Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.19980922I. COMMENTS AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1998, 4:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public II. MINUTES III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Meadows SPA Amendment (Music Tent), Chris Bendon IV. ADJOURN 26.96.010 Chapter 26.96 TEMPORARY USES Sections: 26.96.010 Purpose. 26.96.020 Authorization for temporary uses. 26.96.030 Criteria applicable to all temporary uses. 26.96.040 Conditions of approval. 26.96.050 Duration and expiration of a temporary use. 26.96.060 Procedure for temporary use approval. 26.96.070 Application. 26.96.080 Amendment of development order. 26.96.090 No vesting of temporary uses. 26.96.010 Purpose. Temporary uses are those uses or structures that may or may not be permitted in a given zone district, but which may be allowed on a non -permanent and temporary basis upon individual review of their proposed nature, location, duration, impact, and compatibility with surrounding permitted uses and structures, excepting outdoor merchandising or commercial displays which shall not be permitted as temporary uses. Additionally, off -site construction staging and temporary storage shall only be permitted in accordance with the procedures and criteria as set forth in Chapter 26.108. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1; Code 1971, § 7-1201) 26.96.020 Authorization for temporary uses. No temporary use shall be permitted except upon review and approval by either the planning director or by city council in accordance with the procedures, standards and limitations set forth in this chapter. An insubstantial temporary use may be authorized by the planning director. An insubstantial temporary use shall be defined as a temporary use that meets the criteria set forth below in Section 26.96.030, is limited to a period of time not to exceed seven (7) days, the impact upon the immediate vicinity is determined to be minimal, and in the opinion of the planning director does not require the review and approval of the city council. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1; Ord. No. 5-1995, § 1: Code 1971, § 7-1202) 26.96.030 Criteria applicable to all temporary uses. When considering a development application for a temporary use, city council shall consider, among other pertinent factors, the following criteria as they, or any of them, relate thereto. A. The location, size, design, operating characteristics, and visual impacts of the proposed use. B. The compatibility of the proposed temporary use with the character, density and use of structures and uses in the immediate vicinity. C. The impacts of the proposed temporary use on pedestrian and vehicular traffic and traffic patterns, municipal services, noise levels, and neighborhood character. D. The duration of the proposed temporary use and whether a temporary use has previously been approved for the structure, parcel, property or location as proposed in the application. E. The purposes and intent of the zone district in which the temporary use is proposed. 26.96.030 F. The relation of the temporary use to conditions and character changes which may have occurred in the area and zone district in which the use is proposed. G. How the proposed temporary use will enhance or diminish the general public health, safety or welfare. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1: Code 1971, § 7-1203) 26.96.040 Conditions of approval. Upon review and approval by'the planning director or city council, as set forth at Section 26.96.060 herein, the temporary use approval may be conditioned as deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the zone district and the surrounding uses and structures in the neighborhood in which a temporary use is to be permitted. This may include, but is not limited to, setting requirements for, or imposing restrictions upon size, bulk, location, open space, landscaping, buffering, screening, lighting, noise, signage, parking, operations, hours of operation, set -backs, building materials, and requiring such financial security as deemed necessary to ensure compliance with any or all conditions of approval and/or to restore the subject property to its original use and condition. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1; Ord. No. 5-1995, § 2: Code 1971, § 7-1204) 26.96.050 Duration and expiration of a temporary use. A. Temporary uses may be granted for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days from the date upon which the city council approves same, unless a shorter period is specified in the approval. Insubstantial temporary uses may be granted for period not to exceed seven (7) days from the date upon which the planning director approved same, unless a shorter period of time is specified in the approval. B. City council may grant one extension of an approved temporary use. The planning director may grant one extension of an approved insubstantial temporary use. Requests for an extension of a temporary use approved by city council must be submitted in writing to the planning director no less than fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of a permitted temporary use. Requests for an extension of an insubstantial temporary use approved by the planning director must be submitted in writing to the planning director no less than three (3) days prior to the expiration of a permitted insubstantial temporary use. All proposed extensions of a temporary use or insubstantial temporary use shall be evaluated under the same criteria as set forth in Sections 26.96.030 and 26.96.040. Requests for an extension of time approved by the city council shall be heard and approved or denied at a public hearing. No extension of a temporary use approved by city council shall exceed one hundred eighty (180) days. No extension of an insubstantial temporary use approved by the planning director shall exceed seven (7) days. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § ' 1; Ord. No. 5-1995, § 3: Code 1971, § 7-1205) 26.96.060 Procedure for temporary use approval. A -development application for a temporary use shall be submitted to the planning director. If the planning director determines that the proposed temporary use is insubstantial in accordance with the criteria set forth at Sections 26.96.020 and 26.96.030, he may grant, or grant with conditions, the insubstantial temporary use. The planning director may, as part of the determination whether the temporary use is insubstantial, require the applicant to provide notice to surrounding property owners with an opportunity to comment by a date certain. The form and method of such notice shall be in the sole discretion of the planning director taking into account the nature of the proposed temporary use and its potential impacts upon the immediate vicinity. If the planning director determines that the proposed temporary use is not insubstantial, he shall forward same with comments and recommendations to the city council. City council shall then after a public hearing, grant, grant with conditions, or deny the application. The hearing before city council shall be preceded by timely notice as specified in Section 26.52.060(E)(3), (b) and (c), and all hearings shall be conducted in accordance (Aspcn 10/95) 660 26.96.060 with the procedures set forth in Section 2652.060(C) of this title. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1; Ord. No. 5-19951 § 4: Code 1971, § 7-1206) 26.96.070 Application. A development application for a temporary use shall include the following information. A. The general application information required in Section 26.52.030 of this title. B. A sketch plan of the site showing property lines and existing and proposed features relevant to the temporary use and its relationship to uses and structures in the immediate vicinity. C. If the application involves development of a new structure, or expansion or remodelling of an existing one, then proposed elevations of the structure must be provided. D. Such other information as deemed necessary by the planning director for purposes of evaluating the application. E. Payment of all necessary fees. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1: Code 1971, § 7-1207) 26.96.080 Amendment of development order. A. Insubstantial amendment An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a temporary use may be authorized by the planning director. An insubstantial amendment shall be limited to design, technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual development of the temporary use which were unknown and could not reasonably have become known prior to or during the approval process, or any other minor amendment to the approval which the planning director has determined to have no affect on the nature of, or the conditions imposed upon, a temporary use. B. Other amendment All amendments not constituting an insubstantial amendment must be reviewed and approved by the city council at a public hearing. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1: Code 1971, § 7-1208) 26.96.090 No vesting of temporary uses. A development application for and an approval of a temporary use and/or structure, or development plan, shall not constitute nor be interpreted by any property owner, developer or court as a site specific development plan entitled to vesting under Article 68 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes or Section 26.52.050. Temporary uses and structures shall be considered transitory variances at all times and shall not vest. The failure of an applicant to adhere to any condition of approval for a temporary use shall result in the immediate forfeiture of the temporary use approval and such use shall immediately cease and may be abated as provided for in the Municipal Code. (Ord. No. 5-1992, § 1: Code 1971, § 7-1209) 661 (Asp«, 10/95) 26.100.010 Chapter 26.100 GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM (GMQS) Sections: 26.100.010 Purpose and description. 26.100.020 Applicability. 26.100.030 Metro Area development ceilings. 26.100.040 Annual development allotments. 26.100.050 Exemptions. 26.100.060 Development allotment procedures. 26.100.070 Minimum development standards. 26.100.080 Growth management scoring criteria: residential and tourist accommodations. 26.100.090 Amendment of development order. 26.100.100 Expiration of development order. 26.100.110 Affordable housing. 26.100.010 Purpose and description. A. Purpose. The purposes of this chapter are as follows: 1. to implement the Aspen Area Community Plan's goals and policies, in conjunction with the background research and studies conducted in support of the Plan; 2. to ensure that new growth occurs in an orderly and efficient manner in the City of Aspen and the metro area; 3. to ensure sufficient public facilities to accommodate new growth and development; 4. to ensure that new growth and development is designed and constructed to maintain the character and ambience of the city and the metro area; 5. to ensure an adequate supply of housing, businesses and events that serve the local, permanent community and the area's tourist base; and 6. to ensure that growth does not over -extend the community's ability to provide support services, including employee housing, traffic control and parking. B. Description. As the primary implementation tool for the Aspen Area Community Plan, the Residential and Tourist Accommodations Growth Management Quota System is designed to promote many objectives. Despite its complexity, two overriding goals form its core: (1) to prohibit development in excess of the Aspen metro area's projected peak population of thirty thousand (30,000) persons (permanent and visitor); and (2) to ensure that the rate at which growth occurs does not exceed the community's ability to cope with associated public facility and service demands and accompanying changes to community character. Aspen area residents have determined that the maximum average growth rate that can be accommodated without long-term negative consequences is two (2) percent per year. Therefore, the GMQS is designed to ensure that new development approvals not exceed an average rate of two (2) percent per year. The community's growth rate goal is implemented by the "development pool" regulations of Section 26.100.040. For a variety of reasons, it is possible that the community's actual population growth might exceed two (2) percent per year in some years. Previous GMQS approvals and exemptions, for example, could result in periods of construction activity and population growth that exceed the planned average annual growth rate. Regardless of the rate at which growth actually occurs, it is the intent of the GMQS that new approvals not exceed two (2) percent per year and that the maximum peak buildout population of thirty thousand (30,000) 662 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Direct Julie. Ann Woods, Deputy Director FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner RE: Aspen Meadows SPA Amendment -- Public Hearing Lot #2 Aspen Meadows Subdivision -- The Music Tent DATE: September 22, 1998 SUMMARY: The Aspen Music Festival and School, applicant, is proposing an amendment to the Specially Planned Area (SPA) for the redevelopment of the Music Tent, the expansion of the backstage area, and the development of an underground connection to Harris Hall. The Tent is located on Lot #2 of the Aspen Meadows Subdivision. This new facility is proposed in the same general likeness of the existing tent in approximately the same location, with the most obvious difference being that it will be a permanent structure. The 1991 SPA Agreement set forth the approved expansion of the tent's seating capacity to 2,050 seats and for the expansion of the backstage area by no more than 1,500 square feet. The applicant has generally stayed within the existing physical boundaries of the current tent by observing the existing height and general footprint - with a few minor exceptions which will be described by the applicant. The process for this review entails a recommendation to City Council from the Commission. In addition, the project was referred to the Historic Preservation Commission for a formal referral to Council. Their specific charge was to evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed architecture in relation to the tent's surroundings, the proposed materials, and the tent -like characteristic of openness and permeability of light and sound. The HPC recommended approval of the redesigned Tent by a 4-1 vote. Members of City Council and the P&Z have expressed a desire to consolidate the presentation to the reviewing bodies. While a consolidate review is not provided for in the Land Use Code, the City Council has been invited to this special meeting to hear the applicant's presentation, public comment, and the findings of the Commission. In addition to the SPA Criteria, which are detailed in Exhibit A, staff has delineated five primary areas of concern, under the heading Main Issues, and has provided a response. Staff would like to present these issues as a point of initiating discuss' �g�T 1 � Hn+ imperfect qualities found in many historic structures. In relation to this, it is important to note that while many structures on the Meadows Campus fall under HPC review, the Tent itself is not a protected historic resource. Another person expressed a belief that the tent itself, whether in its present or future configuration, should be considered a landmark and given that level of protection and review. The HPC did recommend, by a 4-1 vote, that the City Council support the new tent design, finding that the proposal represented a design, use of materials, and relationship to the surroundings which was compatible and appropriate. The HPC, in their discussion, did comment on `landmarking' the idea of a tent in this location. This came up in relation to the historic reference to the historic use of the property for public concerts in a tent and not necessarily the historic qualities of the tent itself. The applicant was generally supportive of such an idea, as long as the designation did not encumber the ability to update the structure to better serve the needs of the users. 2. Structure and Fire. The Building Department has expressed concerns over the tent's exact classification as a building and which code provisions are applicable. These concerns are for ADA access, the roof structure and possibility of condensation, and compliance with the Energy Code. Compliance with the Building Department's regulations is a requirement of any development application regardless of specific land use reviews. The Planning Department, recommends that as many as possible of these issues be resolved sooner rather than later to minimize the possibility of amendments for technical considerations. Ed VanWalraven, the Fire Marshall, has also expressed a desire for the applicant to provide a fire suppression system due to concerns over the width of aisles for egress and the flammability of the tent material. The applicant's fire suppression consultant will be meeting with staff and the Fire Marshall on Tuesday morning to discuss the exact requirements. The stage platform, backstage areas, and the tunnel will most likely have to be sprinkled with a standard system similar to any other building. The main seating area may have to be sprinkled or may have to be separated from the stage area with a water wall. Staff will update the Commission on the Fire Marshall's position and technical approach to fire safety at the meeting. Staff has included a provision requiring the improvements meet the Fire Code requirements. 3. Traffic Impacts. The SPA Agreement included a provision for a traffic mitigation plan. As the Commission is well aware, this included specific remedies for the movement of students and concert -goers to and from the Meadows Campus. There is a provision of this traffic mitigation plan which requires a review every other year on the date of the original approval - June 1 Oth. The elements of the facility that affect traffic generation are seating capacity, adjacent lawn seating, the number of events, and the length of the season. The 1991 plan intended for the expansion of this seating to 2,050 seats from the existing 1,750. The 3 perimeter of the construction area to protect pedestrians from entering the construction area. The redevelopment of the tent will include a significant amount of excavated material which will need to be removed from the site which, in turn, will require a certain number of hauling trucks. After the construction of Harris Hall, the Streets Superintendent, and some members of the public, recommended that impacts to streets be mitigated. Staff believes there should be a requirement for remediation, if there are indeed measurable impacts, and has suggested this be included in an overall construction traffic mitigation plan. At the time of this memo, staff had not had the opportunity to jointly discuss with the applicant, their construction consultant, and the Streets Superintendent appropriate provisions which might be included in a Construction Traffic Mitigation Plan. A joint meeting has been set for Tuesday morning and staff will present the findings at the hearing. At a minimum, the plan should include the starting and ending dates for hauling, the primary route to be used, the expected duration, the times of day when hauling is permitted, mitigation measures for dust and debris, a requirement for patching and repairing as necessary, and compensation for significant deterioration of the infrastructure. There is a standard measurement for street surface conditions which could be determined before and after the traffic passes. Jack Reid, Streets Superintendent, has suggested Third Street as the most logical street to carry the construction traffic. The physical structure of this road is stronger and better permits carrying heavier vehicles, meaning the applicant is less likely to harm the subsurface (and may not have to reimburse the City for subsurface repair). The street itself is scheduled to be resurfaced in the near future, which could be done after the construction traffic is completed. S. General Safety. Harris Hall is located in close proximity to the tent and will continue to operate during the redevelopment of the tent. The majority of events in Harris Hall during the Fall and Winter months are in the evening. However, there needs to be adequate provision to ensure the public's safety during the reconstruction of the tent. Staff is encouraging the applicant to protect the public by limiting construction, and prohibiting site work with large equipment or loud machinery, during and within half an hour before and after events at Harris Hall. Construction barricading should also be incorporated for the service entrance and any interior spaces where demolition and construction is taking place within Harris Hall. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the substantial SPA Amendment for the Music Tent, Lot #2 of the Aspen. Meadows 5 9. The applicant shall abide by the public safety plan. This plan shall prohibit the use of large or loud machinery during and within one half hour before and after public events at Harris Hall. The construction area shall be barricaded to prevent public access. Construction barricading should also be incorporated for the service entrance and any interior spaces where demolition and construction is taking place within Harris Hall. 10. All utility meters and any new utility -pedestals or transformers must be installed on the applicant's property and not in any public right-of-way. Easements must be provided for pedestals. All utility locations and easements must be delineated on the Final SPA Development Plan. Meter locations must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed. 1 1. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. except as specifically restricted by other conditions herein. 12. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 13. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to recommend City Council approve this SPA Amendment to Lot #2 of the Aspen Meadows Subdivision for the redevelopment of the Music Tent, the backstage area, and the tunnel connection with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated September 22, 1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 7 on the North side. The open space and public entrance to the Tent and Harris Hall provide the user with a wonderful experience beyond the actual performances. This is an amenity which should be and is maintained with this new proposal. The proposed tent will fit within the height of the existing tent by lowering the stage area and providing a greater rake to the seating. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: The Tent is in compliance with the Aspen Meadows Master Plan, which was developed for the entire Meadows Campus. This document functions as an amendment to the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, providing more detail than the AACP while allowing site planning and specific designs to come forward individually. The Aspen Meadows SPA, which followed the Master Plan contemplated the seating expansion and the architectural characteristics which should be encouraged in a redeveloped Tent. The SPA also contemplated what is now Harris Hall. In addition to the Tent's direct compliance with the Meadows Master Plan, a few more general statements in the AACP apply to the Tent development. "Maintain and create places and opportunities for social interaction and lifestyle diversity," and "Maintain design quality and compatibility with historic features of the community." It is important in relation to this second statement to realize the Tent itself is not a protected Historic resource. However, the use of the property for music under a tent has been, and should continue to be, a defining feature of the town. The proposed Tent will carry on this tradition of a music tent in this location as first provided by Saarinen and continued by Bayer and Benedict. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Finding: The redevelopment of the tent will require the off -site relocation of fill material. The applicant, the construction consultant, and staff will be meeting Tuesday morning to fully realize the possible impacts of removing this material. Jack Reid, City Street Superintendent, has suggested that the applicant use Third Street as the primary access way for trucks, and that the applicant be required to compensate the City for a proportional share of any deterioration of the street. The Planning Department recommends that an overall construction traffic plan be required as part of the Ordinance. The plan would be completed prior to permit issuance and would include the expected starting date for hauling, the primary street, the expected duration, the time of day when hauling is prohibited, mitigation measures for dust and Staff Comments Pg. 2 �s'pen ConsoLoT�zlfeaf6antIalt0I2 ishrIC 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1998 Tele. (970) 925-3601 FAX #(970) 925-2537 _ .J Sy Kelly Chairman 0M. ivi LI GJ 1�EV.��t CE 1 j Michael Kelly Paul Smith • Treas. Frank Loushin Louis Popish Secy. Bruce Matherly, Mgr. September 9, 1998 Chris Bendon Community Development 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Meadows SPA amendment Dear Chris: The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District currently had'sufficient collection and treatment capacity to serve the development proposed for the Meadows property. Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specification which are on file at the District office. Clear water sources (surface run-off, roof drains, foundation drains) are prohibited by our regulations and must be directed to dry well, storm sewer, or other treatment. A service connection will be required for the building located at the southeastern edge of the property (lemonade stand). There will be significant fees associated with the addition of public restrooms to the new backstage area. Fees can be estimated once detailed plans are available and a tap permit is completed at the District office. The Meadows consortium made substantial improvements to the on -site collection system in 1991 as a result of the current SPA. The on -site system was designed and constructed to ACSD standards. Sincerely, Bruce Matherly District Manager EPA Awards of Excellence 1976 • 1986 • 1990 Regional and National County of Pitkin } } SS. State of Colorado } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION SECTION 26.52.060 (E) I, � oHQ y 6,ct<" Af,! (NA2�Y �E +�� A�c�-r� r Lc i 5) . being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the —4— day of %K_ , 1996 (which is J 8 days prior to the public hearing date of 0 .22.gv . 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the I -h„ day of SEPT , 199_& (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. ;gnature Signed before me' this ' (( day SEP iC 1` .sez- ,1990b My commission expires: Po, ' coMMISSION EXPIRES: b, Z000 S-f�a�+ In L I sl. ,_,r�EIt1II.3'Et� Notary Public Notary Public's Signature EXHIBIT Aff PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA) AMENDMENT, MUSIC TENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 22, 1998, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Aspen Music Festival and School (a.k.a. The Music Associates of Aspen) to consider a substantial amendment to the Specially Planned Area (SPA), for the redesign of the tent structure located next to Harris Hall within the Aspen Meadows Campus. The parcel is legally known as Lot #2, Aspen Meadows Subdivision. For further information, contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5072. s/Sara Garton, Chair Aspen Planning & 'Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 5, 1998. City of Aspen Account KNURR GOLDIE P HODGES ELAINE C O'SHANA CATHY 603 W GILLESPIE ST 2020 S MONROE #118 101 ROBBINS ST ASPEN, CO 81611-1242 DENVER, CO 80210 OSTERVILLE, MA 02655 BREMER MALCOLM H & ANGELIKA S 3262 AVALON HOUSTON, TX 77019 MARKALUNAS JAMES J & RAMONA I 624 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 FERRARA JAMES & MARION 614 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ELLIOTT ELYSE A LUETKEMEYER JOHN A JR & SUZANNE F 50% MARQUSEE CHARLES B 610 NORTH ST SCIIREIBER EUGENE H & STANFORD P O DRAWER X ASPEN, CO 81611 D 50% BOCA BATON, FL 33429 17 W PENNSYLVANIA AVE TOWSON, MD 21204 PULLEN ROBERT W PULLEN ANNE W MORRIS JOHN S JR GOLDSMITH BETH H 710 N POST OAK RD #305 PO BOX 8991 7326 TILDEN LN HOUSTON, TX 77024 ASPEN, CO 81612 NAPLES, FL 34108-7713 CHOUMAS JOHN JAMES & PATRICIA NORTON JOHN G NORTON ROBIN BLDG 300 BAYS 313-314 817 W NORTH ST 1601 E OLYMPIC BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90021 Fi. &OBERT K PO BOX 12249 ASPEN, CO 81611 SLADE ELLIOTT K III 40 E 67TH ST NEW YORK, NY 10021 MCDADE JAMES R & ELAINE B PO BOX 9090 ASPEN, CO 81612 DIGIGLIA LE RAY DIGIGLIA JOHN WILLIAM PO BOX 4305 ASPEN, CO 81612 COLGATE S A& R W TRUST U/D/T 12- BERGER BRUCE 29-89 422 ESTANTE 960 CHEROKEE LOS ALAMOS, NM 87544 DENVER, CO 80204 GALLUCCIO VINCENT PO BOX 8065 ASPEN, CO 81612 GALLUCCIO VINCENT P PO BOX 8065 ASPEN, CO 81612 JJDG LLLP 263 E GORE CREEK DR VAIL, CO 81657 LANGENKAMP FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 1/2 633 NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CUNNINGHAM I MCA 605 W MAIN ST #2 ASPEN, CO 81611-1619 BERGER BRUCE 960 CHEROKEE DENVER, CO 80204 MCCARTY DANIEL L PO BOX 4051 ASPEN, CO 81612 iNG EVELYN F TOON PAMELA & DOREMUS JOHN POWELL WILLIAM E & DANA D 101 D WATERS AVE 822 W SMUGGLER ST 11 LYNN BATTS LN STE 100 ASPEN, CO 81611-2136 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218 ROSE ALLAN V WANGER LEAH JOY ZELL & RALPH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP ONE EXECUTIVE BLVD 1540 LAKESHORE DR #14N OF ASPEN MEADOWS LLC YONKERS, NY 10701 CHICAGO, IL 60610 7950 E PRENTICE AVE STE 210 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 1000 N 3 RD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN INSTITUTE INC PO BOX 222 QUEENTOWN, MD 21658 F SON JAMES L FEi\,uUSON ESTHER B AS JOINT TENANTS PO BOX 1457 CHARLESTON, SC 29402 SHERMAN HARRIS D LAMM RICHARD D 1700 LINCOLN ST #4000 DENVER, CO 80203 PARKER DAVID WHITAKER PARKER ELIZABETH VINEY AS JT TENANTS 725 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 KELTNER DONALD H KELTNER VIRGINIA P 916 W SMUGGLER ST ASPEN, CO 81611-7123 1-1 & C MARQOSEE INC TRUSTEE GARFIELD & HECHT PC 601 E HYMAN ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSBURY CHRISTOPHER JR C/O SILVER VENTURES PO BOX 460567 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78246 SMOOKE BARRY 75% INT 155 5TH ANITA LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 REED PRESLEY O REED PATRICIA 999 8TH ST BOULDER, CO 80302 SARPA JOHN G & JAN JONES SARPA DR JR & MARY 515 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 MCPHERSON/LIND LLC C/O MASON & MORSE 514 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 VESTAMERICA INC PO BOX 309 FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702 WESTVIEW HOLDINGS LLC C/O BROOKE PETERSON 315 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSBURY CHRISTOPHER JR C/O SILVER VENTURES PO BOX 460567 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78246 BELL MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LTD PARTNERSHIP 222 N LAS SALLE STE 2000 CHICAGO, IL 60601 FORD MERRILL M PO BOX 445 ASPEN, CO 81612 MCLAUGHLIN DAVID T 442 FERRY PT RD ANAPOLIS, MD 21403 MCPHERSON/LIND LLC C/O MASON & MORSE 514 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWMAN JOEL 355 OCEAN BLVD GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 WESTVIEW HOLDINGS LLC C/O BROOKE PETERSON 315 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 M AVE MARJORY M KOEI-ILER DAVID R TRUST WALTZ THOMAS A & NELL F 1/2 INT 629 w"NORTH ST 618 W SMUGGLER ST BERGLUND JAMES H & MARY F ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 10666 N TORREY PINES LA JOLLA, CA 92037 HOUSTON SAM 308 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASPEN MEADOW LOT 10 1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASPEN MEADOW LOT 7 1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS 700 E GILLESPIE ASPEN, CO 81611 WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP C/O DWORMAN DARRYL 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A NEW YORK, NY 10019 ,EY SUSAN H 330 W GILLESPIE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HOLLENBECK FAMILY 50% C/O KATHY SHIELDS WIDLUND 7203 S HARRISON WAY LITTLETON, CO 80122 JORDAN WILLIAM R III & CHERYL A 112 N 1ST ST ASPEN, CO 81611-1402 SCHUHMACHER JOHN JR & MARIANNE H PO BOX 3528 ASPEN, CO 81612 GREENWAY GILBERT C PO BOX N7776 NEW PROVIDENCE BAHAMAS, SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASPEN MEADOW LOT 9 1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 1000 N 3RD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 1000 N 3RD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 STARODOJ ROBERT F 50% INT PO BOX 1121 ASPEN, CO 81612 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 KELLY FAMILY LTD KELLY JOHN THOMAS C/O 533 E HOPKINS ASPEN, CO 81611 HOFFMAN LARRY J & DEBORAH 1221 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI, FL 33131 I B H PROPERTY TRUST FIARRIS IRVING B TRUSTEE 2 N LA SALLE ST STE 400 CHICAGO, IL 60602 ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS 700 W GILLESPIE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASPEN MEADOW LOT 8 1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC 2 MUSIC SCHOOL RD ASPEN, CO 81611-8500 CHATFIELD CROSSINGS INC DWORMAN DARRYL C/O 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A NEW YORK, NY 10019 BART MORRIS III & CATHY KANTER 11 RUERROYALE METAIRIE, LA 70002 HARRIS ROBERTA H 6 LONGFELLOW PARK CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 GANTZEL JOAN 705 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 DUNCAN DAVID C/O LA SALLE JOHN D 675 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 WALDECK VIVIAN G 72 VALLEY RD KATONAH, NY 10536 J 1 ROBERT N CAMALOTTA ENTERPRISES LTD Pt_ -,)X 7847 WEST END SOLAR TRACT DUNCAN C/O ASPEN, CO 81612 HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 675 MEADOW RD ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN GORDON SHELDON M & CHRISTINE E 130 S GALENA ST C/O GORDON GROUP HOLDINGS LTD WING KAREN J ASPEN, CO 81611 3500 LAS VEGAS BLVD S STE N28 15 S ROYAL FERN LAS VEGAS, NV 89109 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 HANSEN SALLY LAUDER LEONARD A LAUDER GARY 1/2 PO BOX 9343 LAUDER EVELYN H LAUDER WILLIAM 1/2 ASPEN, CO 81612 2 E 67TH ST 767 5TH AVE 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10021 NEW YORK, NY 10153 LAUDER LEONARD A LAUDER EVELYN H LAUDER LEONARD A CHAMBERS MERLE C 2 EAST 67TH ST 2 EAST 67TH ST 4750 S DAHLIA ST NEW YORK, NY 10021 NEW YORK, NY 10021 LITTLETON, CO 80121 CHAMBERS MERLE C SANT MARALYNN VIERSEN C/O AXEM RESOURCES INC REVOCABLE TRUST MARCUS STEPHEN J 4750 S DAHLIA ST PO BOX 280 PO BOX 1709 LITTLETON, CO 80121 OKMULGEE, OK 74447 ASPEN, CO 81612 PITKIN COUNTY DAGGS JAMES K & GAY FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 640 N 3RD ST FAMILY TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z TRUSTEES 250 TUNNEL RD BERKELEY, CA 94705 S PETER & EVA PETERSON JAMES D CRAIG CAROL G 8401 VISTA LN PETERSON HENSLEY R PO BOX 18 PRESCOTT, AZ 86301 PO BOX 1714 ASPEN, CO 81612 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 PINES DAVID & ARONELLE S CURTIS JAMES L DURAND LOYAL III DR & BERNICE PO BOX 576 300 E HYMAN AVE BLACK TESUQUE, NM 87574-0576 ASPEN, CO 81611 4314 FAWN CT RT 1 CROSS PLAINS, WI 53528 NORTH FOURTH STREET ODOM JOHN A JR TRUSTEE 1/2 ASSOCIATES INTEREST UHLFELDER NAOMI CONVISOR MIKE C/O ODOM LORRIE FURMAN TRUSTEE 1/2 PO BOX 1165 PO BOX 11 INTEREST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 11490 W 38TI-I AVE WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 COLLINS CHARLES & JANICE S STARK GEORGE W & MARGARET S FINKELSTEIN RICHARD & CARIA PO BOX HH AS TRUSTEES OF STARK TRUSTS CAROLE C 50% ASPEN, CO 81612 619 N 4TH ST 9034 BURROUGHS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90046-1405 BECK NEIL H CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH R DAMES BECK PAMELA L AS TENANTS IN Sty- vV NORTH ST BISHOP AND DIOCESE OF COLORADO COMMON 536 NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 515 W GILLESPIE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOLMES ROBERT R JR & AUDREY P DALY THOMAS J 45 BERMUDA RD 520 W HALLAM ST WESTPORT, CT 06880 ASPEN, CO 81611 FOX SAM FOX MARILYN 7701 FORSYTH BLVD STE 600 CLAYTON, MO 63105 BROOKS LAURENE B SHERIDAN SUSAN B 421 DETROIT ST DENVER, CO 80206 1,872.52 2.430.25 2,542.43 1,995.81 2,210.52 2,564.64 1,338.12 1,948.48 3,261.70 2,758.63 2,232.82 1,900.77 2.328.68 2,557.36 1,901.58 2,669.58 2,374.51 2,154.07 2,661.26 2,817.96 1,359.60 PUBLIC NOTICE E NOTICE: That the Board of mfssioners of Pitkin County, is regular meeting on April 22, r a duly -noticed public hearing, ,flowing Resolution: )N OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY ,LONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, )0, APPROVING THE ASPEN )S VILLAGE PUD FINAL PLAT iblic Hearing published in The )n August 22, 1997. Copies of the Resolution are available for pub - during regular office hours in the Jerk and Recorder, 530 E. Main St., do 81611. Phone: (970) 920-5180. mette Jones, Deputy County Clerk The Aspen Times September 5, PUBLIC NOTICE 3PLICATION TO ESTABLISH CBCT hereby given by Mesa National th 6th Grand Junction, CO a ap- was filed with the 4 th( y on September. 1, fled It, 5 30 for permission domestic Dranch at 317 E Hopkins 0201, Aspen, CO 81611. fishing to comment on this applica- comments in writing with Deputy Vestern District Office, 50 Fremont 3900, San Francisco, California, 30 days after the date of this pub - non -confidential portions of the are on file with the Deputy s part of the public file. This file is public inspection during regular I. The Aspen Times September 5, PUBLIC NOTICE IRT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 22, DIV. _ PUBLICATION AND CHANGE OF fER OF THE PETITION FOR THE LAME OF: -Imonte, Petitioner. 'UBLICATION laving read and considered the hange of Nawe and the petitioner's d the Cour. being sufficiently :he allegations made in, said peti- favit satisfy all statutory require- )URT FURTHER FINDS: That the ;e of name is proper and not detri- IVERSON DAVID E. F SUPERVISOR 3,371.20 owners of the affected property have consented JACKSON CHARLES J F SUPERVISOR 3,585.60 to annexation of their property to the City of TUCKER BOBBY W F LEAD DRIVER 2,744.00 RIDLEY PENNY L F LEAD DRIVER 3,027.61 Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 31-12-107(1)(g), C.R.S., man- SCHAEFER BRADFORD F BUS OPERATOR 3 2,041.85 2,688.01 dates that the City of Aspen initiate annexation . THIERING RONALD W F LEAD DRIVER RFTA OPERATIONS Total 273,855.91 proceedings in accordance with Sections 31-12- !08 to 31-12-110, C.R.S., whenever a petition is Grand Total 1,094,107.41 filed pursuant to subsection (1) of Section 31-12- BENEFITS PAID RETIREMENT 118,719.01 88,905.00 107, C.R.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INSURANCE BENEFIT -MEDICAL, DENTAL, VISION & LIFE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COL UNEMPLOYMENT .3% OF GROSS SALARIES PAID ,. 16,22525.79 ORADO: FICA/MEDICARE Grand Total of Benefits 227,882.47 OTHER BENEFITS PROVIDED, I.E., SICK, VACATION AND COMP TIME ARE Section I That the Petition for Annexation of territory to. INCLUDED IN THE GROSS SALARY REPORTED. the City of Aspen is hereby found and deter - to be in substantial compliance with the MANAGEMENT & NON -MANAGEMENT EXCLUDING RFTA 163,181.50 mined provisions of subsection (1) of Section 31-12- MANAGEMENT NON-MANAGEMENT 535,908.53 107, C.R.S. Total County Salaries Published 699,090.03 in The Aspen Times SEPTEMBER g, 1998. Section 2 That the City Council hereby determines that it shall hold a public hearing to determine if the proposed annexation complies with Sections 31- mental to the interests of any other person. PUBLIC NOTICE 12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., and to establish IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: RE: 240 LAKE AVENUE FAR VARIANCE whether or not said area is eligible for annexa- 1. That pursuant to statute, petitioner shall give NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing tion pursuant to the Municipal Annexation Act public notice of such change of name by publi- will be held on Wednesday, September 23, 1998, of 1965, as amended; said hearing to be held at a cation of Public Notice three (3) times in a legal at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of newspaper, published in said county. This publi- Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Aspen at 5:00 o'clock p.m. on the 28th day of cation is to be made within 20 days of the date of this Order. Proper proof of publication shall Council Chambers, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an September, 1998, in Council Chambers at City 130 S. Aspen, Colorado 81611. (A As Galena Hall, p be filed'with the Clerk of the Court upon final application submitted by Ronald Greenberg , date which is not less than thirty days nor more publication. 2. That upon proof of publication being filed. requesting a floor area bonus of 500 square feet. The property is located at Lake Avenue, than sixty days after the effective date of this with the Clerk of the Court, the name of Dina de which is described as Amended Lot 15, First resolution). Caryn Belmonte will be changed to Dina Car g � Amendment to the Wogan Lot Split. For further Section 3 Bozza. information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/ That the City Clerk shall give public notice as DATED: 8/13/98 Fitzhugh Scott III, County Judge Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. (970) 920-5096. follows: A copy of this resolution shall consti- tute notice that, on the given date and at the Glenita Melnick, Clerk Published in The Aspen Times on Aug. 22, 29 s/Suzannah Reid, Chair given time and place set by the City Council, the Sept. 5, 1998. Aspen Historic Preservation Commission City Council shall hold a hearing upon said res and Published in The Aspen Times September 5, olution of the City of Aspen for the purpose of PUBLIC NOTICE -1998. determining and finding whether the area pro- CiDNTRACTORS SETTLEMENT PUBLIC NOTICE posed to be annexed meets the applicable Notice is hereby given that on September 17, RE: ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNrequirements J of Sections 31-12 104 and 31-12- 1998, final settlement will be made by Pitkin AREA (SPA) AMENDMENT, MUSIC TENT 105, C.R.S., and is considered eligible for annex - County, Colorado with G. A. Western NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public heariation. Said notice shall be published once a Construction Company, hereinafter called the will be held on Tuesday, September 22, 1998,week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper "Contractor", for and on account of the contract a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen k; of general circulation in the area proposed to be _ for the construction of Project described as: the Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities annexed. The first publication of such notice replacement of Bridge No. PIT-1511-00.2A and Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., ', shall be at least thirty days prior to the date of Bridge No. PIT 15B-00.5A on County Road 15, ° Aspen, to consider an application submitted by 1 the Aspen Music Festival and School (a.k.a. The the hearing. The proof of publication of the rec- shall be returned when the publication over Castle Creek and Conundrum Creek respec- olution Music Associates.of Aspen) to consider a sub- '' is completed, and the certificate of the owner, tively. 1. Any person, co -partnership, association, or stantial amendment to the Specially Planned Area (SPA), for the redesign of the tent structure editor, or manager of the newspaper in which said notice is published shall be proof thereof. A corporation who has an unpaid claim against located next to Harris Hail within the Aspen co of the resolution and petition as filed, shall copy the said project, for or on account of the fur- Meadows Campus. The parcel is legally -known j also be sent by registered mail by the clerk to nishing of labor, materials, team hire, suste- nance, provisions, provider of other supplies as Lot fit, Aspen Meadows Subdivision. For fur- ther information, contact Chris Bendon at the 1 _i the Pitkin County Board of County used or consumed by such Contractor or any of Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,. Aspen, CO (970) :' Commissioners and to the County Attorney of Pitkin County and to the Aspen School District his subcontractors in or about the performance of said work, may at any time up to and includ- _ 920,5072. at least twenty days prior to the date fixed for ing said time of such final settlement, file a verf- s/Sara Garton, Chair Aspen Planning & Zoning Commissio such hearing. Section 4 fled statement of the amount due and unpaid ort Published in The Aspen Times September 5,' That pursuant to Section 31-12-115, C.R.S., the account of such claim. 2. All such claims shall be filed with MR. BRIAN'= 1998. City Manager is hereby directed to initiate appropriate zoning procedures with regard to W. PETTET, COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPER -. COUNTY, 76 SERVICE CEN- PUBLIC NOTICE -.Colorado Mountain College is accepting sealed the territory proposed to be annexed. INTENDENT, PrMN TER ROAD, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611. - _ bids for the sale of one (1) Canon NP6060 copier with copy volume of 2,663,843. Copier will. be IN-. RODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 27th 3. Failure on the part of a creditor to file such sold as is with no implied or expressed warran- day of July, 1998. statement prior to September 17, 1998 will ty. To view the machine, contact Danielle Hinz at John S. Bennett, Mayor relieve Pitkin-County, Colorado from any and all (970) 945-8691 during regular business hours. 1, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting liability for such claim. Sealed bids are to be returned to Danielle Hinz, City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true Dated at Aspen, Colorado, September 4, 1998 Purchasing Manager, Colorado Mountain and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by BOARD OF PITKIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS College, PO Box 10001, 831 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 on or before 3:00 the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, BRIAN PETTET, ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPERINTENDENT p•m., September 14, 1998. Colorado. Mountain College reserves the right to refuse any and/or at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Published in The Aspen Times September-5 and all bids at its sole discretion. Published in The Aspen Time August 29, 12, 1998. Published in The Aspen Times Sept. 5, 12, 1998. September s, 12, 19, 1998. APPLICANT: ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL AND SCHOOL LOCATION: LOT #2 ASPEN MEADOWS ACTION: MUSIC SCHOOL AND FESTIVAL TENT REDEVELOPMENT RELEVANT REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AN AMENDMENT TO AN SPA 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping, and open space. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability, and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails, and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.84.030(B)(2)(b). 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. EXHIBIT W Additional Condition for Fire Protection 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the permit plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. The entire structure shall be sprinkled unless an alternative plan is accepted by the Fire Marshall. co 1 0 v p (Y) Ln 'IT LOLO CY) LOLC) CY) p uO CIO IL IL a. p ppp O LO p p L6 N ti c0 O O O Q Q O O O O O (P 6 r-- CEO r- p Cn e- O d �` cu .O LL L O) (u J, Cn CY) -p CU - C U) U) 2i O O LW C C C N O O O C C: N O L (D a) QQQ V M O O O Q. 4--4-4 N U) O O O 3 oF- __= v) 1�EXHIBIT . 1 2_ SEP-21-98 T10N 02 � 04 °t1 9 Keith Ventures FAX NO. 303 639 4619 P. ill Leith Ventures, LLG 1700 Uncnin Street, Suite 3,950 Denver, Colorado 80203-4539 'hone (303) 839-4600 Fax (303) 839-4919 Company From }' '�-. A � [ P Fax .� -- 4 of Pages Phone # Data .. Comments: UY\ �'U 44 :_ ,-.EXHIBIT SEP-21-98 MOM 02 ; 04 PM 9 FAX N9, 303 839 46t9 P, 92 Chambers/Grant Residence 305 Roaring Fork Road Aspen, CO 81611 City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 FAX: 970-920-U39 Gentlemen: My husband and 1 live very close to the Music Tent. In fact, our property location makes us neighbors, which makes the Music Tent an important part of our rives in Aspen. Also,1 currently am privileged to serve can the Board of Trustees Of the Music Associates of Aspen. ley husband and 1 respectfully request that you approve the plans for remodel of the Music Tent. We believe that a new, improved Music 'dent with a superior sound system would enhance the musical experience not only for the audience but the fine musicians who perform. In addition, a new facility would add to the reputation of the Aspen Music Festival, giving it a now level of distinction. Sincerely, Ile Merle C. Chambers Hugh A. Grant rrq WITNESS LIST* nENDA ITEM: <� A-(-"L�� v��AJ�X WS, cc:> PA NAME OF WITNESS: 1• c_=� � � . 1 S �� I �� ��9 Staff Person P 2. �;�..� �� � spa 3. 6. 20 MA=:A- 7. 8. 9. J-1 ul C,u �7l ,o. 11 12. �3.LLLn�� 14. 15. 16. VI'Q * Includes staff persons, but excludes staff attorney and board members. C-0 T-22,1� �--7-71 J 18. 19. 20. 21.Al 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Grp( P�Z- G/zzl q8 EXHIBITS* AGENDA ITEM: EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION IN DEMO I 5tflr� MIEMD � 7 A -PO L-i cRMaA-1 ✓ 01 jQ 3A4� yj aT ELA owl car- ✓ r�c��E are Kro.o�� 15 �Err� `/�rrrti�c i% * "In" means the exhibit is introduced into the record. "Demo" means the exhibit is used only for demonstration or illustrative purposes.