Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19950828Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. with Councilmembers Marolt, Richards, Waggaman and Paulson present. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 1. Sy Kelly told Council he met with the city manager and asked for the city’s portion of expenses in the superblock project. Kelly said he submitted a list of all expenses for the 3 private property owners. Kelly said the city admitted they were partners in this. Kelly said the property owners went through the superblock proposal at the city’s request. Mayor Bennett said he would be glad to reconsider this request although he is not sure the outcome will be different. Councilwoman Richards suggested Council review the record since they last considered this. Amy Margerum, city manager, told Council when she received this request, she and the planning staff went through all the files to see if there was any agreement on these costs. Staff could not find one. Mayor Bennett said the city attempted to create a partnership and to pay their own expenses. The city never intended to pay the expenses for the other private entities. Ms. Margerum said she will get background information so Council can review this. 2. Norma Dolle said she has been told the forest service is going to close down the Maroon Bells campground. Ms. Dolle said this campground has been there for years and a lot of people use it. Ms. Dolle said it may be a liability problem with avalanches and mud slides. Councilman Paulson said the forest service wanted to move the parking lot but not to eliminate the campground. Councilwoman Richards suggested staff inquire of the forest service what their plans are and report back. 3. Howard DeLuca, representing the West Meadow Homeowners’ Association, petitioned Council to widen Cemetery Lane between the intersections with Silverking Drive and Pitkin Mesa Drive. DeLuca said this is a dangerous stretch of road. The traffic, both pedestrian and bicycle, is extremely high. Mayor Bennett said this will be reviewed during budget time. Councilwoman Richards suggested the asset planning committee look at this before budget. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Councilwoman Richards moved to move Langley Deed Restriction to the consent calendar; seconded by Councilman Paulson. John Worcester, city attorney, asked if this authorizes him to write the letter that the applicant requests. Council said yes. 1 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Richard moved to table Resolution #57, Series of 1995, to September 11; seconded by Councilman Marolt. All in favor, motion carried. 2. Councilwoman Richards reported she attended the NW Council of Governments meeting last week on behalf of the Colorado Association of Ski Town. The issues of interest to Aspen are highway funding. The legislature is looking at excess revenues in the state and putting them into the highway fund with a capital committee to review projects. All the time spent getting Highway 82 up to the top of the list may go by the wayside. Councilwoman Richards said it appear the takings legislation is coming back again. These issues should be watched. 3. City Manager Margerum announced that RFTA scheduled a meeting Thursday September 7 at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the transportation development plan. 4. Ms. Margerum said the representatives of the Moore pro ject would like to bring in their transportation consultant and meet with Council, Wednesday September 6 at 5 p.m. This should be scheduled as a special meeting so action can be taken if necessary. Council pointed out this would mean meetings September 5, 6, and 7 and asked if the RFTA meeting can be changed. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilwoman Richards moved to read Ordinances #43 and 44, Series of 1995; seconded by Councilman Marolt. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #43 (Series of 1995) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 57 (SERIES OF 1989) WHICH ADOPTED CITY CAMPAIGN REFORM REGULATIONS; TO DELETE THE PROHIBITION AGAINST EXPENDITURES LATER THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO ANY ELECTION; TO MAKE A CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE AND THE OFFICERS OF A POLITICAL COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE FOR FILING FINANCIAL REPORTS; TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 6, SERIES OF 1974, RELATING TO PROCEDURES FOR RECALL ELECTIONS; TO AUTHORIZE 2 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 EXCESS CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE REFUNDED TO CONTRIBUTORS; AND, TO CODIFY THE CAMPAIGN REFORM REGULATIONS BY THEIR INCLUSION AT CHAPTER 8, “ELECTIONS”, OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE #44 (Series of 1995) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATING 935 E. HYMAN AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE SUND LOT SPLIT, ALSO KNOWN AS LOT D, BLOCK 35, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, AS “H” HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-7-703 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE were read by the city clerk Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt the consent calendar as amended; seconded by Councilman Marolt. The consent calendar is Minutes - August 14, 1995 · Ordinance #43, 1995 - Amending Election Code · Ordinance #44, 1995 - 935 E. Hyman Historic Designation · Board Appointments (CCLC - Jon Busch, Bill Dinsmoor; Board of Adjustment - · Charlie Patterson; HPC - Les Holst; Clean Air Board - Dee Bellina; Child Care Committee - Kimberly Grady, Patric McLaughlin, Mary Wolfer; P & Z - Roger Hunt) Resolution #52, 1995 - Approving Holy Cross Contract · Resolution #54, 1995 - Red Brick Management Agreement · Resolution #56, 1995 - Truscott Lease Amendment - Tennis Courts · Resolution #55, 1995 - Contract Approval Puppy Smith & N. Mill · October Council Meeting (Change to Tuesday October 10) · Request for Funds - Cozy Point Bridge ($5000 from contingency) · Resolution #53, 1995 - Contract for City Hall Windows (Craig Ripley) · Langley Deed Restriction · Roll call vote; Councilmembers Marolt, yes; Councilwoman Waggaman, no; Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried Councilwoman Waggaman said she is voting against Ordinance #44 for philosophical reasons. ORDINANCE #35, SERIES OF 1995 - Mocklin 3 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Leslie Lamont, community development department, told Council this request is for subdivision, rezoning one parcel to AH, and vested rights. Ms. Lamont reminded Council the property is 3 acres of which one 35,000 square foot piece is zoned RMF/A contains an 8 unit apartment building. The applicant proposes to take the remaining portion of the property and create 6 parcels for single family home lot of 15,000 to 24,000 square feet. This is zoned R-15A with a minimum lot of size 15,000 square feet. Staff is recommending the remaining parcel be rezoned AH. Mocklin is using a provision in the land use code to deed restrict 7 units in the existing apartment building and to use the replacement free market credit to create the free market parcels. Ms. Lamont said of this 3.5 acres 117,500 square feet is zoned R-15/A. There is an 8 unit apartment building of 12,800 square feet; 15 bedrooms in 3 one-bedroom, 3 two-bedroom, and 2 three-bedroom units. The net livable area in the building is 6,880 square feet. Ms. Lamont said one option is to tear down the existing building and reconfigure 7 free market parcels on the property. Because of Ordinance 1, 1990, the applicant would be required to replace on site 50 percent of the bedroom and 50 percent net livable, which would be 7 bedrooms and 3440 square feet. The applicant proposes to subdivide this into 6 free market lots and one lot with the existing apartment building. The applicant will deed restrict 7 of the 8 units, total of 12 bedrooms, ranging in size from 370 square feet to 1470 square feet. P & Z reviewed this and recommends approval. Ms. Lamont included an updated landscaping and grading plan. The applicant has shown a 5 foot walk along the private drive. Ms. Lamont pointed out the building envelopes have been defined on the site development plan. Staff recommends no grading, no land changes, no developments, no fencing, no vegetation other than native vegetation can occur outside the building envelopes. This is to protect the sage field and the dense aspen groves. The applicant set up story poles of 30 feet on lots 5 and 6 indicating top of ridge. The height limit in this zone district is 25 feet with the capability to go up 5 more feet for a peaked roof. Ms. Lamont noted that code interpretations generally do not go to Council but are approved by the community development director. The interpretation regards replacement of development credits on site and whether these can be used to create 6 free market parcels. Replacement credits has been a concept since the inception of the growth management code. When one tears down and rebuilds, one is not adding new growth. Ms. Lamont said the current site plan is designed to keep the houses away from the road and take advantage of the views. If the apartment building is eliminated, there could be one more free market lot. The deed restricted 4 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 units would probably be replaced in duplex or triplexes and some in the free market houses. If Mocklin tore down his building, he would have to replace 7 bedrooms and 3500 square feet. Ms. Lamont told Council if the building was torn down, there would be a credit to the land based on bedrooms for the park development fees. This would be traded out for building. These fees are reassessed every two years but the fee is not due until a building permit is taken out. With 6 four-bedroom houses, the city will get about $20,000 in park development impact fees. If the building were torn down and credit accrued, the park development fee could be as low as $12,000. Ms. Lamont reminded Council they requested a report on how the houses would look pre- and post- Ordinance #30. Ms. Lamont said the only significant difference is that there would not be a 500 square foot bonus for the garage. The slope FAR reduction will not make a big difference on this property. Ms. Lamont said Council brought up the RFTA bus stops. The first one on Lone Pine road is not on the applicant’s property. The RFTA stop closer to Gibson is in the public right-of-way. Ms. Lamont included a condition of approval that requires the applicant to work with RFTA to see if an easement is needed at this location. Ms. Lamont said one issue that has not been resolved is the issue of which GMP allocation pool these units come out of. P & Z does not want the units to come out of the AH pool. Ms. Lamont said staff will work on a code amendment to take care of this problem. The code is silent to the free market units. This will not hold up this proposal. Ms. Lamont noted staff has requested that as individual homeowners come in to do their drives, there is a new grading and vegetation plan for each driveway. Ms. Lamont said staff supports the subdivision finding that the replacement credits applies to this. There will be more bedrooms and square footage in this proposal than in tear down and replacement. Sunny Vann, representing the applicant, told Council they have relied on the interpretation that replacement credits will be allowed. Currently replacement credit work no matter how larger or small the unit is that is being torn down or replaced. Vann told Council in this submission, the lots are larger than required, the setbacks meet or exceed all requirements. This has been designed to preserve the majority of open space and reduce the impact of the structures. Vann said this does not need to 5 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 be rezoned to AH in order to work; the staff requested this zoning in order to reflect the use. Councilwoman Richards said not having to replace a building saves the applicant a lot of money. Vann said there is a cost associated with replacement; however, the applicant would have to replace less square footage. Vann said this is a perfectly good building with tenants currently living there. These people would be displaced if the building were torn down. Councilwoman Richards said the code interpretation is saving the applicant money and the project could happen with 5 lots rather than 6 lots. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. Richard Jennings, Hunter Creek Condominiums, said if the applicants retain the grade the buildings will be fairly low. Jennings told Council the Hunter Creek Association bought .4 of an acre of land to the north of this proposal. Jennings said the Association might be able to cooperate with the city or Mocklin to make this land open space for some financial amount. Mayor Bennett said he would be interested in pursuing this discussion at another time. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Waggaman asked about the deed restriction clauses stating they will be effective when a building permit is issued or within 7 years of final approval. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to see this timing moved forward. Councilwoman Waggaman asked if this is when the first building permit is pulled or when all of them are pulled. Vann said the deed restriction will be done but it will not be triggered until a person pulls a building permit for one of the free market lots. City staff suggested a time frame that even if the lots are not developed, the units are deed restricted. Council agreed with that approach. Vann suggested the mechanics of which unit is deed restricted with which free market lot be worked out with the housing office. John Worcester, city attorney, said he reads it to say that as soon as a building permit is pulled, all 7 units would be deed restricted. Vann said the intent is that each free market lot permit would trigger a deed restriction; no growth, no deed restriction. Councilwoman Waggaman said she likes less pressure for development rather than having to have all 7 houses built at once. Councilwoman Waggaman said she can live with one unit going with each building permit. Councilwoman Waggaman said she does not want to start with the smallest unit and working up to the larger. Ms. Lamont said the categories should be 6 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 specified in the subdivision agreement. Vann said the units are all low with the exception of the 2 largest units. Councilwoman Waggaman asked if what is permitted outside the building envelope is clear. Vann said the only things permitted outside the designated building envelopes are the construction of each driveway and the installation of additional landscaping to replace that lost due to development. Councilwoman Richards said she is concerned about the driveway through the trees There may be some site redesigns that could have better access and better parking. Vann said separating the two driveways will create a better experience for both the free market and affordable housing areas. The driveway goes through aspen trees, which are the easiest trees to replace. Councilman Richards stated she is concerned about two driveways 20 feet from each other. Councilwoman Richards suggested deed restricting 6 units and only have 5 free market parcels to have a better access and site design. This is a sensitive view plane. Vann reiterated the applicant can tear this building down and replace it with 8 units, subject only to the subdivision regulations. Vann said that scenario would not result in better site design. Vann said the access road is a purview of subdivision and they can combine the driveways. Vann said he feels this would be less attractive and there would be no change in the layout of the 6 lots. Vann said this project should be reviewed under the subdivision criteria. Councilman Paulson agreed he would like to see the driveway redesigned so there is only one entrance. Councilman Paulson said there is already a lot of traffic on Lone Pine and there are parking problems in the area. Vann said there will be 1 parking space per bedroom for the homes. There will also be access driveways to each homesite, which will provide additional parking. Vann said the carrying capacity of the surrounding streets will not be exceeded by this application. Councilman Paulson asked about the trail going through lots 1, 2 and 3. Vann said that has already been conveyed to the city. The parks department hopes to make improvements to that trail. The building envelopes have been set back to reduce the impact on these houses. Councilman Marolt said this is 3.5 acres in Aspen and with the implementation of the building envelopes, about half of the 3.5 acres will be open space. Councilman Marolt said the open space and building envelopes will take care of the concerns for this project. 7 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Mayor Bennett said this application will result in 71 percent more affordable housing bedrooms and 50 percent more net livable square footage in the AH project. This also reduces overall density from 8 to 6 free market units. The park impact fees will be greater under this application. The community plan recommends that existing structures be saved whenever possible. P & Z, housing office and staff recommend approval of this project. Mayor Bennett suggested asking staff to analyze the access question and the landscaping issues of the road going through the aspen grove. Mayor Bennett suggested also that lot 3, which is much larger than the other, be looked at. Vann told Council some corners have been moved around, which does not show on the plat. The corner closest to the road can be cutoff and the building envelope moved. Vann agreed to provide a revision of the building envelope to the satisfaction of the planning office. Mayor Bennett asked the planning staff to look at the driveway and landscape issue from a purely planning view. Vann said he would like to have closure on some of the issues so that they do not have to go over this again. Councilwoman Waggaman said she has no problem with letting the existing building remain; this is preferable to waste of material and extra construction in the area. Councilwoman Waggaman said the AH units should not come out of the AH pool. Councilwoman Waggaman agreed about having the driveway re-examined and she likes one curb cut better than two. Councilwoman Richards said the city needs to create a new growth management allocation pool for replacement units. Councilwoman Richards said she feels this code interpretation adds value to the project. Councilwoman Richards said she feels it would be nice to have some acknowledgment of that in the site design. Vann said there will be less units with more square footage in the affordable units. Councilman Marolt said the P & Z went through subdivision plans thoroughly and recommends Council approve this. Councilman Marolt said he is ready to vote on this. Councilman Paulson said there should only be one driveway into this subdivision. Mayor Bennett said he would like additional guidance from staff on the driveway and best design for the area. Councilman Paulson said if lot 3 were eliminated and additional land were added to lots 2 and 4, this might accomplish site design Council is looking for. Vann said 6 lots is the threshold issue. Vann said he is willing to table this and to see if the driveway can be resolved. Vann said the majority of Council supports the application, maintaining the existing building, the interpretation of the deed restriction. 8 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Councilwoman Richards moved to table Ordinance #35, Series of 1995; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Marolt all in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #37, SERIES OF 1995 - Code Amendment - Temporary Sales Sign Leslie Lamont, community development department, told Council this is a staff initiated code amendment to amend the sign code to allow end of the season sale signs to be displayed from March 1 to April 15. The current code only allows such signs to be up to 14 days. Ms. Lamont said staff has heard from small businesses that they wanted to be allowed to have end of the season signs. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilman Paulson asked about “no more than 3 sale signs per business”. Ms. Lamont said this is in the existing code and is not being changed. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #37, Series of 1995, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Marolt, yes; Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Waggaman, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #38, SERIES OF 1995 - Aspen Meadows Extension Leslie Lamont, community development department, told Council Savanah Limited Partnership is requesting an extension of their vested rights status and growth management allocation for lots 5 and 6 of the Aspen Meadows. These are 2 parcels near the restaurant. Ms. Lamont said 7 townhouse are proposed for lot 5 and lot 6 has the existing Bayer townhome with 3 new townhomes. Ms. Lamont pointed out this is the third time the applicant is requesting an extension. if approved this will put the project to December 19, 1995. The previous extension expired June 19th. The applicant submitted a request prior to that expiration. Ms. Lamont said if Council denied this application, the growth management allocations would disappear and the applicant would have to compete for allocations. The applicants also would not be protected from changes in the land use code. John Sarpa, representing Savanah Limited Partnership, told Council there is a pending sales transaction. Savanah has reached an agreement with the Aspen 9 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Institute and entered into a one year contract to sell back the trustee houses. This period was to allow the Institute time to raise funds to complete this sale. Sarpa said it is a long term goal of the Institute to get the trustee houses back to their ownership. Sarpa said they did not pull a building permit because they did not want to commit to build when the sale was still pending. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. Gideon Kaufman, representing the Aspen Institute, told Council they have been working hard in order to acquire the 8 existing trustee units. The Institute had to raise a lot of money to do the initial renovation and upgrade. Kaufman said there is still some HPC review for the existing townhouses and they will not have broken ground by December. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #38, Series of 1995, on second reading, including the 4 conditions in the planning office memorandum; seconded by Councilman Marolt. Councilwoman Waggaman said she cannot see a reason to extend vested rights if the applicants could pull a building permit and have a year in which to complete the building. Councilwoman Richards said she is supporting this application out or consideration for the work Savanah did to make the Meadows partnership happen. Mayor Bennett said he feels very differently for the extension between lots 5 and 6. Mayor Bennett said he cannot find evidence that the project on lot 6 has been diligently pursued. Roll call vote; Marolt, yes; Paulson, yes; Waggaman, no; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Mayor Bennett said if there is a fourth request, he will vote against it. ORDINANCE #40, SERIES OF 1995 - City Speed Limit John Worcester, city attorney, said this ordinance allows the city to impose a city- wide 25 mile per hour limit. The state legislature recently authorized cities to impose this type of limit. This will allow the city to post signs at each entrance to 10 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 town to advise motorists of this speed limit. Worcester said the speed limit in residential neighborhoods is 30 mph unless posted otherwise. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilman Marolt questioned the speed limit on Main street. Worcester said this will not affect Main street as it is a Colorado state highway. Stan Clauson, community development director, said some signs throughout town may be eliminated consistent with recommendations of the community plan. Councilwoman Richards said she has received a lot of requests for the city to lower the speed limit in residential. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #40, Series of 1995, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Paulson, yes; Marolt, yes; Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried ORDINANCE #42, SERIES OF 1995 - Amend Sales Tax Code Steve Barwick, assistant city manager, told Council this amends the current sales tax code by correcting an oversight in the original ordinance. This does not add any revenues. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #42, Series of 1995, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Marolt, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. WATER PLACE HOUSING BUDGET Steve Barwick, assistant city manager, told Council this is a request for an additional $40,000 for planning and schematics design phases for the water place housing project. Council previously approved $30,000 for this project. The $40,000 will come from the sale of the Cemetery Lane units. Councilwoman Richards said she would like staff to look at the rate of appreciation. The city is 11 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 putting in the land and will be buying back the units. The rate of appreciation should be lower than other housing projects. Barwick said the project is going to P & Z September 19th. This project has the same escalator clause, 3 percent or CPI, whichever is less. Barwick told Council there will be a 1.7 percent annual charge to homeowners for the capital replacement. This will come from the appreciation. The net result to homeowners will be 1.3 percent appreciation. Mayor Bennett said he likes that this will cost nothing to the taxpayers. Mayor Bennett said he has major problems with the plans. They appear to violate every design standard the city just created, like using cul-de-sacs, attached garages. Mayor Bennett pointed Mayor Bennett requested staff pass these comments on to the design team. Councilwoman Richards moved to approve an additional $40,000 allotment to the budget of Water Place housing project from the proceeds of the sale of existing city houses; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDINANCE #33, 1995 - GRAND ASPEN DEMOLITION EXTENSION Stan Clauson, community development director, told Council the applicants have stated they cannot continue to operate the hotel and to provide rooms to the M.A.A. under the circumstances of the motion made at the last meeting. Clauson told Council staff does not have a specific recommendation as to the mix of free market or group rates for the Grand Aspen. Councilman Marolt moved to reconsider the previous vote on the Section M amendment and restated plan to extend the demolition date from October 1995 to May 1998; seconded by Mayor Bennett. Mayor Bennett said his questions are (1) would 75 rooms cause the Grand Aspen to lose money and to close October 1; (2) how badly does the M.A.A. need rooms and how many rooms. Mayor Bennett said the M.A.A. has stated the closure of the Grand Aspen would cause immediate and severe impact on their organization. Mayor Bennett said another question is if the Grand Aspen does close, would other small lodges step up to the plate and deliver the needed rooms. Mayor Bennett said he would like to have more clarity before he makes a final decision. Mayor Bennett said he has a hard time accepting the argument that a group size minimum for the 12 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting August 28, 1995 Grand would still be unfair to other lodges. Mayor Bennett said he would like to know why the M.A.A. gave up the Truscott housing. Mayor Bennett recommended convening a citizen panel comprised of Savanah Limited Partnership, M.A.A., small lodge representatives and neutral citizens to dig into the inconclusive issues and provide clarity. The M.A.A. should explain and explore their position on rooms, how many they need. Savanah can explain their financial operations and why the 75 rooms are needed in order to support the M.A.A. Councilman Marolt said he feels if the Grand Aspen is demolished, everybody loses. The small lodges will benefit from continuing discussions on zoning considerations. The M.A.A. students are vital to the organization and orchestra and it is important to have them living in town, which causes less car trips over the S curves. Councilwoman Richards said she would support the motion if a better decision is made for the entire community. Councilwoman Richards said she the group should know that if they reach the same conclusions as Council, that is all right. Councilwoman Richards reiterated the Grand Aspen has no life after October 1st. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Richards moved to continue the second reading of Ordinance #33, 1995, to September 25; seconded by Councilman Marolt. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Richards moved to adjourn at 8:55 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 13