Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.055-92A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCILv CITY OF ASPENv COLOR~DO~ FOR THE APPROVAL OF A CONCEPTUAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLaN FOR THE EAST COOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPOSAL LOCATED ON A 2.35 ACRE METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL ON EAST COOPER AVENUE~ IN THE RIVERSIDE ADDITION. Resolution No. ~'"~ (Series 1992) WHEREAS, on an application was submitted to the Planning office by C&G Mustard Seed, Ltd. for a mixed residential development under the AH (Affordable Housing) zone district requirements; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned R-15 (Moderate Density Residential) and must be rezoned to AH prior to or concurrent with the Final PUD Plan approval; and WHEREAS, in order to obtain a level of assurance that the proposed rezoning was acceptable to the City, the Applicant requested that rezoning to AH be discussed as a threshold issue during Conceptual PUD review; and WHEREAS, the Planning office received referral comments from the Engineering Department, Housing Office, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, Parks Department, Water Department and the Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, because the Applicant desired input from the surrounding neighbors potentially affected by the proposed development, an informal public meeting was held on August 27~ 1992; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the application and the referral comments the Planning office recommended approval of the East Cooper Affordable Housing Conceptual PUD Development Plan with conditions; and WHEREAS, at two meetings held on September 8 and September 15, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard comments from the public regarding the proposed development; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the application and the concerns of the public, the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed that Riverside Drive should not be used as access into the any portion of the proposed development, and that the density of the site was too great and negative impacts to the area would potentially result; and WHEREAS, at the September 15, 1992 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the East Cooper Conceptual PUD with 23 conditions; and 1 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed that as a threshold issue, the proposed rezoning of this parcel to AH was acceptable; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on October 13, 1992, the Aspen City Council considered the recommendations forwarded by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the comments expressed neighbors of the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the Council agreed with the rezoning as a threshOld issue, and was also concerned that the impacts of the project on the surrounding properties would be too great; and WHEREAS, the Council voted 5-0 to approve the East Cooper Conceptual PUD Development Plan with the conditions recommendediby the Planning and Zoning Commission and added a condition to require that the Final PUD Development Plan reduce the impacts of the development on the surrounding neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen City Council that the East Cooper Affordable Housing Conceptual PUD Development Plan is approved with the following conditions to be satisfied within the Final PUD Development Plan: 1. The CDOT must grant an access permit for the project's access driveway and emergency drive. 2. The parking design for the townhomes shall be re-worked to eliminate conflicts with the emergency access corridor. Parking spaces shall be indicated on the Final PUD submission. 3. Any curbs, gutters, streets, and parking areas must ibe designed and constructed to City specifications. 4. There shall be utility easements over all underground utility installations. 5. The Riverside Ditch Company must enter into an agreement with the developer including but not limited to reconstruction and relocation, maintenance, and general liability. Maintain contain with Parks staff regarding these items. 6. Holy Cross shall provide more information on what easements it is interested in acquiring. Each utility must be specific as to its easement requirements. 7. Calculations/methodology for slope density reductions must!be provided. These shall be prepared and stamped by a registered land surveyor or registered architect. 8. A complete drainage plan and calculations must be submitted 2 with the Final PUD Development application. Each free market lot will have to provide the same with submission of building permit applications. 9. The grading plan and report by CTL/Thompson must be finalized regarding fill material removal/replacement° The project shall then be designed around their specific recommendations. 10. In addition to standard Final submission requirements, the following must be addressed or included: - designated common areas - parking spaces - trash access areas - snow storage areas - exterior site lighting 11. All required easements must be recorded prior to the city Engineer approving plats for recordation. 12. Any changes to deed restriction category mixes resulting from P&Z or City Council review must be reconsidered by the Housing office prior to Final PUD Plan approval. 13. If necessary for a water line extension, the developer must receive a waiver of the Water Mainline Extension Moratorium from City Council concurrent with Final PUD Plan approval. 14. The proposed 8" waterline from Riverside Dr. to Lot 4 shall be extended to Hwy. 82 to complete a loop. All installations shall be according to established City standards. 15. The Applicant is responsible for all tap fees, water right dedications, and applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 16. Trees must be at least 30' from the Hwy.82 intersection. 17. Connection fee surcharges will be required to address two downstream constraints in this drainage area. 18. Connection to Sanitation District system must be approved prior to review of final plans. If site collection system will be deeded to the district for maintenance/repair, it must meet District specifications. 19. Submission of a Final PUD Development Plan must be submitted within one year of approval of a Conceptual Development Plano Failure to do so will nullify the Conceptual approval unless an extension is granted by the City Council. 20. Within the Final PUD submission, the Applicant shall include appropriate assurances guaranteeing construction of affordable units. 21. Engineering reserves the right to further review the Highway 82 right-of-way with the Applicant and the CDOT. 22. The Applicant shall include in the Final PUD submission a parking and service plan which will address keeping vehicle impacts off of neighboring roads and properties. 23. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approvalf unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 24. The impacts of the East Cooper AH Development shall be reduced by incorporating any or all of the following methods (but shall not be limited to): reduction of density, FAR, setbacks, or height. RESOLVED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~ day of~ 1992, by the City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado. John ~. Bennett, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the ~y Coun_cil. ok the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held//~~4/ ~ , 1992. Kathryn ~/'K~ch, City Cler~F 4