The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.530 E Main St.0023.2016.ASLU0023 2016.ASLU 530 E MAIN STREET MAJOR PUBLIC PROJECT REMODEL AND ADDITION TO THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUILDING I . 2737 073 47 851 & 852 r S Co F Â«Â£ 3 7// P \ S 013 I u. 'File L~ U 4 [f 17'" F 11. PATH: G/DRIVE / MASTER FILES/ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0023.2016.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 073 47 851 PROJECT ADDRESS 530 E MAIN ST PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION REMODEL AND ADDITION TO THE EXISTING COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUILDING REPRESENTATIVE DAVE DETWILER AND JODI SMITH DATE OF FINAL ACTION 05.09.2016 CLOSED BY KARLA HENRICHON 7.20.2016 44*- 0013. iNIo. AiLLL- '604 R34 2737.-013-47-YW 9 2737-073-47-fl DIe Edit Record Navigate Farm Reports Fcrmat Iab Help - * 11) IX )0 ./ 22] g Â¥ Q.I â‚¬9 -3 3 a. . ]4 1 ' /1 9 21 06 Jump 1 + 9 V * I 6. . 2 8 e m :4 -4 . V 6 0 6 2 21 -3 â€¢. 1- Main i Custom Fjelds Royting Status Fee Summary TAdions I Routing History, Permit type ME LAspen Land Use ~ Permit # 0023.2016.ASLU ---j A Address 530 E MAINST ~ Apt/Suite ~ Cit, ASPEN State CO :LI Zip 81 611 _~ Permit Information Master permit L Routing queue *,15 ~ Applied 03>28/2016 ~ Proiect ~ Status [p,nding _ J Approved Description REMODELAND ADDITION TO THE EXISTING COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUILDING. Issued i v ~ Closed/Finalf V Submitted JODI SMITH 920-5377 Clock Running Days 0 Expires I 03/23/2017 ~ Submitted via i v 0 wner Last name [FifRiN COUNTY First name ] |485 RIO GRANDE PL - Ilol Phone ~0781"920-5396 ~ Address , ASPEN CO 81611 1 Applicant Â® Owner is applicant? m Contractor is applicant? Last name .PITKIN COUNTY | First name ~ J [@5 RIO GRANDE PL ---- -- 101 Phone I [970] 920-5396 ~ Cust # [29585 ~ Address ASPEN CO 81611 Email [~- Lender Last name 1 , First name ~ ~ ~ Phone [1 - 1 Address I Enter the citp of the permit address AspenGold5 [served debrap I 1 of 1 i tl ~ A~.,â€ži ft,i ?*fi,ai,~im~~!~,~~ . ii ii~ il ~KI ~ ~~./,1,"b""ble:*/0*4*E 'led~~292%1*tAN %44*00*~ 21 (192#5- 6 A/012 - -Rtkik Lath{4 4/471580 â‚¬ PA,n P A -Qjill lili 1*2ift# 40 301 A 1 25 31 - 34 0)4L' 0 32 5Â·bo EA14 re*- 4 31% #Dos/4 4 (ill- 1 Ljoc -Rm R A, 0.4 - 4 lu 2-5 $@ION 40!noj ~ *oqlool~ ~ sdnoig gel.~ #imp 'im A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO APPROVING THE REMODEL AND ADDITION TO THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUILDING AT 530 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN; AND RESPECTFULLY OVERRULING CERTAIN CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN CITY OF ASPEN ORDINANCE NO. 10, SERIES OF 2016. RESOLUTION NO. USS'- -2016 WHEREAS, Pitkin County, under Article X]V of the Colorado Constitution and Title 30 of Colorado Revised Statute, is a subdivision of State Government charged with providing essential public services; and WHEREAS, in order to discharge its responsibilities to provide essential public services the County must have adequate facilities to house the various departments and offices of the County and Ninth Judicial District; and WHEREAS, Title 30 of Colorado Revised Statute establishes Aspen as the County Seat for Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, Title 30 of Colorado Revised Statute requires certain County offices to be located in the County Seat; and WHEREAS, in 2006 the County completed a Facilities Master Plan that identified significant deficiencies in County Facilities to support the provision of quality public services to ensure the safety, wellbeing and health of Pitkin County residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, Pitkin County partnered with the City of Aspen and other non-profit entities to complete the Aspen Civic Master Plan, which found in part that: "Removing civic functions from the downtown will tend to reduce the kind of community character that still makes the core of Aspen a vital and traditional downtown..."; and WHEREAS, in 2006 the Board directed staff to explore alternatives to meet the County's facility needs in Aspen's Core consistent with the County Facility Master Plan, and Aspen Civic Master Plan; and WHEREAS, in 2007 the County, along with the State and Nation experienced a significant economic recession commonly known as the 'Great Recession' that led the County to defer all major capital projects, including all facilities improvements; and WHEREAS, in 2014 the local economy had recovered sufficiently for the County to address its facility needs; and WHEREAS, County staff and elected officials did extensive public outreach and collected public input to develop a proposed building design, including, but not limited to open houses, discussing the project at over 30 publicly noticed meetings, and informed the public through television, Internet, radio and newspaper ads; and WHEREAS, County Staff and Elected Officials have worked very hard to minimize the size and massing of the building, reducing the proposed square footage by 52% from the 2006 Facilities Master Plan, and keeping floor to ceiling heights modest while still meeting the facility needs of essential public services; and WHEREAS, the proposed addition to the Courthouse Plaza building meets all the Dimensional Requirements approved in Exhibit A of Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 10 (Series 2016); and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has determined that proposed facilities are necessary to provide essential public services to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of Pitkin County residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2016 Pitkin County submitted an application for remodel and construction of an addition to the Courthouse Plaza Building located at 530 East Main Street Aspen to house departments providing essential public services for location, character, and extent of compliance with adopted relevant master plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed remodel and addition was reviewed under City of Aspen's Land use Code Chapter 26.500 as a major public project; and WHEREAS, Colorado Revised Statute 31-23-209 allows the Board of Commissioners by a recorded vote of 2/3 of the commissioners to overrule a denial or condition placed by the City on the submitted plan for public building or structure; and WHEREAS, on May 9th, 2016 the Aspen City Council unanimously approved Ordinance No.10 (Series of 2016) granting major public project review approval for the Courthouse Plaza with certain conditions that the Board finds are not in the best interest of providing essential public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado that: The Board does hereby approve the Courthouse Plaza remodel and addition as submitted to the City of Aspen, and heard at Public Hearing on May 9, 2016. Specifically this resolution respectfully ovenules the disapproval of the submitted plan for public building or structure and particularly the following portions of ORDINANCE NO. 10 (SERIES OF 2016): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING MAJOR PUBLIC PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA LOCATED AT 530 E MAIN STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO: 1. Section 1: Approvals, recommended conditions to: a. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the building. b. Prior to the renovation of the Pitkin County Courthouse, the applicant shall return to HPC to evaluate the removal of the northeast exterior stair to create a larger separation between the Courthouse and proposed Plaza building addition. c. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. d. Reduce the amount of glazing on the curtain wall portion of the Main Street fagade to be compatible with design guidelines. 1. Section 3: Engineering Department: a. A condition requiring a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) at building permit submission acceptable to the Engineering and Transportation Departments. b. If greater than 25% of the site is disturbed, water quality capture volume (WQCV) will be required for the whole site. 3. Section 4: Parks Department the County reserves the right to remove trees in the area known as Veteran's Park as necessary to implement the landscaping plan developed with Veteran's and to construct necessary public facilities. 4 INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED ON THE ~3 DAY OF ~Uk v; 2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS f---) .-1A+Z q <ch , â€ž -../-, By U~49% ~2*A By: /-- I Jean#te Jones Rache]\F. Richards, Chair \~ Depfty County Clerk ~ Date: 6-9-9-101(o APPROVED AS TO FORM: MANAGER APPROVAL 41=1/ 2 M.ki- - - Laura C. MRkar,-Assistant County Attorney 156~Peacock, County Manager ORDINANCE NO. 10 (SERIES OF 2016) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING MAJOR PUBLIC PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA LOCATED AT 530 E MAIN STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-47-851 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Courthouse Plaza (the Application) from Pitkin County (Applicant) for Major Public Project Review; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application-March 18,2016, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, this property is located in the Public (PUB) zone district and is partially : located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department referred the application to Aspen ' Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department, and received comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended conditions; and, WHEREAS, all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, a summary of public outreach was provided by the applicant to meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided full access to review the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 13, 2016 the Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval with conditions via Resolution No. 11, Series I of 2016 by a four to one (4-1) vote; and, WHEREAS, on April 25, 2016, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 10, h Series of 2016 on First Reading by a four to zero (4 - 0) vote; and, i WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street 1 Ordinance No, 10, Series 2016 Pagel of 7 the recommendations of the Community Development Director, the Historic Preservation Commission, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 9, 2016, City Council approved Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2016, by a five to zero (5 - 0) vote, approving Major Public Project Review, WHEREAS, City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1:Approvals l Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, City Council hereby grants the Pitkin County Center Subdivision Major Public Project review E approval, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. The approved dimensions are i attached as Exhibit I. City Council recommends the following: 1. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the building. 2. Prior to renovation of the Pitkin County Courthouse, the applicant shall return to HPC to evaluate the removal of the northeast exterior stair to create a larger separation between ; the Courthouse and proposed Plaza building addition. 3. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. I 4. Reduce the amount of glazing on the curtain wall portion of the Main Street faâ„¢le to be j compatible with design guidelines. : 5. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. Section 2: Employee Generation A baseline of current Pitkin County employees - full- and part-time - will be provided to APCHA prior to building permit issuance. At least twice within 10 years after the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is received on the new building employee audits will be conducted (preferably 5 years and 10 years after CO). The audit shall include all employees - full- and part-time working out of the building. The hours would be added and then divided by 2,080 to get the FTE count. If the audits show additional employees above the baseline, mitigation shall be required. Mitigation can be satisfied by utilizing existing deed restricted units provided by the County (new or as buy- downs). The Housing Authority shall request the audit from Pitkin County. Failure to request the audit shall not render any of the approvals invalid. Pitkin County shall provide the Housing Authority Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street ! Ordinance No.10, Series 2016 Page 2 of 7 and the Community Development Department with the audit report. The Housing Authority and i Community Development shall forward the audit to the Housing Board, HPC and/or City Council for review, as applicable. Any costs for the audit shall be paid by the applicant. Section 3: Enizineering Department Drainage- If greater than 25% of the site is disturbed, Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) will be required for the whole site. At a minimum, WQCV will be required for the disturbed : area. The Applicant shall provide an updated Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) at building permit , submission acceptable to the Engineering and Transportation Departments. Include a report in 2 the TIA that summarizes traffic impact mitigation. Section 4: Parks Department There is a large cottonwood tree in the city ROW that must be protected. Typical tree protection includes the entire area under the tree canopy. Minimal excavation will be required under the triangular walking path to protect the critical root zone of this cottonwood tree. Utilities that will be required will also need to stay outside the dripline ofthis tree. The applicant must submit a tree removal permit. There are a number of large diameter cottonwood trees that will be permitted for removal and mitigation will be charged for those trees. Any trees that may be impacted by changes to Veterans Park will require another review by the Parks Department. Section 5: Environmental Health Department The current submission does not specify the "service yard" as space being dedicated to the storage for trash, recycling and compost. The space shall be labeled for this specific use in order to comply with Municipal Code 12.10. The proposed "service yard" space is slightly below size requirements, but will be considered acceptable if the applicant fully encloses the space from wildli fe. The space shall be enclosed in such a way as to prevent wildlife access and shield the waste containers from public view. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded 5 whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Ordinance No. 10, Series 2016 Page 3 of 7 Section 7: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 9: A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 9~11 day of May, 2016, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 pm in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day of April, 2016. Attest: 3Â« l r 4 01 01\ / C 444924444 - -- Â»4 Â»C .LL-----Â«, 6 \ --1 Linda ManRing, City Clerk < Steven Skadron, Mayor FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ~ day of / 7/14 Ad~ , 2016. Attest: Â£,VA A -Â·-1-7 Ad-tus-ka} t-(-4 -~ 1 A * 946 Linda Mlnning, City Clerk / Steven Skad~n, Mayor Approved as to form: 0 -7: - ~a,Bes R. True, City Attorney Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit B: Proposed Building Elevations Courthouse Plaza , 530 E. Main Street Ordinance No. 10, Series 2016 Page 4 of 7 i f 1 i Exhibit A - Approved Dimensional Requirements Dimensions Proposed Minimum gross Lot Area No requirement Maximum height 55', no favade facing Main Street shall exceed 40' Minimum front yard setback No requirement Minimum side yard setback No requirement Minimum rear yard setback No requirement Minimum utility/trash/recycle area Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 Minimum Ooor-to-floor height No requirement Cumulative FAR 2:1, or 138,540 square feet Public Amenity Requirement met by Veterans Park Minimum parking spaces 10 i Courthouse Plaza I 530 E. Main Street Ordinance No.10, Series 2016 Page 5 of 7 0 90 0 9 00 13* 83 ,- ~3- ...Â· 2 1 _ i---1 0-7233 ._ *Ii= .&:1~r.,i.,Mf. .. = 1 =V"-1 1/ra A- - *- - . -24---- 1 ;Ar..11- 1 4/' hifill. 41&Mrâ„¢&. ~ NORTHLEE>'839!1 - \Ey ... 1,-1.. 9.iv 8 0 86 9 npnpraM' m 8 3 4.v v O 3 0 09 0 9 '~ Ii'M . 1 1=, 1-1 1 -21.,2~./- .. ...T r- Â· - t. - -- -4 - --Â· - Â·Â·Â·Â· - Â·-Â·Â·Â·. Â· Â·Â·Â· 1 -' 1 .l Â·Â· 1Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â¥â€¢Â¥~p~t~L. I X#-I.~I/Â£..& ,â€ž M.'Im.,100' : Â· 1 .9. O â€¢ Â· Â· 1 . L..64.~ ..... . . ..1 1 ... 1 1-1.; 1 =1 11 . - -t Â·.....'d*"I-WI" --t=.----*. --r==:-:.=.2-192*=4-1/=T:.1: 12;:LU.1....:~ f f=-:c-=FM='~12!5~3-~32t'..L~XZ~ril ~ P'' ~~-.I .1'P'D~12â€¢*M" + â„¢* 1-'' 't#"~'111' ' ' .1/,9.Â£11Â£1.ira1 I 111 1 r Z ) EA. ELEATION \,U)'Al =,iÂ£ g.]* L. PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY gm ~ poss SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A201A Exhibit B - Proposed Building Elevations 9 1 02 60!los .ON @OUBU[plo L Jo 9 OBed @snoq 9 9 CD 8 1 X Â® 83*D (plu 1. I 'RKÂ·Â·*ie. 79 91615*,fhAMFO-7 JT ~n, 4.-_-tÂ·Â·Â·+W,Pwre a J H#>!M-'i /*~1*_Â£Mulau ~=f~' alj 111{~t ./r,~Ill,Ill. 1 111 1 . _ ....=&'-r'ton . 11 1- 1-301â„¢ El:FMILIME 9 0009 9 00 MUTU 60 2 8 88 9 T-- T Â·i 1 1. I'll-/1 1*9*&4/124#u/1/~/~~744 --' -1-1--- ----- - --Er-%41Â«1-- 1 '.-1.1Ll--Idmj..-*a.............r...*-,, 41.-'49 :. 4-----t' '91 123 212"-1: =22- ~~ 41'IN.1."9,11. 1,1 r'ilil"~~ - E.1 ~11Â».I==NI=-4.7.1.i -4 41,93....,.,Ii.â€ž. .. +1%,11' ~31 M Y E ' #MY &m t-il LI~tikzilit=&~I!~ilh m Â· i , r 7-=1/---ri.Imp,-Mr rl, ~*EÂ«* 11 1-1 0-1 Li 3 -~-F TTI~ 152 44Muil*Uusl~,:,L i ".,Mr n I f.â€¢fi,rir 0 7Uur,11 1 1 1 j ....... m WEST ELE,An.1 Z LA PEy ..i ' /. ' . 0 12 n PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY p Trl POSS -' SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A202C 3. E. G O w * , 3. Â»j,i- - ..- W': ~.*~.~~-.;~ ~p,-/ 4~-.I--k,-*1-'I.-0~:*Â»$** J-.,k~*â€žw~,I.i,~..~ .,equyâ€žai,-w.J.W:-, .....-$2*â€¢~2â€¢-Â·.-Â¢61 *-&W12/4~.~4~--~)~d~WL#%t/1~*-~MI~' eA~4~.1, A- 1,~2..=r/4.'Iâ€¢Â£4* ~~k,#*0p~*i-,4 Li-~a~,~ -4+.' ..1 â€¢".~., '1/-0.4 -4.--'. DOURUIPlo L Jo L 09 EZE[d osnoqun Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council Mav 9, 2016 but if it is attached to a hotel it would be treated differently but this would treat it the same. Ms. Garrow said the issue with the St. Regis said sundries were defined. This would say uses in the commercial core zone district. Councilman Frisch asked i f there are any uses that are restricted that might be normal commercial. Ms. Garrow replied office use. Mr. True stated the language Ms. Garrow offered would address the concerns. Councilman Frisch moved to adopt Ordinance #1, Series of 2016 with amendments; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. Roll call vote. Councilmembers Daily, yes; Mullins, yes; Frisch, yes: Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #10, SERIES OF 2016 - 530 E. Main St. (Courthouse Plaza) - Major Public Project Review Mr. Barker told the Council this application was submitted by Pitkin County and the property is currently 69,000 square feet located between Main Street and Rio Grand and zoned as public with a planned development overlay. The property currently contains the courthouse, jail and plaza building. The applicant is requesting a major public project review approval for a renovation and interior remodel of the existing courthouse plaza as well as a new three story addition between the plaza bui Iding and the jail. It is an effort to combine most of the county facilities to one location. The state statute requires the city to provide a decision within 60 days within the submitted application or the application is deemed approved. If the city decides to deny the application the BOCC would have the opportunity to overrule that decision. The 60 days would be complete on May 17th. The project is also subject to planned development. growth management and commercial design portions of the land use code. In terms of dimensions it is zoned as public and the dimensions are set as part of the PD process. The criteria for the dimension review relate to is it in line with community goals, are they appropriate with the character of the primary uses and compatibility with surrounding development. Staffs concerns are mainly towards the north side ofthe building where the height is proposed to go up to 45 feet. It is higher than any of the surrounding zone districts as well as the proposed floor area for the addition which is almost two times as large as any of the other structures on the property in terms of the floor area. Another concern relates to the addition and the distance it is located from the historic courthouse building. It is approximately 11 feet from the north east corner. It is out of character with what has been there historically and creates a pinch point. The architectural style is not in character with Aspen and does not strongly relate to either building. Staff is suggesting that the architecture be a little more close to one of the two of theni preferable to the plaza building. In terms of growth management it is considered an essential public facility and therefore no annual allotment on the square footage of the building and the employee generation is determined by HPC and Council ultimately determines what the mitigation rate will be. This type of use would typically generate approximately 101 FTEs. It is mainly a relocation of employees from other areas that would be vacated and relocated to this spot. APCHA reviewed and recommended a series of employee audits. It would include a current audit of what there is today and a 5 year and 10 year audit. If there is an increase then mitigation would be required. HPC supported this. Questions from first reading include what is happening to Veterans Park. It will largely be retained but the existing path would be effected. The cottonwoods would be removed but the final design is still in progress. What are the sustainability goals. The applicant will provide details. The TIA does not fully mitigate and there is a condition for that. Staff recommendation is for approval with conditions. Councilwoman Mullins said because of what we passed earlier this year we have 60 days to approve this. Can we require or ask for any changes. Mr. Barker said Council can include any conditions and unless the BOCC decided to oven-ule that with a majority vote they need to adhere to those. 11 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council May 9.2016 Councilman Myrin asked for affordable housing and moving out of spaces and in to this it seems like we are double counting spaces. Mr. Barker said the new development would typically require generation. They are not actually generating new employees. Councilman Myrin said if the county vacates 2,000 square feet at the armory and the city backfills at the armory do we then mitigate for that space. Mr. Barker replied no because it is existing space. Councilman Myrin said either the new space has to count or the previous space has to count. Ms. Garrow said the growth management differentiates between traditional commercial space and traditional net leasable and essential public facilities. Essential public facilities don't have a set mitigation rate it is done through a review process with the finaldecisionby Council. Ifit was a private applicant it would go under a commercial requirement and it would be a 60 percent mitigation rate. It is up to Council to determine what the rate is from 0 to 100 for the new space. Past essential public facilities have come through and have not been required to provide affordable housing at the time they have made the application but been have subject to an audit. Theater Aspen is an example. Councilman Frisch stated it is not government but essential public facility. Councilman Myrin asked could the county not have fast tracked this. Mr. Barker stated they could go through the typical land use review process. They have the opportunity and right to do either. Councilman Myrin said we can make suggestions. Is the best we can do put the suggestion from page 1116 in the ordinance. Mr. True said at some point the county has the decision to accept them or not. Councilman Myrin said the problem with a denial is it doesn't convey what we want to achieve. The suggestions tells the community we tried. Councilman Daily said he understands Staffs recommendations. He would like more understanding on the reduced mass. Mr. Barker said a logical standpoint would be to look at the allowable heights in the surrounding zone districts. Councilman Frisch said there are two buckets of concerns, the six technical questions and the process issue. There is the full legal ability to take the 60 day route or the normal process. He would like to know the thought process from the county on the express process. Mayor Skadron said Staff liked almost nothing and HPC agreed with Staff. My concerns deal with height and mass, set backs and the weird connector piece. He is curious why we are sitting here. Jon Peacock, Rachel Richards, Joe Disalvo, Janice Vos Caudill, Dave Detweiler, Jodi Smith, Richard Decampo, Dan Richardson, Dan Gliden, Colonel Merritt, Cindy Houbin, Steve Child representing the county Mr. Peacock said why this project, why now, why Aspen. Since 2006 the inadequate facilities have posed as a barrier to providing services specifically around operational spaces. Why Aspen. There are legal requirement in title 30 because Aspen is the county seat. In 2006 the civic master plan Pitkin agreed to keep key services in the core in order to be an anchor for the community. What is proposed - provide the old court house for the exclusive use of the 9th judicial district. Relocate the sheriff's department, assessor's office and treasurer's office. Move the county community development department from city hall and environmental health to the down town. The city and county trade space with the police and community development departments. Dispatch is being relocated. As far as the public process to this point. In January of 2006 they completed a comprehensive facility master plan including meetings with all neighborhood caucuses and public surveys. A 52,000 square foot 12 Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council Mav 9, 2016 additional space was suggested. In December of 2006 the civic masterplanwas completed. In 2014 the county revisited the 2006 plan and confirmed the goals of staying in the core and relooked at the programing and said 52,000 was too much. We identified 32,000 square feet of office space was adequate. We started a series of public outreach in June of 2015 including over 100 radio spots, 32 half page newspaper ads and three videos. We conducted open houses with 70 participants. This has been discussed at over 30 commissioner meetings. What we heard at the series of open houses was 81 percent wanted to bridge the design styles of the court house and the plaza. 83 percent wanted to include energy saving measures. We were not told to meet minimum building code measures. Needs to be addressed included law enforcement, courts and better customer service spaces for clerk, assessor, treasurer and community development. And last on the list was a nice lobby. The architects developed three to four options for the community to look at and provide feedback on. The option that was selected was option four. We changed the rooftine, windows and added the canopy and cover to get to this project. Our experience with HPC was positive and well received. Kim Weil. architect. showed a 3D review ofthe project. Councilwoman Mullins asked about the heights on the north side. Mr. Weil replied 42 feet to the garage door. Councilwoman Mullins asked about the set back between the addition and the courthouse. Mr. Weil replied about 11 feet. Ms. Garrow said the concern is at ground level with the covered stair well where it is more like five feet. Mr. Peacock said HPC requested removing the covered stairwell since it is not historic and the back porch. Joe Disalvo, sheriff, talked about the importance of public safety. He does not see this as a mixed use area. Sometimes twice a day they have inmates walking back and forth from the jail to the courthouse. It is not the best place for a park either. We have mixed this use for too long. It should not be used for public access between the two buildings. Councilman Frisch said the sheri ff raised some valid concerns. Mr. Peacock said on Veteran's Park there is no question the county considers this revered space. Dan Gliden and Colonel Merritt said in 1985 they had the idea ofa memorial to veterans, specifically Vietnam veterans. Mr. Peacock stated as far as the consolidation of county employees it will be 69 from the plaza and 44 from the courthouse. Why is this desirable. It will lower capital costs. It is building on land they already own. There will be no voter tax increase. For traffic impacts they have no problem with the TIA study. There will be minimal to no impact on traffic or parking. They provides free bus passes, we cycle and community vans to employees. Dan Richardson, SGM, said it will be a greener sustainable building. High performance for the long hall. They will invest in solar projects in holy cross territory. For housing mitigation they are consolidating existing services and existing employees. These are not commercial spaces that are privately leased. Essential public services do have the ability to request an exemption from these and it is important to consider. Housing is a significant priority and a significant obligation of the county and city. 13 Regular Meetine Aspen (ltv Council May 9,2016 The comparison of this project to the surrounding zone districts. The design is respectful to the existing courthouse and the same height of the existing plaza building. The fact we are building on this topography is causing the height issues. In response to the proposed conditions we are removing the corbel for condition one. Creating a stronger architectural relationship we are bridging the architectural styles and ask council to remove condition three based on public input. Reduce amount of glazing. One of the top goals was to provide natural light for both public and employees. We believe the glazing as proposed provides a good architectural break between the addition and the plaza and allows for the architectural distinction. The curtain wall allows for the brick and stand stone wall appropriately proportioned. He asked council to remove condition four. The biggest challenge is to reduce the mass and scale and set back. The only way to do this is to reduce the size of the building further. Mr. Disalvo said they currently occupy 3,000 square feet in the court house. The proposed is 85000. It is small for 30 people. lt is a modest building. They are doing 21+t century police work in an 18th century building. 23,000 square feet will house all the county services. Janice Vos Caudill, county clerk. said the clerk's office was one of the top three departments the citizens expressed concern over. We need the space. I think it is fair. Operations under one roof creates efficiencies. Mr. Peacock requested conditions one and two not be included. Councilman Daily said it is a really nice job. They covered a lot of territory and did it honorably. He appreciates the thoughtfulness. Mayor Skadron opened the public comment. 1. Toni Kronberg said the county did relentless public outreach. It is a perfect fit and fills in the spot. She agrees about the pathway and it is a security risk. The glazing is important and the public needs natural light. The community wants the canopy. 2. Steve Child said the jail will block the majority of the addition. He does not think the mass of the addition is the big thing. This is a modest building. A vast majority of employees ride the busses. Mayor Skadron said he believes everything you guys said. The requirement for space needs is a given. When you are reviewing an application and your expert staff says one thing and the applicant says one thing do you dismiss it. Mr. Child said there are times when we disagree. Mr. Peacock stated he thinks your staff has done an excellent job. He said the breadth of public interest is broader than a typical land use review. Mayor Skadron said we often conflict with Staffs opinion. It concerns me because we deal with the same issues. Mayor Skadron closed the public comment. Councilman Frisch said on housing not adding FTEs is a fair one. The audit is what we should be focusing on. An updated TIA will be provided. The first two deal with a smaller building. Three and four are time not bulk and mass. A comment about the fast track. Good hard work is somewhat tainted by the fast track. The coinmunity would have a better project if we sent it back and said work on it with point one and two. The ability to work more provides a better building and I think the community is losing that. He 14 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council Mav 9,2016 thinks the building is good but it has the ability to be better. Staff sees a lot of buildings. My preference is the first four things stay. Councilman Myrin said they already signed leases in Basalt. The timeline is out of sync with what could have been done. it feels like we are under pressure. What Councilman Frisch said is important. We need to figure out what are the best things to put in this recommendation. Everyone is well meaning. Page 1169, the proposed service yard by environmental health is 16x8 for the trash/recycling area that should be 20x 10. He would like to include a recommendation to meet the requirements by the City. Page 1163 the site plan shows the buildings are close together. He would like to see the space wider. Thanks for eliminating number five. He agrees with Staff on the others. Councilman Daily said he is supportive of the application as submitted. It is a pretty conservative approach. There may be places for improvement. The cottonwoods are a risk. Councilman Myrin said it is interesting that there are so few public comment. The idea the city is discouraging renewable since we have 100 percent renewable. He suggested the conference rooms be side by side by the lobby to share space. Councilwoman Mullins said the irony is it is the same thing we have been struggling with for customer service and rent versus own. You are trying to come in way below national standards but you still come in with a big building. In terms of public outreach there was quite a bit. Because of the topography and the mass ofthejail the building from the north will not have the impact as it would if the jail is not there. She thinks there should be a greater set back between the addition and the courthouse. The glass partition is fine. She is so glad you got rid of the corbel. She supports the audit, it is the fair way. They should do the TIA analysis. She would rather they save every tree but trusts Ben as far as what ones need to go. They need to look a bit more at environmental health. She supports the project the way it is. Ms. Garrow said on the environmental health piece the DRC comments are in the packet. They are comfortable with the smaller size as long as it is enclosed. Speaking to the glazing it is important to make sure new buildings are consistent and compatible with what they are adjacent to and the general context. They recommend more punch openings on the upper levels and a more traditional window pattern. Mr. Barker said the architectural relationship is tricky here. Normally they would request the applicant come back with more design options. Ms. Garrow said the mass and scale from the north is important to look at what the adjacent zone districts have in terms of height limit but it is important to recognize the significant drop in grade. 38 feet is the height limit in the commercial core. It may be realistic for the front portion but something closer to 42 or 44 for the back. In terms of setback. a change could be to go back to HPC during the remodel to remove the non-historic stair and address that particular piece. Councilman Myrin moved to approve Ordinance #10, Series of 2016 with conditions to modify recommendation 2 to have the non-historic stair be examined by IIPC during the renovation of the building and modify number 4 that the glazing be compatible with the design guidelines; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. Councilman Frisch asked for the best case scenario timeline. Mr. Peacock said the process will be roughly the same going forward. They will bring the conditions back to the board. 15 Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council May 9, 2016 Roll call vote. Councilmembers Mullins, yes. Daily, yes; Frisch, yes. Myrin, yes; Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion carried. Councilman Myrin moved to continue to May 10,2016 at 5:30 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Frisch. All in favor, motion carried. Linda Manning, City Clerk 16 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHA_PTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1530 E . AA,~ SWeek Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I (name, please print) th' 2* 9 Cel.h' being or representing an Applicant to t~ City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: U/'0' Publication ofnotice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than. fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation.in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. AL-91 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this _2* day of AUDG~ , 20#Q_, bf &-1 07-~A. 2,5- H~ PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of an amended site-specific development My commission expires: J plan, and the existence of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of As- pen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Parcel ID 2737-073-47-851; legally de- scribed as Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision 1(*ul# 0~4 fajto_tiffs,/O.- commonly known as 530 E. Main St., City of As- pen, County of Pitkin, Colorado. The approval Notary Public grants a Major Public Project Review approval: re- lating to Municipal Code Chapter 26.500. The ap- proval is for renovation of the existing Courthouse Plaza building and a new three-story addition. For .. further information contact Justin Barker at the City KAREN REED PATTERSON of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen. Colorado, justin.barker@cityo- faspen.com, (970) 429-2797. ATTACHMENTS: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO City of Aspen NOTARY ID #19964002767 ' Published in The Aspen Times on May 26,2016. COPY OF THE PUBLICATION My Commission Expires February 15,2020 (12129099) lili I - . h-/'I...I- DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.080, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official. pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock. 530 E. Main Street. Aspen. CO. 81611 Property (hvner's Name, Mailing Address Second Amended Plat of Lot 1 9 Pitkin County Center Subdivision. recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception No. 626213: 530 E. Main St., Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval to renovate the existing Courthouse Plaza building and construct a new addition. Written Description Of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Major Public Project Review approval by the City Council via Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2016 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) May 26.2016 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) May 27.2019 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 19th day of May, 2016, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. , Â·4142 (t Flil(1Â».A Jessica Garrow, Community bâ‚¬velopment Director 0 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner THRU: Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director RE: Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza, 530 E. Main St. - Major Public Project Review Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2016, Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2016 APPLICANT /OWNER: Pitkin County 8 9/: REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Detwiler & Jodi Smith LOCATION: 530 E. Main Street CURRENT ZONING -- 4 -AL~ Public (PUB) w/ PD overlay e 0 SUMMARY: .-ALLEÂ¥ 6 f 4. . E MAIN ST The applicant requests City Council -/I-- approve renovation ofthe Courthouse Plaza Locator Map building and the development of an approximate 32,000 square foot addition. m,er .Ne., '4 Ap.Â·1.71 ' :-I e STAFF RECOMIMENDATION: Â¥ 4.-I MT . Staff recommends City Council approve :a 2 A I with conditions. ... - f %.: -4, /.,r,~ M ...Â£ q t. ..1 - -1 Current image of Plaza building & Veteran's Park Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 1 of 8 OUESTIONS FROM FIRST READING: Council had a number of questions at First Reading, including: Provide additional information on essential public facility - An essential public facility is a facility which serves an essential public purpose is available for use by or benefit of, the general public and serves the needs of the community. An essential public facility has unique Growth Management requirements, which are outlined on pages 6-7 of the memo. Provide additional information on Veterans Park - The proposed project largely retains Veterans Park as-is. Staff has some concerns about the addition being too close to the courthouse. There is currently a pedestrian path through Veterans Park that would be negatively affected by this reduced opening width. Staff has recommended a larger setback between these two structures. The proposed project also appears to remove several large cottonwood trees on the east side of the park for a wider path. The Parks Department has expressed some concern over the loss of these trees. Provide additional information about the sustainability goals of the project - The Applicant is prepared to respond to this at Second Reading. The Applicant has provided a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), however staff has concerns that the proposed measures do not fully mitigate the trips generated by the project. A condition is included in the proposed ordinance. LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from City Council: â€¢ Major Public Project Review - (Chapter 26.500) for development proposed by a governmental entity. The proposed project is subject to Major Public Project review. The Public Project review process was adopted by City Council in December 2015 to bring the Land Use Code into compliance with Colorado Revised Statute Â§31-23-209. The Statute requires the City to provide a decision within 60 days of application submission for a project submitted by governmental agencies or other quasi- municipal organizations. If the City fails to provide a decision within sixty days, the application shall be deemed approved. If the City denies the application, the applicant's governing body (in this case the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners) may overrule this decision by a recorded vote oftwo-thirds (2/3rd) the Board. Because of the limited timeframe for review to occur, Council is asked to make a decision at this meeting. City Council will be the final authority on this project. HPC will not conduct a Final Design Review. BACKGROUND: The proposed project is located on a 1.6 acre (-69,000 square feet) lot. The lot currently includes three Pitkin County facilities: the Courthouse, the jail, and the Plaza building. The property is zoned Public (PUB). The Plaza building is a three-story above grade structure (with full basement) that houses several Pitkin County departments, including the Board of Elections, Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Clerk and Recorder. The Plaza building was constructed in the 1970s, designed by Jack Walls, a noted AspenModern architect. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 2 of 8 The applicant is required to have a Planned Development because the property is zoned Public. The Public zone district does not provide dimensions, and therefore all dimensional requirements are established through the Planned Development process. The Planned Development review criteria for dimensions are based on community goals, character of the primary uses, and compatibility with surrounding development patterns. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes remodel of the existing Plaza building and construction of a new 32,000 square foot addition. The remodel of the Plaza building is mostly interior with minor exterior changes. The proposed addition will be a new three-story structure located between the Plaza building and the jail, above a parking level accessed from Rio Grande Place. The purpose of this project is to consolidate the majority of Pitkin County staff in one location and provide enough space so that each department can serve the public more efficiently. This also includes relocating several County departments from other locations into this project. The scope of work for this project does not include the Courthouse or jail buildings. STAFF EVALUATION: Public Project (Exhibit A): The following sections of the Land Use Code apply to the proposed project: Planned Development, Growth Management, and Commercial Design. Staff responses to each section are detailed in Exhibit A, with specific highlights noted below. The proposed dimensional requirements are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Dimensional Requirements Dimensions Permitted in CC Permitted in C-1 Permitted in SCI Proposed> . Minimum gross Lot No requirement No requirement 3,000 sf No requirement Area 55', no favade 28', 38' for three- 28',36'forthree-story 35' facing Main Street Maximum height story elements elements shall exceed 40' Minimum front yard No requirement No requirement No requirement No requirement setback Minimum side yard No requirement No requirement No requirement No requirement setback Minimum rear yard No requirement No requirement No requirement No requirement setback Minimum Pursuant to Pursuant to Pursuant to Pursuant to utility/trash/recycle Chapter 12.06 Chapter 12.06 Chapter 12.06 Chapter 12.06 area Minimum floor-to- First floor: 13' First floor: 11' No requirement No requirement floor height Upper floors: 9' Upper floors: 9' 2:1, or Cumulative FAR 2.75:1 2.5:1 2.25:1 138,540 sq. ft. Pursuantto Pursuant to Pursuant to Requirement met by Public Amenity .. i Section 26.575.030 Section 26.575.030 Section 26.575.030 Veterans Park Minimum parking Pursuant to Pursuant to Pursuant to 10 spaces Section 26.515.030 Section 26.515.030 Section 26.5 15.030 Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 3 of 8 Planned Development & Commercial Design: Staff has some concerns related to mass, scale and height of the proposed addition. The height of the proposed development on the north side of the structure ranges from 31'-42', plus a fourth floor set back from the lower levels that reaches a height of -45'. These heights exceed the maximum allowance for any of the nearby zone districts. Additionally, the FAR of the proposed addition is much larger than the other structures on the property: Proposed Plaza building: 14,710 sf + 27,165 sf addition = 41,875 sf Courthouse: 16,580 sf Jail: 15,645 sf New addition 1 1--i trrITI --- g"~1Aflfltf~~ttif 7 -.ill'-I= - ...... &1.... .1 . 3:.a.. Â·uÂ·,lauu&2;Â£'17~22 k. - ./i ~..W~La~~~232~ElE] @@~ Ell EE I -6 -- I ~04*F j~;E##Ai~!1Â§~49':t TIL'll FrrrT-n rE It 42 1 121 g y & 1 1- . A -- . 1 6 11 tililillvlllillillili~ . 1 Figure A - North Faqade (Rio Grande side) I-- AL - 1 - ..1.- 1_ ti Figure B - Rio Grande perspective The proposed mass and height on the north side is shown in Figure A above. Renderings from a 3-d model were provided at the HPC public hearing, and shown in Figure B above. Although the provided 3-d rendering helps alleviate some of the concerns, staff still recommends the applicant explore options to reduce the overall height, mass and width of the structure from the north side. Some suggestions include a further set back top floor, or potentially relocating some additional mass subgrade. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 4 of 8 '4 1 1. 'K The "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines" state that the setting of iconic historic structures should be preserved and enhanced when feasible, and to locate amenity space adjacent to an iconic structure. The Courthouse has historically had ample open space on all sides of the structure. The addition is set back from the street, preserving Veteran's Park and providing some open space on the east side, but the proposed addition is located only -11 ' from the corner of the Courthouse (see Figure C). Staff recommends the addition be further separated from the Courthouse in order to better preserve the historic setting. - 1|Illia=-W ~~DDITION~ 91~ -3. 1 7/I'll/"Fl.# . 7-7- Â£ It Y" --,r-ZÂ· vy 4.7 -- - 12* h 1 -:1.- -, 1*0 4. 24=.-'.21 - ELEVATOR 'I=i b. 1 - N . -Â£7 PITKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE - 311Â·-4144Â· '-1~ , -=ty-: 11 Le,d~ BUILDING /\ ~u Pi. 5 : -1 4 'EXISTINCOURH-Â£ PLAZA~ 1 -- 4 D _ il . CREMODELED) IRI~II~:I 11 1 , . 1. r --L r-/ 4 - 1 b Â·-r d- It 1111.Â¥. 1. ., LL_ze I Â·. - 11.-- 5 4 LL --1 .1/4/ f: ft'_ 1 4 ~t 1. 6 9. 2---4 16# PROPOSED Il 11 4' CANOFf , _ , 0 EXISTING STATUE -7 1 11 h . EXIST!!IG IRON FENCE / / \ b BIKE RACK $=--/0 z 2. EXISTING SIDEWALK --, --: b 1- Figure C - Site Plan In terms of architecture, the addition uses a style that is not consistent with Aspen's architectural history and also includes a three-story glass curtain wall facing Main Street (see Figure D on next page). The addition is not strongly related to either the Plaza building or the historic Courthouse. Staff recommends the use of architectural elements and details that creates a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings, such as reducing the amount of glazing on the curtain wall. The west fa~acle of the addition includes a stone corbel detail above the first floor (see Figure E on next page). This is the only area where this detail appears, and does not seem to be consistent with the style or details of the rest of the project or adjacent buildings. Staff recommends this be removed from the design. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 5 of 8 '4 - Il- .A~V I la- ..f p -. .4 7 - 1 .9 St. 9 7 1. 4- 9 ; 4 0 91 ZE 3 W 2.- 1 * 2 5 F. 3 3 4 6 - I. - N r i mi 't - .2 4 m V - |'/ 1, 1, Â·i ':h; it 1 - 1, Ti '' 1.t , : 41 -il â„¢ . 91. 1.1 1.,1 -. ' N Figure D - South Faqade (glass curtain wall is highlighted) 1-11 1 1 1 1 --1 14 1 1 1 1. I 1 .. :4â€¢Â·.4 Â·Â·A 4 2 31.-r-- t ' . 1 1 : 1 -- ----Ill- -lig- .+~'i2---- 1 21 1; 41 . - - 9 w ' ~cm!FI~Er-~ , 1 K . 1- .1 ' .1 411- 424- â€¢1 J P. 1 1. Lim- 1 1-# 1%. 1-j Il I..r------ tr 1 1 ': /1 1 11-1~ M -1 1 -11 1 1 1 Figure E - West FaÂ¢acle (stone corbel detail is highlighted) Growth Management: As County government office space, the proposed project is an essential public facility. There are two unique features of essential public facilities in terms of Growth Management: 1. There is no annual allotment limit. 2. Employee generation is determined by P&Z or HPC. City Council may then assess, waive, or partially waive any mitigation requirement. Although employee generation is determined by HPC, the Land Use Code references an employee generation rate of 5.1 employees per 1,000 square feet of net leasable area for the Public zone district. This is considered typical for office type uses, which is the primary use of the proposed Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 6 of 8 facility. Using this generation rate, the proposed addition would generate approximately 101.69 employees. To a great extent, the project will house existing employees who are currently working in locations which will be vacated. The APCHA Board reviewed the application at their regular meeting held on April 20, 2016 and recommend approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. A baseline of current employees - full- and part-time - will be provided to APCHA prior to building permit approval. 2. At least twice within 10 years after the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is received on the new building employee audits will be conducted (preferably 5 years and 10 years after CO). The audit would include all employees - full- and part-time working out of the building. The hours would be added and then divided by 2,080 to get the FTE count. 3. If the audits show additional personnel, mitigation shall be required. Mitigation can be satisfied by utilizing existing deed restricted units provided by the County (new or as buy- downs). HPC supported the audit requirement during their review. REFERRAL DEPARTMENTS: The application was reviewed by Transportation, Utilities, Sanitation District, Zoning, Environmental Ilealth, Fire District, Building, APCHA, and Parks. All received comments are included in Exhibit B. with applicable comments included in the draft ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve with the following conditions: 1. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the building. 2. Create a larger setback between the addition and the Courthouse building. 3. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. 4. Reduce the amount of glazing on the curtain wall. 5. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. 6. An updated TIA shall be provided at building permit submission. HPC recommended approval with conditions by a vote of 4- 1. Draft copies of the HPC minutes and approved resolution are attached as Exhibit D & E, respectively. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Major Public Project Review for 530 E. Main Street, with conditions." EXHIBITS: A. Review Criteria - Public Project B. DRC Comments C. Application Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 7 of 8 D. April 13, 2016 HPC minutes E. HPC Resolution 11, Series of 2016 F. Public comment received prior to 5/2/16 Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 5.9.16 Page 8 0 f 8 304.vaÂ®,N'.4 -â€¢MTYÂ». '. - Community Development Department 344 130 South Galena Street L.~4 -- WW Aspen, C081611 29 A.,Flk 201:6 PM .'2. L . â‚¬Â»40 Â·Maf HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING CONDI COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE ~C- ~1~~ ASPEN, CO 81611 See 78 1 N (8005/08/16 UNABLE TO FORWARD/FOR REVIEW i.(004*â€¢ E C: 81611194999 DU * 2 379...111132 -29=1 42 5 3.51=i * * 1**1049 7111 1 3-,ili 5 :111Iii, ,-il !,1,1 jil 13114 %|s,11,1. :inilitâ€ž, 1,+1 .1 411 1 115 9, ).0 3 .,1,11 } 11 9 . .1. i 131: 2 j 13% * 31 1 m ,/Ag,#. *$m**.I- '4,7, .Ala Community Development Department (3.PAND JUNCTION Â¢30 2%15 W/-t=-"""Â«./09'". ..>"" 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 29 APR 2016 PM 1T - 1~11 FOREVER le- . A,u ah,LLIÂ«m - - -- Pit// M & G CONDO ASSOC 426 E MAIN ST ~ 4 ASPEN, CO 81611 MGC0426 808 UNABLE TO FOB..A 9. *C00452 de j.. .a Bi@***g@@*07 11:idill!*ili,wigitjâ€ž11!1111ilitilli:111,11111~liliftiftlill:111 0 5/P . ..'lili.,44 *WI,<.'.'C.2,7,=.# 14.7/,1~k,~~~1 - Community Development Department ..M,2 GRÂ·AP.1 (7]i ,11.JNCTION di)Â·815 6.EWS~ 4, 130 South Galena Street > ~ ~9' mel =f-~9~79 i- C?52 4,PR 52331Â·46; 16**1 1 L Aspen, CO 81611 R g L . FOREVER '626,~ - '1 1-691 1 GALANTER YALE & ELYSE 525 S ANDREWS AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 333012831 NIXIE 353 PE 1 0005/10/16 i I RETURN 3-9 SENDER ' ~ NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADD E SSED UNABLE TO FORWARÂ» EC: 81611190230 *. 4979- 0957-29-42 w:AIRâ‚¬i :blp %49 02 0 1!2%11|1"; |; 1 | i |Fi|| I ii!11 1 1111111'1011 ~ lf/11 ~ 1 11 il!111 131111 1 11 ..1 100' Q , 4/ lf. 1 31 .!11! 3 " -1 1* C rl + .....9.- - -#%/.-'- ~ -L R.4,*1Â·M Community Development Department GRAND JUNCTION EtC> Blm .t'.'M+I 130 South Galena Street R#-.~* inlir,a#."M..73"W~WakilWE Aspen, CO 81611 29 APR. 20'16 Â·PM :2. L /f-'41.} khtiER#ig.~~I Fi~'" FOREVER 4*. ~~ GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 4491 ASPEN, CO 81612 ?64 T 7 T = 622 5 2 1 500 5/03/15 N i I ..... 6 RETURN TO SENDER 1 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN i UNABLE TO FORWARD I 12 ... m c, -b 1119{34:SU '* Ze/3-1UULM- 29-42 1 ~ b'$25 ' 1.p '1Â£ M ''F 't 1 ,1,3,1 B 1611â‚¬GS@94 0 2 littililt'!111111'11111*1111!Uili#Ii,21.1111111!111111'lilli'511'! ~ ' I)RAND JUNCTION 00 2315 405~ Community Development Department ~ ,Â«-*MiR imill:4 ' 9/ 130 South Galena Street 29 APR 20116 '1>94 1 L ./ Aspen, CO 81611 & ~11< JA Krolv - M.*f 2**2 - ~4'Â· u._2*VER L JII#~,4.,~.11 STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 12738 W 84TH DR ARVADA: CO 80001 1 9.0 =7 X- = 8018 ZE 1 0005/08/16 [' RETÂ·Fe 70 SENDER I ! 6.. r v - - ..' . Â· t .i - m U C ; -Â· J ; 1 *; ;.I Al C -31 0 in'U Â·1 1- 3 1 1 2 1 '2 7 U r. M A r W 1 82: 81611190230 -19.9-11177-29-42 i BOWâ‚¬*tkilâ‚¬402 11!&'11""il,?ill:1'ill'!fi,11,11021-0,1,2,-11)Malli,ilill:,51,5, ~ 1 6 .! i :1 _*34.4 At 9&5% /4 J. , ' 1 3 ''}!' 1 1 (1 : '-d % 1 1 11..1!- gl /Â»50.-Ill './..-1/.-~I-.J't, L,-.11- I#*-Â»1#--/23/****4 Community Development Department GRAND JUNC'OON COÂ· 815 .,Â©p =* 130 South Galena Street - Aspen, CO 81611 29 APR 2016 Pivt 1 -r /~'*~frl@~ ibil&."..62.... ./.7*/M FOREVER ~492.2~,/1 MILL & MAIN COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 808 SE 1 080 5/0 5/16 1 1':. Â£ XI E RETURN TO SENDER 1 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN 1 UNABLE TO FORWARD i t . r a &â€¢' gÂ·.Â·1 4 / 1 X. A-A Â·9.-1 9 1% * I" /9 ~ 6 6. ~ Â·i u -4.6 50236, 1 2 Â·Â·I 47 - -4. C .i. 0 -, --Â· L al - 9 ,r. At *Â·1 311 3 1,2 , 411. ' 1Â¢ =ke#11:7**%2 ttif-1111.11"nli'ili' Misiblititilili!t'!11:1Â£'i,!!111!ili,ti,di. ' 1 1 1 L. Community Development Department ,#*:4*/7-- ,*1./. Â¢24â€ž&,A NE)Â·. Ill..1 NC.:1-127.IN,I Ii:C~ 6;1.!.1, Â·~â€ž~~l;~~Â©~~~4~2~kt~'.~ 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 ~ti ~~~p.~~~ ~ ~~~~ *~1<~,~ Â·~t. 4 1 1: - < e.3 5 (44 /3 FOREVER ~A .Z-h@~~LE#M MILL STREET CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA RIO GRANDE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 N 1 l. J. 2 825 be 1 0 Â·9 0 3 / 2 9 / 1.15 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 81511136230 4 p . CE - A -Il- 4 -' . 2 - -4 * m. 4 7 r. .le./ 7 .4 BiB:&4*10/402 111'Kilitii'!11111!,i{.111Â£|1&1111:1111241!1111!1111!811&11'litil i Community Development Department .:. 33Â·RAND 31.)tÂ·.}trl*'10*:1. -COÂ·315 130 South Galena Street Kp./Imb 7/1./.Ir/'ll- 1.4794Â·~b-L#VOW-#47*At Aspen, CO 81611 ,#........."m~/."Er.~.- *;i-# 29 APP. 20,16 PiLY 21- '1.'" -ia:.,fÂ· lb*O~~<1,':j;~2t~~ 00'.75Â»14660*4/EM.#a.1EeLe OBP LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL#104 ASPEN, CO 81611 N I X. 3. E 808 52 1 0805/08/16 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD UÂ· j~ A .4I .,~2 E~ ~ ~ .l A .-2 6> .Â£6 * ,*L I ; 2 7 - . 4!' LO' A-44*91-44 -4 6 12142 4371&02 ;, - 1 1 : 1 1] 1 1 1 1 - I t' 1 R I ~ i 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 J ~i t' i t /11 2 1 111 }1 I 1 1 1 111 ?i 1-i , H'iti l l I I i'. 1 ,11' 1 1 $ fe: j '4 'i< a,2 ' , , ' j C Community Development Department -- 130 South Galena Street /0 7~ -7-fof- Aspen, CO 81611 FOREVER ~21'!~~ MILNE SHEILA PO BOX 8286 ASPEN, CO 81612 1 /2 06 - 51//1 KIZI 1-Â·4 -/ A. 1 2 308 FE 1 9 9 9 2 9Â· W ' A '/ i H + P Than = Sy 1 A TIE M F TE D - N OT < NOWN ~ A - U t: h U L C 10 FORWARD 541 81611198238 ; 0, rfÂ· Â¢: 4# i:tl ./1 3 f '1 1 ]* Â¤ Be *4<4.04&920 zs:.: t 21!'11'111<11111,111%11'LI,!â€ž111;,11'11,11]211,11,#iltil,litaill 61279-07656-29-45 1 W. U ' 0*2 ls, 1 11 1 , 1 ., e Community.Development Department - 9.'.49 130 South Galena Street ~ Aspen,.CO 81611 '29 A.PR 2016 PM I T A-*12-#r-~ 7-jj........ FOREVER ID., 42~641?9 - CONCEPT 600 CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA BASALT, CO 81621 N I XI E 808 lEE 1 0005/04/16 RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIL RErmoTAr; 2 UNABLE TO FORWARD 616*1*31%1902 ' 3/4 81611190230 *1979-10935-29-42 Evi,11111111/'ili'SllaiTijitlijilliti}'13!t'ill,ilitilibillijil i Community Development Department Â¢'~'0 i'4, +.r; ~ ; 4~"A. â€¢' ,iu_, -â€ž._ _ - <lot:LAN u "431'ujix!,â‚¬31.-1-Â£ 0+J COÂ·815 Â·Â·0*;'~">~ -- - :*-â„¢16 0-0/ 130 South Galena Street , >.A.00Â»--!F- Aspen, CO 81611 L .:.-,â€žellp*** w.. Jai-br :iâ€¢" 'aja FOREVER -~- 'Â·~--- - GLATHAR KIMBERLY J PO BOX 12197 ASPEN, CO 81612 N I XIE 563 75 1 0003/08/16 pETURN TO SENDER AT:Ely CED - NOT <NORN UNABLE TO FORWARD 5 1611198230 -1979-iD-,614 - - 8 i~2 ' p p k i t i a t i l l " l l i t i : r ~ 3 1 rl i d -1 1 1 1 : 1 u l i ;, p l ~ i t i l i l l t : 1' l i j , 2,5 1 ' r. ' 9.' /. 1. "A:} 1/1/1, /: j .'i 6.90.1.-49-42 j- - I.W.*... ...'Â· i ./*I ,/I i.."I.' 1 4'395*4413 1<JftÂ©77Â£/>1~~1 CO 815 .503,42~ -~ ' Community Development Department ' 19 .. 130 South Galena Street 29 .4.-PR 20 16 F'fvl 1 L ./07~44~ Aspen, CO 81611 ..n. CD FOREVER ~~' 7.#.~~Â£41 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BIBI i Eki .r:0 illitillillil,ilillill,lillii'lill'll'ilillillilijilibillilililll AD-1-- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: / 530 Â£ Â· Ma.0,3 SE ( (cr--4Â£7.te-~ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Hol 9 1 e y: 002 no , 20_(G_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS.. County of Pitkin ) 1, 4-94Â£ 5(Â« (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby Â·personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4~ublication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch ill height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 ,, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice Was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepid U.S. mail to all owners of property within. three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conductedÂ· prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A ~ copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or teit.amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal desÂ·cription of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signatufe The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 21 day of Arrit ' 20(4-5 by 'd,vut.4#u 5 c ~--u-'~ NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE: 530 E. Main Street (Courthouse Plaza) Public Hearing: May 9, 2016,5 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Cham- bers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 My fommission expires: 4,5.lac) Project Location: 530 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: PID # 2737-073-47-851 Description: The applicant proposes a remodel and addition to the existing Courthouse Plaza building. The building is located within a historic Nothry Puolic &*ah Ped 1.R"5-3-kt district. Land Use Review: Major Public Project Review Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: Pitkin County, c/o Jon Peacock, Coun- KAREN REED PATTERSON t'y Manager 530 E. Main Street, 3rd Floor, Aspen, NOTARY PUBLIC CO 81611 More Information:For further information related STATE OF COLORADO to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, 4TTACHMENTS AS APPLICAB L}l?TARY ID #19964002767 justin.barker@cityofaspen.corn. lMy Commission Expires February 15, 2020 Published in the Aspen Times on April 21, 2016 'UBLICATION -- (12058316) â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTALAGENCIES NOTICED BY MÂ£iII â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 RESOLUTION NO. 11 (SERIES OF 2016) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL GRANT MAJOR PUBLIC PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA LOCATED AT 530 E MAIN STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-47-851 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Courthouse Plaza (the Application) from Pitkin County (Applicant) for Major Public Project Review; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day ofinitial application -March 18,2016, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, this property is located in the Public (PUB) zone district and is partially located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department referred the application to Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department, and received comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting: and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended conditions; and, WHEREAS, all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, a summary of public outreach was provided by the applicant to meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided full access to review the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on April 13, 2016, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were heard by the Historic Preservation Commission, and recommended approval with conditions by a vote of four to one (4 - 1). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1:Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby recommends City Council grant the Pitkin County ~ Center Subdivision Major Public Project review approval, subject to the recommended conditions of approval as listed herein. The recommended dimensions are attached as Exhibit I. RECEPTION#: 628952, 04/29/2016 at Courthouse Plaza 11:06:36 AM, 530 E. Main Street 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Resolution No. 11, Series 2016 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page I of 4 The Applicant shall complete the following, prior to City Council review: 1. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side ofthe building. 2. Locate the addition further from the Courthouse building. 3. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. 4. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. Section 2: Employee Generation An employee audit shall be conducted by an outside entity prior to CO to determine the baseline number of existing employees (full- and part-time). Two years after CO, an additional employee audit shall be conducted by an outside entity, based on the same type of data received. for the baseline number. Any additional employees above the determined baseline shall be subject to future mitigation requirements. The Housing Authority shall requestÂ· the audit from Pitkin County. Failure to request the audit shall not render any of the approvals invalid. Pitkin County shall provide the Housing Authority and the Community Development Department with the audit report. The I Iousing Authority and Community Development shall forward the audit to the Housing Board, HPC and/or City Council for review. as applicable. Any costs for the audit shall be paid by the applicant. Section 3: Engineering Department Drainage- If greater than 25% of the site is disturbed, Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) will be required for the whole site. At a minimum, WQCV will be required for the disturbed area. Include a report in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that summarizes traffic impact mitigation. Section 4: Parks Department There is a large cottonwood tree in the city ROW that must be protected. Typical tree protection includes the entire area under the tree canopy. Minimal excavation will be required under the triangular walking path to protect the critical root zone of this cottonwood tree. Utilities that will be required will also need to stay outside the dripline of this tree. The applicant must submit a tree removal permit. There are a number of large diameter cottonwood trees that will be permitted for removal and mitigation will be charged for those trees. The possibility of a re-design of the Veterans Park may come about as a result of ongoing discussions with Pitkin County. Any trees that may be impacted by this will require another review by the Parks Department. Section 5: Environmental Health Department The current submission does not specify the "service yard" as space being dedicated to the - storage for trash. recycling and compost. The space shall be labeled for this specific use in order to comply with Municipal Code 12.10. Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No. 11, Series 20 I6 Page 2 of 4 The proposed "service yard" space is slightly below size requirements, but will be considered acceptable if the applicant fully encloses the space from wildlife. The space shall be enclosed in such a way as to prevent wildlife access and shield the waste containers from public view. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction: such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 13th day of April, 2016. Aphroved as to form: AppybvedÂ® topontent: 44*j/- Le Deborah Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pemb#, Chair Attest: ~94*ulk,lk Kathy Strick~nd, Deputy City Clerk ~ Attachments: Exhibit I: Recommended Dimensional Requirements Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No. 11, Series 2016 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit I - Recommended Dimensional Requirements 1 g . Dimension@. .. Propdked:P' %' =* 83:- Minimum:gross Lot Area ./4 4 No requirement *MaxidiuEhDightÂ· C Â· :-24-1,4. 55% no fagade facing Main Street shall exceed 40' *MinimuiÂ£fFOiitÂ»rd setback:~i>%9*92 No requirement Minimum Â§136 yard setback .., 39* No requirement &*Dmihum rear yard setbacC ~ i No requirement hlininium utility/trash/ree>de Jit c.1 Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 Minimum floor-to-floor height No requirement â‚¬umulative FAR- t.:Â¢-- 2:1. or 138,540 square feet 1Public Amenity 3, No requirement +Minimuihpatking spaces ~ '- â‚¬3 10 Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No..1 1, Series 20 16 Page 4 0 f 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 free market that was approved. I really like the architectural design and the architect has real talent. MOTION: Jim moved to approve resolution #10 for 534 E. Cooper for Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design subject to the conditions that the trash area be improved if a restaurant use is ever proposed for the building in accordance with the recommendation from staff. The tree plantings as recommended by the Parks Dept. on Hunter and Cooper are implements and that the public amenity open space be deemed satisfied with the contribution of $100,000 to be applied to the bulb out proposed on Cooper Ave. and not to exceed up to $100,000. Bob second the motion. Sara said the parking mitigation is in the resolution. Debbie pointed out in connection to the public amenity issue the code does have requirements for meeting that in certain regards and there is a calculation that is done based on the amount of square footage that is to come in. This applicant has offered to go above and beyond that and I don't know that you have the authority to require them to go up and above that as a condition of approval. You can ask them to study and consider up to $100,000 but you should approve something that is consistent with the code. AMENDED MOTION: Jim amended the motion to accept the offer to not exceed $60,000 but ask that they consider in good faith before the come back to take it to $100,000. Motion second by Bob. Roll call vote: Jim, yes; Bob, yes; Patrick. yes; Michael, yes; Willis, no; Gretchen, no. Motion carried 4-2. Gretchen said her concern is the entry. Bob said they might go back and look at and they might agree with certain aspects of it. 530 E. Main St. (Courthouse Plaza) Major Public Project Review Bob recused himself. 14 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 Debbie said she received the affidavit ofpublic notice and there was glitch in the publication in the newspaper. The newspaper inadvertently put the wrong heading o f 534 E. Cooper instead of 530 E. Main. They published a second notification that included the proper heading. The content of the notice was accurate. Given that we have four methods of notice I believe that notice has been sufficiently provided and HPC can proceed. Justin said the property includes the courthouse, the jail building and the courthouse plaza building. The proposal is to renovate the existing plaza building as well as construct a three to four story addition that connects to the rear of the plaza building. The purpose is to consolidate a space for the vast majority of the Pitkin county offices. The project is subject to a newer process called pubic projects review that was adopted by City Council about 4 months ago. This is ill order to comply with state statute requirement that any project submitted by a governmental agency would need to be reviewed by the city within a 60 day time frame and a decision provided within that time frame. There would be a hearing in fi-ont o f HPC or P&Z with a final decision going to council. It is a recommendation from HPC tonight. If the decision is not provided within that 60 days the application is deemed approved. There is an option if the city denies the application in that time the applicant may over rule the decision with a vote of 2/3 by their board. There will be no final review by LIPC and then it goes to council. There are three sections of the code that this application is subject to: planned development, commercial design and growth management. Staff' s main concern is the massing and height of the building on the north side which range from 31 to 54 feet depending on where it gets measured. This is a large building to be viewed from the Rio Grande side. The upper floor has been set back to help alleviate the height concerns. It still is a tall building and would be taller than what most of the surrounding zone districts would allow. The size of the addition is substantially larger than what exists on the site. Each building there range from 14 to 16 thousand square feet in floor area and the addition is 27,000 square feet in floor area. The proposed addition is 11 feet from the courthouse building. The iconic setting is the public green space surrounding it and the commercial guidelines call for retaining these settings for iconic structures if at all possible. Staff is recommending that the addition be pulled a little bit further away from the courthouse to help create the traditional setting. In terms of the architecture for this building staff feels that it doesn't quite relate very well to the courthouse building or the plaza building next door. Some of the detailing doesn't align and staff is recommending that it be re-evaluated to more 15 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 closely tie to the other two structures. Iii terms of the growth management this is an essential public facility so there are two important things to note about that. The first is that there is no annual allotment limit for this so it doesn't need to receive an allotment other than state the amount of square footage that is provided. The employee generation is determined in this case by HPC. The code does provide a typical rate of 5. l employees per thousand square feet in the public zone district for an office use is what this typically is. Staff ran the calculations to about 101 or 102 employees that would typically be generated out of this type of proposal; however, it is important to note that this is a relocating of current employees that are in other spaces in town. It is not necessarily generating additional employees. APCHA will be reviewing the application at their next meeting. They will be recommending that a current audit of what the employees are now that will be working in the building and to do another evaluation within two years to determine if any actual employee generation occurs and i f there is that would need to be mitigated. There is also concern from the Parks Department regarding some of the trees in Veteran's Park and they will be working with the applicant and have that resolved by the time they submit for a building permit. Staff recommends that HPC recommend approval to City Council with the four mentioned conditions. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the building. Locating the addition further away froin the courthouse building. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. Michael asked what type of public outreach was done for the project. Justin said the applicant held two public meetings and they can speak in greater detail what specifically they had done in addition to that. Gretchen asked about the architectural style. Justin said the architectural style for the addition that faces Main Street doesn't very closely relate to either the Victorian of the courthouse or the more AspenModern of the plaza building. It seems like a prairie style and it was suggested to pull some of the details from either the Victorian or plaza building styles into the addition. 16 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 Michael said you indicated in tile memo that the max height proposed is 55 feet and I didn't see anywhere where it hit that height. Justin said we didn't get the specific measurement points but that would be where the garage entrance is coming from Rio Grande up to the highest point of the top floor addition. The property does slope up toward Main Street at that point and due to the upper floor being set back it might not actually get to 54 feet and might be measured at a slightly lower point than that but if it was viewed from the Rio Grande it would be 54 feet. Michael said unlike the Police Department proposal that section is way pushed in closer to Main Street. Justin said it does get approximately to the same point back as the police station but the difference is the police station is proposing affordable housing along that back area too which is much closer to the edge of the street. I believe they are both pushed back from the Rio Grande edge of the property roughly the same. Willis asked Justin to outline the differences in the review processes between the county vs the city's police station proposal. Justin said the code amendment for the public project review does not require city projects (police station) to be reviewed within the 60 day time frame. Debbie said the City chose to go through the process like any other applicant. Michael said the county could have opted not to fast track under the new state statute. Justin said they could have gone through the typical review process but they also have the option to do the public project review. It is up to the applicant to decide which one they want to pursue. At the pre-application they were provided options for both and the decision was left up to them at that point. Willis pointed out that it isn't a new state statute it is newly adopted by the city. Willis said he recalls working on the library regarding this subject and 17 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13,2016 you can't pick one public entity tilat is funded by tax dollars against another funded by tax dollars. Applicant: Kin Weil, Poss Architecture Bill Poss, Rachel Richards. commissioner; John Peacock, county manager; Dave Detwiler, county project manager; Richard DeCampo, Poss architecture: Ron Ryan under sheriff John Peacock said as a public project this starts off in a different context. This project is about public service. What is motivating this public project is a response to providing essential public services. Those services are driven by demand of the community and state laws that set requirements as to how the services are to be provided. Regarding the sheriff's department we are doubling the space that they are in currently but not one position has been added to the department. What has changed are the requirements under which that department operates and space that is required to do the job. We are also required to have certain services located in Aspen. Aspen is the designated county seat for Pitkin County and under that statute we have to keep certain offices for essential services located in the county seat. We operate under a different set of motivations and a different set of rules that is driving the proposal that is in front of you. Because we are a public entity it also drives a different process for us. We established the programming needs for the essential services and then developed a vision paying attention to the importance of civic interaction, collaboration zones, good work environments, workflow efficiency. We reached out to the public and did open houses, videos, webpage outreach, CGTV. channel 11, press releases. We had a lot of feedback and asked the community what was important. in terms of architectural considerations we needed to bridge the design styles between the old court house and plaza building. The public said don't replicate and don't make a new civic statement. They talked about our energy goals and after taking everything together we asked the team to develop 4 different architectural concepts that we brought back to the public and asked for feedback in order to make modifications that the public wanted to see in their public building. We have been conscious to minimize the footprint while still meeting the minimum standards to effectively deliver the essential public services. The review process is vetted and we are following the letter of the law. Kim Weil, Bill Poss architects 18 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 The addition is essentially bridging from the courthouse plaza to the jail. Our addition connects to both buildings. We are set way back from the front of the courthouse and that was to respect Veterans Park. The Clerk's dept. will be in the basement of the existing plaza building. The parking area will be below where the sheriff parks presently in the addition. It will be lowered 8 to 10 feet which will make the driveway less steep than it is now. On the main level are services for the public, BOCC meeting room, multi-purpose room, and Sheriff's administration office. Community development will be in the second floor of the existing plaza bldg. Open Space and trails, assessor IT, GIS, treasurer will be on the second floor. The third floor will hold County administration, BOCC rooms, attorney, conference rooms, HR and finance. Kim said our tallest point is 44 feet at the garage door to the top of the parapet. We are 12 feet floor to floor with a three foot tloor pack. On the lower level we line up with the floor levels ofthe existing plaza building. The east elevation is 3 stories hidden by the proposed police station. On the materials there are cues taken out from the court house. There is brick, sandstone banding and a strong sandstone base and the vertical proportions on the windows are similar but at the same time it doesn't replicate the courthouse. The height is to the courthouse comice. It was important that everyone working for the county had access to some sunlight. The conference rooms on the second and third floor are glass on the outside and glass on the inside so that the light will filter through the building. The existing plaza building will be basically untouched. The upgrades include new windows and added insulation to improve energy performance. From Rio Grande Place the existing jail dominates the elevation. The Courthouse is the prominent building on Main Street. The new addition is 55 feet back from the courthouse and 80 feet back from the property line. The intent is to leave the plaza building a building of its own time. Questions and clarifications Michael asked about the process. Given this is a community project why did you opt for the 60 days rather than the traditional landuse application. Rachel Richard, BOCC commissioner Rachel said we had chosen this approach from the beginning. The public outreach was very important. We are on a tillie line and interest rates are important. These are public dollars that are at risk. We have to relocate all of our offices out of that building. We have signed leases in Basalt and this 19 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 is going to be a huge disruption workwise. Time is money. We want to be respectful and hear your comments and try to respond to those in the process. The process is part of the state law. Our City and County have good relationships. The process has been open and transparent and we have been inviting the public in and discussing it on the web. We are keying off the Civic Master plan that took ten years to create which talks about having historical human uses of having civic buildings in your downtown. Michael said he has not seen one letter or read one letter. This is a huge project and we are being asked to evaluate it, take it or leave it and we're moving on. A lot of the uses in the new building currently exist in the courthouse. John Peacock said we have 18 positions that are in city hall and 44 positions that are in the old courthouse which includes the Sheriff's department as well as the assessor and treasurer's office. One of the goals is to make room for additional hearing room space and more space for the 9th judicial district. The state has told us to find hearing room space. As we relocate the treasurer's office and sheriff's we can use the courthouse as a true courthouse. We will also secure that building. We are trying to maintain the interior of the courthouse as well as the exterior. While it is a large space it is not an efficient space. We have been talking for some time as to how to meet the essential facility needs. Rachel said communications for 911 offices will be moved to the North 40 fire department. It is a 10 year contract. That will free up 1800 square feet in the jail and that will then be available for future expansion and use of the jail facility. Our current BOCC room is very inadequate facility for quite a while. Michael said he would recommend for Council to have full page renderings of each ofthe facades in 3D. Patrick asked the applicant if they have looked at going down one more floor to add more square footage below grade. Kim said the initial concepts had another level below but they were too expensive and we have budget constraints. 20 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2016 Rachel also said daylight is important for employees. There was a solid decision to not put employees down below. Veterans Park is sacred ground and there are relies that are buried there. Willis asked about the north courtyard with the corbel stone regarding staff' s comments. Kim said we are willing to look at that and have options. Willis asked about the north portico on the courthouse that is an non-historic addition to the courthouse. What is it repurposed as? Dave said they are still planning with the gth Judicial district. This location is where people are presently being transported from the jail into the courthouse. Those items that are not historic could be considered for future consideration when we repurpose the courthouse. Rachel said that is a great point raised. It might not be needed when the remodel goes forward and we could take into consideration the remove or modification of non-historic structure on the courthouse could be appropriate. There is also consideration of emergency exits. Jim said this is a confined space to accommodate the needs of the county and there is not a lot you can do with moving buildings and creating separation. The space is needed for functional purposes to deal with modern requirements. Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Willis identified the issues: Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the buildings. Locate the addition further from the Courthouse building. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. Jim reiterated that there is not much that can be done in reducing mass and moving the addition further away from the courthouse. 21 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 13,2016 Gretchen said she is confused whether the applicant is trying to match the architecture of plaza building or the old historic building between the sandstone and vertical element and a horizontal element. It is a good project. The skylight idea between the two buildings is really nice. Perhaps the joining element could be reduced in height which may make it look less massive. The architecture is a little bit of both and feels like there is a lot of different architecture on the site. Maybe the new addition could be quieter. The building is appropriate for the site and it is a successful project. Willis said he agrees with staff's recommendations and proposes they advance to city council. Patrick and Jim agreed. Willis said the corbel should be restudied as it is a confusing element. Gretchen agreed. Willis suggested when they get to re-programing the Courthouse when they come back to HPC to look at the non-historic elements that have accrued over time. The path from the courthouse plaza will be about five or six feet and that pinch point is going to be exacerbated with the number of pedestrians being funneled through there. Ron Ryan said that is one of our concerns from a safety perspective. Jim said the pedestrian pattern to Rio Grande Park is through Galena plaza. There is not much they can do regarding mass and scale. Dave said they have added an overhang on the east side of Veterans Park to improve that area and adds a shelter. MOTION: Jim moved that the commission recommends approval to City Council of the Major Pubic Project Review for 530 E. Main St. Courthouse plaza, resolution #11 with the conditions as recommended by staff; second by Patrick. . Roll call vote: Michael no; Willis, yes; Jim, yes; Patrick, yes; Gretchen, yes. Motion carried 4-1. MOTION: Willis moved to adjourn; second by Gretchen. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 22 Lisa Markalunas 15 Williams Ranch Court, Aspen, CO Mailing: P.O. Box 8253 Aspen, CO 81612 970-925-8623 April 12,2016 Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen 130 S, Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 and ; Board of County Commissioners Pitkin County 506 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 i RE: 530 E. Main Street (Courthouse Plaza) - Major Public Project Review Veteran's Park - Proposed Cottonwood Tree Removal Historic Preservation Commission Members & Board of Pitkin County Commissioners: After reading the coverage in the local newspaper that you are considering the possible removal of the four iarge cottonwood trees from Veteran's Park, i would like express my support for finding a way to preserve and keep these large cottonwoods in the Park. These venerable trees are important components of the historic landscape of both the Veteran's Memorial Park and the Pitkin County Courthouse. Since the City's forester believes the trees are viable and not of any concern to public safety, it seems that preserving them would be in the interest of maintaining the historic character of the landscape surrounding the Courthouse. I believe all efforts should be brought to bear by Pitkin County to insure that the trees are preserved. Replanting is not an acceptable solution as we will not see replanted trees grow to anywhere near this size in our lifetimes. The removal of these trees, for what appears to be a wider entrance sidewalk, is not, in my opinion, a sufficient reason to sacrifice these significant components of the historic landscape on a property as significant to the community as the Pitkin County Courthouse and the Veteran's Memorial. I urge the HPC to recommend that the trees remain on the site and I am hopeful that the Pitkin County Commissioners will lend their support in modifying the plans as necessary to keep these trees as an integral part of Veteran's Park. Sincerely, Lisa Markalunas IV.B. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner THRU: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza, 530 E. Main St. - Major Public Project Review Resolution No. _, Series of 2016 - Public Hearing DATE: April 13,2016 APPLICANT /OWNER: Pitkin County 8- mO GRANDE PL 65' REPRESENTATIVE: -2 1 Dave Detwiler & Jodi Smith LOCATION: -Inrii,0/ 530 E. Main Street CURRENT ZONING ...f / Public (PUB) a SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC recommend j, m E MAIN ST approval to City Council for renovation of Locator Map the Courthouse Plaza building and the development of an approximate 32,000 square foot addition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: . 'e'. -~ ~Â·L:-1 '. *V . $ Â·41 ' 1 Staff recommends HPC recommend Major Public Project approval to City Council with ., *tr 4. I conditions. Current image of Plaza building & Veteran's Park Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 4.13.16 Page 1 of 6 P209 IV.B. LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Historic Preservation Commission: â€¢ Major Public Project Review - (Chapter 26.500) for development proposed by a governmental entity. (See "Staff Evaluation" for full description of this review process) BACKGROUND: The proposed project is located on a 1.6 acre (-69,000 square feet) lot. The lot currently includes three Pitkin County facilities: the Courthouse, the jail. and the Plaza building. The property is zoned Public (PUB). The Plaza building is a three-story above grade structure (with full basement) that houses several Pitkin County departments, including the Board of Elections, Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Clerk and Recorder. The Plaza building was constructed in the 1970s, designed by AspenModern noted architect Sam Caudill. The purpose of this project is to consolidate the majority of Pitkin County staff in one location and provide enough space so that each department can serve the public more efficiently. This also includes relocating several County departments from other locations into this project. The scope of work for this project does not include the Courthouse or jail buildings. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes remodel of the existing Plaza building and construction of a new 31,500 square foot addition. The remodel of the Plaza building is mostly interior with minor exterior changes. The proposed addition will be a new three-story structure located between the Plaza building and the jail, above a parking level accessed from Rio Grande Place. STAFF EVALUATION: Public Project (Exhibit A): The proposed project is subject to Major Public Project review. The Public Project review process was adopted by City Council in December 2015 to bring the Land Use Code into compliance with Colorado Revised Statute Â§31-23-209. The Statute requires the City to provide a decision within 60 days of application submission for a project submitted by governmental agencies or other quasi-municipal organizations. If the City fails to provide a decision within sixty days, the application shall be deemed approved. HPC or Council may establish conditions to be addressed within the sixty day period and then Council must decide to approve or deny the adjustments, if made. If the City denies the application, the applicant's governing body (in this case the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners) may overrule this decision by a recorded vote of two-thirds (2/3rd) the Board. Because of the limited timeframe for review to occur, HPC is asked to make a recommendation at this meeting, rather than asking the applicant to restudy and return to this board. HPC will not conduct a Final Design Review. The following sections of the Land Use Code apply to the proposed project: Planned Development. Growth Management, and Commercial Design. Staff responses to each section are Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 4.13.16 Page 2 of 6 P210 IV.B. detailed in Exhibit A, with specific highlights noted below. The proposed dimensional requirements are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Dimensional Requirements Dimensions Proposed Minimum gross Lot Area No requirement Maximum height 55% no fa~ade facing Main Street shall exceed 40' Minimum front yard setback No requirement Minimum side yard setback No requirement Minimum rear yard setback No requirement Minimum utility/trash/recycle area Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 Minimum floor-to-floor height No requirement Cumulative FAR 2:1, or 138,540 square feet Public Amenity No requirement Minimum parking spaces 10 Planned Development & Commercial Design: Staffs main concerns relate to mass, scale and height. The height of the proposed development on the north side of the structure ranges from 31'-42', plus a fourth floor set back from the lower levels and reaching a height of 43'-54'. These heights significantly exceed the maximum allowance for any of the nearby zone districts. Additionally, the FAR of the proposed addition is almost double any other structure on the property: Proposed Plaza building: 14,710 sf + 27,165 sf addition = 41,875 sf Courthouse: 16,580 sf Jail: 15,645 sf New addition _ 1 .-\ , -i- .. 1-"- , .littiflilif*kthÂ¥~~1 =2'ellb a ------- 0 Â£"1 - ~CE EE E 1.q'"==...~ Ti~V .,bl -* A lit ___11EE EE , D:~i n = : & Â·' 1 2b 54~ 1#= ,a _ A Â· â€ž1't :,4 1 - 61' .2Â« 1 = 1 Figure A - North Fafa(le A structure of this mass and height will have significant visual impacts, particularly regarding mountain views from Rio Grande Park and the relationship to the Courthouse (see Figure A). Staff recommends the applicant explore options to reduce the overall height, mass and width of the structure from the north side. Some suggestions include lower floor-to-floor heights, a further set back top floor, or potentially relocating some of the mass under Veteran's Park. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 4.13.16 Page 3 of 6 P211 IV.B. The "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines" state that the setting of iconic historic structures should be preserved and enhanced when feasible, and to locate amenity space adjacent to an iconic structure. The Courthouse has historically had ample open space on all sides of the structure. The addition is set back from the street, preserving Veteran's Park and providing some open space on the east side, but the proposed addition is located only -11' from the Courthouse (see Figure B). Staff recommends the addition be further separated from the Courthouse in order to better preserve the historic setting. i:EF-=-E .4- .. 1... A-~ : 1 4 -+ j j. 447 9 .4 ' it 1 1- -11 1 . ELEVATOR i 20 1-4 -' 1 31 i OIERPIDE 1 ~' L--r-' i-1 i --7 .'-â€¢i:Â· ~ ' ~ ' 1 tF -=t PITKIN COU,m COURTHOUSE BUILDING .1,7 ''' 4 1 - 1 3 %/ 11 4 15 1 lilli' 1 EXISTIFIG COURil~~li~~~~ ,1 1 -i (RFEPOEL.t~_~ VETERAH= i / 1 ME'ORIAL , 1 1 1 2-. , i h- h k li -0 ' 1. ~f I' 9.1.,1, Â·' . 1.-1/ 1 2 11 - 92Â·34 ( . P ' ' ' :.C 3 t noposED BIKE RACK-- z ~ CANO..- , .1 STING STATUE 7 i EUSTHÂ«@ IRON FENCE Â£ ,1 & â€¢ '-' S - DISTING SIDEWALK ./... - -~ ._1/' Sir .- - .-2< Figure B - Site Plan In terms of architecture, the addition uses a style that is not part of Aspen' s architectural history and also includes a three-story glass curtain wall facing Main Street (see Figure C on next page). The addition is not strongly related to either the Plaza building or the historic Courthouse. Staff recommends the use of architectural elements and details that creates a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. The west faede of the addition includes a stone corbel detail above the first floor (see Figure D on next page). This is the only area where this detail appears, and does not seem to be consistent with the style or details of the rest of the project or adjacent buildings. Staff recommends this should be removed from the design. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - StaffMemo 4.13.16 Page 4 of 6 P212 IV.B. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f - .-- 11111 11 IF' 2 93-14 , L : .--------1 r-- 3 -1 -9 4 1: - 411 44 f Â·iÂ« 1 11. .1 I // P 'ff' tÂ¥ 1 ~ =4 . p - - - -4 -,2-14 1 1 111 1 . - 11'i I 1010- /1 7'..1 -&,1,111,41- .. 1 Figure C - South Fa,ade 1 1 1 ---- 1 1 1 Trilieveplfl.Flf 1 j F 71 f -4 TtITTI jÂ« -47 t.1=31 Â· Â· 2-1-t - 'lit 7-lE Ii.MI'll"_1-51 - -- -1r k--llt--4- -b-â‚¬ - - j 11 4....#111:7 | I. " K 'P; 1:4Â·Â·1~4-i~*4' 9tl :e 1:'' !1 1 Lky__EN-j pn[-1 ...../3-13, : t.: " 2 /4 pm 7/fil--Plfw..P./tplil3 8.. 1 n7/ 1 1 7*ik- -4~--4-01:t#;1 f J 1~4UW I lili , 4 '1 1 1 Figure D - West Fa,ade Growth Management: The proposed project has been determined as an essential public facility. There are two unique features of essential public facilities in terms of Growth Management: 1. There is no annual allotment limit. 2. Employee generation is determined by P&Z or HPC. City Council may then assess, waive. or partially waive any mitigation requirement. Although employee generation is determined by HPC, the Land Use Code references an employee generation rate of 5.1 employees per 1,000 square feet of net leasable area for the Public zone district. This is considered typical for office type uses, which is the primary use of the proposed facility. Using this generation rate, the proposed addition would generate approximately 101.69 employees. To a great extent, the project will house existing employees who are currently working in locations which will be vacated. Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 4.13.16 Page 5 of 6 P213 -1 il-111 f " IV.B. The APCHA Board is scheduled to review the application on April 20. APCHA staff has recommended to the Board that the applicant provide a current audit of employees and that a second audit would be required 2 years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. If the second audit shows additional employees that the applicant would have to provide mitigation. This recommendation is subject to change depending on the APCHA Board. Staff supports the proposed APCHA recommendation. REFERRAL DEPARTMENTS: The application was reviewed by Transportation, Utilities, Sanitation District, Zoning, Environmental Health, Fire District, Building, APCHA. and Parks. All received comments are included in Exhibit B, with applicable comments included in the draft resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC recommend approval to City Council with the following conditions: 1. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side of the building. 2. Locate the addition further from the Courthouse building. 3. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. 4. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fa,ade. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to recommend approval to City Council of Major Public Project Review for 530 E. Main Street, with conditions." EXHIBITS: A. Review Criteria - Public Project B. DRC Comments C. Application Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza - Staff Memo 4.13.16 Page 6 of 6 P214 IV.B. RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2016) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL GRANT MAJOR PUBLIC PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE COURTHOUSE PLAZA LOCATED AT 530 E MAIN STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-47-851 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Courthouse Plaza (the Application) from Pitkin County (Applicant) for Major Public Project Review; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application -March 18,2016, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, this property is located in the Public (PUB) zone district and is partially located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department referred the application to Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department, and received comments as a result ofthe Development Review Committee meeting: and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended conditions; and, WHEREAS, all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, a summary of public outreach was provided by the applicant to meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided full access to review the proposed development; and, WHEREAS. the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on April 13, 2016, during which the recommendations ofthe Community Development Director and comments from the public were heard by the Historic Preservation Commission, and recommended approval with conditions by a vote of to L - D. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1:Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Historic Preservation Commission hereby recommends City Council grant the Pitkin County Center Subdivision Major Public Project review approval, subject to the recommended conditions of approval as listed herein. The recommended dimensions are attached as Exhibit I. Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No._, Series 2016 Page 1 of 4 P215 IV.B. The Applicant shall complete the following, prior to City Council review: 1. Reduce the mass and scale of the north side ofthe building. 2. Locate the addition further from the Courthouse building. 3. Create a stronger architectural relationship to the adjacent buildings. 4. Eliminate the corbel detail on the west fagade. Section 2: Employee Generation An employee audit shall be conducted by an outside entity shall be completed to determine the baseline number of existing employees (full- and part-time). Two years after CO, an additional employee audit shall be conducted by an outside entity, based on the same type of data received for the baseline number. Any additional employees above the determined baseline shall be subject to future mitigation requirements. The Housing Authority shall request the audit from Pitkin County. Failure to request the audit shall not render any of the approvals invalid. Pitkin County shall provide the Housing Authority and the Community Development Department with the audit report. The Housing Authority and Community Development shall forward the audit to the Housing Board, HPC and/or City Council for review, as applicable. Any costs for the audit shall be paid by the applicant. Section 3: Engineering Department Drainage- If greater than 25% of the site is disturbed, WQCV will be required for the whole site. At a minimum, WQCV will be required for the disturbed area. Include a report in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that summarizes traffic impact mitigation. Section 4: Parks Department There is a large cottonwood tree in the city ROW that must be protected. Typical tree protection includes the entire area under the tree canopy. Minimal excavation will be required under the triangular walking path to protect the critical root zone of this cottonwood tree. Utilities that will be required will also need to stay outside the dripline of this tree. The applicant must submit a tree removal permit. There are a number of large diameter cottonwood trees that will be permitted for removal and mitigation will be charged for those trees. The possibility of a re-design of the Veterans Park may come about as a result of ongoing discussions with Pitkin County. Any trees that may be impacted by this will require another review by the Parks Department. Section 5: Environmental Health Department The current submission does not specify the "service yard" as space being dedicated to the storage for trash, recycling and compost. The space shall be labeled for this specific use in order to comply with Municipal Code 12.10. Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No._, Series 2016 Page 2 0 f 4 P216 IV.B. The proposed "service yard" space is slightly below size requirements, but will be considered acceptable if the applicant fully encloses the space from wildlife. The space shall be enclosed in such a way as to prevent wildlife access and shield the waste containers from public view. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 13th day of April, 2016. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Deborah Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair Attest: Kathy Strickland, Deputy City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit I: Recommended Dimensional Requirements Courthouse Plaza 530 E. Main Street Resolution No._, Series 2016 Page 3 of 4 P217 gLEd f Jo t osed 9 1 02 so!.IOS '-ON uo!,nioso'H Palls u!EDN -3 0Â£5 ezeld osnoqunoo 0 1 34 saillds iluppud uinunu,w }UOUIOJInbol ON 4!uOUIv 3!Iqnd 1004 ojenbs 0179'8Â£I 10 '1:Z tIVA aA,Jeiniunl luoUIO.Imboi ON "INWI[ .IOoU-01-100IJ UlnUI1U1W 9O E I Joldetio 01 luensind Bale apaa.[/tIse.11/411!*n UlnUIpulk luOUI01!nboi ON 43EqleS p.[Ellgal UlnUIIU!14 luOUI01!nbaI ON Youq}as p.:gl aP!Â§ tunUI'u'W luOUI01!nbal ON Mieq,gs pick luo.IJ mnumI'W 40* poooxo Hells 100.IlS up?IN Su!0133 opujuj ou :, 55 )1!BIall Urnul!XEW lu0UI01!nboj ON 13/V '07 Â§Â§0/:i tlinUI'upw pasodold SUO~SUaUIp(I Sluaula.1!nbaN [Buo!suatu!(1 PapUOUIUIOOaH - I Uq!4XG[ "8"Al IV.B. EXHIBIT A PUBLIC PROJECTS 26.500.070 General review standards The following review standards shall be used in review of any application for Public Projects: 1. The proposed project complies with the zone district limitations, or is otherwise compatible with neighborhood context; and Staff Findings: The subject property is located within the Public (PUB) zone district. Essential government uses are a permitted use in this zone district. The structures on this property include the Pitkin County Courthouse, jail, and government offices. These are all essential government uses. The dimensional requirements for the Public zone district are set through a Planned Development approval. The proposed dimensional requirements are listed in the table below: 7, Dimensions Proposed Minimum gross Lot Area No requirement Maximum height 55', no fa~ade facing Main Street shall exceed 40' Minimum front yard setback No requirement Minimum side yard setback No requirement Minimum rear yard setback , No requirement Minimum utility/trash/recycle areaÂ« Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 Minimum floor-to-floor height No requirement Cumulative FAR 2:1,or 138.540 square feet Public Amenity No requirement Minimum parking spaces 10 The proposed dimensional requirements are somewhat similar to those of the Commercial Core (CO zone district, with modifications to maximum height, minimum floor-to-floor height, public amenity and FAR. Specific discussion on these are outlined below. FAR. The proposed FAR is 2:1, which is what would be permitted for commercial uses in CC. This is lower than the 2.75:1 permitted for civic uses in CC, and the 2.5: 1 permitted in the Commercial (C-1) zone district. The proposed addition's FAR is approximately 27,165 sf Including the existing development on site (46,935 4 the total FAR would be 74,100 sf This is significantly less than 2:1, however, additional development on the property requires a Planned Development Amendment and is subject to review. Staff is supportive of the proposed maximum allowable FAR. Heights: The surrounding development includes: West: Pitkin County Courthouse - -42' tall (excluding tower).facing Main Street East: proposed City of Aspen Police Department - -30 ' tall (currently several single-story buildings) Exhibit A - Public Projects Page 1 of 5 P219 IV.B. North: Pitkin County Jail - -33' tall.facing Rio Grande Place South: St. Mary's church - -42' tall (excluding tower) facing Main Street Courthouse Plaza - -35' tall facing Main Street The proposed addition is approximately 38.5' tall facing Main Street, which is similar to the current and proposed surrounding development (30'-42'). The fagade facing Rio Grande Place is approximately 42' tall with a set back.fourth floor at almost 55' tall, which is significantly taller than the Pitkin County Jail building (-33 '). Staffis concerned that the proposed development will appear massive from Rio Grande Place. One suggestion to reduce this height is include lower floor-tonfloor heights. In order to reduce the overall height, staff is supportive of no minimum floor-to-floor height requirement. Staff is not supportive of the 55' maximum height, and recommends that the applicant explore options to reduce the overall height to be more consistent with surrounding development. Public Amenitv: This property is located in the Public zone district, which is not required to provide public amenity. However, Veteran's Park is approximately 10% of the square footage of the property, which is the minimum requirement for public amenity in Section 26.575.030. There are no plans to eliminate Veteran's Park, which adequately serves as public amenity for the site. Staff is supportive of the proposed public amenity requirement. 2. The proposed project supports stated community goals; and Staff Findings: Pitkin County is responsible fbi the space needs of the 2 ls' Judicial District, which is mandated by State Statute. Several offices located within the Courthouse need to be relocated in order to accommodate an additional court room. The offices would be relocated to the proposed project. The Civic Master Plan identifies that reduced office sizes and scattered locations.for departments creates inefficiencies both internally and with regard to customer service. The 2006 Civic Master Plan Core Principle #1 speaks to the importance of locating civic uses in the heart of town. The relocation of offices from the Courthouse to the proposed project remains on the same parcel, which has been identified as an appropriate location .for civic uses. The 2006 Civic Master Planl recommends that "as part of the collaboration between the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, regarding civic space needs, the City and County should identify an appropriate downtown space and design a shared-use Meeting Hall" The City of Aspen is also currently in the planning process .for a new City facility. This provides a perfect opportunity to explore the shared-use Meeting Hall that the Civic Master Plan recommends. Staff recommends Pitkin County coordinate with the City of Aspen to develop a shared-use meeting Hall to avoid duplication of costs and reduce overall new development. ' The 2006 Civic Master Plan is a regulatory document that requires land use applications to demonstrate "consistency with the Civic Master Plan or Core Principles and relevant portions ofthe AACP cited in the Civic Master Plan. Exhibit A - Public Projects Page 2 of 5 P220 IV.B. 3. The proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of the Land Use Code; and Staff Findings: The following sections of the Land Use Code apply to the proposed project: Planned Development, Growth Management, and Commercial Design. Responses to each section are detailed below. Planned Development: The property is zoned Public, which requires adoption of a Final Planned Development approval to establish the dimensional requirements. The approval of both Project Review and Detailed Review together constitute a Final Planned Development approval. For the purposes of meeting the State Statute timing requirement, Project Review and Detailed Review are combined in this review. The purpose of Planned Development review is to encourage flexibility and innovation in the development of land which: A. Promotes the purposes, goals and objectives of applicable adopted regulatory plans. B. Achieves a more desirable development pattern, a higher quality design and site planning, a greater variety in the type and character of development and a greater compatibility with existing and future surrounding land uses than would be possible through the strict application of the zone district provisions. C. Preserves natural and man-made site features of historic, cultural or scenic value. D. Promotes more efficient use of land, publicfacilities and governmental services. E. Incorporates an appropriate level of public input to the planning process to ensure sensitivity to neighborhood and community goals and objectives. F. Promotes safe and convenient transit, pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access and circulation. G. Allows the development of mixed land uses through the encouragement of innovative design practices that warrant variationsfrom the standard permitted zone district land uses and dimensional requirements. Stafffinds that the project does not meet the following standards: 26.445.050.D. Dimensions - The criteria states that the project should be compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources. The proposed addition's FAR is approximately 27,165 sf This makes the Plaza Building more than double any other structure on the property and represents increase of almost 60% in total FAR. Exhibit A - Public Projects Page 3 of 5 P221 IV.B. The proposed project will be a significant additional mass on the property that will appear almost two.full stories taller than the jail building (see River Approach below) and is proposed very close to the Pitkin County Courthouse (see Commercial Core below). Staff recommends that the overall height and width of the building is reduced to minimize the visual impacts from Rio Grande Park and that there be more separation between the addition and the Courthouse. 26.445.050.E. Design Standards - The proposed location for the project is located partially within both the River Approach and Commercial Core Character Areas, as identified in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines". For this application, staff has used the River Approach Character Area in evaluating the north portion of the development and the Commercial Core Character Area in evaluating the Main Street fa,ade. River Approach: The River Approach area states that buildings should respect the natural contours,.features and scenic vistas that exist. Guideline 3.7 states that a building on a sloping site shall be designed to reduce its perceived mass and scale and reflect the natural slope of the site. The proposed development is four stories tall.facing Rio Grande Place, and is almost double the square footage of the existing Plaza building. This will be a significant additional mass on the property, and will have a large visual impact from Rio Grande Park. The proposed structure will appear almost two full stories taller than the jail building located directly north. Staff appreciates that the proposed design sets back the fourth floor to reduce the impact and reflect the slope of the site. Staff recommends that the overall height and width of the structure be reduced. Commercial Core: The Commercial Core area states to maintain the traditional scale of buildings, and it is important thal future growth acknowledges, complements and enhances the existing scale and character of this area. The Guidelines also focus on the relationship to historic structures. The Pitkin County Courthouse (built in 1890 and on the National Register of Historic Places) is located next to the proposed addition, and is identified as one of Aspen's iconic historic structures within the Guidelines. The addition is shorter than the Courthouse, and is set back from the street which further reduces the perceived height of the building, which are both in line with the guidelines. However, the distance between the addition and the Courthouse is only -11 1 Guideline 6.34 states that the setting of iconic historic structures should be preserved and enhanced when feasible, and to locate amenity space adjacent to an iconic structure. The Courthouse has historically had ample open space on all sides of the structure. Staff recommends the addition be further separated from the Courthouse in order to better preserve the historic setting. Growth Management: The proposed project has been determined as an essential public facility, which means that the employee generation is determined by HPC. City Council may then assess, waive, or partially waive the mitigation requirement. Section 26.470.100.AU) of the Land Use Code states an employee generation rate of 5.1 employees per 1,000 square feel of net leasable area for the Public zone district. This is Exhibit A - Public Projects Page 4 of 5 P222 IV.B. considered typical for office type uses, which is the primary use of the proposed facility. Using this generation rate, the estimated employee generation would be calculated as follows: Basement: no net leasable Ground Floor: 8,876/ 1,000 = 8.876 x 5.1 - 45.27 FTEs 2nd & 3'd Floor: 14,751 / 1,000 = 14.751 x 3.825 = 56.42 FTEs Total Employee Generation: 45.27 + 56.42 = 101.69 FTEs Mitigation requirement: 101.69 x 0.6 = 61.02 FTEs The APCHA Board is scheduled to review the application on April 20. APCHA staff has recommended to the Board that the applicant provide a current audit of employees and that a second audit would be required 2 years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. If the second audit shows additional employees that the applicant would have to provide mitigation. This recommendation is subject to change depending on the APCHA Board. Staff supports the proposed APCHA recommendation. Commercial Desimi: See responses to "Design Standards" in Planned Development above. 4. The proposed project receives all development allotments required by Chapter 26.470. Growth Management Quota System. Staff Findings: The proposed project will add approximately 32,000 square feet Of essential public .facility. There is no annual limit on allotments for essential public .facilities, and therefore there is no requirement to obtain allotments. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Exhibit A - Public Projects Page 5 of 5 P223 IV.B. EXHIBIT B DRC COMMENTS ACSD Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Oil and Sand separators are required for parking garages and vehicle maintenance establishments. Driveway entrance drains must drain to drywells. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru 0/s interceptor Oil and Grease interceptors (NOT traps) are required for all food processing establishment. Locations of food processing shall be identified prior to building permit Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements and prior to soil stabilization measures. Soil nails are not allowed in ROW. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. A "Shared Service Line Agreement" will be required to serve the COA Police Department building and the PitCO courthouse annex and addition on one sanitary sewer service line. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Where additional development would produce fiows that would ovenvhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). Exhibit B - DRC Comments Page 1 of 3 P224 IV.B. Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Sopris Engineering will furnish average and peak flows as well as service size prior to final design. The district will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed building and utility plans are available. APCHA What has been recommended is for the applicant to provide a current number of existing employees (full- and part-time). The hours would be added and then divided by 2,080 to get the FTE count. Two years after a certificate of occupancy has been issued, a second employee audit would be completed. If the audit shows that no additional employees were hired, no mitigation would be required. If the audit shows additional employees, then the applicant would have to provide mitigation at that time in a manner recommended by APCHA. Environmental Health 1. The proposal submitted shows a "service yard" space of 16' x 8' x (open to sky) that the applicant stated will be the trash and recycling storage area. The dimensions required for a commercial building and no food service is 200 square feet (20'1 x 10'w with 10' height clearance) for trash and recycling storage (Municipal Code 12.10.030 A. a.). a. The space is slightly below requirements, but would be approved for a commercial building if the applicant were to fully enclose the space from wildlife. It is recommended this space be enclosed in such a way as to prevent wildlife access and shield the waste containers from public view. b. Since the Pitkin County Jail has a successful waste diversion program with recycling and compost, Environmental Health recommends an enclosure to create the best conditions for continued success of this program. 2. The current submission does not specify the "service yard" as space being dedicated to the storage for trash, recycling and compost. Labeling the space for this specific use is usually required as part of complying with Municipal Code 12.10 to prevent confusion and ensure this space is committed solely to the storage of waste containers. 3. Environmental Health recommends placing the trash and recycling area ("service yard") closer to, or within, the building to provide the most convenient and safe access for staff. a. There are logistical constraints of this property due to law enforcement considerations, The applicant is encouraged to work with City and County staff to ensure the waste diversion potential is maximized in this new building, despite those constraints. Exhibit B - DRC Comments Page 2 of 3 P225 IV.B. Parks There is a large cottonwood tree in the city ROW that must be protected. Typical tree protection includes the entire area under the tree canopy. Minimal excavation will be required under the triangular walking path to protect the critical root zone of this cottonwood tree. Utilities that will be required will also need to stay outside the dripline of this tree. The applicant must submit a tree removal permit. There are a number of large diameter cottonwood trees that will be permitted for removal and mitigation will be charged for those trees. The possibility of a re-design of the Veterans Park may come about as a result of ongoing discussions with Pitkin County. Any trees that may be impacted by this will require another review by the Parks Department. Engineering Drainage- If greater than 25% of the site is disturbed, WQCV will be required for the whole site. At a minimum, WQCV will be required for the disturbed area. Traffic Impact Analysis- Include a report that summarizes traffic impact mitigation. The following comments are also shown in the attachments. â€¢ No credit can be taken for conditions that currently exist. â€¢ To get credit for work on adjacent block, the proposed work needs to be shown. â€¢ Explain new landscaping. â€¢ Explain minor pedestrian improvements being proposed. â€¢ What bus stop is being improved? Exhibit B - DRC Comments Page 3 0 f 3 P226 IV.B. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD . u Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review E Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ U Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. P227 m El El El IV.B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARr'~MENT .1 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen CCity") and Property Pitkin County Email: Phone No.: 920-5067; jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Owner Cl") Address of 530 East Main Street Billing 530 East Main Street Properly: Address} Third Floor (subject of (send Eis here) Aspen, CO 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applicationis and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 1 Parks 0 Select Dept ~ $ 1,300 flat fee for . $ flat fee for - $ 1,625 flat fee for APCHA (Housing) $0 flat fee for Select Review 1 For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is I impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the Cjty for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 7,800 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time I i 24 above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. j $275 1 1 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the i deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ' .. ... .-- 4. -Ghfis-Benele# Jessica Garrow Jon Peacock Community Development Director Name: Title: County Manager City Use: 11000 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January 2015 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-Â·5090 P228 IV.B. CITY OF ASPEN 9 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 . DATE 5.18.15 PROJECT: 530 E, Main Street REPRESENTATIVE: Jodi Smith, 970.920.5396 REQUEST: Major Public Project Review DESCRIPTION: The applicant (Pitkin County) would like to construct a new addition on the north side of the Courthouse Plaza building, located at 530 E. Main- Street The existing structure will also be remodeled on the interior and po,tentially refinished with new exterior materials. The proposed addition would be approximately between 18,000 -22,000 square feet and 2-3 stories tall. This property is zoned as Public (PUB) and partially located within the Commercial Core Historic District, City Council adopted a code amendment via Ordinance 11, Series of 2015 on May 4, 2015. This code amendment establishes the Public Projects Review process, which Pitkin County qualifies for as a governmental entity. The applicant must submit the application after the amendment becomes effective (June 3,2015) in order to be reviewed as a Public Project, Based on the scope of work, staff believes this would qualify as a Major Public Project Review. This is a two-step process with public hearings before HPC and City Council. The applicant may elect to create an advjsory group to review the project prior to the public hearings if desired. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpjtkin.com/Portals/0/docs/Cltv/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20809%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/DepartmentdCommunity-Developmen#Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(sl 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.500 Public Projects 26.500.040.C Major Public Project Review 26.710.250 Public (PUB) zone district Review by: Staff for complete application Engineering Parks Public Hearing: HPC and City Council Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - Major Public Project ($7,800 for 24 hours) Referral Fees: Engineering (per hour) - $275 - Parks (flatfee) - $1,300 APCHA (flat fee) - $1,625 ASLU Public Project 530 E. Main Street 273707347851 1 P229 IV.B. - Total Deposit: $11,000 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $275/hour) To apply, submit the following information: E Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Il Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). U Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report; or atbrney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application, Â¤ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, O HOA Compliance form (Attached) O Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: http://www,aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be included with the application. 0 A written description ofthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application atid relevant land use approvals associated with the property. O A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. 6 An 81/2" by If" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. El 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: Â¤ 20 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. U Total deposit for review of the application. 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. O A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. . 2 P230 IV.B. PnKIN COUNTY ATTORNEY John M. Ely Courthouse Annex Property County Attorney 530 East Main Street, Suite 302 Lisa MacDonald John.ElvW}nitkincountÂ¥.com Aspen, Colorado 81611-1948 Jane Achey Paralegals Laura C. Makar Tel: (970) 920-5190 Lisa.MacDonald@pitkiI,countÂ¥.com Assistant County Attorney Fax: (970) 920-5198 Jane.Achew@DitkincountÂ¥.com Laura.Makar@DitkincountÂ¥.com March 16, 2016 To: City of Aspen Community Development Department RE: Legal Status of Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property for Development Application To Whom it May Concern: Pursuant to the request for information concerning the legal description, ownership and encumbrances affecting the Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property, and as an undersigned licensed attorney practicing in the State of Colorado, the following information is submitted: â€¢ Legal Description of the Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property: Seconded Amended Plat of Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision Recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception No. 626213 â€¢ Property Owner: Pitkin County Capital Leasing Corporation and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County â€¢ Easements affecting the Parcel: The property is subject to all easements, rights of way, Property setbacks or other restrictions of record as shown on the Second Amended Plat of Lot Pitkin County Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No. 626213 including: 1 20.39' Utility Easement per Plat Book 93 at Page 56 1 8.0" Telephone, TV, Natural Gas, Water Service and Electric Easement per prior plats > 15.0' Joint Telephone, TV, Electric, Natural Gas and Water Service Easement per Plat Book 690 at Page 313 7 25.0' Trail and Transit Easement per prior plats i 10' Air and Light Easement per prior plats P231 IV.B. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MARCH 16,2016 7 Source Gas Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception Nos. 626208 * City of Aspen Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626210 1 Qwest Corporation Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626212 1 10,0' City of Aspen Electric Easement per Book 464 at Page 28 1 Obermeyer Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 499687 > City of Aspen Encroachment License recorded at Reception No. 565894 k Right of Way Vacation per Book 113 at Page 40 To the best of Applicant's knowledge there are no mortgages, judgments, liens, contracts or other agreements of record affecting this property. PITKIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sincerely, John M. El~ Â£Â£~lint,Attorney P232 IV.B. March 18, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Letter of Authorization; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, This letter is to authorize Dave Detwiler and Jodi Smith to act as our representatives for the above referenced project. Their contact information is as follows: Jodi Smith Pitkin County Facilities Manager 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 920-5377 Dave Detwiler Integrated Construction Solutions 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 261-6360 Sincerely, 21 -m>y L/--tow,1 41 c QuieÂ« tileÂ»"1 P233 IV.B. Â·Â· COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certificatjon must be signed bv the.property owner or Attornev representing the propertv owner. Name: Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock Property Owner (77: Email:jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Phone No.: 920-5067 Address of Pitkin County Center Lot 1 Property: (subject of Pitkin County Center Veterans Park application) I certify as follows: (pick one) Â· 5~ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the Improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. C] This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the Improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 1 understand this policy and l understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document Is a public document. /// Owner signature: 4 4 j --sc- --- -- - - date: 3/ 16 l l,6 Owner printed name: , Jon Peacock or, Attorney signature: . date: Attorney printed name: i P234 IV.B. Trip Generation Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: In order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" andthen click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center" category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then click the "Macro Settings" category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enter the project's square footage and/or unit counts under Proposed Land Use. The numbers should reflect the net change in land use between existing and proposed conditions. If a landuse is to be reduced put a negative number of units or square feet, Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable undereach of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. Points are only awarded for proposed (not existing) and confirmed aspects of the project. Sheet 3. TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Sheet 4. Summary and Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mitigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected for the project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measure that was chosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicle traffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense Helpful Hints: 1. Refer to the T ,Ira.nERm?tion.!01RaÂ¢t.4.naly-PLidelines for information on the use of this tool. 2 Refer to 1 TIA Frequently Asked Questions , a quick overview 2. Hover over red corner tags for additional information on individual measures. 3. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. = input = calculation DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 E. Main Street APPLICANT CONTACT Richard de Compo Poss Architecture + Planning INFORMATIONÂ· 605 E. Main St.; Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL rdecampo@billposs.com Minor Development - Inside the Roundabout Is this a major or minor project? |minor Major Development - Outside the Roundabout Net New Trips Gâ‚¬ nerated Units/Square Feet of AVI Peak-Hotr P VI Peak-Hoir the Proposed Project Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Proposed Land Use Commercial (sf) 10560.0 sf 16.54 7.43 23.97 17.49 26.23 43.72 Free-Market Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 Affordable Housing (Units) O Units O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 Lodging (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Essential Public Facility (sf) 5510.Osf 2.94 1.80 4.74 3.66 5.49 9.15 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 19.48 9.23 27.56 21.15 31.72 45.46 *For mixed-use (at least two of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hour and a 14% reduction for PM Peak-Hour is applied to the trip generation. ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Average PM Peak Aver:ge Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 Affordable Housing 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 P235 IV.B. MMLOS Input Page Instructions: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable to each measure under the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. ~= input ~= calculation ~ TOTAL NUMBER OF TRIPS MmGATED: ~.. ~ 45.4 Category Sub. Meaiure Number Question Answer Points Does the project propose a detached s dewalk where an attached 1 sidewalk currently exists? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer No 0 meet standard minimum widths? Is the proposed effective sidewalk width greater than the standard 2 No 0 minimum width? Does the project propose a landscape buffer greater than the 3 Yes 5 standard minimum width? '1 Subtotal 5 Does the project propose a detached sidewalk on an adjacent 4 block? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard No 0 minimum widths? Is the proposed effective sidewalk width on an adjacent block 5 No 0 greater than the standard minimum width? Is the proposed landscape buffer on an adjacent block greater than 6 Yes 5 the standard minimum width? & :. 9-11 -,14, '1.1.1..... Subtotal 5 Are siopes between back of curb and sidewalk equal to or less than 7 Yes 0 5%? 8 Are curbs equal to (or less than) 6 inches? Yes 0 Is new large-scale landscaping proposed that improves the 9 pedestrian experience? Properties within the Core do not have ample Yes 5 area to provide the level of landscaping required to receive credit in thic ratenorv Does the project propose an improved crosswalk? This measure must 10 No 0 get City :zoroval before receiving credit .Ill' Subtotal~Â¥'.- I *. 5 1 ~:gY '. 11 Are existing driveways removed from the street? NA 0 Is pedestrian and/or vehicle visibility unchanged by new structure or 12 Yes 0 column? Is the grade (where pedestrians cross) on cross-slope of driveway 2% 13 Yes 0 orless? Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian access points from 14 the ROW? This includes improvements to ADA ramps or creating new No 0 access points which prevent pedestrians from crossing a street. i Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian or bicyclist 15 No O interaction with vehicles at drivewaY areas? Subtotal "~" 0 16 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor less than 1.5? Yes 0 Does the project propose new improvements which reduce the 17 pedestrian directness factor to less than 1.2? A site which has an No 0 existing pedestrian directness factor less than 1.2 cannot receive credit in thig raterinrv Is the project proposing an off site improvement that results in a 18 No 0 pedestrian directness factor below 1.2?* Are traffic calming features proposed that are part of an approved 19 No 0 Dian (sgeed bumps, rapid flash)?* Subtotal Ill&_ -_---~L, 0 Are additional minor improvements proposed which benefit the 20 pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Yes 3 Aspen staff? Are additional major improvements proposed which benefit the 21 pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of No 0 Aspen staff? Subtotal 3 '~ Pedestrian Total'- 7/6'7...I"Ir -91 11* P236 Pedestrian Network Considerations on Adjacent Blocks 40 on Project Frontage Proposed Pedestrian Routes , Sidewalk Condition i Sidewalk Condition Pedestrians Traffic Calming and Driveways, Parking, and Access Additional Improvements IV.B. Yory Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points 22 Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design? No 0 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or 23 No 0 drivewae Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to 24 NA an existing bicycle path? Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements 25 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements 26 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? 9 Jilipp*-5â€žâ€ž-4.2 1- Subtotal j~~~ . 91. :4 0 4 r 27 Is the project providing bicycle parking? Yes 5 2 IMÂ» - . 'â€žI '/V"- I '...I I -, Subtotal 5 .al~Di -1Â£ - - AL~fo egory Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points 28 Is seating/bench proposed? Yes 3 29 Is a trash receptacle proposed? Yes 3 30 Is transit system information (signage) proposed? Yes 3 31 Is shelter/shade proposed? Yes 4 32 Is enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? Yes 4 33 Is real-time transit information proposed? No 0 34 15 bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? No 0 35 Are ADA improvements proposed? Yes 5 22 i 124 - _6., Subtotal -: 3. + 36 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? NA 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway 37 No 0 operations proposed? 38 Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)? NO 0 Subtotal 0 - ,/.h P237 1 5 Transit Bicycles Enhanced Bicycle , Modifications to Existing Bicycle ~ Basic Amenities Amenities Paths Ensit Total" IV.B. TDM Input Page -I 91 . 1JP1II bii6M --~ 10 1- Instructions TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions, A pro,ect will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use Measure Strategy VMT Category Number Reductions Sub. Question Answer Will an onsite ammenities strategÂ¥ be implemented? Ye5 1 Onsite Servicing 3 00% Which onsite ammen,ties will be implemented? Retail Servicing Will a shared shuttle service strategy be implemented? yes W hat is the degree of Implementation? loW 2 5hared Shuttle Service 0.00% What is the compan' size? Small W hat percentage of customers are eligible? 0% Nonmotorized Zones ~Will a nonmotorized zones strategy be implemented? |NA O.00% Measure Strategy VMT Category Number Question Sub. Answer Reductions Will a network expansion stragtegy be implemented? No 4 Network Expansion What 15 the percentage increase of transit network coverage? 0% 0.00% What is the existing transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? 0% Will a service frequency/speed strategy be unplemented? NA 5 Service Frequency/5peed What is the percentage reduction In headways (increase in frequency)? 0% 000% What is the existing transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? 0% What is the level of implementation? Willa transit access impro.vement strategy be implemented? No 6 Transit Access Improvement 0.00% What 15 the extent of acces. improvements? 7 1 Intercept Lot |Will an intercept lot strategy be implemented? |NA O.00% Measure Strategy VMT Category Number Reductions Sub. Question Answer Will there be panicipationin TOP? Yes 8 Participation in TOP 4 00% What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% 1% a transit fare subsidy strategy implemented? Ye5 9 Transit Fare Subsidy What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% 13.80% What i the amount of transit subsidy per passenger (daily equivalent)? 1004 Is an employee parking cash.out strategy being implemented? No 10 Employee Parking Cash-Out 000% What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a workplace parking pricing strategy implemented? No 11 Workplace Parking Pricing What is the daily parking charge? O,00% What percentage of employees are subject to priced parking? 15 a compressed work weeks strategy implemented? No 12 Compressed Work Weeks What percentage of employees are participating? 000% What is the workweek schedule? Isan emplover Monsered shuttle program implemented? Yes 13 Emplover Sponsored Vanpool What is the employer size? Small 1 38% What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% Is a carpool matching strategy implemented? No 14 Carpool Matching 000% What percentage of employees are ellgble? Is carshare participation being implemented? No 15 Carshare Program How many employee memberships have been purchased? O.00% What percentage of employees are eligble? Isparticipation Inthe bikeshare program WE-{Â¥cle being implemented? No 16 Bikeshare Program How many memberships have been purchased? 0 00% What percentage of employees/guests are el,gble? Is an end of trip facilries strategy being Implemented? No 17 Endof TriF Facilities What ts the degfee of implementation? 0.00% What Is the employer size? Isa self funded emergency ride home strategy being implemented 7 No 18 Self funded Emeigency Ride Home 0 00% What peicentage of employees are eligible? Is a carpool/vanpool priority parking strategy being implemented? No 19 Carpoot/Vanpool Priority Parking What is the employer size? O 00% What number of parking spots are available for the program? Isa private employer shuttle strategv being implemented' NO 20 Pflvate Eniplover Shuttle What is the employer size? 0.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? Trip Reduction Maiketilig/Incentive 15 a trip reduction marketing/incentive program implemented? No 21 -- - 0.00 Piogia,n What percentage of employees/guests are eligible? '" -1=12 -I-, ..I.nd~ O Al/ 1,~21 1 1 22% work trms represents a mtxed- used,tte (SF Boy Area Travel Survey) See Assumptions Tab for n P238 Strategies Enhanc,ment, St,-,les Transit System Improvements N//hboihood/Slt, Commute Trip Reduction Programs Strategies IV.B. Summary and Narrative: DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 E. Ma n Street APPLICANT CONTACT Richard de Compo Poss Architecture + Plonning INFORMATIONÂ· 605 E. Main St; Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL rdecompo@billposs.com SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation NET TRIPS TO BE Peak Hour f Max Trips Generated MMLOS ~ TDM f Total Trips Mitigated MITIGATED PM | 45.5 45 | 3.13 | 48.13 0.00 Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explainthe Enforcement and Financing Plan forthe selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative re port. P239 IV.B. ~J OSS Al< (] 1111 EC-1 0 RE -1- P I /\14N I NG March 17, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Major Public Project Review Submission; Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, Enclosed please find our application for a major public project review for Pitkin County's new office building. As the accompanying drawings point out, this project involves the both the remodel of the existing Courthouse Plaza building and the construction of an addition to the northwest. This addition will be generally located in the parking area that currently exists between the Courthouse Plaza building and the Pitkin County Jail. The goal of this project is to consolidate the majority of county staff in one location and provide enough space so that each department can serve the public more efficiently. The existing Courthouse Plaza building contains approximately 13,700 square feet on three levels above grade. In addition, there is full basement measuring approximately 4,550 square feet. The remodel of this structure includes a complete removal of all interior finishes and non-load bearing walls and replacement with a mixture of new walls and modular office partitions. On the exterior, the changes will be relatively minor. These changes will include new windows, a minimized redesigned fascia, and new spandrel panels. The addition will be a new three story structure above a parking level accessed from Rio Grande Place to the north. Principal materials on this building will be brick and sandstone. During the design process of this building, great care was taken to respect the historic Pitkin County Courthouse located on the southwest corner of the parcel. The front most wall of the addition is set back almost 54 feet from the front of the courthouse building. The design takes cues from the courthouse such as materials, horizontal banding, and vertical window proportions but still allows the addition to be seen as a building of its time and not a copy or replication of historic architecture. Total area of the addition is approximately 17,000 square feet on the three above grade floors with approximately an additional 5,000 square feet in the below grade parking level. 605 FAS1 MAIN STRFET ASPEN. CD M{,11 (t) 1 P240 ,"1 (1) 9/0/970-7950 WWW.101 IPOSS.COM IV.B. ~OSS ARCIHI FC I [IRE -1 PI ANNING General Review Standards from Section 26.500.070 1. The proposed project conforms with the zone district limitations, or is otherwise compatible with neighborhood context. Response - The entire parcel is located within the city's Public (PUB) zone district. Section 26.710.250 outlines the permitted uses, conditional uses, and dimensional requirements for this zone district. Government office buildings and other essential government facilities are permitted uses under paragraph B.5 of this section. All of the buildings located on the parcel fall within this category. Regarding dimensional requirements for this parcel, paragraph 26.710.250.D states that these requirements are set by the Planned Development approval. Attached to this letter as Exhibit A are the proposed dimensional requirements for this parcel. These requirements are based on those currently existing within the city's Commercial Core (CC) zone district. We feel this is most appropriate because the CC zone district is closest in both use and proximity. 2. The proposed project supports stated community goals. Response - The proposed project will allow the public to interact with Pitkin County employees more efficiently. County departments are currently located in multiple locations. Some of those locations will have to be vacated in the future due to either through the loss of space due to City Hall being proposed for repurposing or required expansion of the county courts affecting the departments located in the courthouse. With the proposed remodel and addition to the Courthouse Plaza building, all of the county departments currently located in the courthouse and city hall will join the departments currently located in the Courthouse Plaza in one building. This will allow easier interaction between the public and the various departments as well as support interaction between the departments themselves. In addition, currently many county departments are challenged to provide quality service within the limited space in which they are currently located. The proposed project has gone through an extensive programming exercise to ensure that each department has the space required to perform their function. The ability forthe county staff to perform their task and interact with the public more efficiently benefits the entire community. Finally, we firmly believe this project furthers the goals of the City of Aspen Civic Master Plan (ACMP) adopted by the city council in December of 2006 by bring together county services in the neighborhood identified in the ACMP as appropriate for such uses. 3. The proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of the Land Use Code. Response - No variances from the Land Use Code are requested. 4. The project receives all development allotments required by Chapter 26.470, Growth Management Quota System. Response - Growth Management Quota System allotment for essential public facilities is governed by paragraph 26.470.030 of the Land Use Code. According to paragraph C of this section there is no development ceiling for essential public facilities. Further according to P241 IV.B. ~OSS ARC;I-lITEC-Illl<E-1 PLANNING paragraph D of this section, there is no annual allotment limit governing essential public facilities. Since the proposed project has been classified as an essential public facility it is clearly eligible to receive a GMQS allotment. The review criteria for this project are contained within paragraph 26.470.090.4 of the Land Use Code. Those standards are addressed below. GMQS Review Criteria from Paragraph 26.470.090.4 a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility. Response - The Community Development director has determined that proposed project is an essential public facility by virtue of the Pre-Application Conference Summary dated May 18,2015. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. Response - Pitkin County (applicant) formally requests the waiving of all affordable housing mitigation requirements for the Sheriff and administration Offices project. This is not to say that Pitkin County does not support the effort to provide affordable housing. The opposite is true and this commitment is shown in other ways. Pitkin County has been a partner in APCHA since in its inception and will continue to do so. In addition, the county has in the past and will continue to develop affordable housing projects and provide land for AH projects as opportunities present themselves. Representing the county's commitment to affordable housing is the fact that over the last 3 years the county has purchased 8 existing units in order to house county employees. Moving forward, the county has pledged 50% of its AH funds to supply housing to county employees in addition to housing forthe work force at large under APCHA authority, It is important to note that the primary goal of this project is to consolidate most county employees into a single facility not create space for additional employees. No new employees are being hired as a result of this project. Rather, existing employees will be relocated to the new facility. P242 IV.B. ~OSS /\Ii(]lil i IÂ· (} 1 URI.Â·.4 PI ANNING c. The applicant has made a reasonable good-faith effort in pursuit of providing the required affordable housing through the purchase and extinguishment of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. d. The proposal furthers affordable housing goals, and the fee-in-lieu payment will result in the near-term production of affordable housing. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. Please review this information and feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Bill~poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. I: 'Rim Heil, Partner P243 IV.B. poss AIL(:Illl ke I URE+PLANNING EXHIBITA Proposed Dimensional Requirements Pitkin County Center Parcel. 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): No Requirement 2. Minimum Net Lot area per dwelling unit (square feet): No Requirement 3. Minimum lot width (feet): No Requirement 4. Minimum front yard setback (feet): No Requirement 5. Minimum side vard setback (feet): No Requirement 6. Minimum rear vard setback (feet): No Requirement 7. Minimum utility/trash/recycle area: Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 8. Maximum height (feet): 55 Feet a) No fa,ade facing Main Street shall exceed 40 feet in height b) Mechanical equipment may extend up to 10 feet above height limit provided it is located at least 15 feet from any street facing fa,ade. 9. Minimum floor to floor heights (feet): No Requirement 10. Minimum Distance between buildings (feet): No Requirement 11. Public amenitv space: No Requirement 12. Floor area ratio (FAR): 2:1 13. Net Livable Area AH units (square feet): No Requirement P244 IV.B. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings k Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: P245 9. . 23 Â· f ;*112**I'9â€¢.A lil-i- lihle -f'i*nt,4~ 4%2-4â‚¬347&-d**0 1 .ie. N>' 3--Â»4 4. 1.4.4 46' 1.1 1*4.: ., ..310QDâ‚¬1 1.20_.4, SPLL_ 4. i. *t~ ' it_â€ž ~,0 Â£ A , .f Â· el 600 9 1 i Z TO .4.i- 209 .. 74- .24Â¢1 .5 y ' f /7. , adooo Â· 1,4 43 4 2. . /9 hi 1 9# '96 4/,1,74 $,8*3 *3/"2 , 1 /~~ r~ ~ -~~~~~~ i - 403, .ALLA.. 4, &2> Â»- 4-'0,4 1, 1) A/2$~T~ ,< 4 4 5.0* 2-9 =02 'es., '44:51 1/4 4- . W , L .% Mi41.1~ ''4 el . - #44, i ~_ 4 .4 W *6 -ifith & 14:Fl 9b:Â¤-L '1 i .1 h //1 Co~ 79. " Â£4 â€¢C' mo , 4 1/ 1. k , 40-7772 11 - 9NT :*,p.t. - :i .5. <. . f 9*.2 776 ..... 1 4, . - 6 . 1 . 4 1 /-4 14 LW* ./...L Â».4~ 7*te . .4.. 1. ~ -2- -, 1.1 . , r -J-t. 1- 1/~ r It/AD,Â»4,6 . .1,1 - . b 0' --7 0 ~1.4 - I. G.7 41 #-1 0 -~ Ok-<2 . Il, . r L-LS ** Â· *, 77.9~ ...11 . .-... .f I . 1- . 4 Â·.Â¥rb -r 44- I K â‚¬.1 Â· . , - - ' 44* . ' 4 '29' @K:.mt, f t?t'r * /. 6~ 0 11 0 , .. I ,â„¢.4 n . 41 *' 0 *41 44- 4 4- .ig: #8000,1.b 4 + ~ /< - 715 pt45.f~~~-JIvx- ' 44~~4 4.4 1 ~-4' N P â€¢ a 10/' i . ./6 . . ' I 4, 014 4,9 z r 92 A.w L i Iâ€¢ 6 4 r 4 : : 6 7-/ . , 1~ - .2. 74 7 44<7 44.7 , -1 1 0-. ,-ri # . /r . Mt' q . 6 .9 J "4 '1 . h .., y.â„¢m-/I- t..1 { I . 4 - f .1 -I- . , 7./0 1 > 9.-7-.../. . 4 ' 42+Z s~ ' ..2 , JT .b; E J / 0 .11 if Â»123 k - 4 .. ..b ., 3 Ill ...4. 41*1:4 1, t<,t: 0- - 4.-0 4 . - ..7 4 , ''1 -l 2 . .~740,4,- 14 : ,4 0- - 4 2 I :- I G . 40..,. , ... r. 1- 4 1 1Â¥ 1 1 1. ./ .... 0 â€¢Â·2%4 (D/ Â·+ 1 /6- i 3 71//4" Pic - :>' *t<Â· * Â· / 4 ?23'00)44 -1 + .N..6,wwg .Ar 4 f $ I.1 --L I/A - -,- .4 07 ; A Or - . 11 1Â£(*2 Â·'. .4 1 \92 E / 1% / 1 - '~ r *f , 1 p IN'.1 0 -../. 1 i *. 4 , 2.Â¥ t. .Jil~ - -. . - M. $ - 43tf ~ '~/ 7~/~8% 4/ - I ... I - I. 21'j 0 ~4 - .6 1 * 3, i~ 'b . F. . . - f , . I . fy Ak , *f 9 4, -Nt* i '4 - â€¢ . mil . ., ~>..:12...#I.3,1/7,; A . . 0, .. f. k!, 4.4~ T 1 k, r J :- 4 11/ 4.. . . Ae ; I ' = - 9/.11 .-- - I r. i . ., 1 6. 94#>\, i.<4 . . =.: .0--- >Ci~3* 06.JO. A>21,9. f. .- .4 'â€¢ . . I . -- . Â¢ , r.1 2 , â€¢0180-4*m~ ~- 4 r â€ž I '' 7 ' 0 r ./94* lilli/.- . 2 ' ' 7-0 -. *-....I-** I.I. -.4, == 1 -,4 .,1 . 5 - F v TrÂ· . 4 'f e'. 4 " e .#t '..3 h.... Ir'll"ll) â€¢ d 48. - Â· ' ' f/li . I - t. .gr 9 >07* 11,6 Â·6 X-Lr 1 #ROL~' L >6 r,44 AG~, F/.49. â‚¬ 4 r, 1-'Â· 12} 4.>.4,1,&6:kij.. 1 . .. .0 r. k d *teÂ· I - .. 4 h. 1%0.-a y ' 49 1 1. 14 2 4.0 i.Â·f f .1 z : u<~ ':*:. 44 - Ar ~ ~,z*g, 0# v i .. Y ' 4.4 , . - r I ..1 ' ' I .1 7//.b- .. n..t h ' . I 'L , i , ff, , 1 -â€¢ 70' "41 (0 : h * IV.B. poss ARCm FECTURE 1Â· PLANNING March 23, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Employee Generation Standards; Major Project Review; Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, This letter will address the employee generation standards for the city's Major Project Review Process as outlined in the Land Use Code. a) The expected employee generation of the use considering the employment generation pattern of the use or of a similar use within the City or a similar resort economy. Response - County departments are currently located in 4 different buildings within the vicinity of Aspen's commercial core. These buildings include the county courthouse, city hall (Armory), and the Pitkin County Jail. The purposed Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Center will bring most of those departments into a single location. County departments will be vacating the courthouse and the city hall as those facilities are scheduled for future remodels and ~ repurposing. The county is not increasing services or staff as a result of this project. Rather the existing staff is being relocated into a facility that will allow for better service to the public and a better working environment for the county staff. b) Any unique employment characteristics of the operation. Response - As an essential public facility, the services provided by the staff within the proposed building are critical to citizens of Pitkin County. These services will include government administration, finance, community development, human resources, open space management, county clerk, and law enforcement. One other very unique characteristic of this facility is the sheriff's department operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Within this department, workstations and offices are shared between the various shifts. The second unique characteristic of this facility is the public nature of the BOCC meeting room and voting operations requiring as seamless interaction with the public as possible. c) The extent to which employees of various uses within a mixed-use building or of a related off-site operation will overlap or serve multiple functions. Response - Most county departments and many county employees serve the public in multiple ways. Their tasks will not change as a result of the new facility. However, their ability to perform their duties and serve the public will be increased. Some county departments will bO!,1 ASI MAIN SIN[l l ASPEN. (,0 816] 1 (I) < 111,5 (I) 910/97(}-2950 WWW.1!Ill POSS.COM P247; IV.B. ~]OSS Al?Clll 1-[-(:-IURD-PLANNING remain located off site. The off-site facilities include the courthouse, jail, road and bridge, and dispatch operations. d) A proposed restriction requiring full employee generation mitigation upon vacation of the type of business acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Commission. As an essential public facility, this building will be the center of operations for Pitkin County for generations. The chances of a vacation of the facility by Pitkin County is extremely remote. e) Any proposed follow-up analyses of the project (e.g., an audit) to confirm actual employee generation. Response - The major purpose of an audit appears to be a check to ensure that an entity is meeting representations made during an approval process, As stated in the application, Pitkin County has in the past and will continue a strong commitment to affordable housing. This commitment manifest itself in support of APCHA, development of AH projects, and buy down of free-market units to house county employees. In addition, since Pitkin County is requesting a waving of affordable housing requirements, an audit to ensure a housing requirement of zero is being met seems unnecessary. f) For lodge projects only: An efficiency or reduction in the number of employees required for the lodging component of the project may, at the discretion of the Commission as a means of incentivizing a lodge project, be applied as a credit towards the mitigation requirement of the free-market residential component of the project. Any approved reduction shall require an audit to determine actual employee generation after two (2) complete years of operation of the lodge. Response- This standard does not apply. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Billfpss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. ~By: /K~ eil, Partner V P248 - M / 1 t/ \1 11 li' /' 1 ,..P pOSS ' AR< 41 - PLANNIP 11 // L / 11 1 \17 4555 RIOGRANDEPLACE 1 t.' ,i,r / CONTROLLED | \ \ CESSe:YE mil ..'.1. ..1. :glâ€ž.â€ž :11 M,1111, \3 T E-1 #..91 7898.0 C &\ - I }Crat - / 346. Al h 1 1 , 1 \11 .KIN cou* M I Iiii A~1lD~Â£ \ 4 12> , 43/11 â‚¬ 1 1 .1,1 4 0 1=. .\3\ 11 41\ -1-=71 r 11 540/ MAINSTREET r ' ; PARCEL No, 2737Â·073Â·2+003 r 0â€žNER CmÂ¢ OF ASPEN 20 S BCC ASPEN'.816]1 0607 AC Â·w- 4/ 1 1/ i ./ 1 -.1 , h SHERIFFNÂ®O~ImATKÂ»1 EER 1-17 ~ ./40.11 2,- U PmaN COUNT( SHERIFF 21- FACILITY 1./E .EA '1 ~ & ADMINISMAION BOR ----1 OVERRIDE'T | / 1.r=r- r.1 1 , 21 ...ITÂ¥ COliRTHOUSI 11Â·- 1/4- / BUILDING : EÂ»STING COURHOUSE PLAZA PRoPoSED APD Blm.DING iREMOOELED, V r =1 1 1 4 -, i ~1511/ r-r___~ Â£ :-2.< 1 C- Â£4 121.-4 . - Akn SL P.IN' *m 1 1. 4 Â¥ 1 . ARCHITECRIRAL SNE PLAN PROPOSE, T Cm59â€¢1 C, alsnNG 5TATUE BIKE RACK - i I 4 :, / * 'Â· SC~LE EXISTING!#ONFENCE X f--9 1 InsÂ·=llÂ· i 9 'ct. -- C Â· ,27,- j A001 < // 0 - 9 1 .1 1 , 1 1 Â¥;,1... .97 1-i,)0 -~~//LI -7- 0/ - 0:04..Eâ„¢.1-P - 1 2 % ial . p1155 2 Â°tiffift ARCHITECLRE . f f f--1------ff 1 0 I.~.Iii 1 10 02 1 1 1 m . ..1.1. 1, .I....0 i "./11$1111 .1~24: f Pt- 4---- Fi-Ti 1 0 11 -1 /-0 0 1111 0 1 1 1 1 ~ 111~1 + GARAGE 1 1 1 CP 1 11 4//1 1 .011 ~1 'lj 1~ ~1 2 -i '2, P3 1 P.J I Il I I Â° Il 11--t ---f- 4 - Â«3 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION 4 ' SHERIFF FACILITY 1:n . 99 1 4 re CLERK 1 1 FNaf:TI~ + 23- ift 21511.DC L67 -1 2 <nHEME BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN l'= 10-0- 51'-672 A101 C,Al eAL) N PL PM 0 2] 4 ..1 r...=, 5%&=&76=7 I-,nol-.-I.-MI--~Â» 18 poss ARCHITE.~LRE * PLAN#W i G 1 1 11 M ID Eli 1 i 9/Fr 11 m 1.1,111 -;Ir mi' -0011111 lili 0 D.:1.. 0 99 11 1.11 :1 0 1 1 IiI Â«3 SHERIFF 1 111 1 111 0 : p 11 1 | |MULTI.PURPOSE I /4 I 21==rfl 1 h' 1131 0 1 ! He Â®104-1 1 WOMEN I h.e 6-y--Â«-1----tl-- 02--T~-j]~*~-- -f---0 G f li 1,1 0 LOBBY I BOCC MEETING ROOM 6-- -lk -1 -1- ------1-1 31444F]4319~~1~Irf--6 /~1 L./1-/ h.1\J ' - ~- -~ -- P5 1 1 1.U Pm(IN COUNTY SHERIFF i i ~ & ADMINISTRANON 1 FACILITY 9 + fle #1 2 CLERK NORTH ~ (P7) { te ~rTH r-- 41 - 40..[ L151100 . 8 Câ‚¬E 'Irti MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 = 0Â·â‚¬ Â» 14 - (~F) cip u PL PM 51 -67/ A102 S nâ‚¬1,-nz,~r=- =aL+g~40-1-. 1-mii-ni ~ mia.m.Â£.1. ...-Ill........=Nall' "M"11â‚¬.14~ LGEd 3'//1, 411,1. Aâ€¢' 9 77 ...0 99?Of pl155 R ARCHITECTURE I m 1 1 1 0 i 1 1 0 10 ~ ~ ~ | ASSESSOR | | ~ m ....1. 11,â€žT ,â€žL."I...â€ž.1 04 [,11",1,5,1,1 1 0 rn:uhnt 0 T 1 -1 2-Â« TREALURER- - --4 - -A - -% '1 11 1 0 BTSCIS 1 1 - 1 1 1 1100Â®u i &0 1 1 U 1 - h j~ ~ GIS MAP ROOM | A 7, 1 ri lill - I IIJETF- P-- i 0 19 1â‚¬m 1 rOPENSPACE- -L-__ 1313- ----~10 9 06-1- -7-Â«9 & TRAILS 1 1 1 Â«pl) 2, Â·Â· Â·Â·uÂ·cle ~ Â·yfÂ«~' T~~,..7-fF ---36 j - 31 4 4 ~ I I I ~ Â° I~ ~ ip Pm(IN COUNT, SHERIFF t Â· & ADMINISTRATION 1 \ FACILITY 9 t t-Â» ~I COMMUNITY i DEVELOPMENT CK 1 10"THI 049 te 1 1 %1 . th a @Â«ali=,1,[ rilf Â· II-(Plch :Eli / 8 , 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 8 $ L * ~Lf a 3 I A103 I PA H Gl) (POI PEI I N 1 {Pt IPM) .....4,)... 42 (-,/3 0:/1, .â€žrâ„¢..... -ft- 99'.0 1/ m..0 poss Â«991 91 --0-9 +9999 Â» ARCHITECURE + PLANNING T L Ill 1 1 1 11 1 1El Il ir I llbl '~ ~Jj i 1 1 1 11 1 0 1 ' ' ~ ~ _11,1 ,~ i 4 ... 14Â§ I. â€¢im 1 # E ,â€žE. :.0â€žâ€ž mil 0 1~L-.-41.=2-=4+JI 111 1 1 1 0 1 + 1 11 1- 1 STAFF 5 1 1 1 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 9 1~ 2111 11 ~ 1 0 ~j-11-0 11 Ieee 4 1 In ...EN i I h., 0 Fi ---t 1 | MEN ~ 8 ~ COUNTY ATTORNEY | @ 11 GIGI 0 - CONFERENCE | | | 166 ~Â© t-9-'hy Il ~ ~Â° ~ Â«310> CONFERENCE , Pm(111 COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRAION FACILITY HR Pa , 1 A Z %1 1 Nomâ€ž 1 / D . Pl U SoIlâ„¢ J~~ FINANCE 1 E PRI'l L--------- 9.-- -=-JLL - ---9 1 li , Tlcr-1*-'nor--'fÂ·r-'~r==131 -(F) eMEE.11.-Â£ 3RD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 11 1 Â®1 SCALE 1 1-0. - 9 1 -1- -[~ =--9 A104 < 3 0 I,/ ..1.-*.â€¢Il. (PAI{Gl) PD PE IN) PL PM L./Ly LAj .-I 3 ==1==72 . 1 Jll ....ti~--1./.M.... EGEd 9 909 poss 2 0 7(F (1 0=f==-'-f=- f 0 ARCHITEC-DRE I ,O m 11 111 11 I lili iD 1 1 1 211DFUOR 'OOF I I-- A 'ASr ..1,1[,El 11~~ COLIÂ»100,Ii,i ... - +4-4--Â»~ 1 i M G mNDEMING 40 1 g 1 UNIi - U 1 1 1 1 I f 1-=- 12 1 1 1*1 L_- Ii- 1 1 ~ITI-]T' 1 11 11 1 1 --B /4------L--F | 03 ~ O.A. u,irT -1 Pm(11 COUNTY SHERIFF C- & ADMINISTRAION FACIUTY Fam.1 (PA 49- - -E -< .-I C- 1-6Tol .Sil 8 2~ 17) U C plo G PROX' I 4 =711 Ill' 0 41 lie 1 1 ROOF PLAN 0 1 1 1 9 7.- Alll (Gl) IPD) 0~014 :t~:=p. ...m....rl.:IrÂ®.rl=-It. =37==t==.1 I.,ill....Al...1. *,1 .=.0~WE'-T--/-1.-Ir. ==Li~-4,~gM=.= 9 0 9 009 0 t'GEd 917&~ C !& M AM 9 99 9 9 99 1 9 A TO Fl FVATOR OVIRRI' Y 7956'.2 0 *;F~ P. PFT R F 11 1 - --101-1 1*/1.' 1;~Ii/:.i ' . ' 1,7. T.I ./-l/ 1 ..1.......90/ T 7937'-11 :~ 7.0 FIN ARI.,RD./. , 7935'-11' 22*%&11.12 42. E 11-1 - 1 A T.0 FIN' R I 711;,FVT! T 7925'. 11' ihiliE t" -~idi-:=-Li_f'~7 N T 7921'.2 582' I. E-o. I -4=2+ - . 2 -1- A T,O El AT IOOF - T 7913'-11Â· A T.Qi FINFi"MINLE" 1 ATOMAINFIRIA!1 4. 79[9 6 -r--7- ii ~i~ i~ | | | ~ Â¢ T.0 A ./ 0 GAR/f 1 11 11 7898'Â·11' 1 1 1 lili 1 ~ NORTH ELEVATION \A201 A/ SCALE 1/Â·. 2-0Â· -0 0 -0 N P12 4;\ 1 Plo P, P6 PS 4;V-V--3 417 9 9 99 + f U' 1 1 1 T 1 1 I 1 1 ~ M A '/011 OVERIA 7956'-2' 1 11 1 1 1 1 11*7 0.4 1 1 1 L I . 7 7952'.5 1 TO NFWPARAPFT J. To ....,ROOF / T 7949Â·-11Â· 1 - A Toi PARAPF[ .g*gÂ· = t~~:2,7 :'Â· T.' ''1 .., .Â¤~E~=5=bikhEa~22*~~~~a:mmi=SEd~Eadr+--4'1-;9=Â·4* IÂ· 1 q *i*:~i..~j, Â·~wil,=-â€¢Â·,w--11-1- nÂ»:0"Â»6 T 7948Â·Â·1112Â· $ T.O.STEEL *{EIROOF ' i ..: 1 . 'I..0 ' :Ili-J Il_'I .._.#_:, .'V.'2.L}I,i-â€ž1-1,-122.3-IlÂ·IEJETJFFF*%31E'.LÂ·â€ž11: -'.'.:12.c'=t-zi:i_--Â· z=Â·9;u~., : i 'Â·Â· 'r'r- i~FIN i i T 7945'-11' 1 . Â· . =tr r. : Â·tlts=*=,%â€ž1Â»: . a:4 - . [ 1 1 1 -7 - .1 . '.- -I~- .-1 ...~ - - 1 71M 1,/, 4 1 ---zu~~. -Â·--IE.--4-4--fl~~ 1 --- 7 [ f---0'~~',I~Aâ€ž-~â€ž,IMI,I Â·Â· Â· A TO FINAR. RDFWOR __ir- -11.7-- --4- 7 T 7935'-I ..~01-1Â«1112=7Â» =_74--Er-FI.7-7.-77-â€žr =4. --17]1.---2--2---1--11Â»--0+1-m:â€ž2 -11 11'11 )~1_-i.9 i ATOFINFIRI'll'll Â· 7 7925'-11Â· 1. 1 Â· 1 A TA FINF/lilliEL T 7913'-11Â· 1 1 i Ill lill . 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A T,0, ............ 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 41 11 T 7907'.0 A T O ./ . 1 ./R 1 .1 T ?903'-11' 1 1 1 1 lilli 1 11 1 1 i MID lilli 1 ~ 2 ~ EAST ELEVATION gLE 18'â€¢ 1'. PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILIT' ;2 poss SCHEMAnC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING % EAS! 'Al' Slal~~ ASPEM COLORADO .16) .â€¢=At,!0=1 A201 P (TI Â»10/92' 4755 I} 070/@2~ .50 R ..,1.1111,~ 11.11.,11,â€ž 11. 1 r'll, ~-1,~ _11_ILM. C /4/ Aod. 8 . / I It.. -r . '11 11. 1 11 ' rt---1-SI~L~ 11[lt dll U L It.IIK,=.5,#lf,r# *1 4,2.' Ill' 1411 U Li,J~*IE "11 8 - E i.. 44 4 .4.k. m -1.. .1 ., . r 1; 1 I Â·6 ..,41.11 ~ NORTH ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT / - - Â·--re- 1// ./..........In. !, . L 1111"1 h /11, A ~~~ ~~~ ~*~~04 88fjEL~ 4 It ' 1.A. Â·-4 . . . Â·---e 1,1~ ~ WEST ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY poss SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVAnONS - CONTEXT A202D '.,0 1 ", $ 2 f't Â· 99Zd 9 F 9 f e f Â« - PM ~ T n .1.ATOR OVER'UN 1 '1 ~11 1 itil T 7956'-2 0 4/P~RAPFT 1 T. PARAPFT 1 1 1 - -2 4 T.0 sm' ..ROAF T 7945'. 11Â· T 7937'.1Â· /TOFINFIR./.DI'll/4 .rf-1 I.18~Â·~=Â·= "EN k b.....9 ! 1 . 1 1.* 1.* 1 --~ 11 . r 1 . hT.FINFIR.7.D LEVEL - / 7925'- 11' '. r . 121 N 1 1 1. .1 - 1.1.- h.0 FIN.R.MAINIFWI 11 11 7 7913'Ill' 111 lilli 1Â¢J903'- 11' .Or...10.RIFI It 1 1 1 -1 ~ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/'â€¢ 1'/ -0 N 01 f Tifff i 27? f f f ?ff 1 0 66'.:. CROM'FRRI IN 1 1 111 ~ 1 111 & T 9 !'1â‚¬W P.~ET 77957-5Â· t, 1 T,g PARAMT ma- Â·21*4 4 ki,i@&4==1 e.-_=pw 14--11.-IL,1~.~~--11=41 JIYELL_......._- 1 1-LU Â¥ 7948 -1117 .... 4-=Il- '7949Â·11Â· 1#OAME] f~.9 .-4 ..i-v i - I - ATI! FINFIR..3./0. DECK -,- 7937'- 11Â· .P ' 7937.1 h~-1 f--*==4=66*~ - - ATOFINFLRâ€¢(EJJRDIOOR /7935'Â·I .1 1.1 i ; . 1 I i-Â·=12=6= ATOFINFIR/71/1/F f f/ ~-â€¢Iri.~3113 d ,, trgi, , 1 ; 1 71 0-1 .; 1 ==i==Cri~Jj/ 77925'.1] 1 119 - , ./ 1 44 ATO FINIA'WIN'F,in 71 , 1>.~14 -1 1 11 1 ' 7913'-11Â· 1 11 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' 7903'. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 A Tri .......F 1 11 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 11 1 -1 /A WEST ELEVATION EN SCALE l,r. re PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILIT' 2 poss SCHEMAnC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING . 0 N.iii.-u '1 ...5 4755 I[) D70/920 .50 A202 P .. r=1 1111111 .//.P ..... liliÂ·11.11 Â·Â·Â·11 IllÂ·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·-1--1 11 I lili 1 * a. O a tb ik-: i ,Â·...&:4*-foÂ·:r:'7-Â¥'f~ Â·:U t.~113--3.1 2 In Im -R F= 6 ~El EE t"w--.**.,:----F=+ 0 'Â· - k . 1 tl 'eÂ¥, 1 LL-1 NORTH ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT & 2__Ul- ?.Ed 0%. = 1 F -#.-il-I rrÂ·__ . 4. 440'..4.-1.- 11'.1 Â·Â·Â·~Â·Â·Â·Â· N.. . ... .. - 1-' ..., ...Y. .... - /:=52!EnEÂ£210.'f'. . . Â»2Â·721:72'EETE-+39.--1 Il[Illil}dillillillillillill ,66 Â· - O 0 611&'ill ~ EAST ELEVAnON WITH CONTEXT "MEN .'ui jo, . i u. PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY poss SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVAnONS - CORM A201B 1,1 {AIT #i ... mt' Â¢1~11Al* 1,~Il r.... IV.B. 89Ed 9 9 999 7 7 ~0'~ ~~~11 n H n H N H â€¢51 M 68 8 (3) 6% (a Â¥ Y Y V T 34/7 11 1 -31 < LIJI ---tr ' ~-- pOSSIBLE F'UnAE 4 1 1 1 ~ | 1 1 ~ 41-/ -1-Li i,/ 1 1* ~ 11 1 1%7 -tÂ· T ' ' ' TO ......A I ' 1 1 - -1'818;mer#m- -- Â· Â·Â·--+18&81Â¥8Â· 1 1 1 :/ ~ -~ -'-rt y. 41:rN.Â·,F'ROOF t --.6, 1.12 1 1 1 1.'l l *11 [11111 3---3 F 11 __32- 1 I.Q. D>FINAR*(NURDIOORDECKA / - 793'-tÂ·'Ii: | 1 1 I lib | & 1 11 1. 1 1 Il 1 1 11 ~~ ~ Ti . 7 7925'-11' | . . ATO FINAR /?NDIFWI TO FINFLRIi:*EFL. 4 Â·. 1 11 1 1 r 41. 2 I | C-' f I fÂ£ 'll b r- 7 -41 Â£ T 791.-11' G lili 1 . , A....1//All' 11 1 1 IN- 1 T 7903'-11 lili % Il l IN- 1 9 1 1 111 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1=1 j rn SECTION N/S THROUGH GARAGE SCALE r.K,Â·C~ PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILIT poss SCHEMATIC : SECTION ID A30 m (>Mt iifiL 10!m'.Im=.1 Final Plat E. Second Amended Plat of Lot 1 dz:01Â¥ 41 ,10* 1 \ =- Bl 13 PM==- 0- k ...... ne -. 01.111,t ./ -,1, .*..... Plt' $~4 ~f Colof- - -1 prcp*ty -, mo~ p,lid,!, *1-6 I ~- Pitkin County Center Subdivision 00*AL lot 1. - Am.d' . / . 1. Plt' lly C,rt~ ..... 0--, I I I 111 Situated in Section 7, T.10 S.. R.84 W. of the the 6th P.M. *......IM................Cll,-7- ./. Pitkin County, Colorado , , v j j-il *1 / 1% 6 1 \ .0. 1 of ........Il.Ill#........I/'ll. . :: Ill' 6 04 ....... 0 #7 cli 73.4-K-/ + 41, ' ri , / TE \ 1 .0 Pulpose St.tement me pulpo,e of Ihis cmended plot i to merge wly*X_ / 4 + \I .. / % | Ch,4 C-* - prp,t%5 -1-g c * of 1.* -Â£ AA or * ho.e ~00 PalceINo.273707324004intolotlof PilkinCount,CerierSubc-on ---- - - --| #414: â€žâ€ž, --1 ~ ~2'%;~Â° ~ ~ \16. / ~ BE by .. I-/ 10,d . 00(I,d 0,6 -Il..... - .d... S 140 Ih- m Â»1~ . Â»T- 0!1 -n, d *I k- 6Â»-d . ,1 â„¢ 1, MI~ C.4 C-t, &,--, a,4 ' 1-4 d,kcli to 11, * ' *t,-01--,. &54Â·34'001~ - x I ID, NIG 9. , Cze; 17.. \/ 7:h . ~ f ~~~~~t~ ' - 1 rfif'Â°Â°'j' *"7744: : d 9 1 j 0 ..1 4 0.- I. . i = SICM, 01 C*oÂ® ) H 3:hm.............2 -2 4 It.Â«11.-E C=,t, of Pilk~ r %\ C C ' ' 2.r */ 1/ 47Â» NS f --1-L/'-_\- 7/ \ ~~_~0~0_~~~~~*~_~~--U~ N / I#:*UF- JANE& AcHE' .. .*my-O-O1~d'. . 01, ea'CIED..,I 0 No,Nic 4 - i>~~2â‚¬ Lifk.. Et*4 61/4-1 W. - LEGEND - 1 \ 0150 ' I IR..4 C. 0 F.......MA... M s- a / m, q 521'2830'W~ E ~ 0 4 larl:'1 Jit \ \ E-1. 01. - m Of 0 m 384 .0 14 ..9.- /-r - ,/ 71.~ A.* ,,8-, 0 .J mmt, c.,~i -, 6.0- * W. m441.-4*:Â· ~01â€¢R-Pu,~IC I e# I 9-, I # 2910 4 . ./ \ SIntâ€¢ I Coi- ) )~E A kt* 11/1 4 rr- / - ~0.,11.-- 1- 'Â·14Â£1 '1~ s :TA:,O./.O.â€¢.0 - VICINITY MAP - 20,/1/" k 01,Â»met~.co.,~,*,.0~j 'Il S2357'19'W tl, V I 1 *(U~~.-Â·4:.Â·3~ r , Co,40"Ilkâ€ž r ...,le.'.9-* 0 - tc' -tre.Z,i 5* 0'4 4.--- DS'.,f~.01. . *16*.1.':14+It -1-1 2. Dote ' = "" Â·h,1, M Vâ€¢u 4.1. X)1& 1 .le ./ ~rpe- I ./ -..... I =I' Ict ./. Il- 11.- mle-m,1,~d-omcI~ - 4,1â€ž4 Cl. 4 80// h-, ...11-M,-/1-tlw to'De~/ I...41....0......./.6,3..... '35* Id-4 KÂ¥; 40'>99/. #..ty.1. *be, ... - ko,d 01 . -01 -d ~ the an, I th, -t ,r4. * a -, lul, f <2\ ' /7-. Â¢fit 0./#1 .Â®tehâ€ž~ 0'* S14Â·50'49~ - 5 allpÂ»"24'/.7-pl"W~'/ 86/93/Poâ€žI'W&*61*P,.1Â£*'Ple,80/1]/Pluclof -4.Â¢ lili- ; _ .... 0822&6 81. PI....'"... .tot ~~50 &44='in=22=' 6 ~*2~' ".m i ~,bj,c: to cl 0-T",/ 04-=~ bul* ,#,cd~ u 01- be- 01 r-4 3 -1 R- mey 00 .. 7 5/ ... r.......... rn- I ......I oll. a ....r po-- .... Ine** ..... 4 -Z d0~~11 ./ . c~,W I ./c~ Ill=...........i ./-/ I. â€¢~~tk~ ,-1 ./1, - c,0 - 10 ~- - w - .. - - * N7509'111Â¥ At- VI #JAkiQAVI,K, & An,....... Ilt 11~ ./.t -* ~rl' I.) -0- I .... I. ~n~ I. IM-kr, # I. I- 22.H'h 4 .i f'\..1~ .; -<-'01 i yfiR- 017- 1 14 k \ 402 - 1 , :z::%=c ;=:z:=~Â·y,r:=:tÂ©~Â· Â· "*09 5.1.1~1 . .-SU. 1. F.n'.cicâ€ž of i / :Agfria,2/.1~~~~~~~~1:J/Esle#...1 9. ~0-d -, up~ 0,1 Floed ~,== Me * (C-,4 P- I 00097C0194 C -d .~,e 4 1Â§87. ~,-, by t~e Fa- FUN//2 1 ; 1/ C./-4 D-'ll* Ch:. 1 - 2 1 # .....C-de 10. Th, fr-~ngtle' d.... beld,7 diM..... 1=- I - eleâ€¢ , 15.Om 420 ; I n. M Acc- I.-01-Il '-ul, Not pr-,y I. I. thi -I....... I- I P../ 3 ./. a I. 3 vgt -pu-8,-LW , :r ," f "6' 4, ' 1~ ,~r a,61 6,0 *I, - pid'- 1,~-d 'Uad~., ..[00-.-_ ...9 . h..by r,nowd ./nc. No 40 (S-. 01 2014), R.c~= I. 816734 "910, i ~ 43727- L.1_~=JUL-Z*. 7. E /,C, L.91.09 " 1 ' 4979'E' l DO.10. -1 79, â€¢15 p... . . _21-__de 01 -1~-a-L_-- 10/ 3 .r--1..#. ~ituit~*UM*t:'***.,r*=d==22 0, 9'235 . 1 .V.I ---- -f / -2, 10 T ' t' 116,7 11 , . 441* 44 ~al,n hi *,dol . . lua.--.-+ . liu /3Â»-33767 -,. ... .1 I No-b, 12. 2013 i i ts 7529'W [ /091 A Ntr50'49Â¥ Clly ./.r_ -#-mt â‚¬72a39' Â«-se ... rÂ® R- f, Ik.1 b. Iho,n 11 0.1, n :1-,d 11111 -marn,nt Â«~pti~ ~ N not alfkh,Hy de,yted A r- * Mt.. 0, il Ihey '5- 1,0 %, 3,1) ---C, E.-/ 12 ..tot !3 Rl/21~/a ..... odÂ»-t -. â€¢IC i .5 f J901 $74 CHOÂ® CHO- u j CURVE' lallâ„¢ Rhal *d /'1* LENOâ„¢ Cl 13. 5359' #'39' NC,Â·52~48~ 1161' * n 4 - lilll=:1 4 .0919'-f..-'-jiliI Â·Â·Â· Â·ri- Â· (L.:Â·r,7-tr.1./4, :10 4 1 ..1.1.1.- # --4~-,~ 4,-- I-- ia~* A--e, -6-*. .i li - LINE TABLE - Â·LIE TeE- mEay-w L T *4 ~*j 41/* 8 UNE' IWING INNICE LNE' aEâ€¢all OST'/Of. MI RE-10 DISTANCE , 4 r E/ .......t... dj# 1 I ..... ./.1 /6 .450â€¢4/ Â·& 74' 0 20.39 24 1 , - v.1/1/1.#: 44 0 95,Â·inÂ·-I .1951*5C-2 ~06 78' '32 475:I: ~824 L 4 4.2,42 CIAA'UE"ILÂ£*mk J M *t was * ~râ‚¬â€¢â€¢ I . â€¢Ic, of Ih, gÂ«k . ** I * L18 ..9554" 51.28 '33 ./.'1Â·E .i" db I â€¢ le.*p:,. Â·'.144,I.,Mil 0 - -*aN-- /9 â€¢12/355!,I 8507 l. .430'.I w v -t" 0 v ' 4 1 n,/ L20 /431/00-: 98.04 ~35 575â„¢Â·rE 9430 4 h /mt*:fi; 9*4692â€ž= 8 *' ~ 633 Â£ L40 4~4'50*g~[ 577/ \ ~ dIC'/1 .+ lonry'. 8 . '36 .14'50'.E 1937 .I P 2/ IAAAILAAL-.2.Ladia RECE,nON,â„¢21, Ii,/2814 4 St ~ %1 ae.k * R=- l ' 02:17:41 PM. 1 OF 1. R ..00 *e K 1,22 .moo~E Â·958 '37 575591â€¢~E 2124 4 1 3 7Rf.14 P:=1:21% C Uty COk~ ......,Pi~COUnly. CO 543-0'00'I 00'y 1 NHÂ·50'40/ 3422' :Ei>> PLAT BK 113 . I 5283555~v . 99 L39 575:'ll \ mns,1 - 5/ 0. kt. l D- A Co.pe, '"1 ' r"'-d Proll-.d L~,1d /9, k--5 ' 0* Slte I C-~-, do .....& 0,/ 1 I. -d 9,h ./t of . 51- ~n-- a .1./. I 77 W ~05'26'00/ 240â€¢ 4% ' :3'%6:â‚¬*-pÂ·k#& PÂ»t I lot 1. Pithâ€¢ Corrty Cl- 5,~h'~I~ %( the I=tkn of th, 0.1- fi-- I.-0 D,-f, ro-.......... =,01.4..eÂ¢N, 11- hâ€¢- I.. 0 1.630 :248. -27 â€ž75~759/ 22.03 .2 $:# 21 41 '# A ./ th- .- on I. "1Â¢ ..,tor t. -- D- I - -v,~ - 0â€žt.*.- h -*- I C : Nâ€¢916'51~# .0 .28 '925'47Â£ 1 6300' W 2000/ 864 fe57 .0Â·00'60/ 2. 49' .29 Uâ€¢Â·25'57â„¢ I 4887 smÂ¥'FlY 248.26 6. /5 - . Ii'll ~Ir~ 1 1- . my ./.d I......... - ~ th~ 21* do, 0[ 0=,b,. AD ~5 /5 .ci,sor/ .48~. (30 K.-'IÂ·I ~ 5019 Main Street k GRAPHIC SCALE fi I . . . .0 6SGM # R~ilion D* By Job No 201 3337,005 '--O 42,;a,~ ~. ~1. 5.* co.5,!0,Â¢! Pitkin County Courthouse, 1 -M' 6-ing d /-0 0. 2bm' n d pqe I 2/21/I5 . b* d. 1 --m ~ 2 2nd Amended Plat D. 12/21/ls 5.'24 -le --* * * 1 18 Wai Sidh Slreet, 5- 200 Jail, and Courthouse Plaza ' GI'nwood Springs, CO 81601 . Am-# 01 1 970.945.1004 www.sgnik.corn 5 Rk Janice K. Vos unt , CO PLAT'B RECEPTION#: 62 3, 1/ 09Zd I Ii.4*r kil-W-il.%-W . -/:t .,4-1,93Â«7 /4, 1 1 - -- LEGEND -- r~~ ==-.. b.----*47*'1' -- c./ =4 1 i Site Improvements I '-dieb,acÂ»...6/kic.i#*3 | : EZEK I . w .1- & cÂ® . n. & .- L& ~ -. mz yA- ----1. re I :/.27*/ ' Survey 11 /01//9 /t . 1 City of Aspen Engineering Department 0 - T#k 5,gnol / AL..74 --/,1.- le - â‚¬ 1.- El Compliant Survey 0 -Ill lonsformer 2 -96< \: 0 w -/.k yer/ / - Dell Donel j - lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision and a 0 - Ight Ple 1 1 /1 1 ,Orr OF *Dk portion of Block 92. City of Aspen. and a I - Te./.r Ped A - ..... 04 0 "11.4--515 li.' 10~(1-1 portion of Block 10, East Aspen Addition 9 1 2â‚¬6. =925â€ž1-,/02Â¢*m.n. L Section 7, T.l OS., R.84W., 6th P.M. 0 - PVC *e , 57'25'00 I 0 -. seÂ·, w./e 71:4:- ./43/ 44/0 , 6 - 0 - le,mout 11 866 i Gcs.. ./ / 4 4. I .; I 4.64 / 1. C edestel m k 1 9 .-5572500'/ 2494 m 2 - Storm U..le p r 1(. 1 4/ ...a P.n r - 971 - S.* po,0 ~Un STG'f fh BA 1 17~< 4 28~fll.'. : /' L Z~4~ / *'* f PRCPFTf DEUPT. - Bâ€¢e 'cc' Lot 1. Fks[ A-ded PloÂ¢ ol Let 1. P k~ Ocunty Center Subd.lor occordng 10 1/ plat ieÂ¢orced ir .1 5ock 93 01 Poge 56 I . PRI[~ Cou~, recordN Toge(40 -th .. 0, R * %0 We* m of * 004 92. Cr~ ond To,nmite I 00 -- f. 1 2: - Aspen. ond lots 11. 12 ord the Wes~ely 7 5 4,1 01 W Â·0 Bloc+ 19 [os~ A5pen Adrflk~ c I. C. Id T.mle o Al. I~kiLL=.aL.k=* ~ ~ I ' Togelier â€¢ith 1Â·101 018,ay *g elt-y of ond 'pcent ID Lot. 11 0,~1 12. Book 19 - -~10~P,3~3 Â¥I' i ., ANHEp. 4 [c,Â· 8,pe Ad/3 Ic the Cty o' A- 411. /. CountÂ¥ C:~rado r.gree. i,e 4 1, E--L.9607 Ill _/1.3 4 1. e.fr L ' "ele -*- Scnitoxy S- _re 9 ----4 , . 4 ! J . .Â» I / / y 1,Â· N 7 Ils 'lly h. beer lon*led p. 1/ cliells i./.1 .r o Sle ....mill Surly -I- dio,eT L f,e . ge(A ..res I ....1,~s of . pÂ·ope,t, -or- 0,erhe' lel,chone L ne NuaT~1-L,_J~11.C . 3 1 -.- Undeg.nÂ¢ Telephone Lne , 1 9: : , 0 3 1.4, Â·s I l,ee meo.u,r,ent liS .. r.st NEÂ» O 0 k -I ./ 1 ~ iE, -N- Und:,cunc f~er optic L ne . r ' I _ Pilkin County 0 0 Ill' 11-r-f-rr-.-r-neÂ»,r- r ~ a Jail Bunding ' 1 00% ' [e~(KrS ~0' he- 'e N*40 8& D-, # to . Ile,ot,on ol 791198 01 NGS S.. 0-159 le, Ihe 5â€¢ ure, I the Pinr ./.1, Co.1./. orÂ©pely ~1111111111111111 . I Â· r ..----1 1 - Concrete .2 S23%* LOT 1 . F.m - herecn. r' .y. eo .t Ieee*,I .Â£' 1/ I. Â·s I -er'. AUNJE /0 )44/ S./.9/ 't'11111!111,1111111111111111~111! 11 | - ASplt PARCEâ„¢ ~3~Câ‚¬-852 \111111!111111 111,111,111141111 lili . ... 1 , i 1-0/ 4 I 5/ .1 FnS[ Al.IE~ED PLAT OF LOT 1 I 6 .... /'es,cn...., .....cd. to thi ~-,mt c'te it lerheS.r Pin(NI COUNTY CENTER /8DP,,90N 1-Gra- ./. CITY OF ASPEN . Il'lilli:': 1.kit# }.1 Â·Â·Â· PARCEL NOM?-07}-47-I 0 po,~s.= h copy. 1... ... I I. dow-1 ... cor.yed ;0 9,0 O,NER: Pin(,1 COJNTY 1 / -41,4 \ ......geÂ¢ ./ .leÂ¢ docul. o lue the orancy 01 Â·Â·e ./motil 130 1 GAL[NA S-REET Iii,1111 ,Â· 7. 4 ILAPIDAED E ~ N |-Deck i ASPEN, CO 8161 --1 ASPEN, CO 81611 2 C lili 1 4 - FRAME 1, 11 7 ., sub...ce 'llil,n .I .......r ..e . mork' I oppe,/I 'lly 530 E. MAIN STREET n02 ,h- c~ cly,- cop,.,Â¢ 10 0,Me INI,0 ~Â»ch,ge. 110â€¢. 30 mode 1 0 C 94? AC : - L. ula II I Â¢cm-,0, cl the :fne of Â·.1â€¢s s,r., Ce~l/crt,ocÂ·oi Â·nu:l *rt goeÂ¢e I,Pit, 'logstone , , / I./06//th' I./ 0{ I,6 'lly ...6 t#' /* 1 ; 4 7\ ...g * .I I '*r~ to I. any l. -*/*#Im t. lÂ»Â¤R *m,CW, I PE compan,5 10 -1, bol 1. loce'. * deD' 01 respec'* I.# A*it.. DATES , gRI'[Â¥ 1III111iI . dr-, 5(ad . .Â©( b! respor*le Â¢~ eted,cr c' Sks~loce ut~it'e~ r~>t rnoked or ~PRO'iallESmiDVA IRC~ PRE,1=...7 6 / 4/ /,1 /1 L.,4-i '7-144. . . 4 11. f I .'-......0 11 Â· 6 ..0,80: e,eno m~rkedb, u.,lecl'-to=# p 0.-Â©'.le &'./ CLENT .TH DATES... â‚¬ 0 ~ent,foe by lield mp' moy neâ‚¬ ro ~e re-,c d Â·he 4 8 0'herel,e mcy nol be *0,9 n-on Â»e Jt- e "'199 â€¢ve â€¢0' 94 FRCM.11Â¥ 2008 - MIROI ~009. a .... 19 .2 , Â£ 4 9 ..... UWilles 'll ..... M~~ bo,ed on '/I mÂ® ./d ./ng ./lus A = 4 4 #4 co 8,~ ~, dete,m;gal, os 10 8*oc) wh. 1. Of utlly th' r./.t * 90/ be..ed PO E MAIN SIREET pei I. best eaâ€¢m. ol y. W ue~ 4 Â®pers tâ„¢ sri oed. used /,en' 1 ,*1'2 12?Jv#." 2 pw ~ors ~ dilf-I ~me~ of th' wne 1-hes ore m~tt-u;e' trereN~A * compones 'se nole Ihol I . m.cic.ed by .. ..Â·y.. .re ./. t som. uÂ·#ity I. in~mation ./. her// moy./ clcrific'In .In .... u., It fe rol m.ed on the gra,nd I the U# I 1% .. N . W H I Ntlf 111]1111111- r M i AFIA'i'y â€¢ .knoM ' su' lifilie, 30 ex'sÂ· 01 thi Â·ime 10 . property 00Â¥,n 'â‚¬10on I gubjecl to oll ~5emen....I-â€¢lol, ... .beck, I olke, reslr,Â¢10~@ el recor. I I. iÂ·ams may ~ffect thus /,pert, Th,9 mop coes noliep,e-t. a t !!e se* oy hs 5url. or SON 01 Ine or/ly ~- X3 ..' :187" - 6, Of, 1 C -L 1 . 812, . / P.f 71 C.IDER BLOCK . en~Inb~onCes of =.3 Olle:,ing Itis =1~ heitor, lo del,mine owre~ Â¢cmpolbhl, with cd,liing â€ž~219, Of ecs-Mi C~ GARA~ -=&:7 dily' 01 1 4 .ft.'t...1 4\*. ~~ ~ ..-'111: 11 Theproperty'o. her/n .sub'/tool! el]-n./. flght.of-./bu"ng 9,tbeeks or other restrictions of rec~d gs SJÂ¢h items m~Â¥ ~feol Ihi, cirneity h sune, % not reprment o tile *ch by * IM. to .-le mershÂ® or I P UE --- ; ..... 11111'11!21,1,1,pÂ¢ -L#" 2 1 h. I ' I.Â·, M I /1/ --- .SI~ "'.Â· de...* or oth, Mcumbrorceg 01 re=d Af â€¢form/lon p.'all ' and .0' r./. *IE ~ .0.10 ..... ... . ..1. 60/ I .eW . .3 Id Ne . 0,~ership. 805ement ,14 other encurrbrcices oâ€¢ fecold hes 50~n lok,~ lfern Ih, Â·Itle /1.:1 Graphi Scale . I . , b 721 1 / 0133/33767 hoy' on if'ec~,~e le of Nownber 12, 2013 rwmeeÂ¢~litments ./* St~wcd Trâ€¢,el~~tyâ‚¬*ony File No R=5.69 In F. ' = 20' . C =NI ' 9, ' % i , 11' t . 1, i . . ttle .nm..ts referen. .. Ime sul .. moy not be *,o. il thi, Nhd# 01 Diht=80 ~*4 g .e ...rd I. cc-4.It e*Â¢.... il Mt ./.Ily d...d ;n 'ecord. 4 4 / ' ~0 / __ 5 ~ â‚¬=2~- 12 E-f clte~,pl ho5 bee mode t~ SN~ ~ ecserments end ~iÂ®t.-01-woy releried le n t'' 20391 dxu-li I ' the% luoÂ·ed en ' cenl Nopert:.5 . LLE-IMLE. 0, 0 4 Ji# 1/..Iff ,0->=L'. 112.11 4 730 1 UNE# NEARNG CISTANCE C t l* ~N 75~9'1 4 7 S,Eitaf[RE' L! S.5/'1 E 1/04Â· I, Ild A Cco./. do .ly./* thot I ,n o Re... Lid ... Il'le unl I N.W.'E 5640Â¢ Pitkin County Â¥ \Â£ 1 le./ 6' the Stote ol Col,0* 11,61 tâ€¢k, mop ~a. Prepared Al, 22, 2015, cnd th~ i - .- 639*Sk 01'0 too : r|/0+le'll./1 1/batelmy....e and bell . /6+44'06'E 2616 ' Courthouse ..:41. , -0 LE..5 FeÂ· ceft '1 1 ' . /6'44'06-E 11.60' 1 42 t. a -4 I / 1p,â€¢,7 Building . 272232% "At . 45419'2. 4 56' . 4 U. r c i, ./ 1 ...3-m"40~,", 14:6 8 ve / 51615'05~W 66/ 119: / . /696*50~W .39. 1 %4>y <- / 1 . 51430'49. 697 . 0 fÂ«44 44 *2 - m,1.1 DoMA. Coopel ~,.~ni 1 ~ . WOOD FRAIED HOUSE Â¥/ -1 Le .3.... 100' Ue> j 1 ; 8 \ / .Â·. \F 4:2 . behal / K/ ----2/<1,0 LtD 4 k i CliA.hq.~UtmEAkAC I ./.ENT /. and / 0Â«, 1 / X ~3%...' 37â€žr/ : t .27 : .N>Â· .---7-7-2-Â» 1 U 1 *# 21 -CURVETABLE. ,-- 7-/ - Mt ~~ C~~ ERâ‚¬*6#- ~1 T I ARC DMA CHORD CHORD ' 4 t , f Lt#i. e CURVE # LEI'l~ RADIUS ANGLE 8/AING LENG. I 45.32' 5000' 51Â·56'15- S4910'55'E 41. L f -'.----,--11, \%.'- 4 . . 75~67 69 __ ..fl- ~Eâ€¢ 14 ~75~9'11"W .9760' ..72' 5369* 8712'22' N77'21'4n' 7408' ~ ~ - - -* 11 1 1. O 59./ 131,27 2514'00- N62'42'OD~W 5,5/ L. \ 1.' 1 t: r-1, ~11 . 71.98' .4 00' 2./.' '02'34'2'W 7/I =r-:-â€¢1 Eau , N Nolice Pilkin C ounty Courthouse, * Reviston Dole By Job- 201/332001 20 2-'rit'- Dfown I 1 s~e *6-n,r,w ~lt ~ko- 6SGM Courthouse Plaza, and Jail 2 Site Improvements Survey . 07 22 2015 s,j~ d,/-/ hi no a-f m~ ey -fo/ 118 West 510* Breet Suile 200 3 b,Med â€žO,1 0,y 00/0Cf ,Â» Ulls SU.~, . Approveo .GIll 1d mole mcI, ien yeof, nT.m ac du* Glenwcod Springs. CO 81601 Aspen, CO I I ./il.bal I.- 4,rl.fi 970945.1004 www.sgginc.com ' File COA_*.A .l J.LrJJ 4 9 r. , L9Zd &.i)/ I J,/ 6,6â€ž4,~,~ed/~6~ Sie#.ig-Â«H ..gs~5*.9-dowu#./IN-cou.iye,o,e_,Â£-,iâ€¢Ggr~.I DODD' 3 6*09*IN IntrirÂ»ted 1 â€¢inâ€¢lruct.,n *,1,11=n' 7, -- F A Pitkin Sheriff and Adminsitration Building- Public Feedback Architectural Considerations . Carry forward Architecture from old courthouse 8.3% Bridge design styles between old courthouse and courthouse plaza building 81.3% Make a new civic statement with unique architectural style that distiguishes the new building from the courhouse and courthouse plaza 10.4% 100% 1 â€žIr/râ€ž/1,1 4-,inâ€¢IrticÂ·twin #,1,11,1â€¢ni i..m.Â·. Mip. iÂ·.et.,Ii.iâ€ž A Prâ€¢-,1 %1â€žuiâ€¢Â·â€žâ€¢m Pitkin Sheriff and Administration Building- Concept Design Options Total Scoring by Rank Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Projected Final Cost - based on preliminary designs 1 4 2.5 2.5 Projected Energy Efficiency 2.5 4 2.5 1 TotaIVote 2 3 4 1 Total Ranking - Lowest is Best 5.5 11 9 4.5 Scored 1-4 with 1 being the best (lowest cost, highest energy efficiency, highest vote) R Â£9Zd IV.B. I El poss Pitkin County Strategic Plan IÂ·, vIÂ·.Il,ly .-in.I ex~:ellent,Ally Ill/t,lfe,~1, I 11: filiality IncilititÂ·. arld land{,c.,1,2. IlÂ·int ..11[,11 Iblcill 1 1 illilit v,$.lili{~sh .in<l i . i, ikÂ·i,ilnleiit to fibr.,11 le.pon,thility Couity larÂ·ilill,3% (elic tÂ·ji.Itaqe An,1 fa, 1111Â£11Â· civic interaction 111, h :Â·10./ â€žI?(itlence or Intâ‚¬?110/ alla extr)11,)1 im,11)11( .ind belillÂ·put>IIi 3.1.).Ii Â·TÂ·3; Ilint artÂ· bate (11,42'I i,flil I, il||1.3 C :>Willy 1,1, liliÂ· 1,; 1 ~' entry experience Hat ii Inviting 30( 101 , 1,-paly li,iviclat,le ,afe .Pelt Bred 2111(1 v,%13:,Ily 11}p/:.11'114 1 reception experience ..,il. 4-,111111 4 .,ric! 11,)VIC:lÂ·S f 11- Il V,,fil.,tlliallig I or plit)|Ic alic! ttillf .) 11 4,3 Pli[,112 211)d 1,11..11 collaboration zones '1 (34.Â·ting roomÂ·., ut<.3 2,re designed tO Int nailly acc.(:5:ilile Lilli, t, fil,Ic tional alid .inilily 417&'(1 allatiqi?rl 1 3 1111"'i:, , rl stul b,Â·ini.e tu ,Â·idle,(-fÂ·lil lisi C f 9 01' t y (. Ill I bl ,} Â·, work environments ir,Â· cir:veloped nio,ind f tint tional and 21(12 [)tabl:' th.k-orionted 'il,ficÂ·,3% that Un,/1 â€¢/ d P p: u I)!I,lt , i . I, ./ , I, 11 lit ,-1 iici vt?rit 11.1 ti'(i k) 1{;\ 1,11 I I IntlÂ·bional exptÂ·[len, u tlir 41|I Dep:iltment. die cp.itiplily -,1.,inted tcÂ· er,Courbige 4211.3, ; workflow efficiency Tl 1i overall experience 01 :,ny for Ility evokes .1 5,311.e u: ,-unimillitty,lild eml,loyee pric.le Ilorli)15 tlic hibtoritul Co:ttext. ' 1 ) d e ! 1 r . l 1 1 pt op.1 ,Â·111 1'.b 111 t he Â£ 01'le.xI (.11 1 4,Â·lf'Â· ./illâ‚¬1 1111)1~.Ily ,)11vlionn,ent ...1.1-mm........ Energy Conservation 4**%'29*9%WA/Re#"W.'I.*IM/~/*M/*W . . Meet minimum building code requirements Include energy saving measusres projected to pay for themselves , over the useful life of the building 83.8% d J Be a model to the community and try for net zero or net positive regardless of cost 10.8% 4 100% ' Architectural Considerations ' '~'~ 'jt*Â»fit; "i-?9%'t;'4~*&4Â·Â· ...up,.~~.,4- . Carry forward Architecture from old courthouse 8.3% Bridge design styles between old courthouse and courthouse plaza 'e * building 81.3% '1. I. <.1 Make a new civic statement with unique architectural style that * distiguishes the new bu Iding from the courhouse and courthouse plaza 10.4% 100% Priorities ' '~4.7.-Rf,â€ž*.NMâ€¢,Â»Â·*~i-'1Â«RietÂ«,1'"ouu-,~â€ž..e:#<1~~**M,il:g,fwag#~N't~pNfÂ¥~â‚¬49-â€¢eÂ»,~ i ', Â· ~~~ :i:t Law enforcment needs - interview rooms, evidence storage 33.8% Courts - hearing rooms, additional offices, jury rooms, security 24.3% Better customer service space - Clerk, Assessor, Treasurer, etc 20.3% Public Meeting Room 16.2% Reception area/lobby - Entrace to Pitkin Co Govt. 5.4% 100.0% PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Facility Vision X pliblic Feedback P264 12 ... 15 IV.B. ADM*,IrnIA,ION poss - -571 -F .lt _d TRE~SuRER *SgSSOR lL , ~/ OPEN SPACE I TRA.: 41 6-1 1 / ' 99*Alk.1--el r COURTHOUSE COMMUNIIÂ¥ DEVILOP~~f i...FTEÂ« 1 1 1 0.= A-1 5HER. P--7-1-- 10"Â·r 83Â£ F ~ APD ~ c-â€žogs. .*6 / linimmBUT........... IIi 5HENF'b GARIOE FIg DIERâ€¢f S I STORAGE COUI?IMOUSE BASE'Dll I ELECTIONS . PROCESSING .ULm.~,lilll PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schemmtic- Design P265 12 .... 15 -El -4- IV.B. I El poss VOTE HERE - d ... C.JP 4 k: & 621 3 I %1Â· .Â·; r.1 & 1 - 'll~,....t 2 'J-' Ill 9. P i ' ' . ~ * I .1 1 41 1.,. 7- ir 8 E. --- 9- 42. Ii,r -- -Ill~ . UÂ· 0 = 2- 1 72 1 -1 3 1 i 14 I n 14. . LE,h. f ..1 -9 - J - 4 Option 1 takes cues from the adjacent Courthouse ~4 plaza building with the rhythm of brick and sandstone 41 ' 44% piers, and window openings. The new building is more 41{.; lir i.A ! dynamic with added window openings and textured 0658* color concrete material, setting it apart in a more modern way. Window shading overhangs create added detail, while green panels between the window 4,-â‚¬3:= openings form a tie to the historic courthouse. An -//7-9/- / architectural concrete wall comes out from the entry to the street and provides a buffer to the adjacent office spaces. A metal canopy forms an inviting gateway announcing the entry. The Courthouse Plaza Â·~ J~~ building design renovation closely relates the two buildings. 29 -- Et PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schem Atir Design P266 12 .-- . 15 IV.B. poss C. VOTE HERE F.*.r #,t pwi .UN til 1 - be..i . A :V> i. 4 1, 1/. ti >3( .L 1 ./ , , a k . .li - Y.E., i. 1 â€¢ - :D= 1 .....64. , 22- , i . A - ~' ~ ~~ ct , .C. :.f 'Â¢ ~:" 1,1. 6. P Â·4 -44 1. " 4 1- <.-;ija,94#.fl~= 1 1 B '1 1 1 1 En ?22 E - 1 - ,? lilitillilt . :21:2*t2i * -4 Ii-Il . ~711.,1.: /#"-k Option 2 utilizes varioussun shading devices allowing a great deal of light into the interiorspaces and ample glass material. Solar panelson the roof double as /// I ~ light scoops bringing in additional light. Sandstone panel cladding grounds the building to its context, . while metal panel cladding and accents set it apart in a more modern way. A steel and glass canopy structure comes out to the street to invite the public a in and announce the entry. The canopy correlates to the brick pier rhythm on the Courthouse Plaza building. Design revisions are proposed for the Courthouse Plaza ' building. Option 2 allows the Historic Courthouse, *./.*.It. I Courthouse Plaza building and the new building to Â¢ have distinct architectural style variations that allow 4-4 Â· % tb . h! Â·~ 6 each to stand out with their own place in time. . PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schematir Design P267 12 . .. . 15 IV.B. I El poss VOTE HERE . .C,0,#~.3 ?,4 1 /8 5 hiâ‚¬. -1 :,1. 1 .. Â· Â·Â· W - p-' + I . 1 le. 4 tur 4 l 9 +11'3 1 i im!1~=mm,- -1 ./ 'liwill F-1 -I 3~.MI 1,11. -11 4 + 0 1,1 - i# b.* th. 0 1 11,d PÂ¥5 il . 1 E *i I 122/ . ? - The brick and sandstone exterior groundsthe building -,0,/ ..ililij#911.r %- .-//.-:B~.I~:/r/fie,LF# to its context and the perforated metal screens are 04, incorporated for a more modern palette of materials. --~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~11*-~ 1' 1 AA The offices have plentiful glass giving much light to the - ..:'. 19 --..1 4., .lit interiorspaces. The metalscreensare added to the - facade over glass areas with clear openingsto give [.LA the impression of smallerscale windows that better fit the surrounding context. The metal screens filter light to the interior spaces, provide sun shading, and are a similar huetothesurrounding brick and sandstone. This helpsto blend the materialstogetherin a unified 4,7 ... q . 1. way. A sandstone clad wall with perforated metal screens comes out to the street along the Courthouse 4 4.... 12 f 0 1 -Lk perforated metal canopy forms an inviting gateway ,Â·S Plaza building providing a buffer to office spaces. A f LO announcing the entry. The proposed design renovation for the Courthouse Plaza building has sandstone p iÂ·,i r ,Â·' 4, 4.i-0 . 1 1 . '1"1 accents and detailing that help tie it to the new building, PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schemy,tir Design P268 12 . ..* . 15 IV.B. poss b -VINÂ¥-, VOTE HERE U Â£10 16 311. 'i>k * 1' ., 92 , --49 19 i, 404.. r .- 4Â§ 4.62- :<ty#. . 1 7 34'1~ r c - : =AÂ·17'K . 1 - 1- I .r I 9 . 1, u - 'il -- ./ -1 - t.. -1 --*-1. Allifillil/Klil~all i':,ikt* 02 -*44././5- t - . ~'"*15Â¢~5'Ya':!-,1 . ,39 .--*. -----7 . i ':Wirr.Jilti--------9 I - 1 -M 1 1 1 - Erf : dz-Aa - - - -- I - 22 ./=Ii Option 4 more literally relates to the context of the historic Courthouse building. Similar materials of sandstonebase, brick, accent banding and roof shape relate, but are distinctly different to not replicate. A finely detailed glass wall at the entry creates a visual void the separates the roofed portion of the ...4--9.. ... new building from the Courthouse Plaza building. This allows the building toread as a singular proportional glass window voids, and metal wall cladding, This statement. A similar strategy at the west Galena Plaza side is employed with a change to flat roof, again creates a singular presence of the roofed portion of the building that relates proportionally to 4 21'X.:8:00---4- - - the Courthouse and helpsto break downthe scale . A of the building. A design renovation is proposed for 9 -Se - -6 Courthouse Plaza building and retains its own distinct t - .1 / , C. character. C â‚¬ 3 . PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schemmtir Design P269 12 .. .15 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE ./ M EL,& 0 REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (F), ASPEN LAND USE CO~~ ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 69-99 530 E rÂ·(4ln St- *, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Ae:\ /3 #20,4 0) 5fnn , 2016 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) Â£ 0-1.141 S c ove/9 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the_Cia-ofÂ«spen, Colorado, hereby .personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inell in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted Â· prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is ill any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 3( - day of 4wv~- , 20_16 by Afj- 5 0-c--0.~ NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 530E. Main Street (Courthouse Plaza) WrINESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Public Hearing: April 13, 2016, 5 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Cham- bers 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 530 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Pitkin My commission expires: al ls, 00 County Center Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: PID # 2737-073-47-851 Description: The applicant proposes a remodel and addition to the existing Courthouse Plaza ' building. The building is located within a historic MUM duldl faittae-~ district. Notary Public Land Use Review: Major Public Project Review Decision Making Body:Historic Preservation Com- mission Applicant: Pitkin County, c/o Jon Peacock, County Manager 530 E. Main Street, 3rd Floor, As- pen, CO 81611 1*KAREN-REED PATTERSON ~ | NOTARY PUBLIC More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City 01 Aspen Community Development Department, 130 | STATE OF COLORADO S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: | NOTARY ID #19964002767 justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. ' LEammission Expires February 15, EEJ Published in the Aspen Times on March 31, BY OF THE PUBLICATION - -- 2016(12009649) .. ..AllOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING b 46 R le*Ur) (2&0*7 RE: 534 E. Cooper Ave. Public Hearing: April 13, 2016, 5:00 PM Meeting Location:City Hall, City Council Cham- bers 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, 0081611 f f Project Location: 530 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Pit- 14â‚¬/9 k 00â‚¬Qt< - kin County Center Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: PID # 2737-073-47-851 Description: The applicant proposes a remodel and addition to the existing Courthouse Plaza <*Mw) a Fww building. The building is located within a historic district. Land Use Reviews Req: Major Public Project Re- view Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission Applicant: Pitkin County, do Jon Peacock, Coun- ty Manager 530 E. Main Street, 3rd Floor, Aspen, 0081611 More Information: For further information related lia ?m a to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, 1 R .11.f 3,0,/ED justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Published in the Aspen Times on March 24,2016 ~, MAR 2 4 2016 (11997565) . . .. . . .. ......AA 1. 1 - CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT 11 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6120 9 + IY'A] U; Â«1 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20 1 Gy , /2 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, Ict 111 9-3 G J L (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 73 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 1,9 day of 111,A 9/44 , 20 169 to and including the date and time of thepublic hearing. Aphotograph ofthe posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~* Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. b< Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Sikqature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 17 day of /4 Fri' 1 , 10.16-'by K I >'1 1Â»''u '1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JOSHUA S. HALL Notary Public My commission expires: 2-2 1111 17 State of Colorado EZZI fri,M,9 tort,511. 189 ' Od/\Â«f?Â«20 yNotaÂ«1~ut>lic- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 -1"Â£ 4 0 . I I I : 1 042-3 . 1 a.=c. 4 +Al â€¢' tiyÂ· c: r 4~ kils '<,flMI- ftf~ 4* 4 Â· r / 9. t == ' Â¢< -4-4 f 22. - . / :2 J Zr W - .4 7,4 . , , -- F 7 & t.3774//1 I...., 4 ..6 - .44 -i Je' 4/ 4 -~- ekl-- 41â€¢ I ' LE 'C ...i .1 - _ -= -'\ 2,( 2 il . * " 74-icÂ· 0. 1 9 6 /1 21:$ 1 ZAL-li -- 1 K.1 1 Â·i / 1 9.4.#mil i. 1 4 ic 5,14[4ir, m E %12 4 i (' 1,1-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-- - ~ * ; 1.Fu . Z â€¢â€¢ rs- . 9 ~ - ' 9 1.11 / , -.Im-- :2~h -:/' I E E .. t - D. e:911.D~ H U .-I '2\ *1: 1/ /,. / ' 2*ImÂ»-iftÂ»***R>*7--239-9 . -.. Kid<331/ . I - 4 4 I i , e 1. it m i L>C/-41-/553- 9-;7 A..11 1- /1 1- â€¢1-42,4-\Orp,-91>R/< 4 r 1.2 1- t.:, .., 1, -1 ~, 2-'1 . 3-- Lit>' L -2, 1 4/ . E= , â€ž 0%. 1 -7 --- - .Â» .7 ..# . - I 4 -- L I.M.Â£:= 17-L- -' f -1, Oh; 8 r.,<-49'.-Ar. , i /1 . A :5 -i,~Ad>:91 .r.> I"'//. EK'.-6...0 - -:1./i 78- 2 ' - liaudili~ -7 . -L 3 1/1 *2. 3 E mr 1.47 1 mi=1/12--~ - m 1= 1 .,..eaJ. 64 =i, *i: M ---Ip- P 1 0.1 . g 411 A , 1 L. J W.' li -y U - m =1 M 4.11 6 â€¢ 0"7". 5---4--% 13,2~ -- -/-1~ - 1, .1 ., I I , 1. - 1.~p, - -1 .... . 49: 7f- - ... ..4 - U - E 4 4., I ' .. 114 I. . 24 . 84 2**P -> ~40 41.. . : 2Â©/*I lili I ... I .%6-* .V+I ...92 4 1 3/W . . X'~, 1-2:& 2,74.4 @â€¢4 *e 2,51*t ' 2 . 4 - i .. . 1.Â·* I 361' * 1â‚¬ - .Â· â‚¬ 2.33.-Â· 41;pyi,xi,-&3:-42)'2 .k Â· t..4 el ftÂ©*i- 1-- :f - {tr...Cit-Irrk.'4 -' ti.*ffilitift<il~-~:iLY-23 - - . - - I . ./111..> I .t ..4 .'.u.:. :544 -"944Â«ti Vi;t.3.--7.: 3.74..:4~: li~ifi>:9:>12:.,. ~â€¢~~:1*fp~~~~i.irjfi*r-42;,-1#<4.*6F*a. .2.24.31. 4.9.fittl *t I % . . I .-0 - .?r.Â¥49.11 ~-4 ,....ff.lfÂ·~"*F: 3.42.-*3::â‚¬U, 2 ....U.-4.-*, 1. ''~ -'.1.- i :/ i.51~424 .3.t.Ji Fof '4- 20*.4 , -. A I -. , ..A+Â·*ri.:t...ter . ..~ I 9:.i\%,â€¢Alk: ~ ~ . I -- 4. 444.&28.i<*,a'Â·n. 1 .' -- ,uj-:,t .1,--4.4,7 2.,0,~i,Â·v-*. .. . ... . 1 *= .... i~.t:-ff-thil.*tr J '14'..Tgfl;369,1-31: flyÂ». 1.k,iÂ·~0 14.1, - 4 4.* ........lowmi. -. --Ii' ....iJE- 25,1- 2/lib. '.cess, t.,tr:. -. * I V - -'* Â· 79*Ofis+4*'m4%*Tror&*MAE,rtfag Â»02 --- : -:-t Â«6' u.Â· - 17 . 1 '' EMed: 1 -r f~f- t j.Â· . 9,4 '* ' 4 1 41. '1 * , ' 0 1 *4# I .410 - i. 1, -- PUBLIC NOTICE 7 4 0 ~.....~ [late: April 13,2016 u j- Time: 5 PM ,J?!Iw --22 Place1130 a GAna st., City . g 1 - - Hal-t-cmthmiGhambers- i 1-. Â·9* "7 9#R : . Purpose: 1~~: Eftkin (-ggn ly60~~I-~dAiffiS prop-h.. 4~ 1 - ts oroposing a ramoaeliand addition Â¢ I 4~2'/ 2 # rd '~ 'pv.-- 4 the Courthouge'RIA*a building. 1-- T '' I.* - The Historic Pre*vation - Commissibit*%0nducta Major . :6 Ed . A. 4 1/ Public Protect Review .....3- ' 4 0: , .1 . 17. For futlf J -iltion contact Aspef E - .' 7 1 1<e 0 : ./ Planning Dept at 970-129-2797 - ./ 1. - - .* m>~" / ri rÂ·x r 1*3' 1 1, 4 % '2 1 1444 ./. ' 2 1 /1 i illi711'ZLI ' _ 11#mulin/. Nwidum:Liti 11 , , . & M - - :,31Iwie~~1111:28I11,Iml=Ilil:u. i . , , 1 1 - r -Il--I-==EW---IL IC=4 - 4 ~ jae t*--: r 4, .19 f 4 - 4 k. - '- .. .. f . b., , - t FF, . L }- .-0) )1 1EF THE CI'TY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 530 E. Main Street (Courthouse Plaza) Public Hearing: April 13, 2016, 5 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Chambers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 530 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Legal Description: PID # 2737-073-47-851 Description: The applicant proposes a remodel and addition to the existing Courthouse Plaza building. The building is located within a historic district. Land Use Review: Major Public Project Review Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission Applicant: Pitkin County, c/o Jon Peacock, County Manager 530 E. Main Street, 3rd Floor, Aspen, CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. SL PROPERTY LLC BORCHERTS ROBERT H REV TRUST BORCHERTS HOLDE H REV TRUST 2606 STATE ST 1555 WASHTENAW 1555 WASHTENAW DALLAS, TX 75204 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 BROUGH STEVE B & DEBORAH A EMPHASYS SERVICE COMPANY CITY OF ASPEN 599 TROUT LK DR 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D PENTHSE 118 130 S GALENA ST SANGER, CA 93657 MIAMI, FL 33129 ASPEN, CO 81611 EMPHASYS SERVICES COMPANY BULKELEY RICHARD C & JULIE J DORAN RALPH 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D, PENTHSE 11 600 E MAIN ST #401 2600 WOODWARD WAY MIAMI, FL 33129 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30305 WTF LLC ASPEN LEGACY LLC MARASCO FAMILY TRUST 311 BOWIE ST #2107 17740 E HINSDALE AVE 653 261/2 RD AUSTI N, TX 78703 FOXFIELD, CO 80016 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MARASCO RAE O TRUST MARASCO EMILY A STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 653 261/2 RD 21701 FLAMENCO 12738 W 84TH DR GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692 ARVADA, CO 80001 MARASCO BERNARD R GENE MCCUTCHIN LTD 11 600 ASPEN LLC 320 DAKOTA DR PO BOX 802043 625 E MAIN ST #102B PMB 233 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 DALLAS, TX 753802043 ASPEN, CO 81611 MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C LLC LARSON MARIA M MARCHETTI FAMILY LLC 2465 NOB HILL AVE NORTH PO BOX 8207 1526 FOREST DR SEATTLE, WA 98109 ASPEN, CO 81612 GLENVIEW, IL 60025 GRIMES DAVID L RKJR PROPERTIES LTD LEBARRE FAM LLC 3510 BROMLEY WOODS LN 5934 ROYAL LN #250 7518 MIDDLEWOOD ST GREENSBORO, NC 27410 DALLAS, TX 75230 HOUSTON, TX 77063 SMITH JAMES F&N LINDSAY ALLEN RONALD W & CARROL A REV TRUST MAESTRANZI ALEXA LEE TRUST 600 E MAIN ST #302 4908 N 77TH PL 1736 PARK RIDGE PT ASPEN, CO 81611 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 852511606 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 MANN KATHLEEN A REV TRUST 99% VAN WALRAVEN EDWARD C REV TRUST 1 % COPPOCK RICHARD P PO BOX 1455 PO BOX 1455 PO BOX 44 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 DEXTER, MI 48130 SHERMAN CAPITAL COMPANY NR HOLDING CO LAMB DON REV TRUST 5840 E JOSHUA TREE LN 580 MALLORY WY 1449 E 56TH ST PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 CARSON CITY, NV 89701 CHICAGO, IL 60637 GILKERSON LINDA REV TRUST HICKS GILBERT W & PATSY K GODIVA HOLDINGS LLC 1449 E 56TH ST 3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PL 435 E MAIN ST CHICAGO, IL 60637 HONOLULU, HI 96822 ASPEN, CO 81611 BANK MIDWEST N A ALH HOLDING CO MILL & MAIN LLC 1111 MAIN ST #2800 435 E MAIN ST 3235 HARBOR VIEW DR KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN DIEGO, CA 92106 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER HOLLAND AND HART CONCEPT 600 LLC 1300 S STEELE ST PO BOX 8749 PO BOX 2914 DENVER, CO 80210 DENVER, CO 80201 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ALPINE BANK ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY 420 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 10000 530 E MAIN ST #302 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ASPEN, CO 81611 BANKERS MORTGAGE CORP LESTER JIM BRYAN ROY MD PA PROFIT SHARING PLAN 1616 ORCHARD AVE 395 SOUTH END AVE #29N 5836 LONG BRAKE TRAIL RD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 NEW YORK, NY 10280 EDINA, MN 55439 SMITH GARY W BOHNETT MARSHA ANN TRUST DANIELS SIMON B 800 W 5TH ST #606 10780 NAVAJO WY 431 E HYMAN AVE AUSTIN, TX 78703 OREGON CITY, OR 97045 ASPEN, CO 81611 HENRY WILLIAM STONE REV TRUST STAPLE GREGORY C FAREY SIOBHAN C 3382 TURNBURY DR 7903 CURTIS ST 7903 CURTIS ST RICHFIELD, OH 44286 CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC CICUREL CARY LUCKYSTAR LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 2615 N LAKEWOOD PO BOX 7755 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81612 WILSON FAMILY TRUST ORR KEITH MURPHY GEORGE W 101 FOUNDERS PL #201 4545 N STATE LINE PO BOX 4146 ASPEN, CO 81611 TEXARKANA, TX 75503 ASPEN, CO 81612 OP LLC VECTOR ENTERPRISES LLC BOSELY MARY ANNE REV TRUST 424 PARK CIR #6 0490 ASPEN OAK DR PO BOX 26 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 OBP LLC G & G CORPORATE OFFICES LLC NGS LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 2520 S GRAND AV # 114 101 FOUNDERS PL #109 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81601 ASPEN, CO 81611 CRUMMER KLEIN TITLE TRUST SINTA SCOTT BALLINGER ELIZABETH F 1305 N BEVERLY DR PO BOX 2872 PO BOX 10205 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 SEYFFERT STEVEN J HANDLEY DENNIS KLEIN JAMES J & SALLIE R 102 FOUNDERS PL #201 102 FOUNDERS PL #202 PO BOX 12022 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SMITH H W 111 HUNTER ALEXANDER DONAHUE ELIZABETH PO BOX 10914 PO BOX 1638 102 FOUNDERS PL #2302 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLATHAR KIMBERLY J GWM PROPERTIES LLC 311 ASPEN LLC PO BOX 12197 PO BOX 4146 2317 PENNSYLVANIA AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 WILMINGTON, DE 19806 GOLDFEIN MICHAEL R TRUST GOLDFEIN PAMELA J TRUST BOMBA LAURIE A REV TRUST 1724 BRAESIDE LN 1724 BRAESIDE LN 5601 HIGH DR NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 WELSCH SUSAN F REVOC TRUST RAMOS WALTHER JR & MARJORIE R GALANTER YALE & ELYSE 101 N SPRING ST #201 133 TALL TREES DR 525 S ANDREWS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BALA CYNWYD, PA 19004 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 333012831 FESUS GEORGE J & SUSAN C ATWOOD STANFORD H & PAMELA S LVG TR MARTINEZ RITA PO BOX 9197 16125 GREENWOOD LN 101 N SPRING ST #3104 ASPEN, CO 81612-9197 MONTE SERENO, CA 95030 ASPEN, CO 816111518 PEARSON DOUG DOCKEN ANDREW ARENELLA BETH & FRANK 111 101 N SPRING ST #3105 101 N SPRING ST #106 101 N SPRING ST #107 ASPEN, CO 816111518 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAPIRO FREDERIC M & SUSAN SUMNER VERONICA GRAHAM NARELDA 101 N SPRING ST #3108 101 N SPRING ST #3109 101 N SPRING ST #203 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SATTLER SANDRA A CURETJORDAN LAZAR FAMILY TRUST 101 N SPRING ST #3204 PO BOX 3380 5342 ALDEA AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ENCINO, CA 91316 BASSI PETER & BARBARA FAMILY TRUST COHEN NANCY C REV TRUST LEONARD FAMILY TRUST 18 CHANNEL VISTA 2026 N MOHAWK PO BOX 710 NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657 CHICAGO, IL 60614 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 MOSCOE THOMAS D SMITH GAILEN B FAMILY TRUST OBERMEYER 204 LLC 14700 ROCKSBOROUGH RD 625 E MAIN ST #102B 2727 ALLEN PKWY STE1400 MINNETONKA, MN 553453718 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77019 PARDEE JAMES LEE 111 REV LIV TRST BIG BOY LLC LINDENAU SCOTT A REV TRUST PO BOX 4153 205 S MILL ST #301A 501 RIO GRANDE PL #104 ASPEN, CO 816124153 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TGS LLC UNIT 109 OP LLC ANDERTON JAMES L PO BOX 1913 501 RIO GRANDE PL #107 100 OBERMEYER PLACE DR#4101 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FELDMAN JONATHAN MILNE SHEILA NGUYEN MICHAEL TAM 100 OBERMEYER PLACE DR #102 PO BOX 8286 430 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 DAO OANH KIM UNIT 106 OP LLC GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC 430 E HYMAN AVE 205 S MILL ST #301A PO BOX 4491 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816112497 ASPEN, CO 81612 FORTIER TIMOTHY MAROLT ENTERPRISES LLC TSE HOLDINGS LLC 601 RIO GRANDE PL#102 PO BOX 8705 601 RIO GRANDE PL #120 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PAM LLC JOSA LLC LCC ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 4446 601 RIO GRANDE #110 PO BOX 1550 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SCHENKELBERG LLC K & J ENTERPRISES LLC OBERMEYER PLACE RENTAL GRP LLC 140 VISTA GRANDE 601 RIO GRANDE PL #119A 115 AABC GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81507 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DIXIE DOG VENTURES LLC FURTHUR CANCUN LLC LANE TAMMIE 1690 HOMESTAKE DR PO BOX 2199 601 RIO GRANDE PL #118 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRUNSWOLD KIRK ARTIM LLC KIMPLE 2004 TRUST 601 RIO GRANDE PL #118 PO BOX 30106 3505 TURTLE CREEK BLVD #PH20A ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10011 DALLAS, TX 75219 OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN CARVER RUTH A OBERMEYER PLACE CONDO PO BOX 514 116 S ASPEN ST COMMON AREA GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 ASPEN, CO 81611 210 N MILL ST #201 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCEPT 600 CONDO ASSOC DML REAL-TY LLC UNIT 5E OP LLC DBA BIG BOY LLC COMMON AREA PO BOX 305 205 S MILL ST #301A BASALT, CO 81621 CHAVIES, KY 41727 ASPEN, CO 81611 RIO GRANDE PARTNERS 88 LLC PR ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 214 WEST COOPER LLC 1008 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 1006 6 NE 63RD ST #220 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 HUTCHESON LAURA TRUST CALHOON THOMAS C HAUSER MARY JANE 98 SAN JACINTO BLVD # 1009 315 LAVACA ST 1540 BOHNS POINT RD AUSTIN, TX 78701 AUSTIN, TX 787013036 WAYZATA, MN 55391 WAGAR RICHARD H HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( MILL & MAIN PO BOX 9063 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81612 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MILL STREET CONDO ASSOC CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CONDO ASSOC TASTERS RESTAURANT INC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA PO BOX 6211 RIO GRANDE PL 530 E HOPKINS AVE SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 625 MAIN INVESTMENTS LLC CWAREI LLC TRACY KATHLEEN 1482 E VALLEY RD #463 3030 HARTLEY RD #350 625 E MAIN ST #202 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32257 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROY ADAM C & SARAH G STUDIO SIX LLC EMCAR LLC 625 E MAIN ST #203 PO BOX DD 655 MADISON AVE 11 TH FL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10065 CAREM LLC 625 MAIN ASPEN LLC MILLENNIUM PLAZA LLC 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL 465 N MILL ST #I2-113 PO BOX 1247 NEW YORK, NY 10065 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 426 EAST MAIN LLC M & G CONDO ASSOC HUNTER SQUARE LLC 623 E HOPKINS AVE 426 E MAIN ST PO BOX 2 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SONOMA, CA 95476 JURINE LLC CANTINA BUILDING LLC GARRITY LAUREN N PO BOX 2 PO BOX 1247 415 RIO GRANDE PL #102 SONOMA CA 95476 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROCKHILL BRITTANIE COLE REBECCA NEWLON LLC PO BOX 10261 415 RIO GRANDE PL #202 PO BOX 1863 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO WELLS FARGO BANK ERNEMANN ANDREW & ASHLEY 1111 MAIN ST #2800 PO BOX 2609 39 POLECAT DR KANSAS CITY, MO 641052154 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 ASPEN, CO 81611 HENDERSON JAMES C KUCK KATHERINE M 530 HOPKINS LLC 4880 HARLEM RD 4880 HARLEM RD 5301/2 E HOPKINS GALENA, OH 43021 GALENA, OH 43021 ASPEN, CO 81611 JARDEN CORPORATION 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Inretritli *14 'Hâ€¢,4rn,Â·tirn 0,Â·11â€¢Ii#,11: 1 1â€¢â€¢,1"'â€¢ Hf,11,-4.0'11,1,1 1% 1'11,;ril 'h,11:eviti.1,1 Pitkin Sheriff and Adminsitration Building- Public Feedback Architectural Cor*deraltions _ a-*~a.i,auu,u. ..mi - . D . Carry forward Architecture from old courthouse 8.3% Bridge design styles between old courthouse and courthouse plaza building 81.3% Make a new civic statement with unique architectural style that distiguishes the new building from the courhouse and courthouse plaza 10.4% 100% In:#trntr.1 1 'rirl.lru,Â·litrn Nolittkipi,â€¢ 4 4, 11â€¢1 - 31 1,1,-Â·iÂ·:.1.14â€¢11.% fhÂ·,-,1 '1:in.Â·f, 3,um Pitkin Sheriff and Administration Building- Concept Design Options Total Scoring by Rank Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Projected Final Cost - based on preliminary designs 1 4 2.5 2.5 Projected Energy Efficiency 2.5 4 2.5 1 Tota I Vote 2 3 4 1 Total Ranking - Lowest is Best 5.5 11 9 4.5 Scored 1-4 with 1 being the best (lowest cost, highest energy efficiency, highest vote) oss The Pitkin County Strategic Plan is visibly and experientially manifested in quality facilities and landscapes that unphasize sustainability, health/wellness and a commitmentto fiscal responsibility. County facilities encourage and facilitate civic interaction with a clearsequence of interiorancl exterior public and semi-public spaces that are safe, open and inviting. County facilities provide an entry experiencethat is inviting, social, clearly navigable, safe, sheltered and visually appealing. The reception experience is welcoming, and provides clear wayfinding for public and staff alike. Public and private collaboration zones (meeting rooms, etc) are designed to be easily accessible, quiet, functional, and amply sized/arranged to m inimize disturbance to adjacent uses. County employee work environments are developed around functional and aclaptabletask-oriented spaces that, liere appropriate, are naturally well-lit and ventilated providing a friendly professional experience for all. Departments are spatially situated to encourage effective workflow efficiency The overall experience of any fa cility evokes a sense of community and employee pride, honors the h istori ca I c o ntext, and encourages preparedness in the context of a safe and friendly environment. 91(3%1131 Y; VISION Energy Conservation .--I - Meet minirnum building code requirements 5.4% : Include energy saving measusres projected to pay for themselves 9 over the useful life of the building 83.8% 0 + 1- 4 Be a model to the community and try for net zero or net positive r regardless of cost 10.8% 0 ~. ,.p 100% 1&: 1 1 -0 -1 Architectural Considerations r . - Carry forward Architecture from old courthouse 8.3% , Bridge design styles between old courthouse and courthouse plaza .. building 81.3% . 1. Make a new civic statement with unique architectural style that p + 2 . l istiguishes the new building from the courhouse and courthouse , lp|aza + 10.4% 100% Priorities .,â€ž4/" ', v Law enforcment needs - interview rooms, evidence storage 33.8% Courts - hearing rooms, additional offices, jury rooms, security 24.3% Better customer service space - Clerk, Assessor, Treasurer, etc 20.3% Public Meeting Room 16,2% Reception area/lobby - Entrace to Pitkin Co Govt. 5.4% 100.0% PITKINCOUNTY SHERIFF& ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Facility Vision & Public Feedback 12 . 09 . 15 r=13-mnron-1=23 Ki:I'. ~ _ ADMINISTRATION poss - 1 2[1114; ATTORNEY . CONF~ Lh V -r- HR 4 1 1 CONF ~ ~ *f FINANCE ~17 I W 1 E---1 STS TREASURER 1 EL 1 ASESSOR X -- 1120 1 *19 OPEN 1 SPACE & ' , TRAILS CONF r-- ~ 6 11 i f APO COURTHOUSE Â¤ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 I i R Ct 1 JAIL 9l 14 Ill 3 f SHERIFF ''"47-IT'll...- ._ 0-Url L BOCC #. 114+ i i Ml-3 ~ LOBBY 1 . ;fl APD < 1 COURTHOUSE 1 CLERK & ~ t~ RECORDER ~ j LÂ¢r i,r-râ„¢ 1.-r 0%*2<KIRST LEVEL 1,021=Â£=U,-!9,?,1 4 , 0 . y~ . Y - - -1 , 1 i 1 7 ' L-1 \ SHERIFF'S , GARAGE '' 3- - SHERIFFS ' r STORAGE ' COURTHOUSE BASEMENT r ELECTIONS i r PROCESSING 11 W *11 -1 h_13 -~RAGER,LEVEL PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF& ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schematic Design 12 09 15 poss VOTE HERE / &?k 1, 5 1, /-1 4.7. 095 1 1 11 11 ==1111 29 11 ta". ..41 - .11 1 .tv - 1 0,4> . 19 1 i. I - W ', , 9 I . , 1-9 411 - il .- - . Â·'~:Iii'.slw 1.1 -0.~St*~Z~ bE i Â·A %.1.. 1. Â£ Â·- '4~~lf/ P/'j 1R 1 1 1. - 4.- 3 - .- .- C 'MÂ», 4136-3-~mi -'23~ f ~ 34 - -4- 9,=I.+=:1 ...1.:1 - .* --= 4 -r -- ------ -- Abl .&1WALfi*U~2Rdi~42 2~ 90'1 74 Ch - -./* E-96 :,1 -1,4,1 /*.4 - J -Z -3..1.t .1, 41 4 1 ..4...1- , 4 ./ I ./ I' )* 1., ic ... -1 ..A-- --I./- 1 -1 1 -1 .mekt 411 ': .... D 3 6..-6.,--1 vi L~ "1 1 1 1 1 - 1 L ' M;=7~ Â»rÂ» -Â·- --- - r- . _ - ....ill------7-- ~ M - ..1 - I f#,7 4 Option 1 takes cues from the adjacent Courthouse 120 plaza building with the rhythm of brick and sa ndstone 97 piers, and window openings. The new building is more e Â£1 dynamic with added window openings and textured 4.0(It color concrete material, setting it apart in a more ~ ~~,JÂ¢yjt modern way, Window shading overhangs create added detail, while green pa nels between the window openings form a tie to the historic courthouse, An 1 .1/ architectural concrete wall comes out from the entry to the street and provides a buffer to the adjacent * office spaces. A metal canopy forms an inviting gateway announcing the entry. The Courthouse Plaza building design renovation closely relatesthetwo buildings. PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schernatic Design 12 09 15 3.....4 31 poss - ~ â„¢20.0, VOTE HERE k,S V 4,4- . 1*. . b 1 *Â¥4 9 1 * -. r i..- 11 .1. Ip .......; ~ + I A--11- : 3 >1 4 - t.- 'A ., 1 1, . / 1 1/ - - . I. . 024 1Â· ' 1. 1 9'm:!.Â·Â· 'V JA -1. I k.. *- 2 - Â·, i...,90'*;.W*48:3Â¥.*?A,i,RKNhl~ Â¥ â€¢,4. -4 Â· 1 1 * f, 1 -I 1363,9/2 '1, P 7- 4. ....1 . 7 , 43 / 1 1 - . ... 41 4. .1 .1. i 34 r r- r EMar- 1 ;-11 1 -- 1 H - . I JrfF: .- -- i96'1 -; . Zy,I 2.1 Ft- 1->~ 1 H - j i - -*&%. .,'5 -.Z, ....A[ 7-Â· Â·, If I ILL . , 1- - 1.-1- -I-. j W-- 7/# 1/lum./997-: L ,%:- - -. s !' .4 13~21I r Â·'1 1 1 - - -~ A~-4.646--12,1. f,8/<TE)=-4-1--.391 -----.1.--. --*-2.--11â€ž---LIE:2~=m -' . J, iÂ·Â· -I - [Il " ~hy 1, , je f;W:. - . T.L, . 1. -4 9. 2.,i 1191*~1~ 7 ..ir{ l /-; 7 1 Option 2 utilizes v arious sun shading dev ices allowing a great deal of light into the interior spaces and ample 2-- i Â·iÂ«-gi '3 -~.19 -.- 2 1 glass material. Solar panels on the roof double as ! . light scoops bringing in additional light Sandstone 1. Â· 1 / .L panel cladding grounds the building to its context, while metal panel cladding and accents set it apart t - .4.,Yti. 3-~:Â·A'k'K-1.,-4 :Â·'Â· ; .,Â·- . in a more modern way. A steel and glass canopy 2 ftÂ·fi# ukÂ·- i. irÂ· 13Â· *Â·~4- structure comes outto the streetto invite the public in and announce the entry. The canopy correlatesto the brick pier rhythm on the Courthouse Plaza building, â‚¬. Design revisions are proposed forthe Courthouse Plaza ' - building Option 2 allowsthe Historic Courthouse, i Courthouse Plaza building and the new building to have distinct architectural style variations that allow each to stand out with their own place in time. 1,- PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schernatic Design 12 09 15 1 3 42 g#k t,~ . 10 poss VOTE HERE . *.I W -41 4,, 02 .t.. v I. I 4.. . W 7 4 , 4.% ,-~4* .,1- 71%43- . ..I.d. :*i , ' 91 r 3 . 'iÂ·Â·.3 6,1 1 1 0 . 3 :. 1 N 1 .2 - W + . 1 h 4 - I 0177--:'L= . 51.24;5.,d*.g Â¢81 2 . -- * \ I , .1- . . 0 1 ...= 1 .. .IL , '4 . j ' &9 illt , - 24 Â£ W 't- 1 . 4%18 -m . -. .9,9 - '/ . - I , . ihil '4 1 ; ti 1 .,i 4, f t. 8/9. 1,%4 *4 V ./ D ** - 4 J . 1 1%- 4. Â£ : IdE '. E. lili 1- r i [:i 0~1?t,,# I.' 411 t-* 1. .. : q. Il,A.,!lil 'I 1 - 11, rt i V :40 ,;w L *4 I 1... 2#514{+Sh , f " i â€¢- .di.:.HI" 4 ' ..,11 -1~,C~t Â· Â· .... 4/4â€¢1/? 1 1 *3* 1 Ill. . 1 - 4 imitc==t . vÂ·Â· i" *:*2 1 ' Â·Â·Â·-Il ........ -.....& I./.* &/ <; 3 )4 . .t,1 3., fÂ· of.-gi#3.321?470Â·.Ir:r~.E'fid The brick and sandstone exterior grounds the building .. r .4 .....:I. 1=......: at 7, , ..+' I . ' Â·Â·Â·.r:,Â·'~c.Â·'4~f{-4:-~,~.;193* to its context and the perforated metal screens are f incorporated for a more modern palette of materials, FET/-/,42/ 35ir#Qi,%4. IretistÂ·Â·,&?I~ The offices have plentiful glass giving much light to the - /4*24't-ME i:724.343224 interiorspaces The metal screens are added to the ky 4 I.: 0 :AN..:~'~46~ facade over glass areas with clear openings to give . '49.i. 1,~ 44.1 ;62-7. ~ '.m Â·Â· â€¢74:Â·Â·'Â· ,0 ' 9 the impression of smaller scale windows that better fit ..2;1 '131 .; .r the surrounding context, The metal screens filter light #4 -,V., 96Â· a similar hue to the surrounding brick and sandstone. A.- ,. ,-. 2 Â·r Â·vÂ· .01 â€¢7 -' tothe interior spaces, provide sun shading, and are This helps to blend the materials together in a unified . 71 ... . I . r. way. A sandstone clad wall with perforated metal screens comes out to the street along the Courthouse i,~Â· Plaza building providing a buffer to office spaces. A h.1 perforated metal canopy forms an inviting gateway 11 A..: : announcing the entry. The proposed design renovation f. for the Courthouse Plaza building hassandstone I k. R 'li. g *.* accents and detailing that help tie it to the new 4 building, 11 . 150 ly#gatl AL Der-*1 4 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF& ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schernatic Design 12 09 15 M El poss VOTE HERE ~U'114 ./.. 1, V . . 4. -4/EU... /2 + I. ... f . ' 4â€¢ Â· 46 , y '.J,Â¤& .3 '. 1 - f ..1. Â·it 1.1 + 1 â‚¬ * 162 ..2 6.- 0 ' '.7 â‚¬ ke I: ... . ---441Â· k . . 2 -- D.: 1&. . . 0. 1 -7- - : UL - - -34 1 + : 2.i . - le k f 7.WÂ·/tr: 4 1 4 =23 4 4 -130 . 1-- - ti ~-3 -r:71,1,~ .~.: 0114 1 â‚¬ . 1*4 -..45*3 .. 3...i . lt. I t- -. 40:ft R # -<E- _ 11- thibLW,W . -t~ 2 '- TI~ 7 : I./.6-- .) -/1. I -- 4------ - , :t ..., - --1. J Â·Â·Â·Â·*Â·-1521=/--ttlll f = ,* -13 1- 4 11/tjitjltill-Z ,"'-r ' 1 ft< -7 - 2- 4 4 L 8Â· 4 1'_ 1 1 _---*--=9#20&12&2="m=M=&,; 11 1 1' 1. .1,- .EL. L- .....--~Mi---laindiawk,r 1 --IJL---4011 .% .4 7 1 ..- 'ti' : .:/Â·1"m'=T'i"li'lo- Option 4 more literally relates to the context of the historic Courthouse building. Similar materials of sandstone base, brick, accent banding and roof shape relate, but are distinctly different to not replicate. A finely detailed glass wall at the entry creates a * visual void the separates the roofed portion of the I ..Â·/i Â·,EL -5 - ' - new building from the Courthouse Plaza building This allowsthe building to read as a singular proportional â‚¬ 1 %44 ... .nâ€ž4 1 9.2 1 statement. A similarstrategy atthe west Galena ..... Plaza side is employed with a change to flat roof, - . - . "gt '*11: glass window voids, and metal wall cladding, This -r Â· Â· again creates a singular presence of the roofed /4 Z 1 -JW . 4 - portion of the building that relates proportionally to the Courthouse and helps to break down the scale - of the building. A design renovation is proposed for ..â€žr-jEMErVA,F.01,=7#&.1,*111%,d,~an,$49 -d#PW 6 1: Courthouse Plaza building and retains its own distinct character, !4*~EIAL DETAIL PITKINCOUNTY SHERIFF& ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Schematic Design 12 09 .15 1 11 1/ Â¢ i.1111111 11 5 90 6 14 u'U - EXHIBIT 1, l. \44 5-1 3 . 0 151 - I U 4 , . h:' -' \ 0 4 .1 4 Â¥ 1, 4 , %. r . P # 'f u,.*-. -~ fi 4 - \ 2. .3 9..4 -/d.6. 4- 11 -11 I '...... - 1 .* j~14 - 25-24 -2 -r I _ - 2-=-e=-a 2 --r __- _ v-fl - --- 1-1.--Â·- 2 --32ES.=k ./ 9 %- *l ------ . --- .3*f, 1 A ---=---- --- 4 0 . t - I - . . 4 - U,-7 - Uk e- .-- -- 4**/.., - .. -- 2 . .. ..lili.....Il.../4,/I Â· 11.-.*I-. r $ 0 , - I ... 4.- Â·~ 74 .r 4 4 ' ' .........t ~' 0 ,~ ;943*K-â€¢, ~ *~ .* -.0 ~74: 4 it f - L 7 - 7- + *.0 **2 iff " 1-'&94"90.43 9*24-ZER.ST/:/PLE,dp .91344*24/ w .1 ~%1 -- >,C-%224-64 6~..,:.,rÂ· 4 k,( F 12. 4.. ar ,#Ar 1.-i*7~5~ V~lyq~Â£~~~~~SAE ft ': 0 M 0 ..4 3 Al' 4>fy -A-~1.,4..06 1~ 47 3 t -A . .Millilill//IM'lle'lligs///ia/jmr...5- . 2% - - Mir* ...I.../ --IiNVM- - '. , ~2_J 1 -19~--*L ' , m i j -11 B _:.un--- Â» f L-1/Nu,61&femmeffecli. Â». -- - Â· - -- ..â‚¬,St- - 1 n:fR~*~~5â‚¬Â· *â€¢5-u 1 4- Â«*~1,9-~0 -- 3-9.5.0039*6 1,7.-*et:=g:. Â·Â·'Â· c - . :4 . ~. 0 - m..:,4, - - 1 . 14 '.1 1, I': 1/ 1 2... - ,"4*Â·Â· 1 .12Â»t.. + . - . - -' -1 . '1.iIFS-7/. ~%/ .4=:I -- 24**0 .....4 24. .. *1 /1. ty. 1 ki. i Aâ€¢ = '6 5. 4 _215 - . 7 F '27 Â£ 9 07,~ i I - 11 I 19,1/ -- t> 1 3. --*f . 4,+11 - . I - ....59 - . 1 0. .:. p -- - . * Â¢ ..,4 tiÂ¢ ..% . Â¥. - - C 1 ' <44 . -9><- , '6 4 4, â€ž I b .S n ' .rb / . -0-1 9 44 L 441â‚¬ ..'' 0~ - .1 42: ./ ' ./. I. ./59 - 7% -*- T - 1IR hÂ·- L . I 4 --1/ 95.-9 - 4, ... 24 - r- , rel 0 ' FliI- - ..i - 11 1 - - I: * *- 1 :* t -6- - r# /2-1A1l.24684;Ar OurÂ¥ 1 -1.M,1 -Â·2 '. -Â· ./ U .i.?Se'". 2 . 4-4. .35Â»Â«2,A -, -p - 22 $ A ,:96 1.-; .... -- - ~=21 7-57- _ v .. 4 - - - -- - 4 - - ./ M--*- - - T. L- . 6 7% - 4- , JAIL . i .e - - F - , - --0 - ./ 4-// 3--- 1 .- . ... ' . G~-- -/9 - 1.1. flu 6 1* i i i Vi =04 j1 i ,/4 ' 2 Â» Community Development Department ETMf'll'*ir'.&~ -,L,Â·-tr'â€¢ IlÂ·8814+I 130 South Galena Street 644.AN 42} -Illâ€ž,1Â¢4Â« 4-14.-304 CO 815 ,"Â° 7 .....,..0'r,~L#.r, -_,~4 .1 *â€ž wAAQ/41<iv I.. 1 1 1 Aspen, CO 81611 Â»,â€žÂ£,r -0 '94-V~ 4Ar- 8 -W/dpi*////W I.*% 4 -9 "r--2 .7-1 0(41.7& FOREVER MILL STREET CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA RIO GRANDE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 808 52 1 0004/03/16 RETURN TO SENDER 677* M O 'Â·r F n - M A- iâ‚¬ 10 r) W N 11 N 4 R 1 * 7 n =OP WARD OLO 81611190230 9* 9 47 4- aC Â°93-2 9-41 u . LE â€¢ -,4 - 4 4.4 4 -0114 53 ' 1-1:1â€ž11,115111 11 ,â€žilil'# i i , 11â€ž11., 61!, 6,1 1 ,#11111*01 i , ,12:, i i , ti A*---V-Mr- S') ' , t:' 1 k: - I , ~: Community Development Department U.k-At-9. 13 ..AL.).4-4.Cl ilti.'}44 -e - 2.â€¢<â€¢4(fi,1....... 130 South Galena Street . ~aw,Â·~~.~7Â»%~1-'~ ~~2~~~-4 g ~ 6. 44> Aspen, C081611 FONEVER I./- -c...."..~*- / STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE .73. 7 1- 12738 W 84TH DR U U./6 k_- ARVADA CO 80001 H i Al C 230 4 3 C 4 RETUMN TO GENTâ‚¬ 4 NOT DELIVEÂ·RABLE AS ADDRÂ·ESSEL UNABLE 70 CORWâ€¢RD BC: 81611190230 Ld,1-09550-29-41 42 - e Â·Â·* rÂ· 0,265*44=* W % C -b 31511 95Â§~ N" 1 1 i ~ 21 1 1 1 li ~ 1 11} ! 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 iii i i % 1 i ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Â£ i i ~ i ~ i i 1 i ! 1 1 4 11 : '111Â·~ ' 11 d I Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street . il i '- '~GRAND .?ftl:,(441-1 IC,r; i..â€ži~'315 Â·Â·'ti~~~''~'~ , .'ll/**9 Aspen, CO 81611 269 MiAN 20 1.6 03 2. L /"~ 9CNIF1W ..... FOREVER GLATHAR KIMBERLY J Â«A PO BOX 12197 ASPEN, CO 81612 7 E 1 8Â©04/05/16Â· 1 2 = 1-.to 2.1 '7 0 *C C N ;t = R ATTEMFTED L NOT-kNOWN s U 4 3 -d>FAP 3% 1 81*LiA*@Ne 2 *2079-10193-29-41 ~ BC: 81611190230 Ip'"li 'ti '11) lit'21:11!1111111'!ililit';'"iii"1111111!}sli,ill . Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street GRAN,O 3.UN..C :4 1*CH-4 64.34 616 ':'~5222*~"~6'21' ~/Ea ;7~#< Aspen, CO 81611 22:, {+L~ 3.11 2,4 .,1%$ 0:,3 t-+1 2 7 ,.,Â·~ FOREVER ~~ GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 4491 044Â« ASPENf CO 81612 :W A A I. L 3 68 5, 2 -1 6004/05/16 0 2 7 1: P U =r= n mc M Â·Mt Â·ize ATTâ‚¬42+12 2 42~-2NBWN UNABLE TO CnewARD mr- , 6 : W 10.1119023 0 *2070-09993-29-41 8 4%1193-38940 2 N,ille#lii'dil,;44,411111121,111,!44{,iifiliciti:11*,p Community Development Department I..;1.11... 130 South Galena Street (6Â¢<,u~Â¢~441 JL.}4412.I~414>04 C,C>, 615 fi~U '40.31.2~ re ~-Aft'*~ Aspen, CO 81611 041 - FOREVER .L- MI~jA~;~~-~~ 1 MILL & MAIN COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 61 ~ I .-7 . ZE 5.- A- 1. C 808 52 1 0004/03/16 ' RETURN TO SENDER Â£ 71- P 10 0 -rm n - AinT 11' N 0 WAI *. Jâ‚¬Â» Â· 4 Â·-- I ~ ~x= 1.1 .. ...9 1 a menu z TO FORWARD ' b 1011 1-10 52 0 8 =2079-09801-29-41 O 4#D,1.liÂ»**# 7 .1 #21-15 x, 11.11 st :,! lIlli i' t.! 1 113 1| lili '11 &1.1 Â§9 111," Rili .# 2.1, 953 -----9=--- , ):b ' 1 t' i' 1,1>' R ' .-'694 ,-i--i--3 11' -1-) 5, GR.A.r,ji D J}UNE}.TfON~i.â‚¬30 ~43.~t ,' Â«1- - 3 Il#*p'-I/&3.-I Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 r, - *19 29 MAR 2.016 PM 2. M... ./L Â· r w 4*,4: 4,19'L, - q'?6 , FOREVER L- J."li'* 44 M & G CONDO ASSOC 426 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 A J. Al M 808 52 1 0904/63/16 9 C :. i D P' T n F p /5 h * . TJ .*- = j /1 J r 21 :NÂ·W C 7- NO MAIL RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD niealÂ£90230 *2079-10143-29-41 1 C 1*p,1/+?AWL'g a -5 1 11â€žIll;.1 1,21 5 1Â·, 1, a ij: 8 r ; 'I: 2111 - Â·' ji,14~/1111'.1,i.1-_._111,1:,:â€ž, r.,1 1,1.1.-Â·I.'l,MUUâ€žnill, 1 -------r-X 13 &. .:]t + 4 t &26'' 2 ' : ' . ''1(11 '4 '12: ' 'I '242 Il = ..4. Community Development Department GRAND JUNCTION I.O 815 , *........... :~441. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 /32'rp-4,~~~. 2'id {'4 44.*c .11Â£ 1Â» ir"Tl 2- 1 ..>:~'' ~_.~Q~Â£-&.4 ~~~~~~~-.,Nn~~h, . 1-6*.- Irm m ./.2/8/'ll FOREVER -.,2- -~ MILNE SHEILA PO BOX 8286 ASPEN,CO 81612 N IXI E age j t 1 0 0 0 4.f 05/ 1â‚¬ i 0 5 T '- 17- 1 -rF'â€¢ .c,= hÂ· n..2 0 AT~g MtÂ· Th D L A 54 217 KNOWN 11 N 4 51- P TO c 1 -' W 4 R O EC: 81611190230 0 079-10060-29 41 8 ki1kiliti49' 2 111241" 21 2 "111 1111 i ; 5 11' 1 i iI ' 1 l ili tili 111 il is 0, :11,1 141 Â·11 3.1 ...1 .. J 11]2 3 101 11 1 '4~ ~r Community Development Department ' 130 South Galena Street ..fr.-731/EZE:M,Aillilimb* 46/4&* 14 Aspen, CO 81611 ey*e 'h/<19'//1/~/1*071 FOREVER -1.21'.j..i/N".211/ CONCEPT 600 CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA BASALT, CO 81621 808 SE 1 0004/02/16 ~ , RE TURN TO S-E NDE R INSUFFLEL=MT ADDRESS 1 1 UNABLE TO FORWARD 1 . B.C: 2 161119.0230 *2.079-09839-29-41 i 1 0 44 44 1 297# 3 11'1111.!.loiliti!111!11!.1,1.1.:it':..4,111,1,1,~ti:Â·101,;!gi.,. D &&; Ad)Ke 1 ,/1/ ' ,p 1 li/1 ' 1 A 4 ') 1,1:Et. i : t.~,43. N M fre.*** -=~2.r':tr=kf-4:k - - - I Community Development Department . GRAND .111.-#44CTION (.O '22-: C /32'~bâ€¢.. 7**~--~ 130 South Galena Street ./,Fr~/Flfirrn.flimill"#0#:1:dia:Fi Aspen, CO 81611 02 APR 2016 PIM .1 1- 4.0~-1~%;;~,I:Flf,~ 29 MAR Pri-)6 PtÂ·-1 .2 , 404* Â·-- ~ - Â·-Â·-- - p 44 FORIVER AL .~~~O44#.1 OBP LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL#104 ASPEN, CO 81611 6 0Â·8 3 E 1 4 ) 9.' 0, 4 â€ž / - b : E. .- - I=:- w ATTEMPTED L NOT" KNOWN U 'M 451 9 -7 0 CON WARD EC: Rl P.3.11 483276& *1668-05125-08-43 --- 814-1 i-4 â€ž2 oaolifi'902 1 11 11121'Illilliltill{ 1 ill}1 111 111" lili'111Â£11'11111 1,1 1.:11'11/1 Community Development Department 1 -____ - _ IM1*. 5 130 South Galena Street + JaN+*. mezip- ' Yr~~1* 'C't.VANL.37 .FU.flit-~1"~ION CO 81 5 ,;*'~'0'~~ ... P.1- 11 Aspen, CO 81611 9 4 // Â»lf j , R. 3 4,142, 1 4. 3 f , 6. L.. 1,â€¢'0!'Â· -9.eLex. 1.0./.1.4 : .9. -1. FOREVER 'Â» GALANTER YALE & ELYSE 525 S ANDREWS AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 333012831 Â·NIki E - * " sÂ· 7 1 FE 1 2 2 2- 4 - 4 3 1 6 m F ".7 / & I. -7 A Â£" = "5% 51 - r-, 6 ,; u '4 h : u = 2 *n 4.3 u 83 A TTR W. 2 1 5 5 -Â· R U W <NOW'N LON AE; L. E TO FOR WAR C Bi: 2516Â£13.se-Â£541 * 2:UP 9-1Ueâ‚¬,2-29-41 I b 4 5*6%191902 ' ~i Dt /1 liqj,% b d 1 1 1 1 4 9 11 i /kil !}% 2 1 1 1 int 1 / 181 N 0 1 1 'Jui k 1~ pill ,' : ta ' im W -M'- ID:"f.1.7,1.1.-ee . Community Development Department --- 24.#Pe=-4- 130 South Galena Street ../'h~ GRAND JUNCTION,CO '1315 -'0*"-~9 Aspen, CO 81611 29 MAR 2016 PM 2 L. .4*-*P --- ~m= *--4-"-I FOREVER ~~- '1" HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND< COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 4/. - NIXIE 0 0%,St K= 1 0084/03/1 I . h--Â· -- rzeÂ·rlir,-1 TO GENDER NO MAIL RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD EC: 81611190230 *2079-09685-29- Biyl&/1343,2 8.4.*93111.11!1141,4 .:littitttlit@tiliti u:111--tisi,14,1/'.11)42 1: 3, D': 2 3: 2. 2 2 1 i i 8 11 ' 1/i.13 '' Justin Barker From: Kim Weil <kweil@billposs.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 8:21 AM To: Justin Barker Subject: RE: pitkin county parking Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Justin - There are currently 14 parking spaces in the area between the courthouse plaza and the jail. These current spaces are used by the sheriffs office and the courts. The proposal contains 10 enclosed parking spaces. The use of these spaces is still being negotiated. They will either be used exclusively by the sheriff or continue to be shared with the courts. <IM WEIL I Architect I Partner 'loss '4100 ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 105 East Main Street Aspen; CO 81611 970/ 925~4755 wÂ»,wÂ»1120%,hum lEimil IDES ONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 1 The infoimation contained in this e-niail is confidential and hhall not be shared by a third party except as necessary to perform your vork. Ityouhavereceivedthise-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail. From: Justin Barker [mailto:Justin.Barker@cityofaspen.corn] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 10:39 AM To: Kim Weil Subject: pitkin county parking Hi Kim, What is the current # of parking spots, and how many are proposed? Is the parking used exclusively by the sheriffs dept? Sorry for all the piecemeal questions, but as the first Public Project, we are still trying to figure out what kind of info we need to perform an adequate staff evaluation. Thanks, Justin Barker AICP 1 LEED Green Assoc Senior Planner 1 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com 1 Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient. please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning. which is subject to change in the future. and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance 2 Justin Barker From: Kim Weil <kweil@billposs.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM To: Justin Barker Subject: Re: pitkin county parking Justin - approximate floor areas are as follows: Jail - 15,645 sf Courthouse - 16,580 sf KIM WEIL Architect 1 Partner POSS ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970.925.4755 ,www.billposs.com Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Justin Barker <Justin.Barker@cityofaspen.com> wrote: Also, the requested cumulative FAR is at 2:1. Do you know the approximate FAR for the courthouse and jail buildings? Justin Barker AICP 1 LEED Green Assoc Senior Planner 1 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is Intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that Is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law- If you are not the intended recipient. please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further. the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning. which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance From: Justin Barker Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 10:39 AM To: Kim Weil (kweil@billposs.com) <kweil@billposs.com> Subject: pitkin county parking Hi Kim, 1 What is the current # of parking spots, and how many are proposed? Is the parking used exclusively by the sheriff's dept? Sorry for all the piecemeal questions, but as the first Public Project, we are still trying to figure out what kind of info we need to perform an adequate staff evaluation. Thanks, Justin Barker AICP 1 LEED Green Assoc Senior Planner 1 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient. please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further. the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable. the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning. which is subject to change in the future. and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance 2 Justin Barker From: Kim Weil <kweil@billposs.com> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:31 AM To: Justin Barker Subject: RE: Pitkin County Justin - The gross areas are as follows: Garage 8,709 sf Main Level 8,876 sf including entry vestibule Second Level 8,451 sf Third Level 6,300 sf KIM WEIL I Architect I Partner J u.,v ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING ;05 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 ,70/ 925 4755 www.bi!190..'>.1.i.gm 10.0 (Vise ONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE I The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and shall not be shared by a third party except as necessary to perform your vork. If you have received this e-mail in error. please notify the senderand delete this e-mail. From: Justin Barker [mailto:Justin.Barker@cityofaspen.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 10:33 AM To: Kim Weil Subject: RE: Pitkin County Hi Kim, Could you provide the breakdown of how much SF is on each level of the new addition? I need it in order to run the employee generation calculations. rhanks, justin Barker AICP 1 LEED Green Assoc Senior Planner I City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Votice and Disclaimer: rhis message is intended only for the Individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant o applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or Dpinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based in current zoning, which is subJect to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The opinions and information contained herein jo not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detnmental reliance. 1 From: Kim Weil [mailto:kweil@billposs.coml Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:21 PM To: Justin Barker <Justin.Barker@citvofaspen.com> Subject: Pitkin County Justin - Attached please find our response to the employee generation standards. Regarding a more accurate size of the project please see the table below: Existing Courthouse Plaza Gross Area: 17,720 sf Existing Courthouse Plaza Net FAR: 14,710 sf. New Addition Gross Area: 31,460 sf. New Addition Net FAR: 27,165 sf. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. KIM WEIL 1 Architect I Partner poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 East Mail Street Aspen, CO 81611 970/925 4755 www.billposs.coin 10~ECZEe CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE I The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and shall not be shared by a third party except as necessary to perform your work. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notity the sender and delete this e-niail. 2 Justin Barker From: Kim Weil <kweil@billposs.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:21 PM To: Justin Barker Subject: Pitkin County Attachments: PC MRR Employee Generation Standards.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Justin - Attached please find our response to the employee generation standards. Regarding a more accurate size of the project please see the table below: Existing Courthouse Plaza Gross Area: 17,720 sf Existing Courthouse Plaza Net FAR: 14,710 sf. New Addition Gross Area: 31,460 sf. New Addition Net FAR: 27,165 sf. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. KIM WEIL I Architect 1 Partner poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 Fast Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 1/0/ 925-47% www.billposs.corn lEi lirl /2/ Irl :Fil "LE' CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE I The Intorination contained in thi% e-mall isconfidenlialand shall not besh.ired by a :hird party except as neceâ‚¬5ary loperforniyour vork If vou have received this e-mall in error please notil.' the sende, and delete thise mall. 1 ~OSS ARCHITECIURE PLANNING March 23,2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Employee Generation Standards; Major Project Review; Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, Thisletterwill address the employee generation standards for the city's Major Project Review Process as outlined in the Land Use Code. a) The expected employee generation of the use considering the employment generation pattern of the use or of a similar use within the City or a similar resort economy. Response - County departments are currently located in 4 different buildings within the vicinity of Aspen's commercial core. These buildings include the county courthouse, city hall (Armory), and the Pitl<in County Jail. The purposed Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Center will bring most of those departments into a single location. County departments will be vacating the : courthouse and the city hall as those facilities are scheduled for future remodels and repurposing. The county is not increasing services or staff as a result of this project. Rather the existing staff is being relocated into a facility that will allow for better service to the public and a better working environment for the county staff. b) Any unique employment characteristics of the operation. Response - As an essential public facility, the services provided by the staff within the proposed building are critical to citizens of Pitkin County. These services will include government administration, finance, community development, human resources, open space management, county clerk, and law enforcement. One other very unique characteristic of this facility is the sheriffs department operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Within this department, workstations and offices are shared between the various shifts. The second unique w characteristic of this facility is the public nature of the BOCC meeting room and voting operations requiring as seamless interaction with the public as possible. . c) The extent to which employees of various uses within a mixed-use building or of a related off-site operation will overlap or serve multiple functions. Response - Most county departments and many county employees serve the public in multiple ways. Their tasks will not change as a result of the new facility, However, their ability to perform theirduties and serve the public will be increased. Some county departments will 805 LASI MAIN STREF[ ASPEN. CO 8!611 (0 970/975-4755 (11 970/970Â·7940 WWW.1111!POSS COM ~OSS ARC,'ill ECTURE Â·: 71 ANNING remain located off site. The off-site facilities include the courthouse, jail, road and bridge, and dispatch operations. d) A proposed restriction requiring full employee generation mitigation upon vacation of the type of business acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Commission. As an essential public facility, this building will be the center of operations for Pitkin County for generations. The chances of a vacation of the facility by Pitkin County is extremely remote. e) Any proposed follow-up analyses of the project (e.g., an audit) to confirm actual employee generation. Response - The major purpose of an audit appears to be a check to ensure that an entity is meeting representations made during an approval process. As stated in the application, Pitkin County has in the past and will continue a strong commitment to affordable housing. This commitment manifest itself in support of APCHA, development of AH projects, and buy down of free-market units to house county employees. In addition, since Pitkin County is requesting a waving of affordable housing requirements, an audit to ensure a housing requirement of zero is being met seems unnecessary. f) For lodge projects only: An efficiency or reduction in the number of employees required for the lodging component of the project may, at the discretion of the Commission as a means of incentivizing a lodge project, be applied as a credit towards the mitigation requirement of the free-market residential component of the project. Any approved reduction shall require an audit to determine actual employee generation after two (2) complete years of operation of the lodge. Response- This standard does not apply. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Billâ‚¬oss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. 19.- It -la 1 v,pâ€¢- ~'By: #rÂ¥~eil, Partner V TI lE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: March 18,2016 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant. We have received your land use application for 530 E. Main Street. Public Proiects Review and have reviewed it for completeness. *f Your Land Use Application is complete: Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) One electronic copy of the entire application including drawings, in PDF format to Justin.barker@.cityofaspen.corn 2) Review deposit of $10,725.00, checks payable to City of Aspen. 3) One additional hard copy of the entire application. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2797 if you have any questions. Thank You. *AL JustifFBarker, Senior Planner City o f Aspen. Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD 02 Yes- No>g Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) 4/ GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing YesÂ»f_ No Commercial E.P. F. ,>C Lodging RrCENLD MAR 1 8 2016 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: CITY OF ASPEN Name: Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building Location: 530 East Main Street; Pitkin County Center Lot 1 & Vet. Park (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273707347851 and 273707347852 APPLICANT: Name: Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock Address: 530 East Main Street; Third Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 920-5067 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Dave Detwiler and Jodi Smith Address: 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: (970)261-6360 (Dave) and 920-5377 (Jodi) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment J Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) E Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes ~1 Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane Commercial Design Review D Lot Split 01 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment 11 Other:Major Public Conditional Use Project Review EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) No recent approvals. Pitkin County Courthouse, courthouse plaza bldg., Pitkin County Jail and Veterans Park are all located on the propoerty. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Remodel and addition to the existing courthouse plaza building. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 11,000.00 &1 Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form E Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Modelforlargeproject (Will be available for hearings) All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. Em E El El El El ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building Applicant: Pitkin County Location: 530 East Main Street Zone District: Public (PUB) Lot Size: 69,270 square feet Lot Area: 60,099 square feet (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 sf Proposed: 0 sf Number of residential units: Existing: 0 sf Proposed: 0 sf Number of bedrooms: Existing: 0 sf Proposed: Osf Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 0% DIMENSIONS: (Note: Allowable information in the table below is based on the proposed limits in the application.) Floor Area: Existing.Â·43,600 st Allowable: 120,198 sf Proposed: 71,990 s f Principal bldg. height: Existing: 60 a Allowable: 55 fi Proposed: 45 ft Access. bldg. height: Existing: -N/A Allowable: N/A Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 14 Required: 0 Proposed: 9 % Site coverage: Existing.* N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A % open Space: Existing: NA Required: N/A Proposed: NiA Front Setback: Existing: 0 ft Required: Oft Proposed: Oft Rear Setback: Existing: 9 fl Required: Oft Proposed: 9 ft Combined FIR: Existing: N/A Required. N/A Proposed: N/A East Side Setback: Existing 0 ft Required: Oft Proposed: 0 fl West Side Setback: Existing: 3 ft Required: Oft Proposed: 3 ft Combined Sides: Existing: N/A Required. NIA Proposed: NIA Distance Between Existing 30 ft Required. O ft Proposed: O ft Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None Variations requested: None External Media Located Here ~ M-007777 ~1 RMMI tpy;â‚¬47:7â‚¬22~ Â·flzeÂ·4%21 002 146.411 R-77"1 1 /R PERMANENT 7 -3 r-rri,TD larl" 39 + 46 MAR 1 8i_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Pitkin County Email: Phone No.: 920-5067; jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Owner ("ID: Address of 530 East Main Street Billing 530 East Main Street Property: Third Floor Address} (subject of (send bills here) Aspens CO 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use application& and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these i flat fees are non-refundable. 1 Parks 0 Select Dept $ 1,300 flat fee for . $ flat fee for _ $ 1,625 flat fee for APCHA (Housing) $ flat fee for 0 Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed i project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I i understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is I impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. 2 The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not i returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 7,800 24 i deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time i above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. 1 i ~275 32$.00 1 1 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ' -Ghfis-BendeR- Jessica Garrow Jon Peacock Community Development Director Name: l 1 050 Â·00 Title: County Manager t City Use: 11~00 Fees Due: $ ,0,"--<- Received: $ January 2015 Citv of Asven 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building Location: 530 East Main Street; Pitkin County Center Lot 1 & Vet. Park (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273707347851 and 273707347852 APPUCANT: Name: Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock Address: 530 East Main Street; Third Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 920-5067 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Dave Detwiler and Jodi Smith Address: 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: (970)261-6360 (Dave) and 920-5377 (Jodi) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMOS Exemption E Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision H Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes C Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review El Lot Split E Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment 11 Other:Major Public U Conditional Use Project Review EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) No recent approvals. Pitkin County Courthouse, courthouse plaza bldg., Pitkin County Jail and Veterans Park are all located on the propoerty. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Remodel and addition to the existing courthouse plaza building. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 11,000.00 &1 Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Â® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 29 Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project (Will be available for hearings) All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. m El El El COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Pitkin County Email: Phone No = Owner ("1"): - 920-5067; jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Address of 530 East Main Street Billing 530 East Main Street Property: Address; (subject of Third Floor (send bills here) Aspen, CO 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applicationÂ§ and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application, For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 1,300 Parks 0 Select Dept flat fee for . $. flat fee for $ 1,625 flat fee for APCHA (Housing) $ flat fee for 0 Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed bi]Iing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. 1 have read: understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposjt, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 7,800 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time 24 above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $275 1 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: // -Ghris-Benden- Jessica Garrow Jon Peacock Community Development Director Name: Title: County Manager City Use: 11000 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January 2015 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 . DATE: 5.18.15 PROJECT: 530 E, Main Street REPRESENTATIVE: Jodi Smith, 970.920,5396 REQUEST: Major Public Project Review DESCRIPTION: The applicant (Pitkin County) would like to construct a new addition on the north side of the Courthouse Plaza building, located at 530 E. Main Street. The existing structure will also be remodeled on the interior and po,tentially refinished with new exterior materials. The proposed addition would be approximately between 18,000 - 22,000 square feet and 2-3 stories tall. This property M zoned as Public (PUB) and partially located within the Commercial Core Historic District City Council adopted a code amendment via Ordinance 11 Series of 2015 on May 4, 2015, This code amendment establishes the Public Projects Review process, which Pitkin County qualifies for as a governmental entity. The applicant must submit the application after the amendment becomes effective (June 3,Â· 2015) in order to be reviewed as a Public Project, Based on the scope of work, staff believes this would qualify as a Major Public Project Review. This is a two-step process with public hearings before HPC and City Council. The applicant may elect to create an advisory group b review the project prior to the public hearings if desired. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpjtkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Api)s%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: httD://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Codel Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 1 26.500 Public Projects 1 26.500.040.C Major Public Project Review 1 26.710.250 Public (PUB) zone district 1 Review by: Staff for complete application , 1 Engineering t Parks ~ Public Hearing: HPC and City Council i Planning,Fees: Planning Deposit - Major Public Project ($7,800 for 24 hours) Referral Fees: Engineering (per hour) - $275 i - Parks (flat fee) - $1,300 1 APCHA (flatfee) - $1,625 ASLU Public Project , 530 E. Main Street i 273707347851 1 j Total Deposit: $115000 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $275/hour) To appIy, submit the following Information: N Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement, E Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). N Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur; consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance , report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and al[ mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and ~ demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. N Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. N HOA Compliance form (Attached) NI Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City,s Transportation impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: http://www.aspenpitkin,com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- Amendments/, A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be included with the application. I A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application alid relevant land use approvals associated with the property. El A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submitta[) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado. N Written responses to al] review criteria. N An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. N 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 1 0 20 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. : U Total deposit for review of the application. U A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. 1 0 A sketch up model will be required for the public hearjng, i 2 - PnKIN COUNTY ATTORNEY John M. Ely Courthouse Annex Property County Attorney 530 East Main Street, Suite 302 Lisa MacDonald John ElÂ¥@pitkincountv.com Aspen, Colorado 81611-1948 Jane Achey Paralegals Laura C. Makar Tel: (970) 920-5190 Lisa.MacDonald@pitkincountv.com Assistant County Attorney Fax: (970) 920-5198 Jane.AcheÂ¥@Ditkincountv.coin Laura.Makar@pitkincountv.com March 16, 2016 To: City of Aspen Community Development Department RE: Legal Status of Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property for Development Application To Whom it May Concern: Pursuant to the request for information concerning the legal description, ownership and encumbrances affecting the Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property, and as an undersigned licensed attorney practicing in the State of Colorado, the following information is submitted: â€¢ Legal Description of the Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property: Seconded Amended Plat of Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision Recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception No. 626213 â€¢ Property Owner: Pitkin County Capital Leasing Corporation and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County â€¢ Easements affecting the Parcel: The property is subject to all easements, rights of way, Property setbacks or other restrictions of record as shown on the Second Amended Plat of Lot Pitkin County Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No. 626213 including: > 20.39' Utility Easement per Plat Book 93 at Page 56 > 8.0" Telephone, TV, Natural Gas, Water Service and Electric Easement per prior plats 7 15.0' Joint Telephone, TV, Electric, Natural Gas and Water Service Easement per Plat Book 690 at Page 313 1 25.0' Trail and Transit Easement per prior plats 1 10' Air and Light Easement per prior plats CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MARC1116, 2016 k Source Gas Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception Nos. 626208 1 City of Aspen Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626210 k Qwest Corporation Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626212 1 10.0' City of Aspen Electric Easement per Book 464 at Page 28 1 Obermeyer Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 499687 > City of Aspen Encroachment License recorded at Reception No. 565894 > Right of Way Vacation per Book 113 at Page 40 To the best of Applicant's knowledge there are no mortgages, judgments, liens, contracts or other agreements of record affecting this property. PITKIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sincerely, John M. E*,%,- ~8*ty Attorney March 18, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Letter of Authorization; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, This letter is to authorize Dave Detwiler and Jodi Smith to act as our representatives for the above referenced project. Their contact information is as follows: Jodi Smith Pitkin County Facilities Manager 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 920-5377 Dave Detwiler Integrated Construction Solutions 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 261-6360 Sincerely, b /5* L/--9 0 Hp â‚¬ v \' C 01*:, AnloÂ» 7& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications wjthin the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association I Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attomev representing the propertv owner. Name: Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock Property Owner 07: Email:jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Phone No.: 920-5067 Address of Pitkin County Center Lot 1 Property: (subject of Pitkin County Center Veterans Park application) I certify as follows: (pick one) 11 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other forrn of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in thbland use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 1 [3 This property Is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the t improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners I association or covenant beneficiary. 1 understand this policy and i understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the ~ applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document, Owner signature: r ~ /_-irf- ----Â· date: 3/lb,/1/0 1 Owner printed name: Jon Peacock , or, Attorney signature: . date: Attorney printed name:, Trip Generation Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: In order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" and then click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center" category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then click the "Macro Settings" category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enter the project's square footage and/or unit counts under Proposed Land Use. The numbers should reflect the net change inland use between existing and proposed conditions. If a landuse is to be reduced put a negative number of units or square feet. Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable under each of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. Points are only awarded for proposed (not existing) and confirmed aspects of the project. Sheet 3. TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Sheet 4. Summary and Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mitigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected for the project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measure that was chosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicle traffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense Helpful Hints: 1. Referto the T.IF.40%29.[tajjon.!01.Rgct.An?.!*sliuidelines for information on the use of this tool. 2 Refer to i TIA Frequently Asked Questions Â· a quick overview. 2. Hover over red corner tags for additional information on individual measures. 3. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. = input = calculation DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 E. Main Street APPLICANT CONTACT Richard de Compo Poss Architecture + Planning INFORMATIONÂ· ' 605 E. Main St.; Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL rdecompo@billposs.com Minor Development - Inside the Roundabout Is this a major or minor project? minor Major Development - Outside the Roundabout Net New Trips GE nerated Units/Square Feet of A VI Peak-Hoir P VI Peak-Hoir the Proposed Project Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Proposed Land Use Commercial (sf) 10560.0 sf 16.54 7.43 23.97 17.49 26.23 43.72 Free-Market Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Affordable Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Lodging (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Essential Public Facility (sf) 5510.0 sf 2.94 1.80 4.74 3.66 5.49 9.15 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 19.48 9.23 27.56 21.15 31.72 45.46 *For mixed-use (at least two of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hour and a 14% reduction for PM Peak-Hour is applied to the trip generation. ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Average PM Peak Average Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 Affordable Housing 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 MMLOS Input Page Instructions: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable to each measure under the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. ~= input ~= calculation ~ TOTAL NUMBER OF TRIPS MITIGATED: . I Category Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points Does the project propose a detached sidewalk where an attached 1 sidewalk currently exists? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer No 0 meet standard minimum widths? Is the proposed effective sidewalk width greater than the standard 2 No O minimum width? Does the project propose a landscape buffer greater than the 3 Yes 5 standard minimum width? Subtotal 5 Does the project propose a detached sidewalk on an adjacent 4 block? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard No 0 minimum widths? Is the proposed effective sidewalk width on an adjacent block 5 No 0 greater than the standard minimum width? Is the proposed landscape buffer on an adjacent block greater than 6 Yes 5 the standard minimum width? Subtotal 5 Are slopes between back of curb and sidewalk equal to or less than 7 Yes 0 596? 8 Are curbs equal to (or less than) 6 inches? Yes 0 Is new large-scale landscaping proposed that improves the pedestrian experience? Properties within the Core do not have ample Yes 5 9 area to provide the level of landscaping required to receive credit in thii raterinrv Does the project propose an improved crosswalk? This measure must 10 No 0 clet City approval before receiving credit. Subtotal 5 11 Are existing driveways removed from the street? NA O Is pedestrian and/or vehicle visibility unchanged by new structure or 12 Yes 0 column? 13 Is the grade (where pedestrians cross) on cross-slope of driveway 2% Yes 0 orless? Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian access points from 14 the ROW? This includes improvements to ADA ramps or creating new No 0 access points which prevent pedestrians from crossing a street. Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian or bicyclist 15 No 0 interadion with vehicles at driveway areas? Subtotal 0 16 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor less than 1.5? Yes 0 Does the project propose new improvements which reduce the pedestrian directness factor to less than 1.2? A site which has an 17 No 0 existing pedestrian directness factor less than 1.2 cannot receive credit in thiq rateaorv. Is the project proposing an off site improvement that results in a 18 No 0 pedestrian directness factor below 1.2?* Are traffic calming features proposed that are part of an approved 19 No 0 plan (speed humps, rapid flash)?* Subtotal 0 Are additional minor improvements proposed which benefit the 20 pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Yes 3 Asoen staff? Are additional major improvements proposed which benefit the 21 pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of No 0 Asoen staff? Subtotal 3 r--. , .. .... .â€ž .......-IL.--,â€ž'*pli:Â¢ 24 92-75IfÂ·fl' '~ ~~~ /'~ 1.,,L '' 1,Â¢1%Â¢11 k.,-2< Traffic Calming and Driveways, Parking, and Access Sidewalk Condition Sidewalk Condition Pedestrian Network Considerations on Adjacent Blocks on Project Frontage Proposed Pedestrian Routes Pedestrians Additional Improvements . 45 Category Sub. Mea5ure Number Question Answer Points 22 Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design? NO 0 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or 23 No 0 driveway? Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to 24 NA 0 an existing bicycle path? Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements 25 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements 26 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Subtotal 0 27 Is the project providing bicycle parking? Yes 5 Subtotal 5 ---7/16'X+M...V&h#yme -- .5â€ž,M.FL - Category Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points 28 Is seating/bench proposed? Yes 3 29 Is a trash receptacle proposed? Yes 3 30 Is transit system information (signage) proposed? Yes 3 31 Is shelter/shade proposed? Yes 4 32 Is enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? Yes 4 33 Is real-time transit information proposed? No 0 34 Is bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? No 0 35 Are ADA improvements proposed? Yes 5 Subtotal 22 36 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? NA 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway 37 No 0 operations proposed? 38 Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)? No 0 Subtotal 0 Enhanced Bicycle Modifications to Existing Bicycle Transit Bicycles Amenities Paths Basic Amenities Parking TDM Input Page -- '%39:0 --7 -Y ~1,- "WplliC' V .tri a.z: i54:2 ~ 11 -- ~ 121'll'll'll'll' ~.=16.13. -2/ Instructions TOM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for vour project. Proposed TDM or MAILOS measure5 should be new and/oran improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MM LOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. Measure Strategy VMT Category Number Reductions Sub. Question Answer Will an onsite ammenities strategy be implemented? Yes 1 Onsite ServicIng 3.00% Which onsite ammenities will be implemented? Retail Servicing Will a shared shuttle service strategy be implemented? yes What is the degree of Implementation? Low 2 Shared Shuttle Service 0,00% What is the company size? Small What percentage of customers are eligible? 0% 3 Nonmotorized Zones |Will a nonmotorized zones strategy be implemented? |NA O.00% Measure Strategy VMT Categor, Number Reductions Sub. Question Answer Will a network expansion stragtegy be Implemented? No 4 Network Expansion What is the percentage increase of transit network coverage? 0% 0.00% What Is the existing transit mode share as ati of total daily tips? 0% Will a service frequency/speed strategy be implemented? NA What is the percentage reduction in headways (increase in frequency)? OP.4 5 Ser,ice Frequency/Speed 0.00% What is the existing transit mode share asa % of total daily trips? 04 What B the level of implementation? Will a transit access improvement strategy be implemented7 No 6 Transit Access Improvement 0.00% What Is the extent of access improvements? 7 Intercept Lot |Will an intercept lot strategy be implemented? |NA 0.00% Measure Strategy VMT Category Number Question Sub. Ansvver Reductions Will there be participation in TOP? Yes 8 Participation in TOP 4.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% Is a transit fare subsidy strategy implemented? Yes 9 Transit Fare Subsidy What percentage of emplovees are eligible? 100% 13.805 What is the amount of transit subsidy per passenger (daily equivalent)? 100Â°4 Is an emplovee parking cash-out strategy being implemented? No 10 Employee Parking Cash-Out O.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a workplace parking pricing strategy implemented? No 11 Workplace Parking Pricing What is the daily parking charge? O.00% What percentage of employees are subject to priced parking? Is a compressed work weeks ~trategy Implemented? No 12 Compressed Work Weeks What percentage of employees are participating? 0.00% What is the workweek 5chedule? Is an employer sponsered shuttle program implemented? Yes 13 Emplover Sponsored Vanpool What is the employer size? Small 1-38% What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% Is a carpool matching strategy implemented? No 14 Carpool Matching 0.00% What percentage of employees are eligble? Is carshare participation being implemented? No 15 Carshare Program How many employee member#ips have been purchased? O.00% What percentage of emploYees are eligble? Is partlipationin the bikeshare program WE-cycle being implemented? No 16 Bike,hare Program How many memberships have been purchased? 0.00% What percentage of employees/guests are eligble? Is an end of trip facilities strategy being Implemented? No 17 End of Trip Facilities What is the degree of implementation? 0.00% What i. the employer size? 15 a 5elf-funded emergency ride home strategy being implemented? No 18 Self-funded Emergency Ride Home 0.00% What percentage of emplovees are eligible? Isa carpool/vanpool priority parking strategy being implemented? No 19 Carpool/Vanpool Priority Parking What Is the employer size? 0.00% What number of parking ,pots are available for the program? Isa private employer shuttle strategv being implemented? No 20 Private Employer Shuttle What is the employer size? 0.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive Isa trip reduction marketing/Incentive program implemented? No 21 " 0.00% Program What percentage of emplovees/gue'ts are eligible? tly--- -/.-I#//-.Ill..... 1.22% work trips represents o mixed-used site {SF Boy Area Travel Survey). See Assumptions Tab for more detoit Transit System Improvements Neighborhood/Site Strategies Enhancements Strategle$ Commute Trip Reduction Programs Strategies Summary and Narrative: DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECTADDRESS: 530 E. Main Street APPLICANT CONTAa Richard de Campo Poss Architecture + Planning INFORMATIONÂ· ' 605 E. Moin St.; Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL rdecampo@billposs.com SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation NET TRIPS TO BE Peak Hour ~ Max Trips Generated MMLOS TDM i Total Trips Mitigated MITIGATED PM i 45.5 45 ! 3.13 i 48.13 0.00 Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out wherethe measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcement and Financing Plan for the selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibilitY of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach anyadditional information and a site map to the narrative report. ~) O S S ARC 111TE C -1[J RE+PLANNING March 17, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Major Public Project Review Submission; Pitkin County Sheriffand Administration Building; 530 East Main Street DearJustin, Enclosed please find our application for a major public project review for Pitkin County's new office building. As the accompanying drawings point out, this project involves the both the remodel of the existing Courthouse Plaza building and the construction of an addition to the northwest. This addition will be generally located in the parking area that currently exists between the Courthouse Plaza building and the Pitkin County Jail. The goal of this project is to consolidate the majority of county staff in one location and provide enough space so that each department can serve the public more efficiently. The existing Courthouse Plaza building contains approximately 13,700 square feet on three levels above grade. In addition, there is full basement measuring approximately 4,550 square feet. The remodel of this structure includes a complete removal of all interior finishes and non-load bearing walls and replacement with a mixture of new walls and modular office partitions. On the exterior, the changes will be relatively minor. These changes will include new windows, a minimized redesigned fascia, and new spandrel panels. The addition will be a new three story structure above a parking level accessed from Rio Grande Place to the north. Principal materials on this building will be brick and sandstone. During the design process of this building, great care was taken to respect the historic Pitkin County Courthouse located on the southwest corner of the parcel. The front most wall of the addition is set back almost 54 feet from the front of the courthouse building. The design takes cues from the courthouse such as materials, horizontal banding, and vertical window proportions but still allows the addition to be seen as a building of its time and not a copy or replication of historic architecture. Total area of the addition is approximately 17,000 square feet on the three above grade floors with approximately an additional 5,000 square feet in the below grade parking level. 605 FAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (1) 970/920-2950 WWW.311.1.POSS.COM ~OSS A l< Clll-fE C 1 URE +PLA N NING General Review Standards from Section 26.500.070 1. The proposed project conforms with the zone district limitations, or is otherwise compatible with neighborhood context. Response -The entire parcel is located within the city's Public (PUB) zone district. Section 26.710.250 outlinesthe permitted uses, conditional uses, and dimensional requirements forthis zone district. Government office buildings and other essential government facilities are permitted uses under paragraph B.5 of this section. All of the buildings located on the parcel fall within this category. Regarding dimensional requirements for this parcel, paragraph 26.710.250.D states that these requirements are set by the Planned Development approval. Attached to this letter as Exhibit A are the proposed dimensional requirements forthis parcel. These requirements are based on those currently existing within the city's Commercial Core (CC) zone district. We feel this is most appropriate because the CC zone district is closest in both use and proximity. 2. The proposed project supports stated community goals. Response - The proposed project will allow the public to interact with Pitkin County employees more efficiently. County departments are currently located in multiple locations. Some of those locations will have to be vacated in the future due to either through the loss of space due to City Hall being proposed for repurposing or required expansion of the county courts affecting the departments located in the courthouse. With the proposed remodel and addition to the Courthouse Plaza building, all of the county departments currently located in the courthouse and city hall will join the departments currently located in the Courthouse Plaza in one building. This will allow easier interaction between the public and the various departments as well as support interaction between the departments themselves. In addition, currently many county departments are challenged to provide quality service within the limited space in which they are currently located. The proposed project has gone through an extensive programming exercise to ensure that each department has the space required to perform their function. The ability forthe county staffto perform their task and interact with the public more efficiently benefits the entire community. Finally, we firmly believe this project furthers the goals of the City of Aspen Civic Master Plan (ACMP) adopted by the city council in December of 2006 by bring together county services in the neighborhood identified in the ACMP as appropriate for such uses. 3. The proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of the Land Use Code. Response - No variances from the Land Use Code are requested. 4. The project receives all development allotments required by Chapter 26.470, Growth Management Quota System. Response - Growth Management Quota System allotment for essential public facilities is governed by paragraph 26.470.030 of the Land Use Code. According to paragraph C of this section there is no development ceiling for essential public facilities. Further according to poss ARCHI IECI[JI<Ii-1 PLANNING paragraph D of this section, there is no annual allotment limit governing essential public facilities. Since the proposed project has been classified as an essential public facility it is clearly eligible to receive a GMQS allotment. The review criteria forthis project are contained within paragraph 26.470.090.4 of the Land Use Code. Those standards are addressed below. GMQS Review Criteria from Paragraph 26.470.090.4 a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility. Response - The Community Development director has determined that proposed project is an essential public facility by virtue of the Pre-Application Conference Summary dated May 18, 2015. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. Response - Pitkin County (applicant) formally requests the waiving of all affordable housing mitigation requirements forthe Sheriffand administration Offices project. This is not to saythat Pitkin County does not support the effort to provide affordable housing. The opposite is true and this commitment is shown in other ways. Pitkin County has been a partner in APCHA since in its inception and will continue to do so. In addition, the county has in the past and will continue to develop affordable housing projects and provide land for AH projects as opportunities present themselves. Representing the county's commitment to affordable housing is the fact that over the last 3 years the county has purchased 8 existing units in orderto house county employees. Moving forward, the county has pledged 50% of its AH funds to supply housing to county employees in addition to housing forthe work force at large under APCHA authority. It is important to note that the primary goal of this project is to consolidate most county employees into a single facility not create space for additional employees. No new employees are being hired as a result of this project. Rather, existing employees will be relocated to the new facility. ~1 OSS ARCHI-11-26 1-11 RE+ PI ANNING c. The applicant has made a reasonable good-faith effort in pursuit of providing the required affordable housing through the purchase and extinguishment of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. d. The proposal furthers affordable housing goals, and the fee-in-lieu payment will result in the near-term production of affordable housing. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. Please review this information and feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Bil\Foss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. <: 'Rir~Feil, Partner ~1 OSS Al?CHITIi CTURIi -I- PI.ANNING EXHIBITA Proposed Dimensional Requirements Pitkin County Center Parcel. 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): No Requirement 2. Minimum Net Lot area per dwelling unit (sauare feet): No Requirement 3. Minimum lot width (feet): No Requirement 4. Minimum front vard setback (feet): No Requirement 5. Minimum side yard setback (feet): No Requirement 6. Minimum rear vard setback (feet): No Requirement 7. Minimum utility/trash/recycle area: Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 8. Maximum height (feet): 55 Feet a) No fagade facing Main Street shall exceed 40 feet in height b) Mechanical equipment may extend up to 10 feet above height limit provided it is located at least 15 feet from any street facing facade, 9. Minimum floorto floor heights (feet): No Requirement 10. Minimum Distance between buildings (feet): No Requirement 11. Public amenitv space: No Requirement 12. Floor area ratio (FAR): 2:1 13. Net Livable Area AH units (square feet): No Requirement ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building Applicant: Pitkin County Location: 530 East Main Street Zone District: Public (PUB) Lot Size: 69,270 square feet Lot Area: 60,099 square feet (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 sf Proposed: 0 sf Number of residential units: Existing: 0 sf Proposed: 0 sf Number of bedrooms: Existing.- 0 sf Proposed: 0 sf Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 0% DIMENSIONS: (Note: Allowable information in the table below is based on the proposed limits in the application.) Floor Area: Existing.Â·43,600 st Allowable: 120,198 St Proposed: 71,990 sf Principal bldg. height: Existing: 60 ft Allowable: 55 ft Proposed: 45 ft Access. bldg. height: Existing: NIA Allowable: NIA Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 14 Required: 0 Proposed: 9 % Site coverage: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: NIA % Open Space: Existing: NA Required: NIA Proposed: NIA Front Setback: Existing. 0 ft Required: Oft Proposed: Oft Rear Setback: Existing: 9 fl Required: Oft Proposed: 9 ft Combined F/R: Existing: NIA Required: NIA Proposed: NIA East Side Setback: Existing: 0 ft Required: Oft Proposed: 0 ft West Side Setback: Existing: 3 fl Required: Oft Proposed: 3 ft Combined Sides: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A Distance Between Existing 30 ft Required: O ft proposed: O ft Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None Variations requested: None â€¢ r * -W. ry'. ... . lt. ., , . ... 'A,023 - 22 . :1' I VE'/42, 7.i; '414.9 1 3/ Â·â€¢ t-TI 1. :f - a i.~1 kt:-4-Â». ~/1->, 13,4- Â· .1 -- 4 - ,#f .". -Â©;A' 97SF:Â·' <j:,4....'. '' 4 %0 - 0Â·- . 7 2,Â·tb. -?\ ho~;, 6.9.4. . fl,.n.9 . ; .7226 4 . .. . 4 -, 1 Â· ... - *0% *% A / 41 .f f . I".. V.. 84 ..:/ 21142 Â· .--Â»#*- 1, *IM#t.~ 4. .7 4* '44~~~-Aft 4 44.1'4 *~ ~ I *9. 4/f:10:/ 44#4- t) *:*wÂ· -st>y.st'~JÂ¢,Tri (44 e f/' & '.,114.4 1,Â»: 4.7., M'fi.. j,UC~Y# ~ Â«if Â·Â· Â·. ~ '%2\ -6.,AW".7E +6J~r , * d. 4,) ~~ ' ~ '* ~~* . . 0 ~ - . i , 1 4, , . ,/13?t 1 2 . 0 ..6 , , 1 -,1 - "h;42'51 ... P /9 Â·T 2 , ' 4 f. , ./.-k 4. - . , -â€ž-.--=.1,~rk,4,.- -' pride'pi'.- 9*1 ' .481 ~ ' 4 1 - 4 f "**f#/ f. + W: D. . .1 Dir - aL Â£ 1 1 . 0% 444 V - - 3, . r.. .=--. ' la _p 4 ~Â¢/u_ 41 46 1/Wia' I _ /Lill . 1 y t.4. ~t Ei ~~3)~ '>'~-~~~ ~~~~iN,U~4~\ < I. " I I ./. k ,/ N Â¥ , -In . 4., ~a .0* g , i 1*3't t A, ' ..* r.Q<W 1 1 ./ 1 tâ€¢ . F.. - 77 -Â»<. , 14 .1 -It $ IiI a 41.... *, 17444,41444, 1 ---1 -I. - V ~. if .â€¢â€¢ _ . ~ ...1 i Nk:w -v, 9.27 --r ~ 1; 4 4.- AA'j '- $ , .r ././. ./ . - . 4 0 - '' i Als, h ...4. 1 . },I42IS, r j... ---'.4 , ~ - 14.21,1-1#161&6...,0-/f - . - - -"<1*%9&+4./P : 0~frflÂ£IL :Wst..4Â« 'ill 6 7,.4 ft '5 D-14 8 k, t. , 4 #/ r '~4:,g-~3 A<Â¢4~224.,2*<# 37'~ - -7 9- 4.///b- . --64*e . 454 , . ~2... ... . #,r . 7= I '4. --1 2, *WA *t .16 - r 4 -0 4 4. 11 6<4% gia# 4ir _?DkAW - iVW iR; 4-X-3 A t,k>. Â®4~- 43:~ 2 ': : f.> /401 , A. 2 . t'- -T'4.4 'tif~~4* Mrl -Â£:'.*IÂ· - Â»~~5#'2 *#J.,7, ...r-15. . .1 k . Â· 1 -*11 ty../, 1/9/ Fh I .. * J /*.;41.* Â· 4, , -. , 9 47' i. &4&23"74-474 'Pn< 4 V Vi -- . .. 4, h:* ' 0. 4 -, ~L - - 41 ike:#441162;1 4#1 2. >2: 294 . 1,6. : ~*.6 3*N#46#p P '129( â„¢\ I ib ./ 7 -. . 6/.49. 1 - 1 P f 7.44.... . 4.. 4 .r 1 4 $ . , I . . te. T i R.' , I I 9,/'#%' f 11%'' ~<~~~ ~ Queen 4 -" -,-4-Â· f Â·_-l. ~ **3~2331'1bcAT*L:$~r,21#5*d#9 9-wD Â·0<-: 9 4 -*A.14.ke-: 1 1 p â€ž' *~44 % - , + 74*. -9 I ',d .. . f .-. --4* 0--41 * < 1 - - 9.744.-tr~Grf .01*, 1/,1, la 14fff;40-: 7'K' 4 2. -3-44:r, .e~Â·ltd .1 2. 5..0 6 6 4. r m - 7 1 + 1 A . 4 '4 ,â‚¬ ..4.4 . .. . 4 . . . . S / 1 , + 00 - 1 . 17 1 31:.. . .i2 'rlÂ·f--74 N . , .- -2 , 0 =4-4--444 EN: ; t.4.- tti~~7*Â·0~k..~~~3;~~M;}~,~ ~- -~~=74 ift '19.PQWAy I /39 *rmle j w - 2Â¥ â‚¬ -I"'0)4 z .=, 2 44*i"di 131 ~1**Â·44/ â€¢i - -,41 fRI - - b,1 *4 01#48[~ 1.#~ ! t*-6*7-J- r=34' ..th ht. 4-*tut; 87.,k.rmilip, 2.441~ -~lrÂ»==6-- * ~f Â¥94%*y '/ .' a,Al' I "mets _ m .'/2.4 2- ' 14/ 1. ici i Â· 1 e,/ March 18, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Letter of Authorization; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, This letter is to authorize Dave Detwiler and Jodi Smith to act as our representatives for the above referenced project. Their contact information is as follows: Jodi Smith Pitkin County Facilities Manager 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 920-5377 Dave Detwiler Integrated Construction Solutions 485 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 261-6360 Sincerely, / 60':51.-50- 8.1 E h~ COU bill A.T.109- W7 ~OSS Ali CHITECTURE -1- PLANNING March 17, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Major Public Project Review Submission; Pitkin County Sheriff and Administration Building; 530 East Main Street Dear Justin, Enclosed please find our application for a major public project review for Pitkin County's new office building. As the accompanying drawings point out, this project involves the both the remodel of the existing Courthouse Plaza building and the construction of an addition to the northwest. This addition will be generally located in the parking area that currently exists between the Courthouse Plaza building and the Pitkin County Jail. The goal of this project is to consolidate the majority of county staff in one location and provide enough space so that each department can serve the public more efficiently. The existing Courthouse Plaza building contains approximately 13,700 square feet on three levels above grade. In addition, there is full basement measuring approximately 4,550 square feet. The remodel of this structure includes a complete removal of all interior finishes and non-load bearing walls and replacement with a mixture of new walls and modular office partitions. On the exterior, the changes will be relatively minor. These changes will include new windows, a minimized redesigned fascia, and new spandrel panels. The addition will be a new three story structure above a parking level accessed from Rio Grande Place to the north. Principal materials on this building will be brick and sandstone. During the design process of this building, great care was taken to respect the historic Pitkin County Courthouse located on the southwest corner of the parcel. The front most wall of the addition is set back almost 54 feet from the front of the courthouse building. The design takes cues from the courthouse such as materials, horizontal banding, and vertical window proportions but still allows the addition to be seen as a building of its time and not a copy or replication of historic architecture. Total area of the addition is approximately 17,000 square feet on the three above grade floors with approximately an additional 5,000 square feet in the below grade parking level. 605 FAST MAIN STREF.T ASPEN, CO 81611 (1)970/925-4755 (f) 91()/920-2950 WWW.IUMPOSS.COM .. ~OSS ARC 1-11-1-E CHJ RE -1Â· PLANNING General Review Standards from Section 26.500.070 1. The proposed project conforms with the zone district limitations, or is otherwise compatible with neighborhood context. Response - The entire parcel is located within the city's Public (PUB) zone district. Section 26.710.250 outlines the permitted uses, conditional uses, and dimensional requirements forthis zone district. Government office buildings and other essential government facilities are permitted uses under paragraph B.5 of this section. All of the buildings located on the parcel fall within this category. Regarding dimensional requirements for this parcel, paragraph 26.710.250.D states that these requirements are set by the Planned Development approval. Attached to this letter as Exhibit A are the proposed dimensional requirements forthis parcel. These requirements are based on those currently existing within the city's Commercial Core (CC) zone district. We feel this is most appropriate because the CC zone district is closest in both use and proximity. 2. The proposed project supports stated community goals. Response - The proposed project will allow the public to interact with Pitkin County employees more efficiently. County departments are currently located in multiple locations. Some of those locations will have to be vacated in the future due to either through the loss of space due to City Hall being proposed for repurposing or required expansion of the county courts affecting the i departments located in the courthouse. With the proposed remodel and addition to the Courthouse Plaza building, all of the county departments currently located in the courthouse and ! city hall will join the departments currently located in the Courthouse Plaza in one building. This will allow easier interaction between the public and the various departments as well as support interaction between the departments themselves. In addition, currently many county departments are challenged to provide quality service within the limited space in which they are currently located. The proposed project has gone through an extensive programming exercise to ensure that each department has the space required to perform their function. The ability forthe county staff to perform their task and interact with the public more efficiently benefits the entire community. Finally, we firmly believe this project furthers the goals of the City of Aspen Civic Master Plan (ACMP) adopted by the city council in December of 2006 by bring together county services in the neighborhood identified in the ACMP as appropriate for such uses. 3. The proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of the Land Use Code. Response - No variances from the Land Use Code are requested. 4. The project receives all development allotments required by Chapter 26.470, Growth Management Quota System. Response - Growth Management Quota System allotment for essential public facilities is governed by paragraph 26.470.030 of the Land Use Code. According to paragraph C of this section there is no development ceiling for essential public facilities. Further according to ~) O S S ARC 1-11 TE (: *IURE - 1 - P LA N N I N (i paragraph D of this section, there is no annual allotment limit governing essential public facilities. Since the proposed project has been classified as an essential public facility it is clearly eligible to receive a GMClS allotment. The review criteria forthis project are contained within paragraph 26.470.090.4 of the Land Use Code. Those standards are addressed below. GMQS Review Criteria from Paragraph 26.470.090.4 a. The Community Development Director has determined the primary use and/or structure to be an essential public facility. Response - The Community Development director has determined that proposed project is an essential public facility by virtue of the Pre-Application Conference Summary dated May 18, 2015. b. Upon a recommendation from the Community Development Director, the City Council may assess, waive or partially waive affordable housing mitigation requirements as is deemed appropriate and warranted for the purpose of promoting civic uses and in 1 consideration of broader community goals. The employee generation rates may be used as a guideline, but each operation shall be analyzed for its unique employee needs, pursuant to Section 26.470.100, Calculations. Response - Pitkin County (applicant) formally requests the waiving of all affordable housing mitigation requirements forthe Sheriffand administration Offices project. This is not to saythat Pitkin County does not support the effort to provide affordable housing. The opposite is true and i this commitment is shown in other ways. Pitkin County has been a partner in APCHA since in its inception and will continue to do so. In addition, the county has in the past and will continue to develop affordable housing projects and provide land for AH projects as opportunities present themselves. Representing the county's commitment to affordable housing is the fact that over the last 3 years the county has purchased 8 existing units in orderto house county employees. Moving forward, the county has pledged 50% of its AH funds to supply housing to county employees in addition to housing for the work force at large under APCHA authority. It is important to note that the primary goal of this project is to consolidate most county employees into a single facility not create space for additional employees. No new employees are being hired as a result of this project. Rather, existing employees will be relocated to the new facility. ~OSS Al<(]I-IllfIc IURIT +PIANNING c. The applicant has made a reasonable good-faith effort in pursuit of providing the required affordable housing through the purchase and extinguishment of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. d. The proposal furthers affordable housing goals, and the fee-in-lieu payment will result in the near-term production of affordable housing. Response - With the request to waive affordable housing mitigation requirements (see above), this standard does not apply. Please review this information and feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Bill~oss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. : <im eil, Partner ~]OSS Al<(]I-Ili-Ii(: IIJI<11 -1- PLANNING EXHIBITA Proposed Dimensional Requirements Pitkin County Center Parcel. 1, Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): No Requirement 2. Minimum Net Lot area per dwelling unit (sauare feet): No Requirement 3. Minimum lotwidth (feet): No Requirement 4. Minimum front vard setback (feet): No Requirement 5. Minimum side vard setback (feet): No Requirement 6. Minimum rear vard setback (feeth No Requirement 7. Minimum utilitv/trash/recycle area: Pursuant to Chapter 12.06 8, Maximum height (feet): 55 Feet a) No fagade facing Main Street shall exceed 40 feet in height b) Mechanical equipment may extend up to 10 feet above height limit provided it is located at least 15 feet from any street facing fagade. 9. Minimum floorto floor heights (feet): No Requirement 10. Minimum Distance between buildings (feet): No Requirement 11. Public amenitv space: No Requirement 12. Floor area ratio (FAR): 2:1 13. Net Livable Area AH units (square feet): No Requirement I . CITY OF ASPEN 9 PREÂ·APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY - 29 Â¥ 4- PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 RZ Cttl, 1.DATE: 5.18.15 PROJECT: 530 E. Main Street REPRESENTATIVE: Jodi Smith, 970.920,5396 MAR 1 82016 REQUEST: Major Public Project Review CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION: COMMLWITY DEVELOPMENT The applicant (Pitkin County) would like to construct a new addition on the north side of the Courthouse Plaza building, located at 530 E. Main- Street The existing structure will also be remodeled on the interior and po,tentially refinished with new , exterior materials. The proposed addition would be approximately between 18,000 - 22,000 square feet and 2-3 stories tall. This property is zoned as Public (PUB) and partially located within the Commercial Core Historic District, City Council adopted a code amendment via Ordinance 11, Series of 2015 on May 4, 2015, This code amendment establishes the Public Projects Review process, which Pitkin County qualifies for as a governmental entity. The applicant . must submit the application after the amendment becomes effective (June 3,2015) in order to be reviewed as a Publjc Project. Based on the scope of work, staff believes this would qualify as a Major Public Project Review. This is a two-step process with public hearings before HPC and City Council. The applicant may elect to create an advisory group to review the project prior to the public hearings if desired. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/ComdeWApps%20and%20Fees/2013%20Iand%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and.Zoning/Title-26-Land-Useâ€žCode/ I Land Use Code Sectionfs) 1 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 1 26.500 Public Projects I 26.500.040.C Major Public Project Review 1 26.710.250 Public (PUB) zone district ~ Review by: Staff for complete application . 1 Engineering f Parks I Public Hearing: HPC and City Council ! Planningfees: Planning Deposit - Major Public Project ($7,800 for 24 hours) Referral Fees: Engineering (per hour) - $275 i - Parks (flat fee) - $1,300 APCHA (flat fee) - $1,625 ASLU Public Project t 530 E. Main Street 1 273707347851 1 Total Deposit: $11,000 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $275/hour) To apply, submit the following information: E Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. E Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). N Street address and legal descripljon of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance : report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and ali mortgages, judgments, liens; easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. N Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, E HOA Compliance form (Attached) El Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and IMitigation Tool, available online at: http://www,aspenpitkin,com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be Included with the application. I A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application alid relevant land use approvals associated with the property. N A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado. N Written responses to all review criteria. N An 8 1/2Â» by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. N 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 20 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. U Total deposit for review of the appljcation. 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format, ' 0 A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. 2 Trip Generation Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: In order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" and then click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center" category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then click the "Macro Settings" category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enter the project's square footage and/or unit counts under Proposed Land Use. The numbers should reflect the net change in land use between existing and proposed conditions. If a landuse is to be reduced put a negative number of units or square feet. Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable under each of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit section5. Points are only awarded for proposed (not existing) and confirmed aspects of the project. Sheet 3. TDM: Choosethe mitigation measures that are appropriate foryour project. Sheet 4. Summary and Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mltigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected for the project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measure that was chosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicle traffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense for Helpful Hints: 1, Refer to the T. Irpospgriqtion.Imp?gthn,a_l.Ysis. idellnes for information on the use of this tool. 2. Refer to 1 TIA Frequen.tly Asked Questions a quick overview, 2. Hoverover red cornertags for additional information on individual measures. 3. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/oran Improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. = input = calculation DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJECT NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 E. Main Street APPLICANT CONTACT Richard de Campo Poss Architecture + Planning INFORMATIONÂ· ' 605 E. Main St.; Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL rdecompo@billposs.com Minor Development - Inside the Roundabout Is this a major or minor project? minor Major Development - Outside the Roundabout Net New Trips Generated Units/Square Feet of AVI Peak-Hoir PM Peak-HoL r the Proposed Project Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Proposed Land Use Commercial (sf) 10560.0 sf 16.54 7.43 23.97 17.49 26.23 43.72 Free-Market Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Affordable Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Lodging (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Essential Public Facility (sf) 5510.Osf 2.94 1.80 4.74 3.66 5.49 9.15 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 19.48 9.23 27.56 21.15 31.72 45.46 â€¢For mixedÂ·use lat least two of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hour and a 14% reduction for PM Peak-Hour Is applied to the trip generation. ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Averagâ‚¬ Prn Peak Averege Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate 56Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 Affordable Housing 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 Category Sub. Meaiure Number Question Answer Points 22 Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design? No 0 23 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or driveway? No 0 Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to NA 0 24 an existing bicycle path? Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements I 25 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements 26 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Subtotal 0 3 -E 27 Is the project providing bicycle parking? Yes 5 Subtotal 5 1 Category Sub. Miasure Number Question Answer Points 28 Is seating/bench proposed? Yes 3 29 15 a trash receptacle proposed? Yes 3 30 Is transit system information (signage) proposed? Yes 3 31 is shelter/shade proposed? Yes 4 32 ts enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? Yes 4 33 is real-time transit information proposed? No 0 . 34 Is bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? No 0 35 Are ADA improvements proposed? Yes 5 Subtotal 22 36 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? NA 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway No 0 37 operations proposed? 38 Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)? No 0 Subtotal 0 Enhanced Modifications to Existing Bicycle Bicycles Amenities Paths Basic Amenities Category Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points 22 Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design? No 0 23 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or driveway? No 0 1 15 there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to 24 NA 0 an existing bicycle path? Does the projea propose additional minor bicycle improvements 25 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements 26 No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Subtotal 0 27 Is the project providing bicycle parking? Yes 5 | Subtotal 5 Category Sub. Measure Number Question Answer Points 28 Is seating/bench proposed? Yes 3 29 Is a trash receptacle proposed? Yes 3 30 Is transit system information (signage) proposed? Yes 3 31 k shelter/shade proposed? Yes 4 32 ts enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? Yes 4 33 15 real-time transit information proposed? No 0 34 Is bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? No 0 35 Are ADA improvements proposed? Yes 5 Subtotal 22 36 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? NA 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway 37 No 0 operations proposed? 38 Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)? No 0 Subtotal 0 Enhanced Bicycle Modifications to Existing Bicycle Basic Amenities Parking Paths Transit Bicycles Amenities TDM Input Page - 614.7.,4/6 -li . .'. ''dill//9 ~~ 19.Uk~Sy " -'myle rillill *4.- ---y. Instfuction,TDM: Choose the mitiption measuies that are appropriate foryour project. Ploposed TOM or MAILOS meaiures should be new and/or an improvement of exiling conditioni. A project will not -60 credit for measures al,eady Inplace. Proposed TDM or M MLOS measures should al,0 make scme in the conte* of project location and future use. - Strategy VMT Measure Sub. Question Answer Category Number Reductions Will an onsite ammenitle, s Irategy be imple,nented? Yel 1 Oniite Sen*ing 3.0014 Which onitte ammenities will be implemented? Retail Servicing WIN a shared ;huttle se,vicestrategy be Implementedl yes What U the degree of implementation? low 2 Shared Shuttle Se,vice 0.00% What I$ tlie company size? Small What perccntage of customers m eligible? 0% 3 | Nonmotorized Zones | Will a nonmotorized zones strategy be implemented? |NA 0 00% Measure Strategy VMT Category No Sub. Que'tion Answer Number Reductions will I network expansion straztegy be Implemented? 4 Network Expar'ion What is the percentage Increase of Iransit network coverâ€¢ge? 0?6 0.00% What 15 tile exkting trailt mode shar, as a % of total daily trips? 0)6 Will a service frequeng/speed strategy be implemented? NA 5 Sen,ice Fiequency/Speed What h the percentage reduction in headway5 (increase in frequency)? 0% 0.00% What 15 the existing tran,It mode share as a % or total daily trips? 0% What is the level of Implementation? Will a transit access Improviment strately be implemented? No 6 Tranlit Access linp,ovement 0 00% What h 11,~ extent of *ce,$ improvement,? 7 | litercept Lot |Will an intercept lot strategy be Implemented? |NA O.00* Measure Question Answer Strategy VMT Category . Vâ€¢ Sub. Number Reductions Will thG be partkipation in TOP? 8 Partkipatlon in TOP 4.001 What percentage of employees are eliglblel 100% 1; a tfai,511 fare sub,ldy .tratery implemented P Yel 9 Traill Fare Subddly What_percentâ€¢ge of eniployees ir. eligible? 100:4 13.80?V What li the amount of transit subildy per pi,senger (dall, equlvalent)? 100* 10 Emplove, Parking Cail-Out -!tin einplovee paiking ca,h-t stiategy biln, Implemented? No 0.00% whit pefeentage of employees are eligible? 1, a woikplace parking pilcing *trategy Implemented? NO 11 Woikplace Parking Pricing What is the daily paiking chni? 0.00% What percentage of employees m subject to priced parking? h a comprested work weeks strategy Implemented? NO 12 Compleâ€žed Work Weeks What percentage or employees m participating? 0.00% What k the woikweek whedule? A In employer sponsered shuttle protram impliminled? Yes 13 Employer Sponsored Vanpool What is the employer size? Small 1.38% Wliat peicentage or eniplovees are eligible? 100?4 Is a Â¢a,pool matching strategy implemented? No 14 Carpool Matching - 0.00% Whal peicentage of employees are eligble? 139â€žha,e pallicipation being implemented? NO, 15 Carshare Program How m,ny employ- membeiships hav, been purcha.d? 0.00% What percentage of employees aie il'sble1 h.glitkipation In the blke.har. program WEÂ·cycle being Implemented? NO 16 Bikeshaie Program Me many m,mbel,lips hive been purchased/ 0.00% What percentage 01 employies/g.,le;ts are eligble? Is an end of trip fadBIES stratigy b,ing ImplementedP No 17 End of nlp Facilitie' Whit h thedeelitlmplementationi 0.00% What Is thi employer size? 18 SelfÂ·funded Emergency Ride Home h a selfÂ·fu,ded emeigency ilde home strately bein, Implemented? NO 0.00% What percentage of employees ire eligible? 13, carpool/vanpoot priority parking strategy being implemented? No 19 Carpool/'Vanpoot Priority Parking What Is the emplover $12,7 0.00% What number of park!4 spots are available for the pro,am? Is I private employer shuttle stra t ely being Implimen ted 1 No 20 P, ivate Employer Shuttle Whit 1, thiemployer s12.7 0.00% Whit per~entage of employees m eltgibl.? Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive 15 a tr p reduction marketing/incentive proiram implemented? No 21 -0.00% Progiam What percentago of emplonâ€ž/suists mili,Ible? AA..7-11.m~impl.' 9Nlil;~"flâ€¢'#4~1'll,-,1â€¢iâ€¢:rÂ¢#I,!Ririm~ilniMWJimmE],RUUUM Â·2"Â» .IL, .-/1-/.Ull 77/Ff/79 , I . â‚¬120Â·11'.Â·Fill;[117:Will.m:mi!(,211. 1.22% work trips repments o mixed-used site (SF Boy Area Trevet Survey). See Auumptions Tob tor more detail, Transit SY=tem Improvements Neighborhood/Sit. Erlhâ€¢â€¢coments St,=te:Ic Commute Trip Reduction Programs Strategies 1 . Summary and Narrative: DATE: 3/17/2016 PROJEC NAME: Pitkin County Sheriff/Administration Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 E. Main Street APPLICANT CONTACT Richard de Compo Poss Architecture + Planning INFORMATION: 605 E. Mo/n St.. Ste. #1 NAME, COMPANY, (970) 925-4755 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL .decampo@bi//poss. com SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation NETTRIPSTOBE Peak Hour \ Max Trips Generated MMLOS i TDM 1% Total Trips Mitigated MITIGATED PM i 45.5 45 | 3.13 48.13 0.00 Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcement and Financing Plan for the selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6, Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative report. Pm<IN COUNTY ATTORNEY John M. Ely Courthouse Annex Property County Attorney 530 East Main Street, Suite 302 Lisa MacDonald John.ElÂ¥@pitkincountv.com Aspen, Colorado 81611-1948 Jane Achey Paralegals Laura C. Makar Tel: (970) 920-5190 Lisa.MacDonald@pitkincountv.com Assistant County Attorney Fax: (970) 920-5198 Jane.AchCV@Ditkincountv.com Laura.Makar@Ditkincountv.com 4,:CE,VED MAR 182016 March 16,2016 CITY OF ASPEN 3(4## 44.1 Y 05.itu)PMENT To: City of Aspen Community Development Department RE: Legal Status of Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property for Development Application To Whom it May Concern: Pursuant to the request for information concerning the legal description, ownership and encumbrances affecting the Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property, and as an undersigned licensed attorney practicing in the State of Colorado, the following information is submitted: â€¢ Legal Description ofthe Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Property: Seconded Amended Plat of Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision Recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception No. 626213 â€¢ Property Owner: Pitkin County Capital Leasing Corporation and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County â€¢ Easements affecting the Parcel: The property is subject to all easements, rights of way, Property setbacks or other restrictions of record as shown on the Second Amended Plat of Lot Pitkin County Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No. 626213 including: > 20.39' Utility Easement per Plat Book 93 at Page 56 7 8.0" Telephone, TV, Natural Gas, Water Service and Electric Easement per prior plats 1 15.0' Joint Telephone, TV, Electric, Natural Gas and Water Service Easement per Plat Book 690 at Page 313 1 25.0' Trail and Transit Easement per prior plats 1 10' Air and Light Easement per prior plats CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MARCII 16, 2016 1 Source Gas Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception Nos. 626208 * City of Aspen Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626210 1 Qwest Corporation Underground Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 626212 7 10.0' City of Aspen Electric Easement per Book 464 at Page 28 1 Obermeyer Right of Way Easement recorded at Reception No. 499687 > City of Aspen Encroachment License recorded at Reception No. 565894 > Right of Way Vacation per Book 113 at Page 40 To the best of Applicant's knowledge there are no mortgages, judgments, liens, contracts or other agreements o f record affecting this property. PITKIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sincerely, Joh9 MÂ· ElyÂ« t:~Boty-Attorney COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the properly owner or Attorney representing the propertv owner. Name: Pitkin County c/o Jon Peacock Property Owner (213: Email:jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com Phone No.: 920-5067 Address of Pitkin County Center Lot 1 Property: (subject of Pitkin County Center Veterans Park application) I certify as follows: (pick one) 11 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in th}s land use applicatjon do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 1 i El This property Is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the i improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners I association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and 1 understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the ~ applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. --7 Owner signature: 4 f )_un'- 2 date. 3 l 16 l \,01 Owner printed name: Jori Peacock r or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name:, t ,-1, ' . Â· . %44.. ... 4 1-4. * . r NA.-1 3.0,. - 4 j. <.,b::,52... .. . I J . 1 /4< t.5- it,7 ..{51, .-TZ....- e.-is.t..., 1. . t L , L 1 . t ' 7 - 6 ,, Â· .4 -2103'i -Â·Li 4'f . % 1 4. + .7 â€ž2*42[ . < ..1 , 2 9. -1440 0 Â·41 .- * 6 ..4 , . 4 4 . 4 f 1 , i â€¢ 4 UÂ¥.=4** Jit b - '. a $ 14.2 ...mt.AlÂ·*; Â· 143 - #C/~XY 64-13,4/t ./5941(; . f c , , 4 40% t //6 2 - 1 - t, â€ž4 '. $ '. . r t. I 1, . ti -PZ.*St# :, 3? . ':.. 4 .9 .40,k E ..1 -1 -r / ' . *444**Â¢..* ..6./ A .- I: I 1 , 4, .... 9 2- s R.is,Gr.ande 4, - t'f I 't t.1~.656/3. -- I.,2.- . , 'th-v .1 4, 4 . 44 . -- -- ': 1 /- iwii.... # I lk--- I I : 4 ... /2. I. N'/#194 '9Ii../b A~, , 7,- k 0, . -. 1-7 1 f 1 .}S i=.1 : 47. 1 * --/*UL Ip/4 Fi.b.' 44-.=12. 14., 20-Â£ . *_ .fli r Â£#BM.Mi. Ar 4: 'i 6 1" 4 1 . .4 I k , , r. 4/Al-1 9.. 1 4 ./,:A . / :I'l. - I.-7.... - , & 1 4- rli 4 r- -1 - I .~02Â·* â€¢. 'J $ - g. .r. t. , .2; J I. .1 I 2'Mi , 1, . *~ - M -ti & l./0~~~ ~-f~ ~-**~~ vlt-Â· 5 ;R 4 . * f 4 1 141;Â·fi:-7~,2,;.,-r*e / ..re. 2%; 0~'.~$844-1~r #, 4* 9~. * I '91 2.- /3, ** --- . .1,4 . *-4<.3.5 46.2 2*-71-:El~ + r.fil' AN+25 I ... -re- 1 . .. I ' 1 .9 4 .17,4 2 , . .. -=0.4-b - 0 ' 4451.4~,4Â£+12#~ip: I. 6..4,~~ l/:04 46& t--9.-2....L~ .,2 , *4~,2.,rf, 7 . 1 1 4 1-' j?@f~Â· 4 - 3; 'Trhakix'*;9* - f~F,5~ ~~~ 40 r.< + -, . V : . 91 ,f.: 61.4 Lt '4 k -- 'I . 441126*4& 4 P lizr .:fit, St,z :,4 2.-.,45-1-E 9.0,-c y:i f t.Â·Â»:-; arvul tril~~~~14 -~ , Â« 08,4 . 4 4 2 k . 4 8*1 1 *vil 09,44 4,; Â· Jr $ ANT ./ 1 1963.. 4 'Â· *i72=Â«12%<49- '4 0 / . 1\ . ij/'61 1041 -'--r-Â»a.-,5, co, J J,<FF #/EitÂ¢L/,th-â„¢-~~ . *= r 44 e A- â‚¬ . I 2.3= ..2/63%43-- 3/NIE:P..1 % IC, I ' t.-* . eÂ».-Â·4...,2..2 r â€¢ 1. 2, . 4 Â£ 444 .- +22 -r 13 7 6-f: te' - I #Ff. , I. 3 -ur . 0,0.244# -t.-' 2..44Â¢Â¥ 7-/ 7 - I . Â»Â«.9,0 6 3:-r , ... 1 . 5,94. 1. 1 .. - A 14 n ....1 Â· .... .1 - 2 . A * --S-- 4 '.. 42 ---1549â‚¬ 90 i.* , 0 ---- 4 2 ..11 ./24 - Â¥46 -4. I....:-/ , Â£2....-4 *k.4,t Â» -9.-1 f 17.R N 44. 4.3114#9.1 .t f:.Â·. -- :*.--T- . V *tr? e Â¢.. 6*N . ,-1.16 1 1/ -I - LEGEND -== -# 913--\- tte-- h 1 Ju-~~FlofiÂ«Â·_2-cÂ«*1 -* -. ~ ' Site Iniprovements /\ S Found rebor & cop 2 noi ond shlner. LS # 28643 ' -- - O Found #5 reb/ or rebor ond 1.9/le cop \ 2 1 - m Set #5 rebor & cop or nal & shiner, IS # 29030) i ~ ~~1 4 - Survey s.%...C , I 3 Found rebu & cop, LS 1 13166 i ~ \j *SS--4 0 e Found reb/ & c, LS # 16129 I . r-- - City of Aspen Engineering Department 1 - I \* -1 -- - Traffic Signal 1 Compliant Survey --- \ r \\ - Electric Transformer 4 /- - / Electric Meter , / i ./r- 1 . 1/11'~ - Electric Panel - 1. " :---7 - '+ L ,0 - *Â« 1~ I Fi~ory #ner Norrb .d Address: | Lot 1, Pitkin County Center Subdivision and a - Light Pole 75' 850 W 1 I -'. .'- -u- -~4 -41 1,/ 7/,-fÂ« /.--- -2/ 0 #0 i - Telephone Ped 1 â€žCITY OF ASPhk Water valve (4 575'0150'E /' 70 10'_ 5 - E -=.' A- 5-i~. ~4--~*-3,9-- .- --*./'1,14---- ,/~9 -i.Â£5*~~~~ENB~Dtr\\\J\ portion of Block 92, City of Aspen, and a - Fire Hydront ~~~_~ ~* __ ~;~~ ~; * ~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ portion of Block 10, East Aspen Addition - Woter Meter e , .A, \-----4/ + S. Water Shut-off - 1 - ==595:09+1.E _ ' - Section 7, T. 103., R.84W., 6th P.M. - PVC plpe f- 16 8.66' >1 Â· S 3233'05' W 2&49 . 40 f,ff/4 7 S - son. S ewer Monhole City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado - Cleonout t&15( - 114'is 60'16Â§~14' W , / N 57'25'00" W - Gas Meter , 11.00 0 . 0. 1% 17 40' EL .:7889,0 52 2 1 I .1 LDING ....- Â£ i ,/ >'I';;'--34 z f~3 - M W N <P~FRA PLACE ~ ,-7 - ~ 455 '00 GRANDE PLACE i 4600 wb,/ WFTAL GRANDE 57Â·25'00-E 2494 posjol ./- ' Â· Sign - Single Pole -- -/$1&/Â¥P-9 1 ,-- .% PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ---:.-i i &,I,#74 - Bike rock ~ Bull DING Lot 1. First Amended Plat of Lot 1. Pitkin County Center Subdivision, according to the plot ~~~~~ecid'u~~~~~~~n_221-2 ' OkfF pthG~---_- ~ 'l--1<1 -~-~--= -~- - -~----,1,~... -3 6.1 1~:~8960 . . 1../ -- I-- , S 15Â·01'20" W Â»- Â·,f t Bleeker (per PY recorded in Plat Book 93 4 Page 56 of the Pitkin County records. ~--Indicates one tree. 8Â·trunk (084) Â· I JUEx f _ -- v L. 1 1--30~ t\/1 .. %& 4 Â£ - P - 13. Togethe *ith lots Q. R Ind the Westedy 75 Feet / Lot % 8/ock 92, Cily md Tomsite of --' ' ' Aspen, ind Lots 11,12 ond the Westerly 7.5 feet of Lot 1 0, Block 19, Eost Aspen Addition 7*23(<'j' , 'aS rop. BerÂ· 4 - i --~ L R ' - 1 2;Â©,UBE 4- ir.A : , to the City and Townsite of Aspen, 32 \ 1: Together with thot olley'Roy lying northeny of ond odjocent to Lots 11 and 12, Block 1 9, bligLI[,2511LL,bdi C,-Indicotes two trees, 10~trunk (* I L 1-9 Evergreen Tree . . 16*s : 129 -Â· .. 2 -' 7 ..... ~.-Th ''UO -1 De.tr4.0. Pi,1 1,7, :12 .r t,QL \Pl N - uf.-Â·~4-_ ~ ~~~~ 1 < 'If & 44- ' m.,t 11 11 4 East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen, oil in Pitkin County, Colorado. ' 7' Â·1 /'BIED RIO GRANDE , 3# -uE-- Underground Electric Line .-p ' ' - 4 .BDI#. , 41 - , 7900'.. , :7897.2 - -ue-- Gos Une Â£; .h REC NO. 469504 ~ ' I NQIESL g FF: 7897-2 4 - 11/0 . PARIL NO. 27]7-07.06-854 ( 9 , \ OWNER: CITY OF ASPEN -x- Fencerine . 1 11 - 6.Frl t. 1 - rÂ· -1 130 S GALINA 5TREET -ss- Sonitory Sewer Line Â«~,1.71 ASPEN, C[} 81611 I /1 4 'I) I 1-4_/ 0532 1. Dote of field survey: July. 2013 - July, 2015. - - Water Line FT: 7/7 r / \ F 1 Ihis survey hos been completed per the clients request for a Sile Improvements Survey , :4; ~ py & LO,t L ' _ 1 ~-1 y PARCEL RO. 2131-073-41-89 / for specific fectures of spec# portions of the property. --cr- Overhead Telephone Line ' i cjy,5 ~ I OBERMEYER 4- Underqround Telephone Li 3. Units of linear meosurement US Survey Feet. Â· - FF:Im.2' ~. / -4 - Underground Fiber Optic Line - 00 1. Pitkin County / f '1 8 4 3. - - Jail Building - 6 Concrete . 714Â©-IC .i Utal o 4. Fevations shown hereon ore NAVI} 88. being relotle to on elevation 01 7911.98' 01 NGS Station Q-159 neor the SW comer of the Pitkin County Courthouse property. AME,dED Rle GRANDE SUBD,VISION - - - . . 1 523Â·5731 WÂ· LOT 1 -1 J Â· 40.08 ,/6 11!111 1 \R U - - Aspholt REL NO 469504 - ' \1,1,41 ' 1 1/1 4% |~ ~ ~ ~ 19â€ž4 9RST AVENDED PLAT OF LOT 1 PARCEL NO. 7737-973-06-852 DITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION 6. SGM will not be responsible for ony chonges mode to this document oMer it leoves our . 1. - - Grovel OWNER. CITY OE ASPEN . -- , . -1 Â· .#Â·9 possession. Any copy. facsimile, etc., of this document must be compared to the 5. Fences shown hereon, if ony. do not necessorily represent the limits of ownership, originol signed, se/led ond doted document to insure the occurocy of the information 1 10 S ALENA STREET . . ' . - h OWNER: PI[KIN COUNTY shown on ony such copy, ond to insure that no such changes hove been mode. L. . 7.7 ELIEI] - Deck ASPEN, to 81633 , . *42-4 ~ 530 E. MAIN STREET ik302 ,-' < ,' ~ DILAPiDA1ED ~. Â£:1 I, 0 ~42 AC ** - -, /. 7 - 1 7 J ASPEN, CO 81611 / r 1 1,1 m WOOD FRAME " t. 1 - - Flogstone . '11': Â· ,.' /1 \~/ 1?5 + rf fift-- '4 :1 Â· 1 t>tv . A. 2 X / BJ]LDING * companies ot the Ume of this survey. Client/controctor must contoct specific utility ' CRUSL UATRIZ~ AREAÂ· , ' - 1 1,1 " companies to verify both the locution ond depth of respective utgities, Additional 24.17 + 1 7. Any subsurfoce utilities not shown hereon, were not marked by oppropricte utility N59'20'37 E Tie to SW Prop. CONDOMN IN[/R (]014SJ?fllem* 04 PIE,/ - ~ ~1 ' ' '' A lt/ ' . 791.0Â« ' surveying work moy be required to show ony such subsurface utility locations on this 3415' CE WRVEN. .. 2/5 54 \ drow/g. SGI wm not be responsible for protection of subsurface utilities not marked on 25.45'~ i : 1 ~ K -7 r 9~~ W '2*234, ~ i 11. PREFPRIMED I SORRIS ENGINEfRIND Â·~ / , 4 *B ' NA,4 ks Exk -1 2 '0 14*Fi*E Zt \ the ground ot the time of this survey. Ous EsnleÂ· ~3 I. 0445 DE SUIIVEY 13 j~ /'1\ ~ liÂ·~ 4 fRQ)1 4/ 2008 - MARCH 200# , w \ \ & Some oreos were not marked by utility locator due to cors p/rked at time of locates per For to SW pfap 0 \P r.-- 1 \ und therefore moy not be shown hereon. some utility locote markings *ve not fully i- k JANUAR~ 19, 29[2 44 1Â°760, Pg A h\ identifiable by field surveyor und my need to be reviewed with the utnity locator. N52'53'19-Â£ ~ :790&3 ~ ~ t ~ 1 9. Subsurloce utilities hope been shown hereon based on paint mod<s found during .rious 20277' por/ori ,Â¥0 S GRENA P ///' \ . field surveys betwen July. 2013. and July. 2015. Some point morks were not ANN FINANCE D#1 1 2 . .1 4 2 L . y 5,24' 00 9 4 E. MAM SFEET 0. , determinoble os to exactly which type of utility they represent and have been Icbeled \ per the best estimate of survey field crew. It oppeors thcl some locates used different A . 273 -073-24-0 j ~ P t*Â·~ j:ir ASPEN ~ pcint colors ot different times, or thot some trenches ore 'multi-use' trenches, and F,64. 1 5 1 ...= 1-1 li ->------ -ib j some utility line If~motion shown herein incy need clofilicition fram vinous unity 1 1 0 1 componies, Also note thot prior maps provided by Pitkin County show some utilities 1- .,Mllf g i E u. - LF \ -0 ~ 13~ ASPEN k unknown H such utmties still exist ot this time * that were not morked on the ground at the time of this survey. and os such it is I 11 Z j I : ' ' el.'I I d-&-- ~- $ F 79083- 0.607 AC.* 2 % 1 - 1 1 " )128 1 Â¥,6 1- >~ *ff / j / \ *~ -- 74 | ' 1_N,1.N'IÂ·Â£ im# 1 101 The property shown hereon is subject to oil eosements, rights-of-woys, building - I ..5/ A,G / th / (2, B 4 Â· , map does not represent o title seorch by this survepr or SCM of the properÂ·ly shown setbocks or other restrictions of record, os such items moy affect this property, This . j 1 79.9 -9Â«3 1 1 '6Â» 20 :), ONE STORY - Lot 1 . 1 '4 Elec .mt 1 CINDER BLOC -AB encumbronces of record affecting this porcel. hereon to determine ownership, compatibility with adjoining porcels. or easements or 1 ' w Utrl~k al por*ing t- 1 HA>k 464 P ge . . Ga RAGE 0991 r vault * 1 '1 \ / .2/ F 7911.5 EL 0 11. The property shown hereon is subject to oil mements, rights-of--woys, building 1 , 9 4. *gis: . -Ste/ 79033 Se#k~~41-Â£*ILK)~- UE _- 3 -- 4 Â£,57 10 sumy does not represent a title seorch by this surveyor to determine ownership or to 0 Â·ds) ' 7 ~ w,st 10' steel 7904.1 setbocks or other restrictions of record, 09 such items moy offect this properly. 1his 307- I /Inc und % 15.0 rete/. & 7Â¥ Esr4.- r 8 ok 6 Graphic Scale . b , 4 , . 710.10 Mest 4. 4 7903.4 ownership. eosement end other encumbronces of record hos been token from the tite -Â· _, N 75'09'11~ W 3 I. 7971.5 . s. $0'. discoer eosements or other encumbronces of record A[[ informotion pertaining to - insuronce commitments issued by Stewort Title Guaranty Company. Fle No. .p, Im-, - 7 8' " E 0.09 i 61. uN~ 24.f ' wes< 4 ~ 7903.5 0 10 20 40 M Oved /6 dul b. ASTRE 1â„¢5 .69' ' r 5711 E IE-, 01330-33767 having an effective date of November 1 2, 2013. - _ -'~--OPEE ' 1 8 ~ . I L 1611 '. Â·E N 12' *--1, Bottom 01330-34746. havrng an efective date of December 11. 2013 and File No. In Feet: 1" = 20 Itt 50' 9"E TO . 0 - w â‚¬h DIst=*Bo. ' m =1162= I I P -A, / i y.>, ,Â· 1â€¢7; ~ ~ the title commitments referenced obove. Some such Items may not be shown if they $ 1 - . =-- --1- Â·19-Â·FlÂ· ; 1 ' 6-...,~~. / - _/' 20.39' documents, or U they cre situated on odÂ»cent properties, etc. i -79-TT *g- E--- ore stondord title commitment exceptions, or if not sufficiently described in recorded - 4 '.5 4906.7 - ' 1 3 - --i 23 1 ' 9 70.0 - - SURVE'YOR CERI]HCATE . a . .1 1 14 - 1 N 75'09'lf Ve w 1 J 1 ul. Esmt 42 \ . 9 4 96 ~~0(* 91, p"e ~' ..... SEWER? Al~.~ - n SS --,u-f~--UT- 12. Every attempt hos been made to show oil eosements and rights-of-woy referred to in 'Â£-- UNE#-BEARINGTDISTANCE T %1 r- . 1 1 2 -6 / / . % u, ond Book 310 /03/ 341 LE_la=Ellia/0-1 4 0\ , ff-#tel~/~~,~~~~~-- , V â‚¬ PLAZA mto B\AL. 1 -004 1 Do,d A Cooper, do hereby certify thot l am a Registered und Suriyor licensed under -1 | 575Â·09'11"E | 13.04' | ~ e , 0 the laws of the Stote of Colorodo, that [his mop was prepared on July 22 2015. ond thot 2 it isa true and correct to best of my knowledge and ber,ef. 0 . 1 1 al, -- - \ER.- -, 6 ) --4 17 - u K'N COUNTY CAPITAL oreo Pitkin County 530 E MAIN STREET Courthouse L4 | N16Â·44'06 E | 1160' | I 5367 5 *04 1 :7917.2 Building b.9 \I ASPEN, CO 81611 :7906 6' a /;72' :-1 -- ~~ ~ 4,~,i~~tÂ¥Â· <3~ ~Â·--1%1~~ ~~'V ~ MI /4 ~DR/131~01 '/ ~ 1 Â·5 15 '+I ond on. t" * O Â· ; *ly" I- 4-% It : .... 1 I. ' Er=7997/ Â«13*Â» : 7914........ . 4-Ezr-------- -1 ---- t of Lot i ~ L7 |St&Â·16'50"W| 3.39' | M. I.*F ~ ***& 1 7.b ~eet of Lot 10 .$ ~~ WOOD FRAMED 1~0USE %/ 7 | La | Sl,Â·50'49-w | 6.97Â· | c., 1 10 David A. Cooper -fÂ·.0-iÂ·lob .0 L9 | N73'03'08-W | 3.00' | '79Â·7.2 -\ \9 1 For, and on i .:/Cg030 1 - IO |N75Â·09'11"W | 1.02' | â€¢ ../ . We' -141Â· 6 34 / f 1 . Il 1 te:*8 4 g. ..... :7905.6' e. 1 F: 7914.7 1.3. j (* behall of SGM G,iry-02 -f.7 BASEMENT p Colo. Reg. P.LS, 0 29030 ,~f'~'lf,34l y 3 CO\ERED ALA ' . 64944 Llâ€¢. 31 =CURYRIABLE 1 St ' F, h 06. 4 / 1 /1 1 04.// --7 ./ 7913 '94=..... 120 .-.t ./ 8 . 1 .,e ~--79'J ' ; 1?fj ~CURVE # | LENGTH ~ RADIUS~ ANGLE | BEARING ~ LENGTH | 0/ . -211-232139301313Â©31_LEEMILE.79 ' / 6 01. v ''1 1 l'f 0 ,. N 75Â·09'1 67.69' ' Â« [*------ | N75'09'11"W 97.60' 0 | 59.01' | 133.12' | 25Â·24'00- | N62Â·42'00-W | 58.53' | - -- Le__128164.%12222-1232425-f-20 ------- . ----~- - ---- i , 1~ /: -- -----1 1 Notice: # Revision .~ Accord,ng *0 Colorcdo Low. yet, must commence 1 ony 4901 ocbin boned upon any dated in this 6SGM Pitkin C ounty Courthouse , Date By Job No 2015-352.001 Drawn by: ilw/dec sur,ey with'n three yeors cfter you first 0/cover 1 such d/ect In no event mci ony /9/ oction 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 3 Courthouse Plaza, and Jail Site Improvements Survey Date: 07/22/2015 tc~eg upon any defect ..tnts sur,ey be commenced mys thon ten yeors from t" dete Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 4 Approved, . rhe =en,7,20'ion en'K heneon. Aspen, CO .Of 1 970.945.1004 www.sgmÂ·inc.com 5 FileÂ· CIA_Pitki.c,n//1/.30 e ~llÂ®0Â® 41144 Z,aomlim@ ' \201/\2015.-352-Cf t)~ fAspelld//001 -Bld/Roplclement ~H-DIg' #Sury//wgs V -Bose'lls /./.Pit"lle'lly,P'lle_ALL Re' o. dig 72TOÂ· Final Plat ~ tz:3 w 'S . 1. 1 im de Sub Bl,3 pm Ced' . Sec< 1 Amended Plat of Lot 1 Â° ~ Know all I esents that Pitkin County ond Pitkin County Capitol Lessing H 916'16'5074 .'/41 ' Corporation. the owners of 011 thot reol property situated M the County of Akin. M O 10.00' 52.50' S State of Coloradi, soid real property being more particulily descrted cs follows: - Clm \ b 0171.1.- 1 4 Pitkin County Center Subdivision -'001 1 \ \ 00 Lot 1, First Amended Plal of Lot 1. Pitkin County Center SubdiAsion. according to the o Z plot recorded In Plat Book 93 ot Poge 56 of the Pitkin County records. . m / 0 t30 , vII.) Ctlr OF AS?Eti Situated in Section 7, T.10 S., R.84 W. of the the 6th P.M. 9 ATTN FINANCE DEPT Together with Lots Q, R ond the Westerly 7.5 feet of Lot S. Block 92, City Ind To=ke ~ ~ 130 S GALINA ST O* \ Addition to the CIty and Townsite of Aspen, O.W / of Aspen, and Lots 11, 12 and the Westerly 7.5 feet of Lot 10, Block 19, Eost Aspen ASPEN. CO 81611 Pitkin County, Colorado â€ž ~ Together with that vacated clley'woy '*g northerly of ond odjocent to Lots 11 and 12, 1-10 Ed. Rebor & \ Block 19, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen. cs showt on De Block 19 - I. LS 73766 (01*UDS> .1/ Â« owner Name onc(46&95: 1 Pur'pose Statement: The purpose of this amended plat is to merge ,~7 1% I P.- Right-of-Woy Vacation Plat, recorded as Reception No. -412Â£281-Â¥- all in Pitkin ./ b k Parcel No. 273707324004 into Lot 1 of Pitkin County Center Subdivision ---- -- - Â· / Cr' County, Colorodo, sold properties contoining o totcl of 1.590 ocres. more or less, hove '00 060&42 23.49' i **,> oa W 9, / / / 00 ~ shown on this pict under the nome ond swe of Second Amended Plot of Lot 1, Pitkin ~ N O by these presents laid out, plotted ond subdivided the some into lots and blocks as Mi%%m% . / - 0 - | County Center Subdivislon, ond do hereby dedicate to the public all rights-of-way and PO Vt...2*24.-8 I Â·4(46tv> S6076'1414 ~ / '64 /3 /1 /9 / 58454'00 14 9.-h Ch eclements shown hereon for public use , 1-1 A riar p Pitkin tounty, owner 4 2 0* 45% 17.40' Â· 9 N28 10'001Â¢ Executed this --*-- dev of &-r A D. 2916, SO/( i- ) ./7 / 24.61' 4%Â«*9-<. -4 .1 :--1 r/ 111-14% 234:2:ila Fl :F OW ~ ~' Â·~ t. (1,613 M A 3 ul .',1 *'.-. V ~~~~126 9- 1 / Eol.j'eeKS~~~h\ ~ .. @ 0 S15'01 2014 - 64/~*QÂ·jt,-t </ Â·iÂ·r.74{ 2~15 18.39' i ~ )39 8 2 Stote of Cclorodo ) . 2/ter+4WfO~L/*Al.> fÂ»Â»: 8*4Â«1~ :2 , Un 1101-1 7 County of Pitkin . tk i. 7'1...EfA.+ Eite 13 I.~tit}~ 4 The foreg~ing stotement of ownprship was acknowledged before me this doy of A '1 ..1 ..8 LD. 2040' 2/4 E N Te to SW Prop CornerÂ· E ~\ ~243.(1 4-Â¥I-->Â»41.13* .*: - - - . 0 15 Water " Â·~ / finx -- 0 ~ tg 1 commission ..pâ€¢es: 0,Â¥1 09 /AMIf Se,wa 1 â‚¬ 8.0 Waterper ~ent Es/1 , JANEA ACHCY , 1-1 1 4 *14â‚¬' 3.L~- 1.-P -' 1 1 1% .M 1832%:3Â»19;.~ :.l 379~-Â· itpli.t,-~ '414.*}j pg 30 1 i ( 9 , b -_#57.25'0014 ~ NOTARY ID N 1990400896' 83. 690 1 14 I = W~tness my h,nd ond officid Â¥01. NOTARIPUBLIC 1 *51399" *3233'/BMÂ»:.r..2,--1-. i ..mi... .~'- Â·"12 == LEGEND = 1 and Eper /0 p / 11- -1 - Li-- - 4- 1%' i - - ---1 awer 74-i'(tz,0/1.,4:14.Li/*913# 2 -1 . \\21 8.66' .44 a. A.'A~ licâ€¢,sxp,REsx.,0..sTs,, y I . found Rebor & Cop OR Neil Ind I 1 Foserf'%;687 1 No84 Public W. M Shiner. LS / 28643 - $21'28'301Â¥ i i ) 3 ; - 1 1 - ' ' 1 -3 -21 0-1 11 -Â» . 1 *4 45.22' / , $ -1 11 41.1 -31 , - .J. 1 -1 ~--~ Rec, Executed this - doy of A D. 3914. 30/4 W 1 11- 1 lili- 0 OW O fbed *8num// cs assc/Z,ed L* i / Â· Â· 10 '/Â» Pitkin County Copit/ Leasing torporotion, Owner 7; 65Â¥1-1, /8,4/ A (% G.9. -11 #lewlp- cok -41 Il- L -1, 3 9 Rebar & Cap, LS / 29030 or ~\ -1 , all Nci/ & Shiner, LS / 29030 to be ~ \f Sinte ot Cdâ„¢cdo j p . Ph,1 1 .1 4 1-f' 0.'Â·th-,ir'- kDE 7= #p~,~ -**w L24--9 {11 1 1 1,- dl* -7- ,~& 7 I . JANEA. ACHEY . - t.0. 111 1 NONARY.JULIC ......COLORADO O 4 ' 4 4Â£4F 4 ~2 1- -- - MYCOMN<tSSIONExPIRESAUGUSTA 201 -VICINITY MAP - | 52357'1914 ~ l il ~ 1 1 Â· _, 42* ZE -1 1 ~ The ~~g st<]tement of ovmers*~ wos ocknowledged betore me this County of Pitkin ) NOTAR~ I[)~ 19954008967 . W.QIEi pft/crl 10 4~e end hdd,//5 40.08' . .' 1 i ! day of Aft-,5/1.0, AD. 2946. 28/4 1 u 1. Units of lineor me.surement. US Survey Feet, / 1f # R,11-1. 1 1',11 kly commission expires: D~~ Of/>-O (9 2. Dote of lield survey: July. 2013 thru April, 2015. r-, i 1, lul| 1:|Lul |114: F. 23 9 .. ~ 4~75Â·09'1114 Egiggliumc-737073Â®82 3. The sole purpose of this omended plot is to vocote o lot line cs shown hereon. 25.487-N\ HA M i * I - Lo 1 r - ' ' ' i =i, i i - _:j i .~ , Witness my hid und offkjiol sed. m Â»Â»yg]Â»L 4Â»Â£- a. a.u~ 1-1 1 1 blic CITY OF ASPEN 1 \ 1 7 Â·Â· Notory 66 ATW ANANCE DEPT OTY OF ASPEN 4. Basis of bearings: Bearings shown herean are relative to o beoring of N14'50'49-E between o rebor and cop. LS # 28643 found ot the 130 S GALDNA ST Resullng arek t '' 1.1 111 1 11 -- FINANCE DEPT southwest property corner ond I rebor ad Regible cap found ot the north end of the curve ot the west property line, 08 more fully . ACM Asnen City Coincil Annroval CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST depicted herecn. the Pitkin County Records 0, . $1450'491Â¥ in - ~ Â·Tbis Plat was opproved by the City of Aspen City Cound 9. the 1~r doy of 'P 1.590 Act- bi _ - i , 'I 144 8\68 ASPEN, CO 5. This plet is based on prior plots recorded in Plit Book 93 ot Page 56, in Plot Book 61 ot Page 19, and In Plot Book 13 at Page 83, oil of 46.00 ~ recorded in,the gtfice of the Clerk of Pitu County, Colorodo h Book Amended Rao (Lot ~rande Sub) .iÂ»h268%,i34 2015, by City of Aspen Ordinance No. 14Â£1 Series of 20S Ind RTON&1=14 document must be compored to the original signed, seoled ond dated document to ha,re the occuracy of the information shown or any and â‚¬ eock -93 The dedicotjons ond 6. The properly shown hereon is subjact to all eosement# fights-of-Toys, building setbacks or other restrictions of recorf as such items may % / 1 . M ~ 1 I â€¢ - '- eager#ts shi#heD,fo,1 ~~eb~occepted. affect this property â‚¬ /0' Notemt Gas Esmt 11 J' f. ~4< . , 07 --< ~ ~ 4--ALI\1 Pa( pitr *c. -11 1 *b./1 7. SGM wit not be responsible for any changes mode to this document after it leaves our possession. Any copy, focsimile, etc., of this , ~ I/ 5, Â£ 1% IJ,I .rds. P such copy, ond to insure that no such changes have been mode 70 l 7 1 -3 "' ,2 8. Any subsutoce ut'~ities not shown. were not m/ked by appropriate utility companies at the time of this survey ond therefore are not shown N750~2.Jtl 0,9 U. // Â£ Attest.. Ed A~fAN-ll,<W/.k City Clerk ~ hereon. Client/contractor mus! contcct speck utijty Cmp<7,5 to m-fy bob the ~ocatm ond depth of respeethe ut,7,Zies. Additioner - 1 Pr ;/cry O er 146/8 ona AddressÂ· 51430'49Â¥ \ 3Â·11.1 -- ..M u ZE I 409>(;h~ -1 i - r ---.6. ~ 4Â£*rE'~,. Community D.velooment Drector A.prol surveying work moy be required lo show ony such subsurface utiity locotions on this drawing. SGM will not be responsible for protection of subsurface utilities not marked on the ground at the the of this sur,ey. 6.97' -1 -- 4 -6-54&--,1-2-J- --60 ~ .... .41. 1 441*V, . ~:t.r;:r~ut,--~~~~~1~ /1/ 11/ 1/ ) 3 ,+ - Aspen, Stote of Colorado, on this 5123 day of L,Â»OUM~- 201* This plit has been approved by the_g~arnunity De*,prent Dector of the City of 9. Based solejy upon the Flood Insuronce Rotc Map (Community Panel No. 08097C0204 C, dated *ne 4,1987. prepared by the Federol / Emergency Management Agency, the subject property is designated cs being situated in Zone X ~Arecs deterrnmd to be outside 500-year ' - - I S Rood plain". 7,4 1 11 hi Community Deidopment Director 1 â‚¬ 8 0,82/6,4/ TV & E. 1- 1 City of Aspen, Colorodo 10. The mathemotical closure for the boundory dmensions aown hereon is less than 1:15.000. 11. The 20' Access Right-of-Woy previously that previously existed oiong the eostedy property line. as shown in Plot Book 1 3, Pages 83 & 84. E[wic@e[jaLD:g=lmlnt.-&,2- Deita.gqj*j~ ~ 1 ~I ~~~JAÂ£/ 0 1l530 *i R~~'8~08'~~~~8JIJ UTAMULT -~ .:Â·~ .~i' L35 UT MulT --'......464 *ge 28 5 .* L ~1*~BcÂ·~Nor' Is hereby removed per Ordinance No. 40 (Senes of 2014), Reception No. 616734. O Multi-purpose Gene*,ol Purpose '-, 4'~-f 1.1.74 re/*00 + T, i i.,â€¢ .r. . Â·. .0 ,-4.i: . N75097114 1. v~ /.6 - Ie Or ~.:ect 4 T. F. . /: d T : 69Â£~ figs 813 Â· Ul[ 1.'ll.JET - ~~~U-~- Utility Easement- Reception , 1 2 The property shown hereon Is subject to oil eosements. rights-of-wo,s, buldeg setbocks or other restrictions of record, cs such items may - ' affect this property. This survey does not represent c title se/ch by this surveyor to determme ownership or to discover elsements or other 1~1,4 - ~ /1 4 -L: 2 2 11111%=U requirements on this V d.yof .la,f.-2Â¥ 205 Ed. Noil & Shirle.y ,/ This pict wos re~ewed for 06 depiction of the Engineering Deportment ~rvey 1 Po.10'-.'*Post NO.1 0 7 *f' imm Computed usynef insurance commitments hed by Stewart Title Guaranty Compony. File No. 01330-34746. having on effective dote of December 11, 2013 and Ch Br~Noist-80.55' ~ (1'Vf~fA No J..Ab AU- . 1 . - 21 'UOL-- encumbrances of record Alt Information pertaining to ownership, easement ond other encumbronces of record has been token tom the title t./ 8%. J .2 Â· 11-lnrl in 11% in L~- ..k 1-Intl LA i i.132 .line, b.inA ,#0Â·:':Â·0 r.Â·, !h-'i .lot .. J File No 0133>33767 having on effective date of November 12, 2013. (Vocoted Alleyway) . f ) <7~20.39' Corn'. I :- I '(S 75'09'11Â·' r ' r~ :...4.1. ''1 W \ N14'50'4915 CAy of Aspen EigiU,3ng Deportment 1 1-0 '0 51 Prop Every attempt has been mode to show oll easements and rights-of-way referred to in the title commitments referenced above. Some such < 7~~Â» f-7 f~Westerly or ExtensÂ·on or E Une Lot 13 )--- Â·Â· Imn..21ifingk L.6117'02 E U- 1.00' Witness Comer items moy not be shown if they cre stidord title commitment exceptions, or if not suffidently described in recorded documents. or if they h /1 'Book 310, Poge 341) -4,0 are situoted on adjocent propert* etc J f /LS/4 Rebar & Cap - ~ ~R _ LS # 29030 i KIuar %26#80'I -do hereby certify that I hove 1.3 - N75'09'111Â¥ examined the title to oll lands herein dedicated ond shown upon this pd and Ihot title '3047.7' ..~ to such lands is in the dedicotor free und cleor of all liens. .â€¢-04 ond encumbr=ces, ARC DELTA CHORD wi| / DR:336*413.-80)24...7~ --7.50' CURVE# RADIUS ANGLE BEARING LENGTH U .~ ., 44 Â· Te. 'di 9~-' .. - 'it'' 1, Al 6 'I 'i, F.111. 16.6 11 i. : #8!j:trF>tR;,11~*fl :il':4:4- fii Fd. Rebor & except gs follows: LENGTH / .*I d# 4.4.40 44â€¢.02, q.*â€¢aÂ·1 426,23 ...A- Tâ€¢.Uâ€¢,Ull 6rm'h,WI 42 4 Cop, LS 168 M,An.-r *E-De. 4 Uck W. u...3 .<"â€žct,u #ar,/6'4 2/,":/2 4 4 *E-,Dit> 4 /.c, 4,0 51,>.;,- 00,98 Coâ€¢â€¢r,4.Â»r,â€¢f ........ Cl 13 68' 53.69' 14'35'38" N04Â·52'48'E 13.64' 'W k.&:AM'#/ 1 ,B :-' #'I .- M)*igi#*A~pirpT 57//6,1/WT, A, uw/,4/ 0 //2/. A-Â· /F-/TF /. ///7//,IW aw, LU-/Aâ€¢&/ -e d.#442;:AR:41.11 .f# .fr - LINE TABLE - - LINE TABLE - -LINE TABLE - ~ .* 2 Dated this --Â«-doy 0(28,8/Mu__ A.D. m die,.5,144 i Â·'hbll,%-,j.I:, = R. 1/ 6.4-2 0 7.1- 1 1 0 LINE # BEARING DISTANCE LINE # BEARING DISTANCE LINE # BEARING DISTANCE :,41 .A*f~Z'=4'11 ~-0220-, - --~'--P'Â·'P ~ '1 7 1.- Ll N23Â·57'19"E 150.44' L16 S14-50'49 W 18.74' LM N14-50'49"E 20.39' L2 261Â·47'21-W 19.44' L17 N 39Â·51'50 E 106 78' L32 /75 09'11"W 162.44 4 1:4 1 1-Â·r- 1 Zi ' A''LL. Bi:~,Id/'g , ' + ,I' 2 ,/.' . -7 3~ ~ff-jEP?~~f{~-- ~ ~~~~ k36:11:y '4 "~ 'Al P 3 - :'i Â·Â·Â·-4- â€¢ . ~~'~- ...~'-. I."~ '~I'll~~~~'- 0 523Â·47-21-W 14.64' L18 /34-25'54-E 5128' L33 S75-09'11 E 65.43' This plit was jiled trecord in the office of the Clerk ond Recorder of Pitkin County, L4 S50Â·36'46"W 12.42' L19 N28'35'55 E 85 07' L34 N14'50'49 E 6.00' 9 W ..?3%.tA.....1.Â»224!2#9 55 N 03Â·24'34~W 8.80' L20 N 43'10 00 E 98.04' L35 S75Â·09'11 E 94.38' 5 1 %35 '', 4~4 - 1-",1,Â¢1414!1 .1- if ' Â·'-'*J.,1 i _ ~I, i. - 3 LIZ Reception No. 3 N13Â·01'45"E 13.93' L21 NOO-30'00 W 6.29' L36 N14'50'49"E 49.37' 44 411 13 1-4 Colorodo. ot ,*LE+ 0'clock _2Jn., the - day of '3-A n ka r-4.~' . .. , 7 co 2 -0 Â· - . G 3 61 03'n Pjal Book -tf3- on Page _-3-1-__ 5 - â€¢twÂ·f,â‚¬-6*,0.-1.~ I~>rA.*jut<.:-9 ;3 'Fog,4. 'fl O,0(n RECEPTION#: 626213. 01/08/201 6 at 1 1 0 Clerk and Recorder 1 53 .>!Â·.?Â· Â·:Â·45.4Â·.Â·Btkin,Count*.dg 0 Pitkin Count Vos Caudill, Pitkin County. CO &7 N16-21'15-E 15.94 L22 N82'00'ODE 19.58' L37 575'09'11 E 23.24' 02:17-41 PM, 1 OF 1. R $11.00 Janice K 4 19 ~ - - 1 Bep'Â£.4Â°'~~do Estlr 1 N6415'21"E (ye / d:A':it:'P.Free<a:-pp:6::Â·,SwÂ·'11â€¢,Â· al[mg[12ddig5Â£1:L LS 936Â·44'10-W 16.37' L23 S 43'10'00"W 80.13 L38 N 14+50 49"E 34.22' O 1 PLAT BK 113 PG 39 ~ i 211 528-35 55 W 85.99' L39 575-09'11"E 11.85' ~ t, / 4 08' 4%Â¢/ L40 N14-50 49 E 57.70' 1 f I. David A Cooper, being o registered Professiond Land Surveyor, licensed : the Stote 67 1*Â·Â«A&%4.itt)1,rr*:Â·Â·~Ed L41 /05-26'00"W 24.04 t.... ....u.-ci..'i.-- NÂ·tretÂ·~ Plot of Lot 1, Min County Center Subdivision, that the location of the outside 1 9 29/ ~ <(~~ ~~ti:Â·7.911=Â·.Â·n&*Â·2.' M ~Â· 13 k of Colorcdo. do hereby certify thot I have prepored this plat of the Second Amended r 4, 7 L42 N 8434'00-E 2141 1 1/ (Townsite of Aspen) (lovn~e af Asp# :49Â·- E-#Cop some ore bosed on field surveys ond thot the plotted site and the roods conform to 24~5 Ed /?ebar I boundary, roods and other features ore occurctely cnd correctly shown hereon, thct the N 78-25'47 E 63.00' L43 557Â·25'00 E 8.66 180.57 ' - -- those stoked on the ground c U 4 N 40'00'50"W 25.49 L29 534Â·25'57'W 48 82 $75*09'11'E 248.26' In witness whereof I hove set my hwa ond U\/d. /5 Rebir seol on this 21st doy of December, A.D. 2015. #9*gEgfra - L15 N0119'07 W 44.66' L30 N 75 09'11-W 60.7 Main Street Da A. Coopâ‚¬*i*29030-72 i GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ?g Cdo, RemEÂ»f{Â« 0 10 20 40 80 #J#:S~ c Notice: # Revision Date By Job No. 2013-337.005 Accoroing to Colorado Low. you must commeâ€žce â‚¬ any legol action based ulon any defect in this ( IN FEET) 6SGM Pitkin County Courthouse, 1 correcled bearing ond distance on 2 lines / n. end properly 12/21/15 doc Drawn Dy: doc sumey within three years ofter you f~rst discover 1 inch = 20 ft 2 E "ch defect in " event muy "y legol oction k bosed upon any de#ect in th. survey be 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 2nd Amended Plat Dole: 12/21/15 fl commenced more thon In yeofs Mom the d/e Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Jail, and Courthouse Plaza 3 G of the certification shown nereon. 4 Approved. . Of 1 970.945.1004 www.sgrn-inc.com 5 File: P}IC-*P|-E-Exhil 030'0071 1 *69999 ilflp ln I- ..1 .\A \'' /'. /,/, L\\ 1 / , \ 1/ , \17/21 1 poss 0 , f ) I. 'Dig'/ -A t-:Â· / / ' .~%1 , HE - N# ' .$ - 44-42 f r ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING / 1]43'~ -4 / gic==12~k-Â·SERVICEYARD ~ If - I 5Â»4* j:,1 f Nt{, 1 f //f; Jtz) - 455 RlO GRANDE PLACE - 1-Â» 9---- -44<it\~ 45 \~ 0-/- & , 1/7 01 1 1 ~~~~~'~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~ till / h \ C J Joill ./2- -- 44 1 - ---1, x# CONTROLLED i Â· i i *.\ . i / 74 . , ACCESS GATE 1 4 \ 603 EAST .111 STREET AS'El Co ORAD= m. h 4 - 1 -//1 , Consultant 3/2 4 Â«31] FIRE LANE 7898.0 7544%,4 -1 I~ /4:/fda 74 + 1 *1&-WwN - Â©U LL 7 '.41/jj / 7/ f / I. I \ ! 1//lw f 1 4 1 PITKIN COUNTY \D JAIL BUILDING 4 /--5 An i \1 \ , 1 4 --/ 4# i ~\4 -- -- r . //It \ , , /4 Issue: 1 1 / *)11 ./ 4 -19 4 1 / N. B,3 540 E. MAIN STREET j 1 ) M %1 / PARCEL NO. 2737-073-24-003 ~ --- OWNER: CITY OF ASPEN t,-14 1 ., 3 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 , 4 2~1--71 -444-9 4- - - 0.607 AC. +A .G J 'At I a /C) H 9 73 /9 +11 1 1,vy N\' 2.1 '11 ~-- 11, 1 . ...f~ Â· ~~I ,RIFF,/Ir,/11,Ill~4~~0ri:Ii)N .14~":Â· f - 1.--4-9 11 4 11 1 5 11 1,1 A.3, ./Â»45 N) 1)) I I I .~-44' |' ', 7 I 1 1 \01 --- \1 1 ,?: 9.11Â¥.1 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF \ r / 9 3 --~11 1:..11':- 11;fl lal & ADMINISTRATION i 4 - OF-f- ~ f/1 li -,f / i , i~ LT _ G +RAGE AREA 1 WELLVENT FACILITY / #=Â·T I L I / .1-2=9 1 --iÂ· If=177 Â·Â· Â· -1 - vab N.. 2 Â·F: i 1 1 1 4 4 /./1 Â»Â« . 1 r j Â· Â· Â·-Â·'1 Â«1- '' / 1 11' -41/4.621/1 46 6 ~==~ -41 ' :Â·~ Â· ~ ~ ~~~ 1 1 -lk .3 PITKIN COUNJY | COURTHOUSE BUILDING - '06.1, INI'Â·C., 01 IPH:D'IM PLA/A PROPOSEDAPD BUILDING 1/ 1 11 1 3/ ./ 5==ki : Â· 1.11,11.1.: 1,1 294 % :AL it ~ I -- - 7 -:EL-7*< C <5 4, ) , -~r 4 l VETERANS ~, ~ -- â€ž 1 1 1 /-1-01 1 1\1 MEENL I X. : 2.,g. : '2,~ 'it 47- 2 0 6 W 0 1Â£# Wil ~ ~ell .1>. .. /,// t~ 2 -9. \\ 1-1 1 11 1 \ . PROJECTNO a . Ly\ 21511.00 :1 :90 Itc a -- 1# -.. 1 r 1,4- 0--1 2<Tpo '-449 5 -~ J~f- ~.)~ : 11 SHEETTIILE d 1 4 ic C ..t.-c--1 f/ , h i li / 6 - Â· Â· I 2- 8 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN i \ m 11 ' \,~- EXISTING STATUE 7 6 9/ f KL &%*ED _ I- __I -b 1 -Gl*Fi)=4 L EXISTING IRON FENCE A v - | 1/16' = 1'-0 BIKE RACK SCALE - : 4-1 1 Av,itn,w )1 1,-~ 39 EXISTING SIDEWALK , < *.3/ Q) C --8 y-' , 3*,1 - 3 f-99- =,~363.-r"% if~,fr 1, ~ A001 W \ Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· N LP-gl -1 U-V 1 ...1/ -*I- m -. --1-.IÂ· 1, . â€¢'NTEr Â· . ... -2 n A 1 .. 1 - ..lilli . 411.10 PIG 1. .1 - Â·Â·Â·, .,fh .Â· _ RET.I. Al ....1/~Â· 01?Â¥ Al 04ER Â£ _% . -, . 1. -,Â£ ' C.'ISH .RETO =1 Ah .m . m 1 c '0 ; 21 tb .rÂ·Â·.3 Â¥_r [F 1[1 11-1 rr~11 11 t /11 L_~3 -- Itt lin -- - -1 1, -'-~ - -/37': f 1 r ..P-~ 17&1 54.- .. I - .----1"J-r.'~'23# L....4%9Â·-Â·44Â·:.9 ... 17. E-Â·2<....~~Â«Â·-Â·' c ' --. Â·r,-Â·. . 1 - Â·. F..2.1:-tk'.it r71 IM -1 1 11.1 F=- J.| g/All- LU m.1 E-- i-Nalli- 1.11/9. Â· ri.i Â· - . .0 ~.-7 ' -I./*.*.: g .' -' -. -**I;-I.i'. I. A....... 9...... 1. ... 1 ..--I 21 - . &' .. . 1 11 Â·-r-4 ir --1 31 F.:.gÂ·NÂ· '. I./:v: rih NORTH ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT SCALE 3/32' = 1 -0 i la TIT "-TI , 1 -- 1 1.1. .... ------11-1 lili.U.1:.:929.1. &-triÂ·' ""---,Â·~--.1;4.258** 0 0-7 .Pe Â· Â· t rn EAST ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT SCALE 3/32' 1Â·-0 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY pOSE MA N STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 A201B SCHEMATIC ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - CONTEXT 337=-rl ' 20'4 ./....AS*JCIA.1 (T}970/925 4755 .) 970/920 2950 ARCI~ECAmE AlÂ® Ft-~1 P C 1 kÂ£16 U 4:AM Itt I - -~- - 1 T.O. ELEVATOR OVERRUN 7 7956' - 2 -'It_-1 1 1 11 1' F ... 6 T.O. NEW PARAPET 7 7952 - 5 01, T.O. PARAPFT 1 7948' -111/2 t -11 ~ Z:: 1 - -1 -1[~ 1 1 T.O. STEEL 9 (E) ROOF ' 77945'-11 f~91319 -FF- -g :-3 . ..1.':. 1 ti 111,1,111 ~ r '( l illi-- IFFIL , i f 7937'-11Â· ,k T.0, IN) FIN Fl R H (N) IRD Ft OOR El-9-F- -3- --~ m L-- ir -- A T,O. FIN FLR @(N)3RDFL00R DFCK . ...an 7 7937 - 1 - i /2.1- 1 11 4 } 6 TO. FIN FIRe IE) 31[> FLOOR I MIR 1 1 .' 7 7935 -11 14 1 - -IFF 'Ahhi '/ i: - 4 ~t}iJ-|.71~R Â¥ 2!~p LEVEL- Ihi- 4;* tu~* - %1 Rp, 41|' Il|M 11 1 1 1 A T.O. FIN Fl R Â©MAIN LEVEL - - 7 7913'- 11 1 1 1 1 T.O.CONC Â© 10/FR I FIFI 4--1 -- 11 1 - 1 7 7903Â·- 11 ile zi i < 1 ~ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0 9 99-9-_7_ 9 9 fiff f LP13 9 3-Pzj)LP37 643 02) 68 v Y T 7956' -2 4____ 4- F- L_,1_1-4-Â«_i-Li ~Toplf TOROVERRUN T.O. NEW PARAPET 1 1 .1 7952'-5 14 1 4ilifillt-_adi 4 A T.O. PARAPET 1-jllt-+161,< - T 7948'- 111/2 T.O. STEEL @ (E) ROOF 7945' - 11' 1 Plf' 1 1 --- ' A T.0. IN) FIN FLE @ IN) 3RD FLOOR 411 - IR-41=k= -1: . - 1:, u r ,:,ii,i.,Â·-, T-,i,-,iâ€ž,i,Â£ II#{ Cl_Â·- ~i[ZIL 7 7937'-11 3 ILE-FL -1; -f -I Fl F li i- - 1--;i:,2-ii 6--' 4 *~NlF-1-R 0 (11) 3RD FLOOR DECK _ I 3 F 9- __-M// r~==-~m~~--M= --71-0 - 1 - \ Â¢ k&7W1. R e (E.1 3RD FLOOR 1 Il 12-~Â§10 I I ,-=Il 1 T.O. FIN Fl R 9 END LEVEL - jff_-1--ifft---ill- -1- 1-1=-1-1- - 1---, -1~~4---- _ 41828 HM F#I k~ 1*42 L. E Â·30- IZ-- 1.16_.4_64-_LÂ·,31 , r 144 - r 7925' - 11 N Emillm .Rlim :41-4-n-1- Il? 0,1_-t/*H__Il.7'11, I imu I.marrr"'Ii,"IMI=1- 1 . t==u=='Lenmi13I1-4 -,i.-_21_-11. â€¢ED- i n t. 1 1 L 67Â¤4-1 lil-~z#-'ESJ~ >7~141~1 INFI,j - -L-~- - -~ 1 /1 242,4 1 _ 1 T.O. PIN FLROMAIN IEVEL 7 7913*-11 ; 1 ,11 1 -i- T 1 ~.0.IONE@ LOWER LEVEL 1 7903'-11' A T.o. FI OOR @GARAGE 7 7898- 11 / 2 1 WEST ELEVATION SCAI F 1/8' = 1-0 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY ~OSS .i,PCHITECTURE PLANNING SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 605 EAST MA!. STREET ASPEN, COLORADO .1611 8ILLPCÂ£3~D~SCC~TES 1 0 A202C 18 = i '-0Â· @ Eli ~11!ECIUE-liA-~ 9% {T) 970 / 925 4755 [F) 970/920 2950 r -4 -6.. - /Â·609Â¥i**ms:3*.1 Â·â€¢4!Â·Â·6$'=4*.:,4.66.-Â·.=U. u- ... ~ - - 1441-1 1 I.li ~4==-444-gd 1 - 1 23 : -h 4 - 1 1~.*. I .93 21. h .. 121 09 - 3 291 h U. 11[1. CIEli gabll//~Il i Â· i Ellel li~2,10 .--,1-pi-%1 P n R 3 p i -El ..3 - 1 In=.1=LL- 01.5.1 d .1:Â·Â·â€žâ€ž1. 1&%1 . ErÂ·.~t .Â·r. i 1-dS~*1 - --- -n~zoix . 81 " " , ' ** -*: , 1111111= . 1 =299 1 71; ringy- m~ m 1 1*T*Â« 2Â·trj Â«ji Â·Â·Â· Â· 5 9 -----1 - - .4'~~1Â·1101Â·Â·~...mMâ€¢~10.........IN...%1 11 fk. -. --, --' --- -i -. --. - 9 . -: . - , "" /Th NORTH ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT SCALE 3/32 -1'-0' 49\ 131-"...... UT.'ILL -1.1 -1-1 -b== 117 t :'Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·,....1...Â·,~...i....'.....r~.~IF r'31 __ I-- ' '-' ./ g n Clq. 1<.440....11.-11. .!.11 1~. 111,41%@t..Ii 11.-1:~... ''r//37 - ~~lrl [-1 1 E T: -4 th -:... â€ž5 d r~ T ,, .,. 1 Â· t. 62Â£1- ChÂ·: ;- _li.1. X". 1 1 11$*. Â·.- ... i . ~. Il '! 1 ~ .'' ..: .1 1 ' 11/' ..1 '911 .+Â·. â€¢, 7 I. ' .- Itb.,NS" . ~ 3,,- :I-:11.ti~-i,-,â€ž15-2.1-0--- 4. 1 f- 1 ' 17r N. 1 1 1 09 L 1 -1.11 MA'an/31%,12'724:14!Â·1751%1?'~:bLJ:~p:1Â¥1Â·.1$2?kj31; 11 -Â·Â·. 1- . .... .1 -- .. ... ... -- 1:;", . , i ............... I.- -,A--9-~.---==-V: 1.1 __ J.-- M 81?. 1 â€¢'Â·iÂ· li~Il. 45.1 .Â·*0- 4 210 4@ IN 611~i........ Â·Â·ii;-7121 17 -1.Â·'C-I K+..%-Â·3 L. Â·Â· Â·'Â·Â· ' ~'.44 0199 2.2.-7. 4 .CLI=i Â·Â· 1 11] fÂ·Â· 4 - 1-- 4 M =--=22 :'- 1-' '- - v.~ ~'~' "- -Ji f Â·J//9 1 .pm"* ( 2 ~ WEST ELEVATION WITH CONTEXT 159 SCALE 3/32 .1-0 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY PO.MT MAIN ' SCHEMATIC : ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - CONTEXT STREET ASPEN. CO"RADO 81611 01[LPOSSNEASSOCU- A202D 337 -1 0Â· 1 2014 .Al/'CnmE AMD"*. U (T)@70/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ...'3856 . i-/%#7# .//*/*"*I./.pv, =.1 11 9 90 <Dj~CJLBj) [AIX) TIÂ» L. - 2 -.Li- - -2~.-.- A To, Fl EVATOR OVERRUN . i i 1-1 {-1 .1 1 7 7956'- 2 - 1 JL 1 To. NEW PARAPET ' 7 7952'-5 Â«-122 1 32 - 01 T.O. CONC @ (N, ROOF 7 7949'- 11 f.~2 ~ - 1- 1 m 1 .11111 1. 1- J T.0.<M) FIN FLR @ (N) BRD FLOOR - ..1 -1 -F-1153*7 f 7937'- 11 4 T.0 FIN FE R@(F) 3RD FI DOR - =-7~ef-IF- 0~i~-i__~~E~I-t- ~~~~- =04--r. ~ 1 f 7935'- 11 i I.-I Â¢ TAI FIN FI R @ 2ND IFVFI 7925'- 11Â· Imle, r.....1 , J T,0, FLAT ROOF JAIL 7 7921Â·-2 5/32 LE lati L[1 1 ' I - - - A T.O. FIN FLR @MAIN LEVEL 1 7913'-11 J T.0 MAIN FLR JAIL - 7 7909'- 6 1 1 1 r ~ Toi FILOOR O GARAGE ----- 7898' - 11 / 1 1 NORTH ELEVATION ~ SCALE 1/8Â· = 1.-0 \537 e 8 V 9 ,-/ 7 f__ 9 9 99 (t 1 _ - - 7 7956' -2 01 T.01 El EVATO R OVERRUN A T.O. N FW PARAPET __f____- 77952-5 -241citi~it-4Â«----4-19-01011 4 T.O. CONC @ (14) ROOF ' 7949- 11 1 T.O. PARAPET 7 7948' -111/2 ~_. ~_7_mIL.._ -...*5127~,C 2-321~~ J~ZILL E~UU. E-13ZU===___ i i Â· Â· , 7 7945'-11 It - - 4 1 T.O. STFFI @ (F) ROOF I .1 ' ' i' ' -~ Â· 1 1 Â·=un-t-=- 1 TA (NI FIN FiR @ IN) 3RD FLOOR T 7937' - 11 1 ! 1 11 1 T:01 FIN FLR @ (N) 3RD FLOOR DECK 1 ' - 1 --- -= --=J ---- ---- --- -.------- - --- ----- _ AT.O. FINFIR@(F)3RDFL00R i i , r : : 7 7935'-11' . 06 T.0, FIN FLR @ 2ND LEVEL 7 7925'-11 1 1 1 , 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 IMI 111 11 1 i __ _ _ __L A T,o. FIN FIR @ MAIN LEVEL 77913'-11 1- f f I I I I El I I I I I I I I 1 T,o. BASEMENT @COURTHOUSE 1 7907 - 0 --- 6 --_ 4 -- -~__- ~-4--4-------4-- 0T.Q.Col~C- LOWER LEVEL T 7905 - 11 1 1 1 1 1 ~Ii' 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 - ( 2 ) EAST ELEVATION ~201/j~ SCALE 1/8Â· = 1-0 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY Poss MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81511 A201A SCHEMATIC ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - BUILDING T) 970 / 9.5 4755 .) 970/920 2950 18Â·-140Â· (i) 2014 ==%6': 00 00(9 99 96-0. tff~ 1 0 00 pus:i L ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING _ 1-u u an _ .i. -44,- - 1 -1- -4- -1--0 r =J I.---t----Il--.E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l0 1 11 A.H ColORADC 81611 1 1 , 1 11 11 1 4- - =Â» -_Lfu- -f- --- 114---4--4 - f - -2 Consultant - - - - - - ( - 3 t UP 11 i -*4*aL 1.I GARAGE 1 1 Issul 1 1 Ir--11 1 -1---- -L- 0 - E-- --4 --~0 44-4 --0----i-+ Â«-_f_-_v/7~ -4 -f- .1'Mr-EFB XIA B *~71-4-4- r----4-4-3-1-- -9 - --<3 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF i & ADMINISTRATION 1 SHERIFF FACILITY (PEN~ U 41 1 e : mi:] CLERK 3 4 1 1 4_f_ _ 11[1 - U PROJECT NO 21511.00 31 1 1 ---pil j SHEET TITLE BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1' =10-0 51'-67/8Â· 23 -- A101 [ PA I Gl 1 (PDIPE) PL PM L-id) d, C-) C-3 81 -W '/ r- .- " 0 2014 1, . .. P 1Â·/Â· 1 ' 1 '12 ... ./ . ./.". I 1 A.n - ClgE. Â£'All L~VI . . -WNIER~L-Â£n/A._,/.. NAU _â€¢ 99Â« Zi; li 9 99 9 9 961-0. 9999 9 ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING poss -rC----Â·-iT'-1-E--3: ---L-~0 ji .=41 1 2 al 4111* lilli (iÂ» -~ -ill 603 EAST VAI~ STREET AS'El COLORADC 816: 11 11 IF] 910/920 295C Consultant 9011(3 ~4~__ - -fLL 13 - --- - 1- f --- --f -Al - --1- - f - f - -7 - -4 - -(43 E i 44121Â»811 U ; ' Ue 0'04 j ~Â«39 MULTI-PURPOSE ~U Issul LDÂ» 3-- --1- -~- -_- - 1-t- - tgefir - tj~p-~-a-- -1- -f UP MEN \ 1-6-11-6 eli - __-4/83 LOBBY ~ ~BOCC MEETING ROOM ' 12~ ~f~f ~gu- 11_1 L~L ~--,_1~ -~bal L F F r t - 1=F=nE/..1.Wirill IXIA)(B)(cl r-V) C P4 p-Â·Â·~ - - -1 7- 1 A PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF - & ADMINISTRATION | | FACILITY (pl- *1 1 CLERK 1 SOUTH =--1--- 1 3 IT----4- ILLÂ» PROJECT NO - 1 --(Plo) 21511.00 U UP SHEETTITLE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 -- SCALE 1=10'-0 44 0 51' - 6 7/8 A102 (PA )(Gl) (PDIPE) PL PM , ....'CAr.Â·[ Ujuj dit) 0 20/4 Wâ€¢Â·'-'. â€¢% -4 â€¢' " â‚¬ 1Â¥09â€¢'Am J P. I : 'â€¢VED 1â€¢~,{CCOD.IMNTICTâ‚¬ :Pywâ€¢-1.1 Â· I.â€¢ . . All. i......ViNG PC 'EAS-7 -1 I Â·1111' 1/11~-~ .DID-n,rpm?RWETTI E.....1 - Â·. ill *gF /Al,DFIA!-CPS Et.K~AK)-.. .-AW.%':Gâ€¢ILLRE-~N AiLO~ I JAUTr4.1~Re{m... m.l ... T T Ff 3/17/201610 0448 / 99 96'-0 9 9 9 -9 f _t ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING O poss 11 H J 1 6 1 j \ 1 1 1 1 10 Il 1 1 1 1 - 1 ASSESSOR - ED3 EAST MAIN STREET A.E. ColoRAD. 81.1 IF; 9~0/920 29SC Consultant TREASURER- - -- - - 0- F_ 11 1 --__f---4--- f -4- -47211-4 BTs/GIS ' 5 5 . 2 *__6 â€ž 1 11 00 0101Â£=1- - 1 ~ | GIS MAP ROOM ~ ~*fi I Issue 1- - F F ----1--1[-- 4*4" 7 'tor -- 1-- --0 . ' 1 1 111 0 n 0 0 EL - 1 UP < 8~ - -- - TOPEN SPACE- - - IL===i-,-- ---Â»-2-~ -- 1 . & TRAILS I 7 -,- --,---~ -1- U U I -2- ' 1 ,&147)Ir~ 17 Ir-1 : 0 41+ Li F 1--/ -LE----11Â»3 -P3 3 /-1 E )( Fl 1 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION 1 FACILITY (PE h- - COMMUNITY I DEVELOPMENT k 3* L- 1%21 M U PROJECTIO - - PB) 21511.00 -4114 _ 4# _ 1219' 1- StiEET TITLE 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 41111 1 7 1- SCALE 1 1 -11 1 1=10-0 P12 Â· -' P12) + , 11 I A103 51' - 6 7/8' d, cu(E) eD,kpE O 68 CD 2014 AR-1[TE- UREPA -/2 81/P' Ala IllE2 1/A- ..1,- 21 17, r. ' -CC~-I Â· 1~~-I THE Â·v,14 PC # 4 -1, V, -111'.G .1 1-P - 4 â€¢I.W. L. n I I.- Al-I'-,JEK'iC'.A,Al,Co: .....MCCu .4-- .0,[En[DP.NI~'G;COLALLE-Al'i A /Jaul/Al,T+JITRIMIED.:.....k CPYRISHTTHERETCI Â«TT 3/1/20161004 49 AM 997 99 0 KOO puss CO H T ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 96' 0 191 1 1 1 1 1 - -L - -0 Il 11 1 L , 605 EAST ~AIP[ STREET AS'El COLORADS Bi611 11 Consultant ''' 7 1 . /1 1 111 111 WI -1--4- 4-4--12--0 - 1 41 1 1 1 32 1 STAFF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION . 42 1 W ~Ue 010 14- { 1 WOMEN Issue: 1/1/70 _6- - I -1 -0 VI[of - -7 --0 **i MEN | DN ~ COUNTY ATTORNEY . 0 |'| 0 010- - I -<8~ 1 CONFERENCE | | | 1 1 1 --. 1%, %-Atw_iii-21=LÂ»---95-~DI ' iGIl I TÂ«rt_ -r_ -LÂ»-7 - --7 pz ) = 1 %y 1 Pa r-- CONFERENCE A )(BBC ) E F 4197 -~ P53 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY HR O 66 }_-_ --- - P6 1 NORTH r-Lj' --- ?7 SOUTH FINANCE - 1 ~ -- =-Â·-2,L=~k -- - pio 2151100 11 if P8 PRDJECTNO ~---9 3 DN ~~~ ~~L~ SHEET TITLE _11_LE A 3RD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1=10'-0 - 9---IrÂ· -4-4 P/2 A104 L/) [ PA N Gl ) AD I PE 6LYPM 91..==Aâ€¢CRED]A'C C)/-) U) e) 0 2014 Ae.+C /,A,0 P.A.rÂ£ 1- â‚¬ ~Ce.Al~ W,2 ~JI~NTEr CWAND I T~Z DZJAM~1 C THE pey[....e. *C A~C~TEC %1~~IRE KP,-ING P.C MC;Ae 7 -4[ .c-Â·..1 I LCEÂ© MnÂ«T THE ~/OR'qiTTEN P[~COâ€¢ 7 81.. I.<I'll ./.ENIRE AAD PLA~~C I D El.~C-COD~'CAq.WI.vM. PE 2*46. 11 X-01 1.Ul JAAIT=i C IER REER.C g. 1Â£/I 7.=..' FTT An G 0900 poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I ---0 1 111 lit**E~ 11 11 AS.. CoLORA DC 81111 1 1 li I Consultant 1 Nj jj 1 1 1 1 1 -___--Linict 1-1 1 11 --0 1 1 1 0 CONDENS'E.j~91 UNIT _ -4 - 4-4-4---~- -CO go 1- ~Il I 1 ROOF HATCH i 11 0 L.\ 1 .._I ....liT 1 Iswe 1 Ililli il 1 1 OVERRUN 1 1 -1-_ 4---C=]~ 111 ff---t-- 41 +LInt 1 Ca--~ -3 --- --4- f- 1 01 ---Â« O A UNIT PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF & ADMINISTRATION FACILITY +I~-=4~ 00 _~_~_ Ien Fold-1 CONDENCI~_t UNIT 1 (rp83 -7 4--~------------------{Plo) PROJECTNO 21511,00 SHEETTITLE ROOF PLAN SCALE c/ +~- -4---- -~- --A - P 12 1Â· =10'-0 -0 Alll LE-12 . O qu BL...lATEJ O 2014 ..54-CTUREA,OF.% P J â‚¬ P,Â»AU, <10, rE]1- C*AME I -MIC DILMEÂ¥ C THE AJEr. 2~EUDZ~i-22*lt i<NU#t K.I. PC ... 7-4:1Â¥24.-B.1 ..CED'/ TkE...mr' PE-'ll:'llicl:*TES Al.ECTU. Al/A~ I : MuCJ A,â‚¬ CCÂ¢~TES ./171/U,I A,OU.. F C CHLL @r.. INU,n#........~EDÂ»1. % cy.my -im 7 9 999 3/17/20161015 38 m