Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.19990302ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 2,1999, 4:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL I. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. , Public { MINUTES 1 I �� 1 f/ `1) H. 1 III. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Iselin & Rotary Park Rezoning V. WORK SESSION A. Iselin Master Plan V. INFORMATION ITEM A. Long Range Planning Discussion VII. ADJOURN — 7:00 PM (unless extended) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 22, 1999 5:00 P.M. Resolution #16, 1999 - Contract Award Meadowood Pump Station Improvements - Awarded contract to Con -Sy Inc. for $119,500; city's construction costs will be reimbursed by the developers (Moore and Hines/Highlands) Resolution #15, 1999 - Hunt Group Productions Film Entrance to Aspen - Approved agreement for production and delivery of a film about the immediate and long term goals and benefits of the entrance to Aspen project Supplemental Funding Request Parks 1999 Vehicle Purchase - clarified funding for parks vehicles Ordinance #1, Series of 1999 - Historic Designation - 920 East Hyman - Adopted on second reading Snyder Final Budget - Continued to March 8 Resolution #14, 1999 - Koch Performance Roads Proposal - Approved contract with KOCH Performance Roads for rehabilitation of certain city streets and maintenance of these streets for 15 years Resolution #13, 1999 - Ballot Language - Discussed general obligation bond versus revenue bond for the parks capital improvement issue on the May ballot. Final action on all ballot questions will be March 8 Next Regular Meeting March 8, 1999 COUNCIL MEETS AT NOON FOR AN INFORMAL PUBLIC DISCUSSION, BASEMENT MEETING ROOM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mitch Haas, Interim Deputy Director DATE: March 2, 1999 RE: Follow-up and Up -coming 1. Up -Coming P&Z Calendar: (March = 4 mtgs., April = 4 mtgs.) • March 9, 1999: at 12:00 p.m.: the Planning and Zoning Commission, Downtown Enhancement and Pedestrian Plan (DEPP) task force, and the Asset Management Planning board (AMP) have been invited for a joint meeting to review the plans for the first phase of DEPP implementation. • March 9, 1999: at 4:30 p.m.: Long-range Planning Meeting of the Commission. • March 16, 1999: (at 4:30 p.m.) Regular Commission meeting. (at 5:30 p.m.) Convening of the Growth Management Commission, after which P&Z will reconvene for discussion of long-range planning issues, if time permits. • March 23, 1999: at 4:15 p.m.: Joint City Council/Planning and Zoning Commission work session for discussion of the Lodge Preservation (LP) program. • April 6, 1999: at 4:15 p.m.: Joint City Council/Planning and Zoning Commission work session for discussion of the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. After this work session is finished, a regular Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing agenda will commence. • April 13, 1999: (at 4:30 p.m.) A Special 1yleeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to include review of a Conceptual PUD, and a work session to discuss the proposed Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. • April 20, 1999: (at 4:30 p.m.) Joint meeting with the County Planning and Zoning Commission for review of the Buttermilk Master Plan. • April 27, 1999: (at 4:30 p.m.) Long-range planning meeting. • May 4,1999: (at 4:30 p.m.) Regular commission meeting. 2. Other Meetings of Interest: • AACP Oversight Committee: anyone interested in attending is welcome to come to all or part of these meetings held in City Council Chambers, City Hall: • March 8, 1999 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.: "Implications & Tools." • March 15, 1999 from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.: Topic to be announced. from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.: Informational Open House. • AACP Community Outreach Presentations: • Wednesday, March loth (12:00 p.m.) ACRA Membership Meeting • Thursday, March llth (7:30 a.m.) Rotary Club • Wednesday, March 17th (12:00 p.m.) Aspen Realtors' Board 3. Economic Sustainability AACP Focus Area Group, next meeting will be in the Sister Cities Meeting Room at 8:30 a.m. on March 4th. c: /home/mitchh/p &zmemos/3 -2-99. doc CITY AGENDAS 3/1 City Council/City Planning & Zoning (5:00) Land Use Code, Joint Work Session 3/2 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 2/9 Iselin & Rotary Park Rezoning, Public Hearing (CB) Iselin Master Plan, Work Session (CB) Long Range Planning Discussion 3/8 City Council (5:00) City Notice 2/16 930 King, Lot Split, Grant and Extensions, 1" Reading (AG) "Miner's Trail" Street Name for Mocklin Subdivision, Consent (SO) Iselin Park Rezoning to Public Zone, 1 S` Reading, Consent (CB) Porath Water Service Agreement Amendment, l s` Reading (CB) 3/9 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 2/16 Long Range Planning Meeting 3/10 HPC (5:00) City Notice 2/16 Work Program Campo de Fiori, Minor (SO) Isis, Amendment to Final Goldrich, Work Session Elks, Minor and Site Visit 234 W. Francis DEPP 3/16 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 2/23 Barbee Affordable Housing, Final PUD, Subdivision, Rezoning, Special Review; Public Hearing (CB) 3/16 Growth Management Commission (5:30) City Notice 2/23 Barbee AH GMQS Exemption, Public Hearing (CB) 3/22 City Council (5:00) City Notice 3/2 930 King Street, Lot Split, Grant and Extensions, 2nd Reading Public Hearing (AG). Iselin Park Rezoning, 2" Reading Public Hearing (CB) SCI Zone District Amendments, 2°d Reading Public Hearing (CB) Barbee Affordable Housing, Final PUD, l S` Reading (CB) Porath Water Service Agreement Amendment, 2nd Reading Public Hearing (CB) 3/24 HPC (5:00) City Notice 3/2 13 5 W. Hopkins, Conceptual, Public Hearing 134 W. Hopkins, Minor and Variances, Public Hearing 2 Williams Way, Inventory, Public Hearing 234 W. Francis Work Program 4/1 DRAC (4:00) 4/6 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 3/16 2 Williams Way, Inventory, Public Hearing (SO) 488 Castle Creek Rezoning, Public Hearing (MH) 855 Bay Street: Stream Margin Review, Conditional Use for an ADU, Residential Design Variances, Public Hearing (MH) 4/7 HPC (5:00) City Notice 3/16 Special Meeting DEPP 4/12 City Council (5:00) City Notice 3/23 Barbee Affordable Housing, Final PUD, 2nd Reading Public Hearing (CB) 2 Williams Way, Inventory, V Reading (SO) 4/13 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 3/23 Special Meeting Bavarian Inn Conceptual PUD, Public Hearing (MH) Lighting Code Work Session 4/14 HPC (5:00) City Notice 3/23 2 4/20 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 3/30 Joint Meeting with County Planning & Zoning Buttermilk Master Plan 4/26 City Council (5:00) City Notice 4/6 4/27 City Planning & Zoning (4:30) City Notice 4/6 Long Range Planning Meeting 4/28 HPC (5:00) City Notice 4/6 5/4 City Planning and Zoning (4:30) City Notice 4/13 5/6 DRAC 5/10 City Council (5:00) City Notice 4/20 2 Williams Way, Inventory, 2nd Reading Public Hearing (SO) 5/12 HPC (5:00) City Notice 4/20 5/18 City Planning and Zoning (4:30) City Notice 4/27 5/24 City Council (5:00) City Notice 5/4 5/26 HPC (5:00) City Notice 5/4 cc: P&Z Packet City Attorney's Office City Planning Staff City Clerk's Office g:/pl anning/aspen/agendas/comingup. doc/ 3/1/99 k] I\% � � % Ell ►7��►� �1�j1%� TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Qe Mitch Haas, Interim Deputy Director e FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner RE: Iselin Park Rezoning -- Public Hearing DATE: March 2, 1999 SUMMARY: The City of Aspen has recently annexed a 2 1 + acre tract of land known as "Iselin" and "Rotary" Parks. As part of the annexation process, the City has an obligation to zone the property within 90 days of the annexation. In Pitkin County, the property straddled two zone districts. The northern half of the land was zoned AFR-2 and the southern half AFR-10. Both of these zone districts include single-family residential uses and general outdoor recreational uses. The parcel is owned by the .City and managed by the Parks and Recreation Departments. The parcel is currently being planned for expanded municipal recreational facilities including an ice rink, ball fields, a redesigned pool, and possibly a few affordable housing units. Representatives from the Parks and Recreation Departments will be in attendance at the meeting and will be presenting conceptual plans during a work session at the conclusion of the Commission's public hearing agenda. The Community Development Department is recommending the parcel be zoned Public (PUB). This City zone district allows for the current use of the property but removes the provision for a single family home. The Public Zone District provides for affordable housing as a conditional use — a use not allowed in the Park Zone District — and establishes all dimensional requirements of the site through the PUD process. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for this property to be included in the Public Zone District. APPLICANT: Community Development Department, City of Aspen. LOCATION: 450 Maroon Creek Road (Moore Pool). Located west of the School Campus. ZONING: Pitkin County Zoning: AFR-2 for the northern portion. AFR-10 for the southern portion. Proposed City Zoning: Public (PUB) Zone. A copy of the proposed zoning is attached as Exhibit B. LOT SIZE: 21.269 acres. CURRENT LAND USE: Active and passive open space and recreation. Municipal pool and tennis courts. PROPOSED LAND USE: The City Parks and Recreation Departments are considering a redevelopment of this parcel to accommodate an indoor public ice rink, pool, ball fields, and affordable housing. A more detailed presentation of the conceptual development plans will be made during a work session. A PUD application requesting formal approval of the development plans will be submitted in the Spring. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this rezoning request. An informal presentation of the conceptual development plan was made to the Commission in the Fall of 1998. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Rezoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the application at a public hearing and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial to City Council. BACKGROUND: The subject property was annexed into the City of Aspen on January 11, 1999. According to State statute, the City must zone the property within 90 days of the final annexation. The property was zoned AFR-2 and AFR-10 in Pitkin County., These are low -density residential zones. STAFF COMMENTS: The City Planning Department is recommending the Public Zone District because it represents the best possible "fit" with the uses being considered in the Iselin Park Master Plan. The Public Zone District allows for public recreational facilities and for the provision of affordable housing on -site -- a use not allowed in the Park Zone. Representatives of the City Parks and Recreation Departments have been invited to present a conceptual development plan to the Commission during a work session following the public hearing for the rezoning. The purpose of this work session is to 2 provide direction to the development team for their preparation of a land use application. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit A. A copy of the Public Zone District requirements has been provided as Exhibit B. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward to City Council a recommendation of approval to rezone Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Public (PUB) Zone District, with no conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to recommend City Council rezone this property, Iselin and Rotary Park, to the Public Zone District." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Public (PUB) Zone District provisions Exhibit C -- Vicinity Map Exhibit D -- Proposed P&Z Resolution 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF COMMENTS: Iselin Rezoning Section 26.92.020, Standards Applicable to Rezoning In reviewing an amendment to the official zone district map, the City Council and the Commission shall consider: A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this title. Staff Finding: The proposed zoning is consistent with the Land Use Code and does not represent any potential conflicts. The Public zoning requires all development on the site to proceed through the PUD process in order to determine the appropriate dimensional requirements, parking, general impacts, and intensity of uses. Therefore, before an development occurs, the Planning and Zoning Commission will have the opportunity to review the proposal under a PUD process. B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: The 1993 AACP did identify the Iselin and Rotary Park parcel with the following suggested action: Expand Iselin Park for organized recreational activities, and incorporate the Rotary Club proposal for a passive park and semi -active park. The Public Zone District is appropriate for these types of proposed uses. This zone also allows for the provision of affordable housing as a conditional use, which may be a desirable element of the final program. C. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics. Staff Finding: Surrounding the site is the public school campus, medium -density residential, and Maroon Creek. There is a. proposed bridge linking the parks with the base area of Tiehack. The Public Zone allows for uses compatible with the surrounding area. The subsequent PUD process will determine the intensity of those uses allowed and any mitigation measures to offset adverse impacts to the surrounding area. D. The effect of the proposed amendment on traffic generation and road safety. Staff Finding: The Public Zone District allows for affordable housing as well as uses similar to those allowed in the Park Zone District. The level of development and its level of traffic generation and impacts on road safety will be evaluated through the PUD process. Traffic, transit, pedestrian facilities, and overall road safety have been issues raised by the Commission in work sessions with the Staff Comments 1 Parks Department. These issues will remain important elements in the planning- process. The existing and potential level of traffic in the area must combine with the high level of existing and potential pedestrian movements in a safe manner, especially considering the age of the pedestrians and peaks in level of activity. The difference between the Public and Park Zone Districts would have no bearing on this transportation issue — both allow the same uses and intensities, and both are reviewed through the PUD process. Transportation issues, the acceptable level of trip generation, and the most appropriate and safe design will be determined and required through the PUD process. The project team does include a traffic consultant who will address transportation in detail. The development program for the parcel is in the conceptual stages. The applicant realizes that safe transportation is a primary design parameter and has made specific accommodations in designing the site. This zoning does not allow development as of right to occur without full review as a PUD, and the Parks Department has been very cooperative in accommodating the concerns of staff and the Commission in programming the site. Staff believes the Public Zone District is the most appropriate for this parcel and that the PUD process requirement allows for sufficient review of the final proposal. E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such facilities, including, but not limited to, transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities. Staff Finding: The zone district designation will not, itself, have an effect on the provision of public facilities. Again, this topic is a criterion of PUD and of GMQS. Applicants are required to provide letters of intent for services which the development affects, and upgrades to the system or other appropriate mitigation measures are typically required if found to be necessary. F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. Staff Finding: The natural features of the site are being considered with the master planning effort. The river corridor, recreational connections, transit, and use schedules with the surrounding parcels are all being considered to reduce the level of impact the development may have on the natural environment. The Public zoning designation will not adversely affect the natural environment. G. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community character in the City of Aspen. Staff Finding: The Parks Department has been working with the surrounding property owners to achieve a reasonable compatibility with the neighborhood. This process will continue. Staff believes the master planning effort is consistent with the AACP and that the Public zoning is compatible with the City character. H. Whether there have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel or the surrounding neighborhood which support the proposed amendment. Staff Comments 2 Staff Finding: Annexation of the property into the City of Aspen is a condition, which requires this process. The Public Zone District allows for the current use of the property and allows for the uses being considered in the master planning effort. I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this title. Staff Finding: This proposed Public Zone District does not pose any conflicts with the public interest. The AACP specifically reflects a community desire for increased recreational facilities at this location, and the flexibility to accommodate employee housing on -site for those additional jobs created by the development represents good land use planning and should be encouraged. Staff believes this zone district will promote the purpose and intent of this Title and will be in harmony with the public interest. Staff Comments 3 i 26.28.250 Public (PUB). A. Purpose. The purpose of the Public (PUB) zone district is to provide for the development of governmental and quasi -governmental facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other governmental purposes. B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Public (PUB) zone district. 1. Library; 2. Museum; 3. Post office; 4. Hospital; 5. Essential governmental and public utility uses, facilities, services and buildings (excluding maintenance shops); 6. Public transportation stop; 7. Terminal building, and transportation related facilities; 8. Public surface and underground parking areas; 9. Fire station; 10. Public school; 11. Public park; 12. Arts, cultural and recreational activities, buildings and uses; and 13. Accessory buildings and uses. C.I Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Public (PUB) zone district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.60. 1. Maintenance shop; and 2. Affordable housing. D. Dimensional requirements. The dimensional requirements which shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Public (PUB) zone district shall be set by the adoption of a conceptual development plan and final development plan, pursuant to Chapter 26.84, Planned Unit Development. E. Off-street parking requirement. The following off-street parking spaces shall be provided for each use in the Public (PUB) zone district, subject to the provisions of Chapter 26.32. 1. Lodge uses: N/A 2. Residential uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64. 3. All other uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64. I` IL I��E���! 111mill s®nomi unsung or RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL REZONE ISELIN AND ROTARY PARKS TO THE PUBLIC (PUB) ZONE DISTRICT. PARCEL NO.2735-142-00-851 Resolution #99 - WHEREAS, a parcel of land located west of the public school campus on Maroon Creek Road, commonly referred to as "Iselin and Rotary Parks," the property, was annexed into the City of Aspen on January 11, 1999, pursuant to Ordinance No. 53, Series of 1998; and, WHEREAS, the property is approximately 21.269± acres and is legally described in Attachment A of this Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Aspen must designate a zone district for the property within 90 days of the annexation; and, WHEREAS, the City Council may approve Amendments to the Official Zone District Map (Rezoning) after taking and considering recommendations from the Community Development Director, the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, and taking and considering public testimony at a duly noticed public hearing in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.92; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department analyzed the parcel of land and recommended the property be included in the Public (PUB) Zone District; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 2, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission took and considered public testimony and recommended, by a to vote, City Council include this property in the Public (PUB) Zone District. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the City Council should include the land commonly referred to as Iselin and Rotary Parks in the Public (PUB) Zone District, and direct the Community Development Director to amend the Official Zone District Map accordingly. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 2, 1999. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMIVIISSION: City Attorney ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Attachment A — Legal description of property Robert Blaich, Chair A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SWI/4 OF SECTION II AND THE NWI/4 OF SECTION 14 ALL IN 110S, R85W OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SI/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11. THENCE S39'51'00"W, 1061.60 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 OF THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE N42'35'00"W, 372.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40; THENCE N90'00'00"W, 178.75 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 TO THE APPROXIMATE CENTER- UNE OF MAROON CREEK; THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES ARE ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAROON CREEK; N31'08'20"W, 51.37 FEET; N07'29'45"E, 167.28 FEET; i N18051'21"E, 86.99 FEET; N15'02'28"E, 188.91 FEET; N10'01'03"W, 71.19 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE, LEAVING THE APPROXIMATE CENTERUNE OF SAID MAROON CREEK, S89'48'20"E, 26.91 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 11 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUTH) AN ANNEXATION MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 41 AT PAGE 76 IN THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE N00'14'51"W, 201.82 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUTH) ANNEXATION; THENCE N33'01'14"E, 281.07 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUTH) ANNEXATION; THENCE N02016'09"W, 264.36 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUTH) - ANNEXATION TO THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 214 OF THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE S56'32'30" E, 605.85 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT. TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 789 AT PAGE 214 TO THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 341 AT PAGE 127 OF THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE S56'32'20"E, 144.15 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 341 AT PAGE 127 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS -DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962 ION OF THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY,129.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962, SAID ARC HAVING A RADIUS OF 700.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'37'14", AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD THAT BEARS S61'12'27"E, 129.57 FEET, THENCE S89'48'20"E, 50.85 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S01'22'40"W, 41.23 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962; THENCE SII'12'40"W, 191.00 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962; TO THE SOUTH UNE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 11, THENCE S89'48'20"E 130.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF THE SWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 11 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, MMZcH 2 , Jgqq NAME OF PROJECT: S E L l t f E, IZ0T'j4 p PK, RE-zb4/A)T 1 CITY CLERK: 3'AC-K- t Ea- Lo-rN4 /, ,,&4 STAFF: C{4 f� 15 Zj ,DcvJ WITNESSES: (1) P� r< S 1 (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report >� (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check If Applicable) 4 ?t�,5oI..LV yO-tp qq^03 MOTION: VOTE: YES NO ROGER HUNT YES/4 NO ROBERT BLAICH YES �< NO •-RON ELK nN_ _�� NO JASMINE TYGRE YESA NO TIMOTHY MOONEY YES NO STEVEN BUETTOW YES NO TIM SEMRAU YES NO Attachment 8 County of Pitkin } } SS. State of Colorado } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS SECTION 26.52.060(E) I , being or representing an ' Applicant to the City p r i of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirementspursuant ursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: f hich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. 1. By mailing of notice, a copy o w all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated Mail to a p p on the attached list, on the day of !I19A (which isA+days prior to the public hearing date of OA) 2. BYp g ostin a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the LOday t- 199T to the 2t�day of , 199_�_. (Must be posted for at least of D� ten 10 full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature Sign ed before me this�eday of "OL 19A. by WITNESS MY HAND AND Mycomm commission nAexpires 12/26/2000 M fires: Notary Public ,'vIAROf,)N CREEK LLC 10 CLUB CIRCLE .ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD ASPEN, CO 81611 LOTS 7 & 8 MAROON CREEK LLC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 HARTRICH JAMES G PO BOX 12285 ASPEN, CO 81612 LW DEVELOPMENT INC OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O 533 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 -.)FORD DEBORAH 8OX 4856 ASPEN, CO 81612 FRAMPTON GEORGE T JR C/O US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR 3215 NEWARK ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20008 SCHENNUM EARL C JR SCHENNUM CAROL M PO BOX 867 ASPEN, CO 81612 MOORE ALBERTA L PERS RES TRUST DE BOER MARILYN S REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 126 9342 E CENTRAL AVE WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 WICHITA, KS MAROON CREEK LLC PEARCE EQUITIES 10 CLUB CIRCLE ASPEN, CO 81611 LOTS 7 & 8 MAROON CREEK LLC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN. CO 81611 CARSON L KELLEY PO BOX 8927 ASPEN. CO 81612 BRADFORD DEBORAH PO BOX 4856 ASPEN, CO 81612 LW DEVELOPMENT INC OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O 533 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODWARD RALPH H 105 WOODWARD LN ASPEN, CO 81611 HOSIER GERALD D PO BOX 12354 ASPEN. CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 4970 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY STS C/O REAL ESTATE DIVISION 50 E N TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 DOREMUS ANDREW J & JEANNE C 78.107% 85 GLEN GARRY DR ASPEN, CO 81611 SLATER LAWRENCE J 1072 MAROON CRK RD ASPEN, CO 81611 MCCREARY WILLIAM F & PHILLIS M 9750 AMANITA AVE TUJUNGA, CA 91042 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ISELIN AND ROTARY PARK REZONING TO THE PUBLIC ZONE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 2, 1999 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Council Chamber, City Hall, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen requesting rezoning of the property to Public (PUB). The property is legally described as a tract of land located in the SW 1/4 of section 11 and the NW 1/4 of section 14, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th PM, Pitkin County, Colorado. This tract of land is commonly referred to as "Iselin Park" and "Rotary Park," contains the "Moore Pool," and is located on the west side of Maroon Creek Road near Glen Eagle Drive. For further information, contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5072, chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us. s/BobBlaich, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on February 9, 1999. City of Aspen Account .