Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.037-96 ,.. 'II' ~ 'II' . RESOLUTION NO. S 7 (Series of 1996) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL OF ASPEN, COLORADO, FiNDING COMPLiANCE WITH SECTIONS 31-12-104 AND 31-12-105, C.R.S., FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE "MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDMSION (SOUTH) PROPERTY". WHEREAS, on March 5, 1996, the City Manager of the City of Aspen did file with the City Clerk of the City of Aspen a Petition for Annexation of territory to the City of Aspen; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 1996, City Council did adopt Resolution No. 11, Series of 1996, finding substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107(1), C.R.S.; establishing April 10, 1996, as the date for a public hearing to determine compliance with Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12- 105, C.R.S.; and authorizing publication of said hearing; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was continued by motions of the City Council at regular City Council meetings to July 8, 1996; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 8, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt its findings and determinations following said hearing in the form of a resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCiL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That having heard and considered the testimony, comments, exhibits and arguments :of all persons appearing at the public hearing, the City Council of the City of Aspen makes the following e - - findings and determinations in accordance with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act, as amended: 1. The City Clerk, in accordance with Section 3 of Resolution No. 11, Series of 1996, did give public notice pursuant to Section 31-12-108, C.RS., of the public hearing, by causing to be published once a week for four consecutive weeks in The Aspen Times, a newspaper of general circulation in Pitkin County, the first publication being at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing. In addition, the City Council did send to the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners, to the County Attorney of Pitkin County, and to the Aspen School District, a copy of the aforesaid resolution and petition. 2. That, in accordance with Section 31-12-108.5, C.RS., an impact report concerning the proposed annexation was prepared and filed with the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners. 3. That not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed .to be annexed will be contiguous with the City of Aspen upon the annexation of the Maroon Creek Subdivision (North) Property. (The percent of contiguity between the City of Aspen and the area proposed to be annexed would be 21 %.) 4. That a community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the City of Aspen; that said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and that said area is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the City of Aspen. The basis of compliance with the foregoing is the finding by City Council that the area to be annexed exceeds the one-sixth contiguity requirement and: a. Less than one-half of the land in the area proposed to be annexed (including streets) is agricultural, and none of the owners of such agricultural land, if any, have expressed an intention, under oath, to devote the land to agricultural use for a period of not less than five years; and, b. It is physically practicable to extend to the area proposed to be annexed those urban services which the City of Aspen provides in common to all of its citizens on the same terms and conditions as such services are made to such citizens. 5. The property proposed to be annexed was not divided into separate parts or parcels from any other tract or parcel of real estate without the written consent of the landowners thereof to establish the boundaries of the property described in the annexation petition. (One hundred percent of the owners of the proposed area to be annexed have consented to the annexation.) 2 - 6. The owners of the property proposed to be annexed have consented in writing to the annexation. Accordingly, the limitation set forth at Section 31-12-105(b) is not applicable. 7. There is no other annexation proceeding, other than the one under consideration herein, which has been commenced either in the City of Aspen or any. other municipality which affects the property proposed to be annexed. Accordingly, the limitation set forth at Section 31-12-105(c) is not applicable. 8. Annexation of the property proposed to be annexed would not result in the detachment of any area from any school district and the attachment of the same to another school district. Accordingly, the limitation set forth at Section 31-12-105(d) is not applicable. 9. Annexation of the property proposed to be annexed would not have the effect of extending the boundary of the City of Aspen more than three miles in any direction. Accordingly, the limitations set forth at Section 31-12-105(e) relating to the extension of municipal boundaries by more than three miles in anyone year is not applicable. e 10. The annexation of the property proposed to be annexed would be consistent with the "Annexation Element to the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan". Accordingly, the requirement set forth at Section 31-12-105(e) relating to the requirement that a "plan" be adopted for the property proposed to be annexed has been met. 11. In establishing the boundaries of the area to be annexed, no part of Highway 82 has been included within the area to be annexed. Accordingly, the limitation set forth at Section 31-12-105(f) has been met. 12. The City of Aspen does not intend to deny reasonable access to landowners, owner of an easement, or the owner of a franchise adjoining any street, alley, or highway, upon annexation. Accordingly, the limitation set forth at Section 31-12-105(f) has been met. 13. The requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12- 105, C.R.S. have been met. (Ref. 31-12-110(1)(a)(l), C.RS.). 14. An election is not required under Section 31-12-107(2) in that one hundred percent (100%) of the owners of the area proposed to be annexed have consented to the annexation. (Ref. 31-12-107(1)(g); 31-12-110(1)(a)(ll), C.RS.). 15. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed upon the annexation. (Ref. 31-12-110(b),C.RS.). e 3 . ~ '. ~.. ~.. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the il'CJ-P......- ~ Cl::.- day of ( . ~e.7 ..-; 1996. ~ (~R- ~. John S. Bennett, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. ~xI~ Ka S. Koch, CIty Clerk maroonck.res:compliance hearing 4