Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19940411Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmembers Richards, Reno, Waggaman and Paulson present. PROCLAMATION - Bill Poss Historic Preservation Commission Mayor Bennett read a proclamation commending Bill Poss for his service on the HPC. PROCLAMATION - Diane Moore Planning Director Mayor Bennett and Council presented Diane Moore a proclamation commending her for her service to the planning department and to the city for the last 3 years. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were none. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Councilwoman Richards announced CIVA is creating a comprehen- sive publication of Roaring Fork Valley job opportunities for volunteers. The deadline for this publication is April 20th. 2. Councilwoman Richards said Leadership Aspen is acceptin g applications for their 94-95 program through the end of April. 3. Councilwoman Richards reported the CAST meeting was very well attended. There was a lunch with the legislators and Governor Romer at which CAST's concerns about welcome centers and the 800 number were expressed. Councilwoman Richards said there is a pending bill regarding amendment 1 that would greatly affect Aspen and Pitkin County and staff should keep an eye on this. 4. Amy Margerum, city manager, told Council the East Cooper affordable housing project did receive a height variance from P & Z. Leslie Lamont, planning office, told Council the affordable housing zone allows a special review for a height variance of up to 5 feet. After the project was reviewed, the building department noticed the building was over height. Staff took this back to P & Z for special review; public notice is not required for special review. Staff did send a letter to the spokesperson for the surround ing neighbors. Ms. Lamont reminded Council as part of the review Council did establish where natural grade was because this used to be a gravel pit. This building is 30 feet to the midpoint of the roof. Ms. Lamont reminded Council after approval of this project, they directed staff to expedite the project. Mayor Bennett said with an issue as controversial as height variance, Council should see it. Ms. Lamont noted height variations should 1 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 be looked at very carefully; they only occur in affordable housing and PUD overlays. 5. Amy Margerum, city manager, sa id on the Burnt Mountain environmental statement, a record of decision has already been issued. The only avenue to comment is an administrative appeal. John Worcester, city attorney, said the period for administrative appeals expires May 2. The county has not decided whether they will appeal or not. Mayor Bennett suggested Council discuss this at lunch next Monday. 6. Amy Margerum, city manager, reminded Council there is a joint meeting with the Board of County Commissioners Monday April 18th to discuss the growth management changes and a meeting with the BOCC April 19th to discuss resident occupied units. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt the consent calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. The consent calendar is: A . Minutes - March 28, 1994 B . Resolution #26, 1994 - Contract Honnen Equipment Co. Backhoe Loader C . Resolution #25, 1994 - Judge for a Day/Bo b Francis D . Mayor's Deed - Jim Curtis E . Resolution #27, 1994 - Contract - Red Brick Mechanical System F . Resolution #28, 1994 - Contract - Ice Garden Renovation G . Request for Funds - Trolley H . Request to Submit GMQS Exemption for Essential Service - Ice Garden All in favor, motion carried. WILLIAMS RANCH CONCEPTUAL PUD Mayor Bennett entered into the record letters from Popish, Pitkin County Open Space Board, and Steve Fitzgerald & Kristin Geroge. Mary Lackner, planning office, reminded Council this project is requesting annexation, rezoning to affordable housing, and subdivision approval. The project is 54 units; 16 free market and 38 deed restricted units on 12.7 acres. Council raised several issues at the March 14th meeting. The first was an open space buffer between Centennial and this project. Ms. Lackner pointed out the applicant redesigned the lower portion of the property and moved one fourplex to the upper level and created another 28,000 square feet open space buffer between Centennial. Another concern was lots 15 and 16 which overlook Centennial. The 2 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 road has been moved which pulled the homesites off the steep slope. The applicant has committed to a height limit of 18 feet and a reduced allowed FAR to 90 percent. Some units have been reconfig- ured. Council was also concerned about the proximity to the Smuggler mine. The applicant has an application into the county to run tours on the mine property and to open the mine for active operations. The applicant feels up to 20 tons of material can be taken out a day. Staff has concerns about houses close to a commercial impact. There should be additional information on this before final review. Ms. Lackner pointed out this mine is on the national register of historic places. The applicant is being asked to go through HPC review. Ms. Lackner said the city is looking at contracting a traffic and transportation study for the area to determine the impacts from Williams Ranch on the existing system and what measures can be taken. This report will be submitted prior to final review. Ms. Lackner pointed out the Pitkin County Open Space board recommends this be purchased for open space. Ms. Lackner told Council the applicant has reconfigured lot 15 to make it more appropriate for development. P & Z recommends approval of the project with the conditions listed in the memorandum. Chuck Roth, engineering department, showed a map of the area, noting the streets that would be affected by this project. Roth told Council a 24-hour traffic county was done recently which showed a total of 2800 vehicles on South street and 1045 on Park Circle. Statistics are 4 vehicle trips per person during a 24 hour period. The proposed project will be adding about 300 vehicle trips per day. The final report should look at the bus system, bus routes, paid parking plan. Roth requested $2500 from Council's contingency to help pay for the traffic study; the applicants have committed to matching this. Roth told Council there are right-of- way problems on Park and Midland avenue intersection. The study will also look at additional sidewalks requirements, sign changes, crosswalks, on-street parking conditions and will give conceptual cost estimates for any improvements in this area. Tom Stephens, representing the applicant, showed the conceptual revised. The building closest to Centennial has been eliminated, replaced with a smaller building and was moved up the hill. This creates 28,000 square feet more of open space for a total of 1.25 acre for the entire project. The latest plan reconfigures the area closest to Centennial. Two duplexes have been split into single family lots. On 4 single family units, a one-bedroom unit has been added. Stephens told Council the height has been limited to 18 feet. People can build two-stories but the second floor has to be in the pitched roof. Flat roofs will be covenanted against. Stephens told Council the developer proposes to limit the FAR to 90 3 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 percent of that allowed by Code. Stephens said the traffic study to be done by Leigh, Scott and Cleary should give some direction on how to proceed in solving traffic issues. Stephens said the standard used is 4 vehicle trips per day; Pitkin County uses 7 trips per day per unit. At these rates the proposed development is between 216 and 378 vehicle trips per day. This is between 5 and 9 percent of the total vehicle trips in this area. Stephens told Council he has met with RFTA; there is no data that says how many riders are generated in a development. RFTA is in a reactionary mode and increases services when needed. The existing transit service in this neighborhood is every 20 minutes. Stephens said a bus running every 10 minutes in two different directions will probably not happen with or without Williams Ranch because of personnel costs. Stephens said the architecture tries to echo old Aspen style with Victorian flavor. Stephens said the buildings are positioned so that when one is looking up to them from town it is the short end of the building. Stephens said the facades are broken up rather than a monolithic structure. Stephens said there are 12 townhomes in 3 four-plexes, 8 units in 4 duplexes, 18 single family houses and 16 free market units for a total of 54 units. Stephens said Council suggested looking at a subsidy for the project. Stephens said if Council wants to put money towards the project, it would be better if the city put that money into the road system to benefit the entire area. Stephens said some people may be confusing density with size. This is 12.72 acres. Density is the number of units divided by number of acres. This project is 4.25 units per acres; most affordable housing projects have ranged from 9 to 32 units per acre. Centennial is 17 units per acre. Stephens said this project is designed to be a transition between the higher density and the open space on Smuggler Mountain. 54 units is a large project. Stephens said there is not much land left in the upper valley on which to create affordable housing. Council will have to look at the density on every project. Every project is driven by econom- ics. Stephens told Council the applicant cannot decrease the size of this project. Stephens said the applicant can look at configu- ration of units; creation of open space to help the feeling of the project. Stephens said there is a list of suggested items in the letter from the Open Space Board and there are things listed that the applicant cannot do. Stephens said the applicant cannot delete all development above the 8040 line nor does the code require an applicant to do that. Stephens said neither can they get rid of 4 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 all units below the Salvation ditch. Stephens said they cannot reduce the project by 33 percent and still have a viable project. Councilwoman Richards asked what 20 tons a day out of the mine would mean. Stephan Albouy said this would be about one dump truck load. Councilwoman Richards asked about the Superfund clean up. Gary Wright, representing the applicant, said they are currently negotiating an administrative order of consent with the EPA. Wright said the applicants have a plan that has been accepted in concept by the EPA. Councilwoman Richards asked what party will be responsible for the clean up. Wright said the Smuggler Durant Mining Corporation, owner of the property, is the current legally responsible party. Councilman Paulson asked the height restriction on the free market unit. Stephens said it is 25 feet. Councilman Paulson said this should be lower. Wright said the point of the AH zone is to give the private sector an incentive to subsidize affordable housing from free market units. Every restriction Council adds takes away from the ability to market these units. Ms. Lackner said the height restriction is an issue that can be addressed at final submission. Ms. Lackner suggested the applicants flag the heights of the various buildings for Council to view before final submis- sion. Stephens told Council he looked at donating one of the eastern most lots for parks and recreation. This was looked at with the parks department who felt there was no value to lots 15 and 16 as recreation. Stephens said the applicants have located the houses where they will be of the least impact. Councilman Paulson said he would like to see a larger buffer between Centennial and this project. Stephens told Council the applicants have considered building the structures on lots 15 and 16 themselves so they can be sure there will be adequate landscaping. Stephens said they are will put a landscaping covenant on these units. Councilwoman Waggaman asked how many people will be employed by the mine. Albouy said a maximum of 8 employees, some of whom will live at Williams Ranch. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. Mr. Yurichenko said this is the most beautiful piece of land that can be developed; the layout of this project is well done. Yurichenko said he hopes this project is realized. Helen Palmer said she would like to see this project become a reality. Mike Thuillier said this is a great project and he would like to move back up valley. Terry Shafer said this is a worthwhile project that will not use public money. Roby Albouy supports this project. 5 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 Cecil Lewis, Spruce street, said this is taking away the last visual open space in this area of town. This project should be built with less density. Lewis said the entire parcel should be addressed at one time so that everyone will know what is planned for the rest of the land. Tom Thomas said this is one of the last opportunities for people to stay in Aspen. There are not many big pieces of land left. Dave Zamansky said he would like to move back to Aspen and not to have to travel highway 82 seven days a week. Ward Hauenstein, Spruce street, said the density in this area is already quite heavy, maybe the heaviest in the valley. Hauenstein said his objections are not site specific; it is the overall density in the area. Hauenstein applauded the efforts of this applicant because they are not asking for any government monies. Vicki Brook said she favor the project. There are more employee units than free market units. Jackie Parker said she was born here and hopes to be able to live in this project. Dana Knight said she is in full support of the project. Kyser, Williams Woods, said Council should consider the overall values of the community like keeping employees in town. Jon Busch, Smuggler Mountain resident, said this area is constantly hit for more than their share of affordable housing. Busch said he does not have a problem with the density; this is a good project. Busch said he would like to see as much open space as possible within the project. Hal Clifford, Centennial, said he hoped to see more improvements in the project since the first meeting than he has. Clifford said the threshold issue is the concept of growth; every development is reasonable on its face. This project has very good reasons to be built, and it should be built as employee housing. Clifford said he feels this project is to pay for the redevelopment of the mine. Clifford said he would like to see the density brought down with some subsidy from the city. John Erspamer, Spruce street, said he would rather live next to employees than empty houses. Erspamer said he is concerned about the streets in the area and the blind corner on Spruce street. Erspamer said this area needs open space and parks; there are a lot of kids in the area. Kim Kalin said this is an interesting project with a private developer. Jay Parker said he supports the project. Brian Benton said this is a chance for him to own something in Aspen and for the type of people who work in Aspen to own some- thing. Fred Soyka said he is concerned about open space, a buffer between Centennial and seeing the density reduced. Raymond Auger pointed out the land above 8040 was zoned AF-10, one house per 10 acres. One-third of this project is above the 8040 green line and the requested density violates the county principle. Auger said the 8040 line should be an absolute barrier to development. 6 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 Sandra, Centennial closest to the project, said she is disappoint ed there is not more of a barrier between the two projects. Sandra said she is not against the project but would like to see more of a buffer. Gary Kelly said he would rather see Stephan Albouy develop this project than an unknown. Nicki Snizek said this is one of the nicest projects and she would like to see it more forward. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Waggaman said Council needs to look at controlling the amount of free market and commercial space in order to control the need for employee housing. Councilwoman Waggaman said she feels this is too dense but would be willing to look at tightening up the size of each individual parcel rather than limiting the number of units. Councilwoman Waggaman said she likes the 1400 square foot house with a 600 square foot one-bedroom unit. Councilwoman Waggaman said she feel a 2200 square foot resident occupied unit is much too big; there is not that much land left. Councilwoman Waggaman suggested 2,000 gross square feet for the RO units. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like the free market units to be limited in size. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would rather see a 22 foot height limit or a maximum of 25 feet that does not go to the mid-point of the roof. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like the issue of how much the applicant is paying for the mine addressed. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like the access on Spruce street limited perhaps only to emergency vehicles. Councilman Reno said if the city owned this land for employee housing, they may have proposed more units because of the urgent need for affordable housing. Councilman Reno said he likes the single family unit break down of the building masses. Councilman Reno said he is concerned about the congestion on Spruce street. Councilman Reno said he would like to see parking underneath the townhouses to effect more green space and less pavement. Mayor Bennett said the applicant has made good efforts to respond to Council's concerns from the last meeting. Mayor Bennett said his threshold issues are size and density, traffic, and open space. Mayor Bennett said he feels the fourplexes are very crowded. Mayor Bennett said the AACP states this is a great spot for low density affordable housing single family and duplex lots. The AACP also says this is a good place to test the small house/small lot idea. Mayor Bennett said one way to help the project is to purchase the lower bench with open space money. Wright reminded Council one thing that has made the purchase of this property so difficult is that it is all in the OU2 study area; the portion that is not being annexed has some high lead levels. There are risks 7 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 involved in ownership and development. Councilwoman Richards said this has been presented as a take it or leave it proposition, which makes it difficult for Council. Councilwoman Richards said the city is not going to solve all its affordable housing projects in one site. Councilwoman Richards said she would like to see the parking for the townhouses either beneath or behind the units. Councilwoman Richards said the 28,000 square feet of open space being added will be surrounded by cars and pavement. Councilwoman Richards said she would support the project if there are no townhouses or parking below the ditch line; this should be entirely open space. Councilwoman Richards said this area really needs a larger active open space area. Council- woman Richards said this project is too dense, most in the fourplex townhouses. This would be a better project if one fourplex and one free market house were dropped. Councilwoman Richards said she would like to see a traffic control plan at final review. Councilwoman Richards said a visual model for final review is critical as is what is happening to the entire parcel. Councilwom- an Richards said she would like to know if there is an ability to further subdivide the property. Councilwoman Richards agreed with the suggestion of tightening up the lot sizes to get more open space as well as having landscaping covenants. Councilman Paulson said a very difficult issue is knowing when to stop allowing more houses, providing more jobs. Councilman Paulson said he would like to see less density. Every development adds to air pollution, traffic, etc. Ms. Lackner said compliance with the state implementation plan will be addressed at final review. Councilman Paulson said he is bothered by the mining issue. Councilman Paulson said he would like to see Spruce street closed to emergency vehicles only. Councilman Paulson said height is an important issue. Stephens said they can put access on the Smuggler Mountain road; however, the city and county staff recommended two access points to keep the traffic dispersed. Stephens said the developers can look at all comments to how they can be addressed. Diane Moore, planning director, reminded Council conceptual approval does not vest any development rights or specific plan, it does give the applicant permission to go forward. Stephens reiterated the project cannot survive a reduction in density and if this going to happen, they need to know now. Councilman Reno said he is prepared to approve the project at the presented density as long as the applicants address resiting of the buildings to get more open space. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would consider 54 units as long as she can see how much smaller the units could be, including the free market units. Mayor Bennett 8 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 said adding more units in this area is adding to the degradation of the quality of life and is too steep a price to pay for affordable housing. Councilwoman Richards said she can accept this density level if all units are above the Salvation ditch and the entire area below the ditch remains as an open space area. Councilwoman Richards reiterated the parking belongs behind the townhouses in order to accomplish this. Councilman Reno moved to approve Williams Ranch affordable housing conceptual development plan subject to the conditions outlined in the memo and to direct the applicant to look at keeping space below the ditch open space, retaining the number of units at 54, specifically look at Spruce street traffic mitigation that the traffic plan will address; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Councilwoman Richards said she wants the traffic study to address control issues, where speed bumps might be, if roads should be closed, etc. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Paulson, no; Waggaman, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, no. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #9, SERIES OF 1994 - Elimination of Sunset Provision in Ordinance #1, 1990 Diane Moore, planning director, told Council this elimination of the sunset provision does not propose any changes to Ordinance #1. Staff will come back with recommendation for changes after the growth management revisions. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. A letter from Roland Fisher against this ordinance was read into the record. This ordinance excludes the R-15B zone and gives non-uniform treatment to property owners. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Leslie Lamont, planning office, explained that the R-15B zone district was written for Eastwood and Knollwood when they were annexed into the city and requested that duplexes not be allowed uses. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to keep the bi- annual review of this and not put it in the land use code. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #9, Series of 1994, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Paulson Roll call vote; Councilmembers Reno, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes; Waggaman, no. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #11, SERIES OF 1994 - Golf Course Fee Increase Bill Efting, assistant city manager, told Council the golf 9 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 committee met and agreed on this fee increase in order to fund golf improvements. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilman Paulson said he feels the golf course is beautiful without adding a lot of improvements. Efting said there are improvements that need to be made to make the play better. Efting said staff will do everything they can to keep the course afford- able. Councilman Reno moved to adopt Ordinance #11, Series of 1994, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. EIS SCOPING Diane Moore, planning director, said staff is looking for scoping comments to forward to CDOT. Ms. Moore divided the comments into main subjects with questions to be included in the scoping under that. (1) Air Quality: Councilwoman Richards asked how directly the project relates VMT, this term should be spelled out. How does internal circulation relate to air quality. What assumptions for traffic demand management are being made; if they are not followed through, what does this do to the modelling. There were no comments on 4-F lands, on wetlands, on hazardous materials site. (2) Social and Economic: Councilwoman Richards asked what this will do in terms of increased parking and who is financially liable for this parking. (3) Noise, none. (4) Construction: Councilwom- an Waggaman asked how the increase in construction vehicles will be mitigated, traffic and air quality and where will the workers be housed. Councilwoman Richards asked about the phasing of the intercept lot facilities. Councilwoman Richards said she does not want to see components of the project pitted against each other. Councilman Paulson asked if at some point the intercept lots will be mandatory. There were no other comments. Councilwoman Richards asked how resolution passed by several governments are incorporated into the EIS. Person said they have a strong impact. An EIS will not get passed if a local community has resolutions against it. ORDINANCE #14, SERIES OF 1994 - Housing Guidelines Councilman Reno moved to read Ordinance #14, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #14 (Series of 1994) 10 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 AN ORDINANCE A DOPTING THE 1994 AFFORDABLE HOUSING GUIDELINES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING OFFICE was read by the city clerk Tom Baker, housing office, pointed out these guidelines have two approaches to resident occupied units; one for the city and one for the county. The city's approach is an interim step and the guidelines will be amended when there is a resolution to RO units. Mayor Bennett said he recalls that on unit size, "net livable" was deleted and it was made "gross". Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to see this 2,000 gross; this is subsidized housing. Council agreed to discuss this at the next work session on RO units. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to see people who have lived here longer get more priority. Councilwoman Richards said she would like the Board to re-examine the length of time a dependant needs to qualify; maybe it should be 6 months rather than 9 months. Councilwoman Richards moved to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 9:15 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #14, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Waggaman, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #15, SERIES OF 1994 - Historic Designation 303 E. Main Councilwoman Richards moved to read Ordinance #15, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #15 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATING 303 E. MAIN STREET, LOT 1 BLOCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, AS "H' HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO SECTION 24- 7-703 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE was read by the city clerk Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #15, Series of 1994 on first reading and that $2,000 grant be awarded to the applicant; seconded by Councilman Reno. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Reno, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #13, SERIES OF 1994 - Powder House Condominiums Final SPA Development Plan Amendment/GMQS Exemption/Vested Rights 11 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 Councilman Reno moved to read Ordinance #13, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINA NCE #13 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING GMQS EXEMPTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FOR THE TENTH MOUNTAIN TRAILS ASSOCIATION, SPA AMENDMENT TO VARY THE MINIMUM LOT AREA, FRONT YARD, AND SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS OF THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) ZONE DISTRICT AND GRANTING VESTED RIGHTS FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 1280 UTE AVENUE (LOT 16 CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION) was read by the city clerk Mary Lackner, planning office, told Council these are voluntary deed restricted units. When the applicant received SPA approval last year, they reserved space on the site plan for affordable housing. The applicant is requesting a duplex containing a two- bedroom and studio unit. The applicant is seeking GMQS exemption for these units. The applicant is also requesting a lot area variance for these two units as the RR zone requires two acres per dwelling. Councilman Reno moved to adopt Ordinance #13, Series of 1994, on first reading subject to the conditions recommended in the planning office memorandum; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adjourn at 9:15; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 12 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council April 11, 1994 PROCLAMATION - Bill Poss Historic Preservation Commission 1 ...... PROCLAMATION - Diane Moore Planning Director 1 ................... CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 ................................ ............... COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1 ................................ ......... CONSENT CALENDAR 2 ................................ ............... WILLIAMS RANCH CONCEPTUAL PUD 2 ................................ .. ORDINANCE #9, SERIES OF 1994 - Elimination of Sunset Provision in Ordinance #1, 1990 9 ................................ ..... ORDINANCE #11, SERIES OF 1994 - Golf Course Fee Increase 9 ....... EIS SCOPING 10 ................................ .................... ORDINANCE #14, SERIES OF 1994 - Housing Guidelines 10 ............. ORDINANCE #15, SERIES OF 1994 - Historic Designation 303 E. Main 11 ................................ ...................... ORDINANCE #13, SERIES OF 1994 - Powder House Condominiums Final SPA Development Plan Amendment/GMQS Exemp- tion/Vested Rights 11 ................................ ........ 13