HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20170412
AGENDA
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
April 12, 2017
4:30 PM City Council Meeting Room
130 S Galena Street, Aspen
I. SITE VISITS
A. None
II. 4:30 INTRODUCTION
A. Roll call
B. Approval of minutes
C. Public Comments
D. Commissioner member comments
E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent)
F. Project Monitoring- 28 Smuggler Grove
G. Staff comments
H. Certificate of No Negative Effect issued
I. Submit public notice for agenda items
J. Call-up reports
K. HPC typical proceedings
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. None
IV. 5:05 NEW BUSINESS
A. 500 W. Main- Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design
Review, Special Review and Variations, PUBLIC HEARING, CONTINUE TO
APRIL 26TH
B. DISCUSS ANNUAL HPC AWARDS- Mobile tour of eligible projects
V. 6:15 ADJOURN
Next Resolution Number: 11
TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR, 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM, NEW
BUSINESS
Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH)
Staff presentation (5 minutes)
Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes)
Applicant presentation (20 minutes)
Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes)
Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes)
Applicant Rebuttal
Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes)
HPC discussion (15 minutes)
Motion (5 minutes)
*Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met.
No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four (4)
members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct
any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require
the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of
the members of the commission then present and voting.
4/4/17
Dear Amy,
This is information for the April 12th HPC meeting at 4:30 pm.
The house at 26 Smuggler Grove, next to the historic house at number 28, presently has gable wall windows on the
north side (front of house) that has a 9" horizontal structural member between the lower set of windows and the
upper set. The approved set of prints did not show this horizontal member, so a correction notice was posted.
The rear windows were approved for the same horizontal members mainly to be able to attach the shade housing
to, but the front window was not addressed. Consequently it was assumed that the front window could also have
the same member in order to match the others so that the shade housing could be attached to it, which would
provide some privacy, since there are several houses on that street.
That structural member does add more strength to the wall of windows than the usual window mull strip does,
which is a plus.
Attached are pictures of the approved elevations as well as pictures of the house as it has been built.
We respectfully ask that you approve our request to leave the installed windows as they are.
Very respectfully,
Don Glenn
Simon Bentley
Michael Smith
Picture 1:
Installed Windows on North elevation (front) that we request to be approved.
P1
II.F.
Picture 2: View of the South (rear) elevation with approved horizontal member (for shade housing)
Picture 3: North facing approved elevation:
P2
II.F.
Picture 4: South facing approved elevation:
Picture 5: Approved East facing elevation
P3
II.F.
Picture 6: Approved West facing elevation
P4
II.F.
P5
II.F.
P6
II.F.
1
RESTORATION/REHABILITATION
Eligible Projects:
• 626 W. Francis Street
• 212 Lake Avenue
• 101 E. Hallam Street
• 114 Neale Avenue
• 1006 E. Cooper Avenue
• 1280 Ute Avenue
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer
RE: 2016 Awards Selection
DATE: April 12, 2017
SUMMARY: Since 1990, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has celebrated
local historic preservation successes by presenting awards to individuals, companies, and
projects demonstrating excellence in preservation. This year’s awards are to be held on
May 22nd during a City Council meeting. Descriptions of the categories are below, along
with a list of eligible projects. HPC will review the sites as a group by taking a mobile
tour during the regular meeting time.
Eligible projects received Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy between April
2016 and March 2017. Only projects that were relatively significant in scope or effort are
being presented for HPC consideration. There is no limit on the number of awards that
may be presented. Within the last few years, HPC identified a point system that could be
used for reference in determining which projects to recognize. Staff is not providing any
scoring. The award selections are left to the board.
Maximum of 40 points:
o The quality and compatibility of design (including landscape) and workmanship with
the historic resource (0-5 points)
o The quality of new materials and restoration of historic material in accordance with
the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (0-5 points)
o Sensitivity to the building’s historic and architectural character (0-5 points)
o The impact of the project on the surrounding neighborhood/community (0-5 points)
o An outstanding example of creative work within the HPC design guidelines (0-5
points)
P7
IV.B.
2
THE “EXTRA EFFORT” AWARD
This award is for an individual or group that has taken extra steps to preserve a historic
resource.
Potential Recipient: ?
o An outstanding investment of time and money in restoring a building and landscape
to it’s historic appearance (0-5 points)
o Adaptive use of a historic building that enhances the interpretation of the historic
resource (0-5 points)
o Contribution or enhancement to the interpretation of the historic resource or Aspen
history (0-5 points)
Maximum of 25 points:
o The quality and compatibility of design (including landscape), workmanship, and
materials within the historic district (0-5 points)
o Sensitivity to the adjacent buildings’ historic and architectural character (0-5 points)
o The impact of the project on the surrounding neighborhood/community (0-5 points)
o An outstanding example of creative work within the HPC DesignGuidelines (0-5
points)
o Contribution or enhancement to the interpretation of the historic resource or Aspen
history (0-5 points)
Maximum of 25 points:
o The participants’ dedication to look at creative options in an effort to find the best
solution for the project (0-5 points)
o The participants’ willingness to volunteer designation of a property or to sacrifice
some aspect of a property’s development rights (0-5 points)
o The quality of design (including landscape), workmanship, and materials (0-5 points)
o Sensitivity to the district’s or building’s historic and architectural character (0-5
points)
o The impact of the project on the surrounding neighborhood/community
(0-5 points)
NEW CONSTRUCTION ON A LANDMARK PROPERTY
Eligible Project:
• None
NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT
Eligible Project:
• 420 E. Durant, Rubey Park- completed in 2015 but does not appear to have
been considered in for last year’s awards.
• 435 W. Main Street, Aspen Jewish Community Center
P8
IV.B.
3
THE ELIZABETH PAEPCKE AWARD
This award is for an individual or group that has been a long-time preservation leader,
demonstrating commitment to historic preservation or for an individual or group who
has lead an outstanding one-time preservation effort that has had a clear impact on Aspen.
Potential Recipient: ?
Maximum of 20 points:
o The overall quality (craftsmanship, design, landscape, programming) of
their work (0-5 points)
o The innovative interpretation and enhancement of Aspen’s heritage
through their work (0-5 points)
o Their dedication to preserving Aspen’s heritage (0-5 points)
o Contribution of their work to the Aspen community (0-5 points)
Maximum of 20 points:
o The overall quality (craftsmanship, design, landscape) of their work
(0-5 points)
o Sensitivity to context (0-5 points)
o The innovative interpretation and enhancement of Aspen’s heritage
through their work (0-5 points)
o Contribution of their work to the Aspen community (0-5 points)
THE WELTON ANDERSON AWARD
This award is for an individual or firm that has contributed to Aspen’s built environment
through outstanding new design over a sustained period of time, or through one
particularly important project.
Potential Recipient: ?
P9
IV.B.