Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Pardee/Weedum ~ r") ,. n MEMORANDU~I TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Aspen City Council Alice Davis, Planning Office Hill House Condominium Subdivision Exception - Lot Split March 1,1982 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ Location: 707 Gibson Avenue Zoning: R-15/PUD Lot Size: 82,459 square feet Applicant's Request: City Attorney: The applicant is requesting a subdivision exception for a lot split on a 82,459 square foot parcel of land pursuant to Section 24-11.2(d) of the Code. The City Attorney commented that the lot split should be reviewed according to Section 24-11.2(d) of the Code. Engi neeri ng Department: The Engineering Department has noted several minor items that arelllissing from the plat that should be added or changed before the recording of the final plat. These items are discussed in' ., the attached memorandum from the Engineering Department and_.._~..J'1 include information'YegardlYi1j' easement' boun-wl es, reference '" to the Hill House Condominium, the Certification of Ownership .~ and the Certificate of Dedication. I Planning Office Review: The request for a lot split should be reviewed according to Section 24-11.2(d) of the Code which allows a lot split as an exception from GMP procedures. Section 24-11.2(d) allows a lot split provided that: . 1. The tract of land which is being divided has a pre- existing dwelling, and 2. No more than two lots are created. The Planning Office review shows that there is an existing duplex on the tract of land being divided which will be located on a 43,211 square foot lot after the lot split occurs (Lot 1). The newly created lot will be a 47,829 square foot lot and can only be developed with a single-family residence (Lot 2). The subject property is in a mandatory PUD overlay district and is subject to the requirements of Section 24-8.13 of the Code, entitled "Mandatory PUD". The City Council can, however, deter- mine that the proposed lot split meets the objectives of a planned unit development, and allow an exception from mandatory PUD. The Planning Office has evaluated this lot split according to the requirements of mandatory PUD, Section 24-8.13. After the slope reduction formula is applied to the subject parcels, the lot sizes are 31,239 square feet (Lot 1) and 39,622 square feet (Lot 2), both conforming lots in the R-30 zone district, therefore slope is not an issue. It should be noted that the construction of a single family residence is exempt from mandatory PUD requirements. The proposed lot split creates one new lot which can only be used for the construction of a single- family residence. 'eo'.,.":,-,.., "'~'",.'F,""h' <:;;<.J ,r ,~~1i Memo: Hill House Page Two March 1, 1982 Planning Office and P & Z Recommendation: Council Action: 1'1 ~ Condominium Subdivision Exception - Lot Split The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office recommend the approval of the Hill House Condominium Lot Split. Approval is sUbject to the condition that all additions and changes that have been recommended by the Engineering Depart- ment be made. Approval to exempt this lot split from mandatory PUD requirements is also recommended since only a single family structure can be developed as a result of the lot split. If Council agrees with the P & Z and Planning Office recommenda- tion the appropriate motion is as follows: "I move to grant approval of the Hill House Condomi ni um Lot S lit. Approval is subject to the condition that the c anges lnvo vlng easemen oun (irlE!s ,reference to tne Hill House Condomini um; the Certifi cati on of Ownershi p and the Certificate of Dedication which have been recommended by the Engineering Department be made by the applicant and approved by Engineering prior to final recordation." ! J ./ j r-" (') MEMORANDUM DATE: Alice Davis, Planning Office Louis Buettner, Engineering Departmen~ February 9, 1982 TO: FROM: RE: Hill House Condominium Lot Spilt ------------------------------------------------------------ After reviewing the above application plat and making field inspections, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. The LauLainen Subdivision exception for a lot line adjustment should be reviewed at the same time as this application. 2. This is the 4th application involving this property. a. pardee's development, a lot line adjustment, Council Minutes 3/15/77. b. Wedum/Pardee, Hill House Condominium Council Minutes 6/26/78. change. now. c. LauLainen Subdivision exception for lot line This is before the Planning and Zoning Commission d. This application is for a lot spilt. The following information is missing and needs to be shown on the plat for consideration of this application: v 1. The property slope' areas (zones) are needed as the property is subject to slope reduction. 2. The Spring Street Easement is not shown. This easement was recorded on the Hill House Condominium Plat. 3. The Gibson Avenue right-of-way was dedicated on the Hill House Condominium P1C\t. This right-of-way has been added to both lots in error. The right-of-way being dedicated is no longer part of the property. The areas of the lots should be: Lot 1, 0.843 acres + Lot 2, 1.05 acres + r-; (') February 9, 1982 Page 2 Hill House Condominium Lot Spilt 4. The public utility easement that traverses Lot 2 (North-South) as shown needs described, and continued across the added LauLainen's property. The easement needs to be extended Southerly for the 5.9 feet. 5. The building site is required to be shown per the zoning (PUD). 6. The floodplain limits needs to be shown. 7. Adjoining subdivision lot line needs to be shown, as dotted lines. The unplatted property adjoining should be marked as such. Property owner should be shown for all adjoining property. 8. Reference to Hill House Condominium should be made in the written description. The Hill House Condominium is a recorded subdivision and part of this new subdivision. 9. Description of any survey monument found or set should be on the plat. 10. The Certificate of Ownership should comply with Section 20-15 (j) of the Aspen Municipal Code. 11. The applicant's Certificate of Dedication should comply with Section 20-15 (e) of the Asepn Municipal Code. 12. The City approval and acceptance should comply with Section 20-15 (1) of the Aspen Municipal Code. 13. The ties to the existing building are not sufficient to locate the building. 14. The LauLainen application for his lot line adjustment, shows a access easement across the Easterly portion of Lot 2. 15. This plat shows the LauLainen lot line adjustment as being approved. This mayor may not require correction. If the lot line adjustment is approved, no correction will be required. 16. The Northerly boundary of each lot will need described. This Northerly boundary is the South right-of-way boundary of dedicated Gibson Avenue. 17. qJ.ct LB/co j .f~ r-\ . [) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office RE: Hill House Condominium Subdivision Exception - Lot Split DATE: February 10, 1982 Location: 707 Gibson Avenue Zoning: Lot Size: Applicant's Request: City Attorney: Engineering Department: Planning Office Review: ----- R-15 - PUD 82,459 square feet The applicant is requesting a subdivision exception for a lot split on a 82,459 square foot parcel of land pursuant to Section 24-11.2(d) of the Code. The City Attorney commented that the lot split should be reviewed according to Section 24-11. 2 Cd) of the Code. The Engineering Department has noted several i.tems that are missing from the plat that should be added or changed before fInal plat approval. These items are discussed in the attached memorandum from the Engineering Department and incl ude i.nfor- mation regarding three uni.ndentified easements, adjoi ning subdivision lot li.nes, lot sizes, the building site, survey .monuments, the Certification of Ownership and the Certificate of Dedication. Also i.nformation regarding the slope of the property and the location of the floodplain needs to be provided as part of mandatory PUD requirements. The request for a lot spli.t should be reviewed according to Secti.on 24-11.2(d) of the Code which allows a lot split as an exception from GMP procedures. Section 24-11. 2 (d) allows a lot spli.t provided that: 1. The tract of 1 and which is being divided has a pre-existing dwe 11 ing, and . 2. No more than two lots are created. The Planning OffIce review shows that there i.s an existing duplex on the tract of land being divided which wi.ll be located on a 43,211 square foot lot after the lot sp li. t occurs (Lot 1). The newly created lot wi.ll be a 47,829 square foot lot and can on ly be developed with a s ingl e-family residence (Lot 2). . . The subject property is in a .mandatory PUD overlay district and is subject to the requirements of Section 24-8.13 of the Code, entitled "Mandatory PUD". The Planning and Zoning Commission Can, howeVer, determine that the proposed lot split meets the objectives of a planned unit development, and allow an exception from mandatory PUD. The Planning Office has evaluated this lot spli.t according to the requirements of mandatory PUD, Section 24-8.13. After the s.lope reduction formula is applied to the s.ubject parcels, the lot sizes are 31,239 square feet (Lot 1) and 39,622 square feet CLot 2), both conforming lots in the R-30 zone district, therefore slope is not an issue. It should be noted that the construction of a single family residence i.s exempt from manda- tory PUD requirements. The proposed lot split creates one new lot which can only be used for the construction of a single- family residence. '~ Memo: Hill House Page Two February 10, 1982 Planning Office Recommendation: t"" , n \0: . ',> Condominium Subdivision Exception - Lot Split The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to City Council the approval of the Hill House Condominium Lot Split. Approval is subject to the condi- tion that all additions and changes that have been recommended by the Engineering Department be made by the appl icant and approved by the Engineering Department prior to review by City Council. The Planning Office also recommends approval to exempt this lot split from mandoryPUD requirements since only a single family structure can be developed as a result of the lot split. ^ 1'1 Mr. Alan Richman City and County Planning Dept. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 December 22, 1981 Dear Alan: This is an application for a lot split for the property owned by the Hill House Homeowners Association. As you know section 24-ll.2(d) of the Aspen Municipal Code allows a lot split to be exempted from the Growth Management Plan. In the instant case there is an exist- ing duplex on the property, a single family home will be constructed on the new lot. The attached statement from Jim Reser of Alpine Surveys indicates that each of the resulting lots contains over 30,000 square feet after deducting for slope reduction. I have also attached title policy information from Aspen Title and TransAmerica Title which indicate that the property is owned in fee simple by the Hill House Homeowners Association. I should point out that the parcel marked "B"has always been a part of the Hill House property, however, problems with the chain of title prevented us from including it with the other property. We have now cleared up the problem and have title insurance from Aspen Title indicating that said parcel is owned in fee simple by the Hill House Homeowners Association. The survey included shows the boundries of the entire parcel and the lots to be divided. Should you have and questions please don't hesitate to call me at 925-8737. Sincer Q;j Pardee President Hill House Homeowners Assoc. Box 4153 Aspen, CO 81612 .r--, Alpine Surveys 414 North Mill Street Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2688 February 9, 1982 Ci ty Hall Alice Davis Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Alice: r; ~,""""\~'--i r"l ,.....,"n.~c-- ~ OI"C;"".,.,t""',r (/'. """n~ .; tJ r~J.L~j.x:~'~~Ji~L~'~:,/j ,~.::~ j! ~( \,: i I !L ,; II , . Flo""' .,""'........ ~;' ~ , tQ 1 ( ~CL(?;II ..i.J' .... h..'.""'_. dU' .____.~jC:::J 'It, ASPEN I PiTKIN CO. ~ flANNING OffiCE t. ' After reviewing my topographic maps of Laulainen and Hill House Condo's, I find that Laulainen is getting land probably under 20% slope and is giving up land in the 30% to 40% range. JFR/ml Sincerely yours, //~) ~",,'o''' ~r6..{;fjpt~~ t 13-s" F. Reser , r", t") MEMORANDUM DATE: Alice Davis ,'pHinnIngO:fEice Louis Buettner, Engineering Departme~~ 2/22/82 TO: FROM: Re: Hill House Condominium Lot Spilt (Revised Plat) --------------------------------------------------------------- Having reviewed the revised plat for the above, the Engineering Department finds the following has not been corrected. 1. The Spring Street easement has now been shown but no descri- ption of the boundaries or centerline has been indicated. 2. The applicant's Certificate of Dedication and the Certificate of Approval has not been corrected. The certificate should read more lIke the followIng: CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP The Hill House Condominium Association being the owner(s) of the certain lands described hereon, located within the CIty of Aspen, pitkin County, Colorado, have by these presents laid out platted and subdivided the same into lots as shown on this plat under the name of Hill House Condominium lot spilt and do hereby dedicate- and re-dedicate to the public all rights-of-way and easements shown hereon for public use. Executed this day of ,19 Hill House Condominium Association By: J.L. Pardee, President There should be a Notary Public Certificate also for the Certificate of Dedication and ownership signature. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF ASPEN This acknowledges and evidences approval of the Application of Declarant, Hill House Condominium Association, for exception from the definition of subdivision by virtue of the action of the City Council of the City of Aspen taken at a duly constituted meeting held the day of , 19 pursuant to the Aspen Municipal Code. "' 1""'\ r\ ,.! Page 2 2/22/82 Hill House Condominium Lot Spilt -(Revised Plat) This also evidences the acceptance of the dedication and re- dedication of rights-of-way and easements shown hereon to the public use. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor, City of Aspen 3. Reference to Hill House Condominium is inadequate, as it does not make reference to the former platting of the property. Replace the last 2 lines of the written property description with a statement like: "parts of Lots 1 and 2 shown hereon were formerly known as Hill House Condominium and recorded in the Office of the pitkin County Clerk and Recorder in Plat Book 7 at Page 7." , e~, .,---- 7/11: t/7//J7f' 15/l5EI"/Ffi/7 dAtP,S5/AYC-- ,,{.-tfJ7;Z t/tfJ/OIiIEt:2... t?F"GcP Y' f ft/6i3..Jl5 g6/l/8/~C;5 A;:J.J? gcPv/fIP/I/Z- y ;011f1€ 5 ,ft/ /'//# #"'4-7##/157 /1# -r//"c= ,t?i.5 ?'/jlVC P:5 " ,A/ --- .- r'."r-"""""C7'i01i"'T0';c;77...,..'...t^."...... .... ........?....'...qi~;;:;:; ,:;,f.... l!['-'l'r'u-'! t'-LJ~' 1-\ r~;i"-:@""'-~ ;'7) ~:\_'''''''''' """"'0=:, \~'~"0M ,,-) 'j' ~\ {,,~, ' 0 ~ 'r/~ ~ In 'n; ':/ ; ",i~IT1.;;r"'il!l')\)\l),.;;:;tt~). ,~~.l' ..1'. ..... ,f'i..... ) , .,.... i,~~_"";,,,,,;;,;,,;,;,"<'''''''''i',,,, .,..,",i",.>., J x~ cJ.o (!ou.JflC~ 4-064441S064 03/05/82 ICS IPMRNCZ csp G~WB ,7/ ./ 7145489548 MGM TDR N NEWPORT BEACH CA 165 03-05 0430P PST C;; 'if/ 'if~ \ , ) .> ~ ) CITY COUNCI~ CITY HA~~ GA~ENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 . ) RE PARDEE/WEDUM ~OT APPROVA~ APP~ICATION-DUE TO MY UNAVAILABILITY TO BE PRESENT AT THIS HEARING NOW SCHEDULED FOR 3/8/82 I PROPOSE THAT THIS MATTER BE TAB~ED UNTIL MY RETURN TO ASPEN ON THE BASIS THAT MR PARDEE BEING THE ORIGINAL DEVE~OPtR Or BOTH THE HI~L HOUSE DUPLEX AND MY HOUSE. IN OUR OPINION. HAS YET TO SOLVE AND CORRECT THE fOLLOWING ( BASIC DEVE~OPERS OBLIGATIONS: 1. RE-ROUTE AND PERHAPS UNDERGROUND THE EXISTING ANTIQUATED OVERHEAD POWER/CAB~E ~INES INTO A PUBLIC R/W AREA, WHICH NOW CRISS-CROSS OVER r G~ASS ROOfS AND EXISTING BUILDING WHICH MAY ALSO BE CODE VIOLATION. 2. REMOTE EXISTING SEWER LINES SERVING MY HOUSE RUNNING THROUGH HIS PROPOSED BUILDING SITE INTO A PUSLICE R/W AREA AND/OR GRANT AN ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR SUCH. I PROPOSE THESE BE ADDED AS CONDITIONS Of APPROVA~ AND THE COST BE BORNE BY MR PARDEE. yOURS TRULY fRANK LAU~AINEN. AlA 707 EAST GIBSON ASPEN CO 81612 2038 EST MGMCOM? MGM ) ) ) b ) ) ') )I .~ ~ . .~ ) ,) :: ;:: ~ ~ .0 TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL. FREE PHONE NUMBERS . Transamenca ,-.", Tille Insurance Services ,r ~6~ Transamerica,~ Title Insurance Company' j 530 East Main Street Box 2230 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925.1766 . CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING DECEMBER 24, 1981 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A LISCENSED TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE STATE OF COLORADO HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE HILLHOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION IS THE OvmER IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND SITUATED IN THE NE~ SW~ OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, PANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.MORE FULLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED IIERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS CERTIFICATE BY THIS REFERENCE. TRANSAMERICA HAS EXAMINED THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY UP TO DECEMBER 20, 1981 AT 8:00 A.M. SURANCE COMPANY FICER ...:'" 1". ""' EXHIBIT "A" ~':P2Tc:el'bf'land s:1tua'led in the }\E~ S1\'1.of Section 7, To..'ns1:5 JO SDut.h, ':R2nge S~ "est of the 6th Principal 1.leridiEn, beinJ; more fully oescri"oed as :follows: . Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of that certain tr~ 1:no1OD as tile .l.R. Williams Ranch. ..hence the "West ~ corner of 5 Section 7 bears North SS-27'55" West 2.369.32 :feet; (Being the S2ne po~nt o~ beginning as the.point of beginning in that De~= 7eco~6edi~ Eock 119 at Page 22D.)' . Th,,:-,(;;!:: ::;o~t:~ ES' 20' 00" ..Est .3.47 :feet along said Soutilerly li=: 'l'he:r;ce ~.~0rth lSc 30 I 00 w ::ast 52.39 feet; The::1ce ~~o::."':.h 740 30' .... -.. 125.00 "feet; .. _.::. '- Thence South 150 30'00" \~est 85.49 fees; Thence r<orth 890 20'00" Nest 87.22 feet; '. Thence ~orth 040 12'54" West 160.88 feet; Thence North 190 15'00". East 92.00 feet; Tr.e~~e Xorth 430 45'00" East 40.88 feet; to a point on the centerline cf '3i:..s :J;'l "=':\.C:1ue; Thence ~0110~jDg s~id centerline 208.56 :feet along the arc of curve ~o ~~e ri~~t haviDi a radius of 1.133.00 :feet, the cbord -r-bicb c~-.~:::b(.a~s Sou"th'720301 DB" :E~'st 208.26 :feet; 'The:1ce SO'-1'i.h 55e. 59' 26" :East 33.10 :feet; The~ce SO:1Tb 59c03'29u E?_st S:3.~9 :feet; 'Thence:: Sc):J-th 00000'00" "est 102.61 :feet; The;Jce J~o::-:..h 5903010071 1iest 210:.32 :feet; Thence SOil1;h 2::,000' 00" West 213.6 :feet to the point of beginli:.: County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. . , r; r-" ~ .f MEMORANDUM to: . City Engineering Department Paul Taddune, City Attorney Herb Paddock, Building Inspector FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office RE: Hill House Condominium Lot Split (Subdivision Exception) DATE: February 2,1982 The Hi 11 House Condomi ni ums Lot Split PI at was revi sed to more accurately reflect the true lot sIzes. Attached is a copy of the new plat; please review and return comments no later than Monday, February 8. This Item Is on the agenda for City P & Z for February 16, 1982. Thank You. . '~';\e - I I I I I I ! ! i ! -01 'I " . f""\ Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 south galena'~treet aspen, colorado 81611 ^ MnlORANDUM TO: City Engineer City Attorney Building Inspector FROM: Alice Davis RE: Hill House Condominiums - Subdivision Exception (Lot Split) DATE: December 29, 1981 This application by Hill House Condominiums, is for a lot split to permit the construction of anew single-family residence. The application is directly related to another you have recently received, the Laulainen lot line adjustment. In the inter&st of reviewing all the proposed changes on these properties at one time, we have scheduled this item for the P & Z meeting on Jan- uary 19, 1982. Please have your comments to me no later than Wednesday, January 7, 1982. Thank you for your assistance. ~ . . --,Y'::"",- . '-. -'I',~ c..<:"'-" ","'.' "... ....., , ~. () PEN 130 asp T:r.:- n 8 1982 I'.....'". / co. ';.1?1J~;Np2J,t\U::~ OfFfGf MEMORANDUM '" ;::.~.:.,.;..~...'~ ~ > __."- ..~,/;i!'> DATE: February 5, 1982 TO: Alice Davis Gary Esar~ FROM: RE: Hill House Condominium Lot Split (Subdivision Exception) This office submitted comments on this application (and the related Laulainen Subdivision) in memos dated January 18, 198~ The revision of the plat does not appear to require any revision of those comments. GSE:mc ~ ::# cJ eIT PEN MEl'10RANDUM DATE: Januaey 18, 1982 TO: Alice Davis ~.._ ~\ Paul Taddune FROM: RE: Hill House Condominiums - Subdivision Exception (Lot Split) Peocedueally, I see no peoblem with excepting a lot split applica- tion feom the full subdivision peocess. Keep in mind, howevee, that the subdivision must eeceive final appeoval by the City Coun- cil. PUesuant to Section 24-11.2, the consteuction of one single family eesidence on the subdivided lot is excepted feom GMP peO- vided that: 1. The teact of land which is being divided has a pee-existing dwell ing, and 2. No mOee than two lots aee ceeated by the subdivision. PJT:mc ,il f[', I II . i""'., i' I ~ i "I I i I ('r'p-flY ft,.lJ) III ~~"~,~::~,~:, 111 . ,"n .-- il! 6/0~ . ill buildif18 srle- II i -f.r.oodplzin Iii , I ,~ '\, \ ,~A",c l-1;...\...-,'....... ~:",\~':'" 6prif1:1 s-fr Ca.5ErrerrI- v ut- S{ze. t/oL-Of- tine eXc(I,Jdr'nq 01b501l. /?.O.u.J. PtA.bfic.. . ulih'{y Casel1\~ 0/ ......... tlctjoin/ncr ~. W.f. (j~ f-:eJ- {o tt;a it~ CIYL((6. ..~U~ ty!,OI1.Um;;rtt':> C . OWnU1-..~P C () QJJ(!I'.a..{-COI\ - (~ +ee-,=> ftCU?55 l!!fZ.:e.~nJ ."~ , Iii II I ,I il Iii 111 I ii " " if , III I'! :11 :,1 Iii II' I,I h. 'ii i I ill Iii III 1:1 Iii ill 'I' [: I III , I II [ to+- riM- a.4Ju1fw.ettJ- ~~._ """~'~':,.~_,"~",o , .",', . --.'- ---~-"'-~- - ',-'''--' -...""~_....,"-- , j I I i I I I I , I ; , I I I II i II .i q~i''''''-'''"''-- "-~,~' , _, __',__"__""_..'H_'____,.~>';-,. Schedule B-Section 2 Exceptions Street Address of Property The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. Exceptions numbered -0- are hereby omitted. 6. Taxes due and sales which have payable: not been any unpaid taxes properly redeemed and assessments or cancelled. and any and all tax 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded December 24, 1902 in Book 55 at Page 116 as follows: right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted. 8. Right of way for the flow of the Roaring Fork River and Flood Plain Plan. Conditions and Stipulations The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect. lien, encumbrance. adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 1,1 no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this commitment. l~~ .:;~/ .....->'~ ~~,~,~,:.~~j s"'...... s'" ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." USLlFE Title Insurance Company of Dallas ~1/t1~ President & Chief Executive Officer ~/t~(!4L Attest: Executive Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer , ~~.~ Autho!fzedSignature'. ',' , A~PEN TITLE COMPANY, .i'D. .~ "'''''- -~;.~ , ;> ."~ T:'" 1""\ r1 f EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED TO AND HADE A PART OF COt1J:HTHE"T IIA81-399 -' LEGAL DESGRIPTION A tract of land situated in the Northeast ~ of the Southwest ~ of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado, being more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Southwesterly corner of that parcel des- cribed in Book 370 at Page 886, Pitkin County Records; Thence following the Westerly and Northerly lines of said parcel the following courses and distances: N 390 48' DOll W. 85.70 feet, N 370 49' GOll W. 43.34 feet, N 170 20 ' 0011 W. 48.35 feet, N 100 27' 3011 E. 42.16 feet, N 12' 33 ' 00" W. 27.94 feet, N 780 23 ' 0011 W. 41.58 feet, N 000 16' 00" W. 25.21, feet, S 660 35' 1411 1':.224.22 feet to a point; Thence S 190 15' 00" \< . 169.11 feet to a point on the South line of said parcel; Thence N 890 20 ' DO" W. 14.90 feet to the point of BEGINNING. Pitkin County, Colorado ~ ~'- Transamenca"""" Title Insurance Services Transamerica ~ Title Insurance Compan. 530 East Main Street Box 2230 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-1766 ,r CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING DECEMBER 24, 1981 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A LISCENSED TITLE INSUAANCE COMPANY IN THE STATE OF COLORADO HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE HlitHbuSE coNI5oMINIUM ASSOCIATION IS THE OWNER IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND SITUATED IN THE NE~ SW~ OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, PANGE 84 \'lEST OF THE 6TH P.M.MORE FULLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS CERTIFICATE BY THIS REFERENCE. TRANSAMERICA HAS EXAMINED THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY UP TO DECEMBER 20, 1981 AT 8:00 A.M. c';-- SURANCE COMPANY /1 to l ~;/ r , '. .,r' ,1'""\ ~ EXHIBIT "All J. Parcel. b:f-land situated in the NE~ S1l'~.O;[ Section 7, To....nsr. 3D South, P.2Dge 84 ilest 0;[ the 6th Principal Meridil:!D, being :more full)' described as ;[01]0....5: . Beginning at a point on the Southerly line 0;[ that certain tT. l:nOk'D as the :J .R", Williams Ranch "I'i'hence the nest :l corner 0:[ ~ Section 7 bears.Nortb 55-27'55" nest 2,369.32 :feet; (Being th~ S2~e ?O~Dt o~ beginning as the.poi~t 0;[ beginning in that D~~c . - - ~ , ~ 1.0 ~.,., 22a ) . reco~neo ~~ LOC~ ~ ~ a~ rage. .. .. ~, -~r' ,..-"-.... ceo' ?L'J" o.-,n -=~st 3 "7 :r-ee.... along sa~d So"t'ne_""ly -.!.i_~. ":'.IJC_!___ .....v. :.._- c.__".._ ...... ..~ ....-=t ~ ..... L.; ~ Thence North l5c 30'00"' East 52.39 feet; The:1ce ?~o:..-:.h 740 3r.' ~~.:...::t. 125..00 .feet; Thence'South 150 30'00" West 85.49 fees; Thence l~orth 890 20' 00" Nest 87,22 feet; Thence ~orth 040 12'54" West 160.88 feet; Thence North 190 15'00". East 92.00 feet; Tr.~~~e Xorth 430 45'00" East 40.88 feet; to a point on the centerline c~ Gi~E~~ ~~e~ue; '. Thcnce 3011o~jDg $~id centerline 208,56 :feet along the arc 0: cur~e ~o ~~e ri~~~ havini a radius 0;[ 2,233.00 :feet, the cbord -;::-1:;1 cb CS;-'.'':; bE.2rs South 72 030' OBn :E:::st 208.26 :feet; Thc:"lce SO'-l'i.b 55<-59'26" :East 33.1.0 :feet; 'Ihe::Jse SO:l-tl1 59c03Y2gu East E3_~9 :feet- , Thenc", Sc>:.;,;:n 00000' 00" \lest 201..61. :feet. . 'I'he:Jce J~o:-:..h .::9[)30tOon 1i'est l~O:32 :fee't; Thence Soui;h 25000' 00" West 223.6 i'eet to the point 0:[ begi"n:.r . , County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. I I I ---..; ,*,~; 1