HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20020820 AGENDA ~
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002
4:30 PM
SISTER CITIES ROOM
I. COMMENTS
A. Commissioners
B. Planning Staff
C. Public
II. MINUTES
III. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IV. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 115 NEALE AVENUE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, James
Lindt
V. BOARD REPORTS
VI. ADJOURN
P1
AGENDA
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002
4:30 PM
SISTER CITIES ROOM
I. COMMENTS
A. Commissioners
B. Planning Staff
C. Public
II. MINUTES
III. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IV. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 115 NEALE AVENUE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, James
Lindt
V. BOARD REPORTS
VI. ADJOURN
P2
P15
0101-97310-1111 MLA
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Community Development Deputy Directonq�
FROM: James Lindt, Planner
RE: 115 Neale Ave. Stream Margin Review- Public Hearing
DATE: August 20, 2002
Applicant:.Dave Fuente
Representative: William Pollock,
Zone 4 Architecture Proposed Interior
Floor
Zoning: R-15 (Moderate -Density Y
Residential)
Lot Size: 5,037 SF
Land Use: Single -Family Residence
Request Summary: The Applicant is
requesting a Stream Margin Review
Approval to add an interior floor that
increases their Floor Area Ratio.
BACKGROUND:
The Applicant is proposing to add an interior floor to separate an existing two-story room
into two single story floors in the existing single-family residence at 115 Neale Avenue. The
existing residence contains approximately 2,943 square feet of floor area ratio (FAR). Earlier
this year, the Applicant received Stream Margin Review Exemption Approval to convert an
existing sunroom into heated living area, which increased the FAR on the property by
approximately nine (9) percent. In order to qualify for a Stream Margin Exemption, the
Applicant may not add more than ten (10) percent to the existing FAR. A Stream Margin
Review is required for the addition of the interior floor because the proposed floor will add
FAR to the existing residence, which would remove it from eligibility for a Stream* Margin
Review Exemption.
Additionally, the subject parcel is located within 100 feet of the high water line of Roaring
Fork River and thus requires Stream Margin Review approval. Pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.435, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the Planning and Zoning Commission may
. V
approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for development within 100 feet of
the Roaring Fork River.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff believes that adding the proposed interior floor in a two story room will have no effect
on the riparian area in which the Stream Margin Review is intended to protect. The room in
which the Applicant is requesting to construct an interior floor is located within fifteen (15)
feet of the Roaring Fork River's top of slope as determined by Sopris Engineering. However,
Staff does not believe that the aforementioned top of slope review standard is applicable in
this instance because the existing structure is already legally non -conforming in regard to it's
distance from the river's top of slope and the Applicant is not proposing to change the
building footprint or the exterior of the building. Staff feels that the proposal meets the
remaining review criteria in that there is no exterior disturbance being proposed
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this Stream Margin Review
application.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution No.�~ , Series of 2002, approving a Stream Margin Review
request to construct an interior floor that bisects a two story room at 115 Neale Avenue."
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Application
2
P17
Resolution No.
(SERIES OF 2002)
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT AN INTERIOR
FLOOR TO BISECT AN TWO STORY ROOM IN RESIDENCE LOCATED AT
115NEALE AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY; COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2735-073-53-001
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Dave Fuente, represented by Zone 4 Architecture, requesting Stream Margin Review
approval for the construction of an interior floor that bisects a two story room in the single-
family residence located at 115 Neale Ave; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant's. property is a 5,037 sq. ft. lot located in the R-15 Zone
District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the
Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable Land Use Code
standards, the Community Development Director finds that Stream Margin Review Standard
No. 3, No. 9, and No.11 are not applicable to the proposal because the existing residence is
currently non -conforming in regards to it's setback from the river's top of slope and the
proposal does not increase the aforementioned non -conformity; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use.
Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam
Margin Review finding that the remaining review standards have been met; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as
identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public
hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the Stream Margin
Review request, by a vote of to (_ - _), and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this
Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
P18
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request to
construct an interior floor to bisect a two-story room in the existing residence at 115 Neale
Avenue.
RP[`tinn 7
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
fiPetinn I
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
�ectinn 4
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless
amended by an authorized entity.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on August 20, 2002.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
M
UK
EXHIBIT A
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
A. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS
The proposed development is located within an environmentally sensitive area described as a
Stream Margin and is subject to Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be
permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a
determination that the proposed development .complies with all requirements set forth below:
1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special
Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed
for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a
professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows
that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited' to,
.proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood
elevation increase caused by the development.
Staff Finding
Staff finds that the proposal to add an interior floor will not increase the base flood elevation
because the scope of the work will be confined to the interior of the existing residence. Staff
finds this standard to be met.
2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open
Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in
the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of
historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public
use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access -within the high water
boundaries of the river course shall *be granted to the greatest extent possible via a
recorded "Fisherman's Easement."
Staff Finding
Staff finds that this proposal will not be in conflict with the AACP or the Roaring Fork
Greenway Plan because the entire scope of work is to be confined within the interior of the
existing structure. There is no development proposed that would negatively effect the
riparian area that the Stream Margin Review is intended to regulate. Staff finds this standard
to be met.
3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill)
made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall
be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant
to Section 26.435.040(F)(1).
Staff Finding
Staff feels that this standard is not pertinent to this application because the entire scope of
work being reviewed in this application is internal to the existing residence. Staff finds this
review standard not to be applicable to the proposed application.
O
4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of
the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during
construction. Increased on -site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to
prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained
outside of the designated building envelope.
Staff Finding
The proposal does not interfere with or, pollute the Roaring Fork River. Additionally, the
proposal will not affect the on -site drainage because the construction is located within the
existing residence. Staff finds this standard to be met.
5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any
alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice is submitted to
the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. Staff finds this standard
to be met.
6. A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated, that
applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the
flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. The construction shall be
limited to the interior of the existing residence. Staff finds this standard to be met.
7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work
within the one -hundred -year floodplain.
Staff Finding
There is no proposed development within the one -hundred -year floodplain. Staff finds this
standard to be met.
8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting within
fifteen (15) feet back of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most
restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank
stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the
designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as
approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development
applications. The top of slope and 100 year flood plain elevation of the Roaring
Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the
Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering
Department.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing any new landscaping. Staff finds this standard to be met.
0
�l
9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not
exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from
ght- shall be measured and determined by the
ground level at the top of slope. Hei
Community Development Director.using the definition for height set forth at Section
26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020, as shown
in Figure "A".
Staff Finding
The existing residence is already located within fifteen (15) feet of the river's top of slope as
was determined by Sopris Engineering. Staff believes that because the addition of the floor is
internal to the existing structure and that the proposal is not increasing the aforementioned
setback non -conformity from the top of slope; and that this standard is not applicable to the
this specific proposal. Staff finds this standard to be met.
10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river
or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. A
lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing any new outdoor lighting. The existing outdoor lighting must
be in compliance with the City of Aspen Outdoor Lighting Code. Staff finds this standard to
be met.
11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposal does not require identification of wetlands because the
proposed construction is entirely internal to the existing residence. Staff finds this standard
not to be applicable.
7
JTJU
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
- jl. ANNER:
James T;indt, 920.5095 i?ATrF,: 6.27.0
PRO11✓CT:
115 Neale Ave. Stream Margin RovJcw
11 EPRFjSEN! ATJVF-,
Steve, Wilson
CAVNER:
Fuente
T Yf3E OF APPLIC-A T 1C.',N:
Stream Martin Review
DESCR)I'TION:
I'roposcd floor area addition to oxistin� house, F3ecau;3c there iuive bCiil previous Strc m
margin exemptions granted that added flour area -to the project, the j roposal c 00S ilot
*c r an exemption from the Stream Margin Review Standards. Aod'itionally, bx:ause
qua -lift
the Stroam Margin Top of Slope Map repro. ensts that th.o top of slap: runs through the
existincy house, the proposal does not qualify fcir an adrninistrative Stream 'Margin Review.
The proposal requires rcMew by the Planning and Zoning CC1T; mission.
Lard Use Cone Section(s)
26,435.40 Stream Margin Review.
Review by:
Staff for complete application, Development Rcvlew Cornmittoe for techr7ical considerations, and
Planning and Zoninb Corr mission for decision.
Public Hearing.
Yes.
Referral Agencies:
Engineering,
Planning Fccs:
Planning Deposit $1205
Rel'crral :agency Fees;
g Referral $180
En, ineerinti
Total. Deposit.:
S1385
To apply, submit the following information;
I . Total Depo,sIt for review of applioatfon.
?. Applicant's name, address and tc1�pbone• number, Contained within a letter sighed by the: applicant sttating the
name, taddross, and telephone n-umber of the rc.presentat:ivc atitliorizcd to act on bolialf of the applicant.
3. Signed fe'c agreement,
4, Pre application C'onferc;ice Summary,
S, A site improvement survey with topography at two font contours, and the river top of slope (consult the Strelnl
lE.-la.rgin Review Map in the C0111mUrnity Qevel_opment Department) and 011r: hundr0d velar illoocl 1,01.
6. A11 $ 1/2" x 11" vici�lity neap locating; the subject parcels within the City of Aspelt.
7. A written dcscription of the proposal and a written explanation of hciw a proposed developrrw.,nt
complies witl't the review standards relevant to. the developin. ent application.
$: A site plan sh�)wing the. proposed addition.
9. Elevation' Drawings showing the proposed addition.
l o. A copy of the recorded documents which taffeots the proposed development.
11. Proof of ownership.
12.'Additional materials as required by specific rcvie-w. Plcase refer to the application packet for specific submittal
recli7irements or to the cock sections notcd above.
13, 17 -Copies of the complete application packet (items 1-10)
Process:
Apply. Piwiner reviews rase for completeness aiid welds to Fng,ineering for referral comments, often taken to Development Review
Co11,mittee (City Refe.rral Agenolus). Case Pl�Zriner tal:cs,to staff meeting for recommendation. Case planner writes mcn-lo Of
recommondation to the Planning and %oiling Commission. The Plimning and Loring Commission. may approve, approve with
conditions, or det.,y proposal. at a public bearing.
Disclaimer:
The, foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding oil die City. Tire sarnmary is base-d on cumcnt zoning, which 1.5
It
subject tv Chang e in tha ftltiar��, �ncl upr,n f��vt�ial rzl�rescr�t�ltioti-s that Cray or may not c ac-�.um�.e. T Ile strlilrlary elves slat tic ite
legal or vested fight.
she i 1 a f* ue r, -t 06:SOP P-0021
AMC HITEC TV
I N
P.O, aox V508
A.0twOEN 00 0-1 9 1 R
10 O's A 4 .0 0 4 1
February 11, 2002
Commu ft Deyelopintmt
. noy
City of Aspect
130 Sou* GaJens St.
AWak CO 9 1611
To The .Comma nity Deve4opment Dept. of Aspen,
With= 6bock of Zone 4 A=h� eetttre,' 10C.(ficente # 9-3329) VnII act on my bcw- f for
tht Stream Margin Review, Contact infoation -for W, Pollock are as follows:
') William PiAlmic
Z.Qm 4 AMhit_mL re, Inc,
P.O. Box 2508
Asperx, CO, 81612
P 544-9041 -
F 544-4885
Thq*-You.,
Dave Foetim
701 Tem point'Circle
Boca Ratoo, FL 33431
561-417-3587
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and "D,A�I F. f7a F— kTe
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
!15-
I�IA4P A
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision:
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ 0 which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, A PLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will buildina permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
By:_
Julie Ann Woods
Community Development Director
g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doe
1/10/01
APPLICANT T-)4 v C rue /,t1-�'
f,
f!
By: /
Date:
Mailing Address:
7 01 Te Q.tJ Fol sir
-5 oGA --0-ATa4 5Z, • -534-3 )
ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION
Name:
Location:
►�EAI.e
S40AF?—LIJArT�
tkLJ�'
�Lli�Di �
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
APPLICANT:
Name:����
Address: O I ' TE
tztJ _Por
E
TEE 3' 4 -3 f
Phone #: I ' 4 1
3
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: 1,� 1u. t4
TAD
Address:®,)(
ZSOl� S�G�i ► GU
16 17,
Phone #:
4:
PROJECT:
❑ Conditional Use
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Conceptual Historic Devt.
❑ Special Review
❑
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Final Historic Development
❑ Design Review Appeal
Conceptual SPA
❑
Minor Historic Devt.
❑ GMQS Allotment
❑
Final SPA (& SPA Amendment)
❑
Historic Demolition
❑ GMQS Exemption
❑
Subdivision
❑
Historic Designation
�947 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
[]
Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condominiumization)
Expansion
Mountain View Plane
❑ Lot Split
❑
Temporary Use
❑
Other:
❑ Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Text/Map Amendment
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
I':XISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
� �rorz�l i�ous� ��2.r�t �-rcEv��xls-r��1G-r Zvi 43 sF E L-oT st�E T�i , 5 4� ��
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $
❑ Pre -Application Conference Summary
❑ Attachment # 1, Signed Fee A eement
❑ Response to Attachment 43, Dimensional Requirements Form
❑ Response to Attachment 44, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application.
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: t--U �7t4TE2s",-, r1-->E Me-
Applicant: ^D4v e f:.0 F ttrf,
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed:
Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed:
Number of bedrooms: Existing: - ; Proposed: 4:
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area:
Existing:
Allowable:
Principal bldg. height:
Existing: Allowable:
IF
Access. bldg. height:
Existing: A
llowable:
On -Site parking:
Existing.
equired.•_
% Site coverage:
Existing. A
Required-_
% Open Space:
Existing-,
equired: _
Front Setback:
Existing:
Required.-_
Rear Setback:
Existing:
Required:_
Combined F/R.:
Existing:
Required.-_
Side Setback:
Existing:
Required:_
Side Setback:
Existing.
ARequired.•_
Combined Sides:
Existing: AlY
Required: _
Existing non -conformities or encroachments:
Proposed:
Proposed.
Proposed:
Proposed:
_Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:.
.Proposed.-_
.Proposed.-_
Proposed.-_
Variations requested: — ,/0 14.��fLE�SE
a
0
•i
N
•� 94
42
U
GCS L
a,
N C.
U.
ez (U
L L
o u
a
Zwl
r-+
N
o
N
N
•--
*-+
r-+
N
*-
N
r-+
N
`'" 0
N
N
r--
N °�
N
N C/�
N
r�
lu
o
wC-0
w
z
w
z
a
°oAHaaa
A[
zQCz
U�U
aA
a ''
d
W
z W
L.
u u
o
A
Q'
Q+
�+
Q
A
Z w
O
O Ln
d
U
L (IJ
aA
o
6J
CU
6w y
d Od
d
6J
bdi
di �"
M
v c•
c '>
M
M
N
o 0
a•
M
M
u
^
'�, o
N
O
n E
`n
ON
N
N
_d
cn X
W
M
NT
N
n
R v
=
M
CD,—�
rl
en
N
Cl)
00
00
GO
00
n
r--1
n
r-1
¢
r-�1
n
r•'�
N
N
C N
¢
^
M
M
y
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1 C
1
1
i
I
I
1
1
1
1 p
n
1
1
e
Zw
Z
W��
Zz
w
a
r7
z
O
a
a
w
�,
Z
>C
w
a,
W�
w
¢¢
g
U
W
a
w A
W y
>
�1
z
�1.40
o
V
w
a
U
cn
U
W
cn
z°
CW7
c
==
N
a
s
w
a
d
U
QO
00
a
H
C—r
V
s.
V
G
..
N
U
P
>
Q
a
AW
U s
F,
V
U
L°
>
^O
p
O
ca
w
ca
1.
V�V
;,,
U a
V
V O
z
°
p
z
Q�NQ
QUZQ
Nw
W.4�
QH )U.cn
w
N
w
�o�°ao°tea
C6 d
ozaa
�a
z A
W
w z
v w
w
A Q
Z
V
M
a\
M
14
4
1
1 i
r-1
z
cn
W
w
q
rn
z
w
0
h
cn
C
z
W
U
w
a
�
u
A
M
rz
t-,
7 n IV F
ARCHITECTURE
I N C.
P.O. BOX 2508
ASPEN CO 81512
9 7 0.5 4 4 .9 0 4 1
July 16, 2002
PROJECT: FUENTE RESIDENCE
115 Nl�ALfl AvE .
vlCRgTY MAP
I:\7_one 4\PR0JECTS\Fuente\Stream Margin Review\Vicinity Map.doc 1/1
•
'A1
ARCHITECTURE
1 N C.
P.O. BOX 2508
ASPEN CO 81612
9 7 0.5 4 4 .9 0 4 1
July 25, 2002
Community Development
City of Aspen
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
To the Community Development Dept. of Aspen,
In response to Ordinance No. 45, Section 1 (Section 26.435.020),
• Zone 4 Architecture is requesting approval for development within the stream margin
on the behalf of David and Sheila Fuente.
• The request for Stream Margin Review is because the exemption in Section 3, B,
Exemptions, 3-a, is not being met. The development does add more than 10% to the
floor area of the existing structure.
In response to Ordinance No. 45, Section 3 — C, Stream Margin Review Standards,
1. The development will in no way increase the base flood elevation on the parcel
proposed for development. See attached survey.
2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open
Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork Green -way Plan are not applicable
considering the proposed development is contained within the approved building
structure.
3. There will be no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes made
outside of the building envelope.
4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of
the river, stream, or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during
construction.
5. No alteration or relocation of a water course is occurring.
6. No alteration or relocation of a water course is occurring.
7. All work being considered is within the approved building structure.
8. There is no exterior development being considered.
9. The development exists within the building structure. No exterior alterations,
reconstruction, or remodeling is to occur. The top of slope exists in elevation and
location, above most of the existing building.
10. No exterior lighting is proposed.
11. The proposed development will be entirely an interior space.
Please feel free to call with any questions.
Thank you,
William S. Pollock, Co -President
Zone 4 Architecture, Inc.
Mail Notes:
1, For Additional Information See Plano Gated 04-26-02 by Maggert & A55oci3te5, Inc,
Partial Upper Level Floor Plan
1/4" = 1'-0"
Maggert & Associates, Inc. Fuente Residence
Structural Engineers
580 Main Street, Suite 300 115 Neale Avenue
Carbondale, Colorado 81623-2035 Aspen Colorado
(970) 963-9643 - FAX 963-0135
Dwn by: Date:
A.JK 7-2-02
Chkd by:
E.K.M,
Job #:
Fuente
SHEET
C 1
1 of 1
• •Z ••O , N
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ELEV. 100'-0"= 7900'-0"
ARCHITECTUR
INC.
�q.70.544.904
A8PEN 0X 8181122
W
W
o
�a0
m
W
�
J
V
ZZ
H
�W
I'Ta
DATE:
05/02/02
ISSUE:
PROGRESS SET
11/13/01
INTERIOR DEMO SET
12/27/01
P ITS
)TES:
01/3
PROGRESS SET
02/26/02
1IMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMING AND ROUGH OPENING UN.O.
PROGRESS SET
03/11 /02
JALL LEGEND-
PRICINGET
WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED
/2
NEW WALLS
CON ISSUE
05/02/02
:OR BEAM AND COLUMNS TO BE ADDED- RE: STRUCT.
:ONTRACTOR TO vERIFT ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD
ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE 31%" U.N.O.
DESCRIPTION:
'ONTRACTOR TO vERIFT SUBFLOOR ELEVATION
;OR STONE FLOORING TO ALIGN W/ WOOD OR CARPET
3ASED ON FLOOR THICKNESS
ENTRY
FLOOR
LOOR TRANSITIONS FROM STONE TO CARPET TO BE STONE
PLAN
LOOR TRANSITIONS FROM CARPET TO WOOD TO BE WOOD
LOOK TRANSITIONS FROM WOOD TO WOOD TO BE WOOD
S. INTERIOR DESIGNER SPECS. FOR FLOOR MATERIALS
DRAWN 8Y: DMJ
CHECKED BY: WSP
SCALE: 1 /8' =1'-0'
A3.2
EXISTING SIDING
ELE�T.O. PL7.
---y 108,�11 y�-
T.O. PLT_
ELEY. fd0'-®"
CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING
(RUST FINISNJ
TIMBER BEAM ENDS
BATTERED WALLS
RE: OTL. ICIA62
r
T
ww ��
gal
slim
1
(
I
I
i
i
T.O. FLY.
- ELEV. 118'-10 'r Y ELEV. 118'-1® a -
=^I=, 1r� ic:. IV Kci IAIIV-
TO DE RESURFACED
LIGHT FIXTURE -
TO RE 9FE:CIFIED
RE: DETAIL- '1/A&2
- NOTES:
1. ALL NEW AND/OR REPLACED WINDOWS TO
BE SPECIFIED WITH MIN. 0.4 U-VALUE
SOUTH ELEVATION 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO 5E VERIFIED IN FIELD
SCALE: 1/4"=V-a" I
METAL ROOFING
I I I ! GGIVVIIIUV7 AI IVCW rAlr-KICJK WALL? ' I
A �T..A E!,J'
_J
Y gLEv. 100-11
ARCHITECTUR
INC.
�g70.544,904
ASPEN CO 816112
DRAWN BY: DMJ
CHECKED BY: WSP
SCALE: 1 /8, =1 I-0"
1 EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=V-a"
25 FEET ABOVE EXISTING GRADE BELOW FOOTPRINT -
GRADE 15 NOT BE WG CHANGED ON THE EXTERIOR
L
SECTION
1 SCAM: 1/4"=1'-0"
T_0.
ELEY. 119'-IG! q"r
T.O. PLr. 0
ELEv. 106'-II �-
BIB. HEADER J,
K-E V. 134' T
EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN -
TO BE RESURFACED
LIGHT FIXTURE -
TO BE SPECIFIED
, T.O. PLATE
�ELEV.121'-1Iy" - - -
ARCHITECTUR
INC.
�70.544.904
0. PEN CO 81612
W
W
�
o
2
0a0
m
w
9
J
ci
UJ
Zz
T
W/�
IL
Q
DATE:
05/02/02
ISSUE:
11/13/01
PROGRESS SET
01/31/02
PERMIT SET
02/26/02
PROGRESS SET
03/11/02
PROGRESS SET
03/29/02
PRICING SET
05/02/02
CONST. ISSUE
DESCRIPTION:
SECTIONS
DRAWN BY: DMJ
CHECKED BY: WSP
SCALE: 1 /8, =1'-0'
AS A
SECTION @ GAME ROOM