The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1431 Crystal Lake Rd.0072.2016.ASLUL- -- 0072.2016.ASLU 1431 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 2737 181 31 007 SCAn-e& 9// B 6 a ~eu.o< 1 : 1 L THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0072.2016.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 181 31 007 PROJECT ADDRESS 1431 CRYSTAL LAKE RD PLANNER BEN ANDERSON CASE DESCRIPTION ESA 8040 GREENLINE, STREAM REPRESENTATIVE ALICE DAVIS AND GLENN HORN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 09.09.2016 CLOSED BY KARLA HENRICHON Kpa,ted ID&L 27 z jei}-31-06-1 00-12- .20/10-ASA ~ Permits - m x Elle Edit Record Navigate Furm Reports Fcrmat Iab Help v * 15 BX B ,/ 10 7B . &g J 24 23 12 - - 11 4 > >J o .2) A lump 1 @Â¥ - *| 6 - 2 0 .Â® 3 M g c, . 18 1 8 0 2 4 4 w. Main Custom Fields Routing Status Fee S ummarM Actions Routing History Permit type ~ Aspen Land Use Permit # 0072.2016.ASLU Address 1431 CRYSTAL LAKE RD Â·Â·Â· Apt/Suite City ASPEN State CO | Zip 81611 Permit Information Master permit PÂ· Routing queue aslul 5 Applied 07/27/2016 Prolect i.. Status pending Approved Description ESA-8040 GREENLINE. STREAM. EXEMPTION Issued Closed/Final Submitted ALICE DAVIS 925-6587 Clock |Running | Days E--61 Expires 07/22/201 7 S ubmitted via Owner Lastname BASS ' Â·Â·- First name EDWARD P. 200 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Phone {970] 379-7110 Address Applicant U Owner is applicant? El Contractor is applicant? Last name DAVIS 1 - Filst name ALICE PO BOX 2015 ASPEN CO 81612 Phone [) Cust # 22937 Address E mail Lender Last name 1 Â« j First name Phone [1 - Address Enter the permit tppe code AspenGold5 [served karlah ~@i~ 1 of 1 Chec/101 4/330 Reurraj f,row,~~ : cheoll- 122-M- EN Â£1 i pÂ«AS Rtoe *4-4 41%30 ~Anni~ Fees # 1500 smo N Moln E) xoq'001 sdnoig gel DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Edward P. Bass 201 Main Street #2700, Ft. Worth. TX 76102 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Aspen Club Condominiums. Condominium Unit D-3. Building D. City of Aspen. County of Pitkin. State of Colorado: 1431 Crystal Lake Road. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval for the expansion of an existing deck. Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Stream Margin Review Exemption - administratively approved. September 9,2016. Reception # 632191 (9/14/2016) Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) September 29.2016 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of Notice of Approval.) September 29.2019 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 19th day of September 2016, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. r ical evl,B/U Jessica Garrow, ~~munity Development Director U AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQU]RED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1431 (2'61 Le_ U Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORA_DO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, skc-~20\ 9cor-2-4 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that Â· I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: U~~' Publication ofnotice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no latef than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice.- By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. SignatoW 0-- The fore~avit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this01 day ofSe,) , 200.6_, bf lv.\cral 9360..aa CÂ» PUBLIC NOTICE 01 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WITNESS M-Y HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- My commission expires: 9168)2,0(9Â· ing to the following described property: Parcel ID #2737-181-31-007, Legally described as Aspen Club Condominiums, Condominium Unit D-3, Building D, City of Aspen, County Of Pitkin, State Of Colorado; commonly known as 1431 Crystal .-4/2Â«(/- c KE**' Lake Rd. An administrative approval of a Stream ~ Margin Review Exemption was granted to expand an existing deck; Reception #632191, 9/14/2016. Notary Public TARA L. NELSGN The project is depicted in the land use application NOTARY PUBLIC on file with the City of Aspen. For further informa- tion contact Ben Anderson at the City of Aspen STATE OF COLORADO Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St. NOTARY ID 20014030017 Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2765. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09/25/2017 City of Aspen ATTACHMENTS: Published in The Aspen Times on September 29, 2016. (12396273) COPY OFÂ·THE PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Parcel ID #2737-181-31-007, Legally described as Aspen Club Condominiums, Condominium Unit D-3, Building D, City of Aspen, County Of Pitkin, State Of Colorado; commonly known as 1431 Crystal Lake Rd. An administrative approval of a Stream Margin Review Exemption was granted to expand an existing deck; Reception #632191, 9/14/2016. The project is depicted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Ben Anderson at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2765. City o f Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on September 29,2016. RECEPTION 2, 1,09/14/2016 at 10:45:46 AM, 1 OF 4. R $26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 632(9 f NOTICE OF APPROVAL STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTNG DECK AT 1431 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ASPEN CLUB CONDOMINIUMS, CONDOMINIUM UNIT D-3, BUILDING D, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID No. 2737-181-31-007 APPLICANT: Edward P. Bass REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Davis and Glenn Horn, Davis Horn, Inc. SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: 1431 Crystal Lake Rd., Aspen, CO. (Also known as Aspen Club Condominiums, Unit D-3). SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested a Stream Margin Review Exemption to expand an existing deck by fifty-one (51) square feet (existing deck area of 269 square feet). The property is located within one-hundred (100) feet ofthe Roaring Fork River, requiring the review for an exemption. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.435.040[14 The Community Development Director may exempt certain types of development within the stream margin review area if the development meets the criteria for an exemption. Most applicable to this case are the standards established for "the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of existing development." In summary, staff has evaluated these standards and determined the following: a) The proposed deck expansion fits within the thresholds established by the code, The expansion will add 18.9% to the existing deck - less than the 25% threshold. b) No trees are proposed for removal in this application. c) The project does not bring development any closer to the top of slope. d) There is not an established building envelope for this property. e) This project does not lie within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, considering the review criteria, staff finds that the deck expansion at 1431 Crystal Lake Road qualifies for an exemption from stream margin review. For a more detailed analysis of the review criteria for this exemption, please refer to Exhibit B. Community Development Staff requested referral comments from the Parks and Engineering Departments. Both supported the exemption and the expansion of the deck Page 1 of2 subject to recommended conditions. The exemption approval is subject to the conditions described below. DECISION: Staff finds that the Stream Margin Review Exemption application provided by the Applicant complies with the review criteria of Section 26.435.040[B] and should be granted to expand the existing deck area per the information submitted in the attached exhibits, subject to the following conditions: 1) The project will minimize the disturbance to the slope through project design and construction that cantilevers the deck extension QI utilizes only hand tools for the excavation of footers. 2) To the greatest extent feasible, construction will utilize the causeway between buildings C and D (between units 1425 and 1427) for access to the site for personnel and materials. If it becomes necessary to utilize the paved trail below the project for access, personnel will be dedicated to warn recreational users of the trail of any obstacles or hazards during construction or movement of materials. 3) No material staging is allowed on the sloped or top of bank areas. 4) No construction vehicles or motorized equipment are allowed on the sloped or top of bank areas. 5) A revegetation plan approved by the Parks Department for any disturbance to the slope will be required at building permit. APPROVED BY: 0 j willl %Â«-,AD 9 otrinbÂ«q I )01(0 C Jessica Garrok J Date 4-jommunity ]30*elopment Director CONSENTED TO: 007(b-0,-a<Â£2 0 657F~ 70-0 t 6 ENwaid D.-bass Date i Owner Attachments: Exhibit A - Review Criteria (Not Recorded) Exhibit B - Plans and Survey (Recorded) Exhibit C - Application (Not recorded) Exhibit D - Referral Comments (Not Recorded) Page 2 of 2 Page lof 1 *82133* 'UDEIUB Print Date: Pitkin County Transaction #: 82133 9/14/2016 10:59:18 Janice K. Vos Caudill Receipt #: 201605683 Clerk and Recorder AM Cashier Date: 9/14/2016 10:45:48 AM 530 East Main Street (PNADON) Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 429-2707 www.PitkinClerk.org Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary DateReceived: 9/14/2016 Over the Source Code: Counter (ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF Over the Q Code ATTN CITY CLERK Counter Total Fees $26.00 Over the Total Payments $26.00 Return Code- Escrow Balance: $1143.00 Counter Trans Type: RECORDING Agent Ref Num: 1 Payments ELI CHECK 6145 $26.00 1 Recorded Items 13\ BIOPG: 0/0 Reception:632191 Date-9/14/2016 ,$=. tg" i Â®2.1 (APPROVAL) APPROVAL AN Y 10:45:46 AM li''i>[1 From: To: Recording @ $11 for 1 pg and $5 for 2 or more 4 $26.00 pgs $1 Surcharge 0 Search Iterns 0 Miscellaneous Items file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/RecordingModule/default.htm 9/14/2016 Exhibit A Review Criteria: In accordance with Section 26.435.040 Development in Environmental Sensitive Areas; Stream Margin Review; an exemption may be authorized by the Community Development Director if the proposed development meets the review criteria. B. Exemptions. The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the stream margin review area: 1. Construction of pedestrian or automobile bridges, public trails or structures for irrigation, drainage, flood control or water diversion, bank stabilization, provided plans and specifications are submitted to the City engineer demonstrating that the structure is engineered to prevent blockage of drainage channels during peak flows and the Community Development Director determines the proposed structure complies, to the extent practical, with the stream margin review standards. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion not applicable. 2. Construction of improvements essential for public health and safety which cannot be reasonably accommodated outside ofthe "no development area" prescribed by this Section including, but not limited to, potable water systems, sanitary sewer, utilities and fire suppression systems provided the Community Development Director determines the development complies, to the extent practical, with the stream margin review standards. Staff Response: Staff jinds this criterion not applicable. 3. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards are met: a) The development does not add more than ten percent ( 10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%). All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a stream margin review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and Staff Response: The existing deck area exemptfromfloor area calculations is 269 square feet (upper deck of 162 sq. ft. and lower deck 107 sq. ft.). The proposed expansion is 51 sq. ft. or 18.9% of exempt deck area. Additionally, the total square footage of decking after the expansion remains under the 15% deck FAR exemption. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. b) The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. Staff Response: No trees are present in the area of the deck expansion. No trees are proposed for removal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; Staff Response: The proposed deck expansion is not located any closer to the high water mark than existing development. Stafflinds this criterion to be met. Exhibit A d) The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and Staff Response: A building envelope does not exist for the townhome complex. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. e) The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year flood plain. Staff Response: The proposed expansion of the deck is well outside of the 100-year floodplain. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. EXHIBIT FOR ASPEN CLUB, UNIT 1431 DECK ENCROACHMENT OF ROARING FORK RIVER Exhibit B A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 13A & 13 OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION r IN THE Ek OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE Gth P.M. | COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHP,ET 1 OF 1 1 1 1 / -/// /0 1/ -t' NOTES USED FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL CONDOMINIUM 1) THIS EXHIBIT]SBASEDONFIELDINFORMATION MAP NO. 4 FORTHE ASPEN CLUB CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED JUNE 15, 2012 AS RECEPTION NUMBER .V 7) FIRM MAP PANEL 08097Â®04C 589856. <Pe > 37 EFFECTIVEDATE JUNE 4, 1987 40< - dll* ..$92 4 v./ y. .h'* fÂ·.. 22. 09>..:: .Â· Â· SÂ¢M : 1 ve Â«*42Â«442-\ 1 > t PROPOSED LOWER DECK ~46.70' 88.46'\ 78.33' ~ .: t. I Zkk'Z - ./ / MEAN IDENTIFIABLE HIGH WATER MARK . 1/ OVERLAYED 100 YEAR FLOOD ROARING FORK RIVER PLAIN AND FLOODWAY LINE PER CENTERLINE OF RIVER FIRM MAP 08097C0204C ZONE AE $-- --- '4&,EG/44 111 - - JV#Al~34.A7~tiA + --- rl 111,06041 ER LS. #2.04 GRAPHICSCALE -.-I- EY (11 '28843 4%37. 1-0 1.41 40 DATE ~24 ''Â·.,,..Â·Â·'c>- SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC ( IN FEET ) CIVIL CONSLJLTANTS 1 inch = 40 ft. 502 MAIN STREEL SUITE A3 sb 16006 2016-08-12 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 M: \3600dwgs\16006\condo 1970) 704 0311 16006 condo unit 1431 Civ!13[.dwi EXHIBIT FOR DECK MODIFICATION OF UNIT 1431 ASPEN CLUB Exhibit B A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 13A & 13 OF THE CAILAHAN SUBDIVISION IN THE E 34 oF SE~no~0~AoZFMA~F 3?1!2'oPE&81~JEST oF THE 6th P.M. filiallifill Â¢ *PER NOTICE OF APPROVAL RECORDED jUNE 6, 201 AREA TABLE 49Â»4 1 CURRENT TOTAL DECK AREA: 269 SQ.FT. 11.8% , FUTURE TOTAL DECK AREA: 320 SQ.FT. 14.1% \ 1 UNITD3 FLOORAREA: 2.274 SQ.fT.' AS REC #589855 BUILDING D UNIT #1431 EXISTING LOWER DECK EXTERIOR BOUNDARY EXISTING UPPER DECK 107 SQ.FT. EXTERIOR BOUNDARY n 162 SQFT. 14 1 L ~ 27.i r' 1 13.7' 0 4- -1 - - PROPOSED LOWER DECK (DASHED) / 1 EXTERIOR BOUNDARY 158 SQ.FT. J {ENLARGES EXISTING BY AN ADDITIONAL 51 SQ.FT.) GRAPHICSCALE 1~0 ( IN FEET ) SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC 1 inch = 10 ft. ~ 4 ~3$ CIVIL CONSULTANTS Blm=.Ltl 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 1/I/Juhal CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 ab 16006 2016-07-22 SOUTHERN VIEW M: \3600dwas\18005\condo\15006 condo unit 1431.dwa / Exhibit D - Referral Comments From: David Radeck To: Ben Anderson; Hailey Gualielmo Subject: RE: Referral request - Stream Margin Review Exemption Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 6:33:49 PM Hey Ben, Parks has no objections tothe increase of the deck. One concern that we have would be access. The trail that runs below the proposed deck is a fairly well used trail and we would like to minimize construction activity on it. We would requirethatthe contractor use the access point between 1425 and 1427 (the"C" & "D" Buildings). The trees there are not code sized and can be removed with HOA approval. Thanks! David Radeck Project Technician City of Aspen Parks & Open Space 585 Cemetery Lane Aspen, CO 81611 P: 970-429-2025 * F: 970-920-5128 Email: david.radeck@cityofaspen.com http://aspenrecreation.com From: Ben Anderson Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 3:01 PM To: Hailey Guglielmo <hailey.guglielmo@cityofaspen.com>; David Radeck <david.radeck@cityofaspen.com> Subject: Referral request - Stream Margin Review Exemption Hi Hailey and Dave - Here is the link to the application. It is for a deck expansion at 1431 Crystal Lake - Building D, Unit 3 Aspen Club Condos/Callahan Subdivision. X:\City\Ben_Anderson\1431 Crystal Lake Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Ben Ben Anderson, Planner City of Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2765 Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only forthe individual orentity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuantto applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please replytothe senderthat you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinionscontained in this email areadvisoryin nature onlyand are not bindingon the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. Â« OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Â» From: Mike Horvath To: Ben Anderson Subject: RE: 1431 Crystal Lake Rd. Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 10:14:50 AM Ben, To answer your questions, the following language from the code is the what these conditions are trying to achieve: 1. In Section 26.435.010.B: "Review shall encourage development and land usesthat preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural features." The health of the riveralsodependson the natural slopessurrounding it. Disturbingtheseslopes degradesthe overall health of the river and surrounding eco system. In Section 26.435.040.C.8: "There is no development otherthan native vegetation planting taking place below top of slope or within fifteen feet of the top of slope or high water mark, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability." Allowing disturbance and development beyond top of slope goes againstthe entire effort of the standards. 2. The top of slope is determined bythe engineering department. In some cases it extends well beyond the high watermark. I understand the proposed development is exempt from stream margin review, but it was my understanding from the meeting with you and Jessica concerning these reviews wasthat we could condition these reviews how we wanted to. We still need to protect the slopes alongside the rivers in town, and would like these conditions to remain in place. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thanks and have a good weekend! Michael Horvath Civil Engineer 11 Engineering Department City of Aspen mike.horvath@cityofasoen.com Ph: (970) 429-2776 From: Ben Anderson Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:04 PM To: Mike Horvath <mike.horvath@cityofaspen.com> Subject: RE: 1431 Crystal Lake Rd. Hi Mike - Thank you for the review. A couple of questions: 1) The applicant was definitely planning on buildingthe deck expansion with footers - probably sonatube formed. The cantilever requirement is something they are not expecting. Do you have code language that I can point to in explainingthis requirement? 2) I know this is very common point of discussion/disagreement, but how is the top of slope identified in this location? Or is it even an issue here? I think the applicant (and myself based on a site visit) see the top of slope as very distinct and disconnected from the top of bank/high water mark etc. Hailey, I think has had some discussion on this particular property regardingtop of slope, but I was unableto get anything from the applicant on this determination. Guidance towards location of code language on the top of slope conditions would also be helpful. I appreciate any insight you can offer as I continue to try and wrap my brain around the land use code, engineering's code, and the intersection between the two. Someday, we will make this all more clear. Ben Ben Anderson, Planner City of Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2765 Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only forthe individual orentity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuantto applicable law. If you are notthe intended recipient, please replytothe sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinionscontained in this email areadvisoryin nature onlyand are not bindingon the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. Â« OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Â» From: Mike Horvath Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:44 AM To: Ben Anderson <ben.anderson@cityofaspen.com> Subject: RE: 1431 Crystal Lake Rd. Ben, It is exempt from the stream margin review per the Code. The engineering department would like to include the following conditions of approval: 1. There must be noground disturbance for deck support. The deck must be cantilevered. 2. No vehicle traffic beyond the top of slope. Top of slope delineation musty be approved by Engineering Department. 3. No material staging beyond thetop of slope. 4. Applicant must submit means and methods of construction to ensure they meet the above conditions. Please let me know if you need anything else. Michael Horvath Civil Engineer 11 Engineering Department City Of Aspen mike.horvath@cityofaspen.com Ph: (970) 429-2776 From: Ben Anderson Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:10 AM To: Mike Horvath <mike.horvath@cityofaspen,com> Subject: 1431 Crystal Lake Rd. Hi Mike - here is an updated site plan with the 100 year flood plain indicated. Let me know if you need anything else. Ben Ben Anderson, Planner City of Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2765 Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only forthe individual or entityto which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuantto applicable law. If you are notthe intended recipient, please reply tothe senderthat you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email areadvisoryin nature onlyand are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that mayor may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or anyclaim of detrimental reliance. << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Â» THE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 26,2016 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 1431 Crystal Lake Road- Stream Margin Exemption and have reviewed it for completeness. ~l Your Land Use Application is complete: Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdf o f the entire application. 2) Review deposit of$2,275.00. v< ; Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. TJWnk You, c abvi \ buu - 1X / J enniter Pnelgn, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD , Yes -No_~~Q.. Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No ~CL Commercial E.P.F. Lodging f Davis Horn*- PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING July 22,2016 .tee[ 12' 1,/CD Justin Barker JUL 2 5 2016 City of Aspen Community Development CITY OF ASPEN 130 South Galena Street JOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Aspen Club Condominiums Building D Unit 3 at 1431 Crystal Lake Road: Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Minor Addition of a Deck: Dear Justin: Edward P. Bass ("Applicant") is the owner of Aspen Club Condominiums Unit D-3 (Building D, Unit 3) at 1431 Crystal Lake Road. This property is one of 20 townhomes in the Callahan Subdivision and one of 12 located on the Roaring Fork River side of the complex. The Applicant is requesting an exemption from the stream margin review regulations pursuant to Section 26-435.040 B of the City of Aspen's Land Use Regulations for a minor expansion of a deck on the south, river side of the structure. The existing deck is triangular in shape and the expansion will square off two sides creating a rectangular deck. This small addition will simply create enough space to place a hot tub on the deck. A Vicinity Map showing the location of the property up Independence Pass from the City of Aspen is found in Attachment 1. The Pre- application Conference Summary in Attachment 2 summarizes the information and requirements necessary for obtaining this exemption. Background In 1976 the Callahan Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved. As part of the Subdivision, 20 multi- family townhomes were approved on Callahan Subdivision Lots 13 and 13A. These units were subsequently condominiumized as the Aspen Club Condominiums (Book 6, Page 20). The current zoning ofthe property is R- 15/PUD and the Callahan Subdivision clearly provided for the multi-family component as part of this subdivision/PUD. Extensions and expansions have occurred. On June 15, 2012, there was a Notice of Approval (Attachment 3) recorded at Reception #589855 for an Insubstantial Amendment to the Aspen Club Condominiums which memorialized the existing improvements on the site. Table 1 in the recorded Notice of Approval documents the existing floor area for each townhome unit and documents the subject unit D-3 at 1431 Crystal Lake Road with 2,274 existing square feet. Proposal The Applicant is requesting approval to add a 51 square foot addition to an existing 107 square feet deck on the lower level, south, river side of the townhome. There is also a 162 square foot deck on the upper level so the total existing deck area is 269 square feet. After the 51 square foot expansion, the total deck area will be 320 square feet. As shown in the surveyed drawing of ALICE DAVIS AICP $ GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. â€¢ SUITE 104 â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 970/925-6587 â€¢ FAX: 970/925-5180 adavis@rof.net ghorn@rof.net the existing and proposed deck area by Sopris Engineering in Attachment 4, the existing lower deck to be expanded is triangular in shape and the expansion will square off the deck to make it rectangular. As discussed in a pre-application meeting with Jennifer Phelan, as stated in the pre- application conference summary in Attachment 2 and as is shown in Attachments 4 and 5, no portion of the addition will be any closer to the 100 year flood plain or the high water line than the existing deck. The current Land Use Code allows up to 15% of total allowed floor area for a unit to be exempt from floor area calculations for decks. Fifteen percent (15%) of the 2,274 square feet documented in the subject unit is 341.1 square feet of deck area exempt for the subject unit. After the 51 square foot deck addition, the total floor area in decks will be 320 square feet in decks for Unit D-3. The 320 square feet of total deck area will be less than the 341.1 square feet allowed for exempt floor area. Consequently, there will not be any increase in floor area resulting from the deck remodel. Please refer to Attachments 4 and 5 which show the deck modification proposed. Attachment 5 depicts the existing unit D-3, at its closest, is 88.46 feet from the centerline ofthe Roaring Fork River and 58.97 feet from the mean identifiable high water mark. None of the 51 square foot addition will encroach any further into or toward the River, the 100 year flood plain or be any closer to the mean high water mark of the River than the existing deck. Land Use Code Sections 25.435.010 and 25.435.040 establish the purpose of the standards to regulate "Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas" which include the Stream Margin Review standards. Development is subject to heightened review due to the ecological, environmental, architectural or scenic significance within designated environmentally sensitive areas (Section 25.435.010). Development proximate to the Roaring Fork River is subject to heightened review "to reduce and prevent property loss by flood while ensuring the natural unimpeded flow of water courses. Review shall encourage development and land uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural resources" (Section 25.435.040). This section of the land use application demonstrates compliance with the applicable sections of the Land Use Code which have been identified in the Pre-application Conference Summary in Attachment 2 and the consistency of the development proposal with the purpose of the City's standards for Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas as discussed above. Section 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review: Exemptions A. Applicability. The provisions of this stream margin review shall apply to all development within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams and to all development within the Flood Hazard Area, also known as the 100-year flood plain. 2 The Stream Margin review is not applicable as the proposed deck modification meets the requirements for an exemption from Stream Margin Review in (B)(3) below. Only exemption 3 applies as exemptions 1 and 2 are for bridges, trails, flood control etc. and improvements for public health and safety. B. Exemptions. The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the stream margin review area: 3. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards are met: a) The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the noor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%). All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a stream margin review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and b) The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the Code. c) The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; d) The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and e) The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year nood plain. All of the above standards are met and the proposed deck expansion will be in compliance. The 51 square foot deck expansion will increase total deck area to 320 square feet, less than 341.1 square feet which is 14.1% ofthe existing floor area in the 2,274 square foot townhome. The deck remodel does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required. As shown in Attachment 4 and 5, the expansion is located such that no portion of the expansion will be any closer to the high water line than the existing deck. There is no approved building envelope for the townhomes and the expansion will not increase the amount of ground coverage within the 100 year flood plain. Section 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures This section of the Code addressed the procedures for the Stream Margin Review. This letter of application is intended to meet the procedures and requirements for an Exemption to a Stream Margin Review. There is no public notice required pursuant to the pre-application conference in Attachment 2. 3 The following attachments are included for your review: Attachment 1: Vicinity Map; Attachment 2: Pre-application conference summary; Attachment 3: Notice of Approval for a Community Development Decision (Rec #589855); Attachment 4: Illustration of the Existing Deck Space and Deck Modification Proposed; Attachment 5: Illustration that the proposed deck addition does not cross into or toward the Roaring Fork River, the 100 year flood plain or 100 foot high water line any further than the existing deck; Attachment 6: Proof of ownership; Attachment 7: Letter authorizing Davis Horn Inc. to submit this application and to represent the owner in any relate land use reviews; Attachment 8: Homeowner Association (HOA) Compliance Form; Attachment 9: Signed fee agreement; and Attachment 10: Check for the total deposit for the review of the application, $ 2,275.00. Please let us know if you need anything further. Thank you. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INC. BUL GLENN HORN AICP 4 1 -r . ; U , , L ' . L. \ .t </ VAL LOUG/iek ~*EHI~SOURD Red Mountaine A+lach#En41 99 - 19 C + WEST- Ranch i RED 5 90 8 2 7"-illA 1 ritkin -0 40,7 .. ,ON HOL, '44', WAIGIITS % 4/louNT % AD 'Qi, 4/< 44st 44 6/4 1 0 # 04> 1/. L MTHAWK 9 6 . e Â£ RKING V s g 0 1,1 \, ~i~:t~,~~017044~ 04 Â£~rl ~ 040 400 ~te# 4.(:K e p 4, '/O â€¢ .2 Itirch k w. 1, c. g 0 4 7011 * 469, MIN VIEW C# f b ~ J 44 0 ,AAE DR 11'itkin 1 -1 RIDGE RD RED MO DA SNOW"65 4 i )~ 4.:. 1 .i{Â£ sen,J~i AD 11 04/7 Po RD 45>Â·---'422_~. ~rft=-====11...1 ~ENNETT BENCH Red m 4/440 U BUNNY; CT 00 ~ /1 ~ )) 1 4 0 Alt n. 1 y I 0,Â£ 0 4 '9 4 1 M'. I (10" .4 r I ~/OGE AD Ft NA 2 4\P ,> S , 1 11,1 B 4.. Ihit]1119.1 -- ~'//kin sÂ»NA \\ CNI Vai OB % 7 HUNTER WEEK 1 0 0/4 M Y 41-Cen c \411(Â·li 01,9 0 4% U 14 i, ' Kit' d N r. 2 0 1 1 ./ 7;*ta o m ('i' $ (1 k?St~G FORK 12\ 11 Z CO . Am: 108 ./ 1 4 9 X ~ c ~ Aspen 00 43. \ %HOOD OUCKLN 82 40 A J m Meadow,; - - 4Â· -90 F 4 8 <f 04.32'' BARNARD PAR,r ~ f 44 69Â·n \ 9.40 % D & GILL ISPIE ST \Iial lamtÂ·. *92 00 e:501 H PEARL g',(Lake. 1 ,..Â»ne- -~ ./ y U) 0 I'l'[Illi>,(Illb -~ QUI Cl 11Â» 64.60 5-. Ai~lk icft)'e>)2Llb-4722& t-SFrY-1-, NORTH H \ 3 1 9\LV ERLÂ« 1, 1 COWENHOVEN CT MUGGLER ST SPRING & 5 f F,?AAICIS U,bt 0 44Â¢ N l.) / --~4 4 - VINE ST Z g %4 1%/ O:0.2 HAROLD ROSS CT -3 2 14 ; f 2 1 4 1, 44 0\ 3 LUKE SHORT CT 21 1 lit 1/1 6 I., 1~4> tz '069 5 ART PARKWAY & 1 3 +47 17 14 WILLIAMS RANCH CT 1 11 aff 'r <41{6 . 1 . O 2 4.05% 1 6 RECYCLE CIR HALLAM ~ 9 2 AD 5 23 lpARK -<~'~~~ ~ Ar # AT Q ST ~V' %917 (Â§7 ~\~N *860,v ~ 4~ tgo,;4 1 9 // v hfurg, a 1% - + 414//v . 5 ST 2 1,1 O ~ ST â‚¬\% 8/0 5.- '44.4,1 â‚¬1 SOUTH ~,.,44(~ ,Â° -w/ ' 0*UGG 2 5 f U 11 if- 1 %\ 1 ce- - ----- AVE 414/N ST & m ~ HOPKINS BLEEKEF m Ql, 1 , AVE 0 m <f \ 9 ~> CT , & 49 /1 6. t\~ 8AÂ¥ST- #~4~~ ~ifil. - Â© * M 7.1/ 8 f 4. % 82 81 F h. 449 1 X.4- ipe z & r 0 4 5 4/SAM/Al/LE 2 2 h 2 A-2 2 4VSC AD ~ 04 / 4 h ' 2 53 0 -+ 0 QU , 4.3 g,p Â¢ 4 47 16 3 - f â„¢ - el 3 'Â©PKINS AKE 4 04 ,<-. 94 0 i A. MASCOTTE LN B. SMUGGLER GROVE RD PRIMROSE 4. ,/ 4 0 ~~ 40 u"TÂ·~~ CLOU[)-- .~EA~VE~~~4 ~ lf' f#f~ ~9-~" PATH 00. / iÂ« 94.6 07 a.- 4 ~fOSTST %41- + By - I. Aspen SIEVERS CIA C. KATHRYNS MY D WALKER RD - ~Grove E. ARDMORE CT *DLAND PARK PL f# 4/9 4 C> Cty> Dool/TR - ~' ~~ 0 f 9 0 2 21 , REGENT A F ARD MORE DR a < Fc El UEBON, DEAN G. ROBINSONRD GLEt' 5- 4 44,1 cr cm t L ,}1 E--ST DURANT 2 34 f gDOy c. 5/--,~Mc---- OOPER AVE & j h Ke i ST B. D , - H. MAYFLOWER CT , JUAN ST 0 0 G.94 0 LARASH 4 t/H L N / WATER PL | .7 / 064'V ,1 m S l/'S# z ~*4,Â·, f 0 1\1 CAV* gy /'--R . ry'/ ik 4Â£0/'Vcr . 4 f G#647 >9 f AVE SCADE LN Sa i 1 S 4 0 . N eD 1 SUMMIT S* it It psAVE~ ; 44ff> ~' GLE~ <y (:P /1~'jeEBERAY 04 1 / 11 2 @>PENGRO'vE,~ 1 GARRY. .2 0 H f. ~,h 1 f el E .3 *1 \ E 4/ Sl Â£4UIT AVE g Knollwood Mc)lult.lin I / i -1'.. 0 k 11 PERS'DE 00 10 WEST'VIEW <~ / Little Nell i i %/41, 0 60 (f' f '~ f Ski Uit ! j Â»101%91~~t '31Â»TA~#"1*14% 5- Of / e FALCON AD 0 U La /l \-3 74442- H 7944 uy Â»s*i *4Â© 1 ~ (.1111, F - 4 2/ 161 9 0 1 6 4 i Silver Queerl W U k f Ski Lift y M 1 17 5 ubj ed-- g. 3, ..9 5 U NINt $ L *Di f (1-nt O VA-U ./ & h 2 I rd#hi... Aspen e I t. L Â£ I Ilittlll.itic|s 00> p White -Kiver i~National\ forest 1 ' V k j- â€¢ . f 0 f f #002-3 'ABON,\' 4"944904 Willage f %~~~ D 1 . X 4- LN B C D E i HATFIELDRD 0 319Va HA 360(& A 1--TkCA nA eAT CITY OF ASPEN *FL- PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 429.2797 DATE: 4/7/16 PROJECT: 1431 Crystal Lake Road REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn, 925.6587 REQUEST: Stream Margin Review Exemption DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at 1431 Crystal Lake Road, part of Lot 13 of the Callahan Subdivision. The lot contains 12 townhomes. The applicant is interested in expanding the deck on the south side of the structure. The current total deck area is 269 square feet. The proposed addition would increase the deck area by 51 square feet to a total of 320 square feet, The Stream Margin Review Area, which is inclusive of both the 100 year flood plain and 100 feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River, intersects the proposed area of development. From the scope of work presented, it appears that this project qualifies for an administrative Stream Margin Exemption. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with Municipal Code Section 26.435.040.B, Exemptions, and that there is available deck exemption for the proposed expansion. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin,com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.040 Stream Margin review Review by: Staff for complete application Referrals: Engineering, Parks Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - ESA review $1,300 for 4 hours Referral Fees: Engineering (per hour) - $325 Parks (flat fee) - $650 Total Deposit: $2,275 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $325/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 7~ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â¢~ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). ASLU Stream Margin 1431 Crystal Lake Rd PID # 273718131007 1 L~ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property. and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Of(XeRS 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. [~ HOA Compliance form (Attached) mark H. 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. ~ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 98001 Alevi *A [2< Two 11x17 copies and one full sized copy of plans depicting the project, Stream Margin Review Area, and high water line to confirm applicability and any impacts to these areas. [i Written responses to review criteria outlined in Section 26.435.040.B. 0 An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen, W 1 Complete Copy of all application materials. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: El 1 additional copy of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. @f Total deposit for review of the application. I~ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Ed,i,Â®04 P. f?255 Locat,on.. POXECâ‚¬1 10 3k- 23139 - 191 - 3 1-071 (-143 1 Ar\~51 0 lake 200013 Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 1137- 19/'31 -007 A-3 pen Club UndÂ£25 0-3 APPLICANT: Name: Ed Inal. P . 6 0.55 Address: 101 fnaln btrEEE *1700 R. loo rth 136. 76182 Phone#: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: D au)-5 Horn Ine_. CA-1 i (f_ DCAU,5 + 6-lf-r\A HDrk) Address: 215 3 . monarch 5-5. 41:: 184 A>pâ‚¬n CD %1611 Phone#: 990 925-6583 2 GMQS Exemption CE] Conceptual PUD D Temporary Use 2 GMQS Allotment ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision Eyempti on D Conceptual SPA %1 ESA -CI-) Greenline, Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes 2 Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) 2 Mountain View Plane Â£ Final SPA (&SPA U Commercial Design Review 1 Lot Split Amendment) 2 Residential Design Variance 2 Lot Line Adjustment 2 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Â£ Conditional Use Other: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 1 con:10 in 0 10 0,9 -town hofrÂ¥- comptix , 52-2- a-+tÂ«Aid 64Â£.Eqround 560*\on -for pipu)005 <Af Prouals. NoÂ·Hof. A A pfroual in Attor Ament 3. PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) .SI nf 01â‚¬CK- aoldi-tion 1-0 an ,â‚¬Xistlr~ 10'1 5< deâ‚¬E . fliso a tfl,Â·r dicti 50 2-64 5-F *61 0144% arÂ¢a ing/Eabeol -10 3109( < 34-1.t 5-6 ur /9% af- alle,Lwa Zl-12+ Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ ,+ in Untâ‚¬. ~ Pre-Application Conference Summary mod'Lfication Will Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement rof extend ani Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ~Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards f u riWI- wdo i (DO yr. ~ 3-D Model for large project -404 9,06 n or ADW areA iN KMA All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be weder submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 1: rle w 11 AF- R 16Â« March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 :{om[, CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM projecl. Ed!Â©ard P. 13/15.5 96~tarn moli'~n @*L)1'010 &-emption Applicant: E.0 iÂ©ard ? 60 5_5 Location: 9 512â‚¬A Club Conda 0-3 ,~(1/30 i ld'qj O j Uni-t- 35 / 43 J Crilytd I Ca K.â‚¬- fol. /)-3 Zone District: R- 19 eu D P nile >01 size: DocurtleftEd unH 522â‚¬3 2,2-94 51-64 deÂ¥!tArea: 15 4 of aboue 2,2-74.54-146- 2 391. 1 59.f--A deck + (Forthe purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easement, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: N A proposedÂ· JO A Numberof residential units: Existing: NA proposed. N A Numberof bedrooms: Existing: At A Proposed: N 14 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): PA DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 1 ,27\+ Allowable: 2334 proposed D ornt Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed Access. Bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed % Site coverage: Existing: RequiredÂ·. Proposed % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed Front Setback: Existing: Required Proposed Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed Combined F/F: Existing: Required Proposed Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed Side Setback: Existing: Required Proposed Combined Sides: Existing: Required Proposed Distance between Bldgs. Existing: Required. Droposed Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments: i" foot sâ‚¬ft ba-(12.- fro~n-44- h}ah loater ling-+ irrto -to IDC Yed-r -flooolpidlin J variations requested: Alane. 5-1 54. fl- Mer-2- expon,5/ DA [Ui U not- tn( FOGER an\1 -fur'ther trito or- -10(,0,1 rol -04 1204rl rq Fbric RUFf, JH 'DO *Por *00 61 p lan o r be ary c lestr- 10 -EN rfqgn ht'th Wakr lint eÂ¥ -94.21,16 4+on -Nt agiyer~ deck- be)3 4-XfolÂ» el. March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5050 4ENo i nutabe i n floor- arâ‚¬A AA< achmâ‚¬(rt 9 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Owner ("1" ,: Coltvotrol P. 8 45> Phone No.: Email: Address of ;431 C.nJytaI Lake Rd Â· Billing 2-01 Alain Zkreads *2100 ~2f AS 00'1 Club â‚¬0(*&-%"b S,nd Ns :Al E-t Wortlen( 16101 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees Is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the propeny owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees forthe services Indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. 6500 flat fee for Park S . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for , 1 flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs Involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that It Is Impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient Information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless Invoices are paid In full. The City and I understand and agree that Invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remlt payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy Including consequences for no-payment, I agree to pay the following Initial deposit amounts for the specifled hours of stafftime. l understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the Initial deposit, 1 agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to relmburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 43 00, deposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ 3250 deposit for | hour#/of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner~,/~ c,-w- Jessica Garrow, AICP CommunitY Development Director Name: Edward R (395> City Use: Title: Fees Due: $ Received $ March, 2016 City of Apen I 130 S. Galen,1 St. I (970) 920 5050 HOUAEAD & WAKI UP A Aticky,â‚¬f* 5000363U UMB BANK NA. ATTORNEYS ATLAW 36-1901/1012 PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNT 600 Easl Main Street. Suite 104 Aspen, CO 81011 DATE July 13, 2016 Two thousand two hundred seventy-five and CO/ i w ~ -2.275.00- PAY . 1 PAY TO THE ORDER OF ~' . HOLLAND & HART LIP 0 VOID ANER 6 MONTHS City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 --ul 1 ,Â·r~,4, 1 up 1 - b * Il'500036304 1~10121906?C It'5008016038[I' Payee: City of Aspen Holland & Hart LLP Check #: 50003630 Vendor: 223 Check Date: 7/13/2016 Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Amount Paid Discount Taken Payment Am( 071316 7/13/2016 2,275.00 2,275.00 2,275.00 Aspen Club Condominium deck expansion application Totals 2,275.00 2,275.00 2,275.00 A-~--rtLCk-~-Wn 9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work Included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the propertv owner or Attomev regresentinq the property owner. Name: EdWArd P. 64Â» 40 Property Owner< I.): Email:96 mehont'+On@#4019*Â°rA: 970- 9.15 Â·3401(â€¢-Hi~*%* Address of 1431 C r93-1 4 1 l-,11Â£Â£ QU,Â«71 Property (subject of AN>Qn Club Condomin; urn-5 oni+ D. 3 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) D This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. E] This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. L~ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not Interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: gUr:G>,5~ date: 9U1-3/116 26 Owner printed name: E~k,~%7/'~ 153~ 1~5af;.5 or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: A-11 ad, merri 2 6 Corft.3 Glenn Horn Subject: FW: Aspen Club Condominiums Annual Owners Meeting From: Paddy Allen [mailto:Paddy@friasproperties.coml Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 4:16 PM To: Mark Hamilton Cc: Bass, Ed Subject: RE: Aspen Club Condominiums Annual Owners Meeting There is no objection to completing the form as referenced. Regards, Paddy Allen General Manager #.Irsâ‚¬L) -/ *8228$Â£226#8288*W.8.SxaM'Clus .Â¥ Direct 970.429.2436 1 A +lachelent 7 Edward P. Bass 201 Main Street #2700 Ft. Worth TX 76102 May 17, 2016 Justin Barker City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Authorization to Submit a Land Use Application for 1431 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, CO. Dear Justin: As the owner of the at condominium at 1431 Crystal Lake Road in the Aspen Club Condominiums (Unit D-3), I authorize Davis Horn Incorporated to submit a land use application on my behalf and to represent me in the land use review process. Glenn Horn and Alice Davis of Davis Horn Incorporated can be reached at 970 925-6587 and are located at 215 South Monarch Street Suite 104 in Aspen Colorado, 81611. The parcel identification number (PID) for the property is 2737-181-31-007. Please call if you need anything further. Sincerely, /9 EDWARD P. BASS OWNER ASPEN CLUB CONDOMINIUMS BUILDING D UNIT 3 alÂ« th murt 4 stewart title Stewart Title - Aspen 620 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 WRITTEN OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT Order No. 01330-79961 Date: May 18,2016 Customer Reference: 1431 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Condominium Unit D-3, Building D, THEASPEN CLUB CONDOMINIUMS, According to the Condominium Map thereof recorded August 17,1977 in Plat Book 6 at Page 20 as Reception No. 196748 and Supplemental Map #1 recorded May 4, 199 in Plat Book 22 at Page 49 as Reception No. 311198 and Supplemental Map #2 recorded April 30, 1991 in Plat Book 26 at Page 26 as Reception No. 332228, and the Amended Plat recorded April 29, 1991 in Plat Book 26 at Page 25 as Reception No. 332206 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration thereof recorded April 29. 1977 in Book 328 at Page 80 as Reception No. 194019 and Amendment thereto recorded August 17, 1977 in Book 333 at Page 722 as Reception No. 196747 and amendment recorded November 10, 1989 in Book 606 at Page 995 as Reception No. 317025 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO APPARENT OWNER OF RECORD: Edward R Bass Deeds of Trust, Mortgages and Liens which purport to affect the above described property, as disclosed by the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, through the effective date of May 09, 2016: 1. NONE Vesting Deed recorded August 22, 2001 as Reception No. 457864. The liability of Stewart Title, its affiliates and associates, for any errors or omissions affecting or relating to the information appearing in this report is strictly limited to the amount paid for this report. The aforementioned liability is limited to the customer who ordered this report. There are no expressed or implied warranties assuring or representing that this report is reliable for title information, and therefore, should be verified by a Commitment for Title Insurance. No representation is made as to the completeness, validity, or legal sufficiency of the documents referenced herein, nor have any of such documents been examined to determine whether or not there are any exceptions, reservations, encumbrances or other matters which might be detrimental to Title. No search has been made for any reservations, restrictions, covenants, easements, rights of way, mineral interests, water rights, and any other encumbrances which are not a deed of trust, mortgage or lien. Kurt Beereboom Authorized Representative of Stewart Title Order No.: 01330-79961 Written OE Report STCO Page 1 of 2 2 LA chag# 4 EXHIBIT FOR DECK MODIFICATION OF UNIT 1431 ASPEN CLUB A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 13A & 13 OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION IN THE 05 OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 1 f / AREA TABLE / CURRENT TOTAL DECK AREA: 269 SQ. FT. 11.8% FUTURE TOTAL DECK AREA: 320 SQ. FT. 14.1% UNIT 03 FLOOR AREA: 2,274 SQ.FT.* / \\Â« 3 *PER NOTICE OF APPROVAL RECORDED JUNE 6, 2012 AS REC #589855 l BUILDING D UNIT #1431 EXISTING LOWER DECK EXTERIOR BOUNDARY EXISTING UPPER DECK 107 SQ.FT. ~ EXTERIOR BOUNDARY n 162 SQ,FT, \ A L 27.1' 1 26.5' 13.7' 0 4-f-- - ~ PROPOSED LOWER DECK (DASHED) ~ 36dh@* EXTERIOR BOUNDARY 158 SQ.FT. J (ENLARGES EXISTING BY AN ADDITIONAL 51 SQ. FT.) *h GRAPHIC SCALE 10 1 '4 -1. ( IN FEET ) SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC 1 inch = 10 ft. /. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 sb 16006 2016-07-22 SOUTHERN VIEW (970) 7AA nO 1 1 M: \3600dwas\16006\condo\16006 condo unit 1431.dwa 1. I EXHIBIT FOR ASPEN CLUB, UNIT 1431 DECK ENCROACHMENT OF ROARING FORK RIVER A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 13A & 13 OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION r IN THE EM OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 1 * 1 .A< / b / \ ~Â·- ..2~ NOTES: f | 1) THIS EXHIBIT IS BASED ON FIELD INFORMATION USED FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 4 FOR THE ASPEN CLUB CONDOMINIUMS Â·3 6 RECORDED JUNE 15 2012 AS RECEPTION NUMBER r '# 589856, /-~1 A//A,>1 AJ/#1 1 / 0 6 : 4 2) FIRM MAP PANEL 08097C0204C EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 4, 1987 -Al , / A A/ A A/ A A 0 re 1 1. . 0 41,9 1 > d' 0 1 7, y<f-' 1 2 28\ 1 0,7 - 1 .de 190 / 1 i v/f 0 --1 - 1<85Vly'ly 1 + 1 - 1 1 X -- I.... - l--x- 1 12~~-1~l L - -<r _~ 1 1 ~58.97' ~ 44.92' PROPOSED LOWER --/ 72-X-X DECK ~46.70' 88.46'\ ~ . - 78.33' ~ 90.61' Â· # :=:42*2.- / , - \-j . , - 2~ / MEAN [DENTIFIABLEHIGH WATER MARK OVERLAYED 100 YEAR FLOOD ROARING FORK RIVER - PLAIN AND FLOODWAY LINE PER * FIRM MAP 08097C0204C ZONE AE CENTERUNE OF RIVER - " ' . els:'*91%EG/%34 71 1 84163.76* Â·~4~4-4Jr ~MN/liu\ m.1 '42 4 IW,4/ i,c r.. R LS. #2 F :2 08843 GRAPHIC SCALE 1*141 Â· -2-0 1 40 40=.&.16.4 DATE \06-3.<'Â·...,.Â·Â·'~ C*Â·; rtff?AA,-...Affl:*' SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC -L<duESS.7 ( 1N FE ET ) CIVIL CONSULTANTS 1 inch = 40 ft. 502 MA]N STREET, SUITE A3 sb 16006 2016-08-12 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 M: \3600dwgs\16006\condo (970) 704 0311 16006 condo unit 1431 Civil30.dwq ATTackbienT RECEPTION#: 589_-_, 06/15/2012 at 02:31:43 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 3 NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to the Aspen Club Condominiums approving the 4' supplement to the condominium plat and memorializing existing improvements on the site Parcel ID Nos. 273718131001 through 273718131020 APPLICANT: Aspen Club Condominiums homeowners association. REPRESENTATIVE: Patrick Rawley, Stan Clauson and Associates SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: An 1nsubstantial PUD Amendment memorializing existing improvements on the property. SUMMARY: In 1976 the Callahan Subdivision/PUD was approved. As part of the subdivision, 20 multi,family residential units were approved on Lots 13 and 13 A. These units were subsequently condominiumized as the Aspen Club Condominiums (Book 6, Page 20). The original approval of the townhomes in the SIA/PUD agreement noted that the average sq. R. per unit was 2,115 and the average sq. ft. of buildings was 43,560 (Book 312, Page 1 10). Both of these numbers appear to be gross square footage numbers as the code at the time did not have any standards for calculating Floor Area. This is problematic under today's code as building size is calculated based on Floor Area not gross square footage. The current zoning of the property is R-15/PUD and the Callahan Subdivision entittemeds clearly provided fur a multi-family component as part of this subdivision. Extensions and expansions have occurred. The Applicant is requesting to memorialize changes that have occurred as well as memorialize and legitimize the current, built Floor Area of these units. STAFF EVALUATION: Staff finds that the request meets the requirements ofan Insubstantial PUD Amendment and that it is in the city's interest to memorialize a baseline, existing Floor Area for the townhomes. Updating the condominium plat to show current conditions will legitimize development that has occurred over time while developing an existing baseline Floor Area will permit the development to be reviewed under current terminology in the land use code today or with any future development applications that may be submitted. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the request to update the condominium plat and memorialize the existing Floor Area for the townhomes is consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby, APPROVES the amendment as defined below. 411.4 3 â€¢ RECEPTION#: 589 --, 06/15/2012 at 02:31:43 PM, 2 OF 2, rent. Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Table 1. Existing Floor Area per unit Condominium Parcel ID Address Floor Area* Unit Al 273718131016 1422 Crystal Lake Road 2,197 A2 2737[8131003 1424 Crystal Lake Road 2,164 A3 27371813]002 1426 Crystal Lake Road 2,548 A4 273718131008 1428 Crystal Lake Road 2,277 Bl 2737[8131011 1430 Crystal Lake Road 2,541 82 273718131017 1432 Crystal Lake Road 1,834 B3 273718131009 1434 Crystal Lake Road 2,542 B4 273718131018 1436 Crystal Lake Road 2,271 Cl 27371813 ]015 ]421 Crystal Lake Road 2,929 (2 273718131019 1423 Crystal Lake Road 2,443 (3 273~8131013 1425 Crystal Lake Road 2,606 DI 273718131005 1427 Crystal Lake Road 2,532 D2 27371813]014 1429 Crystal Lake Road 2,239 D3 273718 131007 1431 Crystal Lake Road 2,274 - D4 273718131010 1433 Crystal Lake Road 2,883 D5 2737 18I31020 1435 Crystal Lake Road 2,275 06 273718131001 1437 Crystal Lake Road 2,208 El 2737[8131012 1439 Crystal Lake Road 2,186 E2 273718131004 1441 Crystal Lake Road 2,270 E3 2737!8131006 1443 Crystal Lake Road 2,196 TOTAL | | | 47,41 1 Note: *The sub-grade floor area calculation assumes 50% of the wall area to be exposed and is memorialized in Exhibit A for the purpose of verifying existing floor area. APVFrDRY; /7 ACCEPTED BY: V lAMkx Chris Dendon Richard Rabinow Community Development Director HOA President [)ate: G, f C 12 Date: ~10â€¢- 9, 20 1 2- Attachments: Exhibit A - Review Standards Exhibit B - Application 440 -91,%0,4, ntt A.+74Â·quiL