HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.886 Roaring Fork Rd.A060-00
~~
.~
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
..".-....
,~-;
i.;
,f
A060-00
2735-121-04004
Lauder Stream Margin Review Exemption
886 Roaring fork Drive
Fred Jarman
Stream Margin Review Exemption
Leonard Lauder
Micheal Pritchard
7/13/00
Approved on 7/10/00
7/25/00
J. Lindt
~
n
~
~
.i'
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested
property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third
anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Leonard Lauder, 2 E. 67"' St., New York, NY 10021
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Amendment to Stream Margin Exemption
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Administrative Decision, July 24, 2000
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
August 5, 2000
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
August 6, 2003
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 5th day of August, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community
De lopment Director.
~ Woods, CommunIty Development Director
^
,
(')
)I
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision, by Administrative
Decision of the Community Development Director numbered on July 24,2000.
For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090.
s/ City of Aspen Account
Publish in The Aspen Times on August 5, 2000
JUL, ~1.. ~iqiqiq
4:,14PM
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
^
RECORDER NO. 135 P.21
~'/l'.1'~~~\\P='Y~'Il'I~1
NcmCll oi'DI~OJI
.'" ...
TO, J\11lAo AIm W....ds. Caaun~ DM.ap_t DinoW
JOY" 0h1""",, Doputy DirecW
FROM. Ftod.-. PI&1lAU~
_I Leder ABiIBllmu.t lit. D......IDplll~ Order
DATE, Jut}> 10.2000
-y, .
The app"...nt. Lecmarcl. LII\IIlet. r.elCAlec11liy Mia"J Pdtoll8f4 of ( iottle, ClftybeaJ,
UI.4, YaW, requMtl arl Am8Il~t to . J)ovelopnMl"'t Oider far _ 8Alf linlll1!llllve
I\IIPnIvl!lt foI' S... MlUin Bbmpdon a"" 1S, 2000 :f'oI ~ S, s ,""114 Asp...
hlxllvillon loeatlld at 886 ~ Fodc Road. AiIPell. Co SUI1t.
1'7isYJalHl L4Ng lIB AcnO"" ,
> TIle c-a\1~ l)sVelopft\llClt Dl.~ appl'Cl'V4ld. . IlII1c! ""IS.. .pJI,cod:\Cl&l toI' &
StNtIlU Mlaia lleview :BlCempliQn:lbr1ha 1.au4Gr ~ 10 ~ at illS,
p~,. Orive wi!h o~CiolIS Oft J'ue 1$,2000.
BAaCGR01JNV:
~*~~~~:t=:1=t,~;:'~~,~~
~ U'tM on lhe po:ap<II'iJ. TIl,e llJlP11Cllllt, IIp..n ~ofllotll. 8Il1'I WIlli. whlob
111:" _tra4iot0r7l11l1l1tura ~ poUey towards tree 1'IIIDIOVaI. wil ~~ to '
romave tmu !lOt within lhe __ lIllll!&ln pursusni to lb. lue HIDOV I1Ilaml.t lIIl4
lIiI10w oneSSll'QA tift WQIlIS,ell to be _ll'Yed 9'om the '_lDIIl'p 110 r_1Iia
In plaQ8.
'. .
BT4" COMMIN'II
'the applle....t l'tq~ ... Amendm....t to,lbel).vl:lopmel9 ~ fOr Strellll ~ .
ltumpUon,lbu NIIctwd Wl'OvalllV 1M Cloliuil.\VIIiv I)evelopniell.t I IIreeWz,DD JuD.e 15,
aooo. TIll. amedm&1!l:wOuld ""od1~ colldltlon ~ otdau ~ N llice or:Ocoblon
st.a:iD&' . .
2, 21ra,1IO trHI ,han ". "''''III''1Ii 0'- ,-.l.ated 0" 1M II~'" poz I o/l1te 1'1,'11"""
_"II.IIM wlllM aJM1'","wou14 N "1'IN/Ub',4 ",,"flit". C11GJ',.r 11.2" of.ht$
Ollft! .
naa ...4U'I~ JlIDpae Ot1lhe gOn.4l.doA relI_t~I;1IlV llle oppll.- fl: ~ thI& ~t1D
tM 4eve1opmeM carder WO'IIId reed.. f'olloWlll
;. 7htzt the appllcQnl1>lQY r.mcr/le ""CiI e.lnrllctlle4 bJltt""pll1" UQItt io tI "'"
_I'tt'perIHI1I1A1Sd. b)> ,"" p~ Dq/Ir""" 1'fI""''' 'I', "" tJlJIIlb ~rIu
.".._ ...ttrPi htJ_. 110 fHU Ifttlll be _""'0'- "',_ rtd ,."",".f. -- .
m,,""" ." ,1" ,", 118"'" of"" p'-"JIOHd r.ItfD.',. .
-.......
--~....
-
JbJh.?~.'?~~~ .,4:.15PM
K:OTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW K~CUKVtK l't-IO.135 'P.3
~ . ,~'1',P'g!~I~gj'lll~~
. .
S_llli eI1I'IIIlIlly lIIII'PIozIDg Codo 1nc<;Iu!.ltealdo "",~dlnatree _YI d r.ollI1Y With .
mpeot fa dcY~llftt w1dIlA !i1I__=lqIa. TIl.o pub D,gputma ~t . tnoa removal
peI'Illit Jl1'0_-. opeme i1io!lll.~~.....tlyo'T1tie 2_ (A$PIlIl t.Ql4 u.. Cob). ~ lelllldr'a
~ 10 IlOQn:J.\1I11te or delapie tIeI1 removal &vlUrilr to 0Il$ olt)' ell ~ .... Qf
1liIl~ date, 110 ~ MollllOllllu ClCllUfta4 ,reptdblc thb 1._ _ t1 =cfDfe .l8ft'lft1a
tbls oOlllp1'ClaUe. Qf &I~I ere. NIIIllVIiI :!b1' WiN ell d;e :t.aIIder JlIIOP lrt)' mild. ofch.
......lII8rIin _ pll' file 1I'ee plftnit luullCl bJ thlI.. ~ VI ~1b 'llII oOlldI"oJl,
mat uti. wll:lml GlIIIUIlaD1 ~ ~ 'Ie 'be .. aultlllllee,pel!llSeat ~ ntllslIOb ,- - ..
b.... c1~d pre_. mq M ntalllllhad willa NI!** to tree ftlDlOvlil Mthln the steam
m&\l'Iift.' .
lb.VD'.W PROClDUJUI
36.4So'fJgfJ(A,) 1N1;,NiiIIIJJtd~f "'4~1II' rft<<^
Arl.lnlNbatlmtial -eadIaeIlt 10 an. ~ c1~t OIIiu l'Il81 . II UIulrlll8Ci "by 1:htI
~":=: =~m: :is"C:,~~~W::fI~':;~C::
demopm_ ~ lIOUld DOt _oaebly bl1 umcillllte4 cU!aa _ .. piwBl proc:_. AA
lDs.ubNMW 8IIleIl.d!IInt'.ba1l laaludo a ol\llBIo to tile delip r;;t IPProwd o<<.ptaut
P"l'1:lng or 'to 1lico CClbfllul'lltion o'&~ servlco area. Iv!. ~ ,.iJliI ~
iIhlalt!lOt 1....1...' '
I. ADy illAlftNI lD a. dlm8lUliotl81lll'l.~ ellalllltbN r.I tpe=a1l8\iWw. .
2. A.ll1 deorellllll Ill. Ibe nlaber of ot!'.8'trII=t paddIIs .pllOGB ealabll8lled ",.
QeCial ~I.w. .,
...
Arq 4__ I", tho .Ize of .. 1IdJ!q.J!rah servia;e l_ eItahIiahocl ",.
fSl80Illl .,view.
J!lI=I.aalion of, BII)' teptesllll1ed fea1:lIIe. I1I<lb .. pI WIaioG 0' a tt&llh
~. or W n\llllller r;;t IAlIII bl"., wI:Woh 'WlUI . ~ "by Ipeoill
review. .
3.
g...MlI'N'I'I'V ~"''I' APMZJIIT n-r.'KV"'!'OJLD:Rl!I8tON
Tbo C_IlIIlt:)' nevolo~ DI"otor tInd8 thll IrIl1Ubslllllt1a1 ~eJlt 10 II
De,ye\opma1li Ord... to 1:1.. _.I_ft~ ~ w review eritc:rla, lIIld Illft~ apJICOYeB the
1II:I:~1Iflt Otl. t!lIa ~4ay or lilly, 2000 eont!apnt vpo:a. oc~ wid! tho
eonditiODll _II ~ III1d Nll'Cl!rod a,. thI1 lIpJII'owl..
~ ./, ~ - :-' -<3 ;'J,/~)t::>~O '
AppUc_'IIIII~.ot~t Vls'O.
~ '
.. ' <L.~~
JII. Wood8, Co_1Wty :Dovelopmut ])be..,
"f" .
'I., l. .i. ,. 2nD(!
~,. '
Ilr'.....~r_,""
"~
A
f1
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested
property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the, third
anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Leonard Lauder, 2 E. 67th St., New York, NY 10021
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Amendment to Stream Margin Exemption
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Administrative Decision, Julv 24, 2000
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
August 5, 2000
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
August 6, 2003
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.0 I 0 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 5th day of August, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community
De lopment Director.
\<\nn Woods, Community Development Director
~'^:.~
t""'\
n
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision, by Administrative
Decision of the Community Development Director numbered on July 24, 2000.
For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090.
s/ City of Aspen Account
Publish in The Aspen Times on August 5, 2000
.~
. JUL~l..~~'l 4:.14PM
.'" ..
C~E GRAYBEAL YAW R~CORDER (j NO. 135 P.21
, ,
j ,l
, ~'n~~R~~~~\\~l:'III!'
NonC'Jll GPD.~.
TO. J"u.. AIm Woods, Ccaununi~ De\oe1cp_t DirPw
J.;oyoe ~ 1:Iopucy 1:Iirector
nOM, Plod ._lIft, Pl&Mrt)
U, loader .....lIIl1lm..t IIf a D,,",IIIpm~ Order
DATE: July 10.2000
"8VMMAaY: ... .... . . . ,
Thupp1ic&Dt, Letmar4 La\IIIet. rep:mAle4 by Miwel PlttAllld ore ioftl.e, ~,
Irl4 Yaw, requsu an Amanclzrlll"t to r. J);voloJlll2O""t Otd= fbt _ w IiNstnItlYe
IQIPtIWsllol S__ MlUln BKemPl102\ 011 Jwoe 1$, 2000 loI LoJ s. S 1...214 Alp...
!i1l.Wvlllon loaiod at 886 Rc.. Fork lI.oad. AIpen, Co111l11.
l'liuMol1l L4NU Un; AC'nON: ,
> 'FIIo C_,.nity ~pmeDt ~r<IOIDr apprcM!d. a '''''''' WI" .. ,pU=ali= loll.
sa- Marlllll1levlew :Bxe~D i'ol' 1he Lawl8t ~ lo;a;llll4 at 1115,
lla", Fo:k tlrive WiIIl. O~t:iOllS on.T1wll$, 2000.
BA.C:KGaOWIDl
The appllolll\t received Snsm Marllln :Blcempli0ll qlprowl M1I. 001 ~
oppq;q bo and receivlq & ParIa :Oeplll1:llleQt nee Re_1 P_1t to r_
oemln #eO' "Ibe !"wFAt). Tll,e lIJlPllCllllC, Upon rece!pt oneth &I'Il1 wale. wbleh
ate ~o~ ,lIlllaftlM reaaMlDa polioy towa:cla tRe RlmOVaI, wi< ~J 110 .
remove troos !lOt within !be SlrOam merlin plmU8l\t to lbe In. mnov II permit ed.
aII10w OM spNoe tNe ~po,.d 110 be tlln\oved ~m !he Itreem!lll\t'P I to ren&ia
In plaQa.
, .
ST4n' COMMDlTlII
1he appUo~t req_ 1m Amr:Ddmo:nt to Ihe D"V~~I Orde: loI SU'elllll ~ .
l'iUIUIlUoll.l!:l1lt rcoclvlld. Ippl'Cvll by me Comm1lll1iy l).v~ Ureetar,oD Jwe 15,
2000. 11I11_elldmeftl WGuId. mocUt'y collcUtlcm ;\13 otliMl ~!l ~ ll1ce ot:Dowlon
....:..w. '
~~. .
;, 2'hal no t1WI IhaU be ,..moy.d 0,. ,..lot:t1tfd"" lhe ,,,. <II ptzt' aftlte Pr"POIItui
l'tfflfoil.'J'i>>' ..111.:11 III 1HU'IH" "'0,,14 /Ie ~iI',4 .PI'I'Ufi/It,:O <::1.",1' U.'O ofthtl:
Cod"l .
n... -4lfi'!'1 lilDII\IAl8 OtWlllOMt1:lCli ZlI11UtOlSlllol by llle opp.Il.O&Dt eo r ml& --.d:uat tD
the clevelopmant arder WCNId I8sd. u f'011o_l
;. That t1:l,. ap,pllallll1' _ 1'e",CIge "'.S Q4 IlIliiI;tl/1e4 b,)' /VI4pll1" 'Uti/1ft ~ a Il'tJO
_1'II1i"'1'IHI1 Uozu"d b)> rIM PlI/'fuI D.parrm_ NfII"dhog ',..IU o..,.,uu ofllu .
.."....... ..ttI1JDtI htI_. no fI'H' MflIl b. 1'fmt""",,,,. ,..1_,.14 wlllrm tire ""am
"lflrgflt "It ,Il. lit' al;tR'f o/'M p,."ptlHd ,.""",.,,. ,
-.....
----....
~
~ JkJk.?1-...?~~~ ",4' .15PM
. .
1:9~..\E GRAYBEAL YAW K.=CUKD~K .1"), ,.' ..."NO.. ,135 rp',3
, ,~~',P.t~!~~gjIUl~~
sya;rilll ~1)1 eKp.\orlq Code 1M00000~~~trelll_YI ~ p'Olicly With .
INPNt TD dcYlIlopntent w!tbiIl tlle __ =\II'IIJl, no r. D,epart:Q\ellt . trn _OVal
~t plCOri_ 0Il- iIicIep"~~ otTl1!u 2' ~ Lu4 U.. Co.!.).:k I5l1l&ft's
~tIOlllll ~ ordeloptetrcc :_val ~ lIl_ol'!y 44~. All ot
dd.~ date, AD cIe.flnh1ve daollllOll hu o=umld resardlnt: 1h!s Issue _ ~ =c:tbte staB' f=1a
tI111lllDIZIp2'ClmlSO otalklWllla m. removal:fb& lNe. 011_ t.suder Jll'OP l:rly ol1tlld. ot'lhe
........ .....p 118 per the 1reo pctmit lsIue4 13,- tIw !'tIrlR :o~ ... if:i t!Ie oOrldIUoll.
mat UCII 1'Iil:bm _ nrc"", ZIlllflPn,."l:lI8iI1 10'&0 a lultallle ~ t nl!1 5110II ,. . a
&1Otler II", prooeea mq b. atalllllhod willi ~ to ~ nmcyallri1hlD tile steam
mu,;n, '. ,
:RI.vu.w PaoCllDVMI
3f1.43Q,fJ,,(.4J J.'''Nta#trI..4___~ o,f'4~.""'''''"
AIl.lnsubllDlial _oac!luAt to All. epprowd II~ oIl1e: -.,. lo aIUhorlll8Cl by iIw
Cc_lmi~ DovelopMeDt D~artmeDt D1rccu>r. IIA 'IluIDbsilllilal 8l..-"mmt shall bo
l.ImlW4 ftl 1IlOlIJIica1 or qllleOrlq aoll&lder=iOllll :!!rill &Goy. 11111 ~ ..teal
de'N1opmem, W1\4b ;ollld DOt ftllSONlbly ba emldp8lll4 cIllrlDa _ .. P1Yal prcc:_, A.a
=ubNM!al emetldmmt' shall laelllde a olwI8a 10 tho ~1Il at IPPl'Owcl oft.street
PlI\'ldng or to tM CCIl1~ratlon ot a tnISIIIutlllty senico _. AD ill8ul:l ,aWid 8IIIIlIllI==r
IAnll JU>t iMI~, .
I. ~irI.oreea0il1a.d!IrletlaiOU1:eq~.II1:allIitl1e4 ~'Peeii1m.iew.'
2. ~ deorellae III !he nu=_ tit ofl'._:t padcins lJ'1lCGI e&l.abUsb,ed by
special l'oViaw.
3.
A:q 4eon_ in tho .la of .. ut!llVIlruh. !Il:tYice l twa eltablialwd boy
J1lec:ia1 revl......
J!1lmiall!l..... of, ~ %epl'Csllll\ed. featIlre. mch .. p1':lYiIioD. of a ~1!IlC
~o' 01' rllo n=ller <:d lrasl1. bl"s. wbiI:h "W3II 8 ~wa 11)' Il'cci81
fIlYlew. '
4.
, SSmttMtJN'VYn..VI"Y .l'tlIIMZNTDJIIlI!~Dzc_oN
'nil! C_\Wb' :DeYelc~ nireotcr II:lds till. I11l1Ubllllll1l1&1 AmolldMOIt; tv a
tl<!,yeJcpmom Order to 1:oe _.4_~~ with t!I:o review crl~cria, _ II =reby apprcWII1he
llZI:lUldmuC on rills ...IL!!' day of lilly, 3000 ccnt\qalr vpOZl IlC m.p1WIce with the
ccl:!diuollJl state4 herebi llll4 NCI.~ fbr tI1IIliPFOVIl.
~ ./4: ~~- -' -<:3 ;~j:)~~o' .
AJ'p11cllZlC'; S!t1l\1lt1.lr; of Aa'tocmc:nt \.1:0 .
#: .If'' ,
., ., j~ J. ., 2tJD(!
... ' ~ .~"'h.... ~tl. .
...... "'__.r.,,_ "............_ C1.,.;.~~r__",.
~.. ........... .......m=_... ...eve.\opmlNlt .......ctor ~ __ __....
"-' .:~,
-"
. lh--e-
~.
Ij'f~ oo~
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM: Fred Jarman, Planneri)
RE: Lauder Amendment of a Development Order
DATE: July 10,2000
SUMMARY: . .'
The applicant, Leonard Lauder, represented by Michael Pritchard of Cottle, Graybeal,
and Yaw, requests an Amendment to a Development Order for an administrative
approval for Stream Margin Exemption on June IS, 2000 for Lot 3, Second Aspen
Subdivision located at 886 Roaring Fork Road, Aspen, Co 81611.
PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTION:
~ The Community Development Director approved a land use application for a
Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder Remodellocated at 886
Roaring Fork Drive with conditions on June 15, 2000.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant received Stream Margin Exemption approval while concurrently
applying for and receiving a Parks Department Tree Removal Permit to remove
certain trees on the property. The applicant, upon receipt of both approvals, which
are contradictory in nature regarding policy towards tree removal, wishes to
remove trees not within the stream margin pursUant to the tree removal permit arid
allow one spruce tree proposed to be removed from the, stream margin to remain
in place.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant requests an Amendment to the Development Order for Stream Margin
Exemption that received approval by the Community Development Director on June 15, ,
2000. This amendment would modify condition #2 of the existing Notice of Decision '
stating: .
2. That no trees shat( be removed or relocated on the site as part of the proposed
remodel for whic.h a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this
Code;
The modified language of the condition requested by the applicant for this amendment to
the development order would read as follows:
2. That the applicant may remove trees as indicated by and pursuant to a tree
removal permit issued by the Parks Department regarding trees outside of the
stream margin; however, no trees shall be removed or relocated within the steam
margin on the site as part of the proposed remodel;
~
C/t-r/i..- ! /2av-L-- =
/
qe '" _ "Y""/ 'to
. ..
'to Ai
~
I'"')
Staff is currently exploring Code inconsistencies regarding tree removal policy with
respect to development within the stream margin. The Parks Department's tree removal.'
permit procedures operate independently of Title 26 (Aspen Land Use Code), It is staff's
intention to coordinate or delegate tree removal authority to one city department As of . '
this date, no defInitive decision has occurred regarding this issue and therefore staff feels
this compromise of allowing tree removal for trees on the Lauder property outside of the
stream margin as per the tree permit issued by the Parks Department with the condition
that trees within the stream margin remain to be a suitable agreement until such time as a
better defmed process may be established with respect to tree removal within the steam
margin. ,
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
26.430.090(A) Insubstantial Amendment of development order. .-
An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order may be authorized by the
Community Development Department Director, An insubstantial amendment shall be
limited to technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual
development, which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process. An
insubstantial amendment shall include a change to the design of approved off-street'
parking or to the configuration of a trash/utility service area An insubstantial amendment
shall not include: .
I. Any increase in a dimensional requirement established by special review.
2. Any decrease in the number of off-street parking spaces established by
special review.
3. Any decrease in the size of a utility/trash service area established by
special review.
4. Elimination of any represented feature, such as provIsIon of a trash
compactor or the number of trash bins, which was approved by special
review.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds this Insubstantial Amendment to a
Development Order to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the
amendment on this .Jl!:'day of July, 2000 contingent upon compliance with the
conditions stated herein lII1d required for this approval.
~../4?~ ~
Applicant's Signature of Agreement
APPF10V~D
'~," ~
'.
I.,
- <
20D{i
\
~
COM4tUlVl,
(.....
efT} v,: -.sP&;rDlRs.;iu,
Jul" \<\rut Woods, Community Development Director
~
n
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner
RE: Lauder Stream Margin Review Exemption
DATE: June 15,2000
APPLICANT: Leonard Lauder
REPRESENTATNE: Michael Pritchard
LOCATION: Lot 3, Second Aspen
Subdivision
PARCEL ID: 2735-121-04-004
ADDRESS: 886 Roaring Fork Road, Aspen,
Co 81611
ZONING: R-15 (Moderate-Density
Residential)
CURRENT LAND USE: Single Family Residence
PROPOSED
LAND USE: Stream Margin Review
Exemption
LOT SIZE: 40,283 sq. ft.
FAR:
Existing: 4,468 sq. ft.
Proposed: 4,875 sq. ft.
Allowable: 5,412 sq. ft
REQUEST:
The applicant requests a Stream Margin Review
Exemption to remodel an existing residence located
adjacent to the Roaring Fork River to I) expand two
lower level bedrooms 2) add a new entry space and
roof and 3) construct a new deck above an existing
patio.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Stream Margin Review Exemption. The
Community Development Director may exempt
certain types of development within the Stream
Margin Review Area.
Existing deck on the southerly a<;a e 0 the
residence to be replaced. Proposed
bedroom expansion will occur underneath
deck shown in photo.
1""\
n
, >)-
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant, Leonard Lauder, represented by Michael Pritchard of Cottle, Graybeal, and
Yaw Architects, requests a Stream Margin Review to remodel an existing residence located
adjacent to the Roaring Fork River to 1) expaIldtwo lower level bedrooms 2) add a new entry
space and roof and 3) construct a new deck above an existing patio. Initially, the Plarming
and Zoning Commission granted an approval for a Stream Margin Review for a proposed
remodel on the same residence on June 6, 1998 pursuant to Resolution #98-10. Subsequent to
this approval, a building permit was issued, and extended for 180 days. However,
construction never occurred.
The applicant requests a Stream Margin Review Exemption for a new remodel of the existing
residence that does not impact or encroach into the stream margin setback of 15 feet from the
top of bank. A portion of the existing deck on the northwest side of the residence containing a
hot tub currently extends into the stream margin setback. This deck existed prior to the land
use code regarding development requirements in an environmentally sensitive area and is
"grand-fathered" as nonconforming. No new development in this proposed remodel would
take place within the 15-foot setback.
The applicant originally proposed to remove five (5) spruce trees ranging from 27 to 31
feet in height. The applicant also wishes to relocate one (1) 27 ft. spruce tree and three (3)
crab apple trees. The applicant's application indicates that a tree removal permit will be
applied for in order to relocate a spruce tree for aesthetic reasons.
Staff finds that this proposed action contradicts the language and intent of Section
26.435.040(B)(3) which states that The development does not require the removal of any
tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. The
applicant also applied for tree removal permits concurrently with this land use review in
order to remove these trees. Staff discussed with City of Aspen Natural Resources
Manager, Steve Ellsperman, the tree removal permits process operating independently of
the Land Use Code. The intent of both codes is to compliment each other in language and
intent, which in this case results in requiring the trees to remain in their current position.
The applicant agrees to this understanding, in that, any action otherwise will require a
more involved process requiring review by thePlarming and Zoning Commission.
CONDITIONS OF ApPROVAL
The Community Development Director approves this land use application for a
Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder Remodel located at 886 Roaring
Fork Drive with the following conditions:
1. That the applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan showing the size, species, and
accurate location of all existing vegetation to the Parks Department prior to the
application of building permits;
2. That no trees shall be removed or relocated on the site as part of the proposed remodel for
which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code;
2
/"""\
r ~
n
3. That the applicant shall protect with the appropriate measures against any environmental
impacts that could occur during the demolition of the five (5) ft. section of the 24" stone
wall attached to the western side of the residence and located within 1he 15' stream
margin setback from the top of bank;
4. That a survey needs to be provided which is dated within the past 12 months and signed
by a licensed surveyor;
5. That ifthe owner will locate a construction trailer at the job site, it may be subject to
issuance of a Temporary Revocable Encroachment License. This is only necessary if the
trailer encroaches on to the public Right-of-Way;
6. The applicant should either remove the existing split rail fence within the Roaring Fork
Road right-of-way or obtain an encroachment license for the improvement from the City
Engineer;
7. That the applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080)
for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets,
landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way;
8. That the applicant receives approval from the City Parks Department (920-5120) for
vegetation species and for public trail disturbance;
9. That the applicant receives approval from the City Streets Department (920-5130) for
mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways;
10. That the applicant obtains Right-Of-Way permits for any work or development involving
street cuts, landscaping, or other disturbance, including during construction from the City
Engineering Department;
11. There shall be no development other than approved vegetation below, or within 15 feet of
the top of slope. The existing development in this no development zone may be
maintained and reconstructed but cannot be expanded. The hot tub shall be drained
through the sanitary sewer and not to the river. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast and
not directed towards the river;
12. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts for the purpose of
constructing improvements which benefit the property under an assessment formula;
13. All utility meters and any new utility pedestals or transformers must be installed on the
applicant's property and not in any public right-of-way. Easements must be provided for
the pedestals. All utility location and easements must be delineated on the site
improvement survey. Revisions to utility locations and easements must be delineated on
a revised site improvement survey prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Meter
locations must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed;
3
(\,
t)
\ ]
14. Prior to application of building permits, the applicant shall submit a drainage report and a
drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepated by a Colorado licensed Civil
Engineer which maintains sediment and debris on-site during and after construction. If a
ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly
size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage
improvements;
15. Prior to the application of building permits, the applicant shall provide a current signed
and stamped improvement survey delineating the top of slope in addition to the standard
requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria, Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Photo of Parcel 2737-18?-96-033 and Vicinity of Parcel Location
Exhibit C -- Application Letter
Exhibit D -- Photo Documentation of Existing Residence
4
n
()
EXHIBIT A
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
SECTION 26.435.040(B)(3) STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION
Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development
within the Stream Margin Review area:
3, The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development provided
the following standards are met:
a, The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of
the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from
floor area calculations by more than twenfy-:five (25) percent, All exemptions
are cumulative, Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin
Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and
STAFF FINDING:
The applicant provided an accurate depiction of currently existing floor area calculations
in their application. The residence is in the R-15 (Moderate-Density Residential) zone
district and the lot size is 40,283 sq. ft. The lot area equals 30,212 sq. ft. as a result of the
25% slope calculation pursuant to Section 26.575.020(C) resulting in a maximum
allowed floor area of 5,412. The existing residence floor area is 4,468 sq. ft. The
proposed addition on both the upper and lower levels totals 407 sq. ft., resulting in a total
floor area of 4,875 sq. ft. This results in a 9.1 % increase to the existing floor area of the
existing structure. Further, the existing decks total 762 sq. ft. and will decrease in total sq.
ft. to 581 sq. ft. after construction. No floor area exempt from calculations is being
constructed. The applicant meets this criterion.
b, The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit
would be required pursuant to Chapter ]3,20 of this Code,
STAFF FINDING:
The proposed remodel does not require the removal of any trees to achieve the project,
however the proposed Design Development portion of the site plan originally submitted
indicates the applicant wishes to remove five (5) spruce trees ranging from 27 to 31 feet
in height. The applicant also wishes to relocate one (I) 27 ft. spruce tree and three (3)
crab apple trees. The applicant's application indicates that a tree removal permit will be
applied for in order to relocate a spruce tree for aesthetic reasons.
Staff believes these actions to remove and relocate existing trees does not comply with
the specific language and intent of the land use code with respect to development activity
within an environmentally sensitive area. If the applicant wishes to continue with their
intentions as proposed to relocate and remove trees as part of this remodel, they would no
longer qualify for an exemption thereby requiring the applicant to go through a full
Stream Margin Review which is a one step process which requires a public hearing
5
r"j
()
before the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, after discussion with the
applicant's representative regarding this issue, the applicant agrees to leave all trees
untouched as part of this approval for a stream margin review exemption. The initial
proposed remodel does not meet this criterion, however, the Community Development
Director may approve the proposal if the applicant complies with conditions requiring the
applicant to not remove or relocate any tree on the property as part of this remodel. '
c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling
or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing
development.
STAFF FINDING:
The existing deck containing the hot tub and extending into the 15 feet stream margin
setback on the north side of the residence isthe outermost projecting structure. The extent
of the new construction will not exceed the 15 feet stream margin setback. This existing
wood deck may be replaced to match the presently existing deck in size and materials; no
new materials or design will be used. There will be no new construction beyond the
existing north side patio.
The applicant also proposes to remove an approximate five (5) ft. section of an existing
24" high stone wall, which is attached to the westemwall of the residence and located
within the 15 ft. stream margin setback. The removal of this section of the wall is,
intended to provide a passageway from the existing deck along the western side of the
residence. This action results in removing development from the 15 ft. stream margin
setback. The Community Development Director finds that any action which removes
development from the 15 ft. stream margin setback area to be compatible with the intent
of keeping development out of an environmentally sensitive area. The applicant shall
protect with the appropriate measures against any environmental impacts that could occur
during the demolition of this section of the 24" stone wall.
d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one
has been designated through a prior review,
STAFF FINDING:
The development does not fall outside the following approved building envelope
established through Resolution #98-10 adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission
on June 6, 1998. Specific language in Resolution #98-10 indicates "The area within a
line 15 feet further from the river than the top of slope and the required setbacks of the
zone district on the remaining sides of the lot shall constitute the building envelope for
this property."
e, The development is located outside of the special flood area and more than one
hundred (100) feet measured horizontally from the mean high water line of the
Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or the expansion, remodeling, or
reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of
structures within the specialflood hazard area.
6
1"""\
~
"
STAFF FINDING:
The development is not located within the special flood hazard area. Therefore, the
expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground
coverage of structures within the special flood hazard area. Suzanne Richman, project
Manager for Design Workshop, reviewed the site plans prepared by Alpine Surveys and
High Country Engineers and determined the existing building is located over 200 feet
from the edge ofthe river, (the deck is roughly 195 feet distant) and the building is over
80 feet above the edge of the river. This is well in excess of the required 100 horizontal
feet from the high water mark or the 1 OO-year floodplain. The proposed development
meets these criteria.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds the Stream Margin Review Exemption to be
consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the exemption on this _ day of
June, 2000 contingent upon compliance with the conditions stated herein and required for
this approval.
Applicant's Signature of Agreement
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
7
A
()
EXHIBIT B
PHOTO OF PARCEL 2737-182-96-033
CO~
COlli
c>>c
~~
III ....
~.~
cc3
6'8-
.... l'D
~......'
o
::I.
<
l'D
N
W*E
S
,.. ,,", .., _ ",_.".,.....:r",.':._,.~. ,,,c_,;,;,,,?! ~,;,",~",:,",,,,,,,,,,,,,",,j!,,,,,,,, ;,'!.::"",C:,"'~"",A'.:;;'~.,",;;,,>';-',iI,',-;' ,)~'>>/'.<..h'v'.;::;\:i;.v ':<'/,>:,:,:>',":".
VICINITY OF PARCEL LOCA nON
fe',,);>._..C",-::, -,
8
1"""\
("""l
EXHIBIT C
Exhibit C -- Application Letter
9
"-,,
G, l
r1
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING RESIDENCE
EXHIBIT D
o
deck to be expanded.
10
~m"", 'J]'
n
~
MEMORANDUM
To:
Fred Jarman, Planner
Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer ~
From:
Date: June 7, 2000
Re: Lauder House
1. The survey needs to be re-approved and dated within the past 12 months by the
licensed surveyor.
2. If the owner will be disturbing the public Right-of-Way during construction, then they
must apply for a Right-of-Way permit in the City Engineering office.
3. If the owner will have a construction trailer at the job site, it may be subject to
issuance of a Temporary Revocable Encroachment License. This is only necessary
if the trailer encroaches on to the public Right-of-Way.
4. Currently the fence that is located along Roaring Fork Road is encroaching into the
public Right-of-Way. This fence is subject to rempval by the previous approval from
the stream margin review.
5. A curb and gutter agreement needs to be signed by the owner. This agreement
indicates that the owner will install curb and gutter at the owner's cost when required
to do so by the City of Aspen under the Aspen Area Community Plan.
6. The owner is required to install sidewalk on the public Right-of-Way along Roaring
Fork Hoad as part of the Aspen Area Community Plan. This sidewalk needs to be
designed using the City of Aspen Design Standard for sidewalks.
7. Since there has been a Stream Margin Review Exemption, then all conditions of
approval from the initial Stream Margin Review must remain the same pursuant to
the pertinent City Code.
Approvals
1. Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering
Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including
grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and
encroachments within public right of way.
2. Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance.
~r, '__""
3. Streets:
4. Permits:
r';
~
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department
(920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on
streets, and alleyways.
Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving
street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department.
()
~
, .,::~
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
architects
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Job:
Re:
Fred Jarman, City of Aspen, Community Development
Mike Pritchard
5/12/00
Lauder Remodel, 98047
Stream Margin Review Exemption Application
Fred,
Thanks for talking on the phone to me briefly this morning. I am sending the requirements of this
application to you in full. There are two sets of drawings and documents, as requested, one containing
any original letters, etc. I've outlined the requirements as I read them, and attached any required
documents to this outline. Ifwe've missed anything, please call as soon as possible!
Thanks for any time and effort you put towards this project,
~~ -P'
Mike Pritchard
N\_wptmp1t\memo with letterhead.dot
ASPEN; Post Office Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.927.4925 fax 970.927.8578 email: aspen@cgyarchitects,com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL
_',. ,_ ~ John Worcester, 10:48 AM <r""(00 -0600, Re:
I"')
Page 1 of2
X-Sender: johnw@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:48:37 -0600
To: Fred Jarman <fredj@cLaspen.co.us>
From: John Worcester <johnw@cLaspen.co.us>
Subject: Re:
I don;t see a problem with the highlighted language and if you can voluntarily get the
applicant to grant a fisherman's easement, that's fine, but as you point out, you can't make
it a condition of approval.
At 09:43 AM 06/16/2000 -0600, you wrote:
John,
Julie Ann Woods asked me to run this by you. This is an exaction type of question
regarding a condition of approval for the Lauder House Remodel, which is in for Stream
Margin Exemption. I initially placed this condition on the approval because it is required by
our code (Section 26.435.040(C)(2)) which states:
The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open
Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the
proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic
public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A
fishermarS
easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the
river course shall be granted via a recorded
FishermarS
Easement;'tmd,
The condition states:
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a "fisherman's
easement" to allow fishing access along the edge of the Roaring Fork River;
Our feeling is that we can't even ask for this anymore. Are we confusing this with asking
for trails? Let me know if I should delete the language:
Thanks,
Fred
Fred Jarman
Aspen City Planner
920-51 02
***************************
John P. Worcester
City Attorney
Ph: (970) 920-5055
Fax: (970) 920-5119
************************** >From amyg@cLaspen.co.us Fri Jun 16 10:53 MDT 2000 Received:
from comdev10 (comdev1 O.cLaspen.co.us [205.170.53.60]) by comdev.cLaspen.co.us
(8.8.8+Sun/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA15025 for; Fri, 16 Jun 200010:52:57 -0600 (MDT)
Printed for Fred Jarman <fredj@ci.aspen.co.us>
6/16/00
~. John Worcester, 10:48 AM ~/OO -0600, Re:
tt
n
,. ,i
Page 2 of2
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000616103020.00dab130@comdev> X-Sender: amyg@comdev X-
Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 200010:55:22-
0600 To: all3ity@cLaspen.co.us From: Amy Guthrie Subject: historic cabin Mime.Version:
1.0 Content-Type: texUplain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Length: 768 There
is a great historic cabin in Knollwood that was meant to be put on our list of designated
structures, but made it in for a demo permit before that could happen. The owners are
willing to pay to move it somewhere (since that is less than the cost of demo) and I am
desperately looking for a home for it. It has roughly a 1,000 square foot footprint and is a
chalet style bui/ding- very charming. First choice is to keep it within the City of Aspen. Is
anyone working on a project or have an idea for a city parcel where it could find a home?
Could presumably serve a variety of purposes including as a housing unit of course. Any
ideas are appreciated, including locations for temporary storage. It needs to be moved in
about 2 weeks. thanks!!
Printed for Fred Jarman <fTedj@ci.aspen.co.us>
6/16/00
..~ ~'~
<.
r'1
(")
,. ..,
Stream Margin Review Exemption Application
for:
Lauder House Remodel
at
886 Roaring Fork Dr.
Aspen, Colorado
Prepared by Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
t
<
t"")
n
-3
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
arc h i tee ts
Items required for Community Development Director approval
of Stream Margin Review Exemption
1. Total deposit of $650 for review of application. - See attached check from Joe Zanin Construction Inc.
2, Land Use application. - Please see attached.
3. Pre-application Conference Summary. - Please see attached.
4. Signed Fee Agreement. - Please see attached.
5, Dimensional Requirements Form. - Please see attached.
6. Minimum submission requirements:
1. Applicants name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the
applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized
to act on behalf of the applicant.
Please see the attached letter signed by Leonard Lauder.
2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to
occur.
886 Roaring Fork Road, Aspen, CO 81611. Lot 3, Second Aspen Company Subdivision,
Parcel ID # 2735 12104004 Schedule # R005644
3. The disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to
practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all
mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and
demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
Please see attached letter from Leonard Oates.
4. An 8 Yz" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the city of Aspen.
Please see attached copy of phone book map, with parcel identified.
5. A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of
the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado.
Please see attached drawings.
7, Specific Submission Contents for Exemption from ESA Review by Community Development Director:
ASPEN: Post Office Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.927.4925 fax 970.927.8578 email: aspen@cgyarchitects.com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL
N,\.Jauder remodel\padmin\stream m r response. doc
, .
CD
@
@
r"\
n
. /:
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
architects
1. A written description of the existing conditions on the property which are requested to he
altered via the amendment or exemption.
The proposed changes to the property consist as follows:
extension of lower level bedrooms on south side of structure by 9' -1.5". This area is currently
under a deck and obscured by large bushes. A new deck will be constructed above this
extension.
addition of a new entry space, including a new roof above. This addition is also on the south
side. This new roof will raise a portion of the highest ridge by 1 '-4.75".
Construction of a new deck above the existing patio which sits near the top of the Roaring Fork
bank. A portion of the existing patio is "grand-fathered" within the 15' setback from top of
bank. The new deck will not be constructe_~ithin any portion of the 15' setback, including
overhangs. A portion of the existing wood decked patio will be pavedWith-ston~. The portion
within the setback will not be paved, but the wood decking may be replaced to match the
original.
2. Such site plan drawings or elevations as may be necessary to adequately evaluate the
proposed amendment or exemptiou.
Please see attached drawings.
3. A listing of all previous development approvals granted to the property, with the approximate
dates of said approvals.
The property recently went through a Stream Margin Review for a proposed remodel. The Stream
Margin Review passed 6-0 on June 2, 1998. A building permit was issued, and then extended for
180 days. The construction never occurred. Please see attached P&Z Resolution #9810.
4. A copy of any recorded document which affects the proposed development, including, but not
limited to recorded plats, agreements and deed restrictions. If changes are proposed to said
recorded documents, these should be "red-lined" onto a copy of the original document.
No changes anticipated. Please see attached letter from Leonard Oates.
8. Written response to the Stream Margin Review Exemption Criteria:
1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing
structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by
more than twenty-five (25) percent.
The residence is 4,468 sf. The proposed addition is 407 sf, or 9.1 %. No floor area exempt from
calculations is being constructed.
<h 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be
required pursuaut to Chapter 13.20 of this Code.
ASPEN: Post Office Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.927.4925 fax 970.927.8578 email: aspen@cgyarchitects.com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL
N \...1auder remodel\padmin\stream m r response. doc
, ,
r"\,
r'\
:,.,..' :,7
COTTLE GRA YBEAL YAW
architects
The project does not require the removal of any trees. However a permit will be applied for in
order to relocate a spruce (tree "CI" on site plan) for aesthetic reasons.
3. The development is located such that no portiou of the expausion, remodeliug or
reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development.
There will be no new construction beyond the existing north side patio.
4. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been
designated through a prior review.
The development does not fall outside the following approved building envelope from P&Z
Resolution #9810, line 4. - "The area within a line 15 feet further from the river than the top of
slope and the required setbacks of the zone district on the remaining sides of the lot shall constitute
the building envelope for this property."
5, The development is located outside of the special flood area and more than one hundred (100)
feet measured horizontally from the mean high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its
trihutary streams, or the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to
the amount of ground coverage of structures within the special flood hazard area.
The development is not located within the special flood hazard area. Therefore, the expansion,
remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures
within the special flood hazard area. Please see attached letter from Suzanne Richman of Design
Workshop indicating that the development meets the required criteria.
ASPEN: Post Office Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.927.4925 fax 970.927.8578 email: aspen@cgyarchitects.com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL
N:\...lauder remodel\padmin~tream m r response,doc
'"
1""'\'. LAND USE ApPLICATION
\ j
O.
,:~"",:,
PROJECT:'
Name: L \Jl>fl\. R.fnoDGc..
Location: ?;$ G (to (<.IN (;. n,r<.K. R-o n $p rJ vt) "61 t-//
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
ApPLICANT:
Name: Lf:OiV
Address: ;;.... E. , 7"' ...
NY
- 'I,)... 0 6
100;2..1
Phone #:
;l...1d-.. - 5
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: f1 e-ffA!L Pit, cHilI-/)
Address: .;L2'? v€
Phone #: q -70 - "'I J- 7- '1'1;2. S
1>.4 It-Lr-
() 9:16;2.(
IN' /1-((c..HltCC 5
Po o.
of C~7'TLEf c,,/Utye,.G c..
TYPE OF ApPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
o Conditional Use 0 Conceptual Pun
o Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
o Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA
., 0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment)
, 0 ' GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision
)( ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes
MargiI\ Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization)
Mountain View Plane
o Conceptual Historic Devt.
o Final Historic Development
o Minor Historic Devt.
o Historic Demolition
o Historic Designation -
o Small Lodge Conversion!
Expansion
o Lot Split
o Lot Line Adjustment
o Temporary Use
,0 TextlMap Amendment
o Other:
ExiSTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
I\f07'D(:NTfJ}L-. $IN(.LC"- "Fl1ml.Y. :L~6"1 ~f" &li/LDI'Nt; 'Ft>()T~fN T IN '1fJ2.1i} $'I' 1.1!J"r.
, / f '
<-
'(,R.Pt"C-F/H.tf ~ /1ft
N"V {p(N
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
AI>DlrlPN t. GXT(f1JHOII) 'rot-owell. LGVlEL f,€Df{(Jf)n~ {F.1\l7JtY ~f"1ce (I/-I.-L ON ft),/rt-l
I I
6Ley/t'r/ptJ Y Of)" 0 I~\
Have you attached the following? it b S- 0
18 Pre-Application Conference Summary
I2S Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
{2g Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form
129 Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents
o Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents
69 Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application
t09:26 AM
FAX NO.
('
(";,,,}
p, 02
f"'\
4
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
James Lindt, 920.5104 DATE: 4.27.00
Roaring Fork Road
Mike Pritchard
Lauders
o Step_ Stream Margin Review Exemption
Remodeling an existing home and altering the deck on the Roaring Fork River side.
The ridge height of tile project wiH be slightly Increased and the square footage will also
lncrease slightly.
OWNER:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.435.040 Stream Margin Review
Review by:
Staff for complete application, referral agencies for technical considerations, Community
Development Director for final approval.
No.
Engineering
Planning DcposiL $480
Enginccring Referral $170
$650
Public Ilcaring:
Referral Agcncies:
Planning Fees:
Referral Agcncy Fees:
Total Deposit:
To apply, submit the following information:
I.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
Totn! Depe.il for review ohpplicRlion./
Applicant's mmw. address and telephone number. contained within a Ir:mer sil,'I1cd by the aPl)lical'lt st..clling the name. :lddre:;s, :1l1d
tdcflhon~ number of th~ representati....e allthorii:cd to net on behalf oflhe appIiciJnl. ./
Signed fee agreement. ../
Pre~application Confl)l'en~ Stltnmary. ,./
I.and Use Application /
Dimensional ReqllircmL"Ilts FOlm/
Wrillen description of existing conditions and proposed nllemlions. ~
A sire improvement SUt'Vey. I /
An 8 1/2" x II" viCinity map loooting lhe subject pnree!s within the Cily of A>;pen.,
A writtcn description ufthe proPQ..1 and " wriuen explanation of how a propoSl.'d development /
complies with the revil~:W standards rdcvOlm to the uevclopmcnt applicatlon.
A copy oCthe recorded document>! which offects lhe proposed d""Velopmcl1~ /
Proof of ownership. / , , , . .
Additional tlllllclrill!. as required by specific review. Plc",e ,."fer to lh. application packet for specliie submiltal rcqukemenls or 10 the /
t'odc sect.ions no~Ll nbove.
~ Copies ohhe complete npplicolion pockct (items 1-13) ,/
Process:
A~ply. Plnrmcr n:views case fal' comprelcn~::i::i and sends [0 Engineering Cor referral comment!l:. Planner writes staffmel1h) N1U.1 rccomml..'11dation and
has Community Development Director RaviCiw for ilpprovul. If llpflroved, Comrnunity Development DC'par\Jn~nL issues dcvclOl'lllem Md~r, A
nuiltling Permit then must be C'lblaincd prior to construction. The application. 11"1ay be taken to the Planning and Zoning Commission if ComlTlunity
Dcvc.:lol)m.:nt Directur does not feel that appliclltion mtcl.S the standards for Q Sl.rc:anl Mtlfsin Review E:(~inptiun,
Disclaimer;.
The for"going summary j!l: advisory in nature only ULld is not binding on thc City. The: sUlnmary js bu~'"Cl on curl'en! 7oni"g. which is subjc:ct 1.0
cllilflse in the future, and upon f~etual representations that mayor !nay noL be I1CCUr'dte. The summal'Y doc::; nol create legal or vested rights,
---'".'
..-....."'~.~--.
-----. .-
--
~-, .
(")
()
ASPENIPITKIN
CO~ITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT
Arreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and L c.1?"-'1/f/.. j} Ll/vDf::/t..
. (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
$TR.eAM hJ}(l&/w fl--G'v'!I:o,v Gx€...,P't"/PN
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 49 (Series of 1998)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to adetermination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this, time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs ,to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly 'basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings andlor approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission andlor City Council to enable the Planning'
Commission andlor City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ ~ ~ which is for - hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings toCITY to reimburse
, the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic
payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such
accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all
costs associated with case processing have been pald.
By:
-ct-J.
APPLICANT:
L-e()NAP-t> L-flvnel<.
(I..€PIt/:ji!!",T/t'r/Ve: M/c.r/ltliL PR./rC.HA/l.ll
By:'-?~h? .-;:;Z:~JJ
Date: S / J / C' I?
I (
CITY OF ASPEN
ie Ann Woods
ommunity Development Director
Mailing Address:
? O. !>D)'" 5;;.. 9
~~ S It-L-T. L.t? 'l" /6;1./
/
~--
-~,.-- .
,....''''.
. '.
'r,
(1
"C.W"
--...--~/'---
ATTACHMENT 2
DIMENSIONAL REQUIReMENTS FORM
Proj ect:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
LIt~l>e(t Ref-/oDel
t...eovlr(ll;) t...1I110rfl1..
'l;~6 R.OII"-,..r. Fo....o<.. R.I>. .I/$P€III
,
fZ. - I,t;" ,
L/P, .l. '6 3 rt"
() '2.1:>.. sf:" 'fo ;t'l3 1<2.>o~t...fJre (tfrO/l.TION ';::4'TO<<' See'/"Io
(for the purposes 0 calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduce for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
defmition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
;U;.S7S;oJ.PC
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing:
Existing:
Existing:
(:/
1
5'
Proposed:
Proposed: '
Proposed:
6
I
5'
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: L.I.; '-I 6 ~ ,fAllowable: S) 'II;L ,f' Proposed: if <6 75 sf
) ,
" ..' f! ;). 5" '- ,,' Proposed: ~3 '"t/~f1AX)
Principal bldg. height: Existing:~1-JI;!;: '7PV<)Allowable:
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
NO
On-Site parking: Existing: Required:R..fiRUlU'1€N1 Proposed:
"0
% Site coverage: Existing: Required: (l/CIiN,l..t",eNj" Proposed:
""
% Open Space: Existing: Required:.... (aQlt e Me'AlrProposed:
, " 2..5'-0" \ ,'" .
Front Setback: Existing: ~ 4 -0 :t Required: Proposed: ;L 9 - () ""
I " . ,S:....' F"-""" , .,
Rear Setback: Existing: 19 - 8 = Requzred.' 7.0, StoVE. Proposed: I? -~ .:t
, .. 3S'- t,' I .'
Combined FIR: Existing: '1 "! -"J - Required: Proposed: 'f ~ - '6 ;!:
, . , " d I .
Side Setback: Existing: 1 '"1- 9 .:t Required: 10 - 0 Propose: }1-.;<.. ;!:.
~'-S":! 10'. 0" i \\
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: <t- S :t
I " ao'.o" 1'1'..7 ,,:!:
Combined Sides: Existing: .l.:J.-;l. :r Required: Proposed:
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
.....
.
1".'\
~
;/
,
~,
LAW OFFICES OF
OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, p.e.
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THIRD FLOOR, ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING
533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
LEONARD M. OATES
RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH
TED D. GARDENSWARTZ
DAVID B. KELLY
TELEPHONE (970) 920-1700
FACSIMILE (970) 920-1121
e-mailohkg@rof.net
May 3, 2000
OF COUNSEL'
MICHAEL FEIGENBAUM
JOHN T. KELLY
DAVID B. MUELLER
Julie Ann Woods, Director
City of Aspen, Community Development
Department
City Hall, 130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Status of Title - Lot 3 - Second Aspen Company Subdivision
Dear Julie Ann:
Please be advised that we represent Leonard A. Lauder. We represent to you that Mr. Lauder is the
owner of Lot 3, Second Aspen Company Subdivision, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The
property is not encumbered by any mortgage.
If you feel you need a supplementation of this letter, please feel free to call me.
Very truly yours,
OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P,C.
By €wMuM C?)J7J
Leonard M. Oates
LMO/dw
C:lDatalClientslLauderlJulie Ann, wpd
.... ;-6; i;
Ii ,~, , , . .'
~ I~~' ,. h:
~j i :~S i~~ i~~ :0;; ,~~~~!~ i~~~ : :~! !~ i !~ :~ i ij i: ,ll~ J I~ ! i : J : J :~ I~ i i :i;~~d~~J~
~Q" ; ; "'~u5~Q" ;lD ~<i5 ~ t.s l;5lH~'O~-g~ ~ o~ ~ ;<; .!~]<i5 ~ ~t;:H3~<i5~ ";<i5..5~6~~v.;5~ ; ~-' ;~.s ~~ 8 ;'l;iuu" g:.. EO ~
d~..5lo~l;~~iS~~Ol;~""~I-~t~~~.<i5S0~i.S~~~~~~iFJ8~~~~I~~E~~~~~..~E~=8g8iJ~lo
~AI~~~-~~~~li~I~~Wi~~!~f~ft~i~1~~~~i~~~!i~e~~~~~t~g[5~8.1~~i~i~~~~~t}il1
~~~~~<<~~mlDm~lDlDlD~UUOuou8uuo~ooO~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~rrrr~~~~3~33~~~~~~~~~~~~
,011
\
\
\
'-'"
'"
I~
,0
i
\
)
/
(
i
\.~
11
..
~
q
~ ~.:;
.~ I:i"S
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
.'"'~
~~.. ;r
....-s"
~~
~'Sl:t
. 0
1~~
E':....""'"
~l ~
...~l!
~ ... '1::
~o..
s::
GI_
a.:a
UtW
CC
~
.....
~
~
.....
'-'1
s:::
~
~
~
",
~~
.~
~
~
~
, ,
r;
n
Lauder Remodel
F.A.R. Calculations
All 'Sections' are from the City of
Aspen Land Use Code.
Zone District: R-15
Existing Site: 40,283 sf
Lot Area: 40,283 sf x 25%(slope: section 26.575.020C) = 30,212 sf
See section 26.710.050D (table: lot size/allowable sf) for the following calculations:
30,212 sf
-15,000 sf
15,212 sf
15,212 divided by 100 sf= 152 x 6 ~912 + 4,500 = maximum allowed for building 5,412 sf
Totals of Existing Building:
Lower level:
Upper level:
Total:
2,004 sf"(includes 50% of garage total sf)
2,464 sf
4,468 sf
Garage total:
439 sf"
*50% of garage shall count towards allowable floor area-Section 26.575.020A3
Totals of Addition:
Lower level:
Upper level:
Total:
304 sf
103 sf"*
407 sf
** Decks are not included.
Existing Decks: 762 sf
Decks after Const.: 581 sf
1.
../
13.
~G ~ 7.0~G co1\'lMlSSIO~
"""",,1)'tl0" o~ "'" .s>J""" ~ pOll "'" ~01<E
.....lBO"""',. ~ ~G ()1U< 1l0Al>, crJ:\' OP >Sl'El"
"~SlD"E1'ICE,SS;~CEL~O; '13'1_121.04-004 '
. __ ....10_
. ~ ent Departtneut teceiveiatl. applicatiOTl
~,...~~ ... .........-..-.:...-....
-......"""" ~:"'..;.. .....~.... :
..-...,.._...... ,', "",,,,..,,, """,,,,,,,,-.
~,""~~!. ~:"""'--~_...
1 and. IJ3l)tC tbJlXl.l 00/0 o. "We w'" ..
de"e\OpIlletl' . d Zo1!ill~ Co ss\on; alld.
......... by'" .,...,.. ". z' eo""""""".y ....--
__...1l'.t..S, the ?~g and h~" ~n.;+;:ve Nea. ill confoWC.with the
~l.vf ' BnVi!OntnClluuiY "'_.... '
. .mtnm the sue&Xn arg~ . 26 6& MO and. :
~ ""'"''''.... '" """" .' p -"",,.,a ""'" ~
~""CltY~': :"....-' ~-""
~...-a""""" on . ",_2 \...,.........Zomnl1
~-s:EA.S, au,t\:ng s.tepat Ulese }A.a1gill v.e'\P1ew fcEc9-estone
eel by s. 6..Q ....ote1:he ~e . llPni!-ent
Go~sion ~~:~: c....clition! teconunend-e bY 1:he coUlUl"lUllt)' I
~-~- :.
~ . !
I
~_1lII1lI'{t"""""-",....~ . .
,,0'\', ~__ . "",.p"", Road,
1 the 1?cc~ stone ReSIdence. .
_""_~...- ""f ". '
. . ""'" "" """""'" "" 00' .' . _0 ... "",,, ...
IS a~ve .' ettnit, 11:Ie s.p l\.cs.nt S~ 'Pro n to the stanclard
, to isS~ of s. 'oUl\cli1\S P . ea.tin tn-II to?,of-S\O'Pt difD
1. ;;:.,..... ~~::,... ",,,,, -:;~-~..:...
,....-. 11'" ...... ............ C ~..wo.. .~ -.............
one presented to the "P~~e torof-s\\1Pe iffetS S\&niii,c\, \
t\IiS ~ top-of-s\Ope. th uc Jnust 81't\enu , ,
~ '" "".......... .... . ..........:.......... F"'"
. _;t plenS sbs.\\ sno~ s. 5 00 .1.e ~cltn :y red~ced to no
2. ~ 'QU\\cling pew--~~ to 11:Ie propettY "" '
R~s.cl righ~f~:;t. . i oftb.e 11-15 Zone
~1cler t\I.tll.oA 'l:h\n"\he ilne1'lS\o1\ll '
. ent shall be \0_ '9Il d ~ '
$.. "the de'1e\OP~. .,"" buU<1ing envelope cles1f,11a.te r than th:
~_..._"".' ...,.,r-,,,,,
., v\ -;oIit\li:ll- a. line \ S eet ill' "~'f the lot'shall co .
4 B_...-.""""i"'....- ...... I ..-
. s.ncl 11\e reo.\\itoO. setbacP o. e ert:i. -_.: .--'
_. .."""......-..,... ~ -:u,,~ m III \ltfilll
, \~l)1)'U\\'\'~!~~lr~~~~\.~~
\ .4 31l S." I -
.. \ I,
...-..,..,..,.
..
.......~
,
:a
gr,
the
II11p
14. The,
rights
15. The ap
hours b,
16, ACOpyt
the trail e
shall be re
17. Before'
ISSIIl
Resolution
Building ~
to the . Th
City CII .' ,
'...../
..-" -.'
~
.
:
\
. i
-..,. ....
')
r
"
.
120 East ~lain Street
Aspen, Colorado
81611
Telephone
9709:2S-ft3S4
Facsimile
970 920.1:387
-\lhIHlllPrt{llC
Denver
Jackson Hole
Lake Tahoe
Phoenix
Sanla Fe
S~io Paulo
Vail
1'"'\
,
()
Design Workshop, Inc.
Landscape A.rchitecture
Land Planning
Urban Design
Tourism Planning
May 11,2000
Aspen/Pitkin County Community
Community Development
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: 886 Roaring Fork Road - Stream Margin Exemption
We have reviewed the site plans for 886 Roaring Fork Road, prepared by Alpine
Surveys in 1998 and High Country Engineers in 2000, see attached. Based on these
plans, the existing building is located over 200 horizontal feet from the edge of the
river, (the deck is about 195 feet distant) and the building is over 80 feet above the
edge of the river. This is well in excess of the required 100 horizontal feet from the
high water mark or the 100-year floodplain.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
7U~
t-i~~
Suzanne Richman
Project Manager, Design Workshop
DESIGNWORKSHOP