The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.360 Lake Ave.0096.2015.ASLU0096.2015.ASLU 360 LAKE AVE ESA AMENDMENT %/.lÂ· 2737 182 24 008 5 ga/' 01-4~ S ~~ M â‚¬ A J-exi- 01 77 9 2 11-.. \ THE CITY OF ASPEN NO 1 01 9-5 Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: October 29,2015 016 20 I g . AS LA Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 360 Lake Ave. -ESA amendment and reviewed it for completeness. ~iI.Xour Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items. m Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development , application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. The graphics need to be simplified. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Tbamk You, 4--433(/~ Jennifer *Delan, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only. Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Â»C Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes - No->,- Commercial E.P.F. Lodging PATH: G/DRIVE / MASTER FILES/PLANNING/ THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0096.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 182 24 008 PROJECT ADDRESS 360 LAKE AVE PLANNER SARAH NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTION ESA AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE KARA THOMPSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 05.21.2015 CLOSED BY KARLA HENRICHON 7.28.16 276%-121 3200 0 0096 Â· 201 5. ASLU 1#itt *b igl *3~ 2 Permits ~~~ ./. 1//7//IM.......4 iNC l, .P file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Iab Help 1 i @ 2 0(, e 4 Te 1 MEÂ®_128.~ i.> 'inflilumpl ~2Â¥0Moje~ i G e * 3 #1 0 0 0. 1 1 9 % a .; 9 4 i ..[AliA-~ Custom Fields Roging Status i Fee Summary IActions IRouting History I Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # 0096.2015.ASLU Address 360 LAKE AVE Apt/Suite , 0, 1. 1 T City ASPEN State Fco-:1 ZiI 81611 1 i;-1 - -4. â€¢ Permit Information - Â·Â· Â·Â·m,rÂ· Â·M:-F -7 Master permit P Routing queue aslu 1 5 Applied 11/11/2015 ' Â· -' 9 Project Status pendingl Approved Â¥ 4 1/ Description APPLICATION FOR ESAAMENDMENT Issued v Closed/Final Submitted STEEV WILSON 970 2794157 Clock 1*JIWIIFI Days ~-61 8[pires 11/06/2016 Â· Submitted via ~ Owner Last name WALTON - BELL 26. LLC First name S R WALTON 716 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 948-9905 Address Applicant Â® Owner is applicant? U Contrador is applicant? Last name WALTON - BELL 26. LLC First name S R WALTON 715 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 948-9905 Cust # 30219 Address Emai Lender Last name First name Phone ()- Address Enterthepermitapplicant'scustomernumber , |AspenGold5 (serverl| angelâ‚¬~ 1 of 1 Â·Â·2: a' '-m-. .y 2* "Ma..,â„¢2--1- clE- 2% log 7 '~*-Â°4- P 31619 40 2243Â£,Lis 4 1 3 00 o o r â€ž . 71 k Iltill I 5- tls *' 0Ylk,47 / "/*2**04:)j&1. ~ saloN >10!nol xoqlooll ~ sdnoiD cloll ... i.44*h...4*AL L_ ,- A.â€žA~%.* T ... m- -....-.'/-&...Im....-/....~ 6â€ž ~ .... I ...=.0.@Rei~~0**me Ijm ftsâ‚¬(Ob: â‚¬43(f:*~M// 2&w.'- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director RE: 360 Lake Avenue r- Hallam Lake Bluff Review Resolution No..,~Â»eries of 2015 MEETING DATE: December 15,2015 cause the residence to be in conformance with Hallam APPLICANT /OWNER: Bell 26, LLC, 360 Lake Ave, Aspen Lake Bluff review standards and will meet all zoning CO requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: REPRESENTATIVE: Staff finds the request to meet all required Hallam Lake Kara Thompson, Forum Phi Bluff review criteria, and recommends approval of this request. LOCATION: 360 Lake Avenue CURRENT ZONING: I.=21/../427..WL-~dizp/1/1/1./.#9... R-6 (Medium Density Residential) .........1/.imup rzy....millual"....iyw.Im SUMMARY: ~ --6 706*42;Mlki.~j.1/Ne//TaÂ£hgm The Applicant requests Hallam Bluff ~ Review approval to move the ~ proposed residence from the location approved by P&Z Resolution No. 12, Figure A: Aerial image of subject property. Series of 2013 to a new location 24' to the west. Moving the structure will REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals to remodel and expand the existing building: â€¢ Hallam Lake Bluff Review. Other Amendment - This is an Amendment to an Approved Development Order, per 26.435.100.B of the Land Use Code, for development within the bluff area. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority. LOCATION & BACKGROUND: The subject site is located in the R-6 zone district and backs up to the Hallam Lake Bluff. 1 The existing residence was constructed in early 1990, prior to HalIam Lake Bluff review being adopted into the Land Use Code (November, 1990). A A .4 ...2 v - 3.- ' + g large portion of the natural ,- ' ' slope was removed during L FLESPIE , . 4 "4 .."* Â£. 61. A construction to make room for , .4 A ~F.~MB , .,Age~&j i. 1 Â£... - )d..3 4/ *64.991 : the house, which sits within . the landscape. . 4. . fy -3. . . /9 - Â¢4 0 PEA. r .:. 1, F 4 J E I --% 1 . In 2013 the applicant received - Â·Â°Â· U .7.2 . approval via P&Z Resolution y liz j. F f 9i r fl'; +-~ ;/T No. 12, Series of 2013 to . .- ,-0 4 6: T 1 74.57 + 1 46, remodel the existing : 4. a 4 residence which involved *. - 4 n removing a portion of the structure from the rear of the Figure B: Location of 360 Lake Avenue. The star indicates the subject lot and placing it at the front property and the blue hatching shows the protected Hallam Bluff area. of the structure, further away from Hallam Lake Bluff. Although portions of the remodeled residence were still considered non-conforming in regards to placement and height, the new location on the lot was seen as a significant improvement for the preservation of the bluff. The approval further detailed an extensive work plan to stabilize, restore, and revegetate the bluff under the supervision of the City' s Engineering and Parks departments. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The current request involves shifting the proposed residence 24' to the west, as measured -2/0-------1----[F -------% \ from the 2013 approved * L-1--. . building location : | APPROVED <11 3 ~ (represented in the red in ! *Ln~ "L; 2%:A,61 TOP OF Â· j'~1 ~ Figure C, right). .-r BLUFF A --1 L 1 BLUFF 1 1 j ---1.1132 .\7_ ETROSPT~FG ~ The applicant is proposing - ["Pt- 03~ 1 Ff:-TH no changes to the . | LOT 1 36~ LAKE AVE approved top of slope or |ERDMAN ti t|~|~~|I |t| |||||~9~~|~I the restoration plan for the PA~TNERSHIP ~ 1 1- 1 |Ill 11 111 11' a , bluff. The applicant has r 2 U been working diligently 233,556 SQFT +/- r=-- 1 11 ~~APPRovED with the City' s 0 ZO*IE DISTRICT l 1 /1 -41 LOCATION OF HOUSE | R.6 r~ , ,i PER RESOLUTION 12 , I SERIESOF 2013 Engineering and Parks SITE departments since 2013 C~VERAGE: APPROVED LOCATION 13.1 % ~ ~ , '~i" SEEUES Of 2013 i/1./ ini 1-ZE) I krÂ· Lr' I OF RATIO PER RESOLUTION 12 and intends to continue ,t 1- _ ,,~4.- SETBACK LINE -r,--,--41- the plan as outlined in 44%4-- - -ar ---177-~-9,- =i~.t~ U,1533:* .. /, J Resolution 12, 2013 $Â·-/ ~~%7%< Â·fi- ~-119 -JE/ Â§/~0 00-FS'-< N A A *t K, (Exhibit B). Jr , , 870 ------ PROPERTY LINE --1- r.,L-----Â·-42 1~ Figure C: Position of structure on lot as approved in 2013 (in red) overlayed on the current proposed position of structure (in grey). 2 The applicant is proposing some minor structural changes to the residence that differ from that which was approved in 2013. These include changes to an at-grade patio at the rear of the property and to the roof forms, both as depicted in Figure D. \ 1 <8%4... The applicant has proposed an at- W ..Â» 6, EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF -~ grade patio and hot tub at the rear of -p~38 Ux-Â»\ C 221 71 22~12 4%.- i --- /7 \: At-grade development is permitted in 10,~-~ ~ r--- ~ E- 6 K- within this setback, so long as it does ~-4 r- r--Er .I~r â€ž r 11Â©0/ not encroach past the top of slope. 1 LoTi The hot tub is not within this setback ~ 360 [AKE AVE + and it meets the height limitation i EfDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT A imposed by the Hallam Lake Bluff 1 PPLIT ~ LOT ~IZE: 23,956 1 EbT +1- 11 review. i Figure D: ~ ZONE bISTRICT R-6 -eL _ a SITE FOVERAGE Top - structure from 2013 approval, 1 maintaining zoof f~r~ZLE , AUC| - - (1 111/ 11 13.4% structure situated w/in the progressive 1 E 4 - i. 32 1 -4- Nqi)4 gill ---91--4 7H, -orm-- -r-- ----N-_PROPE'ialtueÂ« Bottom - structure with newly proposed ~ faillimibl- CF-0 ./ / 1 11\ roof forms, fully outside of the -"'~-----~ progressive height limitation. PROPERTY LINE -1 As previously discussed the structure -trifit,> approved in 2013 did not fully z comply with the progressive height *~_2 ~.. * JT..77.-/---'--~ 4 9%4%%4 requirement for Hallam Lake Bluff el d t <P~Â¥7" f41241'1'""""""kÂ·.% ' I.<Sh//19*a83A 2 1 1 1.% 1 Al 62**~~~*Â¥:3aa (see Exhibit E following). That ,[--1 I approval reduced the structure's 1 -- | - & â€¢ i --75Â·7 ./ -- :' 4 \4:5MS#BaN%,(sm . nonconformity, but did not eliminate ~~ .0. ~ ~ ~ ~ = it fully. LOT 1 1 4616. 1 ~ :t/ _-1 / 2:r 1 2 1 LAKE AVE F_-1 9==3:t=t r 11111 -~Fi~UT.s:I PROPOSED ~ h,!illil ERDMAN Because the code allows for the ~ PAR~NERSHF LOT /1 :IN;Â·Af,1 HOT TUB ;*Ill SPLIT pEL Â·Â·ecii--:Â·:Â·i:i ., 1 W'~:~: ~L 819" maintenance of non-conformities but 1=1 LOT SIZE: 23,956 Uitiwix not their expansion, the applicant was s X ISQFT +I- _j T : .- Ii#47'74i <ZON, DISTRICT required to maintain the same roof | Srrll COVERAG~ , Fâ‚¬. ..4 1 1 1 7#h forms found on the existing i : 13.1% ~:~) e ; i i.c.--~ .Â·-Â·; . JL --2 residence. However, physical shift ~ 4- 1 - -C. I.-P 1 SETBACK LINE , 1 2%40 that is proposed in the current 1/ u - â€¢tte /,ao \ 4 43 i application moves the structure so ]=zz=---------M~Â·2123*kik-Â·cs*(MI#~1/42/9.06 that it falls fully inside of the 15' -Â· ------- PROPERTY LINE setback from the top of slope. This * 9, -a- - 1- -~~ ~I~34~ would cause the structure to become 3 compliant with the height criteria, and so the existing roof form is not required to be maintained. As a result the applicant has changed roof forms in a number of locations, while still meeting the height requirement for the zone district. Figure E: 2013 approved structure (in red) does not meet the ' , 145' EXTENSION 45Â· cA'ENSION ir,OM ROMAPP~~ tri APPROVED TOP OF \ | TOP OF BLUFF BLUFF BEÂ·fOIVJ progressive height limitation trfpm'~rrpre:t:m-n.A' ~ ~ 1 0 LOCATION OF criteria. The newly proposed 446:44@s616*f ~ HOUSE PER Â© ~ ,Â· RESOLUTION 12 SERIES OF 2013 1. e ' , 1. progressive height limitation. P-if~Â¢424 FF[F'FRIFFF[FF[Fl EFFFII' \ 1 1 1 Mn . .4. 917-rat?â€¢2 ~ ~1 1 - - \ \ G ARAGELEVEL,- 7 \ \ 4..ter.-rm.guam. / I 3-5~~.:MTIOJ~Y~S r-- -m.1--,--JQ-lail MA~NLEVEIA - ---r- --- ___._ ---=i~Â·Â· .1.- -~.~ _ -1 T.Â©. PLY 109-0 = 7865Â·-1140 1=%82 1-- RESTORED A 9 Tpaz - t-+PIPPROVED ADJUSTED SLOPE PER ENGNEERING. Ni-*OPE APPROVED UNDER BUL[Â»IG PERMIT# \\ f |ADJUSTED | 0065.20 WAASK ~'1 --4 SLOPE 1 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0 ~TAFF COMMENTS: The purpose of LIallam Lake Bluff Review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of Hallam Lake through a heighted review process for new development. Development within the Hallam Lake Bluff review area is subject to a more rigorous level of review to reduce noise and visual impacts on the nature preserve, protect against slope erosion and landslide, minimize impacts on surface runoff, maintain views to and from the nature preserve and ensure the aesthetic and historical integrity of Hallam Lake and the nature preserve. Staff is supportive of the proposal as it brings the development into compliance with the LIallam Lake Bluff review standards rather than just lessening the nonconformity, as was accomplished by the 2013 P&Z approval. Hallam Lake Bluff review requires all development within the 15' setback from top of slope to be at grade and that all development fit within the 45 degree angle that is measures from the top of slope. Staff finds all review standards are met with the application to relocate the residence on the site. The review criteria are addressed fully in Exhibit A. There will be no development, excavation or fill other than native vegetation planting outside of what was approved by Resolution 12, 2013 as a result of this application. The applicant has shown intent to meet the progressive height limitation that is measured as a 45 degree angle from the 15' setback from the top of slope. The only development that is beyond this setback is an on- grade patio, which is permitted by the code. All exterior lighting will be low, downeast, with no light directed toward the nature preserve or down the slope. The applicant has worked extensively with the City's Storm Water engineer to create a drainage plan for the site, and Parks has approved a detailed landscape plan. These plans have not been impacted by the current proposal to move the home on the site. 4 REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: The City Engineer and Parks department have reviewed the proposed application, and provided comments that are attached as Exhibit C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the current application to change the location of the home on the site, as depicted in the application (Exhibit D), maintaining generally the same form as was approved with the 2013 remodel. Proposed Motion (all motions are worded in the affirmative): "I move to approve Resolution #_, Series of 2015, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the project located at 360 Lake Avenue. Attachments: Exhibit A - Hallam Lake Bluff Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B - P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013 Exhibit C - Parks and Engineering Departments Referral Comments Exhibit D - Application 5 Exhibit A Review Criteria 26.435.060C. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Staff Response: The applicant is proposing no new development, excavation or fitl below the designated top of slope. P&Z Resolution 12, Series of 2013 is still a vested approval. For the 2013 approval the applicant had worked with the Engineering Dept. to establish the top of slope, and with Parks and Engineering on a reconstruction and drainage plan for the bluff. The applicant is proposing no changes to the area between the established top of slope and the bluff itself outside of what was approved by Resolution 12, Series of 2013. Staff jinds this criterion to be met. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen-foot setback shall not be approved unless the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the following conditions can be met: Staff Response: The applicant has proposed an at-grade patio which extends within the 15' setback from top of slope. There is no other development proposed for this area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. a) A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top-of-slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. Staff Response: There is no development other than the at-grade patio proposed for the area within the top of slope setback. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. b) Any intrusion into the top-of-slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. Staff Response: There is no intrusion into the top of slope setback, and all proposed development meets the progressive height limitation for the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top-of- slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. Staff Response: There is no intrusion into the top of slope setback, and all proposed development meets the progressive height limitation for the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1 d) Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Staff Response: A landscape improvement plan has been previously approved via Resolution 12, 2013 for the bluff area that includes revegetation. Parks will require an updated landscape plan to be submitted with the application for building permit. Adequate landscape screening has been proposed between this property and the adjoining properties. Stajf finds this criterion to be met. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and the method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. Staff Response: The development proposed outside ofthe 15' setback from the top of slope is at-grade patio. No portion of this development exceeds the progressive height restriction delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Staff Response: A landscape plan for this project has been approved by the Parks Dept. in relation to the 2013 approval. Parks has examined the current application and finds no changes to the approved plan. If any changes do occur the applicant will be required to show these as part of the application for building permit. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. Staff Response: The applicant has indicated all exterior lighting will be low, downcast, with no light directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. Staff will ensure the applicant submits a detailed lighting plan that is in compliance with Section 26.575.150 (Outdoor lighting) of the Land Use Code. Stafflinds this criterion to be met. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing any changes to the face of the slope outside what was approved via Resolution 12, Series of 2013. The on-site hot tub will not be drained down the slope. The applicant has worked with the City's storm water engineer to create an appropriate drainage plan for the site. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 2 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff Response: The applicant will submit all required supplemental plans reflecting the proposed changes associated with the current application upon time of building permit submission. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 3 'El\Oil B . RECEPTION#: 599796, 05/24/2013 at C>r 10:54:28 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 12, (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE Elli)MAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-24-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, Inc. requesting approval of Hallam Lake Bluff Review to remodel the existing residence; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-6); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2013, continued to May 21, 2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 1 of 4 7. 1 - *.i , 1 4 - ..4 Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions, as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2: Hallam Bluff Reconstruction A site plan detailing areas of impact on Hallam Bluff, specifically the location of excavation, depth of excavation, type of machinery, storage of materials, location of utility connections and other items shall be submitted with the building permit. Parks shall approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit approval process. Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. 'rhe detailed plan shall identify the location of erosion control measures. The project is subject to Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) standards. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that any trees remaining on site will not be impacted and to prevent unnecessary impacts to the Hallam Lake Bluff. The Parks and Engineering Department shall approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company that has experience in this specific line of work. The company of choice shall provide examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. Site Protection: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions o f the property along the Bluff. Section 3: Parks Department: Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval o f a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of the landscape plan and building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Noxious Weed: The contractor shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen shall perform monthly inspections of the area during construction. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Section 4: Engineering Slope Reconstruction: The slope reconstruction is subject to Engineering and Parks Departments approval. The location and degree of the slope shall be verified in the field. Significant changes to the slope shall require a substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Section 5: The proposed project is subject to a floor area amendment to the Erdman Partnership Lot Split by Aspen City Council, Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 21St day of May, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PI 1 AND ZONING CL _ _ N: Debbie Quinn, Asst. City Attorney LE9Â§pamer, Chhir Resolution No, 12, Series 2013 Page 3 of4 ATTEST: , -49-A\*Al j ,44{IA,ute ~ickie Lothianr[14puty City Clerk Exhibit A: approved site plan Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 4 of4 1 8 11 1 / 1 r-1 4'ED - :te .....GARA,*Rr J, â€¢,~M i FORUM PHI 1 '.7 Soâ€žLh .We St-I ti~/ 202 94 p-, Cole~410 ~181 1 P '7027.4,87 F S. /70 655. 360 LAKE f /Â» . 360 Lake Ave 26 Bell LLC , ' A.pan, CO 81611 2 \ /: A.&,1 61 I * 1 WILSON 1 I , , /L_/ , A .01,27 + j \321355/ 77 i\\J/i,~10Â» 1.-1 \\\ 2-Nib i_---34--, \ 1_~_ - Â·bf -1=--1 L.L_-- 14, ' ~suLTIms R<,-( C 'luttga / Â·Â· SURVEYOR 1 11 - \ 726C,i.-Lerylar- -,lan. CO .101,1 + \1 74 1- i i<' . - .- 4%. - -- ....... . 1 1 1 /,// \\\ I k /2,9/, 1./r= 1970) ....2 CIVIL 5 1.1 1. Al""Ing, 9%LE'%.Â£31try,~- 1 . /=.I :EOTECH , IP 9.1 90 1 -\C-1 1, 144.1 luf'-4494:&5<~M&421~~ STRUCTURAL / I I. ' CONâ„¢ACTOR 4.--'-*. -I~V~- --- I-'-.."/*-2.--f--*. - '~.9 4~./.I: 1 ".3 ..../4,"...4, ./ :=-0 11â€¢1* 01 01/UU'- r % .64Â¥ $ I *-I~ ' .~' . N â€¢I'l, N' --- ACIEGA,/ WARDGe,PE - - BLUFF REVIEW I. WIYry NOT FOR ...T -Â£-- I PRO.ECT NO .7 DRAWNeYÂ· ./W COPÂ¥/.GHT FORUM PtÂ« LLC SHEET TITLE B 1.2 FILL COVERAGE PROPOSED -E .1TH NEW COVERAGE FIU 1,0 j 1.0- Exhibit C Referral Comments 1) Engineering Dept. a. Civil Engineer comment: The changes seem to increase the distance from the top of slope for the most part; therefore, we are ok with the changes and have no comments. b. Storm Water Engineer comment: They will be replacing an existing drainage swale with a pipe and then re-establishing a large outfall from the pipe over the bluff. We are paying for a portion of the work and working with them to get an easement for the pipe and outfall. I believe they will be able to have a portion/all of their driveway within the easement, but no structures. There will be extensive work on the outfall, but we are coordinating on that design and construction management. 2) Parks Dept. Ben (City Forester) permitted removal of several trees on this lot back in August and September of 2014 but these permits have since expired (they are only good for 1 year). The applicant will need to submit a new tree removal permit with a landscape plan showing the trees that they want to now remove and a new landscape plan showing any plantings that they are proposing. As you are aware, the city forester has a list of allowed plants and shrubs that the applicant will need to plant in the 15 foot setback area. I have attached the list for your consideration. Plant List for Riparian Areas in Aspen, CO The following is a short list of plants that exist in the riparian and wetland areas in and around Aspen, CO. While it is not a complete list of all plants that exist in these areas, it is a good representation of the native plants that will do well. Herbaceous Plants Scientific Name Common Name Veronica americana American speedwell Senecio triangularis arrowleaf senecio Cardamine cordifolia bittercress Typha latifolia cattails Sidalcea candida checkermallow Oxypolis fendleri cowbane Heracleum maximum com mon cowpa rsnip Veratrum californicum false hellebore Mentha arvensis field mint Parnassia fimbriata Grass-of-Parnassus Angelica ampla Giant angelica Equisetum arvensis horsetail Geum macrophyllum large-leaved avens Caltha leptosepala marsh marigold Mimulus guttatus monkeyflower Aconitum columbianum monkshood Rudbeckia montana montane coneflower Mertensia ciliata mountain bluebells Limnorchis hyperborea northern green bog orchid Primula parryi Parry's primrose Gentianella amarella rose gentian Swertia perennis star gentian Hypericum formosum St. John's wort Erigeron elatior tall fleabane Nasturtium officinale watercress Cicuta maculata water hemlock Symphyotrichum lanceolatum white panicle aster Iris missouriensis wild iris Epilobium hornemannii willowherb Grasses and Grass-like Plants Scientific Name Common Name Juncus arcticus var. balticus baltic rush Carex utriculata beaked sedge Juncus confuses Colorado rush Juncus hallii Hall's rush Carex nebrascensis Nebraska sedge Carex microptera small-winged sedge Juncus ensifolius sword leaf rush Deshampsia cespitosa tufted hairgrass Agrostis gigantea redtop Agrostis stolonifera Creeping bentgrass Carex aquatilis water sedge Luzula parvifolia woodrush Carex lanuginosa wooly sedge Trees and Shrubs Scientific Name Common Name Populus tremuloides Aspen Picea pungens Colorado blue spruce Prunusvirginiana chokecherry Picea engelmannii Engelmann spruce Ribes spp. gooseberry or currant Crataegus erythropoda hawthorn Alnustenuifolia mountain alder Sorbus scopulina mountain ash Acer glabrum mountain maple Populus angustifolia narrowleaf cottonwood Cornus sericea red-osier dogwood Betula occidentalis river birch Potentilla fruiticosa shrubby cinquefoil Shepherdia argentea silver buffaloberry Lonicera involucrate twinberry honeysuckle Rosa woodsia wild rose Salix spp. willows Sources: -Culver, Denise R. and Lemly, Joanna M. (2013) Field Guide to Wetland Plants Identification, Ecology and Conservation. Ft. Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University -Huggins, Janis L. (2008). Snowmass Village Wild at Heart. Woody Creek, CO: People's Press E#liMD FORUM PHI 4'.i 9, , 715 W Main St, Ste 204 7 n n Aspen, CO 81611 U lo P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 360 LAKE AVE 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN CO 81611 A '-fet*AL. -1.4*4*.. - Â·aâ€¢,005-,t . ,>f~~f-Ve,;*,2:r,*2Â£ .,b.yAd,C.... I Â·,214. r.3--/4/ 10742:=*- , . *,1- ki: f 4,?1*t.*L,T.3,r7LrnanÂ©~4Â· ~ *~'~' ~'-al *12Â¥ .....'AU.,D.P.,j.')&' .6/,-O/ITIA-' 4,~2 -0 754,4 3. f , ..16. 4 '21-- W-- - 44 ! R 4 -fil- ts-22*?341 Â£6. 1115#4*taptii' 4-- :i L f ~ ~*e.:f:'7Â·â€ž.is:t3210ket...<..,. /0 J Â¥ 1 -- . F VAl. - CONTRACTOR 11': / poir / i . 8- . 1 # l---- . - .....4.. I Â·.al,/ I / TBD 2. Al. 9 4 1 fy, h / i 17 gAL_ -1 \ / 41 lili - *431342 79/634 -- i Â«i i ~ 11 h 7 + 141>~2~~ '-,0 ~5~'14~ 46.. : - kitil=W - - PE==r-1 I T+~~ - 1 3 Tf~f--f=2=: r r r- 7 9>2301 *1441 :r Ii. J (%(472 1 1 44 '470;374 4. 11 Â»41 - t.. Y. iD= ~ ' 14â€¢ .34 , 0--11 111 ; IL-U-U Jj==u=u IL--1 -- L j: â€¢ , 1 * #filid AL~1 S STRUCTURAL ...1 2 4 --- pry T 7 - Â·1*lull'TL . Â· 7 TBD ENE' Ul -1-0 1 0 /' '34 3 13 - 27--2--.45-12--- _1 Ll-__LZ Â·~-1. 2,---t '.- - - 4.041 .:2 ~41 I P. U --- y. E-2-4 m jill}jhl>t.Â»Â°14Â·J '\,2.-rd<... . 5 +1.41 l., -r-tr 5- -Â£0-. v-LE-.--- -Â·Â£- . ~ f. th 11 1 U. 1./.h . 11 -1. " ' tEl ; I *4 ESE=9,4/0,& ./ 4 1, I * . 11 u w ' /*:1:f'*4Â£-r:*~.- 1 .~eu~+ 4L .14 1 11-*341 el*-r-Â· - -: 10.:15- -. , 3 d' 1.1 9 /9 (Ent 1 2~.--a.- 121 4 Â· V" 4 1 11 '11 01 . 1 / -)g t. 1 1 , 444 2'v--,6~~.~Â»-i . 1 1 i ! Â·.,1 -:3â€¢45- - - ,- - - .,E=*.--2.Z--*~.2 ...=A-===-==-â€ž- 54 Eae, 1 !1 -----1 8 - 4 I g - 1- -- - -1 1 1~=â€ž---- i ~1 .1, . !~ lili T Â· ... ~. 0-A c 7 r -3.--'- V.,1. h .& 3 ZED . i : X-3 \.6,4,4. . "-1-14=<E= bÂ»=-=1 7 . - ---1 -6 1 - -V,- ' 10 1 --- 23-520 -- -2 DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 iN348313450 AliNI-th2Â©J 1.3684 30 Allo 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW Â§102 I I AON 1 PROJECT NO: 1511 DRAWN BY: KPT 03A!303U COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 360 LAKE AVE - 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN CO 81611 COVER lay/6.35 0 / 1 1 -- O \ \ 2 L./SSMH - 787' e LOT A + AMENDED MOORES LO I SPLI [ ~- 11 - \ \ 2,0 7*7- :, -- I m (CILAT BOOK 39 Â°AGE 87) f Es ?i~~0'Â·, AS< Â»Wob, 11,1 1 \ 1 20 :b ffc; .:, IE . I r -4 \ ~LS.*20151 N 86'311 E 0.10' FND -Rtc (BASS OF BEARINGS>S,4 *4"M. 1 942.8 END 5/8- REBAR W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 20 OW ADJACETLIiYEUMitlz_ LINE) IÂ» 1 2 /0/ : ZIL------1 10. LS #19598 (HELD -OLND POSITON) 1 ha %8 E_212NIKUN--862$100' -E-- ~ 1 ~RT#92 L 4:1 +77 + Â«\SPCM<114193. v %43 + 7824+6 \\ -s ~10_- AH ADJ-STOP _~ _~ a \ a N . N 459/-- \ # , '1 -\\\\\\\ \\\ \\ \ 2 26 1 0' / Â£... 78.51 2-12"SPR O. 10' FRCNT YARD SETBACK 10 00' ze- U) ' , ,> J . -re CET-9 ~~~~ ~ TOE 8 GILLESPIE[ AXE. .RFELD =OR BASIS CF BEARING ROL*RON) FID.5/85 REBAR K, YELLOW, PLAS~rIC CAP <31.---"'---~-~~~~--7~.lf 5&34 0 (PER 25 PLAT 42) 9 0 & \-- .:3 O FND 5/8" REBAR W~ VELLOW PLAS X CAP 0 7869.1 YED-79 - Â·eÂ·9871.0 Â®'.1 Â® 131> Â®Â« 7-SPR 10-SPR LS #9184 (FID. 0.1' NORTH OF LOT UNE) 2Â£.SPR ~\7 87.h t#: \ 40. \\\\\.\\\ -Â· 41 _L - _ Â·2"SPR 15' UnUTY EASEMENT & SIDE YARD SETBACK ~ 9 10"SPR 10 C-#56,6 -E--*- ,\\\\\.\\\ \ G , .0 41- A- -6 ~ ~~b'~ '~~~~e\033Â» N \â‚¬\\\\\\\\\\ 14 SPR 77869.1 M N t A ~5 5,~Â£~~~ PR 010 SPR + 7870.2 (PER 25 PLAT 42) O 8 SPR 184 0 6 --G L ---99-y\- ss -06Â«s_L_ ~ _ __ .. 4: . \ \24~ \\\ . . \ \\I\. \ --- \\\ 10'kt 34,20 ,-4-- . 0 4 / F 40 'Â°fÂ© t. 1\ \\ \ . \. NO \ .\ FR )23. 6 1, ACATED GILLFSPIE AVE. Â»hy +~7.4 ~-2~242) j ji ~ ~ -ss- S .2 E.1/4_CORNE <LaC,12-Il~ 082~ â‚¬41 (PER 170 DEEDS 495,171 DEEDS 387) a..0 4 -4 yf 73 EC==-=--~ 4- ' AREA OF OLD RIGHT OF WAY = 4532* SO.FT. 1 \ \ \ .9- GTH PM A # 4\\ lk/8,7 \ .2.- 2 \ 2462. .\\ I /40 I \ 176 \ 1840 1954 BRASS ~P(PER 35 PLATS ~ 25 -* j - IS Pl-,t-~S 42, SS . '\ I c Li ~ re 1810.1 '1 \ 40 *\ \ \ \%Â·44 1 kNE 1 31 2 \\, \A\Â© 18~SPR -1 \ ' r.+ ---7Â·~ f-G--m- L 4:2~;42 -4 V )24,? . .\0 \ I. \ FOUND 07Â·( MONUMENT 'GIS-Â®- le â‚¬20 0 NG -72337--2-50~- - - N Â® Tr NÂ·* >1\ 1%9 \\\9 14\ \\ N re * f - 1 - 3*T-C 04 2-STORY WOOD FRAMED A.D.U. - AT THE INTtRSECTION OF 7â„¢ & FRANC<S GARAGE AT FIRST LEVEL 62 7897.0 ELF.VA TION OKALUI DISC IONUMEN T - 7906 41' mr ; 2,74r-IE --crv-~ EF-18 18 e A CTV 6.0' kflf //- iÂ·-Â·i-~r-* r~~.JX)* \<90 0-%~11 ~1~~1~fÂ¥/j' ~ ~ )~ ll~ 1~\ 1,/ jj \\ \ I \ 0.%\.' , >t 4 7876.37 ,~ ;17~75.87 rIR rj f | l Â£ L=-ING 11-SPR | 29:CT.Â«...a DRiPLIN. PRICE TREES .2 -- -- - T Â· -4 -2- T -94 --- T 1Â»6----- + 2 / , \ \\ \\ \ \\\ ROOF PEAK ~ ~~ ~ ,~'~--\- VACATED GUESPIE AVE. 1 V L.-21 74.25' ~.spi'~01 A,/1 ;;* 1,94 5.~yii>i-0k- --f- f-r-----J.q.,~___pll-8!9!12!LE81.-LIME--_ j-_ 76/2 , (PER 0/0 DEEDS 495,171 DEEDS 387) 1 \AREA OF- OLD RIGHT OF WAY = 1899* SO.FT. -It- I ~ 27Â¤k v 34*44â€¢ -1/ 1 ~~~1 4 ~ ~ 1 ' 'r~Â¢'91 SET SF;IKE </ 1 4 40 ROOF EAVE' + 7870.5 40 (7876.7') | ||~ ROOFED BREEZEWAY ..~ â‚¬_ Ag_,/ 6 ~, / , ' A\:43. * ... i\\\,1,â€ž,\ i , C, r, 7872 4 + 7870.~ GRD 1 5 + *:52:3914*j\:* :.343 :\ .T..ifiZ I 4 /.* | ~ ~ TELE 1 1 -3 1 GRD \ | 4~ | DECK â‚¬2% 49,46. 43~ + 7871.2 1 GRD ''' L:Yl---*-- --4<~- 04:00 CONCRETE PAWNG -OUND OTY MONUMENÂ¥ -GPS#9(R)" ~ 04 , 2.1 1 AT -HE INTERSECION ~DC 6-7 & FRANCIS 1~ 1 91 2/ 1 2 \ 1 / 18\ .2 4--7*-43>aL=----19 ELEVATION OF DISC 4/NUMENT 4 7908.(9 6-SPR | \ 9â€¢ / \ m ~6 0 1 3 | | ERDMANErtf.mfie'f~Wt SPLIT --/---/T)/I â€¢ My 1865_ 73 1 0, - <1 ,/ 9 6 7859 9 y dF ~ 7.2' ' ~ \ 1 .1 111 i.th,\*\#Am ~ ~ 11 ~;5.36 â€žl ~~ EM ~ 0 * ~ 1)L 4871.0 . 2 / 947.92'1' 4.*p#*d :72 : \.1 ~ ,\ . 1, 1 L-6 4, \\\1 1 1 28 61 \ 4,9 \ \NO -j g //-3----- 20 1 1,(1 ,/ 41) ~ 1 th /.148 \ 2 5-TREE 63 11 - i 0 -- | | 1 0283 8-SPR f 7875.65 1 + 24.13 2 4 \ 4.0- 70 Â£Ep 1 1 lilli LOT i LOT 1 / 3"TREE CONCRETE PAVED AU"OCOURt W/SIONE TR / / 12~S~ 1 -/ \\ 1 \2 , ~ ~ ~ H 441\. 11Â·Z\' 16 4 2\\ (DECIDUOUS) Â®Â· 7851.8 1 09 1 ~<C~T, 7~\ ~ ~ \ 1 ~. , 3.2 \ 1 71 1 Col 0 1 1. / . \ STN 4 ~ /870 0 / / i _ _ -J- 2 + 7865,95 + 78721 4 ~/6 ' EL AREA = 8899 *50.~. ~ AREA = 23.95~ 12 FT. 1 1 J.1 , 1 FL ~ ROOF EAVE .-1 , 7863 FF 11 1 1 | * \\~ (7875.0" , 4.3 Me 11 I = 0.2043 i ACAES - 0.5496 CRES -' ~' T/'IN 7857. 4 4846 ti# '11: i /, 7858 9 + 7 9 /1 3. 1 11111 / 1 2 1 55 g STN / 1 -1 - t â€¢Pel '& 6 + *17412 I to-%99 r 'R â‚¬,1 2. 91 2.5'TREE Sl ONED CAPPED Â·~DE CONCRETE WIL ~ \ Â® 7865.5 1 r7367 Ne 6.6' 2-01 43 101> / . 1 9 7857. Al'Ii' 1 3/FAT 113 m.â‚¬3 't,2A \\1'jIC}~1%09,/~~]11911 1 1 93/1/7- \1 L 1 \0 7, 0 li I 7"ASP ~-1 - / , 56 O 1 + DECK ABOVE TN M / 4 : 41\ ~1 1 1;11 190 1 ) 1 \WN \ i -' 0417~U .\. 8 1809.58 17 I 0 7872.2Z - bL +47871.6 Z N r f iliip. ,; :,\ , â€ž9 ~ 4 5 7404 irr / I ),IMEr--*.9 1 Ill 4 7870 6 lerol 10-SPR 6 3 -B'51.8 ~DINC < - Â¢ 4,1 )111 1 DRAINAGE SWALE LAWN + 7871.8 GRD + 7871.1\ *HOT TUE '6~ ~Il ~01: ' 1 1 -X ' LAVIN + 7865.9 f /4 --p-~ 1 ~ 1 83 1Â¥#P~ . i~ & '1 1Â£ i t; |~ t 05.r5 *m I ~ ~44 11 IE \ f '871 6 1 LAW*i t g EL - hlum f \ 4% 1-l WL _ E N"Al .il- 74~do; 1011 h 12 ) 485, /1( \ \ 1+ 21.5 N L 15 0. 0 / ) 4 1 1 i 114 541' . V D.H 1 BTONE PAVF' i \\4?27.2 4,4 w I1IH)1~'Ull,t;,* ,2 Fle .1 ' m~ ~87~.2 1 ~ ~ 5> < 1 8 2.5"TREE ~ '4'# Jp ZLSE44,2 / f ' 1 1.4/ / e co 1 I la I Z : It 1 11111\ 1 \ \I' \ Â£ 1 1 1\ i 11 \ 54*6 -'la x\ V / / ROOFEAVE 44 0, U/ Â®, (7885.2 1 ~~ - - 2--STORY WOOD FRAWED SINGLE FAMILY . /- - M- 1 /7, 4/T,q 1 1 11~ ' 1 4.2 + 7873.7 CONCRETE PAVED /[Fâ‚¬ 7867.01 IDENCE (W/ WALKOUT BASEMENT) / TOP RES . / // .4 11/1,1, 1 \i . . C \38: 1 101\ ~ ~H ROOF E** W (DIMENSIONS TO OUTSIDE FACE SIDING) 0~~ 4/ < W />1 1 1 , 11 1 1 ~ ~, ~ 4 7872.1 ~ - â„¢ 1 \ IX i \ ,- FL /9 143 1/1 â‚¬* 2- 1~ 0 % 44/ ''1\11 t M C 8-SPR 1<i h ~7871.6 , , , 2.:TREE ~// (7874.St 0 7872.4 +4852.0 .>/CRITE PAVED AUTOCOURT ./STONE TRI' 8-Sol // ~ 5/// f , f'it , 1 1/ 4,1 1 k 1 1 - 1 4 EL /7871.0 \ 1:n . / k.1 r7 ' y. Â¥ 1ST LEVEL CANILEVER 1 4// x ;+7864.~7 6.6 * 0. r I OQ4 / ) em \ I Â°Â° ~" ~ ~m~-64'~%7 ~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5'/Mq~~~,,~6/LR~-8~ f.4- ~ LAWN . 7871.5 1 a/0Â» . 2 7874.04 Ck_ 3-TREE ~\~f DIe \ )4 //% I : SD-(DECID&131- t;%22.1-zzz-=21%-I~S~ ~li~666 :131 0 L.,\ 8-(FEÂ¢Â·2 -3:g.. co \Ef 2, / / MI)-~~-~i---r==--r=L_ ~ ~~432.\' 0 + 7871.9 1/$03- -/ + 7870.0 STEÂ¢81 ' 'Â® 7856.1| i\Â¢ I + 7844 ~ / ~Â·MoNK t) 791.9 ~ ~~0- WD -op 1 1 --1--I.-liW -'-74102-%%Â£Mi . 7,46. / .. . GRD 1 7874.55 < 'I~ NE.7 ~ l\Lff-~*1~b .0 n~F I / 4.'..i '01 - 241=07,;40.4 kir /y ; 7Â£ /// //,f> // / 4. (2 2 1 ' STONE LANg*G| 01- w -----0161-- 1- EP , STONE PAVED /- F- e ' ' , 1 :0 9 b, -18-*) 2 / 1 _ / ./.,4 11/1/ t 0.2 Z ,/ / 2,Q 4- U - 0.- 1 --U-= e-=-1 -- --â€ž ------- -â‚¬-- -- ----- - -1* 1 1 2 / 20~//1 ; 1 / 4, 6 4,724 i 16 e 1----*7.50 , -4.-tup-or _ .f. IN.1 1 -1 & 24 868 ' .OP 3*4 1 (~865.95 It ' â‚¬04 1 - .5 CONCRETE [~,ivâ‚¬EwAY 70' REAR YARCf SETBACK e 9 4861.4 1 11 1 . iNC 37 ' F: #'#.2 ' ' It,kilit'11.1 2. #/ f 20' WIDE ~CCESS & Will/Y EASEMENT (PER 25 PWAT 42) 5 uk / 51 1 J 4 7864.3 12Â· f . 0 1111 Â£ l \\ % 0 CON,7. DRIVEWAY (PER 25 PLAT 47) / 1 1 0 / 0 // /1 -EL- 1 1 / 1 // Q W - 11. . 40 a M'111111Â®st'll, - J.1.j'11~91//2/2 i/,0 ////,/F / O- - \Py --- c 1 - L.-- 'Ji ) -F~ 7 - ~ 4< /0. '/' "686 -2 <34# 1, $ / . I â‚¬56 1 ~g~~.61 ~~6 45 . 26%*21 \\ e 1 4/8- REBAF| w/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 1 FL ,/IS 1201 51 N 61 f09' W 0.32 FND-REC / %-~-'-1- di- ~ 9~3*LE~AIL~35.7 ~ \ 1 1 9 7834.2 +17877 0 I TOP / -3 6 A. 14 C I c. s. %21=F 41 / 170 - - 10.D! 9.6 . . . 78.5.5 1 , CA #9184 S 61-49' W 0.3- FND-REC 9 1/ + Â¥874.47 0 -IM 1 -1Â». 0 * 0 6- 09 70~0' ;4-,2 7~Ulnj~~it'#i*~13 FND.RECÂ·% WEST-* A--78/0-___ *19 9\* *'1 sri I ~26.16' 8,7 /1 _ 0.9-Â«L . ./.w, i. .D I M I 114-~Â§0 + g,01 ..+ 7889.8 48Â· '51 0 4 7 Tbp EB , 1 '52 ~ 1. - t' 1 \Ii , 1 : 1 10!d\/* 1 1 lili' 1 // O . SP .. Ittl' j I v j /-Â·-1 . 0 0 f 'v 1 -4- . / 'FS 4.4 4 5 wi 6 .V i 1 /2 / .41 2 \\' N e 9 12.2 -=-r-----1 1-.- 1 1 1,111 11 ' 02 2. . M , 11 -7 g----I;.~-6----~-X-L ---ill- l-J 1:/' IWII.1 1, 4.,1 ' ' 9 -----N ~7- $ , i ./ 12%~ 1 1 t i. ~ REBAR */ YELLOW PLASTIC d * )0742# i *-Af'~ ' S : /4 1,/ 1 !; â€ž, 1, 41 1 1.2// ---1 I liD-~64641/0â€¢81 --------- jte --*r I . I =Â«-9.1 i , , ~ 1($'/ 2.p ~jz ' TWT~6 ' 2 L +1/, f ' ! L_ - i , ' J'~ ,/4 4-14- )O/95 4 784 9 ; 15tMP --7ZVt' --ur-t~ /aood_ TOr 7869.0 TOP \ - --*--~ .!1 -- 0//71_0_ - | ~lÂ»002.?I(751 2-Â»=~% 69't- -3 1~10 1810Â£/ . J. REel. . -=rig*4-7870- + 78NgÂ·iI 7868.4- - - 5-1024% . A 05 , / - - -- 1--- 4.r).1-,ic 0 -Ilill-- -21- -------I- 0 e / , / : AR 1 Pu - U 71 / e I - -10 8 1 -7 ---2, lh Z=- =- 96 -91 107!NE + 9 2 1. -L",44 3 -4 4 16 3 8-SPR 10-SPR "* 4 A * 7,02Â·301J -q- 0 7871.4 ~~0 /24 9 - - 4-J - '*7871.0 *0 e '5U--@ 78167 -22-.4,â€ž---Top F[ Â·Â·- _ -"Â»42.L,/-25:(4&=tiLL.yioN / 1 / ', /1, / I O. I . I Q t. <49-7 44/6 1 1 1 , 1:1 I. F. . {6-8 All /6. .7- I. â€¢. *2 4~P %5 Â® t fA, C' 05 0-7872.5/ rr. . I ' . '7.mjg:. -3 -1 --r=L x + 78Â£*3 1 1- 7874.54 1 , 9% 1 ~Sft,T RA_ FENCE \'0 04. , 4'IWIDE DITC~ EASEMENT TOP '. 10. + lisp 4./ pt 74*7/ / EP - ALONG NORTH BNDRy OF LOT 5 5814(-c:~~ /:'ay-f;77191'frtf~~,ti' 1/i' D~BkE:,1.i'AE /+ 872.7 j , P - V , , '1111'/1\1 '4if,pÂ·,8,3.9 1 1 I I Â· / 1 5 + 7870.4 + =0.1 - - (PER DEED 8001< 257 PAGE 7211 ,~ ,* 3 I / 1 +-r,~62 .~kl~~u + 7871.1 + 7870,6 06*01 .PR 1 . 31.Meje e CA7872.7 GRD .OT 2 - HUME LOT SPLIT GRD 4/ + 7869.4 / , a.~pe 1-'-~--~ 4>5 /4//,////,//74 /,1 1,// 1 ,/f// 8 64 4'ASP - 17.2' - GRD ~9 'ft . . 03 1940 /1425 6 / ' ' ,'- 1 3 /baaids'pf 1 11 9 1*46*255 2224*~A&9 04 ; \ 2 & %& (PLAT BOOK 29 PAGE 55) ' ' ' lilli I -60-0 1 1/ bl~ES:- . ~ DRAINAGE~RRGATION i ITCH W!/ . 1 111 ./.. Iii j 14:.../ / aL,7442)\Lr 7â‚¬5"g ,/ ./ 1 /2 ./ 7, 9.3 1 / / i , It PIPE/' l ~ |Â· 7872 4 1-STORY ADJACENT CABIN 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING N 86 31'00" E BETWEEN FOUND MONUMEN-S ALONG THE NORTHERLY ' ~ ' i j f FE _ _re / 1# // //4 ' P / / , / 2 1 ,/ 2 / j 9 1 ' ~ ~ FL flu/RENT. .NDER ...UCTON) PAT)O BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 2 AS SAID BEARING IS SHOWN ON TIAT CERTAIN PLAT ENTITLED -ER{MAN PARTNERSHIP 1 1 / LOT SPUT REED IN 8001< 25 AT PAGE 42, PAIN COUNTY RECORDS WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS %2%>. / I. 4 --,1EtÂ¥ ///7 1 /1 5 / ' 1 a \\\ L 1 SHOWN PEREON. , 1. 1 /849.8 . -~ 7874.65 + 9874.79 - ~74.18 1 /7, , //// '510 19 )&...3:/...././4,2 09....//f,/ j CL Â· 2. NO -[TLE COMMITMENT WAS PROMDED OR USFD DLRiNG THE RESEARCH OF THIS SURVEY. AND ALL IEP . EASEWEATS OF RECORD MAY NOT BE SHOWN. .1~690 /~ /~ 1~ 2 ~>â€¢ai 4 ~6*g.pr' ~ ~ ~~~~~ iÂ£~*.0~~ ~~ ~* ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,:P It I PAIO I 3 BENCHMARK: THE TOP OF P='ANOOD OF THE VAIN FLOOR OF THE HOUSE SITLATE ON LOT 2 (AS SHOWN + 78640 1/// '090/ ii,/ 0 ' 1 HEREON) BE!NG AS INDICATED ON -HAT CERTAIN SITE PLAN EN TLED -ER[MAN IOUSE 201 WEST GLLESPIE ST ~ 0 DATED 3-3 -90. ELEVATi ON = 7860.00 (7865.91 FEET). SUB-RACT 5 7 Flou ELEVAn ONS SHOWN TO REACH IT. ORK 12 11 ELEVATION DATUM USED HEREON - aTY OF ASPEN NAVD '88 DATUM. 4874.70 | 1 / 4. NITURAL IALARDS AREAS ARE SHOWN HEREIN -HAT CONSTITUTE NATURAL HAZARD AREAS INCLUDING BUT SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: 1 Ep 1 1 54â‚¬. t,~ 13 46/S>,S~/\21 NOT LIMITED TO SNOW SLIDE, AVALANCHE, MUDSLIDE. AND ROCKSLIDE. 7-1 S SURVEYOR IS NOT QUAL REC TO MAKE 4 782 3. 0 , , 1/\ THESE DESIGNA-,e~S 1- THEY ARE NO- OF RECORD OR OBVIOUS. *THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES TO BELL 26. I LC AND TO IHE ell Y GRD I i . PROJECT 5 A-% ce E ~,Â·ni F *' AS SIOWN ON THAT CERTAIN FEMA FIRM PANEL 203 OF 325 108097(0203C EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 4. 1987. CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED. PREPARED BY T-IE JNDERSIGNED, A PROFESSIONAL Iii m Â¥ OK, Â©.Â° fDZED, ji Â·Â«:%*311*-93.Â»f' .~93. 317*/:.Ofi :'53:./:.. #:4 5.-/0 :.7,"::.,li.521*4$ 5. FLOOD ZON[ DESIGNATION. T.!E LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE OU-SIDE OF THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (ZONE X) OF ASPEN THAT THE MDROVEMENT & TOPOGRAOHIC SURVEY TO WHICH THIS lf' GRAPHIC SCAI,E LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY INSTRUMENT SURVEY , lilli U/ON THE GROUND: THE SURVEY AND THE INFORMATION, COURSES AND FIC , / 00; DISTANCES SHOWN THEREIN. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL SETBACK *Jial 1 Ap.3// i it " //5,~21 4# EDG-LK AND YARD LINES, ARE CORRECT: THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL BUiLDINGS, 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT SAID BUILDiNGS. STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS STRUCTURES AM) IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN, IF ANY- IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Lk'.5-*'--A._ 26., C n - FLOWLINE E7874.93 ~ ~ f 39 74.. - 1 inch = 10 fl ON SAID PREMISES ON THIS DATE, JUNE 06. 2014. EXCEPT UTIUTY OF LOTS 1 AND 2 LEGEND CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY IMTHN THE BOLNDARIES oF THE PARCEL. ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPUT 31 - DRAIN INLEr EXCEPT AS SHOWN, TIAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED CONC - CONCRETE /AVING PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENES ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS PLAT BOOK 25 PAGE 42, PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS ~ ROBERT C. HUTTON MARCH: 2013 4.-ri,Slgi-Â»7Â».k ~ 1=:PE %/b, ~< ~ EL - EDGE OF LAWN INDICATED. AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY (ASSESSOR PARCEL #2735-121 -32001) EP - EDGE 01' AIPHALLIC PAViNG EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS RrL ER - EDGE OF GRAVEL ROADWAY NOTED, THE AREAS SHOWN HERE ON ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY ABULTY. (360 LAKE AVENUE) THE ERROR OF BOUNDARY CLOSURE SHOWN HEREON S BETTER THAN 1/15,~% ....1 FH - FIRE HYDRANT czÂ·,~rer,hÂ·.194Â·Â« c *mp- GRI) - GROUND + 7875.39 /7 1. -TIE- - TELEPHONE & ELECTR]CAL LINE CITY OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO el 1 / ~b 33 -17'04 V A.pen Grove -C- - GAS UNE - SCALE: 1' = 10' DATE: DECEMBER, 2006 DATED (P~( 0 ~~~- BY ROBEU~.S#24312 /' ~-9~' 4;,~ h -W- - WATER LINE SEPTEMBER 2012 ASPEN eit,P, ~ Uâ‚¬+eÂ« 1RR .RyÂ¢!GA'liON (WATER VALVE OR CONTROL BOX) -SS- SANITARY SEWER IINE Â°6 Â£ O ASP - ASPEN TREE (DIAMETER IN INCHES AT DBH) AV ~~ VICINITY MAP 4-Â«7Â»4 1 ; 24312 ~ j O SPR SPRUCE TREE (DIAMETER IN NCHES AT DBH) JJNE, 2013 O 7/w - TOP OF WALL 60 j PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR FEBRJARY, 2014 0 / / Fle - FENCE . . W 725 CEMETERY LANE .UNE, 2014 N.T.S. , SID - STORM DRAJN (UNDERGROUND) MAY, 2014 - REVISION TO DECIDUOJS TREES WES- OF AUTO CCUR- CyÂ¥ Â· CABLE TFIEVE ON (UNDERGROUND) JUNE. 2014 - RE'~SION ADD UNDERGROUND LTIUTY LOCATE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 544-9952 SHEET 1 OF I 1876.69 Â£9Â£ e m RD SETBACK (PER 25 PLAT 42) 20' SIDE YA ~~~IF*~ 8 BiA *3 y + 7874.6 '872 5 lim. APPROVED TOP EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF LINE 7 â€¢ r OF BLUFF LINE FORUM uÂ·-Â·- - -f-'- -~10--.-.3*49~ PHI ----7- / ip l~'TEP-OFBLUTFIS~+ * 20'-0" f- - -1------ ~m?6'TF-r ~- SETBACK (30') ~ji N~ 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 0 P (970) 279-4157 1 1 1.-1 - 2 F: (866) 770-5585 1 73 $1 81*54 1 1.,> r*34194â‚¬2 , 1 -J= 360 LAKE AVE 360 LAKE AVEASPEN - LOT 2 LOT 1 CO 81611 1 - 36#E*RE -AVE- 360 LAKE AVE 04/ L -3---7 allf j>)20 ERDMAN ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOTt~ . 2 27 SETBACH, PARTNERSHIP C SPLIT , , LOT SPLIT _3 1 -I . 2P d VIE~ Ha[1 1 1 ~ LOT SIZE: 8,899 LOT SIZE: LAKE ~ SQFT +/- 23,956 SQFT +/- 1 1 ~ % /1--Â« 7Â»0 - AVE. 1 ZONE DISTRICT ~/ ZONE DISTRICT ~ i ~ i M SITE 1*111 1 COVERAGE: EXISTING FENCE 13.4% TO REMAIN LINE OF SETBACK -*, 1*1'~\Im~ ~, APPROVED TOP - NEW CITY / 0 /A ' -4145 OF BLUFF LINE , CONTRACTOR DRAINAG - ~ < 20' WIDEACCESS ~ rn ~ ~~~~ ~ TBD E PIPE LÂ» ==2 -=- - -&-UTILITY EASEMENT(PER L Z ZIj.=- ... --- -_--,---_ 8-103 ,-- , FINAL PLAT) i.555.-ZEETI8AIIII'II'---/-/-/--1-06-/ IL. -. -A-:11 PROPERTY LINE 3-75 STRUCTURAL PERMITTED SITE PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" TBD 1 ---I. f970-----3---- i- I--I -------. \ 1 --- ----1- s 1 1 ------ 121\ 1, i APPROVED , ---*---1 TOP OF ~d 1 1 - BLUFF 0 LOT 2 ---T L 1 n ~ 4 I-~~~4~~- TOP OF ~ 1 1 360 LAKE AVE ~ 1 1-1 L EXISTING \ \1: 1 ERDMAN - ' ' BLUFF 1 1 1 ~ 1 PARTNERSHIP 1 1 I LOT SPLIT I I LOT 1 ~ LOT SIZE: 8,899 ~ I SQFT +A | ~~' 36b LAKE AVE -t~- ~~,~1~ - -*,~= -~EN- .tA~I- DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 ~RDMAN - ' R-6 4OT SPLIT & ' Bl ~ 1 1 ZONE DISTRICT ~ I PApTNERSHIP 1-_.J 1 1~102-7 COT SIZE: 23,S56 SaFT +1- ~ ~ ~ AppRO\!ED 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW Â« ZOMIE DISTRICT Y ts ./ LOCATION OF HOUSE ~egy#aek'.Â¥g-8&*090W~ \ | R-6 71 PER RESOLUTION 12 PROJECT NO: 1511 SERIES OF 2013 SITE APPROVED LOCATION C~VERAGE: ?un / - 13.1 '#11 Irll IL:4rli ~ UK OF PATIO PER RESOLUTION 12 A SETBACK LINE 1 1 1 11 1 | 1 1 1 I 1 DRAWN BY: KPT 1~~Lr 1 1// A It . 6 0/ /O SERIES OF 2013 --71-rt-- --Fr 9 -â€ž 10'/9- 1-i - -Â·-â€¢ a-m3 - - -- Â· COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC . 1 -Tri'BT , I 30' SETBACK -0 ' 15' SETBACK _3 LO O/ 40 0 40 ././...Ilaa@*riw4ge**aN~~am~4&-*0~~~-40e** FROM T.O.B. Â«~ FROM T.O.B. O < (0. 40 l.0 7 I /2 21 (2 12 2 % 1 t. '~ 9 - . B-001 7870 ------ PROPERTY LINE - -21-2 3-.y- ----. . PROPOSED PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" SITE PLAN APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL [GARAGE] (HISTORIC) ~ EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF ~ ~ ~~ " _,34Â¢L - r-- 715 W Main St, Ste 204 r - 11 1 --- 45 Aspen, CO 81611 -- -- - --- - - F: (866) 770-5585 P: (970) 279-4157 1 1 --- ri-J i 1 1 360 LAKE AVE I LOTi * 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN LOT 2 f m CO 81611 360 EAKE AVE + ~ 360 LAKE AVE | E~DMAN - ERDMAN PART~|ERSHIP LOT ~ __ . i PARTNERSHIP LOT , -1-- -| #PUT ~ SPLIT LOT ~IZE: 23,956 1 | I ~4 1 -- 41 ~LOT SIZE: 8,899 SQFT | sbFT +/- 1 | ZONE IbISTRICT R-6 4 1 111 0.1- 41 LA | ZONE DISTRICT R-6 L --- --- 11 1 SITE POVERAGE 13.4% AV I 1 1 + 1 11 1 3 [.3 1 ---/ 6---- SE ACK- NEW CITY ~ CONTRACTOR DRAINAGE 1â‚¬t_IZZIZ----- ZM====== - - -- - ..... .-- -de&* -9- 4==C== - - TBD PIPE -- - 71[* "+"'- ----- -~ - -D- -D - -n---4*f - =t=== - 1...4 Ii--==93-=~Â»==Led-PagEE PERMITTED LANDSCAPE PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" - -- STRUCTURAL TBD PROPERTY LINE -4il-..4---3-Eni- .7111.-1 --i'd)-~-,1 787/ - T,/14 . __, ...~--r.I.~ .._ - -2 - ~11(..; - U-\19+11Â·Â·, p - 1 IIi -1 iN.__0,72 0 - - ' 11 z e , 6 2.0 9, 0 Â° _ I ..1 1 1 - t:>33#41&39- il-t --v~4*j-tpit Â· =-12 *,2ft' dF:~i .i~|_-~t # ~, *. 1 11 11111'1111 1,1 11111111:1 6>. </.14 t..5 121 % ./' -1% 11 |/~111" lili , 1.1 ,<, ,/71 B 1 1 1 '1 'AD / 4%â‚¬39/ \ LOT 2 Ii.~ii *I' ~ I O I ' 1,11 ' 1 41 1 11 360 LAKE AVE ~ 1~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~1 ~ L 1 ERDMAN I , â€¢ '.' ~'Â·' ~,Â·' ' ~'t' /1 . 1 1 SPLIT | LOT 1 1 111 DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 LOT SIZE: 8,899 3 LAKE AVE \E' 'R.~ ' ' .,Â·/ 46943--,. 1 I | |- PROPOSED & / te:c.-,ji>/ 1 SQFT H- I I ERDMAN HOT TUB 1< It~i'-,i.:Â·~( i 1 â‚¬ ./11\ 1 ZONE DISTRICT R-6 PAR~NERSHIP LOT , ' MU, ..i.' LANDSCAPELEGEND 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW SPLIT ~ 4 1 I~DI , ~ :jl APPROVED TOP OF , i,1 BLUFF 00 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~ ~ i~ ~~ i~ ~1~ PROJECT NO: 1511 /-)~ EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED ON~ DISTRICT -i 11 i~l I /f.'...0/2,/'.....'.1.. ./ I I I IT 1 (131~~RAG . .,1 1 ~ DRAWN BY: KPT . 00 PROPOSED TREES I i ~ ; 0 .~ ~ EXISTING 6' FENCE ~ SETBACK LINE i ! TO REMAIN ~ LAKE 1Â£ fT ~ CONIFER - SPRUCE, FIR ~ AVE .Ill - I.. I ..I - -- - lill- - - ------- â€ž-'ll-'- S OPE TO BE RE- i COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC I EGETATED PER ~ DECIDIOUS - ASPEN, COTTONWOOD - 1 -- b h tr) ,-0*0Â£ 0 0 440 0 ESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 NEW CITY ' 1 - _*~ A *E Â·s** 4 4 4 / . A l WALL MOUNTED SCONCE 8 ABOVE FINISH GRADE DRAINAGE PIPE . ----- r /,All, 13 B-002 - /1 1 - - - PROPERTY LINE - -~ 12-9 B I RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE | 4 -C.It-* * 7//-11,21 - /A 1% \ PROPOSED 1'-6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE == C I RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE PROPOSEDLANDSCAPEPLAN____________._.~.~~~~~ LANDSCAPE LOCATED WITHIN EGRESS WELLS IAN /47/ 3% m 4, I 720 9/ ~PROPOSED HISTORIC CONTOURS~ 1 (Ag m \ ;217Â·'t,62# Â·mi.Â·cÂ· j 6U1" 1 43- 1 '-65.4 \ 1 t 1 *68.251 6522; 1 / 0"1 g"*79 6Â£#3Â· . 1 -44 M.17 1 1 1%\ -6117 69./7 / 46 6294Â·~*7' Il 4 1 U. 69,/7- 0 -1 ' 1 Â· 0.36 KE. \ 67.94 4 I APPROVED Fe BLUFF k 6,9~Inj507 :am R 4/1,I Ii'in? ' EXISTING CONTOURS-, R 067/7. ///// GRADING 1 1 41 7 1 0 S \/ 49'. / 67.94.,/ 1 17./7Â· 1 -*-L Fux w** /4 4 k 4? :dio.:<6527. 1 43 agÂ· - -AuL- - 1 1, 1 '~ 6552Â·" 1 1 I_Ii it 1 1 .1.11 9 , 65.56 1 MÂ« Cul' 1 l 4.83. 11111/11111 1~ LU : PROPOSED CONTOgRS-_-~ 1 1& 2.95, ' m. . 15'20. //0/1 - 1 --- - ftÂ»t , ' 4 4, 0 3 LU -2.W -3.91 --------- ---~- - -i 1]710. Am.*1 - 4. -- - C 133 7070.. i 0 : JOB #. 2014-09 CHECKED By RBG NOTE: 1. THE RED CONTOURS ARE APPROVED BY PhZ TO REPRESENT THE NOT FOR PRE-DEVELOPED HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHY. CONSTRUCTION 2. THE BLACK PROPOSED CONTOURS FOR THE BLUFF CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT A 1:1 SLOPE. GRAPHIC SCALE 1 [N FEE T ] I inch = ID f t. P&Z TOPO EXHIBIT Cl C1 SNIB33NIDNEI >INO:1 DNINVOW BAÂ¥ EIMV-I 09â‚¬ Â£289-9281L~9998~~ejo~ot~-gu~6ds'~Z6) Nd P.O. Box 9554 U.91,9 00'NadSÂ¥ AG NMÂ¥MO NOildl80930 - NOISIA3U >ir GLOZ-60-01. ONIOVES Ah!Â¥NiIN[33Nd i 78'73 -INAN 1/ / LINE OF SETBACK ------ , LI F SETBACK @ @ NORTH ELEVATION ~ ! / .5 141 1 ELEVATION , RIDGE HEIGHT ' '27 -9 1/2"7 iÂ« 45Â° EXTENSION , /// FROM APPROVED ~ ~ TOP OF BLUFF \/ 1 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 -' P: (970) 279-4157 _ -- _ .~ R (866) 770-5585 UPPER LEVEL 360 LAKE AVE -- 11'-1 1~ 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN 111 CO 81611 , / 1 h 3'- 0" / 111 1111111'All~~--11 -I-'-I- -I-/- -'-I-I.-'-I- Ill ' MAIN LEVEL c. 4Â©P-OF Â·BLUFF- ~ -__- 2-1- - .- .-I-.-I-.-.- ~--~ - -0'Â·36;; 6-78657* 7865'-00' - 1 1.- 1 -1---- 1 1 1 11 1 11 0-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 // 2993 \\ /3 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 / In ''k,2 11 1 1 1 1 11---I .-Â·1-1-- .r - - - ~| - n~nri 1 _ 7 1 GYM LEVEL 6,71"~- 1 11 1 LOWER LEVEL 1CONTRACTOR .1.- - - 4 -13'7~ A TBD 1P PERMITTED NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" SETBACK LINE @ 1 & NORTH SETBACK LINE @ NORTH ELEVATION 1 / / 1 ELEVATION STRUCTURAL I / r--------------1 , 145Â° EXTENSION FROM I , 45Â°EXTENSION TBD APPROVED TOP OF FROM APPROVED ~ BLUFF BEYOND TOP OF BLUFF LEGEND , ---I- - --- -------- ---- GARAGE LEVEL -- .-.- - I -- 1 1 STONE VENEER TBD RIDGE HEIGHT- 3 1 fENEER TBO LOCATION OF ,' - ~ 32'-11 ae r I HOUSE PER | WINDOW TRIM TBD 1 2 1 1 r /-~ RESOLUTION 1 F |12 SERIES OF | / | SHINGLE ROOF TBD 1 1 / ~ |2013 - 0 \ 1/ 1// / //1 I / . / 2 2 _ -9**r.6... - Â· Â· DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 3 . .... 1. 1 - 1 UPPER LEVEL,1 4 4 Â»~911Â¥1Â¥1-- r~-- - ~ -=-=-- ~fiE ~I ~~-~ ~~ ----- - 1 L / 1 / T.O. PLY 111'-6~' ~11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW 1/ 1 / EEREEIE . Â·. ------ J~ //1/ 1 / , , \ --- EL-2 ~ PROJECT NO: 1511 ' GARAGE LEVEL- 1 1/ / -~ ~-I'-6. S26 102*'-30= 4 DRAWN BY: KPT â€¢ --========A -- - - -I - / 1 -.-./ 1 / 1 /1 1 MAIN LEVEL_ *TORif. BLUFFL -_----- - -Â· -Â· -Â· -Â· -Â· -Â· ---------------------------.--.--.--.--.--.--.--.-2.--.--.--.-..-..-..-..-.f~.PLY 1~-0'r&72-11W 7865'-0" 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC B-101 7- -- 1 1 1 1 ELEVATIONS 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" EH8B LINE OF | | LINE OF SETBACK SETBACK -/~ ~ @ EAST ELEVATION @ EAST EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHTTO REMAINi ELEVATION -~.------- .=11 27'-9 1/2" 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 I I : \ I' 360 LAKE AVE I - I 360 LAKE AVEASPEN CO 81611 - - - - ._.- - -lJEFR.[4\3*- 11111 1 11111111111 1 11111,1111 1 I .-, I-. 11 lili ~ 111~1111 1 11 1 GARAGE LEVEL E323377~ , ' | MAIN LEVEL 3'- 0"V .-.-.-.--- ' ~~ ~ ~~.772':* Â·Â· 1 0'- 0"=7865'-7~- I i 1. . 1 11 . 1 1 1 11 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 CONTRACTOR 1 - -- 1 1 1 2P PERMITTED EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" ~TBD SETBACK LINE @ 1 &- SETBACK LINE @ WEST ELEVATION ~ ~ WEST ELEVATION iSTRUCTURAL 1 | Â¢ TBD RIDGE HEIGHT 52:JifwIe 1 1 1 1 1 1' 4 [HI[EFFHEE 1 1 2 1 3 E IMME l E=*9 DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 4 2 ---- UPPER LEVELâ€ž WLÂ·gÂ·[[E~ .-.-Ill.-. .I.Il.-.-.-I-.-I-~I.~.-I-.-.-I-.-. .- - --- 1 t]=.0. PLY 111*'-61IU 1 , ' 1 \ 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW i, '' , - ''' \ , - 1%%'Eli ImmmIED immi 91 +9 1---- ~ PROJECT NO: 1511 CÂ· I '' , % GARAGE LEVEIa ' ' , , , / q T.O. SLAB 102'-3 1 , , i DRAWN BY: KPT 1 MAIN LEVEL LEGEND . ~.,1 ~%47. ..1 . . T.O.1PLY 100'-0" = 7865'-,119v 1 ... . COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC STONE VENEER TBD AREA OF ~ BLUFF TO BE ~ fER TBD RESTORED B-102 1 1 WINDOW TRIM TBD SHINGLE ROOF TBD - ELEVATIONS 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" E El %3 83 ~ LINE OF SETBACK \ LINE OF @ SOUTH ELEVATION 1 SETQACKL .4 Â·-Â·-.-.- | EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT ~ @ SOUTH \ TO REMAINA L-m 715 W Main St, Ste 204 27'-9 1/2" 0 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 \~ 45Â° EXTENSION F: (866) 770-5585 FROM APPROVED \Fll-= M " TOP OF BLUFF :\\ h.\ 360 LAKE AVE ---- 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN \ CO 81611 111,1~111 11:l:; 1 "il i' , il .... ~ i \.UPPER LEVEL 1 11 1 -- *- 1 11'-11/2"7 IIi .11 lilli \ 11 111 -1 ~ 1 I \ 1 1 GARAGELEVEL 1 \ '' I i h.. *_ -0 >< -- - 1 \ ~ Ii---- 'U IN LEVEL 0'- 0" - 7865'7~ lilli'.1 1 1 I lili 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 i .1 i i , CONTRACTOR TBD 3P PERMITTED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" SETBACK LINE @ - ,_ SETBACK LINE @ SOUTH ELEVATION ~ ~ SOUTH ELEVATION STRUCTURAL TBD 1 - I 1 1 1 1 RIDGE HEIGHT- 45'EXTENSION 45Â° EXTENSION FROM 32'-11 3~ Â«1221 FROM APPROVED APPROVED TOP OF TOP OF BLUFF BLUFF BEYOND | 0 *PROVE-1 1 1 - . 1 . 1 | LOCATION OF | 1 1 -11 --2 \~ HOUSE PER j 1 I | 12 SERIES OF | | 0 - RESOLUTION 1 -- \ /1 |2013 | \ \ \\1 1 1 - ~ ' 2 \ \L 3 r 1 r:.t- .. MrrtlrIT&Ilr~rf12:R\ 1 1 e DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 - 1 . 1 - 2 9 1 - \ 1 LEI/1[18 ----\ f -.11- -7 / 11 1 , I \ 11 111/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW , ~ NA ~ ~ , . . GARAGE LEVEL - -- '' N 1'Â·~'-T-O. SLABT02*'-30 2 PROJECT NO: 1511 1 \ , M DRAWN BY: KPT 1-DEI]1[~31 1 MAIN LEVEL.~ TOP OF BLUFF - - ---- T.O. PLY 100'-0" = 7865'-117v . 7865'-0. AREA OF Â· ~ , BLUFF TO BE LEGEND RESTORED P&Z COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC APPROVED SLOPE STONE VENEER TBD ADJUSTED SLOPE PER ENGINEERING; 1 - APPROVED UNDER BUILDING PERMIT# 1 , [ADJUSTED---J WOOD VENEER TBD 0065.2014.ARBK 1 ~SLOPE B-1 03 BEYOND ~ WINDOW TRIM TBD | ELEVATIONS SHINGLE ROOF TBD 31 __PROPOSED_SQUIHELEMAI-ION__~ Â®f FORUM PHI 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 360 LAKE AVE 360 LAKE AVEASPEN CO 81611 CONTRACTOR TBD 30' TOP OF BLUFF ' 6_ 15' TOP OF BLUFF ~- SETBACK LINE @ ,_ 15' TOP OF BLUFF ~- SETBACK LINE @ 6- SETBACK AT Bl SETBACK AT B2 SECTION 82 SECTION 1 SETBACK AT Bl SECTION Bl SECTION SECTION 1 1 1 1 1 | | | | STRUCTURAL 1 Ill TBD 1 RIDGE HEIGHT ~ | | ~ RIDGE HEIGHT- , _ _ 45Â° EXTENSION i 32'-11 3/4~ '- i 45Â° EXTENSION 32'-11 3/T~ ~- -â‚¬.1-Â· FROM APPROVED 1 1 \| TOP OF BLUFF | | 1\ 1. 1 1 1 | | APPROVED | | | | | LOCATION OF | | | | | 1 1 \ L 1 .4Â»-12 SERIES OF 1 LOCATION OF HOUSE PER | ~ ~\4 1 1 RESOLUTION --/ ~ APPROVED 1 0 1 .- 1 \ 2013 1 i | ~ ~C! /7 RESOLUTION ~ | HOUSE PER I M I ib ~ 12 SERIES OF ~ ~ 2013 1 1 1 / 1 1 .3 1 1 1.1 1 DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 1 UPPER LEVEL.. I m I UPPER LEVEL.,~ 1 I T.O. PLY 111'-0~v I IlL I T.O. PLY 111'-61v 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW 1 I k 1 \1 1 1 1 1\ 1 0*~ag~=*â€¢a5A&/.*e-#----- I k | I I PROJECT NO: 1511 1 |" 1 MAIN LEVEL , MAIN LEVEL . - .- - - - 11 DRAWN BY: KPT -U.= ---- f-9 9LY *100'-0" = 7865'--11~ -Â» - T-0. Pty *lm-077869-11~ AREA OF | ~'. TOP OF BLUFF BLUFF TO BE TOP OF BLUFF- .2-1 RESTORED 7865'-0' <> ril\ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 1\ 7865'-0'vv ADJUSTED SLOPE PER ENGINEERING, ADJUSTED SLOPE PER ENGINEERING; \ P&Z ----i----Il- APPROVED UNDER BUILDING PERMIT# :2--4.....~1~ P&Z APPROVED UNDER BUILDING PERMIT# -1 \ 4 APPROVED 0065.2014.ARBK APPROVED 0065.2014.ARBK - \ \ SLOPE 1 1 -Nx \ sLOPE B-104 1 1 SECTIONS B2 SECTION 3/32" = 1'-0" Bl SECTION 3/32" = 1'-0" --ljl.J FORUM PHI 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 360 LAKE AVE 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN CO 81611 45Â° EXTENSION FROM APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF 1/Â·.....Â·1& t.3Â¥I.*., CONTRACTOR TBD -r q -68 --V=52'r. L_1 -- 1 L!4 . -1 \ r 22> F ' STRUCTURAL 1- i "b 'â€¢ L' Â·~ 1 - .El EER EB TBD / t ' 14 \ 4*t .11*-1 p'MMMI- " I. / -' - 9181 1 '-' Â·Â· t'' / '. ...1 , -~ I.' 11 +~ +.m Â· ;i .'. 90â€¢ - ~ ...r - -'.4 . 1,1 -15//6 4, ///"*4 r/ES. r-- r.. 1 . % .V*%1 . - 4,61 --= -UL~ i - 9. DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 ' 0/1.- . I: 41" . .1 1 ...i. L rh - 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW FiR-*#ST-jillimifi~gli %.~&%2*:/ImE....:.WIâ€¢:.'mm~ $ X y *=twili"mr.F'... PROJECT NO: 1511 DRAWN BY: KPT ... 1 (14 . 1 - 141 . 111-'ll I'll:,4 di .i - @Air 11-1 T 1.- . -3/r- 1,1 1 , T COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC , B-105 3D VIEWS VIEW FROM EAST 45Â° EXTENSION FROM APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF FORUM PHI 715 W Main St, Ste 204 . Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 14'Â·. F:(866) 770-5585 1 133 fill 2.e? 0 %14Â»F 1 - .1 360 LAKE AVE t ~litm - - J:ti,ttailitim ff[ illi!034 'E . [13 4% CO 81611 T -*lil[IHIHN *FIX 111- : + 4" . .1-7-' , Al"fcâ€¢-r..t*+ 0. * .* ,"OT '., a.1 1'.1 ..9.'IUMEOUJ AL.61 N. - - 1 11 11 '"a~.13* ptÂ¢Â· r E ri,1141.11 *1 m T.O. BLUFF 1 5 ,-4 .,4.- 1.4 CONTRACTOR TBD VIEW FROM SOUTH - 2 STRUCTURAL TBD 45Â° EXTENSION FROM APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF t DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 1 . I . ,~-M. I 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW -N-- PROJECT NO: 1511 001 - dll 1 . n 1 - , INÂ«. DRAWN BY: KPT 2/. 1 /3 r . . COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 14 '11. ..~r /448*2%;!!:~f,~ :.~~ . Â¥d+4Â·,MINI.*,i rÂ·*/h';' Â· ... *1Â·. ". e,i '34 b '*Plig , -47,1 r ' i- . B-106 3D VIEWS VIEW FROM SOUTH - 1 4_ _ ENSION FROM APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF FORUM PHI 715 W Main St, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 1 '4'..e.PIAN... 4 360 LAKE AVE , .0 1, t.r//1 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN , CO 81611 %. 01 '00.4 I /6./. Â¢ V d 1,11 'h 'Ifto*12,5,4 - I , Aut,&4 !4 i J ' :Aw;*,iâ‚¬>2 2 [m Ilillu~~~ T.O. BLUFF ~ ~ '11-----m , 14494 -11'11 M .!1 1 1 1 11 1. *SÂ·Fttli/!1'*: - 4 CONTRACTOR TBD VIEW FROM NORTH - 2 STRUCTURAL TBD 45Â° EXTENSION FROM APPROVED TOP OF BLUFF DATE OF PUBLICATION 11/9/2015 ----le - . ./ 11/9/2015 BLUFF REVIEW ' ~~-9 th r/9"' 1- 4a*Pe*XRM~ai,*a*0M!M*%208S~*4*4%* PROJECT NO: 1511 DRAWN BY: KPT F...: ... - ~ . COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC B-107 3D VIEWS VIEW FROM NORTH - 1 F-DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO TO BE INSTALLED AFTER ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL SOIL IS INSTALLED, DRAINAGE NOT SHOWN. E.C.S. ESSENTIAL EROSION -DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO CONTROL SOIL TO BE INSTALLED AFTER -DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO 6" TO 1.5' DEEP ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL -EC.S. ESSENTIAL EROSION TO BE INSTALLED AFTER SOIL IS INSTALLED. / CONTROL SOIL. ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL - E.C.S. ESSENTIAL EROSION FINISHED GRADE DRAINAGE NOT SHOWN. 6" TO 1.5' DEEP SOIL IS INSTALLED. CONTROL SOIL. PATIO7 ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL SOIL LIFTS DRAINAGE NOT SHOWN. 6" TO 1.5' DEEP 7870- 7870- FINISHED GRADE 7870- TO BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BACK. SLOPE ESTABLISHED FROM ~ PATIO - PATIO FINISHED GRADE O CO STAIR STEPPED TERRACES L 4 EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF 7865 - EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF 7865 7865- EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE FIELD -- -- i DETERMINED. GRADE, REMOVE â€¢ 7860 - SOFT UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS. 7860- DETERMINED. GRADE, REMOVE 7860- ---- CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE FIELD MECHANICALLY COMPACT AFTER SOFT UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS. --- DETERMINED. GRADE, REMOVE CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE FIELD CREATING STAIR STEP TERRACES MECHANICALLY COMPACT AFTER SOFT UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS, 7855 - 7855- 7855 - ~RETYP- - a CO CREATING STAIR STEP TERRACES MECHANICALLY COMPACT AFTER ' CREATING STAIR STEP TERRACES ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL SOIL ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL SOIL LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED CO PARALLEL TO THE BACK. EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO PARALLEL TO THE BACK. EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO < EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO 7850 - 7850- SLOPE ESTABLISHED FROM MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE 7850- SLOPE ESTABLISHED FROM MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE STAIR STEPPED TERRACES DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT STAIR STEPPED TERRACES DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED WHEREVER NEEDED. 5% TO 10% WHEREVER NEEDED. 5% TO 10% WHEREVER NEEDED. 5% TO 10% 7845 - GRADE BACK FROM SLOPE. 7845- GRADE BACK FROM SLOPE. TYP, 7845 - GRADE BACK FROM SLOPE. TYP. TYP. OR FIELD DETERMINED OR FIELD DETERMINED OR FIELD DETERMINED 7840 - ' ' 7840 - ' 7840 mle ..i: -19 ..Im mie .1 N -8 0% mi# 212 01@ Ble M E El i .1 '01. 9. h .h N :1: 0,0 T 0+20 t 0+40 0+60 0+0 f 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+0 ~ 0+20 ~ 0+40 0+60 EXISTING / ~ FINISHED EXISTING / ~ FINISHED EXISTING / LFINISHED GRADE-/ GRADE GRADE-/ GRADE GRADE j GRADE ~ BLUFF SECTION - STA. 0+19.63 BLUFF SECTION - STA. 0+48.68 BLUFF SECTION - STA. 0+64.27 V: 3/16' = 1'-0 V: 3/16Â» =1'-07 V: 3/16* = 1'-0- 11:3/32Â» = 1'-0' ~ H:3/32= = 1'4 ~ H:3/32" = 1'-0~ on NOTES: CUT BENCHES: E-DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO USE OF CUT BENCHES AND ENGINEERED BIOLOGICAL SOILS IS PART OF A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO RESTORE TO BE INSTALLED AFTER THE CURRENT DISTURBED SLOPE TO ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND ABILITY TO SUPPORT NATIVE PLANT ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL GROWTH AND WILDLIFE AS WELL AS PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT. SOIL IS INSTALLED. - E.C.S. ESSENTIAL EROSION 7870- DRAINAGE. NOT SHOWN, REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MATTER: CONTROL SOIL. 6" TO 1.5' DEEP THIS WILL PROMOTE STABILITY AS WELL AS INTEGRATE NEW AND EXISTING MATERIALS RESULTING IN SUPERIOR - PAID SLOPE RESTORATION AND ROOT GROWTH. 6Â«6 EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF FINISHED GRADE 7865- CUTTING BENCHES OR PLATFORMS: THIS WILL ENABLE ACCESS FOR EQUIPMENT AS WELL AS ACHIEVE A SUPERIOR MASS STABILITY FOR RESTORED mELE R SLOPE, INVERSE ANGLE OF BENCHES AND THEIR DEPTH WILL BE DETERMINED IN RESPONSE TO TREES ROOTS 1 82* /-= CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE FIELD AND IMMEDIATE LOCAL CONDITIONS. -* 9 ET 7860- ~-- ~ DETERMINED. GRADE. REMOVE SOFT UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS. FINAL LAYER OF ESSENTIAL SOIL: MECHANICALLY COMPACT AFTER THIS SOIL WILL REMAIN STABLE ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 1:1 AND WILL NOT ERODE FROM RAIN FALL. THIS 2 2? i CREATING STAIR STEP TERRACES FINAL LAYER, IN COMBINATION WITH ANCHORED LOGS, AND VEGETATION WILL RESTORE SLOPE AND ITS I PLANTS VERY QUICKLY. 7855- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY AND FIELD TESTING: EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO 7850- MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE LABORATORY TESTING: DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT SHANNON & WILSON, INC., GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS ?l SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED TILT TABLE DEMONSTRATED FAILURE AT 72 DEGREE SLOPE WITH A FRICTION ANGLE IN EXCESS OF 50 DEGREES. 1~r. WHEREVER NEEDED. 5% TO 10% GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION, TILT TABLE, SHEAR STRESS, COMPACTION, AND PERMEABILITY TESTING (2000). 7845 GRADE 8ACK FROM SLOPE. TYP. SHANNON & WILSON, INC., GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS OR FIELD DETERMINED TESTING AND PERMEABILITY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE FIELD (2001) CALTRANS/SOIL EROSION RESEARCH LAB, SDSU (SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING) SEDIMENT WEIGHT, RUNOFF VOLUME, EROSION RESISTANCE FOR 3 SUCCESSIVE 10 YEAR STORMS AND ONE 50 YEAR STORM EVENT. 7840 SOIL FOODWEB, INC. DR. ELAINE INGHAM r p Â°1: MICROBIAL ANALYSIS OF EssentiaISoil UPON INSTALLATION IN FIELD AS WELL AS 8 WEEKS AND 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING INITIAL INSTALLATION. SOL & PLANT LABORATORY. Re. ' SOIL AND RUN OFF ANALYSIS FOR FERTILIZERS AND HEAVY METALS. 0.0 / 0+20 ~ 0+40 EXISTING / 1 FINISHED FIELD TESTING: f \\ GRADE-/ GRADE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA (2012) - CREEK/SLOPE PROJECT PALI NANI (2010) - RESIDENCE AND SLOPE RECONSTRUCTION & BIO-SWALES ~ BLUFF SECTION - STA. 0+80.68 3*EB-PROJECT (2008) - BIO-SWALES V 3/16' = 1'-0- LARSEN SLOPE PROJECT (2007) - WON SILVER AWARD FOR BANK STABILIZATION, ACEC WASHINGTON IN 2008 09/30/14 H: 3/32- = 1-0~ CITY OF REDMOND (2007) - SLOPE-CREEK PROJECT STRONG RESIDENCE (2005) - BIO-SWALES NELSON PROJECT (2003) - 100 FOOT HIGH WITH AS MUCH AS 60 DEGREE SLOPE BLOOME PROJECT (1992) - LANDSLIDE RESTORATION ON SLOPE GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES SWINDELL PROJECT (1990-2000) - SLOPE STABILITY. ROOT AND PLANT GROWTH .WASHINGTON MUTUAL TRAINING OFFICE - WETLANDS, SOIL REMEDIATION, FILTRATION 2 OF 4 ueld u0!lez!1! q IS Mugg / uo 11 18Â£38Ael L L9 L8 00 ' lIe 108[ id Unig Ue 8Av eMel oul dnoa .hendriku Â£â‚¬4-268-92* E.C.S. ESSENTIAL EROSION CONTROL SOIL. 6"TO 1.5' DEEP - DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO TO BE E.C.S. ESSENTIAL DRAINAGE UNDER PATIO TO BE INSTALLED AFTER ESSENTIAL EROSION CONTROL SOIL. INSTALLED AFTER ESSENTIAL FINISHED GRADE STRUCTURAL SOIL IN INSTALLED 6" TO 1.5' DEEP STRUCTURAL SOIL IS INSTALLED. DRAINAGE. NOT SHOWN CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE FIELD DETERMINED. DRAINAGE NOT SHOWN. -7 FINISHED ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL \ GRADE, REMOVE SOFT SOIL LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED \ EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF GRADE - EXISTING TOP UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS. PARALLEL TO THE BACK. OF BLUFF MECHANICALLY COMPACT SLOPE ESTABLISHED a) = AFTER STAIR STEP FROM STAIR STEPPED TERRACES PATIO -1--~ TERRACES O 13 PATIO-1 DISTANCE TO BE LOGS & SNAGS DETERMINED IN ANCHORED TO SLOPE FIELD (FROM TREE A PER PARKS DEPT. TO TO ROLL OUTCROP) Â· - PRESERVE EXISTING SLOPE & FLORA. ANGLE OF REPOSE TO BE FIELD DETERMINED POLEANCHOR EXISTING TREE ' FINAL CHOICE OF ANCHOR WILL BE DISTANCE TO BE FIELD DETERMINED DETERMINED IN FIELD (FROM TREE i ~ ~ Cl C[:1 TO ROLL OUTCROP) â€¢ ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL SOIL ~L-CUT PLANE ANGLE TO BE LIFTS TO BE INSTALLED FIELD DETERMINED. < PARALLEL TO THE BACK, GRADE, REMOVE SOFT o SLOPE ESTABLISHED UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS. FROM STAIR STEPPED MECHANICALLY COMPACT 2-5 TON BOULDERS TERRACES AFTER STAIR STEP EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO TERRACES EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE MINIMIZE EXISTING SLOPE DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT DISTURBANCE. INVERSE CUT SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED SLOPES WILL ONLY BE USED WHEREVER NEEDED, 5% TO 10% WHEREVER NEEDED. 5% TO 10% GRADE BACK FROM SLOPE. TYP. GRADE BACK FROM SLOPE. TYP. OR FIELD DETERMINED OR FIELD DETERMINED ~ HYPOTHETICAL CROSS-SECTION OF TREE OUTCROPPING RETAINER V: 3/16Â» =1'-0Â» V:3/16" = 1'-0' H *2" = 1-0 ~ HYPOTHETICAL CROSS-SECTION OF USE OF SNAGS & LOGS H:3/32 = 1'-0" O 0 25} 42 NOTES: CUT BENCHES: USE OF CUT BENCHES AND ENGINEERED BIOLOGICAL SOILS IS PART OF A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO RESTORE THE CURRENT DISTURBED SLOPE TO ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND ABILITY TO SUPPORT NATIVE PLANT GROWTH AND MLDLIFE AS WELL AS PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT. REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MATTER: THIS WILL PROMOTE STABILITY AS WELL AS INTEGRATE NEW AND EXISTING MATERIALS RESULTING IN SUPERIOR SLOPE RESTORATION AND ROOT GROWTH. N X CUTTING BENCHES OR PLATFORMS: %1~22 ~ THIS WILL ENABLE ACCESS FOR EQUIPMENT AS WELL AS ACHIEVE A SUPERIOR MASS STABILITY FOR RESTORED 7.g* SLOPE. INVERSE ANGLE OF BENCHES AND THEIR DEPTH WILL BE DETERMINED IN RESPONSE TO TREES ROOTS 1 0%69 AND IMMEDIATE LOCAL CONDITIONS. â‚¬ 0049Â¥@ FINAL LAYER OF ESSENTIAL SOIL: c I :In i THIS SOIL WILL REMAIN STABLE ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 11 AND WILL NOT ERODE FROM RAIN FALL. THIS a) 22 . FINAL LAYER, IN COMBINATION WITH ANCHORED LOGS, AND VEGETATION WILL RESTORE SLOPE AND ITS I PLANTS VERY QUICKLY. I iE SUMMARY OF LABORATORY AND FIELD TESTING: LABORATORY TESTING: SHANNON & WILSON, INC., GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TILT TABLE DEMONSTRATED FAILURE AT 72 DEGREE SLOPE WITH A FRICTION ANGLE IN EXCESS OF 50 DEGREES. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION. TILT TABLE, SHEAR STRESS, COMPACTION, AND PERMEABILITY TESTING (2000). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TESTING AND PERMEABILITY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE FIELD (2001). CALTRANS/SOIL EROSION RESEARCH LAB, SDSU (SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING) SEDIMENT WEIGHT, RUNOFF VOLUME, EROSION RESISTANCE FOR 3 SUCCESSIVE 10 YEAR STORMS AND ONE 14- 1 9 50 YEAR STORM EVENT, j \X' SOIL FOODWEB INC, DR. ELAINE INGHAM MICROBIAL ANALYSIS OF EssentialSon " UPON INSTALLATION IN FIELD AS WELL AS 8 WEEKS AND 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING INITIAL INSTALLATION. 4 SOIL & PLANT LABORATORY. INC. 1 SOIL AND RUN OFF ANALYSIS FOR FERTILIZERS AND HEAVY METALS. '1< FIELD TESTING: BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA (2012) - CREEK/SLOPE PROJECT r PALI NANI (2010). RESIDENCE AND SLOPE RECONSTRUCTION & BIO-SWALES JAEB PROJECT (2008) - BIO-SWALES LARSEN SLOPE PROJECT (2007) - WON SILVER AWARD FOR BANK STABILIZATION, ACEC WASHINGTON IN 2008 09/30/14 CITY OF REDMOND (2007) - SLOPE-CREEK PROJECT STRONG RESIDENCE (2005) - BIO-SWALES NELSON PROJECT (2003) - 100 FOOT HIGH WITH AS MUCH AS 60 DEGREE SLOPE BLOOME PROJECT (1992) - LANDSLIDE RESTORATION ON SLOPE GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES SWINDELL PROJECT (1990-2000) - SLOPE STABILITY. ROOT AND PLANT GROWTH WASHINGTON MUTUAL TRAINING OFFICE - WETLANDS. SOIL REMEDIATION. FILTRATION 3 OF 4 ueld u0!lez! 16 Muea / uo! 1 1858Ael L L9 Le 03 'ue 10 1 id Unig ue eAV @Mel oul dnojg oÂ·sri>~!JpU84 EXHIBIT 1 121,1 E- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE r.71 REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -3/,or L--/42_53 AUCOLL-E , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 41\NET-DAW TLEâ‚¬ aMP>E-2. 19.20 G STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 3-1-/AL, ar~~~--~0 Ar- - 121-6AEÂ»_C--1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conductedÂ·prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 1. /// ~%.EA Lfel,eD /.f % V..3 d..t ~ZU-L 4 Sign*up6 Â·fk The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this / 0 day of IEKEÂ£41386 , 201 0, by :IA-(Gll Ui.96 4, ]2*.fiA-(bALA NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 308 S. Hunter St. Public Hearing: December 15,2015, 4:30 PM WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 360 Lake Avenue Legal Description: PID#273512132001, Erd man Lot Split Lot 1 According to the Plat thereof My commission expires: /6*â‚¬j- 23 20/9 Recorded November 26.1990 in Plat Book 25, Page 42, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 1-- c~ 11-0 Description: Type of development applicant seeks, brief description of project Land Use Reviews Reg: Hallam Lake Bluff re- < view Â£ - I III 1 Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning i Commission Notarf Public < ANGELA JUNE SCOREY L Applicant: Bell 26 LLC, 360 Lake Ave, Aspen NOTARY PUBLIC ~ 0081611 More Information: For further information relat- ~ STATE OF COLORADO ed to the project, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of AsDen Community Development Department, , ~ NOTARY ID #20154011826 130 8. Gatera St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, Sara.Nadolny@cityofaspen.comÂ· w My Commission Expires March 23,2019 Published in the Aspen Times on November 26, 2015 (11710650) ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Â° â€¢ -un' Y OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -3 6 0 LAck-e , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: bâ‚¬ce*116=5- 15'k '20 LS STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, A-ElEV U \LZE,Ok] (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. * Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 14 -day of NDJâ‚¬,9/2- , 20 15, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 1. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this (3'-~ day of ~0\19 m)02.-.)/ , 2015, by St-ea \13;\.3Â£3Â« WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NICOLE LEBBY NOTARY PUBLIC My co mission expires: 21 le) loZC) STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084004424 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB. 6,2020 Notary 0*ic O L ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273512132001 on 11/18/2015 i),THIN ' ColITINTIZ< Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www. pitkinmapsandmore.com HALLAM SANCTUARY LLC BASECAMP LLC AM L I NVESTMENT 11 LLC 5805 MISSION DR 4049 PENNSYLVANIA AVE #400 430 PARKSON RD PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS 662081140 KANSAS CITY, MO 64111 HENDERSON, NV 89015 WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP NORTH THIRD STREET LLC LUBAR SHELDON B & MARIANNE S 450 PARK AVE 3RD FL 500 YGNACIO VALLEY RD #360 700 N WATER ST #1200 NEWYORK, NY 10022 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4206 E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC BART QUAL PER RES TRST PO BOX 5000 715 W MAIN ST#201 909 POYDRAS ST 20TH FL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112 FAUQUET LLC 320 LAKE LLC 300 LAKE LLC 1033 SKOKIE BLVD #605 151 E 85TH ST #C 0133 PROSPECTOR RD #4102B NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 NEW YORK, NY 10028 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAD ASPEN LLC GILLESPIE LLC OAK LODGE LLC 710 N 3RD ST 191 N WACKER DR #1800 PO BOX 7951 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 ASPEN, CO 81612 HUNT ELLEN B EFH HOLDINGS LP ASPEN CTR FOR ENVIRON STUDIES PO BOX 8770 PO BOX 8770 100 PUPPY SMITH ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 335 LAKE AVE LLC LAKE AVENUE LAND LLC MARTIN CONDO ASSOC 715 W MAIN ST#101 3580 CARMEL MTN RD #460 COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGER BRUCE C QPRT #2 BERGER BARBARA QPRT #2 BERGER BRUCE C QPRT #1 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGER BARBARA QPRT #1 BELL 26 LLC RIVERSIDE AVENUE LLC 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 PO BOX 1860 410 LAKE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 ASPEN, CO 81611 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 360 Lake Ave Public Hearing: Tuesday, December 15th at 4:30 pm Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 81611 Project Location: 360 Lake Avenue, Aspen CO 81611, Parcel ID# 273512132001, legal description: Erdman Lot Split Lot 1 According to the Plat thereof Recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25, Page 42, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Description: The applicant previously received approval via Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013 for Hallam Lake Bluff review approval, which included the location of the residence on the site and restoration of the bluff. The current review is limited to changingthe approved location of the residence on the site. Land Use Reviews: Hallam Lake Bluff review Decision Making Body: Planning&Zoning Commission Applicant: Bell 26 LLC, 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, sara.nadolny@cityofaspen.com. , i . Wi , Â· 1 .. i tÂ· 4. ~*/VÂ«:*2 i..' f 1,1 .r ' 1 L , , Flk rt 6, A Y 1, v 1. /.'-I Â£ , 4 fr : 1 4., IN , : Â·' 1 It i-: Â·4 F..~4. ; *.-I TO : ..,, 9 -Â· t : 4 -7, : 1. $4 I 4 -0 . A 41Â¥<i , 4 \\/ 3 & 3 -4 L f -t ' 4 / L.. 4- 42 i k. 1, .. . i , 9 r - . . ' .t 46. . N , . Â¥ . 3 - + 1. .. . 4 \ 1 b : <9.2 - 1 11 th; + .. 4 I' .1 *1 .. - I 61 4 At q A i 171' ,Â· i :Â·Â£ R , 7. . 2 6* 4 4. .3 ! t + .9<. 2, L 't r . 4 I &7 7* Lx *-: 24 LAKE 4 4 r , . I. -. AVENUE 11Â¢ 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Date: December 15,2015 4 Time: _430 pm _ Â£ Place:City Hall, Sister Cities __ 1- a - RoomLi.SLGaleri- Q .1 Purpose: tk Bell 26 U.C,-360 Lake Ave, Aspell-- E , -.9- 11' - CO 81611, as-owner of this g[.oped*i_ * --44 Â· - - is proppsiog to rep*tion the - - ---1( -,0,1 - proposed 4**Le_9111*.~0Lin a . ~42, 1 manner that is contrary to that of a - . .~ prio/approvat (Rts*12. Se@s 2913) -- Land use reviews will include Hallam Lake Bluff review. For further _ informithn.goomct-Aspen Plannina_ - P -- -..4.4 - dilli Qgplat_970=929:Â®90.- 3 M Â· . =. .,rf<% 1 I. r I , 1 f .1. - -r I 4'f D 4, . , 4 9-7 - . ..153#-f..' r , Â·t: it C 4 7 r. - Â·3 4 . I. 'i Â·,44%Â·Â· i. %'.4. 21 ..., P.. ...1.j':.. .Â»04.- I . ... , ... ' 6, *-h CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.420.2797 DATE: 3/24/15 PROJECT: 360 Lake Ave. JSB UPDATED: 5/13/15 REPRESENTATIVE: Kara Thompson, 970.615.0878 REQUEST: Amendment of an ESA development order DESCRIPTION: The applicant has an approved Hallam Lake Bluff Review from P&Z (Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013) and Development Order. The applicant has since decided that they would like to locate the house further west, away from the bluff. The applicant has indicated that the building design will change minimally on the east fagade, but does not significantly affect the massing, and would still meet the progressive height limit. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for an ESA may be authorized by the Community Development Director. If the proposed amendment is found to not meet the criteria for an Insubstantial Amendment, a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.060 Hallam Lake Bluff Review 26.435.100 Amendment of an ESA development order ' ''- 3 1 i *~ /7 Review by: Staff for complete application OCT 2 7 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission, if deemed necessary Public Hearing: None, unless P&Z review is deemed necessary , Â·iL: '11'.:31%?i' 11 Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - Administrative ($1,300 for 4 hours) Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $1,300 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) To apply, submit the following information: O Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. 0 Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). ASLU ESA Amendment 360 Lake Ave. 273512132001 1 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. D HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. Â¤ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 0 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 2 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. O Total deposit for review of the application. El A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 f-- 22 0*0.7151 OCT 2 7 2015 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION , (j> ..SFE; 1 PROJECT: Name: 360 Lake Ave Location: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Lot 1 of Erdman Partnership Lot Split (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273512132001 APPLICANT: Name: Bell 26 LLC Address: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-309-4717 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: 715 W Main Street, Suite 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4157 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD D Temporary Use GMQS Allotment E] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision El Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream D Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Existing single family residence with approvals to remove ADU requirement [Ordinance No 5 Series of 2014] and to restore portion of the Hallam Lake Bluff [Resolution No 12 Series of 2013] PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Restoration of the portion of the Hallam Lake Bluff per Res. No 12 Series of 2013 , relocating the approved development 23' further from top of bluff. Have you attached the iollowing? FEES DUE: $ El Pre-Application Conference Summary D Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 62 El El El ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 360 Lake Ave Applicant: Bell 26 LLC Location: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO, 81611 Zone District: R-6 Lot Size: 23,956 SF Lot Area: .5499 Acres (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: n/a Proposed:n/a Number o f residential units: Existing:2 Proposed:1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 5 Proposed:5 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 4.396.25 Allowable: 4,468 SE Proposed: 4455 SP Principal bldg. height: Existing.- 28'0" Allowable:29 Proposed: 23'-6" Access. bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable:25' Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required:2 Proposed:2 % Site coverage: Existing: 1 2.8% Required: 20% max Proposed: 13. 1% % Open Space: Existing: N/A Required:NIA Proposed: NIA Front Setback: Existing: 20' Required: 20' Proposed: 20' Rear Setback: Existing: 30' Required: 30' Proposed:30' Combined F/R: Existing: 50' Required: 50' Proposed: 50' Side Setback: Existing. 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Side Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Combined Sides: Existing: 20' Required:20' Proposed: 20' Distance Between Existing 5 Required:5 Proposed: NIA Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments:NONE Variations requested: NONE Itel 1 26 1.1.C P.(1 1407 1860 Bentom ille. AR 72712 November 27.2012 City of,Aspen Building Department 1 30 South Galena Street Aspen. C'()81611 To Whom It May-Concern: Please accept this letter as our approval fur Forum Phi, Inc. to apply for and pull any necessary construction permits required to complete the remodel and repairs ofthe property 360 Lake Ave. Aspen, C olorado. The Ii,1 lou ing is the name and address fur the company. Mr. Steer Wilson Form Phi. Inc. 117 S. Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ph: 970-279-4109 Fax: 866-770-5585 I hank you lot your attention to this niatter. Siticerel>. Bell 26 1.1.C. . 1 tices' id.eu.rt- Managing Member & Bell 26 LLC RETAIN FOR PERMANENT F#IL.ES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Agreement to Pay Application Fees A . An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and 1 ' Property Be1126 LLC - 970-948-9905 Phone No. d Owner (T) Email: Ann/77)nrniprtrpoini irrprn nnrn Â¤ Address of 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Billing 715 W Main Street, Suite 204, Property: Aspen CO 81611 Address: (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for 0 $ flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Review $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 1300 4 $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ~4-54 &6.LLC.., Chris Bendon ' tia;. - S A WAL}Jr) Community Development Director , I v.---Pe. Name:,4,6426 City Use: O Tar. 2-14 .~ 4- 4 04 6, LLC-- Fees Due: $ Received: $ .lanuai->. 2013 Cit> DI .Aspeil l 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 OCT 2 7 2015 Permit No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: 360 Lake Ave Lot 2, Aspen, CO 81611 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) E This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ~ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: ,~50~~ date:./2 -2 7*/C Owner printed name: J~ ~r~ U A- 1 1,02 pekkut 6:,021 2 4 LLC_ or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: April, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 Permit No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: 360 Lake Ave Lot 1, Aspen, CO 81611 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) E This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ~ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. A F f Â«- Owner signature. 1 0Â«/Ov- h.--a date-/0-1-7~-/5~ Owner printed name: --5'3ftt,49/ 'TJA .- 64,0z-e=-4-r*twÂ·.1 2 -Â» 1\ + ts:31 26 1 Ltc or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: April, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 Customer Distribution Land litle Our Order Number: QPR62006812 GUARANTEE COMPANY -Since I967- Date: 07-01-2015 Property Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Title Assistance KIM SHULTZ 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-927-0405 (phone) 970-925-6243 (fax) kshultz@Itgc.com FORUM PHI Attention: WILLIAM LEWIS 715 W MAIN ST #204 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-319-7399 (work) wlewis@forumphi.com,kthompson@forumphi.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Land Title Order Number: 62006812 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.LTGC.COM This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: A LENDER TO BE DETERMINED This Report is dated: 06-26-2015 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 1, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1990 IN PLAT BOOK 25 AT PAGE 42. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Record Owner: BELL 26 LLC We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1. GENERAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 25,2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 440881. ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION 9:***9:***************** PARCEL NO.: 273512132001 2015 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $403,570.00 2015 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $155,720.00 2014 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,759.72. AXAAAXAAAIAA**ALAAXAAAiliAA*AAA*AAA*AAA*AlliAAA*AAA*AA*AAWAA*AAA Customer Distribution Land Title Our Order Number: QPR62006813 GUARANTEE COMPANY -Since 1967 - Date: 07-01-2015 Property Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Title Assistance KIM SHULTZ 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-927-0405 (phone) 970-925-6243 (fax) kshultz@Itgc.com Lender - New Loan FORUM PHI Attention: WILLIAM LEWIS 715 W MAIN ST #204 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-319-7399 (work) wlewis@forumphi.com,kthompson@fourmphi.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Land Title Order Number: 62006813 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.LT OC.COM This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: FORUM PHI This Report is dated: 06-26-2015 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 2, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1990 IN PLAT BOOK 25 AT PAGE &2, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Record Owner: BELL 26 LLC We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1. GENERAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 25,2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 440884. ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION 9Â¢9:******************** PARCEL NO.: 273512132002 2015 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $1,113,600.00 2015 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 2014 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,352.36. 1 AA WAA AA AXAA.AXAAA*AAXALAAA*AA**111*AAA 11* AAWAA*AA*AAXAAA*AAA*AA FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING Vicinity Map - 360 Lake Ave . 2457~*).1 C~, . PIN.7 0.- , 6/5 4 44 I P/EVE~ os-I '44>t"~'tf,:3~61\21 9, *s, 0/ O \M HUNErSVIEEK R.- PUDDtâ‚¬* Â«14%2443 -1, 30/77.,&~ U -9,.. 83) 6*,*2- 4. F -=- 9 2 1 ..0 4 .1 . % i Â· 0 03 -r 17 4/. .-90 Trn j,M, ,--3/ .& ...0.76 P.R.: 1 3*443%Â·IiÂ«*E~kÂ®kiE.*~* &11 4 V - -*..1 .9. 1,/1,1 A KNJ/ 96 -Â·Â· Â·'; 93,4I--~'#JQ 76244 44;3>//f--Â¥1544~~Â·Â· - u.we--4.Â·06 C.-1â‚¬ C N,u ' â„¢ Â·. Â·j ff-< T.54% ~ '~ ~~n ,- A ---i -%f//# \ ___L_....sti~LOCATION â€ž - 1,7 ~4-,1.32 >7 -, 3-~=j Â·{'_J;_ ' ~ ~t--1-1 % .*...- 1-99\\ --1< \i -6 ){-1 i_-f--~ 01 7 219 j :Â°~ 1, 3,1.1 \ \ 1 L r- - :t-' 1, I J lili .0, -1_ E] I L -1 L.-9.- 1 - $1TE LOCATION - . 0 m..eÂ¥ % .* r 10 - Â« i 614- -/r--7-7 - .IS Ill 1 Â»075-f L-1-1 12.-Ll i 0-1 4 -_ 0 33'. r-1 1 -% N W, -1* â€ž ,-n-1 A. 2 I.Â»1 '1 715 W MAIN ST, SUITE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 970.279.4157 I FORUMPHI.COM FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING Amendment of an ESA Development Order: Hallam Lake Bluff Review 360 Lake Avenue, Lot 1 October 27, 2015 RE: Bluff Review Response I Amendment to Resolution No 12, Series of 2013. The proposed amendment relocates the development 24' further away from the top of bluff than the originally approved location, with minor changes to the exterior of the home. PROJECT OVERVIEW Bell 26, LLC [the "Applicant"] submits this response for an ESA Development Order as an amendment to the prior approval [Resolution No 12, series of 2013] that includes the restoration and reconstruction of the Hallam Lake Bluff along the East portion of Lot 1 of 360 Lake Ave. as well as the addition to the existing single family residence on the Lot. The subject site is a 23,964.4 SF parcel located on the Hallam Lake Bluff at Lot 1 of 360 Lake Ave. (the "Property"). The Property lies within the Residential (R-6) zone district and has an existing home footprint at 2,128.25 SF and an existing garage footprint at 697.5 SF. These existing conditions make up a gross square footage of 7,142.5. The existing house is located within the 15' top of bluff setback. This proposal is requesting to demolish the existing house and move the proposed design out of the 15' top of bluff setback, respecting the 45Â° view plane extension from the new top of bluff. The proposed design meets all requirements for design listed in section 26.435.060.C Hallam Lake Bluff Review Standards of Title 26. The amendment proposed to the existing resolution does not request any adjustments to the bluff restoration requirements set forth in Resolution No 12, Series of 2013. The proposed Bluff Reconstruction will be completed in the manner specified in Sections 2,3, and 4 of Resolution No 12, Series of 2013 and as approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department under Permit No 0065.2014.ARBK. The Applicant has received an ordinance to remove the Accessory Dwelling Unit [Ordinance No 5, Series of 2014]. By shifting the proposed design westward by twenty-four (24) feet, the new residence will beentirely recessed behind the 45Â° extension from Top of Bluff view plane, making it much less visable from Hallam Lake. The proposed residence represents 5,236 SF of above grade gross area and will be fully compliant with Aspen Pitkin County Land Use Code. The proposed site coverage for the new design is 13.1%. Additional improvements include the installation of a City drainage pipe along 715 W MAIN ST, SUITE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 970.279.4157 I FORUMPHI.COM the South edge of both Lots 1 and 2 of 360 Lake Ave. There is an existing drainage issue in the West End where a significant amount of the City water runoff drains through the Applicants driveway. We have worked with April Long at the Stormwater Dept at the City to design this new drainage pipe and outfall structure to resolve this issue for the City and the Applicant. The Applicant has worked to design a project that meets City goals with respect to Residential Development and Development within an Environmentally Sensitive Area. The Applicant looks forward to working with the City of Aspen staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council in the review of this coordinated residential design and bluff reconstruction project. LAND USE CODE RESPONSES Sec. 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures The applicant has followed the common procedures for review of this development application. A pre-application conference occurred on March 24h of 2015 with planner Justin Barker and representative Kara Thompson. Sec. 26.435.060. Hallam Lake Bluff Review The following design standards, in addition to the R-6 residential district design objectives and guidelines, shall apply to residential development and bluff reconstruction: C. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. No development will take place below the existing Top of Bluff. The bluff new portion of the bluff will be reconstructed per Resolution 12 Series of 2013 and Building Permit No. 0065.2014.ARBK. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. The proposed development that is within the fifteen-foot setback from the Top of Bluff is at grade. The applicable area consists of an outdoor patio and landscaped yard. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. The height does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from the ground level at the restored top of the slope. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. A landscape plan has been submitted with this application. The existing vegetation screens more than 50% of the development as viewd from the rear slope and is to remain. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. The proposed lighting will be low and downcast with no light directed toward the nature preserve or down the slope, as specified in Section 26.575.150. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. There will be no fill material or debris placed on the face of the slope, with the exception of the approved materials used to restore the bluff. The proposed reconstruction of the bluff occurs at the top of the existing slope. The proposed design also does not include drainage down the slope from a pool or hot tub. A new drainage pipe for the city will be constructed on the lot along with an outfall structure that has been approved for design and construction by the Engineering and Stormwater Departments as well as the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. No changes are proposed to the approvals set forth in Resolution 12 Series of 2013 and Building Permit NO 0065.2014.ARBK with regard to the Top of Slope and all elements between that and Hallam Lake Bluff. Sections are attached in the drawing package as well as details from the Hendrikus Group who will be completing the Bluff Restoration effort, as approved by the Engineering Dept. Sec. 26.435.100 Amendment of an ESA development order. B. Other amendments. All other amendments to an approved development order for development within an Environmentally Sensitive Area shall be reviewed pursuant to the terms and procedures of this Section. The Building Permit Application for development of a single family residence, reconstruction of the Hallam Lake Bluff and installation of the City drainage pipe for Lot 1 of 360 Lake Avenue has been approved and Building Permit 0065.2014.ARBK has been issued per Resolution No 12 Series of 2013. The amendment consists ofthe shifting the location of the home 24' West to create more separation from the Top of Bluff to the development. The revised design is similar in massing to the previously approved design, with minor differences in fenestration and roof elements. RECEPTION#: 599796, 05/24/2013 at 10:54:28 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION N0. 12, (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-24-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, Inc. requesting approval of Hallam Lake Bluff Review to remodel the existing residence; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-6); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2013, continued to May 21, 2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Cornmunity Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 1 0 f 4 Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions, as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2: Hallam Bluff Reconstruction A site plan detailing areas of impact on Hallam Bluff, specifically the location of excavation, depth of excavation, type of machinery, storage of materials, location of utility connections and other items shall be submitted with the building permit. Parks shall approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit approval process. Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake ~ Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of erosion control measures. The project is subject to Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) standards. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that any trees remaining on site will not be impacted and to prevent unnecessary impacts to the Hallam Lake Bluff. l'he Parks and Engineering Department shall approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company that has experience in this specific line of work. The company of choice shall provide examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. Site Protection: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions of the property along the Bluff. Section 3: Parks Department: Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of the landscape plan and building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Noxious Weed: The contractor shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen shall perform monthly inspections of the area during construction. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Section 4: Engineering Slope Reconstruction: The slope reconstruction is subject to Engineering and Parks Departments approval. The location and degree of the slope shall be verified in the field. Significant changes to the slope shall require a substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Section 5: The proposed project is subject to a floor area amendment to the Erdman Partnership Lot Split by Aspen City Council. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 21St dayofMay, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PI I AND ZONING -1 2 604 0/-\7) EA-- Ci- --F----N: Debbie Quinn, Asst. City Attorney L~pamer, Chhir Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 1...iL~.1 ATTEST: *-4.#Ak j '~~k~hu ~ackie Lothian71*puty City Clerk Exhibit A: approved site plan Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 4 of 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 7 4 0 LATE , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: bECâ‚¬ B11 eR. 15.4 , 20 G STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, ST-EEV LJ ILSÂ©k) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. % Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 2.4<day of NDJE,get , 20 15 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. K Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public not*cation and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. .44-- 66'f- Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this,3~ day of 13,0\* m\02/ , 20 15. by '54-eâ‚¬N \137 \<aÂ·Cr\ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NICOLE LEBBY NOTARY PUBLIC My cornmission expires: 21 91 102(-3 STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084004424 OC h â€¢1-4_10.Cn MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB. 6,2020 C \ 1 Notary #66lic J L ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 I 3-1 1 1 1--1 AFFAVED . .(,4 4 3 f~ - FORUM PHI 1 11 Â«(P .:A P '70/794,57 F '66.7.5583 1173.-804.,-1. Sul,202 *-, Cgk~do 81611 360 LAKE ia U $ Lf~Â»Â° 3 26 Bâ€¢N LLC 360 LakeAvs Aspen. CO 81611 -I % \ : &. *9 47 116\ i .TEVEN \ \ 402127 A iNt\Â· Xy i - -39- \ - -2-2--7-11 ./7- CONSULTANTS -7---------_ul ' SURVE'OR - 1 31.,2 \ --<thaf&. S --%43 6 n Â· >34, - HODe,iC Flullon PÂ«018.~lon-IL~d Suv~/ir 726C,in,taryLan lili 11 ,~ r -~~ V},7.,/ -- Alpan. COB1811 , (670) 644 9002 77 77-2 1 1.1 ..,/29[ Â·/4/2// -1 '1- CIVIL N-â€ž Im.Â£~,y ,~, r,,.-N---- 111 1.41 k ' .~ ~. 1\.1 ~0~ 6 NA .v.fil 1 .VY'~Â·: - ~tift --- --- '~ ~ ' *9 'I /4/4*/; Â£ fbfÂ· ff;~8Â¢'Hr~/Ir -r- GEOTECH .0 \& 1,,,~2/1--2.:.471/v ,11. :,294/1/f tf 9% STRUCTURAL r!,C Na I / /// 9. â€¢1â€¢,1,1.., 11â€¢,C tlt'. .. _ CONTRACTOR ...lo,; Mof ...lan- .... ~. i'~ -*~ ' '202] -- 1~e. .46&2 .- - ..'Â·74.Â·:t/ _ -- +EGA' __ ./ROE./.2 - -- - ~---------2//-- 5~9~11 BLU. REVIEW PROJECTNO. t 207 SNW COPY.GH' FORUNPH] LLC SHEET TITLE : 81.2 FILL COVERAGE PROPOSED S,TE WITH NEW COVERAGEFI~' .,8- - 1' 0- 10 , I j NOV 09 2015 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.420.2797 DATE: 3/24/15 PROJECT: 360 Lake Ave. JSB UPDATED: 5/13/15 REPRESENTATIVE: Kara Thompson, 970.615.0878 REQUEST: Amendment of an ESA development order 00 96Â· 2.a i- 71 El--(-A DESCRIPTION: The applicant has an approved Hallam Lake Bluff Review from P&Z (Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013) and Development Order. The applicant has since decided that they would like to locate the house further west, away from the bluff. The applicant has indicated that the building design will change minimally on the east fagade, but does not significantly affect the massing, and would still meet the progressive height limit. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for an ESA may be authorized by the Community Development Director. If the proposed amendment is found to not meet the criteria for an Insubstantial Amendment, a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/ComdeWApps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http:Uwww.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.060 Hallam Lake Bluff Review 26.435.100 Amendment of an ESA development order Review by: Staff for complete application Planning & Zoning Commission, if deemed necessary Public Hearing: None, unless P&Z review is deemed necessary Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - Administrative ($1,300 for 4 hours) Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $1,300 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. RECEIVED 0 Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). NOV E< 2015 CITY OF ASPEN CON:11(INIn' 08/ELOPMENT ASLU ESA Amendment 360 Lake Ave. 273512132001 1 1 r Il Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Â¤ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. El HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. O Written responses to all review criteria. O An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 0 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 2 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. Â¤ Total deposit for review of the application. El A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 1 1 Derell,rirt ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION (4* OAL (26( %- PROJECT: 0096.,201 9, AU-,q CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPRENT Name: 360 Lake Ave Location: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Lot 1 of Erdman Partnership Lot Split (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273512132001 APPLICANT: Name: Bell 26 LLC Address: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-309-4717 REPRESENTATIVE: Nanie: Steev Wilson Address: 715 W Main Street, Suite 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4157 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Texâ‚¬Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision [3 Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane El Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment J Other: D Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Existing single family residence with approvals to remove ADU requirement [Ordinance No 5 Series of 2014] and to restore portion of the Hallam Lake Bluff [Resolution No 12 Series of 2013] PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, ete.) Restoration of the portion of the Hallam Lake Bluff per Res. No 12 Series of 2013 , relocating the approved development 23' further from top of bluff. Have you attached the lollowing? FEES DUE: $ U Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Â£ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 52 El El El , ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 360 Lake Ave Applicant: Bell 26 LLC Location: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO, 81611 Zone District: R-6 Lot Size: 23,956 SF Lot Area: .5499 Acres (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing:nia Proposed:n/a Number of residential units: Existing:2 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 5 Proposed: 5 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 4,396.25 Allowable: 4,468 SE Proposed: 4466 SF Principal bldg. height: Existing: 28'0" Allowable: 25' Proposed: 23'-6" Access. bldg. height: Existing.* N/A Allowable:25' Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required: 2 Proposed:2 % Site coverage: Existing: 1 2.8% Required: 20% max Proposed: 13. 1% % Open Space: Existing.* N/A Required:NIA Proposed: N/A Front Setback: Existing: 20 Required:20' Proposed: 20' Rear Setback: Existing: 30' Required: 30' Proposed: 30' Combined F/R: Existing: 50' Required: 50' Proposed: 50' Side Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Side Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Combined Sides: Existing: 20' Required: 20 Proposed: 20' Distance Between Existing 5 Required:5 Proposed:NIA Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: NONE Variations requested: NONE Bell 26 LLC PO Box 1860 Bentonville AR 72712 November 5, 2015 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Lots 1 & 2, 360 Lake Ave, Aspen, Colorado 81611 To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as our approval for Forum Phi Architecture to apply for and pull and necessary construction permits and land use applications required for construction at Lots 1 and 2 of 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. The following is the name and address for the company. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen CO 81611 Sincerely, 1,490 &7- 1461201< Date Ri dioU--D. GLe#<.cu~ 1 Vul P.au,-a- Print Name . 0 ~., w-,JT Fi J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTWIENT < 0 Agreement to Pay Application Fees Â¥ 0 0016 ZOE. Ail---Il *gr~ z An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and - 1 0 30 0 Property Bell 26 LLC 970-948-9905 Phone No. ,-, Owner ('1"): Email: rinnt79)nrniprtrpqni irrprn enrn ~14 râ€¢, Address of 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 Billing 715 W Main Street, Suite 204, 1 'n Property: ~ Aspen CO 81611 % Address- f. 9 (subject of (send bills here) application) r I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for _ 0 $ flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Review $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1300 v< AJ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: AÂ»gu:,LLC Chris Bendon Â· 0./ / / 1.,1.. i=p= - s g WA Â£ I,,0 Community Development Director Name:.ZedhÂ¢11/23 . , ,-c-- 1 1 Title: tf.>UUJF 4 Pt (M t.. ULL City Use: 0 U 00 1 f Fees Due: $ Received: $ i ~00 .lanian. 201 3 City of.Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970)920-5090 F ASPEN RE tivtu Permit No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .1 Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the propetty owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: 360 Lake Ave Lot 2, Aspen, CO 81611 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) E This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. D This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. . '141 Owner signature: h , UUV 4.17kb daa. /b- D.-7- / g' Owner printed name: 6 - R_ U A- 1 403 PÂ»124 611 24 , LAC or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: April, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 Permit No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .1 Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: 360 Lake Ave Lot 1, Aspen, CO 81611 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) E This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. Â£ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: imE/0-3.-7 / 5-- 0â€žam pdrted name-. 1& Wh +T 0 0 ,- fr-â‚¬41-cLA,-t .:6~.0,2.1 2 G < LLC_ or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: April, 2013 City of Aspen ! 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 Customer Distribution Land Title Our Order Number: QPR62006812 GUARANTEE COMPANY -Since 1967- Date: 07-01-2015 Property Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Title Assistance KIM SHULTZ 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-927-0405 (phone) 970-925-6243 (fax) kshultz@Itgc.com FORUM PHI Attention WILLIAM LEWIS 715 W MAIN ST #204 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-319-7399 (work) wlewis@forumphi.com,kthompson@forumphi.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail 4 0 Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Land ntle Order Number: 62006812 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW LT GC COM This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: A LENDER TO BE DETERMINED This Report is dated: 06-26-2015 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 1, ERDMAN LOT SPLIL ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1990 IN PLAT ' BOOK 25 AT PAGE 42. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Record Owner: BELL 26 LLC We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1. GENERALWARRANTY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 25,2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 440881. **************le** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION ********************** PARCEL NO.: 273512132001 2015 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $403,570.00 2015 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $155,720.00 2014 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,759.72. *AAA* lA A*AAAIALAAXAAAXAAA*AAA AXA AA A.AAA.AAA *AA ALA AA *AA AA AA AA*AAA 1 1 Customer Distribution Land litle Our Order Number: QPR62006813 GUARANTEE COMPANY -Since 1967 - Date: 07-01-2015 Property Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Title Assistance KIM SHULTZ 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-927-0405 (phone) 970-925-6243 (fax) kshultz@Itgc.com Lender - New Loan FORUM PHI Attention: WILLIAM LEWIS 715 W MAIN ST #204 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-319-7399 (work) wlewis@forumphi.com,kthompson@fourmphi.com Delivered via Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Order Number: 62006813 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.LT O C.COM This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: FORUM PHI This Report is dated: 06-26-2015 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 360 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 2, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1990 IN PLAT BOOK 25 AT PAGE &2, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Record Owner: BELL 26 LLC We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1. GENERAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 25,2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 440884. ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION ********************** PARCEL NO.: 273512132002 2015 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $1,113,600.00 2015 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 2014 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,352.36. AA,LA*AA*AA*AAA*ALAAAIAA*AA*AAAQAA*AAA*AliAAA*AAWAAAXAA).AA.AAA*AAA .. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING Vicinity Map - 360 Lake Ave ~ 97% f lai <82 . 4//1/453//EM/~Illa k ki 1 5- npeT# P* ..-, 9 1 *id;.fghz//Gila i'. PUD*t* ' b ///WL#/3Â£**,11917*A ~â€¢...Â¥6.Â« 4**5 i 'sr.154, t. .1/2==74: 0. ,-=- t.e \ 4- 28Â° .- 1-Â»â€ž 9 7 t 7 9/Iillimici.0. 6 7//pus /4 r . p E. . 40.........I 4 R % C. '4 L' 7 '. --- 'W '6 /0/ m * - ~*~224 0 ''C~ C 444 2*~-#1:-z: 4-bI:<~~15p1MV~~~9~r~1#,44.~4+.#157k i.itla /4 r -~ . hâ€¢ I ....-0 â‚¬ .... I ,~ ~ . I ' _~,~ 1. 2.4, Lp PUDÂ·-Mulk.~.~2Â«~.44#frAVE - 7/ 1'/UPE' ////4.~,dU-, '%:>~irjmp'.3,~*94*49 'll J U 4JU -T- -'-- -r-- -373*:7 * 41 f Ah_ji j rn ri 1-3 ---, T Ff.') .\/il f L r-r.r) 4 71 -E L.12 ~-Â¥[E LOÂ§ATION / U --1 .LUMES'I tu 03) } lf-3 4 3- 0.-~â€ž.; L.-- 1 -4 1, 1 1 W 3 ./. 1 .1 \ $iTE LOCATION - 6,3. 22-, - \ pEN,L eT % 4, Ak. 1 ELI TEE 272 04 -1 -0 U. 4 1 -r LD-il 114 715 W MAIN ST, SUITE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 970.279.4157 I FORUMPHI.COM FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING Amendment of an ESA Development Order: Hallam Lake Bluff Review 360 Lake Avenue, Lot 1 October 27, 2015 RE: Bluff Review Response I Amendment to Resolution No 12, Series of 2013. The proposed amendment relocates the development 24' further away from the top of bluff than the originally approved location, with minor changes to the exterior of the home. PROJECT OVERVIEW Bell 26, LLC [the "Applicant"] submits this response for an ESA Development Order as an amendment to the prior approval [Resolution No 12, series of 2013] that includes the restoration and reconstruction of the Hallam Lake Bluff along the East portion of Lot 1 of 360 Lake Ave. as well as the addition to the existing single family residence on the Lot. The subject site is a 23,964.4 SF parcel located on the Hallam Lake Bluff at Lot 1 of 360 Lake Ave. (the "Property"). The Property lies within the Residential (R-6) zone district and has an existing home footprint at 2,128.25 SF and an existing garage footprint at 697.5 SF. These existing conditions make up a gross square footage of 7,142.5. The existing house is located within the 15' top of bluff setback. This proposal is requesting to demolish the existing house and move the proposed design out of the 15' top of bluff setback, respecting the 45Â° view plane extension from the new top of bluff. The proposed design meets all requirements for design listed in section 26.435.060.C Hallam Lake Bluff Review Standards of Title 26. The amendment proposed to the existing resolution does not request any adjustments to the bluff restoration requirements set forth in Resolution No 12, Series of 2013. The proposed Bluff Reconstruction will be completed in the manner specified in Sections 2,3, and 4 of Resolution No 12, Series of 2013 and as approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department under Permit No 0065.2014.ARBK. The Applicant has received an ordinance to remove the Accessory Dwelling Unit [Ordinance No 5, Series of 2014]. By shifting the proposed design westward by twenty-four (24) feet, the new residence will be|entirely recessed behind the 45Â° extension from Top of Bluff view plane, making it much less vishble from Hallam Lake. The proposed residence represents 5,236 SF of above grade gross area and will be fully compliant with Aspen Pitkin County Land Use Code. The proposed site coverage for the new design is 13.1%. Additional improvements include the installation of a City drainage pipe along 715 W MAIN ST, SUITE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 970.279.4157 I FORUMPHI.COM the South edge of both Lots 1 and 2 of 360 Lake Ave. There is an existing drainage issue in the West End where a significant amount of the City water runoff drains through the Applicants driveway. We have worked with April Long at the Stormwater Dept at the City to design this new drainage pipe and outfall structure to resolve this issue for the City and the Applicant. The Applicant has worked to design a project that meets City goals with respect to Residential Development and Development within an Environmentally Sensitive Area. The Applicant looks forward to working with the City of Aspen staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council in the review of this coordinated residential design and bluff reconstruction project. LAND USE CODE RESPONSES Sec. 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures The applicant has followed the common procedures for review of this development application. A pre-application conference occurred on March 24th of 2015 with planner Justin Barker and representative Kara Thompson. Sec. 26.435.060. Hallam Lake Bluff Review The following design standards, in addition to the R-6 residential district design objectives and guidelines, shall apply to residential development and bluff reconstruction: C. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. No development will take place below the existing Top of Bluff. The MOM new portion of the bluff will be reconstructed per Resolution 12 Series of 2013 and Building Permit No. 0065.2014.ARBK. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. The proposed development that is within the fifteen-foot setback from the Top of Bluff is at grade. The applicable area consists of an outdoor patio and landscaped yard. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. The height does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from the ground level at the restored top of the slope. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. A landscape plan has been submitted with this application. The existing vegetation screens more than 50% of the development as viewd from the rear slope and is to remain. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. The proposed lighting will be low and downcast with no light directed toward the nature preserve or down the slope, as specified in Section 26.575.150. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. There will be no fill material or debris placed on the face of the slope, with the exception of the approved materials used to restore the bluff. The proposed reconstruction of the bluff occurs at the top of the existing slope. The proposed design also does not include drainage down the slope from a pool or hot tub. A new drainage pipe for the city will be constructed on the lot along with an outfall structure that has been approved for design and construction by the Engineering and Stormwater Departments as well as the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. No changes are proposed to the approvals set forth in Resolution 12 Series of 2013 and Building Permit NO 0065.2014.ARBK with regard to the Top of Slope and all elements between that and Hallam Lake Bluff. Sections are attached in the drawing package as well as details from the Hendrikus Group who will be completing the Bluff Restoration effort, as approved by the Engineering Dept. Sec. 26.435.100 Amendment of an ESA development order. B. Other amendments. All other amendments to an approved development order for development within an Environmentally Sensitive Area shall be reviewed pursuant to the terms and procedures of this Section. The Building Permit Application for development of a single family residence, reconstruction of the Hallam Lake Bluff and installation of the City drainage pipe for Lot 1 of 360 Lake Avenue has been approved and Building Permit 0065.2014.ARBK has been issued per Resolution No 12 Series of 2013. The amendment consists of the shifting the location of the home 24' West to create more separation from the Top of Bluff to the development. The revised design is similar in massing to the previously approved design, with minor differences in fenestration and roof elements. ORDINANCE NO. 5 (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS 6 AND 7 OF ORDINANCE 66, SERIES 1990, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOTS 1 & 2, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1990 IN PLAT BOOK 25 AT PAGE 42, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. PARCEL IDs: 2735-121-32-001,2735-121-32-002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, requesting approval of an amendment to Ordinance 66, Series of 1990 which established the Erdman Partnership Lot Split; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Medium Density Residential, R-6; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development DepaMment recommended in favor ofthe proposed amendment; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.480.080, the City Council may approve a Subdivision Amendment, during a duly noticed public hearing after considering comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 10, 2014, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2014, by a three to one (3 - 1) vote, approving an amendment to Ordinance 66, Series of 1990 through a Subdivision Amendment; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No 5, Series 2014 Page lof 3 Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, City Council herby amends Conditions 6 and 7 of Ordinance 66, Series of 1990 to state: 6. Condition 6 is hereby stricken in its entirety. 7. Condition 7 is hereby stricken in its entirety. Section 2: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation rhis ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Approvals All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 1 06 day of March, 2014, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council ofthe City of Aspen on the 10'h day of February, 2014. Attest: '1 1 4&649 - ---- Kathryn S. ~ch, Cify Clerk Steven Skadr n, Mayor Ordinance No 5, Series 2014 Page 2 of 3 FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this / 3 day of M ...11 , 2014. Attest: ~duÂ« Â»-- Â«-1, L--4 - 0 Kathryn S.Â£~ch, Ciâ‚¬'Clerk SteveW'Skadron, Mayor Approved as to form: g.- VE - /~m True, City Attorney Ordinance No 5, Series 2014 Page 3 of 3 RECEPTION#: 599796, 05/24/2013 at 10:54:28 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 12, (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-24-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, Inc. requesting approval of Hallam Lake Bluff Review to remodel the existing residence; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-6); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2013, continued to May 21,2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 1 of 4 Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions, as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2: Hallam Bluff Reconstruction A site plan detailing areas of impact on Hallam Bluff, specifically the location of excavation, depth of excavation, type of machinery, storage of materials, location of utility connections and other items shall be submitted with the building permit. Parks shall approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit approval process. Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of erosion control measures. The project is subject to Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) standards. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that any trees remaining on site will not be impacted and to prevent unnecessary impacts to the Hallam Lake Bluff. The Parks and Engineering Department shall approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company that has experience in this specific line of work. The company of choice shall provide examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. Site Protection: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions ofthe property along the Bluff. Section 3: Parks Department: Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of the landscape plan and building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Noxious Weed: The contractor shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen shall perform monthly inspections of the area during construction. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Section 4: Engineering Slope Reconstruction: The slope reconstruction is subject to Engineering and Parks Departments approval. The location and degree of the slope shall be verified in the field. Significant changes to the slope shall require a substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Section 5: The proposed project is subject to a floor area amendment to the Erdman Partnership Lot Split by Aspen City Council, Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 21St day of May, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ND ZONING 0(,3 6 .- Debbie Quinn, Asst. City Attorney LEE,kpamer, Chhir Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Mt,Â¢1Â¢Ajj ..~t~U ~lckle Lothian,Wputy City Clerk Exhibit A: approved site plan Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 4 of4 1 1 al 19/7 ,Â»1\ N[-1 / AW*vgp , 2,n 4 -- FORUM PHI 1 1 7 8-/h #. $4-,Sâ€¢â€¢I, 202 \ *lo.-0~elt I ~~en .187 F - .... . 360 LAKE r 28 6- LLC 1 1, I .".+9 1 ".....1 , /.27 /, i C .1.Ve' 2.-LId\ 6,/''r./Â»4. ..4-,E. CON*ULTANTS SURVEYOR , 7><....1.-1== t '1 \,4 :.4Â·Â·~-1 J 1 4 1,X _1/~ <4----121 1 CIVIL :'C .:1 . WA // '1'' ' ./ . -zo,ZAZ/-01---1~ i.1 Lg +.<--- GEOTECH foo b. " /; :'/9/ 2,5,341/9 % STRUCTURAL -- CONTRACTOR -...' VI@,13 .UFF REVEW Â£ ~lerA' NOTF-CONST. M..cr Ne 120, COPY=r FON- PHI. U. SHEET TITLE 81.2 FILL COVERAGE PBOPQSE' SIT# WI TH NEW COVE'UOE AL t. AR 3 2000 1 57PM ASF IOUSING OFC NO.760 P. 1 *ill illl[ 111111 lim 111111111 0,11 .1111 lili lili Wgeâ€¢45 02/18/2000 11,09â€¢ DEED _ JvIIVIS SILVI -1-- ~~.f 1 R 5.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 Pin(IN COUNTY CO AMENDMENT OF DEED RESTRICTION WHEREAS, an Occupancy Deed Resviction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwe//ing Unit Odnance One was recorded on June 25, 1990, at Reception No. 323854, to comply with City Council Ordinance One, and pertaining to the property described as 201 Gillespie Street, Aspen, Colorado; WHEREAS, the legal description of the property was not induded In the document and the physical address is inaccurate: and WHEREAS, the legal description is Lot 1, Erdman Lot Split, according to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, 1990, in Plat Book 25 at Page 42, in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; and WHEREAS, the addressed stated as 201 Gillespie Street no longer exists, and this unit refers to the unit located at 360 Lake Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, this document amends the physical address and the legal address of the Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One recorded on June 25, 1990, at Reception No. 323854, and all other restrictions and conditions still apply tothis unR located at 360 Lake Avenue. ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY MaiyWRbberts, Executive Director STATE OF COLORADO ) - ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this 18# day of February, 2000, by Mary J. Roberts, Executive Director of the Aspen/PitkIn County Housing Authority. Witnes,my hand and official seal. 'Girui~4, 1~expiree: 1 12' loj ~4- Efld 6 ry Public .. ~--FEB, 2, 2000 8:53AM - PI COUNTY TITLE NO.4790 P. 1 0 0 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 (970)925-1766 - FAX (970)925-6527 DATE: 02/02/00 TO: KAUFMAN & PETERSON ATTENTION: BROOKE PETERSON I:ROM: PRISCILLA PROHI RE: ERDMAN PCT 14911 SHEET 1 OF 5 TNCLUDING COVER SHEET SHOULD YOU NOT RECEIVE ALL THE COPIES LISTED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL US AT THE NUMBER LISTED ABOVE. MESSAGE BROOKE, THIS IS THE CITY ORDINANCE THAT INDICATES THAT THIS PROPERTY IS < ON THE S.E. CORNER OF GILLESPIE AND LAKE AVENUE. THE DEED RESTRICTION REFLECTS A GILLESPIE ADDRESS AND OUR CONTRACT REFLECTS A LAKE AVENUE ADDRESS. I HOPE THIS HELPS YOU CLARIFY THAT THE DEED RESTRICTION DOES GO WITH THE PROPERTY. RESPECTFULLY, PRISCILLA FEB. 2.2000 8:54AM PII COUNTY TITLE NO. 4790 P. 2 .. ORDINANCE NO. 66 (SERIES OF 1990) AN ORDINANCE OP THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP InT SPLIT, DESCRIBED IN METES AND BOUNDS, AT THE S.E. CORNER OF GILLESPIE ST. AND LAKE AVE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7-1003 of the Aspen Land Use Code (revision date August 1989), a Lot Split is a subdivision exemption by the City Council; and WINREAS, The Erdman Partnership, represented by Donnelley Erdman, has submitted an application for the lot split of a 32,855.5 square foot parcel described in metes and bounds in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 12, Township.10 South, Range 85 west of the sixth P.M., City of Aspen); and WHEREAS, the Engineering Department, having reviewed the application has made referral comments and addendums; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office, having reviewed the application pursuant to Section 7-1003, and reviewing referral comments from Engineering, recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. One joint driveway access will be allowed for both lots via the 20' access easement. 2. Prior to filing a final plat the applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts. 3. The plat shall indicate the edge of street pavement or curb line and the existing fence and drainage ditch along the 1 . ---FEB. 2.2000 8:54AM PH COUNTY TITLE NO. 4790 P. 3 .. south boundary of the property. 4. The final plat shall indicate that prior to issuance of a building permit for development on either lot, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan to the Engineering Department and do any necessary improvements to the ditch along the south boundary of the parcel. 5. The following FAR and site coverage limits will be: Lgy 1%_FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; Site Coverage - 20% (4,791 s.f.) Lat 21 FAR maximum - 3,449 s.f. (access easement is subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR); Site Coverage - 30.34% (2,700 s.f.) 6. An Accessory Dwelling Unit must be included on each lot for which development is proposed as a requirement of this Lot Split. Each Accessory Dwelling Unit must comply with the Housing Authority's requirements and must receive j Conditional Use approval by h:he Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. 7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, Deed Restrictions for the Accessory Dwelling Units shall be approved by the Housing Authority and recorded by the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 8. Development proposed for any lot (s) resulting from this lot~ split shall conform to the terms and requirements of the l Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) if applicable. 2 -FEB. 2. 2000 8:54AM PIT~ COUNTY TITLE NO. 4790 P. 4 9. A subdivision Exemption Agreement listing the conditions of approval shall be included as a note section on the final plat. 10. The final plat will be signed by the Planning Office and recorded by the City Clerk only upon complete satisfaction of all of the above conditions. WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the Planning Office's recommendations for the lot split does wish to grant the requested Subdivision Exemption for the Erdman Lot Split. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1: That it does hereby grant a Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split, with the conditions recommended by the Planning Office, to the 32,855.5 s.f. parcel described in this ordinance. Sectian 2: That the City, Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 3: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the .,:2_2.- day of 0 20 , 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which a hearing of public notice of the same shall be published in a 3 FEB. 2. 2000 8:54AM PITI~ COUNTY TITLE NO. 4790 P. 5 . newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. . INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 9% 1 day of - EL.,*V'- 0 , 1990. William L. Stirling, MAyor ATTPST: g.2 4. Kathryn ~7 Koch, Clty Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 17- day of 0 4/ , 1990. N itt_ Â£ 1- 9*i William L. Stirling, Mayor mri;% TUKocki, City Clerk U 4 Iro'QJ 2-X C.+ %- 2-jr **41' 40 LE.~ 7323854 96:rE/or-Â£4:42 Rec 1Â·:.5.00 BlÂ·: 623 PE, 696 Â«i 94 1. 9 Devi:.. FÂ·.t:Â·in Cnty ClerÂ·! . Doc W. 00 4 6 â€¢'r'â€¢lA~t-Â· t62:Ii OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT RESIDENT OCCUPIED DWELLING UNIT ORDINANCE ONE THIS OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND ..pAGREEMENT (the "Agreepamt") is made and entered into this 22/- day of .Jun F , 1990, by and betwee.n The Erdman Partnership, of the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, whose address is Box 12395, Aspen, Colorado, 81612 (herein-a-C-@r_ne-Â£-eged to as "Owner"), and thâ‚¬IASPEN7'PITK-IN-COUNTY--HdOSING AUTHORITY 3 a multi-jurisdictional housing auEHErity established pursuancro-tile AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT recorded in Book 605 at Page 751 of the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Of f ice (hereinafter called the "Authority") . WHEREAS, the Owner owns real property more specifically .31~.414 described as 201 Gillespie Street, Aspen, Colorado ("Real Property"), upon which the Owner intends to construct a single- E-,299,6 family residence and a 580 net square foot one bedroom Resident 7 f :.~--.-ft Occupied Dwelling Unit ("R/0 Unit") . For purposes of this j Agreement the R/0 Unit, the single family residence, and the rdal 2 -. tÂ» property and all appurtenances, improvements, and fixtures..6 MI associated therewith shall hereinafter be referred to as th-ef-: 91 M,% "Property'l; and Â·. '- . Â·2~3--Â·j. H li-aâ‚¬~'4; WHEREAS, this Agreement imposes certain covenants upon th'e 'Â«30321.-3 *9~ R/0 Unit, when rented by Owner, which restrict the use Â· ah3. .M?=-4. C' Â· 15:-r. - occupancy of the R/0 Unit to working residents of Pitkin Â·County,-and;**:,1.â€ž.Â·1. LU.>1â‚¬12 their families who fall within the Housing Authority res-itlentimil:-' c- 4Â·Â» -13 202/1I qualification guidelines established and indexed by the Authority.'43*.94' - .i~28:8 ' G Â·'f'y-f. CP- . ... .- 4.1,51... on an annual basis . _15.4. ..ift. , 1 ..11;.O.:.:E.'.4 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, Owner hereby 74,2 r covenants and agrees as follows: 9 1 9.-Â« 5-4.:i?> f.1/:--t. Â· i' 44.-5..:AÂ· 1. Owner hereby covenants and agrees that the Property shall <f -9 3. not be condominiumized during the term of this Agreemeht such fÂ·,1-2 4 2 +21;#J~, that the R/0 Unit and the single-familY_ rpqirlenrp a.ice -631 , 3 0Â·23#P considered separate properties, but that the R/0 Unit shall :,,- k.: ~ be constructed anil maintained so as to be capable o f being .'- t i ttiE:~M 0 7,>'2~*,2 rented separately from the single-family residence. 2. The Owner shall not ~e reguired to rent -pr lease the BLE 4..499] Unit, buti-i-Isrented or leased, occupancy_Ehall limited exclusively toinalviduals wng_Ita-~mnloedull-time in pitkin-camify, together withasioy-sm_anri rplited children' Tieessee shall meet and qgmply with the definiticn-ana requirements_gorking resident established and from time toimeamended by the Authority. Owner shall have the right , to lease the R/0 unit to a working resident of his selection. 1 C -7': % 9-6.';9 â‚¬ 41 .. Ay- :;-\CA-4*3, 4--'032 06/25/'70 14:42 qec 9.15.0(-1 5K 623 PG 697 . <%43. '-Â·1* 1 vi a Da'.Â· :. Â·= , F:> it. 1Â·.. r Crit, C er+ . Doc '7,. 00 :i.1,19Â¢.4 1.%1.6 k'- i.2?.*ht For the purpose of this Agreement, the R/0 Unit shall be considered rented if it is occupied pursuant to a lease or 1 4 rental agreement which requires a payment by the tenant of ~ more than a nominal amount of rent. 3. Written verification of employment of prospective tenants of the R/0 Unit shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authot'ity Office by the Owner prior to occupancy thereof, and must ne acceptable to the Housing Authority. 4 Â· Ogcupang_QI-the-RZQ_Unit shall be limited to no more than two (2) adults and related children. 9. :tly-L- 90 5. A-EL_laaie of the R/O Unit shall provide for a _kern__Qf_not--- less_thansix6nsecutive months. A signed and executed copy o f lease for the R/0 Unit .-.Shall__besubmitted to the Et-I ~&4 Housing_ Authority within__ten-_410)-=days-an==approt-41-1-9-f-- . 2, Â« 1Ng, residenti. 6. This Agreement shall constitute covenants running with ..3-69-' litÂ¢~7' the Real Property as a burden for the benefit of; and sha'll t..4-11:--1~~i 4,:/Imlilf-f.' be specifically enforceable by, the Housing Authority, the , 1 Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin, and the City of r.Â·.'.=729.-r:'Di~*.P Aspen, their respective successors as applicable, by any Â·. 4.- -+ 44&#f 4 appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, .~VÂ·I.'72 Â·tj.Â·Ip. injunction, abatement, or eviction of non-complying tenants; ..2,1.3.-25,6 r.:ip.14.35 4 for the period of ,Â£ittÂ¥_45Â£8 years from the- date of recording . ...:,/ 1 E,-1 Â©jift''t hereof in the Pitkin County Real Property Records. /9-1530-6 - lt-- r.rÂ», UJCE ':Â·fiÂ· 1 . 45# .: f: 9%.. 2 0.34 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed -:45Â·Â·N ..17./ this instrument on the day and year above first written. 3 96$ .. I:-412.1 .:42 r. 1~~:~ OWNER: - p t. -..46 1 414(13 427.-i 'f.~~~.:.14.4 Managing PaUÂ»r; . The Erdman Partnership Mailing Address: The Erdman Partnership - Box 12395 mi.FFIE Aspen, Colorado 81612 - lili ...;:27.-:' .t~I e . P il 16 .... . 1 43.23954 06/.25/70 la: 42 Rec $15.00 9- 623 PG 698 RÂ®+-41#r Si .t v.:. a Dav'. .3 . Pitt i n CnÂ·tyÂ· ClerÂ·1Â·., Dcc li .. 00 *91%,W - -ek,-13!tâ‚¬41â€¢.6, it.ify:29.2-. r:*014 STATE OF Colonao ) ) SS. .1C0UNTY OF â‚¬14*'Â·-'. ) Er foregoing-instrument was acknowledged f Â·baforb me this 61&2 day of OLÂ·L,Al , 1990, by T. f)9000 1 1.Q-7 0-4 nla-Â« ~ i Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expir~: <//*93 - i :~, 5- . - A /1.4/ 3- fla/F Notary Public , . 11 . -1 3 e!?441 ACCEPTANCE BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY Â·1-6,.:..4:tip-6 The foregoing Agreement and its terms are accepted by the . I....j 2.Â£.4~. Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. : -3 45>b HOUSINÂ¢ AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN ; .- U.36 71-abk AND It'KIN CQUN~CÂ¢ COLORADO 1 1 4 N..3 .C?=14.--F 4 . e ... 4 9.-:....4 2,6-3.95...2 ; , -- L. 2.Â·-yil, t,716:ftt.,2,9 , BYÂ·.t,Al -JioÂ°KrÂ· Ad.,:Â»#101 6 (0 e/L-%2,1, . .-Â·. i~ 1-2 :tÂ¢--i-â‚¬-4 Maili~g Address: ...4.-Â·- .2.;:21*Lt 4*20 Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Ai~ority :5 2.- 3&*G,%/ EF*91Â· : 39551 Highway 82 '4 Aspen, Colorado 81611 . ALÂ· ~: f 4 12 , 9014- : 2.t, I.I.J.= - I.I. t- .2 2.: 1 --'â€¢,#W-3J 1 STATE OF COLORADO ) I ./ 1. Â· â€¢ i â€¢ ~.- ./ 71, 1 I 1 3 ) SS. Â©'Â·COUNTY. OF PITKIN ) A.~24 4 4 **14 L - : t . i. Â·.: â€žj The foregoâ‚¬ng instrument was acknowledged befpre Ine tlii:.d ..1 - - I blkt - day of 30.-ra . ,1990, by VI/,58â€žd r)/06:aA/7' . Witness my hand and official seal. .,/,1,ff C , . My commission expires : -1;1/7,/93 Fifit- iff#,41 c,1166 111Â·*-~_ Q J- - -5-,1 )51 L ....,474 .2* Notary Public ./1 1 1 .M...4 -I - 1-' ,?,4 3 - .-~*~ 1. 7% I - 1. ---, .rt'y:.. i:2 . Â·: ~ THE ~ITED STATES *f AN[mRICA, 55/3- : Certiticate No. Z.yt To all to Whom theee Presente shall come, GEEEWINS: 8 Â·41 . 7 8 . 0 - 1 67 . *berÂ«2.- tÂ·4,-4a.44 8% M.2Â·,44*q.L<: 0-, , 1/ I 3 9 -â€¢ , . States ,& Certi#<tate of the Xedister of t,he Land. O,jice 'd '~ - Â·Â¥3 8,Â·f Â· hap.Â·Â·Â· depostted in the General. LandÂ· 0/11ce of the United - <:.w :-'b. . lan , -t!(1Â£ 19...4Â».,t~ ..whereby d appears that fult vaiji)18,2 haR been made by 1.46 st,id '9 0 0 . 1014 0,. h.Â©.col,49'Â»6,1 e i.lted " An Act inakinif fu.7Â·ther pro. 'f;t--)Zii?, t,~k#corflin~Â¢ to the Â»routhion.8 of t.he Act of Congress of th.p. 24th of April, 1820, D J, 0 f 19#41-4 1.4.1 81 *S g-,7-211 ,%~iaior UU gÂ¢ila of the Pablic Laids," and the acts 32*pl8mental there:o. for,Z:4.---0.20 -,~CA,122.0.-f-: Â·-- - ,/Off.> , - 'A:RPeA+,0, A O Arâ‚¬/0/ LAN tr*zATit'llit, ..fe,Â·,0:, ,,U-2-6-,1,~ ,~cUX*i06 0 -31 -7 // .. v ,,04 t.,.d,...04*~ 4 60Â¢5. , 442Â·flf-, ude,414~.v ~~ltÂ£~4 0 ' r...1, BAU,>' Ut, rt~ Aet.~40-14, FAArtÂ·Uâ€¢t 01/0 13Â«,-MA-12~ ILiâ€¢ 2 . 1 ~~Rt: i:J \4**1-*elâ„¢/ r,Â·b tfg? 'A,tÂ·Â·Â·if 422fflftÂ«*-,~ ~ 1~274 1.9 f 1~- 0 61-1.~ ~-i-- ~~- ~At#L rt 2 V , 441 el- bv : ~rfit 1 -tff '#Â£/C , 1 F , ~ a.vi.,irding to th* 001.cial Plat of the Surucy of t}w said Lands. retu,rn.ed tu tile General I,and Oilice by the Su,rver,or G,Aeral, whlc:h said Trad,t Aa,3 6864 purch.a.sed by the said 9 9 (2 -*1.tritil.,1. 40 'lea~LUA -- . --*. - Â·Â· i i 8 i 140- Knem Â¥4 That the United St,des of Amerisa. 02Â· ix>nsialv,ztion of the premises, ~ad in conformity \ 1 . ' with the soueÂ·rul jicts or Cor,rells 01 such. c we made anci proudied hauc 2Â£ven and graiated, and by these presents 'i 1 i do 6ive and rÂ·ant unto 11/.8 :,aid i and to.. ZAÂ·'2? ..heers, 4/6. :aÂ£d 7'ract above r/,gscri-604.Â· To Have and to Hold thÂ® sams, tagethe wim all 3 li ! &40 7Â·44ts. prie,ilotres, intnwinitÂ£8& and app#,4,?uâ„¢c,5.:. of who,troever nature, there,62610 belon,fi,4, unto the said ; '1040.431. A..1 ~7 of , i a.na to~ 444% . heirs a.n.d a.pail,ut fore.ner: subject to an,11 utated, 8724. n.cen).8(i loater ri#hts for mining. agri- Â· i S i#ti; â‚¬ ' cid#,trrd, man,Â£/act,irin.zy or ,>th#:r piâ€žrposw. and ri#d., 10 (litchal and resdrvoin u.yed Â£76 conn.ection With '20â‚¬h 2 .â‚¬ , water rolluts fu mal' he riÂ·(441"*,9"i n.put ackmou,Zed,ed /,11 thÂ£ larÂ¥,1 1.ustony, Laze.r n.nd decr:siona 01. Couits. alwi : 01.0 suldect to th.â€¢ riÂ¢Jit of liMâ€¢ propriefor of ,i ziei.,1, or Uxte lo extro.ct 0.7,4 remove his ore therefrom, should th* ; samÂ·(' be fo!,1,4 to pene.1 ra.fr or int,Â·rse.et t.i r pri,nt, sp,9 h.r.,pl)!i frIN, ted, n,s prollidÂ£,1. Mi law. E i. I M. 're.t:mony Wheireof, I, 42' 10 .f-, f 4 r,1 i.1 <,2-, Praillent af th: Unit:Â¢ Statm Of Americll *f; M Y.jÂ· ' 11*ue ocut.ged. theae le.Iters to be macie. patent. {1.rui th*. 4111. id' the Ge}wral Land Oilice to 66 1-reuiato aillmedÂ· , Given un,der wy Aan.fÂ£. ~al the Cay of H'h,sh'.n-,to),, th , 0 ..y>Lad- -.- . 31 Â·Â·7 4,41 of / ..0 " ' .in, thÂ£ !/al- of our I,ord one th,ousaint gi.i}Lt A=RA fw,Â· I. 9 lutiuired a.,Ld @, f, f./.., f .. cfFÂ£ 4..' . 0.4. of the l.dcpon.d~Ace of thÂ£ Uaited Â· 11 [SEALI 1 st:.t e,; 1 he one kum.d,re. d, an cl..... ~31.iÂ·1..â‚¬j 'f 1-4.- Â·~ ; t f 0 .:, / BY THE PR EN.?7)EXT: J. 1.-r.J 2 -- C Â·41.-4 LA.1 4 06 Â· /7 1 -59''L /7 61,â‚¬-I .RAeretapÂ·U Blf . .*- ifÂ£ t<- -4,2 ,.Rf - .TE .0- i .4 - Recor.ier of the Gausral Land Oili' e Re.enrri r,1 . V,l. i . Pa.* 0 4 e' :. 14.44 bu. 1.Â·' .1 J /he A = -3 1.1 - th, 4 .9 1 I.1.1,Â·1 6 .., L fp 00- '70'. 11*Â·.r 1.g.?..'..,Frc'..19'pm. â€ž4,2.7.-1.9.Mwaf 4,-*.,:,1,....w,+3.4. . , . .1 E--'47--1.Im. 0 .. - I ..1 .6-: 42'r.Â·6.-10 l. A : T- 4.-i. 1. .VtÂ·Â»,2 ' -k.rÂ·:P'4...a. .2.- .t'Mt e:' 2.Â· - te ' ~tt#. r 0 0 .â€¢t GENERAL WARRANTY DEED ERDMAN PARTNERSHW, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, for the consid- eration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to BELL 26, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is do Brooke A. Peterson, Esq., Kaufman & Peterson, P.C., 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305, Aspen, CO 81611, the following real properly in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: d Z i g LOT 1, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, according to the Plat thereofrecor(led November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. also known by street and number as: 360 Lake Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, with all its appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same, subject to and except for: 19 0 Zt 4 1. General taxes for 2000 and thereafter payable in 2001 and thereafter. 2. Building and zoning regulations. 3. All matters described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed this /29'i day ofFebruary, 2000. ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado Partnership '-2'25*2224,74EDEU- Donnelley ErdeK General Partner ~ STATE OF COLORADO ) 440881 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 02/25/2000 ri m ) ss 2>f COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the undersigned authority on this the 8 ~ <~ the Erdman Partnership, a Colorado partnerhhip. /6 day of F>-6â€ž i 0 4.1 , 2000 by Donnelley Erdman as General Partner of a-CLA ' ~ 9 WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. O 0 Notary Public [SEAL] n My commission expires: 1 1< i ~0 3 0 Â».SIOTA 48"-a . . . .. . . %34+1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 440881 02/25/2000 04:21P WD DAVIS SILVI 1 of 2 R 10.00 D 714.50 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO My Commission Expires 11/01/2003 f el- ~Â£19 { 1 043-7.2 09 - 4, - .. EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the 2000 not yet due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 08,1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 3. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreernent Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One, recorded June 25, 1990 in Book 623 at Page 696 and Amendment thereto recorded February 18, 2000 as Reception No. 440645. 4. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. 111'111111111111111111111111 lilli 1111111[11111 lili lili 440881 02/25/2000 04 Â·'10 un ...... u $ .. 0 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED DONNELLEY ERDMAN and CINDA W. ERDMAN, for the consideration o f Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to BELL 01 26, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is c/o Brooke A. Peterson, Esq., 0 Kaufman & Peterson, P.C., 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305, Aspen, CO 81611, the following Nj ~ ~, real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: 2 3 LOT 2, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, according to the Plat thereofrecorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. GEjuB also known by street and number as: 350 Lake Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, with all its appurtenances, and warrant the title to the same, subject to and except for: â‚¬ C/. 1. General taxes for 2000 and thereafter payable in 2001 and thereafter. A- 2. Building and zoning regulations. co 3. All matters described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein 00 m by this reference. .= tiE ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PIT)CIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed this 4* day ofFebruary, 2000. -**a,64* 7 Do 'I.J.. 323fuÂ« ---0 Cinda W. Erdman L d -0 X 1 - STATE OF COLORADO ) -.41 ) SS -0Â® -aÂ® COUNTY OF PITKIN ) EEC, 6 ===,9 Â® The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the undersigned authority on this the = 99 9 90 /ba--~~Q=-c,614 1 4 day of , 2000 by Donnelley Erdman and Cinda W. Erman. --ZZ --80 WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. --O --G Notary Public [SEAL] -0. -Ne --- My commission expires: 1\l c /O-3, -0. ....N ==e o W 1 -2~ .. . 0 ~. . . ......4 0U 52Â·.4 . 4 O Op cotc>B My Commission E*res 11/012003 0002/62/20 03AI303h1 NoIlublt'1030 00 *1NnOO N , 1 EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the 2000 not yet due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 08, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 3. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One, recorded June 25, 1990 in Book 623 at Page 696 and Amendment thereto recorded February 18,2000 as Reception No. 440645. 4. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42.