Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.apz.20010206
AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2001 4:15 PM PUBLIC DISCUSSION WITH STAFF 4:30 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEETING ROOM I. COMMENTS A. CommissiOners B. Public H. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST III. MINUTES IV. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ISELIN PARK CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PUD/SPA, CONDITIONAL USE, Joyce Ohlson, continued from 1/30 V. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETINGS A. TRUSCOTT LIGHTING PLAN REVIEW, Chris Bendon VI. ADJOURN MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ____, FROM: Jovice Ohlson. Depute Director or Community Deveiopment RE: Iselin Park Consolidated Conceptual/Final Planned Unit Development, Specially Planned Area and Conditionai Ise-?,ublic Hearing Resolution Rio. . -Se.•ies _00I DATE: January, 0. 0(' ! Maroon Creek Road i Maroon Creek APPLICANT: City of Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: STEVE BOSSART, ASSET MANAGEMENT DEPT.. JEFF WOODS, PARKS DEPT. LOCATION: Maroon Creek Road CURRENT ZONING: Park PROPOSED ZONING: Park w/ PUD & SPA Moore Family PUD SUMMARY: IThis application proposes to redevelop the Iselin Park (James E. Moore Pool) site with new pools and ice rink, j vouth center, one affordable housing unit, and appurtenant facilities including associated retail. caf&snack bar, lockers and administrative offices. The application requires PUD, SPA and Conditional Use approvals. The proposal includes 76.0` l square Beet ;�r uildin<� area and l�0 on -site paring spaces. CURRENT LAND USE: Park f balltieids. e:ulIS courts) pool. ,open space LOT SIZE: - 19.35 acres H REVIEW PROCEDURE Consolidated Conceptual and Final PUD Review: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall by resolution recommend City Council approve. approve with conditions, or deny J the Planned Unit Development request (,for the overall master plan of the subject property). Specially Planned .4rea: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall oy resolution recommend City Council approve. approve with conditions. or deny the SPA request ( for the allowance of affordable housing in the in the Park zone). Conditional Use: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall _-esoitiuon approve. approve with conditions. or disapprove a development application for a onditionai use (for the allowance of a recreational building in the Park zone). 'VIAL ISSUES: Parking: The application proposes 120 parking spaces on site in place of the 65- spaces currently located on the Iselin Park parcel. Staff sees this an enormous improvement over the existing situation not only in terms of number of spaces but in terms of drop off/circulation function and aesthetics. While this is an improvement over the current conditions, the on -site parking does not meet the peak parking needs of the new facility. The application proposes joint usage of parking areas located within the :aspen School District campus and the Tiehack area public parking lot under a managed and coordinated usage program. The Applicants have indicated that the City of aspen Parks and Recreation Department has been designated as the coordinator of the parking areas and will oversee ' the master scheduling of the facilities which have claim to the subject parking areas. Staff feels this is good use of the parking lots and supports the concept of multiple use. We, however, think that the scheduling and coordination process is critical to the successful joint usage of the parking lots and feels that a more formalized operational agreement between the parties is needed. Staff believes the proposed parking meets the PUD dimensional requirements criteria B(3): The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the follotiving considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use o(common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation tacillties, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity oJ'the proposed deveiopment to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Lighting: The setting for the Iselin Park facility has been developed with recreational facilities for years and in the immediate vicinity is coupled with large public school and recreational facilities across Maroon Creek Road. It lies however, in an important visual corridor on Maroon Creek Road. Outdoor lighting should be minimized to the extent possible to ide for security and safe and navigabie walk ways. reduce light pollution vet must prov building entranceways, driveways and parking areas. Internal lighting should be turned off except for security and maintenance purposes after business liours. A 'final detailed lighting plan should be submitted for final review by the Community Deveiopment Director to ensure the proper lighting- leveis and conformance with the technicai components of the City's lighting code. Architecturai Compatihility ivith the Site: Staff does not take issue with the architectural stvle, design ( inciudin-= massing and height) or location of the structure and its architecture. Given the constraints of the site. the building is well located to avoid unnecessary impacts to Maroon Creek. Its location in close proximity to the roadway makes it easily accessible and minimizes additional impermeable driveways and walkways to get to the facility. Its proximity to the school also makes the facility feel more like a component of the school campus complex rather that a building sitting unto itself. We commend the designers for working with the site so diligently so as to step down the building and maximizing the use of the space for the intended purpose. Specifically, the internal space takes advantage of the natural grade change so that main and upper level by-standers can view into the ice rink and ice rink spectator enter the rink at entry level grade. Affordable Mousing: The Applicants are requesting a GMQS exemption as an "Essential Public Facility' This process will occur on February 20, 2001 for a recommendation to City Council by the Growth Management Commission. (An exemption allows for the project to not be scored through GMQS and the exemption is not deducted from the annual development allotment.) There still exists, however, the requirement, "That the impacts of the essential public facility will be mitigated, including those associated with: the generation of additional employees, the demand for parking, road and transit services." The Applicants are proposing to provide one (1) -, -bedroom affordable housing unit on site, which would provide affordable housing mitigation for ?.5 employees. The Housing staff has determined that the Applicants must mitigate for 19.E FTEs, including the Youth Center employee generation. The Applicants are proposing to mitigate the remainder (17.05) of the employee generation through use of credits that exist at the Water Place Housing Project. Housing staff has confirmed that Water Place has 51.4 credits on balance which would be reduced to 34.3 5 after the Iselin Park mitigation. On September 6, 2000 the Housing Board recommended approval of the mitigation plan with conditions summarized as follows: 1.) The Applicants mitigate for 19.3 FTEs (which includes the Youth Center employee generation. ?.) The Applicants mitigate the 19.3 FTEs by the on -site unit providing for mitigation of 2.25 and the remainder FTEs to be satisfied by the credits of the Water Place Housing project. 17.05 FTEs would come out of the Water Place Housing project, leaving a balance of 34.35 credits. 3.) :fin audit of the Iselin Park employee generation will be required two (2) years after a certificate of occupancy is issued Additional mitigation will be required if employee generation is found to be higher than estimated. -l.) The on -site employee dwelling unit will be deed restricted to no higher that Category 3 and such deed restriction must be completed and recorded prior to building permit approval. Detailed Housing _authority and Staff referral comments are included in Exhibit 3. Landscaping/Bern: The landform alone Maroon Creels Road is critical to the safe and aesthetic integration of the facility onto the site and into the t7reater context of the extended school campus. Firstly, the berm should serve the purpose of dissuading school children from shortcutting across the road from the school campus if the height, density of landscape materials, and location collectively send a message of "too difficult -don't go this way' in mind of the pedestrian. Secondly. the berm should serve the purpose of integrating the structure into the setting by bringing a natural landform and vegetation up to the structure thereby screening parts of the structure, letting the structure look more connected to the ;round and providing a visually appealing foreground landscape for travelers of Maroon Creels Road. The berm should also provide buffer and some privacy to the users of the outdoor components of the facility. Staff has included a condition that allows for a final, on -site review by City staff, including the City's landscape architects to ensure that the berm is serving this multiple function successfully once it is in preliminary form (but prior to landscape installation). Transit and Pedestrian Connections: The redeveloped Iselin Park facility, including the relocation of the Youth Center as an added attraction, will no doubt be a destination site of many school children -from elementary to high school aged. Safe passage of children from the school campus to the facility is of utmost importance. The specific location of the proposed pedestrian bridge (its beginning and terminus) and the provision of convenient transit service will be key in this matter. Staff raises a concern over the design and location of the berm along the Maroon Creek Road frontage. This berm serves not only as an aesthetic landscaping feature but a mechanism to `funnel" pedestrians away from utilizing the back entrance or Iselin service driveway as a means to gain access to the site. We all know that pedestrians, especially children, will take the shortest route to their destination. The berm should be prominent enough, steep enough and landscaped enough so that it serves as a deterrent to *`shortcutting" to the facility as noted previously. The grade of the pedestrian path and its connection to the to the elementary school must be obvious and convenient. It is Staff s understanding that the bridge will be installed in conjunction with the school campus improvements. This poses an issue of phasing such that it is possible that the 4 bridge may not be constructed in time for the opening of the Iselin Park facility. If this is the case staff feels that some type of temporary crossing improvement should be provided, either in the form of a raised and painted crossing walk and/or a temporary pedestrian -activated crossing light. It is not clear as to how and where RFTA will serve the site. Staff favors a situation where RFTA would be able to "pull off' of '_Maroon Creek Road without '`pulling through" the parking lot. We feel the lot should be left to private cars. group vans and pedestrians. Staff recommends that the City's Transportation Manager have the authority to review the final plan for RFTA service to the site and the final site plan details to enable efficient, safe and convenient service. AACP: Community Development Staff believes the spirit and intent of i1he proposed project meets the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan through its provision of recreational and community opportunities on existing and AACP-designated recreational land. The location of Iselin Park lends itself to complementing the existing school campus and adding to an already existing hub of activity for children. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the development proposal with the conditions contained within the draft resolution. RECoM1,IENDED MOTION (ALL titOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE .-FFIRNIATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. Series of 2001, recommending approval to the City Council of the Consolidated Conceptual/Final Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area, and granting approval to the Conditional Use for the Iselin Park project with the conditions in the draft resolution." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Summary from P&Z meeting of 1/2/01 and Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application C:home: joyce:IselinPZmemlan3 5 RESOLUTION NO. 05 (SERIES OF 2001) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL OF THE ISELIN PARK CONSOLIDATED CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A RECREATIONAL STRUCTURE, ACCESSORY SPORT SHOP AND RESTAURANT IN THE PARK ZONE DISTRICT, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735-I42-00-35I WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the City of .aspen, prepared by Otak Rock Creek Studio, dated December 4. 2000, and plan set dated November 15, 2000. for a Consolidated Conceptual/Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for swimming pools, ice rink, recreational fields. 120 car parking lot and youth center facility including appurtenant uses: For a Specially Planned Area ( SPA) approval for a deed restricted affordable housing unit; and for Conditional Use approval for a 76,051 sq. it. recreational structure, accessory sport shop and snack bar/restaurant uses; for a property located on the west side of Maroon Creels Road within the City of Aspen; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 19.E .5 acres in size. and 1Ls located in the Park Zone District; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is designated as "aspen City Parke on the Future Land Use Map of the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan, identifying the land as appropriate for community and recreation uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26.440 (SPA) and 26.44') (PUD), the Citv Council may approve a Specially Planned Area and Planned Unit Development, during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.425.040 the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve of a Conditional Use for the use of property during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director, comments from the general public, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies: and WHEREAS, the Community Development Deputy Director recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use for a recreational structure, accessory sport shop and snack bar in the Park Zone District and Specially Planned Area for an affordable housing unit in the Park Zone District; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070(J), the City Council may approve a G1QS Exemption for essential public facilities and affordable housing after considering a recommendation from the Growth Management Commission at a public hearing (scheduled for February 20. 2001) and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 6. 2000, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board recommended approval to Council of the GMQS Exemption for Iselin Park as an essential public facility and affordable housing and recommended emplovee mitigation for 19.3 FTE's for the project with one on -site unit satisfying �.?5 FTEs with ail other mitigation utilizing credits at the Water Place Housing Project, and, WHEREAS, the AspervPitkin County Housing Authority recommended approval finding that the affordable housing mitigation requirements were met; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has revie-wed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the 'vluluclpal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies. and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on January 2, 2001, where the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a public hearing, took testimony and continued the public hearing to January 30. 2001, and. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of the PUD. SPA and Conditional Use provisions of the Land Use Code and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission fords that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section I The Conditional Use for the recreational building, accessory sport shop and snack bar/restaurant use is approved with the following conditions: 1. That the internal and external lights associated with the structure and site improvements, other than those needed for security, safety, parking and maintenance be utilized only in conjunction with the hours of operation of the Iselin Park facility. ?. That the accessory sport shop and snack bar/restaurant use be operated for the purposes of serving the customers of the Iselin Park facility. The restaurant shall not be used for off -premise catering services or advertised in order to attract the general public (non- users of the Iselin Park facility). Section 2 The Iselin Park Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area as put forth in the Iselin Park Consolidated ConceptuaUFinal PUD/SPA application dated December 4. 2000, and associated plan set dated November 15. 2000. are hereby recommended for approval to the City Council subject to the conditions of approval listed hereinafter. 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within i SO days of the tinai approval by City Council and shall include the following: a. The information required to be included in a PL�D Agreement, pursuant to Section 26.445.070(C). ?. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval granted by Citv Council and shall include: a. A final plat meeting the requirements of the Citv Engineer and showing easements, encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for physical improvements and parking spaces within City. _runts-of-wav, and location of utility pedestals. b. The dimensional requirements for the PUD and SPA shall be noted as follows: Minimum Lot Size: Minimum Lot Area per dwelling unit: Minimum Lot Width: Minimum Front Yard: Minimum Side Yard: Minimum Rear Yard: Maximum Height: Percent of Open Space: External Floor Area Ratio: Internal Floor Area Ratio: Off Street Parking: Recreational Uses: Off Street Parking: Residential Uses: I-; acres l 5 acres 0 feet 30 feet feet 500 feet 60 feet �O percent 0.25:1 N/A 1 space per 1,000 sq. feet 1 space per bedroom c. A drawing representing the project I s architectural character. d. An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, trails and the dimensional requirements as approved. 3. That the Applicant prepares a parking mitigation plan for review and approval by the City's Parking Department for the construction period. 4. That the Events/Parking Coordinator of the Parks and Recreation Department notifies the City Parking Department prior to special events for increased patrolling of Glen Eagle Drive, Glen Gary Drive, and Maroon Creek Road for parking. 5. That the Applicant prepares an emergency access plan for review and approval by the Aspen Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit for the facility and. b. That the Applicant prepares a special events seating planwhich meets with the approval of the Aspen Fire Marshal and the Chief Building Official for compliance with escape route and Uniform Building Code occupancy provisions. 'Such seating plan shall be abided by for all major events and provided to facility operations staff. event organizers and promoters. i'. That the Applicant tiles a final drainage plan that meetswith the approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. The drainage plan. shall include an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer which maintains sediment and debris on -site during and after construction. if a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. A -1-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. g. That the Parks and Recreation Department utilize 'best construction practices to ensure protection of the existing vegetation and other landscape features on the site. 9. That the Applicant implements a combination of incentives and disincentives to ensure that traffic will not significantly increase, and that traffic will be limited to parking available at the Iselin facility and parking areas noted within the application. 10. That the Applicant submits an audit of employees of the facility to determine whether additional mitigation is necessary. Such audit shall be conducted two rears after certificate of occupancy, the cost of which shall be borne by the applicant 11. That a formalized operational agreement regarding event scheduling and parking lot usage between the Aspen School District, City of Aspen Parks and Recreation Department and the Aspen Ballet be provided prior to building permit issuance. 12. That the Applicant provides a final detailed lighting plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director to ensure proper lighting levels and conformance with the technical components of the City's lighting code. 13. That the City's Transportation Manager reviews and approves the final PUD Plan to evaluate RFTA service to the site and the final site plan details to ensure efficient. safe and convenient service. 14. That some type of temporary Maroon Creek Road crossing improvement be provided, such as a raised and/or painted crossing walk and/or a temporary pedestrian -activated crossing light. Such crossing would be necessary if the pedestrian bridge is not constructed at the time of certificate of occupancy of the Iselin Park facility 4 15. That the Applicant provides for and schedules an on -site review by Community Development and Parks and Recreation Staff, including the City's landscape architects, to ensure that the Maroon Creek Road berm will serve the function of dissuading "shortcutting" by pedestrians from the school campus to the Iselin facility. The applicants shall notify the Community Development Director once the berm is in preliminary form (but prior to landscape installation). 16. The PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans shall be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. IT The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A parking mitigation plan ( approved by the Parking Dept.) and construction traffic management plan ( approved by the En(-Yineering Dept. )for activity wring construction time. e. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and anv approval from the Parks Department Director for off -site replacement or mitigation of removed trees. 18. The building permit plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire sprinkler system and alarm system for the recreational building in accordance with Aspen Fire District requirements. 19. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. 210. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized. those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. 21. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on -site and not within public rights -of -way unless specifically approved by the Director of Streets of the appropriate jurisdiction. 22. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 23. The applicant shall not track mud onto City or County streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 24. All uses and construction shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 ( Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 25. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this.project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. 5 26. A fugitive dust control permit will be required during construction. 27. Slope stabilization, erosion control, and sediment control measures need to be implemented before, during, and after construction. Section 4: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if `ully set orth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded tinder such prior ordinances. Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction. such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not atect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 0. 2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C:home:joyce:Ise1inPZResJan30 Robert Blaich, Chair 0 EXHIBIT A ISELIN PARK CONSOLIDATED PUD, SPA, CONDITIONAL USE 26.445.05OReview Standards: Consolidated Conceptual and Final PUD A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity r_o the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding: Community Development Staff believes the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) . The AACP's Map E - Open Space and Trails, identified the property as "Aspen City Park", meaning that the site would be development for community and recreational land uses. the same trails alignments that are proposed in the site plan . This map also shows Two specific AACP Action Items specifically call for developing the Iselin Park community and recreational facility. Action Item 48 states: "Complete the Master Plans for Wagner and Iselin Park. Look at ways to continue active use of the parks in development of the plan." This project both completes and implements the Iselin Park Master Plan. Action Item 56 states: "Ensure that parks and open space are available or are provided near development of affordable housing, especially in the areas of increased densities." This site, while not near the City's highest density areas in and around the commercial core, is located within one-half mile of the Moore Family PUD affordable housing neighborhood, Highlands Villas, Highlands Base Village and Twin Ridge. It is also within easy biking distance to Truscott, Maroon Creek, Water Place and Burlingame seasonal affordable housing neighborhoods. In addition, one of the AACP's arts, Culture Ss Education policies calls for the need to "Support activities and education for youth." Perhaps more than other project this City has or will develop, the Iselin Park facility will directly support youth activities by including a new youth center, creating an ice center for high school and other youth teams, providing much needed pools for a myriad of recreation and competitive needs, all just across the street from school campus. Staff also believes the proposal is consistent with the Plan's Parks, Open Space & the Environment element. This element's policies call for the clustering of housing on a site when the site is proposed for both housing and open space/park usage, creating proposals that are in accordance with the Wildlife and Biodiversity map and Parks, Open Space and Environment map to protect sensitive habitat areas, preserve key open space parcels that help to establish the character of the Aspen area, to discourage sprawl, and to recognize important natural features that define the character of Aspen. Staff believes that all of these policies are met with the proposed site plan. Finally, the Interim Aspen Area Citizen Housing Plan calls for developing citizen housing within the metro area, near available public mass transit, in an area that will not promote additional development or sprawl, and in a location with available public facilities and urban services. Staff believes this site meets all of these criteria. The housing proposed is in the metro area, near transit stops, in an area that Will not promote additional development or sprawl, and in an area served by all public facilities and urban services. The Plan also calls for the development of citizen housing to be compatible with the existing neighborhood character and environment. Staff believes the proposed housing unit is compatible with the existing neighborhood and approved development plans based in this area. The existing neighborhood is near several significant affordable housing communities as identified above. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding: Staff believes the proposed development is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The area includes significant public uses, including (most importantly) the school campus, Highlands Base Village, residential neighborhoods, affordable housing developments, parks, and open spaces. Staff believes the facility has been designed in a way that minimizes its impact on the built and natural environments in the immediate area while serving students, residents and overall community needs. Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the proposed development would adversely affect future development of the surrounding area in any way. T his site has been identified and planned for this facility. The surrounding area is built out, approved for development, or protected as open space. Staff believes this criterion is met. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding Staff believes this criterion is met because the project is an essential public facility and, therefore, exempt from GMQS. Following the Planning and Zoning Commission's review and prior to City Council's public hearing on this project, the Growth Management Commission will consider this project for an exemption. Staff believes this criterion is met. Zstablish.ment of Dimensional .requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish +he dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements. compatibility ,,vith surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply With the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed dimensional requirements (as stated in the application on page 10) are appropriate and compatible with the character of, and compatibility with, existing and future land uses in the surrounding area. The surrounding area consists of the school campus, Highlands Base Village, residential neighborhoods, parks and open spaces. The facility's overall size would be compatible with the school campus buildings, significantly smaller than the Highlands Base Village structures, and not significantly larger - above grade - than town home and detached single family residences in the surrounding area. In fact, this facility is designed to be significantly less visible and integrated significantly more into the natural landscape than some of the surrounding residential developments. Staff believes this criterion is met. b) Natural or man-made hazards. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the subject parcels contain any existing natural or man-made hazards that would deem the dimensional requirements inappropriate for development on this site. The noted historic landfill located on the property dictates to a great extent the location of the structure. Staff believes this criterion is met. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed dimensional requirements are appropriate for the parcel considering existing site characteristics. The proposed development avoids the site's steep slopes, riparian area, and -Maroon Creek. by locating the structure near Maroon Creek Road. Staff believes this criterion is met. d) Existing and proposed man -;Wade characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff F indin Staff does not believe the property's dimensions will have an adverse affect on existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property or on the surrounding area. The facility would be located on -Maroon Creels Road, facilitating easy transit and pedestrian circulation to the site - both from nearby bus stops and a new pedestrian bridge over the road. This project would increase parking on -site, as well as utilize existing school campus and Tiehack parking facilities. Historical resources do not exist on the property. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding The proposed scale and massing appear compatible with the surrounding area, as well as quantity of open space and site coverage. As stated above, the facility's overall size would be compatible with the school campus buildings, significantly smaller than the Highlands Base Village structures, and not significantly larger - above grade - than town home and detached single family residences in the surrounding area. The structure would be located near the school campus, .vhlch staff believes is favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area because the ball fields and environmentally sensitive riparian area in the back would be preserved as open space. �r� Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever ,point use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in Lhe proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding Based on the Chariier Associates, lnc., 'Traffic, Parking and Mobility Management Plan for the Community Campus Area, included as Appendix E in the Application, Staff believes the appropriate number of off-street parking spaces has been proposed. The Citv proposes to increase the number on -site narking spaces at the facility from 65 to 120, and to utilize spaces at the main school lot, high school staff lot, high school student % CMC lot, informal spaces, and Ti iehack parking lot for daily and event use. The estimated total number of available parking spaces all of these combined locations is 655, which the consultant believes is appropriate considering the probable number of cars used by those accessing the development, varying time periods of use, availability of public transit and pedestrian access, and proximity of the facility to the school campus and town. The plan recognizes potential shortages in the available number of parking spaces for special events, and proposes several parking management techniques that can be implemented to alleviate impacts of parking shortages. Specifically, the plan proposes to manage the schedule of events to prevent the parking shortages, arranging for overflow parking at Tiehack or on the school grounds, providing shuttles to events from Aspen and/or the Buttermilk base area, encouraging ride - sharing and transit utilization, and providing information and education to encourage alternative modes of transportation. The plan concludes that the combination of shared parking and implementing parking/ transportation management options will provide sufficient parking for the facility's regular and special events use. Staff proposes two conditions of approval for this project: One is that the Applicant prepare a parking mitigation plan for review and approval by the City's Parking Department for the construction period. The second is that the events manager notifies the City prior to special events for increased patrolling of Glen Eagle Drive, Glen Gary Drive, and Maroon Creek Road for parking. Staff believes this criterion is met. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal. and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding infrastructure capabilities are surt?cient to ser,.,e `he croposed :acuity Staff believes this criterion is met. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mudflow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding Staff does not recommend reducing the allowable density within the PUD. Staff does not believe any natural hazards or critical natural site features exist that would cause reducing the proposed density on this site. Staff believes this criterion is met. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, 6 those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Staff Finding Staff believes significant community goals are being achieved by this project - significant community recreation and youth sen ices would be provided along with one affordable housing unit. Staff believes this criterion s met. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PU D enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following; 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site =Nhich are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed site design enhances public spaces (this facility is a public space), and is complimentary to this and adjacent sites' natural and man- made features. Existing site features include the steep slopes, oak stands, riparian area, and Maroon Creek; this facility avoids all of these natural features to the greatest extent possible by locating the structure and parking lotnext to Maroon Creek Road. The site's man-made features and public spaces - the ball fields - are area also preserved. In addition, the structure has been designed in way that respects the natural landscape and view plane to the west of the property. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant .open spaces and vistas. Staff Finding Staff believes the locating the Iselin facility next to Maroon Creek Road appropriately preserves significant open spaces and vistas at the rear of the property. Staff believes this criterion is met. 7 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. Staff Finding Staff believes the recreation facility is appropriately oriented to Maroon Creek Road considering the nature of the site and recreational purpose of the building. The structure's architectural design contributes to the rural/ mountain context of the site and area, and provides visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement in, around and thru the area. Staff believes this criterion is met. 4. Buildings and access ways are apppropriateiy arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Staff Finding Access to the site is from Maroon Creek Road. Three access points are proposed. The recreation facility and north ball fields would be accessed from the northern end of the property, and the parking lot would have it otivn two access points to the road. Emergency access to the building and northern bail fields would be from the northern access; and emergency access to the south 'ball fields and tennis court would be from the parking lot's two access points. In addition, a proposed eight -foot trail around the property could be used for emergency vehicles. A proposed condition of approval is that the Aspen Fire Marshal shall approve emergency access prior to the issuance of a 'building permit for the facility. The Fire Marshall also stated in referral comments that emergency access cannot be restricted for special events. Staff believes the criterion met with the condition of approval. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. Staff Finding One of this project's best attributes is its exceptional pedestrian and handicapped access. Pedestrian and handicapped access will be provided via two new bridges from the Buttermilk parking area as well as a pedestrian overpass from the school campus across Maroon Creek Road. The path from the east side of Maroon Creek Road would be designed for both skiers and pedestrians use. In addition, an ADA compliant, crusher fine trail around the property would provide excellent pedestrian access to the ball fields, tennis courts, and recreation facility. Staff believes this criterion has been met. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding The Applications contains a complete Drainage Study for the site, designed to comply with the City's drainage standards. The City Engineer stated in referral comments that, "The mitigation plan must address the temporary sediment control and containment plan for the construction phase. The drainage plan must contain a statement specifying the routine maintenance required by property owner(s) to ensure continued and proper performance. The foundation drainage system should be separate from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site, and must be shown on drainage plans and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm.'' A proposed condition of approval is that the City Engineer shall approve the final drainage plan for this project prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff believes this criterion is met. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding Only one structure is proposed for the site. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. D. Landscape .plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well -designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. E Staff Finding According to the application, the landscape plan proposes to preserve significant vegetation - oak stands - to the greatest extent possible. It also proposes to use native vegetation to screen the parking lot and recreation building from Maroon Creek Road. The landscape plan does not propose any changes to the riparian area for Maroon Creek. The plan would not alter any significant natural or man-made site features that provide uniqueness and interest in Lhe landscape because no such features exist beyond the oaks stands and Maroon `.reek riparian area. A proposed condition of approval is chat `lie ?arms De-oartment snail empiov an appropriate method of protecting existing t1 egetauon anci other -andscape features. which thev have committed to oeriorming during construcaon. Staff believes this criterion is me-. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is lZo encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the ,City while promoting efficient use of resources. .Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes that may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. Be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. Staff Finding Staff believes the architectural character of the proposed Iselin facility will enhance the visual character of the City and surrounding area. It is the Aspen vernacular contemporary lodge, which appropriately relates to its intended use, the site, and neighboring properties, while blending the structure into the natural environment and the site's existing landscape. It will relate very well with residential developments in the area as well as with the new Highlands Base Village buildings. Although no historical or cultural resources exist in the immediate area, the buildings scale and massing also relate well surrounding developments - both public and private. Its grand entrance will certainly enhance the X,Iisual character of the Aspen community and community campus. 10 Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less -intensive mechanical systems. Staff Finding It is particularly important for a facility such as this - pools, ice center and youth center - to maximize is natural heating and cooling systems because of the amount of energy required to keep pools warm, ice frozen, and kids comfortable. Staff believes this building has been designed to incorporate, to maximum possible extent, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the site's outstanding solar access. The glazing both allows an abundance of natural light/heat to enter the building, while creating magnificent views for the facility's users. Overall, tl,Le architecture is designed to maximize the use of natural heating and cooling systems. Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. Accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Staff Finding The buildings roofs are designed to accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice and water in ways that do not require significant maintenance. The Citv will review the building's shedding and storage of snow, ice, and water during the building permit review. Staff believes this criterion is met. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up -lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. 11 Staff Finding The building's lighting has been designed to minimize to the greatest extent possible all adverse impacts on surrounding developments, the adjacent Maroon Creek Road, and the community as a whole. The size and design of the facility, as well as its evening usage, prevent the Applicant from eliminating all lighting from exiting the property. Staff believes this criterion has been met as long as a final detailed lighting plan is submitted and reviewed by zoning staff for conformance with the fight code provisions. G. Common Park, Open Space, or .recreation area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common par., open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. Staff Finding This entire parcel is dedicated as an Aspen park with open space and recreational uses and facilities. The Iselin facility and parking lot would be located near Maroon Creek Road while the remainder of the property would be open space - ball fields and the Maroon Creek riparian area. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common parr and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. Staff Finding This public park and facility will not include any separate residential lots requiring such deeds. Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. Staff Finding The entire park and facility will be maintained by the City of Aspen. The recorded PUD Agreement will serve as the legal instrument to ensure the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, the parking lot, and Iselin facility. Staff believes this criterion is met. 11. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: 1. adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. Staff Finding All appropriate utility agencies and the City ngineer wereeferenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project, with conditions. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. Staff Finding Staff recommends a condition of approval be that the City of Aspen mitigates any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses, road impact, and sanitary sewer and water lines. Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding No oversized utilities are required to serve this project. L Access and Circulation. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 13 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. Staff Finding The property is served by Maroon Creek Road, a public street providing vehicular access to the site. Staff believes this criterion -s net. 2. The proposed development, -vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding. roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. Staff F indin According to Lee Cassin, the Citv's Environmental Health Director, the Iselin facility will generate a very significant increase in traffic. She recommends a condition of approval be that '`the applicant implements a combination of incentives and disincentives to ensure that traffic will not significantly increase, and that traffic will be limited to parking available at Iselin." 'Ti he City is proposing to build pedestrian bridges (previously discussed) to and around the facility to promote alternative modes of transportation to reduce automobile traffic. A bus pull-out and circular transit drive will also enable easy and frequent mass transit to serve the site. To address congestion and road safety issues on Maroon Creek Road as well as entrances to the school campus and Iselin Center, the Applicant is proposing several "traffic calming" elements along Maroon Creek Road to slow down traffic with the significant number of children in the immediate vicinity and to preserve the residents quality of life. Specifically, the City is proposing landscaping and "chokedowns" as entry features to the site from both directions to slow down automobile traffic. Signs alerting drivers of the school, pedestrian crossings, and of the facility will also slow down traffic. Staff believes this criterion is met with the condition of approval. 3. Areas of historic pedestrian or recreational trail use, improvements of, or connections to, the bicycle and pedestrian trail system, and adequate access to significant public lands and the rivers are provided through dedicated public trail easements and are proposed for appropriate improvements and maintenance. Staff Finding Areas of historic pedestrian and recreation trail use in and around the facility will be maintained or improved by the development of this project. The Applicant would also connect the facility to the City's e.,dsting trail system and maintain the 14 pedestrian/bike paths serving the site as well as within the site. These trails are all public. Staff believes this criterion is met. 4. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan and adopted specific plans regarding recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and transportation are proposed to be implemented in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding The proposed development includes the recommended recreationai trans, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and transportation sor this specific site as identified in the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff believes this criterion is met. 5. Streets in the PUD which .are proposed or recommended to be retained under }private ownership provide appropriate dedication to public use to ensure appropriate public and emergency access. Staff Finding The final PUD Plat shall demonstrate the public dedication of the all streets, parking lots, and emergency access ways. Staff believes this criterion is met. b. Security gates, guard posts, or other entryway expressions for the PUD, or for lots within the PUD, are minimized to the extent practical. Staff Finding No security gates or guard posts are proposed. J. Phasing of Development plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. if phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: 1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Z. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. 15 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees - in -lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff Finding Phasing is not proposed for this project. 26.440.050 Review Standards for Development in a Specially Planned Area SPA . A. General. In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan. the Planning and mooning Commission and City Council shall consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. Staff Finding The applicant is applying for a Specially Planned :area because affordable housing is not allowed in the underlying, Park Zone District. SPA approval would allow the Applicant to construct affordable housing on this site. Staff believes the proposed development is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The area includes significant public uses, including the Community Campus, Highlands Base Village, residential neighborhoods, affordable housing developments, parks, and open spaces. Staff believes the facility has been designed in a way that minimizes its impact on the built and natural environments in the immediate area while serving students, residents and overall community goals and needs. Staff further believes that the height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space are appropriate for the site and immediate vicinity of the parcel. The height. bulk and architecture are similar to school campus buildings, Highlands Base Village, and residential developments in the immediate area. Landscaping preserves existing significant vegetation while screening the parking and facility to the greatest extent possible. Staff believes this criterion is met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. 16 Staff Finding All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project, with conditions. Staff believes this criterion is met. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. Staff Finding Staff believes the parcel proposed for development is suitable or the ; selin facility. The area next to the road proposed for the structure is mostly dat, contains stabie soils, and avoids mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. The portion of the site with steep slopes and flood 'hazards at the western edge of the property in the Maroon Creek riparian area is completely avoided. Staff believes this criterion is met. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental .impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed development employs creative land planning techniques to preserve significant view plans, avoid environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and additional, amenities by locating the one structure near the public road while preserving the significant open space and riparian areas on the western side of the property. Trails on and around the property would be developed to implement the 2000 AACP trails plan. the on -site trails would be ADA compatible. Staff believes the project's land planning techniques will benefit the public at large, satisfying this criterion. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive plan. Staff Finding Community Development Staff believes the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan (AAC). The AACP's Map E — Open Space and Trails, identified the property as -'Aspen City Park", meaning that the site would be development for community and recreational land uses. This map also shows the same trails alignments that are proposed in the site plan. Two specific AACP Action Items specifically call for developing the Iselin Park community and recreational facility. Action Item 48 states: `Complete the Master Plans for Wagner and Iselin Park. Look at ways to continue active use of the parks 17 in development of the plan." This project both completes and implements the Iselin Park Master Plan. Action Item 56 states: "Ensure that parks and open space are available or are provided near development of affordable housing, especially in the areas of increased densities." This site, while not near the City's highest density areas in and around the commercial core, is located within one-half mile of the Moore Family PUD affordable housing neighborhood, Highlands Villas, Highlands Base Village and Twin Ridge. it is also .within easy biking distance to Truscott, Maroon Creek, Water Place and Burlingame seasonal affordable housing neighborhoods. In addition, one of the AACP's :-arts, Culture � Education policies calls or the need to "Support activities and education for youth." Perhaps more than other project this City has or will develop, the Iselin Park facility will directly support youth activities by including a new youth center, creating an ice center for high school and other youth teams, providing much needed pools for a myriad of recreation and competitive needs, all just across the street from school campus. Staff also believes the proposal is consistent With the Plan's Parks, Open Space & the Environment element. This element's policies call for the clustering of housing on a site when the site is proposed for both housing and open space; park usage, creating proposals that are in'accordance with the Wildlife and Biodi.versity map and Parks, Open Space and Environment map to protect sensitive habitat areas, preserve key open space parcels that help to establish the character of the Aspen area, to discourage sprawl, and to recognize important natural features that define the character of Aspen. Staff believes that all of these policies are ;net :with the proposed site plan. Finally, the Interim Aspen Area Citizen Housing Plan calls for developing citizen I within the metro area, near available public mass transit, in an area that will not promote additional development or sprawl, and in a location with available public facilities and urban services. Staff believes this site meets all of these criteria. The housing proposed is in the metro area, near transit stops, in an area that will not promote additional development or sprawl, and in an area served by all public facilities and urban services. The Plan also calls for the development of citizen housing to be compatible with the existing neighborhood character and environment. Staff believes the proposed housing unit is compatible with the existing neighborhood and approved development plans based in this area. The existing neighborhood is near several significant affordable housing communities as identified above. Staff believes this criterion is met. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Finding 18 This project will be paid for by the voter approved 1999 Revenue Bonds for Parks Improvements; the bond specifically identified the provision of public facilities for this parcel. Staff believes this criterion is met. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040(B)(2). Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing development on any slopes in excess of 20%. Staff believes this criterion is met. S. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. Staff Finding Staff believes this project is exempt from GMGS because it is an essential public facility. Sufficient GMOS allotments are available for the proposed development. Section 26 425 040• Standards Applicable to all Conditional Uses. When considering a development application for a conditional use. the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether all of the following standards are met, as applicable. A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Community Plan, with the intent of the zone district in which it is proposed to be located, and complies with all other applicable requirements of this 'Title; and Staff Finding Conditional Use approval is required for the restaurant and recreational facilities in the Park Zone District. As stated in the above PUD and SPA review criteria sections, staff believes the proposed development and accompanying Conditional Uses are consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and standards of the AACP. Staff also believes the uses are consistent with the purposes of the Park Zone District. The purpose of the Park (P) zone district is to ensure that Iand intended for recreation use is developed so as to serve its intended use, while not exerting a disruptive influence on surrounding land uses. The subject site is intended for the pool and ice center at least since the voters approved the 1999 Revenue Bonds for Parks Improvements. Staff believes the proposed Iselin pool and ice center serves 19 the purpose of the zone district by developing the restaurant and recreation facilities intended for this particular land. Staff further believes, as stated above, that the facility would not exert a disruptive influence on surrounding land uses. In addition, this project complies with all other applicable requirements of this Title. Therefore, this criterion is met. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed development is consistent and compatible :with the character of existing land uses in the immediate vicinity. The area includes significant public uses, including the Community Campus, Highlands Base Village. residential neighborhoods, affordable housing developments, parks, and open spaces. It would substantially enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed development because of its location across Maroon Creek Road from the Community Campus and just down the road from the Aspen Highlands Base Village. Staff believes this criterion is met. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and Staff Finding As previously discussed in several of the PUD and SPA review criteria, staff believes the location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes to the greatest extent possible all adverse impacts on all surrounding properties. Staff believes an events manager for the facility and Community Campus would further improve the overall operating characteristics of all the public facilities, services, amenities, activities, and enforcement in the area. Staff believes this criterion is met. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools; and Staff Finding; �' 0 All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project, with conditions. Staff believes this criterion is met. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and Staff Finding According to the Aspen/Pitkin County dousing Authority, the projecr :rust provide mitigation for 19.3 full time equivalent (FTE) emplovees. In addition, two years after certificate of occupancy, an audit needs to be done of employees of the facility to determine whether additional mitigation is necessary. The Housing Office also stated that there will need to be a deed restriction of category 3 rate for the onsite unit. The Applicant is proposing to mitigate 2.25 FTE onsite and the remainder in Water Place housing by using the credits the City obtained through the construction of that project. City Council can defer mitigation requirements for the youth center however the applicant has included the Youth Center in the mitigation proposal. Staff believes the Applicant is committed to supplving the affordable housing necessary to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the snack bar and recreational conditional uses. 21 All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project, with conditions. Staff believes this criterion is met. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and Staff Finding According to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the project must provide mitigation for 19.3 full time equivalent (FTE) employees. in addition, two years after certificate of occupancy, an audit needs to be done of employees of the facility to determine whether additional mitigation is necessary. The Housing Office also stated that there will need to be a deed restriction of category 3 rate for the onsite unit. The Applicant is proposing to mitigate 2.25 FTE onsite and the remainder in Water Place housing by using the credits the City obtained through the construction of that project. City Council can defer mitigation requirements for the youth center however the applicant has included the Youth Center in he mitigation proposal. Staff believes the Applicant is committed to supplying the affordable housing necessary to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the snack bar and recreational conditional uses. C:home:joyce:Islein ExAJan30 Iselin 'ark Consolidated Conceptual/Final PUD/SPA/CU Issue Identification Summary Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 1/?/01 Facilities: • International size rink desirable over NHL size I Deeperwater section of warm water, leisure pool desirable Separate diving section from lap pool • Overall, the facility is desirable addition as a community -place- The facility is desirable in terms of the multiple use opportunities it offers, it offers an additional ice rink (which is needed because of existing demand) and additional seating for the ice rink over what the C itv has today. Verify terms of the tennis courts ( agreements with Castle/ tilaroon Creek Caucus) • Tennis courts should be removed and replaced with affordable housing Get the project done • Snack bar should serve users of the facility and not be designed to be a `destination`restaurant • Evaluate size and specifications of the pool and ice Through testimonv from design professionals Parking: • Is number of spaces adequate'? • How will parking be managed and enforced? • Provide documentation for shared usage of parking facilities on neighboring sites and with differing jurisdictions Affordable Housing: • Strive for more housing on site • Justification of credits at Water Place Architecture and Structure: • Concern about the scale and mass of the structure • Is height necessary'? • Minimize the blocking of views to the mountains • Provide site cross sections to better illustrate building siting on the subject property Environmental: • Minimize lighting impacts • Minimize noise impacts • Hours of operation to minimize impacts to neighbors • Given the prominent location of the proposal, ensure site compatibility and minimize environmental impacts EX60611f 5 JAN.11.2001 10:35AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC MEMORANDUM TO% Joyce Chlson FROW Cindy Christensen, Housing Operations Manager OATS. Z anuary 11, 2001 �• :iV COIN ATeD PUV5PA NO. d5a F4.1 .55U o The applicant is Proposing development or a r�ereational Tacifit<� to nc;ude offices, swimming poor ice rink, lobby and public areas, ana a youth center. The Camnluni development Housing Office and go 9 Department is requesting a recommendation 1 rom the ' and relating to the �titicatian requirement and how , he VO mitigation requirement is satisT'ied. AWRC Np; The applicant is ,..questing a SMQ5 exemption anger ecticn 26.470.070H, Which states; '`Construct�'on of zssentlal public igacilities. i'his memption is not *dUcted fmm the Mpsctive 'annual development allotment established pursuant to Section 26. 470. M or =ram the Aspen Metres Area development cgilings ,established pursuant to Section 26.47t.030. l?eview is by city eOumil. nis exemptlon Is available prior ft the following =Odltlons being net" except for housing, development shall be emsider19d an $see tOal facility In fWpos to Mg demands for growth, is riot itself a signiflcant yrvwth generator, is available for use by the r�enera/ public, and s+�rves the n�ssds of the City. An applicant for an exemption pursuant to this Section shall be r"Uimd to dem"twe to tW satisfactlon of the elty Council" a. not the impacts Of the essential public facility W/// bd mitigated, including those .assvciafiad Wift r'. the generation of additional employees, the demand for parking, read and transit services. JAN.11.22001 10:35AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC I`IU . d:)C r- . c Tt will be up to City Council to decide if this is an essential facility and is exempt from growth management. 8M&A7'1QN REQVIRE1Vl: Mitigation has been, in the past, calculated two dif f erent ways. The first way is by square footage, which is regulated in the Code. The other is by what the applicant is projecting to be the staffing needs, with an audit to be done after Certificate of Occupancy, The employee generation table located in the 2000 Guidelines is used for calculating the mitigation requirements under the square f ootage methodology, ,suare nctaa Anai sis: Employees Current Projected f enerated E;npioyees Faciii /area 5. S.F, Chan e X oer 1,000 sq. fte67eneratec Lobby Public 1,371 40588 3,217 = 1,000 X 4.4 . Offiee 150 1,037 387 1,00o x 3.0 2.66 ?ooi 6,235 16,432 10,197 1,000 X 2.3 23.45 Ice Rink 341440 34,440 ®1,000 X 2.30 7.0.21 Offices 924 924 = 1,000 X 3.0 2.77 Youth Cntr (Cfce) 264 264 + 1,000 ; 3.0 0.79 Youth Center 5,800 5,800 = 1,000 X 2,3 13.34 TOTAL 136.72 There are no square footage credits derived from the Tce Rink or the youth Center as the original structures are not being demolished. According to Section 26.470.1008, the applicant has to provide for 60% of the mitigation requirements. Therefore, a true square footage mitigation requirement would be 82.03 FTE's. However, Staff realizes that the ice rink and the pool should not be part of the calculation since the square footage is for recreational use only. Therefore, without the ice rink and the pool, the square footage requirement would be 34.06 X 6C% 20.44. 2 JAN.11.2001 10:35AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC NO.35e P.3 z Tim Anderson, the Recreation Director for the City of Aspen, provided the staff ing requirements that he is projecting once the facility is complete. Mr, Anderson states that he is planning to budget for an additional 13 employees once the project is complete. The staffing provided by Mr. Anderson does not include the Youth Center. staff has received additional information regarding the Youth Center. The Youth Center currently staffs three fui!•time employees for seven months out of the year and seven full-time employees for five months out of the year, � ne currpnr � ull time equivalents (F�'s) for the Youth Center are 4,68 rTa's. ,he youth Center uil-rime sees an increase to five full-time .tnoioyees •or seven ;months and eight r . T, F77 • y r are o.25 employees , or f lve months. -"he pro jetted ,. s , or the Youth Cente F T �'s, Ci Council allowed the waiver or mitigation requirements on the yurrent 'Y Youth Center, so no mitigation for the current employees was provided. Affordgbie ;�oUsin : The applicant is proposing to construct ore two -bedroom zit to 'House on on -site manager. The two -bedroom unit would satisfy 22.25 employees. f i"ne square The square footage of the unit has not been estabiished at this time. r footage will determine the category of the unit. To satisfy the rest of the miti ation requirement, the applicant will be asking the City Managers Office , o use 9 j Place Housing project was the unused credits that were established when the Water , .ac of the 'built, The units at Water place house 52 FTC's. 'fie construction maintenance facility used ,5936 of these 52 7F's, leaving a credit of 51.4. 'rhe Board does not have the authority to approve this request, The (approval must come from City Council. RECt EN0A17CN: The Housing Soard met on this issue on September b, ZCCC) MM - 9 to make a recommendation to City Council. The 3oard recommended the following 1, The applicant mitigate for 19.3 FTF's, which includes the entire Youth Center actual employee generation, The applicant mitigate the 19.3 ma's by the on -site unit providing for mitigation of 2.21; and the remainder 17.05 FT F's to be satisf ied by the credits of the Water place Housing project, A letter was received from Steve 3arwick, City Manager, stating that he is willing to mitigate 3 JAN.11.2001 10:35AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC NO.35e P.4 for the Youth Center and the Recreation Facility by using Water Place Housing. V the full 19.3 FTE's were to be mitigated, this would require 17.05 coming out of the "pool" of credits at the Water Place Housing project, This would leave a balance of 34,35 credits. 3, An audit of the employees be completed two years after final Certificate of Occupancy to establish if enough mitigation was satisfied. The auditor should be approved by the Mousing Office, with *he excense of the audit paid by the Recreation Department. :4 the audit shows a higher employee rate Tor either the recreation portion or ;-he Youth Center, than additionai mitigation would be requirea. 4. The on -site employee dwelling unit be deed restricted .�to 'higher thnn Category 3 and that the :feed restriction must be yomQieTZd and recorded 001,+0R to building permit �approvoi. Although the Staff and 3oard would prefer that the entire ,mitigation be satisfied by actual units, they acknowledge that the City and County have done a couple )r projects without taxpayer money involved. The decision on whether projects such as Water Place can be used for mitigation credits should rest with City Courici l or 4he 3oard of County Commissioners, depending on whether it is a City project or a County project. The dousing Of-fice, however, requires that for each reques ► for a credit, the entity provide up-to-date information on what has been used. ne City Manager or the County Manager must approve the use of the credits from these ipecific projects prior to the request to City Council or the 3CCC, The Housing Office will also keep track of what has been used and what is left in the file of that specif is project, 4 MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: Jan 12`", 2001 Re: Iselin Park The Deveiooment Review Committee has reviewed the iseiin OarK application at their Jan 10, 2001 meeting, and has compiled the following comments: General Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that We believe that the submitted site plan is conceptually accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is feasible. The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems related to approvals tied to -issuance of building permit." 2. R.O.W. Impacts: if there are any encroachments into the public rights -of -way, the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license requirements. Site Review Site Drainage — Requirement —. The mitigation plan must address the temporary sediment control and containment plan for the construction phase. The drainage plan must contain a statement specifying the routine maintenance required by property owner(s) to ensure continued and proper performance.. The foundation drainage system should be separate from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site, and must be shown on drainage plans and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm. Information — The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely. This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and re - vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow and what adverse affects may arise from potential mud and debris flow. 2. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter — Requirement- All sidewalk, curb. and gutter must be designed using the City of Aspen design standards which are available in the City Engineering Department. Page 2 of 6 Jan 11, 2001 Iselin Park 3. Fire Protection District — Requirement — As of the request of the Fire Protection District revisions need to be made as follows: a. Fire department access cannot be restricted for special events. b. Require an event seating plan for special events and a maximum occupancy figure which will be made available to all promoters of special events. c. A mechanical plan indicating the type of refrigeration chemicals for the pool and ice rink needs to be submitted. d. A sprinkler system and a fire alarm system are required for the entire building. It is important to verify that water service lines are large enough to handle this capacity in emergency situations. 4. Transportation — information — Building Department —Requirements —The ollowing ; equirements has been provided by the Building Department: a. Check with a building code consultant before final design to make sure all of the building adheres to code. b. Seating plan for special event needs to reviewed for exiting and occupancy. c. There needs to be accessibility for the sauna, steam, kitchen and ice rink. The lift location for The lap pooi needs to be shown on the plan. e. A mechanical plan indicating the type of refrigeration chemicals for the pooi and ice rink needs to be submitted. 5. Parking — Requirement — The following requirement has been provided by the Parking Department: a. A parking mitigation plan during construction needs to be submitted. Information — The following information has been supplied by the Parking Department: a. The City of Aspen will patrol Glen Eagle Drive, Glenngary Drive, and Maroon Creek Road for parking. b. Recommendation of proposals from Charlier needs to be reviewed by Parking Department. 7. Engineering Department — Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Engineering Department: a. A construction traffic maintenance plan needs to be submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. b. Geometric design, alignments, and calculations of all road improvements and parking improvements needs to be submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. c. An Improvement Survey needs to be submitted showing the following: Page 3 of b Jan 11, 2001 Iselin Park • Monument Setback Lines i Easements • Utilities Lines, Pedestals, Poles Existing features, irrigation ditches, sidewalks, driveways, buildings Signed and sealed by a Colorado licensed professional land surveyor Information — The following information has been provided by the Engineering Department: a. Consideration needs to be given for the addition of acceleration and deceleration lanes for the proposed parking lot. This will allow for better vehicular egress and ingress during high traffic volumes. b. A Left turn lane for traffic approaching for Aspen Highlands Ski Area should be looked at if an effort to prevent congestion at peak hours. S. Streets Department — Requirement- As of the request of the Streets Department revisions need to be made as follows: a. The applicant shall not track, mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 9. Housing Office — Requirements — The following requirements have been provided by the Housing Office: a. The project must provide mitigation for 19.3 FIFE b. 2 years after certificate of occupancy, an audit needs to be done of employees of the facility c. There will need to be a deed restriction of category 3 rate for the onsite unit Information - The following information has been provided by the Housing Office: a. The project will mitigate 2.25 FTE onsite and the remainder in Waterplace housing. b. City Council can defer mitigation requirements for the youth center. 10. Community Development — Requirements — The following requirements have been provided by the Community Development Office: a. The final PUD plat needs to be more defined of the subject property inclusive of the ball fields and current construction. b. The uses of the property need conditional use approval by planning commission - These need to be identified beforehand, including maximum occupancy Page 4 of 6 Jan 11, 2001 Iselin Park Information- The following information has been provided by the Community Development Office: a. The bridge connection and the trail connection should be phased into the construction schedule. b. The proper easements should be obtained in ample time so as not to delay construction. c. The details of event coordination be made available to avoid a parking shortage situation 11: Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator — Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster Coordinator: a. NONE 12. Parks — Requirement- The following comments have peen produced by the Parks Department: a. NONE 13. Utilities: - Water. city Water Department - Requirement — As a request of the City of Aspen Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. b. If raw water is used for the playing fields, an analysis of this procedure needs to be preformed because it is the very end of the raw water supply line. c. Drinking fountains outside of the building will require a new potable water line. d. Service to the employee housing needs to be separate from the service to the main building. e. A looped water system encircling the building will be required to provide adequate fire flow volumes. Water system improvements for the looped system will require connection to the recently completed Moore PUD system' in Moore Dr. and to the school district lines located on the east side of Maroon Creek Road. Improvements must be planned to provide adequate clearances between existing and new lines and the proposed pedestrian overpass. Page 5 of 6 Jan 11, 2001 Iselin Park - Wastewater. - Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement — As a request of the Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows: a. The food area will need an oil and grease interceptor. b. The Zamboni garage will need an oil and grease interceptor. c. The elevator shaft will need and oil and grease interceptor. d. There will be no clear water connections such as roof drains, foundation drains or storm water connections. All clear water connections are prohibited. e. The containment system quantities for the pool and ice chemicals need to be identified f. The areas identified for petrol product storage must be designed so as to prevent petrol contamination of the public wastewater system. g. Provide information on the glycol system for the ice rink as Glycol creates a difficult and unusual source of loading for wastewater facilities. Similar information is required if ammonia is used as it causes as it can too cause difficult and unusual source of loading. h. The pool volumes need to be made known to determine the drain size limitations Information- Pool drain size requirements will be determined by ACSD based on capacity allowances. - Construction: Work in the Public Right of Way Requirement — Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: Approvals 1. Engineering: The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way. 2. Parks: The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920- 5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance. Page 6 of 6 Jan t 1, 200 t Iselin Park 3. Streets: The applicant receives approval from the Streets department 1920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways. 4. Permits: Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department DRC Attendees Staff: Nick Aden Ben Ludlow Richard Goulding Torte Bracewell Denis Murray Fred Jarman Joyce Ohlson Ed flan Walraven Willy McFarlin Tim Ware Becca Schickling Cindy Christensen Applicant's Representative Ed Sadler Dave Carpenter Steve Bossart Mark Butler Kevin Dunneit MEMORANDUM To: Jovice Ohlson, Community Development Department From: Lee Cassin. City Environmental Health Director Date: July 1 000 Re: Iselin Park PUD Parcel ID ' �7� 5-142-00-851 The Ciw of _aspen Environmental health .Department has reviewed the land use submittal under authoriv�.- of the Municinai Code of the Citv of Asnen. and has the following comments, in addition to our ,garner comments on the conceptual application. AIR QUALITY: Sections 11-2.' "It is the purpose of lthe air quality section of the Nfunicipal Codej Lo achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available practical methods and techniques to control, prevent and reduce air pollution throughout the city..." The Land use Regulations seek to "lessen congestion" and "avoid transportation demands that cannot be met" as well as to "provide clean air by protecting the natural air sheds and reducing pollutants". The major air quality impact of any development is the emissions resulting from the traffic generated by the project. PM- 10 (83)% of which comes from traffic driving on paved roads) is a significant health concern in Aspen. The traffic generated will also produce carbon monoxide and other emissions that are health concerns. The municipal code requires developments to avoid degrading- air quality and to achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity by using all available practical methods to reduce pollution. This requires measures to minimize traffic increases of the development. or offset the emissions from the project with PM 10 reduction measures elsewhere. Standards used for all developments in the City of Aspen and Pitkin County for trips generated by new development are the trip generation rates found in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Report, latest edition and reductions from the `Pitkin County Road Standards' . Examples of mitigation measures that have been employed in past development applications include providing carpool/vanpool financial incentives to employees, providing free bus passes, providing vanpools, providing dial -a -ride service, paving for additional RFTA buses and service, providing private bus service for employees, charging for parking, limiting parking, allowing residents to pay for parking spaces if they choose and giving discounts to those who don't, having homeowners association tees on a sliding scale depending on the number of cars, providing connecting bike path links in populated areas, plowing bike paths in populated areas, paving dirt shoulders or high -use parking 'tots, providing covered and secure bike storage, providing free bike fleets for residents, building sidewalks to adjacent commercial areas, donating connecting bike path links, and other measures. Whatever combination of measures each applicant chooses to mitigate PNI-10 emissions and trips generated is acceptable as long as it prevents additional traffic that would significantly impact air quality. The City Environmental Health Department has no preference for which trip reduction measures are used, and typically an applicant chooses at least some measures that provide an ancillary benefit to the project. The traffic study provided estimates that the facility will generated up to 480 trips/day. This is much less than the trip generation predicted using the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Rate standards. Even this lower number represents a very significant 18% increase in traffic. This application does not address the issues raised in our first referral comments. The project provides increased parking for the additional trips, and envisions using overflow parking at the school campus for the greater traffic from larger events. This increase in traffic caused increases in air pollution. Private sector proiects have all been required to undertake measures to mitigate their traffic and air pollution increases. Environmental Health staff is uncertain about how to deal with this discrepancy. One minor modification that could make the plan effective would be a very small fee associated with parking at Iselin. Combinations of incentives and disincentives are thought to be necessary to effectively limit increases in trips. That would allow each user to consider whether a given [rip is better made by car or by another mode. Enforcement mi;ht be much easier with lay station dash displays as used downtown than the proposal in the application that would require staff time. To avoid penalizing park users. fees collected in this manner could be used to provide reduced fees for car-poolers. or reduced lees in general. Carpooi parking could be Tree. A condition of approval should be that the applicant implement a combination of incentives and disincentives to ensure that traffic will not significantly increase, and that traffic will be limited to parking available at Iselin. FUGITIVE BUST A fugitive dust control plan is required which includes, but is not limited to fencing, watering of haul roads and disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads (Maroon Creek Road) to remove mud that has been carried out, speed limits, or other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust from crossing the property tine or causing a nuisance. Dust control will be crucial due to the closeness of existing homes to the site. ASBESTOS Commercial - Prior to remodel, expansion or demolition of the concession stand, the state must be notified and a person licensed by the state to do asbestos inspections must do an inspection. The Building Department cannot sign any building permits until they get this report. If there is no asbestos, the demolition can proceed. If asbestos is present, a licensed asbestos removal contractor must remove it. ICE RESURFACER: The ice resurfacing machines should be limited to electric ones. to minimize air pollution in the rink facility. In the past, in both the City of Aspen rink and elsewhere in the US and Canada, very high carbon monoxide levels have been found in rinks as a result of use of gas -powered resurfacers. NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 16-1 "The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace and to :e health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and it its visitors ...... Accordingly. it is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in various areas and manners and at various times and to prohibit noise in excess of those levels." Duriniz construction, noise can not exceed maximum permissible sound level standards. and construction cannot be done except between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. This is consistent with the new amendments to the City noise ordinance and with what was required of Moore and Hines developments. It is very likely that noise �Tenerated during the construction phase of this project will have some nelTative impact on the neighborhood. The applicant should be aware of this and take measures to minimize the predicted high noise levels and notify neighbors if any loud activities are unavoidable. This includes notifying neighbors of any especially Loud portions of die construction. Durini� operation, this facility could violate the city noise ordinance if amplified speakers wereused. The operators should ensure that amplified speakers or music are not used during any of their ,.n,ents, because thev would be likely to exceed noise limits at the property line. POOLS AND SPAS :ail design, installation and maintenance must comply .vith ''Swimming Pool and tilineral Bath Reglulations. Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division. adopted Auqust i 1993 A copy can be gbtained from our office. The facility will be reviewed and approved by the City Environmental Health Department. _an hourly fee is charged to cover costs. A condition of approval should be that at least 30 days prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans and specifications complete with piping layout, equipment and mechanical specifications along with design calculations, shall be submitted for review and approval by this department. FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES A review of plans and specifications by this department is required by Section 10-401 of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Sanitation of Food Service Establishments in the State of Colorado. The Zn Department should be consulted before preparation of plans and specifications. The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District must be contacted for their recommendation on the proper size of the grease trap. The City of Aspen regulates restaurant grills and the applicant should contact this Department to be sure that if a grill is planned, that it is in compliance with City code. A condition should be approval of both plans and specifications before the building permit is approved. A minimum of two weeks is necessary for the Department to review and approve plans. Also, final approval from this Department is necessary before opening for business and prior to issuance of a Colorado Food Service License. Trash disposal facilities need to be wildlife resistant. The applicant may want to consider use of a trash compactor. The applicant should provide information about whether the snow -melting pit will be discharged into the sewer line or drywell or other method and how the snow will be melted. Use of passive or solar melting should be pursued over gas or electric snow melting. As noted before. the applicant should consult with this office once it has been decided whether Freon or ammonia -based cooling will be used. County of Pitldn } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) U50SAX77 , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (3 00) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the s"-1 day of au z , 200 l (which is 15' days prior to the public hearing date of Zoi" dX ). 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 504 day of I*„ t, 200 l , to the Z1 t day of Vjxyu.A i , 200 t . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. (Attach phol , Signature _=t9-4- Signed before me this O day of W 200_L L. by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: N GMER KID ; O OF* • r PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ISELIN PARK CONSOLIDATED CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, February 26, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen Asset Management Department requesting Conceptual/Final PUD and SPA review for the Iselin Park PUD. The property is located on Maroon Creek Road and is legally described as a tract of land located in the SW 1/4 of section 11 and the NW 1/4 of section 14, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th PM, Pitkin County, Colorado. For further information, contact Joyce Ohlson at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5062, joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Rachel E. Richards, Mayor Aspen City Council Published in the Aspen Times on February 10, 2001. City of Aspen Account PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ISELIN PARK GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM EXEMPTIONS FOR AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:3 0 p.m. before the Aspen/Pitkin County Growth Management Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen Parks and Recreation Department requesting Growth Management Quota System Exemptions for an essential public facility for the proposed recreational complex at Iselin Park. The property is legally described as a tract of land located in the SW 1/4 of section 11 and the NW 1/4 of section 14, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th PM, Pitkin County, Colorado. This tract of land is commonly referred to as "Iselin Park" and contains the "Moore Pool," and is located on the west side of Maroon Creek Road near Glen Eagle Drive. For further information, contact Joyce Ohlson at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5062, joyceoLa)ci.aspen.co.us. s/Bob Blaich & Peter Martin, Chair Aspen/Pitkin County Growth Management Commission S/City of Aspen Account Published in the Aspen Times on February 3, 2001 ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 02' JH SCHOOL RD A: CO 81611 BRADFORD DEBORAH PO BOX 4856 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER CITY OF ASPEN DAY STS 130 S GALENA ST C/O REAL ESTATE DIVISION ASPEN, CO 81611 50 E N TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 DOREMUS ANDREW J & JEANNE C 69.6968% 85 GLEN GARRY DR ASPEN, CO 81611 HOSIER GERALD D 8904 CANYON SPRINGS DR LAS VEGAS, NV 89117 MAROON CREEK CLUB MASTER ASSOCIATION 10 CLUB CIR ASPEN, CO 81611 FAMILY PUD MASTER ASSOC INC C/O KAUFMAN & PETERSON PC 315 E HYMAN #305 ASPEN, CO 81611 SLATER LAWRENCE J 1072 MAROON CRK RD ASPEN, CO 81611 FISHER JOYCE C REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT 350 ROYAL POINCIANA PLAZA STE 2C PALM BEACH, FL 33480 LOTS 7 & 8 MAROON CREEK LLC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 MCCREARY WILLIAM F & PHILLIS M 9750 AMANITA AVE TUJUNGA, CA 91042 PITKIN COUNTY 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODWARD RALPH H 105 WOODWARD LN ASPEN, CO 81611 uC E30ER MARILYN S REVOCABLE TRUST 8621 E 21 ST ST N #180 WICHITA, KS 67206 FRAMPTON GEORGE T JR C/O US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR 5105 LOWELL LN NORTH WEST WASHINGTON, DC 20016 LW DEVELOPMENT INC OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O 533 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 MOORE ALBERTA L PERS RES TRUST PO BOX 126 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 SCHENNUM EARL C JR SCHENNUM CAROL M PO BOX 867 ASPEN, CO 81612 �.. ,� ,� 'fir-0. $., ';,�'t,� ',i��,�,i�,•� �-��.�'� , ��, �". tot Al OW a-R' • z'b ��,•`, r .W y i,�y ���`PI i�'�F � 1• � �'1. a ■ f � 4� ;o �n��• L , _ 1 ■ ors • 1 �� �:f,��jl'a�. .e � � � +� a .a.: s � ��,�� � � a� � Icir '+� �. r`S• . � . r . `" :P�f + f �. r i' ��• 1 , �' �� � • q �P � r 9F�r e f'e -,� y$-'A. - ,L"+ r�•' "��� �`,i ; A'�r',� 4-.■;� 1� I� d •�� 1 � : �v.- Ma� �. t. * r� "'w,� r�j� 1,'y#•r' ,i•.+ �,r"�'• 41 , �,•'r ;,�¢+�� 7 •. rA. �yy ' s -n - A,,, f, q�i�"� p`�' 1�'�'alk t 1/' r � •� � +w r � '1�»'�' �' .1 =. y+' l' � � v +P �t�R ■ T �'di d ■ MA r'. • �• °.- y _ j �-- a+"'• op q- lie'•' -�r F -_. , ;, .... . ._,, ._... .-._.:a ...:::,: 1 �` - t •-r •a .■t /• - '�, IM •n�•tR {x � • �,,P s� . -�� �. �R� �r .•� M ■ ��1 .. .M 4`�• a■ _I 1' t _. a f' 'f„� • . „!��• " _ •.�r-� �' a •- 1� � Ir IP Ir LIN for- .�� �� �r �.- r+'-L�%�•A� rrr'• 1 1" `;F1ti' �. .D �k ,f „y. ..+�� rr..'.ay _ :� �•1 ■ / � •1.� �4 a .� � '• ■`'� ■4+ �%'7�y�r#�� �� - - ` • 1• P,. .9g o* __ Rom' _/ 7 k ■• .� a u +• y n: 0 6 •y4ti1F �• ems- Y .x TO: City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission i E FROM: Toni Kronberg Water Babies ©1978 Swimming G RE: City of Aspen Iselin Park Conceptual/Final PUD/SPA Conditional Use Applcation i DATE: February 2, 2001 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, To help facilitate you in making an educated, informed decision regarding the PUD application for the "construction of a new swimming pool", please find enclosed a letter from Counsilman and Hunsaker, detailing the decision -making process that is "standard in the industry" when building swimming pools. The City of Aspen provided the Commission with Appendix D, which stated that the City was planning on re -using the existing pool and building a new leisure pool. The City then submitted an addendum to correct the description of the pools with the statement that "new facilities" were going to be built. The City did not provide what "new facilities" were going to be built. Ed Sadler, Asset Manager, provided you with a "basic fact sheet" which contains "pertinent facts regarding the proposed Iselin Pool and Ice facility". Mr. Sadler states, "In the past there have been discussions about how the experts and other facility managers FEEL about Aspen's proposed facility. We (Mr. Sadler) asked other facility managers to review the plans and give us their thoughts". Pools should not be built on "feelings". Pools should be built after all the facts, figures and background are complied so that an educated, :knowledgeable decision can be made to create a new aquatic facility. A complete working plan complete with: • Analysis of Your Needs (feasibility study) • Analysis of Existing Projections • Market Demographics • Facility Concepts • Revenue and Expense Projections • Project Cost Estimates • Construction Cost Estimates • Sources of Funding After repeated requests by me for the information listed above, the City of Aspen pool and ice planners still have not provided any data. The City of Aspen has failed to demonstrate why this pool design has been selected. Vic Davies, pool architect, stated "he was directed" to design the concept that has been brought forward for final approval. I would like to know who "directed" the architects. Two more important questions - why and how was this current proposed pool design selected. Where is the City's feasibility study to determine what the true needs of the community are? I am working as fast as is humanly possible for me to staple and highlight the packets for you to review. I will get the packets to you as soon as the last staple is in place. Thank you for your thorough analysis of the PUD application. Our community should be building the "right kind of facility", not build a facility "just to get it done". Demanding to "build a facility just to get it done" reminds me of a little kid in the supermarket having a temper tantrum demanding that he have a piece of candy right now. When Mom tries to explain to him that the tin of skoal is not candy and that they do not have enough money to pay for it, the kid continues to have a temper tantrum Respectfully submitted, Toni Kronberg Water Babies ©1978 Swimming January 30. "001 `Is. Toni Kionberg World Link Cafz �;20 East Hvman _A,,'e Aspen, CO 81611 Dear NIs. Kronbers. tins iL:ian Hunsa�er & _associates xwaild ail`.: tc, assM ,he aquatic conlSiiitte: .n d�-ternniniliR tlie feasibili<<v of the pool :n .Aspen. `olorado. Our fee for a prcj.,_-t ,CT Lug size «ould be S30.000 plus :ravel expenses CounsilrnanH..nsaKer & s,4oe.Lites has been in the a4ua.ics ind,.lstr. fDr over K nears. Our experience has ranged front liclping &sign: rnanN• of the \N•orld's elite competition venues to providir:o consultation :ir d desigm sen ices for neighborhood schools and xn1.niuillit• aquaLIC centers across the wuntry In adJiuon. we o«n )v.r o«•n famihy swim center and so have valuable first-hwu d e xperiemce in Operating, rr."intzirirg and progam.nine these types of facilities. At Counsilrnan Hunsaker :sso,:iates. of;r engin.ers, desiTiers and recreation e.:onomics have been directl\, involved in the panning and desizi of aquatic facilities -hrougliout the nation and have participated in ���.:r one hundred fe�isibilit� studies. audits and assessmem, for new constructiolL renovation and upgrading projects, Over the Fears. \t-z hay.- been pleased to share our experl -nct� in a varict` of adv1sCr�° Cspaclti-s --ith in dustn oT aniz4 ions, includi :g the `-ation.-I SN•��imniing Pool Institute. National Parks and RaTeation �5U�13tt1Uli, National S�k inning Paul Foundation, and organizations. Jeff Ellis &..associates, tie National SafeTy Council and the American Red Cross. Our firm was selected by the U.S. tia,,ti• to develop a manual for the design of pools at military bases to be used by all branches of the arned forces. A Counsilrrian HUrnsaker Enterprise Plan is the lira step toward a dream becorning a reality. This business, plan :will provid-a the necesssr} data for the committee to make informed decisions regarding the Jacksonville .-aquatic Center project. But the Enterprise Plan is mor_ than just a business Plan, it will provide you with a complete working plan for the crea:iun of a new acluati� farilit,. including: y dj`�o • Analysis, Of roue :cads - iiirough a workshop protocol 'Nth onununln repr:sentativ s. develop a priority of ebjectivts for the utilization ofthe facility . • Faciliry Concepts - conceptual dra«vings and descriptions indicating a prototypical lFacility that -would acconnnodate the desired programming elenients Construwtion Cost Estimates - detailed itetaized site -specific cost projections `r the "bricks and mortar" of creating structures and mechanical support equipment • Project Cost Estimates - total costs in. -lading professional fees, contingencies, Jt • anal,,sis of Existing Providers, - results of researc:� to detzrnire etiistir.; iz�, zl of sefl -and percei , ed need for the proposed facility • Market Demomphics an analysis of a_g groups. population dens' incomes. and,, groups to prolcct attendlancc. fLc' schc'u:11:s and approprl a'.: prograll?1r=g • Revenue and Expensc Pry?'cCtlons — bast;d Upon the abkwc daza and anal��tica.l research, opi.niors cf financial pe:f0rT:llinCc :tee established • Sources of Funding - a discussion of possible. cp'ians to fund the fa • Design Program Analysis - based or file conceptual designs this analysis desc ni bes ill Uelter de"a it -,he constl ac-ti . zriaterials. t ecl-waques ruiE soecific equip -meat recommended for the proposed fah-.,hV• 'With the abov infor-oration at your fsiger-Ts. in r: t:ounsilman I_iwisaker Eill Plan vcu will haN-e all the facts. figures and back`rot',nd VOU need to rni:.e an e ucated. lane �t-ledgeable dzcisi.�n about the best wa%' to iiiavc f-rru'ard xitll %ou;- aq, aT' cent.r \Ve are aniquely qual* :led tc Cornplele t`Zis and .N icorr.e the opportunit; 'o do se Respectfully submitted. Ms, Linda Duerr Director of project Development To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Ed Sadler, asset Manager Subject: Iselin Complex Date: January 23, 2001 In preparation for our meeting with you on January 30, 2001, 1 wanted to provide you with some further information, which may help you during the hearing. First what we have included is a basic fact sheet that can act as an easy reference guide as opposed to having to look this information up in the application. This fact sheet contains basic information about the facility along with some information about the history of the project. Also included are some renderings of the building exterior and floor plan on easily referenced pages. Finally, in the past there have been discussions about how the experts and other facility managers feel about .aspen's proposed facility. In response to those questions. we asked other facility managers to review our plans and give us their thoughts. We have enclosed the letters that they have sent us. We expect more responses soon and will provided those to you at our meeting on the 30`n. If I can provide you any further information prior to our meeting, please don't hesitate to call me at 920-5085. 2CC1 2 : 4 C ;X FRCM: 3:.'_6 -1 ti•; rn'a. )... Sample Scope of Work For Enterprise Plan Program Phase 1. NEEDS . LNALYSIS � ( 1 trip) �. Meet with the steerrsl2 committee. plus any designated communitN• Qroups and or individuals involved in the project to analyze needs and deterniine objectives. The Consultant wiil cond:xt individual interviews as necess;;r< with, for example. local education adininistrators ard, or athletic directors. chamber of conurerce representatives, business leaders, private and public recreation providers, health professionals,. competitive swim groups, youth and seniors groups. etc.. in order w ascertain axis-ting levels of service and the perceived needs of various user groups in the community. B. ?n addition to individual meetings. The Consultant, vill participate :n a public or by -invitation civic meeting -o discuss the various issues conc,-rning the proposed facility This dlscucslon will iiclude slide and.'or video presentations and conunattary on features of other aquatic :.enters similar to that being considered for this project. background inf nation on historic and contemporary issues in the industry, and an open -forum question -and - answer session to discuss concerns and needs of those individuals and goups auendLng the nieeLillg A matrix of programming priorities will be preserved and discussed to prioritize progranuning and facility features. The Consultant evil? use the results of the interviews and public workshop in deternu tong needs. C. Resear,:h and compile demographic information necessar; to appropriatel, evaluate the proposed facility, including population, age distribution. income, weather analyst: and economic considerations that could affect the project-s viability. D Prepare and submit aii outline of a Design Program for the proposed aquatic center describing pool size and shape options, based on preliminary disc assions and meetings noted above. Page 1 E. Based on the first meeting and committee's r:vieu, of the outline program. develop a Design Program Analysis (DPA) with recommendations on the size and shape of the pool(s) as well as architectural and engineering features of the building and support spaces. The DPA will address the following iteins; I. Pool (or pools) design; size, depth, conf guration, water features. etc. 2. User populations and programq to be supported I Lighting 4. Pool markings 5. Traffic Patterns 6. Deck Egtiimneiit 7. Undztu ater features 8. Mechanical features. filter 3vstem options, «eater treatment and automatic water treatment control 9. Spectator facilities 1 Q Dressing room features and user spaces 11. Support spaces and features 12. Architectural materials and finishes. (Outline Specification for building and pool(s)). i�. Provide recommendations on the general mechanical sv:stim for znvironmzntal control. including dehumidification, lighting and other building systems required by the buildine to 'Z�rpport general and specialized activities in differ %nt vet and dn, areas. 2• COCEPTt'.AI. PL.4� ; I trip) �• 3ased on the agreed upon program. the Consultant Uvill prepare three conceptual concepts. T�picall�• these concepts consist of a '` A.ish list'', preferred and minimum acceptable Tho first concept provides areas of programming without taking into accou:it budget consideratons Ilse preferred facility .uppers the design program with costs to meet the proposed budget. ".be minimum 3c:ceptable concept is a facility that will be considered if the pro :ect experiences limited funding. r B. The Consultant will provide a conceptual plan of the buildings, The purpose of •the plans will be ty illustrate ways to organize the spaces in a functional ar-mnrsemznt and to cunlirm that the building footprint xkill contain the areas proposed in the Design Program. Consultant will met a second time with the committee to partici atc in a design workshop. Preliminary concepts and p �' program features will be reviewed and confirmed "L public meeting may or may not be held as a part of this i isit. Page 2 Ty'•- D. Following the meeting, the Consultant will make revisions to the plans. if necessarv. and mail it to the Committee. 3. COST k\� ALYSIS: (1 Lnp;, A. The Consultant will prepare an Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the pool(s) and buildings. Recent Project bid figures of entire proja is will be used as well as national estimating guides and local cost adjustment factors. The "hard construction cost" figures will be supplemented by a development cost, which will include such "soft" costs as professional fees. survey. site work, utilities, geotechnical report, document reproduction, advertis,:cnerrt for bids and all anticipated expenses related to the project. The sum of these two cost figures will be the total project cost so that the project oommittee will have a comprehensive overview before malting an informeA cLacision -about the project. B. The Ccgasultant will prepare an Enterprise Plait developing an opinion of operati: ins o7 the proposed projec*. The followfiig. will be researched and anal` zcd: 1, area aquatic Providers 2. Market area Demographics Population, age. Inc-ome ;. Area aquatic User Groups Historic I- sage and Protect Level of GrC Svth -l. _-acility Management Outline Facility Operating Schedule Facility Capacity Limits Organization Chart Job Descriptions Wage Structure Marketing Program 5. Opinion of Probable Revenu-6 Market Penetration Seasonal usage ' Develop Fee Structtur: Opinion of attendance LIN, L ser Group Opinion of Revenue 6. Opinion of Probable Expenses Labor Demand Chemical Demand Operating Supplies Utility Demand Opinion of Facility FhiaiiCial Performance S, analysis of Sources of Funding T. 1. age 3 12"I"OL! 2:41- PN The Consultant will make a fuiall presentation to the project co=ItTee outlining the methods and results of th%: saidv. f Page 4 11 17 rf '. is .� r •• , - • 3{j.l 51 Mv.. � T -- ii-Vt 5 ri ii(�.(/,yyrn�.�y �' � � 'r uh �yf. r"'-n '� rr . Yr,�r :.l 14t4.�,s 'h U. .t t. �i f; •t tCi�-?� w�.�T rl -.t ).7��_ M.y ' 7 I � ..i..'\.Ri(iw..i_ 5'�t !i 1'�` .. �t►4 _�V. � .r �., 1i-�.r+rr� rt � �C i��4rr rG':�� �T \t.r ' .� •b"',�.w«Alf ..��.tw.�.��.+ +.. 1 l• .. � •7 r 7 rig '.,�•` �. i4 •r. r a'� r aS�i.:� y i� -.�- .) THE PROJECT As ?an of the overall Master Plam'ior Iselin Park., we will -Lndude sport's fields, a proposed ice facility, an L-idoor pool area jel-sure akno- with irus-�ctional and compet'It-ve) and oti-ier land area0 1 improvements. T fa The goal is to prog-rra m- and design. a " cility that meets the needs o.' 0 1 Aspen residants, is affordable ,'bo!±L in com tnic tion costs and operations) and leas a visual appeal teat compliments =-er.ts the lm'aro'on areek VaUey. the proposed faciLtv is a iesult of M*teractonx�ion,:- the staZ, consultants and co=unity groups to determine -needs and programuxdngC? - current and .future. Through these efforts �7e are sug,,ges tLng a facillity or appToxixnat-_I-v 22,C)00to 23,000 SF total, -A,h--ch will -IrIclude a jcLnt use of the entrance and concession between the Ice/Hccke-tr far �lity and the Aquatic facillit,7. The new proposed Aquatic pornon of the faciht7; could be comprised of a 12,000 SF aquatic area, a 1,300 _'- )F pool -mechanical space and 9,000 SF of support area (to include cha.-Licre areas, administration and control.). -Preliminary design could have: a "3410 SF Leisure Pool with a zero depth entry; an S0-100 13 Body Water Slide; a C=enL Channel; a Bubble Bemch seating area; and an interactive fun Water Toy Activity area; aJ'-',l-;O Sr' Six Lane, 25 Yard Lap Pool (wi-th adjacent bleachers) for competition and FAerdse, and a 104 SF Raised tiVhylpocjl' Asper, Cabmco - ODerational Analysis 1 may - Z 1qg6 r. (14.) fiat U ')-J T \J'I T V it (Z 0 0 1 1 60 it'? 0 f"! I r. , CI f-I O.^. OT (Itl The facilitt• could be unique in the area for it's size anc the J.. combinat-ion of Lei6ure, Competitive and. L9structonal aspects_ The ATuati.c-s could have dec_k yeas, �xeating an open._, spacious feel to a wonderful e-vLri7ri,� er,t. Th�� diverse deli -� of the aruat?c ast a -ould a:!Iow for a -wide v ariety of P.ciEa iOlicil,.Instr. -'t102Zd1 ei21Q le�''apE : c T �'o, a 1L' u7:0 opportc:nities_ Tlvs could also enable the Aspen Recreation Depa tment sty to prograrn &,e uc LIt v in the most cost effective wa ;r to meet the chans.incr needs of the res;dent3 of Aspen C. eative sdied Lng c,,,xiid allow; for to 4atest use for depaxtme_nt proop-rams as well as rentals grid special uses. Lrgjetted Attendauce/Revenues/Epenses Attempting tc, predict attenda-i.ce at the tree Of facility can be a chaUiem inv task. There aze a -mm. er of factors and conditions to he COP,�Sidered �ti'r1iCL1 ma either positiveiv or negatlTdslV impact ti e proierted at�,endance. The level of customer service, atmos-Dh"Irre, 1 scheduling, sc�nool fie.rms ax;d ma.rkeiincr a'l contribute to the al =d ate a:.►mmal attendance_ Wher, projecting the attendance of a smcti�� outdoor iaci it✓�, �r4Te have gatbtered much data over he years hn all climates and demographic/ economic conlitiors. Ale have been able to predict attendance w-,&, a degree of accuracy. O r approach is always one of conser 7ative estimates. 'the projections for a conventional indoor pool_ or a combina-don oT exe nse/ie- sure pool attic -tech 1. a f*a;I cornmzxr�ity center alse has some historical data -base to draw from, thcuvh not as reliable as the outdoor data. we eve on hand. Aspen. Q-xaraaa v Cpera6ora! Aimiysis 2 May 12, r 998 In Lhe case of -the James E. Moore Foot, based on a proposed I ocaticl-L and nature design, it is o-= opinion to 1.ise a combination of our -a, as well so historica inio. at -ion outdoor aquatic facility data, as me we have gathered �-rorn. other ,:Iients -T,,iho operate successfizi Iac:i ties. or the purposes of this report, we wifl estimate both alow and a -�igla attendance, �bc- =e, as well as both low and 1-dgh levenue Egnixes, as a -�- Plarzdn0a ool for the ,;t,,-+'f of the Asven Reizeanon Departnent. Cur - - esdmates are conservative and intended to be used as a PlawtirZ Tool. 71iey ---nay be adjusted to batter reEect&.e Det)artznent's I approach to schedules, fees, local recluiTea-ients and a fines ll plan. Wehav- -uthzed sales TZMa :,eS and pTojected Cperations Schedule as by the stiff of the Aspen Recreation Department. No full time salaries of permanent staff (i.e. Director) o--- portions thereon, were for these calcuiatioris. 77-tey are provided me -rely as a planning tool for'fhe .5rst year of operation. Inpreparino g the Financial Pro Forma fox ,:. - the T fool, L Lo .,,ame-c E. Moore o I., the Ci"r of .Aspen may want to consider the creation of ar. Ann-ua-I d improvements ProgTairt and/oT a -Rate -Stabilization Hand. These have proven very successful in other communities in keepLncy a facili- i in 0100d condition and adding both entext;L=ent and amenities as the facility ages. Rate Stab= -I' adon Funds ha7e�een created to anritially fund against raises in fees, especially for resident members. AsPen, Colorado - Cpefatianaj Apaly-sis 3 May 12. 1.996 A=''N-DANCE P: gTZQINS Utilizing the demo graphic Cdata availa pie ,^, :ih a i0 nine Radius of the tacil-ity, inc?ud�no- he om --:-rats of :�C':O�v1'"'. ass VdliaL 'c�`Iere is an estated tat.-1 pop a?ati ox; o,i�0 to 4,0u0_ used or, a propose d Recreatior. Department sched l'e; we are usinc 340, days cl open =e (which excludes holidays and maintenance 'i -Le assumption is also that attendance ,v� be �'Ig, -' �z fox; Septezriyer o T-1-ul due to the climate. t . s popntanr s,�D� •J� .::Arran' W p1�Q���.�•lYrt+wzwaw::� � '` t �i'etii EXPENSE PRO CTIOM The folHowing Personnel and Operating Expense Prc ecrions are offered for planning pu poses for the fames E. Tdfoc-,re Fool, Both a Low and High estimate are offexed for y o-U - consideration. Ti Lese estimates are based on dn.e far T �--ne Salar,- Rates a^d Proposed Cperaii_n.g Schedule tprosided by =.ne Asnen Recreation- Departm. ent staff. These rates can later be adj-ljstec to bettermeet he Hnan ia.l goa15 of the department End to gjuaiih-caclo-rs a.r.Ci ion gevJ.�� of he Aspen, Cdaradc - Operational kilij! s:s 'day 92, ^,993 employees. '-(ATE: Some opera-dorial expenses are di-sic.-etionan, and under the totem cony ol oy Lhe owner. la, ISO PA Mana.gernent/'Savervision Offic e /C-ashiers Maintenance/ Speciai aosliLLT WSI/Instrucors Lifeg,aard.q Bene�ats (I0.5%) Ave-. acre Average $1315,000 i-L 1139 0 Note: Those --GsLs are calmlated I.-M, 5Zw6eks er year 7 p'ay v Pe week Holidays YS 352 da'' 6 days 346 days Maintenance 6 days 340 days Nl-.F: 340 days per dear �� 14 'Itiouls per day --mmm 14.760 hoUX-S -per gear Sat/'SurL 7/8 days per year ? 7 hours per day 5116 ".ours -Sept To Mai 1 Sat/Sun: 21' days per year � 10 hours per day 270 hoizs - june to May Part Time Rat -es Asst Maina�E/ Sup, er,-iso- $14.00/ hr. -Head Laleguaid I "!I instructors $12.00/ hr- I Lffegruards No ite: 1. 0 =UIZ -'17tze $tZL-ne5 or cerzeils are comFute,:--7 hel-e, 2. ,Aspen, C-clorado - C2 1 7 &l.yr.V S MaY 12, "'393 '002 K",31 33lYm m3! _RR (Imia HC : Rol 913,, s'T,'90 PROBABLE OPEMATLVG SENSES Shirts i LiieEjiarcl 1-7,nifornis (S4l1 -4a.al) .l,A.r'�,� tj ((++�� t�(' /� I .J%,J0C) i & TTainin Low I -Bah 11 _Tzavel Memberslu2s Training &z Safety A-udits Travel �;leedr 's i L(Sub-'o a) ( (�,,,�Oo ( S2,000 Lonu_unications/Electronics Low Pager i Cellular t i Telecon==cations I �LSub-total) Prhptingedia/AdveTdsin Low ! High , F! rers Punt; Ads _ Postage I �' i COP,, Services i�Aisce?l3neatis I Office SuPRIies Law tic Office Su pl ies- S. D, Cards/ supplies i Cornuter/Cush register service ! sun-rotall # s3,�a� ►6,coc� RtkaaA Maintenance , Low Hi. gh Tesdr_g services I VAC/I`yfacnanical_ sen�ces i Pool Chemicals �— _Main e-nan ce & Repair 1 i nitonal Su-v?lies ( ' (S15,000) -?,000 I Asp9n, ;,cIcrado - OperatTonal .4,7alrsrs 6 '✓,ay ; 2, , gga i Equipment_& Sup- hes Low 1 _Special e-7ents/seasond-I First A-Ril;" CPRsunohes' Program s,.ipphes Raci�aztiOTI S-UVPLieZ- 511 500 Utihties Gas & E-lectric Low Watar-Sewer (ass=e stable 0-(--It-v ,..ub-&L-O'Lal) Total Prn-ecfed OperavnExvimse N S105,000 Note: lrszirvnc--, carftaZ OT i,, -R-..ate Stabilizall"lor, Tund is 7xt1ac."u�Lod in th1'f, call cul EXPENSE PROFa-CTTQNS RECA CA P 1 1 -% Projected Slaiahes & 'Nagel.; 51,11 0000 S167,0190 Picojected Ope-ratini5e ----T, S105,000 1 S138,00D L Ota I expense pro 'ectiens S240000 $305,000 REVENUE PROTECTIONS The fol-lo-wing Revenue Projector-s a-T-- oz'rre:-ed ior plann0 inc- purposes lor the Acuatic porrimn c.- the 1 ames 2- Moore Pool. Both a Low and High e-s�nate are offered for-,-ou-r consideration. 'Priese es-I'l mates are based on the P posedgeesand (L:=,ores provided by th', staff of the -).cf,e can Inter be adjusted red to Metier Aspen Recreation Depa7tmem. T L j as meet he finan.cial and saedudnc, needs kof the Department. 7 May 1-9, "996 Daily Use Fee. Average of users per day ?.,� Inf ar. t3s.. u ee with aid Addle) Ldw S15 , p_Jumber of days per year 340 3 1_0 Average fee $3.00 1 J3.00 w56,100) ( SS6,700 Adult Annual Pass ; - Love Dumber oz vatTons 140 210 Average fee s-)00.00 Ti 1 S300,00 , l iSuLz- o�a1 ($4-2,000) t $63,000 ;r Fami1v Annual Vass Lour NI1,xuiber of patrons � 70 � ? 11 Ave.Tac-e fee $500.00 S50Q.co 1 (Sub -total) ( S-.3 000 SwYg. Instruction I Low Dish j .1-1.0 week Sessions Masses per session ' 110 CasseS per year 200 20C i Students Soo n $20.00 ; 1,S00 $2-0.00 Sub -total) ($16,000) i (S30,000 Private Lessons Low HYcrh Ho-u s per week 101 1 NTumbe_.r of weeks 40 40 I Total llouls -_00 600 Average fee I -' r $13.�® rh . 13.5G Sub--+ot3l ) ` S5 �Gt� ( 00 „ �,1 Fool Rentals Low i High lRentaLs per monfh 1 2 -Months per year 12 j . 12 `. Average fee 1 8200.00 1 S200.00 (Sub -total) ( $2,400 LS4,800� Food/Mc chandise Low ( Hish , S10/000 ($15,000 ) I Projected Revenue Total j � 9_Qa L 260,190 Aspe.^, ^�,Icradc • nperadonal Analysis fITn,'_)�h 9.'):T A'gTF1i (hRA /QR n7.E"t7 TP:Ri1 CiII"f.T,1-*0 REV ENUE PROTECT IONS Projected Revenue i S1.66,900 S760"100 Probable Fxpenses 11 5240,000 05" 000 PrOio-ctr-hd Su lus f5,z Q aQ 2 Uc)3 .eco me 17, <544,900> So- 110 Recnvc-ry Future Projectious e� C4- The ZI-1. year operation of arLy facdity lends itself to Eex-iffi-dity and change. As you become more fan-dLa--r I/Vith tthe physical,-Q plant, maintenance and janitoria-1 --needs., yo-a way need to adjust projections to reflect the actual fit;. es. -As the pat arras of lise and beha-vior of the guests become more realistic this ivi]i facilitate adjustmentr, to the operations schedule, staffing and fundiag needs. The City af,-%'Spen LS going through avery exciting process- It would surely be a success intneeting the present and futlixe aquatic needs of all of the residents of the area In addition to the i=ediate rewards Of &1e improved health and spinitual lives ojyo U1: Yesidents, fact litiess such as this serve as an incentive fc�r new residents and businesses. Communilies that invest in thei-r -iamilies, SU61 as Aspen, receive a gr eat return on f1iis invest=ent: A healthy economy, a healthy ?opulation and -a healthy outlook 1-for the coir=mziitv asia whole. a Aspen, Colorado - Operational Analysis 9 May !2, !�q8 T-LO2 H.D31 831Y.�% 666-' -1fi9 06Q :r, 30 ST 11 LT '30 JAMES E. NiOORE POOL Aspen, Colorado Preliminary Conceptual Desigi Water Technology, Inc. P.O. Box 614 W9684 Beaverland Pkwy Beaver Dam, WI 53916 (414) 887-7375 (414) 887-7999 FAX POOL 110 ORE R D R "'-'ON(- CPT f TA T V U J f-'A'-' LUTNA Y I-, G E T 2-17-96 t -7 Cy. TI .4 0 b-A T,"CS ki �, Z-Xvo DeptIR entry -entry -Leisure Pool 90 SF 0() /100 S01-00,000 ),5 SF 5400.000 25in Lai) Pool -.,6-.) 0,0 o 0 Water Features A. 11.11 c- 1 w <* i I i c � ---! �w -1 7 IN -1 U Tower 1,+ 1000 Wl ter 1 -15 T,F --.11 i � G 4,Rr4 flu 3 1, r 1 I iN ir jr'lk 3 t"A c) If I,, t 0 cl 0 S1 8- ,00 0 SF ,)0 75 SF r.-jocker I-Rowns Odier SupportSpaces5,435 SSF$,"62,000 'b - `4610N U TOT.,41r. 3'JIDING 5119171)60 52,7771000 r,,7T -100, OAJ) 1p SITE DEP L.l,0PIIE,,',VT 'slot) J1 U A Buildin a .� 1 Devetwpment ? d Ir 'ColysT. COST) P-;ol S " ?, 0 0 0 S1,917.000 $100,000 S2,77 71000 S 10 c-, o 0 0 LAH I I F Niff"El"N' 17 ip ..l-UAN"l'jTY Contincre Architectural/ Encrineerino Fees Reimburs-iibles F. F. & E. j.- C 0VT L , INGElyr y AI.E FEE.� ES'lrYAL4.7Y-'D 0 TFNER'S E XPENSES fl'wring, Surve'vs Geotechnical, etc...) TOTAL COST '!mn?s E. Mnorp Pool ASID6H. Colorado 0 P ril 0 N I It. -0 N 2" ""O';-'T 1'— -1 COST F 7 '100 $405'. 0 0 0 )2 S 2 1 Ind, 0 0. f%%; 00 0. 0 o cj J $3 0 0 0 70,000 3. 000 S' 60 000 $50,000 s5o000 $3,3 6 5. (1, u- 0 54,847,000 :'2-13-96 Pagt? 2 rml wwllmvm I IL P d V I Lftb s i MANNA 4 C�II.p VM � I `1 r No.1 -, ,�,In� C O N C U P T U A L ORBIGN OPTION 1 WATER °"usm Im JAMES E. MOORE POOL CUMTECHAVLOGY, IW. A S P E N, C O L O R ADO AgaatIa ••"•••" add I a q I 0 a p I E "Maw 4b moomm CONCUPTUAL ONSION OPTION I No SCAU ONOM WATER OEC JAME3 E. M O O R E POOL CEMTECHP*VLOGY, INC 4vatte ato 4*1246 A 3 P E N C 0 L 0 R A D 0 AAMwdw lool4m Omat# 11 6 IN *Cmow SmodL A 14 IIL5 ., ^+ s CONCRPTUdAL. O3•ION OPTION 11 JAMES E. MOORE POOL TECHWX(GY, INC C13M241660 A S P E N. C 0 L 0 R A D 0 ►490114 o6orfoors 1ANW06A1a 7, LL !r lK ©�® WATER M 41 JAMES E. MOORE POOL 0- TECHNOLOGY RENOVATION ASPEN, COLORADO C 0 N C E P T U A L P.O. Sax 6u Beaver Dam Wiq-,Mnwn !a916 VO!cc; 414-867-7.3M Water r"echnology, Inc. Aquedc Doog»errs and E,7gjn&,&m 9eev�- t7am, tM • ,4UMM C4 • Ced&- Rapids. JA - Lang Beach. CA r E H331 H31', m 6RKL. ! Sr ()7! ;a(I:FT QR:n7.Crl P.O.gmmpgwv S6x 5 34 303vw aartt V a=rt-n 52MG Fj I VOICE, cto-8V-=j->a FAX- 4V-A -%ses Water Technology, Inc_ Acuadc Designers and Fnovers Beover dam. klil • Adana aA • Cedar F�pry /A • Larg Beach. GA lip =D 4 T1,117T \T/'7TL'.. .3, t2lC I 10Cj Il'!O#,% #2 t'1' 1,T no ei v e,./,. Lim I -MZ- -62 �� I - M � 4") (", Z H.'Al MvAi 60: tT 9 6 k I n 0 , 0 _ 0 qr 1�CZ ,&DMIJ-4 p, LSISu€F—: ;1} ac�C;~55l arS'r I --� I b i p a� �-AgCRA.,JIeAL 4 �U �n t Cnn M1, T3laT V4TVAA aau� ;00 rl^'RO (IT :fT RRitl'.'i�(1 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council Thru: Amy Margerum, City Manager Thru: Tim Anderson, Director Recreation Agency From: George Pucak, Mgr. AIG Date: June 23, 1998 Subject: Discussion - Operation of Two Ice Skating Facilities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The City may be offered an additional ice arena, funded by private donors, to be located on the Iselin "Campus" site. This offer would provide the City with a great deal of flexibility and versatility in terms of both ice and recreational opportunities that it could offer. The present Ice Garden could function as a facility that handled increased ice usage demands in the winter season and dry floor events in the summer. Staff recommends that Council look into the possibility of acquiring a second arena in light of the potential benefit to the community. CURRENT ISSUES: When discussing the possibility of two skating facilities the question that comes first to mind is one of need. There is currently a definite need for additional ice during the winter season. This need for ice is further qualified by the requirement that the ice surface be full sized. Studio sheets like the Silver Circle do not do a lot to alleviate the demand for ice. Currently, young hockey and figure skaters are often forced into late night or very early morning ice times because of the demand for ice. Families are often faced with long commutes, on icy winter roads, in order to get their aspiring young Olympic hopefuls to the to their ice slots. The retention the Ice Garden for winter skating activities would greatly reduce this late night/early morning need for ice. - As the winter season ends so does the need for additional ice. This would allow for the reprogramming of the Ice Garden to handle dry floor events and activities. Some suggested uses for the facility are for: a skateboard park, in -line hockey & skating sheet, or as an indoor soccer facility. Non -athletic dry floor events might involve usage's by the Food & Wine Classic, IDCA, farmer's market, trade shows or a bazaar. By retaining the Ice Garden the City would greatly increase its flexibility in both usage and programming allowing it to address a greater range of community needs. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: For financial implications please refer to Attachment "A," a simple Operational Performa, that includes assumptions from which financial projections were made. The proforma shows that the City might face an additional subsidy of $50,000 dollars if it chooses to operate two facilities. The Ice Garden has always had about a 100,000 dollar subsidy from the City that it was directed to pass on to the facility users in reduced fees. These subsidies might well be negated if the facilities *can be effectively marketed especially, in the areas of special events, tournaments, competitions, shows, hockey games,etc., but staff did not want to be too optimistic in the projection of revenues. It should also be noted that in the 2003/04 time frame the Ice Garden will face a major decision relative to AMP capital monies needed for facility maintenance. At that point the City, with several years of operational information available, should be able to decide to either keep the facility in operation or allow it to be used. for other purposes e.g. employee housing,dry floor events,etc.. A clearer idea of community need for ice should also be known by then. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council pursue the idea of a new ice sheet at the Iselin Complex and the retention of the Ice Garden. This will allow for the future growth of skating in the community, provide families with more user friendly ice times and provide a facility for non ice related community activities. CITY MANAGERS COMMENTS: Attachment 'A' Operational Performa - Two Ice Sheets Assumptions: • Capital costs of a new arena at the Iselin Complex site would be covered by private donation. • The new arena would be a year round operation and the Ice Garden would operate with 6 months / ice and 6 months / dry floor events. • The ice rental rates at the new arena would be set so as to provide an operational "break ever" for the facility. (Initially estimated to be $ 130-135/hr.) • The new arena will have at least 1200 seats, be somewhat multi use and have new revenue centers e:g., pro -shop, snack bar, laundry and locker storage facilities. • The Ice Garden would retain its City subsidy and allocated AMP monies. • The new arena would be allowed a $ 50,000 operations subsidy - if it is necessary. New Facility Yearly Operating Expense Labor $ 315,000 Goods & Svcs 185 000 $500,000 Ice Garden Yearly Operating Expense Labor $ 105,000 Goods & Svcs$ 90,000 $ 195, 000 Current - Ice Garden (98) Yearly Operating Expense Labor $ 252,291 Goods&Svcs $ 167,750 $ 420, 041 Financial Projections Projected Revenue Ice Rentals $ 125,000 Programs $ 80,000 Pro Shop $ 25,000 Snack Bar $ 45,000 Special Events$ 50,000 Schools $ 125,000 $ 450,000 Subsidy ($50,000) Projected Revenue Ice Rentals $ 75,000 Dry Floor $ 20,000 Special Events$ 5,000 $ 95,000 Subsidy ($ 100,000) Total Subsidy ($ 150,000) Projected Revenue Ice Rentals $ 138,150 Programs $ 82,350 Pro Shop $ 11,000 Special Events$ 10,000 Schools $ 112,000 $ 353,500 Subsidy ($ 66,541) Shared Parking + Avoids unnecessary capital and maintenance costs Avoids unnecessary consumption of space & landscape (125 cars = 1 acre) + Avoids increase in impervious area and storm drainage Achieves consistency with overall Aspen transportation program Requires more management than traditional supply -based approaches /���� �� Charlier Associates, Inc. 6X44 115T--4 1 Management: Fall —Weekday Evening *A.void scheduling soccer &volleyball tourneys on same night as theatre production (schools) Encourage transit &carpooling (schools) Provide shuttles from remote parking Permit some overflow use of Iselin/Rotary Park by event staff, actors, officials, etc. (Iselin/Rotary Park) /����� Charl3er Associates, Inc. Fall — ................................... I......................... Weekend Day Special Events: Women's Soccer, Ruggerfest 900. 800- Combined = 655* School = 425 398 Iselin = 120 89 * Includes Tieback Charher Assocates, Inc. loco goo 600 soo 487 aoo 300 200 0 Lsel'm Dertend MootdSchool Dermnd Combcned Dermnd 3 �:'.a ., a. xe�:'.�'"1Y.d/�"' fi:K�:�-^%�.',�§�i�.�rrb.�=dtF.�.'Yn.:R.�..v§�✓.m�mw.usLi'&r�� �k.'.'�,`"i�r�.�. i''i•' Winter — Weekend Day . ... ..... ..... . ... ... Special Events: Ice Hockey Tourney, Ski Club, HS Basketball Tourney 800 Winter — Weekend Evening ............................ ............................... _ Special Events: Ice Skating Show, Theatre Production 900- Combined = 655* School = 425 Iselin = 120 * Includes Tieback �✓'r� % � Charlier Associates, Inc. 200 �J Spring — Weekend Day ...- .......... Special Events: Soccer Tourney, HS Basketball Tourney Combined = 655* School = 425 Iselin = 120 1000 800 700 600 500 400 300 397 200 308 RAJ 89 0 Iselin Denand Moom/School Demand Coirbmed Demand *Includes Tieback �/�'% � Char6er Assodates, Inc. Spring .......................................... ................. — Weekend Evening Special Events: Theatre Production 900 Sao Management: Summer —Weekday Evening Encourage transit &carpooling to achieve 14%reduction in cars (Iselin/Rotary Park) 'Encourage some use of Tiehack parking (Iselin/Rotary Park) Provide shuttles from remote parking for theatre productions (schools) �/'i��% � Chattier Assocates, Inc. Summer — Weekend Day .y, Special Events: Swim Meet, Triathalon, Softball Tourney, Soccer Tourney Combined School Iselin * Includes Tiehack Charlier Associates, Inc. WE Summary • Most overflow situations are easily avoided by coordinating to prevent overlapping events • Certain events will require shuttles/remote parking (big swim meets and ice events) • Modest reductions in single -occupant vehicle arrivals are more than enough to manage routine situations • Enforcement of "no parking" on streets will be required (with or without overflow demand) • Active program of outreach for education & information will be needed • City should monitor, report and check in with neighborhood periodically r///�'% � Charier Associates, Inc. 11 Rising Sun Enterprises, Inc. Lighting Design ♦ Consultation ♦ Fixtures ♦ Controls ISELIN "SITE" LIGHTING CONCERNS ORIENTATION How do you get there from here? SAFETY - Cars, steps, icy paths, bears???? AMBIANCE "Warm and Cozy" LIGHT POLLUTION "Sky glow" LIGHT THE SPAS S Offending light beyond the property line EXTERIOR LIGHTING Site and building lighting Cutoff and shielded sources Low Intensity INTERIOR LIGHTING Patterns of lightness against darkness Limit diffuse sources Limit ceiling and wall luminances LIGHTING EVIENSITY Higher by day Lower by night COLOR QUALITY "Warm"' V� 40 Sunset Drive #1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 (970) 927-8051/3635 (fax) sardo@rselight.com www.rselight.com L tl 0 l-D, 94 19:00 970-920-7479 February 2, 2001 ASFEN RECREAT i:9N kSPEN MIDDLE SCHOOL Dear Planning and Zoning Committee: PIAf.3E el I'll The Aspen Middle School Physical Education Depa iment is supported by the City of Aspen's swim program. Since we, the physical education teachers, have been involved with the program we have taken our fifth through sevenU grade students to the pool for organized swim instruction once a month throughout the school year. The instruction provided by the pool staff educates the students on propel• swim tecluliques whiincl�.:l�= stroke technique, water safety, physical fitness, and endurance exezcisas. Tx e pool staff also offers a Pre -Life Saving Class for the eighth grade students. The students pay a fee for the school year than coz�?rs th�� ,,ost of the i:�SiT`_;%}ioli. TI1C, 3ysIC of the facility is a shared agreement between :he City of .41s.pen's PecreaL oj1 Department and the Aspen Middle School. W-_ have had a positive relationship with the pool staffand to k forward to the continuation of the swim program after the comp letic�r �jf the �v facilltl�. For your information, Toni Kronberg does not rep:?sert he Aspen Middef, School Physical Education Department. Sincerely, �u"W rl Bente D•• . Griff Smith, Principal Telephone (970) 925-3760 F Russell Loucks a/41 jb rT # 6 0235 High School Rd e-rail: griff4csn.org Asper, L0 8-1611 Facsimile (970) 925-8374 Feb-02-01 11:14A r i i -- }. _��`�■ � � � _ � -�R ter, . �� r� 7 o Vie..... - Design: Bysted bleed. Care must be 'designer: Peter Bysted taken to install the "Bysted" in concrete decifications. A cylin- installations within a -ical shaped bollard drainage pit or, in grass. .Vvith Haired louver "Bysted" is perfect for reflector shades fabri- municipal installations cated from untreated or in areas with highly heavy gauge "Corten corrosive atmospheres. Steel". It is recommended for "Corten Steel" contains use in high vandalism copper and cast iron locations due to its with graphite. The inner rugged construction and surface of the louver virtually vandal resistant shades are finished in a hardware. weather resistant Matte White Enamel for reflec- Colors: Natural tivitY untreated Corten Steel The lamp chamber is Mounting: On a concrete sealed against the foundation, with anchor elements by use of a bolts. polycarbonate enclo- sure, fully gasketed. Electrical: Provided After weathering a thin standard with indoor, layer of uniform rust red outdoor Type I Dual Volt oxidation self protects 120/277 volt CWA ther- many protected F-Can the underlying steel. This Layer of "Rust", in style ballasts for contrast to normal steel, Mercury Vapor, Metal Halide and High Pres- provides a protective function considerably sure Sodium. Maximum reducing the rate of HPS ballast to lamp distance IS 15 feet, "-OITOStOn thus ellmina- .g the need for main - fining the surface Voltages: Mercury Vapor _rmanently. Postline CWA style f'he process of oxidation ballasts are provided causes the surface to upon request, available in 120/208/240/277 volts. High Pressure Sodium 120 volts only. Maximum HPS ballast to (amp distance is 10 feet for 35-70 watt and 5 feet for 100 watt lamps. Refer to National (NEC) and local electrical codes for proper mount- ing height']imitations. Label: UL/CSA Wet Location Lamp Data: For use with Coated or IF lamps. Lamp Holder: Medium Base Pulse Rated Catalog Overall Number Diameter Height BYS•002-100MV-120 11" 45" BYS-003-100MH-120 11" _ 45" BYS-007- 100HP- 120 1 1" 45" BYS-0'08-1001N-120(A21) 11„ Also available with 55" OR Specify Suffix (55" OH). 45" Adlikessed wall luminaires - stainless steel Wed for low mounting heights for the of vleps, stairs aisles and (Jthcr locations indcors, and outcloors where guidance and security light -rig is required, Housing: Constructed of die cast and extruded aluminum .vith intt.gral ^raring compartment Mounting tabs pr-..,vided Enclosure: Ail stainless steel faceplate ` thick 'h; thick Ierupered glass: c'ear with white I'anslucent ceramic coating (repent: clear, elched (hehino !ouvers). Facep,ate is secureri by trvcj (2i !sat soc,�F-t hears staii,.ess steel, captive screws lh:read.,:a into stainless slE;el inserts, r: the hous.ng casting C, nl r LIOLIS h-g`i :(-,mperalure U-ring -jacket for weather tight operation. Electrical: Lampholder G)3 i�L'S1i l�,�Jl"'r^Ji. ta;t _3 (1:31N). F•GGV Ba'last P•A: genic. 11PF avti fahie rn 120V or ;? 7�I Cf}cYc'iiy r11,0110h Wiring. Maximum of ir;.ir 1,4) No 12 AV%I(j conductor-, ilpi is ground) suitable for 7b C Tvvc provided for cond.r,t Finish: #4, light satin slairless steel S'a nle;,s steel retarrrr:=ti regular cleaning ano main-en.ance. mucf", like: household appl:anc=.s. to tY"flirlt sir. W.; luster and to prevent tamislwiq or the appear. -vice : if FLISI hk : titMIIIS U.L.:'sled. suitable for vet loca?ions vie, for in,,Iallatuuw i1hin 3 tect (if grot.no Suitab'e for all types of cemstruct;f7i`i inc•t:d inq pt-;ttrc-d cans~retry Recessed luminaires vmVi stainless steel faceplate voth ntegral louvers and etCttt d tempered giass ciifluser�, Finish #4 sat n sta unless steel Lamp Lumen 2046P Recessed M 1 5W PL 250 2047P Recessed I 1 7l9W PL 400.600 A B C 3 7 :'. 4 3'`. 10.- 4 16 BEGA 7�z, Iwo W&I r i t j N , 7 1 { f i I i f THE CRY OF ASPEN LIN�ING �0MIONANC MEETING DATE: 2/6/01 (continued from 01/02/01 & 1/30/01) NAME OF PROJECT: ISELIN PARK CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PUD/SPA DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Jackie Lothian STAFF: Joyce Ohlson WITNESSES:(1) Ed Sadler (2) Steve Bossart (3) Jim Charlier, Charlier & Assoc (4) Mark Baker, Durant Architects (5) Robert Sardinsig Sardo , Rising Sun (6) Tim Anderson, Recreation (7) Randy Ready, Assistant Cily Manager (8) Jen Alling (9) Keith Hatakana (10) Larry Slater (11) Torre (12) Kevin Patrick (13) Tim Ware, Parking (14) LJ Erspamer (15) Frank Goldsmith (16) Jackie Broughton (17) Jim Finch (18) David Bruton (19) Toni Kronberg (20) Heidi Hoffman (21) Scott Writer (22) Jeff Woods (23) (24) (25) PZVOTESIGNIN02/06/01 THE Cm of ASPEN LA1N1N11�N' iGJ AN� � Zf�N' 111N1G� C�O�M�MII�S�S�I1O�NI MEETING DATE: 02/06/01 (continued from 01f02/01 & 01/30/01) NAME OF PROJECT: ISELIN PARK CONCEPTUAL/FINAL PUD/SPA CITY CLERK: Jackie Lothian STAFF: Joyce Ohlson WITNESSES: see attached EXHIBITS: 1. Staff Report (X) (Check If Applicable) 1130101 2. Affidavit of Notice (X) (Check If Applicable) 1/2/01 3. Toni Kronberg dated February 2, 2001 (10 pages) 4. Charlier Report/Power Point 5. Rising Sun Enterprises Lighting Report b. Aspen Middle School Letter 7. BYSTEDLighting 8. Lighting Drawing 9. Various drawings, maps (not included) 10. Toni Kronberg notebook MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve Resolution 45, series 2001, recommending City Council of the Consolidated Conceptual/Final PUD, SPA and granting approval of Conditional Use for the Iselin Park project with the conditions set fort in this Resolution as amended by this commission tonight adding: the deck area have a minimum of 10 feet from starting blocks to the mechanical, the CHASA high school swimming regulations be met, the parking and transportation strategies outlined be implemented, Maroon Creek Road have a dedicated bus line and prior to the final (CO) Certificate of Occupancy that the IGA be in place for parking enforcement on the Maroon Creek corridor. Roger Haneman second. Roll call vote: Buettow, yes; Tygre, no; Haneman, yes; Erickson, yes; Blaich, yes. APPROVED 4-1. MOTION: Steven Buettow moved to limit the height of the building from the ground to the midpoint to 40 feet. Ron Erickson second. Roll call vote: Haneman, no; Erickson, no; Tygre, yes; Buettow, yes; Blaich, no. DENIED 3-2. MOTION: Steven Buettow moved to limit the height of the building from the ground to the top with a maximum of 48 feet. Ron Erickson second. Roll call vote: Tygre, yes; Buettow, yes; Haneman, yes; Blaich, no; Erickson, no. APPROVED 3-2. PZVOTE MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: Chris Bendon, Senior Planner RE: Truscott Lighting Plan DATE: February 6, 2001 SUMMARY: The approvals for the Truscott Affordable Housing and Aspen Golf and Tennis Club included a provision that a revised lighting plan be approved by the P&Z. The project is highly visible within the entrance to town and the original plan was significantly flawed. The lighting plan has been resubmitted and is far superior to the original proposal. As suggested by staff and the Commission, the residential areas are lit with bollard lighting, with the exception of one 12'-9" pole mounted light at the end of the "internal street." Lighting within the project entrance has been modified to consist of six (6) lights mounted on 12'-9" poles. Lighting in the parking lot has been minimized and consists of six (6) lights mounted on 22-foot poles. The fixtures on these poles are proposed at 19'-6" which is below the twenty foot maximum in the lighting Ordinance. Two lights at 35 feet above grade will be mounted on the intersection signal poles. These are shorter than the two existing lights at the intersection. All of the proposed lights meet the requirements of the City's lighting code. In comparison to the previous plan, this revised plan has only a few bollards on the golf course side of the project and those are expected to be shielded by berming and not visible form the Cemetery Lane neighborhood. In comparison to a similar large parking lot lighting in the region, this plan provides a lighting level lower than the Brush Creek Intercept lot. CDOT is not required to conform to local regulations and there is no lighting plan on file to compare with the proposed Truscott plan. According to Pitkin County planners, however, the Brush Creek lighting is substantially more intense than Pitkin County would have allowed. (The Pitkin County Lighting Code is very similar to the City's.) The Colorado Mountain College (at North Forty) parking lot lighting was reviewed under the Pitkin County Lighting Standards and provides an amount of light similar to the Truscott proposal. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt Resolution 01-_, approving the Truscott Lighting Plan. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING OF THE ASPEN GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB/TRUSCOTT HOUSING OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLAN, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. PARCEL NOS. 2735-111-09-702 & 2735-111-09-001 Resolution #01-�_ WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the City of Aspen and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, applicant, for an Outdoor Lighting Plan for the Truscott Affordable Housing and Aspen Golf and Tennis Club PUD (the project); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Aspen City Council Ordinance 34, Series of 2000, the project was granted Final PUD approval, subject to the conditions contained in the Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, as a condition of the Final PUD approval for the project the applicant was required to gain approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for the Outdoor Lighting Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Final PUD and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on February 6, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and approved , by a _ to _ (_-_) vote, the Outdoor Lighting Plan for the project, subject to conditions of approval listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Outdoor Lighting Plan for the Truscott Affordable Housing and Aspen Golf and Tennis Club PUD, subject to the conditions of approval listed hereinafter. The approved Outdoor Lighting Plan is that document titled "Lighting and Electrical Plan" dated January 15, 2001, and addendum fixture detail sheets as submitted. 2. The Outdoor Lighting Plan (less the fixture detail sheets) shall be incorporated into the Final PUD recording documents. 3. Changes to the Outdoor Lighting Plan shall be considered according to the procedures for amending an approved Planned Unit Development. Additional bollard lighting may be added to the golf cart storage area if found necessary. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 6, 2001 [signatures on following page] Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 01-_, Page 1 Exhibit A Truscott Lighting Plan STAFF COMMENTS: Lighting. (From PUD regulations) The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: �. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The proposed lighting plan does not represent a hazard upon adjoining streets or lands. The lighting is appropriate for the various areas within the Truscott PUD. Residential areas are lit with low bollard lighting and the access ways are lit with pedestrian pole mounted lighting. The parking lot is lit with the minimum necessary for safety and is proposed on poles meeting the height limitations of the lighting Ordinance. 2. All exterior lighting'shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up -lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. Staff Finding: The proposed lighting plan meets all of the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Standards of the Land Use Code. There is no proposed up -lighting or other similar lighting that would cause inordinate attention to the site. The lighting on the golf course side of the project has been limited to low bollard lighting where necessary for pedestrian access ways. Staff Comments Page 1 Luminaire Cutsheets Ordering Information CC/CCS 17" - 29" Arm Mount Curvilinear Arm Mount 70to 1000Watt Mounting Fixture Electrical Module Finish Options Accent Reveals i--- Pole —� Ordering Example: 1 A / CC25A3 / 40OMH277 / LG-P/ A-33 / BL-REV / PRA30-6250A / LG-P For Standard Fixture and Pole 1 Mounting: 3Y configuration is availablE for round poles only. 2 Fixture: Cat. No. designates CC/CCS fixture and light distribution. t CC fixtures have 3 horizontal eveals. CCS fixtures have 1 horizontal groove. See the Kim Site/Roadway Optical Systems Catalog for detailed information on reflector design and application. 3 Electrical Module: HIPS = High Pressure Sodium MH = Metal Halide PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide ,,A) Lamp Lamp Line Watts Type Volts 400 HIPS 277 1 2 3 4 5-11 12 For CC only. 13 See separate Kim Pole Catalog. Omit for 1 W Wall Mount. Plan View: % %0 Wall + Mount Cat. No: 1 A 2B 2L 3T 3Y 4C 1 W EPA 17": 0.9 1.8 1.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 21": 1.2 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.4 3.9 25": 1.5 3.0 2.7 4.3 4.3 4.9 29": 1.8 3.6 3.3 5.2 5.2 5.9 Fixture For selection of fixture and mounting configuration based on photometric performance, see the CC/CCS Photometric Catalog. CC CCS Light Distribution: Type II Type III Type IV Type V Forward Throw Square Cat. No.: CC17A2 CC17A3 CC17A4 CC17A5 CCS17A2 CCS17A3 CCS17A4 CCS17A5 17" CC CCS Light Distribution: Type II Type Ill Type IV Type V Forward Throw Square 21" Cat. No.: CC21 A2 CC21 A3 CC21 A4 CC21 A5 CCS21A2 CCS21A3 CCS21A4 CCS21A5 CC CCS Light Distribution: Type II Type Ill Type IV Type V z Y: Forward Throw Square 25" Cat. No.: CC25A2 CC25A3 CC25A4 CC25A5 w CCS25A2 CCS25A3 CCS25A4 CCS25A5 CC CCS Light Distribution: Type III Type V y Square Cat. No.: CC29A3 CC29A5 29' CCS29A3 CCS29A5 CC/CCS 17" 70HPS120 100HPS120 150HPS120 70HPS208 100HPS208 150HPS208 70HPS240 100HPS240 150HPS240 70HPS277 100HPS277 150HPS277 70HPS347 100HPS347 150HPS347 70MH120 10OMH120 150MH120 70MH2O8 10OMH2O8 150MH2O8 70MH240 10OMH240 150MH240 70MH277 10OMH277 150MH277 7OMH347 10OMH347 150MH347 175MH120 175MH2O8 175MH240 175MH277 175MH347 21" and 25' 150HPS120 250HPS120 400HPS120 150HPS208 250HPS208 400HPS208 150HPS240 250HPS240 400HPS240 150HPS277 250HPS277 400HPS277 150HPS347 250HPS347 400HPS347 150HPS480 250HPS480 400HPS480 175MH120 250MH120 40OMH120 175MH2O8 250MH2O8 40OMH2O8 175MH240 250MH240 40OMH240 175MH277 250MH277 40OMH277 175MH347 250MH347 40OMH347 175MH480 250MH480 40OMH480 250PMH120 40OPMH120 250PMH2O8 40OPMH2O8 250PMH240 40OPMH240 250PMH277 40OPMH277 40OPMH347 40OPMH480 CC/CCS 29" 750HPS120 1000HPS120 750HPS208 1000HPS208 750HPS240 1000HPS240 750HPS277 1000HPS277 750HPS347 1000HPS347 750HPS480 1000HPS480 1000MH120 1000MH2O8 1000MH240 1000MH277 1000MH347 1000MH480 10 KIM LIGHTING FM I 4 Finish: Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Platinum Silver White 'Custom Colors Super TGIC powder coat paint Cat. No.: BL-P DB-P LG-P PS-P WH-P CC-P over chromate conversion coating. Consult representative for custom colors. 5 Optional Photocell: Mounting (see page 10) Wattage per fixture Voltage Cat. No. Factory installed photocell in ♦ iNs S4VS 120 A-30 housing with fully gasketed S 70-40OW sensor on side wall. For 17", 21 ", Photocell 1 A,1 W 2B 2L 3T, 3Y 240 277 A-32 A-33 and 25" fixtures only. S �s 347 A-35 s 4C 70-250W 480 A-34 Fixture with photocell 120 2A-30s) s slave unit 208 2A-31 s s 4C 40OW 240 2A-32 277 2A-33 347 2A-35 480 2A-34 6 Optional Photocell p , —Receptacle Cat. No.. A-25 Factory installed in flat portion of housing top for NEMA base Receptacle: photocells by others. Cat. No. A-25 applies for all voltages 29" fixture only. (120V 48OV). One per fixture required. 7 Optional Convex Glass Cat. No.: CGL Tempered convex glass lens replaces standard flat lens. Lens: - -- -- _.. Convex Lens 8 Optional Polycarbonate Cat. No.: Polycarbonate Shield replaces standard tempered glass lens. Shield: L17 for 17" models 250 watt maximum. May be used with 400HPS in outdoor L21 for 21-models locations were ambient air temperature during fixture operation Polycarbonate Shield L25 for 25" models will not exceed 85°F. See "CAUTION" on page 13. 9 Optional Houseside K Cat. No.: HS For 17", 21 ", and 25" models with Types 11, 111, or IV distributions Shield: only. Recommended for use with clear lamps only. Effectiveness is reduced for coated lamps. - HS for flat lens only Cat. No.: HSC For fixtures with optional convex glass lens or polycarbonate shield. Not for use with Type V light distributions. HSC for convex lens or �. polycarbonate shield 10 Optional Vertical Slipfitter Mounts: y,, Cat. No VSF-1A Mounting Configuration Allows standard fixture and arm 1A -Single arm mount to be mounted to poles having a VSF-2B VSF-2L 2113 - 2 at 1800 2" pipe -size tenon (2%" O.D. x 4Y2" 2L - 2 at 90° Slipfitter VSF-3T 3T - 3 at 90 minimum length). VSF-3Y 3Y - 3 at 1200 Round VSF-4C 4C - 4 at 900 11 Optional Horizontal Cat. No.: HSF Replaces standard mounting arm with a slipfitter for mounting Slipfitter Mount: Slipfitter to a horizontal pole davit -arm with 2" pipe -size mounting end (2%/ O.D.). 12 Optional Accent color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Platinum Silver White 2Custom Colors Reveals: Cat. No.: BL-REV DB-REV LG-REV PS -REV WH-REV CC -REV For CC series only. Reveals 2 Consult representative for custom colors. 13 Poles: ( See Kim Pole Catalog for a complete selection of round and square poles in aluminum or steel Rom LItz," I IIVlU 7 7 l .m Start with the Universe Medium head. 8.10 in 205 mm Select a luminous element if desired. UCM SR FLR CAL PM COP 93 Select a hood style. ' Choose the optical assembly for your application. 4 Select a lamp ballast. Specify a standard AAL color shown, RAL color,. or custom color (sample color chip required at time of ordering). Choose any desired options. Wall mounted arms are found on pages 32-33, pole mounted arms are on pages 34-37 and AAL Doles are shown on pages 38-43. UCM VSL BEL H3 SLA4 FTG Weight. 34 lbs. EPA: 1.14 IP Rating: 65 Ordering Examples LUMINOUS LAMP FIXTURE ELEMENT HOOD OPTICS BALLAST COLOR HOOD FINISH OPTIONS ARM POLE UCM LUM-BL BEL H3 10OMH BLK COP FLD SLA20A DB6-4R14-125 UCM SR ANG GR5 50MH MAL - - WMA8 - UCM VSL STR CAL 150MH WHT - - PM 2P-14 UCM WND FLR H5 IL-85 GALV STS - SLA17 PR4-4R14 PHZ FM3 SR I i VSL SOLID RINGS Cast rings with a diffused acrylic lens 12"/305MM DIAMETER 4.4"/11 OMM HIGH VERTICAL SLATS Cast frame with a diffused acrylic lens 8.75"/225MM DIAMETER 4.177105MM HIGH i LUM LUMINOUS RINGS MOR Edge lit acrylic rings with a diffused acrylic lens 12"/305MM DIAMETER 4.4'711 OMM HIGH *Colored inner lens option, STIR STRAIGHT SHADE H2 TYPE 2 REFLECTOR H3 TYPE 3 REFLECTOR 1 H4 TYPE 4 REFLECTOR H5 TYPE 5 REFLECTOR ----------------------- Reflector with cast door and standard sag glass lens OPTIONS FOR { REFLECTOR OPTICS i FTG FLAT GLASS LENS FLD FLAT GLASS WITH LDL FINISH HSS HOUSE SIDE SHIELD FACTORY INSTALLED OAL OPAL ACRYLIC LENS 8"/205MM DIAMETER 9"/230MM) HIGH MAXIMUM 100 WATTS HID GR3 TYPE 3 REFLECTOR GR5 TYPE 5 REFLECTOR 24"/610MM DIAMETER 4.5"/115MM HIGH i Glass Refractor See p. 25. 6.5"/165MM DIAMETER 6"/150MM HIGH 24 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING U C CVO Ny' 1 \� ( kk I R" 4" Rr I 50MH 50 WATT METAL HALIDE 120/277 volt ballast 70MH 70 WATT METAL HALIDE 120/208/240/277 volt ballast i 100MH i 100 WATT METAL HALIDE 120/208/240/277 volt ballast i 15OMH 150 WATT METAL HALIDE 120/208/240/277 volt ballast 175MH 175 WATT METAL HALIDE 120/208/240/277 volt ballast 50HPS 50 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 120/277 volt ballast 70HPS 70 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 120/208/24OH277 volt ballast 100HPS 100 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 120/208/24OH277 volt ballast 150HPS 150 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 120/208/240/277 volt ballast NOTE: Use medium base, clear ED-17 lamps only. Lamps not included. All ballasts are factory wired for 277 volts. IL-85 85 WATT INDUCTION LAMP LIGHTING SYSTEM. Specify voltage; 120, 208, 240, or 277 volt. LUMINOUS RING COLORS j Internal lens can be added for color on the ring edges when illuminated. i BL BLUE RD RED I GRN GREEN MG MAGENTA yy G g Standard AAL colors are provided at no extra charge. RAL and custom matched colors are available upon request. WHT BLK WHITE BLACK ' Arms are on page 32-37 Poles are on page 38-43 PM POST TOP MOUNT For OAL and GR3/5 optic options only. Not available for reflector i models. Slips over a 4'7100 MM pole. Secured with 6 stainless steel set screws. 18.25 in 465mm DBZ DARK BRONZE i GALV VGR GALVANIZED VERDE GREEN J. CRT MAL CORTEN MATTE ALUMINUM HOOD FINISHES All styles of hoods are available in the matching fixture color, stainless steel or natural copper finishes. The natural copper and stainless steel hoods are unfinished to develop a patina over time. All hoods for OAL and GR3/5 optics have the underside finished in high reflectance white. STS COP STAINLESS COPPER STEEL QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T 4 mini-cand halogen lamp, maximum 150 watt, HID only. Reflector models only. QL Socket for a T 4 mini-cand halogen lamp. Must be field wired to a separate 120 volt circuit. Maximum 150 watt, Reflector models only. PSB Pulse start ballast for 150MH and 175MH (175MH not for horizontal reflector units) (120/208/240/277 volt) metal halide Provides faster reignition of the lamp, longer life, and better color rendition. i 347 120/240/347 volt ballast i for HID lamp/ballast. 347 volt only j for 50 watt HPS. i PMS Pendant mount with 48"/1220 mm and canopy with i swivel. Stem and canopy painted white. i i ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 25 The Kim Compact Bollard Series Comfortable in both commercial and residential sites, these reduced -scale bollards provide low level illumination for a variety of applications. When located as individual fix- tures in key areas along a path, the Compact Bollard produces a soft pool of light for orientation and safety. When several units are placed at consistent spacings, visual direction is established while also providing glare -free illumination for pedestrians. �*M ?F1 -u` Applications g''� • entrances and drives • pathways and promenades • plazas and courtyards • gardens and landscape • steps, bridges and seating areas K I M 2 LIGHTING EXAMPLE CB32 50MH277 WH-P MODEL ELECTRICAL MODE FINISH ORDERING INFORMATION MODEL CB24 COMPACT BOLLARD 24" OVERALL HEIGHT CB32 COMPACT BOLLARD 32" OVERALL HEIGHT ELECTRICAL LINE LINE MAX LAMPS BY OTHERS MODE VOLTS WATTS AMPS 1001NC120 120 100 0.83 100 WATT INCANDESCENT A21 I.F. MEDIUM BASE 13PL1201 120 17 0.29 13 WATT FLUORESCENT 13PL2772 277 21 0.34 DOUBLE TWIN TUBE ' 320F STARTING TEMP. ?0°F STARTING TEMP. GX23 BASE 22PL120 120 26 0.46 22 WATT FLUORESCENT DOUBLE TWIN TUBE -20OF STARTING TEMP. GX32d-2 BASE 32PL120 120 35 0.30 32WATT 32PL277 277 35 0.13 COMPACT FLUORESCENT 0°F STARTING TEMP. GX24q-3 BASE 50MH120 120 67 1.16 50 WATT COATED 50MH2O8 208 67 0.67 METAL HALIDE 50MH240 240 67 0.57 ED17 MEDIUM BASE 50MH277 277 67 0.50 70MH120 120 90 1.90 *70 WATT COATED 70MH2O8 208 90 1.00 METAL HALIDE 70MH240 240 90 0.90 ED17 MEDIUM BASE 70MH277 277 90 0.80 70MH347 347 94 0.65 50HPS120 120 64 1.24 50 WATT COATED 50HPS208 208 64 0.59 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 50HPS240 240 64 0.50 ED17 MEDIUM BASE 50HPS277 277 64 0.44 70HPS120 120 91 1.45 *70 WATT COATED 70HPS208 208 91 0.85 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 70HPS240 240 91 0.75 ED17 MEDIUM BASE 70HPS277 277 91 0.65 70HPS347 347 93 0.55 FINISH SUPER TGIC THERMOSET POWDER COAT PAINT BL-P BLACK DB-P DARK BRONZE LG-P LIGHT GRAY WH-P WHITE PHOTOMETRIC INFORMATION INITIAL HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES FOR 24' HT. BOLLARD 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.28 0.49 0.25 0.36 0.58 0.98 1.10 5.23 2.66 3.57 5.71 10.5311.77 Nabithh, � III 100W 13W 22W 32W 50W 50W INC PL PL PL MH HPS TYPICAL QUADRANT Compact fT�l Bollards SPECIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION Underwriters Laboratories listed and Canadian Standards Association certified for wet locations. Fixture manufac- turer shall be reigistered to ISO 9001. TOP, LOUVERS Interlocking die cast aluminum sections fasten together with con- cealed stainless steel screws. Louver base assembly fastens internally to riser with 4 concealed screws. RISER Extruded aluminum, 5" diameter, .125" typical wall thickness, external vertical grooves align with vertical members on louver assembly. Attaches to anchor base with 4 countersunk stainless steel flat socket head screws finished to match fixture. ANCHOR BASE Heavy cast 131,•DIA.CONDUIT aluminum, fully concealed within OPENING riser shaft. Three 3/8' x 10"+2" �. zinc plated anchor bolts, each l �1 with two nuts and washers, and a rigid pressboard template. 2 Y8' GLOBE Internally fluted, clear BOLT CIRCLE tempered glass, fully gasketed. DIAMETER SOCKET Incandescent/HID models: porce- lain medium base rated 4KV. Fluorescent: 13w-GX23d; 22w-GX24q-3; 32w-GX32d-2. BALLAST High Power Factor, prewired, mounts on secured bracket within riser. 13w Fluorescent: 120v 320F. starting; 277v 0°F starting. 22w Fluorescent: 120v -20°F. starting. 32w Fluorescent: electronic; 120v 0°F starting; 277v 0°F, starting HID: -20OF starting temperature. FINISH Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint applied over a chromate conversion coating. Available in Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, or White. WARNING Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. INITIAL HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES FOR 32' HT. BOLLARD 0.12 0.06 0.09 0.14 0.24 0.39 0.27 0.43 0.31 0.16 0.24 0.38 0.62 0.98 0.69 1.09 1.31 0.66 0.90 1.44 2.63 4.18 2.94 4.63 7.75 3.94 4.60 7.36 15.60 24.78 17.44 27.46 10OW 13W 22W 32W 50W 70W 50W 70W INC PL PL PL MH MH HPS HPS * 70W MH and HPS are not recommended for CB24 due to extreme light levels at fixture base. 01993 KIM LIGHTING INC. THIS VERSION 01997 TYPICAL QUADRANT KIM LIGHTING INC. 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE P.O. BOX 60080 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 PHONE 626/968-5666 FAX 626/369-2695 5700997325 Feed - Series Incan. Fluor. HID Exterior Interior Thru Other Options 2156 I Fluor• ( Cast bronze front, 277V elec- y ( trical, Tamperproof screws, Sur- I I I I face housing, Vertical format 2156 Series Steplites in a vertical or horizon- tal format, are avail- able with louvered or open cast aluminum -J faceplates. A cast aluminum surface housing is also offered. The junction box on Cole Steplites may be field mounted to the back or bottom of the ! ! r fixture. leii falkway Lightlag Steplites 2156 SERIES Description The 2156 is our largest Steplite with incandescent or fluorescent lamp options. Its width allows relatively wide light distribution to the side in a variety of interior or exterior locations. The rugged construc- tion, engineering excellence, and quality make these fixtures ideal for specification in most public areas. Features This Series is offered in both a vertical and hori- zontal format and with optional surface mounting. Louvers in the 2156 Series are more widely spaced than most fixtures of this type, allowing for signif- icantly greater forward projected illumination. Exceptional durability is provided by the thick cast aluminum faceplate and the tempered glass dif- fuser. Louvered models offer even greater pro- tection to the diffuser while controlling the distri- bution of light. Cole Steplites feature a cast aluminum junction box which may be easily field mounted to either the back or bottom of the housing to best suit installation conditions. Applications The 2156 Series Steplites are suitable for concrete pour and stud wall mounting in indoor or outdoor installations. Incandescent fixtures will work ex- tremely well in cold climates. The fluorescent option is the only fixture in this series that may be specified for interior combustible conditions. The vertical format is ideal for bollard applications. Custom If your project demands a special fixture we would be pleased to discuss the production of modified standard fixtures or custom fixtures to suit your specific conditions. For more information on our custom capabilities please contact your local Cole representative. COLE LIGHTING SINCE 1911 C. W. Cole & Co., Inc. 2560 N. Rosemead Boulevard South El Monte CA 91733-1593 Fax (818) 443-9253 Tel. (213) 283-6688 (818) 443-2473 ------------------ - - s1/?"— - — — { 131/e" _ { _ 37A" — — 0 5'/e"X11Va" L_ u u _ J 1� / � b�-T 4 i @ � ,Y t � t� t ❑ ty�4f� � � E Ky t"� r tTM L `M - 2-FC 2- ry ` ��fi C d x 1-FC ,t Cx .5-FC .2-FC"'€' 2 FC FC tth�ff�"' .K. k3• ,''u -a3y ..r.��� 1'✓Ci '-r 3 v{{ "VP K NJ �'s�,'� �� 'C' taa�tngs`dnooicaptlles� z. s 4-u -14f r_� l 3. �,g a 4 e � to isolux curves illustrated above show the foot- candle distribution for a 2156 Series fixture with two 40W incandescent lamps mounted at a height of 2'-0". The conversion chart provides the light output figures for various lamp types at four mount- ing heights. The lamp height determines the scale of the grid, i.e., for a fixture mounted at 3'-0" the grid squares become 3'-0" x 3'4'. To calculate the footcandles for each iso curve use the conversion factors shown in the chart as multipliers of the footcandles indicated for each iso curve. Isolux Footcandle Conversion Chart Lamp Type Lum. Mounting Height and Grid Scale 1141 11-61' 21-011 31-011 2 x 40W Al in. 480 4.00 1.7tU8 1.00 0.44 1 x 13W fluor. 900 7.50 3.33 1.88 0.83 2 x 13W fluor. 900 15.00 6.67 3.75 1.67 ,c J - - r Catalog Numbers Recessed Fixtures Surface Mounted Fixtures Faceplate Faceplate Lamp Louver/Hor. LouverNert. Glass Louver/Hor. Glass 3' 2-40W Al 9 incandescent T2156 T2156V T2156G ST2156 ST2156G 1-13W fluorescent F2156 F2156V F2156G SF2156 SF2156G 2-13W fluorescent F2156-2 F2156V-2 F2156G-2 SF2156-2 SF2156G-2 Options Tamperproof Screws: Tamperproof, alien head Junction Box: Bottom or back mounted junction faceplate screws. To specify, add suffix -TP. box as required for feed-thru. To specify, add suf- Ballasts (fluorescent only): 277V ballast. To spec- -J. Not for surface housing. ify, add suffix -277. eatherproof: For exterior applications. To spec - ify, add suffix -W. How to Specify �= Bronze Faceplate: Satin finished, red brass face- 1. Select catalog number with desired features. plate for louver and glass faceplates and housings 2. Add suffixes for options required to meet job - on surface fixtures. To specify, add suffix -B. conditions. Walkway Lighting Steplites 2156 SERIES Specifications Construction - Fixture housing is constructed from die -formed 16 gauge steel finished with a white polyester coating - Faceplate is cast aluminum with baked aluminum coating, gasketed and retained by stain- less steel screws- Diffuser is frosted tempered glass set in silicone sealant - Reflector is con- structed of die -formed semi-specular aluminum - Optional junction box is cast aluminum with poly- ester finish - ETL listed, suitable for wet locations - Incandescent models for concrete pour/block wall construction only - Fluorescent models for any wall construction Electrical - Fixture is wired for one 13W, two 13W compact fluorescent (PL, Biax, etc.) lamps, or two 40W A19 incandescent lamps. Ballasts are standard 120V (277V optional), low -ambient - Pivoting fluores- cent socket eases relamping - Junction box allows 8 wires thru-wiring, four in and four out. Provided with two 1/2" tapped conduit entrances in the bot- tom and one 1/2" conduit entrance in each side. Mounting Housing has flange with holes for mounting. COLE LIGHTING SINCE 1911 C. W. Cole & Co., Inc. 2560 N. Rosemead Boulevard . South El Monte CA 91733-1593 Fax (818) 443-9253 Tel. (213) 283-6688 (818) 443-2473 QB 5M J91 F• \Tr-mcrnf-f- - nwm 000( ;7\('iinnonf- Ciihm;i-f-al\rI ANITnm I P-M ritan Mnn Ian IR 17- Q1• (1(1 a(1()1 ('lant-nn & AccnryAi-pc Tnr L_... \ 1 1 V�/V V L L V1 11"1 t—V W'jI \VLi1 / %,I I L ♦JV VIII.L L LlJ l \%JL-nII I %J1Y L_L- V 1. V 11y t tV. t VtJ1 i -V 1I . V— VV tV V l V1 VI I V V1 t t J-t 1V 4 W N �-nC7 0A 0CD vCy � 0) � u3 � r I x � �.� to to > 1 0 ;tun > 10 N-H J I 4 �un � K apt NG� 1�7 �O tA- i o =r' N=r' to r- > ti W> O i '0 > 1 ! rr I rr= 0 = Z = Z I 1 C7^� -� C-) N Wyk 0 -0.� W�� 0 'JC7`.� Wes^ 0 -0%.i Wp a)p Opp ®Op Ocnp �Q o m M 3 c3 -00 CA c3 c O c3 tn<' (A v<' 3.r�n< rn< � : o v� ©� cD 0 00 00 CD -n z v ® ; a N (n cD _ Q 0 C� tD 's. O O O O O m � p "'• o �• ? -0 Q (D y Q? 0 a' �< O �� �% e-1- tQ �• 0 '® 4 C Q �.: tt� a-Q Z3 3 co i-.' O O C- 3 'y2 J D C°D 3 'C -e- o �� Q 0 0 o ,.-. -- i°- O o "�U 1 0 1 c 0 0 t O �. 3 � O i i� N O t0D 0 fD 0 x 3 i `° �"� o- c cD � :3 :3 ti OV' O O c� C �- c: '''" p 0 Q O C p tD w to N 30 O G rn t� $ (DO o O' p U! C C 0 O to �Q'O 0 -n " 0 " 0 (D Q 3 'O � -S _ Q-� f0") S 0 ''� 0 cp Q < N 0 � �. I O N E a _ a ^' p. t0D tD O r-1- r-+- tD � -� ? ri -p (D Co I p -�, r 4- c �.. � OF Z .+ g =t 0 -ti J co f 0 O O C�. CL 0 Z CA O G i!1 +- N 0 p fl. a r•r In cG O �- O 0 cfJ C t� N 3 0CA 0 � 0 -nCL0 30 a� cc53� m� 0o m°� °p.rn 0c c�--*3. mac' c CL 0 _� �i 0 O m O? -4 O (�D 3 (D `� 0 CO 0 c» 3 v- < 3 -' tv O -� g 65' O :30 a :3 0 0 � - S O �-�- o "" tD g C7 O ,1- -, -P p O -h � T 3 0 0 C) '''• <DD 0 c:C O _ -0 O. S I O 0 0 3 0' 3 g, 0 3 0 cc N 0 W N :-" ZC f rn Zrn vim= 0rn r�-rn oyr m� nyr ®D, -Trine 0 M r-0 zz Z mo oED rnz Z C Z N O -rr -� Z r C o M � 0 G7 a O > r Z -i =j z m ZO 01 U) or° 0 (f) 0 M (/) ^^ .� �i 00 O m o c z U' K v O n0 M Z Z G� om y N ® C Z rn n v � r I- W M ICA V • rn x rn X Z rn -4 w m (AMM 03 -0 OM ^ -0 �X -' "0 �K (A-V cnm U-) to ..o ::' :.' (A N - 's`' y v ® m --1 z = U--i ,. pp .-N 0 0 to 0 r- G7 J N D > ® L14z N® M M Ito v� 0 :�0 Zn -=-r tZ OOw r a)'�'' O' r Z AO mz -0® M S C v ZQ M Crn rn Z MAn Q� ^rC7 p--I' O l nD y� ZC �Z M Z -ZiKD rOC � -0 D m S Z D 0-- A ?y Z -0 t 1 C n O Z m � 00 t'*1 !T{ Z m ®O � ©0 yin C o o �® O N 0 m > Z vm • N D > 6 c0 > Z r n `•t -T7' fo , � Iyyp O Z z C M 4i;:iGJ 01mO Z o c D r,x y Q o r Z (� N09(n Q moo Z -{ Z m m m �� w fir: �-• N fix M �„i m r yj m-i W a v m m N O C) v v n O m m W -n w'' i i C� �, �. c°� coo u y `Q� 3 4 C r� ►-b `'� , 4 c� o ` Z tw Z x QO, �. ''dam ®©�AsenGolf � � � �.d� �+ * 0 to � d H .. w Z = �. � �_ � ...� Q o Q 0, 0 O , Z ,m Z � W O m • �' 0 --I 4 a i m ' k >a ATruscott b�a f—G. a o �a. � 8 N N � P � , n Z r +� N s o � , c fl, (o o n 0 CL na a O �, C!1 - x a t7 n Aspen, � �- n �� r Z a fi o-pj C • x p «• � -+, cn arc `-i 3 N ,1.,. W O