC AMENITY [OPEN TO ABOVE 1 1 -AND BELOW) SPACE) , PROPOSED COMMERCIAL 1 1 1 ! i.~ 5Â·11 i .111 1 ! _ 1 4 --- I I '.- I.. .*' I. I .*. ,/~ ...'...... ---/- 5ECONO MEAN$ OF EGRE. 2 1-1 -6 PROPOIDÂ· NEW CORRIDI L 'to ..1-- Â»UJ--40--La SERvICEAREI b F= =41 , ALLEY F MECH,HAFT PROPOSED I PROPOSED 1-Â· r-k I E COMMON = COMMON r---[ F-~-ft RESTROOM ~ RESTROONI . 1=1 1 LE C,1 f ~~ ~~ al PROPC)5ED to PARKING 1 m Â® PROPOSED COMMERC!/ S PROPOSED & PARK.G 3 PROPOSED â€¢ PARKING - v 43 - ~EWWINDOw 616 E. HYMAN RED~ELOPMENT 616 E 11â„¢AN AVENUE ASPEN.COXORA.O 51611 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSED LEVEL 1 poss 07-11*-t ...--- 1 Â©"12 ---.-, 2/15/2013 A7 16 " .,1. :!.,1, ..,1. -DO .1.11 .l"G"]' I .'{11'""il "" ../Â£ 6 -,9 PROPOSED: NEW EL[VllOR PROPOSED. NEW WALL5 i ~R-1'05Â£3: ENTRY VITIBUE 4 ~51IOWN 1N GRAn -Â·~ & ST~IR TO RE~IDENCE 1~.1...U.-1.U.Al-*." 09 kvt_- I 1 , EXUING ATRIUM , ZOPENTOBELOW) I.'//134/4#--- JA,.TOR PROPO5m 1' - CLOSET COMMERCIAt j ~-fl~ ~ ~- PROPOSED NtW CORNIDOR/ .1 \ SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS L PROPOSED Â· PROPO5ED : ~ COMMON COMMON ~ - RES'ROOM RESIROOM . ALLEY i Â® Â® FROPOE Â® COMMER)L - 1 1: 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 6].E 11Â¥MArÂ· AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 816! I SCHEMA TIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSED LEVEL 2 1 poss 0 4 8 16 0.' gl~'= 2/IW20I3 A8 U, UIT ..,11 .1.1.1 .1,- â€žIDâ€žâ€ž .1.1, - PR.POSEDÂ· NEW...OR.....E 4 ~ KEY CODE ACCESS TO PENTHOUSE ---- 1 11...Err Â·1Â·Â·Â·Â·1-[ir, iriÂ·Â·Â· Â·-Â·rrÂ· rÂ·lilliÂ·IT,Irr n'Â·rrr- 1 40 -113/4 1-AUT / / 1 I ROOF 1 , 13Â·.0" , 16'-5 3/4*' .1 U- 1 0- , -1 - -- -- 09 .J GLASS CVRDRAIL - 0 \J ~ A !11 , 13' - 113/4 ~1 --, ~-- SCREENED W.l 131 - 0.1 DN -- [NO ROOF] \ F 4 - 1-17 -71 --- 9 :L .godogul KIGEBee. 0 PROPO5ED 11 PROPOSED A MECIIANICAL U RESIDENTtAL : I - PROPOSED:SCREEN ~er~NISSHOWN)-7 J IZ~-~-MECIi.SHAFT ~/ 6'.O' ~/ 7Â·-41/2" ~, ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED ' DECK GLASS GUARDRAIL ..00 0 1 . F 0 PLAN-IER 1 1 __ 2 13 0' , 13' - 113/4Â· G 4 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E HYMANIVENUE ASPEN COLORADO 81 611 SCH EMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSEDLEVEL 3 poss 0 77.- 02012 22:yr='. 2/15/2013 A9 lal'.Al, *'."r .,â€ž~â€ž'..... ~111' 6 16 <3 1 flootft/41 I 11 1,4 1,11 lil i 14 vii, . lili.1'lili , 612/ 2 . ' / INTERIOR CEILING , 1 'OÂ· ./ . ' HEIGHTÂ· 11* / / / /111 9 Il' 1121,11 1 EQUIP Â· 1 SPACE ALLEY I HYMAN AVENUE ~ I 1 ~ 11'.:111'~. 1 '~lili ~----DENRAILING INTERIOR CEILING .. 11 lili 11 Â· HEIGHT: 10'-00 ..1 2' 1 1 h . 14Â«11!111 10 121|4111 1 / 41'1111.1~1~,11,111:11(111~11111.11.111 1 ' /4-' INTERIOR CEILING 1 -1 11 1,1.1. j ; HEIGHT: 9'-0" ' - 7 , :11]_ L.J.'r 1 III: \ 1 1111 ~ XI! lilli 4\ I. '11/~----- 2,22------ lili './: 1 'col, riA ROOF PLAN W .1. 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 [. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 DOSS ARCHITECI[IRE . PLANNING Â© SCHEMATIC DESIGN : ROOF PLAN Alo ' .. EAIT NA!' ... .ill' '0/Â»Al~ 11.. ..-' NORTH 3201! =.-W.,i 2/15/2013 -CHIMNE..... M"eu ~ r---ER,mari -GUSS.'./. \ 1 7--1 ,_-1 j . T D Nâ€¢.El . / .6/ 4 - 4 - -=.0.E..r.....S ALLEY HYMAN AVENUE r G Ri . I ' " 'vr. J -11 1 9 49 -i~ki -1 6 1#18 G fi 1 2 TT-~4 f 1%1 m 8!Blfiall,-6~~~%~tht 7411-1â‚¬4225. Il Il= am*RI-,MIAn=i;JILI- I'-- -I_--m,-7111-a - ---", Â£*WLiiâ€¢0~k~~3*~, mi;Jel tr~-~4Â·&Eg6"h.Lich,4. i-=ifihi U 0%~47. - I- 7=TLI,1 21= 09Â¢111*micÂ®1*1111211*'d P i -8 ~1 1111-11.116 -Irf L.*M-tlyifi-*1 U - 0142rm Ii /1 LI'L - /-2\ BUILDING SECTION ' All / "-' I 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 [.1IYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~OSS Al<Ckill ECTURI , PI.ANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS All 02011 C.......c 2/1&'2013 r~ i-.-lii â‚¬'I Nâ€ž--.' "At . - -.1....ION' 1 0-- G.. MILIN' -P".APET ~- - ~ C 1.0 w,1 1 / . 79 .... 1 18 - , ALLEY HYMAN AVENUE :f /1 . i &' u.-Â·11-30 - 1,9114 , C;27 1.111-41'r,11;. LT' iT'.1,1 li 11 11- . EE!*y#x-- ~1%!lc q ~LigjfattfÂ«~Â«93Â»tulltÂ«~rCU21310kt~ U r'118~li~'IJ 120144 =91. 1 - 390'J#fiFy'*'ta I .~t li '4~ '4"Ir+N - 1.v.-h64:m21'/ ~ BUILDING SECTION 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ,ASPEN, COLORADO 8161] ~OSS ARCHITECTURE ~ PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS A12 0 201] /:Â¥Mt Em.i, 2/15/2013 I-'..1 4.1 !,1... -,6 (5~1151Â¤' [DHU=3} Lf=9Â·Ed]. -I"/08.10/0 i 610[.1-MAN i~ 'IN=FL -f -- _ : r-- .Â· C.E. HYMAN 4 4 11 2 1 1 47 )18' le = Â· 2 IF*q' 0 9 Ti'*li /-' 8 - #411 b L-L-1- T i i -44111 J a .. 16-I 0 I I!- Â·::I'-lei'-I-'Irrl, rl-' I -I'll 'IM -IÂ·- ./Wil- _ ,L Il ' lil I 'l J'4â€¢~'~'p"0'~r' "~" '-5'5:'7"W-7,~79~~3,~*~ETJW*,t,1-31"ll'*f.Fiq'LI~11~11,44~1,08iJ2~Clk~t - r H 1- 1 . /'h BUILDING SECTION / /13 ' 1'Â·~'Â° 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DOSS ARCHITECTURF ' PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS~13 e.o~in!:I#,m-:â€ž 2/15/2013 ,9HUg,G] {014UW -%1 MNI]Slxl) 1 ' 4.iÂ· 40%*54. 1111 4- - 4-lk .2 .... 1- -I l, t . L 12 e .7/ - . M 4 .04. f i . 1 1- 1. ..3 .. '. t, I ..f 1 E .-4,1 .1 I. .' 4 *42 r 1,..f.....21,11'J. 1 - : 4 , 1 : . e.:4 4-1 . t -" .4 41 4 I -1 I. .f "G .m 4 4"4 ~Â· .i g : ':= 4, 1 I * I .0 4, . f , ' 2 *Â¥6 - 14 % .... 1 I ' 791 i,J y 'ya 7- I '. 1. 41 ..3 i 'r' 4.Â· 11 â€¢ I ./ ~ u' 9 . ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Â¥ ~ ~ I # . * -- ./ /3/ - 4 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616F HYMAN IVEN. ASPE,t COLORA[))81611 -. poss 11 ! , b.11'j SCHEMATIC DESIGN: RENDERING 2/15/2013 A14 .1.,1 *p /**fe-,7â€¢ RrV..n/22.....m......0.%......r-?Il-Y- ; - ELEVATOR OVERRUN SCREEN CANOPY - CHIMNEY M94/-// I V. Â·Â·Acy: . V ~4q Et U T.O. PARAPET 6 1 TA PARAPET 1387.0,7* 7 136-6' , HEAVY AMBER COLUMNS 4 b' 'I 4 I 1 ; It - STONE VENEER BUILDING OUTLINE FOR NEIGHBORING C i 1 1,1 1 I 1 BUILDING p t & It ; . 1* 4. 21, 1 1% I / h 1 1 - i F,F, LEVEL-3 te' I. 1 ki 1 1 41 - - -155-0 7 HEAVY TIMBER BEAMS/COLUMNS - k., - STOREFRONT AWNINGS "4 42 " I ht / '41 / 7 Â·Ii F.F. LEVEL 2* - 112'-0Â· ~ 95 - ALUMINUM DOOR 4 - SYSTEM i ".1 hÂ·' - ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 1 r.0 .// SYSTEM F.F. LEVEL 1 1 166-O; 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E 11Â¥WJ4 AVENUE AVEN. COLORADO 51611 SCHEMATIC DESIGN ELEVATION-SOUTH poss 5 til, liff[ , t 4#-,in 1 0 4 8 16 Â©'01' B=Zij- 2/15/2013 A15 .Â¢111 4,31 # %4...4. f.: 1 - CHIMNEY BEYOND - ELEVATOR OVERRUN BEYOND tr 4>4 @Bit,400, Â·~~- -,kI.O._rAE&ELE _ ~ - E~*91~ 1- 138â€¢ - u _T.Q. PBAPET J. 135'70; ...1 ily, 1 I .,4 - WOOD SIDING '4 111, . -/ PARAPET w/ WOOD . Â·i Â·- I ., â€¢i-Â·r7, 7:9,71!:Â· 'Â· ! li SIDING . 4.. #4, , ..- .Ali{M.ji- 4 .: f.. ,#ls .1.-...04 4 FOR 148GH'BORING F.F. LEVEL 3 J , . BUILDING OUTLINE :3 9141/./~U t. 123' - 0' 7 i Â·i- I BUILDING - SER~CE YARD 1- ''3499 *:4 . I .APA}:14 ..UND, i F.F. LEVEL 2 1 Â· Vii'14 ------- ...,it P* 112'- Orl*- - PAINTED WOOD SIDING - PAINTED STEEL COLUMN '91 b F F. LEVEL 1 J ----~ --- ------ - $ * . r 100 -O' 7 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616E 11:MANAill) APENCCXOR,DO 81611 I--5--4 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION-NORTH 0 illl[Â· ' ..1#'; 21.iÂ·,NNIN O 4 6 10 A16 Exhibit 2 26.710.150. Commercial (C-1) Zone District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District is to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor and opportunities for affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the commercial core, the ability to occupy the ground tloor with offices, and a separate chapter in the commercial design guidelines. B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Commercial (C- 1) Zone District: 1. Uses allowed on upper floors: Lodging, affordable multi-family housing, free-market multi-family housing and home occupations. 2. Uses allowed on all building levels: Retail and restaurant uses, neighborhood commercial uses, service uses, office uses, arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center, bed and breakfast, accessory uses and structures, uses and building elements necessary and incidental to uses on other floors, including parking accessory to a permitted use, storage accessory to a permitted use, farmers' market, provided that a vending agreement is obtained pursuant to Section 15,04.350(b). Parking shall not be allowed as the sole use of the ground floor. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.425: 1. Lodging, affordable multi-family housing, free-market multi-family housing or home occupations on the ground floor. 2. Commercial parking facility, pursuant to Section 26.515. 3. For historic landmark properties: Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings and duplex dwelling. D. Dimensional requirements, The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District: 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: 3,000. b. All other uses: No requirement. 2. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 3. Minimum lot width (feet): Page 1 of 3 a. Detached residential dwelling: two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 4. Minimum front yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 5. Minimum side yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 6. Minimum rear yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 7, Minimum utility/trash/recycle area: Pursuant to Section 26.575.060. 8. Maximum height: a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b, All other uses: twenty-eight (28) feet for two-story elements of a building. Thirty-six (36) feet for three-story elements of a building, which may be increased to forty (40) feet through commercial design review. See Chapter 26.412. 9. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 10. Public amenity space: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 11. Floor area ratio (FAR): The following FAR schedule applies to uses cumulatively up to a total maximum FAR of 2.5:1. Achieving the maximum tloor area ratio is subject to compliance with applicable design standards, view plane requirements, public amenity requirements and other dimensional standards. Accordingly, the maximum FAR is not an entitlement and is not achievable in all situations. a. Commercial uses: 1.5:1. b. Arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center and similar uses: 2.5:1. c. Affordable multi-family housing: No limitation. d. Lodging: .5:1, which maybe increased to 1.5:1 if the individual lodge units on the parcel average five hundred (500) net livable square feet or less, which may be comprised of lock-off units. Page 2 of 3 e. Free-market multi-family housing: .5.1, which may be increased to .75:1 if affordable housing equal to one hundred percent (100Â°/0) of the free-market residential floor area is developed on the same parcel. f. Detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast (as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses): Eighty percent (80%) of allowable floor area of a same-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. (See R-6 Zone District.) Extinguishment of historic TDRs shall not permit additional FAR for single-family or duplex development. 12. Maximum multi-family residential dwelling unit size (square feet): 2,000 square feet of net livable area. a. The property owner may increase individual multi-family unit size by extinguishing historic transferable development right certificates ("certificate" or "certificates"), subject to the following: 1. The transfer ratio is five hundred (500) square feet of net livable area for each certificate that is purchased. 2. The additional square footage accrued may be applied to multiple units. However, the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring development rights is two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net livable area (i,e., no more than five hundred [500] additional square feet may be applied per unit). 3. This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development rights does not allow an increase in the FAR of the lot. Commentary: Refer to Chapter 26.535 for the procedures for extinguishing certificates. 13. Maximum lodge unit size (square feet): 1,500. When units are comprised of lock-off units, this maximum shall apply to the largest possible combination of units. 14. Commercial/residential ratio: The total lodging and free-market residential net livable area shall be no greater than the total above-grade floor area associated with the uses described in Subparagraphs 26.710.150.D. 11.a. and b. combined on the same parcel. (Ord. No. 56-2000, Â§Â§7 [part], 12,15; Ord. No. 25-2001, Â§5 [part]; Ord. No. 1-2002, Â§20; Ord. No. 28b-2004, Â§1; Ord. No. 12-2006, Â§11; Ord. No. 11,2007, Â§2; Ord. No. 27-2010, Â§4) Page 3 of 3 RAMP SLOPE: CY) 1 1:12 1 10 1 1,0 DN m _ UP â‚¬ 7 0 0 ~0' - 4" / 0 - - E SERVICE AREA 1 -0/ 1 3 -11" / 1 NOTE: PER OWNER AGREEMENT w/ 610 E. HYMAN, ADDITIONAL \ b 1921 PROPOSED 3-* RECYCLING STORAGE IS LOCATED COMMON . 11 1 - AT 610 E. HYMAN RESTROOM xr 1 1\ 2 PROPOSED 1 1\ 4tWea'*:*f,f FULL WIDTH GATES ~--1 - MECH. SHAFT PARKING 1 80 I- Bl m I k 1 =O T I 1 DRAWING NOT TO SCALE crflze)Â¢#-@tfitifitie~,9----i=f~ RETA (N FOR EXHIBIT PERI NUENT FIL=ts .4-.&-m COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and C- Property Furngulf, Ltd., a Colorado Joint Venture Phone No. (970) 925-2496 C Owner (1") Email: steven@gulfcoltd.com r.- Address of 616 E Hyman Avenue Billing Furngulf, Ltd. ra Property 616 E Hyman Ave. 4,0 (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 Address' (send bills here) 1, Gi application) Aspen, CO 81611 '1 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Review $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 4,550 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time 14 above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ ~ deposit for I hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: â‚¬Ti o... i :fl' Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name , _\EfEM~ FEJ.|4 Title: -PAL-nder City Use: 4550 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January 2015 City ofAspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 EXHIBIT i _1_ MAILING ADDRESSES OF RECORD FOR ALL PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE FIRST SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE AND/OR WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE 616 EAST HYMAN CONCEPTUAL ZONING REVIEW PACKAGE JUNE 12,2015 - SITE I . 1,7 3. . ., LArt'/.+N. I ' 4 .g - . - : 4# 1 3 1 i -N y . C - ,. -- 2-/ e . 1 J. 4 ,-. . - 0 I .Zy -4 , le. - 1 _ it i 3, Â· 1 e 1 3 r W â€¢ .Â¥ 1 1 .PL VICINITY MAP NTS 1 .. ' 4.- 2.- , ... 4 A 7 i Â» 1= 7 -1 - -1 .A _ * ./ 4 r e . S H E ET LI ST JUL 3 0 2015 '' f .< . '. - COVER SHEET - FAR CALCS - EXISTING 3---- * ~ I FAR CALCS - PROPOSED . 4 - - - NETLEASABLE - EXISTING , - NET LEASABLE - PROPOSED 44*.Â· . Â· t. 1 - SITE PLAN - EXISTING 4 d 1 . - LOWER LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING 4 ~ - MAIN LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING 114+-frliff: ; ~ 144 - UPPER LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING 11 lili '11"1111,11.111.NIM!!H"Mi 1 111111" 'likup r - UPPER LEVEL PLAN -PROPOSED / . .., 1 -- / - ROOF PLAN - EXISTING 4* E~ ~ ~~ Â· g S .y Â· >40-0; 0 4 ...~1 - SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - NORTH ELEVATION - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM WEST - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM EAST - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - ENTRY PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - FRONT PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - EAST PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - WEST ALLEY PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING/ PROPOSED - EAST ALLEY PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING/ PROPOSED ~ OSS AR CH'TECT Npr DI ANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORAD' 81611 M 970/925 4755 R 970/920 2950 23 LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL ~ FAR LEGEND ~ EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS (SF) EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FAR - ~ FAR EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR 4,197 SF - EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 3 2-85 SF DECK 820 SF | ~~ DECK AREA TOTAL EXISTING FAR (SF) 8 302 SF 8- . PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS (SF) 111 11_ PROPOSE_D_LOWER LEVEL FAR NO CHANGE PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 4 197 SF PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3,285 SF DECK 820_S F TOTAL PROPOSED FAR (SF) 8 302 SF F 111 1 TOTAL EXISTING FAR (SF) 8 302 SF TOTAL PROPOSED FAR (SF) -8,302 SF EXISTING - PROPOSED NO CHANGE UPPER LEVEL TOTAL EXISTING FAR - TOTAL PROPOSED FAR = 0; THEREFORE, NO NET INCREASE FAR CALCS - EXISTING SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss VRCHI]Ef..llÂ® PLANNING (3 CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review ~ ~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COZORADO 81611 Â© 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 9/0/920 2950 NORTH ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. r LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATIONS (SF) ~ FAR LEGEND ~ EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS (SF) EXISTING LOWER LEYEl- FAR - FAR EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR 4,197 SF EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 31285 SF DECK 820 SF | ~~ DECK AREA TOTAL EXISTING FAR (SF) 8 302 SF PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS (SF) PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FAR NO CHANGE PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 4 197 SF PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3,285 SF DECK 820 SF TOTAL PROPOSED FAR (SF) 8 302 SF TOTAL EXISTING FAR_(SF) 8,302 SF TOTAL PROPOSED FAR (SF) -8,302 SF EXISTING - PROPOSED NO CHANGE UPPER LEVEL TOTAL EXISTING FAR - TOTAL PROPOSED FAR = O; THEREFORE, NO NET INCREASE FAR CALCS - PROPOSED SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss LO 1!JINLi G CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review I El 605 EAST .Al. STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 R 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 NORTH 06.12.15 (i) 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. 11111<. 1111'IS -~ 1~ 9 199 - 3 11 j l''j'1111 I l, 'i!/i/' .7799Â«9Â«949Â«5 i' til< j lÂ«l ////il///l///l////l jj / ~Â«04Â«40 .illl'll'lll -numuuumiI/dullii i//i/JU/4/ trotÂ«_ -jÂ»ju ///////f// / /~\U=kiwiLito / /t/ /. /7Â» lilli //lillilll//////th. LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL AREA CALCULATIONS (SF) AREA LEGEND EXISTING (SF) NET LEASABLE AREA 14 /11/1 1\\1/ // 3\ fiÂ«X\-h / mqÂ¢*979 /////A LOWER LEVEL 3,498 ~ NET LEASABLE AREA F 8 _vtlf- (lill_dlitili-t MAIN LEVEL 3,472 UPPER LEVEL 2,604 7 1 TOTAL EXISTING (SF) 9,574 ~ COMMON AREA 4 -- LOWER LEVEL 3,498 PROPOSED (SF) 111 H ==- /4-/4Ht --- MAIN LEVEL 3,472 UPPER LEVEL 2,823 = TOTAL PROPOSED (SF) 9,793 Ed EXISTING - PROPOSED 9,793 - 9,574 = 223 fLLd l/ll lf/AN (223 < 500 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE) NET LEASABLE DIFFERENCE = 223 SF 1, //Â«///////1 UPPER LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA - EXISTING SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss ARCH']ECIURE-1.ANNING (0 @ 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 NORTH ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. LJ 11111111 L </11.11 lilli 1 - 1- 43] -19.t~ I ////73Â« 0 -- LI J I ....... //il //1 / ;Ii Iilittl lilii lif i Iif i%41 T illilli Il '//l /(Aud /////74//l/.1 ~fÂ»24-1---1. '1--lAl7-1 1-FFF-J ilill//i,li Il 11 111'lut lijill 1/////// /V. â€¢,*, f .\9/44//.f, T *4; bi-. A Iii- jillilli~i9fettiliffiilllilllllii-fultit 4 L LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL 1 L .'... M 1 1 11 AREA CALCULATIONS (SF) AREA LEGEND / ///1////llt EXISTING (SF) NET LEASABLE AREA LOWER LEVEL 3.498 ~ NET LEASABLE AREA 1 LIE 'WA MAIN LEVEL 3,472 \ 74 / / tudy / / / ArbR i UPPER LEVEL 2,604 U - . 4-*N flf//Illa Â« TOTAL EXISTING (SF) 9,574 ~ COMMON AREA 1 / PROPOSED (SF) LOWER LEVEL 3,498 MAIN LEVEL 3,472 UPPER LEVEL 2,823 N./ /1/1 14441/ 41Â£1 /NUUJ ~ TOTAL PROPOSED (SF) 9,793 Â»-LL// /77*T/Tt //jUffÂ»-f///-9-l/////2- 21 EXISTING - PROPOSED 9,793 - 9,574 = ~dr , 4004/4~JI<"5~ 223 'j //ll l // li lill /1 7-UFf-O- - NET LEASABLE DIFFERENCE = 223 SF (223 < 500 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE) 1//1 UPPER LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA - PROPOSED SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado ~ O S S \R CH ' f E l,1 O R Â· i ANNI Nii (3 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 NORTH 06.12.15 ~ ~ Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. 1 ALLEY HYMAN AVE ' EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING WALKWAY _ PROPERTY LINE ! J I 1- EXISTING -Â·-Â·--4-A- DUMPSTER l-_4_-_----------- i jl ---0 _ _ --- Il Pfru TO REMAIN 1 [ i 11 '11 E-7-11 1 1 1 1 4 -11 Iri]I E 1 L 1 1 1 11 1 1 la 1 1 1 10 'LD 1 - 1 1 0 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /- PROPERTY LINE 1 11-iin L I OF 1 1 . 11 __1_-LE_____________- 1Â» 100' - 0" ADJACENT BUILDING I 1 1 SITE PLAN - EXISTING, NO CHANGE SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COtORADC 81611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, (T) 970/925 4755 (f) 970/920 2950 NORTH 06.12.15 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. EXISTING STAI R TO REMAIN -~~~~~ EXISTING ATRIUM, OPEN TO ABOVE - -' A .Â«-4 2 -1 -- A A u#&34 1 NEW 18' SMOKE CURTAIN ABOVE LIFT < I - 1 0 L EX I ST I NG ATRIUM ~ T.0. FIN. FLR 89' OFFICE STORAGE V.I.F. ~002 ~ 003 ~ FlI ~ 001 I 1 1 1 U HALL ,-STORAG E-sc.~ ~~~7 007 ~ \11 008 1 1 -1 1 I TREATMENT TREATMENT TREATMENT TREATMENT ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM HALL OFFICE BATH ~ 9 Y I 018 ~ ~ 019 I ~ ~ 004 ~ 006 ~ 1 009 1 - L .7 2 \1/ ~ T.0. FIN. FLR 89' - 9 27 8 : V. I.F. BATH - I 010 I UE MECH. 3 0 - 0 d ~ 012 ~ : TREATMENT TREATMENT STORAGE ROOM AREA 011 ~ ~015 I ~013 ~ C=-1 11 TREATMENT 41 41 8 1 AREA ~ 005 ~ U.C: TREATMENT OffÂ· -< - ROOM ~014 I W/E ICE 7/7/YXXW Xxx LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING - NO CHANGE SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review poss ARCHITECTURE - PI ANNING (3 -/6 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 605 EAST MAIN STR[ET ASPEN, ColoRADO B 1611 NORTH 0 4 8 16 06.12.15 |~ (T)97D/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. r- REMOVE EXISTING STAIR TO UPPER f ~ LEVEL AND REPLACE WITH NEW ~) NEW STAIR ------- Â»---~<> < 0 DN NEW RAILING -mr---* 93 7- - - , . LIF-7 --ly l.1.~i\1~1 ' - OFFICE OFFICE /t= Nup ABOVE .32' 74 'j -- NEW 18" SMOKE 1 NEW WINDOW --~ 1 T.O. GRADE 1C~' - O" 7 V.I.F, Â«Uff/ CURTAIN ABOVE 13Â« NEW DOOR -# - -4 EXISTING 1 T. . IN. R 100' - 0" NEW RESIN , ATRIUM V. I.F. WINDOW %111 <--L -109-1 - - 1 T.O. FIN. FLR 100' - O" .LlyÂ·\11'1:A /1, IEr~ U - IF 0 -7 9 -4 3' V.1.F, V DN Upi) I Â¢ T.0. ASPHALT 99' - 6" OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE HALL 0 V. I.F. |113 1 -h |114| ~ |115| | 103 | 104 | .Â«-, \1/ M U 11 OFFICE VESTIBULE STORAGE 112 | ~111 ~ - | 108| < t NEW RESIN INDOW SILL C E - f/1 - -f--i VESTIBULEN_ 1109 1 /31 k ~--BATH 4-3-7 -- | 105 | GI~ OFFIC STORAG L /1 GALLERY ~ T.0. FIN. FLR 100' - 0" V. I.F. 110 ~ | 107 ~ | 106 | MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE 1/8" = 190" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review I 7 poss ARCHITECHIRE PI ANNING * i i BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 1 -1 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 NORTH 0 4 8 16 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. 1 j 111111111111111111 44-4 - 7 1111 11 ~i~ 1 111 lilli 11111111* 1 7- ==0 1~ h Ill'll'lll'Illl'll DN ,/ \\ lili - - lili lilli! A I 31 i 11 14 11 OPEN Â«649- / 4 1 TO BELOW- j : 31 i REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW - 1-AND REPLACE WITH NEW -~ AND REPLACE WITH NEW REMOVE EXISTING AWNINGS ii W/ HALF WALL AN D REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW REPLACE WITH NEW I AND REPLACE WITH NEW 1 _.~0 ~ T.0. FIN. FLR 111' - 911 1 11 /11 \ 12 L V. I.F. 1 11/ n 11 - L -----------Tl-- 317 b 1 .11 13=L 1 ~ 11 iiI REMOVE EXISTING DOOR- I 11 r\ AND REPLACE WITH NEW -0 - 1 \ m---- D N 1 31 0 1 1 d 'Fl-11 E- -1 + T.0. DECK 113' - 8" T.0. FIN. FiLR 112' - 3" 1- 3\ lilli / /\ V.I.F. /1//1 ~ VIE -__1 /Ul i L) 10 1 U J 1 1 \ 1 1 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR i 1 | AND REPLACE WITH NEW -~ 7 q 1 N~// / h 1 4 1~ Ld ~L__Il _ __ 1 1 1--P F-7- Â£ Al 025 1 1 FIE-7-I K /irn 1 / L/\-U 1 / REMOVE EXISTING DOOR --_-__-_--_-_-1- -Â©----IV AND REPLACE WITH NEW -7 / 11 E -1 XI <all I i 4 1 1 11 W L /1//1 11 1 1 11 1 1 4 1 1 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR 1 I 1 1 AND REPLACE WITH NEW - 4 1 Ill 1 41 11 I rd . 1 025. ---1 ~ ~ EXISTING DECK TO REMAIN / | | ~\%- 74/71 ~ 0-1 lili 1 -IlL / REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW ji l 1 it-=1] \ /0 11 91]11 AND REPLACE WITH NEW ~li EXISTING PLANTER TO REMAIN =1 Â«+4__11 --- rr X X . .... I I Â· hit AA UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/ DEMO SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss ARCHITH' 1 URE PLANNING (3 I I BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Zoning Review 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NORTH 0 4 8 16 06.12.15 ~~ (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P C. -LIt Iht -lit -ilti 1 1 lt- --lll- -Ill- -lit- ~ T.0. FIN. FLR 112'-3" V.I.F. 1 ~ T.O. FIN. FLR 101' -O" 1 ~ V. I.F. ti 1 1 ~ Â·- ~7~Â£ F.2~9Â»/4 IDN ~ Flq~/E | 208 I BATH ~DN i . 1 T.O. FIN. FLR 100' - O" O\1> 1 -ALtj Li~ TOY 7 V.I.F. li STO. EXISTING I 1 oPEN TQ~hfc>,1 PROVISION |207| BELOW~~ ATRIUM FOR FUTURE . - 1 .....Â£6/1,Â£:SIEJ ~201 \ ELEVATOR / Â¥ RECEPTION - ==bÂ»~ L,Li' ''~ - | 203 | U :<ADS---- 1407.-0 CABINETS ~ 1111 ~ 11.11.11 ,~fil LL| |y=i_ m -- r\\\1///-1 m ~ f L- FILE STAIRE OFFICE |222| LG. STO.-7 ---~DN| 206 1 9 01 C~ HALL --- CONFERENCE 1 209 1 7% l J- /\ L 3 SHELF UNIT L_ 1 219 1 ___ |204 | ' F---------JI = ~ HALL 0 :Il ___ - 17 -I- -p'|~1 ~ r -- ~ 210 I CABINETS ~ 4 -~ L -_ COPY , 1 T.O. FIN. FLR 113' - 8" ~ ~ T,0. FIN. FLR 112' - 3" I 7 V.I.F. V.I.F. ~211 ~ UP //1-- C L r NICHE FOR T V 1 OFFICE 0 ~~----77 , 1 1.9 CABINETS 1 EXISTING DECK |221 ~ r f \\ TO REMAIN 2 | | D.vy. PU ~ REF. ----1-,) SHELF UNIT - ~~~~~~~~<~~~ ~~~~,~~<~~~~<~~ 1 2 \ : HALL OFFICE ---------il ~'~ED Up :1 F , - L ~ 210 ~ - |212| 0 rtill ----1:-T-70 - DEFINE PATH OF _~ EGRESS PER CODE L.1 CABINETS i - P lit '1 - KITCHEN |215| NICHE FOR f 1 - j CONFERENCE OFFICE 48" T.V. _ 220 | </9 SM. SHELF UNIT ~-, |213 | - EXISTING PLANTER ~ COMPUTER 214 | UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss MR(.Lt ILl,Iljki IANNING j i i CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 NORTH 0 4 8 16 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. IF--1[ 9 /0 'I'C ? p "r--'C >1url REMOVE SLOPE AT ROOF AND EXTEND MIDDLE EPDM PORTION TO LEVEL OUT ROOF W/ CONSIDERATION FOR DRAINAGE x / 1 , I- L r h#'' < 111 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11.. 0 11 0 - 11 11 11 LLC, 0 . 11 .0 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 EXISTING [ 11 11 76 /1 iSKYLIGHTS 11 1 'TO REMAIN 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1~ 11 11 , 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 .0â‚¬r --Ii ~ 11 11 11 11 11 It )11 4 11 11 11 11 /4 11 11 / 11 11 11 11 11 Â¢/1~ 11 11 11 E--1 11 11 11 \ 1~ REMOVE | AM- '' SKYJ'AHT ' ' " l|* MI REM 11 11 C 1, 1' 1 ~SKYLIGHT 1 1/ / 11 11 </ 11 11 11 Lj 11 3 11 11 11 11 N 11 11 11/ 11 11 111 21 2 ------~---- ----OJ 11 11 11 11 LI 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 Ill 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 11 111 1 1 11 11 j 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 -J 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1~ 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 111 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 IL i 11 DECK BELOW ii ii 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 -~\ 1 111 11 - 11 11 11 111 -3 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 ' 1 REMOVE 11 11 11 11 1 11 ~2 -3 SKYLIGHT 1 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 19 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 Il Il Il Il _LI_____ I 11 -11-_-LI_---_ I0 1 11 11 11 11 A 1 11 11 11 11 11 It 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 111 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 Ill 11 11 11 11 11 11 111 1 11 11 11 11 lili 111 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 Il 1 11 11 11 11 11 'll 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 Ill 11 REMOVE 11 REMOVE 11 11 11 li 1 11 11 C ~ SKYLIGHTI ~~- ~~ SKYLIGHT~ ~ 11 11 11 11 11 11 1~ 1.11 11 11 2-1 12-1 11 11 f 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1~ 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 'j 11: REMOVE ii ii ii 11 11 1~ 11 SKYLIGHT' ' '' '' '' '' 11 11 11 11 11 19 7 ~~2 10 11 11 11 11 1 1Â»-A- 11 11 11 ROOF PLAN - EXISTING SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss AR<.Hllt(}TORI PLANNINI- (~* i @2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review ~ ~ EAST MA 1N STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 4 8 16 06.12.15 1-1 {T' 970/925 4755 ')970/92D 2950 NORTH 0 ARCHIETURE AND PLANNING, P C. r 1 T.O. ROOF rn- :trirl i 1-1' irl,1-'11 r'iÂ· i;i'Tr-1'1 reil irry,-11 13- rr,1 2 m ,iIiÂ·i Â· iÂ·i Â·41'i i i 1'â€¢1,16'ITT 1 1 rl irl,;'11 r-" 'rl'l _ T EL. 126' oil +A 1-Ill-i' 1 "- Il-v' 1*1' 111â€¢11'1~ 11*41 "1- F.!I~~ 11'.111 rl Il'FIT-1-1 911 , *i lat''ll 61 I *TN ' V 1 4 f I ; 1 1 &1 1 (.t.l I l 1 1 1 [911 1 ! (11 1 1 rl i t ' Tr.7 i 1 1.11 1 p= 4 /1 ; 31' 11 ti + r'11 1 iM. &-1 t ri r) I mtil,1 'Art fir; '!! 1,",! rtfitr,~11~1'11 ry~Â¢ 7'~ 'fi'Ai~ -,~ ir tr*t:7*iÂ»!, 412-r AY*tri.rT&,~~ il,t,ttl;~~3 11-1!ity[.~Zif~B73,-fi-i2Â«1ir Â«9,-. :'7 t'l'. f=16*i j..4 4.1, I I. . .* + L e . *. 4- 4 2 - 9 Â». L 4 .- r .. e.. , , '43 - k . .. j. , - 1 I ' I- I I .42. ID . - Gl * T.O. FIN. FLR @ MAIN LEVEL . i EL. 100' - O" EXISTING 1 T.O. ROOF 7 EL. 126' - 0" +A 1 4 6,41 fl 'Â·Â· - 1,1 IA i' / 1, -1 -1 -y n .f 1 g iliti T.2 . ' -- 44 $ ...i :429.91 j.Â¥,i 4 t.4~50 7% f . - , t . S h A. 7 14 --- + .j . V. I e Ae 46 .. 1 - 04 . ' . I. I. . EMN Uj Â© . lilli 4 1 T.O. FIN. FLR @ MAIN LEVEL . d I W ..8 T EL. 100' - O" PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 616 EAST HYMAN SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss RCHI i F CHIRE PLANN IN l-1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIA1ES, 06.12.15 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PIANNING, P.C. - 1 T.O. ROOF 7 EL. 126' - 0" +/- I' ' <.f' I t i IM 1 1 1/f i i T â€ž1 ., "7 1.1.4.*Â¥ 0 9 i , 41'41 il 411 41'1 11 tr' fi t 1. .. 11 .; '711 'ji'.I 13~'1~+ fi.il~7.1.1: 1,',vi~~xv r 'Yv~|JAS 11 "Â·t 'E~A i'*23 , I.22=*2 F,"" -17 :1:28, iv--Lf. Fir:=Fria .1 11 1 I i 1:. I., 1-1 1. 11 1 '-, J, T.O. FIN. FLR @ MAIN LEVEL %,4 %* 12/limilikill................AL- -ignz-21* *41~~A T EL. 100' - 0" EXISTING ="Il 1 T.O. ROOF T EL. 126' - 0" +A - Fet 1. 1/ a 4 -4 . 4 ;14-2 4%2 41 + 4.1*%*21 I. I. 3 1 1. f 3 It< ' 'Â· i 0 .. 41'*k 4 ~> 1%- . i . . *u. 2 'k r,.. i (':. EA-j~hai f,EÂ·'4 -4+IA ,fi Â· i, .iÂ©:Â£ *0~ 2 . I ./. 0 ,. 0 1/2,5 . 1., ; 1 4 11. 1 - i . . 1 2Â¢ - - 4 e- ~ T.O. FIN. FLR @ MAIN LEVEL 1 44 -4-1- - J-~- Â·Â· ' EL, 100'- 0" ,-- PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss ARCHITECTUR[ :3LANNING CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 (T) 970/925 4755 IF)970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. - 1 h' 1 \ \\L y 57: F-- 3 \ 1 5 - 1 - - -- .4. \ --, - ./-- 1 -/\ \ 1. tb \NE_ -I-- \ --- PA 1 - \ 5 1 /-h\* . Nk , U.... fe. E-1-- - --h. 1 11 - ---- 7 \ / L---Â·-- -1 <21 / 1 L,/8 - 1 - -*t' 7 --- 1 / - 1 I V .. .L / ? 2% . 50$44* \ / .U , . % . A & Z1rÂ·-ch 10,0-- I I 1 -tit:.9 4 r T \ Â· Â·1 '- ti ' +44':9 - EXISTING 1-- 1 -OXÂ«> - ----4 X<<-22Â» - 1 L --- -3,0-/4 1 ---, 'Â»~ -h - / :.....* 61- 1 1 Â»41 1 1 L -/-1 1 1 11 Al -11 n /1 $-* -----IN\ + -$ / . ru - / - 1 \ ' 1 /1 //Â« \ * 4. *'* 1 ~rÂ«*2 Efi ~~~sr, -ic i:J",b-- + 4 --- :Â·'\. 5:j.Jit. Â»'~ f I. / 44:â€¢CP?4 Â·Â· ... , .. PROPOSED BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM WEST NTS 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss iRCHITECTUR[ PLANNING CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 0612.15 ~ (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. ,=3331 1 -21-- ---I-- / / // a-4-7 r-4-- 1 f> kix /// --- --4.---- Y. L 0.--9-%--.- 7 8Â«-4-C-1.- --- k.- it tull.- - --- --i , - / r \ * --- 244, Â«.2... Â£ , 4 I - 3~ i --. i-- - 1-- --- '0$:2 â€¢Â·- --- --4 i- 4 .:pt 2.44 9 * I. - 1 . . 42 -hy#x:&54 -qi - I EWEÂ·Â·C 1.-- \ Imp- I \ 4- t. 4.1 .- . EXISTING --------- 1 -id 7 f< K --34- 7// /7 --- / Â£ LE_ \ , -1--- / *--- ./ 9---- I ---- / / / 2 f --------- *--- - 5 1 - L - Â£ --J -- .-i \ 449* I - 1-1 r---4< ' 1 ' -< 9 ; -j:V:Â· \-./>24 6 4,4,4 4 -+ - -1/-7 ri R..3 .*%-)/99"..ilp7/1 -911 \ Â·-qu-4 0- - 47. k PROPOSED BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM EAST NTS 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado P!!3 3:T~.fl;SHEET ASPEN. COLORADO 01611 H! T r (' 1 U RI- pl ANNING CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review I El Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12,15 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. I f - . % .3- I 32 I E/.. I .1 - , , I 1 -d -â€žt I -1 I I - I.,1 4 ' . . Â¢ 4- 1 - ! r .. i. ' r . M ..2 ./ 4. n. 7 / 2.-1. : I. - -- -Int EXISTING /-3 I I I i _ ~_ 1 / L . & , lit . 1 4 ~ 7 2 3 4 , 4 1 41Â¢ 14' L .. L 1 UL Â· t I I L -5 3 t *' 9 .S- . PROPOSED ENTRY PERSPECTIVE 616 EAST HYMAN NTS 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado pOSS AR{ 41 1[f 11]Ri 1 ANNING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review I El 605 EAST 11AIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12,15 (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. . 3 L --1'-L-1 - -I - *--'"Lr.-- :I -7 p *-7' I - " " 1 . . 1 T...& 11 ' - / f '12: iwl :f'.0 . * 1 - , a ellir A .j 1 *11 - 494 -1 2, kI ..... 4 1 1 . + 1- V i//6/ 1- ' . .- *LI; 1 <t EXISTING 11"talitiliblij14 0,"1,-1,"liT#*1/iliol~it'IM1311*ZIEA-Ed "111:r:5<'93"11":92 3'me*7 4%3*. 3 1 1 . % I." rÂ»---piw . . 4 ' #Cr ../ . %, ...i,-- 1 - -*. k . ..,.1.-/6 - -- . 4 . Â» .0 / . t Â·UL. PROPOSED FRONT PERSPECTIVE NTS 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado DOSS ARCHITECTUR E {- 1 ANNING @ 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review I El I 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 {T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. - 7-4 .1 V I. I al ..1 7 . 9 .2 1,1 1, I - Il i d #,0-1 +A La , 9, 2 EXISTING Rt=-2.="*2= 122=1 -<*22= f ~ ~ ---1_ ~~ *.'./.tri-SWW.'..'- L I -//r-.--/. PROPOSED EAST PERSPECTIVE NTS 616 EAST HYMAN 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado poss RCHITECTURE PLANNING Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, CONCEPTUALDESIGN Zoning Review 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 06.12.15 ~~ (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 295D ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. lit , 319<t i 4'. . EXISTING '-1-li22-7-7- All.'-W:-- 1 Fl# i--- - .....1 ..a--za-- 1 1- ./1-4 f , 1 Fi~.Fliz"'ll'-I'l- 1 4 W/////M//////////////// ' CÂ·' i- i: -I. ,9- a; '41*diw",m.<.4//DUL r PROPOSED WEST ALLEY PERSPECTIVE 616 EAST HYMAN NTS 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado ~OSS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review I El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 01611 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 1 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. k. I 1- m LI . . , . e 4 ' .A-- - EXISTING 1.-_ ----1Â· RK/:14.4-1 -7-] Â£.I- 1 t - - 11 1 .1 1 JIL M 1,1 11 t- it F â‚¬ i J * | Wn~lit-i-78 & 2 ~Â©~~>t 1 14Â® M "-zz= -- 1 - .,B> I ' w -6 1-fr-zÂ· .T .* 5' & 5,~*t PA#: *1~~- 4 1 1 1 i 1 PROPOSED EAST ALLEY PERSPECTIVE 616 EAST HYMAN NTS 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado ~OSS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN : Zoning Review i El 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 Â® 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, 06.12.15 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. ........ LEGEND AND NOTES 4 /792 O SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX, FOUND UTILITIES IN R.O.W. SURVEY CONTROL e-~-O FENCE -7921 7 FRUIT TREE 11!IV Q LIGHT POST THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X- (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A., FOR ARKING PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08097C0204 C, EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 1987 7921 8 THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD 1--10 AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963, FIGURE ES-15. ~ MANHOLE 0 10 20 WATER IS IN HYMAN AVENUE ALL OTHER UTILITIES IN ALLEY ALLEY TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. (20+ BL ock CASE NO. PCT22283P3 EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 4, 2015 ~21-2-SET 0.5 R.0 WITNESS CORNER .W.) 99 ELEVATIONS BASED ON ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 5 ELEV - 7915.94 (1988 NAVD) PAVED DISK 25147 BUILDING BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 94 (9184) AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 99 (9184) (N75'09'11-W) 7923.0 -~93% ZONING: Cl COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON PROPERTY S 75.09.It. --6Â£#67*76 --- LINE 6 60 02 7922.1---. YELLOW VICINITY MAP 1 :AVED 12707 -1 1 t- ~,~N . . -1 /N BUILDING . .v; GAP BETWEEN - Na 9 BUILDING 0.7 - le . SILL 60.0 O -- 4 .Â· i. 7924.4 ELEC . 00- i ... I . . '. -- % SILL 7924.3 ... I f GAP BETWEEN 4 - i 4 ... BUILDING 0.7 00 .. ... t 00 . 1 ... 8.16 N 8 CITY OF ASPEN o v ASEI JOB GPS MONUMENT P AÂ° NO. I 9065A NO. 5 9 2 ST 0 2 BUILd?RY NG VIEW PLANE - NO. 1 P 7971.11 i NO VIEW PLANE BUILDING 0 U') BUILDING ~ ' CERTIFICATION 19 - e THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED 9 DURING ,-,A-/ 1212 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE F I ELD EV I DENCE AS 0 ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME SHOWN, AND THAT THERE'ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, SILL 6j 'g.4 / 7924.0 0 EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES, o AND DOCUMSMSSSNN~ECORD NOT SUPPL IED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THI S SURVEY S IS VO I [10,#Ul.*DO 6062Kbi~AMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW . SURVEY PRECISION 22./IS LE~*~JR#468 fiA'RELD, -U -1| E-) 0.0 W 40HN . 410\VORTH', -P .2.Â§ 25947 CONC 90.03 #7 ' 1 9.. ..60 COURTAA 42>..~ vose f ~ -- C,i,AL LAND VIEW PLANEÂ· YELLOW Â· r 24303 VIEW PLANE ' VIEW PLANe NO. 1 -Â· NO. 1 / 7 73.28 #f 7923.7 7974.10 ~ SILL 0/ 7924.4 N 75'09 ROOF BUILDING // 7939.4 P VERS 0.1 ./- 6.02 SILL ENCROACHES AWNING 40.8 7924.5 1 Ube BRICK PAVERS 7924.3 CONC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AWNING oF 7923 6 STAND'~ SET I' S LOTS N AND O, 8ACK OF 7923.7 CURB CONTAINING: 6,002 SO FT ./-, 0.138 ACRES â€¢/- .A PIPE CORNER DISK BLOCK 99, O 25947 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN 7923.8 STATE OF COLORADO. COUNTY OF PITKIN, BRICK PAVERS If 744 AT * 4,0 AV ENUE 7923.9 (74.80' 7923.9 R.0.*.1 CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 2 PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 A PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 c~ NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS WWW.ASPENSURVEYENGINEERS.COM AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN JOB DATE YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERT IFI CAT ION IS VO ID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 05/15 42115 SURVEYOR. ........ 1 /1/0/-/dle /0 -- 5,04/91// P// 5 L Ally}*Â£/2 , aCVS t,O 91Nkl