Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19990621Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Mayor Richards called the continued meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmembers McCabe, Markalunas, Paulson and Hershey present. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Markalunas moved to read Ordinance #26, Series of 1999; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE No. 26 (Series of 1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 26.04.100, DEFINITIONS, "FLOOR AREA, G. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT OR LINKED PAVILION," PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 26.92, AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE REGULATIONS AND OFFICIAL ZONE DISTRICT MAP, OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE Councilman Markalunas moved to adopt the consent calendar; seconded by Councilman Hershey. The consent calendar is: · Ordinance #26, 1999 – Code Amendment Definition of “Footprint” · Letter to Scott McInnis Supporting Bond Fairness Act Councilmember Board Appointments · : Mayor Pro Tem Terry Paulson Colorado Association Rachel Richards of Ski Towns RFTA Rachel Richards Housing Authority Tom McCabe Board NWC Council of Tony Hershey Governments Aspen Chamber Resort Rachel Richards Assn. Arts Council Tony Hershey Ruedi Water & Power Tom McCabe Authority 1 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Energy Committee Terry Paulson Sister Cities Terry Paulson Roaring Fork Railroad Jim Markalunas Holding Authority RFRHA Policy Rachel Richards Committee ASC Advisory Tony Hershey Committee Trolley Committee Terry Paulson Healthy Mountain Rachel Richards Communities RTA Elected officials Rachel Richards; Jim Task Force Markalunas Roll call vote: Councilmembers Hershey, yes; Paulson, yes; Markalunas, yes; McCabe, yes; Mayor Richards, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #23, SERIES OF 1999 – MAA/Burlingame Housing Final PUD Councilman Paulson moved to read Ordinance #23, Series of 1999; seconded by Councilman McCabe. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE N0. 23 (SERIES OF 1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING THE BURLINGAME RANCH SUBDIVISION, REZONING LOT #2 OF THE BURLINGAME RANCH SUBDIVISION TO THE RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY (RMF-A) ZONE DISTRICT, GRANTING FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOATA SYSTEM EXEMPTIONS, APPROVAL OF THE METHOD OF PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WAIVERS OF PARKS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AND LAND USE REVIEW FEES, AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR THE BURLINGAME SEASONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LOT #2 BURLINGAME RANCH SUBDIVISION, BURLINGAME RANCH ADDITION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735.024.09.851 was read by the city clerk 2 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Chris Bendon, community development department, showed Council where the recently annexed Burlingame parcel is located. Bendon pointed out this parcel is on two sides of Highway 82 and is one undivided parcel. This ordinances divides the Burlingame into the seasonal housing parcel and the ranch parcel. Bendon noted the runway protection zone and ¼ mile from the proposed transit stop at buttermilk. Bendon reminded Council two plans were submitted at conceptual; one with an internal courtyard and crescent shape parking lot on the outside, 69 three- bedroom units. That plan was amended because of expansion concerns. The second plan had an internal parking lot and eliminated the large courtyard and had 50 four-bedroom units. Each of the plans had about 80 parking spaces. Council approved the Burlingame seasonal housing at conceptual with a condition requiring a site planning work session on with P & Z and Council. This third plan incorporates smaller, two-story buildings with a small courtyard for each building. There is a larger green space and 80 parking spaces is on the outside of the proposal. Bendon told Council P & Z recommended denial of the final plan on a 5 to 2 vote. P & Z felt the location was too separate from town and that there would be adverse impacts from the airport. P & Z had passed the plan on at conceptual with a favorable vote. Bendon said location of this project is a threshold issue. P & Z did discuss where in town this type of housing could be accommodated. They looked at the Meadows, expansion of Marolt, and the golf course. At conceptual, the conclusion was while this may not be the best site, it is a site and the design will need to deal with the marginal conditions. At final, P & Z did not feel the design had overcome the adverse impacts of the site. Bendon said he feels this is the best design for the site and more than adequately addresses the negative aspects of noise, visibility from the road and is a pleasant site plan. Bendon told Council concern was expressed at growth management about the number of allotments. There is an annual allotment of 43 units for affordable housing. An excess allotment has built up. With this allotment of 101 affordable housing units, there would only be 2 units remaining in the th pool. There are 7 and Main, Truscott, Stillwater, Aspen Mountain PUD, Bavarian, Pitkin Iron, Gramiger, all in the process and 2 affordable housing unit allocation per year will not accommodate all these projects. 3 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 The growth management commission did request Council and BOCC to look at the number of annual affordable housing allotments and the twenty- year growth allotment for housing. The applicant is requesting an appeal of staff’s decision that these units are apartments units and not dormitory units; dormitory units do not have to pay school land dedication impact fees like general residential units. The applicant has also requested a waiver of a partial of the park dedication fee as there are some additional trails not part of the project that the parks department has requested on site. Bendon told Council staff has asked for a transit backup plan. There is a stoplight planned for the Buttermilk intersection so residents can safely get across highway 82 from this project to connect with transit. Bendon said there is a timing issue on this and staff has asked for transit service from this project either to town or to a transit stop. Bendon said the applicant has presented noise studies and the way in which they will mitigate the noise from the airport and from the highway. Robert Harth, MAA director, said the music festival has used a shared facilities approach to make their school and festival successful; they share the music campus with Aspen Country Day School in the winter, and share Marolt ranch housing and share the tent with other organizations. Harth told Council they will lose 190 beds for students at the end of this season; this is housing for about 1/3 of their student body. Harth said he feels the community also needs this housing for the winter season. Harth said this is the best location for housing that has been brought up for a long time. Harth noted the MAA first contacted Council about this in December 1996. Harth said the design of the project has improved in the last two years. Harth said the music festival does not know where to find 190 beds for next season if this project does not come to fruition. Jim Curtis, representing the MAA, said this project will benefit both the MAA and the winter seasonal employee. Curtis agreed this is not a perfect location but is a very acceptable location. Curtis told Council the MAA looked at the Meadows site, the Moore property, expanding the Marolt housing. Curtis said there are neighborhood problems or zoning problems or purchasing the property problems with all of those sites. The Burlingame site is acceptable because (a) it is adjacent to the existing employee housing 4 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 of the Maroon Creek Club and there may week be development at the base of Buttermilk; (b) being adjacent to highway 82 will allow this develop to be transit oriented; it will be 4 to 7 minutes to a transit stop; (c) the development can use existing utilities. Curtis said with good design, they have made this project attractive and livable. To deal with sound from the highway and from the airport, there will be berming to create a buffer. The buildings have been kept to two- story, top of roof 22 feet. The site has been excavated to lower the buildings; the excavated material will be used for the berming. This will reduce trucks in and out of the project hauling dirt. The buildings have been separated into small cottages, which lessens the bulk and the mass and creates additional privacy. There is a common building with laundry facilities, vending machines, and a two-bedroom property manager unit. Curtis pointed out space where in the future practice rooms could be built when funds become available. Curtis said there are two parking options; A, with a total of 84 cars; and B with a total of 106 cars. Curtis said either plan is fine with MAA. Curtis said the MAA would prefer to start with the smaller lot and test transit incentives. Curtis said there has been 10 years of experience in operating Marolt ranch. In designing Burlingame seasonal housing, the MAA spent a lot of time with the property manager of Marolt ranch. Curtis told Council parking is not a problem in the summer. For 300 beds, Marolt ranch has 49 parking spaced and these are not filled in the summer. In the winter, parking is a problem. Curtis told Council instead of shared bedrooms at Burlingame, there will be two small individual bedrooms. There will be a small kitchenette; the units are 480 square feet. Curtis said although these are individual bedrooms, the project does not fit the definition of dormitory and is being financially penalized by improving the Marolt ranch experience. Molly Campbell, the general manager Gant, said the community critically needs these small units within the metropolitan area. Ms. Campbell said the MAA supports Aspen’s summer economy and the MAA needs these beds. Ms. Campbell said the community needs 200 and more beds to support the winter economy. Ms. Campbell said this is a good example of public/private partnership. The community needs to find more of these type of partnerships. 5 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Roger Hunt, P & Z, told Council he voted against this project as all the problems with the site and with the project have not been worked out. Hunt said P & Z was not shown the noise levels to expect from the airport. Hunt asked how the snow loads on the flat roofs will be dealt with. Hunt said he prefers parking option “modified A”, nestling the stacked in parking under the berm which would give more room in the complex. Hunt said he feels a traffic light as well as a pedestrian connection through the berm are both needed. Hunt said he feels the access has to go through the Maroon Creek Club Road, which is supposed to be a public access. Creating another access to highway 82 at Stage Road does not make sense. Gwen Gordon-Knowlton, restaurant owner, supports the MAA and their housing program. Ms. Knowlton said seasonal winter employers, like her, will also benefit from the project. Ms. Knowlton said she has shared housing with Anderson Ranch between winter and summer usage. Nancy Torinus, Impressions of Aspen, supports this project in this location. Ms. Torinus said housing in the winter is difficult to find, over-priced and sometimes over-crowded. Charlie Tarver, business owner, reminded Council this location and land was the subject of an election question, shall the city be authorized to sell 3 acres of Burlingame to the MAA for housing. This is a pretty good indication of community acceptance. Tarver said he likes the smaller size units, which allow more density. Tarver urged Council to go along with CDOT’s recommendation and not create another entrance onto highway 82. The community has worked hard to make the corridor as efficient as possible; adding entrances affects 23,000 people/daily. Tarver said for precious affordable units, the community should get back less cars. If one wants the right to live in subsidized housing, they should help the community with other problems. Tarver said he supports this housing proposal as it accomplishes a lot of community goals. Curtis said a sound consultant was retained, gave the applicants a technical memo outlining a specific noise-alleviating standard better than UBC requirements, FAA requirements and HUD requirements. Curtis said the applicants have committed to this standard. Curtis told Council P & Z suggested stacked parking, back to back for wintertime when the parking requirements are higher. This will be created with roadbase with topsoil and grass on top of it. In the summer, this will be green and not used and in the winter it will be parking. Curtis said to carport 6 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 this costs a lot of money and does not increase the parking. Curtis suggested excess monies be spent somewhere else in this project. The issues in the winter are (a) where do people put their cars, and (b) how many times do they use these cars. Curtis said they would like to accommodate places to put the cars but discourage using it on a daily basis. Curtis said the applicants are proposing a gate to control parking with two different fees; frequent users and infrequent users. Curtis said there may be technology set up to charge users every time they go through the gate. Michael Hassig, architect, said there is no problems with the snow loads on the roofs of these buildings. This was a design decision to keep snow in the roofs of the buildings. Hassig said an issue with snow shed roofs is where does the snow go. Councilman Hershey asked about the proposed transit. Bendon told Council this section of the highway will be complete in the spring of 2000. The MAA proposes transit service to include the music tent, campus, town and Burlingame. The intersection of Buttermilk with the light will have pedestrian crossing. Claude Morelli, transportation department, noted the highway at this project is being funded from the Basalt to Buttermilk portion of monies. CDOT will bid the project fall 1999 and start construction spring 2000. In the summer of 2000, the MAA will run a shuttle for their students. Morelli said staff hopes CDOT will install a stop light as the first portion of the project. Julia Marshall, landscape architect for the project, told Council CDOT is not interested in an underpass for personal safety issues. CDOT feels an at- grade crossing is the best thing for this intersection. Councilman Paulson said it looks as if there is less open space in this plan than the previously approved plan. Councilman Paulson also questioned whether Council approved 80 parking spaces. Bendon reminded Council the objections to the first plan were that it got too big, was too close to the highway, and the visual effect from the highway was overwhelming. Councilman Paulson said he is concerned about using up more space with less building. Curtis said there were trade offs in lowering the buildings. Three level structures affected the bulk and mass of the project, the applicants were criticized about the parking scheme. Councilman Paulson said separating the building uses more energy. Councilman Paulson said he would rather see this site maximized for housing. 7 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Mayor Richards said 85 parking spaces seem to be an appropriate amount. Councilman McCabe agreed and said parking under the berm seem to be expensive and less practical. Councilman Markalunas said he is not in favor of accommodating any more cars in town. Councilman Hershey agreed with the parking plan. John Worcester asked that the applicants identify with the city clerk all exhibits for the record and have them identified for the next hearing. Mayor Richards asked for the second reading that a comparison of open space be done. Mayor Richards said she is much more in favor of the smaller bungalow type design; this has more character. Michael Hassig, architect, said this project has been a struggle between conflicting demands. This design is in response to requests from P & Z and Council. Hassig said the applicants will have to use modular type building due to the requirements and time. The company building the units are sensitive to resources. Hassig said a two-story building means they can have a single stair out. Three story buildings require more vertical circulation, which also uses up resources. Hassig said an open space consideration was how useful was the quadrangle in the original design versus smaller scale courtyards where people can gather and interact. Julia Marshall, landscape architect, pointed out highway 82 will be elevated 10 feet along the side of the project. The original concept was to have a 20 foot berm, which would mask the buildings, visually and from the sound. Three story buildings would be subject to more noise. Councilman Hershey said he supports the site plan and architecture. Councilman Markalunas said this is a step in the right direction and he supports it. Councilman McCabe agreed. Curtis told Council the applicants question only two of the 29 conditions. The first issue is 21(f) dealing with the school land mitigation payment in lieu fee. This fee would be $59,000. Curtis said the project is being penalized for the good design and there should not be a public purpose in penalizing good design. Curtis noted that Marolt ranch, which has a shared sleeping situation and no kitchens, fits within the dormitory definition. This project does not fit within the dormitory definition. Marolt ranch would be fully exempt from school dedication fee because a dormitory-style project does not generate any children. Burlingame will be operated in the exact same manner. Curtis proposed if any units are rented on a year-round lease basis that they then pay a school dedication fee. 8 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 The next issue is with 21(c), which is the park dedication fee. The applicants agree this project should pay a park dedication fee. Curtis said the land use code classifies this as a two-bedroom unit at a park dedication fee of $2725/unit as compared to Marolt Ranch which was charged $2012/unit. This is a difference of $90,000. Curtis said the project is again being penalized for good design. Curtis suggested Burlingame be charged a park dedication fee on a per person basis. Mayor Richards suggested this be addressed at the public hearing. Councilman Paulson asked if any fees are waived by the city that they be put into using green building materials. Hassig said a good pay back in investment would be an active solar system for the laundry. Bendon said the applicant is not requesting the school impact fee be waived but that Council interpret these units as dorm units. Staff has not supported this interpretation because the units have all the elements of a stand-along unit. Council does have the ability to waive park dedication fees to encourage affordable housing. The ordinance is written to uphold staff’s interpretation of dorm unit. Councilman Markalunas moved to adopt Ordinance #23, Series of 1999, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Hershey. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Hershey, yes; Markalunas, yes; McCabe, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Richards, yes. Motion carried. ISELIN PARK COVENANTS Tim Anderson, recreation director, told Council staff has met with the Maroon/Castle Creek caucuses and have discussed minimizing impacts of the Iselin park improvements associated with the recreation bond. Anderson reminded Council throughout the planning process, staff worked with the neighborhood to address their issues. Anderson said the neighbors requested 15 years on these covenants; staff suggests 10 years. With the ball field lighting, the neighbors suggested the lights be limited from noon to 9 p.m.; staff would like to extend this to 10 p.m. in order to have maximum use of the field. Staff requests this covenant be reviewed again in 5 years. The neighbors urge Council to look at alternative sites to purchase for ball fields and also to look at limited use of lighting, like 3 or 4 days a week. Anderson pointed out staff would like to put conduit in the ball fields during this current phase of construction as it 9 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 will save money; the infrastructure will be there to handle lighting if it is ever approved. The second covenant deals with PA systems. The neighbors originally requested noon; however, staff suggests 9 a.m. could work for some events and any sound systems meet with the city’s noise ordinances. rd The 3 covenant is not to construct a second sheet of ice and the city has no plans to construct a third sheet of ice. No additional building or structures – there has been some discussion about adding the Youth Center. Anderson noted this is something the Youth Center is pursuing and they will have to fund the effort and work with the neighbors to make that facility work. Anderson said there are no plans for expansion or modification of playing fields as there is no room. Anderson told Council the neighbors requested the current concession stand close at start of construction. Anderson pointed out that facility will be needed throughout construction. There will be a new facility when the new building opens. Anderson said this covenant would be changed to read that the old concession stand would be torn down at the opening of the new facility. Anderson said there are already events of over 250 participants and spectators so the covenant will be changed to over 500 participants and spectator and “unless parking and transportation are adequately provided”. Anderson said an event of that size will pay for the appropriate parking enforcement. Anderson said putting signs in both English and Spanish can be accommodated in all city parks. Condition #9 again staff requests changed from 15 to 10 years. Condition #10 is for two tennis courts; two courts have always been part of the community plan. King Woodward, representing the caucus, told Council the neighbors feel 9 p.m. for lights in adequate anytime of the year, not so much because of the lights but because of the noise generated. Woodward said loudspeakers at 9 a.m. are only acceptable for special events and should go no later than 9 p.m. Woodward said absolutely no second sheet of ice. 10 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Woodward said they are willing to go along with the snack bar staying open until the building is finished and a new one can be incorporated inside that building. Woodward noted there are only 475 parking spaces in the entire campus property, which is why the caucus suggests any event over 250 participants and spectators has to take care of parking enforcement. Woodward said the neighbors would be willing to go to 10 years on length of the covenants. Steve Saunders said two years ago he presented petitions with over 500 signatures of people in favor of returning the lights at Iselin. The community stated they would appreciate better ball fields; more fields are needed. In the fall the lights are beneficial to multipurpose uses of the Iselin field. Softball has grown so that the fields are overused, it is difficult to get coaches for little league during the day. Larry Slater, adjacent neighbor, said the biggest issue is the noise. This is a narrow valley. The neighbors are surrounded by 7 ballfields, tennis courts, basketball courts, Highland ski area. The residents would like to enjoy some peace and quiet and do not feel it is unreasonable to ask that any loudspeakers be shutdown by 9 p.m. and that there be no lights. Slater said the city should not need to depend on just Iselin park to handle the entire needs for ball games. Slater said before the election, residents were assured there would be no other building in this area. Slater presented a letter outlining the conditions he felt were agreed upon with Council. Mayor Richards said softball, soccer, football are very humanizing events in a community. Mayor Richards said neither she nor Councilman Paulson remember approving the list of conditions as presented by Slater. John Worcester, city attorney, said this was brought up at a brown bag and the neighbors’ attorney drafted the conditions. Worcester said he forwarded these to staff for comments and informed the residents of that. Worcester said it was clear in the process that something would be negotiated with staff and would be taken to Council for their approval. Staff does not have the authority to approve covenants. What Slater has is not a final copy of the conditions. Mayor Richards said Council would not have approved these covenants without a public hearing of all users and residents. Slater said Council suggested these conditions to him. Mayor Richards said she has never agreed to no lights at Iselin field. Mayor Richards noted a lot of people 11 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 might not have supported the recent bond issue if they were told there was to be no lights on the fields. Mayor Richards said part of the reason for agreeing to no lights on the Moore playing fields is that there would be lights on the Iselin fields. Slater said he would agree to no lighting for 7 years from date of completion, which is a compromise position. Slater said a compromise on loudspeakers is 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. at the latest and for special events only. Council concurred with 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. special events only for loudspeakers, also to meet the city’s noise ordinance. Mayor Richards suggested the city reserve the right to review other recreation facilities if there is no ice rink located in the campus. Councilman McCabe said condition #3 states “shall not be expanded or otherwise changed” and suggested the “otherwise changed” may be too encompassing and may preclude small changes. Worcester said he could amend this so that it only applies to changes of a magnitude to require P & Z and Council review. Woodward noted that the size of seating at the ice rink would also be of concern to the neighborhood. Condition #4 states there shall not be any additional buildings or structures constructed, erected or otherwise located on the property not identified in the Iselin Park master plan in effect as of the date hereof. Mayor Richards noted this agreement is not binding on the Aspen School District. Jeff Woods, recreation director, noted there are covenants for Moore and Rotary Parks and this will not affect the school. Woods told Council the master plan has not gone through the planning process and the architect contract will be before Council next month. Mayor Richards suggested this state the “conceptual master plan”. Mayor Richards said Council should have the flexibility to modify the ballfields in the future if the type of sport were to change. Council agreed and said they will leave that there shall not be additional fields construction. Woods said there is no square footage at all to expand. Council and the caucus agreed on #6 about the concession stand and restaurant. Council agreed that the signs will be bi-lingual. 12 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 The caucus suggests the covenant be effective for 15 years; staff suggests 10 years. Slater said if this is a 10 year covenant, there should be annual reviews. Mayor Richards noted the condition states it shall be in effect for successive one-year terms unless modified or terminated after public hearing. Slater brought up the condition requiring an inter-governmental agreement with the sheriff’s office to control parking and traffic in this area. Mayor Richards said the city has annexed all this area. Toni Kronberg said there should be transportation to this area every day, not just for special events. Ms. Kronberg proposed a dedicated shuttle from the transit center, the school and downtown. City Manager Margerum suggested a statement that the city will make all efforts to work with the county to enforce the parking. Woods noted the design will not allow parking around Iselin; they are getting rid of the shoulder, building to a ditch with trees and some kind of barrier. Mayor Richards said the agreement will leave in 500 spectators as the agreement and that 250 participants will trigger a special event permit. Staff will work on a parking enforcement should the transportation efforts fail. Mayor Richards said the remaining issues are the period for which there will be no lights and a review to allow lighting after that period. Mayor Richards said the neighbors have suggested 10 years with no lights after completion. Woods said Iselin will be complete next year; the entire master plan will be complete in 3 years. Mayor Richards stated it is completion of Iselin. Mayor Richards said the lighting will be allowed “for regular play” not just special events. This will be after a public review. Councilman Hershey said he favors lighting being allowed and after 3 years. Councilman Hershey pointed out there are lights in the park now and they have been used in the past. Councilman Hershey said he cannot support cutting back service in the recreation area. Saunders agreed the lights exist; it costs over $250,000 to build a new field and there are almost no places to build fields in the valley. Councilman McCabe said his campaign was to maintain a sense of community, to have a growth in middle class, to renovate city fields, and have growth in alternative things for children to do including building character by playing sports. Councilman McCabe said he does not favor waiting at all for lights and would like to see them installed with construction. 13 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 Councilman Paulson said he would favor 5 to 7 years without lights to give the neighborhood some peace and quiet and so that the neighbors can adjust. Councilman Markalunas agreed with a 5 year waiting period. Councilman Markalunas said there should be some compromise when recreation imposing on neighbors. Council agreed with 3 year review after completion. Saunders suggested bringing up the issue of lights after the park is completed rather than waiting 5 years. Councilmembers Hershey, Markalunas, McCabe and Mayor Richards agreed with 3 years. Ms. Margerum said the city and school district will have to work out a way to schedule events at the campus so there is no conflict and too much traffic. Council’s agreement is that there will be a 3-year moratorium on the use of lights after completion with a review, which will occur after completion to discuss the needs at that time. Councilman Hershey moved to adjourn at 9:15 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 14 Continued Meeting Aspen City Council June 21, 1999 CONSENT CALENDAR ................................ ................................ ............. 1 ? Ordinance #26, 1999 – Code Amendment Definition of “Footprint” ... 1 ? Letter to Scott McInnis Supporting Bond Fairness Act ........................ 1 ? Councilmember Board Appointments: ................................ ................. 1 ORDINANCE #23, SERIES OF 1999 – MAA/Burlingame Housing Final PUD ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 2 ISELIN PARK COVENANTS ................................ ................................ .... 9 15