The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.134 W Hopkins Ave.0007.2016.AHPCâ‚¬ 0007.2016.AHPC 134 W HOPKINS AVE FINAL HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT 2735 124 19 001 H 1 5(4nrue ill f Al..Â¢14 d P PATH: G/DRIVE /ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0007. 2016.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 124 19 001 PROJECT ADDRESS 134 W HOPKINS AVE PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE JODI EDWARDS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 2.14.17 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY 2.14.17 ir41 4.-0601 216. 411?6 TarcA %* 2135- 11+19 -001 - 0- -- al////Matul'$ Wk:Â·1;3,J,-tÂ·.#v,%394+044////b ~ file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Fcrmat Iab Help v (@ cy Â« iÂ· 47 -4 41 - F.1 6) ..23 j e'. i id 1 . /1 9 6 1& Jump 1 i] 29 - * 1 G v 2 0 6 2 1 U *. 81 9 02 1.'~ O. --/I F- 1 8- z Main ~ Custom Fields ~ Floyting Status 1-he Summar-g gctions ~ Routing Mistorp f P I Permit ts,pe L~ .__ 14?B~n Hist*~ Lan~9se _ Permit # 0007.2016.AHPC 1 Address ~134 W HOPKINS AVE Apt/Suite ' 1 Cit, *PEN - - -7 S tate CO ~ Zip %1611 ~ j - I Permit Information t~ Â· Master permit F Routing queue aslul 5 -~ Applied 03/09/20-16 -~ Project L _ | Status ~ pending -1 Approved | - ~ Description FINAL HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT Issued v 1 Closed/Final U ___11 Submitted JODY 925-8700 Clock Running ] Days F--8- Expires [03)04/201-2~3] Submitted via v 0 wner Last name WEST HOPKINS LLC First name ~ --1 EPO BOX 6i50 - |POTOMAC MD 20859 Phone n. Address I Applicant LE Owner is applicant? 1 Contractor is applicant? Last name IWEST HOPKINS LLC 1 First name 1 IPO BOX 6150 -- -~ ~ POTOMAC MD 20859 Phone [)- 1 Cust # -30302 " Address E mail Lender Last name I First name i Phone []- Address , AspenGold5 (served debrap I 1 of 1 Â·- ':7:'-'1'4'Â£12,99Â·+7-4-, - " Â»ffâ‚¬**et#****$&0*Â«4**iÂ®oe?9*:40*tg**6**t%44*$8?**244 U Eau:*5&â€žf> C ;pt*0~**â€¢8~22 04 4333 41,150.00 * plin feeâ‚¬R # 4034 . Impli 16 [_moN 10'nU oqpol 0,0 RECEPTION#: 631709, 08/25/2016 at i -- 1 1 01:03:26 PM, I 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION i ' i Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) 1 APPROVING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 134 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE 134 AND 134 M WEST HOPKINS LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, ?i STATE OF COLORADO i RESOLUTION #25, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-19-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, West Hopkins LLC, represented by CCY Architects, requested HPC Final Major Development approval for the property located at 134 West Hopkins Avenue, Lot 1 of the 134 and 134 14 West Hopkins Landmark Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070.of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a I designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff : analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine. the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Municipal Code. The i HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain , additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and ~ WHEREAS, Amy Simon, in her staff report to HPC dated August 10, 2016, performed an Â· analysis o f the application based on the standards and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 10, 2016, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and approved the project by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Final Major Development approval with the following conditions: 1. Remove the north skylight on the Victorian roo f. 2. The final landscape plan will be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 3. Prior to building permit, submit elevations for staff review that correctly represent the : details of the historic resource and treafment of all materials. Non-historic conditions ' should be reversed to the extent possible. The details of the historic foundation replica must be provided. Indicate the location and materials for all gutters, flashing and snow clips. The historic east facing dormer is to be reconstructed. 4. Per Resolution #10, Series of 2015, HPC has granted the following variations: o A 116.4 square foot floor area bonus is approved so that the total allowable floor area for the property is 1,919.6 square feet o Front yard (Hopkins Ave.) - A reduction of the required 10' setback so that at minimum of 9'2" is provided, measured to the historic bay window 11 o Side yard (First St.) - A reduction of the required 5' setback so that a minimum o f 1'3.5"is provided, measured to the historic bay window o Side yard (interior lot line) - A reduction ofthe required 5' setback so that a i minimum of 1'3.5" is provided o Combined sideyards- A reduction of the required 10' setback so that a minimum of 2'7" is provided 5. Per Resolution #10 Series of 2015, on site relocation has been approved with the following provisions: a. Temporary storage of the home offsite on a parcel within 2 blocks of the subject lot, is approved as represented. Any other offsite temporary storage location must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. The structure must remain in Aspen city limits. b. A protection plan from an engineer or house mover shall be submitted with the building permit. c. Provide a letter from a structural engineer demonstrating that the building is able j to moved. d. At building permit, provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier's check or personal check to insure the safe relocation ofthe house. i 6. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan : - vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. I However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this , approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise i exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, if specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development I order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the ' development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits) : Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in : the creation of a vested property right. : No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary : to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be : published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development ; plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado : Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews ~ and approvals required by this approval ofthe general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this i : approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required i under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the i Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. I: APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 1(}th day of August, 2016. /7.1 L Willis Pember, Chair Appfoved as to Form: 440.- 0- 1~/1 James R. True, City Attorney \ ATTEST: 4*141Â«1-96Â«4 Kathy Striculand, Chief Deputy Clerk DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. West Hopkins, LLC, c/o Jody Edwards, 101 S. Mill Street, #200, Aspen, CO, 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Lot 1, 134 and 134 1/2 W. Hopkins Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite o f Aspen, Colorado, PID #2735-124-19-001 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval has been granted to demolish non-historic construction, lift the Victorian house on the site for a new basement, and construct an addition. Variations were included in the approvals. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Final approval was granted on August 10.2016. by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission via Resolution #25, Series of 2016. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) September 15,2016. Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication ofnotice of approval.) September 15,2019. Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 2nd day of September, 2016, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. c k,-: 34 11 t\(\A fi A- ~ssica Garro,~ommunity Development Director AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHA-PTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: vb u Â· W Â·4> ~lov~-~ -A-v.~_ Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) I, L~-Jla SOC----3 (Daine, please print) being or representing an Applicant to thE-City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Ladd Use Code in the following manner: ~Publication ofnotice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later- than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A CoPy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal hotice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation.in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature 0 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this â‚¬ day ofÂ«51Â¥*v*d , 200-0 b~ 41.74,4 Scc-reÂ« 3*4 PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and My commission expires: 31(6/00 the creation of a vesteiproperly right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following described property: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Lot 1,134 and 134 1/2 W. Hop- kins Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, ~\ 20Â£4 Wkw<64- Colorado, PID #2735-124-19-001. The property owner has received approval to demolish non-his- Notary Pubhe toric construction, lift the Victorian house on the J site for a new basement, and construct an addition. Variations were included in the approvals. Final KAREN REED PATTERSON approval was granted on August 10,2016 by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission via Res- NOTARY PUBLIC olution #25, Series of 2016. The project is depict- ed in the land use application on file with the City of ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO Aspen. For further information contact Amy Simon NOTARY ID #19964002767 at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) My Commission Expires February 15,227(} 429-2758 COPY OFÂ·THE PUBLICATION - ~ City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on September 15, 2016 (12371493) IV.A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 10,2016 SUMMARY: 134 West Hopkins Avenue is located on the corner of Hopkins Avenue and First Street. The building was most likely constructed 1890-1893 and it is in its original location. The house was owned by the same family for almost 90 years and appears to have been in fairly original condition until the mid-80s, when the property was sold and remodeled, primarily through the *~ #,P #VA#*qMIIL~~FJ,Wil/,8â€¢ %51 construction of a new rear -t.29 ' addition. Some original : /'~ , ar.3/1 1 1-N exterior materials were . : LE~kN~Â· a .P * 14.-i 1- Ifl ...87. replaced and the roof shape .-t , ed./W ...al.. - 9 -LJ.-1 i 4// / 7 7*--Â·L jil 1.1 1 1.-Â· of the original dormers was =2%86tt f 11 r ./ changed from shed to . ~|~ *-~ Â»E T- 1 ... gabled. It appears that new i ...86 clapboards may have been e 4. installed on top of the â€ž 4 original at that time and m -/ 4 . A) various other new details .44Â£ .... C ' 41 ., -r- .. were introduced. 0 7. Ae I . Though the 1980s rear addition was small it did connect directly to the rear lÂ©NE,E ~~--:v of the Victorian and it is -2 444 ---u-ls?fal..,1 difficult to distinguish the e Â·_ old part of the home from 134 W. Hopkins Ave. is indicated above with a star. Properties highlighted in the new without a closer orange are historic landmarks. look. In March 2015, HPC granted Conceptual approval which included demolishing the additions and paring down to the original structure. Some restoration is to occur, for instance recreating the original dormers. The house is approved to be relocated towards the corner, about 2'6" towards First Street and just under 7' towards Hopkins Avenue. A new basement and a new two story addition with a one story connector element were HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 1 of 11 P87 IV.A. accepted. HPC granted setback variances and a small floor area bonus as part of this review. HPC did debate the applicant's proposal to construct a 6'x 8' outdoor deck on the connector element, but the project was accepted by a 4-2 vote. The project was Called- Up by City Council and remanded to HPC for another look at the deck issue, given the corner exposure of the project. In November 2015 HPC conducted a Remand hearing and upheld the Commission's original approval by a vote of 4-1. As part of the Final review application the owner has elected to eliminate the deck on the connector and enlarge a rooftop deck previously seen by HPC, entirely on the roof ofthe new addition. The applicant has addressed many items brought up during Conceptual and refined the proposal. Staff finds some information is needed in order to recommend Final approval. APPLICANT: West Hopkins LLC, P.O. Box 61510, Potomac, MD 20859, represented by CCY Architects and Klein Cotd Edwards Citron LLC. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-19-001 ADDRESS: 134 West Hopkins Avenue, Lot 1 of the 134 and 134 4 West Hopkins Landmark Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R- 6 FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit In addition to those topics, HPC required the applicant to provide further information on the following at Final Review: o Provide details ofthe fence along First Street. o Provide details ofthe at grade skylight. o The Hopkins Street entrance shall be the primary entrance. o Provide details of the foundation material and document the existing relationship to grade. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 2 of 11 P88 IV.A. Responses to these items are as follows. A wood picket fence 3' tall with gaps between the pickets equal to half the picket width is proposed. This fence only surrounds the front yard. A large at grade skylight is located along the west side of the connector, with a smaller version proposed on the east. The skylights can be walked on, though it is not clear on the plans where access into the house is provided from the west skylight. This must be clarified for the HPC hearing to ensure that the Victorian front porch is the primary entry to the house. Staff has some concerns with the proximity of the west skylight to the historic structure and recommends an opaque surface be created along the north boundary of the Victorian as a more sensitive transition between new and old. This element will glow when the basement space below it is illuminated. Visibility from the street is limited due to a screen wall that is proposed around it. The last issue highlighted at Conceptual was a requirement to provide more detail about the foundation material for the historic house. There is currently an original red sandstone foundation. The applicant does indicate that foundation will be recreated. Specific details will be required for building permit. For Final review, as noted above, the deck on the connector has been eliminated and relocated to the roof. The architect has also taken a closer look at ways to reinforce compatibility between new and old through material selection and fenestration. Below are the Conceptual west elevation (top) and the Final west elevation (bottom). The deck railing is removed on the connector. Windows that previously faced west on the upper floor stair column have been removed. Other windows have been revised to more directly reflect the proportions of the large double hungs on the historic house. Siding on the new addition is coursed at a 4" exposure on the ground floor of the new and old. On the upper floor of the addition the siding has an 8" exposure. Staff finds the proposal has improved in these regards and meets the guidelines and the notion of choosing two aspects of compatibility (in this case fenestration and materials) but departing in another area (in this case form). HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 3 of 11 P89 IV.A. ' .1. 91\\ 12 I -14â‚¬2 // 71\ F- 7 r 1- -il.2-6-----t ---- A 1 -Â»-ru- i/kil h:01 ~1 At \ ./ 1 1''7\!lt'.a i 404Â¥ '+ 'f. 4Â· 31/kt>110- 4/. UPPER LEVEL , 1 110'-0- P 3 r .I B 17 .@PfU,14 Aflel -IP-.rilÂ· i. F /2 rl f .,r - -r /# b. 4 MAIN LEVEL d I:'CAV''ilk.*0:46.44'///hic.-,4-L____.L-:i AIr- 111~11Uk~t,~. --1*~ 100'-0 Y 1. I 1 46 i i i 4 8 'F ). , .;7 4 k 1 11 'fl 1 1 74, - \Aj M'A-1 ,/ '11 1,#lEAl U?~ t,~T. / / 0. 1 4,1/lf 1 // -\41 3~t '7/ e /1â€žÂ« "i /*// $1-- 8 Â¥110 \1 limllimmi~~///~ } 4..* /43"*t "f 11 ' i 1 7 ,\ t// ali = ., 944, ....,7#,48*fn, V--'ANJ~dibl|ril,kdL=~ 1 1 At Conceptual the applicant provided a historic structure study that was very detailed as to the evolution of the building and identification of new and old materials. Staff considers this report to encompass representations that must be translated into a more detailed preservation plan for the resource, which will be required at building permit. The elevations submitted for review show the details of the historic structure schematically and cannot be interpreted to represent approval to change or remove any elements. For building permit, correctly drawn elevations of the resource, with the treatment of all exterior materials are required. It appears that the existing clapboard siding may have been installed on top of the original. It appears that the front porch, in particular the spandrel details installed between the posts, is not entirely original. The architect should explain what is being preserved and ideally remove inaccurate changes that have occurred. There is no north elevation of the Victorian provided in the drawings. The original north elevation was destroyed by the 1980's addition, however the large areas of glass that seem to be proposed on the back of the Victorian may not be appropriate and needs to be clarified. This drawing must be provided to staff by noon the day before the HPC hearing. Finally, the drawings indicate a number of skylights on the roof of the Victorian. While these were shown at Conceptual they were not a topic for that session. HPC's guidelines do not support skylights being installed on a Victorian resource like this. Staff recommends these skylights be eliminated. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 4 of 11 P90 A relatively simple lighting plan and fixtures are proposed. A recessed can is indicated at the front porch of the Victorian along with two path lights. HPC has not supported pathway lighting in the foreground of a resource like this one, considering it to be out of character. Staff recommends these lights be removed. Regarding the landscape plan, there is limited private yard left beyond the developinent. Staff recommends a reduction or elimination of the Cotoneaster shrubs surrounding the west and south sides of the Victorian. The proposed fence provides screening. The shrubs are more formal and numerous than would necessarily be characteristic of a Victorian home. The shrubs on the west have the potential to introduce too much moisture alongside the house and block views of it. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the application if the following information is provided by Tuesday, Aug. 9th at noon and is found to be in keeping with the guidelines: A north elevation of the Victorian and plans and elevations clearly indicating all entry points into the structure from the west. Additional conditions of approval would include: 1. Reduce the west skylight by creating an opaque area on the north side of the Victorian. 2. Remove the skylights on the Victorian roof. 3. Eliminate the path lights in front of the Victorian. 4. Reduce the number of shrubs around the west and south sides of the Victorian. 5. Prior to building permit, submit elevations for staff review that correctly represent the details of the historic resource and treatment of all materials. Non-historic conditions should be reversed to the extent possible. The details of the historic foundation replica must be provided. Indicate the location and materials for all gutters, flashing and snow clips. 6. Per Resolution #10, Series of 2015, HPC has granted the following variations: o A 116.4 square foot floor area bonus is approved so that the total allowable floor area for the property is 1,919.6 square feet o Front yard (Hopkins Ave.) - A reduction o f the required 10' setback so that at minimum of 9'2" is provided, measured to the historic bay window o Side yard (First St.) - A reduction of the required 5' setback so that a minimum of 1'3.5" is provided, measured to the historic bay window o Side yard (interior lot line) - A reduction of the required 5' setback so that a minimum of 1'3.5" is provided o Combined sideyards- A reduction of the required 10' setback so that a minimum of 2'7" is provided 7. Per Resolution #10 Series of 2015, on site relocation has been approved with the following provisions: a. Temporary storage of the home offsite on a parcel within 2 blocks of the subject lot, is approved as represented. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 5 of 11 b. A protection plan from an engineer or house mover shall be submitted with the building permit. c. Provide a letter from a structural engineer demonstrating that the building is able to moved. d. At building permit, provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier's check or personal check to insure the safe relocation of the house. 8. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested ' property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 ' days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation o f a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the j urisdictional boundaries o f the City o f Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 6 of 11 IV.A. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application text and drawings Exhibit C: Historic resource study Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines for 134 W. Hopkins, Final review Historic Preservation Guidelines 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. o Any fence which is visible from a public right-of-way must be built of wood or wrought iron. Wire fences also may be considered. o A wood picket fence is an appropriate replacement in most locations. A simple wire or metal fence, similar to traditional "wrought iron," also may be considered. o Chain link is prohibited and solid "stockade" fences are only allowed in side and rear yards. 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. o A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. u On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City ofAspen's "Residential Design Standards".) A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. 3 Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. u Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. u The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod. and not covered with paving, for example. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 7 of 11 P93 CC C IV.A. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. 1 Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. o Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 1 Preserve original building materials. Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. 3 Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. u Avoid the removal of damaged materials that can be repaired. u Isolated areas of damage may be stabilized or fixed, using consolidants. Epoxies and resins may be considered for wood repair and special masonry repair components also may be used. 6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. o Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. 3 Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. u Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration of the brick itsel f. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. 1 If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 8 of 11 P94 OOp 0 0 0 N 0 0 00 0 IV.A. 3 Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings ofwindows. Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. o Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character-defining facade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double- hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. 1 Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character- defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. o A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than to replace a historic window. u Install a storm window on the interior, when feasible. This will allow the character of the original window to be seen from the public way. u If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub-frames or panning around the perimeter. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. o Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These may include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. o Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 9 of 11 P95 00 0 IV.A. o If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. o If the secondary entrance is sealed shut, the original entrance on the primary facade must remain operable. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. 1 Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. If a substitute is used. such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non- reflective finish. 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. 3 On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a modest miner's cottage is discouraged because it would be out of character. u Where a stone foundation was used historically, and is to be replaced, the replacement should be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. 3 An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Page 10 of 11 P96 00 0 IV.A. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. D Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. HPC Review 8.10.2016 134 W. Hopkins Pagellofll P97 00 00 0 IV.A. K C KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC E C ATTORNEYS HERBERT S. KLEIN' hsk@knectaw.com 101 SOUTH MILL STREET LANCE R. COTC, PCÂ·Â· cote@kcectaw.com SUITE 200 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, 111, PC jee@kceclaw.com ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 KENNETH E. CITRON ... kcitron@kcectaw.com TELEPHONE: (970) 925Â·8700 MADHU B. KRISHNAMURTI mbk@kceclaw.com www.kceclaw. com 'also admitted in Hawaii "also admitted ill California ... also admitted in New York and Massachusetts February 24, 2016 VIA HAND DELIVERY Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City o f Aspen Community Development Department Third Floor 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 134 West Hopkins Ave.; HPC Major Development Final Application Dear Amy: Enclosed please find the Major Development - Final Application for the Historic Resource located at 134 West Hopkins, Ave, Aspen, CO 81611. Per your instructions we are delivering one loose (inbound) copy of the Application together with a check payable to the City of Aspen iii the amount $1,950.00 drawn on my office account, Once you confirm the Applicationis complete, we will provide any additional copies you need. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Very truly yours, KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC r.-1 <57 0 /1 C / botud<fi/49(\4'40(9 1 Jos46 E. Edwards, III encl. P98 IV.A. ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application : =-1 PROJECT: Name: Q â‚¬bT- RuP vi,1% , LLC Location: 134 60 cs-t- 0-u{>12.fi, Abpeti c CO NU,// Ld- i , /34 â€¢-4 ,341/1. 1,0 &14 14" 'k <tbric Ul- S,lit e.,- f4'Nc-A AA 5-141 o Y An (Indicate street address, lot & block mimber or metes add bounds description o f property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 2-736/24/ 9001 APPLICANT: Name: Oet Vme\Â£-4$: LLC_ Address: clo <[1&1 64.-1.4, 101 5. Mt,(4*2Â®0, *Re.\,Co %(64 Phone #: 925-%700 Fax#: 9257- 59 77 E-mail: - . jeeD kiee.law, Co "1 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 2,4 4, 7-2,<t42112, , co y ,4,-06 d,ch Address: 21% 141.,l k,i.-4 Ave, < ~a~ A.H--Â£ 60 2/624 Phone #: 927- 49 2.1 Fax#: ElnaH: (flf.,A 21Â£2) OCY .r.4,7.4. Câ‚¬J &*1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): E Historic Designation U Relocation (temporary, on U Certificate of No Negative Effbct U or off-site) D Certificate of Appropriateness D Demolition (total demolition) D -Minor Historic Development D -Major Historic Developinent ~ Historic Landmark Lot Split xi -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses. previous approvals, etc.) ~liblotic. Le'lt, uttkS,VtÂ¥6~< to--n- AlItofiL LiGUL-tikkiL Â° &90 letri No to- 521 4 2.0/4 2 6.. 4.'*tÂ»d /14.#r 6,4 bhâ€¢ 40-kia , Fif~< E o itus, 1- I/*r,kâ€¢Â«-C- PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, moditications, etc.) 14.- 14,thletiht#AN:C +6*li A,+~*t 90& *kbrÂ·'c At,l itA ; AL, 444 A-U,HC '44-Jo l 0,10/1 Aspeii Historic Preset-vatioli Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: April 30,2015 P99 ~Lt- 11*le- 69 d P.* 6 43 AcY-hid)o. 49-1 /3 IV.A. General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application This information will helpus review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. NO E Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? [] Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? 0 ~ Do you plan other future changes or iniprovements that could be reviewed at this , time? El ~< In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building peiâ‚¬t, are you seeking to meet the Secretaty of . the Interior's Standardsfor Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 0 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) O If yes, are you seeking the Colotado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: El Rehabilitation Loan Fund 0 Conservation Easement Program ~~imensional Variances 0 Increased Density U Historic Landmark Lot Split 0 Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses O Exemption from Growth Makagement Quota System El Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P100 W >f M IV.A. ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Proj ect: } 34. k/. i - .4,15 five 40=lt W.st n,p#,4$ Un Project Location: 13+ W. tiopleAng Zone District: A-6 Lot Size: 3, 2% sf Lot Area: %1600 * (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes, Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: A~â€¢1, Proposed: Fl Number ofresidential units: Existing: j Proposed: Number ofbedrooms: Existing: ~ Proposed. Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write Wa where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: Allowable:]003.aproposed: 1219.6 Height (9 116.4 FAk konvo Principal Bldg.t . Existing:223-2" Allowable: 27 proposed: 25' Accessory Bldg.: Existing: F}'~4 Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: / Required: ; Proposed: 9- % Site coverage: Existing: 0/'4 Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: F} ~dI, Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Ex\sting. 161-10~~ Required: /O~-D~ Proposed: /0~-O~~ , AL, 0, Rear Setback: Existing:-44 -'6'~liz~red:18-0jb#D Proposed. jo'â€¢d'~5ld' Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N. S. E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: E Existing.~L~ 904equiredÂ· 3â‚¬0 " Proposed: 347'* SideSe*ak. \A/ 2;xistingl~ -5~4~ B,equired:5'- 01' proposed: '2~-93 Combined Sides: Existing:5~-9-1/6'Required: /O'D~ Proposed: 5'- 3'/e" Distance between , Existing.' /~,/4 Required: Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities 61 encroachments and note if encroachment licenses,have been issued: . Side, 4.rdSâ‚¬tbacle per c,Fi~ c,avmcil ord)'nale- 11=61:b Â£>e49Â¢85 04- 92>03â€¢' Variations requested (identif; the exact varianct(~;;ll;F'~ 04,4Â¥ 404,/ Coynbted s} 0 10'vol 91- Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P101 .r \(b ' ...../.. 3.328 MDS 9836881 p.3 FIV.A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ('City') and Properly West Hopkins LLC Email: manydor@msnydervenlutes.com Phone No.: 301-873-5656 Owner (T): Address of 134 West Hopkins Ave. .O. Box 61510 Bltling P Properly: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) Potomic, MD 20859 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use appliations and the payment of these fees Is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For nal fees and referral rees: l agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand thal these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept O $ flat fee for . S. fial fee for Select Dept 0 $ flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Review S flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand thai because of the size, nalure or scope of the proposed project, it Is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the app!!callon. 1 understand thal additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is Impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid In full. The City and I understand and agree that Invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to renii[ payment within 30 days of presentalion of an invoice by the City for such services. i have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following Initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compljanl with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay addi[[onal monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinaffer stated. s 1,950 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time 6 above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. 30 0 deposit for hours of Englneen'ng Department staff time. Additional time above Ihe deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owyer: f,)AT~ thrf/6/Al,5, AL C %1: 4.-fA /</ Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: 6ichele SÂ¢lyder Tme Manager/Sole Member City Use: 1950 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January 2015 City ofAspen 1 130 S, Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 P102 IV.A. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, 970.429.2758 DATE: 2,18.16 PROJECT: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Final HPC review REPRESENTATIVES: CCY Architects, KCEC Law DESCRIPTION: 134 W. Hopkins, a designated landmark, received HPC Conceptual approval for a proposed addition on March 11,2015. Tile project then proceeded through a required "Call-up" process which resulting in City Council remanding the approval back to HPC for furtherdiscussion. On November 11,2015, HPC upheld their original decision, allowing the application to proceed to Final. According to HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2015, an application for Final approval must be accepted by March 11, 2016 or the approval will expire and the process will start over. The application must be received and deemed complete by the Planning Office prior to the expiration. HPC Final design focuses on landscape, lighting and materials. HPC will use tlie Historic Preservation Design Guidelines to make their determinations. Although the City has recently adopted new preservation guidelines, this application will be reviewed under those in place at the time of the original land use application. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070 Development involving designated properties (Major) 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.610 Impact fees 26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6) Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations, HPC for determinations. Public Hearing: Yes. Referral Agencies: None. Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour). Referral Fees: $0 Total Deposit: $1,950. Land Use Code: http:Uwww.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Common ity-DevelopmenUPIan n inq-a nd-Zon inci/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Depa rtments/Community-DevelopnienUH istoric-Preservation/H istoric- Properties/ P103 IV.A. To apply, first submit one copy of the following information: O Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â¤ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Il Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 inonths) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Il Applicant'sname, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. O HOA Compliance form (Attached) O List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing Â£ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, ceitified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. 0 Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at 14" scale. O Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. Samples are preferred for the presentation to HPC. D A lighting plan and landscape plan. O Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models or streetscape elevations. O A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development, and any requested variances or bonuses, complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. O Response to all conditions of approval included in HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2015. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: D A complete copy of the application, including all items listed above, provided by email (amy.simon@cityofaspen.com) and one hard copy. P104 IV.A. 0 12 sets ofallgraphics, printed at 11"x17." O Total deposit for review of the application. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing suininary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The sumniary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. P105 IV.A. K C KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC E C ATTORNEYS HERBERT S. KLEIN' hsk@kceclaw.com 101 SOUTH MILL STREET LANCE R. COTI, PC- cote@kceclaw.com SUITE 200 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, 111, PC jee@kceclaw.com ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 KENNETH E. CITRON- kcitron@kceclaw.com TELEPHONE: (970) 925-8700 MADHU B. KRISHNAMURTI mbk@kceclaw.com www.kceclaw. com 'also admitted in Hawaii "also admitted in California "' also admitted in New York and Massachusetts February 24,2016 VIA HAND DELIVERY Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Commimity Development Depailment Third Floor, 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 134 West Hopkins, Aspen - Title Opinion Dear Amy: I am an attorney licensed iii the State of Colorado. Concerning the above-referenced propeity, 1 confirm the following: Legal Description: Lot 1,134 and 134 1/2 W, Hopkins Historic Landmark Lot Split, according to the Plat recorded May 4,2004 iii Plat Book 69 at Page 6 as Reception No. 497137, Pitkin County, Colorado ("Plat"). Owner of Record: West Hopkins, LLC. Encumbrances, including inortgages. judginents, liens, easemems, contracts, and agreements affecting the Property: â€¢ Improvements Agreement recorded November 22, 1994 in Book 767 at Page 726; â€¢ Resolution of HPC recorded December 16,1999 as Reception No. 438633; â€¢ Subdivision Exemption Agreement recorded May 13,2004 as Reception No. 497541; â€¢ Plat; â€¢ Resolution of the HPC recorded January 12, 2007 as Reception No, 533287; and â€¢ Floot Area Allocation Agreement recorded September 9,2007 as Reception No, 541727; â€¢ Land Survey Plat recorded January 27,2012 as Reception No, 586245; and â€¢ Resolution 10-2015 of HPC re-recoided April 17,2015 as Reception No. 619129. Please contact me ifyou require any additional information. Very truly yours, Kl'WN â‚¬OTIi EDWARDS CITRON L,L,~~ C ,/lf j,EEP , b> Jose~E. Edwards, Ill P106 Feb 26 16 10:32a MDS 3( 36881 p.2 IV.A. WEST HOPKINS, LLC P.O. Box 61510 Potomac, MD 20859 (301) 873-5656 February 24, 2016 Amy Simon City of Aspen, Historic Preservation Officer 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy: This letter serves as authorization for Rich Can' and Chris Touchette of CCY Atchitects and for Jody Edwards of Klein Cotd Edwards Citron LLC to acl on behalf of the West Hopkins, LLC, in applying for, processing and representing West Hopkins, LLC at all required hearings with respect to any and all Land Use Approvals reasonably required for the remodel of the residence located at 134 W. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. Ifyou have any questions about this authorization please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, WEST HOPKINS, LLC 8 4 lvI~11&le Snyd~r, Manager & Sole Member P107 IV.A. Â£9 COMMUNIn..DiVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - -- - Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land ilse applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land ilse application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: U)690 14rlâ‚¬14% ) 16 Property Owner (11: Email: t/,Â£ e Dk Ced/4,4,2-0 '11 Phone No.: 925-- 270 0 Address of Properly (subject of I Sif l/Jed- Atold,15 A-ve. I jA~e 4( CD 31(0( 1 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) 1~0~ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land ilse application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public dociiment. Owner signature- date:. Owner printed name: , of., Attorney signature: ~%,4....4<~14-<1.4,03Â£-Â£Â·Â»81: 4,24 /0 Attorney printed name: < 14746 644*<4%3 P108 Easy Peel Labels gm I 1 See Instruction Sheet ~ Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® tl[&) 1Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature,k ~-4/\11 ~AVERY' |V.A. 212 WEST HOPKINS LLC GARDNER EZRA JOHNSON ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 212 W HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 3655 4949 E LINCOLN DR#19 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 852534108 RANCE CAROL MULLINS MARGARET ANN HITE HENRY H & ANGELA R 4B MOUNTAIN LODGE 216 W HYMAN AVE PO BOX 155 44 MT KELLETT RD ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODY CREF.K, CO 81656 THE PEAK, HONG KONG, TARADA LLC BOWMAN AL KING LOUISE LLC 1934 OLD GALLOWS RD 2ND FL 700 HELEN ST PO BOX 1467 VIENNA, VA 22182 MOUNT DORA, FL 32757 BASALT, CO 81621 CHRISTENSEN ROBERT M & CANDICE L ASPEN TOWNHOMES 3 LLC TARPLEY GERALD W JR & SUSAN 1240 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 1796 E SOPRIS CREEK RD 2255 PLACID WY ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 JLR QPRT TRUST STRAUCH ELAINE B ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC 355 MARQUESA DR 4327 S YOSEMITE CT ' PO BOX 1248 CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 ~ ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORI1 CHISHOLM EDITH S STEVENSON KAREN H 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ~ 205 W MAIN ST 205 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ' ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHISHOLM HEATHER M COLES DAVID SEP A TRUST COLES PETER SEP A TRUST 205 W MAIN ST 3937 TILDEN AVE #C 20 PRESCOTT ST #41 ASPEN, CO 81611 CULVER CITY, CA 90232 MASSACHUSETTS, MA 02138 HARPER MARILYN HILL & HILL GARMISCH LODGING LLC LAMPTON PATRICIA M TRUST PO BOX 7952 110 W MAIN ST 929 GREY FOX RD ASPEN, CO 81612-7952 ASPEN, CO 81611 LUGOFF, SC 29078 DE TURRIS EMILIO 135 HOPKINS LTD DEAN FAMILY LTD PTSHP LLP 5230 KENSINGTON HIGH ST 12400 HWY 71 W #350-371 590 DELLWOOD AVE NAPLES, FL 34105 AUSTIN, TX 78738 BOULDER, CO 80301 BACON SHIRLEY R ZITELLI MARK C ASPEN UPTOWN LLC 3 GROVE ISLE DR #1608 211 S FIRST ST PO BOX 348 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNYDER, OK 73566 ttiquettes faciles & peler A Pl 09 Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Sens de chargeinent d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY E IV.A )eis f;*20 1 A I See Instruction Sheet 1 i -, ' EMPLATE 5160Â® Ulk] 1Feed Paper for Easy Peel Featurel 1/ r~ ~~AVERVÂ®5260â„¢ INVENTRIX LLC WARSHAW MARTIN R TRUST NO1 CWG HOLDINGS 111 LLC 227 MONROE 1058 SCOTT PL 720 E DURANT #E8 CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096 ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2585 ASPEN, CO 81611 VAUGHAN CAPITAL PTNRS LP SALTER CLAUDE C MAYER KEVIN PO BOX 390 204 W HYMAN AVE #5 222 W HOPKINS AVE #2 HEBRON, IL 60034 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GROSVENOR DENIS FCB LLC GASTON JOHN & KATHERINE 209 CAMINO DE LA MERCED UNTI C PO BOX 6622 16 BRYNWOOD LN TAOS, NM 875716922 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615-6622 1 GREENWICH, CT 06831 FRITTER MATTHEW C FRITTER KATHERINE G CURRIN DANIEL 3312 ROCK CREEK DR ~ 1 3312 ROCK CREEK DR 3312 ROCKCREEK DR RALEIGH, NC 27609 1 1 RALEIGH, NC 27609 RALEIGH, NC 27609 GOLDSMITH HENRY JOSH BRENNAN SAMANTHA SCOTT BRENNAN SHAWN TIFFANY 7902 BRYNMOR CT #504 408 TENNESSEE GLEN WY 408 TENNESSEE GLEN WY PIKESVILLE, MD 21208 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 THOMAS GAIL HICKS REV TRUST TYROLEAN LODGE LLC SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC 1242 HAMPTON RDG 200 W MAIN ST 232 W HYMAN AVE BEDFORD, VA 24523-1508 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGHOFF KRISTIN TRUST BERGHOFF MICHAEL R TRUST ROSS PAULINE 9112 WALNUT GROVE DR 9112 WALNUT GROVE DR PO BOX 9969 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236 ASPEN, CO 81612 JES 2002 GRANTOR TRUST SHIELD JULIET E PECHTER JEFFREY S 221 N STARWOOD DR 221 N STARWOOD DR 8135 LAKE WORTH RD STE B ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKE WORTH, FL 33467 HAYMAX LODGING LLC , POOL JUDY F M POOL ALEXANDRA M 101 W MAIN ST 3038 ZUNI ST 1650 FILLMORE ST #1340 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 802113829 DENVER, CO 80206 POOL MARKELL L KOENIG RAYMOND J TRAGGIS ELIZABETH G 1650 FILLMORE ST #1340 PO BOX 284 PO BOX 284 DENVER, CO 80206 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 ttiquettes facites A peler A Pl 10 Consultez la feuille www.avery.roni Utillsez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Sens de cliargement d'Instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel Labels gm I I See Instruction Sheet ~,1 EE] Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® 61& 1Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature A ~AVERV{ IV.A ANLUJO CAPITAL INC 132 WEST MAIN STREET ASSOC LLC WINKELMAN WENDY L WOODBOURNE HALL POB 3162 PO BOX 6565 108 W HYMAN AVE #8 ROAD TOWN TORTOLA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLA SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 816156565 ASPEN, CO 81611 MAROON BELLS LLC JACOBSON SUZAN & JAY FRANK EDMUND H EXEMPT TRUST 7360 POINT OF ROCKS RD 108 W HYMAN #7 1500 SW 11 TH AVE #1504 SARASOTA, FL 34242 ASPEN, CO 81611 PORTLAND, OR 972013544 FRANK VALERIE EXEMPT TRUST U/W MONARCHILLC SEIDER FAMILY TRUST 1500 SW 11TH AVE #1504 4601 COLLEGE BLVD #350 26642 LATIGO SHORE DR PORTLAND, OR 972013544 LEAWOOD, KS 66211 MALIBU, CA 90265 HALCYON ENTERPRISES LLC MELTON DAVID NEWKAM PATRICK C 78 LOVERS LN 135 W MAIN ST 211 W MAIN ST PRINCETON, NJ 08540 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIELINSKI JUDITH R TRUST BIELINSKIROBERTA JR MCBEE LISA A 2121 TROWBRIDGE CT 523 WEST 34TH ST 523 W 34TH ST GLENVIEW, IL 60026 HOUSTON, TX 77018 HOUSTON, TX 77018 MARTIN SCOTT M SAND KATHERINE M ~ 1 MARTIN SCOTT M PO BOX 51 PO BOX 51 ~ PO BOX 51 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~ 0 ASPEN, CO 81612 GUNN ROBERT W 1996 FAMILY TRUST GUERRA DONNA DHM FAMILY TRST 409 OCEAN AVE 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST 1820 PEACHTREE ST NW #1401 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 DALLAS, TX 75205 ATLANTA, GA 303098401 MORGAN DONALD DONATELLI ROBERT A REV TRUST DONATELLI SUSAN J REV TRUST 1820 PEACHTREE ST NW #1401 235 W HOPKINS AVE 235 W HOPKINS AVE ATLANTA, GA 30309 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROMANUS RAYMOND TACO 2 LLC SPERAW ENDEAVORS LLC 19 RIVER OAKS DR 220 W MAIN ST #202 PO BOX 6575 CALUMET CITY, IL 60409 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 WEST MAIN VENTURES ASPEN MAIN OFFICE CONDO ASSOC AJAX VIEW COMMERCIAL/NORTH STAR OFF PO BOX 11977 220 W MAIN ST 132 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ttiquettes faciles & peler A P111 Consultez la feitille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Sens de chargement d'instrtiction 1-800-GO-AVERY lels figÂ¥1 A - See Instruction Sheet I _ *1 i |V.A. EMPLATE 5160Â® G:(&1 Areed paper --- for Easy Peel Featurel F-URl ~*AVERYÂ®5260â„¢ ~ WEST SIDE CONDO ASSOC GARETCONDOASSOC COTTONWOODS CONDO ASSOC 234 W HOPKINS AVE 222 W HOPKINS AVE COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 124 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 INNSBRUCK CONDO ASSOC BLUEGREEN VACATIONS UNLIMITED INC ASPEN TOWNHOUSE CONDO ASSOC 233 W MAIN ST 4960 CONFERENCE WY N #100 COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, Fl- 33431 108 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 HOTEL ASPEN CONDO ASSOC SHADOW MOUNTAIN DUPLEX CONDO ASSO SHADOW MOUNTAIN LODGE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 110 W MAIN ST ' W HOPKINS AVE W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KOCH TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC ASPEN SKI LODGE CONDO ASSOC NORTHSTAR OFFICE BUILDING CONDO ASS COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA W HYMAN AVE 101 W MAIN ST 122 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DIMITRIUS RALLI TRUST MOLLY ADJACENT LLC 535 FREMONT DR 605 W MAIN ST #2 PASADENA, CA 91103 ASPEN, CO 81611 11 itiquettes facites A peler A Pll2 Consultez la feuille www.avery. com Jtilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY allill--plillillillillillillillillill-Ill-i.--I~, . - -' .... '4 -e,, 1 > 6.94. 2,4.*94. ' IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT <33'.:Ut)*4*%2~4Â£ I Lot 1, 134 and 134 1/2 lfâ‚¬st Hopkins Histor,ical Landmark Lot Split As shown on the Ptut recorded o.t Book 69 at Page 6 Lots K and L, Block 59 City and Toionsâ‚¬tr of Aspen, County of -742--'â‚¬2Â». 4091 Pitkin, State of Colorado 2-2<1 k. : 3 fp Â»AL/Fc-N/re Alley Block 59 y== 2-C, e Ek # 57~k'?'Â°* / 446Â¥.2, 1 6 Fwndâ€¢/crall.*/ C. 1 7-'tall.E -'y' p I I. 1/% 4 '.1 4 - i X -101 - NOICATES FOUâ€¢Â© )101101#el-5 )5 )Â£3CRIED 1 I. i ' lihir , UNE I *ARID LENGTH I L.1 5 14Â·*m . '1.72' 1 , DAI / SURVEÂ¥. â€¢16Â¥-9- 5 209 4 P 44â‚¬ 01 S 153,-59. I . U.r OF ......T US ..... r.6 01 4 75.5, W : .0. 1 S,- 11 ir' 46Â· Â» 003"~ Lot 2 Moer' 15 HOT LOCATED VT-* i Id.OW IAL,10 //CORDIN, TO Iâ‚¬ CTâ€¢ 7 15,01 11â€¢gllumll DE]'/1,â€¢Eyâ€¢, 4,18 â€¢101,110,4 641 5 Â·145.14' E 7.24 - Tur; PBVER,r 13 -OCATED N 7* i (AREAS DETER-ES TO BE â‚¬,JTSÂ®â‚¬ 50Â© 41*2 f'COOPU,N PEI Â·lili UAP P,MEL NCI C~007320* / 4 1/30*Â¢7~ f ..90 1 DATED Uâ‚¬ 04 1957 -AKO, f,0, -4[ FEI,A NAP griE :DITER AMD mâ‚¬ 37Â¥ y AS,â‚¬N EN~Nfille DEP/MMT ,â‚¬Btllt Tl S 2.-C All-" â€¢FORMATI,4 rOR A DED,DW I' ACCEM Â¥Aâ€¢ PEW Pm,4 Cou,19 TILE. K 1.~F.011, HAZARD MAP. TH[ PROFE,/ I-.15 )fET ACCE'16 TO E,SY 411,M AtuE A CEDCAPE-l Fum,C : TEE Â·. AND 7,â‚¬E I IC ~00,6 h I 227 1 U:91<2= G. ~ -EMAK. ; -7=--, . . THOE '5 IC OISErâ‚¬C E'Â©EMCII / 'St / â„¢E P*CFE,17 A. A Fl 'As DU-. SUIP M $39,1/,11 LAIC'U. r-- 4. - M,OSON,li UAam hE#,CE POUCY CANC, BY Tâ‚¬ 3,ivE,OR N 1,1 I.Mi, A..NT OF 1,00)(00 -0 BE , ENCT DIC,Â»c. T 11* Colmle- 90 Con-LATE 0 9.RANCE -0 SE FURMSHED 1,94 REOJETT - ME*%3 M 8/Im, /014 A RIAR Iâ„¢ A 'â‚¬LOW PLASTIC CAP. /, NC. 1Â§121. FOUN[ AY THE 9013â„¢InERLÂ¥ CO,â€¢ER y LCT . AM> A REBAM â€¢1-h I RED PLISIC CAP l.1 rein FO,0 Ar 7-â‚¬ 5001â€¢EAETE,!u 20*111[R Cf Se .0-. UNG â€¢ REAR'â€¢6 0, M :rce'l â€¢ 8CTWEEN 70*12 - 2 C~ 11 /,0 DES,/Ig BIA<In rÂ¢ H ~Â·64144. ~ ~24 5' - 143 SLIWEY )33 NO* MEMONT , nE 5Ek~Câ€¢ P VIS ELI'â€¢EÂ¥, TO DE*IME OINE;9Â«P OP K (SUPER EAKIEN-1 OR OTâ‚¬k ENDAE~*CES OF //C NO 11-LE /2-~IENT â€¢AS 47~CED 4.Honjse GRAP* SCALE - TH,5 m,On, 5 5,3.ECT m AFF,MENT EASEâ‚¬>18 FCA Dfan,K) Unlul,1 lilli 2 t.i L.-al[14% Gote A,41 , . 1415 Pamqi 5 te.ECT Fo EASEI.a m>415 OF ...0,0 F REN,â‚¬,015 4 40,rE CR 910%11 4 MIl FICORDS Cf 14Â£ frvi COWNTÂ¥ CLEW â€¢â€¢l ECONOE' r: e 74 '6 yi , ( 81 ..r - CIVAICÂ»,5 /RE BASED ON STY / ASPEN -5 009-Rtl IFACE PLAI Â¥041,4,TA-14 NAVt 88 IENOIA/* IC I 1893/1 2 /Chi &4 -4 it 1-Tr 1 â‚¬W- *bis imei -- Ct, O, â€¢*, ap S p 7.4 V. Â¥ 0.. . Ffult Treâ€¢ b St-t & 4 Hook'â€¢ A- .z.3-NT- -1*1..3 -r7471 Ckst 1 - sÂ».Ce -7 2 7515'5Â¢. r x1 - 114'llon /, I - Ilt, U,t. 0 - *11*rl, Fid-l,1 [51 - T.*"/ b Â©- ..Ped.Â·el r + M . *Â¥~ -1, . 11.1 6 r '17- -/' : - le, 6.- * - 31//m *nholi / C 90.51 8f~ . Re,ah CM )-a / i "/ Piat FF - not 'toll -7~' 3,A h \ S - 2.: E].Clb, BS . Boltm Sof'IÂ· 22*Kal.2EAL RE - G:/ El- 4 .CFPEr AC.EW :CTU 9Ell â€¢ 04/ES9Cllâ€¢. IM} SU/Â¥Ey// â€¢ THE STAE OF WAM,04 80 *~lm :ZJIFY B; ME -POilENT 1/1*:/ nS flyl/RED INgl AN AC'VAL = :I/*- /411 NOWANGIED 1-0 91#1' P M PROPE,rf Cyle w,Aâ‚¬>1,3. SON Fotâ€¢l AIr 327 Â¥41.0. 1.1'Asm J UNF I OPECT SLPEN,ltâ€ž0 0â‚¬18 â€žAp C 15 CMPEG ID ,â‚¬ 86, 9 r P..... 789&$â€¢ -4(*P I I.*1 proll/, f. ci SELEF *43 eolita 4,0 1441 L 00,01904 2Clh Jâ‚¬AR Aâ€¢Â·E] 4gAAâ€¢ IFPE 4.7 4Â£r Â£2Â»* h.00.1, - 4,1,4/06 4.c. *il/MED MY I *51-71 CON;Ret WNEr I â„¢E fUD â€¢lo, 2*UNCED *% ROSE Wn- A .UT / , 14 1000 0,10, C//INUES â€¢In, COLOPADO ///rlie/44Â£ //,CAPO; FIP A LAM) ke,y PLAT Ai/ 94 CU*V' ACCURACÂ¢ V.4'CAES rÂ·l ALTA//COA GAO 741Â£ 319â‚¬v J RA,â‚¬N CENIn nfly A 1-PO,ENEN,S 014 9,1 .â€¢fle 'â‚¬ 0511WD $4* 444 4~\ NÂ»/1 nâ‚¬ 00,1â€¢DAMES 4,â‚¬ PARCEI, DaP, AS 9,0- ne WAT Iâ‚¬,E IS â€¢0 0,211 09 74â€¢3 WE 956â‚¬*Ep al XMâ€¢, OCEÂ£7 9177 -ryâ‚¬:,74 Af 5,5. ' APPAPâ‚¬,1 //CE,a OR 3174 y AlÂ¢. E,sneâ€¢T /05,6 00 kID[-c ANÂ¥ 0/: / saL PARal_ E./.T 'S IOE. West Honking<4 - Ff T Orng I '10-13 75.00' Rteard R.0.19. Uâ‚¬ i Â£/9-* 4191 /3tf Ll 33- DA'Z- - TUTTLE SURVE}ING SERVIEEE 20- Â¥ 2Â·./J , IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 134 W. Hopkins Av enue -7241 7 %10-2Utl'Z:ir-:r'.-- -WOX S.'F'no. - 1-9.0 5,60 11ZZ.S'-2~.St~~7UL. :70 ?22-3705 :=412 0.-92-Â· TUIT-u SUM'inâ€¢,c .-1,8 Aspen Colorado. 81611 10,0AV.' t â‚¬1.1.d L. DRAWING INDEX: 01- COVER SHEET < 02- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 03- MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 04- UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN . ROOF PLAN 05- BASEMENT LEVEL 01 PLAN 8ASEMENT LEVEL 02 PLAN 06- SOUTH ELEVATION (WEST HOPKINS AVE.1 07- WEST ELEVATION (1 ST ST.) 08- NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) 09- EAST ELEVATION 10- 1 ST STREET PERSPECTIVE 11- EXTERIOR MATERIALS 12- EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN LO-01- LANDSCAPE PLAN 13- NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT MAP 14- NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PHOTOGRAPHS 15- TERRACE SKYUGHT DETAIL -1=--- . S*-SP-7 1Â· Â· 2' ".-1.6994 11'pÂ¥-4 315..1. 4 PR /1 .A- ./1/ 2- 3-7 114 Pt#.4 1 1.r-ar.1 1 ILL[ - 229Â»7 11 , u \0-=12-9 /lu - -- - - 1 El ---- , --4 ted - br-2 - 11 ==L I- 4 -1 'dEE - Â»711 ~ ~ .W . 7 --",4 2 Al al-&4--T<5 5 11. 'In~~ ... gli --- tlÂ·~ h 1 'El,4 41 , @2 'nmr *PIMP#~9#41-1 Corne~~rspective from 1st and West Hopkins WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSIO1 $,LI.d BERAL NOTa ll REFER TO LANDSCPAE PLAN FOR PLANTING PLAN 2) REFERTO LIGHTING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING NEIC,~DI'HIESE 4- 3.71 1 1 tÂ·Â·2f-- I I .CT DESCRIPT~JI . \ 1 |' r I ~EE pt<rECT, NAN NEr-.-te- ~ V %9" Ir,HTWELL C....APe . - E.'ll:%.." /50/.E .... [SH 111111~ HATCIED; RE LANDSCAPE HAN -7 -------9 .E[JUGHT-LL- - 1 E-TNG . 1 4 6 7--4 1 111-< 1 i / Crp-11 UL.BEL ..<rf-1 : 0 2-11 t.1 'L ./Tr ~~~~ 252 SISâ„¢G Exl.NG 11 16-1/ 2 + 0Â»ECTDR I ~ 141ATE " â‚¬ECADD.IN ZZ im -ENM#-AV / F.rr.5 .r.Yal RE IANDRJAPE FLAN -C ..........F -~ ........ 1 .7 21 F~Tr 1 â€ž 1 9 1 //#5/ BELL W . PIr e SED PATK W/ RE WILEVEPLAN 1 + ANDDEâ„¢LS 10-0- 1 .// ./ *Ee'FÂ£,05Â£.AL./.AnE - ----4 '84:KUNE -=Se=E=- - AE P. JEâ€¢.' CE,-kIP,1.,3. --4 ErÂ·.c:%~a /TREEI~EVN~A~lwTI~An' | . A- -- 71 le, i I - 993:1.' ~X- . 4 % 4 \ \ b . IKTYLINE - T.EMV IA. A.-/TFATIN ly ---Zet P. IE-TCE~ F 1 I _---' - ---E-,1-~~ 90. / RE ....TAPE'll 1 1 -'I.JECIDEÂ·C~PT, '4- -M-TREEP't -E.71. 1 7% 1111 0 c~-j 11 11 15T STREET U ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN @ 1/4"SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSICâ€¢ - GLI.d --H IJ IV. GamL*ZIE, 1) REFER TO LANDSCPAE PLAN FOR PLA/14G PLAN 3 REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING =Â£GHTWE' M*Â·ITÂ¥!aUS+)-WN CAgÂ·IEDATLrr.UN> ril AFP~jâ‚¬CKA NCEPTUAL) PR,Â·SEDLL}Â·frm' .-----7 . rr----*-*I./-' 4 ..1 Wmr.HT T " 1. - f -/=1" SPACINO BETWEEN RE Mt'Â£Rks n.c vebED 3 / NEW#. RE; ./I':CAT~Il \11 1 . ATâ€¢ ..11 DET I . . -L4-J -- i *jib I ! E . R.-3'ES L.:-1~=7 1 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN O 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS. LLC. 1 HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO I 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS 1 03 IV.A. 91.Ld 1.- 1: I Qi"?:~*bith('i'~DK''MNNM*Numegmpfwm'4 w &&14 f,2 1-~% 211 i 211 1: f K.:3,22.:( 2 :(20 ~ :-3(Â· E N E U*Eflk feâ‚¬ 1.ir:Z ; :11~Z:41 ,~j ;~..(91)(..(01)0:9 j~ IL= rn ED.*..pl tz=ZE=681 - ...2, 1 Re.. - OPEN .t~~ 1dka Â·rc~ - BELOW LOFr CY' OP'EN TO < BELOW \ 0 2%98- PROPOSED ADDTTION m/CL.:.C. ti**9 Â£3111â€¢ / '...(Co~ECTOR; ~a=-Rwr,---1 , 1 432110~ 1-q - - 1./.,1/6 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE 3.Al /)2 - ----7 ~ i' 4- E- 1 1 . P 1 El ..â€ž; I %: u ZE=I 9 641 - Fle*6~â‚¬UNTED 4 i. *yLF..HT m'P) . .M,JE# - -WL R.*D:KU,HT ./. 1 DECK N39Â» * She) ,- SEAME,/ LI/'- U.0.9..D.J , 91 91 1/,r 4 1 - 14./1 ' -- r 1 ROOF PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO ~ 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSICâ€¢ ZLLd 49 IV. PEem*T~/6 ,/LITWIEU5 5,1-44'N DA91EDATLOCATtiÂ»,15 AFFRMIFIR OXErlu~U ril - PRJ/:SED UGHTWELL 11 1 - 1, 11 1 1 1 / .f -y= BASEIWENTLEVELI 149/NIA 1 BASEMENT LEVEL 01 PLAN Â® 1/4" SCALE N.-[>LIGHTWELLS -- /.HTWELLS 9~OWN (*HECATLXAD~~ AFIVMD FCR CONCEPTI. r 1 \\17% ,--U --_-_ .rl.R.......WEI /- 1 *--1 1.:1 Elll .râ€¢....' 0 5 1 " A IÂ· a---/I BAil,ENT LE'VEL r BASEMENT LEVEL 02 PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTS105 IV.A. 9L1.d 4, *4 L / 11 i * 91 A#'4 ... f. 2 L, .7, *. 5# /1 -A '. I. I . kt 9 2 Cr*<#1 LARft ~ J''t.g, < ~~ " SHAKESIE~STNE ZED'Eli le, i. rNEW' 4'CL....ge' Ens,r, â€¢.A~STO. FOUâ‚¬ATD,1 iEklsâ„¢,4 ..... F Ip. 1.1 / fr. 51 FIKET..TH 1 -- Ik lk- - 4.1 1 4 -Ii'$.AND -- == 111 / 3\ / .-/......DEN Fli DMWING LArdro ..=V ~ 1 1 2/r PR.All:/I~i - 1 24. Ir. $ SOUTH ELEVATION (WHOPKINS AVE.1 @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN. COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSIC "0â‚¬1 2 r f I r / Y I.tAL W<AD RAIN:CREEN:;101+ M 8'(111-14........ r! -IÂ·SHAKE'/05'll 1 Â£ f \ \ i !11 4 --1.. 4.j..,61- ..,INUM CLAD WLâ‚¬ D. 10.1,45 Ir 11\\ti; ; 1' '4 / Val -..........., ' 11 W/' 1 !1'' / m /0//72/0/ .- , / 34 T 1â‚¬,IrNTAi Â¥0-C RAIN'REEN 40116 1 4 ---. Â¢' CWRSIMÂ·IMATCHED E*WING) 4 \Â¢ AL,li' ./'t Â· \\- - 4Â· W..... i '8-NO~ r -1 -i Â·- l' a]Adilifft/~li~-r ...14*Fil - 1 1 * fzvj 41,1, ... -1744.1,Â·rtrni, : / 1 1. Tr'Â·2'-,-0~ --/--- * M 1.- 2 . -1-Ar- 1/ - -/ *r T rt-I - 1-- ./.IÂ·.1'NEEN Pr KETS In:' PICKETWI[,TH 1 1 1 1 Â· , . MATEmALS 'ARD 1 A|. i'Â·P ; r'-?71 ~144'TWÂ·, i 1 ' .~ \/.:V. . - INDS.NE'NO.. (E)0511N,) . r- MUC.SED....K: T)92AiALLÂ£Ei WEST ELEVATION (1ST STREEn @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTS107 OZI.d -LI.W9-/.V.~,1,!42~W\ 8~Câ‚¬R~r,MATCHES...Â·. /*7{ â€¢1Â·./tS,ri....S.... 1 / 1 21/ 1 -/ 1 471 {11?1 '.(f: -- tb 1 7 E - - -r- 1 7 4 0 .01 L - 0- .11. - r 1 1 2.- I 1- - - - "/1MI./EF 1. 12 ts- ':-- - ./' J - t i -JI I '0.'. Â£=Â·m T P = =1 - Q- =1 = Ir =1 =Ir- -1+ 1-- -. - ......-L th i.:1 -~t ~ 11 '11- 1 1 1 -1 1 f~[,1'r.4 1 -1 4 ~ 1 ' '| - Lwj L _1 _ , m ~_-0 p.:rhEDS,K-L -L - ~E Lit - f f .1-1---3T-' ---- in _.--FIT -2 '-- / -A.'51[/5 44 113*TEL-4-2J1-*77 -1 - //-7- 9 - 7 7-~33--7.113EJETE 1 - ILl -1 -1 _ .1----- -I- lilli-1 11 21!IL-, 1. -. ~_ ' 11 1 J 1- i 1' - 1- 1- 1 1 1 7: Â· $ '1 .L NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. 1 HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO I 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSIOâ€¢ LEI.d .(ASS FACKE PAh,El 8.............. I ./.REEN./, IÂ·it, 0 9 l t fe\1 4 1 / i :twt Y e CEDAR ,/./.>... 1 4Â·.1.-1510'N. PVV 4 f f h,/ 21'y f , - [ / \1' 4 , i'Vt , Â·' t. ' * / GV~ ; f f *-.â€ž... DCÂ© R~!PULREEN 9CING. 14'.i'/ 1. .7 4, C, *1.I' I.'cli EITIP,11: Â¥:'TAIi Pifâ„¢FT./. .||; ,-f F| ~~~'d' f.7.v :p~ AFEe#*--1*.fliTiD@,412 1 44 X 1// ~ #...TWEEN F'EKETD/2 FFIKEâ„¢,1[TH RE MATE'/58'ARD V 41 11 . . \. 1.3.Ffi...1--:f:-~ ~Bkitit~'2'-T6i36'44Lj. %;Bi' 40' 10 'Fi. 6/WAÂ·E---Â·639.6FP#47#=rifnA':-::.4 \: ,,17 ~ ! C I f-~'.r-~J.ZI~41.3=7-1?133*1-r ~=-Eft~2&=.p*W 4 \ / 1 - f. , % l -1 / ' M# " l.'. . -1, 1 -------------Â·Â¢-4}[Ent,1 r~-'iLI[Ilililll--_ER r-_1__-~itillIllill 4Â«-_Ul __- ~.- - ' =.744 VNâ€¢, / PRC~OSED9*.-il.i -7 1.<AL All IDES \ A"C..i $ EAST ELEVATION @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN. COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV CCYARCHITECTS109 Cold Iliff./S.,7.9 '1\1 j \\ 1 1 \ 6 V /,/f \ '48 \: !1\/ t/ / /9 r-1 W: / 41 1 k / \,/ /1.,p/ , 1 'r A 6, 1 0% If '1/lt /. Â·Â·{.3,/1 91 1 1,. %1\.,fih}/, f ..Â· (,11*.1 '2,~ :a f 4,\ \1 \,j, f, ~1 ./ ' 7 Â»\ 1\ 1 ,#Upt 11\ 114\j iii/Jf /....... iti dit j X \\~~ Â«97-3- .' /, 4\ 78 2 kfi / 1 1 k P / Il A 97 40 / ,/ 9311 1 --TEE./ // 3329\ ;; /: ' \ ~ lit ;1 f -Jpl 7 t. .. ' 14 *ivt j-'\1 .' 1 '1!11 ; .: // / 14 -: -0~ a NIN \ 1 -1// 1. :4 .Je'll (I \\ 1.'ll~l 111 f - /' I ft , ell.14Â· n=- 1 ' L-;IUL.1-Â·JL.i.-0-\\ 11 '11'j, - - 1 r , 1 . 2 \ 1 t 1 /,. -E EsÂ·F - 933 - ET i--_--~~ pi 71/0 :47 ~1'k,1/ A 0, 0 r / 4i=efl r- - -- - - - El-Z.E iii - -- - -,u--- --1 ---1# -I.- : 1illl // 41// r If t*~ t.111 1 1 1 -- - -/Il:$ - t + r --- -- L=._ B IÂ£J M 6/ - 41? _41 i 43*z_,L_.0- ,-,-FfY-t al:- C,"i-,1, e =~M - I 17 ill M --1 1. Â· Â· 1 ___~ - ' iNI' ilnnly]J~1'1111~j'(Uillimurm#I"'"~~1 i Â· â€¢, Â·1111JmunnmrrTilmruITTT11 1 allil]All].M11]111!nill]1311;111Â£111 --- -[ f-\ 1 :A. 1 1ST STREET PERSPECTIVE- NTS WEST HOPKINS, LLC. i HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE I 2016.03.07 li ASPEN. COLORADO I 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSI1â€¢ 21EBALNQIES: 1> RE: ELEVATIONS FOR MATERIAL LOCATIONS ~ 3 PHYSICAL SAMPLES AND MOCK-UPS TO BE PROVI[ ~ FOR REVIEW AT HPC MEETING -P 4 .7 - 465--JhtÂ¥I:=~ / A., ./. ...0.- 1 Â£43 - ./.I j.. -.0 f I 6 7 ~ 0 8 9~ 1- R+Trrf~JAA'.1#*r.m 91. - C~;*.6 MI\2 - ' f. -* - ~MI- -:UIL .- 0. 4.5-J.24~ 11==LA 182/4 45*j~ 4 ./ 5 4 3 *fÂ· %@4* 1 MATERIAL LEGEND: 01- SANDSTONE FOUNDATION (EXISTING) PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.D IN HPC RESOLUTION #10, SERIES OF 2015 02- PICKET FENCE (PROPOSED TO MATCH PHOTO) 1 -fi * PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.A IN HPC ,/4/1Â·. 9./ 4.E.*WE#& RESOLUTION #10. SERIES OF 2015. .FEN.GE.=.11. I ~ 04--Illil~~a-,1- 03- 4" CLAPBOARD SIDING {EXISTING 04- HORIZONTAL RAIN-SCREEN SIDING (4" & 8" COURSING MATCHES EXISTING) fi-:.p. 1 33,-RE~r 05- FLUSH MOUNTED SKYLIGHT - 6 -4/, 9 :> I~ 06- CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING .i . 1.- .1.-1.4 - n - ..f k. ..:u8.. lulli,3 11,1,1 07- GLASS FACADE PANEL (NON-REFLECTIVE / MATTE) U.14 11'11 j'l.01~!1Lu"mE 7.5//lift#..rrf"- 08- ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS 09- GARAGE DOOR 1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS- NTS WEST HOPKINS, LLC. HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO ~ 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS~11 t'EL d 11 I. f.... a A UTESTICK' MINSCAPE - m- 44 I Slivef .......4 7857 7859 7875 - *- - ..al- P.r... 1 Â¤ I en:96 U -. 1. '.-J.J..lilli C.... :=:Â·. 1=:.. 1 - -- - IN?N i~Z 3~_... - 2727--:72-:=- ----- CATALOG NUMIER LOGIC ~-.~,- - _ 2.El.CE].[*].[p.[1.,9. Ip ". 1 . C.-â‚¬- Wr ./-,-.I-,1. #*. = == =-- ----/-- 4----,6..1.1 . m.*.. --4 F- -'ME~A- ~-1-&*- *K- A--4/Wl.f- , ., I - ..........1.-I... ....I ./.*.Il - ,C * T.* A . t ~rt-'.. ---1.- - - :.=:.:= - 0 ..1. - 'W. 'mâ€ž . ..... .. .. - ,-1. 11*LED . _'to t_ - '.L>â€ž. - I --. 1-ron.~u1- .1-1. Afll,h - I -I-< ... - ....'. 0,0.-8.1 --- - - - 0,-- ; & '. . . ---1 - 1-11 -1 - 11 --- 1 --1.--1 -4-- 1 a 1.~r ' , r 1 -I. 1 - 1.-1 -- 1 - ./.- 1 - I.Â» 1 - ,-I- 1 ---. 1 - 1-1 fir 1 -- ... ---D- 1- m. -- , 1. 1 - 1 - 1 -Ir- 1-â€ž-11 - --- 1 ---- 1--- 1 + 0. 21 'r ,/. *- 1 , H H 1-1 1-1 , ....ill.-Il-....*.* ;'lit. . _ --,--*. - --./.- 1 -.... 11.... 1 LE] ..1-1,- - ------===2-7.- 1 .41 ...4 1 7,/fl E-3 - --..I-- â€ž.. 1 ---- - 1.- I.*- ..Â£. A SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE B LANDSCAPE BOLLARD 5- WALL SCONCE 6/ RECESSED CAN ~ ]NSET WALL LIGHT ' J. 1 LIGHTING KEY 1 1 ....i:/ --- ,# ASURFACEMOUNTED>FOrn.IRE i in * : --1 1 --- ... I - - -1 U. 1 -1 il ~ 8~ LAN[ SCAFE ~DLLARE Â¤. r'Prm:t -7 A*WETÂ¥C-[â€¢FUTENP 9 -- 1 11 1- 1 C:RECES-EDCAN | 1 1 6 U EINSETWALLUGHT . 7 iÂ¤ I I 1 1 00 1 p , 1 1 1 1 lA I ' 0, r rp . 2 -i.-_Er. - 0 -i--3=-0-Uy - 'i E f E & In---* - EXTERIOR UGHTING PLAN 0 3/16" SCALE R WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 1Â» 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN. COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS llâ€¢ E 1 !!! 921,d 1 1 @101@1@1@1@101@1@ DESIGNWORKSUAD Urb. De,1,8 â€¢ Te-m . taW..#.....De S.#L~Cin .~Tahoe I 120 Em,t Main Streel /F ANen. Color- 81611- I (970*925Â·8354 Face,nle (970) 920-13â€ž W WWOES|INWORKSHOP.CO' -1.-- 0 /mibho,ing/rceMobeprotected ~ during lite con,truction 1. @ =---=--==-==-=ma---=alanal--11.-1.-aa Nineb,rk shrubs Lightwell . nnial b,oundcover ;* Ughtwell Ninebark shrubs - ic '.1 ..1.f... lightwell .- SWIgM < 0-a. 1 03 Of Z* @ 0 W 1 111 r Concrete dftyâ€¢*a, 9- Cast in 40, ligh: gr,y concrete with ut 3, Pathwav digned with front deÂ« *, -1.2 ,-1 1 71~t seeded expomed mogregate Skylight 1 - . J Turf grass,od 4 plardedinROW - . -- L 1- 1 - . .1-1 I-litip,ep ..1. Propity UnD not to exceed 42- -Â»io to T"Il building FFE ISS'ECATE -'ch' // REVIgONS Existlic Ipfu- 0- 'fliliangmfueat-~ _ Proposedcoloivoodtree Proposed cottor-ood tree Proposed com,-ood tree 3(r viewshed triangli - # DATE .ON . *ppir, â‚¬ 44 * .. r Â° DRAWN - REVIEVe . I ............. St,t Street -43â€¢~A.- ~Â·N*< HPC FINAL PROJECT NUMBER XXXX LANDSCAPE PLAN .EET NU~E' LO-01 ORIGINAL SCALE 1Â·.4Â·-00. 1 @ 1 0 1 0 1 @ 1 @ 1 0 1 0 1 @ 00'NadSV 91 1. d -*., ~ r.: 2- 14- , ~ 5,: .>,i.#. A.; & I ..442 =~ 'il<im - -~+ d; o - 74"dz<,4/. 4 3 17. 444 44"4*,1, 1 irrb bi -Mill.'- 4.* . . .111 ; a- 1 Y: 1 1 'r,~ 1.-- - I :,le ... 3 L ' ' 4, 111 . ///8 6. 4Â« 5 b . 2.2 --*mr-v-e 4 - 4. . 4 .......- . 4,4 N<39et- . 4&1/lk 1 f #* - 7*hjliÂ«~Â· 4.91- 2*1,*9* . I /9 .0, '6 1,1,-, - 4 0... U. 4 ' . I J . I - -- 4 . Â·U) - 4,43 l. 2.0, 0 4 J N f; 1 1 Ki 41 7'/Â£ 44 , 4./C 9 4 2 1. : ihk - 1 f c 1_ â€¢14 qi////r j .' ~4 .~2 i, 134 Hopkins .ve-.Aipeh co 8Ifl 27,0 Â¥ 2 2-2'~ .4& ./ 1 VA ./dip-4 Â· ,â€¢i,tvk. 9 - firq .1 5 r 12â€¢ 4 '1. 'd s,1/- 76 .1# , Â· - - :4 R.fi : 1 2 * t. 66:'*. 4. .ip - I te.1 1~ 1 ""e, 2=r~-f m , 144.*?M . t .443 ,Â£Â£ ' 41 t> <t â€ž - 2 4 5 - - 94.- .9 1 , I y-+ i, Â· 444' 7 ~ 79.616 , i . WÂ¥ .. 0 -; t. :4.Ir .: 9 --4 ra, . / .-% 1,3%e 11>1 . U 6 .M p '4, Â·plah A .84 4. r. 4%32 1 0 - ,.â‚¬53.1.L 42 - I . 44'irl ' h 7, 2 . 9. U I ., .. . 7 - . I --m. P./. I & ' t. Â· . 479 . ~ . .Â» â‚¬ 00 1 - .. 1 , .1, I '4 1 .0 .1 - 0 . . . 0. A ...... 1. A . 1 .. th'Ur .â€¢ 4 ~ Â·EM&& . 1441,- r. A ,<Â»44/:i. _* 72:2' .5 -,j - f IX p i. '110~ , ....' I 4 Â¥14/ a 33'.1 . , ~ .1, 5 4, : *lt f'-+ f./:" 11-- la':4,1< EF 4 4 1-" * 941 FO--99 k ;~M 44 - t. t, . , . ... AL /*%4 < .1 . r - p- 9 Â© <4434,3 . - "ta/*7*Ad'. - A.'56*07: - 4 - f '/';'/ 4i ~f - - B . - 41â€žW, , , .L .... ~64 .9 ...-I-- r -0 -- . . ./ t .0, 7 -7 1. U ..... k 'lÂ·r*.32 1Uf Jit~f' a ,- 1 . 2 544.' ' t â‚¬ i . Mlij'11. ifINd . . h I .- 4%.5 ..: . A <,- -4- - -1 . 3 0/ . i .. .6 '41 ...:, 4 11 %'' ..211 1. .*~7* 1.1,1'11 -,Â·Wr - - -.-- . 7,- 4~~â€¢- , 0 - D . . '111Â· CE L Â· '44 ' .I.I.-I 1, 241 f 2 VnÂ· 24 & 1 . ... # t.* 4 * ' P ' - . 2 1101 ni , . - . ... 09 * Â· b ,Â· . '~,21'' '~'Â· 0'hty - - .5*:40Â·Â£ It . .1.4 '2 j. - - '1 i r..2 0 1 :, . - 0- f 1- .. - -- .14 zigr t' A .,1~~4 ./ 4 gli i- '- _i- V..as-ki .... -- â€¢ lf# ji Will'llva rr. 11 0 . 1 .4 tr 1/Lill-1 , 1 J : .--- 't j 1 - f 11 1*00*'644 1 14:., , = 1/ 1 -1â€¢illit. , Â¢ 1 W * .1 * 0. U..t 4 1 ' '' 4& #r .1--,3. f f 1~ 1 # 449: /, . .... 4â€ž : L., . ,. - A- - ... 0 , .... .... 0. . A 1.1 1 . I. . ...D. 1. 1 -- N. .... gninalimt 1 DETAIL PROVIDED PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.B IN HPC RESOLUTION #10, SERIES OF 2015. ...r 0 T.O. WALL . r- 17.0,!ROFOR,jEDIONCRETEWALL i Â· / .- 5~P FOR PLANTING, RE ..APE ~ UNEAR ORAIN .,Â·~...~~~ Â·'0 , . / V -- GLASS.O.,SLOPEDWIPER..1 . ,â€¢ I Il ijr . .....Â· - | Al.~li~ .. - ..44..1,-- . Â·'-r Â·Â·Â· BISIBIi=111=" 1121 =-4Â·GU>t L_.,-N Â·- 0.' Â·'FlIBIEWEWEE'I E Elle Â·i.4.4.--4...5- rl liel 1*111....Â· -'. 511=1IE Ilml lEi HE IEI = :. u. :Â·Â·:'Â· ..Â· Â·.--2 *6'12....... Ellie 'BIIE111- IE Elle--.0:340..f.4 1 /I.Z.7/1/1 *Et-:-*tiÂ·. -~~~'Ii~~~CD 2%Â¢-ta _ E""r..cli7 V =:=4/4, r -~" -1 ---- -- / 9.1 TERRACE SKYUGHT DETAIL *4.4- .- 0 SCALE /I// r WEST HOPKINS. LLC. 1 HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE I 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO ' 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTSI1â€¢ 47 MAX. 6ZI.d IV. IV.A. Project Description: 134 W. Hopkins Ave. HPC Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Major HPC Development Reissued 3/7/16 by CCY Architects; Revised 7/20/16 Overview This proposal is for the rehabilitation of and addition to a historic home on 134 W. Hopkins Ave. The general concept is to shift the historic home to the southwest and towards the corner on a new foundation and create an addition to the north and back of the historic home. In the process, we will remove the non-historic additions from the 1980's and add a garage (with living space above) to the north towards the alley separated from the historic home by a connecting element. This new addition will be separated from the historic home by an outdoor street-facing terrace allowing the historic home to be the predominate element on the corner; the primary entrance to the home will remain via the historic front porch. The rear of the addition will respect the 5'-0" garage-only set-back from the alley and habitable space above the garage will conform to the 10'-0" alley set-back. A modification to the existing non-conforming side yard set-backs will be required. The proposal is in keeping with the City of Aspen's Historic Preservation Guidelines as well as Section 26.410- Residential Design Standards. The proposed residence is 1919.6 sf FAR, including the FAR bonus of 116.4 sf for an exemplary project. The design takes significant steps to preserve and rehabilitate the historic resource, taking care to only connect to the historic home where it had been previously disturbed by earlier non- historic additions. The overall roof configuration of the historic resource will be reconstructed to its Pre-1980's form as outlined in the November 2014 Historical Analysis prepared by Reid Architects, Inc. Building materials for the addition are envisioned as primarily board formed concrete and wood siding with aluminum clad wood windows. The addition will have a flat roof in keeping with other new construction in the vicinity so as not to overwhelm the steeply sloped historic roof relative to mass and scale. The applicant is committed to creating an exemplary project and intends to undertake extensive steps to rehabilitate the historic resource to the greatest extent possible. Since receiving conceptual approval for the project, the applicant has worked with HPC Staff to create stronger compatibility between the new addition and the historic resource. The specific refinements to the design include: 1) Exterior Materials: In evaluating the neighborhood streetscape, it was observed that the board-formed concrete anchoring the base of the new addition lacked precedent. Wood siding, scaled to match the siding courses on the historic resource, create a better fit. 2) Window Fenestration: The West Elevation (lst Street) has been updated on the new addition to reflect the historic resource at the street level including a projected bay- window element. Additionally, upper level picture windows on the new addition have been updated with mullions vertically dividing the window into proportions compatible with the historic resource. 3) Connector Deck: This feature approved at conceptual has been removed from the project to reduce perceived mass at the connector. The area associated with this element has been reallocated to the roof deck atop the new addition. The roof deck atop the new addition is set-back 24" from the exterior wall. P130 IV.A. Project Description: 134 W. Hopkins Ave. Page Two Compatibility Rather than imitating the historic home, the new addition will relate to the fundamental characteristics of the historic resource while conveying the stylistic trends of today. The proposed addition features the following points of compatibility with the historic resource: 1) Form: Combination of simple rectangular volumes. 2) Materials: Similar in scale and finish to the historic resource 3) Proportion: Windows and doors similar in size and shape to those of the historic home. Relocation Based on the findings from the November 2014 Historical Analysis prepared by Reid Architects, Inc., the structure has been determined structurally sound for temporary off-site relocation. Off- site relocation reduces the possibility for damage to the historic resource during construction as normal construction sequencing (excavation, utilities, foundations, and framing) proceeds efficiently without having to move the historic resource multiple times from one side of the site to the other for construction coordination. The owner is in the process of securing a temporary receiver site for the historic resource two-blocks away on the now vacant Boomerang Lot Split: Lot 1 which may end up having a 501 W. Hopkins address if/when developed in the future. Tree Mitigation CCY Architects met with Ben Carlson, City of Aspen- Parks & Open Space, on-site November 20, 2014. Mr. Carlson made the following observations: 1) The (2) Coniferous trees and (1) group of multi-stem Aspens located on property to the western side of the historic resource are eligible for removal at full mitigation value in order to make way for the proposed development. 2) Construction management plans shall include provisions for tree protection of the (4) Conifers in the northwest corner and (1) large Cottonwood in the southeast corner of the Right of Ways. Design Workshop met with Ben Carlson, City of Aspen-Parks & Open Space on-site February 29, 2016. The following observations or clarifications from CCY's 11/20/14 meeting were made: 1. The two (2) shrubs closest to the large Cottonwood tree are not eligible for transplant as the process would damage the roots of the protected Cottonwood. If removed, roots to be ground for sensitivity reasons. 2. A 30' sight triangle along the corner of the R.O.W. must be left clear of shrubs and trees, according to City regulations. 3. Sod and neighborhood appropriate shade trees (such as Cottonwood) are recommended within the R.O.W. Spacing recommendations for large trees are: 8' from the curb, and 20' O.C. 4. The existing Russian Olive shrub planted on the SW corner of the R.O.W. is an invasive species and will not incur mitigation costs. 5. The Pine tree closest to the west fagade of the existing house will not incur mitigation costs as it has deformations. 6. The single trunk and multi-trunk Aspen trees in both the NE and SW corner of the existing house are likely to incur mitigation costs, and will be calculated with each trunk as an individual tree. 7. Bushes, such as the Serviceberries, with a DBH below 4" can be removed without mitigations costs. 8. Shrubs may be added within the property line as long as they are below 42" in height. P131 IV.A. 134 W. Hopkins Ave. RDS Compliance Reissued 3/7/16 by CCY Architects 26.410.040.A- Site Design 1. Both street-facing facades are parallel to street. 2. 100% of the front faGade is within 5 feet of the minimum front yard setback. 3. Fences are not more than 42 inches high measured from natural grade. 26.410.040.B- Building Form 1. Exempt from Secondary mass 26.410.040.C- Parking, garages and carports 1 a. Garage accessed from an alley 1 b. Double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors 26.410.040.D- Building Elements 1. Entry is from the street with a street facing principal window from the street with the greater block length (Hopkins) la. Historic 8-foot tall Entry door is about 6-feet back from the front most wall of the building. lb. Historic 1-story entry porch is 6 x 11 (66 square feet) and part of the front fagade. 1 c. Historic street facing principal window faces the street. 2. The first story element is a historic entry porch comprising 46% of the building's overall width and is 6 feet from the wall the element is projecting from. 3a. Street facing windows do not span through an area where a second floor would typically exist- between 9 and 12 feet above the finished first floor. 3b. There are no non-orthogonal windows on any of the building facades. 4. Lightwells are in the side-yard facing the neighbor; not the street and entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. Light well locations adjusted following conceptual approval; re: Floor Plans. 26.410.040.E- Context 1 a. Application of exterior materials and details are consistent on all sides of the building. 1 b. Materials are true to their characteristics. 2. Inflection does not apply as the parcel is less than 6,000 square feet. P132 IV.A. 134 W. Hopkins Ave. HPC Compliance Checklist Reissued 3/7/16 by CCY Architects; Revised 7/20/16 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual interest. Re: Landscape Plan- Light grey concrete with minimal seams proposed as appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. Re: Landscape Plan- 36" wide light grey concrete walkway runs perpendicular from street to the front entry. 1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting. Re: Lighting Plan- Exception requested for pathway lighting based on safety considerations. 1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to the building type and style. Re: Elevations and Materials Board- Picket fence proposed with spacing between the pickets M the width of the picket. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. Applicant proposes to restore the roof to its original form as described by the Historical Analysis report prepared by Reid Architects. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. Overhangs will be preserved. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Applicant proposes to relocate the building on-site to rehabilitate the existing foundation, provide light wells for sub-grade space pursuant to the Residential Design Standards, and restore the house to its pre-1980s form (re: Historical Analysis by Reid Architects). Before the building is moved, the applicant will submit a construction management plan for approval detailing the methodology to secure the structure while providing a new foundation, utilities and historic restoration. The proposed design of a new addition shall be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. The applicant requests moving the building, on a temporary basis only, to a different site for construction coordination as outlined in the Project Description "Relocation" paragraph in the submitted application materials. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. The site plan and floor plans submitted with the application propose the historic structure remains entirely within the boundaries of the historic parcel. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. Applicant proposes to site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. Applicant proposes to shift the structure slightly closer to the corner of the historic parcel to highlight the restored and rehabilitated structure on its prominent corner location. Further, neighboring buildings currently step towards the corner from the east to west as the general cadence or P133 IV.A. pattern of the neighborhood streetscape (re: 134 W. Hopkins Ave. Aerial Map and 134 West Hopkins Avenue- Neighborhood Context, Images 1-3). 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. Applicant proposes to maintain the historic elevation above grade. 9.7 A light well may be used to permit light into below grade living space. Refer to Item 9.1 above. The size of the light well shall be the minimum allowed by code for egress and will not be used as a walk out space. 10.1 Preserve an older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right. Refer to Historical Analysis by Reid Architects; the historic addition shall be preserved. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. Refer to Historical Analysis by Reid Architects; the non-historically significant addition (circa 1980s) has been proposed for removal. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. Refer to Project Narrative, "Compatibility." New addition interprets the historic character of the primary building relative to materials and proportion. The new addition does not imply an earlier building period of the primary building or seek to imply an inaccurate version thereof. Likewise, the new addition is removed from the primary building with a connector so as not to cover any historically significant features. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. See response to Item 10.3 above. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. The addition is similar to the height of the primary building; the new addition is 21" taller than the primary building and separated by 12'-7 W. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. The addition is separated from the historic building by a 12'-7 1/6" long connector or link. Viewed from 1St Street, the 1-story connector is 18'-0" long. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. The addition is located to the rear of the historic building and set back from the primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. The connector is setback 10'-O" from the NW corner of the historic building facing 1St Street. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. The historic building utilizes a "Mansard" or flat roof to tie the gabled and hip roof elements together. The proposed flat roof of the addition is consistent with this historic flat roof typology as well as other flat roofed structures in the project vicinity. Further, the proposed flat roof allows the new addition to remain similar in height to the historic building. A sloping roof on the P134 IV.A. new addition would tend to be less compatible with the historic building relative to perceived scale and ridge height. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. No historically important architectural features will be destroyed or obscured by the new addition. The historic structure will be restored and rehabilitated to its pre-1980s form. P135 IV.A. 134 West Hopkins Avenue Response to all conditions of approval included in HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2015. Prepared 3/7/2016 by CCY Architects; Revised 7/20/16 1) Agreed a. Glass rolling on the on the connector deck to bo low iron glass with no ccoms as noted on the drawings and materials board This condition is no longer applicable as the connector deck has been removed; re: Project Description. 2) Items to address during final review: a. First Street fence details- Refer to drawings and materials board b. Details of at grade skylight provided in drawings c. The Hopkins Street entrance is the primary entrance d. Details of foundation material and existing relationship to grade documented in "134 West Hopkins Historical Analysis- November 2014" by Reid Architects, Inc. submitted with this application. Also refer to drawings and materials board. 3) Agreed 4) Agreed a. Agreed b. Agreed c. Refer to letter from KLA&A Structural Engineers dated 3/4/16. d. Agreed 5) Agreed 6) Agreed a. Agreed b. Agreed c. Agreed d. Agreed 7) Agreed P136 IV.A. Th KL 64 Inc. Structural Engineers and Builders 215 N. 12th Street, Unit E, Carbondale, CO 81623 ph 970-927-5174 www. kiaa.com 150 South Main Street 421 East Fourth Street 1717 Washington Avenue, Suite 100 1875 Lawrence St. Suite 700 Buffalo, WY 82834 Loveland, CO 80537 Golden, CO 80401 Denver, CO 80202 Job Name: 134 West Hopkins Memorandum To: Company: E-mail: Chris Touchette CCY Architects ctouchette@ccyarchitects.com From: Brett McElvain, P.E. Date: March 4,2016 Pages Including Cover: 1 re: Existing Building Relocation CC: Comments: Chris, On March 2, 2016 we conducted a visual observation of the Victorian residence located at 134 West Hopkins after reviewing the November 14 "Historical Analysis Report" by Reid Architects. The purpose ofthe observation was to determine ifthere were any obvious reasons that would prohibit the building from being relocated. From our observation, we did not find any conditions that would lead us to believe the building could not be moved by a competent contractor with experience in moving structures ofthis type. When the non-historic additions are removed from the historic resource, we recommend conducting a follow-up observation with the moving contractor to discuss structural challenges (ifany) uncovered by demolition. If you have any questions or need clarifications, please call. Brett McElvain, P.E. Engineering Principal G \134 West Hopluns\Doc\160304 Relocation Memo docx P137 IV.A. 134 West Hopkins Historical Analysis f , . t. â‚¬ 6 i Â·. ' A j. 4- f 41. 4. ...47 1 9 , t. 1 :ll 'Â·. - 4~4444 f 4 - 4 â‚¬, , I . 1 "I I 1.- . 2 04 - 1 ..2 - prepared by Reid Architects, inc â€¢ november 2014 P138 IV.A. Chronology 1890 A different house exists on this site, based on the Sanborn map footprint and location. c.1880 1880s photo in guidelines book attributed to this house is, in fact, not this house. 1893 The footprint of this house appears on the Sanborn map. Based on materials investigation: The floor, wall and roof framing in the structure consistent with the historic footprint are consistent with construction materials and methods from 1880 to 1900. In addition, the main level double hung windows, bays and some trim and siding materials are also consistent with the period. c.1900 to 1988 This house was owned by Ann Anderson (related to the Popish family) during this period. 1988 Ann Anderson's son sold the house to Julie Wycoff. 1989 The house is remodeled by Julie Wycoff under HPC review. â€¢ The lot underwent a lot split and the house adjacent at 134 1/2 was located on lot B, with a large addition at the rear. The site plan created a very narrow setback between the buildings and placed the 1341/2 addition on the sideyard lot line. . At 134 a small shed addition was removed from the building. A new 375 sq ft kitchen and 200 sq ft bedroom were added to the north side of the building, along with a basement under the addition. . During the remodel the north roof plane was completely altered and the existing dormers were reconstructed from shed roofs to gable roofs, new windows were installed in the dormers. A fourth dormer was added on the northeast roof plane. The north wall ofthe sandstone foundation was replaced by a CMU foundation wall. â€¢ A restoration of the exterior was also undertaken. Based on a conversation with Ms. Wycoff, the existing siding was preserved and cleaned up and painted. Materials analysis of the siding and other details suggest that the siding is not actually historic. For instance, the fact that the siding is continuous with the new addition suggests that new materials were added, in addition the siding is face nailed, which is unusual and the materials analysis identified the species as redwood, which is not a native material and unlikely to have been used in the late 1800s. The siding and trim has several decorative details that are distinctive and may have been replicated on both the historic house and the 1989 addition. - see the following for a detailed analysis. â€¢ The double front door was restored as part of the 1989 rehabilitation and a historic but non-original door was installed in one of the openings. 1994 Sold to Ann & John Canas 1997 Sold to William & Payton Bundinger 2002 Sold to James Marciano 2004 Sold to West Hopkins LLC aka Michele Snyder 11/2014 page 1 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P140 IV.A. Sanborn Maps 1 1. --' 1. 1 8_4 L.]f-i ~d - i 16 1 A I. / 5 58 k M ~- 1 0]- - 1 &Â·c i i ~Â£ - -OEr, ; 611 1.4 1 *L I 9 4-1 tWE i 2 G] i 13111 l# U ,; 4 -i.T-//1fj...#./.-1- 1 / <... '21, MAIN 11 'Wd 1 IL=,1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Fy ~..f gl 411~ Â£ -1 Â· E i 1.-Cl i ; i W I 1 :â€¢ 1/Al I â€¢I i Fl -ri -r 52 -, A long rectangular building is located on 7-,-Er- P -r--T-f-* .; lEi 1 two city lots in 1890 -p..1. /. ...... --------------Ill-ler-4------ 7 19-1 6 8 11IF-i~ L y 11 - . ... .... , l.. -. . 0 ... -' ..1- . 0, . NS--0--- AV. .... 1-'Er , , *c- i. Mh f..91 4 71 2 4% -lf k m 77 W -,a~~ _ 1890 Sanborn Map _0 LI gu '. d t : 10. 6, .0.10 13 r.1251 G -1 -1. 4 5-1 m | Fj 5-3 ~~~JR |,..di~~3 v 51 58 k I D.Zr- â€¢i I J .52 22,42 1 I I .4. e 41Â£-4 It ri 1 11 9 - i liJJ' f Z mr.'.r-717'-3,-,1-1..,-1,1-â€¢ /" 7 Â£.4. W:~~N---------3-------- ----------------4- . '417> 4 4-~ -71 2 4 Or ' â€¢ â€¢12.1, =2 NA lo 2 4 0 '2<Il'. ,=-2 -=11 A square-ish building is now located on 52 ' . 59 one city lot in 1893 -9 - ~-. ,--'1 ' ' ; -Ff_371 3-2 . 7, Hz,1 [.22 -E--3/ 1 4 '4- 44 Â·'.Â·1 ,11 Â« â€¢ ' 42E1,Il.G-,O.131 E 71:isjootprint is similar to the historic LF I - I= 4 -Il'%4 i . 2. Ill,'-' -1 u, 11--' Â· IL[... footprint of the house . 6 .... ..1- .'. ./-J, .U- 3 't, I I '10 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 2 of 27 11/2014 P141 W]IN30*S U3-LN .. - --'(9 ~93*N39'S IV.A. Sanborn Maps i' L lr]% ATI fEr] t.62 lia,Yi '8 51 58 f-1,3-- W i l 'al / 09< r ri.Lde"WH~ Bm.Â·~~-~â€¢~~I~~~ 11 1 4: :: W.MAIN e t 96 3,/ 1/7 /, '7/.,3 /" /" 1"" I" "-â€ž.-11/--1A 721-11 - g VE I ~n LE'Lri P k '6-6 .1-7. . tr', A JL- a hbj ---Eid-gia .5124k ~- - 2-of,z,-rr--, â€¢' r= .[,71 CJ 10 8 0 1 4,1 The same building appears on one city lot . / . ALL PAK' 4Â· ,~ "~I Â· " ~AF-~ 1'Â·rt in 1898 pt | Ir- 1' 11â€¢ :' AMI-=Â«'Â·, r.Â· i~-1 -------------------- -1~ Â·- 4=]h,=14;*-2 lk:ot.lurll.a.*61 i n07-7Â·77**71'r-=7 Â·.â€ž 1,# i.,0 . -, ..1 -74 .., Irn 212 77,isjootprint is similar to the historic - --- --0----- - - ------ ----I---- -â€ž.-... AOPKINS AV. . * e footprint of the house â€¢ â€¢ r:21 ' 0./%-/â€¢ â€¢ , 1898 Sanborn Map 6 1 K L,1 E-3 1 1 im c D=X':0 6@ i %:' Â· 5/ GO i 97,6 2#Â·*â€¢ AfÂ· 3 13#-1/ 07â‚¬ 11LD '4Â·'9 ':543 t ~~J dc- ..... 0/1 4 0 H ... '1 0 E El .- 11, a 59 ~ ILL 0 '"' ". '.1 -|_ L_.-1 6 1 M Â£ N & Detail offootprint in 1898 '71 il t: E ------------------------ ~- _11 - 2 Nrizf77|r- " Fi r-'; : r- 71 . I. 4. 0-,441 pAL, 1.- CD ~ 1?B 711 4 L '. E 1, y-Ur, be ~Â·7 '34Â·13 CS 4 m-te ,$*44 44-1 bv. 1898 Sanborn Map ,â€¢-s *,-w. ..._lkl_.m:m.-mi_Al i nsÂ·,5 #,6 A, 11/2014 page 3 Of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P142 831N33'N U31N30S IV.A. Plan Diagrams 1989 Addition ; \ â€¢ CMU walls 9~,v+-LvvYvvy./*/vvel 14 â€¢ Concrete slab floor â€¢ Full head height 4 = 2-3 ...4 5 11 Ah XXX X x X X x x x x x x x X XX AAK X > 1 XXXXXXXX â€¢ Area of excavated basement %0' XXX XXX XXXX the sandstonefoundation wall isfull height in -3] IX xI 0 . X this area. . ~X---J x r. XXXX â€¢ Area of crawlspace 0 c. 1893 Footprint â€¢ Stacked red sandstone foundation â€¢ Dirt floor â€¢ Crawlspace height there is no evidence that the sandstone 4 foundation wall has been altered or added to i and its construction is consistent with the c. 1 1893 date. \ property Une N Basement Plang . west hopkins avenue 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 4 of 27 11/2014 P143 south first street CAAÂ¢ <bl twb<'WY>(Wb<'WY>Â¢ IV.A. Plan Diagrams 1 , A-Al/: ' ~ \ /-At,,41/\/\A/\4 ./VV Vwk.<, 430Â© '>)4&*yV'77%<6/b<G<71 XXX1 ' 1989 Addition Â«Â»100Â«3 1 34Â¢Otc' -1 IN /6,=1 +Ex* 7 i â€¢ Siding is the same throughout * i -1 c. 1893 Footprint â€¢ Original framing, windows, and interior partitions property line Main Level Plan ' west hopkins avenue 11/2014 page 5 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P144 south first street IV.A. Plan Diagrams ./ \/ ./ 4./.X liff)' lifÂ»j : 1989 Addition f\%44 4+I: â€¢ No historic wall remain on north side of the 1893 house XI I â€¢ All dormers have modern framing - -.. T. : - 1 ---U-r 1 Â» ~ - =12' - 1 -r i J - 1 Â». 1 â€¢ Interior is new throughout Â· c-=-- L 1 1-1-:h A 17=1 c. 1893 Footprint â€¢ Shed dormers with small g '1' rectangular windows appear to be in generally the same locations as the current gable dormers property line N Upper Level Plan t e west hopkins avenue 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 6 of 27 11/2014 P145 south jirst street 42 IV.A. Plan Diagrams t Â£ E t.ct. â‚¬ 2 3 '01 1 1 1 1989 Addition i 1/ A \till /1 \/1 area of flat roof extended to the north \\4\ L- 7.L---1 1--7 dormers changed from shed roof to 22 gable during 1989 construction --/ - c. 1893 Footprint 0 // 7 4 If' I property line N Existing Roof Plan . 0 west hopkins avenue 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 7 of 27 P146 IV.A. Plan Diagrams 1 /4 1989 Addition 1 original hipped roof at rear of house -ho . l ~iti\\ D l1 11 If jj shed roof dormers, similar locations 0 It 1 h to current gable rooÂ£ but may not be i --------- exactly the same footprint ~ 11 original area offlat roof ~~ c. 1893 Footprint 2----------f 1/ I property line N Historic Roof Plan . west hopkins avenue 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 8 of 27 11/2014 P147 south first street IV.A. Historic Photos In this 1934 photo the % -- 2... south and west sides of the ..... -6: 1,1,~=FifI,f!-' r" r house can be seen at the 1 . - " - bottom of the photo. The . 1- a .'.2/ configuration has a front 'F - gable, a side gable wing and *-4-Â· , S 1 11 .1- d. a hipped roof rear volume. / An area of flat roof is , ~ . . .-'... - located in the center of the r . -2. . footprint. '44/Fi .4-, it't.~El .Les, , E- - r .. --B h -r # . 42 : 1/I /31* ' A 11; ' Le. _,_- 1.Wr*LIC,Â£6 -..% Â· :~ al.. i A-*224* 31 2 41 -lili/*/...~I~-im'*I~ 1934 - Detail from composite panorama of Aspen In this 1984 assessor's photo the historic house seems to remain in similar condition to the 1934 photo. The shed roof dormers, and turned porch posts .A',3 can be seen. A shed addition extends w off the rear, which was removed as part ofthe 1989 addition. i N8 ~ #d# f. 1984 - Assessor's Oftice Photo - *Un m ....limmia/~I'll'll/MAL'" LIilil This photo appears on pg 24 of the Aspen Historic Preservation ali ..E*=. ~Â¤~ Design Guidelines and is erroneously labeled as 134 144 Hopkins. . It is actually the Berg House at 635 E. Hopkins. 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 9 of 27 P148 IV.A. Existing Elevations ................................................................................................................................... O'. 4~All / L.14 I '.2///3-HMr, 11 Il li_ ==TI-14"7.Tr-r~~Z__M 11 10= 1 ETFEII--EF]~~FI 1-----11 0 0 0 ~141 0 111'In 1 1 1 113 1 11 south elevation I north elevation I I L..1../. ~Ll.U.U.UL..U,~~1 ' i 1 10 isy//le....J........Y,1 11000= newcons%rtictionlrhBtonp 6~uunu-L- west elevation ' ~' uu'l' -T:~411~1 1.1 1 1.I 1.L LII 1.1 I.1 !11!1!LI ' 1 1 11 1 Ulk I FE-F~FFF'UNE-EFN-77'77FFIFFE-FFEFFIFFEFFEFEnrF'7X l--------------.... 1 1 1 1 historic I new construction L east elevation 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 10 of 27 11/2014 P149 IV.A. ... il \ la looking northeast 9-P-/ -1-97\\.8.- looking southeast ILL Â¥ 11~. looking northwest â€¢ the 1934 historic photo form was derived from: â€¢ the location of the existing stone foundation 73*Y â€¢ indications in the existing roof structure , looking southwest 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 11 of 27 P150 IV.A. 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 12 of 27 11/2014 P151 IV.A. Photo Analysis south elevation ' 9 *: . 1 *Â¢#%4\ N Â¢t dormer converted to a gable in 1989 1 window is new A-4 . .101 .4 - -A' ~----- LcÂ¢LUL u window added or enlarged in 1989 ....-Â· %%<i 032Â·:teÂ¥ . Â·44*.Â· b,4. 4 <~ original bay with old roof shingles and I 7. original double hung according to the owner, in 1989 Â¢ the siding was original and was treated and restored. ,52[14 - 21--2.67 - -- - Materials testing performed in 2014 revealed 1 A ,-+I.. ~ t that the material is redwood and not likely original, though may have been replacement 1==m- .C=ri, --- materials before 1989. The details of the 4 - f. 9.- Â· ~27 T siding, corner boards, decorative shingles, etc. :6: 000Â£DÂ¢*.At presumably were derived from the original . configuration. . - - porch reconstructed in 1989 current porch decking added in 2013 ish double front door restored in 1989 porch posts and decorative fascia restored in 1989 based on materials testing and conversation with owner who did the work in 1989 original double hung window 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 13 of 27 photos P152 IV.A. Photo Analysis Â· -*rueÂ· â€¢ *?31 9, - . 4 r.4 t. A *>, ' 444477 gri j .- 9Â£ %Mt: 7,1*. iÂ¥ ~ *1~ . r.r. .1 et, . / I / 4. ~ *~ 7 ~ 4 , - 4 -- , 9 2 53 2/ /4. F. f . 4 Â· i'.1 2 Â·f -7> 4, f ' ' Â· Â·* 2 1 1.. dir glic:,:=: h " J ..... .. 1 . . 4. . 1 , i & --9208 , 1 ..1.Fign 4 1 4 1' "& . 439 -. Â» #,2/ Lh , al ' - A f - ... - ..* a...m -. * historic part of west elevation original double hung window dormer converted to gable in 1989, double hung is new original bay with old roof shingles and original double hung decorative shingles in west gable end a mix of new and possibly historic materials, based on materials testing original red sandstone foundation wall, appears to be intact in original location and configuration 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 14 of 27 11/2014 photos P153 IV.A. Photo Analysis ... . 01 2.4 r er" 41 'A - 5 4 4 1 *9 - -- l 4 1 V - r./ 4 1 4 L - 4 * .- . 6 + 1 -Ck - j. y. north elevation all new construction on north side one story shed addition new rear wall is an extension of the front gable, all new construction, includes an extension of the flat roof to the north upper level deck over section of 1989 addition 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 15 of 27 photos P154 IV.A. Photo Analysis 1- 41.2 laitt-J:% 1 -11â‚¬166 44 * . I - 3 32. El ?- .0 - - 4 -7 - Â¥ 'l, . 4 3: 12 L east elevation dormer above (not shown) converted to gable in 1989, double hung window is new original red sandstone foundation wall, appears to be intact in original location and configuration clapboards run continuously to new addition at rear of the house original double hung window original double hung window rear addition begins approximately here new double hung window on rear addition 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 16 of 27 11/2014 photos P155 IV.A. Photo Analysis ..pe'â€¢' 1%5...h. 4 1 Ill'll'llit il.~ Allillillilll 1.1.- - ;474.] , I ... '+1 '1 . --7 n m !41 - -7 - 1 Dormer converted to gable in 1989, detail Detail of historic double hung at porch wall, shows contemporary double hung. All dor- original hardware can be found on all the his- mer framing is new, dormers are likely to be toric windows that remain. in the same location as the original shed roof dormers. Typical of three. ill -12......... I. - k\- I.L.../. 1...11/5 ./I -7 A .'.1 - L Detail of historic window sill at porch wall. Detail at the top of the south bay window. New porch decking can be seen below. Historic wood shingles can be seen along with decorative bead board panel, some of which may be historic. Photo also shows decorative corner bead on window trim, this detail is repeated throughout. 11/2014 page 17 Of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue photos P156 IV.A. Photo Analysis - - 1/6 1 1/'ll//9, ./12//Eirrill/kic...0..5=7- 1~ /9/ El / /. t.-9V./ir V .=4 5, 1 531,/ -Il....Il/VI'llill'll//0/'ll'll//IA ...&â‚¬/.., -7,11' Al'li -Ji 1,75 43- '---0?0 '1- ..it#/ *16'......1 -4 1 9/1 ~ A..111~..111~ Detail at south bay historic double hung Detail at porch decorative fascia, (not original meeting rail. based on materials testing), cornice return on eave end and west facing bay with wood shingle roofing. - WINI . rip.~ . -5 - I.U: 1.flow// 1 - - Â£416.,~ i igpzze,1/'ll/.69"I""""Il"""Ill/"I, b - .ind:MA,h*gitmrel</~RgmMiwill'll'll'll 'le//rE ill'llill t./00.2.3344.Mililill/'ll'll//r Â£:d - &2.X , Detail of historic red sandstone foundation Detail of decorative siding under west facing wall. New porch infill panels can also be seen. window Note that these panels are inset from the face of siding, which may indicate that these are original decorative details. Materials testing indicated that the species is appropriate for the period. 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 18 of 27 11/2014 photos P157 IV.A. Photo Analysis ! h l==..:mA r.'2Â· f# i -k --1 . VI....1 ,-4 1- ......5. 1...r Detail of decorative shingles over west facing Detail of the decorative shingles on the west bay. The cornice board, in this case ends short gable end. Diagonal beadboard references the of the wood shingles, implying that there may decorative details on the sides of and below be other original material behind. A similar the south and west bays. condition exists on the south bay. Na~ - ip>79~ = 1,/"flllllilinfl~ ,*W 4-01AA \CA ~-a~<' 1 J~ 1/. -- 4.â‚¬L...47, ..i/...9..M..3/64*'91Â£*ATI/&. -\10*-2-. ,/ //42 -0 , .,1 -In *4 - --~tif ~m~.VER . 4 ..4 -. -~ illillitilililimillilliliall0l~ll:I:ilillilizijillilirililil Detail of foundation wall at original northwest Detail at the original northeast corner corner where it meets the 1989 CMU transitioning to the new cmu foundation wall foundation wall on east side. Note the continuous siding from old to new and shift in watertable board. 11/2014 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 19 of 27 photos P158 IV.A. Photo Analysis f <591 p~393:'~ 1 â€žL> . F /// //// F //1/,0-*1d / 4 - 2 4. 6.# // -1-1- --_U-F-* 1 ..t 1 --1--I Detail at existing northwest corner where 1989 addition copies the siding, cornerboard line of original hip continues up to flat roof and trim details from the historic house. section. 1989 addition extends off north face of hipped roof to the north. 1 / - 01 11. t. j d r. Oil 144 1 t 4.-1 Ill. M 1 --- -, Detail of meeting rail at east facing historic Upside down bottom sash. window. In this case the bottom sash has been installed upside down. See sill condition at right. 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 20 of 27 11/2014 photos P159 IV.A. Photo Analysis fi I.-f~.~~ 1 I . L Â·Â·Â·t .6 a 1, Â· 1 .4 1 t, 1 t 'Mr.............................................. 11.- (fj illills,/LIZZI.'..'../.3,2,-7"1/"Illilill .- I '.1 Â£ 7, ir , Ar Detail at one of the exploratory holes on the Detail of interior wall with original plaster & interior of the historic section of the house. lath and new layer of drywall, typical through- Rough sawn framing, plaster & lath and new out the historic house on the main level. layer of drywall can be seen. .Cwrill--Il .7"- Vililillis2dmasm/:312**20lpiti*IliN#:.4 illillisi :i. 4./.INIP - ' -a,v, . - "4043* q 44/4 *lutJN,3 ./ 'U - Pililib~:El//9:2'".t~Wgilfill'lill . 1' 11 FAXETTI'll'll 4 6 M 9 VW - . 4, ti, -At 1/.W. 9...1.. .3. rl m 29%16' IL#'91.- . --- t Â» I ./ I - ...t : 4/ I. -~ Â·4$6 - 4 4.3 - 6 /1, ....1 r .,1,! 11 11 7.Fl .9/ ....Adil/DIJ. .:%, ... -4: --0 -2 m .1/' :I & W .-2 Detail of interior of foundation wall at full Detail at CMU wall along north line of height section. Both sandstone and brick historic house footprint. This wall replaces can be seen. Wall construction extends to the sandstone foundation along almost the full basement floor in this location. length of the north wall. 11/2014 page 21 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue photos P160 IV.A. 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 22 of 27 11/2014 P161 IV.A. Appendix â€¢ Preservation Plan for 134 W Hopkins â€¢ Materials and Historical Report by Anthony & Assoc. completed 11/2014 note that this report refers to the eroneously identified photo, the conclusions drawn in the report are still valid and are based on fleld observations and materials testing. 11/2014 page 23 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P162 IV.A. 134 West Hopkins Avenue page 24 of 27 11/2014 P163 IV.A. Preservation Plan The historic house at 134 W. Hopkins is in excellent condition. The current redevelopment plan provides the opportunity to restore the historic house to its original form and to create a clearer distinction between old and new. Following is a summary of the actions that will be undertaken to improve the preservation of the house. The Site - The proposal is to move the house a small amount to the west and south. The move will improve the relationship of this house, to the house at 1341/2, which was placed on the adjacent lot in 1989. The move will also allow the additional floor area to be handled more sensitively and to create a better distinction between old and new. Since new subgrade area is being added either way, the historic foundation will be impacted, regardless of the move. In order to minimize the visual impact of the move, the house will be set on a new foundation, designed to retain the red sandstone finish materials. Before the move the foundation will be photographed and otherwise documented to ensure the proper reinstallation. The new foundation wall will be faced with the existing stone, maintaining the same relationship to the siding and the same exposure above grade. Salvaged stone materials will be cleaned and installed with the same stacking character, the same corner details and the same mortar details. The existing mortar will be sampled and a new mix will be created to replicate the existing joint character and hardness. The move itself will be undertaken by Bailey House Movers, who have a long history of success with historic house moving in the Aspen area. The owner has the option of moving the house off site temporarily to a location just a couple of blocks away on West Hopkins. The owner also has the option to keep the house on-site and shift it to accommodate construction activities. The temporary off-site relocation may allow the construction activities to be performed more quickly. Either way, the move will be undertaken under the requirements of the Aspen HPC. It should be noted that the house will be lifted at the base of the wall, requiring some destruction of the siding materials and first floor framing. Since it has been determined that the siding materials are not original, there will be no additional loss of visible original materials. Restructuring the main floor framing will allow the house to retain its current relationship to grade and the foundation wall, which is critical on the exterior. There are some questions that are outstanding about the nature of materials that may be concealed under the siding layer. These issues will be investigated and appropriately resolved before the physical preparations for the move are made. The area of decorative siding under the west bay will not be damaged by the move. The house appears to be structurally sound and the simple geometry of the plan should contribute to the success of the move. Before the move, the structural engineer will design any temporary shoring which may be needed to ensure the success of the move. In addition, the windows and doors will be protected and the area of the 1989 addition will be closed in to prevent any deterioration during the move and storage of the house. The house will be placed on the new foundation in the same orientation and at the same relationship to the grade, to preserve the historic character of the siting of the house. Other aspects of the site which support that historic character will be restored to their current condition, such as the walkway to the house, the flat topography and the historically appropriate plantings. Historic Building Materials - The historic materials on the house have been identified through materials testing and the verbal description of the 1989 addition. These original materials are centered on the main level double hungs and some of the decorative siding and roofing related to the bays. Much of the other material is of newer vintage. Since the current details of the siding and trim are appropriate, much of what is there will be retained. Early in the construction phase, any questions about what may be under the siding will be assessed and changes to the current preservation plan will be made accordingly. The 1989 addition will be removed and the siding will be terminated appropriately on the historic house. The new addition will be designed to create a clear distinction between old and new, rectifying the current condition, where the siding and details are continuous. 11/2014 page 25 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P164 4 v. .CT ..1ON & 1- r 32=2 - (.* ./Tr,/ I....ELOCAT)"HC*~1~TCHED~ I w iâ‚¬1 9 - 1 K l 4 L__- ---9 () LL.~, .1,3.- -- i 4 11 127,0- 1 + j m /11 44 <3 r----,ri nonn~~ 1,0 // â€¢ â€¢ 9 +7 C - .0,Â£op.w... [. . i i.~ i..%/ts *c>...7' $'T-Ck# ~i <J - - -- ----1------ - -11 ----- -- 1 ~ L -- I . 1 :11 1 1(0 T -TIC- PROPgnule 20 - â„¢al#.*Iâ„¢GATON 039 -tuy' 1 0- -*irm=U#v U 0 440 YO - Ly R-. be NORTH riot to scale SITE PLAN - 1/4" = 1'-n" WEST HOPKINS LLC. 134 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF 11.25.2014 SUBMISSION DATE ~CCYARCHITECTS APPROPRIATENESS FOR MAJOR HPC DEVELOPMENT IV.A. tIOE/II anuMÂ¥ suptdoH leM M I Preservation Plan 3ri~13,1Â¥9//dOE IV.A. Preservation Plan Windows - As stated above the main level double hung windows are all original and will be protected and preserved. The one window in the back bedroom, where the bottom sash is upside down, will be corrected. The upper level has no original windows. The south gable end window was either added or altered by the 1989 project. A window does show in the 1984 photo, but it is unclear if this was an original window. A new design will be proposed for this location. The dormers were altered in the 1989 project and will be restored to their original shed design with windows similar those shown in the photographs. Any new windows used in these cases will be selected to be similar to the historic windows. No new windows are proposed for the main level east, west or south. The north elevation will be redesigned and any new windows that will be added in that area will be designed to be compatible with the historic context of the house. To increase the energy performance of the historic windows, wood storm windows may be created and installed. Doors - The two entry doors will be preserved and will remain in place. One of these doors was installed as part of the 1989 addition. Porches - The existing porch retains the design and location of the original. Much of the original material has been lost. At this time the existing porch posts and decorative fascia will be retained. The one area where the porch can be returned to a more appropriate character is the decking. Currently the deck is trex and runs east to west. This material will be replaced to run north/south and to have a more traditional material and edge character. Architectural Features - As previously stated, much of the exterior character is defined by materials that are not original to the house. The decorative details are, however, consistent with traditional details and were likely recreated from the original examples. The existing details will be preserved and if information about the original details can be found through additional exploration, this will be undertaken and the plan will be adjusted accordingly. The new addition will be designed to be of its time and be differentiated from the historic house, clarifying the current distinction between old and new. Roof- The intent of the design is to restore the original roof form. This will serve to create a better distinction between old and new, and will give the house back its full historic form. The restoration of the dormers will also eliminate significant features that currently change the impression of the original character of the house. Building Relocation - See site discussion above. The relocation will take place in accordance with the design guidelines. Building Additions - Currently, the addition is not clearly distinguishable from the historic house. There is only a small step on the west side, a continuous wall on the east side, and no clear distinction on the north side, particularly on the upper level. The new design will restore the primary volume of the historic house and create a strong distinction between old and new through the use of a one story linking element, set in from both corners of the historic house. The style of the new addition is contemporary and in its simple massing and form will accentuate the subtle details of the historic house. The materials palette is restrained and limited, which doean't compete with the more dectorative and traditional detailing of the historic house. Only a small amount of floor area remains to form an above grade addition to the historic house, the bulk of which will be set at the back of the site. The majority of the other new space will be located subgrade. minimizing the impacts to the primary volume of the historic house. 11/2014 page 27 of 27 134 West Hopkins Avenue P166 IV.A. Report: Structural and Architectural Materials Assessment for 134 West Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado , ,., 4 r 1,1 ). t. . U. h. R,6- '. 1 : 01 - - ,> N D -- 1 1 - *d##111.' t Illl1 - 124 4 Submitted to: Reid Architects, Inc 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Submitted by: Anthony & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 271400 Fort Collins, CO 80527-1400 November 4, 2014 P167 il .Tht , IV.A. Structural and Architectural Materials Assessment for 134 West Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado BACKGROUND Anthony & Associates, Inc. (A&A) was asked by Ms. Suzannah Reid of Reid Architects Inc. to conduct a structural and architectural materials assessment of 134 West Hopkins Avenue (the Building) in Aspen, Colorado. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the construction history and the approximate age of alterations to the building. The Building, which is believed to have been constructed ca. 1880s, is a wood-frame building with a modified rectangular footprint. It is clad with a combination of wood trim, horizontal wood siding, decorative wood shingles, and wood beadboard. SCOPE OF WORK There were questions regarding the construction history and age of the Building. The completed scope of work and this report provides information on the approximate age and construction history of the Building based on an examination of the structural wood and architectural components and associated metal fasteners and hardware. The scope of work included the following tasks: â€¢ Conducting a site visit to photograph and document existing conditions, followed with an assessment report. â€¢ Examining accessible roof and floor framing to determine dimensions, spacing, and fastener type as well as to identify evidence of alterations. â€¢ Examining exterior architectural wood elements such as window sashes, siding, and trim to determine fastener type and identify evidence of alterations, â€¢ Examining structural wall framing (through probes) in areas of interest as determined by the architect. â€¢ Removing a minimum of 10 wood species samples to identify the wood species or wood species groups for structural and architectural elements of interest. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc, 1 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P168 IV.A. FIELD PROCEDURES Anthony & Associates, Inc. provided a historic preservation specialist to conduct an investigation of the structural and architectural materials of the Building. Access to the attic, wall framing, and crawl space was the responsibility of the architect and/or owner. An on-site meeting was conducted with the architect at the beginning of the field investigation to verify the objectives. The investigation was based on a combination of visual inspection, species identification, and historical research. These methods are described below. Visual Inspection Visual examination of the structural and architectural elements of the Building allows for identifying components that are incongruous with surrounding material and that may be indicative of an alteration or repair. Identifying structural member dimensions, spacing, and the types of fasteners used can also provide information on the construction sequence and approximate age of the materials. Species Identification The Building is a wood frame structure with wood siding and trim. Identifying wood species can aid in interpretation of historic construction or repair campaigns. Wood species will be identified by removing small samples from which the species or species group can be identified under microscopic examination. A sufficient number of samples will be removed to identify species of key architectural and structural wood elements to aid in developing historical documentation. Historical Research Other materials may be present that can help to determine the age of modifications and the construction sequence of the Building. Material with stamps, maker's marks, logos, or other identifying components can be researched to find date ranges for production and/ or distribution. FINDINGS General Construction - Architectural Elements The long axis of the Building is oriented approximately north to south, with an addition known to have been constructed in the 1980s at the north end (Figure 1). The southern- most section is believed to be the original structure built sometime in the 1880s. The construction and/or alteration dates of the center section are unknown. The various sections are apparent along the west elevation. See Figures A-1 through A-3 in the Appendix for drawings and plans of the Building with the labeled sections. Anthony & Associates, Inc. 2 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P169 IV.A. 1 - t Figure 1. West elevation showing the 1980s addition (red) to the north, the center section (yellow), and the southern section (green). The majority of areas on all elevations are clad in horizontal board siding (Figure 2). 1 -----CZE- 1 -~ r, Figure 2. Horizontal board siding on the east elevation. The roof is asphalt-composite shingle except for areas over the bay windows which are wood shingle (Figures 3 and 4). Gable areas on the south and west elevations have decorative wood shingles and trim (Figure 3). The west elevation gable also has beadboard siding (Figure 4). Areas of beadboard siding can also be found under and around the bay windows on the west and south elevations (Figure 5). Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 3 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P170 IV.A. 4 hi . 4 Figure 3. Decorative wood shingle siding on the south elevation gable, and wood shingle roofing on the south bay window projection. ~r 1 /1 ' I , 18 7. 4 ...3 - * 1' Â£27Â«1- '2 . , 467 4,~ , . Â· f /-1~Z~ZI~--Â·-Â·222:2: Â·Â·r ' F , C Â·Â·- V. - /'fi vi , p ,. ~ 1 '2-L''tiLL~L--~-~1 3- , 9 - 4N N 02 -4/-Zlk 44/'' . pa44 ./ 44.--- Figure 4. Decorative wood shingle siding and beadboard siding on the west elevation gable, and wood shingle roofing on the west bay window projection. , p '/'ll p L Figure 5. Decorative beadboard under the bay window on the west elevation. Anthony & Associates, Inc. 4 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P171 11 111 IV.A. General Construction - Structural Elements The structural wood framing, as determined from probes on the interior and from visual inspection of the basement is composed of wood members spaced approximately 16 inches on center. The wall studs were typically rough-sawn (Figure 6) and, of those measured, ranged in size from 1 34" x 3 3/4" to 1 13/16" X 3 7/8" (actual). The wall finish in most areas was horsehair plaster and lathe (visible in Figure 6), although in some locations modern gypsum board was placed over the plaster. Modern dimension lumber framing measuring 1 7/16" x 3 5/16" (nominal 2 x 49) was identified in some of the second floor probes (Figure 7). :1 . z Kki* 1 IE.$12 M + A... N eÂ·Y Figure 6. Rough-sawn, full dimension lumber inside probe 4, first floor. ~ ?6 -13'll.'P tr - Â·- Lit 61 - W /91 6. r 4. L 1 Figure 7. Modern dimension lumber in probe 8, second floor. Access to floor joists and other wood members in the basement was extremely limited due to the presence of radon-mitigation materials and insulating foam (Figure 8). The Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 5 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P172 2NERALHQIfi - 5.CONDARYENTRYFROM... I J .Frr. TO 1 AND'.Al 'Al ./. ANTI./.AN SLIC,NO PAnODOORS EO~,ECT INI[I,OR 2) REFE R TO I IGHTNG PI A. FOR EXTAMOR 1 IGHT NG .ACESTOCOURTYARD PRIMARY ENTRY AT..ORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT FORCH -4.% *IL - k 3.9â‚¬, .Â·,1 ....ME ' \ /*CE-141 , 1 .l;01 Â»4,1.I __- --_. ----~~-- -Â· 3~'TA-LPOE-FENCE i |7 ........ PIC<ETG / r. PICKE â€¢410â„¢ .....5 6/4 ' a 1,1 -11 -- 1 COP.'Ce' / / â‚¬*. 51Â©,C - 1 - ti , ~ .pos# .. Â·--'rSE'WIATKOhmON.SCURCE, ' 1// . i :-..#.UC lock= ' Â· 2.-44- .11"li 2,0116 11 . lU-UN=--Â·-~ .i: &/ - 1 1 1-1 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE Reduced 50% for printing WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016,03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~03R 2016.08.09 REV. #2 e IV.A. accessible floor joists were either rough-sawn, full-dimension 2 x 6s or were modern surfaced members (nominal 2 x 6, but actual 1 3/8" x 5 1/2"). & ' e , "4 4 Â¥ r â‚¬ -,4 - t . r 11* 6 L F t* # ./ 44% B Figure 8. Access to wood framing in the basement was limited due to mechanical systems, radon mitigation systems, and insulation. Species Identification Thirty-eight samples were removed for species identification. Given the assumed age of the Building, historic materials such as siding would likely have been produced from trees with native ranges extending into Colorado, such as western yellow pine (a hard pine species group that includes ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine) and/ or Engelmann spruce; however, western yellow pine is still used today for architectural siding and trim, so decisions regarding the age of the exterior architectural wood cannot be based on species alone. A complete list of species identification samples and their locations can be found in the Appendix. Multiple samples of the horizontal siding were removed in order to compare the material on the known 1980s addition with that on the other sections of the Building. All of the horizontal board siding was identified as redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). Redwood is native to the California and Oregon coast and as such, is indicative of replacement material. Vertical and horizontal trim elements from various locations on the Building were sampled for species identification based on discussions with the architect. Vertical window and corner trim samples were identified as western yellow pine (Pinus spp.). While western yellow pine was commonly used as construction material in Colorado from the earliest periods of Euro-American settlement, it is also still used today for exterior millwork. The vertical trim in all locations of the Building appears to be in excellent condition with no evidence of weathering, and the samples of vertical trim Anthony & Associates, Inc. 6 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P173 IV.A. appear to have only two applications of latex-based paint applied, indicating that the vertical trim elements are likely replacement material (Figure 9a-9c). ..... ....... .P.1..... 0 â€¢ Mill .1. ''~~1 7'Z~~U,44. I . . 4 'M~Mol -Â·I'777~Oal; â€¢ I ...... 1 ..... ............... .:.,f................. Figure 9a-9c. Sample 26 (a), removed from the vertical trim around the north window, west elevation showing two applications of a latex-based coating (b), and wood in good condition with no visible weathering under the paint (c). The decorative beadboard trim was sampled in several locations in order to determine the wood species. A sample of beadboard from the west elevation gable (above the bay window) was identified as fir (Abies spp.), while the other samples of beadboard removed from below and around the bay windows on the west and south elevations were identified as redwood. The generally excellent condition of the beadboard trim on the west gable suggests that it is replacement material. The redwood beadboard may also be replacement material because redwood does not grow in Colorado; however, some of the beadboard on the sides of the south elevation bay window has visible evidence of weathering that telegraphs through the paint. It is possible that the redwood beadboard in some areas could be historic and was a specialty item brought in by train ca. 1890 - 1915. Species identification samples were removed from upper and lower sashes of the windows on the historic and center sections in an attempt to identify whether the windows may date to the same period. The samples from the sashes were all identified as eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Eastern white pine is not native to Colorado or the western region of the U.S. The natural range of eastern white pine includes the eastern portions of the U.S. and Canada; its range extends as far west as Minnesota. Given the use of eastern white pine and the presence of wavy glass in a few of the sashes, it seems likely that the windows were ordered from the eastern U.S. via the Sears and Roebuck catalog or a similar publication and delivered by train to Aspen ca. 1890 - 1915. Two samples from the western column and a sample of the spandrel on the front porch (south elevation) were removed for species identification. Although in excellent condition, the west column has a visible timber repair (Figure 10) near the bottom. Both Anthony & Associates, Inc. 7 Report-134 West Hopkins Avenue P174 L IV.A. the repair material and the column material above were sampled; the bottom repair portion was identified as southern yellow pine, a U.S. east-coast tree species, and the top portion of the column was identified as western hemlock, a U.S. west-coast tree species. Neither tree species is native to Colorado, suggesting that the columns are not original to the historic construction. The decorative spandrel sample was identified as western yellow pine, which, as previously mentioned, was used historically and continues to be used today as millwork. -.- -12.9*2 e~ 9%42/944*0;-F-#1"9/'EDMI 4,10-UVREÂ«:*rEpl Z: d.Vats?â„¢U?g Imp.'47--di - 1.=N'**thÂ£#21 Figure 10. A visible timber repair on the west column of the porch. The rough-sawn species samples removed from the floor, wall, and roof framing were identified as fir (Abies spp.), Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), and western yellow pine (Pinus spp.). All three species have native ranges that extend into Colorado and the Aspen area. The surfaced, modern dimension lumber that was sampled in the roof framing and the floor framing was identified as Douglas-fir. Douglas-fir, while also having a native range that extends into Colorado, is primarily produced from the west coast today. Based on the dimensions, the surfaced Douglas-fir members post-date 1964 (Smith and Wood 1964). Age of the Structural and Architectural Wood Elements Determining the exact age of the structural and architectural wood elements by visual inspection alone is generally not possible. In conjunction with species identification and historical research and documentation, however, it is sometimes possible to determine the sequence in which materials were added or altered by examining the materials and fasteners in detail. A key identifier can be the type of fastener used to hold wood members or architectural elements together. Wire nails, in common use today, were not widely produced and used in construction until the 1890s. However, in rural parts of the country such as Aspen, common use of wire nails did not occur until after the turn of the 20th century. Anthony & Associates, Inc. 8 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P175 IV.A. While wire nails have flat circular heads and round shafts, machine cut nails were typically stamped or cut from a sheet of metal, resulting in square or rectangular heads and square shafts. Machine cut nails were primarily used prior to the widespread manufacture and use of round wire nails. Given the assumed date of construction, the use of machine cut nails would not be unusual; however, all of the visible fasteners on the siding and trim are wire nails (Figure 11). These findings, in combination with the generally excellent condition of the trim and the species identification results, suggest that the majority of the siding and trim is replacement material. 'r.Â¥r'hil~ IHI11111#411411#'91111#11"114,1 Jilii,ti,OP:FÂ· ~ ~,lt"liti 19 20 21 Figure 11. Round wire nail heads visible due to face-nailing of the wood siding. Square cut nails were identified in two locations: at the junction of the bay window and the Building on the west elevation, and through a first floor joist accessed from the basement (Figure 12). The bay window is in what is considered the original portion of the house, while the nail in the floor joist comes from the central section with the unknown date of construction. The presence of a square cut nail in this section is evidence that the central section was likely built before 1920. , ..Al 4,4 ..t :.-*& p -~~ *. + --* 7. . Figure 12. A square cut nail above a rough-sawn floor joist in the center section of the Building. Anthony & Associates, Inc. 9 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P176 IV.A. Although some of the window glass in the original section and the center section appears to be replacement material, several of the sashes have wavy glass (Figure 13). Wavy glass is indicative of the manufacturing process and is either crown glass or cylinder glass. Crown glass was blown by hand and was generally not produced after 1850 in the U.S. Cylinder glass is typically associated with windows manufactured ca. the 1870s to the 1910s. Based on their large size, the wavy glass panes in the bay window sashes appear to have been produced based on the Lubbers process (ca. 1890s to 1910s, Bock 1998). Window hardware in the majority of the windows on the original section and center addition also are congruous with a manufacturing date range ca. 1890s to 1910s (Figure 14). 2 d a. / I ir'.133. '. 49 ir#f::. 4 t.4. fÂ».7--' I / ' A 4 Â£.... .... 9. . â€ž41.- -I.--- 6.lt'.? f , I 1 .4 S I,/7 34 - I Figure 13. Wavy glass in the bathroom window upper sash, east elevation (center section), can be identified by looking at the distortions in the reflections (red). : Â·Ii Figure 14. Window hardware in a bay window that appears to date to the period between 1890 and 1915. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 10 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P177 IV.A. For the structural framing elements, dimensions can sometimes give an indication of age. Modern dimension lumber is marketed by nominal size (e.g., 2 x 4s or 2 x 8s), but the actual size of the lumber is smaller, due in part to surfacing of the wood. Rough- sawn lumber, or lumber that has no surface finish, often varies in width and thickness. Sawmills began to use planers ca. 1870 to size rough-sawn lumber into more uniform dimensions before shipping, and modern lumber is surfaced on all four sides. National lumber size standards did not exist until 1924 (Smith and Wood 1964). In 1900, the most common thickness for joists, rafters, and wall studs was 2 (actual) inches; modern lumber joists, rafters, and studs are typically 1 4 inches in thickness. Measurement of the accessible wall and floor framing studs shows a range of widths and thicknesses in the rough sawn lumber, which indicates the lumber was likely milled prior to the 1924 national size standard. Historical Research The Colorado OAHP Compass database, Sanborn maps, U.S.G.S. topographic maps, and historical databases were consulted in an effort to more precisely identify the original construction date and the date(s) of alteration. The 1886 Sanborn Map of Aspen does not include the block on which the Building is located; the earliest evidence of a residence located on the property is the 1890 Sanborn Map, which shows a small, single story rectangular wood frame dwelling with a stove pipe (Figure 15). --'3:*. MAIN = - .% --i...I-----==.,-- ../*Il.LI-/ -*#I -I- m, . } ~W I /' . B rrl, L..,.., 1 1 â€¢ F ' 1 1 0 %] â€ž p , ' 11~1 ' ' ' â€¢ 'Ell/ â€¢ p.'71 ' ' .1. '- QIâ‚¬ m. [2Â·Â·Â·33 - i 1 1 & :34 1 1 52 - 59 .Lt><El u 1 1. , I â‚¬05 99-1.~ =-Z 1 -t=fl 1 e r ' Pl ' 9-1 < i le,) Eft P 1 4 - 4 ...' 4- O, W .HOPKINS-- ex--.- -- AV.-- . 9 = ,-- - -I -- * * - _-- I + %/ p - Figure 15. 1890 Sanborn Map of Aspen (sheet 3) showing the Building footprint (red). This finding is inconsistent a photograph in a document published by the City of Aspen in 2000 of the Building. The photograph, assumed to have been taken ca. 1880s, shows a 1 4-story dwelling with what appears to be a "T-shaped" footprint (see Figure 18a on page 13). Additionally, the photo caption describes the Building as a vernacular structure with an "L-shaped plan" (City of Aspen: 2000). Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 11 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P178 IV.A. The next available Sanborn map from 1893 shows a 1 4-story wood frame dwelling with a larger footprint (Figure 16). W.MAIN . Ii.' Ill. fj. '1) -9 - 43. 4i - 9 23! A I Â¢ O 1 ' I /-' I I O 9Â£ k Wl 52 Â· E -9>qw IÂ»<Â£ Cr 3 T' ' 0 -12~~~~C~CO- , M 0 -1. 1, L.-Â£-TI ~g - ~ Â· 11~jff'Pld 6 14Â«lug,lut, 7Â¥ I be N & Â¢ M . 2 1 4 W I 90 6 Figure 16. 1893 Sanborn Map of Aspen (sheet 5) showing the Building footprint (red). The footprint of the Building remains consistent on the Sanborn Maps from 1893 to 1898. Sanborn maps produced at a later date are not available online but can be reviewed for possible additional information regarding alterations and/ or additions to the Building. An 1893 map by Augustus Koch shows the Building to be in a similar configuration as it is today (Figure 17). . 0 4 1 4 CiNTIR . V t 1. + 4 I . Of' .? 41Â¢ . Figure 17. 1893 map of Aspen showing the Building with a bay window and an addition to the north (Koch 1893). Anthony & Associates, Inc. 12 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P179 .4,1 - k IV.A. '. 9////.1///1 (a) UM; ,-Af#, t31**1. B.'.-li I W"11 --#- I...... 4 - i.1.1 -l. - 1.4 -Â£11*7/3 7 -1 1 N line="mu Figure 18a-18b. 134 West Hopkins Street ca 1880s (City of Aspen 2000), and the Building in 2014. A close examination of Figure 18a reveals that there is an addition located to the north of the west-facing gable. Figure 19 is a close-up of that image, with the addition circled in red. ./Ill'lli~-'I'.A--1 --4122?37/i -â€¢.;.Bl 1/ilill'll:lerililir%13.-- - I i t- illififil, .. ~.2 .Am- -ZE=Â·_ Â·.i:â€¢r E . .2* ,- L- 't. .. 4- 7 4 - :1 2 , Figure 19. A close-up of the historic photograph showing an addition to the north of the Building. SUMMARY OF THE WOOD INVESTIGATION The findings of the wood investigation can be summarized as follows: â€¢ Based on a limited number of samples removed, the existing exterior siding is redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), a tree species not native to Colorado. The presence of wire nails and the generally excellent condition of the siding indicates that it is replacement material. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 13 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P180 IV.A. â€¢ The existing exterior architectural trim and beadboard (excluding decorative elements from the porch) is a combination of western yellow pine (Pinus spp.), redwood, fir (Abies spp.), and Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii). Some of the redwood beadboard has minor weathering visible through the paint indicating that the beadboard around the bay windows may be significantly older than the existing horizontal siding. While it may be historic, since redwood is not a locally available tree species, it likely does not date to the original construction. It also is not visible in the assumed ca. 1880s historic photograph of the Building. â€¢ Samples removed from the decorative porch elements (the porch columns and the spandrel) reveal a mix of species including southern yellow pine (Pinus spp.), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), and western yellow pine. Based on the species identification results, the porch columns are likely replacement material. No determination of age can be made for the spandrel. â€¢ The window sashes that were sampled for species identification were identified as eastern white pine (Pinus strobus), a tree species that is not native to Colorado, indicating that the windows were likely manufactured on the east coast and shipped by train. The presence of wavy glass in some of the sashes and the window hardware indicate that the windows were likely installed ca. 1890-1915 but do not date to the original construction. â€¢ The wood species of the rough-sawn structural framing indicates that the material likely came from locally available sources. â€¢ Examination of the structural framing through probes and in the basement indicates that the wall studs and floor joists on the first floor are rough-sawn with varying dimensions. Although the thicknesses and widths vary, the wall studs are close to full 2-inch by 4-inch members and the floor joists are close to full 2-inch by 6-inch members (or larger) members, indicating that they were likely milled prior to the 1924 national size standard. â€¢ Examination of the structural framing on the second floor reveals a combination of rough-sawn and modern surfaced lumber (post-1964), indicating that the second level of the Building has undergone relatively recent alterations. â€¢ Square cut nails were found associated with the floor framing supporting the first floor, center section, indicating a construction date prior to 1920. â€¢ A review of the available Sanborn insurance maps indicates that a 1-story, wood- frame dwelling with a rectangular footprint existed on the lot in 1890. A historic photograph believed to have been taken ca. 1880s shows a 1 4-story wood frame dwelling with a north section or addition, but without bay windows. It seems Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 14 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P181 IV.A. likely, then, that the date of the photograph is incorrect and it was probably taken between 1890 and 1893. â€¢ Based on the visual inspection, wood species identification, and historical research, it seems likely that the Building was altered from a small single-story rectangular dwelling to a larger 14-Story structure between 1890 and 1893. The center section, while present in the historic photograph, may have been expanded prior to 1893. â€¢ Based on the 1893 map of Aspen produced by Augustus Koch for the Aspen Times, the bay window on the west elevation may have been present as early as 1893. What is now the center section appears to be present in the drawing as well. â€¢ Victorian decorative elements were subsequent alterations, based on the historic photograph, but were likely in place prior to 1915. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 15 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P182 IV.A. REFERENCES Bock, Gordon 1998 "Glass in the Past" Old House Journal. Electronic document, http:/ /www.thehomeinspector.com/Clients/OldGlass.html, accessed 10/29/14. City of Aspen 2000 City ofAspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Electronic document, http:/ /www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct==i&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved= oCCAOFiAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aspenpitkin.com%2FPortals%2F0%2F docs% 2FCity % 2FComdev %2FHPC % 2Fintroduction.pdf&ei=ae9TVMDbHdWlv AT2sIGADO&usg=AFOiCNGBeSn,O7yrdikR2xRnV9flAKM118O&sig2=Sblxge lfUsFxf5MIfOuiEg&bvm=bv.78677474,d.aWw, accessed 10/22/14. Koch, Augustus 1893 "Birds-eye View of Aspen, Pitkin Co., Colo. 1893," Aspen Times. Library of Congress electronic document http:/ /www.loc.gov/item/75694514/, accessed 10/28/14. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. 1890 Aspen, Pitkin Co., Colorado. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd., 117 Broadway, New York. Electronic document, http:/ /libcudl.colorado.edu:8180/luna/servlet/UCBOULDERCB1-21-21, accessed 10/24/14. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. 1893 Aspen, Pitkin Co., Colorado. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd., 117 Broadway, New York. Electronic document http:/ /libcudl.colorado.edu:8180/luna/servlet/UCBOULDERCB1-21-21, accessed 10/24/14. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. 1898 Aspen, Pitkin Co., Colorado. Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd., 117 Broadway, New York. Electronic document http:/ /libcudl.colorado.edu:8180/luna/servlet/UCBOULDERCB1-21-21, accessed 10/24/14. Smith, L.W., and L.W. Wood 1964 History of Yard Lumber 5ize Standards. Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, Wisconsin. Anthony & Associates, Inc. 16 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P183 IV.A. Whitehorn, W. Clark 1993 Aspen and the Railroads. Aspen Historical Society, Roaring Fork Fellowship supervised by Jody McCabe, Director of the Aspen Historical Society. Electronic document http:/ /www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct==i&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved= OCCAQFiAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.archiveaspen.org%2Fdocuments%2F AspenandRailroadssearchable.pdf&ei=b81TVI32BsawyATXnIGICw&usg=AFOi CNEs -nRthR OKilliRTbPbwf5kf\ftg&sig2=DNdsVYenVMn3kgOP1ZspuQ&bvm =bv.78677474,d.aWw, accessed 10/31/14. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 17 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P184 IV.A. APPENDIX Species Identification Table Plan Drawings P185 IV.A. Table A-1. Species Identification Results Sample Elevation Member Location Results No. 1 west wood sill crawl space access in foundation, Engelmann spruce (Picea unknown addition engelmannii) 2 west siding 1980s addition redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 3 west siding unknown addition redwood 4 west siding original structure redwood diagonal under bay window, original 5 west redwood beadboard structure vertical under bay window, original 6 west redwood beadboard structure eastern white pine (Pinus 7 west upper sash bay window, original structure strobus) 8 west lower sash window on unknown addition eastern white pine decorative above bay window, original 9 west redwood molding structure decorative above bay window, original 10 west redwood molding structure sawn above bay window, original western red cedar (Thuja 11 west shingle structure plicata) horizontal 12 west gable, original structure white fir (Abies spp.) trim horizontal north bay of bay window, 13 west white fir trim original structure gable above bay window, 14 west beadboard white fir original structure west front porch, lower lamination or southern yellow pine (Pinus 15 south column dutchman repair spp.) front porch, upper lamination or west western hemlock (Tsuga 16 south solid member above dutchman column heterophylla) repair 17 south siding original structure redwood 18 south beadboard east side of bay window redwood 19 south upper sash bay window, original structure eastern white pine 20 east siding original structure redwood 21 east siding unknown addition redwood Anthony & Associates, Inc. 19 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P186 IV.A. Sample Elevation Member Location Results No. window bathroom window, unknown 22 east redwood apron addition bathroom window, unknown 23 east upper sash eastern white pine addition vertical bathroom window, unknown 24 east window western yellow pine addition trim bedroom window, unknown 25 east lower sash eastern white pine addition vertical 26 west window unknown addition western yellow pine trim interior, fir 27 wall stud probe 1, den 1st floor interior, 28 wall stud probe 2, bedroom Engelmann spruce 1st floor interior, 29 lathe probe 2, bedroom western yellow pine 1st floor interior, 30 wall stud probe 5 western yellow pine 1st floor interior, 31 roof rafter probe 6, bedroom Engelmann spruce 2nd floor interior, 32 roof rafter probe 8, bedroom Douglas-fir 2nd floor interior, 33 floor joist old joist, accessed from basement western yellow pine 1st floor modern joist (sistered to rough- interior, 34 floor joist sawn joist), accessed from Douglas-fir 1st floor basenlent interior, 35 floor joist old joist Engelmann spruce 1st iloor interior, 36 column mechanical room western yellow pine basenlent decorative 37 south front porch western yellow pine porch trim vertical southwest corner of south 38 south western yellow pine corner trim projection, original structure Anthony & Associates, Inc. 20 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue P187 I '1 Probe 3 Probe 1 L.L.1 i- LJ 1- - 624'Aug I ~ 7 -9 1#ppooM ~ N WP .-I Probe 2 ~ - .-/ - - u NH i E E F---P'*~IL 0 Â¢ Â»EN tf ' < -4 + 9 Ir/ e lai 1 N .... DIN#& 9 d * FN, FO, LIVING I =t - F- IV .1 it +"- - 7Â£ Probe 5 I ZE Â· 4-100Â·ft r ..11 '11 4 1 .. 1*ele" 6:0 1 B : 9 i t i tl PAT 5 Loop. il b# ~ Toi* flali *PEA .- 1 1164. \Age.r 14#MUN# ,!dle. AvekeceÂ· '919,90;er Figure A-1. Plan view of the first floor showing what is believed to be the original section (green),the center section (yellow) and the 1980s addition (red) as well as probe locations. Drawing courtesy of Reid Architects. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 22 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue IV.A. 881,d 1 1 - 1 1 I. h i crl- I Probe 8 . = 0-1 it -A.be 7 .' &.1--- il-0 IL. *0~1#t,M,1 , i__-9 ~ _,7 - T + \1**e 6 L f.-1(' 11 8 4 4 13<H,pl., A~t~~~ 0 c. tiofft'/ LI--- - ta Probe 10 11 Probe 9 ~ 'i 14'I ou 14, el lot,C .1, .:,1, 413,01 QUA . i e &00 H o r b o of- 11 1% + 1 forAL FLOOR *A * 10Â¢- -*im -1494419 AVE. Aered v GO, 1 Â· 795.92 gr Figure A-2. Plan view of the second floor showing probe locations. Drawing courtesy of Reid Architects. Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 23 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue ~ (9229 " 4.11 7, 681.d 1 bill?. I' lilli I. C ,1- i._, ~ 4 _:t. iff 1 _1__ 1 ' -' c 11 l, Bt~ M up rÂ»+ 1 Vtpoot' 4 i PEN ~ //Â¢Â¢ .'Ff W It B.,1 l â‚¬ 1 k~ -'7 Â· 44 4-- 1 - h . 0,4 w DINÂ» .4 /1 PIN. ts(/, l.' v.'4~ ' 7 n./,1 - '144. M - + find,0. e ...p.--- -S#f--* ./.*.--Il- 1- f-1 â„¢n . 1 :1 11 Figure A-3. An overly of the existing first-floor plan on the 1893 Sanborn Map footprint Anthony 6 Associates, Inc. 24 Report - 134 West Hopkins Avenue GENERAL NOTES: = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; 1) REFER TO LANDSCPAE PLAN FOR PLANTING PLAN SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR 2) REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING SPACESTO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY AT VICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH PROPOSED UGHT WELLS ---1- (LIGHT WELLS SHOWN DASHED AT LOCATIONS APPROVED FOR \<INNX CONCEPTUAO ~- PROPOSED LIGHT WELL --- \ N - & t. %=22220 n======4/ -- --- -- - --- - -- - ---- 1 1 =711 1~ 1~ 11 1 1--1- ... 11 f 1 E-1. / 17~~7377 r -1 " """ I- - W. , / 11 .1 /1 1 Il 1 1[1 1 SFUGHT +0 BELOW 1 1 -1.-47/ m \ ~ 36.TAI. PICKET FENCE 1 / PICKETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH ~ SPACING BETWEEN / ~/ RE MATERIALS 8OARD f / 1 -I/4- 1 PROPOSED - / CONNECTOR , NEWHISTORIC 1 i / RESOURCE LOCATION 7 i ==a 1 PROPOSED GARAGE , ' 7-6Â· OPAQUE AREA 1 1 -----(SEPARATION FROM RESOURCE) 1 ! i ,L gf ./ 1- El 1 RE: AT C UADE SIM.IGHT DET/L . ' 0 1-1 1 1 1 SLOPM . .' ~52/1 - - 1 1 P------------------ i , ~ 5...1 ' .-p- 1 - _* pj- -1&21 r DRArN â€ž,C.,6..._.... ._ | 0 1 , *p . - 7 I - | I , 1 | SLOPES ~-~14.-0 1 1 1 L r--3 0 L MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE ~ for prirairig Reduced 5090 WEST HOPKINS, LLC. 1 HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~03R 2016.08.09 REV. #2 e = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR SPACES TO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY ATVICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH 4 1 ill HORIZONTAL WOOD RAINSCREEN SIDING 8' COURSING HAITCHES EXISTING) ~ < ' - A SHAKES (EXISTING} N / A ClÂ· *. _ - - WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING INEW) 1 \ HORIZONTAL WOOD RAINSCREEN SIDING- 1, 4- COUPING (MATCHES EXISTING) ~1 ; \ A s ly -- ?f -..... (12 3--ME+Ed ---:26-- ...11.11 +by; 4- CLA'SOARD 51DING {EXISTING) \ . h\ \ -., 1 ~ '. '- 1 1.-1-2 .4 L C . /444-1 ~1 -- -- - >%11 *- F \1~leÂ·\IiÂ«-04'FialÂ·EERÂ·29Â»9~Â·// 22#E.1..lic.. '. Â·' 1 P 111 MP .fll/' ~27 - ~Â·"F." ttft - - -th- -1Elt -r-ti \11 4 .,/ /,r 6 - r '36/ % - 36-TAI I PICKFT FFNCF SPACING BETWEEN PICKETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH RE MATERIALS BOARD ,- h - 1% - 1- al E - 1 -1 -4 4 lili////'' - ... - I- I ,#-:flÂ·' ; 8*i.. i -11#F"~lfhA ~~-itick / , - 1 -- 44 14/i - i r Â· 1 ' .L<1. !400. Il' ' 'I[! i~Il lil11411 ..111 -- ----. MAIN~NI. , L L/_-fp -2 -I 114.-2-=4%~ f --;_-~ - - ntt. .... 1 1 1 .1.111111]1_.11.L- " . Ml ili,i, I 1 ... - --- --- --- Â·1~ GABAgE LEVE. . 980' 0 ---- SANDSTONE FOUNDATION (EXISTING) BASEMENTO, . 88-0 , 9-7 - PROPOSED SHORING. / 1YPICALALL SIDES BASEMENT 02 $ 76Â·4Â· WEST ELEVATION (1ST STREET) @ 1/4" SCALE for priatirig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARC HI TEC TS~07R 2016.08.09 REV. #2 = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR SPACESTO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY ATVICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH -1'-3" (HISTORIC WALL) l Irt 21'-6" (RECONSTRUCTED) NON-HISTORIC ADDITION REMOVED \R \19 y// PROPOSED SIC'LIGHT AT RECONSTRUCTED ' --=--- kt-zy'i,34.â€žifff?WRIri?I~- ROOF 0/ Â»\ . 1 111 1111,~ 111 {111,4,11,1111111 11 L 1111111 1.11!~It~1[1 111, 1~ | 119... 3- 'allitf 32Â» 4 b "-97' 7--f;"f-1 \7*\ â„¢Kn . 449 /1 497,7 '14-1111,11111,11'lll'111111 ' "Il' 'I ind l' Il il i. i \3Â»Ulf #,/wv 694&44*,F - 4%44'444 - 1 1 1 1 lili 11 111.11'11}11'111"di 7,,*t"â€ž'44|'li,i "1 I",44,9,-9MLI 'A iN'it V ,. " 21"Liqi,~.--i~r'A< i~.3 2-* . /.Ng,il_ _11.--- ~11112,4_11.Ltilll._CU_ . -trti#6612.u=6. fi jj 2/116 ta# 17 vex.../ 'N-Al -ZA I ri 'IN h A 174 - 11 3$21 - - AFk MAIN~VEL /, - CONNECTOR 4 4 .. - PROPOSED SHORING: 2-0" / TYPICAL ALL SIDES 1 0 .-1 - _BASEMENT 01 ~ ' 88'-0" -1- BASEMEI\IT 02_~ 7620" NORTH ELEVATION (VICTORIAN) @ 1/4" SCALE for prmulag Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~088 2016.08.09 REV. #2 EXHIBI~I- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE CJ REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CO ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 154 W - Ropic, 4% , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: WED#gs/Â»-9, Autual-/D , 2% 1 * STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 4 k/9%601- #87FAC#a~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: v'' Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the ~ 1/1 r) 3( i?-7 1.,4 7 . property.subject to the development application. The names and addresses of i #13[!l K property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they :.,liA;1010: appeared,no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A i , 3 1-1(134)90 ,. A '16#5 .; f 01':i.;ind,-' e: t:.G.OFJA of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that -was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE Public Hearing: 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 10, 2016 Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Cham- bers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 134 W. Hopkins Avenue Legal Description: Lot 1, 134 and 134 1/2 W. Hopkins Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of As- pen. Colorado, PID #2735-124-19-001 Description: The applicant proposes to restore the Victorian era home on the site and to construct a basement and an addition. Final design approval is requested. Land Use Reviews: Final Major Development Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission Applicant: West Hopkins, LLC. do Jody Edwards, 101 S. Mill Street, #200, Aspen, CO, 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simonÂ®cnyofaspen.corn Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on July 28, 2016 (12266541) U W Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. AlÂ° 4 /7 ~3*iature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this ze,lay of J Ul>~ 20* by /CRELA- 0*7VAL#o /J WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 41.{ l50~Â·323 5414 12Â« -RdtteÂ»- Nota* hblic ~ KAREN REEDPATTERSON~ NOTARY PUBLIC ~ ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964002767 1 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION dkE=EZEE=fEEL!20201 â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PRnPERTYÂ· l 34 AT~% f PA 'e ki Â« , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Ak -C.~t L Â© , 20_Z~' STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County~-Pitkin ) L rjose-flt_ 6. Lcluard>, lfL (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. A Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the < - Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was-posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the2-5~Ly of 8 (Alv , 20 ~6, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A Aotograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy Of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 40-1 ~ SignatuÂ£) 1fi> The foyegoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknol*ledged before me this bw' day of ,] Al~ '104-,by <losef\ E. E-L-Ja/-(05(GE- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JANET A. HAAS~~~ a)TARY PUBLIC ST.c' -rE OF COLORADO | My commission expires: LR- 97-20 / 9 Nol ARY ID #20064027556 1 <MEW-9-~~sd27Expims December EE]U C idilt j(kflkÂ°,Â°3 Notar*Public -,- JAner -~A. 14AAs ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 p.lâ‚¬d -~1 - - - - - - ...t 1 -'1 , L .r n . , f V. - I. . , 4 7, t 1 Â» . .r 1=*.9 .# . 1Â¥ .4 41 1 0 ' - . PUBLIC NOTICE Date: Wednesday, Aug 10 2016 Time: 4 30 p.m. ,b Place: 130 S Galena St.. City Hall Council Chambers . u. st. Purpose: ~r-.'Â·, - HPC Will consider an application by . West Hopkins. LLC. c/o Jody 90==* 4*%3 Edwards. 101 S Mill Street. #200, Aspen, CO 81611 affecting this property. The apphcant requests Final design approval to restore this Victorian era home and to construct a F - basement and ati addition For more . information contact the Aspen . Â·Â· Planning Dept at 970-429-2758 + I. 1 1'1 M. ... , - Le 3 lut C[w - .:tit.... J ''- . $ 4459 1 , 'rN' , f * ~ .9Â· th PEÂ·0*33 Alk . I f. I /'.PXL:13 I .1 . I 1-A ' #Â£* 'll'. .â‚¬31, 2. 63 . 41{.47 . . , 4: 42, . ,-e. ' :3 kbki:)2; ,Â· ~ ': / 4..f .#Ss/*.93Â·~; ..,/.~~6.~*~4/~~Â· ?lf '.. 2 . Â· ''Â·.05*5/;..Â·-.4/73*9~ES/*BA' Â·2?, .. V ;Mal#~44~.Â»%fitiAL&#SL...4,Â· 2.~ : , Â· , -3317.l *r-lv~Tin, , 41-*4:itk~.~911 ...AfWI#Rgfj>~0/ VA4#<~5& Br.. ~>47_~4 ' : 't,-1,_7 7- f -'' t ely.An, 4 - ' . *1 A. / 4 1 Â¥â€¢ 4- Jt 0...' .,4. t> '. 7-j - 3. : 4 -4.4 4% I . 2:19':.' r' -= ter, ~ 01....1.= -- - . 1 t.../ E*, "&43< . *. .W Â· Â· car-"",6 Â· a. ~ 1~ 94 0-~ 4 c ".. , '%4.-' e. p.. Â·:539" ' 4 . I ; I # B'I. Â· â‚¬ 7.... . ' D ~. 1/1 , 'Sp, 4~~~z rp . 2Â·,- ' - a- - ; tÂ·, Â· , Â· r ..... I. . - . Â¥'' 1,~ -4 ~ , ,-Â£3 / , . ' 0 w , 4 ~' ~41 ~>Â· ' 4 7, f . 7 r 3 4 -brl I. 6,6. f . 4-1./.7 ;,/2-till::.-' -4 1 . 1. -I-=:P * 1,7 1. ,7, t i. P ,-0-14-1-31.92/+P#Nof- ..1 -*44 1-. A - 02 Â¥,f 11 It k I Â·. c ,37 : 73~* , r ..1 *-Â»~ -Arâ€ž 4. .~ ~ ,~31â‚¬,1 &44- 4 - + - Pii L ':rliit:/1011 & P . 50. 1.2 6 . I .... ,- * Uk*, . 1 .. .r L - P â€ž~.-4.~.445;2 A- A=~.T#*#Y1~ :~FI~~1*,~,A. .~5 4 -' '32-7-' I , . A ...V . 1. . .. .4 â€¢ . '... 3â€¢It* 49 ;'/24.43 .. r - -- .- WA 4/&143 4.9 - - f alilli 11. . 4-0 h .-/ 1 . *, 142-Of ..#44 7 J . ."f 4 4, 4 30'AuJ- > . 0 Â¢.LI672 6 ..1 0 ' *41 Â·;vA - ~~ 4 ?- f ' ,~=h .7-Â· a, - I,~44/4,â€žPÂ· 2/3 4.LA&43*31 1.7,4/24.- i.233 1 6,4 - -A. *r,2 4~-4/E vi litf :3:7 . 4.. - -- 2-2 1, . G, E . a V *FA 1 7Â£,#I,lf' k - rt*Kil 4<'*fr 2 1- ~Â¥1* Y.: 16 ....> Â£44 4--2.00:,43' 22 111: . '. 6 . I 1/ 4 u , 47, 2 . r ==99 2,7$991,0 + 96 94 0... . -' Â· p 7 : lim,~0"'Me".FleM'.KH.*78/, .1 Imm.EM......I -- 1 .. . . 1. ... .0 1 E'BAT~lilltill-limilmtiling~ .. ..... Â£7 4; -I.UlaEERfigg*mâ€¢.6,Br:rim' 1/kiynill"liIâ€¢/:1-,1*Iinrifillâ€ž//'.. -- I\Â¥ \1 -Ii'Illlllllllllrg. 6-k-Â·p. 470'kt)19..2.lift.ft,i;'.tr..,s....9.1 4,~..:Â·Â·Â·,21.11'i,~. f.,4. rfli. 1 ' lili Il ..~ ... t.: *518, ;, rl;,/f'~ A , >' I k.k '. Â·, . ., / , ~'CAL"4.: AL ,& pe 9~ <1-~<Ul/Z1/~~~(,24QVI< 22'K " Cztti 1 4Â·liA .4 f. i. 4 .. , , i.,Â· 1..,J ,.., i,441. 4 1.41 1 ... \; ' ti 2'*Â· 0'â€¢Ait' 3:43 '~j' T f''f i'.4.i' i;-~'.'-'-~ --/24Â¢.4,3, '8#.4,9 .41 111(ti:fr~;4 i. 4 , . .- 1 49...Tr35,< 14:11 ~3..r,!9 7.,$,J''i. t.:1,20 2.bf i - ..P' ..7 ' , * ~. ..:4#.r:' T. i#< ~ i'~ 15"-- Â·'Â·<t'Â· , A.: j, ,4,9 2'' \ 7,7 4% L,ff., ~~~... - Flo'bf<L p~6- 71Â« V C- 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: /74 ti)/.sT Mo DIOns , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Aug,gAT- /8 , 2014' STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) Jiner A. NA A S (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A COpy Of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) / Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By *xe certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. C.__Ua-1- Siguhture The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me thisolÂ®day of 3013 ,2016_,by .janet /1. Ne(29 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL LORI MOSCHET Mycommission expires: 10/89/~80( 9 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20074040500 18-4 Â«GU-J My Commission Expires October 29, 2019 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273512419001 on 07/25/2016 Guiv Tr< Â©0.04) Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www. pitkinmapsandmore.com 212 WEST HOPKINS LLC CWG HOLDINGS 111 LLC VAUGHAN CAPITAL PTNRS LP 212 W HOPKINS AVE 720 E DURANT #E8 PO BOX 390 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HEBRON, IL 60034 INVENTRIX LLC WARSHAW MARTIN R TRUST 1 MULLINS MARGARET ANN 227 MONROE 1058 SCOTT PL 216 W HYMAN AVE CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096 ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2585 ASPEN, CO 81611 HITE HENRY HARRIS REVOC TRUST HITE ANGELA R FAMILY TRUST TARADA LLC PO BOX 155 PO BOX 155 1934 OLD GALLOWS RD 2ND FL WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 VIENNA, VA 22182 BOWMAN AL CHISHOLM EDITH S STEVENSON KAREN H 700 HELEN ST 205 W MAIN ST 205 W MAIN ST MOUNT DORA, FL 32757 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHISHOLM HEATHER M COLES DAVID SEP A TRUST COLES PETER SEP A TRUST 205 W MAIN ST 3937 TILDEN AVE #C 20 PRESCOTT ST #41 ASPEN, CO 81611 CULVER CITY, CA 90232 MASSACHUSETTS, MA 02138 HARPER MARILYN HILL & HILL LAMPTON PATRICIA M TRUST DE TURRIS EMILIO PO BOX 7952 929 GREY FOX RD 5230 KENSINGTON HIGH ST ASPEN, CO 81612-7952 LUGOFF, SC 29078 NAPLES, FL 34105 135 HOPKINS LTD DEAN FAMILY LTD PTSHP LLP BACON SHIRLEY R 12400 HWY 71 W#350-371 590 DELLWOOD AVE 3 GROVE ISLE DR #1608 AUSTIN, TX 78738 BOULDER, CO 80301 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 GOLDSMITH HENRY JOSH HAYMAX LODGING LLC MARTIN SCOTT M 7902 BRYNMOR CT #504 101 W MAIN ST PO BOX 51 PIKESVILLE, MD 21208 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAND KATHERINE M GUNN ROBERT W FAMILY TRST GUERRA DONNA PO BOX 51 409 OCEAN AVE 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST ASPEN, CO 81612 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 DALLAS, TX 75205 MAYER KEVIN GROSVENOR DENIS FCB LLC 222 W HOPKINS AVE #2 209 CAMINO DE LA MERCED UNTI C PO BOX 6622 ASPEN, CO 81611 TAOS, NM 875716922 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615-6622 GASTON JOHN & KATHERINE GREENASPEN LLC BRENNAN SAMANTHA SCOTT 16 BRYNWOOD LN 475 HARBOR DR 408 TENNESSEE GLEN WY GREENWICH, CT 06831 KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 BRENNAN SHAWN TIFFANY SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC ROSS PAULINE 408 TENNESSEE GLEN \NY 232 W HYMAN AVE PO BOX 9969 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 JES 2002 GRANTOR TRUST SHIELD JULIET E PECHTER JEFFREYS 221 N STARWOOD DR 221 N STARWOOD DR 8135 LAKE WORTH RD STE B ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKE WORTH, FL 33467 POOL JUDY F M POOL ALEXANDRA M POOL MARKELL L 3038 ZUNi ST 1650 FILLMORE ST #1340 1650 FILLMORE ST #1340 DENVER, CO 802113829 DENVER, CO 80206 DENVER, CO 80206 KOENIG RAYMOND J TRAGGIS ELIZABETH G ANLUJO CAPITAL INC PO BOX 284 PO BOX 284 WOODBOURNE HALL POB 3162 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 ROAD TOWN TORTOLA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLA WINKELMAN WENDY L MAROON BELLS LLC JACOBSON SUZAN & JAY 108 W HYMAN AVE #8 412 E MACEWEN DR 108 W HYMAN #7 ASPEN, CO 81611 OSPREY, FL 34229 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANK EDMUND H EXEMPT TRUST FRANK VALERIE EXEMPT TRUST U/W SEIDER FAMILY TRUST 1500 SW 11 TH AVE #1504 1500 SW 11 TH AVE #1504 26642 LATIGO SHORE DR PORTLAND, OR 972013544 PORTLAND, OR 972013544 MALIBU, CA 90265 HALCYON ENTERPRISES LLC MELTON DAVID 132 WEST MAIN ST ASSOC LLC 78 LOVERS LN 135 W MAIN ST PO BOX 6565 PRINCETON, NJ 08540 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 816156565 MONARCHILLC SALTER CLAUDE C DHM FAMILY TRST 4601 COLLEGE BLVD #350 204 W HYMAN AVE #5 1820 PEACHTREE ST NW#1401 LEAWOOD, KS 66211 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 303098401 MORGAN DONALD DONATELLI ROBERT A REV TRUST DONATELLI SUSAN J REV TRUST 1820 PEACHTREE ST NW#1401 235 W HOPKINS AVE 235 W HOPKINS AVE ATLANTA, GA 30309 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GARMISCH LODGING LLC BERGHOFF KRISTIN TRUST BERGHOFF MICHAEL R TRUST 110 W MAIN ST 9112 WALNUT GROVE DR 9112 WALNUT GROVE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236 INNSBRUCK CONDO ASSOC BLUEGREEN VACATIONS UNLIMITED INC ASPEN TOWNHOUSE CONDO ASSOC 233 W MAIN ST 4960 CONFERENCE WY N#100 COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 108 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 HOTEL ASPEN CONDO ASSOC SHADOW MOUNTAIN DUPLEX CONDO ASSO SHADOW MOUNTAIN LODGE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 110 W MAIN ST W HOPKINS AVE W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KOCH TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC ASPEN SKI LODGE CONDO ASSOC NORTHSTAR OFFICE BUILDING CONDO ASS COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA W HYMAN AVE 101 W MAIN ST 122 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DIMITRIUS RALLI TRUST MOLLY ADJACENT LLC NEWKAM PATRICK C 535 FREMONT DR 605 W MAIN ST #2 211 W MAIN ST PASADENA, CA 91103 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIELINSKI JUDITH R TRUST BIELINSKI ROBERT A JR MCBEE LISA A 2121 TROWBRIDGE CT 523 WEST 34TH ST 523 W 34TH ST GLENVIEW, IL 60026 HOUSTON, TX 77018 HOUSTON, TX 77018 GARDNER EZRA JOHNSON ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC RANCE CAROL PO BOX 3655 4949 E LINCOLN DR#19 4B MOUNTAIN LODGE ASPEN, CO 81612 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 852534108 44 MT KELLETT RD THE PEAK, HONG KONG, KING LOUISE LLC CHRISTENSEN ROBERT M & CANDICE L THOMAS GAIL HICKS REV TRUST PO BOX 1467 1240 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 1242 HAMPTON RDG BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEDFORD, VA 24523-1508 TYROLEAN LODGE LLC ROMANUS RAYMOND TACO 2 LLC 200 W MAIN ST 19 RIVER OAKS DR 220 W MAIN ST #202 ASPEN,CO 81611 CALUMET CITY, IL 60409 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPERAW ENDEAVORS LLC WEST MAIN VENTURES ASPEN TOWNHOMES 3 LLC PO BOX 6575 PO BOX 11977 1796 E SOPRIS CREEK RD SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASALT, CO 81621 TARPLEY GERALD W JR & SUSAN JLR QPRT TRUST STRAUCH ELAINE B 2255 PLACID \NY 355 MARQUESA DR 4327 S YOSEMITE CT ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORI1 ASPEN MAIN OFFICE CONDO ASSOC PO BOX 1248 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 220 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AJAX VIEW COMMERCIAL/NORTH STAR OFF WEST SIDE CONDO ASSOC GARET CONDO ASSOC 132 W MAIN ST 234 W HOPKINS AVE 222 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ZITELLI MARK C ASPEN UPTOWN LLC COTTONWOODS CONDO ASSOC 211 S FIRST ST PO BOX 348 COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 SNYDER, OK 73566 124 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 44 1 LiC. = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR SPACES TO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY AT VICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH ---1'-3' (HISTORIC WALL) 21'-6" (RECONSTRUCTED) ~ / / NON-HISTORIC ADDITION REMOVED PROPOSED SKYLIGHT AN,f /4 ~~CONSTRUCTED *94â€ž49Â»\ x4Afj-b',0/- 20' --N~~,~1 11 "Un=.,A= 14\\\\t, 1\11/7 f 622*134 \'-3*:i**ept 446*45'Ad/f 'll, 1'. / 1 W Â£11*,45**~lk/2,4'*a .&7,0 /,2 Â·'Â·_ , ,-'i~ii-~34?4.4 .2 -1 -2 -: Le. .1 .Â»\Fill,1 11 9 -2- -24.-\*411.1,10,39 1.Mlet:ZE- ~21 L /01* r MAIN LEVEL ,, 100-0. CONNECTOR , - PROPOSED SHORING Z.(r TYPICAL ALL SIDES , ic _L ------ JASEMENT 01--', 1 88'-0Â· 1 BASEMENT(12 76-0.. NORTH ELEVATION (VICTORIAN) @ 1/4" SCALE Reduced 50% for printing WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~088 2016.08.09 REV. #2 = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR SPACES TO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY ATVICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH y 1; , HC.WOMr'.20.RAÂ»U,C.~41'll r=SI.G-,ra,F~i=-1- -X-; 1 , Â· - 0- S â€žAES'/ST'llc \11,1 i. b ....v,~,Mzw, wsco~,Non~i -- , . .,r'/ 1 4,7'XI 0 1 1 1 WJ.AÂ© -/1 WU,~1 p!~i i h i i: , f '' 1 '!.0 y..& =fy=-0 1 .\ , i tv, Â£777-1 i \-1 \ '1 'iQ Ji - 1 f - 2,1. ./ lili 1 i_l 4 -4 419 1 ~3x k vlk- '41 ,-: b :7 I ..1.1.- .ycl r* 1 #Â·$1Â·9:Â»~Â·)-1,~i,h i 1 L ,~, 1 -1 J ' _____ -1... -* -- : 01'm,11,1111 i .i' Il. 4 w I ..TI. EFÂ¢.1/Dâ€¢-160,1 'ye r. eA.ENeN / I /0 .Â·I - 0*CMâ‚¬Â£0 ,Â«3.,4 ./04 e I X. _ _ _ i _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RAIMF.1 , WEST ELEVATION (1ST STREET) @ 1/4" SCALE Reduced 5u% for printing WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. C CY AR C HI T E CTS~07R 2016.08.09 REV. #2 JUL 2 0 2016 DR ING INDEX: 01- COVERSHEET 02- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 03- MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 04- UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN 05- BASEMENT LEVEL 01 PLAN ' BASEMENT LEVEL 02 PLAN â€¢,1!r'. 1,/.9 06- SOUTH ELEVATION (WEST HOPKINS AVE.) 07- WEST ELEVATION (1 ST ST.) 08- NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) 09- EAST ELEVATION 10- 1ST STREET PERSPECTIVE 11- EXTERIOR MATERIALS 12- EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN LO-01- LANDSCAPE PLAN 13- NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT MAP 14- NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PHOTOGRAPHS 15- TERRACE SKYLIGHT DETAIL 07\ necEIVED 'FE-- 75.-1 \ .0,042*J<A L(~1 L 1 CITY OF A :SPEN 220/l~ 4 7.afÂ£4911 fU-7 eff; ' .1/ /3 /11 ., U...':4'.3 47 - ~ X / i / / 77/ 1 1, ||||||~ ~ ~~~~ ~4,~L+L-LULLLII IllIlllIN 304-'=-10954â‚¬395:792*:92'~~54579",41~/ ll] lili 111 1 11 11TITTM-H" 6411 1 1.1 "11 1 Â·t j ' ;faS t \y:*1 .ta n y - LILLI \/ - Of 44 Mt III =fi f_(19- - - 9 - Ieee .3=4 Wht i ZI~ J - 1 '1- 73â€¢-E .4 1 -21-2Â»:- ly- L- 1 - ~ 1!(3 -- 1 =22 ! . i: r- - ~ ./-W-t -Iiff 6 ----i--- - Â£3342---4.".1.|.".9~,1.- illail ji- -33 = 79= z -13 â€¢0. -0= .ilii* 6. . 1,-i-'~'------= -~1 1 m==EME[W-[1 ' --Â·Â·d,Illil limitÂ®#M U 11'AA lili Corner hrspective from 1st and West Hopkins for prititing Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~01 14 GENERAL NOTES: 1) REFER TO LANDSCPAE PLAN FOR PLANTING PLAN 2) REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING NEIGHBORÂ·S HOUSE | 3-9 3'-176 1 \F 1---,1 f 1 1 4 ' ~~ 4 . 41 .IN ' f 63.04 RE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: \~ 1 1/ TREE PROTECTION N.. \~J NEIGHBORÂ·S ' ~~- 1%A Ntf LIGHT WELL fr-9.1 CONCRETE APRON- RE LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 EXISTING HISTOBC RESOURCE LOCATION (SHOWN HATCHED) 1 6'-10" ~~-3Â¥'' f Â· - PROPOSEDLIGHTWELLS EXISTING ~ e 49 N , 9 4 117 121 - 24 .3 1 1 -tx r- PROPOSED LIGHT WELL<-7-]Rek ~74 , . . . 4 5 <1.21 ft' A 2 1 Y Â»Wif 0 il; 1 4 - SÂ«LIGHTTO BELO - - 92- 'f 1 1\: i ' ly--'. 7 1 1 26 8 718- 4-1 ====9 ~- 6 ~3 r 16'.10Â· 4+ Ir i EXISTING 1 -- SLOPES E L-- h k-< PROPOSED - CONNECTOR ~ EXISTING 1 3 17/49 41.Z~~. 2// PROPOSED ADDITION 1 - CONCRETE WALKWAY / PROPOSED HISTORIC PROPOSED 2-CAR GARAGE - RESOURCE LOCATION S RE LANDSCAPE PLAN --r- 12'.1 -f.WI g 1 1 1 1 & PORCH l- f 1 0 FRONT ENTRY ~ - PROPOSED PATIO W/ SKYLIGHTS TO BELOW 9 LINE OF P~POSED ADDITION ABOVE 7 - __4 -11 -*-4 RE MAIN LEVEL PLAN O 1 AND DETAILS . 10 0 FL-L-- F-----=1 RE PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~ -21 -Â»Â»11...A ~TREE REMOVALAND MITIGATION--SEE / 9 -,RE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION un L 1 SET BACK L INE 1Â«.4.7 I 1 V - Â«f~~n--1 .. 2.~ 7 4*,4 -4/TREE REMOVAL AND MI TIGAT ION 6 0 6 .V 4 g r . PROPERTY LINE e m RE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4 TREE REMOVAL AND MITIGATION kip>7 Â«94 44 RE LANDSCAPE PLAN 939 - STEPPING STONES- ' /7/1 1 -.4.1Vaw,4- -RE. PROJECT DESCRIPTION *.=TREE PPOTECTION -RE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: <TREE PROTECTION It ./ Â»r \\\ 7/r--7. 32. 1ST STREET 49 C- U--)JU)\ U /// 9==h--2557 u _ . ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE ' for priritir'wl Reduced 5090 WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~02 &7 BANBAV SNINJO GENERAL NOTES: 1) REFER TO LANDSCPAE PLAN FOR PLANTING PLAN 2) REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHT WELLS (LIGHT WELLS SHOWN DASHED AT LOCATIONS APPROVED FOR CONCEPTUAU g- PROPOSED LIGHT WELL -----------1 Gr--Iizal G===bq-/ 11 11 11 p 1,1 1' 8 -\ -' 1 6-1 11 11 :1 . 1 11 11 1 11 11 11 / 11 11 P 11 lili 1 1 1 1.4 1,1 -----1 - 1---4 1 3-11 -9 -4 4!111 12 SKILIG HT TO BELOW . le=**** **%09:40 - 36-TAL.L PICKET FENCE lu =g PICKETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH -JILLEÂ»- SPACING BETWEEN 4 RE MATERIALS BOARD 1 0~~Swit. 1 1 UFF,Tre,2 PROPOSED - CONNECTOR ~~ NEW HISTORIC RESOURCE LOCATION . / 1 U C PROPOSED GARAGE , - ~ 1 1 ft f ~-- RE: AT C RADE Sâ‚¬(LIGHT DETAIL m I SLOPES / /109>A 7- --2-------- --------- 7-*-1 -- 1- DRAINâ€ž._ r 7 1 0 L_ ________________________________-__--26-__--___ 1__--2-------- r---P- -I--- ------ -I- 5- 0 11 / 1.0 9.1 .S...,*--A SLOPES MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE for prititirig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~03 e - - 2331. 44;il-It.'-r-2,111111 1 - 1 1 - 0,- 11 1 1 EDGEOFCONNECTORROOF 3%329\ r--- Â· 1 1 29â‚¬Gl L OPEN 1 1 EÂ«Â» 1 1 1 1 1 [1< FLUSH-MOUNTED 23===E==1= SKYLIGHT RE: =ZE=ZE=21- TO 39 1 MATERIALS -24*&*7 BELOW 1 4/ *3 i 1 1 ~DE=Uy 1 -&1 - - 1 OPEN ~ ~< LoFT t.~NE~tir,;< A~,6~|Â£,7-râ‚¬**499 1 Z===4 1*lifEng,jrny-At*4* 1 3=2 BELOW LAÂ¥ 1% J-- 1 1 PROPOSEDADDITION I~ EDGEOFCONNECTORRO 1 1 -- 1 fl - 1 1 1-li ~~~ Illir mill _11Â»1 1 1 11 17'- 9 (CONNECTOR) 1 1- la- 1 1 1 1 ==--==- / AilltiwiÂ»+494Â·,1~ 1 "-42'â€¢ L\\ -77 _2Â· -IL_, - _Â·-'44*#// - *far ' I- -6'-1" l.. 414.1-1.. Il 1,~IR Â£-iâ€ž Mii di ,â€ž2~1 XO \ 1 1____, arr~24.1 1 r I illilli Il ~I I -I -9%- Â·,i, Lb - 8%*91~~t iML~-~,Ii~iw~jlf~--------- 1 11 lili lillip' 1 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE GLASS ROOF - ~-- - 1 F-- 51 1 I 1 \-, I 1 - Â£ PROP. PROP. 1 J PROP. Il -~ 1 1 / SKY | (No Slope) 1|SKY |1 -- - UGHT 11 LGHT 'i L==_-J - 1 1 FLUSH-MOUNTED I &1 - 1 RE MATERIALS - - (No Slope) SKYUGHT (TYP ) 3114 1 1 \\ PROPOSED SKYLIGHT 1 Â« 1 4. 1 - [No Slope] I l 1 PROPOSED . 4 DECK ~ (No Slope) ~ *UGHT 1 (No Slope -- - SEAMLESS LOW IRON 1 / GLASS RAILING | 6 5 / 12Â· / 51/4Â·/12Â· 9 - 1 91 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1/ 14"/12" 14 /12 I -- - 1 1 1 1 ROOF PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE for pririfirig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~04 JJ e PROPOSED LIGHT WELLS (LIGHTWELLS SHOWN DASHED AT LOCATIONS APPROVED FOR CONCEPTUAL) - PROPOSED LIGHT WELL 1 .- -- - - 17=======71 .i $+ ' '- -lill 14 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 '1 11 11 4 11 11 11 - 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 1 ---46~ lilli 1 *::Â»i, 11 1 1/1 !11 -- 1 iiI ~11111 ,..----U- - - -JL.,-.~..i ...1-- -+L _ 11. _ _ 122 --_--1 02 --111 '11 1-____ 1 1 D-- - 1 - 1 / 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 Ii==i I 1 I 1 BASEMENT LEVEL 01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 =1 1 1 _________----------------------461W#-------- 1 1 1 14**4 2**E 1 1, . 1 11 1 I BASEMENT LEVEL 01 PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE PROPOSED LIGHTWELLS - (LIGHT WELLS SHOWN DASHED AT LOCATIONS APPROVED FOR CONCEPTUAU - -1-- " rp=======/ X 11 11 4 11 1 PROPOSED LIGHT WELL -- -1 11 11 1 17[/, 1 -- 1. 1-' 1 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 L 1 P - - ----1 1 014 1 1 1 ..2 / 1 1 1 - BASEMENT LEVEL 02 1 1 l.' 1 1 1 1 1 1 3=2:tatÂ«f. 11 1-3 | 1 1 -l.. 1 1 1 BASEMENT LEVEL 02 PLAN @ 1/4" SCALE for pririting Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~05 e f 21 Y ..'' h /\\ 6 .1 ~*1\ 11 Amt) 4/l/*' 8" SHAKES (EXISTING) CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING (NEW) 7%29Â£92511.1, --,1-1 r.lu~4--U- _11/17-A ..I#ERZE U.r Z r.iliy / 149* 4'Â· CLAPBOARD SIDING . (EXISTING) SANDSTONE FOUNDATION (EXISTING) 3 w\\ f m lill ; , UPPER LEVEL / 1\ v : 'i -'A ,~t ~'.7 4.1441- -0-t- -il N - 36'Â·TALL PICKET FENCE -~ ~~%~ ~ SPACING BETWEEN PICKETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH / \14 RE MATERIALS BOARD \ 12 = Ill"E = 4%34. = -1 EE -== i *44 / 0 \.1,~ (FOREGROUND HIDDEN FOR - - - - - DRAWING CLARIm lili - = Al 12 -E 1- 1 1 1, 1 t.- l. 0 : --1 - -_-_M.Al>l~Y:L. L.C===- 1 ,~-.- '15 - . f - \ GARAGE LEVEL . 98'-0- ' 1 BASEMENTal . 88'-0'Â· ' 1 2-0Â· 1 tic PROPOSED SHORING 1 1 TYPICAL ALL SIDES \1 1 1 ' 1\ 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I BASEMENT 02 ~ 76Â·-0 SOUTH ELEVATION (W HOPKINS AVE.) @ 1/4" SCALE for Pr intmg Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~06 f HORIZONTAL WOOD RAINSCREEN SIDING 8" COURSING (MATCHES EXISTING) 8 SHAKES (EXISTING) 19<i WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING b I ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS * (NEW) V-- 3 /. 1 4.~:'~*I~ 1- \ / / HORIZONTAL WOOD RAINSCREEN SIDING- LI-Il TI 7% TUI~IJ 1-~v - :I *T-UT-K- 227---4-1- J -- 4- COURSING (MATCHES EXISTING) ' UL ...1 -- . r -I .-rÂ· I. 4' CLAPBOARD SIDING . i ' 4 -i #ir- 77'81 (EXISTING) â€¢ â€ž 1 Â»=.trtne 14=- L 1 -1.1 11 1 --Â·-frmr m 1 1 / 11 1! 1, \:i It - =.693& --m-, j; 1, ./ - A lid , Â· f r - -----1 1 1 -- 6 11 ~1 1 44Â« 4-1_L+ 4 ''Â· 4111~ 1 :' ~' / UPPER LEVEL h W // Â·' ' .,4 - ~ _~ -- - - t:. ----------'6.6Â·- 01 r 4 ~SPACING BETWEEN 21/71 -- 36'Â·TALL PICKET FENCE. PICKETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH - Â·Â· RE MATERIALS BOARD =Un O -4 r.i.t I f -2225 1 ---=341 T.Za- 1 - r--7 - ----- - 100'-0" ' MAIN LEVEL . ..3.11 1 - n 11# 4 1 1 7- 2 1 1 \GARAGE LEVEL L 98Â·-0 ' 11 11 SANDSTONE FOUNDATION (EXISTING) - - - --------- ----- -1-- -1- ---------------- --- ------------- ----------- ----------------------- ---------------- -----_-----L_-L___________-______ _54%EMENTR.L.. 1 1 88Â·-0Â· ' 1 1 1 1 - PROPOSED SHORING; 1 1 TYPICALALL SIDES i IA 11 11 ------------ 1 ---L----------------------------------------------------- ------ ---------------------L-----------------BASEMENTE A L--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 78,-ty. r WEST_ELEVATION_(liLSIREE-IL@_1/4"SCALE for printirig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~07 ~ ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS 1 1 HORIZONTALWOOD RAIN-SCREEN SIDING- 8 COURSING (MATCHES EXISTINGO i l/ \1/ \v r /1 , HORIZONTAL WOOD RAIN-SCREEN SIDING- 4Â·' COURSING (MATCHES EXISTING) . 4 1/ f / W '10 1 T .1 4 --- / vt A,1,='i ~ 143:i' 14-1 r 1 \UFF #9 1 N'' /4,\1 \1 F/= A \A j Li, 4, 1 r - 11. 9/ 7 3 il 3 ' 1 4 \\ - f %11 UPPER LP/KLL 1 I 0 110* 014 mt#/ h 1 , 174 44 - - It 1\ /4 49\ -U -- 1 1 Â«gl -U / /17 MAIN LEVEL , locÂ·-0 ' 6' 11"1 - -- -GARAGE LEVEL ~ 41=aÂ«.tÂ» ._=u_=1=1Â»4~ .- 4 I Â«i 98'-0 -211.11 :El 11*I i,Â«121 1 Â·=IN== 11-; *2, i=I i lili lili In, r 1 1-1 -- = =111-!IF 1 1 1-1 El 119 Ell lei I Ell lei 1 Elle Â· leillei leil lei I lei 119' - T#x 1 - p - 47=11 -1 _ ' T--l ~ GARAGE DOOR 1114 -c' MEI I ENIEil-IliEN 'EN'ENIE I I.HIEI I lei ' 1 -bÂ·.. = m.r ....= z _ u Eli 19,11*111*11 leil lEilluli lEi 12, IE' E~ IEliEI 2 1 1. i. El ' E-{ Â· Â·- -Â· =I f=TPI'l El I !-1 I IEI i li =i 20Â« E' i. i.-r. E Â·Â·-, GLASS FACADE PANEL =111=1 11 I 1Â«11 'El.222..74-42{112 12' IÂ« ' lei I 1 I l-t I 1-1: =11 -11 =h, E- 3 -" u--111=111=11 1-111-1 l l-11 1-111Â« ' 'r, .-2 LE ' =111= i =1=19=41--=31| E-i. --- 3-----E___23~-_- 6/~s~Â®~~[F-4 321 I 1=1 1 l=~ 1121 I 1331 I lEi I lal I lei I lÂ« 4' I bl ~ 1 I lei 112~ ~ la~Â«..~ --_1212 - 113Ei 11-| I i-H 1-H |-1 1 IE| 1 IE| I lei i lial i ~= i-1 1 Ill i E- . -3,-21;Â£7 IALM IZ,RoposED maiNGE| 1 |-1 119 1 |E l IE| I |Ed--d.23& El 119 Eli lal 11211 Ial 11-11191 I lEi I lei I El El 11-: a i Al i lal 112'Â°TALL,EL 112111-111-11121112111-JIE | | Ii- ' E 1 I-| I TE| i l-| I I-I | i-I l IE.I | IEN -| i |EN E| l ib.- ' -- ' IE2f-1-l i l-' : = 9I l l-l I Eal I IELEUJ-I l l-I l l- I 5 E = 'El Â» NEI 1 1911 121 1 Ill I lEi 11*LECLI_EN .--ELENJEL--2Â«191 1 1*I :al : -1 :-I I lel I '- a 11 Â· =1 1 =Ell 1-111-1 1 1-1 1191 I lili 1-1 liLi I JEI PEl I E E__U.Z.. WEI EI 1 IEI 1 ~EN 1 FEI I 1-l ~ |E| | |EN |E| | |E E|IiÂ· Â·Â·Â· ~_11-EI I lEi l IEI I IEI I IEI I lei HEI lei I Ill l IEF I :El 1 1 1311 l ia l El ' |El l E l El 1 121 1 El l El l lEi I lei 1 111 1 Ill I '- - -Â£, F|El I lei I Ill I |El i lEi lEi l lEi I lEi lEi I lei 1 lei:E =Hi=111=111 1=1 11=1 11=111=111=1 1 1=111=111=111=111= ..3-0 ; =| 1=111=1 | 1=41=111=111=111=1 N=HI=111=IIi= BASEMENT 02. 111-2111- ' - 2 -- -H~--3 1 P-1112 ~ 121 ~ 1221 ~ 123 : i.~Ii ..... 1 lei I leill-linl 12111.11 IEI I IEI I IEI 11.11121 i 76Â·-0- ' hJE#flatdaillati~--- _1911-121Â«191*1]1121Â«J_iallf!.17]121Â« NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) @ 1/4" SCALE for printifig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~08 ..... GLASS FACADE PANEL HORIZONTAL WOOD RAIN-SCREEN SIDING 8 COURSING (MATCH EXISTING) CEDARSHUJGLE ROSE-;NG (NEW) 4Â· CLAPBOARD SIDING ~ / 1 1\ 1 I ' 1 - / \ /1 1 L 9 ~ HORIZONTAL WOOD RAIN-SCREEN SIDING- i \ i 11 -= 4 1 ,-- ~ <<~ 41' COURSING (MATCHES EXISTING :1 I 11 -LE--2-177-1-7-IT-,7-HT-fr----I. 1 36-TALL PICKET FENCE [ , J:-r-r IT :!;19 (Pil -4, C- . ~'-Â·.. E?7:Bi~~~ i ~-------- SPACING BETAEEN , Pia<ETS 1/2 OF PICKET WIDTH \ / e RE MATERIALS BOARD ,-rp~I --rff - '1 --1''-~f;~~~~3 3L ~ ~- -- i. Â· . in miliniirinii,inlinniinrilinnii-n. ' -- 4 , *igav.~-3Â»nurÂ·rg~*Rittrmâ‚¬ffA-Â·1 - I -hu*,uqL,â€ž, ' T- CE'Â¥lioqI~W#LWJIJO;WIJOICUI!UIFFEIJIP= N y / 1. 11. 11 -------- ------- -----ia _ 213~19%L .., h : N 4:1 j - ,_4 -JJ /1 P - 1 0/ + 111] 1 --i - , re :5 4 4-lit 1 )1)11-11'E'' ' 'I~: 14 -1 V.A . 1 Â» : h Â« 1 ~1 - 1 7%31- <.. MAIN LEVEL_, ----------- *f~ a. 9 _Â©22ilijiffEL-----<----E:,lillillitiFF773Â© --7-:-6,; ---i-- --------------- 100'Â·0" ' , 4- k I ~ I ,GARAGE LEVEL ~ 98'.0 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 14 1 1 1 88-0" p 1 1 PROPOSED SHORING, li TYPICAL ALL SIDES ~ 1 1 1 71 1; 1 1 1 1 1 1 76Â·-0 EAST-ELEMATION_@1/4"SCALE for prifititig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~09 \ j \ Â£\ 1 \ 4 l .. 1 4,/// \ / ili 1 N ., :,if i. 11 -Jul-- I-- 1 1 .--mill 1- 1 11 j ..11 1 1 11 111.0 + \ iÂ« 1 4 - ,-7.- 1 ' \ \ ,1 4 , ~1 , ~~ ~i 11-1[111LILI i - '' 12 It 1.' T-rE-'- Â·~ i , 4Ti I '11111; 1 ~1 11 1 11 . I 1 HI L.Iti il .1 ' ; - -.,~i --9737'Ti' ' 1 \\1 ---~' CLI I'll . 13 ... , a_.~.1-L _ i --- 11 1 1 N : 11 3 it\ 4 \ I , . /''. , \ -/ - -1 'P> 1- r *f 1 ' -'' 11113 ...4 -,052~ 04-4- 1 --1 - 6 - / 1 Fill 1 -- ,-11 r / M.- --]FT-Â«~, . -3 - / ~'-*iii 1 1 1 - n - 1 1 . 1 11 A\ i. 4 11- t IN \% -I- 3 1 - I 1 Ill -b, 1 :'v â‚¬ 11-U" <1Â«Â·{9 Â· ' - 11 *. --1 - 2----- --- .. 4 -- / 1 1 1 1 .~Â¥2 .. ,0 - 1 -- 11 1 1 I -21 , h liLSIREELPERSPECTIVE-_NIS for pririting Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~ 10 GENERAL NOTES: - 1) RE: ELEVATIONS FOR MATERIAL LOCATIONS 2) PHYSICAL SAMPLES AND MOCK-UPS TO BE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW AT HPC MEETiNG a. 4., .r.fl ~ 09.../4*.1 1 I. 1. 9. I -3Â©4 -.71'<j -4- .R 5.. :* 4 4 ..,77. , - r - . 5 N 0 . 1 Io,lial .,1 3 ' I Â· .,it â‚¬*f r ' ' , 1 4 '1,11= liT:EZINMR ' '0 - . , ~7....0, 1 1 1 14 6 $ + - - 22.-r.A.-ae'lt - pi iÂ«argza- r Cli~.~ - 4 , 9 -*-4,4*-PEELA ' r#: 4 .i~ - iL.~ - r - ~~_ _..../-22-Â·*<27't-3 - I Jg~*.7~.I-' . I 4 r -96 . #4~ ... ' 1. U % 1 .--1, â€ž -9.RteW./=- 5 4 3 MATERIAL LEGEND: 01- SANDSTONE FOUNDATION (EXISTING) PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.D IN HPC RESOLUTION #10, SERIES OF 2015 02- PICKET FENCE (PROPOSED TO MATCH PHOTO) 02-# ~Nu54&,Ut.32"h>* " ' ~ :wi,Â§9~5,50-4 PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.A IN HPC . --/.1 RESOLUTION #10, SERIES OF 2015. IW--1.21-- -.--- -43 04- H,ORCNEAL NN-LEEZsl[ME1 r,1'tai --7* U. /1424 1-= (4" & 8" COURSING MATCHES EXISTING) -Jaur p. . ,. 44 .$Â£14: 4. 05- FLUSH MOUNTED SKYLIGHT r.0(*4.9 06- CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING -44 -- 42 7' 3 IlIlli.lIl1it1t Imillm 07- GLASS FACADE PANEL (NON-REFLECTIVE / MATTE) 08- ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS I E. - Iiiijiiiiiiiliiliklfiii3iiiiiii#I*IiIiliI 0JAO.UUI & 11 1.tittillil#UU-U Ull~Ul 09- GARAGE DOOR 1 2~ EXTERIOR MATERIALS- NTS for prifitirig Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~11 -1...1~ 1=immizle'll'UNW2.......................26............/-././../.9/Tim/".lm"m~Im'.Ill'll'll'll'll'll Gem Â· 12VMR-16 Products Information p ~ the powerol n LITESTICKÂ® 7857 7859 7875 Praducts Applicat# 1*abon Searchrools Partner5 Applications PROJECTÂ· Se~. .loducâ€¢ â€¢ Sea~ch byproduc[# e.,555.4 .... Backlo C'illng Luminaires TYPE: Backlo Receised i ...... . t.'.... -11-21 Lurninaire, CATALOG . 1..... . 1. r...... --m-- N M. .. -....3,- I '.......... Su~ac, c,illng Â· cylindfial do~nlighl SOURCE: 1 I 'll. N -Â» . n,Â·15*ar.... LUMINAIRE INFORMATION J.]|1 /10Al,325CCM R~ce~~ed wall wilelded ligh~ =curce I ./13~...... APPLICATION: VO~TAGE PHO7OMETRICS De,Igned 1/ do- 1,ghtm a-rnl canop,~ pa~aeâ€ži ./ NOTES. . .'47.,15 - 4 . 4.1....... . cent lum,nal f e for Re.0=1, Comm~clal. Al,10,1 or Sped,Ilm / local-sle@tâ€žnoh,hou~ulas~nmeu,~Ili~ldin~bubon Des,r-d . I-MI,ng he,ghi' 10. Intenor ~nd e*t-of *nor -d ex:eno~ kgtiom 18-Irig iymrâ„¢,mc,1 . 1...... . L.=UX..... D,~fibul,ncha~ d~tN,Itio~ Â· rwru* be- 0.-de be- CATALOG NUMBER LOGIC . 1,111-'r . I . l.-1.....1. Rece,-1-/..ly.le~eall....ce D,gl Hosp~al-ments â€ž-i.....14 m.11,r-.-1,~el CEItING CUT OUT ho,-g .Wed gl- /,d m...urn r~11~Â¤ ,.12V MATERIalS .wmâ€žurn.......le 12â€ž U.i Trim Diecastalum,mt,â„¢al Toision~pring*unung ./.1./.7 1 1\ i 90Â»' 1 SeÂ®Wavadalprodu, p~g.lect,icalinlormaiion See ~~dlval'I p~oduct page ler LED *",r an,0 cok], lernpafll.Ie 0 18 - lo - 039 - SAP - A18 - 65 U.~a W.- 7~57 Chiome con/ D.Â¥:damp lot*n U L Imlod ,ul-le for wellÂ¢*,nonm *ar USÂ¥1111GS: .1\. 1,14 ,lk,malc. u =Truâ€¢G 78~9 Wh4$0 co. ,â‚¬).- '.19 /6, / 1 F~o~,c#.ade*.-- ZZ./- .Â«,3$,mul I ..W~11 ../=. 7075 Ve~,cal groove black balfie Proll/0'das,1.5 5 Bra~5 | ~ 1 al No 1~826, =..... 08 -- IC.....no./. Ineels Walful.on la,2 B,Mll/ 50WMRIBGU53Â«r F,- S-d.wd BEGA color B $ 5"less Steel / /'44,1..12 I ..1111% iBEW union made 00., 10ni I .... 1- Â· 'm.'ll../.' LAM~InM Includedlwhenosing IA iamps 3~Max iequâ€¢emer,tind ASâ„¢E283 11,11.0 25Â·~ P,01-Â®on das IP65 - .5OW /,/RiE G.3 588%.0./ --= . ..'.m- -9 Seri25 - wn .=D . (.T.â€ž191 F~,ah St=,d-dBEGAczokn LT Â· Utestkk'Pathmght â€¢ Maximum ceiling /,ckness 1 inch rn ANSFORMER 11OTES .A L~ voliage s~lid st~te eleclionic .Ill ........nal.........61 ....... Stem Le,it:01, .- ../ Nole Due,mÂ¤,me,/knmeirr,01Â¢hsomm Consuk faclor,lur omer ~elling ~0*ons r.c.ir.,r.0.24" ~en,~-*.-.4.9101/,i,ped,14**1* . 1..,W.Â» 1. --f..1 {Spec' 1/Inche~ 'Immersmaycausetiansiormerhum Check â€¢Mai,nurnZIerlsom~onslweA] to:wl r-230, a MOn + 14* Dlf 1 250Â·l â€¢,Ih . I. 1/ 1'.- .*Il./121./.,1,-*00.-*. mul '..D- .,-.--- wilh dimm~r m~nulaclu~ef Â¢0. s..I. â€¢ Use 325CCR Irimless ,08pter,or a,â‚¬223' fource . - -e-W- SurfacacnilingÂ·narrowbaam LED Â· '~'Technology,wtthhneg'ID,1- *60â€¢iâ€¢,2-k-- . - ADJuSâ„¢E. ....comp..-I'll./. 'Â·'Â·~ ' Click p.nduCt # k, de'll Lamp 021*nld..#-1- 171Â·Arm/- Da.hm- Fat- ...........IN-6//r.poll' A.'orru,r 360 *Liontal and I ved,I. 6 5W LED TempÂ·C A B "/ 31Â¢m *,1"5'/*9**/ N ////0 m /*4* 7 "/11* 11Â» - - 1--101. 2272LED EXPRESS 5 7/ 578 41/ c LED Typc Il,Ma-~able consul:!aclol t,Mhr,-I,~mag,~M-*rm 1-00-uâ€¢Idâ€¢,m 0 ... 2372LED EXPRESS 109WLED 71/ 6402LED.m m.%% 65WLED 3- 51/8 e39 3WLED/NK -41 3WLED/41( .htd-1- cMea~am . 1*HuÂ» HOUSING INFORMAnON 6503LED Â£(PRESS 31.LED 28' 7112 5 ,40 Â· 3WLED>/. .5 3WLED/Ambe. Ne* Construc:,on 1/.Tignt qemol -ransto,meÂ· Reno' Aetrofit 2277P -25'3242.Â¥ CF ... 97,8 9 7/8 5/ .15'Mil .20W.GUMM. 10' 5 57/ Finith 6-11 11,1#.Mall-/1-0,~0]pen, TE,dD,T./ . ".. 1- 1.0... 3251!IC ]251C 32~M ~RT/135Wma*J 325KT 5D 2278â€¢H - 1}39WT6G1ZMH 97/8 9 7/ 5 I 551â„¢H (1)39W .4-/5/. 1/ 6 71/ 11.,1,M./**Au,Ao:n,0,Â»T.-11*1 /-/.- '. A],-num I /-$ ..... ...... Pâ„¢mium Fini. Wt{. 227-H - (1170â€¢rl;Glzâ€¢H 6 5/8 581*H (1'70/ TGMM. 12~ =FOr. ]9641111. =Ft#.4. Comk> , I 1./.Â·1/ ./1./.-0....'........., 7/8 7/ ./*Â¥d- Ccat Coll/ A- Antkâ„¢- 11,a. Powd. CmG Cac- Mount- Gr,Nte -G Rod,r Mountaln G,~1:e egâ€¢ hÂ»e: r~ *aitu,=9 Â·%& 6,Â£11. *#UE} ~!,0â€ž ...... 55211.H .15OW.Glm' r .*.** - 1,#<AFE#- +=CI3=M .Cop..1.EGAUS.TE.1.....led 0 /9/0/0 /,O,//*10,4/ IN "088/ / 9/,"1ra* 5.,a,1-n /0.2 ./ 02Â¥' - POL AAIG Aleutd-t Mo-t- Gr-- CN Ca . SDS ./I'lle'*'ll.IR Surhie-lingÂ·wide.am â„¢ W Black BLP BLW M.que AOW An,4..#le -Cream -G Sler,a M~untaineanne Staill-Finish- O Clickpfollud# f,]f detaNs . T./. A s C ....los' W. WWW acm N=â„¢ HUG Hunt=Green TXF T-ed 'ofeM M,chir,ed MAC 645DLED EXPRESS 10 SW LED 42- 5 57/ Aluminum SAP - 82 Be'ee 11,1, . .-.4â€¢Â·1;--Â»T,!0~blÂ»*>.;lrfarÂ· d|â‚¬0-MOLKe P~Ished PCL 6509LED EXPRESS 196WLED E 6 71/8 MP ...aisfas,P-le. -R Wea'Bld * , 1 -r' r-Â·. - C.1 HOWTO SPECIFY Verde VER 1 I.,hed Aed 9 ' C L.I) 6 -,Â· , (El) 561. (1)13. C'we* 87 5 77/8 440 -*4.0 in dUU &.74% ./. 47'.Â· 1 L C~ CÂ» I-Ild P-$ 000 Ck accer 5...b.,marsus-,4,90' Trim Â· Finish 141].kirs Accei=or,8 6053P (1)26/WIFD#,e, 57' 71~2 10 6014P 11)3~CF~Me .r .98 11 Mounting 1 56Â·6MH (1)20/.4 GI'MH F 5 5 7/ A,8 - 18~ Power Pipewith 18~ Adju~table Stem. Anow; ~r vallable rour~ng height =r = .Alove W. C.. 1 1 1 1 S618- . /. 74 Gl,65 MI 76' frcruie * ole..'1-$~orm.r MLrlf I goed~w'a 1.- 1157Â· Chmme Con, prIE ,~ NaÂ·.Col=nic~ ~ ~- I 1â€¢Â»A-HeLC,Lo~~~ .i . 5620MH (1)70W .44.5- I PP18B 10"Powe'Pipe-=kewith'B'Cap ar#-h,0-0..Â·- PP-TR~20 Power Plpe- T Â¤ption wlth lr,take and TRI:20 Ele~onic Tiansfonner" 5622MH (1}1501Â¥..2- 9 85'8 87/8 "â€¢ N I r--r n .0 VI'll,lec{11. , 1.-BfusheÂ¢/Iniess// /.,/I.. , 21/ | 1/0/ ....ns 1/3.]OVAC'Â£yN.No.Â©,mm#.w M Vem,8,6-veS,ack-4 1/Â·.ck 329/ Re-e Trensk,mel ~53* Arlri UV Fler . ~ /,n~ /Lk suver ~ n Te'lied #. ...35 ......mal [.... ... Inea.-.Lens *h up m 24' me6:.n,- - 4 , AF11 .1.â€¢- , ful Â» VI---- dal---- --U, , '479 , AdjUM.. 1 / M.... Gr. -01,1 i Fib~ I= 'rnaucS#en: OptiOn' 50W# Â¥816 GU5J -hAKI ./A SDI,~Le- GS - Adjustable'lan 5hleld .- ..0 C.. - 'EN Eme,90.Â¥-, .... 1.- F.Â©~B'Boruâ€žlic-I. SF Stablll/Flanglibâ€ž'-Pa-*I O Cop,Â·ri~ BEGAÂ·US 2016 AN * 1 /-1 SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE ~ LANDSCAPE BOLLARD ~ WALL SCONCE D RECESSED CAN ~ INSET WALL LIGHT LIGHTING KEY , I A) SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE 3 = ' 1 / B) LANDSCAPE BOLLARD - PATHWAY LIGHTING (FOR SAPErf CONS!DERAT]ONS) C) WALL SCONCE 1 D) RECESSED CAN ~ ~ 1= --1 1---4 rl E) INSET WALL LIGHT I _ ...4 i i 4. 1 At 0 1 E E E -0 1_ __ . -L._. 2__-_-_ --__-_____-__-._.---_-wi=_i-__ -___~ EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN @ 3/16" SCALE for pritifing Reduced 50% 0 WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~12 El O 41 Â¤ M DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning Urban Design Â· Tourism Planning AN}ievme ..4.9,en Â· Austin Â·Denver Saft Lake CIAÂ· . Lake Tahoe 120 East Main Street Â® Aspen, Colorado 81611-1787 (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW.D ESIGNWORKSHOPCOM Existing mature cottonwood oni'~ A neibhoring parcel--to be protected j / during site construction ~ - -1 -. 0 0~+I+Ttn# +1+Iii+~0#0-10 -p - -re'le - - - ./.--m-ip,E~: liall.....IMP..// V.9.~ - L~~â„¢~~ -r-~ Ninebarkshrubs Â®Lghtwell~Ligh~ell~~ Ninebark shrubs -~~ ~ ~ ./4- LAA - 1,4 U...4.-Bl ./ , ...:Â»Â«4.481Â»Ly':ryÂ«4*%**i'*Â»RUEÂ«,e,Â£46 Â«Cv ~ Lightwell ~ , Skylight f '~ ~ 1 -t 4....1 1/Ililli .f =f â€¢er U ~~ 3' path4*'Jig-ned with front dI~ Concrete driveway i ,~ cast in place light grey concrete with ~ ~ seeded exposed aggregate Skylight . 1 3 -- Turf grass sod //1 0//////0/~ 7 1 J///0//////// planted in ROW - 7,1111[r. r.'lle'/3.h,> f...4....../. - 1-. ..ill#.=- fl~' 0,=Ard..11......9.KI41#191//fai---m-=p Sttewell -==a=â€¢-â€¢2rsie"",0",E'- 1-Â·3=Mâ€¢upto 'f.daÂ¤eM~11"m .1,~ 4j,9" ..,1 Z. 51~~~~~ -9,- 9#1. Mj, 4*r vE. vwk 790 4 not to exceed 42" 7mlrit-6 match Â·1~- Property Line 'g-- building FFE -183Â· 'lam . - L.3 ISSUEDATE: March 7.2016 - REVISIONS 30' viewshed triangle - # DATE DESCRIPTION ~isting spruce tre~ --- Â· Proposed cottonwood tree Proposed cottonwood tree Proposed cottonwood tree -5.4-1# ,///& - ./IÂ·Pr-- ~Ail --el"'.La '.1 -Ii-- . 43*' ~. 3 1.H- 1/I'll/Millf./i:2712-!5 -- ~ wide s-~ ~~ 7/'llill/"60.23& Elitic ~~91.2. . ~ stepping -- : DRAWN: MP REVIEWED: MA - 1,0,4%~ I. 454.'.r'-469;WI'll" HPC - FINAL PROJECT NUMBERÂ· XXXX I LANDSCAPE 2 g PLAN 0 rei I LO-01 SHEET NUMBER 8 5 NORTH 0 2 4' 16 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1-=4'-00Â· O ' @ ' 1 1 1 1 @ 1 @ 1 Â® 1 @ I Â® Â©COPY RIGHT DES, GN WORK SH OP i N C ........ I. ./. 1 SNI>idOH 1S3M BAÂ¥ SURdoH M VE 00 'NadSÂ¥ W Hopkins Ave 4-*~ ~ ~4~~~M ~2~ 1;U, CR~. A. 4 4 . - 4.1 Pal ~ f T l. L . -* h â‚¬i 2 . t I I -* M. V- . . 7- 9.7 - i,Â©. Â£ --- . I. 9, . . 4 .1 1 - 32 V - ill- 1 . f . + 44'U. -I W . ./ 41 â‚¬/. . I h 8 I - A .431.WILL. - 4.4. . 6 t a. *f .4,1 -- 0 0 - 64- P. ~ . D. 1 8. t r : **y:- 31.44 46, . 32 .# <47 4 , locker ~ ~~ ~ i-Ill.LI... .9 . rl i.i ,=5~~ r-J . 7 4 45..U -LE.= ...4 N ' f.1 t .,4,Â£~**All /22.4 i* Â· ~C~~ ~ 1+ 4>*4 ,/7, 1 ..4, i- ..i 4. c A.- 1 ., f 48 #.. ..4 4 - An-- I 0 41*43 1. /1 *& & -: - â‚¬ 4ilf > 2 . 4...f ~-~tu 4 -4 4. fig . . Alâ€¢. .,/'ii'lili- . L * *e .~C ' \ -'61: 1....r- %4.J i ---It % . -I - % 82- I c 12 4 F * 1 : . -# 27AI.--.9 2 -nÂ» Â¥ 040:arillk A : 3 A 1. - -. Ill - It u -2-4- .....2 0 LD K -4 - .-2 .a ./ '' 4 74 r - - - - %5 ..%4 .- 4. 4 6 'r ..444* . , .-I ... 1. ---- 4 4 ... . f.i 1 0 , C. . - : <7=4%.2 4 4 M.1 J E ...0 2 //R -. 4.- . ./ - -.I 1 24 2 Jd, ual,1 : 2 7-3 - - IIi..'I--- Mvt . .4. $ i./-7- ./.' - I. - - '. , &- 6 - *EE'Bil' 9% 1 9 4 -7 9 ' '~. - 1 2 -I . â€ž.4 .L. , ' ..il 1,---- r A- ipl//I~//0 71/6 4 '6-% . I. 4 . . - 14 C. f # ild:44.&; * - - . 134 W,Hopkins 40.e,.64peA, CO 816114USA-Vr L / 4 /, )*t --11 - A 1 f. 95 -I.- -* 1/ I.-I'* 41 Firl. Ir. * .-I /4.- - - r ./ -4 -- 5X :.. L . .. 'C, 4 1.0 .. 1. f '21~ a . 9- .AUL '. , C - . 1 1 Fill-- ' ..4, - &= LLS 32 1 4 '. 1,1 : *I-il' 14 1 3 - 77,4/4 4, - R . I O - 4.-42 j . 1"A-i= h . 1 - A I. 2.- .644- -. - 43}. *% f. . --Q - -3 4,- . # 75.4 3/ i /0 . -, 4 v 4 - - i - lil i. * S r . *rf~ -- Yl- 2%~7'40 -* Ar &/ ' /*h.I 99 ~-97.k ' t, -4 . k 4 3 0 1- Ay - --Le ...y'Prt- : 9) . .4.. 0. "sâ€¢,442 30 '*2 2, 4 769 :..... - -ke- i -- . i 4.. I, .4 . T , . 1% i V L . re. * *-4/2.12 -4 ~ Â· Â· . r .:.. 4 + iALL 1 * 4 41 . 631 .... . . r 4. f .. :,, : , . 4 -per-/ .. ~ 4.. '" . . . -4 .4 I . J.iÂ» j..22 , 4 . 8. .. C . \ '.. . 0 A - e. 0 A:, .. ..... 0 .. .. A 0.00 A . . ..... 0 .0 '. A . k1 . .. ..1 Â¥.Â¢> - 1 '0Â· ., - . 11 ./. rt '" 1 1-/ -T.-- - '+ - nâ€¢.....424.'- I V I -4424.-1 4 .. 44*. 93Â¢...4-3 . 9â‚¬ C '*~~ 229.-240@44.1 .:- ~~ W ... 54.,A.,1-14 ..ht W /, / A.ziÂ«*1-4/ . -+7L 0 . .? 1% ?, 441 hÂ»ll_10ul , .-4\91/31.'. 0'.1/k{Al, 24244Â·- P'-1., -3 7 ft -0413%194 -4/, . 77 7%./,Â¥ ... .4 Â·': k t .t L . I I ... < 'pt j>Â·4~lit,5.' C '4:. Â· - 1:, 4 1 . - 7 1 Fbe 1 41,8 j~W~ -4 4 N Â·Aoily 4 ./ Â·'f.4--+MMAN"227** Al ~ -9 V 'Arr<*In"*4/- -9,- 1 >11164.*50. . , Â· L 66 '121 JÂ«litfum;8%1*.â€¢Â·Â·'~%2.- , '....1*.gw ./. J e 20.~~ Fe~-711-k i-7, 'AL,UN@2.9 1.-f:, -,10 ,_3< Ap,Wt*iÂ·1~ 4r . V\%. Â·- j %*V ' Itip 1 . 34 3'TZ**~'l . - w Â· A := -4414X.,d.IFF-*Fi:44,3:4ttl f , ' 3~410-'-.4....6.4.1.1 .'d aMET.tj /-1 ' glry â€žug ,/ 51= v. " s . rfri 5-' N.'. 122. 4.31: 17 %Â¥F.=p.7.: - A 4 --1 4 \. - \ I ,F. 1 194....F<MZ .)4 -,1-.$- ./ V Itr- / 4 2 .... ... .1... Â· 91 &*f- - -- .t': . N ~. ' 4, ~, 2~r. - ' dii' a :Y:, 'yrri> 4 RD f i X â€ž,_ *7 47. /pr. 64>Â»A.- yÂ©..4 - #///4 , ~~ -~-' Â¥ . V. .7 . . te; 4- . 4 -J A.-%07 4 ./-/.1Â¥ . - # .~.2144< 4 + , ... . .. - - -U Â· 1 l'' 7* i.:A#Wis/f:-,09/ 2.g> 2 2 .. - , I --4 =A , ." '/ i.'+ -Wi/'Abil -I .A/1, , . -ill#.k-0 ---r 9-1 ./ re# r.-441Â£ :*iry.Â«2 bA24. .A Â·Â· ' 1.::4~.i -.- 4-34 '. i /1 ---.lf.0-+ LE**1%~*WN"MIN//NE#A~"$ 11-71' 'I .h : ilt.4 illitiliwill/' 11+3 f. ti~~41/el)- 40Â¢L ./ 44 -' ' +~NK/t'-'24~' L ,-2~ ,~ 9 .. 9 i- /34% f -9~0_ i.fl" -itt<Â·01 -1>5 *Wk'ng.-A:ir<)461,5.,1/'lo B 4171'flk .," *t: ..0=.. Â¢:3 ~i .AceÂ· .Ul - - 11 =' .'4' . 6, + . i f ... 4*11'n!14111 1 - mill ~ 1,1,1Â¢11* A -3~~ 9_ 7 '-~- 1 / '2 94 ./4/*0 V*41 V bL:"c ---=--4~ 1/AR#2762uv*7~6 'dqr Z)//~1. 1- rp -99,/re=-=11"/1 ...,2...4,4051.Â£44 ./ 'U :-: . 11= .J....4?yy t#<PE<) = 1111. m i / 4 .4Â·4 "0 1",Spit'.bwir.&116'v , 'iwkbic 1:'Im,1,1,9:1,0,"6.1,24"l4"'11!91 lill I-. 4 -- MT,Ut 5 > --ahâ„¢li --. Tir ---&- *2 1 :~~ 1.6-i,1/* **Aill mwÂ· 155 . . ''.Ii-...:,~ ---------~ ' 5 .Â·-rt~ix--..?CAjflly.: ':;~ 3~ tyf . :.' . i V. . , I - -----'-I-Il.'-A..&/*. 6. b . , 4 -- 0 . 4 . . -+ .1 I . -./...p , t. ~ 1 91 -2-, . L-j 0.2-4 + 4 Ji A '00 .05Â·;:4*2 . I. 7 - ' '- - p 4 - . ---. , " 4.(417. . Â·h, 1 I - 09.A/71 1- .- <. j.4.149 .4,> r:ke,~ 4*Â¢ A I Â¥ . f . C '.mle=-- * . .- U 1- . 17% 4, i#, A"&' 4 .. - A: k . --I ...1 ... 6 - 0 L .< 4 .-.- - 2 4 4. t - 21* ii....1- ?rr-5 . a , 4-&10Â£ f 4 , 1,/0 25-- . P i ~ â€¢wr,. -... .. .. . ~1* , Â¥ 31./. : 1 - 4. ...., A r .,4 1. 11 -1 . A -- /\Â·rt r.4 f 1 4 . I-- :- 1 j. *:,1,/2 ' 1911. 1 0 1 3 1 itt; .~ . r, ,-- 6 â€¢ 30 U -- 41 2 ,=e. . /14 --- - p': 0 1, 01 ~.0 111 . , 1 1/'-i' 4. 'A I . . 422% I , 1,9 - 7':0 . J .*~~.=.4 Â¢ I I ~.2- 1 ,:1/0 - 1 . , -- -4/ -7 Â¢6/.-li,/10 --Il...... -.I"/ - 7'--444 .. .g - - I ' GrkÂ·Â·3:1'97 1 A - .0 A. - .... ..0 . 0- .0- 00 - .. . -- -- .. . 0 . 1 .. I . - 0 - .0 .. . 0 . 0 ... 0 .. .. .. A A . ...... 0 .0 0. A. A GENERAL NOTE: Air... Vidl 1) DETAIL PROVIDED PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL 2.B ~!-,-Â·0"5=,~=24Â»,;.3.7 - . IN HPC RESOLUTION #10, SERIES OF 2015. --I . 91 ....:.I ,* T.O. WALL ~ - 12"BOARD FORMED CONCRETE WALL : GAP FOR PLANTING, RE LANDSCAPE , '22. Â·-;-BibEÂ·,44Â·, 60 A 44-.1.1.;59* LE?E LINEAR DRAIN --1.1,~ 1 .â‚¬?14 - GLASS FLOOR (SLOPED 1/4" PER FT ) SLOPED PAVEPS - - - lip 1 - rE ----- td'r= ~~ ~ ~2#222~EZE 4 r i_~ [INI] ~1~1 #5. ~.J....,1.1-'* <ffll lIli lili J -M.1 11-1 --- AV " -== *' 1 d .i ./1........923.-.11,=*7.r. 1 Â·: 2.1/~ TERRACE SKYLIGHT DETAIL .p.. 7. @3"=1'-0" SCALE m.- 4%*64 Al:= ~.En ".... Â¥ - pw.' - %*5/illillitill'..2*Illillillilillilillr for prififing Reduced 50% WEST HOPKINS, LLC. ~ HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCY ARCHITECTS ~15 PROPERTYL 42" MAX. r ? J 4, THE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: March 8,2016 Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your Final land use application for 134 W. Hopkins Avenue. The application is complete and will be scheduled for public hearing before the Historic Preservation Commission. Please contact me at 429-2758 if you have any questions. Thank You, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging = SECONDARY ENTRY FROM WEST; SLIDING PATIO DOORS CONNECT INTERIOR SPACES TO COURTYARD. PRIMARY ENTRY ATVICTORIAN FROM COVERED FRONT PORCH - i Â£ r.: -1'-30' (HISTORIC WALL) 1 1 21'-6" (RECONSTRUCTED). . ft . .t I - 1%00* NON-HISTORIC ADDITION REMOVE[)44 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT 1 AT RECONSTRUCTED " 1 '111111111111,1111111111111111"lili'111111.--4'.,0-...Â»-1.5. ,11 111,11 111111 Ilirll 111111 Ililll.111]11 111111 111 /111111 111111 111111 111111 111111111111111111 111 4<futtÂ« Â·03,4 Â· ROOF ,~111111 li li ll 1111 It 11 li li t] 11 It 11.111 .l il li Ull 11 11|A -.2 I, c r. - ~~BALÂ¢ ' ~/' 1 ...~4 ...~~~~~..~ ~ 1 11.11 It liti 11 111111 1[1111 111111 lili j u]111 11['11 111Â¥.. li li 11 Il ll lill W Illi li lili U Illi u 11 Il lt "Il li lil li Illi'll.'- 12* Â· Â·i lili 1111 li li ji 11 It 'r ..111 it Ilil li ll till Ill 1 11 tl u 11 1111 0 1111 1 -0- 1,1 ..0 , .. .. lili 11 lili H 11 11 PU~witi,i? ill .',.l I. lit,y..J~i' I:,". I.: &V .7.,f~ Â»f2* aittifi,i,UN,j, i,it-il'n -7-Tt7 . ;I~ . . 1111111111111"0Â»41111 - 1 1111 il 11.11 " It 11 H 11 11 it H , , lilli lillitill" lin 11 10.6- l il li li ll Illl 11 It li li lili H Il a 11 1111 11 !111 11 111111 1[1111 It - Ill 11 lili It lili 11 1111 11 111111 1 - .lill illill fill" itult lili" . .- lit'111111]1111111111111111111 - ij-~Al*f *. â€¢ 111111 'lilli ullil 111111 lilli 1 11 111 111111 11 11 11111111 lili 11 ll)- 6â‚¬MMEAMMi - L'~'i t '6'~? d'h'A'~il'h'A' i,"Ni'~' J' i'd'19~Â·.. Â·5 1 ~*f - i ~ . r .1 4 f--116 - .lilli 1111111111,1 1111~Illili lin,11'16;~IL- ~Ill 11111111111111111111111111111111 1111111[1.1111'111 11111111111'1111 111111 Ilti ll lill i IA : 61-4-r 111]11 lin fl lill 'I lill i' 111111 [1111 11 011.111]il l[]1 111111 Ul]' 111111 111111 11111ltill tl B.%19i44" Â· /111% 11 11~111 lili ll 111111111111 lill i lil li lili 11 11]111 111 11 lilli 111 11 111111 lililt 1111111111 44+44 Â» i /1 lilli till i illii lili 1 1111 11111 111111 illiti iciril 111111 111111 111111 Illitillilll Illil lilli #4Â·04Â·wi ' ..4 ,Â¢11 1 111,<1 11,1,1.!111'll 1111.,1,1 11 { l'.11,I ll,!1).11,1 111111 11 111 11 f,l il li'.111 111111 111111 11 111 1 11 1 Int I I'kÂ·li-:P ,~ C ii 021 11 1111,1 1,Â¢111 #4111 Â¢11115 1 1,1, 01,1, 1 ' 1 ...1111 2.9 â€¢:Â· d f: ... 0 . 0 - ------U-e---- %. '....b 1 j' i 13, 1 i l.=7 ... MAIN LEVEL Â£ -. 100%0" p CONNECTOR 4 , e . - PROPOSED SHORING: 2'-0" TYPICAL ALL SIDES I * / .1 BASEMENT 01 6 88;10 " p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BASEMENT 02 . 1 76-1-0" M NORTH ELEVATION (VICTORIAN) @ 1/4" SCALE WEST HOPKINS, LLC. HPC FINAL 134 W. HOPKINS AVENUE 2016.03.07 ASPEN, COLORADO 2016.07.20 REV. CCYARCHITECTS 08B 2016.08.09 REV. #2 \>4\ \