The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.517 E Hopkins Ave.0031.2015.AHPC3)- 0031.2015.AHPC 517 E HOPKINS AVE CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, MOUNTAIN VIEWPLANE EXEMPTION 2737-073-40-003 J -fA~â‚¬/Li~ 44*f H 9 ~ 61 l L 4 UÂ«Â»-Â»1-6- Â« puuvol / 4 1 - p ayÂ° ts- p h~1~j'-3 / la/ fet- -- 3 ct:,Wl-,-~ 1 -- 1 - PATH: G/DRIVE / MJFER FILES/ADMINISTRATIVE/ADmN/LAND USE CASE DOCUMENTS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0031.2015.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737-073-40-003 PROJECT ADDRESS 517 E HOPKINS PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION 517 E HOPKINS REDEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE HAAS LAND PLANNING DATE OF FINAL ACTION DEC 9 TH ,2015 CLOSED BY NICOLE HENNING .. 0031.2015.AHPC 2737-073-40-003 ~ h Permits , Hillihi NI/& 1Â£6 11.,11*:1 1-=ly Eile Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reporis Format Iab Help 2 â‚¬1 -Mi ...1 21 2 0. .dj) .i> 0< CA kr) 2% 49 v fli 19 -1 2 d - . . 11 4 / 4 0 21 10&. lumpl I./ - : U | 0 , .2 914 7 4~- It IActions Fee Summae Main Custom Fields j Permit type ahpc Aspen Historic Land Use Permit # 0031.2015.AHPC Address 517 E HOPKINS AVE Apt/Suite Clw ASPEN State CO Zip 81 611 21 Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslul 5 Applied 1 0/09/2015 Proect L Status pending Approved - Description 517 EAST HOPKINS REDEVELOPMENT Issued ESA MOUNTAIN V'IEWPLANE.COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2737-073-40-003 Closed/Final Submitted HAAS LAND PLANNING - 925-7819 Clock Running Days 0 Expires 10/03/2016 Submitted via Owner Last name 517 EAST HOPKINS LLC First name 2001 N HALSTEAD ST SUITE 304 Phone (312] 850-1680 Address CHICAGO IL 60614 Applicant El Owner is applicant? E] Contracto, is appicant? Last name HAAS LAND PLANNING LL[ First name MITCH 420 E MAIN ST STE 10-B Phone [970] 925-7819 Cust # 25346 ,Address ASPEN CO 81611 Email MITCH@HLPASPEN.COM Lender Last name First name Phone (] Address AspentioldE [server] robertg I 3 of 3 PAI D $5,800 Check #1052 10/09/2015 Receipt #39464 I saioN 17131 xoq10011L sdno]9 qel~ .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Aspen City Council FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: Call-up of HPC approval of Demolition, Conceptual Major Development, and Conceptual Commercial Design for 517 E. Hopkins Ave., HPC Resolution #31, Series of 2015 MEETING DATE: February 8. 2015 On January 11th City Council voted to call ~ up a recent HPC approval for discussion. - The call-up procedures are described below. *A During a public meeting. City Council ~b*Rk Alll:Ill*Illl~~ shall consider the application de novo and ~ may consider the record established by the I ~ HPC. The City Council shall conduct its ~ review of the application under the same ~ criteria applicable to the HPC. City Council may take the following ~ actions: 1. Accept the decision, or 2. Remand the application to HPC with direction from City Council for rehearing and reconsideration. or 3. Continue the meeting to request additional evidence, analysis or testimony as necessary to conclude the call-up review. The final HPC vote on this application was six to one (6-1). Staff supports the HPC decision and recommends Council select Option #1, accepting the HPC decision. If Council selects Option #2 and remands the application back to the Board, the rehearing and reconsideration of the application by HPC is final and concludes the call-up review. Substantial changes to the application outside of the specific topics listed in the remand to HPC may require a new call-up notice to City Council; however the call up review would be limited only to the new changes to the application. Following the conclusion of the call-up process, this application will be subject to Final Major Development Review by HPC. Staff Memo - 517 E. Hyman Call-up Page 1 of 5 .. BACKGROUND: The existing development is a 9,000 square foot lot that contains a three-story building with offices in the basement, commercial on the first floor, and residential units on the upper floors. There is also a large carved out subgrade space that accesses the offices. Built in 1950, this building is not historically significant, but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The property is also located within the Courthouse view plane review area, however the zone district limits height to 28', which is below the height of the view plane (approximately 31'-37'). I-IPC was asked to conduct Conceptual design review of a project that involves demolishing non- historic construction on the site and new construction. The Historic Preservation Commission (LIPC) approved the proposal by a vote of 6-1. The approved drawings are attached, along with the HPC resolution and draft minutes. DISCUSSION: Demolition, Conceptual Major Development & Commercial Design: The proposal is to demolish the existing building and construct a new two-story commercial space. HPC approved demolition, finding that the existing building has no historic significance. Two options for the two-story element at the middle of the proposed building were presented to LIPC. Option A includes a setback from the property line and Option B has the two-story element at the property line with a recessed entry. Please refer to the drawings on the next page. Staff Memo - 517 E. Hyman Call-up Page 2 of 5 .. Option A: Two story element set back 4 - I 4 , ntt t. . . 4,5. A , , I 'LA & 1 ./ Option B: Two story element at property line . 1 5 I 9 7 , it ff . 0/ *27. ..... A . t. I -- * 1 .~ --.-*. /<5>T t,1, 4 /3 .....3...-Il -- *1 - 4 4 4. 1 f i * '- 1 I .4 8 - . -4.9 -1 ./ # Ill:. Staff recommended in favor of Option B, as it more closely meets Guideline 6.18, from the "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines". Additionally, the guidelines state that setbacks should reinforce the objective of maintaining and enhancing the special urban and traditional character ofthe strong urban edge of the street *ade. 6.18 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much of the *ade of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ A minimum of 70% of the front fagade shall be at the property line. Staff Memo - 517 E. Hyman Call-up Page 3 of 5 .. Most of the commissioners were supportive of Option A, mentioning that the undulating fagade provides a better connection and fits better with the mix on the street and surrounding context, particularly the Connor Cabins and Kenichi building (see image below). It was also mentioned that Option A breaks up the fai:ade and massing of the proposed building more than Option B. The design objectives for the Commercial Core support this by promoting creative, contemporary design that respects the historic context and a variety in the street level experience. One objectives states that "architectural form should recognize existing scale and diversity and build upon established design traditions". A few commissioners discussed if there was a middle ground between the two design options. LIPC ultimately decided in favor of Option A. /1 I 1~cr, 4 v 'Â» CONNOR ., CABINS 31 -4, in ' 1 t , .. ~fo#- ./ ' 1 , . ~i SUBJECT ~ 1.1. 4 r ' R L h , 1 PROPERTY . /-v KENICm *3 4 , /-- r: ~ -9 4 BUILDING i *Â£ . ~ b-~1. r 5* .il The Code states that the application shall comply with the guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. HPC determined that the proposed project met all other applicable guidelines. The proposed project is also in conformance will all dimensional requirements of the Commercial Core zone district. Public Amenity: The current development contains approximately 5.5% of the lot that qualifies as public amenity. The project must provide a minimum of 10% of the lot (900 sf) as public amenity, either through on-site. off-site, cash-in-lieu payment, or a combination. On-site public amenity is required to meet a certain set of design criteria including open to view, open to the sky, and within a certain height above or below the street level. The Design Guidelines also describe desirable characteristics of on- site amenity space. The Commercial Core has a strong and relatively consistent street faga(le line. However, there are some departures from this where small areas of open space provide relief. Public amenity space along the primary street frontage should be an accent within, and exception to, an otherwise well- defined street fagade. Staff Memo - 517 E. Hyman Call-up Page 4 of 5 .. The proposed project includes approximately 285 sf of public amenity space including benches and planters in the northeast corner of the property. 11PC accepted the proposed amenity at ground level as it meets the design criteria and serves as an accent within the established street favade of the rest of the building. The two second tloor decks were also proposed as public amenity. HPC did not accept the second floor space as public amenity, due to lack of exterior public access and the desire to see public amenity space at street level. III'C also accepted a cash-in-lieu payment for the remaining required provision of public amenity. HPC determined this was acceptable fur this property, due to the location on the south side of the street creating a less than desirable space with limited solar and view access. Additional on-site requirement would also require pushing more of the building fagade further from the street, which would further diminish the presence of a consistent street fava(le and contradict the Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council uphold IIPC Resolution #31, Series of 2015, granting Demolition, Conceptual Major Development, and Conceptual Commercial Design, Demolition for 517 E. Hopkins Ave. HPC approved the project by a vote of 6-1. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMITIVE): "I move to uphold LIPC Resolution #31, Series of 2015." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Conceptual Design Exhibit B: LIPC minutes from December 9,2015 Exhibit C: HPC Resolution #31, Series of 2015 Staff Memo - 517 E. Hyman Call-up Page 5 of 5 REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NUMBER| KEYNOTE 2 ......ALWOC.ANKS ./SH/8/1 3 FIREPIN.~ED BRAKE METAL 4 CONT,NUOUSSTEEL R.UNG PINTED 5 CLEAR 'OV,AE INSJLATINS GLASS V.,TH ALUMIN/l STCREFRONTRAAI,~NC 6 PRE'/SHED'ET. OVE'/ANG 7 EXPOSEDSTEELCOLUMN PAImED 8 CLE'AL...INSUL.ING'LASS~THAL'/INUUÂ¢UATAI' WALL EaJALLYSPACEDPANES 9 812Â£18Em.APPE.INPREFINISHED.RAKEME'AL FINWOMATCH.ST~~EFRONT 10 STEELUE.......D T/O ELEVATOR SHAFT 12 Fâ‚¬FlbISHEDMETALCOPING < ..0- ~ 14 <.11'ECTUAALCâ‚¬STONE 13 .0. F LINE '~ 4!?PER p4!22#T- - - - - - T 16 BUTT.LAIDSTCMEFRONTSYSTEM 15 8OARDFORMED./.ETE./SH 47 28 - 0. rh PARAPET )r. ~ - ROOF L 7 PREPINISHED METALâ‚¬(NERED rf:,Rv -I ..6Â·~7 1,8 ./.1 pâ€¢INED#....... ./ 27 - 0" cy>\ - L 4 ' 2%2* 1 CD Â· 1 r MI) 11 - . 1 1 _ 1 _ TO RAILINIG *2 19' - 6" I. 0 ?Pref6221 -_-_-- 1 1 1.1 1 ,/k BO LINTEL . 8.0 INTEL 1 Â£ ~1 11771 3/4Â·-- - -- - -- - --- ICE)__Â·'>''::Â·~~~ .. -f EXISTING t I EXISTING i 8UILDING BEYOND A %01 ~ CD CD d i o o ~ .~ 01 BUILDING 0 i & li W (NIC) 1 N.I.C.) I. i I Fit#Â§ r1 FIN FLOOR i . i t /Â© NORTH ELEVATION U 3/16Â» = 1'2 1 T/O ELEVATOR r 'ECHAI'liSCREE.1% - - - 3379 *: -\ UPPER PARAPET < 4 Â® -<ID PARAPET F 28Â·. 0 K. =F=, 27 -W '-0 -- , [lie- T O RAIL!NG ./ 1- ---- 19Â· -6' 00 SECOND FL:22_Â£ 4 : CD -: 164 - 0Â· i 80=LINIEL.0Â·\ A-- 11'- 11 3/4- I. TRASHENCLOSURE--Â·. - / I / a CO rl:ANS FIN. FLR SPACEÂ·AÂ· L Â® EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'/ 0- 8 31?3F-1./ : I l d A-211 {111 '3 0803,41*5Van0WÂ¥) .%.40,1Â¥101 flenSS, v~ w , 1 , -BAVSNI>IdOH-lSÂ¥3 L.19 CIM aLÂ¥0 NOI. 180630 I Ag I .vl SNOLLVAS'13 lO[yELD(3 GIXIObld UJ IN_jdb V i I f...1 2.6 1 '09.-1 i.-J 9, ',%**I Ae NAWee . 9%~ REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NUMBER | KEY NOTF 8 CMU PAINTED WHEaE EXPOSED 3 .....DRAIED...RETEFINISH 4 CLEAA LOW-â‚¬1/SULATING.iLISS Aln ._5'.I " STOBTFRA~NG T/0 ELEVATOR r-MFC liANIC~L SCHEENINC~ SHAFT L - Â·Â·-- ---- --- 51 6.. . -t=lumm--29 PARAPET . / 27.0Â· A SECOND FLOOR k 16 -0 ./ FmASMENSLOSURF CIO' I ROOF ..0 ALLEÂ¥ LINTEL I. i'Â· 7* El ? 4%24 I TRANSFL~/EA I ; T.AN.'It/El , 11*# \ FIN BgpI .3 El ENCLOSLDC --i IT South U 3/16"= 1'-0- 2 2.4 MIC-ANK.AL SCREE~NG ~- OUTUNE<*ADJACENTS'J.DING 4 r-CD UPPER PARAP ET L /<D u ' 1 28'-0" L., PARAPET L 2 Iy-\., e 0 CD REQQAIRFLOOR Â£ An West U.' 3/16" = 1'-0 A n nAJ f 5..Q A-212 2,-mnomm[ 8 -Il 3AVSNI>IdOH 1SV3 LL9 GUED. 31Â¥ Nolill/% . m.'.1 03 N.ldSÂ¥ 0 ~LL'JrJWV::G ~""" ) 011'g'lla NOIBUB 03SodO/d AUNA& VH =Al==n BC,LARD PROTECTIC,4 v 7'h 90Â· 3 1/2 ;&3/~~14+ \\ . 1 1 24-7 | = 2 . 1 Â· 0Â»Â« 3 21 1 ,_7 - TENANTSPACE I ~ | C'NSTAUCTION F TENANT , 94 0 -S L ' R IST.OQU . . 9 --J --1 LJ 1 , ' 14:0 1~APPR0X) '9 Â£ 11- 85 91/ . &'11 E= 1-4.0 7.0 1 1 11 0 1 1.' , * Â£:1 :../r 21* .1,3, 9 19 & 340/ 2 E:-11 /11 M I 2 -/1 c====1 -- 1 RESTAOCM . U!11 71 1 CONSTRUCTON 1 9 J~DN ' -TENANT --- '142 UP _ ' 2 81,2 38/RE, # APPROX) i :49 i Â· 2122=ZE ' 1 [ [- - .... , 1 ) 29%< . , =31== i .1 /: -t Â· . 2 ..5 Â·ta 5 35Â·101,8- ..3 4 Nill//1 1 4 2 t . 0 3 3 5 0-7-81/2 23-101. 03 23 2 1 9 2.14 f i d -1=-emir-Â« b EL. M . CORRIDOR 6 2 -2% rEÂ© I m - -- ELEV i|I : LOall - -Ul--117 1 ./ 0 I ry-1 4 RELUL SPACE A' RETAILSPACE 8 RETAINK 35.0 ry3 #1 f , /0' Fmn-3-21=ZE -3 1 J TEMANTS.ACE G .74 8 ' ./ANTSPACEÂ·F STNR--' lin* '8~ ~-0_ - - I ;u% I 1 yÂ»+ 0 . /2/ :35 . 09 4.: f . rAIRCURTAIN 38~ 4 - i=/ 2./7 ; BYTENANT 1 1 I Aw. 18 01,2 IM*r-%::I 1 . NJIL014. .....1. --, 5 1 Ov[RJIANG 23 iG PRUPERTI LINE 90.317 LINE :i_ I I 1 .Im .1- I- -- ----- rÂ© LOWER LEVEL . FLOOR PLAN Or. MAIN LEVEL. FLOOR PLAN Â© V 1 /8- = 1'-0 0 1 /8~ = 1 Â·-Cr 3*% A-100 â€žNNV,dONVIOâ€ž,8Sg vw 5,Â·â€ž, i ~3AVSNI>IdOH 16Â¥3 89 ""8 SIONS!.ad I ./CO//'5Â¥.-..45!.........#.....I)Nailialli' Ir.L~13.')SI'lu JE, C.v;I'll._0#Â¥...S.-QI-i.).)&.03*=}-SlfdAr./VND.03-/ELial.SNOO,â‚¬3/.....INALLI'll. r,ONVI.C. I.'.r ..liv-JO1 I )2.P. ()Nl-JB..0 I Ae [ .VC f CO NOISÂ¥ ....... IliLLE)NIAWba SNVId MOOV 0360,10ld 7 3 kdal 1 - 181.-Aoy I b Li-1 45 1 -MES./.CAL- 1 I .M....REâ€¢ 14/ 50 - I L ..3 1 1 1 8, I ' Et. D /4:j. SECOND.... L..N.. / .REENNÂ£ ~ rEN.' SPACE. ' +-~~t~ STIR. [*3 2Â¤11 --SLOPE .apE- -nr -SLJ'E * | ELI. O 1 -531 11 431 -- .Wil . I. =212, = Ill UtE- -- hi , %3 3.1 2.-1.T 2 S 1 - h V-<NS C*~i, 6 1 .46] V r J 11:&Â°R Jil !-rk â€¢IR k: 40 =1 1.6/ 1 -T -T-2 1 L____1 6 11_ .'.NIME . / i >k - g 1/ , I lA r--:..- 1 0 < 1 164 - . 11 --- . \1 , I, I /3. r LAW'NS 3 Z L. I Mo 1.21 1 1 L-J In SECOND LEVEL -FLOOR PLAN O (Sh ROOF PLAN O i : M W 1/8- = 1'-0' & 1/8"= 1'.0 ./ h 1 LO r I & & A-101 EXHIBIT B ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 MOTION: Patrick moved to continue 124 W. Hallam conceptual development to February 10; second by Gretchen. Michael suggested giving the applicant clear direction. Sallie also said if we required a model our discussions would go a lot easier. Bob said you don't see the new addition on the back from the streetscape or very little of it. A lot of it is on the alley. A pitched roof would not work and I am very positive about this project. There will also be something on the west side of the lot. John said we owe the applicant some direction as to what needs changed. Willis said a block elevation of the alley would is advised and photo sides of the alley. Patrick suggested the applicant listen to staff' s recommendation. Roll call vote: Gretchen, yes; Patrick, yes; Willis, yes; Bob, yes; Nora, yes Sallie, no; John, no. Motion carried 5-2. 517 E. Hopkins Ave. - Conceptual Design Review and Demolition Proo f o f publication - Exhibit I Justin Barker, Senior Planner Justin said the proposed project is to demolish the existing building and replace it with a two story commercial building with a basement. This building is not a designated building but is located within the commercial core historic district. HPC is being asked to review conceptual design, conceptual commercial design review as well as the demolition for the existing building. All other reviews will be combined with the final review. Staff is in support of the demolition. There is currently no parking provided onsite and the applicant has the right to maintain this deficit and will only have to provide for the increase of net leasable which they are going to do through cash-in-lieu. The project is also required to provide a minimum of 10% ofpublic amenity space of the lot which equates to about 900 square feet and it is a 9,000 square foot lot. There is currently 500 square feet of space that qualified as public amenity which is essentially the walkway that 8 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 leads between the street and the alley. The proposed building has a setback area in the northeast corner which is about 285 square feet which the applicant has represented as public amenity space and they are also proposing the use of the upper level decks as public amenity space. Staff is in support of the northeast corner but not for the second story portions. Staff recommends that the remaining be cash-in-lieu payment. There are two design options. Both options have 4 modules to the design on the street level. There are three commercial areas and one is the entrance area for the circulation of the building. The entrance area is set back about 14 feet from the property line. Option A which has the center space set back from the property line includes a bridge cat walk between the other two commercial spaces to connect to the roof deck areas. Option B is what is presented after the applicant met with staff which pulls the center commercial area forward so that the three commercials are located at the property line. Option B is in line with the guidelines which bring the building fronts as close to the property line and sidewalk as possible. It helps create a stronger street fagade which is what the guidelines request. It also displays a strong height variation which is requested by the guidelines for properties that are over 6,000 square feet. Both designs conform to the zone district. The maximum height is 28 feet and they are at 28 feet. The only portion that extends over that is the elevator overrun which is permitted by right in the code. The proposed development is below what the view plane is and is not subject to view plane review. Staff recommends approval of option B. Mark Hunt, owner Mitch Ilaas, Haas Planning Mark said the City came to us and asked us to explore putting in some office space and that is why the aspen leaf is on the building. The City decided to go elsewhere. The leaf is a signage place holder. The space to the east is designed to be a shared office environment where there would be short and long term offices with a social environment to that. There is also a health and fitness area as part of the project. We will be using steel and glass partitions to keep it light and airy. The ground floor has a lobby with a large corridor where local artists can hang their work. There are exterior decks above the retail. There will also be benches and landscaping outside. It is one building but we are delineating with the different heights and different facades. There is 285 square feet on the ground that is calculated for public amenity. There will probably be another 750 to 900 square feet provided in the right-of-way. We are only counting the 285 sq.ft. and will pay the cash- 9 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 in-lieu for the balance. On exhibit A the ins and outs o f the fagade are consistent with the block and the color is softer. Adding the wood makes a difference and it works well with the brick and stone as proposed and it engages the street. Mitch said the building itself is set back off the street. The public amenity today is essentially the walkway that leads to a transformer and then to the alley. The walkway is on the northeast side of the property. We can do the balance of the public amenity 903 square feet with cash-in-lieu even though the code says it can be taken iii the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-ways or private property in commercial areas. Why we shouldn't get credit for improving the street scape putting in benches, trees and a detached sidewalk I don't understand. The view plane height ranges between 30.6 feet at the front of the property and 34.4 at the front and at the back of the property between 36 and 41 feet high. We fall below the view plan and the elevator run is also below the view plane. The existing building is 10 to 12 feet taller than the proposed. The second floor space on the north east will be broken up into pods or cubicles. There are also three broken retail frontages that face the street. Option B would be all brick punched openings on the second floor. Staff is recommending approval of option B. The existing building fails to meet the guidelines with the sunken courtyard. Dwayne Romero, represented the applicant The proposed structure is stepping back out of a pre-existing encroachment into the view plane that runs to the benefit of the court house. The mass and scale of the proposal is completely in line with the concept of small downtown character. The proposal has an active lifestyle health and fitness thread and a community social gathering space tied to it. It is a great program for our community needs and the shared office model is also included that rounds out the program. Mark said the four studio units on the third floor will be replaced 100 percent off site. The second floor is not laid out for retail use. Mitch said the zoning has changed and we cannot have a third floor. Justin said the housing credits will be addressed with the growth management review iii the future. They will either build units or buy credits. 10 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 John asked staff why they do not like the connecting deck etc. Justin said the design holds the property line and establishes the street wall that is in the guidelines. Mark said option A looks like individual buildings and B is more of the same material. Bob said plan A provides niore space on the second floor and has more glass which makes the space lighter and airy. Bob commended the applicant for putting that kind of space in our community and it is needed and successful. Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public comment portion of the agenda item was closed. Mitch summarized and said in terms of height, scale and mass we have kept things to the 28 foot height limit. We have broken up the faÂ¢ade into modules to give a rhythm to the property. We have heard iii other reviews that breaking up the frontage so that it looks like separate development is recommended. Willis identified the issues: Public amenity Demolition Cash-in-lieu View plane Mass and scale Community character Willis said this is an excellent presentation and the applicant gave a convincing case for demolition. What was lacking in the presentation was the street elevatio11 showing the former Gap building and the Kenichi building. Option A has a better connection and fits with the mix on the street and the context. As Bob said the glass is a functionally good thing for an open office plan. Willis said he tends to supports staff' s recommendation for approval. 11 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9,2015 Michael said he supports the demolition and option B. Exhibit A presents messy facades going in and out and the punched windows are appropriate. Regarding the public amenity ancl because of the location on the south side of the street and the fact that there isn't a real way of providing it 1 can grant it for the small opening in the entry and paying cash-in-lieu for the balance. The second level doesn't meet the criteria for public amenity. Patrick said they have done a good job with no variances requested. I Iaving the breakup in option A is preferred. On Hopkins everything historically is pulled back. Regarding public amenity cash-in-lieu has not been beneficial to the community as much as putting physical space on the site. If the public amenity is on the ground floor it works. In general the project works and the concept is great and hopefully it will go through. Willis said the outdoor amenity space represented on the second module is not open to the sky so it doesn't count for public amenity. Gretchen said she is totally in favor of tearing this building down. Option A is appropriate. The fact that the decks above are connected is a good feature and it feels very community friendly. The breakdown of the building is totally successful. The only concern is the streetscape and the walkway which will be missed. There will be a narrow very small walkway to the very large fagade. There should have been more discussion about the corner and the integration ofthe building. Mark said the building is 141/4 feet back from the street. Gretchen commented that the board should know what is going on next to the proposed building and see it in plan. The corner is harsh. When applications come before us we need to see a streetscape. Regarding affordable housing it is a mistake to take any affordable housing away when it could be kept there. Continually moving employee housing out of the core is a huge mistake. The different materials and the way it steps in and out and the details are all great. John said he is in complete agreement with Option A and it is messy vitality and the look of the proposal. When it comes to the public amenity you ai-e reinstating a nice detached sidewalk with benches and in the past portions of what applicants have done were calculated in the public amenity. You should get credit for doing the detached sidewalk and benches because it 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 improves the streetscape. The pedestrian sidewalk experience by the old Gap building is one of the best in town. By doing the detached sidewalk you are doing a service to the community. The undulation proposed will do good for the Saturday market. Nora said she also agrees that street scape diagrams should be provided on all applications. Even when you know the street well it is different when you see a new building on it. Philosophically public amenity space should be on the street. Nora said she prefers option B. Option B is much quieter and unified. There are too many materials. Sallie said she is OK with the conditions. Sallie said she would prefer A to look a little more like B, (A '/2.) The Theory building next door is one material and not chaotic. 1 would stand behind that building any day. B feels like a side street. Option A brings in a lot of glass and it doesn't feel cold. Bob said functionally with the glass A is better. A has a little too many variables. Maybe there can be a middle ground between A & B. The relief of A is good. The fenestration can be dealt with at final. Michael pointed out that the second floor fenestration of all glass will probably not meet the design guidelines for final. A shows a better distinction between the two story element and the one story element of the fagade. B looks like it is ready to go to final. Option A might not be what you end up with. Motion: John moved to approve resolution #31,2015 as written with a minor amendment that option A is conceptually approved and everything else will be addressed at final. Motion second by Willis. Roll call vote: Patrick, yes; Gretchen, yes; John, yes; Bob, yes; Nora, no, Sallie, yes, Willis, yes; Motion carried 6-1. MOTION: Willis moved to adjoum; second by Bob. All in favor, inotion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Cler 13 0 - - --ill----1 R~PTION#: 625749, 12/21/2015 at EXHIBIT C 10:34:24 AM, 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill. Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 31 (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, MAJOR DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AND DEMOLTION APPROVAL FOR 517 E HOPKINS AVENUE, LOTS D, E, AND F, BLOCK 94, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-40-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 517 E. Hopkins LLC (Applicant), represented by Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; â€¢ Major Development Conceptual Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415; â€¢ Demolition Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, and; WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - September 21, 2015, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the application represents that the proposed building does not infringe into any protected Mountain View Planes pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.050; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Environmental Health Department, and Parks Department, as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Community Development Director and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit ofpublic noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, ' WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on December 9, 2015, the Historic Preservation Comrdission approved Resolution 31, Series of 2015, by a six to one (6 - 1) vote Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 1 of 3 .. granting conceptual approvals and demolition approval, with the recommended conditions of approval listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the : Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants - Major Development Conceptual approval, Conceptual Commercial Design approval, and Demolition approval subject to the recommended conditions of approval as listed herein. Option A is conceptually approved. Section 2: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in ritle 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Desigh Review, Final Major Development Review, Growth Management Review. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may. at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, - grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Section 3: Public Amenity The project has a 10% public amenity requirement. A portion of the required public amenity will be provided onsite. located in front o f the entrance to the upper and lower levels. The remaining public amenity requirement will be mitigated through cash-in-lieu. Section 4: ACSD A potential location for a grease trap (subgrade) shall be included in the building permit application to allow flexibility for future conversion of the commercial/retail spaces to restaurant. Section 5: Demolition Demolition is granted pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415.080. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals Jnd the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 2 of 3 Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this gth day of December, 2015. Approved as to form: ~p1ced_as to content: 4-_ 25rzuzz~ ~ f 14 z.ou.~i u.iv A_/ ~mes R. True, City Attorney *llfislember, Chair Attest: Â·p 0/1..44 4.,I~~ Kathy StriÂ¢kland, Deputy Clerk \ Attachments: Exhibit A: Conceptually approved elevations and floor plans Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 3 of 3 REFERENCED KEY ED NOTES N U/88 R | KEY â€¢,IOTE PEÂ·TÂ·En f.EN aACK Â©w,.16~ SEAEE â€¢.4 H..INT...CK.P#~S INS./ ' P..4.50 BRAKE Â¥ET.. . T,~55-EE ..:/0 2/â€¢aED S .... 0/Â·E ~Â·laMA./ .LASS.TH A.U./.M 8-OA.*TFAUIN,ll i r,poGrl .rrn.....Im' 8 ...,Le.....1-GISS....MINUMCIRT'IN *A...WSPACEOP-9 g slal. 8wl,M...pkoli. PIEFINSÂ®. ~Aâ€¢â€¢U; METIL Â»,94 loMATtwsÂ»,EFACNT 10 ........ PA,/to, W ELEVA [OR " <kAD.GINALV,--5Â·IDA... PREn.....MAL CCIPÂ». 0*_/_Sil/L _-_--- . I.... id AAC....AL CAS' STOE 86~AD-LIEDICÂ».CAETE ~**4 w#RAPEr _ _ _ _ _ 1: T -1 t au Â· .*F I 12 -6~19,EDâ€¢t-.*ED,41â€¢f ~-CD -W ... 0 . 4..CFDÂ¥â€¢4~REPg'I;~el? I. PAI'll_ I ' tÂ· -Â·Â·- - Â·--Â·- Â·Â·UN=j- â€¢ .=.=IMp///R'll'-Ill r-21.e " " Â·Â· v Â·Â· IW-liT-7 -Â·Â·,i i,~I~~~r..~' IÂ·-t , ~rÂ»I A Ie R-,UNG M 19~77 -4 A. r. A ...........JU-LZIr ]1- 11 -~,-il 0/7/ FLCOR . T- Â·. - - - d 02Â» i liIâ‚¬71-(Migil. Â£119 LINIk_ _ L_ 1//9/// 19- E _ _ _ _L - 21.2 imIEke,.. 0-7 ACE-9 "1 1 -,1 .1 1 -, - - 02 1 11-1 i 11' â€¢1 3,4- Â·r EjUSTING 22 '-2F 11.| M -Â· Â· EUSTING RUILDING (D BUILDING SE'rOND .CD ..1 C) 02 if* ~ . ~ m f IN1.C ) - LI " . ..M=90* , - ) F. FLOOR _ ~ /~Â·N NORTH ELEVAT]o~ U ~16- - H TiO ELEVATOR re<'*,CAL!Â£qt~% -7 'I-/ L. - 24 RAPEL-Â£ / 1<2 ---- 1.-6-I. : 47 Â· _ - _ __19 B.IUME'I -- W %Ln,; , au>. - - -10.'Ir'IE.L/1 4 +2 3. 01 / - Â·'ICD Te: 1 1 TgA~s I L C =/ Â¥ 3% 1 / , . , ~~.1 â‚¬ t~%%.1 FIN FLR SPACF A .\ - -u.ejoj~ 1 9 & Al ISTELEVATION e./.0.-i<r 5 -E=i 6 i laill i A-211 . 6 or, â€¢aa 3,4, sY;;tami NO:1~111-30 1.1 .1.0 1 0.4 .....Null M.I - â€ž.*1. ' i -3AV SNI>IdO s-,slm, REFERENCED KEYED NOTES- NOWEFIT~~~~~ ~ KEY NOTE - /--f//1/:go-*REAâ‚¬â‚¬*A~E7 - ..AL'.EMU,â€¢I'll,SS...AL..... IfTIO.E.nON....... T/0 ELEVATOIR 1 SM-IT ./ ./ . .' - I ./ - 2 -1 ' in'r PAF-PET A - --V --- --"\\T- =---:EO--7 I PA~APE" ,Â·3 27-0-Il 0 ..... ..1- m FLM A - - T.Iyri 1 , i r r': -8.0.81'EY 47'rk@ 01,-m 1 0>/ , ./.ac/1/0 FIN F nne t r K ~ .7 1 Â£'5-Â°'ffÂ·.~ 1 +Sc~th U.64'. - r -1 UPPER PARAPF T Â£ lcD 1 / 7//_/ PARAP. t 1Â¥ - U 1 inid CD- 0 1 1 ' .. I - AEâ‚¬RNEFLO<28.-I. e. 0. 1 ~Â· --Â· t . . Â· 1 A ABC â€¢ A:,1~CNIT BUI.DÂ·â€¢Â£ Â·Â· -- -- --- : ~9 3/16- = 1Â·â‚¬Â· A-212 22 1 11 ~3AV SNDIdOH .LSVE; LLG S ..1.B :NOUVi/8 80<28.18 /39~PI Jâ„¢11Ed 0LAG~ PAOTEC~C6 rd'-~ t. 1 Â·. 17 - 8 W. lilli V 10/ op~Â·,roci' i g '4Â» \ . 1./51 50 561-11216 11/ 2 1 1 rtl--5-_ ' 6 'W'DÂ»/ 11 ' I = 17 7 - 3-,d==,1 94/26/7 1' ~~ A.â„¢CO~- . (Sâ„¢UCT,C,1 plli TAISTA~ 1- / dal ..i row,r. -Ic' I .u...' ..."I ~- r- 1 C '1 F l ~ ~3 | C 7,6~AUCn<,4 C=] e f- ~ ..i L. J L J , i I TE~~N 1 trfc-- bi. Â·Â·. --/ 1 1 11 9 . . e CORAlÂ©OR 4 Â£- 4, Â« 11 1 1 + C b /44~ Ar)/pli tr.: 0 1 - 9 2 4 ' 1 /*Th-FIC- Ll Ilt *E d 1 8=.T 1- : -- . 53 /2 1 1 17- 1 1~.. ,0 v. Â£ r 4 4 r I . + TE 7 1 I 4 /5:f . 10,7 i i : 1 .-2- IL- 2 IC, I 1 8% If i l-V ? : 8 â€¢ [m! b 0 8,,1 h : 1--1- 2 8 1 23 ' I - -lit i Of 4 4 EZE - .... .PACE A 'IM ./At N I RE'NUPACE C ME : 1 . /E [tfc 22] - 4161 7 .-1 23 1 3119 --4 I. r I 6 . ./ ./ / .... , DI '. e . , / L Â· 0,31 v r- :17=~-4 - 31 - -91, . /: k. [110 b 1-1 6 r-W-1 I 1 - TD'.1 * 51 1 1] Er=#4 M-TE-1.7--j v E AIHCUH14' 0 ' 0/7 It--%b- a 714 - ... 18 0 1 . Ur~ 00.3 V7 i CO AY.ill.T * 111 5 10 A LOWER LEVEL. FLOOR PLAN v 1,8Â·- T'-0Â· 0 6 @ Mt,tal:' Â· FLOOR PLAN E I 3 3 1 11 A-100 97..."-mil ~11'~000!Hl~5WnaWÂ¥~ .'44Â¥40//}0. 031.' .w t: ' : r Â· V 19Â¥3 LLS ax}.Â¥1 -Â»,â€¢40,1Â¥ mor-, C~ 10Â¥080 00'NldsÂ¥ full !~4,*111 Ae tâ‚¬*.r f '-T- , '11,1 t~~ ~'Â·'"'7 trIZI \ IMI Â· UTH-_ M -=-- I M 9 -- 74.3 . -- 6 1 I LOT / 9 1 9 -./. \: 1 1. M L ... 3 _ 1' Â·' 11170 - ' ff\\\ 13-D'~- 1/ P g. 1 4 11 1 -0-/ 1 6 1 \14/ 4- m \ ~i 4 r 1 \ SLCFE- -- ~C*F 1 0 I L 1 1 - C 1 2 19 -7. / 4 ---------1 -1 -R --9.*ri: - DRA*'kj/ILE PROPOSED FLOOA PLAN *E) ROOF PLAN | CUABUAAUn,[000NIA A-I-rÂ«Â», 4.< -vâ€žI,Â» ie,-0.- OHAâ€¢,MDY WEI = f I 1 C.. 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. ; ' 111 1.1, 19 1 ~sâ€¢r-rt> ASPrN CO 1 '40 1 DATE . .5.CR,m., . 1 - I, N./.001/Â·13/ 2.Â·D e 24 Â· 3- aEO.~ PLCX~ . V lili JOI eolde - - B M - 21 VI'-'IL ~'I%'In .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Justin Barker. Senior Planner RE: Notice of HPC approval of Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design, and Demolition for 517 E. Hopkins Ave., HPC Resolution #31, Series of 2015 MEETING DATE: January 11.2016 BACKGROUND: On December 9, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Conceptual Major Development. Conceptual Commercial Design, and . Demolition for a project at 517 E. Hopkins A 1/9 * - Ave. The existing development on the ~Â·' f~* ** +++: r' . - ......2. . -10 . 9,000 square foot property is a three-story . 11~ ,...0-,84/li/6/'4* 'V%13~-:,p building with commercial, office and 7 ZY:.2/71Rly residential uses. This building is not Â·. *5â€ži.,--*-It . historically significant, but is located within '6*-Â·~ -Â· the Commercial Core Historic District. ..i..../*al, ..... , 7 The proposal is to demolish the existing building and construct a new two-story commercial building with a full basement. The proposed building will be 28 feet tall. in conformance with the Commercial Core zone district. HPC has also accepted partial on-site public amenity and a cash-in- lieu payment for the remaining requirement. Drawings representing the Conceptual approval are attached as Exhibit A. The draft HPC Resolution is attached as Exhibit C. The board approved the project by a 6-1 vote. PROCEDLIRE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the January 1 1 t11 Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project. please contact the staff planner, Justin Barker, 429-2797 or justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B). City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. For this application. City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their January 1 1 111 meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision. the HPC Resolution shall stand. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Conceptual Design Exhibit B: HPC Minutes - December 9,2015 Exhibit C: HPC Resolution #31. Series of 2015 1... - - ' V R~EPTION#Â· 625749, 12/21/2015 at ---1 - 10:34:24 AM, 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill. Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 31 (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, MAJOR DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AND DEMOLTION APPROVAL FOR 517 E HOPKINS AVENUE, LOTS D, E, AND F, BLOCK 94, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-40-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 517 E. Hopkins LLC (Applicant), represented by Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Commercial Design Review. pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; â€¢ Major Development Conceptual Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415; â€¢ Demolition Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, and; WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - September 21,2015, as applicable to this Project: and, WHEREAS, the application represents that the proposed building does not infringe into any protected Mountain View Planes pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.050; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering. Building Department, Environmental Health Department, and Parks Department, as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Community Development Director and relevant referral agencies: and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit ofpublic noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on December 9, 2015, the Historic Preservation Comidission approved Resolution 31, Series of 2015, by a six to one (6 - 1) vote Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 1 of 3 .. granting conceptual approvals and demolition approval, with the recommended conditions of approval listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the i Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants - Major Development Conceptual approval, Conceptual Commercial Design approval, and Demolition approval subject to the recommended conditions of approval as listed herein. Option A is conceptually approved. Section 2: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Desilin Review, Final Major Development Review. Growth Management Review. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Section 3: Public Amenitv The project has a 10% public amenity requirement. A portion of the required public amenity will be provided onsite. located in front of the entrance to the upper and lower levels. The remaining public amenity requirement will be mitigated through cash-in-lieu. Section 4: ACSD A potential location for a grease trap (subgrade) shall be included in the building permit application to allow flexibility for future conversion of the commercial/retail spaces to restaurant. Section 5: Demolition Demolition is granted pursuant to I.and Use Code Section 26.415.080. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 2 0 f 3 .. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 9th day of December, 2015. Approved as to form: ~A~1Led_~ to content: ~James R. True, City Attorney Wiliin'ember, Chair Attest: 677, 53(J~# Kathy Stri*land, Deputy Clerk < Attachments: Exhibit A: Conceptually approved elevations and floor plans Historic Preservation Commission Reso No.31, Series 2015 Page 3 of 3 REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NU~BER | KEY NOTE 1 PETE...8/1............ 2 ...INTALWOCOPLANKS FI/S)â€¢1'80 3 ...HISHEOEBAKEMETAI â€¢ Â®WW~JEE-#.... s ....&.Ns~........../.-/1 STCAEFACNTFRAâ€¢~W 8 -$/94:CIETALO~EAH~NC 8 CLE. L./.All/1â€¢SSÂ¥,11. AW-*Al CURTI' MALL EO,AWÂ¥ SIÂ¥ACED *S 9 STEEL 8EAM *A~Fy'ED INPRE-S* ./0 ./AL =.TO-TCHSTUAEFACfC 10 ...10Â£. PA,Imb NO ELEVATOR :2 PREAN,â€¢EDâ‚¬k C04,6 11 Â·GLAD~23 IN.L..4,214:DAEmÂ¢NL - _SHAFT 1. - -3 RetÂ»-t ld__ 4!N,lrEERnalpASTSTO,Â£. Up ~ I ac-,DPKJAâ€¢ta)CGâ„¢irPiKENE~ -_ Friavznâ€ž- -33_3 72-2 -722 _ 1 Â· -'--CS 1 1~ 0UT-1*AZED'Te;kEFU,ONTSÂ·Â¥STE'A. ROOF Â£. . 4//91. Er....... 077' I , j ..WI'll-Il ~In#il . iÂ·Câ€¢,1., PAIImel>WHFINF<PO*P 7 cÂ·E--77337 --fl~.il it :44:14 r. T.O. RAIUNG L 9'J. ) A J_ ~- r 1 7 17< F=JETT 1 CD 0_SEQONQF,98 - -1 4.._ - _ 'E.. 4 1,UWA"tr7i L- 1 ----9 a.: I (I) "%15-*-- ]1.<fl'JI / BO ./EL I. 0-?,94'Ty=- -- 1 2 + 1 -1 . ~ -+- -I - EIV.. EXISTING -1 BUILDING CD BUILDIW BEYOND lili J (lili.) , #>I EXISTING â‚¬ 1,1=4 1 1 ..i: -ct 1 FIN. FLOOR ~ - v #.0- . /~4 NORTH ELEVA noN V .e.1.J 51':.1 R'!i WELEVA- i i | f ~ â€¢!â‚¬0,0./ SCREE'% _ SHAFT ./ 37=y-7 - 7 / / -/1 --<m - - --6 UPPER PARAPET - 28./ 1 PARAPET /1 ..C J 202-6 _ _ __ _ ~ RAIUNG L Â£'Ili; T-31 ~ , ~- iy hL" '. 'FI' 1,11.=131 _-__ ./25Â·'Q-F~OOR I. +-: ---- __!30.,-INIE'wk mASH E.4.SURE---% 22.'~32Â«ff>-f'~4-: ~" ~~ -~"~~ ~- - '. 1.11 3,4 I. CD . CID T11~p,S :ir -2 , C U031Y-9 Fl'159 SPACE A # rp EA~T ELEVATION e ,; ..1.7 i 13 g A-211 '~ On'22&,3 ,Â¥*.,rÂ¥. All Na.0 -1~fic,(,3r., ~ 2.- i, ~ i JAV SNDIdOH 19Â¥3 0 '~ 1 d 4 31VO I CN 09 N.del .0.5 REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NUMBER I KFY NOTEi 1 ---WE........... 2 |~t....ED....Cal -3 --t-Â¢1*62.â‚¬://11 -- - - - 'W...1..... UO ELEVATOR - - - SHâ‚¬fI..., ._ r. -,Z-1Â£ PARAPE . Al'. .. . P.0 SECOND .09,1-L - ' iE-/ I. Â·9Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· r- â€¢4â€¢11 C,Â£a-caÂ·. 0 1 - . __8 0 N... 11/EL IM./.82*1*G ii. - 1 \ :=:61. 1 -,- -r"" 1 ; OS-h NE i /16 - 1 -7 at,i 413: F.-4-1 t,,HW..0 r rou~NE~~ACE418LAIÂ»Ki ~ UPPER PARAPET /1 TCD f . ..._ PIMPEI_*1 . - i...1 CIL>- 1 - - . - 1 1- agMZFY,3.-Â® 1 -- - ---raREE~.m.*-'i<-uâ€¢lowilâ€žâ€¢,i- . 81 Z, Ast U .5- - 1Â·-07â€¢ 2. A-212 %0 ~11'.006â„¢1*Slm-' ,Â©1~0530 I â€¢9 I 31. M ..#0%010*~6/ I,..5 ...4 , -3.V SNDId 16Â¥3 L LS gue,9 &&1.I e , illu 'ON j"l'./1 .. Ce I [1 E; E r E.[,%11- -g:=--92- f N Iii ** .,11,1- 116-= I i '.1.-ml ,@L 4 4 Q I I 1 2 1 1 r j j M 1 - 9 & 9 m g 8 .9 , L.7- . .r: R 4-17 9 41 48,017 . 017 ... ' i /,5' ~- 1... 01 /4 10. ~ LYJ 1*96*&***%4**91â‚¬13!21 e ty F L _ *+--1 + 4 03% L {r---rÂ·---n~L/ q 4 12--1 4 : RAM,up- - -~ 'l_--_JL---Â·U 'bu.7 -4 Mi 1.9 ~3*S:3 1+Lati-- 7* 4 4 --1 4 Â§ 6, 4 .>19 e . R M F re g 22,-- - p' E rl- 1 1... 83. 15 6* 19081 04â€¢0 2 01 ~ 3 149 2111 + 141- 'Ir k 4 1 .7 4 1 1, 1 ..e . Url 1 I 77. . a --2 1 M. 4 6- 4 8 1 L.1:7 1 gs ' 1. 11# 21 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 3> .AL[ ~ACIC-h<) =. VOCAT'OP,Ne 1 ~â€¢ **BY ' 1 122'5 M RA 1 ,~F- I-~S- ASPEN. CO 10 I [Alt I 0/ I CES<DI~* 9 8,10/15 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE, i .-IN,--- 2..A 1 ./Por.3 NÂ¥'43 kKK>-U Â· ]BAIn 'BP~1 O NVId/0/11 Â·1~3n N 0 :IN.5 -i .32...... .. 4 ' '~ : 4 Int ' â€ž 0,/=-,4. mpdiii: i. 1 / 5... 1 9 r 1 1!14=4 NEL--1- 1 4 ----- m-- =-44.-==Ill ~ , - - -lp 11 ''--AL-r-- r 1.-r- L-M - 4 6 1 5/ ~4.& 9- -2 -=11 L --1-2- - 1.-- -? 9 - -:b --1 - â€žr ... 1 1 E- 1 1 . 7 L 1 $' -- \ A / - SUPE / 9-Or 7.-1 1- 1 9 , --1 b ' ' 1 1 I 9 ELI> Lin - - - 1 1<([I] 1 1/ U 1 f 1 1 1 Xm 1 CE' E# 1 1 10.-- 50 I.__-----J -- ./. Du.:1 i Â·U- PROPOSED FLOOR P'.AN AFOROOF PON ... CAM*URAS & â„¢5000RL L.I SCALE 1 1 1 â€¢Ul â€¢.4--C ~4'*.~4~-7~ ,~*t?-4- pno.,c ./1 ~441JC? ~ LÂ¢CATIC,4NO I~Â«c~]7 01-~BY. | - 517 EASTHOPIONSAVE. ' """~" ~1Â¥,5 â€¢s~eâ€¢â‚¬0 ASPEN, CO _7~ BY c~scA,Pno,. N~'ld k10013 - 13A31 0~0339 ' 0 LO L-V .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 MOTION: Patrick nioved to continue 124 W. Hallam conceptual development to February 10: second by Gretchen. Michael suggested giving the applicant clear direction. Sallie also said if we required a model our discussions would go a lot easier. Bob said you don't see the new addition on the back from the streetscape or very little of it. A lot of it is on the alley. A pitched roofwould not work and I am very positive about this project. There will also be something on the west side of the lot. John said we owe the applicant some direction as to what needs changed. Willis said a block elevation of the alley would is advised and photo sides of the alley. Patrick suggested the applicant listen to staff s recommendation. Roll call vote: Gretchen, yes; Patrick, yes; Willis, yes; Bob, yes: Nora, yes Sallie, no; John, no. Motion carried 5-2. 517 E. Hopkins Ave. - Conceptual Design Review and Demolition Proof of publication - Exhibit I Justin Barker, Senior Planner Justin said the proposed project is to demolish the existing building and replace it with a two story commercial building with a basement. This building is not a designated building but is located within the commercial core historic district. HPC is being asked to review conceptual design, conceptual commercial design review as well as the demolition for the existing building. All other reviews will be combined with the final review. Staff is in support of the demolition. There is currently no parking provided onsite and the applicant has the right to maintain this deficit and will only have to provide for the increase of net leasable which they are going to do through cash-in-lieu. The project is also required to provide a minimum of 10% of public amenity space of the lot which equates to about 900 square feet and it is a 9,000 square foot lot. There is currently 500 square feet of space that qualified as public amenity which is essentially the walkway that 8 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 leads between the street and the alley. The proposed building has a setback area in the northeast corner which is about 285 square feet which the applicant has represented as public amenity space and they are also proposing the use o f the upper level decks as public amenity space. Staff is in support of the northeast corner but not for the second story portions. Staff recommends that the remaining be cash-in-lieu payment. There are two design options. Both options have 4 modules to the design on the street level. There are three commercial areas and one is the entrance area for the circulation ofthe building. The entrance area is set back about 14 feet from the property line. Option A which has the center space set back from the property line includes a bridge cat walk between the other two commercial spaces to connect to the roof deck areas. Option B is what is presented after the applicant met with staff which pulls the center commercial area forward so that the three commercials are located at the property line. Option B is in line with the guidelines which bring the building fronts as close to the property line and sidewalk as possible. It helps create a stronger street fagade which is what the guidelines request. It also displays a strong height variation which is requested by the guidelines for properties that are over 6,000 square feet. Both designs conform to the zone district. The maximum height is 28 feet and they are at 28 feet. The only portion that extends over that is the elevator overrun which is permitted by right in the code. The proposed development is below what the view plane is and is not subject to view plane review. Staff recommends approval of option B. Mark Hunt, owner Mitch Haas, Haas Planning Mark said the City came to us and asked us to explore putting in some office space and that is why the aspen leaf is on the building. The City decided to go elsewhere. The leaf is a signage place holder. The space to the east is designed to be a shared office environment where there would be short and long term offices with a social environment to that. There is also a health and fitness area as part of the project. We will be using steel and glass partitions to keep it light and airy. The ground floor has a lobby with a large corridor where local artists can hang their work. There are exterior decks above the retail. There will also be benches and landscaping outside. It is one building but we are delineating with the different heights and different facades. There is 285 square feet on the ground that is calculated for public amenity. There will probably be another 750 to 900 square feet provided in the right-of-way. We are only counting the 285 sq.ft. and will pay the cash- 9 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 in-lieu for the balance. On exhibit A the ins and outs of the faÂ¢ade are consistent with the block and the color is softer. Adding the wood makes a difference and it works well with the brick and stone as proposed and it engages the street. Mitch said the building itself is set back off the street. The public amenity today is essentially the walkway that leads to a transformer and then to the alley. The walkway is on the northeast side of the property. We can do the balance of the public amenity 903 square feet with cash-in-lieu even though the code says it can be taken in the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-ways or private property in commercial areas. Why we shouldn't get credit for improving the street scape putting in benches, trees and a detached sidewalk I don't understand. The view plane height ranges between 30.6 feet at the front of the property and 34.4 at the front and at the back ofthe property between 36 and 41 feet high. We fall below the view plan and the elevator run is also below the view plane. The existing building is 10 to 12 feet taller than the proposed. The second floor space on the north east will be broken up into pods or cubicles. There are also three broken retail frontages that face the street. Option B would be all brick punched openings on the second floor. Staff is recommending approval of option B. The existing building fails to meet the guidelines with the sunken courtyard. Dwayne Romero, represented the applicant The proposed structure is stepping back out of a pre-existing encroachment into the view plane that runs to the benefit of the court house. The mass and scale of the proposal is completely in line with the concept of small downtown character. The proposal has an active lifestyle health and fitness thread and a community social gathering space tied to it. It is a great program for our community needs and the shared office model is also included that rounds out the program. Mark said the four studio units on the third floor will be replaced 100 percent off site. The second floor is not laid out for retail use. Mitch said the zoning has changed and we cannot have a third floor. Justin said the housing credits will be addressed with the growth management review in the future. They will either build units or buy credits. 10 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 John asked staff why they do not like the connecting deck etc. Justin said the design holds the property line and establishes the street wall that is in the guidelines. Mark said option A looks like individual buildings and B is more of the same material. Bob said plan A provides more space on the second tloor and has more glass which makes the space lighter and airy. Bob commended the applicant for putting that kind of space in our community and it is needed and successful. Chairperson. Willis Pember opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public comment portion of the agenda item was closed. Mitch summarized and said in terms of height, scale and mass we have kept things to the 28 foot height limit. We have broken up the fagade into modules to give a rhythm to the property. We have heard in other reviews that breaking up the frontage so that it looks like separate development is recommended. Willis identified the issues: Public amenity Demolition Cash-in-lieu View plane Mass and scale Community character Willis said this is an excellent presentation and the applicant gave a convincing case for demolition. What was lacking in the presentation was the street elevation showing the former Gap building and the Kenichi building. Option A has a better connection and fits with the mix on the street and the context. As Bob said the glass is a functionally good thing for an open office plan. Willis said he tends to supports staff's recommendation for approval. 11 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 Michael said he supports the denlolition and option B. Exhibit A presents messy facades going in and out and the punched windows are appropriate. Regarding the public amenity and because o f the location on the south side of the street and the fact that there isn't a real way of providing it I can grant it for the small opening in the entry and paying cash-in-lieu for the balance. The second level doesn't meet the criteria for public amenity. Patrick said they have done a good job with no variances requested. Having the breakup in option A is preferred. On Hopkins everything historically is pulled back. Regarding public amenity cash-in-lieu has not been beneficial to the community as much as putting physical space on the site. Ifthe public amenity is on the ground floor it works. In general the project works and the concept is great and hopefully it will go through. Willis said the outdoor amenity space represented on the second module is not open to the sky so it doesn't count for public amenity. Gretchen said she is totally in favor of tearing this building down. Option A is appropriate. The fact that the decks above are connected is a good feature and it feels very community friendly. The breakdown of the building is totally successful. The only concern is the streetscape and the walkway which will be missed. There will be a narrow very small walkway to the very large fagade. There should have been more discussion about the corner and the integration of the building. Mark said the building is 14 14 feet back from the street. Gretchen commented that the board should know what is going on next to the proposed building and see it in plan. The corner is harsh. When applications come before us we need to see a streetscape. Regarding affordable housing it is a mistake to take any affordable housing away when it could be kept there. Continually moving employee housing out of the core is a huge mistake. The different materials and the way it steps in and out and the details are all great. John said he is in complete agreement with Option A and it is messy vitality and the look of the proposal. When it comes to the public amenity you are reinstating a nice detached sidewalk with benches and in the past portions of what applicants have done were calculated in the public amenity. You should get credit for doing the detached sidewalk and benches because it 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2015 improves the streetscape. The pedestrian sidewalk experience by the old Gap building is one of the best in town. By doing the detached sidewalk you are doing a service to the community. The undulation proposed will do good for the Saturday market. Nora said she also agrees that street scape diagrams should be provided on all applications. Even when you know the street well it is different when you see a new building on it. Philosophically public amenity space should be on the street. Nora said she prefers option B. Option B is much quieter and unified. There are too many materials. Sallie said she is OK with the conditions. Sallie said she would prefer A to look a little more like B, (A 14.) The Theory building next door is one material and not chaotic. 1 would stand behind that building any day. B feels like a side street. Option A brings in a lot of glass and it doesn't feel cold. Bob said functionally with the glass A is better. A has a little too many variables. Maybe there can be a middle ground between A & B. The relief ofA is good. The fenestration can be dealt with at final. Michael pointed out that the second floor fenestration of all glass will probably not meet the design guidelines for final. A shows a better distinction between the two story element and the one story element of the fagade. B looks like it is ready to go to final. Option A might not be what you end up with. Motion: John moved to approve resolution #31, 2015 as written with a minor amendment that option A is conceptually approved and everything else will be addressed at final. Motion second by Willis. Roll call vote: Patrick, yes; Gretchen, yes; John, yes; Bob, yes; Nora. no, Sallie, yes, Willis, yes: Motion carried 6- 1. MOTION: Willis moved to adjoum; second by Bob. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Cler 13 (SEL,A NID JUNE.1-![OBA CO 81[..5 ,#* 4 ..1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. F**#- 20 NOV 2.015 PM 2 'Ir Â·Â·it"l....1,~t.'~ 1-Il- 130 S. GALENA STREET ---....- -Â·Â·Â·'.**Ill".41~.. : T 4,1,4,40-~//,9; 103~r le,4 ASPEN, CO 81611 --%&,-r. i--d- HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING CONI COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 N I XI E 802 ZE 1 0012 /07/15 r * U -' 9 5 9%4 T n. c r r. i rm " *5 1 62 - 9 W h '1 â‚¬ 5-7 ; ATTE Â¥tiâ€¢ TED - rE U j lit fÂ¥ U * 2, 6 tia..le, C le:h C 6*.u' f.m G 9 1/ 1 ./ O-'C' V ~ i AC; 81611190210 Â£2079 -17861- 20 -42 i 816ifitikf1902 Efjf'*fildifrdlfaillil,lill,;'1'ili:,111=11*:fiffiqpqu.nifill I GRAND JU!\!CITIOIV COÂ· 81.5 /0~~*#*.--.#*---.on..-.-*. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , 20 NOÂ·42 2015. PMÂ·~ 2 -r 130 S. GALENA STREET -0-%2**#41"lw'Egra'* ASPEN, CO 81611 lkâ€ž-.a>,ful. 4,> 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 601 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 Ni Al 1 802 52 1 0012/07/15 RETURN ,a .2 6 f Â¥ L' 6 h Â¥ 6 - D' M' %'% C * ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD SE. 8161119023-0 *2079-15311-20-42 Bicifi?&321 902 iligil'fil'jijj'11111!111'i,cillilitililillibi::11,111111%21:11...1 .-mm'd/6-~Yâ„¢- GRAND -31,3NCTIO,f,J CO 815 ~~1~3,3:ZI~:~~74~25 &-d#:*4.,1.At,n",1,1/./..../.** AL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 5. GALENA STREET 20 NOV 2015 PM 2 L .0- ASPEN, CO 81611 CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CONDO ASSOC , COMMON AREA AN k 530 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 802 72 1009 0011/26/15 i K 1 a U r<- 14 i U b Z 1% L' C & i ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN s U NABLE TO FOR WARD 8 C 6161119023-0 1 2 2/ 9 - 1 37 15 - 2 6-44 4 =ill,ailli,4â€ž 11131,%:111,nHEd=,11; 1111141-,i.1!241ti~~3 A GELE,0.*41*599 2 i % *41 GRAND JUNCTION C 3 Ek/.11 ...2 ./....... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 130 S. GALENA STREET 20 NOV 2015 PM 2 T ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 .m&- jli . DUVIKE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA f/ 420 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 N I XIE 892 75 1009 0011/26/13 1 W - 7,1 E I TO 9 P h D = A. 1 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN 1 UNABLE FO FORWARD ; BC. 6161116026 0 -287 9- 1867 3 -28-42 1 ! 13 ' 1 1 . 1 *la'4!1.1.1.12.!..,..=lillital.1,11 ~ 84/f!**4902 'jil;!ilii! i"li'kii:i'il<i"i:1111,"1.111'1''I''''Ill'tâ€¢'â€¢'â€¢Ii; i GR.A N D JUNCTI13' N -CC,) 815 ~JI'zED>JZES,I,Â·0"~"~â€ž-444.~,~ al, COMivioNITY DEVELOPMENT *0.â€¢fâ€¢n#. .."U#-.P/--9,-m.,M./'mr#,*. 130 S. GALENA STREET 20 NOÂ·V'.2Â£! 3.5 PM .2,{... 4*-44 ./.-'..&"Imill/Tr"Jil"E/>4. ASPEN, CO 81611 11,1.-I PITKIN CENTER CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 i: A /1 - C Pl 211 -D j ...a -/ - r i 202 5 E 1 O 1 -A. 4 5 04/ 10 1 I 1 1 RETURN TO SEADE R i Y ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN l i I I; UN ABLE 1'0 F OR WARD 611- 61611.19*238 " /O/ 1- 1/ 09.-E 17- 94. i rei &11*44*92 1,"ti'jiglitilii"jilill!,111%'1:111"1111,ilitjililli!1111!1111 0 . rmmii~--1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE It 1221-5- 1 REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE COI ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 5/7 12 40'f |/U-S , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Wal -hic 94 2 5: Oopn ,20Â£ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the Clity of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: |0~ Publication ofnotice.- By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage :~n:-0.- .,.. prepaid U.S. mailto all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe ,. , p, , , property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of ' 'Â·Â·'-' property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they , ,....' ' .. . appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that -was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 0 0 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimunl Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 569(L lc~~Â£~3 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Fl day of AID Â¢ , 20(L by 3471942 &- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 01'011 92 fow th fia_ IRÂ«- Notary Public L KAREN REED PATTERSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964002767 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commission Expires February 15, 2016 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue Public Hearing: 5pm, December 9, 2015 Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Chambers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 517 E. Hopkins Ave Legal Description: 2737 073-40-003, Lots D, E, F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Commercial Core Zone District Description: The applicant proposes a redevel- opment of the property with a new two story build- ing above grade. The requested development ap- provals associated with this application may be modified by the approving body. Land Use Reviews Req: Conceptual Major De- velopment Review, Conceptual Commercial De- sign Review, Viewplane Review, Demolition Decision Making Body: Histor,c Preservation Commission Applicant: 517 East Hopkins LLC, 2001 N. Halst ed St., Ste. 304, Chicago, IL 60614 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 3. Galena St. Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, ;ara.adams@cityofaspen.com Published in the Aspen Times Weekly November 19,2015.(11691356) ember ig. Mis .. ATTACHMENT 6 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4\,7 East 1-4pkiks A vÂ«u-.29 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Deâ‚¬4Â« 9 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, t/~36:6 , /ArÂ®ral Gr *tar UU PLHA/>74- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby'personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. K Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 20'tay of Nob'â‚¬0,46<./0-- , 200 /2 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. M Mailing Of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29.2007 .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part ofa general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. *ature ~ The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1 -- day of ibg-u-reL,/ , 20063 by ----UZE, bi -IIR-Â·-ors,e( 7 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL BARBARA J D'AUTRECHY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID # 20074042687 My commission expires: 0, r.c \ 1 0.0 ; 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 11 2017 k /,-111400 r-J c. )~0-j,- '~_r~< 1,U~~ L.Nofary Public ~ (~ ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29.2007 .. Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273707340003 on 11/11/2015 44",IN ' CouNT* Â©000\4) Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com .. COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST GODIVA HOLDINGS LLC KANDYCOMINC 730 E DURANT AVE 435 E MAIN ST 766 SINGING WOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ARCADIA, CA 91006 530 HOPKINS LLC JARDEN CORPORATION AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC 5301/2 E HOPKINS 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN PLAZA LLC ALH HOLDING CO WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC PO BOX 1709 435 E MAIN ST 211 N STADIUM BLVD STE 201 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLUMBIA, MO 65203 EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC FURNGULF LLP CM LLC 1601 ELM ST#4000 616 E HYMAN AVE 230 S MILL ST DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SJA ASSOCIATES LLC PITKIN COUNTY BANK BRAND BUILDING LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 534 E HYMAN AVE 205 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLAU JEFF T HINDERSTEIN FAM REV TRUST BRAND 13 LLC 60 COLUMBUS CR 19TH FL 4415 HONEYMOON BAY RD 0133 PROSPECTOR RD #4102B NEWYORK, NY 10023 GREENBANK, WA 98253 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEVY ASPEN RESIDENCE TRUST WALL JANET REV TRUST GELD LLC 5959 COLLINS AVE 205 S GALENA ST PO BOX 1247 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS ASSOC ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER 13 BRAMLEY RD 517 W NORTH ST 1300 S STEELE ST LONDON W10 6SP UK, ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80210 ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ALPINE BANKASPEN CITY OF ASPEN 420 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 10000 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ASPEN, CO 81611 COTTONWOOD VENTURES I LLC 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE LLC PARAGON PENTHOUSE LLC 419 E HYMAN AVE 2001 NORTH HALSTED # 304 9950 SANTA MONICA BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 .. COTTONWOOD VENTURES 11 LLC 419 AH LLC COTTONWOOD VENTU RES 11 LLC 419 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 4068 300 CRESCENT CT #850 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 CICUREL CARY LUCKYSTAR LLC SILVER SLAM COMMERCIAL LLC 2615 N LAKEWOOD PO BOX 7755 60 COLUMBUS CIR CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEWYORK, NY 10023 BRAND BUILDING CONDO ASSOC 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC BPOE CONDO ASSOC 205 S GALENA ST COMMON AREA 210 S GALENA ST #31 ASPEN, CO 81611 601 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DUVIKE CONDO ASSOC TROYER TROUSDALE TOWNHOMES CONDO HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 420 E HYMAN AVE 611 E HOPKINS AVE 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN CENTER CONDO ASSOC PARAGON BUILDING CONDO ASSOC CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA E HYMAN AVE 419 E HYMAN AVE 530 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 426 EAST HYMAN AVE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 418 E COOPER AVE #207 PO BOX 4068 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 514 AH LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC MYSKO ASPEN HOLDINGS 514 E HYMAN AVE 421 N BEVERLY DR #300 615 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODS FAMILY LP 410 AH LLC 204 S GALENA ST LLC PO BOX 11468 PO BOX 4068 2001 N HALSTED #304 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHICAGO, IL 60614 HUNTER SQUARE LLC 90% JURINE LLC 10% BASS CAHN 601 LLC PO BOX 2 PO BOX 2 PO BOX 4060 SONOMA, CA 95476 SONOMA, CA 95476 ASPEN, CO 81612 HORSEFINS LLC COLLINS BLOCK LLC BPOE ASPEN LODGE #224 601 E HOPKINS AVE 205 S GALENA ST 210 S GALENA ST #31 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. 308 HUNTER LLC 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 490 WILLIAMS ST 610 E HYMAN AVE DENVER, CO 80218 ASPEN,CO 81611 .. THE Crl'Y OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www. aspen pitki n.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue Public Hearing: 5pm, December 9, 2015 Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Chambers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue Legal Description: 2737-073-40-003, Lots D, E, F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Commercial Core Zone District Description: The applicant proposes a redevelopment of the property with a new two story building above grade. The requested development approvals associated with this application may be modified by the approving body. Land Use Reviews Requested: Conceptual Major Development Review, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Viewplane Review, Demolition Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission Applicant: 517 East Hopkins LLC, 2001 N. Halsted St., Ste. 304, Chicago, IL 60614 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, sara.adams@cityofaspen.com _ 6 ) 1 - #f 491059- 42> .J- 2 4 - -..Ig -- .> --1- . 1)%6Â· 9:14: .r - . 72* -:.' - 1 - p - '@WI -I,1 0 I."A- li 1 I *M 14 1 ./.% hu, =7.80/ - . . ac , 1 -- 94 d.4 .... - 1 . I Â· 4.4: I.'I 1 . i.. .. - -i -- 49= - I : 0 .. 4./7 ...B r 9- 1 11: r ' L . k *0 --u.jÂ£-1- S -lill.-'I~ 2,41 1 Â»4'Â» 1 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner RE: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue - Demolition, Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Public Hearing DATE: December 9,2015 SUMMARY: The subject property is located at 517 East Hopkins Avenue. It currently houses the city building and engineering departments in addition to some retail shops on ground level, and some residential units on the upper floors. It is a 9,000 sf lot. The Historic Preservation Commission is asked to review demolition and replacement of the existing building with a new two story entirely commercial building. The structure on the site is not historically designated, but the property is in the Commercial Core Historic District. The reviews include conceptual design reviews, Public Amenity, Utility/Delivery/Trash, and Parking. The property does not fall within a designated Mountain Viewplane as shown in the application. Affordable housing mitigation and Transportation Impacts will be assessed and reviewed concurrent with Final design reviews. HPC is expected to be the only decision making board for this proposal. City Council will receive notice of call up after conceptual review approval. -â€¢ '16 . -- 1.1 '. , .2 .... 7. $ . . Â».i.,~41/': . - 04-V ' /7 4.. 9 1 1 A 94 " a ., 't ~, U ..f - C . . . 2- 1 1 ' , 7 - . -,1.. ltd, 4,3/ i, .4-' Â¥ - r ECOOPERAvE I * 7-,416. : . <# ' , .: 4* ./ 1 - .16* EDO,%1&,49 '7 - j f :. ., t.. .... 1 ..4 -4 i 04 S' r ,>6-2.7 4.- .al.... :~, 2 - .1 â€¢r â€¢ i -- 4 t. â‚¬ h. ~1 '-,4/i . -- 2 . Figure 1: Map indicating subject property 1 .. APPLICANT: 517 East Hopkins LLC, represented by Camburas and Theodore, Ltd. and Haas Land Planning. ADDRESS: 517 E. Hopkins Ave.., Lots D, E. and F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-40-003. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. DEMOLITION Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: a) The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b) The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c) The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d) No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and Staff response: The structure on the property is sound and is not an imminent hazard. The building cannot practically be moved to another location. It was built in 1950 and is a two story stucco frame structure. Staff finds that Criterion D is met. There is no documentation that supports a finding that any development on this property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance. Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a) The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District in which it is located and b) The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the I-Iistoric District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c) Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. Staff response: As stated, the existing development is not considered historically significant. The property is not directly adjacent to any historic resources and in fact is generally surrounded by non-historic structures, except for City Hall and Connor cabins located across the street. 2 .. Demolition of this structure will not affect the historic preservation needs of the area. Staff finds these criteria are met. CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW & COMMERCIAL DESIGN The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The LIPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project' s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Maj or Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon IIPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the LIPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. The design guidelines for conceptual review of a new building in the Commercial Core Historic District are all stated within the "Commercial, Lodging and Ilistoric District Design Objectives." The applicable guidelines are listed in "Exhibit A." The subject property is located on a block that contains no historic resources. Within the vicinity are City Hall and Connor Cabins buildings. Street & Alley Svstems: The proposed project maintains the established town grid (6.1) and improves the existing condition by bringing the building to the property line and removing the large sunken area well. All parking will be mitigated through cash in lieu payment. There are some concerns about the configuration of trash/utility locations onsite which is discussed later in the memo. Cash in lieu is a by-right option for commercial parking mitigation in this location. Public Amenitv: Redevelopment of this site requires the provision of an on-site public amenity space, or a cash in lieu payment. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public U.) .. rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. The project is required to provide or mitigate 10% of the lot or about 900 sf. for public amenity space. The design guidelines in Exhibit A describe desirable characteristics of on-site amenity space. as meeting the following requirements: 1. The dimensions o f any proposed on-site public amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur, considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. 2. The public amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar access. view orientation and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. 3. The public amenity and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way and uses contribute to an inviting pedestrian environment. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. 5. Any variation to the design and operational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the purpose of the public amenity requirements. There is currently about 500 sf of at grade public amenity space onsite. The proposed building has a setback with benches on the ground level in the northeast corner that meets public amenity and is about 285 st< In addition, the two upper level decks are proposed as an alternative option for public amenity mitigation. Staff does not support allowing the upper level decks, which do not have exterior access, to serve as public amenity space. Staff finds that the Design Guidelines for second level amenity space are not met, specifically 6.13: 6.13 A second floor amenity space should meet all of the following criteria: â€¢ Ensure consistent public access â€¢ Be dedicated for public use â€¢ Provide a public overlook and/or an interpretive marker â€¢ Be identified by a marker at street level. Staff recommends that the HPC approve cash in lieu to mitigate for the remaining public amenity requirement (900 sfrequirement - ground level 285 sf = 615 sf.) Building Placement: The applicant proposes two options for the two story element at the middle of the building. Option A includes a setback from the property line and Option B has the two story element at the 4 .. property line with a recessed entry. Please refer to the drawings below. Both options are included in your packet; however floor plans only reflect option A. Option A: Setback two story element (applicant's preferred option). I *13' I 'A I 4[ , r 5.~I '4 F/- 4/2 e.. 4.25>~1 1 Â· 4 .. Â¥-1 'k - .' , 1 1 - E * 3 .. A "- Option B: Two story element at property line (Staffs preferred option). 1 -- U I , 4. 4 04 4, - -. r , 1,Â«Uft- --*-1: * r Â·- : ~i[ 1 4. /ta - -, 1 P- 1. I. f L# ~1 ~ 4 2 1 â‚¬. 4 â‚¬1 1 &612 / It,k The building is proposed parallel to lot lines similar to traditional building orientations (6.20). The primary entrances face Hopkins Avenue (6.21). The building is broken up into four 5 @MODIO@M,L + M.*09=0 .. modules, three of which are commercial spaces. Each commercial space has a different approach to the recessed entry as shown below (the floor plans below reflect Option A). The fourth module is the entrance to the upper and lower levels and is setback 14'5" from the pr9perty line. '1111)11011'11111111111[11111]11111 111' 11 lilli ' 1 1 1 711111 1111111111'ill!/11111'll'lit, .*~ - -gm#>0914*,%/thf49/ Iu, 1, I 1%~ -go.:gÂ·-@- ----- -ar- -- 4>1 BENCHES- LBALCONY ABOVE L-SOFFIT ABOVE PARKING, '-SOFFIT ABOVE CONCRETE WALK (TYP.) KIOSK ' 1=ZE t. b. 1 la==&&=gâ‚¬.:.,1....VAY.S......1.4: ~..Â·â€¢-LIGHT POST - E-/9,/ASS,479122 L=Â¥4 1 2--Â·''ulÂ« , L----7,0.-\1 1 Fr> t/ /' LANDSCAPE- 1\99 F./,17 ip kl._PAVERS, Tvp 14-51 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Figure 4: Detail of ground level floor plan showing setbacks for Option A. Guideline 6.18 states that facades should be on the property line. Staff is supportive of Option B which pulls the two story element to the property and finds that Guideline 6.18 is met. Option A, shown above, erodes the street wall and does not meet Guideline 6.18. The redevelopment of this property provides an opportunity to strengthen the alignment of facades along the street. Staffrecommends HPC approve Option B. 6.18 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much of the fa~ade of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ A minimum of 70% ofthe front fagade shall be at the property line. Building Form/ Height/Mass/Scale: The overall mass and scale of the building is appropriate for the downtown. The maximum height in the Commercial Core Zone District is 28 ft., which is proposed to the top of the parapet. The elevator overrun extends to 31 ft. which is allowed by Code. A flat roof is proposed (6.22 and 6.23) as noted in the Design Guidelines. Floor to floor heights for the first level are 16 ft. and the measurement to the top of the parapet wall is 19 ft. 6 in. There are two street facing second level decks. Option A provides a walkway to connect the decks and Option B does not externally connect the decks. Staff is supportive of the decks which provides height variation as shown in Option B. The Guidelines (6.26 - 6.30) recommend height variation when the site is larger than 6,000 sf (this site is 9,000 sf). Staff finds that the review criteria regarding form, height, mass and scale are met. Utilitv, delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building are well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success 6 J st R,f * [-1 12@1 .. of the district. Poor logistics of one building can detract from the quality of surrounding properties. Efficient delivery and trash areas are important to the function of alleyways. The success of the project related to th.ese topics is assessed by Environmental Health, Engineering and Utilities, using the following criteria: 1. A trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated on all projects and shall meet the minimum size and location standards established by Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code, unless otherwise established according to said Chapter. 2. A utility area shall be accommodated on all projects and shall meet the minimum standards established by Title 25, Utilities, of the Municipal Code, the City' s Electric Distribution Standards, and the National Electric Code, unless otherwise established according to said Codes. 3. All utility, trash and recycle service areas shall be co-located and combined to the greatest extent practical. 5. If the property adjoins an alleyway, the utility, trash and recycle service areas shall be along and accessed from the alleyway, unless otherwise approved through Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code. or through Chapter 26.430, Special Revie-w. 6. All utility, trash and recycle service areas shall be fenced so as not to be visible from the street, unless they are entirely located on an alleyway or otherwise approved though Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code, or through Chapter 26.430, Special Review. All fences shall be six (6) feet high from grade, shall be of sound construction, and shall be no less than ninety percent (90%) opaque, unless otherwise varied through Chapter 16.430, Special Review. 7. Whenever utility, trash, and recycle service areas are required to be provided abutting an alley, other portions of a building may extend to the rear property line if otherwise allowed by this Title, provided that the utility, trash and recycle area is located at grade and accessible to the alley. 8. All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property. Easements shall allow for service provider access. Encroachments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical and should only be necessary when existing site conditions. such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. 9. All commercial and lodging buildings shall provide a delivery area. The delivery area shall be located along the alley if an alley adjoins the property. The delivery area shall be accessible to all tenant spaces of the building in a manner that meets the requirements of the International Building Code Chapters 10 and 11 as adopted and amended by the City of Aspen. All non-ground floor commercial spaces shall have access to an elevator or dumbwaiter for delivery access. Alleyways (vehicular rights-of-way) may not be utilized 7 .. as pathways (pedestrian rights-of-way) to meet the requirements of the International Building Code. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral component of the building. Shared facilities are highly encouraged. 10. All commercial tenant spaces located on the ground floor in excess of 1.500 square feet shall contain a vestibule (double set of doors) developed internal to the structure to meet the requirements of the International Energy Conservation Code as adopted and amended by the City of Aspen, or an air curtain. 10. Mechanical exhaust, including parking garage ventilation, shall be vented through the roof. The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away from the street as practical. 11. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof, minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. 12. The trash and recycling service area requirements may be varied pursuant to Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code. All other requirements of this subsection may be varied by special review (see Chapter 26.430.040.E, Utility and delivery service area provisions). Staff response: The Environmental Health Department and the Building Department's comments are attached as an Exhibit. Environmental Health and Building are supportive of the proposal for trash and utility area. The applicant has represented that a potential location for a grease trap (subgrade) shall be included in the building permit application to allow flexibility for future conversion of the commercial/retail spaces to restaurant i f desired. The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant demolition approval and Conceptual Commercial Design and Conceptual Major Development approvals for Option B with the following conditions: 1. Option B is approved. 2. The project has a 10% public amenity requirement. A portion of the required public amenity will be provided onsite, located in front of the entrance to the upper and lower levels. The remaining public amenity requirement will be mitigated through cash-in-lieu. 8 .. 3. A potential location for a grease trap (subgrade) shall be included in the building permit application to allow flexibility for future conversion of the commercial/retail spaces to restaurant. 4. Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Design Review. Final Major Development Review, Growth Management Review. 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval o f a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension o f the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. EXHIBITS: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Development Review Committee comments C. Application 9 .. Exhibit A, Relevant Design Guidelines 6.1 Maintain the established town grid in all projects. u The network of streets and alleys should be retained as public circulation space and for maximum public access. u Streets and alIeys should not be enclosed or closed to public access, and should remain open to the sky. 6.3 Develop an alley fal:ade to create visual interest. Use varied building setbacks and changes in materials to create interest and reduce perceived scale. Balconies, court yards and decks are also appropriate. Providing secondary public entrances is strongly encouraged along alleys. These should be clearly intended for public use, but subordinate in detail to the primary street-side entrance. .6 A street facing amenity space shall meet all of the following requirements: Abut the public sidewalk Be level with the sidewalk Be open to the sky Be directly accessible to the public Be paved or otherwise landscaped 6.7 A street-facing public amenity space shall remain subordinate to the line of building fronts in the Commercial Core. u Any public amenity space positioned at the street edge shall respect the character of the streetscape and ensure that street corners are well defined, with buildings placed at the sidewalk edge. u Sunken spaces, which are associated with some past developments, adversely affect the street character. Where feasible, these should be replaced with sidewalk level improvements. 6.8 Street facing amenity space shall contain features to promote and enhance its use. These may include one or more of the following: 3 Street furniture u Public art u Historical/interpretive marker 6.12 Second level amenity space should be compatible with the character of the historic district. u It shall remain visually subordinate to any historic resource on the property. u If located on a historic property, it may not alter the appearance of the resource as seen from the street. .13 A second floor amenity space should meet all of the following criteria: Ensure consistent public access Be dedicated for public use 10 O/2 CtJCUU' O/ C .. Provide a public overlook and/or an interpretive marker Be identified by a marker at street level 6.14 Second level space should be oriented to maximize solar access and mountain views, or views of historic landmarks. 6.15 Second level space should provide public access by way of a visible and attractive public stair or elevator from a public street, alley, or street level amenity space. 6.16 Second level dining may be considered. u If the use changes, the space must remain accessible to the public, so long as it is to be considered meeting the public amenity space requirement. .18 Maintain the alignment of fafades at the sidewalk's edge. Place as much of the fai:ade of the building at the property line as possible. Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. A minimum of 70% of the front fagade shall be at the property line. 6.20 Orient a new building to be parallel to its lot lines, similar to that of traditional building orientations. o The front of a primary structure shall be oriented to the street. 6.21 Orient a primary entrance toward the street. Buildings should have a clearly defined primary entrance. For most commercial buildings, this should be a recessed entry way. Do not orient a primary entrance to an interior court. Providingsecondary public entrances to commercial spaces is also encouraged on larger buildings. 6.22 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core fagades. 1 Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. u The fagade should appear as predominantly fiat, with any decorative elements and proj ecting or setback "articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominant roof form. .23 Use Hat roof lines as the dominant roof form. A fiat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear of a site, should be the dominant roof form. Parapets on side faGades should step down towards the rear of the building. False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered. 6.24 Along a rear fagade, using building forms that step down in scale toward the alley is encouraged. u Consider using additive forms, such as sheds, stairs and decks to reduce the perceived scale. These forms should however, remain subordinate to the primary structure. u Use projecting roofs at the ground floor over entrances, decks and for separate utility structures in order to establish a human scale that invites pedestrian activity. 11 0001 00 0 OCUR 0 0 .. 6.25 Maintain the average perceived scale of two-story buildings at the sidewalk. u Establish a two-story height at the sidewalk edge, orprovide ahorizontal design element at this level. A change in materials, or a molding at this level are examples. 6.26 Building fafade height shall be varied from the fafade height of adjacent buildings of the same number of stories. D If an adjacent structure is three stories and 38 ft. tall, new infill may be three stories, but must vary in faGade height by a minimum of 2 ft. 6.27 A new building or addition should reflect the range and variation in building height of the Commercial Core. u Refer to the zone district regulations to determine the maximum height limit on the subject property. u A minimum 9 ft. floor to ceiling height is to be maintained on second stories and higher. u Additional height, as permitted in the zone district, may be added for one or more of the following reasons: - In order to achieve at least a two-foot variation in height with an adjacent building. - The primary function of the building is civic. (i.e. the building is a Museum, Civic Building, Performance Hall, Fire Station, etc.) - Some portion of the property is affected by a height restriction due to its proximity to a historic resource, or location within a View Plane, therefore relief in another area may be appropriate. - To benefit the livability of Affordable Housing units. - To make a demonstrable (to be verified by the Building Department) contribution to the building's overall energy efficiency, for instance by providing improved day- lighting. 6.28 Height variation should be achieved using one or more of the following: Vary the building height for the full depth ofthe site in accordance with traditional lot width. Set back the upper floor to vary the building fagade profile(s) and the roof forms across the width and the depth of the building. Vary the fagade (or parapet) heights at the front. Step down the rear of the building towards the alley, in conjunction with other design standards and guidelines. 14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street. o When it is feasible. screen service areas from view, especially those associated with commercial and multifamily developments. u This includes locations for trash containers and loading docks. J Service areas should be accessed off of the alley, if one exists. 12 0 0 U C 0 0 0 0 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Â« ASPEN, CO LOCAL JURISDICTION: LANDLORD: ARCHITECT: LAND PLANNER: THE CITY OF ASPEN M DEVELOPMENT CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 130 S. GALENA STREET 2001 N. HALSTED ST., SUITE 304 2454 E. DEMPSTER STREET, SUITE 202 420 EAST MAIN STREET, STE 10-B ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 DES PLAINES, IL 60016 ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL (970) 429-2761 CONTACTÂ· MARK HUNT TEL (847) 298-1525 TEL (970) 925-7819 CONTACT BY DEPARTMENT CONTACT: TED J. THEODORE NCARB LEED AP CONTACT: MITCH HAAS DRAWING LIST: OR ROB AVILA, LEED AP SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME CS-1 COVER SHEET ALTA EXISTING LAND SURVEY PA-1 EXISTING PUBLIC AMEN[TY EC-1 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-2 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-3 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN ER-1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN PA-2 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY PLANS A-010 PROPOSED SITE PLAN VP-1 VIEW PLANE ELEVATIONS VP-2 VIEW PLANE SURVEY 04 - VP-3 VIEW PLANE MAP * L#A A-100 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS -- W -- A-101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN FAR-1 FLOOR PLANS - FAR CALCULATIONS * 5 FAR-2 FLOOR PLAN - FAR CALCULATIONS E Nt-1 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE 6 NL-2 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE .* 1 A-211 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I I A-212 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2 * TAI TIA SITE PLAN Â¥ 12 i I- 55.*1 2 '. *4 , ' , 1 t. 1 , #...+.1.- f ~Stt -blT .0 A. - A-4 '-' - ADA. -' 4 I. I I. --. , - - , -244 6 I -/'/Ii,~e/*/u.Gri *=64.- -, r R E - - 1 0,4 . ..6 4..r-- . I. -1..7 I â€ž-/6 -- 3 . I - . I. J- --)": .. I- ~ -- - ..la: . .. .. --/ 1 , . .7 , 2- . r., ~". ...... 1 ~ - 4 -* . . " '.W , S 1, T Tr 4. 4644 2 ~ *u =# : -.2- ... - # .,r W - TN-'Lf. r /2 . I . 1 .* . 4- 5 ---sg - , 11.aâ€ž > P -IJ./442 STORY RETAIL BUILDING Â· '-b,- EÂ·*ml>Â»ROPOSEDÂ¢/ .il~~1/E HOPKINSAVE . . ' te>- r. '. , .4 1 1 QUI C.. :94Â« 42444. Ique . t.. 1-7 * 4 , -4, . . 3, 0- . " J - , ~ 1 1 01 94 8 ~i .4// , t' 4 1 .- L -. 6 ~ .. 1. 1 I '8iee*.... , h , r . ; 1 04 . 0. . â€¢.EeeD.Z.... . ;ty. - Â·Â· 4 - 0 .r . lai- 1*r m I Â£7 9/770 11 14 - . l:b . . PROJECT SITE - 7 4 21Â£.1 4. 1 - -- 2 - j I VICINITY MAP CS-1 Â·6160003H 9 vkinew 910(Ill'$]./.530 15./"WK] I." 0[1~ 0*E 141~8] XÂ¥;1 5 i 96 a MaNNV,d ONVI 0103nGS, Vh, 91-Z-ZI NOLL/15093a AS alla ON 00'NadSV 03MBIABI SNOISIA3U +Oil aUD(]03,U 9 SVUngv,VE, ing,HAJOO 1031,HOMV aH1 ~01Na= NELLIUM 3,{1100HLUM 03SoloS,0 80 03Sn '031Â¥011/IC 38 ION AVIN 3INVS 3[11 ONV 1031!HOE ' .1 30 MUOM (]3HS!,NadNI ONÂ¥ 1Â¥N]DIED 'HL SLLrLLUSNOD N13I3H TÂ¢,831Â¥,1 En]IMINÂ¥ 990 "0 '119 LOON-t,1 'ON NOilÂ¥001 Â£00**+L :+ON 133road 3AV SNI>ldOH .LSÂ¥3 LLS 0 -alvo 133HS HBAOO 31111 DNIMVUO 31Â¥DS .... CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0-159 0 UTILITY BOX LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SUR VEY MO'U'ENT AS DESCRIBED 7911.. S TRET L 1 I N N A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LItâ‚¬ - - - LOT LINE & POSTED ADDRESS: ~517 EAST HOPKINS AVEFÂ«JE- BEARINGS BASED ON CITY MONLIENT FOR T}E SOUnIAST CORIER OF BLOCK 93 1--10' All THE NORT-EST CORNER OF= BLOCK 88 Â·CHISLED r. N 82Â·06Â· 121 ~1 GAS METER e WATER VALVE U.S. SURVEY FOOT . ONE FOOT CONTOURS Â· * CITY MONUMENT CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34'5Â· SLANTED TEn DENOTES 8(NED,NG HE,MT 7915.94~ w WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THEE ALLEY EAST Â·Â· THI S PROPERTY IS SI TUATED IN ZONE -X- CAREAS DETERMINED TO BE â€¢ OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLA I N) AS SHO- ON FLOO{) I NSURIKE RATE Q MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, HOPKINS 60.0/. 4 V ENUE CO-INI TY-PANEL NLMBER 06097(0204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JUE 4. 1 987 THE REFERENCED FLOOD MAP 1 S THE CURAENT FLOOD I NSURANCE RATE IP // . /p FOR THE CO-UNI TY 1 N WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED PAVED 6 75.Ocr DISK /4 R.O.* THI S PROPERTY LIES ENT IRELY INS IDE OF THE CI TY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW IURD 25*47 8.- ~R~R~SE~F~NEED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963. N 75'00- NO 46 1NEATEO PARK I NG 11: PARKING *. ZONED: CC {COnERCIAL CORE) WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY 90.29. .SK NO SETBACK REOUIREPENTS FRONT. SIDE. REAR 25947 1 79..2 POST Â·Â· ELEVATIONS 8,ASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT 5 {7915.94' ) 1988 NAVD 'PARKING c 9 Â® .- KIOS'l COURTHOUSE VIEPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRICKETS] {7952.6} COURTHOUSE VIEIPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETS; [7gle 61 VIEWPLANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT I988 NAVD (5.3! 1 mERE VIEWPLAZES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOWN. 17952.6} ' 1 79. CONCRETE WALK COkMETE *41. R 1 - N 75'09Â·117 90.29. i STAIR; '1, .DIC"IPEO 1 1 AREA I | 8 1 Â· /7949.71 1 - 400 25947 VICINITY MAP STAIRS 7919.1- ~ kA#* C i iiI 790,-i~ 53 GARDIN 1 il 1 1204.& P\. 4...L 1%41 E i 1 j .440 6,3 2 1 1 0 1 FIE / fi 2 '7 1. .% 1 E - 1 -4 0 - 1 4I STORY | 2 P; C 1 1 BUILDING 74 GARDEN ~ D l LEVEL ~ 1 .1 il 2 1 - ~ ~ 244* k 0- 1 El w 1 l 1 e 112 1 1 W .f G ~ 792/./- i k 5 CERTIFICATION 1 THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS w FIELD SURVEYED DURING APR IL oF 20 15 AND 15 ACCURATEE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE RE NO / 5 ILL 2 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. 7921.3 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EMDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHON. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO MOVE*OUND N RE-BAR / / f APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 7920.1 SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS IT STIMPED 4 9 -2 WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE I S LESS THIN 1...... ITLITÂ¥ 1 .15.000 - *,SS.S.=4'k .3 f 9 .die*WA f 9 DATED: 3 2 {7961.3} M.5 JOH~CI~ H(*6Râ„¢ P. LA % 947 *C ... s / 1-1/%** .0 75 09 11 W.,1/"Rel + â‚¬5=7.21 90.29' ./C 7920 I. ~A~MEI~1~ ~E~E~~~WNS - TA9016 ALLEY IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY P. VED 20.90Â· BLO CK 94 :Liâ€ž An'TO~is~TE OF ASPEN. OF DISK IE---Â·-792 1 LOTS D. E. AND F, [7957.21 i=YO?FC:LOR,~D6. CONTAINING: 9,029 SO FT â€¢/-, 0.207 ACRES â€¢/ PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET : K ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX [970) 925-3816 MATEEEÂ°2Â·%?alfil DATE JOB %8:F,5,FE: 0'0?MAL: -.C-i.<2 i; 4 S 4/15 170966 . . 8 /[S ALTA '38OOO3Hlt 153./. . Ul'J JJ~Ul.etwil,we'Â·i,MA' '3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LE HENN\fld ON# 01Â¤3nSSI VH GL-ent NOI1/IWOS30 00 'NadSV SNOISIA/H 011 380(]03 H.L 9 Sninfl,NVI 1HDIUA/3 133 1,HOUV 3Hido iN KNOD Nal.LIM BH-1 LAOHIIM 0380109]] MDIEs n 081Â¥011 Â£0 38 LON AVIN RIVS EH.I. INV Â·10311 liou , 3,11 .10 >{GO I 0:1 1611NndNIA CNY lvE,DnK) 3,1 31nlligNOD N13U 3H .31Â¥181 NaLLIMM ONV KNIA 4011Â¥ lootf-M'ON NOIIÂ¥301 ~ LODKN L 'ON 133/Old *3AUnS ONÂ¥-1 ONUSI)(3 Swal8 311 ll DNIMVEK] Ae NMVUO .... LEGEND AMP ..1/0 O FOURÂ«) SURVEY MONLIENT AS DESCR I BED O Illl TY BOX CITY OF ASPEN GPS O-159 7911.98. O STREET LIGHT A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINE A - - - LOT LINE POSTED ADDRESS: -517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE- BEARINGS BASED ON CITY MONMENT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1--10 AND THE NORTHIEST CORIER OF BLOCK 88 -CHISLED XÂ·. N 82 IÂ· 12-W. Ul GAS METER 0 10 20 Â® WATER VALVE 0Ai'~d~V~ON~AS ' e CITY MONMENT CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34.5 SLANTED TEIT DENOTES BILD#Â£ +Ele' 7915.04 Ul ~ne' M't T e 2# THE ALLEY EAST ME*i;ti~p953*EAZE:%â‚¬EFÂ£EPWORNE HOPKINS NO SETBACK REOU,Re,ENTS FRONT, 61DE. REAR ~~Â·~@~2FC~18EA.~'?~7~~0~~AE~~F=~~~E I ~~6~A.cd~'~I2'~1~87 0,. al.e 4 0>. 4 V Elvt,Â£ '~~9 FOR THE COPIUITY IN -101 THE PROPERTY :s LOCATED DISK *-O., â„¢15 PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD 25947 4. AREA AS DEFIED BY nE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT Nul@ER 1983. FIGURE ES-15 NO ARKING SPACES DEGikATED p N 75'09 1, Â¥ 90 N 75-09'11-W 90-29Â· & KREP ... ZONED: CC (COI~ERCIAL CORE) Ilâ„¢ HISTORIC OVERLAY 29 2SM, 7918.2 POST Â·Â·. ELEVAT IONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONLMENT 5 (7915.94 1 1988 NAVO PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEIPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] 1 -CAP .t . Â® . KIOSK 17952.8} COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS USTED IN [BRACKETS] mERE VIEPLANES OVERLAP. MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOWN. [7948.8] ' VIE-LANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 NAVD (5.31'} 1 17952.6, 1 CONCRETE WALK 79,0.6 coâ€¢#cRErâ‚¬ .14 R 1 , 4103(4 - 1 ....- A...7919Â£=47 1 1 7019.1- VICINITY MAP ~ STAIRS [7949.71 1' - 400' / 10 4 ' 0 790.4' -J<,7 L s 1 Roop 1 7946.6 / Sil i , 1 1 111 1 1 1 ~.6 7908.7. , .~ ~ BILL / GEE' y I 2 1 3 1 - l STORY c P i '/ 74 / 0---- 514.23 S.F. '~EWED* 11 / 2 PUBLIC AMENITY BUILDING ~ GARDEN 1 I J l LEVEL 0 / ill I l Z - 1 E *0#LE:EL 3.. :-191\ 0 0 39 1 CERTIFICATION: 0 U) G If 0 0 5 1 SIU FIELD SURVEYED -INA _ AND I S ACCURATE m A THE UPI)ERS I GNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCR I BED HEREON WAS w 7921.3' BASED ON â„¢E F I ELI EV i DENCE Al :Holl AND THAT â„¢ERE ARE NO RE-BAR 5- EXCLUDED AREA 21:gg,r,&:SR?G,Ai9~DiA:~D~&L~ ~ ~~ 1 ~:&& Igjs:,NNR9~0NTs. 7920.1 1 1 9 - ~~~I~~E~N~~~EO~Hg:~.12:?:It~~O~~O~I ~I' ~~p7~T~IN~OA~WMD I $ f (ABOVE 7921 ELEVATION) SURIEYON ARE txCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS IET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF Ti SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1/15,000 2 (7961.31 4., 1 345Â· DATFI JOHN M. HOWORTH P.L.5. 25947 O 30 z ui [7956.3] 11'E . 4.4 ./ 7920 {7981.2} ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS ~ EASEMENT RECEPTION NO.187066 ALLEY - r-7 IMPROVEMENET/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY < B C-J-792/ OF Z LOCK 94 DISK 25947 LOTS D E AND F, R.0 I 7920.0 BLOCK h, MO CITY AhÂ«) TOVNS ITE OF ASPEN. EL O COUNTY OF PITKIN O Z [7957.21 STATE OF COLORAM I: CONTAINING: 9,029 SO FT â€¢/-, 0 207 ACRES â€¢/ 1- W U) <C LU r. to PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 1,1} ASPEN. COLORADO 8:611 :*M PHONE/FAX 1970) 925-3816 2 *NS ..di: CS m .. E d % m EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY rÂ© CALCULATIONS PA-1 )0.00Â· 8UiLOING DOES NOT ENCROACH 'â€¢Ilk:*15- Noi LOOtt"t,1 ' ON NOI.LÂ¥301 ~ &00#-f[ ~'ON 103Â£0Hd '011 3 003Hli SVH newv) =111'cewin' M CONCRETE WALK H3NNV1d ONÂ¥1 olognssl VI 5/-81-11 011 '380)003 Hil T SnIng,IVO IHDIE,Adoo Â·1031]HOUV 3 Hi 30 1N3SNOI N 3 11[WA 3,11 lnOMLIM 03901061(1 to ISA 031Â¥0ndn] 36 LON AVVY 31'IVS 3Hi ONÂ¥ 1031!HokiV 3,U jo >IWOM 03HSnNndNA ONV Ti,NIDIHO .Hl 31rll!1SNOD NI3U3H 1Â¥lk,31Â¥IN / 3 LLIUA, aNÂ¥ SON' IMO 11Â¥ kLIN3~IV Olland DNI1SIX3 311ll DNIMVE] Ae NA'WHOJ . 0 . . WEE Al*A 7 0 0 L T - F 8.-4 1 1 2 1[-//1149 NET LEASABLE - 50 SF NET LEASABLE AREA - 931 SF 1/' 1\. \\. 3 .\\' \:\ 1./.\\' 2 4-3 22]b fl COMMON - 658 SF 01 1\\\ T 1-14 ~JA~--~A' r Lj *F 1 flitÂ« 82 i gl i i 5 i ;ZZ 9 \ t iE NET LEASABLE AREA - 3226 SF t GROUNP LEVEL < 62055 AREA // 0 9,919 501 FL ':44. ~ ----L L.// :L - .1 COMMON - 78 SF NET LEASABLE AREA: 3226 + 931 + 50 = 4207SF COMMON AREA: 658 + 78 = 736 SF :Ck A 1â€¢L - PRAWIN65 DY PROPERTY MEA*EP CITY PLAZA BULPINA ~ Z .~ 111.E 9 IMENSION$ 917 8,51 H0PKIN5 AVENUE. YCALE 1/ 411.1 ' #:: 63= EFEN[lit@ENÂ»15Â£OM EFEN, CO 81611 JILY 20ll EC-1 '3 003H1, SÂ¥HneW t.li}Jagx}â€¢4Wt...1, Avai 3AV SNI>idOH 1SVB LI.9 g[/8 8 HaNNÂ¥ld ONÂ¥1 01 03ISSI VH 91-9/41 L NOI-ldIHOSBO AE 31Â¥01 ON SNOISIA3H 011 .000'Hi 9 SVklneNÂ¥3 .HE),MAdoo Â·1031,HOWV 3Hi 30 1 NF}SNOO N3111Â¥M /Hl 1,Â·10.. 03Sol:)910 90 03Sn 031Volldna 38 loN AVVil 3WVS 3Hi ONÂ¥'1031,Hou r 3Hi 30 >IWOM (13HS,1NndNA ONV 1VNIDIUO 3. 31nlLLSNO:) N,3k!3H 1Â¥IUE]1VIN N311!* aNV SONIMVUa 11/ Â£00Â».1 ' ON N0llV301 ~ LOOKI'-M ON 133reld NVId U0013 NO!1IONOO DNLLSI)(3 03'NadSV O3M3IA3H 3-lill INIMVE O-oz 045 5 r ;0 0 m, Pal 0 m-1- 00 Â» 11 .. N WO W Ul %/% 0 + 4 . It m (0 00 " g -- -- U. <0 74//N/i, U) / 991 % 9 - ///11. 1 /////i Â«1 f z m 4 /i/fi-- 1- 1..404*20< % .m Z + A /. Â«OVWV . Â£ lyyy* 3 /Fi m r ''>529$292 Â¥ /9411 I -- Â·, 94Â« r 20<0 r - *4~ m sw AA I.XAX 2 6 9 . 4 . x m , L , 66<Xx5<566Â« Â· Â· V Â«XX ' 166Â©Gy <XXX. ' I V.I4 i N 1.419Vh/v 0 ,/XXXXX Â· ER I Crl '.0* 02 XXXXXXX V.VVVvvy 4- -1-1 23660 i i j f f < < I j [If 'flll! 1 - .4 B ts Lin TD 7-U DRAWING TITLE EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. |~~| SCALE AH{ Heh hjil~ t.** #I[~Â¢08:(,NI FNGIN+IRING PROJECT NO. 14-44007 LOCATION NO.: 14-44007 0 DRAMM SY: RA m,84,1290 1525 fAX{847,N~81 1 11-18-15 RA ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER DATE: 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. www CambuM,and,~,Â¥lori Com ~ 8/18/15 NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVIEWEDÂ· ASPEN, CO TT esl 1949 REVISIONS ALL ORA ~INGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN COINSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUNLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT AND THE SAME MAY NOT SE DUPLICATED USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT CAMeURAS & THEODORE. LTD. JS 9 LZ MV NOININ COMMON - 715 SF 410% Alr WOO'Â§140161\13WldIRIN %1018Â¢1 Â¥Zy'ld All) GrEVJW 113&033 NET LEASABLE AREA - 984 SF IINIJAY SNDIcOH 16Â¥3 kle =IS 98 - OllÂ¥d ---~ - PATIO - 278 SF 1 106 99014 .... "r ,. â€ž 1 ,4 1 1] 4 1 - 1 1 ~x-- COMMON - 99 SF - n, /1 01 71-3 1 1, U v 3/ 10 01 -1 1 CIO [10 ~ E-. 3 6. 1 ja 3 - r-- , 1 NET LEASABLE AREA - 5490 SF 1 1 .% = 6 01 : 3 I El E i 1 1 9 15% i B * 4, t 6% i & 1 1 1 GARDEN LUVUL r COMMON - 134 SF 1 ~ ~ 1055 NEA 6,048 50, Ff, 1 0 2 U NET LEASABLE AREA: 5490 SF COMMON AREA: 233 SF ' i ..4 . : C r~ 91*IN65 BY: FUEI?TY MEASED: CITY PLAZA @DILPING UJ 1 101 mE PINENg@5 917 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 5(AL[ 1/411 * 11 8 e ARN, CO 81611 JLLY 20ll n 0 0 EC-3 buM'anmh"dofe com NOIWIHOSE] 31Va ON H3NNV1d ONIV-1 01 03nSSI VW gret-It ~ '3AV SNI>ldOH 1SV3 L L.9 9 1/8//8 SNOISIA3hl (111 380003'1 9 SVInelyÂ¥0 .LHDULWOO 'llall,408Â¥ 3 Hl :10 IN3SNOO N 31J IWM 3 H1 1A0HIIAA 039010SI0 HO a3Sn '031Â¥011dn0 38 10,4 Am 3,4/9 3HI ONÂ¥'1011]HOUV EHI ~0 WEIOM 03HSONndhin ONÂ¥ 1Â¥NI!)I~10 3141 3.[nlllSNOD N1.3H 1Vlk331VIN NELL,WA ONV SONI, VyC 1-1V LOOr-PL 'ON NO11Â¥301 LOOM I "ON 103rOhld 00'N3dSV '03M3!A3}d NV-ld &001=I NOUIONOO DNUSI)(3 311 ll INIMVI Ag NMVEIa .... PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 18 SF PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 21 SF '1 , â€¢4 . 4 ,/ .t ' i>Ap#*.r--7 ~f.FAÂ«In<*0331â‚¬ket' >722~ // iixÂ·.Â«Â« NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE AREA - 452 SF AREA - 433 SF AREA - 414 SF AREA - 585 SF L. : 7 40 COMMON - 516 SF ----- ~~~~~ 1 2401 /CED ELI h 2 ~ ~ 44'1'332'01\ da i N.\\\\\\tx 8331& Elli N j if 8*%:i THIE FLOOR ~ 62055 AFEA 2,743 50, Ff ROOF NET LIVABLE AREA: 1884 SF PATIO AREA: 79 SF COMMON AREA: 516 SF PlaWINE BY: PROPERIY MEAEREP CITY PLAZA @UILPING [El TU FIMEN510145 917 BAGY HOPKINV AVENLE 501.E 1/4"01' g AN'ENREDIMEN5101%,COM EFEN, CO 81611 JLY 2014 % ER-1 H3NNVId CNVI 01 oanSSi Vkl 9-81-kt i 3/\VSNI>IdOH 1SV3 LL9 NVId BOO-13 1VllN30IS3kl DN:19:XEI Lootk-t.L ''ON NOI3301 LODÂ»-t[ ON 103C08d 91/81/8 311ll DNIMVE 31Â¥OS 31Â¥0 M .... ALLEY - PROPERTY LINE 1 90.29' 5 11 9' 11 COVERED) | | -RASH ARE,â€¢ ~ 216 f 1. u / DI liz 70 I Ty l Lvj ) 1ff. :0 2 CL 517 E, HOPKII J 5 2 -UPPER ROOF 9,159 S.F 1 3 1,-'i-,TPRINI Â· Uj Ln LO 1098.40 S.F. PUBLIC AMENITY / 25-612 22 -111/7 - 1 ..... ~ 'k \ ~ Z 5 18-J .72 ]Il- tklt.lk. .1 S ~ - Â·:4~~\,~ (Dl T DOC R ,1 , w ' ..~~Â· 1â‚¬ 1-1 1 CECR I \Ill ... ./ Ct m #Â«tj f - -------N.- .- -6 - N .NA\\:VECK\!1 1 1\,1-141'NOki IN ......ININ'IN.... itint I . I . >- : I. Â»2022&1-414 1: :4. C.1 . CO 27-1/12 1 , ... i.. 01.42 Uk 4 - 1 M %* PUBLIC - ///// . 4 4-1 Â» tb 1 . 2. C. . .11\\121 \~t 1/,11/14Â·' â€ž O . BENCHES L L L AMENITYAREA (TYP.) PARKING-n SOFFIT ABOVE CONCRETE WALK BALCONY ABOVE SOFIT ABOVE LU KlOSK 285.10 SF r- MI, I k JIT rf 1 + h 1 .f' - I 20 LANDSCAPE-~ 64 f 'LANDSCAPE-~ O- O AREA. TYP ~1~~FAVERS, r,p OZ EAST HOPKINS AVENUE F * A SECOND FLOOR PUBLIC AMENITY â€¢t4 fih SITE PLAN E< u 1/8=1-0 2/1/8= 1-0" < LU LO :@ r r X. ' O DOCRÂ· ~ 3,>i ij .... Oil - Z < 1 . 1 79 /..5,1 --x 71,4 V : 0 LU -1 1 m *m PA-2 P 2 4 533 E. HOPKINS â€žWE E - .9L 'all '3W0003 Hl, SVHneWÂ¥) 011 '3~003}Â·1.1 9 SnineNVO LLHE),EA,100 Â·loall,0,V 3H1, Hi 30 31110/03HS,1/nk,Nn ON' 1Â¥NIE)/0 3HI glfullSNOO N13/3H 1Â¥lki31Â¥IN N31.LIUM INV SE>NI, VHO 11/ ./I N'INI...30 11/31./.'â€¢U,~ -.mt,u......pr-.com 0[lgÂ·06{ ELn~*U 5~51 B lji 9 .....UO'.MI/NINNI/|38/1~,11,/.V CONCRETE WALK h,3NNVId CINVI 01 03nSS NOILd IHOSBO 31VG 'V,/t jtttt 't'Itt 11''t 1,Â¢ #t''t '#14'P, ' t't''t' L=62 '' ''1, /t,tt1 t '1111 Â¢'kkt 1,1141,1 11,1,4 I itttifittil't'44 I 1,}1'. I *+4 n ;,i,x,6 #lilli ' tlt,1, ''11,11' 1,6/1,116;It 11, SNVId A.LINam Oll~ind 03SOdowd LOOKIN ON NOIIÂ¥301 ~ Loollt 'ON 103rold 311ll DNIMVMO 6#61 15/ AS NMVUG :m 1 *m 1 4: :: 1 I 4 EN 533 E. HOPKINS [D 3 I lei ::8 m 10Â· -6"-21_|:, 9 4 m 0, 09 CONCRETE WALK 6 Â¢ OPEN To SKY 1 ~F m- P PA %4~1\4 \Â«4\61 1: 4Â«14-1\44~0 1--Ed:~2 14'- 611Â»~ 1 1 1 . %-1% ~44*3~4 12' - 0" I. PS */*#ha 25 9/A . e m 6 U. 11 - #0 + C 494Â»41Â«~ 2 62 *AR 11 44 J L 12 484 . CJ coitÂ»-):4 02 U Â»Â«1Â«4Â«: : m2 0. -1 0 mr #n *4 N. N Â» 8 -, 11Â· g 413%4~Vj~@ 391~ - Â»4t4L' ~~~ -4-4-OW j~aft~~ 44 4"*Muf- M I \ 1 \\\1 499 1 14\%14**A, 4Â» e -2- ~~-----2 ~ -f~t~ 1---\-9 : 1 1 1 9 21 1. Â»FMM/~A ..1 /All \.... 515 E. HOPKINS DRAWING TITLE | PROPOSED SITE PLAN CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. SCLE | ARCHI,ECTIE,PLANNING,IN~ROADE,le,lia,INIERÂ»KG PROJECT NO.: 14-44007 LOCATION NO. 14-44007 6 DRAWN BY ~ 245Â·lt DEMPSTERSTâ€ž DES,AINEM 500,6 RA I *w, 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. 1 ~ 12-2-15 RA ISSUED TO LAND PUNNER ~ = FAX(847]g081. .J DATE www amburasar,dtheodo,e.com ~ NO. | DATE | BY | DESCRIPTION ~ REVIEWED ASPEN, CO TT REVISIONS es! 1949 ALL DRAWINGS AND WRINTEN MATEHIAL HEHEINCONSTITUTE NIE ORIGINAL ANDUNPUNLISHED WORKOF THE ARCHIIECT AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT Tile WRITTEN CONSENT Or THE ARCHITECT COPYRIGH r CAMBURAS & THEODORE LTD 30 /Al) NVId 31!S 3nN3AV SNI>IdOH 1SV3 >IlVAA 3138 SNIMHV AlliNÂ¥ AOEIV ANOO W 3dVDSC]NV1 ~+454--7 COURTHOUSE VIEW PLANE #2 CHV/2 /J \ U - - - - - +7Â§62 5.-â€¢F < T/ELEVATOR SHAFU - -4Â»-------59125-29145Â£EWEbEUL___-_--____ -97-+7950-1 ---- U ~ -----------------------+ ----- -&2912 22 ROOFTOP SCREENING -L - T, PARAPET /A - - - +7946 2/FT (31'-0") - 7ANTE- , t| pTl It 377 I Flp I ___r=t .& T/RA'UN9- ----- 121 - Iâ€ž'][f T T T. - .-r -2 (28'-0") ~,2 +7937 4 +7938 4' -T 11 11 ======= r-6 T/ EXISINGGRNE--1 V+79191Â· / 1 If -- 7/ EXISENEG?ff'22-4 1 1:/71 == re . I '/ - 1, - H A 11 - NORTH ELEVATION - VIEVV PLANE rÂ© ANALYSIS U 1/8" = 1'-0 ------ ~k CHVP1 -- _-__--_ 22121921]SE VIEW PLANT #2 -~29572 COURTHOUSE V[EW PLANE#D 8% 2 CHVFU A 4--L _ -0 - - +7949 7Â·~7~ ROOFTOP SCREENING--~-- A T/PAFUEET- .E ' 2 -7-Â¥7945-2 Â·Â·Â· jl=== 02 2 2 4 O/32: ... TI PASIAPET--6 +7938 4' 7 Z#&23 - . I 0 C 1-N- F RAILING . I - - =?937 4-4- 53*gl ----~ li// 1 NN zilils ;lLi 0-k =3.-. ....... _iy/ 5/@TiNG GRADE_ t~~1~_-1220-6_-~ T/EXISTING gRADE_~. I- - +79193Â· - =m 7-117 t-'r ~ ti f j~ EnSING GRADE +791198 EAST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE ' ra ANALYSIS CM> 1/8"=11'-0 ~-___-______-___________221!'1.21992U1erloatt/1_________________-__...___________- _ CHVP2 +7961 3' 2 CHVP2 ---- - +7956 3 Â¥7Â§626' - - CHVP 1 COUUMQUE-YZELDEUL - 1-T. 1 ~ ~ -ROOFTOP SCREENING T/ELEVATOR SHAFT < +7950 1' 7 29486 r-OUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING (28'-0") -40%07ET --- - - ~ 1 - -/'.. 52331_ _ Â· , i T/PARAPET - Â· ' -111 2 --- 711 N _411 -+79584 1 1 -E-NTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDING, ,[1 T/EXISTING GRADE ~ +79182 - - LL 11 EXISTING GRADE - +791198 WEST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE ~ih ANALYSIS U 1/8"=1'-0 VP-1 H3NNÂ¥1/ INÂ¥1 01 03nSSI VH SEST-U r -3/\Â¥ SNI>{dOH 19Â¥3 L LS LOD*-t[ 'ON NO11Â¥001 ~ LOOÂ»* ON 133mld SNOI1VA313 3NVId M3IA St/8L/9 311ll DNIMVIO Ae NAAVIC 3iVO . . 0 . . ~ CITY OF ASPEN GPS O-ISO O UTILITY BOX LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 7911.98Â· O STREET LIGICT N A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINE - - - lOT LIME & POSTED ADDRESS. '517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 8EARINGS BASED ON CITY MOIUENT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1--10. All Tlâ‚¬ NORTHIEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHISLED X-. N 82'06'121 GAS METER 0 10 20 Â® WATER VALVE 54*&Â£ C I TY MI".ENT 5 CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34.5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BILD#NG 4 GHT 7915.94~ w . ~TUR I M'~s *'~i'& THE ALLEY .. THIS PROPERTY 15 SITUATED IN ZONE -X- CIREAS DETERMI?ED TO BE .. Hop 4 I Ns P PREPARED BY F.E. A FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, â€¢ OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN} AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE I : do.//Â¥~~1~,l~~@~LAM~EAA#60:7~~C}~~*15:tp:fl!):E,g~~~~U:%T0'Ml;87 0'. ...... 4 V ENUE F:OR Tf COIIINITY IN NICH DE PROPERTY IS LOCATED PAVED a. 00. R DISK /4 .O... -'Â· â„¢IS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD 23947 -4- "D 44#4Â»~ ~ ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MollMENT 5 (7915.94Â·) 1968 NAID AREA AS DEFINED BY TBE C I TY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAI MAGEE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963. FiGURE ES-15 4 73Â·09Â·1-I PARKING .... 'Â· ZONED: CC (CO~IERCIAL CORED WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY DISK "GN ON-yo' Â·Â·Â·.. . 90.29. 25947 LIGHT NO SETBACK REQUI ReENTS FRONT, SIDE. REAR ARKING SPACES 7/".2 POST PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] Â® ....0.1. COURTHOUSE VIEWPLAME NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS} t 7952 I) Â£*#g, 4.4.. mERE VIEWPLAIES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOIN. GROUND-79182 --- Â· VIEâ€¢PLAME ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED To FIT 1988 NAID (5.3 (7948.6] CHV/1 - 7948 / (ALLOWED) 1Â·EIGHT:30.4, [7952.61 1 CH\,92 â€¢ 7952.T (AUOWED HEIGHT. 34.47 CONCRETE WALK 7910.6 COAt*Els I . 75 1Â· 1 1/ 90.29 STAINS LANDSCAPED â€ž~,RE 1 AREA. 1 El STAIRS VICINITY MAP [7949.7] 1' - 400 7.0.4/ 19 - CH-1 - 7949.7 ALLOWED HEIGHT:30.8') ~ 1 /FF OUTSIDE OF CHVP2 AREA GARDIN 1 1 1 4 44.L 9 1 ,=EE 1 1 1 1 440 10 5 25 SILL & #2Â»DmggeÂ»= 7.t.7. 3 r / /1 1 4 f ~ ~ *I S ZO* ~ 1%:1 E le BUILDING l LEVEL ~ -1 i 1 9 1 -- i' ; I E I g 4 0238:74#,EL N B : ~ Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·-791\ CERTIFICATION 1 792'.V -0 e I g â„¢E UNDERS IGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCR IBED HEREON WAS tu FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 1 1 5'U DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROAO*'IENT:. 7921.3 MY,75 NRE:NU.~EMoths &Â¥,Mnis.WIT~ Aa,06*OUND 1 1 0 E 7920.1 APPURTENANCES AND DOCUIENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE t / 15.000 Â· &*P.*I . WY?HEEE :EL~FETHri,gn=15 NFLEL:suu is im THAN /2 DAT%9:,0901~ :: GROUND â€¢ 7920.1 . U.,4-LE,-M CHVP1 - 7956.7 (ALLOWED HEIGHT:36.7) {7901.3} 34.5' . CHVP2 - 79612(ALLOWED HEIGHT: 41.1) , / 2/4, : 0 3 W 1/0. - I. 4 . 0. Nk:27 S 75Â·09 [7956.31 1 1 /E .....4 - 0 7920 17961.2} z ELECTRIC AND CMMUNICATIONS AL Â£ 8 y . EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 187060 IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LU 20.;12 Â£ ocK OF DISK 7921 < 94 25947 LOTS D. E. A- F. 7920.6 C ~KA~'Te-5 ITE OF ASPEN t~ GROUND.7920./_ COUNTY OF PITKIN, Mr CHVP1 - 79572 (ALLOWED HEIGHT 36.61 STATE OF COLORADO. O- O CONTAINING 9.029 SO FT â€¢/-. 0.207 ACRES â€¢/ O Z A U) <C UJ PREPARED BY LO ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLOR,00 8,011 PHONE/FIX ( 9701 925-3'16 &1--41-:%7.8~1.-grvkm- AFTER YOU F"RST DISCOVI SUC,1 CU~ECL IN 1,0 E~{T MAÂ¥ AN, =IC,1 DATE JOB iat 36/151%#B".Al=..74 4/13 170986 6 W O VIEWPLANE SURVEY 4 B!- 8 3 W L./ 3/32 = 1-0 VP-2 941~133NIEIN3 NÂ¢igf 'all '380<303 HlY SVUABWÂ¥3 UNIVIdâ„¢J 'W 14'50'40/ 100. PAVED WALK W3NNÂ¥1/ ONV-101 030SSI NOIL/IMOSIa SNOISIA3U GRAVEL (111 3%%'HI I /Â¥Bng/VO ./1/Adol 133111138V 3H1301N3SNOON3111UM 31111Â®1111/A 0:]solos,0 Woogsn '011Â¥011dnd 38 LON AVE 3â€žVS 3Ht ONÂ¥ 1031!HOWV 3Hi m OM 03+161. dhn ON' 1Â¥NDIUO 3 H,1 310111 SNOD N!3~13H 1Â¥IW3lm N3.iUMONV SONIA /80 1. Â£00Â»*L ON NOJIV001 ~ LOOPMT ON 10320Hd X3AhlnS 3NV-1dAA 31A 311ll DNIMVIC] E NMVIC] ... Observer: Main Street 7906.9 4 517 E. Hopkins Ave. (Subject Site) Observer: Courthouse 1 Observer: Courthouse 2 7912.32 7913.02 *4 1949 ,~ .9 \\ 25,Â«202 6%9 C 42Â·32 Pbag Observer: Wheeler Opera House .02 7916.18 '~ ~1952.32 7963.02 i ~ , Observer: Wagner Park 4*Je â€¢ 7919. 14 244 / i I \ 1 7962.32 i T .al/aL 30 ' 7972.32 /' Observer: Cooper Ave â€ž 7926.75 ..2.4 % t Z â‚¬ ads. 1,3 /1 * 444 4 3 W & / :A .1.1, 2 E m K : - _ vy'. 4. 44 4%:1 V Emt# 1 7956.18 7956, =9 p. J 7966.18 7 01/3 ~/,7976,18 5 14... t,7986.18 7968.18 4%49 7976.18 3 1 Observer: Glory Hole g U} A 7947.55 a 2 Mountain View Plane re Above which no land use or building shall project * 19 1 Lli Height Above Observer X %10 .D 4 7,1 4 ~ Observer elevation to 30 feet Z 4\ 0. h.* M o 0- 0 30-40 feet i , O 2 * City of Aspen Land Use Code -Section 26.435.050 IÂ» g I ai â‚¬Â» . 1.- 9 +IN *Ff. ~ 40-50 feet View planes eAdend to inlinity. The view plane representations Â· U) shown on this map only extend to 60 feet above the observets ~ w 50-60 feet Structure elevation. View planes exist past what is shown on this map. 4, A 9, r GIS Department February 12, 2007 LO . i*t 65 VP 3 Â·011'38OOO3H1-'9 SVUMWV) (M -.1 0,1 X. H3NNVId ONÂ¥101 03ASSI Vy NOUd IWISBC AW filla ON 011 '380003111 9 SVUm]INVO 1HDIUAden '1031!HOUV 3141 30 1N.SNO' N3 11&IM 3HlljlOH~M 0360109,0 80 (Jail 031Â¥Dlldna EA ION AVIN 3*VS 3HL ON' 103111 :>H f 3H L L NUOAA 03HS,1NndNn ONV 1VN,DIUO 3HI 3 Ln LU SNOI NIB/3H .IWiLVIN N31118AA INV SDNIAAÂ¥410 11/ LOOVEN'ON N0llV301 ~ LOOM.1.1 ' ON 103rold dVA 3NV-ld M3IA 31111 DNIMVE 31V0S *8 NAAVE 3190 ~ (13M3IA3H .... UTILITY METER BOLLARD LOCATION, TYP. n PROTECTION, TYP.~\ 17-81/2 77 -7 90 - 31/2' 1 io'-0 9'- 11152} 1 \\ --7-5- 4- 44---4-6 47-11Â·~ ~ 24- 7 OPEN TO SKY 1 \41111/ MECHANICAL r |~ |~ z i .-J CONSTRUCTION i , ' BYTENANT 0 /BUILDING J I 4 4 |0~ OVERHANG I I - , ~ I 4$'r -1 r -1 r -1 =-7 / 11 CONSTRUCTION TENANT SPACE 'D' TENANT SPACE 'E' | 76 ~ 2 - 1 IRS-[AOOM---1Â· RESTROOM Â°5~ L. _1 L _1 L _1 ' B" TENANT 1 6- . MIN's E ~ - ~ ~ , (APPROX) af 9 [212] 1â€¢. r Â·gjj~ h IB&@HAREA | I | 6 8/-91/7 218 SF - 4 14'-61/2 . 2 -6 39 - 1 C 34' - 3' { U=*+26- Eif - 8 a.k - CORRIDOR m.@ : 1 Â· L //4'.0 r. V L, It 0 929 6 . 1 7+777- 71 --0 - ~ p '- ,fE3 '/7./ STAIR #1 r==P 9 RESTROOM ~ r--1 ,-1 - 923 uP- = ~~ES~~~TloN 4 Et:1Et:'- + (APPROX) 4/ al'Ef' 1 i #3% a_ . Z * -11 r -~ ' .D ' ik:.Â· r-ril El i 10 -51/8" i 9'-7 10 35-101/8 34 -3" - m 1 00. 12 r 1 57 Â«- -L 05 1 . ' 8~.21 /r- 81/ 23Â·-101/2 24'- 1 24 7 :803 -1 f i Z i ... 9 b ELEV. , CORRIDOR 6 - Â·f. 22'. ELEV. - LOBBY = ~g L ~ . 7 1 0 / V ./ 1 4-R_-r= Ie . tri,-- 1 RETAIL SPACE'A' RETAIL SPACE 'B' RETAIL SPACE 'C' [8] 0/0 Ea Â£ 1. 35' - 10" 34.3 A . 1 / 1 Â£61: â€¢421 1 1 , Â·Â· I .22 r-T- . 4/ I I Mt= EE:_L - i UP TENANT SPACE'G' TENANT SPACE Â·F' Cl STAIR #2 ~ ~ " + j--~~~32'i__tr>F_ STAIR #2 - ED '4* , //af, '055 . ']174, 11/f:.51 09%6 mMEN ~ ~ b â€¢ r-AIR CURTAIN '~ = I k ~ BY TENANT ' FAIR CURTAIN AIR CURTAIN L 1.-3 ~ BY TENANT FBY TENANT 0 - 18'-01/7 0 â€¢ . -ble-G==11..... =4-/ I ..dILI~ __ .... '-I ~ BUILDING b PROPERTY -<. 18' - Cy' 23 - 71/2 OVERHANG 24.1 7 23- 9 . ~ PROPERTY LINE LINE 90'-31/7 Ch LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN A MAIN LEVEL- FLOOR PLAN ~ LD 1/8= 1-0 51/8"=1-0 i K A-100 ,"log 1 U. I ... 1 P.e AE] NAAÂ¥kda 3HI SVHROW SNyld H0013 03SOdObld H. 1Â·' Xvi .Â·962!2~8 21 NOildIB0930 00'N3dSÂ¥ 03413IABI MINNInd INÂ¥101 (]3nssl 45'-312 SNOISIA3U 011'3WCK]03.9 ....Â¥3 'HEMIA,100 10311HondÂ¥ 3 Hi 30 INRSNOO N3 LLIUM 3HL mOHOM (]3Solos,0 80 (139/ 031Â¥011dn/ 38.LON A Illy 3,NvS 34 ONV '1031!HD I 1 34 jo )130/A 03 mis INndNn (]NV lv NID,hlo all 31nliLSNOI .1393,4 1VIW31VW N31.11%,M ONV SEN,i vac] i iv Loottl 'ON NO!1Â¥001 ~ Loott-tÂ·L ON 133rOUd 3/\Â¥ SNI>icIOH -LSÂ¥3 LI.9 9[/8 '08 311]1 DNIMVIC] 31VDS .... 10.0 55-71/ 1 1 Jn ' Fi f ' MEN'S 10-21/ 78k- 6 FROOF . i ACCESS 1 1 .'.*1. 1-1-fl El-- ROOF 1 L.12 ACCESS ~ Â· MECHANICAL - 1 EQUIPMENT AREA j I Ituuu' ~ 1 . 19' - 1 ~ 50- C L 19-3 . 1 FE: - 4 9 MECHANICAL SECOND FLOOR * - STAIR#1 GÂ® neD TENANT SPACE R -SLOPE SLOPE- R - -SLOPE SLOPE-- _--SCUPPER <2 I A-212 i J \1-1 f NE E: 1 I Ul liu 2 0 I Ele: / - EN 3 6'-1" 6 25-1 23Â·- 101/2 24'- 3' --- r Â·r p I \ 5 \ 11 \ 1..ALI 1111.... 4 [-f 1-. ,.4 1 lili . 1 1 11\ 11 , 1 El] i i ~) JTDOOR ] OUTDOOF. - 1 4 1 1 19 / 1 DECKII = -1~ DECKI / /111 1 4, --SLO'E BLEFE-R ,~t -SLOPE 117-101/7| ||||||| ||||| ' B 1 1 1 lili 1 1 X It, Ill 2-1117 1 1 f 1 I 1 11 21'1 \ 21'.91/2 L----1 5 -I ~4- - ~-~- 1---, AWBllE P . 11 // Ill>[Ill lili 11 11 /4 1 A \1 1 ' r & lili N I 1.Li 1 3 HIM 11 11 'I't I b 4- 1 I -1+t-AD,KI'/-- / M ~ - ~~ING W L__-__ ~ 7-17]tfr \:.4 1 13/1 ' 1'11 El 6 < BELOW MO 0- 0 IA-211 OZ rij SECOND LEVEL- FLOOR PLAN A~t /j'h ROOF PLAN 4 p ~ (0 u 1/8-1-0 1, Al' 25 r- LO 2 0 LU "Ni1111 1. Z U 1/8 -' 111 ul S @ A-101 ad/19-- 3d019- 3d01S-- Â·011'330003H1P SVURGINV) NV-ldBOON ONÂ¥ NVId 800-13 03$OdOHd .le ll S,NIVIUU IHIWIVJ 1,6. 011,IWXVJ ;6186â‚¬Wâ€¢11131 VI ' /,0, J,Opod'lles/.1.1/IJA., I . ..... 4. ' i I--:In-r---I- h I Â·.-I-I-n rn I.-I x . 1 '14:1,1)1,21,1,11'il'iNINNVIdtrl'ill,iNV 31VDS -7 8: NOtld!80&30 31VO ON H3NNV'ld ONÂ¥1 01 O3nSSi r i atoaD ]Hi, 9 sviantilÂ¥0 lillibil,100 10_31!HOUV 3 Hi 30 IN) SNOO 4 31 I IMM Ell inolliM ....SIC /0 (]3Sn {131VD,ldf10 36 ION AVIN 31'IVS .1 ONÂ¥ 1331]HOE ' 3,11 30 'WOM 03HS,1NndNA ONÂ¥ 1Â¥N/,30 3HL 31'll./00 NI3U3H 1Â¥!83LVIN N311!WA ONÂ¥ SEDNIMâ„¢(] 11V -3/01 -~--3d01S LOOpp+L : ON NOIVI)01 ~ LOOD#-rl ON 103COBd 31111 E)NIAAn=K] Al NAAVEK] .... FLOOR AREA SUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 8.785.14 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 7.234.27 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 1.097.62 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR 8,331 89 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012.74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6.64279 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2.369.95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9.012.74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF SECOND LEVEL 8,34205 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6.503.72 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 556.67 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 1.281 66 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR: 7,060.39 SF TOTAL FAR 15.392 28 SF (1 71 1 FAR) ZONING INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS: ZONING (CC) COMMERCIALCORE NET LOT AREA 9,000 SF (90Â·-0Â·Â· X 1 00Â·-09 ZONING ALLOWANCE (2:1) 18,000 SF (2 X 9,000 SF) CALCULATIONS: COMMON AREA: GROSS FLOOR AREA COMMERCIAL SPACE 20,380.78 SF (RED) COMMON SPACE: 5,759.15 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) 1097.62 SF EXEMPT SPACEÂ· 10,747 65 SF (PURPLE + LOWER LEVEL) EXPOSED WALL BELOW GRADE NORTH O SF EXPOSED SOUTH, OSF EXPOSED 09 Et .74.1 -----------0 - --4>< ~34-4~ff COMMON AREA: 556.67 SF 'IA //// 4// EAST, 0 SF EXPOSED WEST O SF EXPOSED 2% BELOW GRADE WALL AREA NORTH 90'-7 1 -4494 SOUTH: 90-7 , A 4. #Mt -9- / ...Â»f I ,/4 WESTÂ· 100% E , 1~ , 3 YD < e i s ..Il, EASTÂ· 100'-Cy' L-= - 1 -/ 991 X 29Â·-0Â· HEIGHT TOTAL: 380'-4Â·' LENGTH ~92"CFE'~~i j ~ '2 1~ ~ ~~~ ~~'< Im".f// : L / /2/fff / 11.029Â·-8" SF TOTAL WALL AREA .,3 1 2 J ~ 5 01 11,029'4"-0% APPLIED I ty. 1 1 4 *=NE 4 I .......... Sin h~R f.. 1 9.1 4.1/, i: // //94/99 1 1 ?ili / ~ MAIN LEVEL = 8.785.14 SF (453.25 SF EXEMPT) SECOND LEVEL = 8.342.05 SF (1.281 66 SF EXEMPT) 9 5 3 i 1 CUMULATIVE = 15,392 28 SF (1 71 1 FAR) :4 3 2 1 8 ROOF TERRACE = 0 SF (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) -=.:.3 = 2/ //, / 1 1 DECK EXEMPTION: LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9.01274 SF EXEMPT) =i 2 2 9 0,/1 fÂ·fÂ·Â·4,I 4/ I. .-8 - UP INA , ' ZONING ALLOWANCE OF BUILDING 18000 SF BEE 3 1 G / . 446-04 9{ 1 ~ 11:44 01 DECK ALLOWANCE 18.000 SF X 15% = 2.700 SF ACTUAL DECK PROVIDED Ur '=123 'E=, *ffÂ» } : o #t ~- f 4,9//////:. f 128166 SF (COMPLIES) ~ . 1 SECOND FLOOR ' U ET-1 TENANT SPACEE COMMERCIAL 11 C' ii IiÂ·. / LÂ» 1&-4 'Illt - M#24 / O lOBBY RETAIL SPACE 'A' RETAIL SPACE Â·8 RETAIL SPACE'C' 1 AREA: 6,503.72 SF -E~ 1 ELEV. 1 /[E 86Â© . 7/ f COMMERCIAL AREA: , 4 . . ~ //,f m lili =3 J ' 4>044 /9 - Â«~k /9 4. O STAR#z 1 5 /49 , U[-2 / - /4 4/1 7,234.27 SE 1, /4 9/ , '' 910 .//4/4/4,0,//Â« '11).i'fill,/ril 3 0% 24 if~ ~ , 1%01//11 .. '44:04 . d R:.. : 0 1.1 - 1 Z 111 I t,1..11 lin 1//0//. ////0 , up DN ' , =99/ 4, O ~ i>6â€¢ LIi f '. 0'1,00 6 4 ~ STAIR #2 , , _ 2,/A'6/UN 1I . '.:Il:91,1 ///// \ / 4/4 7 '-71 F-- ////~Â£=1Â£=L----J 1 *~*~illt /21='1Â£:i~* 7 LL/,Â·t /,7, 7 04509 17;.til<~11)40Â§1~Il., 4.3,%2 - : M:*>914#N.1 & t>Nj+Â· 29/,44;// WOMEN'S 6 11<1 i yclti.fl . .'1 id 1 9 14, 2 , .1 1 :.1 + 2 Xklk .12 4 1,Â· â€¢,>14 'b<Â·P' O _ 8/ I ..0 - I -Â·E . r L.<air :* 1 1,1 ,,Â· ..6' x ,â‚¬Â·4/w 4.fl<XI K ' Â· 1 1 Â· i Â· e "29417 ' : M 0 2- O z ' | 1 '4 ~~ ' ~ . '1>3 I 8 0- 0 1 IM / 4,14 11 T' 21 :ifili~ r.-c:ciEEmul I~IÂ·I~tI+:3-=~I-i:L-L :~ -34*1:1,~~;~~~I.22~~ 2 3.i: 3 k ./ z :. Â· ,Â·i i Â· I k . x .1. i Â· I. Nh 4 1 1 . . P . 1.,1. 1. 4,1.. . . o LU , 3 < Z 1 h ..Â·hl-:itÂ·..' 1.i. lx,> h *6 -' . 8 10 Â· Â· ..t'XI I / W ~Â· 94,2-7, . (1:2.Il|~!I ./.'~*~ 1,~.1,. L PROPERTY PROPERTY - L_ PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF LINE OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: LINE (EXEMPT) 1,281.66 SF (EXEMPT DECK) - : C /Â© MAIN FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .,4 A SECOND FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS â€¢14 ui Lj 1/8= 1-0" * 18"= 1-0 0 4 U V FAR-1 HOOO3H hl3*N~Â·lei aNYÂ·101 agnsil Â¥H WHI ~ 3AV SN SL/91/8 SNOISIA3W 8111 380(]03111 9 Svunill,IVO 1,{DRIAdOD '10311}40UV 3,4 1 30 LN JSNOD N 3111* 3 H 1 1,10HLIM 03%10910 /0 03Sn '011Â¥311/r,0 38 ION III 31NVS Diil ONV '10311}13, ' LIHL :10 WBOA~ 13HQI,Nndln ONV -T,NIJIG 3Hi ainiUSNOO N1383H 1Â¥&13/VIN /3111/A ON[Â¥ SDI,MVU' ill SNOI.LV-In31Â¥0 biÂ¥3 - SNÂ¥-led klOO13 31lll DNIMVIO AB NMVUO 03M3IA3W 0 . 0 0 FLOOR AREA SUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 8,785.14 SF COMMERCIAL AREAÂ· 7234.27 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 1.097 62(BLUE) DEDUCTIONS: 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FARÂ· 8,331 89 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012.74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6,642.79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA: 2.369.95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9.012.74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF SECOND LEVEL 8,342.05 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6.503 72 SF (RED) p COMMON AREA: 2,369,95 SF COMMON AREA 556.67 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 1,281 66 SF (PURPLE) (EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR: 7,060.39 SF TOTAL FAR 15.392.28 SF (1 71 1 FAR) 1 X ZONING INFORMATION AND CALCULAnONS: MECHANICAL / ~ 2 ZONING' (CC) COMMERCIAL CORE hin ' ~ NET LOT AR EA 9,000 SF (gov X 100Â·4 Â·) ZONING ALLOWANCE (2 1) 18.000 SF (2 X 9,000 SF) 910 / 94./ 9 Â£ 4. ..4, 9,/' *fttit CALCULATIONS: . . , TENANO:77%+90.Â»t GROSS FLOOR AREAÂ· COMMERCIAL SPACE 20,380.78 SF (RED) COMMON SPACE 5759155/(BLUE& PURPLE) EXEMPT SPACE: 10,747.65 SF (PURPLE + LOWER LEVEL) MEN'S =- '9929Â»9 44999943 EXPOSED WALL BELOW GRADE NORTH OSFEXPOSED 1 1 1 11:IIi 1 , lie:.11''lili :111:1 SOUTH O SF EXPOSED I' ./. .... . lili . lili .' I ' ''1 1 |i i'' It'1,1 1 :lilliÂ· El Ii. ..1, Â· Â· qI'lld 2101 lil: 11 .41 EAST 0 SF EXPOSED WEST O SF EXPOSED 1 Illil' m|f!11:1 Wi:. gi' STAIR #1 r 1 ! 1,11!1:111!'11!1 111111,Â·.1,1 4% BELOW GRADE WALL AREA NORTH 907 1 4,4:543/44.;,Â·Â»Â«0 ~~ 3 0/.4,54027/4. "I, lilli!'111Hfil lilli: ,:i, 1, Â·2 SOUTH 90'-2 EAST 100'-0" WEST: 100-00' i 3, 51 1 lili 11 ~ 1 I lili i i; Illl i;Il li \:1 TOTAL. 380'-4" LENGTH X 29'-0" HEIGHT COMMERCIAL AREA: /2.%#Mytvyl,E A //4 11,029'/' SF TOTALWALLAREA 3 2 4,209/44 0 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA, *Â£ 9 6,642.79 SF (EXEMPT) 0 / 11,029Â·-8" = 0% APPLIED :Ill"jil fill,;1;1)1,1,1 FINAL FLOOR AREA: - MAIN LEVEL = 8,785.14 SF (453 25 SF EXEMPT) ~ SECOND LEVEL = 8,342.05 SF (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) ROOF TERRACE = 0 SF (1,281.66 SF EXEMPT} E I I # LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9,012.74 SF EXEMPT) h77U V CUMULATIVE=15,39228 SF(1711 FAR) 31/1 . DECK EXEMPTION: -77- CORRIDOR 1 18,000 SF X 1596 - 2,700 SF - DECKALLOWANCE :i-i F ' ZONING ALLOWANCE OF BUILDING 18,000 SF OZE / ACTUAL DECK PROVIDED 1 281 66 SF (COMPLIES) ,~ & I ..' '- . / .a b 11/11111 1 1 -91 .4 % 4. , 445 2 â‚¬E! 1 t. , , t .i ,0 I :: 11 !!11133 , 4..9 Â»//40 /39/ /7 ./ff UP , 55 347~*7/, 0~%2 STAIR #2 - 9 0 0 4,3 - 98 0 : 5 ,/ 4 1 l lh, j j1 0 94 . !1 .. WOMEN'S , . 9- 2 0 '...~ 9 3 19 . W 0 0,0/4 1 9 r & 43 / 'flulb 47Â» I //4.9 - I. Np-"VI' I 20 0 0 Â»943 , LU > 12.0/ .// 0- 0 O i Z ,-i LOWER LEVEL - FAR CALCULATIONS AN H W ~ 1/8" = 1'-0' 0 1- LO 1 -> ai W FAR-2 'Crl '3~,O0O3Hi 9 5Â¥HneWV) ./. 'IllÂ¥/UU .H UNJJ.Mâ€ž411'ue,ei 6/ 81/8 10 1-tinli kl3NNV-ld ONÂ¥-10103(1SS{ NOLLdIHOSIa 011'3%003HL I SVInayÂ¥0 1Holl/col '103/Hotiv 3. L IN3/NOI ..Ill gillinoill' Casolosio /0 aasn ~031Â¥oridno 38 ION Av/ 36â€¢Jvs *,1 (ltv 1021!Holl all 30 WBOM 03 HS nNAN ONÂ¥ 1VNIDIHO 34 31.Il SNOO NI3hI3H 1VI/31VW N311!UM INV St)ND vul 11/ SNO11Â¥-In31VO hIV=I - NVId 21001: LOOM+-1-L ON NOII'001 ~ LODI-tÂ·L ON 103'Obdd lEi 311ll DNIMVUO Al NAilla . . . 0 NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,349.29 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 1.367.57 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 6.349.29 SF LOWER LEVEL. NET LEASABLEAREAÂ· 6,24456 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2,158.82 SF (BLUE) SUB.TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6,244.56 SF SECOND LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,248.26 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 507.23 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1,146.33 SF (PURPLE) SUB-TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 6,248.26 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE 18,84211 SF ~~----- NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: - NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 1,367.57 SF 507.23 SF (EXEMPT) ./ El E .94----_____--__-- / / *1 r-\ n I /4//4 I f Pll/// * -1 7 7<N//9//pll/// ///dip/0 1 /04 ~ 'Ull/ 1 111,1, 1 41**%1/ &#9 1. * F: 0 67/ I ~M 4.Â«/.4.//Â« 07 ,@ . MEN'S 'â€¢, /, ~/ fi / 11 1 , 9%32 // f//// , rf''if,f[ i/fjiint.; 21 . I . 20*28 Wi#;E 42, I' t 4 0.:14 ff}rh~L-/9//~ 03% fo , . i It ' i k Â«,5/5 / f: M iii i 1 1 ,, 22* if , ./ . e f' -EJ m, -0 & 0 .2 : 5 g 3, Eatzz 65%61 8 .7.//L.t 01/ / / ' / A,4 . I .. fjot: 2 0 t-1 t- SECOND FLOOR TENANT SPACE .T- I I , 310 Ill 1 ' ' NET LEASABLE 0434: 23. 22 1 1 LLi-.__s'*r /9/7 9, . 2 AREA: 6,248.26 SF f LOBBY ~ RETAJL SPACE'AÂ· RETAIL SPACE Â·B RETAJL SPACE'C' f ~ f ELEE4. / 491 - . I I Ul $ 8 4 2/1 40 0 k NET LEASABLE 1 2. / , 0 1.71 34 12,4 , AREA: d'14' '1 ; 4 1 111 6,349.29 SF i 2-1 -2- f U Â«47 -4 -44~ i E. Equi 1Â®11% 41 ditin. I .4/ /Â«Â«94 0~4/ Of/ - UJ -4-,/ ,/ 4.*dit 4 @10/- --9/94 . . UP DN / - 0 - - :97% 4 0 , - STAIR#2 , [1151 , :37- 4.14 1 " WtTJI" A pITIP--~ : P o 1,1(]inkl J. 2 Â· . i Â· Â· .1 1 it .Tlfid-- i:,Ili' [10:111 J W!*'S ./1 for'.4.:Â·*:1.21 -Â·,;.'. i./. 5 ' fl fly)M.'4111 1 11 1 X:X >.LÂ·,i , 9 W fÂ«t.... 0 . 0 i tip[Wlt .421., 1' K. x Â·>!1Â·1 1229'~ p h'--Â·Â· ' ' / . . 11 ../.. 2 - 0 +210/C. %W= . I I ..14 / - / < '-' '1./.1./ :.. 1 , lili I â€¢diN'.40.,rbooR Â·:L :Â·f:< Â· . 103Â«y : 7 +344,1 0 0- 0 9 0 1 .1 kil . x 1 1 I., Dll. mu = r - ]$14< ..11 1 I . 9 8 20 = fl~~2~kifflimp,5-IiÂ·LÂ»b-;-.I /4 - : Itpl 1 1 11 y . [.1 - i~Â·,Â·.Nt klt-":,bjqut;-.-1-44 1 ++033 hE dU 4>411 2 09> it \L. ~-L' '.'.'. .1 9 1 1 I 0- - 159 j~ '. I't' 1 ' ~t' ' Â· 14 , 411 k Â· I 3'F'#LIEF L./, / 44 W 11 - ..ll<-1-]IL X2% ~p PROPERTY OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: PROPERTY - LINE LINE PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF 1,146.33 SF (EXEMPT DECK) - (EXEMPT) SECOND FLOOR - NET LEASABLE â€¢R MAIN FLOOR - NET LEASABLE A CALCULATIONS ri, CALCULATIONS .8 5 1/8=1-0 U 1/8= 1-0" V V L NL-1 011 '390003 Â¥ SVIne,NVO 'HE)]kiA/0 '1031,HOWÂ¥ 3'1 30 INBSNOONal-LIEM EklinOHIM 0380108,0 80 o/S/ 03[VOildil[J 38 JON .VIN 3VNVS 3H LONÂ¥ 10311/DE ~ Elil 30 )1~10. 03HS,1 NndN,1 ONÂ¥ 1Â¥NIDIMO 3,4 31nll.LSNOO N,3/.HlÂ¥1/ELLÂ¥/ N.UI/MaNÂ¥ S./1/VI{111Â¥ >â€¢illyl~+IlÂ·~N NIY-1 01 03 nSS SNOISIA3H 318Â¥SÂ¥31 13N - NV Id bl0013 OH 19Â¥3 LIS GIg g 31lll INIMVIC 07 ~ loort-pr ON 103mld 3735 AI NAAÂ¥&~a 3140 O3AA31A3h3 NET LEASASLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 5,349.29 9 (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 1,367.57 SF (SLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 6.349.29 SF LOWER LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,244.56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2,158.82 SF (BLUE) SUB.TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6.244.56 SF SECOND LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,248.26 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 507.23 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1,14633 SE (PURPLE) SUS-TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 6 248.26 SF - NON-UNIT COMMON TOTAL NET LEASABLE 18.84211 SF AREA: 2,158.82 SF i fÂ« MECHANICAL 1 1 '11 1..lili 3 9 .Â· Â·,'''*NIANT SPACE A TENA'9Â§BACE'w ~.t/1 1 1 -41///*.e h W. 'fili'/' lifili."i.i, , ,, ., i fl,-i*],il.l'illi,.Â·ill:!I,imqN MEN'S 11 I/Â«t / 0/7 111111 pli//1/"/Ii//-/t.i/il ///1-1 i /lij'Ij/y. , I 0/4 VT.ilivill,/11 f"ll,::111'11 ' 11 'll - Â·11. i~.'11|11~11'u 'Jlll" Illl1102,,i i,lii, - 17Â«471 9: 1:111111111,1 IiI ill' 1 1 1 STAnt #lr--~ : - 2~4~ g ' COMMERICAL ~/'Â·, i~41,; /4/'4Â·Â·/4'/kÂ«hwA//'0 e ,,â€ž ~ AREA: 6,244.56 SF '10~>~~. 1 1 11 11 11 11,1111 " , 11/11 f...924 / 1.* CÂ°~ErR 'd 11,1 *#01* . fof - .RUL/7 Intkii' 's<(Li~j ~* 9 4 // / f// 29 /, !1 er-,1 n n offo/ 3/Â»/.9 Ptl toi *424Â·** ip 39---- -4/1 4--1 1-f77,4/,j STAm. /- -{~f , 447 / 10=lt '.4 \ 10 jf 11 ,/ f 2 2 3 0 WOMEN'S d> 2 r - 3/37 ' ill â€žC Z 24 1 .// lili . . 111 , r .........rÂ« LU J < a. LOWER LEVEL - NET LEASABLE .A CALCULATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0 3 f N L-2 tÂ« 1 'all'3110]03HLM SÂ¥1108WV) 94!.3.t.- /1,;b....11Nli'.*:1."1*MnINiIH>MÂ¥ 91009 11 ....53' 15.115.1... '.râ‚¬ 0[1806[UWIXÂ¥J 52.-EUDÂ®111 V. WOD}â€¢Ugwd44'uew,IMIW".WA, SÂ¥3 LE NUIidltIUSd/ AW =livu 83NNV1d ONÂ¥101 OBASS! VI 31EIVSÂ¥3-113N - NÂ¥-ld H001=I Â£00*.M,l ~'ON NOIiÂ¥001 ~ Loot,r-tl 'ON 103rOId 311ll DNIMVIC Al N/Alla 9 6/8 L/8 Ea REFEREN..D KEYED NOTES . . . 0 NUMBER | KEY NOTE 1 PETERSEN BRICK, KOLUMBA SERIES, K4. 2 HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANKS, FINISH (TBD) 3 PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL 4 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAILING, PAINTED. 5 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING 6 PREFINISHED METAL OVERHANG. 7 EXPOSED STEEL COLUMN. PAINTED 8 CLEAR LOW.E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL. EQUALLY SPACED PANES 9 STEEL BEAM WRAPPED IN PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL. FINISH TO MATCH STOREFRONT 10 STEEL MEMBER. PAINTED T/O ELEVATOR 11 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 1 SHAFT 12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING -51'Tb" 13 ROOF LINE 14 ARCHITECTURAL CAST STONE 15 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH. rh UPPER_PARAPET 47 28' - 0 16 BUTT-GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM r'-h PARAPET - -ROOF *A 17 PREFENISHED METAL COVERED ENTRY 26' - 6/ 8Â·Â·CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED WU 27' - Or' 'f r---7 (92 A 4.Fth, 8 j / I. Â» A z - r -~r- - Te1 '1.f. 1-r.-~,ff CD P I T.O. RAILING /7 1031 A F l _ __ir_ f__ _- _ 1 _- 77-1 -31- 1 - ' -17 19' -6" 4/ CD 1 SECOND FLOOR 4736-6 M ~*11 ' U-CD B.O UNTEL 1 /1 rh B.O LINTEL 11311 5/4" -.--= Â·Â·~-------- - -. ------ - ~~~ '- i M . *Im 1---771 ./.IM~ I I _,1- 128 =i Â£1Â£11* =,1. ' , | EXISTING EXISTING - Ezi BUILDING BUILDING - (N.I.C.) BEYOND ' 1 ~-<ID i 1 - - 03 CIO .-1 2 . aD (N.I.C.) iiI - 1 2- 2 14 d: 4=55*r.m-F- - rk FIN. FLOOR _ rD NORTH ELEVATION U 3/16"= 1-0 T/O ELEVATOR g-MECHANICAL SCREENING SHAFT t 11 - UPPER PARAPET 2'A 1-05-n Â»...<=) 28' - 0" 0 1-12,2 ==== PARAPET 27' - 0" - 1 -3 f --1 -- e L 1 FD TO. FAILING Al 1 =2 1 ~ SECOND FL:QQR_~h 16' - 0" 4-~ Â® . ADJACENT BUILDING Â· - -- _ 8.0.UNTIL *In ~Â·.Â·I'"-F ; 11' -11 37â‚¬* TRASH ENCLOSURE- 1= L Til!, 3~ IN inti - 0 0 ~ TRANS --1 FIN. FLR SPACE'A' An -I Â· - 0 - 8-5732'~-7 A EAST ELEVATION 2/3/16"=1-0 : C A-211 11'31,0003H1, 59 AUWV) 1, â€¢mOD!114!|[Win'Â·INVId|'HAE.91 31VDS 91809 IA@Nivld SJU 1~0jlSdWia ~t~ DittlÂ»[ IZ~(VJ %261 862 U- 1. U. 01>0/41vuew'mqu,Ch# 3/\V SNI>IdOH 19Â¥3 LLS gl/81 9 83NNerld ON\il 01 OBASSI V}1 91-GPIL K NOILdltiOSES AS Hly<l ON DEM)MIH 6 00 SNOJSJA3U (11-1 3U{)003111 9 SVMng,NVO .LHEMHAdoo 1031140}1Â¥ 3Hi 10 1N3SNOO N311!UM 3HlinOHLIAA 03SO10% UO 03Sn '031Â¥011dnl] 38 LON AÂ¥01 31'Â¢VS JHJ. UNV '10311110, 1 -llil 30 >18{) M 0 3 HS ]Nndhin ONV lvNE>ill 3,1.1 Billils,00 N,383H lVIWELVIN Nal-LIUM ONV SE)Nli VBC] 11Â¥ SNOI1VA313 HOIH31)(3 (3SOdOWd LOODK-pl ON NOilÂ¥30-1 ~ LOON-t L 'ON 1O32Old 00'NadSV 311ll DNIMVID Ie NAAVIO D . . . REFEREN~D KEYED NOTES NUMBER | KEY NOTE 1 8" CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING 3 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH 4 CLEAR LOW.E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FHAMING T/0 ELEVATOR ~--MECHANICAL SCREENING SHAFT /Th -- L. A.11 -41 7UPPER PARAPET ~ 28' - 0" \ PARAPET ~ 27' - 0" SECOND El=OOR 16' - 0" ./ --TRASH ENCLOSURE l ROOF B.O. ALLEY l=LNIEL 12' - 8'1 L. ~TRANSFORMER 1 1 @ ,,0-NEIGHBORING $ TRANSFORMER _ FIN Fl OOR -h - 1 ~TRASH 1 0' - 0" 4.- 4 - - 1 - -- 1- ENCLOSURE a ~~ 3/16" = 1-0 -. ~MECHANICAL SCREENING ~OUTLINEOF ADJACENT BUILDING , UPPER PARAPET rr : i i ~ 78' -0" s /m - _ ~FUPEI_*h 27 0" 4 u n : k 1 4 W 3 3 0 @ECOND FLOOR /1 m' 3Â¥7 2 L.Li ENTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDING v < < Mo O- u 02 IE 1- W LU Lo Ca West 1 3/16"=1-0 w 611 5 0 -212 1~11 , O.11 '38OOO3H1, SVHAUWV) Â¥t009 ' .... 90 1% Hill/K] 1 .tÂ·C - ./*It.= $2510(<U~,Ui WOJ~Opod4]Pue,vinipAw H 3NNV-Id INV101 030SSI VH NOI1/IHOSIG SNOISLAEU (111 380003141 9 SVU/IVI IHE>[WAdo)0 10]LIHOMÂ¥ 3Hi 30 iNENDO NE !_LIUM *11 1AOH.WA (13SO10)SIC WO C36n 031VS,ldn(] 30 10N AVIN 301Â¥6 3Hi ONV '100-LIHOU , dHE 30 MYOM 03,161Â·INndNn {INÂ¥ 7/NID, 30 21Â·LL lin LILSNOO NI.* 1/lkaLVIN NELLI/AA INV GONI' lu] 11V SNOI1VA313 MOIU31)<3 03SOcIOUd LOO,rt[ ON NO,1Â¥001 ~ Loopril ON 133rOUd 31VDS < 3 lill INIMVEIC] Aa NMVEIO ALLEY ----Â«rÂ» -19/////////4/////// l/// 3i///iji Il ITRANSI ITRANSI lili 111'ihj 1 -fÂ«Â«jÂ»Â«15#*WWL. -.~~"~~I~M VA~~~) Ph.sfilibillul ~ 1 ,li 1 1~1 4 '111 N .1 1(11.11 1 i, 1 1 II-i Nuf'lpm l < J I li lIlil/filfiilllilll/ltli#l/i=/iii~ffil/li# ilill/lhmn f/i/ll/ ///Pl #/l ~*hiqlili~ll /4/ hill/ //i // li j j i i j i j / 1i /1/ 1 i //i/ '/ 1ir , ' i fi 1l 1 11 11/ll/i Ill Ill 1 1 4 il .l 1 1 Â£ r /1 11, 1 44Â¢944Â¢94 - - / I~ i 1 billi , ~5-52%~112~~ENTRANCE.f~~~ , f hil L 11 1 141 1 ' 11 1 1 1 11 ' 11 ' fl 11 lill 1 1 11 1,1 1 1lil /l 1 1 1, j ////// 1 //1////1////////UL=L24114Â¢00441/il~l~i~~~~'/ll~~afpruuÂ«/ll,l/l///i//il/li///~/l//~ |1 111~ 11 1 Â·eivt*amai:i:se,1~~1~ /litt~PEDESTR*~Ijj'll 'll' l l '/ ll l ,/18 - C NION"ININIP 1 1 <METte~ 4////4///////////////) r -1+, :442:12-,34fli,~,~ /Y//~f ~4//ll//-8/N==M//i//////////lll//////ll/////l//l/////l//llili, 1 1 3-0 ROUTEÂ¢/ /42**%90/,2*F EN DOORS.358824*82~9 "*44%%92**ffftÂ« ~ It / BENCHES- 1 /'A COL , TYP 1 1 43Â» -7---4)22~ (TYP OF 6) - ,45Â¢I i. -~9~Â«- qi-IT-*--IA__-hful] - 1119~~~Itf - 1 --\- ui b SOFFITABOVE BALCONY ABOVE PARKING-1 CONCRETE WALK NEW PEDESTRIAN '- KIOSK N L Â«a FLIGOT PÂ°e71 ENTRANCE . .-FACE OF CURB 2 ( A\\ /2\ ~ J .Â·' L.NOSCA: } 4 c' f.1NIghj , ' AREA -7. LANDSCAPE - / AREATYP / Q- ( r y' A . X 3 .Lul 31/ Kl...3>/ \\L 1.-11 -4// ~ LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AHEA, TYP PAVERS, TYP PAVERSTYP EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 6%.584Nâ€ž UJ : d g TIA-1 533 E. HOPKINS I.#- SNI>IcIOH '3 GLG '011 '3300]03H1, SVHneWV) ./. 11% /1.Id>KJ 1-.54/*3 ihil Of,IltÂ»~ ,Â£,8) X. 9~Sl 862 l~ WJ 1/ UJ~> > dJ~)1>0.~411,Uet~~1~,~WL'J Â·MMA' AV SNI OH lSÂ¥3 LE kl3NNV-ld ONÂ¥-101 03nlli | VH NO:ldlkOSBO ] Al 31Â¥0 'ON ---- - Â£00~-PI ~ ON AM)%01 Â£00#Â» I ON 133'Old 311!1 DNIMVIC NV-ld 3119 Vll AB NMVIC] g k/8 1/8 ... r / / I / / l:i' '.~~ :,7 ha~~~ / // //-/ 0--7. ./ I - ,Â·,:: ~i-trI.h.fÂ·,Â·5-z'~24â‚¬:Â·42:46?I :Â· .-- . ..1 1 ., -I iÂ·;i...1. '19-4----7 ki-LÂ© ;.7. i .jv.9---i'.2 J iit ~~ i ~ i~~jj~~~;~~,:,i,~i: i , ~, i, i, , i, ~ , -/,1 4.L: Â·t JI' _INCE 111/*I Â·:-n-ki <i/#G-Lu '4 . ,+Em 1#1*Â«rt IMIM /.2~ *i" 2 ''lbl -Â· ...212~; ...11- 1 1 lilli' 111 :f I'l|'Bl,Mi"I 'IL.LI 1 EnÂ·u.Â·i,2-11':iIi FR~*14.-:.:1~~~~~:-3.2-24>.11.2 Uppr , -- -1 - ---/ 1 , * I t.'.r- Â·Â·r -r..1*Y T-Â· 21 . :22 --fit 1 ----14% 4 - 1... 1. T -------- 41.L. C.,Irr'.TtnÂ·r'.6 1- Ir' I .311Â·., 1 :.t' r.-17.11Tidu-Â·rT-i.Â·.: i :-- -- 2Â·LI-:.T'-11.1.i:Lrd,-3" Â£ ...~ Lint./.. ',3'Â·' T Â·Â·5/1,1.1.7-1-2-9.-It'Il...nÂ·Â·Â·r 324 1-:Â» '726:irÂ£11-:-, Â·Â· - i i . ' -râ€¢~r~-UC~' ~ :t- 1 I 1 - 1.1 - 1-L-r-4-4-41 - -- tr~' 1.'7'--1... :i 11 - 11 1 11 lili 1 11 ~I~ - -. i1 I 1 ~V/~~~~~.I r r r Â·-7 U~+M -! I.'TIC; .. ~:3Nf9a -~-1 - - -7-I ./. lili & r.+4' :19-VT - -*'.CE:fie'lltl milli- 4 F~ 19-- - 1 T'Ill' ~ ~~~~_1:Â¥If - (t .....11'..1.11.lit: 111~I al ./ /6/9/ ilillpl/ .- I i $ fhs' 1.71.2 ~-''TZ'--.1. J.Il.. 1.--0. 1. 41/,/i 7 â€¢ 1 =.1 I. ' '~~TLT-Lr.: 7 .MI# 1,- 4Â·Â»1 i ...:6~=*ihEW - Â·ltr/4 Â·-441-rLâ€žÂ£*.14 Â£~9-41 -- 1- 1 lilli. 11-3434 Â·~ ~ i.-1-t ~ kiyri, 1 JI* .Elt 0 -iU~%48-- - ' rÂ·Â·ST '_Ll_ 1__-ti fiia?#33*1 :T - ri----__ 11 1~: 1 7FEr' ~ 22-- =~- 3 Â·_C,hM,in!; rr/ r=6.-b----Jilit --1--WJ--2â€ž494*4-L.2 \\\\ ifff/11 -ff ... 1 1 ~ ~- U.L. In -13 - :--~ . -1 2 1~ 1 1~ ._C _'I." _.r.12.1.Z...Z.U~ 4 111- 1 - 1 k -- 1 .I- -21 - _ -IEr ...E. E. -. t 1 r. -1 -7 I .I- L H Â· i L.FL - -2.'u i 1 03000 00000 1 - 1 . - 1.2 I 3 Â· ...L I _ - Â·Â·r--r--1.- e -7--CI , -. ~ - L- T -21/16,Nfa-1~..:.-4-< -r-~.--1 -1-F rfa~FI-- ]1 -f ... _z i 3-4 3 ~-2.- -t-Il-1--rol.-~ -1--,TJ--r-osijtifra-J~.7~~ -ci_-tr--3-4Ittif I-, ---93.Lftl#*.2--Â£3~1$~t-,7 - -/.1-3/-.1---. 102Â»4-99. ~~_13~~9234/nt?4~I--1 1% ~_iI-- ~11/r- . I..laT T .1 -2- -9ju#&E=C- 2742315.-T---" -- Â· ~ -'lv-3, 5-Ir-L,ITIE-Â«3 , 21~ 1- 9- -1-1. -r-Â· - .- ~1. 1 -1.- -z -- --~Â·Â£Â©=ujf~-x :' h 1 - --- 3----1-TZ- -r-ZIZ---' -r _t-rj-C~~..1 L--7-1-22-21-Ek-~3 + .---Unt 211_-~_r fr.1./- -"- 2-7 ~-T 2-1-tIL-- ~ ~ -- i _0 - u-n-Â»_r--_2*Lrizrf-_914-I--7UDI--2-I--9-_.~Ito-qi u.-~ Â·Â· - Â·' - u . __.... -:..,~ 1--1 71dj-MI-~1- 4 - / --39---Â·---z= ----Â· ~ 2 - .~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ -31.-~LF~~Â·~ ' 1-f , 2%11 ~2 -IC,ratry _1-T~71- 1- 1 --I--1.L,--~ 1=9922444120==4=tffl . -rÂ· - -g-- nu .g---,+.-U=---------- .- 1 .=.,Ii-~ IT-90-11-3/<12 Ang-26:2 - --x .<1--7. - - -T--L-IZZILIZEZ].-_r--'- .1-1- 1--~ Â»511 .Etc291-2 243[-~co---uZI , 1 -' ' / 14- --/ c-- 1~~3/=Vis/LUS-fLitABBM*0321/2,i.-1%1--- *-- - . tr -4 : rÂ£-r- h [d i ' 1.- -nt.ft - ~ tip- #II-1Â£.TESSIZ- /2/6/tz----IT-Er--ff-,722621%-/Iggirifig t 14 - 4 - 1 - 4-1.10]......LE.4 r.. 2--1 1 j... 1 . -123.-11 7~ -" r.tÂ«- -- i 1 -I- -2 L_7-1---1------7---~1-1.-f<15--L-- =--LIFI_ t---7----1----3.--L-- -[-ffin-ln--i~--1.- _-1- 3-_...3-Q~~r liI!2Â©I~ -2-2-2 -- 9- 141/71.1 .1 - 1 - _ r)6 341.-1 =1It.~.1 _ILâ€žIr.LJI-rÂ·-L.7. -1=14-- . 24- Ue LoLLL-~ .. . dc- 3 1 1 -E - f 1=41+Zf6*Effat~#~EFET-L 1 L- tEEl --iif rÂ·.3 Â· 3_ 1 - 1 ---- -4=r- -r L. "-4.- E-72. . L -.1. __L-- 21 -- IL/=- Â·Â·lE -T _ _ __: , i i 1 - - 1 -- - _L.. ~ - 4 - 3 1 i .....q- ~.1 - 36=Ir -- - < --T-U.__i_ 4 . . It:CIpE 1 --- --4,9- ----,----VÂ»- IZE " .. ,-- r. r. pil .i- -1. I 1~ @*t 1 . 1 . . 9 ... 71 4. . *1 1 r. I. 22Â« I ~ -1 - i,_LTÂ·Â·Â·.Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·- ~ - 4 :6 4 1 1 Â·Â· Â·I 0 4: ..m 11 T 'T LT-LT i T 1-Â· T-T- 3 ilk -tr- 1 11 - - 1 I 1 1 /-W K 1.Â»7 - 11 1 in 12 L -1 111 ~ FZT <: - --- th>40 17 - 'f _ e_- . 1 1 11,1 . I i lili .1=4:IkÂ» .- 1 1-11 1 1 â‚¬ 0 '' 1Â¢Â· *44*- t - ~ 19.rL ; LIn ./~MI 1''I =:Pa./. . 37- T i .3- / -99-9-2 1 ..I....11 'k I Â·1 rl' * - 1.....2-1'- 6- ' â‚¬ i - -- .% 1 1 &8'*49 i i 1 ..7 1 1-â€ž a ...1... -11 1 j 1!thi -4 Mb#-AERIW4Â¥Gid;@* - 77777Â» - .141 K i -/Cir ~I~~ J - Lit - i - _'F '1 -[fi..1 -1 1 r. :Eli-11 --1 - r Â·Â·Â·4 L L 4 1 4 - Il~IJ~EfI~f I -_ -r T -- r-- ~ -_U~jÂ·~â‚¬pfy~ i ~lirll I<IE>r.~hjr~pr-ILE i -4 Ll-Â« i -11... I ~-r..L[-Lr-.1-- T ' -3214-L - -, - . 1 1 - 7-1 =311 L L..11 - -r - - *EIZIT------1 1 T--r---/~..p""..7. IA 2 ~-~2Illil~~ - T - n- 3 - - I 2- . 1-2 Â·Â· 1 + 1 2 - -T A i ' i|1 1 3- __ -Â· 7-r-Â»=r~~-r-~ lilli - 1 111 1-1 1 I 1 1 1 1-lili m. 1 111 1 lilli - 1 4 :11-lili .lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 1 -T 111 lilli 1 lilli lili 111111 1 lilli lilli W .1 lilli lilli . 1 I 1 1 111111 - 11'lli lili 1 6 lilli _L_[ 1 1 1- _1 I L.1 - 111111 lITI'Ir-1 1 I 1 1 .lilli 111'11: lili 111111 1 lilli 1 1 1 ...1 lilli -- I lilli 1 1 IT. , 111111111111 1 1 lili.1 C 111111 1 AÂ£~~t--!4 : ' , - y .1*4 1 7 r.. 7- JILTÂ»J--~1 11 3 9 11. - i 411 L ~J . i --- Off~; ~~~~~~11;4 91 f ./ 1 4 .i# h , %â€¢.Â« 1 t IN :1 1 1 11 1, tj B 9 21 -4 1 -- /1 1 3 ~ ~~l L : 5 1 4 -4 1 - 1 - i Ji fil f-,-1 ~ - 1 1 - Lilli L# H ' M A U 1 Â¥ . 1 ~ 1 Â£ i E 1 9 . t. 41 $ 4 k -ll e 1 r k Â¢ 0 4 E-1 1, 4 1 rl -1 J , '111,11111'!!11111'i,11!111111111,111111 *=th.Â£#L/#12.10 .. ./ F-1 .. ..1 r. r. r. r. -r- r-=1- ... r. ... r._cl 1-1 , I - Ii. 4 11 1 1 1- 1- K 1 1 ' 1 .-I ' .-& â‚¬ tÂ· â€¢ a.l'> U. '.6 4. 0-Â»'4'*Â·' =frul , El Â·-- Â·Â·Â· ic 1-Â«Â» - 1 % nn 4 t.. â‚¬: . .9 J ... + 44 -0 1. 1. lit. -.21:G A 11 31 - ark v#////// 1 I. 1 1 121 1 1 1 1 1 1- Â» 11 1 0 - r' 4 9 0-Â· j 14# 40 1 '4 _ & 4-1, ,Â«9â‚¬3752(4-<2-:9-z 1 p.< 2345&623 --tr.:.-Â·c. â‚¬*itf~ -r-..t -$-+.. ... - I. .- .... Â·. -,--t_-c-Â·--*-Â·â€žr--Â»r-. . 44 t 1 --- - - - -* .-} -,_)-c~-.cÂ«Â·q--ct-tri-' 41>-r i - A,HP -W j +-1 +'_r-~_ q-tÂ» Â·. Â·- Â·Â· . Â· Â· Â· , Â·Â· U- '6-1 1 -1 -- i ,Â£ 1 a. , 1 - 0-, --- ---tort~-~i~Â·L<-Fir#i)*rECS*/ *. /+ / 6--1-1-,-3-1 454 1 1 1 1 913-9--~--4 11, It 44 lilli 1 1 11 111 i i It , . - 91 H 91 N 6 1; 7 i A LV 1 4. 1 2 r 1 i n -'f~ till ~ 1 \ L 7Â»7-3 1-' ,~/~ ' i,/ * IL_ ~ |~1 t ||4 ~| 1 ~Ij 44, e. 11 1 \\ Al , H 51 1 11 i 1 1 5 1 F:lirc, 1 1 j H 1 $â‚¬ â‚¬: V 111 \ - -1,1 1 k. \-- -1-1 \--- , 1 1 jillr/ 1 *1\ 1 i 1 --- 1 .. 1 11 1 1 1 111 e 1 1 lili I 1 it 1 /-1 f-1 i 1, -1 /4 - 1-i , , It 4.-1 1 9 411 1 1 11 1 tf 1 1 F.-3 1 W . Sk. # ~~~ ~-1.,=41. .47>.+3.la# "+I'f/ k 22,4.4 â€¢tÂ·t Â·Â«â€¢.Â»4 1:*-4 -2 fIAV~- O .. 1 ~1 , i 1 + 1 1 A 2,4- 1 7. REFERE . EYED NOTES 11 1719 NUMBER KEY NOTE 1 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK, 1/2 RUNNING BOND 2 PREFINISHED METAL COVERED ENTRY. 3 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAILING, PAINTED 4 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING 5 EXPOSED STEEL MEMBER, PAINTED 6 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 7 TERRACE LINE 8 BUTT-GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM 9 CMU, PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED. 10 PREFINISHED METAL- COPING. 11 EXPOSED STEEL LINTEL,PAINTED. 12 BRICK SOLDIER COURSING ELEVATOR 13 BOARD FORMED STAINED CONCRETE. rh OVERRUN ~~~_~ ~~~ - 14 NATURAL BUILDING STONE, 9/ 31' - 0' 15 NATURAL BUILDING STONE PARAPET. 16 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK, STACK BOND. 0163 Bill rin Ch UPPER-PARAPET_ 1 13 (7 14 17 RECESSED MODULAR BRICK PANEL. 18 FLUTED CAST IRON COLUMN ROOF -1 19 TEMPERED GLASS PANEL 0- O PARAPET --- , - -. -.--- 266Â¥-1 20 ACCENT LIGHTING. 27'- 21 BUILDING SIGNAGE. UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT 22 PREFINISHED METAL BRISE SOLEIL 91 r =91 - - 3 --; T.O. RAILING /1 100 CD ' 10 1 1 -,7 1 14 1 Ch SECOND FLOOR Â· 12 1 ........ Â® B.O. LLNTEL 1 ,) 1 8.0. LINTEL - - -i 130. 1111 514 1-3 EXISTING i#/ 1 -72 -* H-----1 - -- t EX]STING â‚¬ BUILDING BUILDING , 4 3 0 (N.I.C.) 1 - BEYOND CD 00 R 00 e J I 2 2 (N.I.C.) 11 11 1 :. 24â€ž M - ~d----~41 1 511 = V *8: . -- - 4 rh FIN. FLOOR /11PROPOSEDNORIM_ELEVATION U 3/16"= 1'-0 ELEVATOR f-MECHANICAL SCREENING OVERRUN Ah g 1-0'K, 3.---77 & T I I~-avarcr n - - -\ UPPER PARAPET /F. 28' - 0"ll/ - 0#34|~5~til -Â· IF/,â€ž. - I PARAPET #) 27- 0' il/ T.O. RA[LING-I) 19' - 6" l./ 1 i _ SECOND_FLOOR /1 I Â· 16' - 0" l.Â·/ ADJACENT BUILDING B.03-INTEL /11 - 11'-1134"/ LU TRASH ENCLOSURE- : i > \ 1, --. 83 03 CO Z ---- 2 0 0 0 O 2 TRANS ___ ------- H W 1 1 FIN. FLR. SFACEA 0' - 8 31/32" L. M h (21-PROPOSED-EASTELEMATION- tf~ v 3/16 , liD A-211 '011 '380(]03H1;9 5Â¥Uni]WV) .....3 /0153<1 BOI'MI I ./.14 I 3801)31114)8Â¥ 31VDS 91009 1133NIÂ¥ldg(1 15~!115dINK} 3~Ve OE,1-06f(ing:'04 5251--21.aell HaNNVId ONV-1 01 03nSSI VH 6,-C-Zi i tuoy-Opol,APu....0, ~At. esl 1949 SNOISIA)U 011 3UO(]O3HL 9 SVEnfl'IVD LHEMMA<00 1031,HOWV 3HI JO 1/3SN/3 N 311,/. 3111 inoilll/A 039010SI0 WO Ollen '031Â¥Olldnl 38 loN Al,9 3INVS 3H1 ONV 1031Â»108Â¥ 3kl 30 >IUOM 0 3HSON nd In ONÂ¥ TINIDIWO 3,41 31nll.LSNOD Niziy]H l'u'luaLVIN /3J_ll/MaNV SE)NUAVÂ¥0 11Â¥ Aa 31VO ON LOOKP-ft ON NOI)01 LOON+L ON 103DOHd SNOI1VA313 150831)(3 03SOdOWd 31111 DNIMVEIC] 8 NA'mK] Â¤3M31/\3B . . . REFERE~KEYED NOTES NUMBER | KEY NOTE 1 CMU. PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING 3 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING 4 EXPOSED STEEL LINTEL, PAINTED 5 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK, 1/2 RUNNING BOND. 6 NATURAL BUILDING STONE PARAPET 7 INSULATED STEEL DOOR, PAINTED ELEVATOR ~MECHANICAL SCREENING OVEBRUN /A -T-1 "CT 1 - i - -- 31'7Â¥-7 '41414 #2-1 4 -ly . 1 1 1 ~.....!.1. 'Â· 2~\~UppER PARAPET ~ 28' - 0" \ PARAPET an 27' -0" 1 SECOND Fi!=OOR /IN 16'~7Â¥-EV r----TRASH ENCLOSURE 0 ~ ROOF B.O. ALLEY 11NTEL /7 12'7Â¥-E~ -A<AL ~TRANSFORMER / /117FER 7-\/ .NEIGHBORING f TRANSFORI~ r En-I _ TRASH 2 ENDLOSURE FIN. FLOOR_-41 ~ Cil PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION L./ 3/16 = 1-0 ~ MECHANICAL SCREENING UPPER PARAPET ,Â·, /~D I T.-7 T : ~OUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING 28' - 0'1 4. 7 PARAPET in o 27-~ 91 > U Ct SECOND FLOOR -7 16' 2Â¥-, LLi > <C 1 ENTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILD!/G CO Z EO 0- 0 O Z 6 W - h LO Gh PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 5 3/16"=1-0 0 . A-212 H .....9/'iN.......Ill/k'.14 3411)/IHOBÂ¥ 31VDS 9(009 1/3NIÂ¥/530 'tk/54/30 3.- 'Cll '3UO0O3HL Y SVIinFIWV) L[-XVi ./Â·96~~9;1}1 83NNV1d ONÂ¥1 01 03nSSI VH SPDEL [ UIODalopoa41pu~ieinqu,e)â€¢.6~ NOtldlk!0930 1 31Â¥a ON ~tMal... 011 3U0003HL V SVUAS~VO LHENWAdoo 10. IHOWÂ¥ 3HI :10 lN 3SNO:jN3 LLIUM 3. lno. IM(]3SolDS,(] Mo aasn '(]31Â¥011dnO ~lglON Am MVS 3H1{JNV 1031IHOb f 3HljO >lUOM 03HS,1NndNA ONV 1Â¥NIEDIBO 3,LL ELLALUSNOO NIB 1VI/31VIN N31 LIMAAINV SDNIP VUO 11/ Lolt-N ON NollvIOn ~ ZOOÂ»-p[ ~'ON 103/0 Hd SNOI1VA313 NOIhia.D(3 03$01Ohid 311ll DNIMVIO Al NMVHI .... 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN, CO LOCAL JURISDICTION: LANDLORD: ARCHITECT: LAND PLANNER: THE CITY OF ASPEN M DEVELOPMENT CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 130 S. GALENA STREET 2001 N. HALSTED ST. SUITE 304 2454 E. DEMPSTER STREET, SUITE 202 420 EAST MAIN STREET, STE. 10-B ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 DES PLAINES, IL 60016 ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL (970) 429-2761 CONTACT: MARK HUNT TEL (847) 298-1525 TEL (970) 925-7819 CONTACT: BY DEPARTMENT CONTACT: TED J. THEODORE, NCARB, LEED AP CONTACT: MITCH HAAS DRAWING LIST: OR ROB AVILA, LEED AP SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME CS-1 COVER SHEET ALTA EXISTING LAND SURVEY PA-1 EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY EC-1 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-2 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-3 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN ER-1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN PA-2 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY PLANS A-010 PROPOSED SITE PLAN VP-1 VIEW PLANE ELEVATIONS VP-2 VIEW PLANE SURVEY 2 :r, VP-3 VIEW PLANE MAP ~ . A-100 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 52 A-101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN ur: -%â€¢Dt i. FAR-1 FLOOR PLANS - FAR CALCULATIONS /* FAR-2 FLOOR PLAN - FAR CALCULATIONS ./ i . Nbl FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE :i !1 4 : 2 ~ WL-2 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE A-211 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .C a A-212 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS % r DA-1 TIA SITE PLAN . U A .11, -- 2 3 r 11 , 4 , I. 4 . 34)4 ..j Â¢ r 4.- 1 - 3,21 2 -/.*.....W-' 4. 2. . g,te , . . -1,4.. 1 94@, . 14. V 1 074.4 t, 4 4. I 2. L râ€¢~25Â·Â¢Â· f.h~irr Â£ ~i -V &41, I . 6'Â·4 # w, I :*. * 4'NA_. 4' , -4- 73 1.1 .970 4 4- '1 E , ; 4 ~ 4-0 a. -- A d - - I . ... . I 4~4 PROJECT SITE :tÂ·.~ 1 ,; i~ 1 ~ - 1 - . / r. 1 Â·Â· - ~ :#~ ' lilli --L . 1 Â¢= -1. ; 9.. - - 77 - . 1:121 -D . .. ..517E HOPKINSAVE . I ./47 STORY RETAIL BUILDIN 1 - 1 - L 2.*ht->54~ROPOSE[*/ ' . 1,5 Q U.9 . ~ 07 +â€¢â€¢.mme Â·- Â£6*1 -. - .1 Z . -_ ./ 4 , ..3 lie - 4 ... .2 Â£@ . 1. 1 7 , 7Â· . - 4 i L -1- . 3, O Â· E - 4 Â¥ t.: < .. 4 r . Â¥ .-I 4.--3. 0. 44>f m : 4 - -ic 4-- â€žr * f jo .r . I a..% dj 2 . I VICINITY MAP CS-1 9,0091/. Cll '380(103KL 9 SVIdnl],WO Â·LHE)18Adoo loal,HOHV 31,1 J WO) OJOIJOOll~pUD;Wn(Il M 9//8 /9 ' 0[I' ...... 5251-1/.I.1 03 '9 VHMWV) NOI1dIHOS30 A8 31Â¥0 ON k. t- r 'embE,0,<9Â¥.I B3NN%rid ONÂ¥-101 03nSS1 VH 91-2-ZL , 3AV SNI>ldOH .LSV3 LI.9 SNOISIA38 .*4'#;4 -:! ' r '1/ k! I EIKIL + SÂ¥%18 N]93 91(02 e LOOÂ»+L ON NOI1'Â¢001 ~ LOOPK+L ON 103rOWd 00'NadSV :03MBIABM 133HS hIBAOO 311ll ONIA,UndO alva .... CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0-159 O UTILITY BOX LEGEND AND NOTES ' O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED mil.98 O STREET LIGHT A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINE 8 - - - LOT i i NE POSTED ADDRESS: Â·517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE- 1.-10 /,ND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHI SLED r. N 82â€¢04'12Â·W. BEAR] NGS BASED ON CITY MINIâ‚¬NT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 0 10 20 ~ GAS METER U.S. SURVEY FOOT Â® WATER VALVE b ONE FOOT CONTOURS Â· q CITY MONUMENT : CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 7915 94Â· w WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE 34.5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES IBLING NE#GHT v ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY EAST OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) IS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE 3 THIS PROPERTY 1 S SI TUATED IN ZONE Â·r [ARMS DETERMI NED TO BE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A., FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, I t. ..... 49/9 0 . .. Cor"UNITY-PANEL NUMBER 080970204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4. 1987 ./.8 417 ENuE THE REFERENCED FLOOD MAP IS THE CURAENT FLOOD INSUR~NCE RATE MAP DISK '4 - 4. THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OP THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD FOR THE COI'llUNITY IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED 25947 - AREA AS DEFINED BY THE Cl TY OF ASPEN MASTER ORAI NAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963, FIGURE ES-15. NO DELINEATED PA,KING N 75'09Â·11 W 00 PARKING ~~~Â·Â·Â·-Â·. ZONED: CC [CMERCIAL CORE) WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY DISK NO SETBACK REOUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE, REAR Â·29Â· 25947 LIGHT 1 POST .. , ELEVATIONS BASED oN CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT 5 [7915.94Â·] !988 NAVD ..... SPACES ...KIOSK PARKING LANDSCAPE " COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. I ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] 17952.61 COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATt ONS LISTED IN BRACKETS] WHERE VIEWPLANES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICI VE SHOWN. VIEWPLANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 NAD (5.31Â·1 [7952.5] 1 7.10.61 CONCRE,E WAL, P R .. CONCRETE WALK N 75 00Â·11 1 1 STAI~a 6* Â·29, LANDSCAPED 1 1 AREA . V... STAJRS 1 VICINITY MAP 4*. 7919.1- , I. I - [7949.71 1' - 400' $3/. ' ROOF 1 1 1 7/4...1 o .,=mu :Ms : i W 1 1 9 11 - 5 2 1 11 1 1. W. r.-I . + - 6 ! FI:]JORY C ARDEN i BUILDING ~ l LEVEL 1 1 i . E m a TO#Uff/ 7954 8 - k / 2/ / / . A 5. . - e 1 1 1 W 1 ell / 1 1 1 1 792'.tÂ· i , S CERTIFICATION 22 G 3, THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCIR HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 IND IS ACCURATE / SILL BA5ED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ME NO 7921.3 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OP WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. RE-In 0 7920.1 APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO IBOVEGROUND A DATE;4~~ " SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED i 9 W! TH THE SEAL CFÂ· THE SURVEYOR BELOW ERROR OF CLOSURE 1 5 LESS THAN . c913 0. ..EA 1 gB 1/15.000. ,.~S~-- gb ..I- 2 1 {7981.31 .i 34.5 JOHM / HQ~ORTH p, Ll: 3. *947 4/C m i - ' 8 - 3.0 a... '80 GUARD RA I LANDSCAPED IREA A'C S 75-09'11'E [7956.31 7920 <42:>F {7961,21 8.2/Â· 4 4 1 Ui ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS 4Â£LRY EASEMENT RECEPTION No.,87.6 IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BLO CK 94 PAVED DISK OF 20.90. 25947 LOTS D, E, AND F, RO... 7920.6 BLOCK 94. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, O [7957./ COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. CONTAINING: 9.029 SO FT â€¢/-, 0.207 ACRES ,/- ID PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALEN~ STREET ASPEN. COLORADO /'ll N E.Ph~~.'~~.#E.'.'.'","'.".:E:921Â©N PHONE/FAX (970] 925-38!6 %&34,5,F33=~Hn"~dE~EME'3~Z DATE JOB 4/15 1706 * W ~ 3 52 ALTA 4'50'49 I toO.00Â· BUILIMS DIES NOT ENCROACH till '30OOO3H1 ) 5 011 '3800(>314 9 SVUnem' 1HS,W..100 10ELLIHOHV 3Hi 3 NI63]NIDPOINOI53(]UOâ„¢3Â£ ZOOÂ»-Pr Â· ON NOI-LV001 ~ ZooÂ»-tt : ON 103rOWd 0[18Â·06[f'~IXVJ .ANISCAPE REI 91009 11'53N1Â¥ld %3015 9316dW PAVED #K 1 AND 2 / COURTHOUSE EWPLANE NO. 2 COURTHOUSE VIEWPLINE NO W3NNV1/ ONVI 01(]anssi va NolldIHOS3(] An | 31Â¥0 ON SNOIS!.A3H 00'NESV Â·a X3AblnS ONVI DNI1SIX3 311 ll INIMVE *9 NMVIC] .... ~ LEGEND AND IN U 1 n I O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX CITY OF ASPEN GPS Q-159 7911.98' O STREET LIGHT A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL H paorENTY LINE - - - LOT LINE BEAR INGS BASED ON Cl TY Moil.MENT FOR THE 50UTHEAIT CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1--10 POSTED ADDRESS: 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE' AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHI SLED X'. N 82~06*12-W. 9 GAS METER |O 20 Â® WATER VALVE U.S. SURVEY FOOT . ONE FOOT CONTOURS Â· e CITY MONUMENT 34 5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BUILD/NG HEIGHT CITY OF ASPEN GPS S 7915.94'LIU X ALL~T~IER ~ ~TI~ 1TIES ARE ~N â„¢E ALLEY wÂ· THIS PROPERTY I S SITUATED IN ZONE X- CIREAS DETERMINED TO BE EAST 1 OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE n MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR P ITK14 COUNTY COLORADO, Â· T/ REFERENCED FLOOD MAP IS THE CURRENT FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP Z COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 01097(0204 C, EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 17 79/9 plvEO AVENUE FOR THE COMWUNITY IN WHICH THE PROPERTY 15 LOCATED THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD DISK /JO ~~~ i. R.O. AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963. 25947 Â·88. FIGURE ES-15. H 75-09Â·11-1 PARKING~~~~ Â·Â·Â·Â·... Â·. .~ NO SETBACK REOUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE, REAR No Ul INEATED PARING SPACES S I~ ON ..'~ ZONED: CC (COMERCIAL CORE) WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY 90.29' ~247 LIGHT 7918.2 POST -Â·Â· ~ ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONIENT 5 {7915.94Â· 1 1988 NAVD LAND,%(ME Â® KIOSK COURTHOUSE VIEPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED I N {BRACKETSI 'PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] 17952.61 - I . ARer. VI~WPL~NEE~E~~TI~NiRk:JOSm~TT~EpT~ I SAIE,dV8I,8.31Â·1 [7948.61 {7952.61 CONCRETE WALK 7910.6- R 09, 1 1 Â»W NCRETE WALK N I: Do *TAIRS 29 1 -7919 .1- LANDSCAPED AREA \ VICINITY MAP STAIRS -[7949.7 1 1' - 400 l 790...1 te- 1 914:â€ž 4%. )- /2S 1 1 ,â€¢Tzo l 1 f 7908.7 Vjaa An,3//L BIT/'91/~ :2. 6 5 2922& 2 i :33!23Â¢ 5 3 1 7 u /C :2 / Â¥/14 Â®.--514.23 S.F. / PUBLIC AMENITY BUILDING | u' GARDEN 1 l 1 1 LEVEL 11 1. liE li GARDEN , _ / ROOF couRrrk'/EL 1 M 7954.8 / 1 11 1 e , .8 R G Ill ~2 CERTIFICATION: THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WAS / BILL 2 FIELD SURVEYED DURING ~ AND IS ACCURATE 792 I.3 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 2- EXCLUDED AREA 8,ltiA%&?r6~SR?6?~~D,I?O'i'PME-b' 2Gt &2~&~' SAS~CH~~R~C~ENTS. ~ ~ o EXCEPT AS HEREIN SHOMI. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE&ROUND 0 2 (ABOVE 7921 ELEVATION) APPURTENANCES AND DOCLÂ»lENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE ~XCEPTED. â„¢IS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED ' 5 5 WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN I "Â· iii),0764 ~ 1/15,000. 22.1 ' p. 5 DATED: 4 [796:.31 3 - JOHN M. HOWORTH P.L.S. 25917 4'C l [7956.3 1 11-6 4/C 40 GU~%54 AREI {79/1.2 1 00Â·29Â· ./ r< Â· ui EXSEMEN~ RE~EPT~NAX'TI,9086 > 4LL8F IMPROVEMENET/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY < 8 2~ 07 Of OCK 9 4 DISK 437.---292/ OF ~ z 25947 LOTS D E. AND F. - 7920.0 BLOCK 64, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN ~ [7957.2] STATE OF COLORA06. I CONTAINING: 9,029 SO FT â€¢/-, 0.207 ACRES â€¢/- to PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 2 t 0 SOUâ„¢ GALENA STREET . ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 lit PHONE/FAX 19701 025-3816 2 EAM210Â¥%fi#i'ZEE#12%,~Â· 17= DATE 9/14 EE??, 1,_,g.*16'Er.=: =12 82:0 -le 4 2 - EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY WEa rÂ© CALCULATIONS \-1 3/32" = 1'-0" PA-1 49Â·W BUILDING DOES NOT ENCROACH 9.....,/IND,90,0/.Nit'IN,N 0! I.3/I...... '011'3kl0003Hl )00.00 'AVED COUR-THOUSE V IEIPLANE NO. 2 COURTHOUSE VIEÂ¥PLINE NO'S. 1 IND 2 ~ H3NNV-ld ONV-101 OBASSI VH NOLdibl]S30 AS 31VO ON SNOISIA3H L00tÂ·t"PI ~ON NOI1-V001 ~ LIKX-Vt ~'ON 103rOld 00'NadSV 03MBIABH kLIN31NV 01-lend DNUSIXE] 311:1 INIMVIO *8 NMV .... 7-1 - WETE Al*A II-_ -,0 0 \71:241 1 -3-F~ti,~ _.- ____- , I 0 1 - -0 4-61'f~ *f NET LEASABLE - 50 SF \\ \\\1 NET LEASABLE AREA - 931 SF 1 (LI COMMON - 658 SF . I Â· -Â¢tri 490~--i 2 3.1 92 \ , 2%01 NET LEASABLE AREA - 3226 SF UEOUNPLEVEL d2055 Al*A 9919 50. Ff, it \ 2 1 ---- . r. COMMON - 78 SF NET LEASABLE AREA: 3226 + 931 + 50 = 4207SF COMMON AREA: 658 + 78 = 736 SF 1 K - m PZAWI\165 DY: 5CALE 1/ 41' - 11 @Se PROPEETY MEATEEP CITY PLAZA POILPINu M Z lnE PIMENSONV 911 EA51110PKING AVENLE 8 5 3 - EFENmLEPIMEN510145.COM AMEN, 00 81611 JLLY 20ll EC-1 -~~,"wn#iNqi'&~56'ji~y ~newv) NV-ld BOO-13 NOLLICINOO DNUSI)(3 0!0091I~53Nlvld S]OUSU315dW3O'3' OE[~06Ef~~I)~ wilÂ·,t.I~,gl BAÂ¥ SNI>ldOH .LSVEI LI.9 91/91/8 6~1 *0 ~ 00'N3dSV C]3M31A3H *NNV1d ONVI 01 03nSSI VH SpelÂ·U ~ NOI1/IMOS30 AE 31Val ON SNOISIA3H LOODI,L ON NO!)001 ~ LOOMIL ON 103rOWd 3-Illl ONIMVID .... 4. 24 W .. PATIO - 278 SF i X I - ; 1 NET LEASABLE AREA - 984 SF T' '1 I :\1 4 0% 4 (1 / COMMON - 715 SF---- 1 T 6 - 11~ -94~ 22 2 25 1 / 1 2%/2 =gm: g T T :imi 0 / NET LEASABLE AREA - 2075 SF SECONPFLOOR x \\L, 1 4 /1 1 62055 MEA I 'J i 4,084 50. Ff. 1 r--- 1 3 NET LEASABLE AREA: 2075 + 984 = 3059 SF PATIO AREA: 85 + 278 = 363 SF - -- -- COMMON AREA: 715 SF -\Xt- - 7.'-- FA[10 're '4\ \ PATIO - 85 SF Fl. MA*05 BM. FROFER[Y MEAVUREF: CITY PLAZA @JILPINA 501.E 1/4" - 1' 9 E- RE PIA'ENS0N5 917 EAS[ HOPKINV AVENLE gRk ' Al'ENEEPIMENSPIe,COM ArEN, CO 81611 1LY 2014 EC-2 M '1% /1/faS ZOOÂ»~i 'ON NO!1Â¥00-3 ZOD,rit Â· ON loITC)Hd 011 '3~10(30314 9 SVWOOINVO LHDIUAd00 1031!HOUÂ¥ 3 Hi 3 Hld '-06[ 1~BUXÂ¥J M wo)Â·Djapoi)41-â€ž~,0,T...- E13NNV1d ONVI 0103 nSSI /8 91-8/-/1 ~ -3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS 9//0//8 NOi.LdI6OS3a AE ~ alVa ON 00'N3dSV Oa,643;A361 SNOBIA3H NVId 200-13 NOILIONOO DNLLSIXEI 311 ll DNIMMHO Savaill &*5 52 - 1-1 6- n /1 . -0 1 -/ W 0 4 00 cn 47 - 4 /1/1 g (L- aw m 3= am 10 2 - 0 3 7 --11-- -- lu ' lrÂ· c Eâ‚¬ E 0 0 Â¢9 * FE DRAWING TITLE EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN CAMBURAS &THEODORE, LTD. SCALE: AACHITECTU. i PlmNNG I INI~rlon DES~ I .GIN[EmNG PROJECT NO 14Â·44007 LOCATION NO 14Â·44uu) 24~Â·IE. DEMPSTERST. DESI'~MINE5.IL 01,0~6 ~ DRAWN BY ~ -somil-ofe~m RA TEL(8471298Â·152' ..Wi'90Â·800 '/ . DATE. 8/18/15 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. 1 11.18-15 RA ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVIEWED: ASPEN, CO TT REVIS]ONS osi 1949 0 ALL DRA 'INGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUNLISHED WORK OF â„¢E, ~CHITECT, AND lHE GAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICA7ED. USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT oF :HE ARCHITECT, coPYRIGHT: CAMBURAS & THEooo~F i T. =IS :VahIV NOV\IV\103 =IS 06*9 :VaBV 318VSV31 13N COMMON - 134 SF 512~15Â£OM NET LEA 13 kl.IJ :d*rIEyjW 11218&Id 8/13106 ;INJAy SNI .... PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 18 SF- PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 21 SF 1-/phib-/.' ~ ; FATIO 1 i FA110 '~ ~-1 - p/mo .1/9/I'll'L# - 1 - tas/g.,SESE~# ~ . NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE =33 hz= AREA - 452 SF AREA - 433 SF AREA - 414 SF AREA - 585 SF 6 â€¢ 10 11 3 '* c- COMMON - 516 SF--# ED 0-3 1/ 1 -- 1 - 25 ~ AN.ArmnÂ©42~<23~ 05 3 8% ti Zg 25 1 5% 4 2 [11119 FLOOR 0055 AFEA 2,743 50, Ff ROOF ~ NET LIVABLE AREA: 1884 SF PATIO AREA: 79 SF COMMON AREA: 516 SF = PlaWIN65 BY PROPERTY MEASUliP; CITY PLAZA PULPINd g RE ANEN510% 917 EAST HOPKINV AVEN[E 91Â£ 1/4" - P ASFENMEPIMENSONS.COM A*N, 20 81611 JILY 2014 mgE ER-1 91009 3/1.dS.-15.31'd/30'315 ' DrigÂ·06'N., i i 01 woya~,~04~~~~~'Jft(!Wt'J~AVA' tl3NNV-ld a NYÂ·101 03nssl 'Ad 91-St# , '3/\V SNI>IdOH 19Â¥3 LLS St/81/8 AÂ¤ h VU i NV-ld HOO1:I 1Â¥IlNBOISabl DN:1SIXa 200~M Â· ON NOLLV]01 zookrn Â· ON 133Â·Old 31111 DNIMVEIa 19 NAA ALLEY PROPERTY LINE 1 6 90.29 ITRANS TRANS I L 1 \ 1 1 1 1 11 1 -O"ERED 1 i , Tr ,.:H AREA i ~ liIF 0 [r 3 -!Qlp-- I ~;Â·0 9Â· 333] : : 1 1 â‚¬ 98 - C Z r. f 517 E. HOPKIN-, -UPPER ROOF--, i159 S.F FOOTPRIN' w 10 1098.40 S.F. PUBLIC AMENITY 1 C 1 25 -6 12 22-111/7 J \-1,411 1,1, J . 1 ./ : 14 HplÂ·1 11'll~G 1: 3- 9 31,6 |'14Rll5 jr ft{1111 4.41 ix -- ' -------- -~- illtlidiq|.A <EKK~~p~~tbrÂ·--: 1, lil NOUTX)ORLF.WÂ« 3--4 +111: 111- I~2 :24uul_t: - &41141 DESKifitdthx U-- 41[44~4%3 ~ 4#M[1% 99[43~ til 4 49{442]49 Â· - PUBUC - ., . V --1-- --4=16-14,64 ...=i : .Â·.1 -'Â·6 1-1,4 -Â· 2.-1.- - - ..1. 1 tkft[l 41[Itk <]titk~ 41 I L- i BENCHES ~ ~_BALCONY ABOVE L-soFFIT ABOVE LU AMENITY AREA: GYP.) PARKING-n SOFFIT ABOVE CONCRETE WALK KIOSK 3 < 285.10 SF -LILinT r. ET , cr , 1 ' 1 ..Ar.- 1 .---Â«6<Z Z LANDSCAPE V/ AAN~SCAPE-_~ Kly AREA. TYP xd_.FAVERS. TYP. 2 0- < EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 1 1- i /Â© SITE PLAN A SECOND FLOOR PUBUCAMENITY .* 0 U 1/8"= 1'-0" f 1/8 U 35 h 10 CO 1 PA-2 533 E. HOPKINS ft\\,1, , - I.-' ~WE E -.9Â£ '011'3MOC]0311.P 5VHnBWV) INIU31/9,8./.10.0.INAINININd I ./.In,]. .I//1'5....0'15.315./30Â·31Â·Il Of,U 06{ltri,IxÂ¥~ .Â·862I~+~1131 uloya.opo..........Au, CONCRETE WALK 83NNV1/ INV-101 03nSSI M NOildltIO:% Al mo ON Loork#t Â· ON NollÂ¥007 ~ Loort-t.L ON 103rOkld VId A.1.IN31/,V 3118nd 03SodOUd 31111 DNIMMHa SUBL/8 . . 0 . BOLLARD ALLEY UTILITY METER PROVIDE LOCATION, TYP.n PROTECTION, TYP. 71\ 3Â· CLEARANCE AT ALL SIDES OF Â· 10' - Cr . 9-1117' L ' 45Â·-8/ ~ N 24.5 TRANSFORMER-~ OPEN TO SIC( ' ~ 8.1 L 1 OPFNINIG 1 I 90.29' PROPERTY LINE i\ ~ 11-11 41-110 floâ€ž00Â»91- -4-1 1, f NEIGHBORING ~ m M TRANSFORMER 1r In. 0 \ COVERE |~ 1 TRASH AR[LIâ€¢ ~-~ 21@sc I ; 1 '' C -r- -- 1 . M~ . 17-819 : 0 -- 73-7 d 11 0 2% 5/ 5/ 'g 89 W 81 -/5 2 - mi CL 517 E. HOPKINS O 8,1593.F E LU FOOTPEII.T E5 kin .QI-' - U: I I I : 9 . .1 1 1 1 1 - 72 310 7 - 117 -1.1/ 11 ; Iii. 5 ~L, TYP. = , I 4**td~-7~Â». r- -0 - ---= -Â·f- - -14 11 1 11 " 1.2. BENCHES SOFFIT ABOVE BALCONY ABOVE SOFFITABOVE L L (TYP OF 6) b b PARKING-n CONCRETE WALK 4 ~--uGHT posT 'Li ' KIOSK > < 9-71*91 7.- LANDSCAPE--~ ~~LANDSCAPEU KFACEOFCURB-~ BE USED WITHIN ALL ~ SILVA CELL SYSTEM TO ~.. AREA. TYP. PAVERS. TYP. T.B D. LANDSCAPE AREAS. EAST HOPKINS AVENUE rn SITE PLAN .8 h u 1/8"= 19 kn 4,1 1 e 0 0 A-010 533 E. HOPKINS ON'/#/53 9 01}0Di,11)ueiei,ii, (0[iv~tu~xv) 01Â· 9~009 ll'll/11%]0 15 W}1$d.0 CONCRETE WALK 83NNVId ONV101 (EASSI VB NO[ldIWOS30 AG 31Va 'ON Â£00:*Kt ON NONIV001 ~ ZOO,rit ON 103rOWd NVId 31IS 03SOdOMI 311ll DNIMÂ¥8a 31VOS 00'N3dSÂ¥ '03031A3W EaB ~-n ,------COUR-FOUSEV~~~~~E#2------------------------------------------â€ž ----- gfgpuk- +7952 6 vp <T agMATORS-*-~-.-~---.-Â£OgIR292Ef?RQ*Mk==========--====mam~-------+ ----- -~~~~- ~1_ TPARAPET (31'-0") ~.::.1 f U RASUNG T/ PARAPEr J +7937 4' -= (28'-09 +7930Â·TY I f T/EXISTnNGG E , T/ EXISTING GRADING 17799i, 1' , ~ , - . ~ ' ' 1.PreÂ·NA ~ , . I .' 1,/ ~ I NORTH ELEVAT]ON - VIEW PLANE 4-E /5\ ANALYSIS U~198"=1'-0" ..Â£.g-I,Pl 01, n ~+7937>f---f---~211-----_-2 -----1021HEFEEME212UL_--- --- --- --------_---Â£91RaizuifEE-1-BUL__---- -- ---â‚¬} -u"j â€¢k T/ELEVATOR SHAFT ------ 9497+ 9 +79501 ROOFTOP SCREENING-~~CZEZZIUZZ~~ U PARAPET.Â£- (28'-0") 2-3 T/PARAPET --- - - +7946-2 ~ -7-Â¥7Â§452 TIPARAPET ~1 ~T/~ISTENGGRApE ME~ -11 lili 1 11 7.12 1 -1 2211.-IdL_d[El~ L--11 â€ž 9 --EEZIRTI%112* EXISTING GRADE -- +7911.98 EAST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE 2-tpurIOS - .CIVE?2 _ -~- +79613 --- ,h CHvp2 CHVel u:k- 7--+9527-_ - col]RTIOUSE_MIgiMD'22.--- ---- ---------- ---- m --------8- - 1%563-- 7 --- --- --- 162192222..21&12.KL_--________ ROOFTOP SCREENING (98' n"\ .li T/PABAIZE --- -"L------- - L -U j , +7946.7 -rÂ· 1-- - -- --- - /1 ,k -WPARAPET - - ~ -7-Â¥79452 dk TPARAPET - ' -+79387 ------ 8 ' 1 ' t ' 1 .. ...'...... - Â·Â·1Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· NTIRE ELEVAndN kBUTS ADJACENT BUILDING . W CL 1, W ~ 7 EXISTING GRADE ' -7-â„¢82 - - - - 1 1 1 - .ILIC.iT_.!._ T. 1 1 1 1 ,-2 EXISTING GRADE - +7911.98 WEST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE -ANALYS!.S 1/8" = 1'-0" ~I~--I-IWI-Ii-MiliMI~--I~ 01 4 : ~it 0 CIO 0 . VP-1 0....10/} I./.0.01.31,1, I.,1,#4.1,1 1 38/1)31111.V 'Ort '380003Hi T SVHMWV) .009 -!Ill....." ./d.0 -3 I. Dne 06EWH0XVJ Bweta~I. ....DI.....lik...... 3AV SNI>ldOH -LSV3 LLS WaNNVId ONV-101 OBISSI VH 91-@I-t L NOild IHOS30 *9 31Â¥0 ON 011 '380003,LL' SVUn91'IVD 1HDIUAdor Â·10311/0HV 3141 30 LN39NO0 N3LLJWA 3,u ino,tl,M 039010910 bio) 039/'/31/011dn' 39 ION AVIN 31'NVS 3,11 INV'10311/08'1 3,41 30 >IUOM /3HS'NOdNn 0,~r, 7,Â·NI/1~10 3. ..UINOO NI/83H 1Â¥lk,31Â¥11 14311,HAA ONÂ¥ SONIMÂ¥WO 11v LootÂ®fl ~ ON NOI1Â¥301 LOO,MI Â· ON 103ro}1/ SNOUVA313 3NV-ld MBIA 311:1 ONIMVia 8 NMVGO .... LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED A o. ASPEN GPS 0-159 O UTILITY BOX 7911.98 O STREET LIGHT SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL N PROPERTY LINE - - - LOT LINE A POSTED ADDRESS: Â·517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE BEAR I NGS BASED ON Ct TY MONU'UENT FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1.-10 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CH1SLED X . N 82'06'12-W. 9 GAS METER 0 10 20 Â® WATER VALVE U.S SURVEY FOOT ~ ONE FOOT CONTOURS J 8 CITY MONUMENT 0 CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 ' 3/.5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES WILDNIG HEIGHT 7915.94' W IN~0~2~ ' 0~72 ,?i2s ~W' 1~ THE ALLEY Z Â·Â·..... THIS PROPERTY IS I TUATED IN ZONE -r [AREAS DETERMINED TO BE EAST M'RUW'FNEEA36~~7~uiAew,E~&&6'ZQXJ~LLMI ~r OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN} AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, 8 2 %. 0/. ...... . '470.., 4 VENUE 4)/9 FOR T HE COM, UN 1 T Y I N WH I CH T HE P R O PE R T Y I S L OCA T ED 75 00Â· R THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD DISK /42, 1. AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963. 25947 - 4 Â· ~- FIGURE ES-15. hwat".. PARKING~~Â·Â·-Â· ZOMED: CC {COMERCIAL CORE} WITH HI STORIC OVERLAY NO DELINEATED PARKING SPACES DISK SION ON..-Â·-Â·Â·. .. . NO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT. SIDE. REAR 25947 LIGHT -ho . 79\8.2 POST ' ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT 5 17915.94'1 1988 NAID '~PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEPLANE NO, 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRICKETS] LANDSCAPE Â® KIOSK COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN IBRACKETS ] {7952.61 . 'RelÂ·Â· ~~'~~~-Â·Â· '' . WHERE VIEWPLANES OVERLAP. MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOWN. GROUND- 79182 ~ - VIEWPLANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 NAVD (5.31' ) CHVP1 - 7948.1 (ALLOWED ~Â·EIGHT:30,41 i:Ng::1 1 CHVP'2 â€¢ 7952.6' (ALLOWED HEIGHT: 34.47 CONCRETE WALK 1 7910.6' R CONCRETE 4< / 11.Â» 1. //1/0 0.2/Â· OTAIMS LANDSCAPED 1 1 44* 19\94&7 VICINITY MAP / 7919.1\ STAIRS [7949.71 1~ . 400' 1 1, - -GROUK-7919.1 790.41 - ,",0, y - O-M'1-7949.7 (AUOWED HEIGHT:30.61 -*02L/$/# C W5 - OUTSIDE OF CHVF 2 AREA -2=, GARD. Are . 2 9 1 / I /\ 00/ emic" I Â§Â§. 1 1 1 / 3 OR iii 9 9.2 1 f 1%6 :AL- 3 Z E : 5 1 t' 1 52 M**2 /5.-0 'TE==7;ds.- -2 E a E i 8 69'BUF '3 1 1 & 8/8 1 l STORY 2 Â® - C râ€¢ WI TH --- 0 1 :1 BUILDING GARDEN 1 LEVE I. l l 1 1 1 1 E loop . 1 / / / i -f //791\ 8 0 1 1 mu.iÂ· f f# CERTIFICATION ~ aG 1 THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERT'f DESCRIBED HEREON WAS w FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND IS ACCURATE 0 1 1 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO O SILL DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. 65 7921.3' EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOIN TO ME. e EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND RE-BAR 8 1 1 1 APPURTENANCES. AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED di ~~5,~~SEILOFIE MVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THIN - / 52 DITED: odGAblÂ¥~ 6*7'*1" GROUVDâ€¢ 7920.1' 34.5 JOHIi p.w 1.iQI, RTH P.L.; ~947 - CHVP1 - 7956.3 (ALLOWED HE]IfT 362) {7961.31 6 . 32, CHVP2 - 79612 (ALLOWED HEIGHT, 41.17 , i 2224, j 8 2 Z /60 - w LANDSCAPED AREA GUARD RAI - S 75'09 It [7956.31 6 4/C 7920 90.29' 0 - 0 /796!.2} ./ ~~~69 ~Zgg#9112NLF'T&?Ue ALLEY + A IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY W > BL < rd --- 1 1Â«V-7- 7921 BLOCK A. oF LOTS D E, AND F, R. 0... CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. =GROUND â€¢ 7920.Â¢ COUNTY OF PITKIN 2O [7957.2] CHUPâ€¢1 -79577 Vh.OWED HEIGHT. 36.61 STATE OF COLORAD6. 0- 0 CONTAINING: 0,029 SO FT â€¢/-. 0.207 ACRES â€¢/- O Z- I &1 PREPARED BY lf) ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE/M (970] 925-38 I . E199:N:B,EREÂ©DIi'>?p:ziE7651&,- DATE JOB &&Â¤ 4/IS 170960 2 3,11,5,m=~3e0Ii&Â§fEREK~ SUR'.0.. O E MOWN ~ VIEWPLANE SURVEY - 3/32"=1'-0" VP-2 lulloiNG DOES NOT ENCROACH 1 '3H00 41'9 VHneWV) AND 2 0 COURTHOUSE Â¥ IEWPLANE NO. 2 V;EWPLANE NO'S I B3NNVId INVI 0103nSSI COURTHOUSE 011 '380003H1Â¥ SVUnmNVI :LHDIkLAd00 1031,HOHV 3HI ~01NESNOO N31118AA 3/11/0.1.{13/010.10/003/n'lillind/03/10/ lili 3,Â¥9 3/10]NV +10311/0. '3/1:10>180/03/Sll/nd/noN/-1Â¥NIE)1/03/1/1/111.NODNI/83/1/1/Frl/ N3111/.INV SONI, ./1 rt Â£00Â»-A ON NO,1Â¥301 ~ Loopr,~ ON 1O3rOWd ABAWnS 3NVIdIMaIA '311!1 INIMVIO 8 NM'Â¢kl . .. Observer: Main Street 7906.9 517 E. Hopkins Ave. N~ Observer: Courthouse 1 (Subject Site) Observer: Courthouse 2 7912.32 .. 7913.02 A . 7946 .9 f .9 Observer: Wheeler Opera House 7916.18 . . .....1 7952.32 1 454 / -7 \ . 1 1 1 \ Observer: Wagner Park i , -4-. 7919.73 7929.02/ 1 \ 7962.32 iii\ 7972.32 Observer: Cooper Ave 7926.75 1. . 11' C 7948.la E R Z ! %6 =galâ‚¬ 1 2--24 7956. f8 P i 69/Fi 7956 .1960 f 7966.18 4 4 39 < 'i 7976.18 lf. \ 7986Â·78 t,,7986.1 8 7975.18 Observer: Glory Hole 7947.55 & '. 14. Mountain View Plane Above which no land use or building shall project * * 1911 Height Above Observer 194 I Observer elevation to 30 feet 30-40 feet 14 + * City of Aspen Land Use Code - Section 26.435.050 40-50 feet View planes extend to infinity. The view plane representations shown on this map only e)dend to 60 feet above the observefs 50-60 feet Structure elevation. View planes exist past what is shown on this map. GIS Depa,tment February 12, 2007 VP-3 01,!IU 31~'1!99 DI510 i.*.N Loot.In NON NOilÂ¥001 Zoot.t-*t Â· ON 103rold 011'3 000]Hl lilli'53...530-15 48 NAAVIa U~1!1Â·110[I/~B)*VJ 5 /3NNVId ONV-101 a3nSSI VI 91-81-U , '3AV SNI>IdOH 1SVEI LL9 INWI.LaIC].DOU dVIN 3 NVId AA3IA al.LIL DNIMVIO 91/81/8 31Â¥(] Ee. 0 . . . UTILITY METER BOLLARD LOCATION, TYP.-~ PROTECTION, TYP.7x n-r 17-814 6 90-31/7 ~ 10 -7 9.111/7~ , 47-11~ 1 241-7Â» ~ OPEN TO SKY INA/A _\Â° ' 5- 0' L \ /,1 \ ~ OPENING 9 3 / 11 Lmâ€ž00 16 a -C==~ ~ C 1 0Â®*6030 /1, .i-96 - __~--Ii- 0 .. - MECHANICAL I aE : IR'54*G 71 3=40 / / '' / 1~ Cl~ / /Â«--IC - 4 7 r ' U RESTR -wl-~~ ,- , {DC)bISTRUC - RESTROOM -3 ..4.JUI TENANT SPACE'D' TENANT SPACE 'E' , . 5'El rl En >224 ' CONSTRUCTION i I ; BY TENANT = ME :29 LJL-1 L__1 ~ ~ I (APPROX) B" TENANT -=1 i -OX.) f ..91/7 1 \--WiESF L- u ' 4.-0. 7.-Er .- ~ ~~- P-- COVERED ~ I TRASH AREA 4 14'-61/7 - t2 -6' 35'-10- 34 3' D/, Sil . I I 1 d ,08 . zÂ·,1 1 4 N* r.~ CORRIDOR : 9 Â·8/' STAIR#1 , RESTROOM ./ 1 12 1 1 0 - aj i . CONSTRUCTION 11 UP C_ %=11 1 1 54* i %121 J /- 1 6& â€¢ 1|-L J, F ' Â· 10-51/8- 1 1-71/7 35'-101/8- 34- r 1 1 0, --717: 002 + .iM S I , 1 ty 2 /* 2 2 E R,@98 52:2% 4, 7-817 23'-1017' 24'-1 24' - Z' 11 . 4/ G Z - -4- . I k b W F.ICS e I .... 1-; ELEY. 1 2 LOBBY ~ a, =w:Ge b Â· ELEV. , CORRIDOR - Â· -Â· 3% 1 .ME' TE Â§ *321 1 1 LD . , CD .: 5 3 Te~/ 20 - e 4 r . '.-7-7 / 1 1 77 -4- g ~ -- ' , P 10 - 1 0 â€¢ / . 0 - , p RETAIL SPACE Â·A' RETAIL SPACE'B RETAIL SPACE Â·C' - '29---3 0/0 0/0 093 35'-17 34'-3' , 1 6. m I fi=1 r~ 1 - 1.. ..11=21116-1 / = 1 ' UP TENANT SPACE Â·G TENANT SPACE'FÂ· =I] 9 -: /+ + STAIR #2 /"~- ~ Iliyl ' NI-21 N - w X . '9563 I . 0.1 . . 0 1 992 2 ..:f 1 [03% WOMEN :Â· -/ - I Â· ~-AIR CURTAIN S : b SYNANT < im R ~ 1 -01 AIRCURTAN f I r-AER CURT-ANY ~ BY TENANT ~ BY TENANT In--- 1/U â€¢ O 21-1 ----- -=2=| Â·tilÂ·L- -- BUILDING PROPERTY ----. 18-7 . 23%71/7 OVERHANG 24'-10Â» . 23'- 1Cr PROPERTY LINE - ' ' ' ' LINE 90-31/7 Ch LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN A MAIN LEVEL- FLOOR PLAN ~ U 1/8"= 1'-0" 2/ 1/8"=1'-0 4 K e e 2 em O 0/ A-100. 011 '3~003RL 9 SVI,ng,IÂ¥0 ~1HDIW.dOD 1011,HOWV 3HI 3 Vkinewvi H3NNVId CNV-101 03nSSI NOI1d!B0S30 ON SNOISIA)H 9 ZE, ~ 3AV SNI>ldOH.LSÂ¥3 LI.9 00'N3dSV SNVId "001=I OBSOdO"d LootrÂ·*t ,'ON NollÂ¥001 LOOM,-t [ON 103rOkld 311ll DNU,AVID 31VOS 9~1181/8 -0 U --- Ir 1-, n ri. 101 -01 1 9 ~~ 1-1 9 [@0 1 5 71 k 8'-7 . 00. 0 q 5 lat r--- .0. 17.:, W 9.4 ILLt- -0 1 4 1 5 L-- Â· 1 z ' m 0 1 1 . @i 14'-610 8 2 1 C --. - 218 8 , â€ž 1 18Â·.5- 9 5.0- 74'- 51/7 -R; 4 23'-8 76' - 4 C& h> Im --1 i I I 0/ 4 1 19 : i SLOPE-- ---SLOPE 15' - 0- 14'-0" SLOPE -LOPE I -- 1 1 1 ry-j\\ ---lill- --Ill-- 1 ./ 1-/ - 6 %/ - m i:% 1 1- 6 -SLOPE 1 KL_i_J 1 1 1 1 1 SLOPE-- 1 11 1 1 1- 11 1 0 I O m SLOPE-- in 3 -SLOPE ------- O - F 0 -1 81 . SLOPE -SLOPE / - 1 N 9 -1 EFI X I E m 1 W = 9 0 0 .D m m 0 7 1, 1----7---7----+ZIZI[ZEI~~IEd ... CAMBURAS &THEODORE,LTD. 1 1 PROJECT NOÂ· 14 44007 , LOCATION NO 14-44007, 1 , , :I'll' AACHITECTU.:PLANNIN..I[niOn.SIGNI./.EniNG 1 1.1.|--=tudzzl~~un~zz~1 - .54'.DEMPST./.DES'INEi'MI DRAWN BY: RA | 10 16*TEB,IM,| 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. 11111&15'AISSUEDTON.0/LANNER 'r==1 1 -6 1Ag=WED: TT-= ~ NO,E-BIDISCIPTION~ ~~ -Cambu,a, Ith ofeÂ£om lee I ASPEN, CO ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUNLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND TIIE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED. USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT COPYRIGHT CAMBURAS & THEODORE. LTD. 59-71/2 STEENANT SPACE .ZAOL-.EZ NO FLOOR 99 ROOF ACCESS 3d01S 3dCnS AA0138 ONINMV MO-38 !1 .... , FLOOR AREA, SUMMARY. MAIN LEVEL: 8,785.14 SF COMMERCIALAREA 7.234 27 SF (RED) COMMON AREA: 1,09762 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPED AREA TOWARDS FAR 8.331 89 SF LOWER LEVEL: 9.012.74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6,642.79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2.369.95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9,012.74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF SECOND LEVEL: 8.342.05 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6,503.72 SF (RED) COMMON AREA. 556.67 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS: 1.281.66 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR: 7,060.39 SF TOTAL FAR: 15,392.28 SF (1.71:1 FAR) ZONING INFORMATION AND CALCULAIONS ZONING. (CC) COMMERCIAL CORE NET LOT AREA 9.000 SF (90-0 X 100'Â·0") ZONING ALLOWANCE (21 ) 18,000 SF (2 X 9.000 SF) CALCULAIONS: COMMON AREA: GROSS FLOOR AREAL COMMERCIAL SPACE: 20,380.78 SF (RED) COMMON SPACE: 5,759.15 SF (SLUE & PURPLE} 1097.62 SF EXEMPT SPACE: 10.747.55 SF (PURPLE + LOWER LEVEL) EXPOSED WALL BELOW GRADE NORTH, 0 SF EXPOSED SOUTH: O SF EXPOSED 'r. '' ' ' I , EAST: 0 SF EXPOSED 111 0 11;)111.111-,. Illili, .111 ~-- COMMON AREA: 556.67 SF 1Â¢~f''f WESTÂ· OSF EXPOSED ' Lj NORTHÂ· 90Â·.2 7\ fl f j L i BELOW GRADE WALL AREAÂ· SOUTHÂ· 90Â·.2 a :a n allfh 3 t'.,il EAST: 100Â·-0 r- 1 WESTÂ· 100.-cr 2 485 TOTALÂ· 380-4Â« LENGTH - 1Â« X 29'-e HEIGHT -2 2 1 3'fo *' 2 '~1-, 2 iDUMPSTER#' 11.029Â·-8- SF TOTAL WALL AREA 11-5 2 Z 0 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA el 'EE 0/ 11,0297 = 0% APPUED Ch / 6 0 FINAL FLOOR AREA: W. . Z / ./ I & I 0. S I Z IP'/7//I////. . LÂ«//, MAIN LEVEL = 8,785.14 SF (453 25 SF EXEMPT) 1-70.â‚¬ 4: d ' E SECOND LEVEL = 8,34205 SF (1.281.66 SF EXEMPD CORRIDOR /Â»,07 5 ROOF TERRACE = 0 SF (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) 52*mil / X LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9,01274 SF EXEMPT) .=:.2 44 1 ./ p " CUMULATIVE = 15.392.28 SF (1.71:1 FAR) 0% 8 2 1 S u 'f i.,0.,, 1 -Â· 1 DECK EXEMPTION: Z Â·Â· STAIR #1 1 - i ZONING ALLOWANCE OF BUILDING: 18,000 SF 1 6@lit E DECKALLOW.*ICE: lilli~-2-n 18.000 St X 15% = 2700 SF - ACTUAL DECK PROVIDED: 1,281 66 SF(COMPLIES) ri 1-% 6 943 12Â«-f/ 2 / 4 / 1 SECOND FLOOR BateÂ« i I 111|11 TENANT SPACE im~e :#M V .rl, -. i '01 + 1 COMMERCIAL ...1 11 E J L._â€žjils~~1 1,1//h AREA: 6,503.72 SF B r---n ' fâ€žÂ¢'toBBY RETAIL SPACE 'A RETAIL SPACE Â·BÂ· RETAIL SPACE'C' : ~ L . -, ELEV. 1 35.0.,[ZE] Cm] mil = , lilli 0 . ELEV. Â«221,/, / /1 ~ 1 9.2 11 ' lEN .Â»-r- , U.mil COMMERCIAL AREA: ,03 J i f '724, '~ STAIR#Z / 4/ 7,234.27 SF 1 04 : 11--m 7- ~ ~ 1.64 Â£13' Fifi 'y50 3% :w /1 I 1- '4 l' 0 E=En:, k UP ON ' Â· Z 9 LU STAIR #2 68 ..----#I *--4---11 . .....~----.....===m, / 2-:.lill'll,1141'Ail> 111::1! 4-r 3 > Â£ 41 Â· ~I JPHINLI ' IPPE ~Â· ]11. LF LIE,4 14 241 Â·11'ill I,I ' Ill Illu'11 1 2 11 1 1 Â·r < -1 - EMÂ·.71 III I lilll,i I I~I 2 0 - KEEÂ·,3 i, Ibmihi . Z 7 O 1 lilli 11 11 1 1.1 1 dill ' i 'l lilli '11 1 M dfa 1111 r 32 .-// /H// 11!11': 'OUTCC'gRI 'I~Il I | -f , 1 1111111111 11 1 111 1 1. F%* it 1<.Illilillili~ lili I'lilll It - Zat In,J , - 1111.11,1,111 lili I lili 1 - < 0 1 In 0,1...- 9 1/.9 2-9 In 111 1 1 1 1../'1/1 . ' -4Â·-~LU-LLL 9 4 13. |ir: I OF ~11. 1 LE Fi, |114 40! t|Ef I:.1.1 4 H n- ./ 11/--/54,-i-i~. . 0 , 9 7 / 'W lilli 111 1 , :,10.-ELit 10 . ~ PROPERTY PROPERTY L_ PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF LINE OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: LINE (EXEMPT) 1,281.66 SF (EXEMPT DECK) - : 0 rÂ© MAIN FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .,4 41 SECOND FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS m U 1/8"=1'-0 \29 1/8" = 1'-0" U V B&W FAR-1 iÂ®*21%4 H3NNV1/ ONVI 0103ASSI NOildl80930 SNOISIA3B 011 '380003)41 9 SVWneP,VO '1HE)18!Ad00 10 al,HOWV 3HI *) 1NaSNOO N3 Ll,WA 3H1 InOHWA 039010SIC] U. 03% 1031Volldn{] 39 ION AVW 31,1VS 3+U 0!fi'13311110WV 3HI 30)0:10AA 03HS,INndNn ONÂ¥ 1Â¥,119180 3Hi 31nl,19Not) NI3~3H1Â¥1831VI'll N31.LIUM ONV SONIA V80 -11V SNOI.1-VlnO,VO hIVJ- SNVId HOO-13 3-Ull DNVAVWO 91/81 9 a3M3IA38 FLOOR AREA SUMMARY: MAIN LEVEL 8785.14 SF COMMERCIAL AREA: 7234.27 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 1,097 62 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR. 8,331.89 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.01274 SF COMMERCIAL AREAÂ· 6,642.79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA: 2.369.95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9.012.74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR' OSF SECOND LEVEL 8,342.05 SF COMMERCIAL AREA. 6503.72 SF (RED) ~-- COMMON AREA: 2,369.95 SF COMMON AREA 555.67 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 1,281 66 SF (PURPLE) (EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FARÂ· 7.060.39 SF i TOTAL FAR: 15,39228 SF (1.71 1 FAR) ZONING INFORMAION AND CALCULAnONS MECHANICAL ZONING: (CC) COMMERCIAL CORE 4Â»Â»0 NET LOT AREA. 9,000 SF (90'-Cr X 100'Â·01 r~-1 I~:..1 : ZONING ALLOWANCE (21) 18,000 SF (2 X 9.000 SF) CALCULATIONS: L TEDIA,&*rE Â·AÂ· j; ~. Â· ' ~.0'. I/ TENANT SPACE B GROSS Ft.OOR AREA [=1 COMMERCIAL SPACE, 20.380.78 SF (RED) COMMON SPACE: 5,759.15 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) EXEMPT SPACE: 10.747.65 SF (PURPLE + LOWER LEVEL) MEN'S 020 EXPOSED WALL BELOW GRADE i>$2:2.9494.9..AÂ·~~i NORTH: 0 SF EXPOSED SOUTH, 0 SF EXPOSED 05%'/ EAST 0 SF EXPOSED WEST 0 SF EXPOSED : 94614///110 11. 1 11 1 111 . 11 1111 STAIR #1 1 4 BELOW GRADE WALL AREA: NORTH: 90-Z $ L SOUTH: 90.Z 7-a:'A EAST: 1OCy-Cr :429 :I'll -1 Â¥3-TRE 5Â§54- LENGTH *ESÂ· Te,Ir F>"Ae ' COMMERCIAL AREA: ",f~ ~ ~' ~ X 29 / HEIGHT 1! 11,029'â‚¬* SF TOTAL WALL AREA Â£ 0 SF TOTAL- EXPOSED WIALL AREA . ' 6,642.79 SF (EXEMPT) 0 / 11,0294- 2 0% APPUED 1 FINAL FLOOR AREA: Vill/f"j i MAIN LEVEL = 8,785.14 SF (453.25 SF EXEMPT) 4 ROOF TERRACE = 0 SF (1.281.66 SF EXEMPT) ati, 1 LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9,012.74 SF EXEMPT) ... SECOND LEVEL=8,34205 SF (1.281 66 SFEXEMPT) CUMULATIVE = 15.39228 SF (1.711 FAR) /481 I DECK EXEMPTION: .WEE' E / ZONING ALLOWANCE OF BUILDING 18,000 SF ELEV. ~ CORRIDOR DECK ALLOWANCE: 1 911] 18.000 SF X 15% = 2,700 SF -- ACTUAL DECK PROVIDED: Â· 1,281.66 SF (COMPLIES) ~7T-7~--TÂ·r,7,Â·Â· /997 1. //, / .. .. . ..1 lifEL),(1/. am 911<lil, Â·Â· A--~ 1 TENta[T SPACE 'C' TENANT SPACE Â·D' UP STAR 02 // - 2/ WOMEN'S / ' U ... Â« 03>f LOWER LEVEL -FAR CALCULATIONS .8 1/8" = 1'-0" t % FAR-2 9Nllj33Nlo~f]INDI51Â¤Uoil,]iN{I 31Â¥09 'all '3110003 1 SVHOUWV 9 l.00 'll '53.IVId S. "//5 W.3 1 01/10,0.44'UL"Inqw B3NNvld ONV-10103nSSI 4 SkÂ·8Plk ~ '3AV SNI>ldOH 1-SV3 LLS St/eL/8 NOildIUOS30 *8 alva ON LOOKIN ON Nell~'001 ~ LOOP,Â·PI ON 103rO}dd SNOLLV-ln01VO UV=1 - NVId Hoold 00'N3dSV 03M31A3W -3-ull SNIMVUO AS NMVIJO Ear .... NET LEASABLE CALCULATJONS MAIN LEVEL: NET LEASABLE AREA- 6,349.29 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 1 367.57 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MIAIN LEVEL 6.349.29 SF LOWER LEVEL: NET LEASABLE AREA 6.244.56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2.158.82 SF (BLUE) SUBÂ·TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6,244.56 SF SECOND LEVEL: NET LEASABLE AREA 6.248.26 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA- 507.23 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: 1,146.33 SF (PURPLE) SUB-TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 6,248.26 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE: 18.842.11 SF ~--- NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: - NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 1,367.57 SF 507.23 SF (EXEMPT) .\A/07%/ 71 1/ / */ I , 1 p 4.6Â¥4..4-6:44Â£.4.4 4.4.4-4.Ad ..4--4-4..4 -44 1Â·.*wL-"L-'.4 'd'' ''' 0'' '' 1 0 4 111'* T li r,04,>f j 1 y - 43 I 13 --ig:. I . ! f . U . It / i il==6Â· ct / 1. r i ' 4,Â· ve rl.1 2 lt, Â£ / t-, -vght \1 , . 1 / CORRIDOR 1 // 33 9 1 , -44, /, / DE~/n ~ 1/ 0Z :i i i / .C 5 0 40 **1 1 5 4 .1 4/4// 1 , -- 035 %541:dE ff 1 "E % E: E SECOND FLOOR ' 55 52 ' t.-14-1 4 1 ill] .. TENANT SPACE 5 : *7: f fi) , *E f NET LEASABLE . 1 1 - 1 -1 STAIR#1 , , E ~ e. AREA: 6,248.26 SF ~~ LOBBY ~' RETA]~ACE'A' RETAILSPACEÂ·a F"LSFACEÂ·CÂ· ~ I . 1 -a.EV. . 'br E [39 [1*] le] ' , / 1 @83 r!11, , gy 1:4 : L_-12 40. a im NET LEASABLE : J AREA: 0 //4. u 1 //f''l, 9. 6,349.29 SF 5 il ./ ' 0 , /1 , --1 , : m --9 3 EMA U!, ------ DN I , 2 W 3 24 2. : - UP 'ON 1 1 -9 .// /'42 P I STAIR #2 - 0 , =1 .,1 - r ... ..n T,7 -ar ' . U 11* -4. - . 1] 1] Â«4, j>/ ELUI]111113 Illil 1 li : LF . vi NP41.4. i . *...2.~ 1 7.-Â»Â« 5 â‚¬ .}!ilitl~ -i p I I, - 1.- 1 :11 - /Â«/ 2,// h'111111 11 1 1 lili 1 -~ 1.Â·".ili,[ili'i! I i i,1'' i 090 / 1 1 1 j 0 Z -lili 11 11 11 111- r ,~ 1: Il , '.ol]Tt)00* ';'''IÂ·'1 : IE Â· lilli Ell 1 ~ Ill ./. .9 1111'11 8 Illilli I i i ft'll 111'll'ilill ill.; -21 6 I 4049 2~jÂ®FilÂ®944Â» 04% w /4% tri-Â· , .-1 - Â»_55- f f & w lili I ~..~~Â·~~-Â·, 1 ~.~4 ~Â£41.Uj' - -~Â· 1 OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: 3 4 -7 PROPERTY LINE . PROPERTY UNE PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF 9 1,146.33 SF (EXEMPT DECK) - (EXEMPT) SECOND FLOOR - NET LEASABLE .N MAIN FLOOR - NET LEASABLE A CALCULATIONS rÂ© CALCULATIONS .rq f 1/8"=1'-0" U 1/8" = 1'-0" V 2/e O 0 N L-1 Yun 8WV) 318VSV31 laN - NV-ld HO01=I lon9 11'53Nlvld$]0'15ellSAÂ·,30 31Â·,I H3NNVId ONV-1 01 OBASSI 011 '380(]03,U 9 SVW NIVO UWDIU.'â€ž100 '103LIH0WV 3HldolN39NOO FUIUM 31111/0,11,.03SOIDSIC 80 0390 '03!yoll,InG 36 1ON AVI'l Brivs RHI INV '132Luok , 3HI =10 >,80. 03HS,1NndNO ONV 1Â¥N,Dial aH.1 3LnlÂ¢1SNOO N,31,3H lVIWALVIN NaLLIWM ONÂ¥ SINI, VHC 11 Â£0044-41 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LE 9//81/8 31111 DNIMVHI :03MBIABEI .... NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS. MAIN LEVEL: NET LEASABLE AREA: 6.349.29 SF (RED) . NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 11367 57 SF (BLUE) SUBTOTAL MAIN LEVEL: 6,349.29 SF LOWER LEVEL_ NET LEASABLE AREA 6,244.56 SF (RED) NON. UNIT COMMON AREA 2,158 82 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6,244.56 SF SECOND LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,248.26 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 507.23 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: 1,146.33 SF (PURPLE) SUB TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 6,24826 SF ~~----- NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 2,158.82 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE. 18,842.11 SF '/0 MECHANICAL # t.*Uti:<Aj~ , ///././ ' 11 11110,11111 1 11 ..f Â«94:3~ TENANT SPACE A TENAI~*CE 11Â· Â£ 4- 050 1111 0 / 1.6 MENÂ·S lili 0/, 2 :/4 STAIR#li=j- 1 4 9- . 0 1 8 , COMMERICAL * p. - OF ~ AREA: 6 244.56 SF =3 S 1 5 i & -9 - 119 IMi \ /1./ . 1 . .L. , --- : 2-21 4 21= 0% 2 07 2 4 2 " 4 44 ELEV. 1 CORRIDOR ~ ~ - E3 . t 41, 0 .,1 lili 4Â» /9/ I ./If/20 11, 1111 lili 49 934 / TENANT SPACE Â·C' TENANTSPACEÂ·DÂ· i 7 a 12* [m] UP /4 STAIR #2/'~- .4. 44 .:G~.>511792 /ff ,Â»f 996 / 92Â»./ , 94 WOMENÂ·S I'llifilit. '11 & 1 Zi r / ////4Â»/Off .: -M-~44~4~12 :f~tÂ»...Â· imm.g:EEIMMME~mw~g.,rim#MMMFMMMkmac LOWER LEVEL - NET LEASABLE ~ ~~MI'ONS ~ If) 10 LU NL-2 011 7180003,11, SVUner,VO :1HDIk,Adoo Â·103~IH0HV 3HI 3, 11'3k1OOO3Hl, 5VklneWV) 318VSV3113N - NV-ld HOO-13 Wo)Â·Ji.PO')4)Pul!,eln~~WIDAW 31VO 1' Â· I. 15.]1$./.3//2 HaNNVId ONÂ¥10103ASSI Vwl Spet-ti L 3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 L NOI.ldIHJS30 *8 31Â¥0 ONI 00 'NadSV Â·<33*tal,138 SNOISZA3H LOON-M Â· ON NOTIV301 LOO,r,t Â· ON 103rOHd 31-LIL DNIMVya AG NMVIO REFER -D KEYEDNOTES NUMBER KEY NOTE 1 IPETERSEN BRICK. KOLUMBA SERIES, KI. 2 IHORIZONTAL WOOD PLANKS, FINISH (TBD) 3 'PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL. - 4 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAILING, PAINTED. 5 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING. 6 PREFINISHED METAL OVERHANG. 7 EXPOSED STEEL COLUMN. PAINTED. 8 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL, EQUALLY SPACED PANES. 9 STEEL BEAM WRAPPED IN PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL, FINISH TO MATCH STOREFRONT. 10 I STEEL MEMBER, PAINTED. 11 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT. T/O ELEVATOR 12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 1 SHAFT _ - _ - 13 ROOF LINE 14 ARCHITECTURAL CAST STONE 15 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH. rj UPPER_PARAPET_ - _ 16 BUTTÂ·GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM. ROOF 17 PREFINISHED METAL COVERED ENTRY. CAP**ER - 26' - 6" 9/ 18 r CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED 14 .2 1 1 1|CD Fi -311 1-1-=-r-=-11 -102 1 T.O. AILING /1 191-6 5 -- 1 SECOND FLOOR ~7-3W-36;; -- ~~ --+.-+.*.*-+*-*. ----- B.O. l:INTEL 1 /) -- - - 1 2-8'C/ 1 B.O. LINTEL 11'11 3/4" .Â£24 . - 10 1 .Â·I - hi:L. *._ - 1 EXISTING EXISTING BUILDING - BEYOND ~ (N.I.C.) BUILDING (N.t.C.) - ..9Â»4 1 P â‚¬*1 Â£ ~4% . J | rh FIN. FLOOR i ' 6 3/16" =1'-0" 55 R e 22 & 5 31% 3 5 3 T/O ELEVATOR _SHAFT *Fl f-MECHANICAL SCREENING 31-76Â«, ---- - - -\ UPPER PARAPET Â£ Z 28-0"1/ 0 ./--1.. a .1.5449 - -~ PARAPET Â£ ~r- 45:538*4/, -- 1 27' -0" 1 ,/5 & 6 ofÂ» -----3--------2_-inin__uu 1/ 'U'Of /5, --Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·-Â·-â€ž-Â·-- --Â·-------Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-â€ž-- - - T.O. RAILING L 18 19' -6" d/ . 1!1 24. I fiftÂ«9 --~-~ - --~---' - - ----'-~-' 3 g SECON DFLOOR 0 24~" .<55'49.0."=*1 .:.LILi-~2.13*2._1~ 1 16'-0'11 :/1111 - O '- -/- --Â·p,â€¢ADJACENTBUILDING-0-770719/57 - u- Z WiNNP L 11' -11 3/4" L.r 17 LU TRASH ENCLOSURE 4Â»~9103-,4:492. . -- - 5 h- --- *-9 - E---- T 03 6/3/f,t Mo 0- 0 ;111'llilij"lliti TRANS Â· Â· U) FIN. FLR. SPACE W An 0 < --O,---83i7Sy-~7 ~ -EASTELEMATION - LO ~/ 3/16"=1'-0" LO d 8 M W A-211 9./.DN] | N./.0 U.I.. | I. N.. '011 '38O0O3H11 ./.'NI'll,30-/ Of'./E....' VB 41[~u0$ein(,wei bl3NNÂ¥ld ONÂ¥1 01 03ASSI NOILd IHOSED C rl '3 8000314 9 SVWne lyÂ¥0 : 1 HDIHA/00 10 3/HO HV 3. :IolN3SNO0 N31.LIB,M 3HllnOH.i,A'~ 03Solo}SK] HO aggn '031,0[ld,10 38 ION A,W DerVS 3Hi ONIV'1031!HOHV aHI =lo >nIOAA 03HS,1Nnd,In ONÂ¥ 1VN,9,80 3Hi 31nlllSNOO N!3 H3H 1V,HliVI'l N311,MM ONV SONLMVUO 11Â¢ ZOOM'-P[ ~ ON NON0O1 LOOH.-t L :'ON 133rOk,d SNOI.LVA313 Bolhlal.XB 0390dOhld 3-Ull DNIAAÂ¥H(] AE] NMVUD ... REFERENCEDKEYED NOTES I NUMBER | KEY NOTE 1 I 8"CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED. 2 PREFINISHED METAL- COPING, 3 ]BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH 4 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING ~-MECHANICAL SCREENING SHEET_Â£ T/O ELEVATOR ---- 1 I i I 31' - 0" \Â·l/ =rill --- - T---TLF || 41-TÂ· Â· - i - 28' - 0" L./ F - i 4Â«4.; ER:Â».24 J KIL' 2.313 :1!-TI'-IK 2 1 - b ~-li__11-l!. \ PARAPET /1 lili:1 111 ~Â·'~ INLIU 1-2-~-rE--~Er---.Z~' ~ 1 1 1~, 1 7 1 j. 1 1~-- 1 1, t ill ~'111 1 - 27' -0" C// , l[ T -Tr 14-)1 ' 111-~- i. 1 - 111 ~,!.-Â·T~~-1-[1 -T...11- -J--1-1. ----Â£--.-~---~t-i-i~-,~ 1~1 ~1~.11~111-~~~~~~~ --i l.~.1.3 ~-~ L, 1~ T ~ ~ -i.2-Z ~T'~~ 1 ~]~~..fli~L_I ~._r~ ~~ -i-1.-1 i I . - -T--1-1 'I Â· -7-'-rn 1 -- 1~ -- -1-~ - --- 1 3 -: 1 1 -- , -T~T- -- k I~ .; 1 . 36* T-- i ,-~ ---i ' _. i 'f r~I- 71-11.~.2.2-1 ~r.,LT-T---]n-{-i -Tf-HÂ· i :~ ..., !.Il L - '21217 FL 11: SECOND FLOOR 113-7-i r---1-T 1- T - Li---7+-i -211_- 21Â« I Â· Â· 1 1 1-_1_Li-J _I ' ._- I 1. ''L IT-.-Tli T , ~ --)F-TL -T~ - - T-I-'1:-- 22~iJ--Ti-1.~i~~~-1 ~F 3 1 1.1!~.1-7--1| :~_L_L~_L ~_i~[ ~'~_.~r=-=~9'Cl;os~E......- B.O. ALLEY LINTEL /A 11 11'-1.....Tli (35.L;-:EL....2,1--;I. ~ '~ i-- '. 1 1 : 1 * I |- ~- a j |, 1 |11 -_lr.7-11_1.-1.-1 -Tl_lrl Ll--TL1..1.... J 1 T! ~4L--14 - ~ ~ I , l 111 .111,1 Ill , i 1 ' ' 7--~ 1 11 1 12'Tr 1- T _~~~~~~ 1 1 I~ ~~~~I. ~f~-,~J_.'1 ~: 1 1 1 1 1 - - 1 11 1 71 -'-L T~Td_1_..1.-~1_ ]--17 ---n - .... Â· - ~TRANSFORMER 1 -7.' ie 1 '--1-1-7 .Â·1-L-i.Jit..~_ ~.._4- 23~-~i'-~ .-_ _.._ ~ - 1 I' 1 -NEIGHBORING L TRANSFORMER 1 1 FIN. FLOOR 111 111 -79 1Â»mâ‚¬mthilimemgmâ‚¬m*EntÂ«Erniffwmwatful u I-h itlj:}EATH:H:ffhlifFEMEEVE*-193%464*RE, j i~~1FLuffilhli 6-,al,-IHf:~Emue ~yj Sou!11 v 3/16'=1'-0 f-MECHANICAL SCREENING f-OUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING 1 U PPER PARAPET Â£ ,<D 1 & 78'-0" \J / ------------------ PARAPET /1 -- - - ~T~l~~-~_1~2.j|~_ fl~~-1.~7~I \ ~ni 371111-f- 1 -7'F) -~ ~~~97~i-ru-r--~ 27'-0/ 1 1-'1 111 J 1 1 1 1 1,Ii-,1 ~.-71---- lj'1-4-71-1-.1--.JT---T-Ll-lT-T~~-~r'TT- 11 1~ 'i'1 1,1 I t ,- LFIL. 1-3-7--: ,-1 1 -T-' 'j'i CD- 1 I 1 ' | | I|||Ir| ; |11 1.-111-TIll.[\1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili lilli f' 'I 1-i I lilli I.i'~ 1 1 1. 11 11 1 1 111 1 JI j 1 ! 1 , 1 L .. i :i ' 1- Il, 11:._'i'1' 11 I' |1 1,~ 4 ~'I' '~lij.'I 1 1 , I. 1_i T t. J - l. ,1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 i T I~i~ ~j~,~i~ ~-7111111111 1 '1'~'~| 1 i .~....i i...~-i-i-[-~-~~ ,~-7,~19 T 7'-lm -T~~-~~1~~-1 1~ ~~ i_~.1 1~-~~-~~,~.-i-:1~--~ 1 -1 '1 ~irT Â· 1 Lflut' ~ i- -~ 1! - ~ T-'I~--r~'7 1*1-7' 1 4 ~-1 ~ 1:-lit...1.ti--~-{T fiji " ~ ~ 7-~T"~"T ~ ~-rlf~i-~-1 -Â· ~-~--Â·Â·1'~ ~~ i~ -~-,-~ T'-~ -li~~T~T-~i~I~~-J-T--,,1 1- I~ '-~4i ~ I[ ~~~- ri_i - fECOND FL60.0ORÂ·Â·4 _ 1 4 rl T ~ ~_~~_ I 1 111 1 : : T i T ) ~ T~ 1171 ~ 1 -11-~-1-~ L L l, t ~~ 1 ~ â€¢ ~ 1 ~ - ; 1 ~ ~~ 71.~.~-1-1.i ' ~ - ill T ~ . i : i k :-4 - 1+ 21_-1-~ 1 ~ 1. ' ' _- 1 _L__L __1 ' ' r T I 1 ' 1 7Â·-1 Â· '11 lilli I\11'lili-1 --- 1 > 1 1 1 1 7_L.~ i 1 -FUNT ~_. 1 - - i 1 [ I i i 7 1;' 1 i~T i i j i ' 1 -: 1.1 11 -i T-lil_'L_2_13 -' L fÂ·rEE-IrrÂ· Cr,[TIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDILe 1 . 711 li~ 'Â·T' i F__in L~i _1~ 1 -.1 1 . I~I-- r-7-1 1 I J\- 4 . :44 1.1 ' ...F = ,Â·'i Â·'Â· j' . 1 1 1 T 1 1 i1 lilli 1 , 1 I=-~-Â»1114=f->T TiI,Ii:~~~-T IT IT 2 ~ I ~-rf , ~~~-~~-{11-- ~-i~-1~-0 -i-t~1\1143-HJE ~~ ~Fi__ii I J lii'! 1' | 4 /1-.i~! 1 1~ r i ~.3.-1[ 111~1~1 ) E--}I ]. 0- 0 lilli ' 1 1 1 111 lili lilli It 1 .ill ZE O Z- 1,II 111 111 111. 111 lili |l'l l L_L..,111 1!IiI 1:lili 11{11-L-,1- .â€ž ~ 1_.1__L.â€ž.._..,.... 1 - 1,~TI~T_~~1~i'-~ltIL-~ 7-~1-~--$ ~-~-~ ~-~~ 2 ,1~ 1~-T ~ T < 1 1_T -<1~ T ~~ ~ 1 'th~L-_1_~__-----T -LIzl-_t-fin_-:--1-1--Unit_- 1- ~~-_244-34-3-4----1.- ./ T -1 1 1 1 1 T.-1-1-]1 Ir -7-T i, irilil ~ di'1,1 '1'14'' '11 111-1,1 1 ~111-11 -111-111-1 -1 1-11 - 1 I_H I-H I_H I=H '=1 H=H I=m=11 'ZE=I HE~11 lei Ul' ..12, ~ "I I'lEI A l 12.1 Ill i lei 1121 T- ID A West 29 3/16"=1'-0" 60 a A-212 011 '3110003H19 SVIIABWV) giong /Â·53//1J5]0'll//W.... woy/'01~41/"inliwey".4 011'31K)003,4.1 9 SVHrIWIVO LHO,8.4100 1011!HOUV 3HI j 10 UC~iNI|0~N~1JI./3]Ill,~HV 31Â¥09 0{I'Â·06[ t./*V' 581Â·9.I# /1 VH 533NNV1/ ONÂ¥10103ASSI 4 91-81-IL NOI1dlyOSBO Ae 3190 -ON 03AA31A3H SNOIS!A38 L00*t41 ON NOIIVOO1 ~ LOOktl ON 133rOkid SNOI1VA313 2101831)(3 03SodOWd 311 ll SNIMVIO E NMVHO Â®%10Â©10@0=01 + SÂ¥*1((1]EMIÂ¥3 SE@Z O 1" 0 4 , 4 - Â·3 - I .,L I 04 -/ ~rÂ·* f- 17 4 I . FÂ® i , i - h .+ 44-â€¢ 6 T ' 4 *> 9 - t./ f ' .0 -- ItÂ· 1 , I '1: - - \01 C.'Al 3 24 6, If 4,14 I .\ 1 . 6.Al f - '41 , I. 11 fl IiÂ· INF, "4 4 0 -- Firt - 4,1 4 Â¥ at- r r. . X -/..... #lt' I h 16 k 11 1 lilill f R:Ii I - 1 1 1 U,lk 0.* A 1, ,j jill ili 'i, 1- . 1 l,i, ~ ii 1 !05 - l G + 2 111 1 +4 I 1 b - :4 ~ 2.11 1 111 11. kill 1% . f j: . 1 1 P 1 r .. 1 : < '/J . 42\<* 4 ' 1 1.1. , P 92 4 11,1 & .'. 'al SI, , . 41 34 h P '19 ,4 1 4.11 , A & Â¢4 â€¢ 11 ' 1. * -9 :.; f . . , i g. AW ~ t, " let 91 P 9 't? 8 2 -' 4 .: #/ ' I .9 :,/4 .1'' i - - 1 1 NU Â·23Â·,1 1! e r 'I. â€¢ 1 - i :4/ ./.: .1'il I i, 1 1 , 4414 .1 .1-1 I 6Â« Y'l k. '.,3 .. f. I 1.1 1. 1 i k /1 1.,7 , # Al,E 41 .1 4 .9241,1 9%44 9 7 .7 4..J. a .'Y ....|~ ~ Â·Â·IfÂ· / k ... 4 2* T W 1 4 . 1 v 1 .U,1. A. 19 ''.. t :4. 11 2 . 4 4 f MÂ· 4. - 0, 0. 1,1 . 1 ' Â· .. 1' 0 + ' f# A ..h i f . i ./ i 4 > 4 ' + 4 f '70] 4 r >1 .1. 40 - , '41 411 '2] 1 + C f- au :. I. 0 . .. .1 - 2 14 4 1. + Â· -4 th k it U. 4 7 ti, e - .4 ; 1/.1,: Â·'/~-A -~ 1 e i *h - r \ , el 1 - -1 :Â· I ~;.â€ž~ -*Â· . t' 1 1 * /1 T#T~ , /' 4*424 ' 11 -'Al , 4.7 . . Â¥ 9 1.: \ 1 1... 44\1:44 i.... ,~h Y~131,4.t .1 1 2:634* .63 , ; 4 , ~ t .1 9 6 . illin' 4 +41\ g *s Â·Â·Â·, Â· \ uÂ·X '< \. . ; 'j Â· 1 ' ,;41'i I .:. .:/11 ijl : Â· ' ./. . 11 M' b 1 . , 2 - REFERENCED KEYED NOTES â€¢ NUMBER KEY NOTE 1 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK. 12 RUNNING BOND. OF-5 OlA "8 " 2 PREFINISHED METAL COVERED ENTRY. 3 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAILING. PAINTED, - 4 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING. 5 EXPOSED STEEL MEMBER, PAINTED. 6 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT. 7 TERRACE LINE. 8 BUTT-GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM. 9 CMU, PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED. 10 PREFINISHED METAL. COPING. 11 EXPOSE[) STEEL UNTIL, PAINTED. ELEVATOR 12 BRICKSOLDIER COURSING. 13 BOARD FOR"IED STAINED CONCRETE ~ 31'-Or ------- 14 NATURALBUWINGSTONE 15 NATURAL BUILDING STONE PARAPET. 16 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK, STACK BOND. 0_*zER.-PARAP:76 -_ -- - ROOF ,~ 19 -rEMPEREDGIASSPANEL 17 RECESSED MODULAR BRICK PANEL. 18 FLUTED CAST IRON COLUMN. 20 ACCENT LIGHTING. IV 27'-0" 21 Bul~INGSIGNAGE UNDERSEPERAm PER~T 22 PREFINISHED METAL BRISE SOLEIL - 1- 3 77771- T.O. RAIL_.~1 1/4 71 - 19 rk SECOND FLOOR | r.Â£ 1 11 /1 B.O. LINTEL --*- -=*== tr-TE==rr-11 â‚¬377113/4" BUILDING 1 7/'ll ./.- '-il=b- I Iki=.:CE}:i:,1 (N.I.C.) BEYOND fuU|O|nTRWUM,~I (N.I.C.) HO /4:.1 I - 1/lippr. 13,1 IEF-*4 1, " liz Lj 3/16"=1'-0 ELEVATOR TMECHANICAL SCREENING OVERRUN /1 3 - -IEZEZEEI 3.~ A --1 GO') a. U> - \ UPPER PARAPET *I- K4~~147,~ - r. ---1=Â«mezf 27ry0 r===uzz~zzz~~~~LZE~ZE=ZEIZZE=ZZLE==I=~==1~L:~.=== -fi . ....... IZESIOZSIgiVqi*JW _ T.O. RAILING .\ 1Â¥Ty-7 , LU :: TEL:.~ -â€¢ â€¢ar-â‚¬Â·iÂ·+ â€¢SRE-2Et-F l 16' - 0" ------ADJACENTBUILDING - Z B.O-LINTEL *I) EEiEÂ»E3Â· - O - 1- U.- i-- -Irm*17.- TRASH ENCLOSURE - - 11'-1134"E' Ul > iIÂ®Duy= 15.SAJE (0 Z M o F~96-4-r 0- 0 -_:L~~..24-1- TRANS OZ **2 ===A *ZIâ‚¬j r W -- mvEUm il tÂ· i,tto FIN. FLR. SPACE-W '*4& 1 0' - 8 31/32 11 ./ ridERPOSED-EAST-ELEATION 10 U 3/16"=1'-0 - ID 4 - ' OPTION B -21 Â·011'EVOC]03H1,SVBRAWV SNOLLVA313 GOIbla 0350dOW x t) LOot'*41 ~'ON Nllil 001 Lootit-IL ON 103r0bld . 911]0911/3141...1./.1430'3â€¢5/ 0[10*rv, 52511,6CU,9)131 1, 4 3 wo,0,/00â€žipue:e~n,iluu- 83NNV-Id ONVI 01 03nSSI SNOISIA38 011 '3~10003,41 99Â¥Unemo Â·LHD,b,AdOO 1331!HOWV 3HL 30 LN3. NOI Nall,UM 3,Â·tlinoHI,Ail~ 03901.Io U. 039/ 'OEUVO,ldno 311 ION AVI ./.9 3/1 ONÂ¥ '1031'/0/V 3/1 30 >I'OM C.HS.N.IN' IN' 1Â¥NIE,/0 3/1 El'llis/00 NE]I'll'llall P 'f ',221 ... REFEFf~MCED KEYED NOTES OFT\oN"B 1 CMU, PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED. 1I NUMBER | KEY NOTE 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 3 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM - STOREFRONT FRAMING. 4 EXPOSED STEEL LINTEL. PANTED. 5 HAND MOLDED MODULAR BRICK, 1/2 RUNNING BOND. 6 NATURAL BUILDING STONE PARAPET, 7 INSULATED STEEL DOOR. PAINTED. ELEVATOR ~--MECHANICAL SCREENING OVERRIUM lilli. 31' - 0" L.lv lillill UPPER PARAPET *A ---T -2..i- i---1- ..i...2.. }. ~22. 6-1 --1--3.3--2 ; -LIJJ-~_f~-'"l.I- ~T Z T T 1 j_i--~ 28'-0" 0 ~_.JIL_~.L~1-~-417-~T- I.,I-Â¢72-- 11--:i ; 7~- ,,I#,TZ--9~ ~ 2 ;-- -~ , 1 41- lr-T- : r-hh;-1 i ~ Â·ri-T T i,_-r-,-~a -7--- I i'. ; ~- I|- Lr-T rli' \ PARAPET.Â·,, 27' -0- 1 1 I.-5 Â·Â· 1~~) I.1.-I-- r .I~| ~0|- I~ T--*4+1 4.-1'- Â· 7i ..] 1-- L-1 --, - 1 i .I , 1.-1 ! 177-1-1- _...IZZI~1 L T-f-t-- 11' 117 1 111~ IT '11 11 -b 1 71]1 LIE~_1_L'i~......L L~1.-1 1 ..1 lili 1 r 1-1 11 -1. 11Â·11.7 Â· ,-;'1 -1 1.1. .1 1- I',' 1 - T T--T ' -1 -- 1.7--- *- ' 'i'T--'1 1 1 1 1 1~ ~ ., ' ,TRASH ENCLOSUREr i. LT'T|1-LI.'T-TÂ·"171 1....T'-iÂ·1.1111}-13-Â·1Â· 11 111 111' 11'1 i|,-1 11 i I'11I B I I I ' 1 1 1 1 1 , Ill I I I.. 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 '111 i 1 1 11111 1 - . 1 1 1 1 1 1 lÂ» TRANSFORMER ~1--~T ~3 2 1 --*4 - -111 111'1'11 -1 lili 11 11 \ 7 inf Ti NEIGHBORING 1 111:1 1 TRANSFORMER ! iI:.1211.~ ~1_: i - - 1 1 LTRASH ~ i . 1 ENCLOSURE - _ FIN. FLOOR /1 /D PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION U 3/16"=1'-0 ~-MECHANICAL SCREENING TTT: FOUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING UPPER PARAPET /1 f<D h 281 - 0- 1 , - PAR8PET-Â£ .....27-- ..12-1-=.- -u=112----22&266,- r.7 1-. 11 -3- 11 111 ilill,1 li-i '~ 1 1 -1-L--11-,-1- -T -1 - r.,..Fl,= 1. ..1.2 LILII il l,-,_iii] 1 T.1 -1 27' -0" L. lili t 1 1 1 1 lili 11 -EFJ~~:i tz~~122LIft~ ~~i~Â·i~Â·Â·~Â·Â·Â·~Â·Â·Â·~Â·-~-~Tr...1117.11*Â«:-11---7 L_-1.1-- 1.=,11T-Â·r'Â·rl 'l-L--Tr l.li~-L=IiIII1-L 11-61Â£L--:,111 5,2---~TJT.LI . 1111111 1 1 .1 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 111 ~t_ I__LTÂ·I,1....2-IIi-1 1-- 7.1-4-41-3.. N 11 lilli! 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 - 1 1:1']-'1'i'11.-:1~ f 11-frt-1[1-rii{1'-~t~51 1]1.~1,1 1,~,~,~1 1,T 1 : l i l l i : - . _--rED i T 1 -.En. Ijl,1 1-1 11,1 1-'-1 I I ll....I--1......,-tri-111 T .'1Â·1Â·11,111_i.1 I~l .I 1 1_1.-I i 1 1.-'-1 I 1 - - 1 -7 -T RECOND FLOOR Ari Lli:,1.11 ...3 1.1. I'FLT=3-1117.1..~.-21.~._~~].~..L~.1..~.1..~_~~~~'I~J 1: 11~1~ 211 11 1 1 1- <- T~T ~~~ | ~~~ ~71. 21_~__. ...1~T--f.~E~-lI]. m]_ L.:-T= TtlL 1 1 1 1.11 1111111 1 1 1, lilli lili lilli '111 ~1~, 11 ~1~1~~11 1 1 i i : i~i~i~.i.~i -i.~IfILF--.j ui 1 > I I__1_~ I I I.I -1 ..1-,1-1.1_... I ! 1__1__1 1 J.1-1,1 1 JU__-1 11Â·! 1111 _1- ] ~1._., 1Â·1- ,_l. 1.I.lit'L__Lâ€žL L__L â€ž1 + 1 1 i ' 11 , i I i ' i i i 2-~ i, ~T J.1'-T' LY.J .~.1.TÂ·Â·1..TÂ·- I- 1 ~- -rl I-L i 1 - 27-~-~'~-'---~--~.~3~~,-~-I-L-1~.-]I~I[ 'I~I~ ~~~.~- 1._ .......1~_~i.....t.i...1.L.~1_ ~_1..~.1 -~ 1~ 1~ --11 11 'T ~1] 1~1~1~~1.~ T.-1-1-1 ~~T~.~ 11~~1.~- --~-f~ 1 ~ 9 3-itÂ·'-1 1 li!.111.1 1.13 1 11171 1.-liE-,1 11. 1-1 1 j 1 !I 1 [I] b 1 2 1 -lifi 1 52 ~-4-~I Â©13 1 ~~i-L<~ ')i': 1/0 unt 4 1 --44 --7~ f l~&~'1~11-i-1 Iilfl-~-1--~1~-1--4--4-l# J,1~-41-- 1:-11' Â· Ill'lllÂ· Ililli-T 11 1 1-7- 1 11: '11 11 ib' 26Â¥-7 1.1 1 1 1 T 1 I;III11 . . . _ CHInp CLEÂ·V~TION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDING __ .- 11 a. 11,1 i lili 1111,111,1111,!ill'i- I 11 111Â·Ill 1 1 Ililli,1,1111 iT O I 11 1 111 3 I'll'|~t||~1'll :1~ TL!1111111 !11!! ~ .I 1 ' I I T I T I J I I I ~ J ~ ~ 1 ~ T. -1...,1.-11--~---f--~-"~'T..~f 1 ~ 1 T . T ~ /,1 ~-I 1 1 1 j , 1 1 Il IT,liill iT-[Ii L.J...~.1.~..1-~.1.-~--[-~]' ji,!11111 1.f IlII _ -~ ~ -11 111~11 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1- 0 - h to PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ~ 3/16"= 1'-0" '-L- . -i 94 OPTION B 1 19 1. . 1= -*2212' ' 011 '33OC]03 Hl '9 SVURSWV) 011 '3~,0003H1, SVUrlgWV' 1,0,10'.d00 1031!HOWV 3HI a *Ilt..m .......1 -31N!191:INNVU|lunlm'u~ I 33Nlvld S]0 -lS ~31Sdrl]0 3 ~5. WO~,Op0011,puMP,i,(,Ule,M* 6./. 1.'El: N0IldIH0S30 3190 ON 83NNVId ONVI ol O3nssl - - SNOISIA 3H iMMROdillilÂ¥114#it,E I SNOilVA313 NOIhel)(3 03SOdO Loot,ID L ON Nalll001 ~ toot.lt[ :Â·ON 103rOkld 00'NadSV slÂ·Nt .... . ALLEY ~-- PROPERTY LINE 1= r=1 - L_11 LU 1 1 2:2 EF i --------- : 18 Â§ I - 1 Mi 5 : 2 03: ' W , :5 = S CL 517 E HOPPINE al * 3 1 LU lo ' c NEWPEDESIHIAN / ENTRANCE ./ 76'-10" ROUTE ,Â·- NEW PEDESTRIAN BETWEEIJ [1111-IRS / ENTRANCE 1 55'-3" ROUTE, / 1 BETWEEN DOORi ,-- I JEWPEDESTRIAN # ENTRANCE. 4- 68'-6 ROUTE / / 41'-1" ROUTF 18 - Cr ; BETWEEN DOOR~ f BETWELI J [,Clum, F - 46'-8" ROUTE ./ ' ~ BETWEEN [,OORG , Â· , r 23'-0" ROUTE ' ~ BETWEEN [,vo RS 777--4- If BENCHES- ~ ~ '11 1 (TYP. OF 6) \QÂ·Â·441 1 0 1 \ SOFFIT ABOVE ~ LsoFFIT ABOVE ~BALCONY ABOVE b PARKING )7'x _ i CONCRETE WALK NEW PEDESTRIAN KIOSK r-LIGHT POST>. ENTRANCE N .h. / i 11//\ I - 1 1//\ ~ ~ i **'iyf-f .- 0 (.W~~-9-9 - . - 1-=21- - 1- -- 1 1~L-,IL - --Eld L,-1 I -1-2 1 /=FACE OF CURB '/ p .. 1 + , , , LANDSCAPE-~ ~L.~6~*<2~ Â«7, \U' \.j _3~/ LANDSCAPE AREA. TYP. PAVERS. TYP PAVERS.TYP. EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Ch SITE PLAN .N L./ 1/8"= 1'-0' : m : Z 9 2 2 5 TIA-1 533 E. HOPKINS ON'1,31<"#iiâ€ž, Crl '3b,0(103KLL. SVHr,8,1Â¥0 1~19!budOO loal,HOW',3HI 3, r .IVIWS. .W 1 d 0 -le:.pue,ein(iweD H3NNV1d aNV101 OBISSI VI st,L-,~ i EAV SNI>IcIOH 1SVE LLS 6'fit /50 NOI1dIHOS30 19 31Â¥0 SNOISIA3M . 8'.0 00'N3dSV '03M31A3W Loot*t,1 Â· ON NOilÂ¥301 ~ LOOM-,l Â· ON 103rohld NVId 31IS Â¥11 3-1111 INIMVEO 9~/et/0 ~al.VO - L./1 1 1./ i I - 0 0 -f.1-/ Ig.-0-=.I--~ . I. . f:Â·~r le./ .. L 4 ' 72%* .... 1 - b ... 1 1 -- U , 9,1., 4, M 4 1, . 4 '. I . 4 6 6 41 1 .1 .-r. . + 1 - h ..B . f,1 4 , wi- 6,7 1'3 ''%4464*'.i ~ -. -1~ , - - 4. 41 , C:44920 -- -I W -I.Â· . 't Â«=57Â¥3#: I ~-IK- . , *>*i.Â·308'79'24Â¢,af; ?"Tb -.. i , . c kf ----. - . 212Â·t. --~ ----22Â¤Zuzz~ .,6.47122 ~ - A= .1 , :J I.- - 1.-3 . ----7 I ~EY,12:vil~b. 5,,.. /' .23 i - - ; . #t :* -1 1 + ... 4,- ~LF't=- .7 61- 1:7,5,64 - ill t - A-Â· :.. Im rÂ©2;11 Ae il// ., 2 1 .. ' M ' :I -. - /.I Z 2- 7 \ 3 -9: 1-9 - 4 4=: - ' tt~;[10 W ' ~ Plh iNt [,- Fl' - -â€¢AU :.~t 1.11/h" -:,t 4 -a-'=4'# ----I - I / T .4*i. IM --- i Jt - U 1 rr#* ~. ~~~ * -2. Lin#:Aitti~,i *;1Â©: -31, 7 ==1.*~4~~..7&,;=&~--1.-'-~(*I/=/==--< -- .Wk I ...1 . 1. k .Â·-' - _4-2277 -t. ==m= - 4 ,- - / AÂ«Â»Â·'~*h-V .:I' D - D-- 17"4~, . m -2 =96 .U- 91 - --1.- Mt Z~ -- *-1- . 2-6 Â£ c_ - - f - C- *Â·49"'.9 -" I 34 * 2 E .Â· F~ p / 1 , 46 - .E' .IL*146 -~.J -22~ b Â·.1. ...'I".~ - 17- 07":1:-,%2 f r I ~ 44 + -- 4 - -1-a- -2 lid . tÂ¥. 6 4 . 54-/e . I. .2Â« - =- .1 , = . ; 1.11 r- . 4 te n 1..... 1 . . 12 n 1 'JI - 1-t, - . ti,- LiÂ·- IM - . .1.EJOY- =%:fill 1= 1 -- -- :./. P - ---1: # L -L - i .. - r 9 ./. -.. 4 â‚¬... -- - -- =11.-1=1 - 5.. -=.I,-I -- 2- - =.--ra . Â¢ -11 C 'i 'b - 7 ,1-- L 1 1 j e e_- 47 -- 3: 3 L M.#....Im./. i---- - *.1 . 4-2 .. .. 4-4 /2 -4-, 1 . 1 ' lie 1 1 6 1 . 'S.... ., - 12 ri: ...10 - L V &1 - ill 1#11 3%10)01Â©22 + 9%%18Â®*193 STÂ©g e I '517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ' ASPEN, CO LOCAL JURISDICTION: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: ARCHITECT: LAND PLANNER: DRAWING LIST: THE CITY OF ASPEN M DEVELOPMENT CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 130 S. GALENA STREET 2001 N HALSTED ST, SUITE 304 2454 E DEMPSTER STREET, SUITE 202 420 EAST MAIN STREET STE 10-B SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO. IL 60614 DES PLAINES, IL 60016 ASPEN. CO 81611 CS-1 COVER SHEET TEL (970) 429-2761 CONTACT MARK HUNT TEL (847) 298-1525 TEL (970)925-7819 ALTA EXISTING LAND SURVEY CONTACT BY DEPARTMENT CONTACT TED J THEODORE, NCARB LEED AP CONTACT MITCH HAAS PA-1 EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY OR ROB AVILA LEED AP EC-1 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-2 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-3 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN ER-1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN PA-2 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY PLANS A-010 PROPOSED SITE PLAN VP-1 VIEW PLANE ELEVATIONS VP-2 VIEW PLANE SURVEY VP-3 VIEW PLANE MAP A-100 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN A-101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN FAR-1 FLOOR PLAN FAR CALCULATIONS FAR-2 FLOOR PLAN - FAR CALCULATIONS ~b NL-1 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE 'egy NL-2 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE 5 A-211 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-212 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS O= d Â£ TIA-1 TIA SITE PLAN 02 5 2 0 unz hF 4# - I 9 .* C I 2 5 E A ' - /0 . 4,77 404* Ed 26 5 4 H P .4 #4 1 . . ..t tt .... . 4 m . ~ :9<4411'* 41:9 4 -''ll.Il. J D-,-42y =f :/ 1 2 , 12â€¢1.6. - , /-4,5.Ir â€¢r.- r.* , p./.<pli. - -4.. 47 -- -mr .':06.1 -Â·Ul Â· Ar 9.,1.- - ..6& i#AE< 7.. 1.... ' *: - --46""Ili~i~~~~211~# 74;L ~;- 1 â€¢ -~N ~ , Â· + A ....t -, 1 1 -Dr, -5.-..2.. bi , . 1. - - - _ ir=. Aa y -4 -1. 2.Â»f -- . , :11 -:.._ , 4#- -4 7 : $., . I. r. ' t,. WI CONCRETE WA.K 1 = F / 9 '0 Ir 1 9 2 : 0 5176 HOP,ON -4 . *La . P t . . P. I'll B k. , ~. 44 4 f 1, *rn,7 - 9 9,000 SQ. FT, - @2 2 74&, , 2.94 ' . b # 'P h 3 - - 8 9 i- , . a... f 'UihÂ· L 11 4 O --caLÂ· ' 1- Y E Â« " T - - -- 1.- Â£0 .f - Ar Â£ EY A,4 2 - Wr"pr 43 tÂ· 2 4 --8 143 1 i *\ 1 - Z Â·31% 5 - 2 14 -1 r 4414Â· 14- ;2 :70 .f ...1 . U . r . . 1/4 ?/ 4 7.--... &9 -7- 'L. k 't-'*. / 1 *- 2,r - kf 41 re<4&.'..LAR~Â»r.. Fâ€¢; I. 4 k 0 oCT 0 9 7015 3i*E VICINITY MAP CS-1 ONILJ]NION]|491. all lb,00031Â·,1 9 Sillqi,VO 1,19,8.WOO 13 Al:*iV Dll j .009 I i WO, 2,Â®O84~puPipincw. v"V 3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LE St/ews HaNNY-Id ONÂ¥-1 01 030SS, SNOISLA3H ON NOUV001 ~ LooÂ»nk ON 1O3rOEd 133HS B3AOO 31.LLL ONIMVIO .... 7911 98 O STREET LIGHT LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUIE> SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0-159 A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINEE - - - LOT LINE POSTED ADDRESS:*517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUEÂ· 1 BIO BEAR I NGS BASED ON CITY MONUMENT FOR TIE SOUTHEAST CORIER OF BLOCK 93 H THE NORT-EST CONR OF BLOCK 88 Â·CHISLED *-. N 82Â·06'll-W 0 10 20 GAS RER U.S. SURVEY FOOT ~ 9 WATER VALVE ONE FOOT CONTOURS 5 e CITY MONUMENT CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34 5 SLANTED TE*7 DENOYES BUILDING #EIGHT 7915.94' w WATER IS IN HOPAINS AVENE 4 *. ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY ... 24 S T THE REFERENCED FLOOD MAP , 5 THE CURAENT FLOOD INSURANCE RITE MAP . THIS PROPERTY I S SITUATED IN ZONE Â·r (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE . OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN oN FLOOD INSURANCE RATE Z MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, HOPKINS 60 ' COMâ€¢UNI TY-PANEL IMBER 06097C0204 C EFFECTI VE DATE: JUIE 4, 1987 :,/ 31. 75 'AVED WO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE. REAR -1 .0. 4 VENUE 4)// FOR THE C-UNITY IN MICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED DISK /~ THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INS IDE OF THE CI TV OF ASPEN FU>FLOW HAZARD 25947 .,0 . '. AREA AS DEFIPIED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT ~MBER 1963. FIGURE ES-15 N 73â€¢ 09.)~.. PARKING '+Â·+-.... - ZONED: CC {COMMERCIAL CORE) WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY 110 DE~NEATED PARKING SPACES 90 DISK 29Â· 25947 79\/ 2 POST Â·Â· ELEVATIONS BASED ON Cl TY OF ASPEN GPS MOIUENT 5 (7915.94Â· 1 1988 NAVD 'PARKING {7952.61 LANDICAP AREK' . .03' COURTHOUSE V IEWPLAIE NO. 1 ELEVATI ONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN (BRACKETSI WHERE VIEWPLANES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICTIVE SHO- /7948.01 ' VIEWPLANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 FU~Â¥D (5.31 I 17952.8} i 79,0.5 COAt?676 *tor CONCRETE WALK N 75 -09 1 / 90,29 ~ADSCAPED It.. - STAIRS 1 1 AREA 1 1 VICINITY MAP ST,~IRS [7949.71 1 - 400 :2 1 1e 877~~*./6471 F imil j 790~.4 0- -=S=:=m, a-i*5@ 8 M 1 1 1 =.8 GARDIN 1 '47,0 Eme, S W . -- , 1 1 1 , \3 * 7908,7. a 6 SILL 2 .Z.I. t - ' fi 1 1 C i ~ 4,I ~OR Y 1 3 l G BUILDING | ARDEN 1 ID LEVEL l 1 -1 2 1 1 6 k 4, : 81 2 6 44#DE M LEVEL COUR TIARD O 2 '9 0 / f / 1 1 / ~...... 192\ il m R i 1 1 1 792% r Â£ If G CERT IFICAT ION THE UNDERS IGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN M U, FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND IS ACCURATE ' ~ ~ 6 BASED ON THE FIELD EV IDENCE IS SHOI, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 7921.3' EASEMENTS OR R I GHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EV IDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME SILL 9 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFUCTS, ENCROACHMENTS. * EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE&ROUND RE-BAIW APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 7920.I o e SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. â„¢15 SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS IET STAMPED F ITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN &14,4- - t 7961.31 1 JOI~ I* H#RTH P,C!Â·% 1,â€¢, Mi - 10 [7956 3] Ak LAI~/ED '14' 4 0 + 7920 S 75'09 li E 90 17961 2} M 29 .C I. . ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS 4 EASEMENT RECEPTION NO 187066 IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY + 47 . --- '92/ oF 90...0.. 94 25947 LOTS D. E. AND F. 7920.6 C~iâ„¢A~'TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, i?XJ,09FCEL0R~6 [7957.2] CONTAINING 9,029 SO FT â€¢/-. 0 207 ACRES â€¢/- A PREPARED BY C ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 9 ...B 210 SOUTH GALINA STREET . ASPEN. COLOMADO 81011 : iii E =I:.2=811: 1 LAW YOU MUST PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 Â¤g%W = m.'1::T,40~.~91 'EW~39%,~. DATE JOB im,CE?,2'Ir:ID' INT"14'1-Â·: 11.Tr= 0-w 4/15 17096G ALTA .09...." 0[1906{' 14~50Â·49-I CO.ocr BUILDING DOES NOT ENCROACM '011 ' 0003H1, 5Vkin9WV) 1 91-REÂ·9 SNOISIA3B 011 380(103HL 9 SVk*IEÂ»nO IH91&:LAdOO 12}31,HOUV EDÂ·11 30 1N3SNCK> Nlillk,M }U inCHili OBSOIOSK] HO DISA 031Â¥Olldfi] 383 10Â»4 M BINS 3Hi (]NÂ¥ 1311'Ha 1 31Â·U 30 *BOM 03,Â·IS!11/1/,in ON' 4'19!UO 3'1 lifill'ShKX) NiMaH -MM31Vrd N3 LLIUM INV... .. .. Ag alvo SN; 01#00 Â£00-,I ON NOLLV00-1 ~ Â£00,rn ON 133rObid 03'N3dSV A3AynS Vl-IV 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS SL~1/18 311ll DNIMVHO .... c,r, o. ASPEN GPS 0-159 LEGEND AND Nuin.3 O FOUND SURVEY MONLMENT AS DESCRI mED O UTILITY BOX 7911.98 STMEET LIGHT MA SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINE - - - LOT Llf A POSTED ADDRESS: '517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE BEAR I NGS BASED ON CITY MONLMENT FOR THE SOUTâ‚¬AST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1--10 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHISLED XÂ·. N 82'06Â·12Â·W 1 GAS METER W F~TICONM'ls ~ 6 0 WATER VALVE I CITY MONUENT CI TY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34 5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES *WIDING HEIGHT 7915. Â· WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED I N ZONE -1- (IREAS DETERMINED TO BE AS r .~. OUTSIDE SOO-yEAR FLOOD PLAIN] AS SMO- ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE 2 , MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. HOPKINS 75 DOÂ· ~ COMMUNITY-PANEL IMBER 06097C0204 C EFFECTI VE DATE: JUNE 4. 1987 4,# AVENUE 1THE REFERENCED FLOOD MAP 15 THE CURAENT R.000 INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR TIâ‚¬ CollUN ITY IN WHICH THEPROPERTY 1 5 LOCATED E DISK '20 R.O I ~ THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE c ITY OF ASPEN FUDFLOW HAZARD 25947 . // .. AREA AS DEF I NED BY DE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAI NAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963. FIGURE ES-15. 4,5.09 /, l. PARKI Â·. +Â·Â·. ZONED: CC ICO~*ERCI AL CORED WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY DISK SIGN ON )1~ Â·Â· . Â·~ NO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE, REAR NO =GNEATED PARK.ING SPACES go. 29 25947 LIGHT 7918 2 POST Â·Â·.. ELEVAT IONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONMENT 5 (7915.94Â· ) 1988 NAID PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRICKETS] l'#801' 9 KIOSK {7952.6] -444 COURTHOUSE VIEIPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETS] M.JE':GO:?,82~XM(,s?88*MT?'9&4*v#76 3: I [7948 6] 17452 i ' 7910.6 CONCRETE 1~AL/( / 1 WNCREN *LR W 75 09 1 1 Â·W 90.29 e l 1 . L4DSCAPED ARE,1 VICINITY MAP 6 , 7919 1 25~47 I STAIRS 7919 1-- 1. - 400' 1 3 1 1 -1 â‚¬\\\ AS-JAL 14&v r' S. 0 -p 19 1.L Al#*EaSM/l dl i c GARDEN 7946.8 1 1/ / 1 4.4 mjEWEE,Arr...~EFF Mi' 6 Sl 1 Â£ f i 17-7Â· D ~ SILL 7. i -.4.02Â¥~ 1 Â§2 i = 5 - 13 @ li 1 / a--- 514.23 S.F. C . 0. l PUBLIC AMENITY BUILDING ~ I LEVEL Tri GARDEN LEVEL 11 1. 1 8 2 044 COL*TYARD R 15 1 / i A / 4 1 0. 11 1 4 8 . '7921 7921.1 G 11 1 1 0 1 / 9 CERTIFICATION: 0 ~ 2'ELr'@Sm~ THAT THE PROPERTY ACRI ~~ H~R:8&=~E i I 7921 3 RE-B. 2 - EXCLUDED AREA Elii:ES~]~5?Â¢i~8~~Pif:?m,3:~~%~C368?4~ENTS. 7920.1 ~~~~ ~~ ~I~ ~i~ EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOIN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE&*OUND &; 0 2 APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE 6XCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS IET STAI'rED g 5 (ABOVE 7921 ELEVATION) WITH THE SEAL OF TIE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1/15.000 w 1790I.3] 1 34.5 DATED: 'tr JOHN M. HOWORTH P L.S. 25947 4 9 8 75â€¢09 L/IND~PED AREA M [7956.3] 11'E 7920 0 {7961.2} 90.29 ./0 T.- + I ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS 4 L LE F EASEMENT RECEPTION NO 187066 IMPROVEMENET/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BLA .5* WZJ' 7921 OF 20'Ze vCK 9 4 ~:2KONE. AND F, R.0. 03= e CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUITY OF P I TK IN 1 [7957.23 STATE OF COLORA06. CONTAINING: 9 029 SO FT â€¢/ 0 0.207 ACRES â€¢/ PREPUED I ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN COLORWO 8!011 ; PHONE/FAX 1970] 925-3616 Ell,ER:,&~airwar~..int&/* 1 7021 Ui E DATE 0 9/t 4 !25,5'...~.~MLEP-:~i 9 i m E 0%%@ EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY rÂ© CALCULATIONS - 3/32,1 = 1'-0" PA-1 (111 '380003# 9 SVEN*W~VO IHEMkl 3 1331Â»4327 3HI Â·011 3~10003H1 '95Â¥819WV) UJOy . P~4/ue~pi=vm St-gre k SE VIEWPLANE NO COURTHOUSE VI EWPLNE NO Â·S. 1 AND 2 ~ SNOISIA3&1 Looprit ON NOI-LV00-1 | LOOÂ»-,1 ON 103rOhdd 1 00 Al.INarIV Ollend 9NllSIX3 AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LLS 91/BL/8 31111 DNIMIMO .... WA5ft Al*A V\\ r 7 ..0/ 1 7/7 I / L, l.II.\ M /4 - 77- f>. % A ,j j NET LEASABLE - 50 SF 1 \\\4.75., Â»/ 42 NET LEASABLE AREA - 931 SF 9% 7-14 U ff- \\\ Â»r A 1 , 4 1 - \\ I ,:.. COMMON - 658 SF 5\L.\1\ .\ ""/// 1 - \\ 9\\4 \-~4 Â«44 14~ K%-~\\\K -\Â«-It 41 1-1\Â«N~ . \ I -illill ./ I \1% . 9 i// /jil // / .44\1 L-7 'E?IA N% / ::I ll\Â« 3\ . \\\ \\%\ iÂ® 85 2 W: 4 9 .Ki / 2 I 02 0 9 8 85!fi 1,1 .25 \ U =:,Ze* Emt" a 5=PEE V i NET LEASABLE AREA - 3226 SF 61939 LEVEL 4/ 62055 AFEA 3 2 9319 50, Ff 1 I /4, 1 / 3/ / , P\ E E 1 21 1 17 1 L.t\\th ~ -ifi 1 3% - 9 1 - COMMON - 78 SF NET LEASABLE AREA: 3226 + 931 + 50 = 4207SF COMMON AREA: 658 + 78 = 736 SF 4 K 1 . 1 YA#%5UY PROF[187 41:&29 57 F.AZA NUILPINO M,Ul,/4'-I : i 1. E 0 mLE DIMENSOVV 917 8%<HOPKIN5 AVENLE Q%%@ Ay[NfILEQI:\1[1%10\15,COM AMEA, CO 81611 JLLY 20il EC-1 SNOISIA3bl 011 11OOO3HI 9 SV#I,BIVD DÂ·1018*,900 1031:HOUY EDÂ·,1 30 1N3SNOD /11_11WM /1.1 inotill .......0 las. ..Old,10 38 ION AVW 3,!VS #1 ONÂ¥ 1021[,HOb 1 FIL =*0 ),BOM (33Hsl lyfk:*In (]NV ~NIOUK) 3Hi linlll SNOO N1383H 1Â¥,831-I N 11 1,WA (]Nv SONI, ~10 1-lv Looprn ON NOILV301 Â£00,IÂ·,1 ''ON 103rold 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 Ltd 03'N3dSV NVId HOC)-13 9NllSI)(3 31111 DNIMIHO St/elm .... PATIO - 278 SF FATIO 4/ / NET LEASABLE AREA - 984 SF 19 \611 - 4. \Ill . f \ ..1 ...\ 2 1 \ 1-- / 1 COMMON - 715 SF 1,. 7pfÂ»444-f~>t~~~:Jit >:fi,:::N . 4 . r t: - -\ 1- ~ftÂ«- O/ 5 Z Zf A 4 2 t. 96 0 2% R i 8* i NET LEASABLE AREA - 2075 SF SECONF FLOOR 62055 Al?EA 4,084 50 Ff, 9 1 2 0 7/fÂ« , . 5 -@ NET LEASABLE AREA: 2075 + 984 = 3059 SF 4 1 PATIO AREA: 85 + 278 = 363 SF 7 4 COMMON AREA: 715 SF -: RATIO < PATIO - 85 SF t . -Nm 0~ FROFERTY MEal*F. CITY FLAZA PULPING : MALE 1/ 4" Â· 1' RLIE PIMENN0N5 917 EASE H0PKIN5 AVENLE A5FENfl192IMENSION5 COM EFEN, CO 81611 JULY 2014 3,% EC-2 9AILJINfO~J Â·fOI. C~ UJ Ij~ Â£00Â»Â·h ON NOI17O01 Â£00Â»,1 ON 133rOUd 'all '3klo NVId HOOld 9NllSIX3 {hl91Â»i [aU -' Wne*2 f..,131 UJO) a,Opoaulp~emoo,Ehvm 83NNVId ONVI 01 CE,ASSI 3AV SNI>ldOH 1SV3 LLS 9/8/8 00'N3dSV C]3M31A3ki 31111 ONIMIBO - 011 38000341 Â¥ SVIN/M} iH91~Adol 1331Â»OWÂ¥ EDIL 30 iN3SNOO Nlll'WA EDÂ·U JAOHLIAA 03501)SIO UO (BSO 'allÂ¥/Ildi,0 38 10,4 An'll ImS *U 0149 1011,Hoe i 3,0 30 1,BOAA OliS,1Nfk,In ONV lvN,9IbIO 3H1 31nlllSNOC) N, 383,1 -lv,831VI'll NELLL]WA ONV SONI, n,0 Tr, SNOISI.'3&d Â¢*bl h' Li NOUdIHOSEK] Ag 11Â¥a ON 03'N3dSV OBMELUB W /'U ~UO,e;OPOJ4,1}UP%2,6~1~Ue)- '3/\V SNI>IdOH 1943 LLS 2/0 I 9188 WaNNV'Id ONÂ¥-101 03nSS SPRay k 0Â£,906â‚¬U. W' 9:â€žw-' ~~ L- ON NOLLWOO Â£00,r,1 "ON 1Oat'Obdd VB Ae NMVI)0 *=/ 9:009 -~ 3]N~14%30 _SH]lww]C JÂ»' ONIL.ION] 49,3X]UOU]NION-,1. I..)21,0. aivos 1.U Â·all'guoc]O,Hi, SVÂ»nm,no NV-ld Â¥0013 9NllSIX3 31111 ONIMVEO -1 J- . t/9 Z Un - E 6 42 1111111111{11111 1 <19 . 1 Z L_. 44/ // 1 7/ 22 I 2 g, \ 1% r< 662 8 52 P 5. Â»Â« - E Lu $ ----1 4/. W 4/ %i F i ift / &-1 4 f f i 7,0 1 C /9 0 9 0 /42//2/ Vul 9 4 9 4 .-Â«fÂ«/777 -4/ //////lil Ref * Eg -1 a 1- a UJ O ZO A--n lv'% floilk.[12 W03'61401Â¢V~~01~~ COMMON - 99 SF =IS M t - NOINWOO =IS 06*9 :93%:IV 318Â¥ =IS Â£Â£Z 73klv Oi l 32,0003,11 9 SVInall) IHE,Ilka(,0 1031Â»Oll lil *) 1N3SNOO Nal_lim 31110OH1# 03SOIOSIO 80 03Sn '0310%410 30 ION A- 3MVS 3'1 (INV 10311'HON 0 3HI 310 3,80* 13HS Nnd"/1 ONV l,NID,hIO 31Â·Li 31'71"1SNOO N,383H IVI/31'm .31_11./ ONÂ¥ SONIA VE,0 11Â¥ SNOISIA3H 11 ht,bl be 1.: Â·03,031AE" 00'N3dSV NOI.ld]MI)â‚¬30 Ae alva ON r- St/BL/8 WO,@,Opod"pUP%~~nOW"MA,N ~ 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS :alvo , Napf 83NNVId ONVI Ol 03nSSI *828 L Of19~6&.' *962!.18]131 VB 69 NMV8O 1.,6 91000/DG~.ldg](] -5y....3.. LOOM $ k ON NOILV001 Â£00,rn ON 103-08d ONIL]]ME>N]|â€¢LOI.-OUOUMN â„¢NNÂ¥ld Irl~ 1/DU' 31VOS LU all '3&,0003#19 SVUngWV] NVId 1VllN30IS38 9NllSIX3 31111 DNIMMO . 212 -K 1- on OfÂ¥e; 11_ un 0 Un,Kh 6 ei 51 . 1 .&24 Â·/://///:-0 5 // 1 946 4 9& t2*11_ M * 1-%5- 1-~ 20 2 *A 2 39 S E . .~ 1 4 A U Ul a \I~ \ 4 -%3 d 1 46\~ ...1 /4 L 49Â«z < : I &51 ' 1 - 4 4 9 4 9, 1 og :3 34 -11 C. 193~\ 1 G 2 ;3 4 W % gl r-12~46 - 1\\ 5 95 < . .---1 2 ~-; 00 53 . r--1 h Â» 4 54 ..0 m : 4/ . Z< I 1/ Jr)"1!~~~~ f IL 00 2 - 00 U. RR% 1=1 h- 1 15 05 . 90 i....al :Lu< 0 8 %%5 O Joa 0 mw8 Zo-O A ' u,/ 1MOS MOZ ATE Woo SNOISA jINI PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 18 SF-~ _ PATIO - 20 SF PATIO - 21 SF INE eMO- " IL 00 InG Â¥Zyld A.10 d*rIWil~ 11,33303d .... ALLEY - PROPERTY LINE -9, ' 90.29' TRANS 1 F l -4 4\ / 94,//,l //,11.9 99,10))/11,4,7 0 /,1'' )1 31' l muFN: 1 1 Â«Â°93*24*44% 9 #1 1.01 '19.1 1 = ! 01/7 2 PI Illill,tillil Nil"j:'Â·In'ji"'ijdp'll 1111111 l I 4,1 \ 1 1 - flivilill. fillilli=;ill'dll 1% 1.. ' i 111111 ftrr l l jil ,,a: 11, jiltill lit ill i . T i'llp jir 15 1 111 1Â«f ./ all 11 ~lt u, '' 71, / 0/ /Â»//9 24911 -UPPER ROOF-~ ~ CÂ® 1 11'llilll 1 1.6, - I " 1: U~ 4; - R - - f i- fiÂ»:9 -d/,f-34Â« d //m////a. Z . -R g Iff Â·d mif zi;,ITIfifilil Nif i l I'll ilillilli I-ii, e I. ,1.11 11--f:l' i j , . C - .7~051-1 E.HOPKINSÂ»/ / / Bil illl Â· ~'trifilillir !lilli,i,jl'll'j' #,111, 11'lilli 1 1 UN UNON. NONNINF 1449 i jill f d/Nm/NP / 11 lit 1, 411'11"11'r 1 ..Ii,lill'liqlili 1098.40 S.F. // lili !111111111111111'd'111/1 PUBLIC AMENITY 27 - 111/7 ~ 5 r \ L t.... >042 4,0"h/r,Il~//////b./'/// fy o I ricilimiL. imm,(UllfilhliNIWNII[Ilfltldl~dih ..%...... 9 2 NO :\ I h. ..11\ 2 0 5 . G qÂ·- zi}!i J ''i! u 01#*"1*111;j'llit/' 1111/illillid/lilitllj/j~illillit// ili;il'"1llp 11 111111 1141 1 . ':4-6 al ~ 734% BALCONY 2*06 3 k & i '0 \ \ '11,11 /1~ 34 RE<0330>Nxix, 1 3~\ CO, In'-111/21\19\\1. f g e 1/r Â»ff/-)fitj \ obu 2 1 \\\\93 1% \\\\ /Â»'>E -90.29-* ------01--- 1 1 11 Q Lw W J -:\\\\\11\\\\1 -. 9 PUBLE - ' *Â£ BENCHES ~_SOFFIT ABOVE LBALCONY ABOVE LSOFFIT ABOVE AMENITY AREA: (TYP } PARKING CONCRETE WALK 7.-h' 5 'k\ \,\4 '\" a , t-n / A , KIOSK 285.10 SF 1 1 2-LIGHT POST 4 4 LANDSCAPE -~ _J LANDSCAPE AREA. TYP PAVERS, TYP EAST HOPKINS AVENUE rh SITE PLAN 1 j~ . O A SECOND FLOOR PUBLIC AMENITY 0 1 LP 1/8" = 1'-0 f 1/8"=1'-0 V If) 79{-9 Cly Â¤ : 1 PA-2 533 E HOPKINS 01 1 3BC)003 1 30 'SNOO /311!WI 3.1 iII}HUM 0301OSIO 80 0390'021 30 ION A 31'VS 3,LI ON' 1011IHOW' 3HJ 1 SON,i'w ,â„¢] IT all'3HO(]03H1'9 5Â¥HneW'01 u .,;; 9 ./.1,%*1 4. I'll/ LOOPâ€žL ON NOilÂ¥001 toc,r,L ON 133rOUd 515 E HOPKI CONCRETE WALK aNÂ¥-101 03 t '3AV SNI>IdOH 31Vo 00'N3dSV 03MBIA38 ALIN)WV 0118nd 0390$0hld Sk/81/8 311ll ONIMVBO 31vDS .... 17' .81/7 72Â· - r 90Â· -3 1/2' 47Â·-11 10'-0- 1 7Â·-812Â·' ~ 24Â·- 7" OPEN TO SKY J -11---f- 0 BUILDING OVERHANG 0 . 6. - ----' RESTROOM- 1, RESTROOM RESTROOM 7-7-1 . CONSTRUCTION < CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION WOMENÂ·S TENANT SPACE Â·A TENANT SPACE'8' 13 g ---1 1 1 | , BY TENANT '2_ BY TENANT BY TENANT 1 2.Â£ 11/ %0 ' L eaaÂ·ee 2 46 86'-91/2" 20- 01/2Â·' 35'-10 34'.3" 'A .d,i b iwi 3Â»' fl ,fQ STAIR #1 . ! Ie , UP-: /4/ ,9/0 10'-51/8' 1 9'-71/4- ' 35Â·- 10118 . 0 0 H .0 1 1 W Â· f 23'-101/2- 24' -1 242- ~ ~ f 42Â» '6 6 Ejit 3 i i li .1 11 < wle ELEV CORRIDOR 6 6 ~ 271 ~ 7 . - ~ .2~ ~ ~~ ~ LOBBY & 2 72 - b , ~ 52.,r.j N -- ' . - d--7 , Ch :ff 1-li RETAIL SPACE 'AÂ· RETAL SPACE Â·B RETAIL SPACE 'C 35' Â·10" . 34Â· - 3" a: UP . TENANT SPACE'D TENANT SPACE'C' , UP DN STAIR 02 ~- i STAIR 12 . /' FiTE , N U 7 102 . i , i %5 //,11/ MEN'S 1/ b : r-AIR CURTAIN w| ~ /AIR CURTAIN ~ ~ AIR CURTAIN Â· ; BY TENANT 4 I BYTENW F lai . -1 M E Miz. wEI Â¥ ..1 ..4 .4, 1/Â· Â· .. L-BUILDING 2 U PROPERTY -~- 18Â·- 0 23 -71 ly OVERHANG 24Â· - 10" 23-10 PROPERTY LINE Â· ' LINE 90'-31/2" rn LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN .8 ril MAIN LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN .8 6 1/8 ,=.... 2/ 1/8"= 1'-0' 1 k R/e 0/0/ A-100 pr--H-----# ~-*-â€ž2-*- ')kIL. ION]/49!..UUOUJ LOOrrÂ¥& ~'ON NOLLVE)01 ~ Â£00Â»-n 'ON 103rOld 011 38OOO3HL I Sn.8,VO 1}!DlykdO' 101/.t#V =IHI I NOIidIWOS30 ONVI Ol O3nssl SNOISIA38 3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LLS 91/9608 00'N3dSV Cla/AaIA3 SNVId 80013 31111 DNIMVUO -11 .... 10.0 55' 7 10 24'. T 90'-310 PROPERTY LINE s i _J 111 - 1 / 94 . 0 MENÂ·S -- 10 - 21/2 78-6- UPPER DN ' ' ROOF E fri f: TENANT SPACE â€¢ g SECOND FLOOR - .1 to I. i . f - ' STAIR /1 ~ b 1, ., E -1-1.. ' %(il I _L _ - 0 ' 9 ilmils\10, P= 4 / i i F= 03 , - DN ' 25'-1- . 23-101/7 _ 24 3' ' 2 E >6'11/1 , 8 1 L . ' + ~1'~~~~F~~~ir-IT BA;f-rÂ®-ni/-4- 411111~111-9Tfll]J.*~ h| WOMEMS - 1 I Ill I ~ | 1 ~n~ ~ 1 - Â· Â· L/%.1 , 1 1 L.0/4-1 uy 1 Â»/ .1 Â· :11 / 1.1 1 1 17 - 101/2Â» I f BALCONY BELOW BALCONY BELOW BALCONY BALCONY I ~ 6 21Â·-91/7 22'-111/7 M E |l iii"i . 1-3 44 l.- 1 1:1 1 W W __ ------ 11 i :uNRI 1 1 -9 . __ 7 W W V _____--- 1~ n SECOND LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN /'a ROOF PLAN < 1 0 U 1/8" =1'-0 f 1/8=1'-0" a k 3*m A-101 h-L i~e SNOISIA3B (111 380003â€¢11 9 glkilarM} 1Ht>IMAdoo 1031Â»08Â¥ Dll j 1 '3&,0003H1, SV ne]WVD Â£00Â»-M ON NOILÂ¥001 ~ Â£00Â»Â·IL ON 133fOUd '4009 I ...ld G]O ...J/]2 3 .DY (N,906[NeW W~ Gt,-6eN,g]Ul NV-101 CanSSI 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS SL/91/2 SNVId H0013 03'N3dSV 03Mal/al 31.Ltl DNIMVED 0 . 0 . ALLEY & 7-81/2 Eff 3 r PROPERTY LINE - -1--1- -------------- r r- -k-1 :1 1 AIMI ez .1 MEE %**~25Â»25*Â·44.I-3/7~~b/4////M.1.7/114//'6 1% 1 03=G-324 -fe,/ / 1 . 241. - 3*3 41 3.2.,gn GUAY' 1."ll'11 111, I u . I ' i ' 1 ' 1 1 5/ 'f, lilli 111 :11 4 5 g / 40 11% .dillilll, 111 '%. *WE. %14 -11 1911 'Ift,11111111 4517 E. HOPKINS, 3 i'"Â· 'tilluilli'llillif % , S 4. E ''/ k , , f H 11 11 11 ; 0/4 7 111, lili 12,11 .1 11, ifilifilli,- 152 f. 4%*4~4 7% 4 :/Â«9 // , U 'd m lk'iNEAAÂ¥*2Pkyk'jil/j /4 + ,h . firciliizlilfiilsibl 'ill 1 i[, ,,illl: 7,0,/NEW PEDESTRIANS 14 :Iii 'llill'1111 I'li L ~ ///v / /19 -15 ROUTE / //// ///~/ BEPNEENDOORâ‚¬, ,i ' ~~~y~~,E~TRANCE:/:ff /#U// 5SJROUTE,/// . 9// lirifillul Hilijj' 'tillijiilniti *mi."weir N DOORS 'UU#Me&Â¥EvaTRIA:llqudMWIE , 8,-6 ROUTE/~' ,/>y.'"2"'~'2Â«/Â¢Â« ~~ENTRANCE.<8*E %*2%838*833~ f Hra-NF~=&1:illil~11111111111 l'h '1 /BETWEENDO54///~ /////,/7/912//' I---- 8 11 -3{~f <f~~ ~A//BETWEENDOORsÂ« ~ g 4/ Nml :- :iulful/'lii;/nullb A:ji) _i__ S U LILI SOFFIT ABOVE M LS~FFIT ABOVE LsALCONYABOVE Â«> PARKING-n CONCRETE WALK NEW PEDESTRIAN KK)SK ENTRANCE CO r, ~LIGHT POST $ r-FACE OF CURB LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE C~ LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE / AREA. TYP AREA TYP ~- AREA TYP , AREA,TYP. / 4 + , 2 IL ul LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AREA TYP PAVERS. TYP PAVERS,TYP EAST HOPKINS AVENUE rih SITE PLAN â€¢8 V u 1/8-= 1-0 4 k >4 3 * TIA-1 533 E HOPKINS 91Â»41Â»4 41& "' 4Â»\ Â·all'30OOO3H1'95Â¥klneWVJ ~3~~N] ~I (}~Il]1~ ~~~iJ ~rij i iu~ I 31Â¥os 9,009 I =I.5*1'EW]lgM]O ]~rE 0/ o~~.,~p~~~1'puete~noule~,u,â€¢6Â· NI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS St/Bt/8 0â‚¬190,E lite >Vi ~25,1-ZL-11' NOU.dIMOSEiG 00'N3dSÂ¥ 030'ABLA351 SNOISIA3B 011'380003~11 Â¥ SVI]@INVO 1HC)18+00 12}31*HOWÂ¥ 31Â·tl / 1/3SNOO .111"/0 }U lfK>HUM 03Solos,0 bio O3Srl 0293!ldrK] 38 iON AVW 39 VS 3il {]NI 1031!HOUV Bil jo IWOM OiDIS,1NndNA ONV Â¥419,80 3Hi lin LUSNOO N,3'3H -1Vlk,31VVII Nall,aM ONV SEN' *01* LOOII-*I : ON NOU'Â¢001 ~ Â£00.â€žL : ON 133,~Old NVId 318 Vll 31Ltl DNIMVBO 4 *1 . Qi IVA ulls 1010 29 16*04~4 Rvv- 07*f-- ttzys -*~1 --- 5#4 (M la 06*pu~< 4 VI/cUM'06 I l ot,1 tim4 â€¢ 0 95 - 4.WÂ«- Â«Mt i 1.riv.-~ i OM.kilâ‚¬A *, FLo trviAÂ«,v*prt- us<.. lgV *Wl WAÂ·10* Ab -RA- flxult UpÂ»'lk /1Wn/tY?vp, 6~ ppu.Vr O(64041 U.- Vle~at'PUM##49 0 ' U/MIS - aihy hui; EWLE GL - IAA,1 M Upil (bultikf kull MAVIA- ri,M- 48/ A[0*A,4 All 6~ --3*_ - e*,0- vicÂ£p qpou. F~Wwla 4 u-w f 1- Â» 141 + (1/m#*1- 616, 4 lof 110 4 id-- Alu__ . REFERE EYED NOTES NUMBER KEY NOTE 1 PETERSEN BRICK. KOLUMBA SERIES. K4 2 HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANKS. FINISH (TBD) 3 PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL 4 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAIUNG. PAINTED. 5 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING, 6 PREFINISHEO METAL. OVERHANG 7 EXPOSED STEEL COLUMN, PAINTED. 8 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL, EQUALLY SPACED PANES 9 STEEL BEAM WRAPPED IN PREANISHED BRAKE METAL, FINISH TO MATCH STOREFRONT. 10 STEEL MEMBER, PAINTED. T/O ELEVATOR 11 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT rh _ SHAFT 12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING -51'Tb" ---- - ---- - ----- -- - 13 ROOF LItâ‚¬ 14 ARCHTECTURAL CAST STONE. 1 UPPER PARAPET 15 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH. ~ - - - - 17 PREFINISHED METAL- COVERED ENTRY. -27ryÂ¥------' 1 16 BUTT-GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM. _ROOF -3 *1 PARAPET ---- --------- - Q 26'-IÂ¥-7 1 C PAINTED WHER XP 4 14 4 1 11 11 - 1 _ ~ _ _ TO RM-ING I 1. 1 1 SECOND FLOOR L- 33 2 5 -1 10 B O. UNTEL 1 /r) 1 BO LINTEL ---- r ~ ~ ~~ 12-Â¥~, I1 3 EXISING BUILDING ~ ~ CID BUILDING BEYOND EXIS11NG e (N.I.C.) (N.I.C.) || Â® \OD @ rÂ·h FIN FLOOR ~ih NORTH ELEVATION L/ 3/16" = 1'-0" 01 E T/0 ELEVATOR SHAFT ah - - -\ UPPER PARAPET 43 15 25 -Or C. - ~ L___PARAPET 27' - 0" 4-l/ 4 m -~~ --- ----- ~ TO RAILING /7 1961 3 % - SECOND_FLOOR /In --_ ___ 10 1623Â¥-7 ADJACENT BUILDING - - -(3Â© Â£ 51-- I BO LINTEL , TRASH ENCLOSURE -7 -- 11' - 1 fÂ»Â«I Cil e 3 0 - M k8 J gE TRANS 2 0 _FIN FLR SPACE 'A'J, 0 0' -8 ~ < LU /~ EAST ELEVATION - lo a ag g A-211 '011 '3~10003~41 9 vwngwv) 041]NION]INDI.2(18>u]14 ONNNÂ¥ .000 ....1.530 -5WU.W. ].â€¢i 00906,Ut, M 525~962(2*1,1 luo~ aJOPO'@41PI~einow.*w,â€¢Â· IPIL Id 1 blaNNvld ONÂ¥101 G3nSSI NOUSHOSEIC SNOISIA3B all 380003HI Â¥ SWN,/llo> 1},Diaid/3 1031Â»08Â¥ 3HI 30 iN3SNOO N31-lia,A }41 inOH.11,A 03SOK)SIO 80 DISI 'llilfildrIC 38 10NAW, 3â€žVS 3,1 ONÂ¥ '1031,HotlÂ¥ 3HI jo >IhOM 03HSIMIndNA C]NV TlllE) 3Hi 31A1 ll SNOO N13bI3H .831Â¥)'11 '311'BM INV SEÂ»lumul lil Looprn ON l)EfOUd SNOI1Â¥A313 80!831)(3 31111 ONIAWBO aaM.31/3/ 0 0 KEYED NOTES ./ NUMBER ~ KEY NOTE 1 8-CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED. 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 3 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH. 4 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING T/0 ELEVATOR â€¢ - SHAFT_Â£ 51' - 0" 4' PPER PARAPET C 28' - 0" 1/ PARAPET I 27' - 0" (/ -SECOND FLOOR /1 ~ ~ -89 ALLEY UNTEL , 12'Tr-1 1...1,=lf ,-TRANSFORI FIN FLOOR- - LTRASH 0 -0" L. ENCLOSURE ~ 4 i Ch South 6 3/16"= 1'-0" 2 % * 0 0 91/1 I 3 2 rOUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING 3 m f<D UPPER PARAPET 03 Â«13 Â¤ Lu | - _ PAR*PU-~, ~ 27'- " n Fl/Â£~ : (I>- - SECOND FLOOR /1 U.i E ' ENTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ACUACENT BUILD114(G A West 5 3/16"=10-0" 1 C A-212 i f< Â·011'3HOO03H1'9 5Â¥Hne SNOI1VA313 BOIW31)(3 IN'INION'll'll'UOUD.I HNINÂ¥}J ]L 31VOS 9t1 Xr9 .'53...']C -5.]1 0[190,6i {I~9 ~VI 01 {~11 3BOC]03Hi ~ SVUnfiINVE) IHOÂ¢UAd00 133 LIH DUV 3H i * SNOISIABI 9/1/-8 L Loopnt ON NOUV001 ~ Â£00Â»-,1 ON 103rOMId V SNI>IdOH 1943 LE 03'N3dSV aaMELA38 31LU ENIAAÂ¥20 91/81/8 .... NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 7,010.48 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 884 41 SF {BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 7,01048 SF i~ LOWER LEVEL NET LEASA8LE AREA 6,244.56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2,158.82 SF (BLUE) SUB.TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6,244 56 SF 31 SECONDLEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 5 988 68 SF (RED) NON UNIT COMMON AREA 764 52 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1146 33 SF (PURPLE) SUB-TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 5,98868 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE 19.243.72 SF - NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 884.41 SF ''''...''...''. , I 764.52 SF (EXEMPT) 90 317 t I 'fook 1., ''.MLf 0. I -,/-'' ekt ;/71/; //1 2 62 094/ 49// // / ' /. ' 2 'Fl - 9.11 r\ 1- 31 ..h mill 7/th , 1 9:.9/ 4 /4/ 9~7 Â·Â·Â· 7 / ,/mj. f ---213 4~ 4 , / ~~ IDUMPSTER,2 f ., 90'-11/2- , ~ ' 4- /5/.-- 92. / ' , /42 Z,4 7-\\ I. .' , A- , .,14.2 9 r '. ' 9~7 4**,eÂ· c.649Ja ' , .,7301 I =Za ON ~ Q.-4- ..942 SECONOFLOOR 1 I LL-Ir.- TENANT SPACE 9 3 EE,4 r T~-2 '- -CIZEZZE. 5 0M3 ' 1Â·.Â·i ,>7'-31/2" . ./f~ ,23Â·-101/2'Â· ,.,, - f ,/ 24Â·-1" , ..1 IlillL .:IZE-. l NET LEASABLE 2 , =T--77 13. ST=-fl , ' - AREA: 5,988.68 SF k : Â· _,L_,1, *,5 .. ELEÂ¥Â· , /,1 RETA'grE 'A RETAIL *ACE Â·8' RETAIL SPACE'Câ€¢ /5 ' ~~ 2 - 1 35 1 t~ i.el E t U lat f ..7. r ./ I 4 , 'lld bl NET LEASABLE 1.414 6 E 3 FT ~.. ~ 2 4 AREA: .wg 1Â¤ 8 7,010,48 SF I--2 -1. 1 Ek--2 EfbIZZIE 4 4 - . 58 .'02 - / Nmr Ilf - 9 ''1 . % Il I lk,/ . . ,/ I /1 17' - 101/2" I . OUTDOOR 6 / 6 ,,//Ar// U 6 5.'A o TERRACE 1 Â»11= . f 1 I [*].a M 4 4% 2 W iI[ 1' ' 23-8' Â· -r. .1 - -24Â·-10--' ~~~~~~~>' .. , 23-91/2 ~Â· '. < 1 I 'r , f i ,-tti)1 ' / M . k 1 1/ -4 - 2..0 L PROPERTY OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: PROPERTY LINE PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF UNE 1,146.33 SF (EXEMPT DECK) - (EXEMPT) ait SECOND FLOOR - NET LEASABLE An CALCULATIONS rih CALCULATIONS .N 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 1/8- =1'-0 ~ MAIN FLOOR. NET LEASABLE 1-LL_L-1-1 l 1. // (101 , '' E i IE f- 1 . 1 11-13 ./. 1 .t 11 2 U 1 % N L-1 011 '3BOO]03H1, SVHneWVJ (111'380(]03+Il I SVICAE'*13 1HMAd(>0 1331!HOhf, 3'1 / iN)SNOD NaLLIMM IHI In(*tliM (339O10SK] 110 GISA 031Â¥Olldf,0 38 LONI im 34Â¥S 3HI ONV '1011Â»106 1 31Â·U 30 MUOM 03HS,INA/NA (]NV IDIBO *1 3.inl[1/NOO N 3k33H M31Â¥W NaLLIUM INV SONIA VIC 11Â¥ ~ 3/\V SNI>IdOH 19Â¥3 LE 10('0 I~~Niollne 1Naovrov 23.â„¢Â»f ... Â£00**,1 ON NOI.LVDO-1 ~ LOOP,Â·n ON 133,'Oad NV-Id 318VSV31 13N 3-11.11 DNIMVUO lUe NMV80 5 03/ABIAaa NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 7.01048 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 884 41 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 7.010 48 SF LOWERLEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6.244 56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2.158 82 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6244 56 SF SECOND LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 5,98868 SF (RED) NON UNIT COMMON AREA 764 52 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1.146 33 SF (PURPLE) ~-- NON-UNIT COMMON SUBJOTAL 2ND LEVEL 5 988 68 SF AREA: 2,158.82 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE 19,243 72 SF 90'-1 1/2- .. WOMENS TGNANT SPACE *A TENANT SPACE 'Er ' â€¢ - LE] 143 ' '. I, 1 CL 4 51/Â¥% 01--W g 44 NE L Â¢ 42 N ii 34 ..f COMMERICAL *81, ' AREA: 6,244.56 SF 3 09 , .111111''Ill i. ,; i i c.ch f 1 . ti,-Val/F .:1111'Pll TENANT SPACE'C TBIA'fIEAGE V :4:. 11 1 UP 2: . STAR 12 ~- 16191 L._ ' ~ & // .11> '99 2/3 . - i 8 i .2##99 ./4 h 440'. e h h LOWER LEVEL - NET LEASABLE .8 CALCULATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0" 08] im.1 b / d. 1 . V % N L-2 24'-61/2- 02 wo).,opoa..emu.".A, 3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LLS 'all'no003~41 ;9 5Â¥~nglAIVO SNV-ld 318VSV31 13N LKÂ» 1! i...:](J Â£.831... il Otle06f UtW >V~ BÂ¥62'..1, ON NOilÂ¥001 ZOOÂ»Â·*1 ON 103rOHd kl3NNVId ONÂ¥-101 03OSSI BULL DNIMVNO 31Â¥DS Ae NMVIO 9 IN//9 ~11 I J .... A CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0-159 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUE) SURVEY MOIUIENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY Box 7911.98 O STREET L I GlfT N A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL- PROPERTY LI~ - - - LOT LINE A POSTED ADDRESS: '517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUEÂ· BEARINGS BASED ON CITY MONUENT FOR TIE SOUTHEAST CORPER Of BLOCK 93 1--10 AND THE NORT}mEST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 'CHISLED X'. N 82'08'12-W. 0 10 20 m GAS METER 6 9 WATER VALVE e CITY MONUMENT f CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34 5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BUILDING MEIGHT 7915.94' 9 WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY *. EAST K REFERENCED FLOOD MAP 1 S THE CURAEMI FLOOD 1 NSURANCE RATE MAP THIS PROPERTY !5 SITUATED IN ZONE -X- (AREAS DETERMIIED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE 2 9 MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. do. ~ CO-UNI TY-PANEL NUIBER 06097C0204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4.1987 HOPKINS 0/ 4.8 73.00. DISK /J Â· ~0. 411'80,0~ / FOR THE COMIUMITY IN IMICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963. 25947 4Â· 'Â· Â· f *RE ES-15 40 DEL N 75Â·09Â·Ill <- tri PARKING ' Â·- DISK SIGN ON .. ZONED: CC (COMMERCIAL CORE} WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY NEATED PARKING SPACES 00.29+ 25947 LIGHT . . . Â·Â· NO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE, REAR 1 79\. 2 POST ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONLPENT 5 (7915.94Â· ) 1988 NAVD 4VS Â® KI OSK COURTHOUSE VIEIPLANE NO. 2 ELEVITIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETSI PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] {7952.61 4.4 Â»HERE VIEWPLANES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOnN. GROUND â€¢ 79182 - vIEWPLAIE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 NAÂ¥0 15.31Â·) , 4 [7948.6] CHVP1 â€¢ 7948.6Â· (ALLOWED HEIGHT:30.4Â·) 17952.01 ' CHVP2 = 7952.6' (ALLOWED HEIGHTÂ· 34.41 CONCRETE 1 7010.6 CONCRETE I.AL I I 75â€¢og Â¢'4 8.29 LANDSCAPED STAIRS 1 1 AREA --. 79194947 1 1 VICINITY MAP STAIRS 7910.1- 1' . 400 [7049.7] 1 }1 0 OUTSIDE OF= CHVP2 AREA -= - -GROUNDâ€¢ 7919.1 CHVP 1 = 7949.7 (ALLOWED HEIGHT:30.67 -46al -3,52 / M IÂ® b. e 1// - 5 7= 8 1 11 1 0 0 - 1 It SILL f i 7908.7 . 9: 1 1 1 1% . 2 11 0 3 h 2 21 C Â® 1 - 1 2%4 2 1 BUILDING 1 D LEVEL i -1 ; 1 1 iii' El 2 k YAM:KEL U, 7~4.8 gB fi ; 1 ..f Â· Â·-792\ f l CERTIFICATION G THE UNDERS IGNED STATES â„¢AT THE PROPERTY DESCR I BED HEREON WAS w FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND IS ACCURATE 0 Z / BILL DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, 8 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 7921.3' EASEMENTS oR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNON TO ME. 2 * EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND RE-BAR # APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE I 7020 1 SURVEYOR ME EXCEPTED. TH IS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED m Wy 1/ 15.000 Â· ...SSSXmaâ€¢. WITH THE SEAL OF â„¢E SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1 83 DATE~~1Â« m . GROUND= 7920.1' 2 CHVP 1 - 7956.3' (ALLOWED HEIGHT:3621 (7061 3} CHVP2 = 7961.2 (ALLOWED HEIGHT: 41 1') JOHI[ 4 H#RTH Pcâ€¢ 8947 W It -11 < Â¤ /80 k LANDSCAPED [7950.3] 7920 s 73.09. #, .64 â€ž41 4424 9 ,%=>000' {7961.2} 90 2" 4/c Â».. - 9 ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS EASEMENT RECEPTION NO.187066 ALLEY IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LU > PAVED DISK V'792 1 w < 20.90 25/47 1 LOTS D, E, AND E 4 0.. 7920.6 1 C ~ A~'TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. ~ - GROUND = 7920.6' AN&&54 2 [7957.21 CHVP1 - 7957.7 (ALLOWED HEIGHTÂ·38 6Â·) CONTAINING 9.029 SO FT â€¢/-, O.207 ACRES â€¢/- O I w 8 LU PREPARED BY ID ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 *%1:;2~JM & LAW YOU MUST COI'lâ‚¬ PHONE/FAX ..1 925-3816 . DATE JOB ~ 8 Â¤ 4/15 170966 63 &%FION Il VOID I' NOT -T ST*. ~Iâ„¢ â„¢E SEAL OF V : 0% ./ E rih VIEWPLANE SURVEY - 3/32" = 1'-0 VP-2 9 â€¢ 100 00Â· BUNDING DOES NOT ENCROACH Â·all '3HOC]Oill 9 *3AhlnS 3NV1dMBIA .009 .....530 ...... 1â€¢5,2 ..06,lity >. 5251-24- *po-pieincule> A,vâ€¢. 011 3bKX]OalÂ·!1 9 SVUARIW/0 lit)laid<>0 1031!HOWV 3HI 30 IN3SNOD N311!WA IMI IAOHUM OBSOIDS,(] HO (ESA 'aliVOildll 39 1<JN AVW 3),IVS IHI (IM' 1031"HOE , 3HL 30 3,UOM 03HSI 3HI ..USNOO N! 383# Â¢ 1Vllally1 N l Ill ONV SON' Â¥80 11V *NNVId (NÂ¥-1 01 031SSI St-GE-g NO{ldIWOSE10 03 *NBdSV LOOÂ»-IL "ON NOI1Â¥001 ~ LOOWÂ·Â·PL ON 103COUct 31111 DNIAWHO .... . Observer: Main Street 7906.9 517 E. Hopkins Ave. 11|~ Observer: Courthouse 1 F (Subject Site) 7912.32 Observer: Courthouse 2 4 4~ 4 7913.02 t. 19*9 7966 .9 Observer: Wheeler Opera House 2,~32 7916.18 > 9 1 f \7952.32 All~- Observer: Wagner Park 7919.73 Â» 02 ~ ~ ~ -~ 7962 32 -46: \ l \ 7972.32 1 1 40 Observer: Cooper Ave 7926.75 =EZE@ 9Â£,ii 4~ 15 Nlii 4 nA 5tzW 4 79,6.78 'i~_..... , 1,3 St,3 -..,...11/lill/~Illi:,F if .Coil j + 26*21 7 W I 7956.1 8 .......1. \. -191<,\~7976.18 1. a >986.18 >, 4.?33-3 7966.18 7976.18 Observer: Glory Hole ... 7947.55 Mountain View Plane Above which no land use or building shall project * 141-"4 r Height Above Observer 4. 7987.55 ~ Observer elevation to 30 feet 4 30-40 feet ' 1901 * City of Aspen Land Use Code -- Section 26.435 050 . 40-50 feet View planes extend to in#nity. The view wanerepresentations %4 shown on this map only extend to 60 feet above the observer's 50-60 feet Structure elevation. View planes exist past what is shown on this map. GIS Department February 12, 2007 K gag NE VP-3 011 3EK)(]0*11 Â¥ SIMIIÂ¢0 IH!)lak!00 1031*HOWÂ¥ 3Hi : 1 ' 00 3 Hl, 5VUng NOUd180$30 Ag 31Â¥0 'ON SNOISiA3H Â£00Irpt ''ON NOLLVOol Â£00Â»-IL ON 103fold 3AV SNI>ldOH 1SV3 L LS 91/81/8 00'N3dSV dVIN 3NV-ld AAEIIA 533 E. HOPKINS 03 1 3'-8 10'-0 10.0- L CONCRETE WALK *Apw~:~:w *pFF L.~t ~Â»77 41'. ..''~.4-,11 ,13 OPEN TO SKY ~ 2 41/imm 4*414:113////001 1. U -Â«174 . aÂ«X\Â« Â» 91 0 1 6 00 14.-6.- J SEESSMas&12&1------21 r---1 lzE 1 3 |DU~~ER| | 31 0 9 tÂ«\- thÂ«i- i D L--_J V_ w " --i 12-7 9 r---1 i r --1 7 ~J~P~TER| | |DU~PSTER| - 9 4 J.. 4 Â»Â«941 , \Â»11111 49444-2-r e -r ft \ 6$ AN -\ 21 4 f /4.40 0. 43 0 F NY'~34 _ ~-111/7 A~ A.3 ~ SOM~'~\ Â»2 1 - 18 43433 \\\ # 4-64\3:4 --4 0.-3 5 (94 1 m - 1 4%94 -~ 344 1- 1 9- 0 - 1 \\Â» 1 3 .i - 496Â« 1 44 / 16Â·4.4, 11 4 4 Â«44Â«4611 \\\34~ 4%44 \\ \ \\ a 515 E HOPKINS DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN -- CAMBURAS & THEODORE LTD. ~ SCALE a DRAWN BY-~ == PROJECT NO. 1444007 LOCATION NO 14-44007 I 1- ......7 00..... L 6006 mi.7,2-1525 fAK 847';908130 RA 1 8-28Â·15 ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER =6 DATEE 8/18/15 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. -.camouratandiheodore corn /N e NO. DATEE BY DESCRIPTION ~ REVIEWED ASPEN. CO TT REVISIONS "1 1444 ALL DR~ VINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL. HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND U~UMISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT. AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED vmHOUT nE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT COPYRIGHT CAMBLEAS 8 â„¢ECDORE LTD dAl'SH3Alid Â¥3WV 3AOBV 1.13dOS7 BAOEV AN00178 S31-13N38 ~-88% 30 gov=i 3dVOSONV1 ~200 S.F. TRASH ENCLOSURE 90.29' ,~- PROPERTY LINE 3nN3AV SNI>IdOH 19Â¥3 7 31-TVM 31380NOO 4 UND",111'11'11111"'111,1 N... .... -p,949.77 0 COURTHOUSE VIEW PLANE #2 CHVP2 /Â·6 u +79526.-r- (31'-0") ,' T/ ELEyAIQB *(AE~7-- 4- - COURTHOUSE VIEW PLANE #1 CHVP1 /6 'F +79501 0 ------ ---- - â€¢7528 6-~7- - -- - -EPARABET A MQ'.A"\ --- L UpAB.ET*- .AILBNUNG a , ii iii i i THETI N 11~15311 1| ____ -Tkpzlll +79384 M '7-+79374 P ~ jr-=lrrlrni 1 11 li .lit 11 t-_~- 4~ f T/EXISTING GRADE T/EXISTING GRADING J -7:7919.11 - - , ~ +7918217 :rr,7 n'71 ' ' ='/= L / Il NORTH ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE dh ANALYSIS U 1/8"= 1'-0 .k CHvpi --- ------------- COURTHOUSE VIEW PLANE #2 --- ---- ---il----------------- --- --- --- --- COURTHOUSE VIEYDEE #1 --- (31 '-0") J TELEVATOR SHAFT ----- -------+ CH%1 +79497 ~HT+79501 UPARAPET J /20'-n"\ A|\ TPARAPET ------ - +7946-21~ (OV) ~/â€¢79452 , M 111 11 j tI:lllIj1l1l 1/ENA.J.* t +7938 4 =: 1-1 -23 _T. # +7937 4~ 1.--'j~'11 1 - Â£63/ EXISTING GRADE L ~ -~+79~6'~ ~ ~ Pm ~ T/ EXIEING GRADE â€¢79197 B 2 li<~ EmSTING GRADE 6% +791198 I E EAST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE (ih ANALYSIS v 1/8"= 1'-0 - iN 2!yE2 _ --- +7961.3' COUREtReE.YIEWPLat#2- __--_-_------ i CHVP2 CHVP1 T7+79526' - - - ---- -----â‚¬- - IyE-3'-+ g --- --- --- CoWEDÂ·!24!2UIWLLE'L,U- ------------ - I LLi ILWEMATORSHAFT /6 > Jpl_ - ------ ---- 1- +79501' ~ -r- < 7-+7948 6 rOUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING (28'-0") 1 +7946.2Â· / - â€¢h Â·r, PAEAE) _ - -- I 1 1 , ,1, WARyU_ - - y.79452Â· 1- ~, TPARAPET J n En o â€¢79384 CI4TIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDIG .r- LO 4 Ti ExIW!!&Â·GRADE 1 1 10 7-47Â§182Â· ~ a -7 EXISTINGGRADE- ~~-- Â¥92- M - 3, y 4Â§t +791198 gog* WEST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE ('i~ ANALYSIS u-/ 1/8" = 1-0 VP-1 011'38000â„¢195Â¥HnE@WV) '~NIH+Wl-I lkâ‚¬'1~1,1.In,m~ '1. NNV/,1 ]NI 13~1114 lil 91009 Il i./Id'/1 I.../.0 1~47 011 3380003}1 9 SVUneW,VO 'HO,tlk,03 1031!HOUV 30 1-N3SNOO /3111HM 3bÂ·Li 1OOHLIAA lillia /0 {13Sn '031<)1 39 109 Am 31./3Hi ON' 1331Â»Ob ~ 3HI :IC} *WONL GEÂ»Gl'NfldN/ * 3#Â·UFUAILLSNOO ~ 38* -MUELIV*Nall (]NVS.N. %~01-IV UW M /.MÂ¢ m .b l WO( OW 131 i a'opo@41'uotenqw,i~â€¢MA ONÂ¥-10103nSSI Ae Â£00Â»IL ON NOIIV)01 ~ LOO,int ON 10/Ok,d 03 N3dSV 03/,431/\32 SNOI1VA313 3NV1d M31A .... FLOOR AREA SUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 877303 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 7 345 84 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 973 94 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 45325 SF {PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR 8 319 78 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012 74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6 642 79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2 369 95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9 012 74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF COMMON AREA: 973.94 SF SECOND LEVEL 8.342 05 SF COMMON AREA: 556.67 SF - COMMERCIAL AREAS.503 72 SF (RED) 90'-31/2 I ------ DEDUCTIONS 128166 SF {PURPLE) COMMON AREA 55667 SF (BLUE) , 0 11''I''0'.1.'', , 6 Jr f -TJ- 3 TOTAL FAR 15.380 17 SF (1 71 1 FAR) <3$# AREATOWARDSFAR 7060 39 SF f ~ ZONING INFORMAION AND CALCULATIONS: - 7 / , ZONING ALLOWANCE (2 1) 18.000 SF (2 X9.000 SF) 4- ZONING (CC) COMMERCIAL CORE Â· NET LOT AREA 9.000 SF (90Â·4Â·Â·X 100'-03 CALCULATIONS: - 90 - 1 1/2" 2222.ELQQEAREA ' ' â€¢ COMMERCIAL. SPACE 20.492 35 SF (RED) . , - COMMON SPACE 5.635.47 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) EXEMPT SPACE 10.747.65 SF (PURPLE) A'' - ALLOWABLE AREA OF DECKS [fiKI , Â· I 244 7-i -/3 - OVER 30' ABOVE GRADE 15%(2.700 SF) 6- 1 + ._ON--' Â· 1 0 ~ - DECK AREA 1,281 66 SF-2.700 SF(ALLOWANCE)= 0 SF UPPER ROOF TERRACE AREA 1.28166 SF 2. =trui . I 4 =3, r-- NORTH 0 SF EXPOSED . ly-~ - ' ~ SOUTH OSF EXPOSED ' EAST OSF EXPOSED i Â«i )3 SECOND FLOOR / c WEST OSF EXPOSED I TENAN-7 SPACE â€¢ 2 2 2/LQMM26~.*ALLAREA $ ~4 7 -3 1/2 23' -10 Ur J . . , g 24Â· Â· 11. . , 24Â· Â· 1Â·Â· , - EZZIZE i NORTH 90'-2 7~5 - - COMMERCIAL :Â· SOUTH 90'-2" EAST 1004Â·Â· 8 2 .lhlib . ' 1 '0 ' -' STAIR#1 45 - ~ 4--t----7- {~0 Â· TOTAL 380'-4Â·LENGTH 'fÂ«. . lilli AREA: 6,503.72 SF 9 RETAH- SPACE 'A RETAIL SPACE Â·8 RETAILSPACE'Câ€¢ _~~ - 11.CGNÂ· SFTOTALWALLAREA . OSF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA 55 i 1 ... ELEV. 1 75/, ~[El ME 9 3/ 564 ' 0 0/11,0214"â€¢0%APPLIED ic 21 3 . ELEV rl -359 . lal - 52//ZE i MAIN LEVEL = 831978 SF: (45325 SFEXEMPT) - 0 I 1 : f{/: 9// : COMMERCIAL AREA: - SECONDLEVELâ€¢708039(1281666FEXEMPT) u 96 ROOF TERRACE=OSF(1.28166 SFEXEMPT) ..t 7,345.84 SF ; ; {*~ ~ , CUMULATIVE = 15,380 17 SF (1 711 FAR) ~2 -STAR . LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9.012 74 S F EXEMPT) I.- I .' I 1 J .1 00 ----./ â‚¬ CZE:18=., /, 1.-1.-% --*-. , / , 2 - : 'All--, 1 . 244* , - -f.'- / I UP ON Â·~- STAIR #2 EL-, / ~ 24 0 . r-- It-- L.=4-6 ...4 EUZZI~ r. . , 1 4111 %279 -1 2641-7-73 v U'Â¢4- 1 H \ A X -r VI / , 11/\ 1/ \/ \ A 11 1 ~ . . . L . Â¥ , lilli, tHi 1 , . 4 - I. . - I .... Ill' I I I . .1 4,> 100 1 17'- 10,/2. /OUJDOOR 6 1 11 wv L / f . 6 m / TE#-CE /, I la m \R 'j,X. A Eivir .. 3% 1. 51 ' I !1(/ il[(I (.(t t.. : 1 m t U~=aiLI[j L-AlÂ·,1.4 Eff 6 J.x, .fkÂ«--*1**40%. r '. h .23-91/7 - 9 r .. 6 15;t' 1/ u ~ ~= 4 Ll-,-m < PROPERTY OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: _~ PROPERTY UL PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF UNE LINE T (EXEMPT) 1,281.66 SF (EXEMPT DECK) 63 MAIN FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .8 CRA SECOND FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .8 LF 1 /8" = 1'-0' 5 1/8 =1-0 V 4 X 3 W FAR-1 JACENT BUILDI G (N I .1 011 '3&10 SNOI1Â¥ln0170 BVd tk 1Â¥ 0Â·04 law at I 2180(103,11 9 Sly,nflmo 1Ht)lk,Ad00 1331,HlyÂ¥ 3H1:, )00 1, .]N.ds]0 .51~315jW]C .. 83NNVid ONÂ¥-10103ASSI SNOISIA3U Â£00Â»-*t ON NOLLVE)0-1 ~ LOO,rn "ON 3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LLS St/81/8 00'N3dSV C)3M3[Aakl 31111 ONIMVIO AG NMVBJ FLOOR AREA SUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 8 773.03 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 7,345 84 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 973 94 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR 8,319 78 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012 74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6 642 79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2.369 95 S F (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9.012 74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR O SF SECOND LEVEL 8,342 05 SF ~--COMMON AREA: 2,369.95 COMMERCIAL AREA 6 503 72 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 55667 SF (BLUE) SF (EXEMPT) DEDUCTIONS 128166 SF (PURPLE> 1 90'- 1 1/2- L AREA TOWARDS FAR 7 060 39 SF E#.W#'I'/ I TOTALFAR 15 380 17 SF (1 71 1 FAR 1 ZONING INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS ZONING (CC}COMMERCIAL CORE 2 1 NET LOT AREA 9.000 SF {go'-0"X 100'-0Â·') + ZONING ALLOWANCE (2 1) 18.000 SF (2 X 9,000 SF] . WOMENS TENANT SPACE 'A T'ENAtâ€¢~ACE.B. 3 Â· 2,28.8I!211 5 [ED 11Â£ 22&2.ELQQELARE& 4 COANERCIAL SPACE 20.492 35 SF (RED) 7 7 COMMON SPACE 5635.47 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) EXEMPT SPACE 10.747.65 SF (PURPLE) I~&Â£828 OVER 30"ABOVE GRADE 15% (2.700 SF) ALLOWABLE AREA OF DECKS , DECK AREA 1.281 66 SF Â· 2700 SF (ALLOWANCE) = OSF UPPER ROOF TERRACE AREA 1,281 66 SF 1 Ift 11 j 11 EXPOSFD WAI I RFI OW GRADE - NORTH 0 SF EXPOSED SOUTH 0 SF EXPOSED EAST 0 SF EXPOSED r 9 WEST 0 SF EXPOSED COMMERCIAL AREA: x0*GRADE WALLARM 6,642.79 SF (EXEMPT) SOUTH 90-2" NORTH 90.2 EAST 100Â·-0'Â· .4 #21.1921 ' ~ TOTAL 3804 LENGTH f L.-12=Qliti211 111029'-8" SF TOTAL WALL AREA 0 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WAU AREA 1 /4 7 0 1 11.029/Â· = 0% APPLIED I. . Ii\ ..' Â£!NALELQQKABU CORRIDOR " , 3 MAIN LEVEL = 8.319 78 SE (453 25 SF EXEMPT} SECOND LEVEL = 7.060.39 ( 1.28166 SF EXEMPT} ~ . ROOF TERRACEâ€¢OSF(1.28166 SFEXEMPT) LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9012.74 SF EXEMPT) CUMULATIVE = 15.380 17 SF (1 711 FAR) '.1 },L; ' } '' ///:2/T//f) , 1 tal J,i lf/ ..Â«* 494 ..f 20-9, Al - !111 , h YEWÂ»rT SPACE'C TENANT SPACE U !42 I Im] 0 CO ME,8 - 10 9 . 4 1 . (Fh LOWER LEVEL - FAR CALCULATIONS .N v 1/8- = 1'-0 4 t .*.87. f~ >9 , X ,/ 3 V 3 f FAR-2 NRION'N,i.'luJUJ-!ON '011 380003H11, SVUng,AD SNOMVIAO,VO 8Â¥3 l}h~906't. '. 062!.. I i Â»9 1 G.N.14 530 -58jl.dWk ' â€¢D( Ae NM~490 4KS)]Â·.OPOati~t upte,notue j w.,AÂ· ~3AV SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 LLS 91/81/8 het,~ DI 83NNÂ¥Id ONÂ¥101 a3ASSI 5112.9 1 ~ Â£00*r,1 ON NOUV0O1 ~ Â£00Â»-Ii ON 103rOkld 00'N3dSV 03Â¥3698 31111 DNIMVia .. THE CITY OF ASPEN SEP 2 8 28'1 Land Use Application Determination of Completeness CITY O> Date: September 9,2015 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 517 E. Hopkins Ave. and reviewed it for completeness. X Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items. 1. Mitigate for the remaining 6.99 trips to be mitigated through TDM or MMLOS measures. 2. Update the site plan to include, with labels and dimensions. the selected mitigation measures: detached sidewalk and buffer, additional minor improvements (benches). Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2778 if you have any questions. Thank You. Sara Adams, Senior Planner City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than ] additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging .... 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE f t 54. 1 9., I SEP 0 2 72 ASPEN, CO LOCAL JURISDICTION: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: ARCHITECT: LAND PLANNER: DRAWING LIST: THE CITY OF ASPEN M DEVELOPMENT CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. HAAS LAND PLANNI NG, LLC 130 S. GALENA STREET 2001 N. HALSTED ST., SUITE 304 2454 E. DEMPSTER STREET, SUITE 202 420 EAST MAIN STREET, STE. 10-8 SHEET NUMBER SHEETNAME ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 DES PLAINES, IL60016 ASPEN, CO 81611 CS-1 COVER SHEET TEL (970) 429-2761 CONTACT MARK HUNT TEL (847) 298-1525 TEL (970) 925-7819 ALTA EXISTING LAND SURVEY CONTACT. BY DEPARTMENT CONTACTÂ· TED J THEODORE, NCARB, LEED AP CONTACT- MITCH HAAS PA-1 EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY OR ROB AVILA, LEED AP EC-1 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-2 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN EC-3 EXISTING CONDITION FLOOR PLAN ER-1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN PA-2 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY PLANS A-010 PROPOSED SITE PLAN VP-1 VIEW PLANE ELEVATIONS VP-2 VIEWPLANESURVEY VP-3 VIEW PLANE MAP A-100 PROPOSED FLOOR PL-AN A-101 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 9% , FAR-1 FLOOR PLAN - FAR CALCULATIONS FAR-2 FLOOR PLAN - FAR CALCULATIONS NL-1 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE -- f ..- wh, --7. A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION N L-2 FLOOR PLAN - NET LEASABLE C A-212 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TIA-1 TIA SITE PLAN .Sii 9 /3 4 , f. 41 #. j . , 0 .0 0. 4. gif .:.. 4 J //,7 i: 1 -0 -4*20.1 ...., â‚¬444 :*.%.7 ft'' .:in.>.1 *tki:I . 1 *i- - M/4-a 6- LS- immuma-41 . ~42/07& 1Â£0~~q~jjER%V: #Wrl ' .26- 10~ f,Â« 7 - ---- a '- 'JA 'Iz'.1. -u,0,%. rmiâ€¢/. 4 7.X.%*/ Â·Â·Â·f Â· . w -Â· Â·Â·Â·,- Â· it'~Â· , h c. - 1 8 t 0 i. 2 her, 0 * I -:. J.-4.-c=z;4//%.6.-=dg. -r: 30-:13~ .-il 945*54172'.1 ;34 9%Â¢3' 11 -*-# r 1 - - V.-. rihz- e 6- 15 - . - . 22~22 -_ ,2 5 -4 : H i 4/ - AL - .. 21 , .24 . 4 N I 1 - - ~. 5 .4 .2 . 0 0 12*1 --- 12 2% 1 Â« 1% L Â· ,/rfj - 0 E. HOPKIN - 19 9,000 SQ. FT/ . -/ 2;Ey/- . 25 4* 0 e .r-.,4 I .- J. -- -LÂ·, ' 41 LA. A 1 -- -O Ct: - - m 40- h.'.-.pz . 4-EY /0 m . . #T /1 . OZ r . r: 1% 2 ' .. 4,2 , 1- 9 8 . .. .~ 2~'- 0, *t .. 4 . - T- . 9 - . "4Â» -40 ..,1 4 ...... Pre , A.. ~.Y~ 8 W 3 g i U<IIk - 1 S I - Z 0 U) ar 1% Cen,Q,27~ , M., Â» m OJ OK ~&** 49' - CO .. .mÂ» < 0 it *8 O 0 0 VICINITY MAP CS-1 'all '380003 Hl, SVHnE]WÂ¥ 01... 9 530 -15 y315d~â€¢30 3 IÂ·â‚¬ i* 18 net 581 i..1 VH .... .... Ra. J]lil. 6.1 8: OaAA31A3y P. Vld ONV10 03nSSI 011 '380003141 9 sv'flt]INVO IHE),W,/00 1031 iHOWÂ¥ 3,11 dO IN3SNO3 N31118M 3H1 InOHIM 03901.10 80 039n 031VO,ldnO 38 ION AVIN 31"IVS 3H1 ONÂ¥'103.LIHOk f 3,11 30 >IWOM 03HS:INrldNA ONÂ¥ 1VNIDIHO 3. 31n LLLSNOO N,383H -1,1831Â¥1â€¢1 Nal_118,4 {JNV SONI, Vk,0 1-TV 91-343.NOS LOottÂ· rl ON NOILVDll ~ Loott"fl ON 103rlld '74 31%1 + Â§9 MIPÂ¥1Â¥3 EDZ * 311# DNIM'Ad 133HS bl3AOO Ae NMVBC 51/86'B 0 . 0 0 4 CITY OF ASPEN GPS O-151 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX 7911.98 O STREET LIGHT A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL PROPERTY LINE - - - LOT LINE POSTED ADDRESS. Â·517 EAST HOPKINS AVENE BRINGS BASED ON C I TY MONUENT FOR TIE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1.-10 AND THE NORTIf*EST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHISLED X, N 82'06'12-W. m GAS PETER 0 10 20 Â® WATER VALVE U.S. SURVEY FOOT o ONE FOOT CONTOURS e CITY MONUMENT E CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 1 SLANTED TEn DENOTES SUILD#NG HEIGHT 7915 94 w WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVEN,E 4 h. ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE i N TEâ‚¬ ALLEY EAST T~ REFIREKÂ£0 FLOOD MAP 1 S THE CURAENT FLOOD I NSUR~NCE RATE MAP THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X IAREAS DETERMINED TO BE 7 OUTSIDE 500-VE~R FLOOD PLAIN] AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE g MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR FITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, HOPKINS CO-IUM 1 TY - P ANEL PUIB ER 08097(0204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JUÂ». 4, 1907 eb. 0'. PAVED 7500 ROWAVENUE 2919 FOR THEE COIMNI TY ! N WH I CH THE PROPERTY 1 S LOCATED DISK /// ... AREA AS DERID BY TEÂ·â‚¬ CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1903, THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ~SPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD 25947 -4. . FIGURE ES-15. N 75.0. 0029' 25947 PARKING'~ Â·Â·.Â·... ~ Â· ZONED: CC (COIERCIAL CORE] WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY No Ki#NEATED FARKING SPACES D !SK NO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT. SIDE, REAR ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUENT 5 [7915.94Â·] 1988 NAVD 79".2 POST LAADSAP Â® ..KI OSK COURTHOWE VIEWPLAIâ‚¬ NO, 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETS} PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLNE NO. 1 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] 17952.61 , Â· ARS,rÂ· WHERE V I EIPLNES OVERLAP MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOÂ»N. 57941.81 ve/LANE ELEVATIONS ADJOSTED TO FIT 1988 NAVD (5.3:Â·1 {7952.6} i CONCRETE WALK 1 79,0.5 CONCRETE WALK N 75â€¢09 11Â·W 1 4"24,4 VICINITY MAP 90.29. , t[-â€¢O 0 ... LANDSCAPED 2/ 5 a 05 1 2 1 STAIRS 7919.1- 1' . 400 d .im 17>:9 7 1 j 1 il 7908.4 W22. ' ' ROOF 07,GS=. .471 AM :33# GARDEN 1 51 l \Cool =' m/.9<*.~M 1 262/ MEgm mt,j 1 0 EMEE l U" Z I R 1 Zil A 22 2 ! FI STORY l immwins/,4 C .2 2 Â® 1 3 1 74 G BUILDING | ARDEN 1 ID LEVEL t . 1 31 l : : ~ ~ ~ LEVA I E 785.82 2 8 $.IR.-- 9 I .., r f CERTIFICATION 1 I f Â·Â·Â· as 1 1 31 4 THE UNDERS IGNED STATES â„¢AT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND 4 ACCURATE 4 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE IS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO e 2 1, ~~.3. 0 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROAa#lENTS. 1 U EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. RE BAR SURVEYOR ARE â‚¬XCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOI D UNLESS WET STAMPED ~##6%4 EQi,~~EO~r.18:&Â»lx:?~RÂ©FÂ°~80%6' ~f{' &~pl~IVIN~~A~EGROUND 7920.1 -9 -2 Iâ„¢ THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1/15.000 5/0.1.ild 1 ..7.70,4513=-#1. i 2 DAT~D:-0,##:1 2 -M#-Al {796!.3, 34 5 JOH~ 11~ HQ~~~/94' al: .40# AK LAMISCAPED ARD RAI 4,44 *c 0*04 17950.31 7920 s '5.09Â·,pE [796!.21 -K ~0 29 4 # . f........ 0 ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS EASe,ENT RECEPTION NO. 187066 0 ALLEY IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY o a 22 LOC< ~,~ ...~>*~ oF u Z DISK I R 0... 94 - 25947 LOTS D. E. AND F. 0 79206' 4 Clâ„¢Al'TOWNS ITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN [7957.21 STATE OF COLORM6 CONTAININGÂ· 9,029 50 FT â€¢/-, 0.207 ACRES â€¢/- PREPARED BY : M ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET : ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 LUZ PHONE/FAX [9701 925-3816 gle DATE JOB O.00[ 1/!5 170966 %8225,F32:~1,0:2145'EE"Pr ALTA 03H 1 Â¥ SVHRIWV 961 1.. 1 R 03M31A3 83NNVId ONV-1 01 aanSSI 3/\V SNI>IdOH -LSV) LE gk/8//8 SNOISIA38 all '*0003Hi Â¥ svanii'vo 1+,9,BIll 1031,HOWÂ¢ 3,41 30 1NaSNOO 4311,WA 314i ./Hil' 0390109,0 80 ./. '031/0!ld/0 3gloN AV,N ~wvs 3HloNv 1021!,OW, 3HI 30 >IWOMO3HS,iNndNnoNv lv,4,0,% 3Hi 3101'isNOO NEn,31~lvlk,BlviÂ·,INall,HAA ONV st>li,Iii *0 lTv Ag 31Â¥a ON LOOPIN ON NOI1Â¥001 Â£00*I ON 133rOHd ABAkinS Â¥11Â¥ 3-11:1 ONIMVI .... LEGEND ANU .U 1.I O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0-159 O UTILITY BOX 7911.98 O STREET LIGHT SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL H PROPERTY LINE - - - LOT LINE POSTED ADDRESS: -517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE~ BEARI NGS BASED ON CITY MONUÂ·ENT FOR DE SOUTHEA5T CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1.-10 AND THE NORTHREST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 -CHISLED XÂ·. N 82Â·06Â·12-W. 0 IO 20 I GAS METER 6 Â® WATER VALVE U.S SURVEY FOOT . ONE FOOT CONTOURS e CITY MONUMENT CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 34 5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES 8UI LDI NG Â£ IGHT 7915.94' I WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE . ALL OIlâ‚¬ R UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY ... 44 S 71 ...% OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAI N) AS SHOVI oN FLOOD INSURANCE RATE THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE X- (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. 2 .% COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 0&097(0204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JINE 4. 1987 HOPKINS AVENUE '*0 ;1% m~:5~2,#Â°?2 m"c:AÂ·nWEP,~~~~~~ F~Â°2~cl~:rANCE RATE MAP 31,8 PAVED THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD DISK /4'Â·. AREA AS DEFINED BY THE Cl TY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT 98 1963. 25947 ... FIGURE ES-15 4 7.09Â· 90.2/ =7 LIGHT NO DEINEATED F PARKING 'Â·Â·-Â·... ZONED: CC (COPIIERCIAL CORE) WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY It.. SIGN ON -,- . NO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRONT, S IDE, REAR ARKING SPACES 7918.2 POST ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT 5 (7915.94Â·1 1988 NAVD PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO, 1 ELEÂ¥ATIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] LANDSCAPE l '78 // Â·484 -. MY#~IAM[~i~ I 8~tRAD~0S~:TT:EF~T I I~I;~E,Â·,t~W?8 3I Â· I Â® KIOSK COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETSI CONCRETE WALK 79,0 6 CONCR 1 .,40. $ . ETE WALK N 75 09Â·11- d> 90 Â·29- STAIRS 79194.I LAND5CAPED 1 444 25947 VICINITY MAP . 45 STAIRS 7919 1- t7949.7] 1' - 400' 1 1 l =a 7908.4/ ,~79914.a=Wit,-47-1 8/ i : 1 1 GARDEN Â£ 9 1 1 1 ' Z I E f D / BILL / 7908.7 / ~Â°3. 31* / 1 / I %' - 13 1 - S - . I f {-E*%4 18 l STORY c N ' Â®---514.23 S.F. ~ WITH 1 / ~ ' PUBLIC AMENITY BUILDING ~ GARDEN 1 . 1 LEVEL 1 - 1 1 2 4 l ' 1 1 E ~ Â»*l 1 / l / f / ...........792\ i 7,2MÂ· 1 G CERTIFICATION: 4, < ~ ~ SIU FIELD SURVEYED DURING - AND IS ACCURATE THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 0 7921.3' 6ASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, A~1O THAT THERE ARE NO ;521 f - EXCLUDED AREA Am~#:?rwri?:C:r,A?Ol~f*JAIK"%~SAN&:in~CrTS. (ABOVE 7921 ELEVATION) EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOI. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEOROUND APPURTENANCES AND DOCUâ‚¬ITS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE ~XCEPTED. â„¢IS SURVEY IS VOID 34-E55 IET STAMPED r 0 WITH THE SEAL OF Tf SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN ..:.'3:.. 1 1/15.000. 179;el.31 i DATEDÂ· JOHN M. HOWORTH P L.S. 25947 4,0 l 3.. {7956.31 *~0 4*24 1796!.2] ~0Â·29. ./t ./1 ELECTRIC /8 COMMUNICATIONS '- EASEMENT RECEPTION NO 187065 ALLEY P--h IMPROVEMENET/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Â£~4~ OF BLOCK 94 20. ~WED DISK - 7921 25947 LOTS D E, AND F, R. 0. BLOCK 64, 7920.0 CtTY AND TOÂ»NSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITK IN [7957.2] STATE OF COLORAM. CONTAINING: 9.029 SO FT â€¢/-,0 207 ACRES â€¢/ PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH MLENA STREET 10 ASPEN. COLORADO 61611 #@t PHONE/FAX 19701 925-3816 8 DATE !25,5,Fi!,iÂ·i'.~~IEEEe:JP; 9/i4 1,028 EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY Ch CALCULATIONS PA-1 ~3/32= 1-0" 00.00Â· NG D0E5 NOT ENCROACH 011 '380003HI 9 9Â¥Mfll]604VI 1/91/IdOO 103111~08'tr RIHL 1 ON,833NIDN3 NO,53(]80,~11,1, DNNNV-ld~38nt)]1, Blff LA 5,N,Â¥ld,30-15.3./.30 3/. PAVED WALK 1]11'3k,OOO3H1,SVInt]WV) COURTHOUSE V IEWPLANE NO. 2 HINNVId ONV10103nSSI st-eâ€ž ~ '3AV SNIMdOH .LSVEI LI.9 NOILdIHOS30 *8 31Va I ON SNOISIA3M LootÂ·ltâ€¢ r ON NOIiÂ¥301 LOOVIN ON l[)3 rONd 00'N3dSV 03M3 IA3U kLINBINV Olland DNIUSI)(3 31111 DNIMIHI Ae NMVJO .... . WA5[E Ala / -----7 / -0 0 0 4 .....:2/211 = 1/31 V NET LEASABLE AREA - 931 SF - NET LEASABLE - 50 SF 1 Cul I COMMON - 658 SF - 1 -4/0Mmijp,VE#H.WV~~7 F= < -1 l//1 IAL ti,\\1 \\N 1 m 1 .01./////~ r- -- 4 01 5. \ Di - ' lig-i \Â« NET LEASABLE AREA - 3226 SF U 4 20'No LEVEL 62055 AFEA 9,919 50, Ff, - . F=-I-- . I 1 / \â‚¬ 14*,L -j . 1 ,- -- - il COMMON - 78 SF NET LEASABLE AREA: 3226 + 931 + 50 = 4207SF COMMON AREA: 658 + 78 = 736 SF a C PRAWINU PY: M2(FEI?TY NEAVP: CKY PLAZA BULPIN6 ~ Z TIU PIMENSONS 917 EAM H0PKIN5 AVENLE OLE 1/ 4" - 1' 5*LU AN'ENTMEQIMEN5045.COM ASPEN, CO 81611 JLLY 20ll EC-1 9100911 /3 â„¢1 5 4315d.â€¢130 1 1~ HO<]03H1 ntl8Â·06tlt~9}~Vj ./#Ul -1.'.18. NOI-ldIWOS30 *9 31Vo ON B3NNVId ONV1 0103nSSI aN -8 1 1 3AV SNINdOH 1.SVEi LLS SL/BL/0 SNOISIA38 011 3UC)003Hi , SVE]nEW,Â¥0 1 HD,klidOO 103111408V 31Â·u 30 1N3SN03 N3uiwM 3,(1 1/0,411/ 0380-109,0 80 03sn '(131Â¥31idnu Ju ION Av,9131â€¢Ivs 3Hi ONÂ¥ 1031!Hor'i 'Hi jo MICA, 03,4911*Nn ONÂ¥ lvNH),80 3Hi 3inil.lsNOD .13WD, -lvilaill /3111//OIls//1, ./01-V LOOPIN ON NOilÂ¥001 ~ LOONÂ·tl ON 103rOld 00'N3dSV 03MBIABH NVId H001=I DNI1SIX3 311ll E)NIMâ„¢(] e . . . ET -T ~- PATIO - 278 SF 1.- FA110-6-kÂ· . Â· 142%49 I rk/757 I ./ 9% 7 NET LEASABLE AREA - 984 SF h \\\: COMMON - 715 SF 1 1 .AA mt i -49.-. 3 d /4 \\N \. I 11 ... 1 0Â§ 2 4-~ ~i -94 .* I .8 1 8Â¥ 0 0g 1 a ./ 71 2 â‚¬ 13 f 8& : m i . 1\,/ NET LEASABLE AREA - 2075 SF 5ECONF FLOOR 1 620% a 4,084 50, Ff 1 -m \ 1 1 NET LEASABLE AREA: 2075 + 984 = 3059 SF PATIO AREA: 85 + 278 = 363 SF COMMON AREA: 715 SF \4~~Â·-:' PATIO f \ i. 1 + il_ i ., PATIO - 85 SF = PROPEBY MEA51.159: CITY PLAZA PULPING A PEAWIN05 BY 5(ALE 1/4" 0 1 9 i El TELE PINEN5100 917 BET H0PKIN5 AVENLE 0 1 R EPENEEPINEN5101%~COM AEN, CO 81611 JULY 2014 EC-2 ,*Le(*Et/~fl ~.4 g5m 31 *.%-19.315,1.'1901~ Â£ NOI1dIHOS30 AB 31Â¥0 ON H 3NN'rid INV-I 01 DIASSI SNOISIA3EI 011 380(]03HI 9 SVEdne,VD 1149,81Â£100 10-Ul,10}jv Bwl . IN3SNOO N 31LIWM 31 1 inOR'IM 0390-DS IO 80 03Sn 031VS]ldna 39 ION AVI 3WVS 3HI ONÂ¥ 1031!HOW, ak,1 30 )(HO,A 03HS!1NrldNA ONV ll,NIOIMO 3,1 31nlLLSNOI NI31i 3/ -lvlk,31Â¥1'1 NalL,WA ONÂ¥ SONI, V'BO l'IV LOOM-VL ON NOI1Â¥001 ~ ZoortÂ· M ON 133reld gi-eze ~ 3/\Â¥ SNI>IdOH 19Â¥3 LLS gl/81/8 00*N3dSV a3AA3 IA3B NVId bl00-13 9NllSI)(3 3-1111 INIMÂ¥kll OZ om 80 z w 00 m I 4 I. 1 *5 1 11 41 6.=-/4 ACÂ«/\ /1 n f 41 661 - Z m -1 9 L, if Â» f 0 1-2 ma - 10 U m Crl 0- A 47 4 0 .. 25(0 71 FR 3J Z m 29 7. F- -LL L > IN - 1 L 411 3 C 0%03jjtift [) 1 1-----1-4 1-2 1 a F DRAWING TITLE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. â€¢~1 SCALE ARCHITECTUfiEIPLANNING /1[RK)RDMIGNIENGI. iNg PROJECT NO 14-44007 LOCATION NO 14-44007 j4&1EOEMeslERST. DESPL~NEa ~ 600I6 ~ DRAWN BY RA ~ T[L ~4~ fAX 64/13..1 10 1 8-28-15 ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER 1 DATE 8/18/15 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. u,nâ€¢a-u.-d//10,-ili,1% ,~ NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVIEWED ASPEN, CO eN 1949 TT REVISIONS ALL DR' VINGSAND WRITTEN MATERIALHEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUNLISHED WORK Of THE ARCHITECT AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED USED(Nq DISCUOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT COPYRIGHT CAMBURAS & TIEIDORE.LTI =IS Â£Â£2 :Â¥38Â¥ COMMON - 134 SF 012055 Al*A Mlog Alr W07611016NjNIdIQUN11Â§Â¥ :IS 0649 :93219 CIrl 7-9 00 2-1 -1 Ing VZVY A.[13 :diNIWN A.133303,1 6,048 50. Ff GARPEN LEVEL ... PATIO - 20 SF - PATIO - 18 SF PATIO - 20 SF --- PATIO - 21 SF ./ '* ./1 .r â€¢â€¢r . i FAff b ~ ><FATIO L~1 PATO j - FAÂ®f ~- I . m 43Â»44 442% NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE NET LIVABLE EFIR AREA - 452 SF AREA - 433 SF AREA - 414 SF AREA - 585 SF I I ./ - 1 26 1,7- L r. : COMMON - 516 SF 143 1 3 -1-7 0 I 1 / 1 ,L)61 ~04]~_~ .---i Re, 41 [1 A r~ i/~L 7-) r.~ If Â«b- r- 4 7 - 4 0 2 :Z :* [HIRP FLOOR ~ 62055 AREA 2,743 50. Ff ROOF j . . NET LIVABLE AREA: 1884 SF C PATIO AREA: 79 SF COMMON AREA: 516 SF IM!-~ MAWING5 PY: FROPEEY MEELREP: CITY PLAZA @NIWINA - 5011 1/4" -l' co ~ ..1. Â·~ ~ 91Â£ FIMENN0N5 917 EAM H0PKIN5 AVENLE Eig ~ ARNNIUOINENSONG,COM AfEN, CO 81611 JILY 2014 ER-1 '380'6~ VMMW iu#R' *Â¥J *Â·~167(/WI11]i -' .ii.x,,pi,Mi.inqiur' i.uâ€¢. 3AV SNI>ldOH 1SVE LLS 9I009 -n UNIvld$30'150115dwlal~tÂ£ H3NNV-ld ONÂ¥-10103ASSI St-82-8 U NVId 1VUNBOISBW DNUSIX 3 Loottl ON NOLLVall ~ Loot*Pt ON 103rlld 33111 DN]Maa 9,/8,/8 .... ALLEY - PROPERTY LINE 4 90.29 TRANS 1 0.1 1 p BUIL JING -1\ - -8-, OVERHANG ~ Â£1-1 -1-1 - ~ I 3I ] Ic- 1 i'T-/12 L -Lt2 n n ~ UPPER ROOF - ~ k r- =2 2% / In 2 8% g 1@3Z r.. 3 CL 517 E. HOPKINS O H,159 S.F I FoOTpriNT 1098.40 S.F. R I I PUBLIC AMENITY 25'.61/7 22 - 111/7 1 X-. B N..141 ......./.... C. Â·I . 'r. k 'A 41 k I k I'~,,1.'\ ~. \\ I I g 019*14 .......12 I I ... 05 1 0- Ir 77-31/7 - 526.:::I.\\P ....1... 6 5 V.X.:"..."WI ....tra h Paravaf .:.'ve \ 11 ..4....... \....... 32~\VaAIDON'%44.. ANX:Â».L.CON'r \ ...... N lilli. .....,4.1/1..... b Â«COM Y ~434/12 RI - - :A:1:NA:RvÂ«vale - Ir, ' L. 41<40.4 ...Xy.> 1/ i IyftÂ«: Â·.. Â·. an= .:ikalÂ»0Â·..\,Â© :\VA\\ \1:\VAI o 11 1\..4 , 1..,.. r ,Â·Â«221 90.29' 1 - - PUBLIC ~ BENCHES SOFFIT ABOVE SOFFIT ABOVE LU 1 31 B BALCONy ABOVE ~ 0 AMENITY AREA: (TYP ) CONCRETE WALK ~ 285.10 SF -- F, 3- ..--LIDHTF-~T - - IC a. LANDSCAPE-~ LANDSCAPE AREA, TIP PAVERS TYP I EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ~- A SITE PLAN fil SECOND FLOOR PUBLIC AMENITY W v 1/8.= 1-0 t) 1/8"=11-01' m 0 r. 1.D 115 :KE . LU PA-2 -23Â·-3- DUMPS 533 E. HOPKINS Â·011' OCIO)Hl 9 5Â¥UnaWV) .... sal/ .kilL ' 5. Z.,131 CONCRETE WALK 011 1tio003111 9 SvwflarIVO 1149!HAdOD 1031!HOHV 3Hi 30 1N 3SNOD .31_LIM. 3/11/0,Ul. 0390109,0.0 (1:ISA /31Â¥3,1<1/0 38 1014 AVI -1,WS ./1 0]NV 103111Â·1/r' 3/1 3 BaNNVId ON'rl 01 OBASSI NOI.idBOSBO 3190 ' N 00 'N3dSV 03MBIA3U .../// LOOVIN ON NOIIV001 ~ LOOÂ» PU ON 103rOHd A.LINI30,IV 01-land 0390dOhld 311ll SNIMVUO Ae NMVIO alva 533 E. HOPKINS 3m -0 CONCRETE WALK 13 8Â·.i 10Â·.0. , 10â€¢.0- 1 OPe, TO **E Val~22,. 2/ 4 '100 00' 2 41 4 41 5 4 .4--I 14 6" --- --ill--i- - -9----31 -,02 1 ~ 4 I~ -3 YD- .4.q ~UMPSTER _1 5 -T-1 - .- 8 4 ' T--1 A--, 0 1 1 3 YD I , ~ 3 YD DUMPSTER 1 DUMPSTER L___3 i L___ 3 - I.n ./ i i ~Â«Nall <...4 T g 1 12 m 82 ..1 : 3 g 91. . L. 40 EZ - 4 1 '4- ; 5Â· - 0Â· m > G Â»17 i Â§2 -0 - "-h 1 - LA -1 1 0 1, .9 1 5 <1 I Â· r p 8 1 1 m =1 1 0 -- 3 r i 0 - 1 i : 1m 100.00 515 E. HOPKINS DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN I CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. SCALE ARCHITECT~RE I.ANN~. M. ORDMIGN,ENG,NE.NG PROJECT NO 14-44007 LOCATION NO 1444007 24./DEMPWEA'-UBINNI' 600/ DMWN BY ~ e51 194 RA TELI./*I. rA* 84â€ž0#8",0 1 8-28-15 ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER DATE: 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. - wm,-bu.--eâ‚¬om #J- Â¥1 8/18/15 t[%#419 NO, DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVIEWED ASPEN, CO TT REVISIONS SIBAVd d/1 '/3/V F-3d'OSONV-1 ~ S3HON 06.RHANG Idl CD 3nN3AV SNI>IdOH 1SV3 >11Â¥M 313HONOO dkL L -100 rk CHVP1 Â¥+114*7 - 7 C .-- +7946 7 7 - 1- _I(PbRheET.Lk. (28'-07 1 - T/ PARAPET - â„¢2+ 1! mi. i" I iii lit 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 111 11 .. 1 111 Ill 1 T/PARAPET LT, RAILUNG- -- - -13=~~< 317937 4 I~ -11-' -I , ' I I -6 T/EMISTING gRADE --= , , EV~ " , - TE EXISTING GRADING_Â£. V +7919 r - +79182 NORTH ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE L/1/8= 1-0 --- ---- -------------222-925222UE#2 *CHVPL +79572 0--...------- ~ Il. ---- ----- ----------922'9552222: ill--- --- --4 - (31'-0") -Â£_T/ELEVATOR SHAFT --- - - - - - +79497' vp | -- - 2!yel-41.- P +79501 - UP88*PET_Â£- 428'-07 ~ i Â·Â·Â£2!28BAPET_ - -.....~.~.â€¢...~ +79462 LF < ~ +79452 *Elfit>%8**tuttitÂ»Li- 7/EABAPET_,6. u f - +7938 41 9 --1 2 - - - 1/BAIUNG .h 739-16/ //////// / ~ : Mm~r- , Il Il 1 -5:"Cre:1*11::"./..../- 1 IT.-Li t.=-, r///// 7-r t.fT, LIEXISTENG~ADE-1 I/fIN~_ 9<8~/'/'<9/~/'/'/1/~/'/~/'/'/'/'/'/'1~'~~- - ~79206' T/ EXISTING GRADE J) EXISTING GRADE ~ p-------~ +7911.98 EAST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE ri' ANALYSIS U 1/8"= 1'-0 CHVP2 10 +7961 3 ------ i CHV/2 2%!022&022~2Â£ --- -----0 ?64- + 7-*75526 - - _I --- Ce!12}Â·15N2U'UBJ~CAL----------- --- --- LU > --- --- - _ - _ ILELEMATORSHAFT /6 < 4 cHvpl- +79501' - ~'F 2/ +79486 ~-OUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING ------------------------------1 (28'-03 -4Â·T{PABAR=- -- - -/P,-1- - - -2 1-1 1.LA .12 '~- ~''' 'T - - +7946.2 20 1 i TpARNU- -- 1 - ff 1.12. 4 1- Oz IE J, IPARAPET +7558 4 r 5 rh'Â·1*r'-rÂ£r%Â·T+-r~r~-r~rÂ·-r~r4+Â·Â·rÂ£r44+ePe-P--9Itbbe. 4*46%Â«fartÂ©ftÂ«f=Â»LÂ«-42.5 I -1 1 1 E 11 - ~r Trl,Tr 'TrriT, L-L L 1 ENTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDING r- 7 1 ~11 T/EXISTING GRADE , Â· Â·Â· - -'/- ' 41: i-~T--141 '1411 Â· -1.-I.L J --2,TI 1- 1 -I.L 1.1 .._ ... 1, '7,1 - -- U') :0Â¤ +791198 2 0 EXISTING GRADE :: 8 WI WEST ELEVATION - VIEW PLANE r-x-ANN=YSIS VP-1 ~ 18 = 1-0 -- 0.......530Â·15.31 30 3.sw 0~18-06'Q)~1(~ %(Sl 86ek- Ul *011'3y0003Hl, 5VHnRWV â€¢uo i .1,0,x..mqwe) *,A,i 6,61 /: 1 . BBNNY'ld ONV10103nSSI NOI-LdIHOSE@O *8 31Â¥a ON SNOISIA3H 011 3g0003HL i SVWng,Nvo 1,491UAdOO 10111HOHÂ¥ 3,41 30 LN3SNOO N 311!BM 3H1 InOkE,M 039010910 80 03Sn 011Â¥011dna 39 ION AVIN 3,1VS 3Hi ONÂ¥ '1031,H OEr# 3,11 jo )180. 03H.11NOdNA ONV 1VNMDIWO 3Hi Rinl[1SNOD Niab13H Ivitialv,1 N31_l,WA ON, 99NIMVH(] 11'V L00t*t.L ON NollÂ¥001 LOOt*t' ON 133/Old IlÂ¥A313 ENÂ¥ld MBIA 31111 INIMVel Ae NMVE .... A â€žIt 98 O STREET LIGHT LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONLIENT AS DESCRIBED n UTILITY BOX CITY OF ASPEN GPS 0 159 A SET SPIKE SURVEY CONTROL N PROPERTY LINE - - - LOT LINE A POSTED ADDRESS: *517 EAST HOPKINS AVEâ€¢AJE BEAR 1 NGS BASED ON Cl TY MONUMENT FOR TIÂ·E SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 93 1.-10 H THE NORTHIEST CORIER OF 8L0CK 80 -CHISLED X, N 82Â·06Â·12 W. O I 'O m GAS METER Â® WATER VALVE U.S. SURVEY FOOT ONE FOOT CONTOURS Â· 9 CITY MONUMENT 5 34.5 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES BUILDING HEIGHT CITY OF ASPEN GPS 5 7915 9â‚¬ p WATER IS IN HOPKINS AVENUE X ALL OTHER UTILITIES ARE IN THE ALLEY EAST f REFERENCED mooD MAP 1 S TE CURAENT FLOOD 1 NSURANCE RATE MAP ... HOP KINS THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X- (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE 7 OUTSIDE 500+YEAR fLOOD PLAIN} AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSUMNCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. z Â· Coli,UN I TY- PANEL NUMBER 06097(0204 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4. 1987 aol 0, ... 41, 19/9 FOR THE .,luNITY 111 -CH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED PmED ENUE PSÂ·00' THI S PROPERTY LIES ENT IRELY INSIDE OF THE CI TY OF ASPEN ZIDFLOW HAZARD DISK /30 . IN AREA AS DEFIIâ‚¬D BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963, 25947 .50. FIGURE ES-15. N 7S'00Â·jiÂ·I PARKING + Â·- .. ~ ZONED: CC (COI'HERCIAL CORE] WITH HISTORIC OVERLAY HO DEL I NEATED PARK I NG SPACES 90 DISK SIGN ON ...\42.. -' NO SETBACK REOUIREMENTS FRONT, SIDE, REAR 29Â· 25947 . 1 GHT l 79/6.2 POST ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT 5 17915.94Â·1 1988 NAID LANDSCIP AREKÂ·Â· PARKING COURTHOUSE VIEWPLANE NO. 1 ELEVITIONS LISTED IN [BRACKETS] Â® Â· .KIOSK COURTHOUSE VIEWPLAME NO. 2 ELEVATIONS LISTED IN {BRACKETS 17952.61 ~â€¢ 79182 ~ IERE VIEWPLAIES OVERLAP, MOST RESTRICTIVE SHOWN. - VIEWPLANE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED TO FIT 1988 NAVO 45.31Â· 1 CHVP1 - 7948.S (ALLOWED 1Â·EIGHT 30.41 =H: CHVP2 - 7952-1 wiOWEED HEIGHT: 34.47 CONCRETE WALK 7910 6' CO NCRETE WALK 4 75 09'11 1 90 dt ./.5 I & Â·29Â· LANDSCAPED l I AREI / 7919.1- -[7949 7 3 1 - 400 VICINITY MAP STAIR; 1 0 7908.45 *~ ~1 - 7949.T (ALLOWED HEIGHT 30.61 3~1 -7%27 r- 2 ~ OUTSIDE OF aÂ·IVP2 AREA ' ROOF GARDEN U 1-1~=itj223Ull!EtI~* 1 1 7.6..1 i R 1 0 0 ,&4 6 EEi ' 1% Â£:3 1 2 IZ/ l 3 le i ~ FI TTORY . 1.. 5 1.1. - 1 GARDEN BUILDING | 1 ID LEVEL 1 -1,1 1 1 =r 2 1 8 Â» LEVSC 0 .... 0 1// 5 . 6 CERTIFICATION 1 i 1 1 7921.~Â· i THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THIT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WAS % FIELD SURVEYED DURING APRIL OF 2015 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO 0 ' ~ / SIU. 2 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. 7921.3 EASEMENTS OR RIMTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOIW TO ME. : RE-IM , ~ 0 ~~~~~E~N~~EO~I~H~~I~~~R~0~~I~'kiN'~3pl~I~DN~OA~~~EGROUND 7920.1 0 0 SURVEYOR ARE fXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED ITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 2 5 ITED: ~AetuKP>\ ~ GROUO -7920.1'- 4 CHVP1 - 7956.5 ALLOWED HE9Â·IT 362) 17961 3} .., 34.5 JoHAIWI HQÂ¥/ORTH P.U:% 1947 . CHVF2 - 79612 (ALLOWED HE]GHT: 41.17 Il - 3, 4/C j ..: 70. 8 4 ~ IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 111 3 0 (7956.31 - O 7920 s 75.- (i'E I 902,/flt, i7961.2) .-& 90.29 ./ n.... 2 ~~ " ' ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS 4Â£ Â£* , EASEMENT RECEPTION I. 187ose > j27~'Â·-7,Â·,OF 20 :2 LOCK 94 D 1 SK ~C=m==51 32/ 25947 LOTS D, E, AND F 4.0... 7920.6 :1??KAÂ©'TOINSITE OF ASPEN. -GROLND = 7920.6'_ COUNTY OF PITKIN 20 [7957.21 CHVP1 = 79572 (ALLOWED,EIGHT:36.4 STATE oF COLORADO, O- O CONTAINING: 9,029 SO FT â€¢/-. 0.207 ACRES â€¢/- OZ r: 1- W U) m PREPARED BY LD ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FIX 49703 925Â·3515 2 DATE JOB iNT 4/!5 170966 0 E-~Hi'I;~1:1:-:~T~1:4~ SY~7& :TDE rn VIEWPLANE SURVEY u 3/32" = 1'-0 VP-2 14'50Â·40 00Â· BUILDING DOES NOT ENCROACH DN,113;NIONDNDISK,UOIULN, DNINNÂ¥ldl ~Unlyn,HOHV +all '380003HIL 9 SVHAUWV) SONCRETE WALK *.Â·Â·Â· COURTHOUSE REWPLANE NO ANE NO Â·S COURTHOUSE VIEWPL . I NOIWINISBO H3NNVId ONVI 0103nSSI SNOISIA3H 011'3110(103,il , SVWne,Nvo LHDIUAdo:) 1031,/08Â¥ 3,11 do 1N.SNOI ..IUM 3Hi ln0141!M{1390-10SI' 80 03Sn '031Â¥Olldf,0 38 ION *VIN 3/VS .1 ONV 403.1,14. f 3. ...OM 03WS!,NnIN' ONV 11Â¥NIOIHO 31. ..ALUSNOO N13Ii]H 1VIH.LVW Nall,/M ON' lili ./01-' Loottn ON NOIIV0O1 ~ LOOPI+K Â· ON 1O3rOad AEIAblnS 3NVIdAA)]A 3110 ONIMVIC] *8 NMVBC] 31V0 03M31A38 .... Observer: Main Street 7906.9 517 E. Hopkins Ave. -- ---.-1 '91,1 'i...J Observer: Courthouse 1 (Subject Site) e Observer: Couthouse 2 7912.32 7913.02 B A F .3 79409 11 4 \ 1 .9 29Â© 79*9 42.32 Observer: Wheeler Opera House 7916.18 ~ 7952.32 7963.02 ~ \~ 1 Observer: Wagner Park 7919.n '9402 f 1962Â·32 1. 0 --1 797232 / 25 Observer: Cooper Ave N 7926.75 4,33 * * ,/zi /1 VA I Km*4 .,9- .. 1 5~ p - ~7966.18 ~1 7966.18 - 7956,18 I J , 7976.18 191 7966.18 7986.18 Observer: Glory Hole 7947.55 Mountain View Plane 1/k Above which no land use or building shall project * 1,11. Height Above Observer ~ Observer elevation to 30 feet 30-40 feet 410 * City of Aspen Land Use Code - Section 26.435.050 40-50 feet View planes extend to infinity. The view plane representations shown on this map only extend to 60 feet above the observer's 50-60 feet Structure elevation. View planes exist past what is shown on this map. GIS Department February 12,2007 3Z= VP-3 0108/ I 53Nfir./. ..ttdb'1301.. e woya~~ imilÂ·Â§,Â·inq,liriia,â€ž 3AV SNI>ldOH 19Â¥3 LLS ...i'..3 01'lli.)131 NolldlkIOS30 *8 31Â¥0 | ON SNOISIA3M (111 3~10003141 , 9Â¥Hnil,NVO IHOEKdOO 10al,HOWÂ¥ 3HL 30 LNISNOI NELLLIHIA 3HlinoHI,M 03solos,0 HO o mn (!31Â¥30dfk] 313 LON AVIN 31â€¢Ivs 3H1 ONÂ¥ '1031!HOE Â· 3Hi 30 >IHOM a3HS,1NndNn ONV lvNIE)180 3Hi 31fl 111SNOO N13H 3H 1Vlk,31VI'I N3 .,WAA ON' SONIi Vkla TIV LOOKIN ON NOI-LV001 ~ LOOÂ»-+L Â· ON 103rOHcl 00'N3dSV 03AA31A38 dÂ¥01 3 NVId AA3 IA 311 ll 9N1MVIC] g[/81/8 17Â·-81/7 ~ 72-7 90-31/7 . , T.81/7 4/-11 24- T ~ opl~TAKY f f 0 4-1 1 - \7 9-7 02/41 1 2- 1 . 4 1./,/ ./ n f 0\ 3----1 4 611 BUILDING 5.5 OVERHANG RESTROOM --- RESTROOM- ./ RESTROOM / CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION L CONSTRUCTION WOMENÂ·S - TENANT SPACE Â·AÂ· TENANT SPACE Â·BÂ· . A ~i , M [2*] 940 11 1 ~ BY TENANT BY TENANT BY TENANT 200 SF | TRASH AREA | 86'.91/2. wi I LZE-=J W 20-01/7 L 35'-17 . 34-5 . lili. 9''h .1 4% 112 r 701 16=:6:=< 2 ... STAIR#1 . . 111 STAIR /1- 03 311=C W I- 9 4. 10'-51/8Â» ~ 9-1 1/4" 357 -101/8- 34 -T f fill' * ~~ -~ 7Â· -81/2Â· 23Â·.101/7 24Â·-1' 24'-2 f Â· f 1*# ELEV. ~ CORRIDOR I 6 64 ' 1 ELEV. 1 DIE IL@] : 1 1 I [liI],1 1 1 - â€ž.1 . .. 4: 9 64 E . 1 Â· 6 . L_xÂ» / / RETAIL SPACE'A' RETAIL SPACE 'B' RETAIL SPACE'C' b - 1._fLK = 0/0 35-10" . 34-/ UP : TENANT SPACE 'D Â· , I ' I TENANT SPACE'C' , UP DN I STAUR #2 {0* ~ STAIR #2 ' ' 1112, 1-f . :f I. 17'.7 ' .411 / . 'ill .1911 MEN'S (Ilili b lilli = -AIR CURTAIN to AIR CURTAIN AIR CURTAIN BY TENANT BY TENANT UNE ~ BUILDING LINE < PROPERâ„¢ - 18' - 0- 23.712 OVERHANG 24'-10Â» 23.10" PROPERTY ~ LU 90 - 3 WZ 0 A LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN AN Â® MAIN LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN .8 I LD 1/8"=11 V -â€ž - 1'-0" CJ r. LO :El a % A-100 ri**---uÂ»-- -r------ 'ail '3&,oaom Â¥HnfiWVJ 31V0S OtOM / 53Nn'....1,3*W..... W3NN'rid a NVI ol 03nssl 51-82-8 : 1 NOILdIHOS30 3 9Nlallne,LN30Â¥/OV Lootrl ON NOLLY)01 ~ LOOM.1,1 ON 133rold 00'N3dSV a3M3 IA3U SNVId H0013 31lll SNIMVGO *8 NNWHI Â¢ I-I L _ 55'.71,7 ~ 24Â·.7- ~ gG- 31/7 ~ PROPERTY-- r LINE -7--- --- Il .. r V J 1 1 1* 10'-21/7 f 78' - 6- 2- -UppE. Â« ROOF *1 9 ,-al DN ' I. i SECONDFLOOR 4 0 R TENANTSPACE Z /k i 3 1 , 1 STAIR #1 ' 2 9 9 2it -2111 U V .A, 7 I. ~ , .- STAIR #2 DN ' ~ ;611 LEÂ· 6 - ,â€ž ~ 25' - 1" . 23 - 101/7 1 24 . 3 1 .. , ' a~ 4 1 '.-R--C - - 1, 6., 20 1 1/ N WOMENÂ·S BALCOI,Y ~ | ~ Bz LCONY $ 11- , I 177 - 101/7 ..â€¢~ ~~_~~ BELOU- EAL 30'Y BELOU BALCC NY ~ ~gUr~ lili/' 1 _42Â·-1112- r M 1 I 1, 1 3 I r --2 . -__ 76 6 9-------- SECOND LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN A ROOF PLAN ~ 0 1/8" = 1'-0" <6 1/8"= 1'-0 A-101 80003H1'9 SVBn9WV ~ 31Â¥DS NOUditioSla *8 31VG ON HaNN-ONV'10103.SSI St-eâ€ž , 3/\V SNI>Id OH 19Â¥3 LE 91.1,9 Loctrti/ON Nolilool ~ Loot*tt ON 133rold UJ N=ldb V SNVId B0013 311ll DNIMVIC] Ae NAAVkja . . 0 . FLOOR AREA SUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 8.773.03 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 7.345 84 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 973 94 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR 8.319.78 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012.74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6642.79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2,36995 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9,012.74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF COMMON AREA: 973.94 SF SECOND LEVEL 8,34205 SF 90'-31/7 COMMON AREA. 556.67 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 6,503 72 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 556.67 SF (BLUE) 4--4 1 .7 -fili--f ..I.Iff LI'll,-4 DEDUCTIONS 1.281 66 SF (PURPLE) , AREATOWARDS FAR 7,060.39 SF 41ff 34.4 , /1/ a U TOTAL FAR 15,38017 SF(1 711 FAR) ~ jf---- - - / .. ' ZONINGINFORMATIONANDCALCULA-ONS: 11 11 lilli J'11~1 li Â· ZONING (CC) COMMERCIAL_ CORE 7 , ZONINGALLOWANCE<21)18.000 SFOXI.00088 4..6 OfftÂ»~ NET LOT AREA 9,000 SF (90'-O' X 100'-CP) 92 / .602 I CALCULATIONS: 3 ......, 74 / GO'.11/7. / GROSS FLOOR AREA, ' 950 - I ./ ' ' 0. . /1 -- 1/ . I J 'll COMMERCIAL SPACE 20,492.35 SF (RED) /< ' ' OVER r ABOVE GRADE 15% (2.700 SF) COMMON SPACE: 5.635.47 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) 2,47: ,, 47 I Z , EXEMPT SPACE: 10,747.65 SF (PURPLE) C) i DECK AREA ~ ' STAIR #1 94 : klv, 49 ~ ' ALLOWABLE AREA OF DECKS ~~' ' ' ~ -9 /~ 7 , DECK AREA 1,281 66 SF - 2,700 SF (ALLOW*ICE) = o sF UPPER ROOF TERRAC E AREA 1,281 66 S F ZE :=tz : 4 / - , /j B EXPOSED WALL BELOW GRADE ~f. 1-1- 1 1 NORTH 0 SF EXPOSED ul r -72.2. ~G Stp 14-11.-, 'fti SOUTH OSFEXPOSED ' " ' EAST OSF EXPOSED AH' Eff E Â«iff SECOND FLOOR /' " WEST OSF EXPOSED TENANT SPACE </, F-LI!-Â»1-/ // 6 / \Â»01 ~' BELOW GRADE WAI.L AREA g ~ . ,7-31/2% . 1 /.Â»1923'-101/7 / 24' 1Â· 24 1" / , PE:- =4= 1 45' ~ k NORTH 907 7..i tor-- r - X ~9--0--HEIGHT . '4/ SOUTH 907 4-2 1, STAIR #1 COMMERCIAL ' . ' EAST 100 0 /* 2 31 1 1Â»77 1/ J 0%2_1000 7 ~ LOBBY RETAIL SPACE A RETAIL SPACE B RETAIL SPICE 'CÂ· ' ' Â· ' OSF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA Eli ELEV. |~ /" ~ ,/Pi! /6 f [ZE . ELEV. I * ' 11.13 11 ' / SECOND LEVEL = 7.CEO 39 (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) 5ii AREA: 6,503.72 SF b' , ify' ' TOTAL 380-4- LENGTH *&3 , 11.029'-8' SE TOTAL WALL AREA /c 3 14~ , 01 11,029'-8" -0% APPLIED asa 5 ' / 3 / L II / 122.1 ' FINAL FLOOR AREA: .31 3 MAIN LEVEL = 8,319 78 SF (453.25 SF EXEMPT) ... E i COMMERCIAL AREA: + + :' -~~' ' 41 ~ STAIR#2 ROOF TERRACE = 0 SF (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) - LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9,012 74 SF EXEMPT) 7,345.84 SF CUMULATIVE =15.380 17 SF (1 71 1 FAR) ~ ifi . 2 I i~2_i,'----- ' 4.42 : .1 1. =Ent=: 5/, 141==: /7/0// 7/ I 4 a Â«,21 , Z 32'9Â¥ 4 2 / p O ---f 7-1- ~ [25- L V I : I . STAIR#2 4* .W< O r .1 0 f '..7-7=-â€ž7.7-/ - ---- - A//'A=1 , ..+----, , , .------, 2 m -74 1 UP 1. A ! F-F 1 Â·i~ 1 1 '3'11rk!1-1-~-4111 2~ ,911111.- 0 M :43////h 0 , 0 . 1... 1 .1 : 1,1:111. ' '.id tirj Â· '1FJ'[tiarrlf. |'|''I' 1 It;. .:-i ' 11'1'1~Â·.~ .. Il'Â· ~Il ir.i ' A' V--- / 1,1 > 11:. .. m f jil '1 ''~''â€¢I.';'',);. JÂ·~ lit '"f ~ 17-101/~ 11,1~:1111 { J '11 > ?~i: ill'.'. 6 & .~!i ~ TE'Su!91 2 1.141 . '.#L:Illill'' 'Â·'ll ''1 ' ' ' 1 t.' i'!illi' 4 ill'fl '1. !1: R.!! i M - ' 1Ihi 2 W f==virtÂ«i C i A~"I:~ 11*11~illiTIj i|t, '' *Â©*NÂ·.Â· - 4. Â· --1- r:-:'!'' I dll,1 0:Ill. 1 6/ \,4 -3 r.1 Â·!m : 3,&3.wilitic dilil' 6 .,1.9 N 1'24Â·'-iJ'il{1,+4[,11 71$Â£~FIP; 1 lili,I[ le. .111 i:. I 23'-9167:, Â·/pl - O luxu, ln_,. ~_---- ~ ~~ I -l ijihf-111~.'filif -i .:T,il ' Ii,-1 1-11111.Lf.11|2â‚¬Â·-4Â·-i Hli~H-~~1 11111[titi 1111] ti-_ Z ' -2,1!ilil, i 1,1111~till '111 L '1111 11 Ill|~ Il~â€¢1'1,1.11 1 0 0 '1 11 1 .11 7%4:ut / -G' u 11 _.1 . u~.........Â·-'------ =----~ --4 u.~ ~- PROPERTY ~ PROPERTY VL PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF LINE OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: _~ c LINEE (EXEMPT) 1,281.66 SF (EXEMPT DECK) 20 0- 0 O. A MAIN FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .N A SECOND FLOOR - FAR CALCULATIONS .8 I: (11 1- 9 U 1/8=1-0 f 1/8"= 1'-0" V V CO If) '0 a a Â¤ M R WE 0 0 cr FAR-1 UMPSTER ~ \>30Â»Â»>NÂ«>4 ONI:,3.!ON] N'JIKJBO,Ull I NNÂ¥/i Inlnll,1Â»V 'all '380(1O3Ht.19 SVUnt]WÂ¥) b13NNV1d ON'rl 011'3~10003141 9 sving'VO LHDI'Adoo 1031,HOWÂ¥ 3430 1N3SNOO N3 11!HM 3,11/OHLIM 0390109,0 80 03Sn 03 Lvolldno 39 LON AVI'l 3,ilvs 3Hi ONÂ¥ 1031,HOWÂ¥ 3HI 30 >1806, 03HS,1,4ndNIA ONV 7,NID!80 3,41 31.,19NOD Nia#H 1Â¥,/31Â¥W /311,9,8 INV St)NU Vy' 1-1, Lootrl ON NollÂ¥30-1 ~ Looti"t L ON 103rold SNOUVInDIVO HV=I VW 311# DNIMVUG *9 NMVWO FLOORAREASUMMARY MAIN LEVEL 8.773 03 SF COMMERCIAL AREA 7.:345.84 SF (RED) COMMON AREA: 973.94 (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 453.25 SF (PURPLE) AREA TOWARDS FAR 8.319.78 SF LOWER LEVEL 9.012.74 SF COMMERCIAL AREA- 6,642.79 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 2,369.95 SF (BLUE) DEDUCTIONS 9,012 74 SF (SUBGRADE EXEMPT) AREA TOWARDS FAR 0 SF SECOND LEVEL 8,342 05 SF p COMMON AREA: 2,369.95 COMMERCIAL AREA 6,503.72 SF (RED) COMMON AREA 556.67 SF (BLUE) SF(EXEMPT) DEDUCTIONS 1,281 66 SF (PURPLE) 90'-11/7 1 AREA TOWARDS FAR 7.060 39 SF TOTAL FAR 15 380.17 SF (1 711 FAR) fil'im,1 ZONING INFORMAION AND CALCULATIONS: + 'bilf 11 lilli. . ZONING (CC) COMMERCIAL CORE / 9 54' 2747" 7. :Fid Â«Â£' if Â· ~Â·4 . NET LOT AREA 9,000 SF (909 X 100'-09 ZONING ALLOWANCE (21) 18,000 SF (2 X 9.000 SF) f WOMENÂ·S ' '42 ff TENANT SPACE 1~ ~5#.' TENANT SPACEâ€¢BÂ· ~ 7 Â· CALCULAIONS: k 111 Â»1-+111, GROSS FLOORAREA 7, â€ž f 719 /7-' 1 111,11'P,1 5, ' .4.. /98:5'. '2 COMMERCIAL SPACE. 20,492 35 SF (RED) Pf> r COMMON SPACE 5.635.47 SF (BLUE & PURPLE) f EXEMPT SPACE 10,74765 SF (PURPLE) / DECK AREA h 2/ I ALLOWABLE AREA OF DECKS OVER 30" ABOVE GRADE 15% (2,700 SF) UPPER ROOF TERRACE AREA 1,281 66 SF DECK AREA 1.281 66 SF - 2,700 SF (ALLOWANCE) = 0 SF ' ' EXPOSED WAI 1 BELOW GRADE NORTH: oSF EXPOSED F Â·Â·/ .44 SOUTH 0 SF EXPOSED ,19&2 i TT1'49Â«<f><9~0*p4,44 0 , .' ' .'' ~,~~'7692 EAST 0 SF EXPOSED WEST O SF EXPOSED ~ 2 ~~. COMMERCIAL AREA: .t~ ~:.4$~p.-//..'' 1 Â· .DHE N 1 /1 11'lf-4 BELOWGRADE WALL AREA NORTH 90'-7 & i ~.* 6,642.79 SF (EXEMPT) .Â·/Â· ./ :434/ i SOUTH 90'-2 7... I I ./ : 'Ill -, EAST 100/ 2 I /111]111'll!111?, 11 TOTAL 380'-4" LENGTH . 4 WEST 100'-C' LfÂ»/ 4% f.4.Â«.0 . 11.029'-8" SF TOTAL WALL AREA 9 2 Â£.1 - I ke=dEE' 0 / 11,029'J" = 0% APPLIED) . , ~ X 29'-O' HEIGHT 0 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA FINAL- FLOOR AREA: Â¥ - I I li 5 MAIN LEVEL = 8,319.78 SF (453.25 SF EXEMPT) ELEV. 1 CORRIDOR Â· SECOND LEVEL = 7,060.39 (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) - . Ill021 . ROOF TERRACE =OSF (1,281 66 SF EXEMPT) LOWER LEVEL = 0 SF (9.012.74 SF EXEMPT) ~ -1 , CUMULATIVE= 15,38017 SF (1711 FAR) 9-3% 3 I J Â« ir 5 > TENANT SPACEÂ·Dy ~ ~' a: J L 8%~2 //1 .7/ ./ 9 0 1 . 1Â·Â·11 Nli, '111Nlill Â· :ilill'tilili j1 1 11 I 1 j' 1 ff// 9.Â· 1: 43 . MEN'S 9/0 0 4. ,% , 0 ./ n / 67 B I /> , -7- r o , . ..~ ~... ~.. )4'.,~Â·f':I~Y'~4*0;'0*1%944)MV 469 Â«772.44Â«442 3, : 497Â«ft<j- <1> ,- - -.~Â«/44 . 0 . / A 111 > Â·i 1 2 9/4.*,rjâ€¢>7<4,12Â·FEFÂ»7"*Â«47â€ž'WÂ»tio>vt/z,7 4.-21/:. 4 ' 9,9243423: a. 0 LOWER LEVEL - FAR CALCULATIONS .A 1/8.1-0" Egg FAR-2 nNI1133NIE>Nl N!)~*1BOI~]1NI OkÂ·NNÂ¥ld! 3),AD'll 'all '3HOCO)Hl 9 5VklneWÂ¥) SNOUVIn31Â¥3 hIVJ ,~ rw,Vldi?n ~[5Uit~,IW...' 'AU NM H3NNV1d ONÂ¥101 03nSSI H 1.SV3 LLS toottl ON Noll'~001 ~ LOON-I ON 103rOMd 00'N3dSV 03M3 IA3B 311 ll SNIMVIO NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA. 7,010.48 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 884 41 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 7,010 48 SF LOWER LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6.244.56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 2,158.82 SF (BLUEE) SUB-TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6,244.56 SF SECOND LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 5.988 68 SF (RED) NONÂ·UNIT COMMON AREA 764 52 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1 146 33 SF (PURPLE) SUB-TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 5,988 68 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE 19,243.72 SF -- NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: r- NON-UNIT COMMON AREA: 884.41 SF 764.52 SF (EXEMPT) 90.31/7 L P -m=f 1 .417 . i 419/9 U fÂ«/// 9 / ,/ Alk/l//L -1= 1 3 YD I / 34Â£!* .9 - LDUMPSTER, 6, Â«19*0 - 25 : ---j~ f//// ; O. 62 :Â· Â· 1117 1 255/ 1 '~~ 2:*S i il*I...1 1 / Z.% : 1 / N / b L alhfi -, A 2: 5 I i ' r 1111111i /52: 'i -5-/ up EN , /7 1111'lilli j ,#*g . 7/ c, I I / *Ed. 3% 1 ' 1 41 1I / , fÂ«Â«/ ./ O/.' -C-I-/ 455' 11=4' SECOND FLOOR Â· - /1! TENANT SPACE ~~ 9/2 : i ]EM: y / / * ~ 4 0 3 1/7 f 23.1017.---/ 24'-1 f %40: NET LEASABLE I ~ Â« . , 424 - V / ./.294. -7/ st*r AREA: 5,988.68 SF J ' ' ~ 0 I .9 11 , 1 ' LOBBY RETA]L SPACE 'A' RETAIL SPACE Â·B RETAIL SPACE C 22/' ELEV 1- E 23 omr . MI ELEV. , U 1 [215 1 1 1 Â·f~ '~ sTAIR~ 2~'ft / NET LEASABLE - 4 1 f fl 1" ,- . 33Â·~ f-Â®41 46~,.Â· / 44 2-, 3 1,#f '111' , 'Ifi r ./ 1 .h#*.8 AREA: 7 4 . 9 / : ' 2 i 7,010.48 SF h ./ 4/1,1 , 3 .1--1 oN ' '/4 'r-J-1/ L , UP ON ' t, STAIR #2 : L_ 5274#2*. _ 1,1 V/" <1 '11'1~}144][1 liti 4/ 1~~IN"11'-~~ 9 . / ' WOMEN'S lit'i~111% 1.11 1 :.14'~ ' ~ ., .1 l'111 .Il'r . 1 ~ 1 1 1 : D." 11 t~ilm// 4 / 1 411 + I[i 1 ..I .1.1,14 / . .!11,4 111 1 ./ 1. 11 . ,/4/10 /,1: 5... l Ill 1 1 1 111 17Â· nour . 1 11 ./ I. I I. / : '1!1. Iii 1 'W ill.,111 1/ 1, il'12 4,/mil! 1 1 6 1 lili I '.1, 4 1 111,-4; fl.,,;111 -i,fif 1- i iliTi '~ iliti~. , 01 11,1111 11111 111[!!1-111 1 -1 , ti ~~~|).~~| ' â€ž 1 11:16. ;il - 11 I [1~ jill> ; 1- ,, 2 / W OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA: _~ PROPERTY -~ L L PROPERTY LINE PATIO AREA: 453.25 SF ': (1' lili LINE 1,146.33 SF (EXEMPT DECK) (EXEMPT) SECOND FLOOR - NET LEASABLE .0 MAIN FLOOR - NET LEASABLE 9 CALCULATIONS ,Â© CALCULATIONS 5 2/ 1/8" = 1-0 L./ 1/8-=1'-or : E . NL-1 91009 I,â„¢1Â¥10 Ingwv) H3NNVId O NV-1 Ol 03nSSI , , 3/\V SNI>IdOH 1SV3 LLS 9~/8~B NVId 316VSÂ¥31 laN Â£00~IN ON NIOUV)01 ~ zoottÂ·M ON 10.OWd 311 ll DNIMVIO .... NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 7,010.48 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA 884.41 SF (BLUE) SUB-TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 7.010.48 SF LOWER LEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 6,244.56 SF (RED) NON-UNIT COMMON AREA. 2.158.82 SF (BLUE) SUB.TOTAL LOWER LEVEL 6.244.56 SF SECONDLEVEL NET LEASABLE AREA 5,988.68 SF (RED) NON UNIT COMMON AREA 764 52 SF (BLUE) OUTDOOR TERRACE AREA 1,146 33 SF (PURPLE) NON-UNIT COMMON SUB.TOTAL 2ND LEVEL 5.988.68 SF AREA: 2,158.82 SF TOTAL NET LEASABLE 19243 72 SF 90' 1 1 F . ./2 4// . lIilli f 1 '10 / 0 23 WOMEN'S TENANT I.PACE'A' /// TENANT SPACE Â·BÂ· 4Â« 4 ' & 9/0 /4/2/0 [*1 7 /9/4/4 . / 5 74 /6/4 // 7 1 11 4-1 1 11, 1 /9 9/ . ' ob...f~ /,Â« ., ..LIA:'Â« STAIR #lr===u ~ Â¥ . I <lio p {9,~ COMMERICAL ' 1=A i m ././ I / CO Idj 9 I h . AREA: 6,244.56 SF 4 =:= 9 - , 1 Â»Â«11 1Â·flillifiddb> Z. Zii '14NIN -2=.1 , maili a **i .i/ ; i i I i 1 ELEV. CORRIDOR /7 :4/ Z / 0 TENANTSPACE 'C' TENANT SPACE Â·D' Â· 0 UP C. 0 Lm] ~ STAIR #2/~ / 5,111,11'ill. ..1.':m.~..~Â·:2.' ./ 11 3Â« ./.4 I 1] i ''l iIi'., Â«f.Â· 920. /2, /////5 /9 . 9 9 MEN S >O 4 12 f 9 9 .4 4 LfÂ»~4 / .. ~fÂ»j-~ . Vt LLi .'.1 2 . '. S 20 0- 0 OZ 1- W LOWER LEVEL - NET LEASABLE .tA U) e teMIIONS ~ V h LiD '0 1@K a NL-2 6 HZ' 'all'380003119 6*78~U4 9&'UN ma(.t,H,Ni 100-0 WBNNyld ONV101 03n m-81-8 1 SNOISIA3H all 380003111 i SVHAm'IVO LHE),WAdOO 1331!HOMV 3Hi 30 &39%0 N31118.3141.0.1. 63.010'10 80 039n 031,011Â£,fla 3910N AVI'll 31"IVS * NV '103 l,Hot ' DI L 10 MkdOM 03HS11Nnd,In ONV 1VN,9180 3H1 31nlllSNOO N13B3H 1Â¥19.v,â€¢1 /311!WA INV S.Nli Ind(] 1-lv 4 31'Â¢0 ON ZOOttl ON NO!1Â¥301 ~ LOON-I ON 103rOHd 31VOS SNVId 318VSV31 13N 311& DNIMVEK] /9 NMVWO 03M3 IA3hd REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NUMBER KEY NOTE 1 PETERSEN BRICK. KOLUMBA SERIES, KA. 2 HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANKS, FINISH (TBD) 3 PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL_ 4 CONTINUOUS STEEL RAILING. PAINTED 5 CLEAR LOWâ‚¬ INSULATING GLASS WIâ„¢ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING 6 PREFINISHED METAL OVERHANG 7 EXPOSED STEEL COLUMN. PAINTED 8 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL. EQUALLY SPACED PANES 9 STEEL BEAM WRAPPED IN PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL. FINISH TO MATCH STOREFRONT, 10 STEEL- MEMBER, PAINTED T/0 ELEVATOR 11 GLAZING IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT. 1 _SHAFT 12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING. 13 ROOF LINE -imb" - 14 ARCHITECTURAL CAST STONE aD 15 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH rk UPPER PARAPET ~/ 28' - 0" - -- - : | 16 BUTT-GLAZED STOREFRONT SYSTEM. - - _ROOF ~ 17 PREFINISHED METAL COVERED ENTRY. Â£1.PARAPET 26' - 6" 1~ 18 B CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED ./27' - 0 6 - 11--10.-1 12 P I U.Q. RAILING ,% 19-6" E~ 1 UD 1 SECOND FLOOR _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _-- __-2__ _ ___ --1 â‚¬16'-55 B.O. UNTEL 1 /1 ch B.O. LINTEL 1 - 12' -8" Cl/ CED )29 11'-fil 3/4" - , 4 EXISnNG EXISTING BUILDING Â·, 1 1,4, 1 11 BUILDING BEYOND - ~ - (N.I.C.) Â«dÂ« N liu .a @ IN.I.C.) L- (fÂ© :T'77 . 1 1 FIN. FLOOR ~ - -- ~~r#&&9~Râ‚¬â€žguxâ€ž-IN.. r .- ~ 3/16'*9 - - NORTH ELEVATION T/0 ELEVATOR SHAFT <, f---f ULPARAPErÂ£ 28' - 0" Ll/ Â¤44*448824823445............................=KA-9=4 15 PARAPET Â£ 442411*// /j /ll //j/j//////////j/// l/l/lll/ ~~~~~~ ~~~~1 --!rM!----f~A 27' - 0" 4/ 1 31.//bi.7.i /fiff/"fiff"// i///i//li////// T.O. RAILING /1 19' - 6" . 33?3333333-/Â£ g SECOND FLOOR,a i O 169*d t=trl/H////////////U0555/555~5*955555555Â¢t~ -6 1 - _ Bo_LINIQ!=I â€¢h TRASH ENCLOSURE-- 1_4911=liEÂ«tittÂ»9*2*282*32*22*24+--------------u---~-~==zi~Â® 1 I ~ ~Â·--~. I. 1 11'-113/4"7 LU > 11 2 11 c,1 20 0- 0 OZ FIN. FLR. SPACE'A' dA -- -- - -0'783iEy-EV ~ lo (i>flrflt;VATION - : a .-V / Z 1 1 3 58 010 0 I A-211 0NmUMONg NOA30!fomiINI 91041,jÂ¢MÂ· g~AIJILUOWV Zoott-tt ON NOI.L.VOO1 ZOOÂ»*1 Â· ON 103rOhld Â·011'380003H.19 SvanOWÂ¥) SNOI1VA313 bIOIH31)(3 .... t..........10.*Â·2 BEL@06[lt. 3 .'I WIL'DH)131 VH tl3NN'rld ONV-1 Ol 03nSSI 0,0'.,1,4"h,4,1},le,rinqi,irâ„¢,m ---~- 6;.61 1 9 NOILdlyOS30 all 3~0003HL V SVWflgr,VS iND!.d00 1031!HDUV 3,ti . INaSNOD N3LLIWA .1 100Hll,A a 390109,0 80 03Sn '031Â¥Olldna 38 ION AVW 3INVS 3141 ONÂ¥ '1031!HOMÂ¥ 3,11 30 >IWOM 03149I INnd NE, ONv lvN,DIWO 94~1 31/ill/NOO NI -18314 1VIH 31VW N3UIUM ONV SDNIAWWO 11V 311,1 ONIMVE AG NMÂ¥80 .... REFERENCED KEYED NOTES NUMBER | KEY NOTE 1 8" CMU PAINTED WHERE EXPOSED 2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING, 3 BOARD FORMED CONCRETE FINISH 4 CLEAR LOW-E INSULATING GLASS WITH ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING NO ELEVATOR SHAFT / 3 51'- 0" f- -~UPPER PAIR~~ 8 PARAPET ,/ 27'-0" 1 ..1 J 1. FI r 11 SECOND FLOOR Al - 16 0" EV ..I ' J -- B.O. ALLEY UNTEL ~ 12-8" U I I . L....1............ J . ...ft,i,Y/.4.Z'. -1 ---- 1 1 12.1 ~71[1 1- 11-11 ,-TRANSFORMER FIN. FLOOR * i 1 111-1 - - 11 p ill-il._ -i,-TRASH -21 '-111 11 :1/1,,1 0'-0"I l' i 09}Titatmt*Um*T i 'I'dz mil-i" ILLI I - L-1-11.=1 I 4[ l-rl iel i I-- il- i rÂ·Â·Â·.I=I IL'] I- IllÂ»I l le' ll- I l-I l l-l '4' "*m-I '"-*0* I Â» IE" b' FEsuif 11=11 7111-: z zy l-I I-li- i I-i i i-i l l=i ir i 3 rib South v 3/16" = 1'-0" r-OUTLINE OF ADJACENT BUILDING MID UPPER PARAPET /I, r-CD 1 A 28' - 0" 41 / - PARAPE /7 27' -0" 4/ I rI 9 F~ CD- CD I '-I SECOND Fl.~~ _~ | 1 1 -+ i ' Ul T 1 3> ENTIRE ELEVATION ABUTS ADJACENT BUILDIG -1 -_ . I' . CD I-1,~ 'IT~-~''I' -7'1'1 1- L---Â· .-- i. - I L...1 1 11 Z T | ' 111. - -r MO '.I' a O ~1 1 L ...i..'Il.1.i[ ..L . 1 1-- E--1 -- O 0 1 -1 ..Ill LE--Ii.CIL-- - \ 1'1 :L 1 - 1 : 1'121 -__Â·i 1 11 FL ~JI- -3 CO .1 .1231 â€ž J- - 1 - - ,- I--'il !7-- IC'| -rÂ·- 1 -.Il~ L- i- ~ -| |~~-~| ZILM-A- - |j- F1=TI~2|~~-F~~- ,+ .r- A West 10 W 3/16"= 1'-0" a 0 e E I . A-212 all 'aMOC]03'199Â¥"81'1Â¥0 1,19,8.0 10"1!Illt)HV 3HL j Hi 30...03HS,1Nf.INnaNÂ¥ lv'IDIWO 3~41 ainillsNOO h 3U3H 1Â¥IW31VW Nall,HA ONÂ¥ 99Nli VH{] 1~ Â·011 '3HOOO3H1, SVHnOWV) SNOUVA313 MOIBal*3 nNIN]]kiON3:/9~101,0,~UNI 'DNNNVWDnlm,Hmiv 0,009 1, UN....5431...... ....t....1 NW/,11} 111 v. 213NNVId ONV-101 OBASSI W-82-8 1 NOI1dIHOS30 Aa Ella I ON -1 P . SNOISIA38 i LOOP'll ON NOilÂ¥301 ~ LOONÂ·tr ON 103rlad 31409 311ll ONIMIHO Ag NAWHO ALLEY PROPERTY LINE . ------------f-- 1& 1r 017 E. I+I,PE INS - ZE E ,- .f,4.-6" POIJIL ~ BETWEEN [,OORS / - 46'-8" ROLITE tÂ«-*-*- i' 'BETWEEN [EFPRS / BETWEEN DOOR 5 f r 23'-0" ROUTE~ Fl i .---- --Â¥22232- 1-1.1 r=Â·.H._~ ,- 12 1 \ .]_ rt IMA _ _ i _ |_ 1--=_ _ Ed |A -7. 11 F . 11_ _IV EL_ _ _ p// Ui 1\ It > 1 \ -Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 1 Â·Â· m i=j.-~~1-:f~-1~:IA :--li-t:r -j-:Â·Â· ~:~i .~~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1~ : ~~~~~~~ ;~: ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~::~~~~~: :~ ~: fÂ·-~-~Â·~:~--~- Â·Â·- -4..~ : - --Â·:i9.>tfif-:~4-(i-:-~~~=0-<.#Â·i~~A?-t~hifi~;h~14Â·:-PÂ·Â·h?~~4{4jt;~~iÂ·%~~Y-Â·-~:~i ~:1 Z 1 1 M L NEW PEDESTRIAN O - NEW PEDESTRIAN ~- NEW PEDESTRIAN L NEW PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE. ENTRANCE I ENTRANCE. ENTRANCE. 76'-10" ROUTE 55'-3" ROUTE 41'-1" ROUTE BETWEEN DOORS BETWEEN DOORS BETWEEN DOORS EAST HOPKINS AVENUE F r. 'Â© SITE PLAN Ir) J 1/8"= 1-0' V If : mt (,0 TIA-1 I\\ \\ 'all '380003H1, SVHAUWV) NVId 31:S Vll 5â€¢Ily33Nlohl3 Ng=r]INI !*INN-I..3111H- *Â¥1 5"1 -f [2.1 '11â‚¬.}..i<,p,g..1'.1. 1'~,AM Elva 515 E, HOPKINS NOUd<WOSED Al 3190 , ON 00'NadSV 03M3jA38 Loorrti : ON NOIâ€žLV001 ~ L00tt-t L 03rOMd 311!l ONIMVMC] AG IVAVIO , . 0 51 7 Ea,st Hopkiwuy (Loty D, E, 4 F, 810Â©k~ 94, Aspe,nO AN APPLICATION FOR: Co*oeptwaib Mador Devel,op ment, C o=vvi,wuer 00<Gb D ek02* ReA, Dem, a/11* M 0-wn,ta~Dre Vi,ew PLa*e Eju~Lpt-00* SUBMITTED By HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 420 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 8-10 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-7819 madW }Up }p e*. 007,1/ 42,3 30 Aill*1#ir, N3dSÂ¥ 30 Allo 5102 ZO 43S P f 7'r ty - ., Septew05er 2, 2015 PID No. 2737-073-40-003 .. AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, AND MOUNTAIN VII+V PLANE EXEMPTION FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Submitted by: 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC Mark Hunt, Manager 2001 North Halsted, Suite 304 Chicago, IL 60614 (312) 850-1680 Prepared by: HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC Planning Consultant 420 E. Main Street, Suite B-10 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Email: mitch@hlpaspen.com PID# 2737-073-40-003 .. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE L INTRODUCTION....,............,.,..................................................._1 II. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/PROPOSAL â€¢ Dimensional Requirements Comparison Table...............................5 IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS A. Common Development Review Procedures and Combined Reviews.............7 B. Conceptual Approval of a Major Development......................................7 C. Demolition of Properties Within a Historic District.................................8 D. Conceptual Commercial Design Review.............................................9 E. -Mountain View Plane Review.........................................................24 F. Parking.................................................................................25 G. Impact Fees.............................................................................25 H. Transportation Impact Analysis......................................................25 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Amy Simon; Exhibit 2: Proof of the Applicant's Ownership and Authority; Exhibit 3: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) to represent the applicant; Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map; Exhibit 5: Land Use Application, Dimensional Requirements Form, and Homeowners Association Compliance Form; Exhibit 6: Transportation Impact Analysis; Exhibit 7: An executed application fee agreement; and, Exhibit 8: Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within three-hundred (300) feet of the subject property. PID# 2737-073-40-003 .. Section I: Introduction This application seeks Conceptual Major Development approval as well as Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and Mountain View Plane Review to remove the existing mixed-use building and redevelop the property located at 517 East Hopkins Avenue with only commercial uses. This 9,000 square foot lot is not on the City of Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures (the Inventory), but is located within the Commercial Core Historic Overlay District. The property is legally described as Lots D, E, and F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. This application is submitted pursuant to the following sections of the Aspen Land Use Code (the Code): 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, including 26.304.060(B)(1), Combined Reviews; 26.412, Commercial Design Review; 26.415.070, Historic Preservation; 26.415.080, Demolition of Properties within a Historic District: 26.435.050, Mountain View Plane Review; 26.575.030, Public Amenity; 26.610, Impact Fees; 26.630, Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines; and 26.710.140, Commercial Core (CC) Zone District. The application is divided into four sections, with this Section providing a brief introduction to the application, while Section II describes the existing conditions of the project site and environs. Section III outlines the applicant's proposed development and Section IV addresses the proposed development's compliance with the applicable review criteria of the Code. For the reviewer's convenience, all pertinent supporting documents relating to the project are provided in the various exhibits to the application, as follows: â€¢ Exhibit 1: Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Amy Simon; â€¢ Exhibit 2: Proof of the Applicant's Ownership and Authority; â€¢ Exhibit 3: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) to represent the applicant; â€¢ Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map; â€¢ Exhibit 5: Land Use Application, Dimensional Requirements Form, and Homeowners Association Compliance Form; â€¢ Exhibit 6: Transportation Impact Analysis; â€¢ Exhibit 7: An executed application fee agreement; and, â€¢ Exhibit 8: Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within three- hundred (300) feet of the subject property. In addition, existing conditions are depicted on a survey and various plans that accompany this application. Similarly, all proposed development is depicted on the accompanying architectural plans prepared by Camburas & Theodore (C+T). While the applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Code, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application, questions may arise which require further information and/ or clarification. Upon request Haas 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 1 .. Land Planning, LLC will gladly provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the review. Section II: Existing Conditions The 9,000 square foot 517 East Hopkins property is in the Commercial Core Historic District. The existing development is a mixed-use building that includes the City of Aspen Engineering and Building Department offices on the lower level (below street level), the Aspen Daily News offices and several other commercial businesses on its first and second floors, and a third floor with four, deed-restricted studio apartments. There are no existing off-street parking spaces and only 5.7% (514.2 square feet) of the property is compliant with public amenity space standards. The existing structure actually detracts from the integrity of the historic district. This building does not address or enhance the streetscape in the manners prescribed by the Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines or the City's Commercial Design Standards. The current building has much of its front falade set significantly back and, as such, does not create a uniform wall of building fronts or a strong edge to the street. In addition to its shape, the building's sunken courtyard and hard-to-locate entryways are not pedestrian- friendly. Indeed, in adherence to the Guidelines and the Commercial Design Standards, the HPC/City could not allow a similar structure to be built today. The existing lower level (at sunken courtyard) houses the City of Aspen Engineering and Building Departments in 5,490 square feet of net leasable area (NLA). The ground level includes several commercial use tenants amongst its 4,207 square feet of NLA. The second story similarly houses multiple commercial tenants, the largest of which is the Aspen Daily News, and contains a total of 3,059 square feet of NLA. Finally, the third floor above grade includes four deed-restricted studio apartments totaling to 1,884 square feet of net livable area. In total, therefore, the existing structure includes 12,756 square feet of NLA, of which 8,549 square feet are on lower or upper (not ground level) floors. (See accompanying Plan Sheets EC-1, EC-2, EC-3 and ER-1 for existing conditions floor plans and area calculations.) Code Section 26.515.030 provides that the existing commercial use generates an off-street parking requirement of one (1) space for every 1,000 square feet of net leasable area, or 12.76 off-street spaces. In the Commercial Core, there is no parking requirement for residential units. With no existing parking on-site, the property therefore maintains a 12.76 space deficit. The subject property falls within the mapped area subject to both Courthouse Mountain Viewplanes. The two Viewplanes originate from in front of the courthouse steps (Courthouse Viewplane #1) and at the Main Street sidewalk in front of the Veterans Memorial (Courthouse Viewplane #2, between the courthouse and the courthouse annex buildings). 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 2 5 . 01 \AÂ¢Ak) r,~*,9 Courthouse Viewplane #1 hits the northwest corner of the subject property at a height of 30.4 feet above grade while it hits the northeast corner at a height of 30.6 feet above grade. Courthouse Viewplane #2 meets the north property line at a height of Â·34.4 feet above grade. As these Viewplanes ascend from north to south, the Viewplane height limits increase (as one moves from the front of the property toward the alley). Consequently, the Courthouse Viewplane #1 height limit at the southerly property line ranges from 36.2 feet above grade at the southwesterly corner to 36.6"feet above grade at the southeasterly corner. The Courthouse Viewplane #2 height limit at the alley property line is 41.1 feet above grade. Given the foregoing, compliance with the 28-foot height limit of the underlying CC Zone District inherently results in compliance with the Courthouse Viewplane height limits. In other words, the Viewplanes exceed the zone district height limit. Furthermore, between C-*, the Courthouse Viewplane vantage points and the subject property is a sizable distance ( 'Â£\ that includes East Main Street (Highway 82), the St. Mary's Church property and associated structures, an alley, Connor Park and the Connor Cabins/ Lofts, and East \u) Hopkins Avenue. (For detailed illustrations of the Courthouse Viewplanes and their effective height limitations, please refer to Plan Sheets ALTA, VP-1, VP-2 and VP-3.) Relatively intensive multi-family residential, commercial, civic and lodging uses surround the subject property as it resides within the downtown, Commercial Core zoning and historic district. Immediately to the west is a recently redeveloped, two-story retail and restaurant building while the structure immediately to the east has three stories housing retail, restaurant and office uses. Just across the alley and to the south are a series of three- story commercial use buildings, one of which also includes a residential penthouse apartment. The property is within easy walking distance of all conveniences, including City Hall, shopping, dining, banking, and parks, the fire and police stations, and public transportation. Section III: Proiect Description/The Proposal: The applicant is requesting that the HPC grant Conceptual approval of a Major Development as well as Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and Mountain View Plane approval. All applications for Conceptual approval of a Major Development project must receive a determination of consistency with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (hereinafter "the Guidelines"). Since the subject property is located in the Commercial Core Historical District conceptual approval of the proposed design requires a finding of consistency in terms of height, scale, mass, proportions and site plan with the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines (the "Commercial Guidelines"). Consistency with the Commercial Guidelines is demonstrated below. The current proposal envisions demolition of the existing building and redeveloping the property with a two-story commercial building. No residential units are included in this 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 3 .. redevelopment and the proposal fully complies with the Commercial Core zoning. Should the current conceptual reviews application receive all necessary approvals, the ensuing Final Major Development and Final Design Review application will also address growth management requirements such as mitigation. for the additional commercial net leasable area and replacement housing. The current proposal is fully depicted on the accompanying architectural plans prepared by Camburas & Theodore (C+T). The massing and overall design of project's street front is broken into four distinct, properly scaled modules. Fagade heights are varied so as to enhance visual interest and pedestrian scale while assuring consistency with all applicable design requirements. The proportions in terms of first floor and storefront window/entry heights, roof heights, and solid-to-void areas are all consistent with the surroundings and the applicable design standards. The massing is appropriately broken up both vertically (as explained above and through use of second floor deck spaces) and horizontally though the varying of exterior materials on each module and differing entryway setbacks and recesses. The proposed development will contain approximately 19,244 square feet oUpt leasable commercial space, with some 7,010.5 square feet on the ground floor and roughly 12,234 square feet between the basement and the second floors. This net leasable area would necessitate a parking requirement of 19.24 spaces. However, per the Code, since there is an existing 12.76 space deficit iii parking, a residual requirement of only~.48 spices needs to be satisfied. This 6.48 space requirement will be completely satisfied via payment of cash- in-lieu as allowed by right pursuant to Code Section 26.515.030. The payment-in-lieu of parking will be due and payable at the time of building permit issuance for the redevelopment. At the currently codified rate of $30,000, which may be amended, the payment due would be $194,400 ($30,000 x 6.48). Payment of the in-lieu fee does not require any review or approval, nor does it represent any kind of variance or variation whatsoever from the requirements of the Code. As shown and demonstrated on Plan Sheet VP-1, the proposed design, including its elevator shaft fully complies with the limitations of both Courthouse Viewplanes. At the street front the proposed building will measure 28-feet in height to the top of its highest parapet where the Courthouse Viewplanes range iii height from 30.4-30.6 feet above grade at their most restrictive. As the Viewplanes ascend to the south and the building approaches its alley frontage, compliance with the Viewplane height limit only increases in degree such that even the elevator shaft/ overrun falls well below the Viewplanes (see East and West Elevations - View Plane Analysis, Plans Sheet VP-1). The proposed Dimensional Requirements for the redevelopment, given the description of the project provided above as well as that depicted in the accompanying plans, are detailed on the following page in comparison with the dimensional requirements of the underlying CC Zone District. 5]7 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 4 .. Dimensional Requirements Comparison Table CC Zoning and Proposed Redevelopment DIMENSIONAL COMMERCIAL CORE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT ZONE DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT Minimum Gross Lot Area No requirement 9,000 square feet Minimum Net Lot Area per Dwelling Unit No requirement N/A Minimum Lot Width No Requirement 90 feet Minimum Front Yard No requirement None Setback Minimum Side Yard Setback No requirement None Minimum Rear Yard Setback No requirement None Minimum Trash/Recycle 17.7'W x 10'D x >10'H, plus Areal 20'W x 10'D x 10'H 1 (200sqft) 7.7'W x 10'D x >10'H (Total = 254sqft) Maximum Height 28-feet for two-story elements; 38-feet to top of elevator 28-feet, and 31-feet to top of shaft/ overrun elevator shaft Minimum Floor-to-Floor Minimum first floor to Second Heights floor floor-to-floor: thirteen 16' first floor-to-second floor; (13) feet. Minimum upper *Ld 9, second floor to ceiling floor-ceiling height: Nine (9) feet Minimum Distance between Buildings on the No requirement N/A Lot Public Amenity Space3 10% (903 square feet, per 15.3% (285.lsf at ground existing) 3 level, plus 1,098.4sf of second floor deck) 3 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2:1 (18,058sf) for 1.71:1 (15,380sf), Commercial Uses All in Commercial Use NOTES: 1 : The proposed structure is not planned for inclusion of any retail food service establishments, resulting in a minimum trash/ recycling area requirement of 200 square feet. The proposal includes approximately 254 square feet of trash/ recycling storage area that will also accommodate utility meters. The proposed trash/recycling storage 5 17 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 5 .. area complies with all applicable design standards although not laid out to provide a full 20 feet of alley frontage so as to also accommodate City of Aspen electric transformer pad/ easement area requirements (10' x 10' and open to the sky) without conflict between the two area/uses. 2 : Height limits supplemented by Courthouse Viewplanes, as described herein, although the Viewplanes-associated height limit is higher than the 28-feet limit of the CC Zone District. 3 : Pursuant to Code Section 26.575.030.B., 25% of the area of the parcel shall be provided as public amenity; however, for redevelopment of parcels on which less thai-l 25 % currently exists, the existing (prior to redevelopment) percentage shall be the effective requirement provided not less then 10 % is the end requirement. Existing public amenity space in compliance with applicable design requirements equates to only 514.23 square feet, or 5.7% of the lot area. As such, the applicable public amenity space requirement upon redevelopment is 10%, or 903 square feet. Consistent with Code Section 26.575.030.C.4., and also consistent with ample precedent for allowing use of outdoor terraces on private property to satisfy Public Amenity requirements, this redevelopment proposes that similar outdoor spaces on private property, but which shall remain open to the general public, be used to not only satisfy but exceed the effective 10% requirement. The proposal includes 15.3% of the lot area as Public Amenity, with 285.1 square feet at grade, and another 1,098.4 square feet on the second floor deck. The proposed redevelopment of the 517 East Hopkins Avenue property is consistent and compatible with surrounding development patterns in terms of uses, density, intensity, and layout and building heights. The property is surrounded largely by commercial uses. The proposed redevelopment will enhance the streetscape both architecturally and functionally while having no impact whatsoever on the Courthouse Viewplanes. The area and the subject property are fully served by public infrastructure, services and facilities, all of which are plenty adequate to accommodate the proposed redevelopment. Section IV: Review Requirements This application is submitted pursuant to the following sections of the Code: 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, including 26.304.060(B)(1), Combined Reviews; 26.412, Commercial Design Review; 26.415.070, Historic Preservation; 26.415.080, Demolition of Properties within a Historic District; 26.435.050, Mountain View Plane Review; 26.515, Parking; 26.540, Affordable Housing Credits; 26.575.030, Public Amenity; 26.610, Impact Fees; 26.630, Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines; and 26.710.140, Commercial Core (CC) Zone District. The applicable review standards are addressed below. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 6 .. A. Common Development Review Procedures and Combined Reviews Section 26.304.060.B(1) of the Code discusses combined reviews and states that, The procedures for reviewing development plans und applications where more than one (1) development approval is being sought siniultaneously may be combined or modified whenever the Conimunity Development Director determines, in consultation with the applicant, that such combination or modijication would eliminate or reduce duplication and ensure economy of tillie, expense and clarity; provided, however, that all public noticing normally associated with the subject development application(s) is maintained and that a thorough and jidl review of the application and proposed development as otherwise required by this Title is achieved." It is proposed that the associated Conceptual Commercial Design Review and Viewplane review be combined with and made a part of the Conceptual Major Development Review and approval by the HPC. Accordingly, rather than have a Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Resolution granting portions of the applicable approvals and a P&Z Resolution addressing the remaining parts, it is suggested that, pursuant to Code Section 26.304.060(B)(1), Combined Reviews, all final decisions be documented in a single resolution adopted by the HPC. Combining the reviews in this manner will eliminate or at least reduce duplication and ensure economy of time, expense and clarity but should in no way be construed to change the otherwise applicable call-up rights of the City Council as such are defined and limited iii the Land Use Code. All public noticing normally associated with an application such as this will be maintained via publication, sign posting and mailing. Moreover, a thorough and full review of the application and proposed development will still be achieved. B. Conceptual Approval of a Maior Development Code Section 26.415.070 addresses development involving a non-historic property located within a historic district, such as the subject site. Said Code section provides that No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or n property located within n Historic District until plans or suficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. The proposed redevelopment of 517 East Hopkins Avenue is considered a major development because it involves demolition of a non-historic structure and the development of a new structure iii its place and within a historic district. The procedures for the review of major development projects include a two-step process requiring 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 7 .. approval by the HPC of a conceptual development plan and then a final development plan. As mentioned above, it is requested that the HPC Conceptual Review be combined with the Commercial Design Review and Mountain View Plane Review. All applications for Conceptual and Final approval of a Major Development project must receive a determination of consistency with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (the "HP Guidelines") to be approved by the HPC. Chapter 1 of the Guidelines is not applicable as it concerns streetscapes and lot features on residential buildings. Chapters 2 through 10 are likewise inapplicable as they address the rehabilitation of historic structures. The current project involves redevelopment of a commercial property that has no recognized historic significance. Chapter 11 provides guidelines for new buildings and additions on residential Landmark Properties; Chapter 12 is concerned with design in the Main Street Historic District. As such, neither Chapter 11 nor Chapter 12 applies to this proposal. Since the proposed development is located on a non-historic lot in the Commercial Core, its design must comply with Chapter 13 of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines. However, the Chapter 13 guidelines have been replaced by the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines for the Commercial Core Historic District. Accordingly, the appropriate design objectives and guidelines are discussed below in the Commercial Design Review section of this application. The project has been designed to be generally consistent with the guidelines of Chapter 14 but, as is standard, specific consistency with these requirements will be demonstrated as part of the HPC Final Review. The proposed redevelopment of 517 E. Hopkins Avenue will do a far better job of reinforcing the retail-oriented function of the street and en-hance its pedestrian character than does the existing building. The proposed design will significantly enhance and is compatible with the Historic Commercial Core, but will clearly be a product of its own time. C. Demolition of Properties within a Historic District Code Section 26.415.080 states that no properties located within a Historic District can be demolished without HPC approval. Subsection A(4) thereof provides the criteria that HPC must use in determining whether or not to approve the demolition and states, Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one Of the follouling criteria: a) The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b) The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner' s e~orts to properly maintain the structure, 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 8 .. c) The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d) No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and Additionally, for approval to demolish, all ofthefollowing criteria must be met: a) The structure does not contribute to the sign(ticance of the parcel or Historic District in which it is located and b) The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely agect the integrity of the Historic District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c) Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. The existing building was built in 1983 and has no historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance, thus satisfying criterion (d) above. Furthermore, the structure does not contribute to the significance of the Commercial Core, and its loss would not adversely affect the integrity of the Commercial Core. Finally, there are no adjacent designated properties and demolition of this building will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. Therefore, criteria (a) through (c) of the standard's second part are all satisfied as well. D. Conceptual Commercial Design Review Section 26.412.050 of the Code provides the review criteria for Commercial Design Review and states, in relevant part, that the proposed development must comply with the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, as well as the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. The proposed development is located in the Commercial Core Historic District. The design standards of Section 26.412.060, as well as the Commercial Core Historic District Design Review Guidelines are all provided below in italicized print, and each is followed by a description of the proposal's compliance and/ or consistency therewith, as applicable. The jollowing design standards, in addition to the conimercial, lodging and historic district design objectives and guidelines, shall apply to conimercial, lodging and niixed-use development: A. Public amenity space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. On parcels required to provide public anienity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030, Public amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision Ofsuch amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination Of methods of providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 5 17 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 9 .. 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site public amenity su.*ciently allow for n variety of uses and activities to occur, considering any expected tenant and..fiture potential tenants and uses. 2. The pltblic nmenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar ficcess, view orientation and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. 3. The public amenity and the design und operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-ofway and uses contribute to un inviting pedestrian environment. 4. Tlie proposed mnenity does not ditplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract front the pedestrian ellm/'01111Â·tent. 5. Any variation to the design und operational standards for public antenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the purpose of tlie priblic n-menity requirements. According to Code Section 26.575.030(A), public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property. Subsection B states that the public amenity requirement is 25%; however, for redevelopment of parcels where less than 25 % currently exists, the existing percentage is the effective requirement provided that in no case shall the requirement be less thai-t 10%. Iii its existing condition, the only area of the property that qualifies as public amenity space is a 514.23 square feet portion of the concrete walkway and adjacent landscape/gravel planter areas that run from the East Hopkins Avenue sidewalk to doors providing access to the structure's upper floors (near but not quite reaching the alley); the existing, qualifying public amenity space equates to 5.7% of the property. As such, the effective public amenity space requirement upon redevelopment is 10%, or 903 square feet on the subject 9,029 square feet lot. Code Section 26.575.030.C provides the four methods that may be used to satisfy the provision of public amenity, including the following: on-site provision of public amenity; off-site provision of public amenity; cash-in-lieu provision; and alternative method. By extension, the fifth method of satisfying the requirement is a combination of the first four methods. The applicant is proposing a combination of methods. Consistent with Code Section 26.575.030.C.4., and also consistent with ample precedent for allowing use of outdoor terraces on private property to satisfy Public Amenity requirements, this redevelopment proposes that similar outdoor spaces on private property, but which shall remain open to the general public, be used to not only satisfy but exceed the 10% (983 square feet) requirement. The proposal includes 15.3% (285.lsf at ground level, plus 1,098.4sf of second floor deck) of the lot area as Public Amenity. The provision of 903 square feet of on-site public amenity meeting the codified design and operation standards would be unbefitting of the property location on the south side of Hopkins Avenue; complete on-site satisfaction of the requirement at street level would be inefficient and impractical. The subject property is located on Hopkins Avenue where the majority of surrounding development is built out to its lot lines or close to them and 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 10 .. maintains a strong street presence. Furthermore, the 9,029 square feet parcel is on the south side of the street meaning on-site public amenity space consistent with the design standards would be sited to the north of the structure and be shaded. As such, rather than put all public amenity space at grade, the applicant wishes to satisfy the requirement through a combination of at grade space and second floor deck space. The 285.1 square feet, open area with benches, proposed at grade in the northeast corner of the property clearly qualifies as satisfying 31.6% of the 903 square feet public amenity requirement. Furthermore, the applicant feels that the approximately 1,100 square feet second-floor deck qualifies and should be approved as additional public amenity space consistent with many previous City of Aspen approvals as well as Code Sections 26.575.030.C.4, F.5 and F.10. This deck area equates to a public amenity space of 12.2% (1,098.4sf divided by 9,029sf of lot area). Together, these two areas provide 1,383.5 square feet of amenity space, which exceeds the requirement by approximately 480 square feet, or nearly 47%. Consistent with the codified design and operational standards for public amenity, the proposed second level deck will be: 1) open to view from the street at pedestrian level; 2) open to the sky; 3) unenclosed; 4) free of storage areas, utility/trash service areas, or delivery areas (as an aside, all such areas must also be accommodated on ground level and leave little remaining room for redundant street-level public amenity space); 5) within stipulated grade limitations given that the Commission is specifically authorized to approve second level public amenity space; 6) easily maintained; 7) will be used for commercial use with adequate pedestrian and emergency vehicle access; and 8) meets the parameters of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. As such, the proposed deck satisfies all applicable Section 26.575.030.F design and operational standards for public amenity. For this reason, similar decks, such as but not limited to the space on the redeveloped "Gap Building" site, the space on the approved but not yet built Sky Hotel, the upper floor courtyard at 409 East Hopkins, and the rooftop of the Base 1 Lodge, to name just a few, have all been accepted and approved by the City in satisfaction of the public amenity requirements. To the extent that the second floor deck space is not accepted by the HPC as public amenity, the applicant will then agree to pay the residual cash--in-lieu requirement. By residual requirement, it is understood that the 285.1 square feet ground level space complies with all applicable requirements, which would then leave a residual requirement of 617.9 square feet (903sqft minus 285.lsqft) at $100 per square foot per Code Section 26.575.030.E as may be amended, or a total supplemental cash-in-lieu payment of $61,790.00. Additional discussion of the proposed public amenity space is provided on pages 17-18, below, in response to the standards specific to second level public amenity from the Commercial Design Standards and Objectives for the Commercial Core. Please also refer to and consider these on-point guidelines and responsive narratives, 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 1 1 .. B. Utility, delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building nre well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success Of the district. Poor logistics of one (1) building can detract ./tom the quality of surrounding properties. l<#icient delivery and trash areas are important to the ./imction of alleyways. Thefollowing standards shall apply: 1. A trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated on all projects and shall meet the minimum size and location standards established by Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code, unless otherwise established according to said Chapter. 2. A ittility area shall be accommodated on all projects and shall meet the mininium standards established by Title 25, Utilities, of the Municipal code, the City's Electric Distribution Standards, and the National Electric Code, unless otherwise established according to said Codes. 3. All utility, trash ami recycle service areas shall be co-located and combined to the greatest extent practical. 4. If the property adjoins an alleyway, the utility, trash und recycle service areas shall be along and accessed#om the alleyway, unless otherwise approved through Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code, or through Chapter 26.430, Special Review. 5. All utility, trash and recycle service areas shall be fenced so as not to be visible from the street, unless they are entirely located on an alleyway or otherwise approved though Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code, or through Chapter 26.430, Special Review. All fences shall be six (6) feet highjkom grade, shall be of sound construction, and shall be no less than ninety percent (90%) opaque, unless otherwise varied through Chapter 26.430, Special Review. 6. Whenever utility, trash, and recycle service areas are required to be provided abutting tm alley, other portions of n building may extend to the rear property line if otherzoise allowed by this Title, provided that the utility, trash and recycle area is located at grade and accessible to the alley. 7. All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property. Easements shall allouifor service provider access. Encronchments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical ami should only be necessary when existing site conditions, such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. 8. All commercial and lodging buildings shall provide a delivery aren. The delivery area shall be located along the alley {fan alley adjoins the property. The delivery aren shall be accessible to all tenant spaces ofthe building in a manner that meets the requirements of the International Building Code Chapters 10 and 11 as adopted ami nuiended by the City of Aspen. All non-ground floor commercial spaces shall have access to an elevator or dumbwaiter for delivery access. Alleyways (vehicular rights-of-way) may not be utilized as pathways (pedestrian rights-ofway) to meet the requirements of the International Building Code. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral component of the building. Shared.facilities are highly encouraged. 9, All commercial tenant spaces located on the ground floor in excess of 1,500 square feet s/tall contain a vestibule (double set Of doors) developed internal to the structure to meet 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 12 .. the requirements ofthe International Energy Conservation Code as adopted and amended by the City ofAspen, or an air curtain. 10. Mechanical exhaust, including parking garage ventilation, shall be rented through the roofÂ· The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away ftom the street as practical. 11. Mechanical ventilation equipment mid ducting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for .Biture ventilation and ducting needs. 12. The trash and recycling service area requirentents may be varied pursuant to Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Municipal Code. All other requirements of this subsection may be varied by special review (see Chapter 26,430.040.E, Utility and delivery service area provisions). The proposed utility/ trash/recycling (U/T/R) service area and its dimensions are depicted on the proposed main level floor plan (Sheet A-100) included in the architectural plans prepared by C&T and provided herewith. Pursuant to Code Section 12.10.030(A)b, a 20'W x 10'D x 10'H (200 square feet) area for trash and recycling storage must be provided for Commercial Buildings that will not contain or that will not have the capacity to contain an establishment with a Retail Food Service License. While no retail food service businesses are currently contemplated in the proposed development it is being designed with the capacity to contain such a business in the future should such need arise. Also, the reserved trash and recycling storage space must be adjacent to the alleyway and be accessible from all tellant spaces. The proposed conceptual design plans include a trash/recycling storage area of 17.7 feet wide by 10 feet deep, plus another adjoining 7.7 feet wide by 10 feet deep (total of 254 square feet), all with a clearance of greater than 10 feet in height along and accessed directly from the alley. Further, while dimensions of the trash/recycling storage area are subject to variation through special review under Code Section 12.10.080 when an applicant desires to reduce the size requirements and/ or feels that the requirements cannot be met given the nature of the property, it is it is hoped that no such requirement is applicable in the current case. The proposal exceeds the total area requirement but is not laid out in a perfect rectangular form as providing a full 20 feet of alley frontage would make it very difficult to also accommodate City of Aspen electric transformer pad/easement area requirements (10' x 10' and open to the sky) without conflict between the two area/uses. If it is determined that such special review approval from the Environmental Health Department is required, then such approval is hereby requested and/ or will be obtained prior to Final HPC and Commercial Design Review. Utility connections, meters and an electric transformer are being accommodated at grade and on the south/alley side of the proposed structure as well as within the mechanical spaces included within the structure. The transformer is provided with a 10' by 10' pad 5 17 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 1 3 .. that is and will remain open to the sky. Furthermore, building egress is properly provided from all spaces and not through the trash/recycling area. The trash and utility areas will not be visible from Hopkins Avenue. Deliveries and loading will be accommodated in the alley, with accessible ways to/ from each tenant space. The upper and lower floors are served with an elevator that provides for accessibility to/from the alley, and accessible bathroom facilities to be shared between all tenants are also provided on the lower level. The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines (the "Commercial Guidelines" ) set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The Commercial Guidelines are organized to address the different design contexts that exist in the City. These distinct settings, or contexts, are defined as "Character Areas," within which variations exist among the physical features that define each area. The proposed development is located in the "Commercial Core" character area. These Guidelines replaced Chapter 13 of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Per the Commercial Guidelines, all development projects should achieve the following design objectives: â€¢ Promote an interconnected circulation systeiji that invites pedestrian use, including a continuous street and alley system and a respect for the natural topograplly; â€¢ Proniote n system of public places that support activities, including public anienity spaces, compatible landscaping and paving, Und linobtrusive oystreet Parking; and e Assure that buildings fit together to create n vibrant street edge Umt reinjorces a sense of appropriate scale. The proposed development will achieve the above-cited design objectives iii a manner that far exceeds the existing building's consistency with said objectives. The proposed design will create a more vibrant and visually interesting street edge, reinforcing a sense of appropriate, human scale that is pedestrian oriented and has long been absent on this property. The existing character of the Commercial Core is explained as follows: The heart of Aspen centers around the Commercial Core Historic District. It is the first area that developed in the early mining days of the town and its character reflects this rich mining heritage, which is the image that many carry with them of this historic Colorado mountain to-wn. Each historic building contributes to the integrity of the district and preservation of all of these resources is, therefore, crucial. This is especially important as new development continues. 5 17 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 14 .. The purpose of the Commercial Core (CC) zone district is stated in Section 26.710.140(A) of the Code as follows: "to allow the use of land for retail, service, commercial, recreation and institutional purposes within mixed-use buildings to support and enhance the business and service character in the historical central business core of the City. " The proposed development will retain the existing commercial use but within an updated and well laid out building while enhancing and improving this central property in the Commercial Core. As currently envisioned, the second floor will be used for a service commercial and/ or institutional tenant, thus further enhancing consistency with the codified purpose of the CC zone district. The key design objectives in the Commercial Core are as follows: 1. Maintain a retail orientation. 2. Promote creative, contemporary design that respects the historic context. 3. Maintain the traditional scale of building. 4. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. 5. Accommodate outdoor public spaces where they respect the historic context. 6. Promote variety in the street level experience. 7. Preserve the integrity of historic resources within the district. The proposed redevelopment of 517 East Hopkins Avenue meets all of the key design objectives listed above as follows: â€¢ The design reinforces the retail-oriented function of the street and greatly en-hances the pedestrian character; â€¢ The design of four "modules" is creative and contemporary, but respects the historic Commercial Core; â€¢ The design acknowledges, is consistent with, complements and enhances the existing scale and character of the area; â€¢ The tallest portion of the proposed building (other than the small elevator shaft) is only 28 feet and falls below the height of both Courthouse Viewplanes. The design is appropriately broken into "modules" that approximate traditional townsite lot widths; â€¢ The design of the building, with its large, storefront windows, recessed entryways, and modulated appearance accentuated by varied building materials, setbacks and heights, serves to promote variety in the street level experience; and, â€¢ The integrity of all historic resources within the district is preserved by the proposed compatible, complimentary and subservient design. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 13 .. Outlined below is each of the Commercial Core's Conceptual Review Design Guidelines in italicized print followed by a description of the proposal's compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. Street Grid 6.1 Maintain the established town grid in all projects. â€¢ The network of streets and alleys should be retained as public circulation space and for maximum public access. â€¢ Streets and alleys should not be enclosed or closed to public access, and should remain open to the sky. The proposed development will return much of this property to the alignment of the street and alley by being sited parallel to the lot lines on all sides. The existing building is largely triangular in shape with a sunken courtyard, or " moat" between the sidewalk and the front fagade, detracting from and eroding the streetscape and established town grid. The proposed development will also help to reestablish consistency with the town grid by providing compatibly varied storefronts at the street edge. No streets or alleys will be enclosed or otherwise closed to public access and all will remain open to the sky. Internal Walkways 6.2 Public walkways and through courts, when appropriate, should be designed to create access to additional commercial space and frontage, within the walkway and/or to the rear of the site. â€¢ See also: Public Anienity Space design guidelines. No internal public walkways or through courts are proposed. Alleys 6.3 Develop an alley fa<ade to create visual interest. â€¢ Use varied building setbacl[s and changes in materials to create interest and reduce perceived scale. â€¢ Balconies, court yards and decks are also appropriate. â€¢ Providing secondary public entrances is strongly encouraged along alleys. These should be clearly intended for public lise, but subordinate in detail to the primary street-side entrance. The alley will be cleaned up and will comply with the utility and trash/recycling storage area standards. Brick will be used along the rear faqade and cutout areas for service uses will reduce the perceived scale. The building will be substantially lower in height than the adjacent structure to the east and the buildings located directly across the alley (to the south). Parking 6.4 Structured parking should be placed within a 'wrap' of commercial and/or residential uses. â€¢ The exposure Of auto entry areas should be minimized. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 1 6 .. 6.5 Structured parking access should not have a negative impact on the character of the street. The access shall be: â€¢ Located on an alley or secondary street if necessary. â€¢ Designed with the same attention to detail and materials as the primary building fagade. â€¢ Integrated into the building design. There is no structured parking proposed. Public Amenity Space 6.6 A streetfacing amenity space shall meet all of thefollowing requirements: Abut the public sidewalk â€¢ Be level with the sidewalk â€¢ Be open to the sky â€¢ Be directly accessible to the public â€¢ Be paved or otherwise landscaped 6.7 A street-facing public amenity space shall remain subordinate to the line of building fronts in the Commercial Core. â€¢ Any public amenity space positioned at the street edge shall respect the character of the streetscape and ensure that street corners are well defined, with buildings placed at the sidewalk edge. â€¢ Sunken spaces, which are associated with some past developments, adversely affect the street character. Where feasible, these should be replaced -with side-walk level improvements. 6.8 Street facing amenity space shall contain features to promote and enhance its use. These may include one or more of the following: â€¢ Street furniture â€¢ Public art â€¢ Historical/interpretive marker The detailed design of Public Amenity Space, with regard to guidelines 6.8, will be a matter for approval at the Final Review Stage, although it may be discussed at the Conceptual Stage. Code Section 26.575.030.C provides the four methods that may be used to satisfy the provision of public amenity, including the following: on-site provision of public amenity; off-site provision of public amenity; cash-in-lieu provision; and alternative method. By extension, the fifth method of satisfying the requirement is a combination of the first four methods. The applicant is proposing a combination of methods. Consistent with Code Section 26.575.030.C.4., and also consistent with ample precedent for allowing use of outdoor terraces on private property to satisfy Public Amenity requirements, this redevelopment proposes that similar outdoor spaces on private property, but which shall remain open to the general public, be used to not only satisfy but exceed the 10% (903 square feet) requirement. The proposal includes 15.3% (285.lsf at ground level, plus 1,098.4sf of second floor deck) of the lot area as Public Amenity. The provision of 903 square feet of on-site public amenity meeting the codified design and operation standards would be unbefitting of the property location on the south side of Hopkins Avenue; complete on-site satisfaction of the requirement at street level would be 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 17 .. inefficient and impractical. The subject property is located on East Hopkins Avenue where the majority of surrounding development is built out to its lot lines or close to them and maintains a strong street presence, Furthermore, the 9,029 square feet parcel is on the south side of the street, meaning on-site, at grade public amenity space consistent with the design standards would be sited to the north of the structure and be shaded. As such, rather than put all public amenity space at grade, the applicant wishes to satisfy the requirement through a combination of at grade space and second floor deck space. The 285.1 square foot open area with benches, proposed at grade in the northeast corner of the property clearly qualifies as satisfying 31.6% of the 903 square feet public amenity requirement. This at grade amenity space is fully consistent with design guidelines 6.7,6.8 and 6.9 as it: abuts and sits level with the public sidewalk; is paved; is directly accessible by the public and open to the sky; remains subordinate to the line of building fronts; and includes street furniture. Furthermore, the applicant feels that the approximately 1,100 square foot second-floor deck qualifies and should be approved as additional public amenity space consistent with many previous City of Aspen approvals as well as Code Sections 26.575.030.C.4, F.5 and F.10. This deck area equates to a public amenity space of 12.2% (1,098.4sf divided by 9,029sf of lot area). Together, these two areas provide 1,383.5 square feet of amenity space, which exceeds the requirement by approximately 400 square feet, or nearly 47%. Consistent with the codified design and operational standards for public amenity, the proposed second level deck will be: 1) open to view from the street at pedestrian level; 2) open to the sky; 3) unenclosed; 4) free of storage areas, utility/trash service areas, or delivery areas (as an aside, all such areas must also be accommodated on ground level and leave little remaining room for redundant street-level public amenity space); 5) within stipulated grade limitations given that the Commission is specifically authorized to approve second level public amenity space; 6) easily maintained; 7) will be used for commercial use with adequate pedestrian and emergency vehicle access; and 8) meets the parameters of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. As such, the proposed deck satisfies all applicable Section 26.575.030.F design and operational standards for public amenity. For these reasons, similar decks, such as but not limited to the space on the redeveloped "Gap Building" site, the space on the approved but not yet built Sky Hotel, the upper floor courtyard at 409 East Hopkins, and the rooftop of the Base 1 Lodge, to name just a few, have all been accepted and approved by the City in satisfaction of the public amenity requirements. To the extent that the second floor deck space is not accepted by the HPC as public amenity, the applicant will then agree to pay the residual cash-in-lieu requirement. By residual requirement, it is understood that the 285.1 square feet ground level space complies with all applicable requirements, which would then leave a residual requirement of 617.9 square feet (903sqft minus 285.lsqft) at $100 per square foot, per Code Section 26.575.030.E as may be amended, or a total supplemental cash-in-lieu payment of $61,790.00. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 18 .. Guidelines 6.9 through 6.11 discuss mid-block walkways and alley-side public amenity spaces. Since no such spaces are proposed, these guidelines are not applicable. Guidelines 6.12 through 6.15 are applicable to the current proposal as said Guidelines address proposed second level amenity spaces. Per the Commercial Design Standards, An outdoor patio space on the second floor, which is directly accessible to the general public, will be considered as a form Of public amenity space when it is compatible with the historic context and is clearly inviting for public use. This will be most successful in association with outdoor dining space. In this respect it may be favorably considered within sites affected by mountain view planes. As discussed above, and for the various reasons explained in the foregoing, the applicant is proposing an approximately 1,100 square feet deck area as part of the applicable public amenity requirement. The proposed amenity space has been demonstrated to provide compatibility with the historic context and will be clearly inviting for public use. The proposed second level amenity will be used for commercial deck space and will reside on a site that within the two Courthouse Viewplanes. Second Level Amenity Space 6.12 Second level amenity space should be compatible with the character Of the historic district. â€¢ It shall remain visually subordinate to any historic resource on the property. . If located on n historic property, it may not alter the appearance of the resource as seen jtom the street. 6.13 A second)70or amenity space should meet all of thefollowing criteria: â€¢ Ensure consistent public access â€¢ Be dedicatedfor public use â€¢ Provide a public overlook and/or an interpretive marker â€¢ Be ident(fied by a marker at street level As was required with other second level public amenity spaces approved by the City, consistent public access will be assured. As is customary and consistent with prior City approvals, including that of the property immediately to the west, and with public safety and liability concerns and practices, and given that the space will be associated with commercial use, public access will be extended only during hours of business operation. The proposed second floor amenity provides a public overlook, with an open view to the street below, which is home to the Aspen Saturday Market. A sign identifying the second level amenity and its access will be provided on the building, at the Hopkins Avenue street level. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 19 .. 6.14 Second level space should be oriented to maximize solar access and mountain views, or views Of historic landmarks. The proposed second floor public amenity space maximizes solar access to the extent practicable on the north side of a building. Views of the historic City Hall building and Conner Park, across Hopkins Avenue, are maximized and the space directly overlooks the Aspen Saturday Market. In addition, views of Smuggler and Red Mountains are maximized from the proposed second level amenity space. 6.15 Second level space should provide public access by way Of a visible and attractive public stair or elevator from a public street, alley, or street level amenity space. The proposed second level amenity space provides public access by way of a visible and attractive public stair and elevator, both of which are easily reached from Hopkins Avenue. Also, see response to Guidelines 6.12 and 6.13, above. Building Setbacks 6.18 Maintain the alignment offagides at the sidewalk's edge. Place as much ofthefagade Of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ Aminimum of 70% ofthe front fagade shall be at thepropertyline. 6.19 A building may be set back from its side lot lines in accordance with design guidelines identijied in Street & Circulation Pattern and Public Amenity Space guidelines. The existing building is not even close to being in compliance with this standard and it erodes the historic integrity of the Commercial Core. Most of the existing falade is set back significantly from the property line, behind a sun-ken concrete courtyard. The Guidelines state that, "Inf uniform wall of building#onts is vitally important to the historic integrity of the district and should be preserved." If the existing building were proposed today, it would be inconsistent with these Guidelines and the Commercial Guidelines. The proposed building is sited largely lot line to lot line. Providing for consistency with this Guideline makes it impractical to provide of all of the required public amenity space at the sidewalk's edge. Building Orientation 6.20 Orient a new building to be parallel to its lot lines, similar to that of traditional building orientations. â€¢ The front of a primary structure shall be oriented to the street. 6.21 Orient a primary entrance toward the street. Buildings should have a clearly defined primary entrance. For most commercial buildings, this should be a recessed entry way. â€¢ Do not orient a primary entrance to an interior court. â€¢ Providing secondary public entrances to commercial spaces is also encouraged on larger buildings. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 20 .. The redeveloped building will be parallel to the lot lines and the primary entrances to the commercial spaces are oriented toward the street, with clearly defined, recessed entryways. There are no interior courts or sunken courtyards proposed, and all entrances are on the sidewalk/street level, providing for pedestrian friendliness and accessibility for people with physical disabilities. The existing building has one entrance that can only be accessed by taking a stairway down to a sunken courtyard. The primary access to the two commercial spaces at the front of the existing "street level" requires climbing several stairs. In general, this building is unfriendly to pedestrians and difficult to access for people with disabilities. Building Form 6.22 Rectangularforms should be dominant on Commercial Corefagades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. â€¢ The fagade should appear as predominantly flat, with any decorative elenients and projecting or setback "articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominantform. The proposed building is rectangular in form and the fenestration is vertically oriented. The falade is predominantly flat with the exception of appropriately recessed entryways. The minimal decorative elements and the setback "articulations" all complement, but remain subordinate to the dominant rectangular form. 6.23 Use flat roof lines as the dominant rooffornz â€¢ A flat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear Of a site, should be the dominant roofform. â€¢ Parapets on side fagades should step down to-wards the rear of the building. â€¢ False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered. The proposed roofline is flat. 6.24 Along a rear faqade, using building forms that step down in scale toward the alley is encouraged. â€¢ Consider using additive forms, such as sheds, stairs and decks to reduce the perceived scale. These forms should however, remain subordinate to the primary structure. â€¢ Use projecting roofs at the ground floor over entrances, decks and for separate utility structures in order to establish a human scale that invites pedestrian activity. The alley will be cleaned up and will comply with the utility and trash/ recycling storage area standards. Brick will be used along the rear fagade and cutout/recessed areas for service uses will create shadow lines that reduce the perceived scale. The building will be substantially lower in height than the adjacent structure to the east and the buildings located directly across the alley (to the south). Building Height, Mass & Scale 6.25 Maintain the average perceived scale of two-story buildings at the sidewalk. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 21 .. â€¢ Establish a two-story height at the sidewalk edge, or provide a horizontal design element at this level. A change in materials, or a molding at this level are examples. The proposed design maintains a two-story height/mass at its principle modules, which approximate traditional townsite lot widths. The alternating modules appear to be single- story (because of the second floor public amenity terrace) but maintain the average perceived scale of two-story buildings at the sidewalk by employing horizontal design features such as parapet walls, handrails, variation in materials and appropriately scaled ground floor plate/ceiling heights. The areas of second floor setbacks proposed with this design aid in maximizing the openness of the two Courthouse Mountain Viewplanes. 6.26 Building faÂ¢a(le height shall be varied from the fagade height of adjacent buildings of the same number Of stories. â€¢ If an adjacent structure is three stories and 38 ft. tall, new infill may be three stories, but must vary in fagade height by a minimum of 2 ft. There is now a two-story height limit for properties on the south side of the street in the Commercial Core, and, therefore, this building will have a maximum height of 28 feet. Appropriate height variation within the project itself and with adjacent structures is clearly achieved. Please refer to the accompanying plan set for graphic illustrations of the proposed building height in the context of surrounding development. 6.27 A new building or addition should reflect the range and variation in building height of the Commercial Core. â€¢ Refer to the zone district regulations to determine the maxinizini height limit on the subject property. â€¢ A niinimum 9 ft. floor to ceiling height is to be maintained on second stories and higher. â€¢ Additional height, as permitted in the zone district, may be added for one or more of the following r easons: - In order to achieve at least a two-foot variation in height with an adjacent building. - The primary function of the building is civic. (i.e. the building is a Museum, Civic Building, Performance Hall, Fire Station, etc.) - Some portion of the property is affected by a height restriction due to its proximity to a historic resource, or location within a View Plane, therefore relief in another area may be appropriate. - To benefit the livability of Affordable Housing units. - To make a denionstrable (to be verified by the Building Department) contribution to the building's overall energy efficiency, for instance by providing improved daylighting. Please refer to the responses provided above relative to similar standards (i.e., 6.25 and 6.26). 6.28 Height variation should be achieved using one or more of thefollowing: â€¢ Vary the building height for the full depth of the site in accordance with traditional lot width. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 22 .. â€¢ Set back the upper floor to vary the building favade profile(s) and the roof forms across the width and the depth of the building. â€¢ Vary the faqade (or pat'apet) heights at the front. â€¢ Step down the rear of the building towards the alley, in conjunction with other design standards and guidelines. 6.29 On sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths, the fagade height shall be varied to rellect traditional lot width. 6.30 On sites comprising two or more traditional lots, a building shall be designed to reflect the individual parcels. These methods shall be used: â€¢ Variation in height of building modules across the site. â€¢ Variation in massing achieved through upper floor setbacks, the roofscape form and variation in upper floor heights. â€¢ Variation in building fagade heights or cornice line. The goal of true building height variations was largely sacrificed when the Commercial Core Zone District height limitation was reduced to just twenty-eight feet. This application proposes a two-story building with the second floor appearing to sit above only two of the four "modules." The proposed design provides for distinct "modules" that approximate a traditional townsite lot width along this important street. Above two of the modules, the upper floor has been set back to vary the building falade profiles and the roof forms across the width and depth of the building as called for by these Guidelines. 6.31 A new building should step down in scale to respect the height, form and scale of a historic building within its immediate setting. There are no historic structures adjacent to this property. The neighboring buildings are two (to the west) or three stories (to the east). City Hall is across the street from the proposed redevelopment. This building is subservient to City Hall and fully complies with/ respects the two designated Courthouse Mountain Viewplanes. Guidelines 6.32 and 6.33 address new buildings adjacent to one or two-story historic, residential buildings. Since there are no historic buildings, residential or otherwise, adjacent to this property, these guidelines do not apply. 6.34 The setting of iconic historic structures should be preserved and enhanced when feasible. â€¢ On sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths, the third floor of the adjacent lot width should be set back a minimum of 1 5 ft from the front facade. â€¢ Step a building down in height adjacent to an iconic structure. â€¢ Locate anlenity space adjacent to an iconic structure. The only iconic structures iii the immediate vicinity of the subject property are the Elks building and City Hall. The building proposed on this lot will in no way negatively affect these iconic structures as the proposed design, coupled with distance, ensures subservient compatibility. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 23 .. E. Mountain View Plane Review Section 26.435.010(C) of the Code provides that development within designated mountain view planes is subject to heightened review so as to protect certain mountain views from obstruction, strengthen the environmental and aesthetic character of the City, maintain property values, and enhance the City's tourist industry by maintaining the City's heritage as a mountain community. No buildings or land uses are allowed to project above an established view plane unless the Historic Preservation Commission grants an exemption. The subject property falls within the mapped area subject to both Courthouse Mountain Viewplanes. The two Viewplanes originate from in front of the courthouse steps (Courthouse Viewplane #1) and at the sidewalk in front of the Veterans Memorial (Courthouse Viewplane #2, between the courthouse and the courthouse annex buildings). Courthouse Viewplane #1 hits the northwest corner of the subject property at a height of 30.4 feet above grade while it hits the northeast corner at a height of 30.6 feet above grade. Courthouse Viewplane #2 meets the north property line at a height of 34.4 feet above grade, As these Viewplanes ascend from north to south, the Viewplane height limits increase (as one moves from the front of the property toward the alley). Consequently, the Courthouse Viewplane #1 height limit at the southerly property line ranges from 36.2 feet above grade at the southwesterly corner to 36.6 feet above grade at the southeasterly corner. The Courthouse Viewplane #2 height limit at the alley property line is 41.1 feet above grade. Given the foregoing, compliance with the 28-foot height limit of the underlying CC Zone District inherently results in compliance with the Courthouse Viewplane height limits. In other words, the Viewplanes exceed the zone district height limit. Furthermore, between the Courthouse Viewplane vantage points and the subject property is a sizable distance that includes East Main Street (Highway 82), the St. Mary's Church property and associated structures, an alley, Connor Park and the Connor Cabins/Lofts, and East Hopkins Avenue. (For detailed illustrations of the Courthouse Viewplanes and their effective height limitations, please refer to Plan Sheets ALTA, VP-1, VP-2 and VP-3.) As shown and demonstrated on Plan Sheet VP-1, the proposed design, including its elevator shaft, fully complies with the limitations of both Courthouse Viewplanes. At the street front, the proposed building will measure 28-feet in height to the top of its highest parapet where the Courthouse Viewplanes range in height from 30.4-30.6 feet above grade at their most restrictive. As the Viewplanes ascend to the south and the building approaches its alley frontage, compliance with the Viewplane height limit only increases in degree such that even the elevator shaft/ overrun falls well below the Viewplanes (see East and West Elevations - View Plane Analysis, Plans Sheet VP-1). Views of Aspen Mountain from the Courthouse Viewplane vantage points will not be compromised or further infringed upon as a result of this development. To the contrary, 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 24 .. the proposed two-story building is lower ill height than the existing three-story structure. Not only will the proposed building have no impact whatsoever on the view planes, the areas of second floor setbacks proposed with the design will actually aid in maximizing the openness of the two Courthouse Mountain Viewplanes. F. Parking Code Section 26.515.030 provides that the existing commercial use generates all off-street parking requirement of one (1) space for every 1,000 square feet of net leasable area, or 12.76 off-street spaces. In the Commercial Core, there is no parking requirement for residential units. With no existing parking on-site, the property therefore maintains a 12.76 space deficit. The proposed development will contain approximately 19,244 square feet of net leasable coinmercial space, which would necessitate a parking requirement of 19.24 spaces. However, per the Code, since there is an existing 12.76 space deficit in parking, a residual requirement of only 6.48 spaces needs to be satisfied. This 6.48 spaces requirement will be completely satisfied via payment of cash-in-lieu as allowed by right pursuant to Code Section 26.515.030. The payment-in-lieu of parking will be due and payable at the time of building permit issuance for the redevelopment. At the currently codified rate of $30,000, which may be amended, the payment due would be $194,400 ($30,000 x 6.48). Payment of the in-lieu fee does not require any review or approval, nor does it represent any kind of variance or variation whatsoever from the requirements of the Code. G. Impact fees Section 26.610.090 of the Code provides the established impact fees for development within the City of Aspen. The Parks Development fee is $4.10 per square foot of net leasable commercial space. The Transportation Demand Management/ Air Quality impact fee is $0.46 per square foot of net leasable commercial space. Non-unit space does not count towards these fees. The additional net leasable commercial space from that existing amounts to approximately 6,484 square feet. This would generate a Parks Development fee of $26,584.40, and a TDM/ Air Quality fee of $2,982.64. The applicable fees due at the time of building permit issuance will be paid in full. H. Transportation Impact Analysis Please see the Transportation Impact Analysis (Transportation Dernand Management/Multi-Modal Level Of Service analysis) provided ill Exhibit 6. The following provides the "Narrative" and other written portions that are meant to accompany the analysis contained in Exhibit 6; the applicant reserves the right to modify any of the following commitments prior to final project approvals. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 25 .. The completed Tool attached hereto as Exhibit 6 includes a net increase of 6,484 square feet of net leasable commercial area, but this amount may change through the course of the review process. At any rate, for the subject project, this preliminary application of the Tool results in 6.99 net trips to be mitigated. The applicant remains open to additional suggestions as to how these trips might best be mitigated. It is noted that this is an application for conceptual design review and related issues only. Completion of the TDM-MMLOS, while required, is very much premature. Should the current application be approved, the subsequent application(s) will include final design details and all growth management related reviews. During that application review process is the appropriate time to fully consider the Transportation Demand Management and Multi-Modal Levels of Service impacts. Along these lines, the applicant cannot be reasonably expected at this time to fully understand what types of on- or off-site improvements or trip mitigation measures will eventually make sense. Similarly, the applicant cannot yet be expected to know what types of programs (Le., amenities packages, shuttle services, TOP Participation, transit fare subsidies, employee parking cash-outs, workplace parking pricing, compressed work weeks, sponsored vanpools, etc.) each of the eventual tenants might be willing to implement with regard to transportation demand management much less how such programs might be enforced or financed. As such, it is requested that the TDM-MMLOS mitigation review be temporarily delayed and instead be required as part of the subsequent application for all growth management related approvals. Given the foregoing, to the extent that explanation is needed for those items the applicant has proposed credit for in the attached Exhibit 7 TDM-MMLOS Tool, the following narratives are provided. MMLO5 Input Page, Item 1: The project adjoins the sidewalk on the south side of East Hopkins Avenue, which is currently attached to the curb and includes no parkway strip or landscaped area. The applicant will replace the sidewalk, curb and gutter to provide a full- width, detached sidewalk and street trees. (See Plan Sheet TIA-1.) MMLO5 Input Page, Item 8: Access to the existing structure cannot be gained without ascending or descending stairs and none of the existing access points adjoin the sidewalk. As plans sheet TIA-1 shows, the proposed pedestrian access points all adjoin the sidewalk. MMLOS Input Page, Item 9: The project's pedestrian access points have directness factors ranging of less than 1.2, as shown on the TIA Site Plan (Plan Sheet TIA-1). MMLO5 Input Page, Additional Proposed Improvements: The proposal provides six (6) benches meant to enable a pedestrian "dwell" and congregation experience adjoining the sidewalk. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 26 0 . TDM Input Page, Participation in TOP: The applicant will participate ill the City's Transportation Options Program and all employees will be eligible. All reporting requirements will be met. TDM Input Page, Transit Fare Subsidy: Given the project's location in the commercial core, implementation of a transit fare subsidy strategy makes great sense, and it is envisioned that tenants on the property will be required to provide a subsidy to all full-time employees for not less than 100% of daily work-related bus ridership/transit usage costs. TDM Input Page, Compressed Work Weeks: The applicant envisions requiring that all tenants offer not less thaii 25% of their employees the option of a compressed work week schedule whereby the 40-hour work week can be achieved in a 4-day period rather than the traditional 5-day week. TDM Input Page, Bikeshare Program: Given that there is a WeCycle station located directly across the street, the applicant envisions requiring that every tenant purchase memberships in the WeCycle program and allow all of their employees to use to the system. TDM Input Page, End of Trip Facilities: The lower level of the proposed development includes accessible, common bathroom facilities that will include washing and changing areas, and potentially lockers as well. TDM Input Page, Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive Program: The applicant envisions requiring all tenants to take part in and implement programs identical to the City of Aspen's trip reduction marketing and incentives program. No additional TDM Input page credits are proposed. The applicant likely would have committed to additional TDM measures, but the TIA Tool does not allow credit for anything more than has already been committed. In fact it is not even clear that the applicant is receiving full credit for the programs described above. En~orcement and Financing: The MMLOS measures described above do not require any financing or enforcement. If approved, the applicant will be held to the proposed development, which guarantees the measures. The applicant will finance the development privately and, once built will require no enforcement. Participation in the TOP, provision of the transit fare subsidy program, and the bicycle share program will be provided and paid for the first five years of ownership to each tenant and move in. The tenant is responsible for enrolling iii the programs and payment for usage outside of the membership fees. The TDM measures will be included in lease agreements and reviewed by the tenants, who will accept the terms by means of executing/agreeing to their lease. Scheduling and Implementation Measures: All MMLOS items and the "end of trip facilities" will be completed during the construction phase of the project. These items will be part of 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 27 .. the plan set submitted to the City of Aspen Building Department for review. The applicant understands the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy is contingent upon satisfactory installation of the MMLOS improvements, as reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. These items will be the responsibility of the applicant. TDM measures will be implemented when tenants sign their lease agreements. Monitoring and Reporting: The property manager or other representative of the owner will issue a survey to the commercial tenants on an annual basis. This simple survey will determine what level of use the tenants engage in for the TDM measures and if they have effectively reduced trips. The survey results will be issued as an annual report to the City of Aspen Transportation Department. 517 East Hopkins Conceptual Redevelopment Application 28 0 . EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Amy Simon; Exhibit 2: Proof of the Applicant' s Ownership and Authority; Exhibit 3: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) to Represent the Applicant; Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map; Exhibit 5: Land Use Application, Dimensional Requirements Form, and Homeowners Association Compliance Form; Exhibit 6: Transportation Impact Analysis; Exhibit 7: An Executed Application Fee Agreement; and, Exhibit 8: Mailing Addresses of Record for All Property Owners Located Within Three-hundred (300) Feet of the Subject Property PID# 2737-073-40-003 0 . EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN El PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, 970.429.2758 DATE: 8/12/14 revised 8/24/1 5 PROJECT: 517 E. Hopkins REPRESENTATIVE: Mark Hunt REQUEST: Major Development for property within Historic District, Commercial Design Review, ESA Viewplane Review DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant is interested in removing and replacing the existing structure located at 517 E. Hopkins, Lots D, E, and F, Block 94. This 9,000 square foot lot is located in the Commercial Core Historic District, but the building on the site, constructed in 1983, has no historic significance and is eligible for redevelopment. The property falls within the path of the Courthouse View Planes. The application will have to demonstrate the new building either sits beneath the View Plane, or if the View Plane is impacted, the effect is minimal. There are existing buildings across the alley from this site which are taller than today's height limits and will likely be determined to block the view towards the mountain more than any redevelopment of this site could under today's 28' height limit. The recently passed Referendum 1 may apply to this project regarding viewplane intrusions. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) reviews all development within the Historic District and will perform all reviews for this project. There will be two steps; Conceptual Review and Final Review. Neighborhood Outreach is required prior to the first public hearing at HPC. The applicant will need to be aware of other requirements of a redevelopment, including provision of Public Amenity. A calculation of existing Public Amenity will be needed. Assuming that the building in place today does not provide 25% of the site open to the sky within 2' of the sidewalk grade, the requirement will be whatever the current tabulation is, or 10% of the site, whichever is greater. There are several options for mitigating Public Amenity, including a cash in lieu payment. It appears that there is no parking on the -site today. The applicant can maintain that circumstance, so long as no new net leasable space is created. If there is new net leasable, then the requirement is to provide one space per 1,000 square feet of new net leasable needs or by a cash in lieu payment of $30,000 per space. Other issues that will need to be addressed are current requirements for on-site trash, utility and recycling areas, and the City's new guidelines for Traffic Impact mitigation. REVIEW PROCESS: Step 1: HPC Review Conceptual Major Development Conceptual Commercial Design Review ESA View Plane Review City Council has an optional call-up of the consolidated application. .. Step 2: Council Review Final Major Development Final Commercial Design Review GMQS Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use Code: http://www. aspen p itki n. com/Departments/C omm un ity-Development/Planning-a nd-Zon i ng/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Application: http:Uwww.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/C ity/Comdev/Apps%20a nd%20Fees/2011 %20 H istoric%20 Land%20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines: http://www. aspen pitki n.com/Portals/0/docs/C ity/Comdev/Comm%20 Desg n %20Stnds/Com mercia I % 20Design %20Guidelines_CommercialÂ°/020Core%20Historic%20District.pdf Transportation Impact Analysis Requirements: http://www. aspen p itkin. com/Departments/Com mu n ity-DevelopmenUP lan n i ng-a nd-Zon i ng/Cu rrent- Planning/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach 26.304.060.B.1 Combined Reviews 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.415.070 Historic Preservation 26.435.050 Mountain View Plane Review 26.515 Parking 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.575.030 Public Amenity 26.610 Impact Fees 26.630 Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines 26.710. Commercial Core Zone District and Municipal Code Section 12.10 Space Allotment for Trash and Recycling Storage Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendation Review agencies for recommendation HPC for decisions Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Neighborhood Outreach: Yes 2 0 0 Planning Fees: $4,550 for 14 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Referrals: Engineering ($275/hour) Environmental Health ($975 flat fee) Total Deposit: $5800 To apply, submit 1 complete copy of the following information: 8 Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. [#'Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Ly Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Â¤ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4 A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 6 HOA Compliance form (Attached) O Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and- Zoning/Recent-Code-Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be included with the application. Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. [f An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Once the application is deemed complete, the following items will then need to be submitted: Â¤ 15 Copies of the complete application packet and associated drawings. CO .. m Total deposit for review of the application. 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. m A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 4 0 . EXHIBIT 2 ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW 320 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1557 Sherman & Howard L.L.C. TELEPHONE' (970) 925-6300 FAX: (970) 925-1181 OFFICES IN: DENVER Â· COLORADO SPRINGS Â· ASPENÂ· VAIL STEAMBOAT SPRINGS - PHOENIX SCOTTSDALE Â· RENO Â· LAS VEGAS Â· ST. LOUIS Curtis B. Sanders Office Number (970) 300-0014 E-mail: csanders*shermanhoward.com August 5,2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC; Certificate of Ownership Dear Sir or Madam: 1 am an attorney licensed by the State of Colorado to practice law. This letter shall confirm and certify that 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, is the owner of certain improved real property located at 517 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611, and legally described as follows (the "Subiect Property"): Lots D, E and F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The Subject Property is subject to the following matters of record: 1. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 219 and 278 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 2. All minerals underlying the subject property as conveyed by Deeds recorded in Book 98 at Page 476, Book 98 at Page 481, Book 98 at Page 515, Book 105 at Page 129 and Book 106 at Page 482. 3. Multipurpose Easement Agreement granted to the City of Aspen et. al.,recorded September 16,1976 in Book 316 at Page 701. 4. Those terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Restrictive Covenants recorded April 9,1984 in Book 464 at Page 319, deleting therefrom any restrictions BUS_RE/5331611.1 .. indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 5. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in the Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement dated as of June 10, 2014 and given by 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC in favor of Jefferies LoanCore LLC recorded June 18,2014 as Reception No. 6ll 180, Pitkin County, Colorado. 6. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in the Assignment of Leases and Rents dated as of June 10, 2014 and given by 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC in favor of Jefferies LoanCore LLC recorded June 18 2014 as Reception No. 611181, Pitkin County, Colorado. 7. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in the UCC Financing Statement given by 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC in favor of Jefferies LoanCore LLC recorded June 18,2014 as Reception No. 611182, Pitkin County, Colorado For your convenience, a copy of the vesting deed confirming ownership of the Subject Property is attached. This letter shall further confirm that as the owner of the Subject Property, 411 East Hyman Avenue, LLC has the right and authority to file and pursue land use applications, variance requests, and other requests with the City of Aspen with respect to tile Subject Property. Sincerely, Â»99 - Curtis B. Sanders Enc. 2 BUS RE/5331611.1 0 . RECEPTION#: 611071, 06/13/2014 at 01:32:49 PM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 DF $1000.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO \Â¤ecorders Note: No transfer Declaration 4 Recorders Note: Transfer Declaration del;vered to Assessor on 8/19/2014 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED I 1-HIS GENERAL WARRANTY DEED is granted as ofthe 10th ciay of June, 2014 by ~ 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC, a Colorado limited liability company C 'Grantor") to 517 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN, LLC a Colorado limited liability company (Grantee"), whose mailing address is c/o M Development. 2001 North Halsted, Suite 304. Chicago, Illinois 60614. Grantor, for and iii consideration ofilie sum of Ten Dollars and no/100 ($10.00). and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, has sold ancl conveyed, and by these presents does hereby sell. grant convey, assign. deliver and transfer unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the following real property in Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Propertv'). to wit: Lots D; E and F, Block 94. City and Townsite of Aspen. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. TO IIAVE AND IIOLD the said premises above bargaincd and described, with the appurtenances, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. Grantor. for itself, itS successors and assigns. does covenant, grant bargain and agree to and with Grantee, its successors and assigns. that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the ~ premises above conveyed. has good, sure, perfect. absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance i iii law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell i and convey the same in maimer and form as aforesaid. and that the same are free and clear from 811 former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens- taxes. assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature whatsoever. except for those matters described below on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (collectively, the '-Permitted Exceptions") and thal Grantor, for itself. its successors and assigns, does covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the Property in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, its successors and assigns. against all and every person or persons claiming tlie whole or any part thereof. subject lo the Permitted Exceptions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this General Warranty Deed is executed by Grantor on the date first recited above. * RETT 1HE Orr I Agil Approved BUS_RE/3275295.1 3 BUS RE/5331611.1 .. RECEPTION#: 611071, 06/13/2014 at 01:32:49 PM, 2 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO GRANTOR: 517 EAST IIOPK1NS AVENUE LLC. a Colorado limited : liability company By: Gladwyne Investments LLC, a Colorado limited ' liability company, its Managing Member : By: . /mit -,04(,Â«- Daniel J. Martii@au. Manager- - 5~21;;ld be/Q- i STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1Ott' day of June. 2014, by David B, Kelly, pursuant to Statutory Power (31 Allomey, for Daniel J. Martineau, as Manager of ~ Gladwync Investments LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Managing Member of 517 East Hopkins Avenue 1,!.C, a Colorado limited LiabilityÂ· company. Witness my hand and official seal. My conimission expires: 5-1 7.1,43 : 0 1 -1-7 N a (SEAL) 09Â»96,9 210, psnr-I-2, , â‚¬5==SPÂ» .y?'LANâ‚¬2242 Notar> Putili~7( A+I.Â·'~- 49. f ~01 AR y ~'Â·.2 \ PUBOO/0 17* OF COL 2 RUS_RE/5275295.1 4 BUS_RE/533161 1-1 0 . RECEPTION#: 611071, 06/13/2014 at 01:32:49 PM, 3 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO GRANTOR: 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: Newlon LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. its Managing Member - By: Â»6-44 Â»RE. : David N. Danforth, Manager L.7 ~ STATE OF CokÂ¢4~r/A ) ) 5S. COUNTY OF Lea A.w 65) U t'he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 01* day of IScine , 2014, by David N. Danforth, as Manager of Newton LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Managing Member of 517 East Hopkins Avenue LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal, My commission expires: AfrA 20, 710 \% (SEAL) Notary Public / ROSA HIDALGO Commission # 2065131 ~, ~* PI~3:2~5; 8~]m#mi ~ My Comm. Exp-4-8@1.29.20-11,D Ht .S_RE/52?5295.1 41 5 BUS_RE/5331611.1 .. RECEPTION#: 611071, 06/13/2014 at 01:32:49 PM, 4 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO EXHIBIT A TO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED (Permitted Exceptions) 1. Restrictions as set forth in Deed recorded December 28, 1887 in Book 59 at Page 219, and Deed recorded January 11,1888 in Book 59 at Page 278. 2. Reservation ofall minerals as set forth in Deeds recorded June 6: 1891 in Book 98 at Page 476, and Page 481, June 13. 1891 in Book 98 at page 515. September 9,1891 in Book 105 at Page 129, and December 30,1892 in Book 1 06 at Page 482. 3. Ternis, conditions. provisions. obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Multipurpose Easement Agreenient recorded September 16.1976 in Book 316 at Page 701. 4. Covenants, conditions. restrictions and provisions as set forth in Restrictive Covenants recorded April 9. 1984 in Book 464 at Page 319. but omitting any coveliant or restriction based on race. color. religion. sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin: and any and all amendments, assignments, or annexations thereto. 5. Thosematiers us disclosed on the Improvement Survey, recorded December 8,2000 in Plat Book 54 at Page 93. 4 BLS RE,32752951 6 BUS RE/5331611.1 â€¢ f"--EXHIBIT 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC 2001 N. Halsted, Suite 304 Chicago, IL 60614 - August 28,2015 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, Third Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lots D, E, and F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen (517 E. Hopkins Avenue) Ladies and Gentlemen: I am writing as Manager of 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, which is the owner o f the above Property. In its capacity as owner of the Property, 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC desires to apply for, pursue and obtain at its own expense the City of Aspen' s approval of certain proposed modifications to the iniprovements currently located on the Property. This letter shall confirm that 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC authorizes Haas Land Planning, LLC and Camburas & Theodore, LTD to apply for, pursue and obtain the City of Aspen' s approval of modifications to the improvements currently located on the Property, which approvals may include but not be limited to a building permit, mechanical permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit demolition permit, Planning and Zoning Commission approval, Historic Preservation Committee approval, City Council approval, variances, and any other approvals and land use approvals which may be required by the City of Aspen. Please contact the undersigned with any questions. 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: 517 East Hopkins Aspen Manager Inc., a Colorado Corporation Its: Manager 0 By: Il- Marlhlunt Its: President F Pitkin Maps & More 1,.1 Pitkin Maps & More 6 4. 'gihijifi Ik'fU#,14/121 Map Created on 11:25 AM 08/31/15 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com r.' ft:,m~/mUM,<3 12 -r- ff - B--960, Fl- - '- -.-2- 1 . R: 1, r,9 - ..P /7 [Â·el-entlent S $1 j <A~--' - 82 4 4 11 11 ---41,14,1.1, Legend 11 11 1,1,6,0-1.Cr. N N # .1 t.k' * " -trs 0 State Highway U F 1 //,(< m Road Centerline 4K 4 0 4:Ker,Filâ‚¬ 11 111 h 3 lit t: r 1 1 94, Primary Road ==Ztz=Wi ~~FLTI="-btrit-~- ~~ - Fer c Secondary Road 1/ .*.1. 12 - Service Road MI. il Rivers and Creeks -----# 8 ll r- - Continuous 1 r.,-Â·.. .. Intermittent 1111 H River, Lake or Pond 9 2 # 07&7 " 111 Town Boundary - ----=BHOPKiNS'-AVE,Â·4Â·=====-Â· ,,~ Federal Land Boundary h 4 3 4 -tki- ,4 0 State of Colorado 4, ---114* ... M USFS -- h N -- H C 11 4 U A . R It 3 '2 91 11 0 0 -~1"F->(a.,44'-6VEÂ·-Â«=Â« ''~ !1 11 I M H r ,? N r=k--- 1 rl - -- Notes li 4Â»- 11 11 tabblesÂ· 1 1 # -i-=-- # L .7 E-,Lri 41 , 2.11 376.0 0 188.00 376.0 Feet THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. -' Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee 1: 2,256 concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere 1~ of the content represented, 119%)NINd S-S==s === 1-7-1 0 EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 517 E Hopkins Redevelopment Location: 517 E. Hopkins Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 Lots, D, E & F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2737-073-40-003 y, fu - APPLICANT: Name: 517 East Hopkins, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company SE y y ' . Address: 2001 N. Halstead St., Suite 304, Chicago, IL 60614 Cir q,/ Phone #: 312-850-1680 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Haas Land Planning, LLC Address: 420 East Main St, Suite 10-B, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 970-925-7819 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption m conceptual PUD U Temporary use 21 GMQS Allotment ~ Final PUD (& PUT) Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision El Conceptual SPA tÂ® ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA ~ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mo,uniain View Plane &1 Commercial Design Review El Lot Split El Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ~ Residential Design Variance El Lot Line Adjustment El Other: ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) -lhr-te Â·---5Aor2)bvi \Aint- Â¢v\Ned 'rie 'h -41Â¢ Con'~071-er-ing (321'41 . PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, ete.) DemA,EL,pv'Anc LIclinf a,lrj fedevelon n 4Â»-1-Fi57\1 Corn mordÂ«f Ut 14 i ne r Have you attaciled the following? FEES DUE: $ 5, FDO 81 Pre-Application Conference Summary Â·El Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement El Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 681 Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. .. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 51'1 C Hop k i n 5 2pclewÂ·do 90*nt Applicant: 617 -O,4 hbokvs 1 I 1.C , a. do/orads Unt-fa. l-irih ff\j (?em)grÂ·70<~ Location: 51-7 Â·F . ./.6 pkins A,re Ai-pen : CO Zone District: Con'jmofol-al Arr' (CCI) Lot Size: Rll)00 sf Lot Area: 1 1 600 j Â£ (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the ligh water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing:\4154 54 Proposed: 19 ; 7,44<-p Number of residential units: Existing: 4 T-Toposed: 0 Number ofbedrooms: Existing: ff Proposed: 0 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): /4/A DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: If,/0595% Proposed:/5;38'052 Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: 2% â‚¬+ proposed: 2% 4- . 61 -fl -1-o -Af tjhf Access. bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable: N/A Proposed: M (k On-Site parking: Existing: O Required: 61 6 Proposed: ((4-(rt -beâ‚¬ % Site coverage: Existing: N/A Required: 104 Proposed.Â·N/A 0/0 0~0614 Ame,~ANing: 10 70 Required: /0 A Proposed: \5/0 en bpace: n Front Setback: Existing: K//A Required: A~A Proposed: 1\} / A P liN Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined FIR: Existing: P Required: ~ " Proposed,: 11 11 Side Setback: Existing: " Required: Proposed: 1> 11 Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 1) 1) 1/ Combined Sides: Existiiig: Required: Proposed: 7, M Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Noryâ‚¬_ Variations requested: .. 71- . ...â‚¬ . l " Oil?~17;3 ~FRF} $./ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEMmEPAR*MENT :.... t v :f ' 3*tfÂ· ' 11&4 1. ..3 Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: 517 East Hopkins Aspen, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Property Owner ("1"): Email: MHunt@MDEVCO.COM Phone No.: 312.850.1680 Address of 517 E. Hopkins Property: (subject of Aspen, Colorado 81611 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) Â® This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Â£ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. 517 East Hopkins Aspen LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: 517 East HopkineÂ·*spenMana~Dar, Inc., a Colorado corporation Its: Manager~ By: Mark Amt.... Date Its: President r j ..1 ; 7 Â¥*r .p 0 . EXHIBIT S 6 Trip Generation Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: [n order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" and then click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center" category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then clickthe "Macro Settings" category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enter the project's square footage and/or unit counts under Proposed Land Use. The numbers should reflect the net change in land use between existing and proposea conditions. Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable under each of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. Points are only awarded for proposed and confirmed aspects of the project. Sheet 3. TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Sheet 4. Summaryand Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mitigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected for the project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measurethat waschosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicle traffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense for the project site and are improvements to the current condition. Helpful Hints: 1. Refer to the Transportation Imoact A.nalysis ines for information on the use of this tool. 2. Refer to TIA Frequently Asked Questions 3 quick overview. 2. Hover over red cornertags for additional information on individual measures. 3, Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. = input = calculation DATE: 8/27/15 PROJECT NAME: 517 East Hopkins PROJECT ADDRESS: 517 East Hopkins Avenue APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Mitch Haas; Haas Land Planning, LLC, 420 E Main Street, Suite 10-B, Aspen, CO 81611, (970) NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, 925-781% mitch@hipaspen.corn PHONE, EMAIL Minor Development - Inside the Roundabout Is this a major or minor project? Minor Major Development - Outside the Roundabout Trips Generated Net New Units/Square Feet of the Proposed AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour Project Proposed Land Use Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Commercial (sf) 6484.0 sf 10.16 4.56 14.72 10.74 16.11 (~6-84- -- 3 Free-Market Housing (Units) O Units 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Affordable Housing(Units) -4 Units -1.44 -1.56 -3.00 -1.96 -1.60 -3.56 Lodging (Units) O Units O.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 Essential Public Facility (sf) 0.0 sf 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 8.72 3.00 11.72 8.78 14.50 23.28 *For mixed-use (at leasttwo of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hourand a 14% reduction for PM Peak-Hour is applied tothe trip generation. ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIP GE VERATION AM Peak Average PM Peak Average Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 Affordable Housing 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 .. MMLOS Input Page Instructions: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable to each measure under the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. = input = calculation ' 40, ~ Category Sub. Site Plan Question Answer Points Does the project propose a detached sidewalk where an attached ~ ~ sidewalk currently exists? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer Yes 5 meet standard minimum widths as well? (D Is the proposed effective sidewalk width greater than the standard NO 0 j minimum width? Is proposed landscape buffer greater than the standard minimum width? No 0 Subtotal 5 C -- ) Does the project propose a detached sidewalk on an adjacent block? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard No 0 minimum widths? -7 Is the proposed effective sidewalk width on an adjacent block NA 0 ~.~-7 greater than the standard minimum width? Is the proposed landscape buffer on an adjacent block greater than NA 0 the standard minimum width? Subtotal 0 Are slopes between back of curb and sidewalk equal to or less than Yes 0 5%? ('~ Are curbs equal to (or less than) 6 inches? Yes 0 Is new landscaping proposed that improves the pedestrian NA 0 experience? Does the project propose an improved crosswalk? NA 0 Subtotal 0 Are existing driveways removed from the street? NA 0 Is pedestrian and/or vehicle visibility unchanged by new structure Yes 0 or column? C-) Is the grade (where pedestrians cross) on cross-slope of driveway Yes 0 2% or less? $0 - Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian access points? Yes 5 .28 0< Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian or bicyclist NA 0 interaction with vehicles at driveway areas? Subtotal 5 C 9) Is the project's pedestrian directness factor less than 1 -5? Yes 0 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor between 1 and 1.2? Yes 5 .E z lii E- Is the project proposing an off site improvement that results in a No 0 pedestrian directness factor below 1.2?* ts .8 -1.- 4 2 Are traffic calming features proposed that are part of an approved No 0 plan (speed humps, rapid flash)?* Subtotal 5 Are additional minor improvements proposed which benefit the pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Yes 3 Aspen staff? Are additional major improvements proposed which benefit the ~ pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of No 0 Aspen staff? Subtotal 34.422 4- A---6 79 ng and Parking, and Sidewalk Condition Sidewalk Condition onsiderations on Adjacent Blocks on Project Frontage Proposed Pedestrian Routes Pedestrians Additional Improvements .. Category Sub. Question Answer Points Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved No 0 design? Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or NA 0 driveway? Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements NA 0 to an existing bicycle path? Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements No 0 . which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements No 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Subtotal 0 Is the project providing bicycle parking? No 0 Subtotal 0 Category Sub. Question Answer Points (Il) Is seating/bench proposed? NA 0 ~~ Isa trash receptacle proposed? NA O 03 IS transit system information (signage) proposed? NA O (i) Is shelter/shade proposed? NA 0 Is enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? NA 0 Is real-time transit information proposed? NA 0 (R) Is bicycle parl<ing/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? NA 0 Are ADA improvements proposed? NA 0 Sublotal 0 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? NA 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or NA 0 roadway operations proposed? Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic NA 0 amenities)? Sublotal 0 Enhanced Bicycle Modifications to Existing Basic Amenities Parking Bicycle Paths Transit Bicycles Amenities 0 . TDM Input Page liW// .,7: r 4 :11â€ždz/=fmt:,~ - I *- O% -, -A~MÂ».3 2.Â· i / il ---0 .-- -it Instructions TIM: choose themitigation measures thatare appropriate foryour project. Proposed TDIvt or MMLOS measures should be new and/oral improvement of existing conditions, A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should .150 make sense in the context of project location and future use. Strategy VMT Categon' No Sub. Question Answer Reductions Will an onsite ammenities sllegy be implemented? Onsit/Se.icing 0 00% Which onsite ammenities will be Iimplemented? Willa shared shuttle service strategy be implemented? NO What is the degree of implementation? Shared ShuttleS/rvice ---- 000% What is the company size? What percentage of customers are eligible 7 Nonmotorized Zones ~Will a nonmotorized zones strategv be implemented? |NA 0.00% 1 --4 3,4111,1,11,1,7%;571,1-m;= #-..' Strategy VMT Categ ry Sub. Question Anmer Reductions Will a network expansion stragtegy be implemented? NO Network Expansion What is the percentage increase of tlansit network coverapÂ·' 0+0056 What is the existing tran5it mode share " a % of total daily tripsi' Willa se,vice frequency/speed strategy be implemented? NO What is the percentage reduction In headwayÂ·, 11:i le/Â·,2 wÂ· trequency)? Service Frequency/Speed - -- Â·Â·Â·-Â·-- O,009% What 15 the existing transit mode skare asa % of total dailY tripS? What is the levei of implementation? W,]1 a transit access iÂ·norovement strategy be implemented? No Transit Access Improvement 0.00' What is the extent of access improvementsÂ·' Intercept Lot ~Will an inti-cept lot ;trategÂ¥ be hplemented? INI 000% . P 4 ~'Wf.r'Â·al ,f" ,? .-.ihN~0~~21MtC'.~~ ~il"'it.in Strategy VMT Categor'y Yes Sub. Question An"jer Reductions Will there be participation n TOP? Participatior in TOP 4 00% What percentage of employees are eligible? 100% M a transit fare subsidy strategy iimplemented? Yes Transit Fare Subsdy What percentage o f emplckees are eligible? 100% 13.80% What is the amount of trans.t subsidy per passenger (daily equivalent)? 100,1 Is an employee parking cash-out strategy being implemented? NO Employee Parking Cash-Out 000% What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a workplace parking pricing straIegy implemented? No Workplace Parking Pricing What is the daily parking charge? DOOM. What percentage of employees are 5Ubject to priced parking? ts a compressed work weeks strategy implemented? Tes Com pressed Work Weeks What percentage of employees are participating? 25% 3-75% What is the workweek schedule? 4-day/40-hour Is an employer sponsered shuttle program implemented? NO Employer Sponsored Vanpool What is the employer size? 000% What percentage of employees are elwgible? 15 a carpool matching strategY implemented? NO Carpool Matching 0,00., What percentage of employees are eligble? 15 carshare participation being implemented? NO Carshare Program How many employee memberships have been purchased? 0.00% What percentage of employees are e! ible? ts a bikeshare program participation being implemented? Ye. likeshare Program How many memberships have been purchased? <100 1 50% What percentage of employees/guests are eligble? 100% 15 an end of trip facilities strategy being implemented? Yes End of Trip Facmties What is the degree of implementation? Low 100% What is the employer size? Small Isa self-funded emergency ride home strategy being Implemented? NO Self-funded Emergency Ride Home 0.005' What percentage of employees are eligible? Isa carpool/vanpoll priority parking strategy being implemented? No Carpool/Vanpoot Priority Parking What is the employer size? O.00% What number of parking spots are available for the program? IIsa private employer shuttle strategy being implemented? No Private Employer Shuttle What is the employer size? 0.0091 What percentage o f employees are eligible? ]s a trip reduction marketing/incentive program implemented? Yes Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive Program 4.00, What percentage of employees/guests are eligrble? 100% ~~ ~ 4,14,4.1,,iii., a.rri,â€¢i 'Â·Â·,AT'. 7 ~ t~' ;'741'ANMÂ·,Al >4Â·:.drao/,O;,T~!21 .1~ LMAM,Ni,Ilt2 + 7446**WumIS: 1. 22% work trips represents a mixed-used site (SF Bay Area Travel Survey). See Assumptions Tab for more detail. Tra nsit 5 Vitern Imp,ovenlents Neighborhood/Site Commute Trip Reduction Programs Strategies Strategies Â¤ Enhancement:Strate:tel 0 0 Summary and Narrative: DATE: 8/27/15 PROJECT NAME: 517 East Hopkins PROJECT ADDRESS: 517 East Hopkins Avenue APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Mitch Haas; Haas Land Planning, LLC, 420 E Main Street, Suite 10-B, Aspen, CO 81611, (970) 925-7819; mitch@hipaspen.com NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation Peak Hour \ Max Trips Generated MMLOS E. TDM \ Total Trips Mitigated NET TRIPS TO BE MITIGATED PM i 23.3 15 i 1.29 i 16.29 6.99 -1 The net trips to be mitigated is greater than O. The project shall propose additional mitigation measures. Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the following prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcementand Financing Plan forthe selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative report. RETAiN FOR - , rwer, F. 0 r-m@,1 . 11 7 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property 517 East Hopkins, LLC Phone No. (312) 850-1680 Owner CID: a Colorado Limited Liability Company Email: mhunt@mdevco.com Address of Billing 2001 N. Halstead St., Suite 304 Property: 517 East Hopkins Avenue Address: Chicago, IL 60614 (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 975_ flat fee for Environmental Health $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 4,550 deposit for 14 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ 275 deposit for _1_ hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Ow 70 Chris Bendon 517 East Hopkins, LLC a Colorado Limited Community Development Director Liability company By 517 East Hopkins Aspen Manager, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Its Manager By: Mark Hunt Title: President City Use: Fees Due: $ Received: $ November, 2011 City ofAspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 , .. EXHIBIT MAILING ADDRESSES OF RECORD FOR ALL PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE FIRST SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE AND/OR WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE .. THE CITY OF AsPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: September 21.2015 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 517 E. Hopkins Ave. and reviewed it for completeness. The item is scheduled on December 9,2015 at HPC. X Your Land Use Application is complete: Please submit the following missing submission items. 1) a deposit check for $5800 2) 12 copies of plans and a digital copy of the entire application emailed to sara.adams@citvofaspen.com Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2778 if you have any questions. Thank You, Sara Adams, Senior Planner City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging - ALLEY 1 10'-0, 7--81/2" L 1 lilli SKY f- 7023Â¢ LINE e e - -t- t- 0 ~ r-ME w 1 0 2 -Â»194~ /17 ~ OVERHANG i FI ~-r / -Â«Â»Â»jiff/f/~ 4/ 34% ~li / -1.311 31 @ lt/4/ 444 ~*St**i~ --1 lilli 76'-10" ROU -[-EE45%0 / / ,NEW PEDESTRIAN,5%2*f05*' BETWEEN DOORS 1 1111111111111 1 / lil:ft(inU:NULU/li/jill///ill/// / .,1 muvmErTRANFiwiffl'/lff~j 4N/4/4//11, 18' - 0"/ / BETWEEN DOOIRS5~Â»8500Â«/,~ '14*uNLI/fI/NNHiliHHifixifilifiJ/Jii'/223]jifia fÂ»3'-0,Â· ROUTEÂ«*545/////:23* 1 1 u- AmnliqaWM)~~hw~ / .Â·'>*BETWEEN DOORS'*50550#000> -411 lili \ COL -1 11-41-~ 1 - BENCHES- ~ : 2 :Iwic' (TYP OF 63 -4 *L 1 -- 1_ _ - _*za=.:o _ ~- ~~~2.:1Â£~_ ~_~~~0 1-Â» -14213t~ff=t'=24<4 ------ 1 ' 1 ILLUI- b SOFFITABOVE BALCONY ABOVE LU L L b PARKING--1 CONCRETE WALK NEW PEDESTRIAN KIOSK 1 ~-LIGHT POST ENTRANCE Z ' Â· . FACE OF CURB 92/#'PE Â·,99624" 3 LANDSCAPE Â« d LANDSCAPE - - LANDSCAPE 3 / AREA. TIP ~ AREATYP ~ AREA,-INP ' 0- ( %4 , _J 1- -j// LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AREA. TYP PAVERS,TYP PAVERS,TYP EAST HOPKINS AVENUE r-13 SITE PLAN .U Â» 1/8 =11-0 TIA-1 I - fÂ«Â«rl 533 E. HOPKINS (,NIN+1Nlf)NUN'*~t iÂ«*MUNt,UÂ«NNY,in .i, 14, ~iqv LOOtt"tÂ·L ON NOMIVIO 1 Â£00kt,9Â·t 'ON 133foad SNI>ljOH 3919 '011 '380(]03H1m SVHABWÂ¥) ./. 'NIÂ¥1.'ill'll//1/I. MWBIXÂ¥, 08621(-lU lEi NolldIHOSIC 18 I 31Va l 'ON '~ OH 19Â¥3 L LS 31Va 311[1 DN[MVIL NVId 31IS Â¥11 31VDS AQ NMVEK] SL/8 l/8 .. =.... .... A . 533 E. HOPKINS 3 CONCRETE WALK _~3' - 8- ~ 10-0 ~ 10- 0- J OPEN TO SKY 1*- Wi) 0 1 1 m- - 0 14 6" 9 3- ~ -- ~ ~UMPSTE~ ET 4 -- 11~1~ N --- 0=0 IW â‚¬ R6 3 7 Ri ~ ~ rn 23 3 0 \\ 1 2 - O 1 O 7'-111/7 Z 1 1 124 1\.\~~ C< 8.0 119---1/ Cs ----- 4.-/#H&jAMMOM iw . tÂ«tlmi I .. AN 515 E. HOPKINS DRAWING TITLE Slm PI.,A~141 1 1 CAMBURAS &THEODORE, LTD. ~ SCALE | || AMHON/,jill,IJ'Alâ„¢INÂ¢il'NI'la[WI,19(,1, INGINI,0,46 PROJECT NO 14-44007 LOCATION NO ,Â·1-4007 ~ ~ DRAWN BY: 74%4[ D[MP,IEN'.T.D[,PUÂ»1[4 11 U,n,6 RA 1 1 IJ ATE ISSUED TO LAND PLANNER 517 EAST HOPKINS AVE. 1 ~ 828-15 ~ ~ Â¥mw[,imbur.nand~heodo.M- Il~n,~81~ 8/18/15 %#d ~ REVIEWED ASPEN. CO NO. 1 DATE I BY I DESCRIPTION REV]SIONS esl 1949 TT ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL ANDUNPUNLISHED WORKOP THE ARCHITECT AND THE SAME MAY NOI BE DUPLICATED. USEDOR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRIT TEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT COPYRIG'II CAMBURAS & THEODORE, LTD. rd*245\ 3AOBV 1:3309 EIAOIV ANOall S3H0N38 OPEN TO SKY 3AN3AV SNI>]dOH -200 S.F. TRASH ENCLOSURE , 90 29' - PROPERTY LINE ALLEY SOd ilgll