Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.19920318
r' fat-13 3 f A R-f« MEMORANDUM - To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Consideration and recommendation of re-evaluated Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, Public Hearing Date: March 1~j and ]~, 1992 - Special Meetings SUMMARY: Once every five years, the HPC is required to re- evaluate all non-Landmarked resources identified on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, in order to make the following determinations (per Section 7-709 which is attached): 1. Any change in the rating category of the resource 2. Whether additional resources should be added to the Inventory, due to annexation, previous error, or through contribution to community character not previously recognized 3. Whether identified resources should be dropped from the Inventory due to loss of historic value. The requirement of a review at least once every five years is stated in both the Land Use Regulations and the rules and regulations of the Certified Local Government program, administered by the National Park Service and Colorado Historical Society. PROCESS: The process to re-evaluate resources is as follows: 1. New Inventory forms were completed and new black/white photos taken through field study. This was done in 1990 and 1991 through a combination effort between members of the HPC, staff and two consultants (Andrews and Anderson from Golden, Colorado.) 305 sites were surveyed by the consultants. 2. A list was compiled to compare to the map and previous ratings. Property owners names, parcel identification numbers and mailing addresses are researched and placed . on Data Base, along with the Inventory forms. 3. Only those properties 1,not previously designated \ as Landmarks are subject to-review,at-public-heayings at (7 both the HPC and Council level. Individual public notices were mailed and the public notice was printed in a weekly edition of the Aspen Times. A cover letter (Exhibit A) explaining why the review was necessary, and 1 some of the incentives that have become available during the last five years, was included with the public notice. 4. Information meetings hosted by staff were scheduled for the afternoons of February 26, 27, 28, from 1:00-4:00. The purpose of these educational meetings was to discuss specif ic concerns of individual historic property owners, review all incentives available to them, and discuss their options should they wish to pursue the removal of their property from the Inventory. 5. Public hearings are scheduled with the HPC to begin at 5:00 p.m. All non-landmarks west of Mill St. were scheduled for March 1%. All non-landmarks east of Mill St. were scheduled for March 19. Should additional time be required, either or both of the public hearings may be continued to a date certain, prior to April 13. The HPC is not expected to make their final decision on disputed properties at this meeting, which is designed to receive public input only. The HPC shall consider the information presented to them during the public hearing, which shall be continued to the date selected for execution of the Resolution, which staff recommends be March 25. Should additional properties be recommended for addition to the Inventory by members of the HPC or individual property owners, an Inventory form and documentary photos will be required. 6. The end result of these public hearings is a Resolution of the HPC, which will be prepared by staff for the March 25 regular meeting. This Resolution will be forwarded to City Council, who makes the final adoption of the re- evaluated Inventory by Ordinance. The First Reading (not a public hearing) of the Ordinance is scheduled for April 13; Final Reading (which is a public hearing) is scheduled for May 11, during National Preservation Week. 7. Following Ordinance adoption, a new map will be printed for permanent display in the Planning Office. Copies will be made available for each HPC member. A copy of the map along with a computer printout of all resources will be forwarded to the Colorado Historical Society, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, in order to comply with CLG requirements. Staff recommends that property owners wishing to present information to the HPC at the March 16 and 17 public hearings sign up when thev arrive, to be heard on a first-come, first-served basis. Staff recommends a maximum of 10 minutes be allotted per property. 2 The applicant shall present their argument to either be added to or dropped from the Inventory in writing accompanied by documentary photos of the property. BACKGROUND: In 1980, the Planning Office received grant funding to hire two consultants (John Stanford and Vera Kirkpatrick) who established the first comprehensive Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures in Aspen. Over 275 sites were surveyed. No changes in legislation were proposed at this time. Three rating categories were adopted: Exceptional, Excellent and Notable. Two important developments occurred following the creation of the Inventory: the adoption of the first Design Guidelines and a concerted effort to Landmark Designate significant properties was made by the Planning Office and Council. In 1986, as a result of numerous demolitions and the desire by many to cover the townsite with an "H" Historic Overlay (district), the numerical rating system was established. Non-landmarked properties rated 1-3 required no HPC review and approval for demolition. Only properties rated 4-5 required approval by the HPC. The numerical rating process was arduous, and somewhat subjective. It is important to note that the 1986 rating process was not an in-depth study of the Inventory. The purpose was to apply rating numbers to all properties already identified in the Inventory. In 1989, the numerical rating system was retired, to be replaced again with three easily understood category titles: Significant, Contributing and Supporting. Also at that time, Council expanded HPC's demolition review authority over the entire Inventory, and included partial demolition and relocation as well. Additionally, more incentives were being created for historic landmarks to help offset the strengthened regulations. Today's categories are simple to apply: Significant: Applies to all National or State Register resources, or those considered eligible for listing. HPC reviews include application of the Secretary of the Interior' s Standards as well as the local development review standards. Resources considered "Significant" are in the top 15% of the Inventory, in terms of integrity and historic contribution. These are denoted by a square on the working map overlay. Contributing: 75% of the Inventory is included in the category, which applies to properties that have generally retained their historic character. These are denoted by a triangle. All Designated Landmarks (with the exception of 215 W. Hallam) are rated Contributing or Significant. Supporting: This is the lower 10% of the Inventory, which applies to those resources that have lost their original 3 integrity due to unsympathetic additions or alterations, but are considered "retrievable" with a great deal of effort. These are denoted by a circle. Although the meaning behind rating categories does not carry the same weight it did in 1986, the purpose of applying a local rating system helps in preservation planning (i.e. where future districts should be formed) and allows the HPC some flexibility in strict application of the development review standards when additions or other changes are proposed. PUBLIC INQUIRY: Staff received a modest number of inquiries, most of whom were anxious to clarify their understanding of what the Inventory re-evaluation meant. Seven individuals met in person with staff. All individuals who made a phone or in-person inquiry received a packet of information on the program, including the HPC brochuKe,-incentives, tax credits, and an application for Landmark Designation. Those who requested, received a copy of their inventory form, with a request to notify staff should changes or additions be necessary. One caller refused to identify himself regarding the property at 635 E. Hopkins. The following individuals are expected to appear before the HPC, to argue for the removal of the property from the Inventory: Kathryn Lee - 124 W. Hallam Edith Chisholm - 205 W. Main (letter enclosed - she wishes to be removed from the Main Street Historic District) Elsa Fischer - 525 W. Hallam (letter enclosed) Jim Iglehart - 610 W. Hallam Tam Scott for Margaret Day - 135 W. Hopkins No other property owners gave staff a clear indication they intended to appear before the HPC, with the exception of Mona Frost's Trustee responsible for the estate management for the property located at 216 E. Hallam. Staff received no inquiries from any property owner of the proposed Inventory "adds". TALLY: Staff will present a complete listing of all Inventoried properties for the HPC at the meeting, and a working map will be available for review. The total tally reads as follows: Designated Landmarks: 128 (No review is necessary) Non-Landmarks on Inventory, including proposed "adds": 141 Total: 269 4 Recommended "adds" : 14 Carefully review these properties: 303 S. Cleveland 305 S. Cleveland 307 S. Cleveland 1031 E. Durant 101-109 Juan St. 520 Walnut 557 Walnut 1500 Ute Avenue , , 3·30 L <199 8 <3 4- Glory Hole Park Aspen Brewery Ruins 701 W. Main 106 North Park* 1101 E. Durant* Aspen Grove Cemetery* (Note: * indicates property ownership and parcel ID numbers were not able to be obtained; public notices were not sent out. Additional research is necessary in order to complete the Inventory inclusion process for these properties.) Adds" between 1986-1992: 6 (Note: These have all been Landmarked) 1004 E. Durant 17 Queen St. Holden/Marolt Barn and Salt Shed Marolt House 300 W. Main 134-B W. Hopkins Recommended drops (not counted above): 3 1022 E. Hyman 1031 E. Hyman , , ,/ , . .r f . 1¥ b¥-f. 801 E. Hyman 4*993%3931 4%4re,val,iyes tked) Previously approved drop: 1 601 W. Hallam (George Vicenzi) Drops due to previous demolitions: 16 110 N. Spring 718 E. Hopkins 720 E. Hopkins 624 E. Hopkins 816 E. Cooper 835 E. Cooper 515 N. 5th 5 501 W. Smuggler 639 N. 4th 170 N. Park 940 Matchless Drive 219 W. Hopkins 203 E. Hallam 222 E. Hallam 232 E. Hallam (landmarked; entirely reconstructed) Paepcke Park Gazebo (landmarked; entirely reconstructed) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends the HPC consider all public input and continue the public hearing to March 25, 1992, at which time a Resolution recommending Inventory adoption to City Council will be presented for HPC action. The Planning Office further recommends that the HPC adopt the recommended rating categories of each property as proposed by staff. HPC COMMENTS: memo.hpc.inventory.eval 6 €xkibit A CITY OF ASPEN / PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 303-920-5090 Fax 920-5197 February 18, 1992 ~Fl* AF2* Re: *F3* Dear Historic Property Owner: Once every five years, the City re-evaluates the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures in order to update the map and add to our information of our community's historic resources. The re-evaluation process is an excellent opportunity for you to become involved in our cultural resource program, and bring yourself current on preservation techniques and legislation that may benefit or affect your property. The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee and Planning Department staff have been working on the re-evaluation project for some time now. We have scheduled a series of educational sessions and public hearings to help you understand what "being on the Inventory" means, and how your historic property contributes to the overall character of our community. You will also learn what preservation incentives may be available to you. Did you 1cnow, for example, that you may be eligible for a state income tax (direct) credit of 20% off the cost of rehabilitation? Or that the City of Aspen currently offers a $2,000 grant to any historic residential property owner who landmark designates their property? Which historic properties are being re-evaluated? We will only be re-evaluating those historic resources that: Have not already received Landmark Designation This comprises less than half of the entire inventory, or approximately 120 properties. Your property is one of these. 1 , € 16 t. * A 2.., - ¥ . .1• .1~ 'c ·,4 '4? - 2 ? .. 31 27 12 / I It is presently contemplated that 90% (+/-) of the historic properties being re-evaluated at this time will not change in status since they were originally surveyed for the 1980 Inventory. However, we expect that approximately 10% of the Inventory may change, in one of the following ways: 1) Properties may be eliminated entirely from the Inventory due to complete loss of historic integrity 2) Properties may be added to the Inventory due to annexation, contribution to community character in scale and age, or original error in 1980 3) Properties may be changed in "classification", either up or down What does "Classification" mean? It is important to understand that the 1986 numerical "rating" system no longer applies to the Inventory. The 1-5 numbers have been replaced with a simpler "classification" system, which no longer carries the same meaning that the numbered system did from 1986-1989. The classification system is a three tiered administrative method to help staff, the HPC, and the State Historical Society evaluate the historic integrity of our overall inventory. Properties are classified as either: 1) Significant: All properties listed on or considered eligible for listing on the National and/or State Register of Historic Places. 2) Contributing: All properties that do not meet the definition of "Significant" (the bulk of the Inventory), provided they have maintained their historic integrity or represent unique architectural design. 05%-80% of the entire Inventory is considered "Contributing".) 3) Supporting: Those properties that have lost their original integrity but are considered "retrievable" as historic structures that contribute the overall character of Aspen. These properties have received generally incompatible alterations over the years, however, with substantial effort could be upgraded to "Contributing". Another important change since 1986 involves all properties identified on the Inventory, including Designated Landmarks and properties within historic districts. The HPC now reviews and must approve all demolitions, partial demolitions and relocations according to the Land Use Regulations. When are the hearings? We have arranged to hold a series of informal educational sessions with staff and a member of the HPC, which are open for anyone to attend. Appointments are strongly encouraged by phoning 920-5090. These will be held on: February 26, 27 and 28, from 1:00 - 4:00 p.m. Citv Hall, second floor meetine room 2 The purpose of these one-on-one staff meetings is to afford you an opportunity to ask questions on anything regarding the historic preservation regulations and what it means and doesn't mean to be on the Inventory. We feel these informal sessions will go a long way to help clear up any confusion and make the program more understandable and less technical. We will have a complete packet of information on the incentives program as well. Next, the HPC will hold public hearings on two consecutive evenings, dedicated solely to the Inventory re-evaluation: March 18 and 19. 5:00 - 8:00 p.m. Citv Hall. second floor meeting room March 18: All resources located west of Mill St. March 19: All resources located east of Mill St. Section 24-7-709 of the Aspen Municipal Code states: "The inventory of historic structures shall include all structures in the City of Aspen originally constructed prior to 1910 which continue to have historic value, and such other structures identified by the HPC as being outstanding examples of more modern architecture. " The HPC will be reviewing each property based on this criteria. Their final action will result in a list that will be adopted by Resolution, then forwarded to City Council for Ordinance adoption. City Council will then hear the Ordinance as follows: April 13 - First Reading May 11 - Second Reading, Public Hearing Your official public notice is enclosed. QUESTIONS? Please notify Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer, at 920-5090. Sincerely, Roxanne Elin Historic Preservation Officer og.inventory. reeval 3 a 11Wirt h MAR' 1 \992 14)~t Office Box 9525 A,pen, Colorado 8 I 6i z 303.9zi.807( March 16, 1992 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen/Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne, As a follow up to'our meeting on February 27th, I would like to thank you for the time you spent with me discussing the ramifications of our designation and the various options available to us. I understand now that our house, classified as "Supporting", does make a contribution to the overall scheme of things because of its size, scale and character, and I believe that it should stay on the inven- tory for those reasons. We are going to pursue Landmark Designation in order to guarantee tl it can always make that contribution and to incorporate that designa- tion in the plans that we have for our property. I have met with our architect, Warren Palmer, and discussed this with him. We are going to make an appointment with Leslie before the end of March to discuss our initial ideas and how they will work. Thanks again for your help. ~ S incerepi, T JN 't J:an Wirth , 11 : < 063 /3-BW/j w 1 1 - 6.- 'r , u 6,3 /h -1- 205 W. Main Street , • Aspen, CO 81611 March 12, 1992 Roxanne Eflin torie Preservation Officer y of Aspen/Pitkin County 1 lanning and Zoning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 MAR i 31992 Dear Ms. Eflin: This is in reply to your letter dated February 18, 1992, regarding the re- evaluation of the· Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures located west and east of Mill Street in Aspen. First, I want to take this opportunity to thank you for the time you spent meeting with me and my daughter on February 27, 1992. Since that meeting, I have read and studied the packet of material I re- ceived including the "Historic Architectural Building/Structure Form" per- taining to my property located at 205 West Main Street, or legal description - East 15' of Lot G, and all of Lots H and I in Block 52. The legal descrip- tion on your form in in error. The house that sits on my lots is not in its original location, as it was moved in 1949 from Block 71, Aspen. To my knowledge no significant nor important person or persons have ever resided in it. The roof line has been altered; several of the original long, narrow windows were replaced with larger, modern-type double windows to provide more light and insula- ion from the cold; the open porch at the rear entrance has long since been 1closed and replaced with modern sliding doors onto a redwood deck; and -st of the old, narrow siding has been replaced with the wider redwood siding. Except for normal wear and tear repairs, such as painting, new roof, etc., no historical renovation to the exterior has ever been done to the house. I have lived in this residence since 1950, and God willing, I plan to con- tinue living here indefinitely. Unless some undue circumstance would force me to have to move from Aspen, I do not plan in the future to either sell or convert from a 1-family residence to any type of business which is allowed at this location at the present time. However, if I had to sell, I do not believe a prospective buyer would be interested in purchasing the property if he or she were restricted in anyway to keep the house itself in its present state, or restore it to fit with the Victorian era. We well know that to properly restore an old building, such as my house, not only takes time and a good knowledge of historic preservation, but also an enormous sum of money to do the job properly. I feel my residence would classify as a "tear down" and qualify for demolition. From my property tax notice, the increased 1991 assessed valuation was not significant on the residence itself, but on the value of the 2-6 lots on which it sits. In view of the above, I oppose any further restrictions which might be ' posed by the HPC (other than the normal required P&Z Regulations) and, refore, request that my property at 205 West Main Street be removed om the City of Aspen "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures". Sincerely, ~5 1 . ofi«-1:.2622~---- Edith S. Chisholm CC: City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Office Friday - March 13, 1992 -- ·ASPEN_ . ' .,; i-4 r-.4 7 ROXANNE EFLIN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER MAR' 3 l992 CITY OF ASPEN /PITEN COUNTY PLANN~NG AND ZOING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Co. 81661 RE: MY PROPERTY AT 525 WEST HALLAM ST. ASPEN ------------------ Dear Roxanne: This is in response to your February 18, 1992 letter regarding the abouek A few days after receiving the letter I spoke to you on the phone. I appreciate your advice, and your suggestion that I write Num a letter to you stating my problems. I am a senior citizen (plusl) and have worked and volunteered in Aspen since 1947. I have a not-yet-solved medical problem going into the fourth year, and also have macular degeneration of my eyes. One sister has been in the Assisted Living in Aspen for almost two years. Another sister is legally blind. At this point in time our medical expenses may rise, and we would need funds from the sale of my house. - at any unknown time. Because of the above, I am not interested in depending on any incentives. As to any incentive to the buyer, this may not always hgppen. In 1981 we owned prberty that was definitely historically -designated. Two gentlemen bought, 1he house, made a down payment ... then changed their mind because they were having difficulty with their plans with the P & Z. This resulted in financial problems for us, months of anxiety and worry and ended with a lawsuit settled out of court. e We do not want to suffer any delays if such an occasion would arise again. 4- l Down the road, we may need funds immediately. I love Aspen - as you all do - I want to stay here as long as it is physically possible.I cannot tell just when our "nest-egg" may be depleted, but we want to avoid any delays should a sale be financially urgent. I am therefore asking, and appealing, thru a copy of this letter, to the City Council TO REMOVE MY PEROPERTY FROM THE HISTORICAL DES GNATTON SOON. I would be most grateful to them if such a decision can be made. £lka facher ___11%2 -#6. u.0 60.5 - 525'West *allhnt,Street 31spen, Cotbradb 81611 CC: HON. JOHN 5. BENNETT, MAYOR -70 8 NIC PETERS, COUNCIL]·LAN MARGOT PENDLETON, COUNCILWOMAN AGUIE RENO. COUNCILMAN RACHEL, RICHARDS, COIHICILWOILAN P. S. 3 have my "good" days and my *bad" days so it is questionable when I can attend any meetings. MAR 1 7 1992 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Officer At our February 27 meeting you asked me to learn as much as possible about the construction of my house at 120 N. Fifth St. I contacted Martha and Elsa Fisher who formerly lived across Fifth St. as well as Pat Millington from whom I purchased my house in 1973. They have promissed to write out their recollections concerning the construction of the house but I have yet to receive anything. What follows is information I have received by talking to these people. Pat and Dick Millington built my house around 1970. Pat was graduated in architecture from Stanford University and moved to Aspen when her uncle, Bill Janss, began developing Snowmass. An old house stood on the property belonging to Cora and Bill Taggart who died around 1950 and 1955· Bill came to Aspen when he was nine years old. He ran a livery stable opposite Crossroads Drugs. The Millingtons moved the Taggart house to Oklahoma Flats. Then they moved the Stapleton house from Main St. on the south side across from the Christmas Tree Inn to 120 N. Fifth St. At this time Pat decided to live at this address so gutted the Stapleton house and built a duplex. Dick Wright was the contractor but I find no record of him now. During this period an exceptional wrecking company operated in Denver next to the railroad yards. This company supplied many of the windows and doors used in my house. Pat elevated a modest clapboard house into an elegant Queen Ann style house and while nicer than many, it is still what realators refer to as a fake Victorian. 4 3~4 04£ a - Elizabeth- Fergus March 17, 1992 CHRISTIANIA LODGE & CHALETS 501 WEST MAIN STREET H824/R ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-3014 TO 2/22/92DATE city of aspen p and z SUBJECT 130 SOUTH GALENA ASSPEN, CO 81611 attention Roxanne eflin: I have received some sort of letter dated Feb 18th, 1992 and addressed to to owner of historic property: No structure on property block 31 lots A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,J should be historic. there is no structure built prior to I 1910. As for the little Log Cabin it was built in the late 1950's from some old logs that once held a chicken coop and it fell down and the logs were moved to their present location and rebuilt into the present cabin. When and if the time comes to demolish said cabin, we want nothing to do with some historic designation. thank you. Steen Gantzel - 6144 0 3-9 , L 10 . ~ li Ck-< - Item #ML5N1 12 The Drawing Board, Dallas, Texas 75266-0429 r Wheeler Group, Inc., 1982 FOLD AT (-) TO FIT DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPE #EW l OP 3-1 9--9 1 E.2 L_, 1 j bc__ A-c--y- HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 525.WH Photo Information: ASP-E-32 & 34 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Horace K. hevereux House Full Street Address: 525 West Hallam Legal Description: Lot C and the West 1/2 of Lot D. Block 29 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Hipped roof cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: 2 30" cottonwoods at north side Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): 1 shed-roof qarage. board and batten, approximately 200 square feet (contemporary); 1 shed roof livestock shed with original board and batten siding, approximately 200 sa. ft. For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Hip with corrugated metal Walls: Asbestos shinqles Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): 2 at either ends of center peak; both red brick; 1 red brick at southwest Windows: One-over-one double hung bav with simple brackets below and mansard roof above 1 Doors: Transome.~direct light,~ wood panel Porches: Hip gable over front door only; supported bv turned posts General Architectural Description: 1-story Victorian Cottaqe Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 525.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1886 Actual X Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Asbestos siding Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 122 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Registe J Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture. although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestvle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: January 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner Friday - 1.arch 13, 1992 - ASPEN , f ./ 1,~ , \ex-€1 0 /3-DEL ROXANNE EFLIN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER .*,F AU CITY OF ASPEN /PITKIN COUNTY PLANN'NG AND ZOING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Co. 81661 RE: MY PROPERTY AT 525 1·EST HALLAM ST. ASPEN -----0------------ Dear Roxanne: This is in response to your February 18, 1992 letter regarding the abouek A few days after receiving the letter I spoke to you on the phone. B appreciate your advice, and your suggestion that I write Not a letter to you stating my problems. I am a senior citizen (plus!) and have worked and volunteered in Aspen since 1947. I have a not-yet-solved medical problem going into the fourth year, and also have macular degeneration of my eyes. One sister has been in the Assisted Living in Aspen for almost two years. Another sister is legally blind. At this point in time our medical expenses may rise, and we would need funds from the sale of my house. - at any unknown time. Because of the above, I am not interested in depending on any incentives. As to any incentive to the buyer, this may not always hqppen. In 1981 we owned pr~erty that was definitely historically designated. Two gentlemen bought the house, made a down payment ... then changed their mind because they were having difficulty with their plans with the P & Z. This resulted in financial problems for us, months of anxiety and worry and ended with a lawsuit settled out of court. We do not want to suffer any delays if such an occasion would arise again. Down the road, we may need funds immediately. T love Aspen - as you all do - I want to stay here as long· as it is physically possible.I cannot tell just when our "nest-egg" may be depleted, but we want to avoid any delays should a sale be financially urgent. I an therefore askinr, and appealing, thru a copy of this letter, to the City Council TO RE-:OVE MY PEROPERTY FROM THE H-STORICAL DES-GIATrON SOON. I would be most grateful to them if such a decision can be made. Sincerely, - -- *-- ,-1_UU <i---e - 1 2-,u € 4 a .5 - £8ayuc/ier 525 'West *alI¢m Street Aspen, Coforado 81611 CC : HON. JOHN S. BENNETT, MAYOR FRANK PETERS, COUNCIL:·LAN !·LARGOT PENDLETON, COUNCnjWDLIAN AGUIE RENO. COUNCILMAN RACHEL RICHERDS, U JI.,0--J.,J....fl.i P OITT,v, TT 1.To' 'Av P.S. I have my "good" days and my 'bad" days so it is questionable when I can attend any meetings. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 707.NT FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1890 Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate - Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Roof modification, windows, north bav; dates unknown Additions and Date: Large addition on north side and 1-story garden room added to west around the 1950's; porches northeast and southeast, post 1980's NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1 _ 1 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Integrity has been compromised due to substan- tial modifications. Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture. although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. It is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life style(s) of the average citizen of Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Devon Reese, Intern Date: August, 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner C *(C 1/J 1-1 1.90- HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 707.NT Photo Information: ASP-O-20 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Frank and Della Yates House Full Street Address: 707 North Third (405 Gillespie Street) Legal Description: Lots 6 & 7. Block 100 Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Private Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Vernacular Cottaqe Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Approximately 1,500 Number of Stories: 1-storv Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Modified Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Historic ditch, perimeter cottonwoods on north and east lot lines; perimeter wood picket fence Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material an~ Function (map number / name): Added perimeter covered walk. additional flat roof garden structure to west For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Mansard with front (east) cross qabled; wood shingles Walls: Wood clapboard and cut shingled gable ends Foundation / Basement: Sandstone Chimney(s): 1 brick and 1 metal flue Windows: One-over-one few original wood double-hung, casements in additions, shallow-projecting bay with hipped roof with one-over-one double hung window, supported by brackets at front (east) qable end Doors: Non-original, 2/3 cut glass light wood paint with 1 cut glass side light at (southeast) entry; northeast entry: pair full-light wood Porches: 2 porches aded at southeast and northeast on turned posts, turned balusters General Architectural Description: 1-1/2 story cross gabled vernacu- lar miner's cottage with modifications and additions. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 735.WB FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: Late 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building Style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Porch infill; storm windows Additions and Date: Shed addition at southeast corner NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E - Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Illustrates the family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen in Aspen when it was dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: January 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner D-/ 2 -9 1 4 --4- rn;w £ if , <rt#-1 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 735.WB Photo Information: ASP-E-16 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 735 West Bleeker Legal Description: Lots A & B, BLock 18 East Aspen Townsite City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: East End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material an Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: T-shaped gable with asphalt shingles Walls: Clapboard with decorative wood shingles at qable end; decorative barge board Foundation / Basement: Concrete Chimney(s): N/A Windows: Paired one-over-one double hung; picture and easement window infill at porch Doors: 1/2 light over wood panel, contemporary Porches: Shed, enclosed with turned posts General Architectural Description: One-story Victorian Miner's Cottaqe Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 205.WM FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1890 Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Previous research MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major Moved X Date 1949 Describe Modifications and Date: Moved from Block 71 (lot unknown) Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation 7 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is " retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Representative of Mining Era in Aspen. The historical significance of this structure has been diminished as a result of it being moved from its original loca- tion in 1949 (Block 71, Lot ?). The architectural significance of this Victorian Miner's Cottage is that it basically remains in its original appearance. A single east/west qable with narrow and long double-hunq windows trimmed out in traditional horizontal clapboard siding are typical. The significance of this is not who owned or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representave of Aspen's Mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated bv the silver mining industry. other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner .3-H ~ C, 3 - ) 0 2 fl \/ C j ;xy- Aff D 17 C --k- thwh . til 1 j 56)-Jug..-,~ --4~Jiff /4 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 205.WM Photo Information: ASP-A-9 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Chisholm Residence Full Street Address: 205 West Main Legal Description: Lots H, I, Block 51 40 4/3- cuu~-4> 'Qot Citv and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Main Street Historic District Owner: Private/State/Federal Private Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residence Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Modified Square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: L-shaped gable with qable dormers, asphalt shingles; shed roof on rear (southwest) corner Walls: Horizontal clapboard with decorative shingles Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Single brick at center rear Windows: Paired one-over-one double-hung on 1st floor; two-over- two double-hung at side on 2nd floor Doors: Wood panel Porches: Full-width front hip roof supported bv shingled arches and posts General Architectural Description: Victorian Miner's Cottage con- structed out of wood; single east/west gable with long. narrow windows with horizontal clapboard siding. It basically remains in its original appearance. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 120.NF FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1890's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: -Building Style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS ,i *Al) 0403©06*-4-Pear- Minor Moderate Major X Moved X \:>~:0~70*te Describe Modifications and Date: Shed dormer at north facade bav window at southwest corner; dates unknown Additions and Date: Gable and hexagonal turret added at rear; dates unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register __ Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E ' Map KeV Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. 0 _ Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: As a result of the extensive renovation to the original structure, this building has been placed in an " inventoried" category which means that it was constructed during Aspen's mining era but since then has lost its architectural/ historical integrity. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: January 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 3,1 t..<7_ (Q r (jAb 41 1 3-6-7 €7 C 4 1 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM tfib~~1 State Site Number: Local Site Number: 120.NF Photo Information: ASP-D-36A, ASP-E-2 & 1 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 120 North Fifth Legal Description: Lots A. B & C. Block 30 Hallam Street Historic District City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West Bleeker Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2-storv Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Wrought iron fence wraps north and west sides Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Simple qable garage with decorative wood shinqles at qable end; wood shingle roof with metal ball finials at gable end; clapboard siding. approximately 300 square feet; hexaqonal qazebo, southeast corner of site For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: 2 north/south qables connected bv extensive shed dormer with spindle frieze; hip roof at 1st story wraps north & west sides; crest- ing; asphalt shingles; secondary qable prolecting at southwest corner Walls: Clapboard; decorative wood shinqles at qable end Foundation / Basement: Brick Chimney(s): Red brick at west end with corbeled top Windows: 1st story Daired easement with leaded beveled glass in enclosed porch on northwest corner. plate glass elsewhere; 1 stained glass in north facade; combination stained leaded, plate single and double casements in 2nd story dormer at gable ends; hipped roof bav window under southwest qable has 3 arch-top stained glass windows Doors: 2 segmented glass 1/2 light, wood panel; 9 double-arch light. wood panel. north facade Porches: Wraps north and west sides; enclosed except for east end of north side which has turned posts and spindle frieze General Architectural Description: 2-story Victorian house A f ,~A i /ki*,t~ 02-& (1*u,~ j _- 7,O'rt 10£049 001 tknu _ - ~a,eQ -6 OU«. P<cl~'© 17-10 -Quked,A Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 135.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1880's,1890's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building's Style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Side gable extension, picture windows. board and batten siding, outbuildinq enlarqement and modifi- cations -- dates unknown (1950's and 1960's) Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E I -il - - Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register ~/'~ Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture. although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Glenn Rappaport Date: September 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner XEr ' ./b UL \33 h# C TA m s c 0-T.-T ) 1¥k© f Lib HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM 3 State Site Number: Local Site Number: 135.WH Photo Information: ASP-M-22 & 25 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 135 West Hopkins Legal Description: Lot A, Block 60 West Aspen Mountain City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Shadow Mountain Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottaqe Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Cross gable "L". modified Landscaping or Special Setting Features: 2 mature cottonwoods front (north) yard Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material an Function (map number / name): Small shed roof outbuildings with 2- story qable building attached (possible employee unit); each end could be historic; 1-story with loft (board and batten), wood shingles For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Front qable with side qable now modified to "mansard"; asphalt shingles Walls: Wide board and batten vertical wood; dentil trim and clapboard on front; 5-sided bav window Foundation / Basement: Stone foundation Chimney(s): Simple brick; center (2) Windows: One-over-one wood double hung; some original; front bav windows; 2 3-light flanking 1 9-light; 2 shallow-prolecting bav with shed roof with one-over-one double hunq window, supported bv scroll brackets on west side Doors: 1/2 light over divided light over wood panel Porches: Small entry porch, shed roof. painted metal ornamental posts and rail (contemporary) General Architectural Description: Typical cross-qable 1-story miner's cottage with large, Italianate bay window projection at front-facing gable end, wood siding is not original. painted metal grillwork compromises porch detailing (posts raill. Enlargement has modified side qable to west to a "mansard" look. L ../ ASPEN'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCENTIVES PROGRAM Prepared by: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer - J Introduction Incentives to encourage good historic preservation practices have been an important aspect of Aspen's preservation program since it began twenty years ago. Recognizing that historic resources are a valuable community asset has been the basic premise supporting the creation of an innovative package of incentives, unlike any other community in the country. We believe in meeting the needs of historic property owners more than half way. Aspen's preservation incentives are in response to tight controls that have been legislated by City Councils since 1972. Assisting the property owner in renovating and maintaining their property is seen as a daily, on-going fact of community life, with quality of #te as the guiding principal behind the program. The Planning Office and Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) are dedicated to administering a preservation program. Aspen is unique. Its historic resources and spirit of community cannot be duplicated elsewhere in the world. It is this basic character that has helped make this community both economically vital and cherished by millions. -------- -------- Landmark Designation Incentives are available only to locally Designated Landmarks. The process to receive Landmark Designation involves public hearings at the HPC and Planning Commission level, prior to City Council adopting an Ordinance granting Landmark status ("H" Historic Overlay zoning.) A minimum of one designation standard (out of six) must be met in order for the property to be eligible. Age is not an explicit consideration. The process takes approximately 2-3 months to complete. No processing fees are charged. Individualized "Landmark" plaques are available for purchase by special order through the Planning Office. Information regarding Aspen's historic preservation program, including a more thorough description of specific incentives may be obtained by contacting: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department (303) 920-5090 Aspen City Hall 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 l I .4 *' Financial Incentives $2,000 "Designation Grants" are available to residential property owners from the City of Aspen, without condition. We recommend the grant be used for some form of maintenance. $10,000 zero interest "minimum maintenance" loans are available from the City to historic property owners who indicate financial need. These one-time loans are repaid at time of transfer-of-title or at the end of ten years, whichever comes first. The intention of the Minimum Maintenance Loan Program is to reduce the incidence of " demolition by neglect". Waiver of Park Dedication Fees are allowed by City Council, which begin at $1300 for residential projects, and are calculated per square feet for commercial projects. 20 % State Rehabilitation Income Tax Credits are available for Landmarks 50 years old or older. Modest application fees are changed to process these applications. 20 % Federal Income Tax Credits are available for income producing properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Competitive "State Historical Fund" preservation grants will be available after July, 1992. Processing fees are waived for Landmark Designations. Small flat- rate fees are charged for other preservation project reviews. Creative Zoning - Residential Dimensional variations are allowed for projects where the HPC has found that the variation is more compatible in character to the historic resource than would be according to underlying dimensional requirements. These consist of: o Side, rear and front yard setbacks o Minimum required distance between buildings o Maximum floor area may be exceeded up to 500 sq. ft. o Site coverage up to 5 % and height variations for "Cottage Infill" (affordable housing) projects Two detached single family dwelling units are allowed on smaller parcels than permitted by zoning in some residential zone districts Parking reductions are permitted on sites unable to contain the required number of on-site parking spaces required by underlying zoning. Special uses such as Bed and Breakfasts and Boarding Houses are allowed in residential Landmarks in zone districts. 4 Creative Zoning - Commercial Exemption from the Growth Management Quota System and annual competition is permitted for Landmarks. Substantial dollars are saved in application preparation, time, and mitigation requirements. Impact mitigation such as affordable housing is calculated on a sliding scale, equally proportionate to the percentage of total building out of the parcel. (Employee mitigation is calculated on a per-square-foot of net leasable basis, and may vary from $20,000 to well over $100,000, depending on the project.) Parking reductions and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees for parking reductions, which are calculated at $15,000 per space. The change-of-use with no expansion of net leasable square footage requires no impact mitigation. Expansions of Landmarks are only required to mitigate growth impacts when net leasable and floor area ratios are increased. Example: Below grade (basement) space is not considered "floor area", therefore, i.e. below grade (basement) expansions are not required to mitigate, even if considered to be "net leasable". Example: Exterior additions for elevator towers or circulation foyers are not considered "net leasable square footage", and therefore require no impact mitigation. Variety of conditional uses are available to Landmarks within the "Office" zone, such as antique stores, restaurants, art galleries and bookstores. Open space dimensional requirements may be varied for the on- site relocation of commercial landmarks Residential units above grade in Landmarks within the Commercial Core Historic District are allowed short-term leases Building Codes The Uniform Building Code provides for flexibility in its application to historic Landmarks. Preservation projects receive a streamlined building permit review process. In addition to the UBC, the Uni form Code for Building Conservation (UCBC) is used in special cases involving Landmark structures. - HPC Reviews All applications are reviewed quickly. There are no delays due to filled agendas. The HPC meets twice monthly, and special meetings to accommodate applicants are scheduled as needed. Only small-to-modest flat-rate review fees are charged. Landmark applications are fee-waived. Project approvals may be vested via resolution of the HPC for three years (as allowed by state statute) from the date of approval. The HPC Project Monitor system (for each project) provides timely problem solving solutions and personalized service on-site. Technical assistance and information may be obtained through professionals at the state and national level to assist in specialized cases. A resource library covering all aspects of preservation from tax incentives to color is available in the office of the Historic Preservation Officer, in the Planning Office. Other Resources The non-profit Aspen Historic Trust is available to accept donated facade and conservation easements, which may be a valuable tax- exempt contribution. For information on the Aspen Historic Trust, contact President Les Holst at (303) 925-7616. ### Although the preservation incentives discussed here are applicable for Aspen Landmarks only, the joint Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office are in the process of developing a package of incentives for historic resources found in Pitkin County as well. We encourage input regarding our preservation incentives, and any ideas you may have that might help us. Please feel free to contact the Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office at (303) 920-5090. 22 9 4 - $ 31- 6(Le 5,314,~3 4 .. Non-Designated Properties for re-evaluation March, 1992 Key: Significant: O Contributing: LJ Supporting: 0 Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 432 E. Hyman Commercial Core 423 E. Hyman Commercial Core 530 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 532 E. Hopkins Commercial Core -111-~ ---- 534 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 531 E. Cooper Commercial Core 529 E. Cooper Commercial Core 308 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 314 E. Hyman Commercial Core 406 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 209 S. Galena Commercial Core -- 701 W. Main Main Street 709 W. Main Main Street - 604 W. Main Main Street 616 W. Main Main Street 611 W. Main Main Street 518 W. Main Main Street 1-- - STE 66/ 75 27 W. Main Main Street 0.4..1 ~LU-_ 20_Ltuu -6 /3-,9 1 - Z U e-42 1 'py') '3 -47 9-2 205 W. Main Main Street CLAL¢.3/1 ak -, 1£1(i.< 10«_0-9 ....7~3 101 S. Monarch Main Street 227 E. Main Main Street . Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 820 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 824 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 935 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 939 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 1012 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 811 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 819 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 920 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1022 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1020 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1031 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 801 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1000 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 1006 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 1020 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 303 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 305 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 307 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 918 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 1031 E. Durant East Aspen Twnst. 623 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 625 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 635 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 1101 E. Durant East Aspen Twnst. 600 E. Bleeker East Aspen Twnst. Durant Mine East Aspen Twnst. f I Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 92 1280 Ute Ave. Ute Avenue 1500 Ute Ave.· Ute Avenue Glory Hole Park Ute Avenue 124 E. Cooper Shadow Mountain 214 E. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 101-109 Juan St. Shadow Mountain 325 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 200 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 205 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 214 W. Hyman Shadow Mountain 216 W. Hyman Shadow Mountain 311 S. 1st St. Shadow Mountain 2-,r- 0 135 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain pekh -Tr „'i see -rT- 101 E. Hopkins Shadow Mountain Midland Rgt of Way Shadow Mountain Red Butte Cemetery West End Rio Grande R-0-W West End Ii- .Il ~- 701 W. Smuggler(?) West End 712 W. Francis West End 716 W. Hallam West End 117 N. 6th West End -- 3¥ MY-(A 1 735 W. Bleeker West End IW n<- f 6, * n L 609 W. Smuggler West End 610 W. Francis West End - 3-/2 ta 610 W. Hallam West End b , Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 635 W. Bleeker West End 522 W. Francis West End 523 W. Francis West End 533 W. Francis West End 34 : I i fr j 522 W. Hallam 4 West End 63-0 A- C\, f Ut,J"t - 4/1 434 '21/3 - 533 W. Hallam West End 3)%61:7 Jk 120 N. 5th . West End L.J~ j~i- - - c.kv %_0*7--PEL.,(99 :vel.1 '700~3%11/c£- 434 W. Smuggler West End 515 N. 3rd West End 403 W. Hallam West End 421 W. Hallam West End 323 W. Hallam West End 229 W. Hallam West End 233 W. Hallam West End 213 W. Bleeker West End 217 W. Bleeker West End 233 W. Bleeker West End 121 W. Bleeker West End 129 W. Bleeker West End 205 W. Bleeker(?) West End Meadows/Institute West End Riding Ring West End 701 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 707 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 3-/ 9'-9 774 6.a v o L. C Y.11 1 3 620 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 640 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. . I Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 240 Lake Ave. West End/Hallam Lk. 330 Lake Ave. West End/Hallam Lk. 202 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. 225 W. Smuggler West End/Hallam Lk. 229 W. Smuggler West End/Hallam Lk. 120 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. 126 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. 123 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. 3-'R--4 1 124 W._Hallam West End/Hallam Lk. 314 Gillespie West End/Hallam Lk. 330 Gillespie West End/Hallam Lk. 220 Puppy Smith West End/Hallam Lk. Aspen Brewery Ruins West End/Hallam Lk. Triangle Park West End/Hallam Lk. 101 E. Hallam West End/Church - 105 E. Hallam West End/Church 110 E. Bleeker West End/Church 134 E. Bleeker West End/Church 216 E. Hallam West End/Church 0-LA ST) 1-'Aq_ P. 2 9-7- / '1 D } 1 £- 223 E. Hallam West End/Church -- 232 E. Bleeker West End/Church 227 E. Bleeker West End/Church 202 N. Monarch West End/Church 470 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 950 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. . Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 930 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. --- 920 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. 390 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 230 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 100 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 101 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 165 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 106 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 520 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. 557 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. 930 King Smuggler Mtn. - 925 King Smuggler Mtn. 935 King Smuggler Mtn. 860 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. - 980 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. 990 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. - 720 Bay St. Smuggler Mtn. Aspen Grove Cmtry Smuggler Mtn. Sheeley Bridge Smuggler Mtn. inventory.non.desig fil- 4 € r Nu r L - tr 3-1 2-- 4 0-~ lit cu».*O .)4/»4 -V-LO HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 124.WH Photo Information: ASP-F-26, 27 & 28 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: 124 W. Hallam House / M.V. Chamberlin House Full Street Address: 124 West Hallam Legal Description: Lots El/3, L, M City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Hallam Lake Historic District Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: * Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2-Story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular with southeast corner turret (e.2) Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Northeast single-gabled garage: clap- board; with qabled end verge board; center north: single-qabeled clapboard out building. same as other; northwest garage: single-gabled with side dormer, clapboard, wood scalloped shingles at gable ends and cutout verge board For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross-qabled with hipped turret, with brackets and qingerbread trim at eaveline; wood shingles Walls: Clapboard with fishscale at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): New: south center, corbelled brick Windows: 1st story: vertical fixed light; 2nd story, west 2 hipped gable dormers; 2nd story typical one-over-one double hung with shutters and decorative lintel; turret: decorative panels, brackets and dentils Doors: South (old front?); 4 panel West (new front ?); pair 1/2 light cut glass with large transom and side lights Porches: Shed roof. west side with square posts with brackets on sandstone wall/base -*-- General Architectural Description: ( Retains original character)but porch has been enclosed, f ireplace reocate-with new masonrv, steep pitched roofs of front qable and cross gable with long Aerrow wi,dows, verge board decorating the gable is simple, but has detail standard horizontal clapboard of 1890's; large 1987 turret dramatically alters massing Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 124.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1887-88 Actual _ Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe M -ificatioos and Date: Completely renovated in 1967 on to 1980 4uk QYQ k- Aft- 19 YJ- (1 58 Additions and Obate: / Turret. 1987 ; west carport NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic o Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial e f fort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure historically is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era. This modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen in Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 81*1 b.-7-deco.C39;4w:-21 -#Sn~ 9·n,gfe on vk Plo --«ir t- »- 9+ 7507 -0 --Fal€v n-r,9 #fD em (9 0 2/9 fRA * 117*P ~ w,vir# -4 08 -rive _ew qp fe rmr' J rm-, 9,Lr-w»-o Aw-p,vgv ok·v~W * r~79- -~17 9° p *1, * 3~gnr~~ 4*4 4,12- -4©P'r V ~~«t~»24235, 9- rN--Pal Cvr,0#f*u~~- 2 0K , 70 *rn,0 70728 4-117/ 0.-00 # 0-4,71*3*' .Pr" 6- 4 10 44 · e«rty" - fr 11 . 40}~ <2')/0 '71,~ Lawd wre q¥ 111'Iri.t.m~prn rexn 2(ki -1·4060/4,-v 44~Vh rT Y-*3 , 13 V ' r-pw~o -AT TA 6741Lv~ 7.fi) t° °«* Crd6.21..:36.<0.2 11* f* -4274) ..rf'.*9.- 8.0 VW 93 r"~1.~j- ·r r-3 WN-Nif',4 +FO Xm·*97 »:13-1 =-7866 l rt:Ali t:-re Ok,7 voify~/272#3790 -«Prfvt . 71 re (o "4109 1, 9719.-40«/7 9 iRANTY r*>, °-0- 9 F r (* p i1 ' 'dke e,vn -y 9.v v 7*76 i 74*res 166(1 rm»~f 1<€436As ~ a- 9<; stoR,; cd hles; qna-1 1 64 05% A 4 40: 1-IA l\Ark - 0 oner :1(,ctler'fAe_ Le-4; 1-2. l-e . 1, Nictont'cal 6904r; 41- 09 AOUS€- has Le* ract;CQI; CL~ art ci~ Fl 23 fonn 19.47 «t; C /937.(Itlue.~ries 4 -lt su,69+0*ficde. art auattq-61€-, 6 needed) <:2. -fjin itt fagi- 57#s.-CE hauz ~.Monallq C,64,hie,¢~7~ e_j 61({trion dramalle=ltu 0 -14, hous&17= -SiloKE ts no Il>Aqtr on Nfll,?0,0 .91£6,- -7-Ae· - A# brroo- 32.£ ) s on Mrst €+rid- 3 -_ELL vic-tor ;40 3,22,14' -loite- 4{AS€_. C)Lfe-* p co J h ave, A e en gu:Ue,f '3 7 /781. C~Dtr/©- -1-A E f airt- 5-luts a.f~ Amo Te- 0/ CT#49 Citee,d-, ak * b , a.,64.f ; n. d ke, -6-tiLTUr 6, , --lkest lou)der ar <- nuu 0.-1 ct 4-2-I _2&05+JuLan¥£3-~~£1:4£(61--4.-2 - 4 0 -7-1 4 0 01.54 kag Lea alter el, 1<aln,£4(£4((4 2>GV, Ma #rudural Moj,lee#.,~a.-rek„ ud- %07\COn 3(33-. foLS€- -9- Il 62£0£1£1- -.-L.Larze, tek , i71 /1 11/9-t See NMAcle-cl letter. 0 --1- pufel-a€ e-AL14 36- (14 o be,eal«s e. i i LA 41-Mt ui->e.- £ le/bg., cw #es; «mu rei~ , 4 1-1 C 0-, re< 4-AS I VL e;-6'-u,ENI je# A,coeuerY-1(£# (," b,idod ~n /00 L'/J' 4,~e_~ k)ouit nAL 1 ly)tort, 1 A c314 74*j neki hortoot Cld i~€Rf ~3> alter J ral-o 2 03 t - f t to #th cx, " Old-DE,ia/\ 9IA®2 aA O/cl shell 1 1/ Imalci n € i 4- CE, A tk) " A) 41) - U i curole.f (1,1 0 n /&6+41 4 az£-for /"745Le>~_~1/ 3-7*2€7 de€2 1hull ~ 50 4 6, -31 0-00 F\41(15 5 Ott ' flo ARes 7¢£' 54.41 Ldegirofed hade-) 41 /Htlt, t'-*lf j efter/or ch«€,9 + Elf 11 Aa U t -t¥tre,4 ef y Sh / ro« /77', 1 -1 nouge- O4ud EU) Se, lu 4 Wei /Ojkgf -06£62*#J~i350.'94-Mr- af-_- h'Na _b&-46 ASt 1-Pd -Are-, ukl-'b(-e__ Fronn €Ttter 51-ral- 5 urro uJ, 44 /,KN 6041-2-j C H n lIA An. OR_Ff: Rst 51-redtj *rr# 4 ~ ' UL l~-1 h «1 o 11 0 --317 600.-~ U- a.· Propert u zoA; a.-315 -146,ik, ,Ld =15 UzI U- to Dels well #90 4 148646 74 1~ le"~s weN turf +A-«r fleidlbothoool. -jt,Led«,«Redq conslructe-1. home_. f-1.- ril I: r, 42 Cbso/WeL no Woeica-1 <3)~Mi->'cae~e_, at£1 r{ lou till 6~ glp*fri J.*21*._assa~31~21£516&is„ 11.--- cl~,2- -A-/tt, egfpe.,ne- a./te.ritio,ts (DIRAL k£oe--) 00%47 J f , A €- n ISTOTICALK i A-fcaritat 05 74, ho#ht , . Noll, TAA,0, e titi ELLk <- /-\Ii A«-4.3 0(411,1/6 - Coke:tivs AOUU ]953'j9?96 * N\Alte) p a /IAkofieo 04 0,4,9-199.25 - c#2411&Kl HISTOR.~ ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE /FORM State Site Number: 1.0 A I14 Local Site Number: 124.WH Photo Information: , ASP-F-26, 27 & 28 Township 10 South Range , 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: 124 W. Hallam House / M.V. Chamberlin House Full Street Address: 124 West Hallam Legal Description; Lots El /3. L,.M City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Hallam Lake Historic District Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: - Residential Architectural Style: * (Xterrd> ty PREs.€431 010#€42> Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: . 2-Story Building Plan (Footp]:int, Shapp) : Irregula, with southeast ¢orner ~~~~Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None turret re.2) ¢64·lik- p r#25¢A.1- 001%04. b u. iff 44 82,244 Associhted Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Northeast single-crabled garage: clap- --1 board; with aabled end verge board; center north: single-qabeled clapboard out building. same as other; northwest garage: single-gabled 1 4 with side dormer. clapboard. weod scalloped shingles at gable ends and _-~ putout verge board - /4 // f51*07/./4 49.4 f Wl# f) Rest# O 606)0/L For the following categories include material~ Wechniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: ,Cross-gabled with hipped turret. with brackets and gingerbread ~A trim at eaveline; wood shingles Walls: Clapboard with fishscale at gable ends Foundation / Basement: r Unknown Chimney(s) : New: south center. corbelled brick 4 q.4 . Windows: 1st story: vertical fixed light; 2nd story, west 2 hipped qable dormers; 2nd story typical one-over-one double hung with shutters i ,~ and decorative lintel; turret: decorative panels. brackets and dentils,-1 r 41 Doors: South fold front?); 4 panel Ajed /0-,t 4 West (new front ?); pair 1/2 light cut glass with large Akid 1 transom and side lights ~ Q~V+orches: Shed roof. west side with square posts with brackets on sandstone wall/base 1- 027 N fri- General Architectural Description: Ret.~ns original character but porch has been enclosed. fireplace relocated with new masonry,. steep /UG+ pitched roofs of front crable and cross ciable with long harrow 41-dows.~Toka ~;~i:o:t:idc~~cpboro~~~njft::9:i::ell~g:11';~? 't~;tetalrtlitta~~;~~{;rs B~~ massing /h; €,UL) M.10 AA ©e , 40» , f\,Q U iflop 1 0*, nID YFA- t| s_blk#AL. ~age 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 124.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: , Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1887-88 _ Actual _ Estimate _ Assessor -Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Ill Minor Moderate /Major _A . l#oved Date Descrilop, Modif ications and-mate: ComDIetely renovated in 1967 on to 1980 CHABIG#*1 A.G-ke#>dAte-J 19;(5- 19'966 Additions hnd Dqfte: Turret, 1987; west carport NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register . Is eligible for National Register; - State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D - E Map XmY_ Local Rating and Landmark Designation I __ I Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. . 0 - Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: 0 Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure historically is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era.AFThis modest structure is of historical importance by illustrating tHe family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen in. Aspen which was dominated bv , the silypr mining industry.~ ~i 1 5-*S 2,7'4€4- i/1 '4 0 vaq ~'9 ,#,10~5;4 A-6.il\...1¢U, DA,-t·- pbr- D.)641 NP 0-400,·se,gr Asioe.A ~pinioui riA-ya - l'kt Jeolly, 11»l turet#:15 a.11 ,€tli-t-'00 4-st' 1,4' Du'») C /10/ eJ Other Recording-Informatlion -4-16 v,11 . Specific References to the Structute/Building: , Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential; - CY or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Asnen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner ._ The Aspen Appraisal (formerly Mottica & Associates, Inc.) Group, Ltd. Crystal Palace Building · 300 E. Hyman · Aspen, CO 81611 · 303/925-8987 · FAX 303/925-4975 Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 4 17 $5 1 |_3 I bfek 1 PUR I 55 2. (2 X 7-53 i 30 1.- 7.5 1-7 x 43-5 = 7 3 9.5 - 0- 3 x q e 11 SEcoNS S.•02- (Sx-3 4 1) C 1 3 1 0 K 29 -5 - 1~1 5 1.5 '1 1 5-5 x 14 - 89 5 1 3 A S = _35_ 7.5 1%.5 5<cor·,86.002. ARIA C \, \3 E.5 Uf 5-FoR-ha € - - p 1 19 15,5 1= 11 15-5 3.51-- ------- log z 9-6 1 (OVER-CO fORd i 13-5 i 7.5 2 1 ----- 2 -5 BA33'117-- Fires·r flooR- 15.5 -5*19-5 ' RGE.25 i 5 M K - 76 1 6.VOUO . S x 24 = 9/ 1 1 23.5 3 x 31{ , 101 (3*3)42 = 4-5 1 1 ---.- *5.5 x 515 o 9 5.25 ErbUM< 7- 5 21-5 K 95 . i 2%1-5 11 Y 43.5 z 479.5 44 GARAL€3 --2.S 11 x'as + 350 0 2-5 k 2% 1 70 I 3.5 x 20.5 = 276.7.5 14.5 9 14 x 21= 3 92 12< ARs-r Fic,or, 4,26,9 1 2,434.75 0 14_ '7.5 ~ 11.5 s s L i v ' A Q AR€A : 3,7 -7 3 12~ 14 1 ig. 5 lotAl w:11 9,51 6 10 \ f-1 1 Scott M. Bowie, MAI avxr, l 6.,1 Randy Gold, MAI •[At -itu,1 1· t 11 .Hi OSI 001 09 0 01 07 0£ r» 0C ·#aej jo aieog -==.======, '070'11 W.P 11 hi 3 1.N 3 0 * N 11 . li 11 lDp 'DE '02 1-fr 7 11 •717 1 - u % - r,e €'L - -1 1 ---,9 - 11 - 1, 0 8 211 0 1 .H. 1 0 1 A g _g-i 1 % V; 1/1 1 1--- ,-I 0 771 11 3 k,) D Z 0 R ./ 11 % 4 11 1 15 30141 2 -113 *1 . 2/ 0 0 '..,1 99 ; 1; 1 0 2 , gil W 11 3 Ill, 12:zi 67 /1/: 11 N 0 ME 1 197 0·, -1 Y + r i " 91 Uk_J 12 r-, J i friz 214- R te :r- 2 4 0 7: 0 *. 1 6 , W 11 az £-1 17--1 1 71 1 , 4 il 0 1.-1 1 •L Ll -0 1/ 1 4:< 44 18 b ELI : 4 1% -: ra , 1- /12; B F:/1 4 11 CD :flk, 1 1, IT, ,/ -C.ZE- 11 1//\ 0 / oop . % lit 0/C DOE .# 0 11 44 11 11 0 lift 1 3 a - -eL. N . 9 0 h 1 17" 11 0 -1 /06 ... % It f.1 1 4 11 / e.. 0 45 -- 1 1,.Ng#=. 1 4 -I 129*#*£, p 1 43) 11 /L_" 9 121 *301,48bno 0 1 0 '910 5/ b H CD ... 1,4 -1/ :AN 31 11 711 . d I -23 3 ~ ~t - ~ 0 2 1 1 WT :,11 71 . .ZLI .3 F-- 0 r 9 4 11 H 664·Am 1/ .0 11 G N 11 .*1, -; £ 0 - LIn . O 1 11 N C 11 11 0 - 11 i --1 0 -- 0 / 11 11 · 9 7 '1 1. 11 1 2 1 63:, 4 11 1 ·04 ' 1 0 1 - t,6 7/•11,.161,/FIVIT--- 01. ffi.., - t. m x * ,rt' '|' THEODORE K QUY ASSOCIATES PC AACHITICTI AND I¥AUCTURAL INE»INI*1:18 January 12,1987 Catherl), Levitz-lie 124 W. Hallarn Aspon, Colorado 81611 Dear Catherine: Ve und,ritand thit your house is bein, oon,ide'*d for 401*#tion &* I hisloric struot:n. V. wonder which portion of th• holk,• thet; vould d•510•t• 1% historic, We hare reo.,11& 006*lit,·d con,trootlor, doormwots for , tovor addition 6, revieving the red«,t - history of the hous*, we four.d constructiort drawings for at baft <Ine *ignificmt remodeling projects They oorn¢>letel, alt,rid th, orig~,al bullang footp, P,t and or®.ted the Victorian offoot of the existm hourn It it not #litotio-, the,# olunges :t,rted In 1967 u,d continui to thi pregent day. V. will be u."ble to *pear at Ihe hearing Fobe*W for ThurIdalt Jwuar, 15,1987 Pl,as# fo,1 free to hav, 4 of Ihe Citg offiotals bonlaot us ff thog iwid Arther bformation. Slncer•kl yours, liteaau Thoodori K O.0, President A THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ~ ,/ TKO/1¥ 86534 L1 1}