HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Beck Lot Split
rJ. ........ ....................
'" .ASELOAD SUMMARYSBEET
/~~~ :~~~~~~tT~?~ City of Aspen J~~/O~
PROJEcr NAME: (JjtCI< -IJYt (J[Jh:C .xJ~~
APPL ICANT:
Applicant Addre~Phone: ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~:Wd~~~Ph~~~1 mf1A't). 0 A[;)~MJf{~ f(!0/!
I ,
Type of Application:
n
,
_ 1.
GMP/SUBDIV IS ION/PUD (4 step)
Conceptual Submission
prelimi nary PI at
Fi nal PI at
($2,730.00)
($1,640.00)
($ 820.00)
II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
I Ill.
1z IV.
Conceptual Submission
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
($1,900.00)
($1,220.00).
($ 820.00)
($1,490 .00) ~b<6D,
(@)
EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step)
SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step)
Special Review
Use Determination
Condi ti onal Use
Oth er :
-------------------------------------------------------------.-------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
@ CC MEETING DATE: 'fV\A.,\ .g... . PUBLIC HEARING: ~ ~
~===========~~:~=!~!~::~~:=====~~::::=;~=:;;::::==~~====~=~;~~~,\
REFEJRALS:
~City Atty _ Aspen Consolo S.D. ~ School District
~ City Engineer _ Mtn. Bell ____ Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
____ Housing Dir. ____ Parks DepL ____ StateHwy Dept (Glenwd)
Aspen Water ____ Holy Cross Electric --r StateHwy Dept (Gr.Jtn)
____ City Electdc ____ Fire Marshall ...::L... Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn
____ Envir. Hlth. _ Fire Chief ____ Other: .
----------------------------------------------~?---------r- - --
;~;~-;~~;i~G~-------~-----~--;~T~-;O~;~;~---~- - ---~-iN~i~~~- / --
____ City Atty ,/ City Eng' neer - .,Y Building Dep .
Other:
_ Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
CASE DISPOSITION:
"
....../;:;;~(...,
( r,5, &Z )
. "- -----"
."...."\.. ~.~, .-\'
., \
City
/
.\~\"-::,(')
r"""\
Counci .
Revie\~cd by:
,..
0",--,,- '-Z', _ -' .1>.0,0-
{"" Ji,",-, .. J \
'\, ".
-I 'j
Revie\olcd By:
i".spen P&Z
,e-- _______
" City Council \
./
"::\"._I"'_L ~
i\'\i)I' ^ ,.\
.j .\
"\ \ \.
" '
\\, C;\.( \:"\\c"" 1(/li'\
I
'.) .......
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to grant approval of a subdivision excep-
tion per Section 20-19 for the purposes of a lot split and a GMP
exemption per Section 24-11.2(d) for the construction of a single-fam-
ily house on the newly-formed lot with the following condition:
1. The following items be added to the plat prior to recorda-
tion:
a. Legal description;
b. Location of existing trees;
c. Location of water, gas and electric meters; and
d. Language stating that no further subdivision may be granted
for these lots nor additional units be built without receipt
of applicable approvals pursuant to Chapter 20 and an
allocation pursuant to Section 24-11.1.
~
I"')
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Aspen City Council
Hal Schilling, City Manag~
Alan Richman, Planning Office
Beck Lot Split
May 28, 1985
~
TO:
THRU:
RE:
DATE:
================::::=.::::::::::::======================= ==================::::======
,...........,...n...,_.,,,...,_,."...h.. ............... ..."...., ,...... ,_ ,.', _,' .. ,._,..',.... .".,'.....,...,.".,.,.,.".......... .......
SUMM,ARY: The Planning Office recommends that Council grant subdivi-
sion and growth ma~agement exemption for the Beck Lot Split.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
LOCATION: Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen
407 W. Smuggler
ZONIR;: R-6
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a subdivision
exception pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Munic:ipal Code for the
purpose of a lot split and an exemption from GMP procedures for the
construction of a single-family house on the newly-formed lot as per
Section 24-11.2(d).
PLANNING OFFICE REVI.~W:The request for a lot split proposes the
subdivision of four original townsite lots into two parcels of 6000
s. f. each. The subdivision will be along the original townsite lot
lines. It is unnecessary for the split to proceed through the full
subdivision process because of no particular land use impacts, hence
the request for an exception from full subdivision.
The criteria of Section 24-11.2(d) for a GMP exemption are as follows:
(d) The construction of one single-family residence on a lot
subdivided after November 14, 1977, where the following condi-
tions are met:
(1) The tract of land which was subdivided had a preexisting
dwelling unit;
(2) No more than two (2) lots were created by the subdivi-
sion;
(3) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was
not previously the subj ect of an exemption under th.e
provisions of this section or a "lot split" exception or
exemption pursuant to section 2Q-19;
~
f'1
(4) A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded by the
applicant after city approval indicating that no further
subdivision may be granted for these lots nor additiona:I.
units be built without receipt of applicable approvals
pursuant to Chapter 20 and an allocation pursuant to section
24-11.1;
(5) The application was reviewed by the city council at a
public hearing held pursuant to the standards of sections
24-l2.5(c)(1) and (2)."
These criteria are met by this application in the following ways:
1. A dwelling unit exists on Lots H and I;
2. Only two (2) lots are being created;
3. No previous exemption has been granted;
4. This language must be added to the plat and will be a condition
of approval;
5. This will be reviewed by City Council as outlined.
The two lots conform to the subdivision standards of Chapter 20 of the
Aspen Municipal Code and no non-conformities are 0 being created. The
property is fronted by a dedicated street and all utilities are
available.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-,0
in favor of the applicant's request at their regular meeting on May 7,
1985.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to grant approval of a subdivision excep-
tion per Section 20-19 for the purposes of a lot split and a GMP
exemption per Section 24-l1.2(d) for the construction of a single-fam-
ily house on the newly-formed lot with the following condition:
1. The following items be added to the plat prior to recorda-
tion:
a. Legal description;
b. Location of existing trees;
c. Location of water, gas and electric meters; and
d. Language stating that no further subdivision may be granted
for these lots nor additional units be built without receipt
of applicable approvals pursual'll::to Chapter 20 and an
allocation pursuant to Section 24-11.1.
2
"# ~
,-.."
r)
APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT APPROVAL
PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-19 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN
ALLOWING FOR CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS FROM THE STRICT
APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 20
OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE AND REQUEST
FOR GRANT OF EXEMPTION FROM
GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM ALLOCATION PROCEDURES
Pursuant to ~20-19(c), BECK INVESTORS, LTD, a
limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as the
"Applicant"), hereby applies for exception from the strict
application of all of the standards, requirements and
provisions of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen and seeks final subdivision approval for the division
of the property described on the lot split plat filed
herewith into two parcels as described on the lot split plat.
For a lot split to comply with all the standards and
requirements of Chapter 20 would be redundant, serve no
public purpose and be unnecessary in relation to the land use
policies of the City of Aspen, Notwithstanding any exception
which may be granted to applicant, the proposed subdivision
will comply with the design standard of this chapter and is
appropriate for a one step City Council approval.
A. EXEMPT FROM GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM
ALLOCATION PROCEDURES.
Pursuant to ~24-11.2(d) this lot split is
exempt from complying with the Growth Management Quota System
Allotment procedures because the tract of land being
subdivided has a pre-existing dwelling unit and only two lots
are created by the subdivision. In accordance with
S24-11.2(d), Applicant therefore requests that the City
Council formally grant to Applicant an exemption from the
Growth Management Quota System Allotment procedures for this
lot split.
B. LOT SPLIT COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE.
1. Section 20-9 suitability of land for
subdivision.
a. The subject property is not burdened
by any hazards such as flooding, bad drainage, rock or soil
creep, mudflow, rockslide, avalanche or snowslide, steep
topography or any other potential natural hazard, feature or
condition likely to be harmful to the health, safety or
welfare of the future residents in the proposed subdivision
or of the City.
,
~
n
b. The proposed lot split is located in
the central residential core of the City of Aspen and thus
conforms with growth patterns and does not necessitate any
extension of utilities or public services.
applicable zoning
of Aspen and laws
c. This subdivision conforms with all
ordinances or other ordinances of the City
and regulations of the State of Colorado.
2.
Disclosure of Ownership.
Attached hereto is a true copy of Ownership
and Encumbrance report issued by Stewart Title Guaranty
Company for Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
3. Lot Split Plat.
Filed herewith is a lot split plat containing
necessary items and information indicating that the proposed
subdivision meets the design standards of Chapter 20 of the
Municipal Code which are applicable to this proposed lot
split.
4. Adjacent Property Owners.
Attached hereto is a list of the names and
mailing addresses of the owners of the adjacent properties
prepared by Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc.
5. Zoning.
The lot split plat indicates the property is
presently zoned R-6.
Dated this ~~ day of
/1"'1'-<-/1
, 1985.
Respectfully Submitted
LAW OFFICES OF
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, P.C.
By~r
Beck Lot Split/LOTSPL
- 2 -
~
n
e/~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
Aspen City Council
Hal Schilling, City Manager
FROM:
Alan Richman, Planning Office
t\f"
RE:
Beck Lot Spli t
May 28, 1985
DATE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends that Council grant subdivi-
sion and growth management exemption for the Beck Lot Split.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None.
LOCATION: Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen
407 W. Smuggler
ZONIli2: R-6
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a subdivision
exception pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Municipal Code for the
purpose of a lot split and an exemption from GMP procedures for the
construction of a single-family house on the newly-formed lot as per
Section 24-l1.2(d).
PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW: The request for a lot split proposes the
subdivision of four original townsite lots into two parcels of 6000
s.f. each. The subdivision will be along the original townsite lot
lines. It is unnecessary for the split to proceed through the full
subdivision process because of no particular land use impacts, hence
the request for an exception from full subdivision.
The criteria of Section 24-l1.2(d) for a GMP exemption are as follows:
(d) The construction of one single-family residence on a lot
subdivided after November 14, 1977, where the following condi-
tions are met: '
(1) The tract of land which was subdivided had a preexisting
dwelling unit;
(2) No more than two (2) lots were created by the subdivi-
sion;
(3) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was
not previously the subject of an exemption under the
provisions of this section or a "lot split" exception or
exemption pursuant to section 20-19;
-
...,'~.
r"")
r-,
(4) A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded by the
applicant after city approval indicating that no further
subdivision may be granted for these lots nor additional
units be built without receipt of applicable approvals
pursuant to Chapter 20 and an allocation pursuant to section
24-11.1;
(5) The application was reviewed by the city council at a
public hearing held pursuant to the standards of sections
24-12.5(c)(1) and (2)."
These criteria are met by this application in the following ways:
1. A dwelling unit exists on Lots H and I;
2. Only two (2) lots are being created;
3. No previous exemption has been granted;
4. This language must be added to the plat and will be a condition
of approval;
5. This will be reviewed by City Council as outlined.
The two lots conform to the subdivision standards of Chapter 20 of the
Aspen Municipal Code and no non-conformities are being created. The
property is fronted by a dedicated street and all utilities are
available.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-0
in favor of the applicant's request at their regular meeting on May 7,
1985.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to grant approval of a subdivision excep-
tion per Section 20-19 for the purposes of a lot split and a GMP
exemption per Section 24-11.2(d) for the construction of a single-fam-
ily house on the newly~formed lot with the following condition:
1. The following items be added .to the plat prior to recorda-
tion:
a. Legal description;
b. Location of existing trees;
c. Location of water, gas and electric meters; and
d. Language stating that no further subdivision may be granted
for these lots nor additional units be built without receipt
of applicable approvals pursuant to Chapter 20 and an
allocation pursuant to Section 24-11.1.
2
-
~."
,-
~,
,
APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLJ1' APPROVAL
PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-19 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN
ALLOWING FOR CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS FROM THE STRICT
APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 20
OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE AND REQUEST
FOR GRANT OF EXEMPTION FROM,
GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM ALLOCATION PROCEDURES
Pursuant to ~20-19(c), BECK INVESTORS, LTD, a
limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as the
"Applicant") , hereby applies for exception from the strict
application of all of the standards, requirements and
provisions of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen and seeks final subdivision approval for the division
of the property described on the lot split plat filed
herewith into two parcels as described on the lot split plat.
For a lot split to comply with all the standards and
requirements of Chapter 20 would be redundant, serve no
public purpose and be unnecessary in relation to the land use
policies of the City of Aspen, Notwithstanding any exception
which may be granted to applicant, the proposed subdivision
will comply with the design standard of this chapter and is
appropriate for a one step City Council approval.
A. EXENPT FROM GROWTH MANAGE~:ENT QUOTA SYSTD~
ALLOCATION PROCEDURES.
Pursuant to S24-11.2(d) this lot split is
exempt from complying with the Growth Management Quota System
Allotment procedures because the tract of land being
subdivided has a pre-existing dwelling unit and only two lots
are created by the subdivision. In accordance with
S24-11.2(d), Applicant therefore requests that the City
Council formally grant to Applicant an exemption from the
Growth Management Quota System Allotment procedures for this
lot split.
B. LOT SPLIT COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE.
1. Section 20-9 suitability of land for
subdivision.
a. The subject property is not burdened
by any hazards such as flooding, bad drainage, rock or soil
creep, mudflow, rockslide, avalanche or snowslide, steep
topography or any other potential natural hazard, feature or
condition likely to be harmful to the health, safety or
welfare of the future residents in the proposed subdivision
or of the City.
,-?
,..-.,
1
..;..:,...
b. The proposed lot split is located in
the central residential core of the City of Aspen and thus
conforms with growth patterns and does not necessitate any
extension of utilities or public services.
applicable zoning
of Aspen and laws
c. This subdivision conforms with all
ordinances or other ordinances of the City
and regulations of the State of Colorado.
2.
Disclosure of Ownership.
Attached hereto is a true copy of Ownership
and Encumbrance report issued by Stewart Title Guaranty
Company for Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
3. Lot Split Plat.
Filed herewith is a lot split plat containing
necessary items and information indicating that the proposed
subdivision meets the design standards of Chapter 20 of the
Municipal Code which are applicable to this proposed lot
split.
4. Adjacent Property Owners.
Attached hereto is a list of the names and
mailing addresses of the owners of the adjacent properties
prepared by Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc.
5. Zoning.
The lot split plat indicates the property is
presently zoned R-6.
Dated this ~~ day of
!1hrt<..-[-\ , 1985.
Respectfully Submitted
LAW OFFICES OF
GIDEON I. KAUF~iliN, P.C.
By
~Ar
{
Beck Lot Split/LOTSPL
~ 2 -
I"J
t""'"")
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
Beck Lot Split
Nay 7, 1985
RE:
DATE:
======================================~=============~=~?~=========~==
LOCATION: Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen
407 w. Smuggler
ZONING: R-6
APPLICANT' S ~EOUEST: The Applicant is requesting a subdivision
exception pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Municipal Code for the
purpose of a lot split and an exemption from GMP procedures for the
construction of a single-family house on the 0 newly-formed lot as per
Section 24-ll.2(d).
PLANNING OFFICB REVIEW: The request for a lot split proposes the
subdivision of four original townsite lots into two parcels of 6000
s. f. each. The subdivision will be along the original townsite lot
lines. It is unnecessary for the split to proceed through the full
subdivision process because of no particular land use impacts, hence
the request for an exception from full subdivision.
The criteria of Section 24-1l.2(d) for a GMP exemption are as follows:
(d) The construction of one single-family residence on a lot
subdivided after November 14, 1977, where the fOllowing condi-
tions are met:
(1) The tract of land which was subdivided had a preexisting
dwelling unit;
(2) No more than two (2) lots were created by the subdivi-
sion;
(3) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was
not previously the subject of an exemption under the
provisions of this section or a "lot split" exception or
exemption pursuant to section 20-19;
(4) A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded by the
applicant after city approval indicating that no further
subdivision may be granted for these lots nor additional
units be built without receipt of applicable approvals
r;
pursuant to Chapter 20 and an allocation pursuant to section
24-11.1;
(5) The application was reviewed by the city council at a
public hearing held pursuant to the standards of sections
24-l2.5(c) (1) and (2).n
These criteria are met by this application in the following ways:
1. A dwelling unit exists on Lots H and I;
2. Only two (2) lots are being created;
3. No previous exemption has been granted;
4. This language must be added to the plat and will be a
condition of approval;
5. This will be reviewed by City Council as outlined.
The two lots conform to the subdivision standards of Chapter 20 of the
Aspen Municipal Code and no non-conformities are being created. The
property is fronted by a dedicated street and all utilities are
avail abl e.
PLANNING OFF! CE REC()~EtmATI;QliI:'l'l1~l?!I@I1!ng Office recommends tha,t
you recommend approval of a subdivision exception per Section 20-19
for the purposes of a lot split and a GMP exemption per Section
24-11. 2 (d) for the construction of a single-family house on the
newly-formed lot with the following condition:
1. The following items be added to the plat prior to recorda-
tion:
a. Legal description;
b. Location of existing trees;
c. Location of water, gas and electric meters; and
d. Language stating that no further subdivision may be
granted for these lots nor additional units be built
without receipt of applicabl e approvals pursuant to
Chapter 20 and an allocation pursuant to Section
24-11.1.
CP: jlr :apz. beck
2
rJ
r-')
MEMORANDU/1
FROi'!: ELYSE
PENNE, PLANNING OFFICE j1/,7
ELLIOTT, ENGINEERING OFF~CE~
TO: COLETTE
RE: BECK LOT SPLIT
DATE: APRIL 9, 1985
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
, '. .. ,
After having reviewed this lot split application and made a site
inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments:
The lot lies in the R-6 zone. The split will create two lots,
each having the minimum required area of 6000 square feet (60
feet x 100 feet). This split will not effect the compliance of
the structure of Lot 2 to the side yard setback requirements.
We require that these items be on the plat:
-legal description
-location of existing vegetation (trees)
-location of water, gas and electric meters
Other than these items, this department has no problems with this
application~.
rJ
130
asp
r--J
\, -'
CITY
SPEN
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 15, 1985
TO: Colette Penne
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Beck Lot Split
City Case No. 010A-85
APR I 6 1985
I again suggest that all applications be executed by the owners of
the property in question, Qot their attorneys or representatives.
Al so, please keep in mind that the appl icat ion is for an .. excep-
tion" from the full subdivision process, not an exemption from the
definition of subdivision.
PJT/mc
I
il!i
:: :::: "."" I
B,;-;:k L9~. SNPlit w\ I
C~ty Case o. '"
,--~,,-,,-., '-' -,~
I
I
!il
Lots H and I presently have a single family dwelling ,(~~~~h,;;o.';~~"}!~S,,,~.~, , r'. ""._",_ .Ji
F.A.R. and other":. zpning considerations). ' I
.n'i
. '-"-'-"'-"'- ,'"I
i>l
I!J
I
@j
III
i
~
I
!
I
I
III
I
I
I
I
. ~
.' . .. ~;:'~=;;;;:~- Str13et I
.,-.... A&P&'n~~'cofDraac;~~i~::::;-I
. .-.,....,-," .." III
!!!
ASPEN.PI'l'KIt\lQ9JQNAL BUI
-
DIN-.:i.1 EiEPARTM
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Colette. PenIle, ~Lanning
RE:
These .lots, (F,G,H, & I) in Bl.ock 34,,"!".'il9n~!LK-::6 which requires 6000. s.q.ft.
for a' building site; minilllllm lot .wid~h. ts. "gO; is fronted by a dedicated st.reet;
and water, sewer, gas and"eieci:rlc.:ny'are"availabie.
PN/ar
offices:
110 East Hallam Street .. ..r_._,. ,... - ..,
"" ....:.:." :',: ,.... :,..... ..... ...,.... ...:.... <. ..,',-',' "':7~..,<::",.,,,,,:~.:"':>~i~,,,,.~,",,,:':,,,,:'-""~"''''''':~;::\'~':';""":':~""""':;;'~,"""""'''~'''-'''';:':00:<-"''"''''#"'.'',,""'~,,,,;,, .0"'~"'>:~, "'.
Aspen, Colorac;l91[:1:'$,.1.1.~~'p~~~::g~7;;t. '
T
I
:ft1
~
I")
;;r--
1;"
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Beck Lot Split
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, on May 28, 1985, at a
meeting to begin at 5: 00 P.H., in Aspen City Council Chambers, 130
S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted
by Gideon Kaufman on behalf of his client Beck Investors, Ltd. The
applicant is requesting of a subdivision exception for the purpose of
a lot split of property located at Lots, F, G, H and I, Block 34, City
and Townsite of Aspen (407 W. Smuggler).
For further information, contact the
Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado
ext. 223.
Aspen/Pitkin Planning
81611 (303) 935-2020,
s/William L. Stirling
Hayor, Ci ty Council of the
City of Aspen, Colorado
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Published in the Aspen Times on Hay 9,1985.
City of Aspen Account.
~
\; ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: ~ Attorney
/Ci y Engineer
oning Enforcement Officer
FROM:
'Colette Penne, Planning Office
Beck Lot Spl it
City Case No. 010A-85
April 1, 1985
RE:
DATE:
-------------------------------------------------.-------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Attached f9ryour review is an application submitted by Gideon Kaufman
on benalf of his client Beck Investors, Ltd. The applicant is requesting
exemption from the Subdivision Regulations for the purpose of a lot
split of property located at Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City and
Townsi te of Aspen (407 W. Smuggler). Please review this materLal and
return your referral comments to the Planning Office no I'afer than
April 17, 1985, in order for this office to have adequate time to
prepare for its presentation before Aspen P&Z on May 7th.
Thank you.
//~~'
~
'~ .~"...,...
ij
n
SOTtct':ty of Contract
STEWAR'r TrrI..I<~
OF ASPEN, INC.
602 E. HYMAN . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 . (303) 925-3577
March 6. 1985
Mr. Gideon Kaufman
Attorney at Law
611 West Main
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Gideon.
Enclosed please find a list of the adjacent property owners
around Lots F, G, H, & I in Block 35, City and Townsite of
Aspen. Although we believe the facts stated are true, this
certificate is not to be construed as an abstract of title
nor an opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is
understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc.
neither assumes nor will be charged with any financial
obligation or liability whatever on any statements contained
herein.
'~
Ch a r 1 e s C. S .
Executive Vice President
Stewart Title of Aspen. Inc.
CCS/kk
,-'
.......-<:-'-"
""
""
j'
,.../,
APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT APPROVAL
PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-19 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN
ALLOWING FOR CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS FROM THE STRICT
APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 20
OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE AND REQUEST
FOR GRANT OF EXEMPTION FROM
GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM ALLOCATION PROCEDURES
Pursuant to ~20-19(c), BECK INVESTORS, LTD, a
limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as the
"Applicant"), hereby applies for exception from the strict
application of all of the standards, requirements and
provisions of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen and seeks final subdivision approval for the division
of the property described on the lot split plat filed
herewith into two parcels as described on the lot split plat.
For a lot split to comply with all the standards and
requirements of Chapter 20 would be redundant, serve no
public purpose and be unnecessary in relation to the land use
policies of the City of Aspen, Notwithstanding any exception
which may be granted to applicant, the proposed subdivision
will comply with the design standard of this chapter and is
appropriate for a one step City Council approval.
A. EXEMPT FROM GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM
ALLOCATION PROCEDURES.
Pursuant to ~24-11.2(d) this lot split is
exempt from complying with the Growth Management Quota System
Allotment procedures because the tract of land being
subdivided has a pre-existing dwelling unit and only two lots
are created by the subdivision. In accordance with
~24-11.2(d), Applicant therefore requests that the City
Council formally grant to Applicant an exemption from the
Growth Management Quota System Allotment procedures for this
lot split.
B. LOT SPLIT COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE.
subdivision.
1. Section 20-9 suitability of land for
a. The subject property is not burdened
by any hazards such as flooding, bad drainage, rock or soil
creep, mudflow, rockslide, avalanche or snowslide, steep
topography or any other potential natural hazard, feature or
condition likely to be harmful to the health, safety or
welfare of the future residents in the proposed subdivision
or of the City.
~
b. The proposed lot split is located in
the central residentia,l c()reofthe ,c:ity of As:pen and thus
conforms with growth patterns and does' not necessitate any
extension of utilities or public services.
applicable zoning
of Aspen and laws
c. This subdivision conforms with all
ordinances or other, ordinances of" the City
and regulations of the State of Colorado.
2.
Disclosure of OWnership.
Attached hereto is a true copy of Ownership
and Encumbrance report issued by Stewart Title Guaranty
Company for Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34, City of Aspen,
County of pitkin, State of Colorado.
3. Lot Split Plat.
Filed herewith is a lot split plat containing
necessary items and information indicating that the proposed
subdivision meets the design standards of Chapter 20 of the
Municipal Code which are applicable to this proposed lot
split.
4. Adjacent Property Owners.
Attached hereto is a list of the names and
mailing addresses of the owners of the adjacent properties
prepared by Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc.
5. Zoning.
The lot split plat indicates the property is
presently zoned R-6.
Dated this ~'7 day of
HMc.-I1
, 1985.
Respectfully Submitted
LAW OFFICES OF
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, P.C.
By @v1r
Beck Lot Split/LOTSPL
- 2 -
.
1"""\
~
"
.."
o/...pr-. '"
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on this g~ft day of
198~ a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of ublic Hearing
was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,
to the adj acent property owners as indicated on the attached list of
adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Plannaing Office by
the applicant in regard to the case named on the public notice.
.
.
.'
',.. ..<-.
.
"r-'
,';
BL6CK 34
BLOCK 35
BLOCK 41
BLOCK 42
1""'4
~
Virginia S. Stranahap
577 E. Front St.
Perrysburg, Ohio 43551
Elizabeth P. Chamberlain
420 W. Francis
Aspen, Co. 81611
Jospeh Coors
100 Castle Rock Drive
GOlden, Co. 80401
James Heck and Charles T. Knight
P. O. Box 8416
Aspen, Co. 81611
Harriet B. Rahm
P. O. Box 1376
Aspen, Co. 81611
Thomas J. and Gwendolyn Maddalone
325 North Third
Aspen, Co. 81611
L. Irvine Barnhart
2121 Sage Road, Suite 333
Houston, Texas 77056
Steven and Sandra Gordon
343 E. Jefferson Blvd.
Los Angeles, Calif 90011
Dolores Courshon
301 Authur Godfey Road
Miami Beach, Florida 33140
Mary H. Kalmes
404 West Hallam
Aspen, Co. 81611
Norman E. Neqfotist
P. O. Box 2425
Aspen, Co. 81612
Comanche Land and Cattle Co.
P. O. Box 22856
Denver, Co. 80222
Helmut J. and Brunhilde Schloffer
P. O. Box 941
Aspen, Co. 81612
Frank and Sally Shafroth
288 Clayton Street, Suite 303
Denver, Co. 80206
Marion B. Getz
P. O. Box 4737
Aspen, Co. 81612
-
l",
~~ ,.~"".t.
A
Pi
OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMlll KE REPORT
- .--'
2190 T i
"--
Made For:
Gideon Kau f fman
STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC.
HEREll Y CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this office that the owner of
Lots F, G, H and I, Block 34,
City and Townsite of Aspen
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
Situated in the COUnty of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of
Beck Investors, Ltd., a Cal iforni a Limited Partnership
and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following:
None
EXCEPT a]1 easements, right.of-ways, restrictions and reservations of record.
EXCEPT any and all unpaid taxes and assessments.
This report does not reOect any of the following matters:
1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcies, antedate the report
by more than fourteen (14) years.
2) Suits and judgments which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years orl
until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period"1
I
3) Unpaid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years. I
Although we believe the facts stated are true, this Certificate is not to be construed as an abstract of title,
nor an opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen,
I nc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with any financial obligation or liability whatever on any state-
rncllt contained herein.
Dated at Aspen, Colorado, this
13th dayof
November
A.D. 19
ft4
8 : 00 A. M .
STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC.
BY ;!~dJ{ ~ 1/
Authorized Signature
(' -F";'fj' F: , OP;Ztn/Q.,