Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19921026Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmembers Peters, Pendleton, Richards and Reno present. PROCLAMATION - Red Ribbon Week Mayor Bennett and Council proclaimed the week of October 25th to be Red Ribbon Week and encouraged citizens to take a position in favor of healthy life styles and against driving while under the influence of alcohol or dugs. Council presented the proclamation to David Mitchell CITIZEN COMMENTS There were none. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Councilman Peters moved to table Resolution #51, 1992 - Creation of Japan Office, Ordinance #68, 1992 - 320 W. Main Street Condomin iumiza tion, and to delete Pitkin Mesa Construction Contract, East Water Plant Engineering Contract and Ordinance #71, 1992 - Design Workshop/US West Lot line Adjustment; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried. 2. Council woman Richards moved to add Resolution #54, Series of 1992, opposing amendment #1 to the consent agenda; seconded by Council woman Pendleton. All in favor, motion carried. 3. Councilwoman Richards moved to remove Child Care Grant Policies from the consent agenda with the understanding these policies will be discussed with the child care committee in the near future; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All in favor, motion carried. 4. Councilwoman Richards pointed out this is the inaugural meeting in the newly remodeled Council Chambers. Councilwoman Richards thanked staff for all their work on the remodel. 5. Councilman Peters requested an executive session to discuss issues pertaining to Castleridge. Council scheduled this for Monday November 2 at 4:15 p.m. 6. Amy Margerum, city manager, pointed out the staff generated draft of priorities for highway 82 is not part of the consent agenda but is something staff is working on to take to the CDOT meeting later in this week. 1 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Peters moved to adopt the consent calendar as amended; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. The consent calendar is: A . Resolution #50, 1992 - Contract Approval Parks Master Plan B . Resolution #52, 1992 - Endorsing County Purchase Of Reeder Property C . Child Care Grant D . Appointment - Child Care Committee E . Black Birch Fire Cont ract F . Resolution 53, 1992 - Snowmass - Aspen Transporta tion Plan G . Resolution #54, 1992 - Opposing State Amendment #1 All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #65, SERIES OF 1992 - Improvement District Bonds Dallas Everhart, finance director, told Council the city went into the market with the bonds for the improvement district and was able to sell them at 4 to 6.7 percent. The city participates in these districts with the financing and this issue will finance Upper and Lower Ute and Pitkin Mesa. Everhart pointed out the budgets are all higher than the original budget. Everhart requested Council modify the budgets as follows: Upper Ute from $213,104 to $223,761, Lower Ute from 328,232 to $331,836 and Pitkin Mesa $54,135 to $79,403. The funds will be reimbursed by the district. John Worcester, assistant city attorney, pointed out the final interest rates are not yet in the ordinance. Councilwoman Pendleton moved to table this until later in the meeting; seconded by Councilman Peters. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #63, SERIES OF 1992 - Amending WOH Board Power and Duties Amy Margerum, city manager, explained this amends the management structure giving the city manager the ability to hire and fire and manage the staff of the Wheeler Opera House on a daily basis. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Pendleton moved to adopt Ordinance #63, Series of 1992, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Reno, yes; Peters, yes; Richards, yes; Pendleton, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. 2 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 ORDINANCE #64, SERIES OF 1992 - Reorganization City Staff Amy Margerum, city manager, pointed out this reorganization creates a new parking department and gives the overall organization of the city staff. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilman Peters moved to adopt Ordinance #64, Series of 1992, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Pendleton, yes, Richards, yes; Reno, yes; Peters, yes. Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #66, SERIES OF 1992 - $3.6 Million Bonds Red Brick School Dallas Everhart told Council this issue has already been marketed and the interest rates range from 3.1 to 5.9. The debt payments range from $354,000 to $361,000. Everhart said this amount is lower than anticipated in the asset management plan and in the 1992 adopted budget. There will be a $30,000 to $47,000 savings annually. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #66, Series of 1992, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Peters. Mayor Bennett asked where the city stands with the school board and signing a contract. Jed Caswall, city attorney, said the city has not heard back from the school board since doing the changes to the contract. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Pendleton, yes; Reno, yes; Peters, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #62, SERIES OF 1992 - Aspen Electric Subdivision, Rezoning Councilwoman Pendleton left the room due to a conflict of interest. Leslie Lamont, planning office, told Council the Siegels own lot 3 of the Sunny Park North subdivision and propose to subdivide this and create lots 1 and 2, rezone lot 1 to AH. The Siegels have received a lot line adjustment approval from the commissioners to add to their present lot in order to keep this parcel a conforming lot under R-15 zoning requirements. They propose to build a deed restricted triplex on the new lot, fronting on park avenue. The Siegels have proposed a building envelope showing the development rights before subdivision. 3 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 Ms. Lamont told Council the commission ers wanted included in the ordinance a condition reading, "The deed restriction shall contain language enabling the Siegels right of first refusal when the units are for sale as long as the Siegels own their home on lot 2, the Aspen electric subdivision". Siegel suggested this be reworded so that he can retain his business even though he sells his house. Ms. Lamont suggested adding "or his business". Council agreed. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilman Peters moved to adopt Ordinance #62, Series of 1992, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Siegel asked about a waiver of park dedication fees since this is 100 percent employee housing. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Reno, yes; Peters, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Richards moved to deny the request for waiver of park dedication fee; seconded by Councilman Peters. Councilwoman Richards pointed out the city paid the park dedication fees on West Hopkins, which is 100 percent affordable housing. The theory is people who live in affordable housing use the parks as much as any other residents. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #67, SERIES OF 1992 - G. O. Refunding Bonds Amy Margerum, city manager, requested this not be adopted on second reading. Councilman Reno moved to adopt Ordinance #67, Series of 1992, on second reading. Motion DIES for lack of a second. ASPEN MOUNTAIN (RITZ) PUD SECTION M AMENDMENT AND NON-COMPLIANCE HEARING Councilman Peters moved to combine the PUD Section M Amendment and the PUD Non-compliance Hearing; seconded by Councilman Reno. The applicant stated they had no objections. All in favor, motion carried. Jed Caswall, city attorney, told Council the PUD Section M Amendment is based upon a request from Savanah Ltd Partnership for 4 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 an extension of the construction schedule. The applicant requests an extension of the certificate of occupancy deadline for the Ritz Carlton hotel. Caswall reminded Council in 1991, Council granted an extension for the c/o from October 1, 1991, to October 1, 1992. On September 28, 1992, the applicant requested an extension from October 1 to November 9, 1992. The PUD agreement allows the applicant to request an extension or variances in a construc tion schedule. Caswall reminded Council the applicant has the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence that the reasons for not complying with the October 1st deadline were reasons beyond their control. Caswall said Council also needs to address a c/o deadline date for Summit place August 1993 and demolition permit for the Grand Aspen which must be pulled by October 1, 1995. These dates are attached to the c/o date for the hotel. Caswall said Savanah had an obligation to obtain a c/o by October 1, 1992, for the Ritz Carlton. On September 28 and October 1, staff conducted a physical inspection of the hotel to determine whether it was eligible to receive a c/o as required under the PUD agreement. At that time the hotel was not eligible for a full c/o or partial c/o. Under the amended PUD, the applicant is not entitled to a hearing as to whether it is in non-compliance of the PUD agreement regarding the October 1 deadline. The authority to make that determination was delegated to staff and staff has made a decision and determined that Savanah is in non-compliance with the PUD agreement. Savanah is entitled to offer facts and circumstances in mitigation of any penalty or sanction that Council may choose to impose. Caswall said possible sanctions may include the revocation or termination of any and all approvals contained in the PUD agreement. Caswall entered into the record a copy of the certified mail served on Savanah regarding the notice of non-compliance. Caswall also entered into the record all the packet materials for the Section M amendment and the non-compliance hearing. Hughes had no objection. City Clerk Kathryn Koch swore in Perry Harvey, Ferd Belz, Bob Hughes and Paul Donahue, representing Savanah Limited Partnership. Hughes told Council the applicants did not think they would need an extension up until the last moment and could make the October 1st deadline. Hughes said there were delays caused by early winter storms last year and labor shortages. Hughes told Council the applicants thought they were going to make the deadline until the very end. Hughes said the ice rink money has been escrowed, the employee housing deed restrictions have been taken care of, the tap fees have all been paid. Paul Donahue, resident manager of Bechtel, told Council he is 5 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 providing project management services for the Ritz, managing every function of the project. In the request for extension, weather and man power shortages were identified as reasons beyond their control. Donahue told Council one of the first thing Bechtel does is estimate the manpower in the various trades for this project. Donahue said during the course of the project they had problems obtaining skilled craftsmen for portions of the project. This was also true in interior finish workers. Seven to 10 days were lost a year ago when there were major snow storms while the project was getting the roof on. Donahue said there was also an impact from the Maroon Creek bridge in getting materials and the placement of concrete to the project. The primary factor in the delay was the inability to get required manpower. Donahue said when they reviewed the manpower and schedule, they came up with 38 days to completion. Donahue presented a bar chart of the anticipated manpower requirements versus the actual. Donahue said they tried to offset the shortages and catch up. Donahue said the project is analyzed monthly. Hughes moved the bar chart and graph into the record. Ferd Belz, executive director Savanah Ltd Partnership, told Council part of the problem was a misunderstanding between the applicant and staff on the meaning of temporary c/o. This is one reason it looked as if they applied for an extension at the last minute. Belz said the applicants feel November 9th for a temporary c/o is an obtainable date. Belz told Council they are working on the area surrounding the hotel and plan to have it more of a public area than construction area. Belz told Council PCL advertised for manpower all over the mountain area. Hughes told Council the applicants should be getting a c/o on the employee housing Ute City Place this week. Hughes told Council they would like the date for the demolition of the Grand Aspen reaffirmed. Perry Harvey said the applicants intended starting construction on Summit place last summer. The plans are ready for permitting and the approvals are in place. Harvey said the impact and sprawl of the Ritz had an effect on the neighborhood. Harvey said there was a lot of construction work parking on the Summit site. In June Savanah made application to the Board of Adjustment for a variance to use the 1 acre parcel of land to the south of the lift 1 for car parking for workers in an attempt to get these cars off the street. Another problem with Summit Place was the frequent interruptions on Monarch and on Mill, leaving only Galena to access the entire area. Harvey said the applicants decided to make a one year extension for Summit Place to let the Ritz get done and let things settle down in the area and not start construction until the summer of 1993. Harvey requested an extension for c/o on Summit 6 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 Place to August 1, 1994. Hughes said the applicants accept responsibility for missing the deadline. A lot of money has been spent on this project. The last year has been very busy. Hughes said the c/o date is an interim milestone and nothing has slipped from the end of the project. The public opening date is December 11th. The project is in non- compliance under the agreement; however, no one is worse off for not having made the October 1st deadline. Everything else is still on schedule. Councilman Peters asked where the Ritz is in terms of meeting it's employee housing obligations. Harvey said all the deed restric- tions have been recorded or filed with the city. Ute City Place is within days of a c/o. The Copper Horse has been deed restricted. The Ritz has determined they will not need that housing this winter. The owner is free to rent these units to anyone according to the housing guidelines. Hughes said the Alpina Haus will become a deed restricted property when the c/o is issued. Harvey said when a c/o is issued, the housing office will be able to enforce the restrictions on the Alpina Haus. Councilman Peters asked when the landscaping around the Ritz will be finished. Donahue said is it almost complete; the only two areas that remain incomplete are the front of Blue Spruce on Durant and on Dean street. The area in front of the Blue Spruce should be complete this week. The front entrance to the hotel is being used as a staging area for the bridge. As soon as the bridge is completed, this should be cleaned up. Donahue said he anticipates 3 more weeks of landscaping. Caswall told Council the PUD agreement does not require landscaping to be complete until 1 year after c/o. Councilwoman Richards asked if the housing authority has confirmed the rates for the affordable housing. Harvey said the rates for the Alpina Haus and Copper Horse were set in the PUD agreement at $200 per month or 25 percent of the employee's net monthly pay, whichever is less. These were indexed to the housing guidelines as those appreciated from that time. These are set differently from other affordable housing projects. Councilwoman Richards asked if there are currently plans for the development of the Bavarian Inn. Harvey said the applicants still own the property. It is available for the audit, which is to be done at the second anniversary of the issuance of the c/o. City Clerk Koch swore in Bob Gish, public works director, and Gary Lyman, chief building inspector. Gary Lyman told Council the entire ballroom level is ready for a temporary c/o. The second, third, fourth and fifth floors of building A are also suitable for 7 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 a temporary c/o. Lyman said the temporary c/o the building department is considering is limited to training of hotel employees only, not open to the public. This temporary c/o would expire at a date certain and a hard copy c/o issue before this expiration date. Lyman said the areas in the B building are not ready for a temporary c/o but are close. Gish told Council the public works department has been monitoring the PUD agreement to make sure conditions have been met in the areas of utility, water, sewer, fire hydrants, curb and gutter, streets and enhanced paving. Gish said these items have been met. Gish said there also have been certain expectations, rather than conditions. One of the expectations of staff was that this area would look like a nice hotel rather than a construction site. Gish told Council the construction aspect will not be cleaned up until the bridge is complete. Gish said the issuance of a c/o should include turning the public right-of-way back to the public. Gish told Council staff has asked the applicant to provide parking in the parking garage to lessen the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Staff has also asked for additional clean up to the ice rink site. Lyman said the two different issues are a c/o and completion of the PUD conditions. Lyman suggested extending the date for the hard copy c/o to a December date that will coincide with the applicant meeting the conditions in the PUD agreement. Caswall told Council the PUD calls for substantial completion. There was a question regarding "substantial completion". The PUD agreement also calls for a certificate of occupancy. A project could have substantial completion without a c/o in the sense that the building was open for the public. Substantial completion was viewed as a term referencing compliance with the UBC, meaning health and safety requirement; making sure the building was sound and other codes were complied with. It was determined by staff that substantial completion could be read to have a temporary c/o. Caswall said that was probably the intent Council had when it set the October date and used the term certificate of occupancy. Caswall said the applicant did not even qualify for a temporary c/o on October 1st. The crucial date is now a certificate of occupancy to allow the hotel to open to the public. The Ritz has said the hotel is to open December 11th and they have to have a hard copy c/o prior to that date. Hughes said what is important to the Ritz is that they be able to get employees in the hotel and train them before the hotel opens. The Ritz has to have the hard copy by December 11th. Caswall said there is nothing to prohibit the Ritz from getting a temporary c/o other than failure to meet those standards. Lyman said the only question staff has is whether issuing temporary c/os would set up problems for other departments. 8 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 Belz said there are parts of the hotel that will not be able to get a c/o until next year, like the Blue Spruce. Councilman Peters said he would like to find out the lost property taxes and sales taxes for the year as well as for the period requesting to be extended. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. Caswall said one person submitted a letter which is a wage complaint against the contrac- tor. Hughes objected to the letter being entered into the record. Council indicated they were not interested in the letter. Councilwoman Richards asked about the lighting at the Ute City Place employee housing. Belz said the interim solution has been to turn the lights off. Belz said they have met with the engineers and plan to reduce the wattage and redirect the lights. Council- woman Richards asked how the complaint at the Grand Aspen parking lot regarding booting cars has been handled. Harvey said the manage ment of the Grand has increased the signs. Harvey told Council he will check up on this before this winter. Councilwoman Richards asked if all the agreement regarding the ice rink have been completed. Hughes told Council he has drafted escrow agreements. Caswall said the issue was whether to strike the language about the escrow for an ice rink on Wagner park should be stricken. Harvey asked if striking this language would require another ordinance. Caswall said since Council decided not to go ahead with an ice rink in Wagner park, the language in the agreement is moot. An ordinance is not required. Caswall said Savanah wants to make sure the $700,000 if not used for the ice rink is used for a recreational amenity in the community. Caswall said since the city exacted the money for a recreational amenity, it has to be used for that purpose. Councilwoman Richards said she does not want the city to be in a position of precluding the opening of the Ritz ice rink in 1993. Councilwoman Richards said she would like to strike conditions 1, 2 relating to the Koch ice rink and condition 3 as they are no longer applicable. Mayor Bennett said this is not part of the Section M amendment discus- sion. Councilman Peters suggested Councilwoman Richards work with staff and draft language for Council to consider. Councilman Peters moved this be tabled to November 9, 1992, in order to hear back from the finance department on the lost taxes; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Councilwoman Richards asked if the purpose of this is to set a higher base revenue for the city in the case the Bruce amendment passes. Hughes pointed out the Ritz has never planned on being open for business before December 11; they would not have been generating sales tax before then. Councilman Peters said all the 9 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 extensions and accommodations made for this project have tremendous value. Councilman Peters pointed out when this extension was granted, the applicant stated they would positively be open by October 1st. Everyone opposed with the exception of Councilman Peters. Motion NOT carried. Councilman Reno moved to amend Section M to reflect a full, hard copy certificate of occupancy to December 4, 1992; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. Councilman Reno amended his motion that the escrow language will be cleaned up by next week; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Peters. Motion carried. Harvey said the applicants would like to reconfirm the date for the demolition of the Grand Aspen and extend the date for Summit Place to August 1, 1994, for a certificate of occupancy. Councilwoman Pendleton moved to reaffirm the demolition of the Grand Aspen date and to extend the Summit place c/o to 8/1/94; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Peters. Motion carried. Caswall said the applicant has represented they will provide and use 80 parking spaces in the garage to get the cars off the street and minimize the impact on the neighborhood and that they will establish and adhere to a schedule for deliveries to the Ritz so they are not blocking the city streets at all hours. Caswall suggested the extension be conditioned on these. Councilwoman Pendleton moved to make the extensions as granted at this meeting conditioned upon the applicants implementing 80 parking spaces in the Ritz hotel for employee parking for the construction people and that they establish and adhere to a delivery schedule for trucks delivering at the Ritz hotel; staff can determine the hours for that; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried. Caswall said Council may consider whether any sanctions or penalties should be imposed due to non-compliance on October 1st. Amy Margerum, city manager, said the only sanction may be covering the incredible amount of staff time caused by this delay. Ms. Margerum suggested the applicant pay for staff time. This is normal for development applications. Councilwoman Richards moved to table the decision on whether to levy sanctions or penalties until the December 14, the first Council meeting after the c/o for the issuance of c/o to get a 10 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 cumulative total and to see whether the rest of compliance has occurred; seconded by Councilman Peters. Councilman Reno asked if the applicants meet the December 4th date for a c/o, will it be too late for Council to issue sanctions. Caswall said the non-compliance is on October 1st and will not go away for them having come into compliance in December. Hughes said the applicants can stipulate paying the staff time right now in order to get this taken care of. All in favor, with the exception of with the exception of Council- members Pendleton and Reno. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #65, SERIES OF 1992 - Improvement District Bonds Dallas Everhart, finance director, passed out an amended copy of this ordinance with the appropriate numbers filled in. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #65, Series of 1992, as amended, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Reno, yes; Peters, yes; Pendleton, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #69, SERIES OF 1992 - Woods Condominiumization 620 W. Main Councilwoman Pendleton moved to read Ordinance #69, Series of 1992; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #69 (Series of 1992) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING SUBDIVI- SION EXEMPTION FOR THE CONDOMINIUMIZATION AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR 620 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, LOTS P & Q, CITY OF ASPEN was read by the city clerk Leslie Lamont, planning department, told Council this commercial building is located in the CC zone. The condominiumization is for 3 commercial and 1 residential unit. Ms. Lamont reminded Council there is state legislation that may affect the city's condominiumi- zation legislation. However, it is staff's opinion that until the city's municipal code is amended, the legislation is still in effect. This application was reviewed under the existing city regulation which include for commercial condominiumization the review and filing of a plat. For residential units, this includes 6 month minimum leases and payment of a housing impact fee or deed restricting that unit. 11 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 Sunny Vann, representing the applicant, objected to the inclusion of conditions 3, 4, 5 and 6 of section 1 in the ordinance. The applicant's position is that the state statute, Colorado Condomini- ums Ownership Act, precludes the applications of regulatory requirements on condominium ownership that would not be imposed upon the same development under a different form of ownership. The conditions of 6 month minimum lease and housing impact fee are imposed solely on this project as a result of condominiumization. Vann said if the city's code is changed so that these regulations are no longer applicable, the applicant would be absolved from these 4 conditions. Vann reserved the ability to be released from these conditions if the code is changed. Jed Caswall, city attorney, said this is premature. Councilman Peters moved to adopt Ordinance #69, Series of 1992, on first reading; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Pendleton, yes; Reno, yes; Peters, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #70, SERIES OF 1992 - Pitkin Mesa Improvement District Amending Ordinance #29, 1992 Councilwoman Pendleton moved to read Ordinance #70, Series of 1992; seconded by Councilman Peters. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #70 (Series of 1992) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AMENDING ORDINANCE 29, SERIES OF 1992, WHICH CREATED THE PITKIN MESA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT was read by the city clerk Councilwoman Pendleton moved to adopt Ordinance #70, Series of 1992, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Peters. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Peters, yes; Pendleton, yes; Reno, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilman Peters moved to adjourn at 7:45 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 12 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council October 26, 1992 PROCLAMATION - Red Ribbon Week 1 ................................ . CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 ................................ .............. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1 ................................ ......... CONSENT CALENDAR 2 ................................ ............... ORDINANCE #65, SERIES OF 1992 - Improvement District Bonds 2 ..... ORDINANCE #63, SERIES OF 1992 - Amending WOH Board Power and Duties 2 ................................ .................... ORDINANCE #64, SERIES OF 1992 - Reorganization City Staff 3 ...... ORDINANCE #66, SERIES OF 1992 - $3.6 Million Bonds Red Brick School 3 ................................ .................... ORDINANCE #62, SERIES OF 1992 - Aspen Electric Subdivision, Rezoning 3 ................................ .................. ORDINANCE #67, SERIES OF 1992 - G. O. Refunding Bonds 4 .......... ASPEN MOUNTAIN (RITZ) PUD SECTION M AMENDMENT AND NON-COMPLI- ANCE HEARING 4 ................................ .............. ORDINANCE #65, SERIES OF 1992 - Improvement District Bonds 11 ..... ORDINANCE #69, SERIES OF 1992 - Woods Condominiumization 620 W. Main 11 ................................ ................... ORDINANCE #70, SERIES OF 1992 - Pitkin Mesa Improvement District Amending Ordinance #29, 1992 12 ..................... 13