HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.20160713ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
1
Chairperson, Willis Pember called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Commissioners in attendance were Nora Berko, Gretchen Greenwood, Jim
DeFrancia, Michael Brown and Bob Blaich. John Whipple was absent.
Jeffrey Halferty was seated at 5:00 p.m.
Staff present:
Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney
Amy Simon, Preservation Planner
Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director
Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
Suzannah Reid
MOTION: Jim moved to approve the minutes of June 8, 2016 as amended;
second by Bob. All in favor, motion carried.
MOTION: Willis moved to approve the minutes of June 22, 2016 as
amended; second by Jim. All in favor, motion carried.
Jim will recuse himself on the Holden Marolt item.
Holden Marolt Mining and Ranching Museum Planned Development –
Minor Amendment, Major Development – Consolidated Review, Public
Hearing
Debbie commented that the public notices are in order – Exhibit I
Amy said HPC determined that it would be appropriate to move three
structures that are currently at 540 E. Main out to the Holden Marolt site for
interpretative museum pieces. The structures are the Zupancis house which
is the Victorian era home which is partially a log cabin and partially a frame
structure. There is also a shed and a barn. HPC is asked to make findings
that their landing locations on that property are appropriate and the
techniques to get them there are appropriate. The restoration work should
also meet HPC’s standards.
Relocation: Amy said the applicant has provided detail information from
Shaw construction how they are continuing to investigate the best way to
move these buildings. The Victorian home does not have one continuous
floor level and that will be a challenge. The applicant will be doing some
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
2
investigative work inside and remove some door jams and look at the
framing. It is still up in the air whether it will be moved all in one piece or
multiple pieces. Certain features will be protected, doors, windows, porches,
roofing and the best plan will be ironed out. When the plan is finalized staff
and monitor will look at it. When the buildings land at Holden Marolt which
is an historic landmark we want to make sure that where they are placed they
don’t destroy something that is important out there in the process. The
applicant has done an archeological survey and it was determined that
nothing of the Victorian era would be disturbed. There is a ranching
irrigation pond nearby but nothing detrimental to the historic significance of
that property. The site plan shows where the three buildings will be set.
Staff has asked that the Victorian house be squared to the road that accesses
it which is normal on Victorian houses. We also ask that the shed be placed
to the rear of the house.
Amendment to the Planned Development: Amy said at one time the Holden
Marolt was planned for free market housing and instead we got the Marolt
affordable housing project and the Historical Society Museum which is a
much better community outcome. There were approvals in 1991 for the
museum site which indicated the various activities. We feel this is a minor
amendment to the plan to add these buildings to the functions at the Marolt
site.
Restoration: Amy said when the buildings get to the site we need to know
how they will be treated in terms of restoration efforts. Right now the
Zupancis house has vertical board and batten siding around a substantial part
of the structure which doesn’t appear to be original. The applicant will
restore the building back to the original state. The building will also be re-
roofed and go back to wood shingles as it was originally. Staff and monitor
will approve the lighting etc. There is also a letter of intent from the City to
the Historical Society in terms of financing. The City will pay for all of the
relocation costs and foundation preparation. The City will also pay $30,000
for a preservation consultant who is a specialist in historic interior finishes.
Jeffrey was seated at 5:00 p.m.
Applicant: Alan Richman, Planning Services; Richard Pryor, Police Chief,
Jeff Pendarvis and Jack Wheeler, Asset, Rob Taylor, Darla Calaway, Design
Workshop, Charles Cunniffe, Cunniffe architects, Rich Keller, Shaw
Construction, Lisa Hancock, Aspen Historical Society
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
3
Alan described the adopted PUD for the Marolt property. In 1981 this
property was proposed for a significant development, 100 unit project with
affordable housing and free market development. Since the 1940’s the
property was operated by the Marolt family as a ranch and as the Holden
Lixiviation work in the 1890’s. In 1983 a deal was struck and the property
came into public ownership. In 1989 the city took ownership and entered
into a long term lease with the Historical Society for the central portion of
the ranch which is 1.84 acre parcel. It covers where the barn is located but
also goes to the pedestrian trail and the area north of it. A few years later the
Historical Society submitted an application for the construction and
maintenance of the museum building, a PUD plan. 25 years ago there was a
thought that this would be a good location for additional exhibits to occur.
Staff has concerns about archeological sites at the location and we had a
Mountain States Historical and Archeological consultant visit the site and
analyze whether any such features were present. There is a foundation
where the barn is to be located and it was determined that it is a 1940’s era
agriculture barn that no longer exists. We feel comfortable that the location
is not part of the Lixiviation works. The other area is where a pond existed
for the Marolt ranch site. We feel comfortable there were no archeological
resources that were identified to be preserved.
Relocation Plan: Shaw construction, Rich Keller
Rich said he is leading the effort on the relocation and working with Amy
and her staff to make sure all the bases are covered. The structure was built
in three different pods and if they are moved in three different pods we need
to make sure they are intact. The initial idea is to remove doors and frames
after they have been initially documented by the preservation specialist. The
building has been shored on the interior to keep the roof structures from
collapsing. We will probably have to do some structural upgrades and we
will look to see whether that is done before or after the move. As we move
forward we will be able to determine the different layers that are on the
structure.
Charles said working with the specialist we will develop the final
preservation plan onsite. Bill Baily house movers will be involved in
moving the structures. With the relocation plan we will return it back to a
ranching environment and how ranchers lived in the 1890’s. Over time the
house has had additions and we desire to bring it back to what was original
in materials. The end result is to be authentic as possible.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
4
Lisa Hancock, Aspen Historical Society
Lisa said with the addition of these assets it will be like a campus that tells
the story of Aspen. This grouping will be a great interpretative opportunity
for us and for the community.
Alan said we are very excited about the opportunity to bring these structures
back to an environment where they will be at home.
Jeffrey said typically a diagonal bracing is done around the interior and
exterior and the shoring up of the windows. A bond is also needed.
Charles said it will all be done professionally by that standard. We will also
record the existing conditions as they are should anything crack or move.
Amy said Derek Skalko will on the site taking photographs of the interior of
the building for a documentary so that they can be used to show the before
and after the character of the house.
Gretchen asked what parts of the building are requiring new materials.
Charles said they are removing added materials that were done over time.
We will try to find what the original was.
Rich Keller said the vertical siding is not original. The original was a
horizontal clapboard. We believe what is on the existing front where the
porch is we believe is original.
Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing. There were no
public comments. The public hearing was closed.
Willis identified the issues: Relocation, restoration, PUD amendment
Willis said this is a great outcome and a great asset that synergize the Marolt
and Aspen Historical Societies function to reach the public with a great story
to tell.
Michael said he is prepared to support the resolution as proposed and it is
great that the City and Jack have been working with the Historical Society
and they reached a resolution to move the structures and restore them.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
5
Bob said this is a great project and I am totally in support and the resolution
as drafted by staff meets all the requirements as necessary.
Gretchen said she was initially in favor and there is a lot of erosion of
historic buildings in downtown Aspen and through the excellent presentation
and research and work with the Historical Society this will be a good asset at
the Marolt property.
Jeffrey said he has been paying attention to this project a lot and it is a
fantastic project. On the original proposal having the historic building
sandwiched between two other buildings made them not visible. My
concern is about the mobilization of the historic buildings to make sure they
are rigid and diagonally braced.
MOTION: Willis made the motion to approve resolution #20 as proposed;
second by Bob. Roll call vote: Jeffrey, yes; Gretchen, yes; Bob, yes; Nora,
yes; Michael, yes, Willis, yes. Motion carried 6-0.
540 E. Main Street, Planned Development, Detailed Review, Major
Development-Final Review, Final Commercial Design Review and
Growth Management Review for the development of Affordable
Housing, Public Hearing
Jim was seated.
Debbie said the affidavits of the public notice have been provided, Exhibit I
Jennifer said the property has been conceptually approved to demolish two
existing structures on the site and formally approved to relocate the three
historic resources to the Holden Marolt property. The property will be
redeveloped with a new police station with a subgrade garage and a new
building at the rear of the property that will contain 8 affordable housing
units. Part of the project is a relocated trail connection from Main Street to
Obermeyer Place. Tonight’s review focuses on the final details of the
project such as materials, landscaping and lighting. Some of the design
objective for the commercial core are to promote creative contemporary
design that respects the historic context; maintain the traditional scale of the
buildings in the area and reflect the variety of building heights seen
historically and accommodate outdoor public spaces where they respect the
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
6
historic context. With regard to materials the police station contains brick,
sandstone, wood and glass. The affordable housing is located behind the
police state is proposed to be brick, metal panel, wood and glass. Staff feels
these materials provide a contemporary composition. The police station
along Main Street promotes a contemporary design while maintaining a
traditional scale of building from the downtown. With regard to landscape
the site includes a public courtyard in front of the police station which is
intended for public gatherings. There is a walkway ramp to tie the Main
Street to Obermeyer Place as well as taking people through the site. The
front or Main Street property provides a lawn like setting. There are heavier
tree plantings toward the rear of the property indicating a more privatized
housing portion of the project. Overall the landscape is a mix of trees
shrubs, perennials and grasses. During the conceptual reviews the previous
conditions were to review the garage elevation along Rio Grande Place and
to work on the alley elevation to make sure it is softened as much as
possible. Some planting is provided around the short term parking for the
employee housing. Two designs are being proposed for the Hunter Street
trail connection. The ramping portion is the same in both proposals but
there are two options for a stair connection between the police station
property and Obermeyer Place. One of the stairs is located on the police
station property while the other one would be located both on the police
station property and Obermeyer Place. Those designs will be finalized at the
Building Permit stage.
Jennifer said with regard to the housing APCHA reviewed the application
and there are 8 units proposed onsite. They are all above grade. Each unit
provides a private deck or balcony and there are exterior storage units for
each unit. Overall staff feels the review criteria are met and recommends
approval of the project with either of the stair designs.
Alan Richman, Planning Services
Alan said we are here to review materials, lighting plan, landscaping plan
and the conditions of conceptual. There was a work session with city
council on July 5th and at that point council was supportive of the basic
design and having the project move forward into the construction process.
We are seeking HPC approval so that it can be implemented. The elevations
on the Rio Grande side of the property have been modified to reduce the
height which was recommended by council and HPC.
Richard Pryor, Police Chief
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
7
Richard thanked the public for coming to the meeting. We have had solid
community support. This is an essential public facility and it is about
improving our ability to provide professional and respectful police services
to the members of our community. This building will enable us to do that
more effectively. We would like to parallel the county building and have
completion in 2018.
Charles said the mass and fenestration of the building were previously
approved. Regarding the stair connection we have two options. One stair is
entirely on our property and the other one in hoping we have cooperation
with Obermeyer is to replace the one that exists now with something that
works better for the site. Regardless of that outcome we are prepared to
move forward. Regarding materials the building is sheathed in brick,
glazing, sandstone and wood. The police station and affordable housing are
compatible but not identical. The police station has brick and stone and
some wood siding and metal flashing details. There will also be wood
columns and the benches would be a concrete with a wood top. The
landscaping will create a real community gathering. The affordable housing
has the same materials but with different variations. The brick from the
police station would be mildly incorporated on the affordable housing units.
There are raised planting beds and there is a green roof over the parking
garage. The exposed garage level at the bottom was minimized with
additional landscaping and trees were added. We were asked to soften the
elevator and we did so by a detailed element of glass.
Charles said there was one change made which is a stair that comes down
from the second story meeting room. There was security concerns about
exiting through the police station in the event of an emergency. There is an
open brick wall that extends out from the stair which is more like a trellis
rather than a solid wall.
Darla Calaway, Design Workshop
There will be a flush mount light integrated into the wall completely
shielded to direct people to the employee housing area. One street light will
need to be reconfigured as part of the improvements. There will be can
down lights at the front of the police building on Main Street and at the rear
of the building. They will also be in the soffit of the walkway and at the
entry to the elevator below where the parking is. There will also be lighting
near the bench. The public courtyard will facilitate interaction between the
public and the police. We will also be doing right-of-way improvements on
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
8
Main Street. There is also an employee courtyard. The Hunter Street trail
connection will also be realigned. We will also have employee housing
internal circulation and some outdoor employee housing spaces. The site
materials include brick veneer for the sight walls and linear paves in the
front entry courtyard. Scored concrete sidewalks and retaining walls start to
make the transition into the design language of the Obermeyer development.
The landscape of the streetscape includes narrow cottonwoods and
ornamental grass. Some elements of steel are brought into the landscaping
including the thin perforated steel panel that wraps around the police station
outdoor courtyard.
Darla said there has been some question brought to us about what it feels
like from out site to the Obermeyer Crescent building. There is a site wall
and a fence that separates the Obermeyer sidewalk to an asphalt parking lot
that exists there today. To create a uniform grade across our site there is
about 5 feet of grade change that we need to accommodate. We will have to
raise the back of the site to create a level pad over the parking structure and
a level grade change between the police station and the employee housing
building. What that means is a raised landscape that would be less than the
height of the fence that exists there today. Two site plans are being
considered. One is a wider stair connection which makes a clear urban
design gesture to the lower north end of the Obermeyer Crescent
development. These improvements are on Obermeyer property and at this
time are not approved.
The second option includes a staircase directly to the ramp that exists today.
Carla said there were questions about the height of the retaining wall and the
garage doors as you exit the police station garage. We have made design
changes to mitigate the impact. The police garage doors have been
narrowed from 20 feet to 16 feet in width and that allowed for planting
pockets and trees at the highest point of the retaining walls. The treatment
of the retaining walls will be a finer gesture of the Obermeyer walls which
include scored concrete caps and vertical joints to break up the mass of the
vertical panels and a sand blasted texture to improve aesthetics so it won’t
feel like raw concrete. The railings and handrails are designed to be open
and transparent to create a visible connection.
Jeff Pendarvis said they are continually in negotiations with Obermeyer to
come to a resolution that is satisfactory to both entities.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
9
Willis said it looks like the police parking garage would create a lot of
conflicts with one vehicle going into a police bay while a sheriff’s car is
going in the opposite direction.
Charles said they worked with the sheriff’s office in coordinating both
buildings. In the event that the Rio Grande is blocked off then the sheriff’s
vehicle could egress through our garage out to the alley. It is an emergency
backup.
Michael asked the applicant to explore “quiet” garage door openers which
will be nicer for the employees living above.
Jeffrey also mentioned the tight turning radius in an emergency when you
have vehicles coming from two different departments.
Jack Wheeler pointed out that the garage area width is two lanes wide. It is
48 feet wide.
Charles pointed out that the turning radius is inside the garage.
Bob asked about maintenance of the space and will it be heated for snow
removal?
Jack Wheeler said we are working on a maintenance plan and the snow melt
will be addressed in that plan.
Michael asked if the applicant had easements to access the garage?
Jack said currently we have easements to access the road that is behind the
jail and we are working together with the county on just about everything.
Willis said in the rendering the windows are bricked in on the west façade of
the police station.
Charles said there is no glazing and we were asked at a previous meeting to
put punches into the building to break up the mass.
Willis pointed out that the signage is facing eastward and there should be
signage presenting to the west also.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
10
Jeff Pendarvis said the addition of the exterior stair is only for emergency
purposes. We were faced with someone pulling the fire alarm and gaining
access to the secure area and it wasn’t acceptable from a security standpoint.
Charles said the screen wall in front of the steps reduces the mass.
Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing.
Jerome Simecek, Obermeyer Place Condominium Association
We feel this is a good project and we have been working with everyone.
There are concerns and one of the big concerns is the stair. Residential and
commercial owners support the stairway into the property and we haven’t
committed until all the issues are addressed at one time. The stairway
connection was part of the overall Hunter Creek trail access design as
Obermeyer went through its approval. We believe this is a key component
to the Hunter Creek trail component as well as the adjoining properties.
Michael said it seems like there is a lot of benefit in 3A.2 for Obermeyer
Place.
Jerome said 3A.2 is the open stairway. That is the existing condition right
now. The ramp comes down from Main Street and exits onto the stairwell.
We concur that the stairway does add value. Now the trail has to stay high
above the garage door where currently its slopes down where the garage
door is. We would like to keep a similar condition as existing.
Charles said they worked in cooperation with Concept 600 to reconfigure the
ramp to avoid conflict with Obermeyer Place and to keep it entirely off their
property.
Jerome said another concern is the maintenance of the ramp. Another
concern is the garage use for the residential parking spaces which the full
burden for maintenance falls on the Obermeyer place association. This goes
back to a lease for a land swap and the association wants this resolved prior
to signing agreements on this component whether the city necessarily agrees
or not remains to be seen.
Bridget Bielinski, practice administrator for Aspen Medical Care located in
the Crescent building in Obermeyer place. We are supportive of the
majority of this project. Our prime concern is the stair. We function as the
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
11
only urgent care clinic in town. We see a large number of visitors every day.
Our location currently is very challenging to guide people in. 3A.2 is our
preference. 3A.1 will make what is already a difficult job to get people into
the office more difficult because the entrance will be more hidden than it
already is from Main Street.
Susan Welsch said the design is beautiful and it will probably enhance
Obermeyer place. I live at Obermeyer place. My only complaint living at
Obermeyer place is that there is absolutely no guest parking. Parking is
important in this town. Possibly guest parking could be incorporated in the
project.
Steve Seifert, board member of Obermeyer Place
We have been trying to initiate dialogue with the applicant. We are not
opposed to the police department proposal. Richard Pryor has been
absolutely great. The wrap around is a poor design. We were told that the
grand stair will not be approved until we agree to the terms and conditions.
There are other items that need addressed and are ignored. The access off
Rio Grande is not shown. That access is shared with Obermeyer and a
handful of parking spaces. It is also shared with the jail and county building.
That access will have a significant impact and needs addressed. Right now
the Hunter Creek trail connection doesn’t flow well when it comes out of
Obermeyer Place and between the Crescent building and the other building.
Once it hits Rio Grande it has to jog out toward the skate board park. I
really believe there needs to be better flow in this design. A lot of people
use the skateboard park and the recycle center. Traffic in that area does not
flow and it is a poor pedestrian interflow. There are a lot of issues
unresolved and council directed the applicant to work with the neighbor.
Steve said there are 5 parking spaces for Obermeyer and a handicapped
ramp that flows along that area as well and it is not illustrated.
Jim commented that the parking spaces and ramp are on Obermeyer property
and not part of this project.
Steve said that driveway does share with Obermeyer and there is no
discussion how that will impact Obermeyer so we can’t respond.
Jim said the parking and driveway is on your property so therefore there is
nothing they can do to impact you.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
12
Steve said the driveway is shared with the jail and county building. I see a
flat drop into the parking garages of the county and police department. That
area ramps up to the existing parking spaces.
Jim said there will probably be a grade change.
Steve asked how that will impact the existing parking spaces that currently
ramp up into the jail and county building and Obermeyer.
Chairperson, Willis Pember closed the public comment portion of the public
hearing.
Rebuttal
Jack said we have been in a process for the last two years that included
public open houses and outreach meetings. We presented to Obermeyer
specifically on a lot of these issues. We have been available and if they call
we respond. That broke down about four months ago. There are lease
negotiations between Obermeyer and the City of Aspen that have made it
tenuous at best. The City Attorney can deal with those issues. We have 12
parking spaces in Obermeyer that we have a current 30 year lease. There
will be no additional parking other than the two spaces for short term and
ADA use. We have not addressed the parking at Obermeyer because we are
not impacting that in any way. The civil engineers have devised a plan. The
5 spaces that they are referring to are not Obermeyer property, it is City of
Aspen lease holdings that are reciprocal to the parking in the garage that we
have with the agreement with Obermeyer. We are not touching the parking.
The stair is an existing stair that may need some modification. We are not
touching anything north of those two parking spaces. We are happy to build
the grand staircase and in order to do this we need a letter form the property
owner to build on their property. We have not been successful in getting
that. We went to the design team to get an alternative so that we could
submit a land use application that doesn’t require their approval. We have
ADA access and have worked with the Parks Dept. to make sure the biking
connection and pedestrian connection is maintained in a well manner. We
have submitted both site plans in this application for approval and we would
like HPC’s support.
Jeff Pendarvis said there are 20 spaces in Obermeyer and 8 parking spaces
will be allocated for the affordable housing. The lease goes for another 30
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
13
years. We have a commitment through the City Manager’s office that the
affordable housing parking will at the Obermeyer or Rio Grande parking
garage.
Willis identified the issues: Fenestration, materials, landscape, planned
development and GMQS.
Jim said this is a good project and makes good use of a difficult site. All the
needs have been addressed. It is attractive to the public and has good public
space. I would like to see the grand stair case but if the property owner in
question doesn’t agree we can do the alternative proposal. Signage is also
needed on Main Street. The material selections are compatible and I can
support the project. I would encourage the applicant to pursue 3A.2
regarding the stair but it is out of our control and theirs.
Gretchen said 3A.2 strengthens the relationship of the density of all the
buildings. To go through this amount of building and not create a strong
link among Obermeyer and the police department to Main Street would be
amiss. I’m a little disappointed in the material selection that is hiding the
stairs that are being required to put in. It just feels like an afterthought.
Maybe there could be another solution such as a sandstone material. This is
a great project and I am in favor of everything you are asking for.
Bob said the applicant has listened to our concerns from the previous
meeting and resolved most of those questions. 3A.2 is a better solution of
the two and hopefully that can be resolved. I have no issue with the
proposed screen.
Jeffrey said he feels the applicant has done a good job responding to staff’s
direction. It is a very important civic building. All of the conditions of
approval have been met. The landscape and lighting plans are thoughtfully
done. The affordable housing components are excellent. The Green
certification is nicely done and the material plate is good with the mixture of
sandstone, brick and metal. I do prefer the staircase 3A.2 and it would be a
good improvement getting to the doctor’s office at that location etc. The
applicant should continue working with the neighbor to work out the stair.
Nora thanked the public for coming to the meeting and adding onto the
conversation which was helpful. For the community and everybody 3A.2 is
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
14
a better solution. I would concur with Gretchen that the screening of the
staircase is a concern and it should be looked at.
Michael said overall I am supportive of the project and like the material
choices. I also have the same reservations concerning the stair. It looks like
an afterthought. There are a few things that should be developed more for a
building that is going to be there a long time. The west wall above the
garage doors could be addressed. The fake brick windows do not work. I
also support 3A.2 for the grand staircase.
Willis said he has no concern with the stair and likes the screen. The
signage is not well thought out and it is facing the wrong direction.
Incoming traffic needs addressed coming from Main and Mill. The signage
should be legible from both directions. The bricked in windows are a blind
window and I would suggest that you look at different materials to tone
down the contrast. The concept is workable and maybe the use of the same
materials would work. The elevator tower could also be addressed.
Regarding the driveway you currently drive up to get to the garage bays and
the jail and something seems off a little. Maybe a site survey that brings all
the contours into proper alignment.
Gretchen said the civil engineer should address that street elevation and
explain it to Obermeyer place. The material infilling the blind windows
should be looked at. Perhaps bringing in wood one story above the garage to
break it up and have a strong linear line.
Willis also said the elevator tower needs simplified.
MOTION: Jim moved to approve resolution #21, 2016 granting final
approval for 540 E. Main subject to the conditions and designation of a
monitor to address the issues raised by the commission,
Simplification of the north elevation flashing of the elevator tower and
restudy the material infilling the blind windows on the west façade.
Additional signage on Main Street. HPC recommends 3A.2 for the grand
stair case. Restudy the screened wall for materials.
Motion second by Jeffrey. Roll call vote: Michael, yes; Nora, yes; Willis,
yes; Jim, yes; Bob, yes; Gretchen, yes; Jeffrey, yes. Motion carried 7-0.
Jeffrey is the monitor.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
15
533 W. Hallam Street – Conceptual Major Development, Relocation and
Variations, Public Hearing
Michael recused himself.
Debbie said the public notice has been appropriately provided – Exhibit I
Suzannah Reid presented
Suzannah said conceptual is height, scale and massing. This is a small
historic house with a lot of rambling piece meal additions on the back. The
applicant is proposing to remove all of those and leaving a T shape of the
historic house plus a gable that extends off the back that is presumable part
of the original house. The removal of the additions will greatly improve the
distinction of the historic house. During demolition any evidence that shows
what was historic on the south side of the house that those areas be respected
during demolition. The relocation is moving the historic resource forward 7
feet on the lot. On that block there isn’t a specific development pattern so
moving the house forward doesn’t affect anything else that is happening on
the block historically and will improve the ability to separate the historic
house from the proposed new addition. They are including a one-story
connector that complies with the 10 foot requirement of the guidelines. The
variances requested are related to the rear yard on the alley. The garage is
allowed to be at the five foot setback but the basement under the garage and
the space above the garage would require a variance to occupy that space.
This encroachment reduces on the setback on the rear yard from what is
currently existing.
Suzannah said the new addition is separated from the historic house by a one
story linking element and there is a two story addition proposed with an
increase of 711 square feet including the historic house. The area of the
footprint is similar to what exists. The bulk of the addition is being moved
to the back of the site creating more open space between the addition and the
historic house that would be visible along the side, 5th Street. The main
concern with the addition is the overall height and the wall that faces the 5th
Street side. It appears to be an 8 foot plate height on the second floor and a
10.6 floor to floor on the main level. Overall the proposal complies with the
majority of the design guidelines. The concern is the height and the tall
vertical wall on the 5th Street side. They propose to reopen the porch on the
north east corner of the historic house which is totally appropriate. There is
a small garden shed that is currently on the side yard of the 5th Street side
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
16
and the applicant is proposing to move it to the east side. Staff is
recommend that it would be more appropriately located on the alley which
would require a setback variance.
Suzannah pointed out that the application is under the old guidelines and it is
on a corner lot.
Patrick Leeds, architect presented
Patrick said the minor cottage has two front porches. Our plan is to extract
the additions and move it to the north which will bring it into better view on
the street. We will take the pitched porch roofs off and restore them to flat
roofs which is visible in the historic photograph. We will relocate the
entrance that is currently on the west side to face Hallam. There is a lot of
vegetation and it is difficult to see the front of the house. The historic asset
will move forward with a one story linking element to link the two story
structure at the back. The bulk of the two story structure is to the south east.
Pulling the historic asset forward reveals it on the street. There are matching
proportions in the gable ends and the fenestration matches. Volumetrically it
is sympathetic to the Victorian cottage and others found in the West End.
Materials will differentiate the different volumes.
Gretchen is the lot is 60 x 100 and the historic house is 640 square feet.
Patrick said in the design the second floor plate height is 7’6” and the
ground floor is 10’6”. Patrick agreed that the shed is better on the alley.
The verticality is well under the height limit by two to three feet. The
connector has a 9 foot plate height and it tucks under the eave.
Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing.
Kristin Henry said she lives at 525 W. Hallam Street, the adjoining property
owner. This project greatly impacts my property. Visually the height has an
impact. The addition is much higher than my two story garage. In the staff
memorandum my concerns are the same as staff’s. The north south ridge
line is 4 feet higher than the existing ridge of the historic house. The east
façade is a concern as it creates a very tall vertical wall. The addition dwarfs
the historic structure. Maybe the scale and mass needs reduced to be more
compatible with the neighborhood. The addition is very imposing and will
impact my property. The out building is better on the alley. Kristin asked if
there were plans for the fence line between my property and this property.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
17
Kristin said she would support the project if a few changes could occur.
Kristin also mentioned that her house is a landmark.
Willis pointed out the fences and landscaping will be addressed at final.
Patrick said a one story addition is not the programmatic interest of the
client. The proposal fits pretty well on the site.
Jim said staff is recommending an overall height reduction which is
commensory with the neighbor’s comments.
Willis identified the issues: variance request; location of the shed.
Gretchen said she agrees with staff’s recommendation about the overall
height. The whole building needs restudied as it doesn’t meet guideline
10.8. The roof forms need restudied to bring the building height down
because it competes entirely with the historic resource. I do commend you
on the restoration of the Victorian and the link is very important. It is nice to
see that old building emerge in the plans. The height of the building with
the narrow forms overwhelms the historic structure. I also feel we should
not be giving variances when it is the new part of the building. This addition
doesn’t have any kind of hardship and we should be scrutinizing variances
that we give. I would not support the variance on the deck or the basement.
The shed should be moved to the back of the property or removed
altogether.
Nora said the staff memo was very thorough and helpful. You look at the
house coming down from Hallam to 5th Street. The addition is massive and I
understand it fits within what is allowed but I am not sure that is the best
solution for all the restoration work that is going into the house. The entire
block is “low”. The design needs to feel more compatible and it is totally
imposing as you move down Hallam Street toward the east. I concur with
staff’s recommendations and am glad the porches are coming back.
Jeffrey said this was an excellent presentation. The restoration effort on the
Victorian is extremely well thought out. The link is extremely effective.
The materials are a good selection. The shed seems like it just blocks the
area and the better location would be in the rear. Because of the landscape
the height doesn’t bother me that much. Maybe you could get six inches out
of the plate height on the lower level. There is a great separation and the
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2016
18
forms are small and thin. It is commendable that the applicant has asked for
any addition FAR bonuses. The decks are screened from the vegetation.
Moving it closer to the street will only help the historic resource. The
variance over the deck with the garage should be an accessible use. The
architecture is very well defined. Maybe on the west there could be a
material change. I could support this project with a couple minor tweaks.
Bob said he agrees with Jeffrey’s analysis of the project. Bob said when you
talk about scale immediately across the street to the west is a pretty big
house. We aren’t imposing anything in the neighborhood. I do not have that
big of a problem with the context.
Jim concurred with Bob’s statements.
Willis said he would prefer the outbuilding in the south west corner off the
alley. The dialogue is based on the width of the bays and volume. With the
decrease in height the relationship of the width to the historic structure
wouldn’t be lost. How much reduction is up to the applicant. With the
reduction in height you wouldn’t lose the handling of the volumes.
Jim said he feels the height should be pulled down a little.
Nora suggested stepping the height down.
Gretchen said there needs a tweak of the breakdown of scale.
Bob said he supports staff’s recommendation.
MOTION: Gretchen moved to continue 533 W. Hallam Street to August
24th based on staff’s recommendations one and two. Jim second the motion.
Willis added that the outbuilding should go to the south west corner.
Amended motion: Gretchen accepted the amendment, second by Jim.
Roll call vote: Jeffrey, no; Gretchen, yes; Jim, yes; Bob, yes; Nora, yes;
Willis, no. Motion carried 4-2.
MOTION: Jim moved to adjourn, second by Jeffrey. Adjourn 8:00
, Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy
Clerk