Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.20021022ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMiSSI0~ OCtober 22, 2002 Jasmine Tygre opened the regular Planning and Zoning meeting at 4:30 p.m. in Sister Cities Meeting with Jack Johnson, Bert Myrin, Roger Haneman and Ron Erickson present. Ruth Kruger and Eric Cohen arrived at 4:40 p.m: Dylan Johns was excused. Staffin attendance: David Ho&er, Assistant City Attorney; Chris Bendon, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING (09/03/02, 09/17/02, 9/24/02, 10/01/02, 10/08/02, 10/15/02): INFILL LAND USE CODE AMENDMENTS Jasmine Tygre opened the continued public hearing on the Infill Land Use Code Amendments. Ct~s Bendon stated that Pedestrian Amenity was a concern with the impact fees on open space overall. Bendon uhlized power point graphs, formulas for square footage of the open space required and the parking requirement on and off site. The commissioners discussed rooftop restaurants and restaurants not on ground levels requiring service elevators. The commissioners questioned if the city should continue to require a pedestrian amenity. They questioned the affects as an exaction; they said that the fee must be spent on something tied to the impacts. The commission struggled what to call the open space/pedestrian amenity requirement. The Lodge Zone District was talked about regarding the fact that this was an out dated product in Aspen and needed to be updated for short-term accommodations. The commissioners asked how revitalization could encourage re-development to keep lodges as lodges; they looked at the success of the condo rentals at the Aspen Alps redevelopment. There was discussion on how to allow the developer to respond to the market; how to structure and not dictate what the market wants. The commission discussed smaller number of units but did not favor smaller square footage; they also talked about permanent residential and a density incentive. The conmaissioners favored the impact fees based on a combination of the number of units and the number of bedrooms with greater density in the lodge area. A 20% pedestrian amenity was favored 6-1 by the commission; Myrin wanted to keep the 25%. There was mixed use in the lodge zone district. There was a need for non-unit space in the lodge for self-sustaining the work force and anything but lodge units. ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION October 22, 2002 The Commercial Lodging was located in the Commercial Core with mixed uses in that zone district: Tax incentives were suggested to mitigate some of the financial Concerns with regards t6 the development of commercial properties and these concerns would be best addressed at the end of the infill public hearings. The Commission agreed 5-1 to move the Commercial Lodge to the Commercial Core Zone District review criteria. The Eodge Overlay Zone had no large changes. The commissioners talked about lodges and the generation of sales taxes verses time-share and single-family homes~ VieTM planes were presented by Chris Bendon with a power point presentation and discussed by the commission. The commissioners voted to keep the Courthouse, view plane 2(yes)~4(no); Cooper Street Pier 3(yes)-5(no); Main Street-Jerome 3(yes)-5(no); Wheeler 6(yes)-2(no); Street level Wheeler- more information requested; Wagner 4-4 and the second Wagner - more information was needed. The commission discussed no increase in building heights from Wagner Park, to protect the views of Mill Street to Wagner Park. They voiced concern over spot zoning for view planes. No public comment. MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to continue the public hearing on the lnfill Land Use Code Amendments to October 29, 2002; seconded by Bert Myrin. APPROVED 7-0. The c ,am~mi,'~ ,'ssiork adj~)urned at 7:05 p.m. ~ckie Lothi~n,'-~puty Cit-y ~lerk 2