HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.regular.20170424 ills
4
THE CITY OF
ASPEN MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX P '
tir-
Local-Serving Business
C Obermayer Placc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Thefollowing document contains historical and other background information on sites and
C SCI Wert. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 g
U City-owned Parking Lot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 topics reviewed by the Civic Master Plan Advisory Group.The Table of Contents tracks with
thefive sections in the main Civic Master Plan document.
O Arts In Aspen
9
The Ans ie Aspcn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
Wheeler Opera House&The Wheeler Paroel. . . . .24
Aspen An Museum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 How to Read the Appendix
Local Government
City of Aspen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 In each of the five sections,the reader will find a summary that includes a reference to
Pitkin County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 relevant portions of the 2000 Aspen Area Community Plan.Each topic in this document
Meeting Hall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 includes up to eight(8)sections:
Zupancis Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Former Youth Center. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 STATUS:This section provides the latest information on the topic,as of December 2006.
visit.,Center . . . . .30
Pitkin CountrJbn ORGANIZATION: This section identifies the organinfion(s)relevant to the topic.
Aspen Fre Protection Dig. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .31
SI TE:This section describes the site or sites that were reviewed. m
The Thrift Shop . . . . . . . . 31
8
Aspen Sanitation District . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .32 VISION:This section includes information generated by the Phase l Civic Master Plan Report, `o
issued in May 2001,and outlines the goals of relevant organizations. r
Public Open Space
Rio Grande Pork. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 RIO GRANDE MASTER PLAN:This section reviews any recommendations for this site in a
Galena Plan. . . . . . . . . . . .33 the Rio Grande Master Plan 1993.Not all sites in the Civic Master Ran were reviewed n is
pan of the Rio Grande Master Plan(RGMP).
Pedestrian Movement
Movement RELEVANT C 0 R E PRINCIPLES: This section identifies the Core Principles relevant to
Main Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35 the topic.
Building Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35 iE
Downtown Enhancement& FI NO I NG S: This section lists the Findings made by the Civic Masher Plan Advisory Group
Pedestrian Plan(DEPP) . . . . .. . . . . . . .35 (CMPAG).Al the end of each finding,the relevant Core Principle(s)may be noted. m
Pedestrian Connections Map. . . . . .. . . . . . . .35 t
N.Mill St Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 RECOMMENDATIONS: This section lists the Recommendation made by the Civic Master f
Wayfindin .. , , , , , , , , , , Plan Advisory Group(CMPAG).At the end of each finding,the relevant Core Principle(s)
g. . . . . . . . .. . 36 s
may be noted.
r¢
0
11
This decummt is also awllable online at w evaspenpitkiocorn,, 27
City of Aspen Community Development Department,Long Range Planning
I CITY OF ASPEN CIVIC MASTER PLAN
City Owned Parking Lot 4. Infill affordable housing is a rare and valuablecommodity that decreases
traffic congestion by creating walk-to-work opportunities,and creates year-
STAT US: This area is utilized as short-term parking and as a staging arca for special round vitality in the downtown area.(CP 12,CP$3,CP 04)
events in Rio Grande Park. 5. Using a wide range of criteria,the 2002 FPS Housing Study rated this site a/1
for the development of affordable housing.(CP 12,CP 13,CP g4)
SITE: The parking IN north of the Community Banks and Rio Grande Parking 6. If a building that includes the north edge of Galena Plan,and descending
Garage buildings are owned by the City.The parking Ims were designed in a cam.
standard configuration. to Rio Grande Platt is not constructed,the urbantpark edge can be defined
through development of stand-alone buildings along Rio Grande Place.(CP
ORGANIZATION: The City of Aspen owns the property,and has the ability to move t2.CP 13,CP 94)
forward with planning at this site in the short-term,mid-turn or long-term. 7. If development occurs on the City-owned parking lots,the need for short-
VISION: The CMP Phase I Report/Opportunities Map lists the following potential term parking must be addressed.(CP t5)
uses: 8. The parking lots along Rio Gmnde Place and North Mill Street are owned by
Mixed Use:Neighborhood Commercial/Gov.Offices/Aff.Housing: the City,and there is no compelling need to develop them in the short-term.
Arts Facility—PMormance Venue:
Ancillary Arts facility functions(could be part of mixed-use building). RECOMMENDATIONS:
The CMP Phase 1 Report Physical Analysis—"Urban Fdge"subsection slates, "Both 1. The CMPAG supports the urban design concept of establishing a clear edge
the river/park open space and downtown would gain from a stronger edge to the built or demarcation between urban blocks and public parks,reinforcing the
environment.The current transition area between these two distinct areas consists identity of both the urban area and the park.
of surface parking and outdoor storage that creates an unraveled characteristic.New 2. The CMPAG supports Neighborhood Commercial uses and affordable
mixed-use infill buildings at...the comer of Rio Grande and Mill St.(currently a City housing in the area where cily-awned parking lots currently exist along Rio
parking Id)...would better define the character of both urban and open space:
Grande Place.the CMPAC does not support the development of free market
The 2002 Aspen Affordable Housing Strategic Plan identified this site for infill housing on this city-owned property.
affordable housing.City Council has talked about the potential for Service/
Commercial/Industrial or Neighborhood Commercial uses on the first Boor.
RID GRANDE MASTER PLAN: The RGMP Site B map(p. 13)shows the parking
lots were purchased with 7th Penny Transportation Funds.Under"Goals,"the RGMP The Arts In Aspen:
says:"Satisfy transportation related needs first when considering the use of Site B."
The RGMPdoes not recommend any uses aside from the existing parking IN.All Painting The Big Picture
maps in the RGMP show the parking lots as unchanged-including the"Scenario
STATUS: During the Civic Master Plan process,the CMPAGecoithat some
w
Maps'in Appendix A.The parking louere to be located between the future
ne
'Transportation Center"(now the ACRA Office(Visitor Center)and the future arts groups in Aspen had identified space eds,ranging from performrming ng arts space to
"Regional Rail Facility"(now the playing field at Rio Grande Pad.) spam for educational programming.During work sessions ar the Civic Mester Plan,
the City Council expressed conceptual support for a new shared-use arta facility,while
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES: asking for additional information gathering.
I. Mixed-use buildings and mixed-use areas create vibrant,memorable places. The CMPAG explored the potential of a new performing arts facility,with a one-story
2. Focus on creating great people plains. building at the north edge of Galena Raza,and the bulk of the building along Rio
3. Affordable Housing and Affordable Commercial space ensures viability of Grande Race.
civic functions and vitality of town. The CMPAG also identified the Wheeler Parcel as a potential location for performing
4. Civic planning must address need for parking while not inducing additional arts and/or rehearsal/educational space.In November 2006,the local performing arts
traffic. groups that had expressed interest in the Galena Raza/Rio Grande Race site were
5. Public-private partnerships can be very advantageous in achieving public mom focused on the Wheeler Parcel.Theatre aspen was focused on upgrading the tent
in Rio Gra do Park.
goals.
6. Improved pedestrian orientation. Staff has undertaken the Arts Sector Facilities Analysis,as recommended by the
CMPAG,to evaluate the need for it new ars facility.Staff suggests that a range of
FINDINGS: reports,including ongoing studies,be considered as part this analysis,including:
1. In the downtown arca south of Main Street,both urban blocks and public
parks have clearly defined edges and are easily recognizable.In contrast,the The 2005 Wheeler Opera House Organizational Audit.
City-owned parking lots along Rio Grande Place are an unraveled edge that The Wheeler 21st Century Master Ran,which includes a needs assessment of
do not clearly demarcate the end of an urban block and the beginning of a arts organizations as relates to their use of the Wheeler.
public park.(CP 02,CPt3,CPS7) The Snowiness Village Cultural Arts Assessment Study by Webb
2. Creating a clear edge and demarcation between urban blocks and public parks Management Services Inc.in 2003,which contains extensive research on the
is a widely recognized and sound urban design concept.(CP i2,CP 13) regional arts industry and suggests there is additional capacity for performing
3. Neighborhood Commercial(NC)zoning is a rare commercial use in the City arts in the Aspen area.
of Aspen and is primarily intended to serve the local,year-round population. "flute Arts in Aspen:Do We Need More Space?'by consultant Michael
Neighborhood Commercial uses tend to be successful in areas that locals Strong in 2006,which includes various pros and cons for developing
frequent,including the North Mill Street corridor.(CP n,CP 03,CP W,CP additional arts sector space.This study was commissioned by the Wheeler
I6) Open House.
This dximent is also arailable online at waw.mpenphkin.can, 29
City d aspen Comarmily Development Dimmareat/Long flange Plan;,
Public Meeting Hall RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. As part of the collaboration between the City of Aspen and Pikin County
STATUS:In 2005,the CMPAC broached this topic,as partofdiscussions regarding regarding civic space needs.the City and County should identify an appropriate
new civic spaces. downtown space and design a shared-use Meeting Hall.considering the
SITE: Theprimary meeting space for the CityotAspen is the Council Chambers, following Desired Elements:
which is used by City Council,the Planning and Zoning Commission,the Historic Inspirational
Preservation Commission,the Board of Adjustment.the Municipal Court and for Design of space should reflect the importance of discussions/decisions made
meetings of City employees.The County Chambers is currently the subject of a study there
to improve the function of the space for public meetings,including improvements in Dignity afforded to the public
audio,sight lines,and orientation of the Cowcil,presenters and the public.The adjacent
smaller Sister Cities Room is also used by a wide range of groups.Lack of availability Elevate the debate
of both time rooms is not annual and boards,committees and City employees use Flexsbility,
Sherrill sites such as the Rio Grande Meeting Room,the Fire Station Conference Room Appropriate technology
and the Pidin County Library Meeting Room.The Phase I Report/Facility Analysis of 2 Appropriate sites for a Meeting Hall include:
2001 stated that,"meeting space is insufficient..."
The former Youth Center
The Pitkin Comfy Board of Commissioners and other County boards,comminees The north edge of Galena Plan
and groups currently use the Conference Room on the tat door of the County Plan The Zupancis Property
Building.The Phase I Report Facility Analysis described this room as"a marginal
conference room for public forums.The size and configuration makes it difficult to hold
effective meetings,especially when the meetings exceed 20 members of the public."
The Conference Room is heavily used throughout the day and evening,and County
boards,committees and groups also use the Pitkin Comfy Library Meeting Room Z u p a n e i s Property
and the small former County Commissioners Meeting Room,on the tat door of the
Courthouse.
STATUS:In August 2005,the City of Aspen and the Aspen Fm Protection District
ORGANIZATIONS: City of Aspen.Pitkin Comfy. agreed to end the joint planning proms than had focused an Zupancis Property as
the home for a new AFPD Headquarters Station.The City is currently leasing the Site
VISION:The Phase I Report Facility Analysis stated that."an additional meeting to the Obermeyer Redevelopment Co,which is sub4msing to its SCI tenants while
room is a significant community,need."The Phase I Report Function Analysis states Obar Byer Place is under construction.
that,"a Targe capacity mating facility...should be mushy located and be able to In July 2005,Pitkin County begin e F Feasibility
acoommodam approximately 100 people...The space should be able to accommodate a to generate ,tit in strategic lana The
rbty Analysis that is expected
variety of meeting types and incorporate the latest technological capabilities..." S yP upends property is one of the sites in be
The Phase I Opportunities Map identified the north edge of Galena Plan and the former assessed as pmt of the sft*.
Youth Center as potential sites for a Meeting Half In October 2006,the Board of County Commissioners and City Count directed staff in
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES: a work session to begin the process of establishing a public promas that encompasses an
1. Civic uses belong in bean afiown ares between the Zupancis Property to the east and the Iabrary to the west
2 Mixed-use buildings and mixed-use areas create memorable places. This process is intended to explore potential civic buildings for city and comfy
government as well as a potential library expansion,replaoemem of the gmage roof at
FINWINSS Oulem Plan and other potential users.
1. The existing meeting space for the City of Aspen and Pitkin County is not
adequate. SITE:540 East Mein StreeR next to the County Plan Building.The property includes
historic cabins at the back end of the property,The topography of the she allows for
2. The design of meeting space cumendy used by the City and the County do not underground parking,and a link an underground parking at Obermayer Place.
mftect the importance of the discussions.debates and decisions being made.
3. ACity-County Meting Hall is an appropriate shared use,considering the 0RGAN IZATI0 N:The City of Aspen purchased this property in 2001 using general
funds.
existing need and the similar purpose of the use.A shared Meeting Hall would
avoid a duplication of costs. V ISI O N:The CMP Phase I/Opportunities Map identified the Zup uacis property ns
4. Atavic Meeting Hall should be close to downtown government offices, a potential Fm Station,Mixed Use Building car to be used in combination with the
adjacent to nurture public Spam and at a prominent site that conveys a sense of
adjacent Comfy Plan building for a larger civic project.
significance. In past discussions,non-profit groups such as Theatre Aspen and the Aspen,Art Musemn
5. ACivic Meeting Hail should be designed So That it can be available for a had expressed some interest in the Zupancis parcel.
variety of uses by the general public as well as government matings. RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES:
6. Logistical issues between the City and the County regarding a shared Meeting
Hall will need to be addressed 1. Civic and farts&cultural uses belong in the heart of town.
2. Focus an creating great people places.
3. Affordable Housing and Affordable Commercial spam ensures the viability of
civic functions and vitality of town.
4. Civic planning most address need for packing while not inducing additonal
traffic.
5. Public-private partnerships can be very sdvanmgeom in achieving public
goals.
6. Improve pedestrian orientation.
34 i This document Is also available online at awa.sspenpakln.com,
City of Aspen Community Development Depadmenl/Long flange Planning
FINDINGS: FINDINGS:
1. Aspen was a traditional mining town that ultimately evolved into a resort,and 1. The former Youth Center building was designed as a Youth Center and is
the traditional functions of a small municipality still remain in the heart of the relatively inflexible in accommodating new uses.The future renovation or
downtown. replacement of this building could allow for new was the could increase
2. As noted in Cote Principle#1,a primary goal of the Civic Master Plan process vitality at Galena Plaza.The size of the building was limited by funds
is to build upon the intrinsic asset of a civic cora that remains integrated into available,and a future structure could be larger,if funds am available to
downtown Aspen. address engineering issues related to topography.
3. Both Pitkin County and the City of Aspen are experiencing space needs. 2. A built cast edge as part of a potential future renovation or replacement of the
4. The Zupancis Property has the potential to establish and improve north-south former Youth Center,extending to and encompassing the existing elevator/
pedestrian connections from Main Street to ObermeyerPlace and Rio Grande stairwell features,could increase virility at Galena Plaza through new uses,
Park,as well as east-west connections between Obermeyer Place and Galena and draw pedestrians across Main Street through the use of compelling
PM+e amhitactural elements.(CP#1,03,#7)
RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:
I. The CMPAC recommends that the City of Aspen collaborate with Pitkin 1. The CMPAG recommends that the former Youth Center building be considered
County during the Facility Feasibility Analysis process in order to review and for renovation or replacement in the future.A new or renovated building could
evaluate the scope of potential civic uses at the Zupancis property. be a welcoming and inumcdve destination point but eapitalims on the visna,
2. If the Zupancis property is not used for civic purposes,the site would be creates vitality and could include mined was andlor a range of civic and/or
appropriate for arts and cultural well or a mixed-use building with affordable cultural uses.
housing. 2. In conjunction with the future renovation or replacement of the former Youth
3. The CMPAC recommends that the easement established as part of the Center,the CMPAG recommends that the east edge of Galena Plaza be
Obermeyer Place approval be used to improve north-south pedestrian considered in the furore as a built edge,extending to the existing stairwell/
movement between Main Street,Obermeyer Place and Rio Grande Park. elevator feabrre,and including compelling architectural elements intended to
draw pedestrians across Main Street
3. The City of Aspen(should)collaborate with Pitkin County with regard to the
Facility Feasibility Analysis pmcess in order to review and evaluate the scope
Former Youth Center of potential civic uses in the downtown area,including but am limited to to
Zupancis property and the former Youth Center."
STATUS:71he former Youth Center currently houses City employees,including the q Appropriate sites for a Yssitor Center include:the former Youth Center
GIS Department,and several employees from the Asset Management Department and
Community Development Department——with meeting space on the top floor(f he 5. Appropriate sires for a Public Meeting Hall include:the former Youth Cerner.
ground floor is leased as a restaurant)
Although the joint City County-County Commissioners vote in March 2006 did not
request that the former Youth Center be explored as a joint civic facility,one of the
options generated by the Pitkin County Facility Feasibility Analysis in January 2OD6
included the former Youth Center as a potential County building site.
SITE:The former Youth Center is at the northeast edge of Galena Plan,descending
down to Rio Grande Piece.It was used as a Youth Center unti12003,when the Aspen
Recreation Center opened adjacent to the public school complex on Maroon Creek
Road.
ORGANIZATION:The City of Aspen owns this site.
VISION:7be CMP Pbax I/Opportunities Map identified the forma Youth Center m a
potential location for"high traffic"government departments such as Housing,Building.
Police/Sheriff,and/or a Mating Hall,ACRA offices,Visitor Center.
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES:
I. Civic and arts&cultural mea belong in the bean of town.
2. Focus on creating great people places.
3. Civic planning must address need for parking while not inducing additional
traffic.
4. Public-private partnerships can be very advantageous in achieving public
goals.
5. Mixed-use buildings create memorable places
6. Improve pedestrian orientation.
nis4ocument b elmavalhble online at wrov.aspenpitkin.com, 35
City of Aspen Community Development Department I Long Range Planning
r r 1
Visitor Center Pitkin County Library
STAT U S: Following the November 2004 ballot ekction that defeated the proposal STATUS: Although the Pitkin County library has m easement w expand
to relociatetbe Visitor Center to the Gakna/Main intersection,no further discussions approximately 44-feet esestwanl onto Galena Plaza,there are no immediate plans for
regarding a raw location have taken place.In 2005,the Aspen Chamber Resort expansion.However,the library wants he insure a potential expansion in the future as
Asses;heties signed a five-year lease with the City for its current site. the Civic Maxtor Plan facuses on this area.
Site: 7be VaitorCenter is located on Rio Grande Place,next to ACRA offices.
Organization:City of Aspen and ACRA. SITE: The Library is located between N.MBI Street andGalena Placa
VISION:The CMP Phase l Report/Facility Analysis stat;that"constrained space ORGANIZATIONS: Firkin County Library.
fimits the only operation of ACRA and the location is not convenient for visiting
gouts.ACRA serves a high number of visitors and lacks basic amenities such as VIS 10 N:The CMP Phan I Report/Facility Analysis states that if the library wishes
public remmms." to expand eastward,the Rio Grande Parking Garage cannot sustain"increased loads
The Aspen Retail Analysis(the Frick&Beer Report)identified a relocated and associated with library stacks"without pillars that extend into the garage below.
revamped visitor center as a pressing need.-Ibe moment Visitors Center is difficult The library has funded plans that show the number and location of pillars in file
to find and too far from the downtown...What is most important is that the center's garage necessary to sustain bookweight as part of the expansion.City staff h;held
location.appearance and operations all signal the community's genuine appreciation preliminary meetings with the library Boar to discuss the potential for shifting
for guests,mrd that the center assist visitors in accessing and understanding the programming inside the library so that the expansion does not include extensive
downtown' library stacks,
The Phase l Report/Oppodunides Map identified several potential sites far a Visitor RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES:
Center,including the Hines/Hills buildings at Main SL,and the Galena SL Ext,the I. Civic and ads us;belong in head of town.
first floor of 4e Wheeler Opera House,the Wbwlu parcel,the former Youth Center
building and Galena Plats.Of those sites, Hines/Hilts was rejected by voters;the 2. Mixed-use buildings and mixed-use areas emote vibrant,memorable places.
Wheeler Opera Horse was determined to be appmprfate only for a satellite Visitor 3. Focus an creating great people places.
Center;and tae Wheeler Parcel w;reserved for men related to the Wheeler Opera 4, Civic planning most address need for paling while not inducing additional
House.The sites remaining are the former Youth Center building and Galena Plaza. traffiu
However,the Visitor Center COWOP did review and evaluate a longer list of potential
sires. 5. Improving pedestrian orientation.
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES: FINDINGS:
1. Civic and ons uses belong in hent of town. 1. An expansion of the Pitkin County library is appropriate for this downtown
2. Mixed-un,buildings and mixed-use areas create vibmn4 memorable places. site,and in combination with other new built"edges"at Galena Plaza would
3. Focus on creatine great people places. contribute to a vibrant and memomble mixed-use area(CP#I,02,t3)
4. Civic planning must address need for parking while not inducing additional 2. A ground4evel meeting mom as part of the library expansion would allow
traffic for public access to the meeting mom at any time,and would increase the
5. PublcpriYaw partnerships can be very advantageous in achieving public use and vitality of Galena Plaza(CPBI,92,S3)
grrns RECOMMENDATIONS;
6. improving pedestrian orientation. 1. The CMPAG recommends that staff representatives of the Pitkin County
FINDINGS: Library,Pitkin County and the City of Aspen meet to discuss the Library's
1. The constrained office space and lack of basic amenities remain challenges at short-kala infrastmchm planning and long-term facility goals,and identify
the existing Visitor Center. an appropriate public review process that will address both shod-term and
2. The lack of visibility,lack of wayfini ing and inconvenient location of the long-term goals.
existing Visitor Center remain major obstacles to providing optimal services 2. The CMPAG supports an expansion of the Pitkin County Library,to the
to visitors(CPi3,07) east The CMPAC recommends that the design of the building be coordinated
3. An optimal location for a Visitor Carter would be close to paling and the with other built edges around Galem Plaza,to the extent possible.
downtown,(CPO 1,05,t7) 3. The CMPAG recommends that a mating room be located on the ground
level of the library expansion.to allow for public access to the meeting room
RECOMMENDATIONS: at any time,and to increase the use.
I. Appropriate sites for a Visitor Center could include:
the former Youth Center
the north edge of Galena Plaza
2. The CMPAG recommends that the Visitor Center and ACRA offices be co-
located,and could be put of a mixed-use building.
3. The CMPAG recommends that if ACRA begins a search fm a new Visitor
Center site,the evaluation of sites under the 2004 Visitor Center COWOP
process be used as a resource.
36 Thls document haiso avrllable online rtxwn.aspenpitNin.wm,
Cly a/Aspen Communlly Derebpment Oepadmanl/Lnng Range Planning
1I .
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES: Galena Plaza
3. Focus m creating great people platta
7. Improvedpedestrian orientation STATUS:
The Galena Plata site played a critical role in the formation of the Civic Mawr Plan
FINDINGS: (The Rio Grande Park Master Pim was presented to the CMPAG in (CMP)process:While a leak in the roof of the Rio Grande Parking Garage demanded
2003,before the CMPAG generated findings.However,the CMPAG informally attention,a clear consensus was emerging that the plaza was a failed public space.The
endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plea in 2003,and subsequently adopted findings goal was to find a way to re-energize the plaza and coordinate the solution with the
related to establishing improved"edges to the southwest edge and west edge of the repair of the roof.
Park,listed below.)
An engineering consultant has recently determined chat the roof must be repaired by
1. In the downtown area south of Main Stree4 both urban blocks and public the spring/smnmer of 2008,or serious structural problems will result At the as=
parks have clearly defined edges and are easily recognizable.In contrast,the time,recent in-house discussions have revealed that the repair of the roof can go
City-reamed parking lots doing Rio Grande Place are an unraveled edge that forward at my time,with construction amp the plam proceeding at a later date without
a substantial duplication of costs.
do not clearly demarcate the end of an urban block and the beginning of a
public park(CP 112,CP p3,CP d7) The CMPAG reached a consensus that creating modest built"edges"that introduce
2. Creating a clear edge and demarcation between urban blocks and public parks new uses to the site will increase the use and enjoyment of the open space that will be
retained at the center of the plam.
is a widely recognized and sound urban design concept(CP 92,CP i3)
3. Providing a larger buffer between pedestrians and traffic(on N.Mill Street) SITE: Galena Plum is located between the Pitkin County Library and the Courthouse
will increase safety,and improve the pedestrian experience and visual esthetic at the terminus of die Galena SL Extension.B was constructed in 1989,serving air a
of the area.These changes will encourage more pedestrian use,and improve m if section of the Rio Grande Parking Garage and as a public gathering place.
conditions for events and public)privace sector users located in this area of ORGANIZATIONS:The City owes this property.The northeast portion of the plates
roma(CPp3,CPM7) win purchased with 7th Peony Transportation funds;the southwest portion of the
plaza was acquired via land trade with the County.The Pitkin County Library holds an
RECOMMENDATIONS: (Ne Rio Grmde Park Master Plm was presermd to the easement for a future expansion at the west end of the plaza
CMPAG in 2003,before the CMPAG generated recommendations.However,the
CMPAG informally endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan in 2003,and subsequently VISION: The CMP Phase I Report/Foundation Map sorted that drainage problems
adopted rernmmmdations related to establishing improved"edges to the southwest mutt be addressed,while noting an opportunity forthe plain to become"an interesting
edge and west edge of the Park,listed below.) public place"that"encourages pedestrians to cross Main Street"
The CMP Phase 1 Report Physical Analysis section states that,"this Public space does
1. The CMPAC supports the urban design concept of establishing a clear edge or not have a presence on Main Street,or strong pedestrian circulation mutes mining
demarcation between urban blacks and public parks,reinforcing the identity through it,nor does it benefit from enlivened architectural edges As a result,the
of both the urban area and the park space is somewhat disappointing and does not function as a quality public place.Ibis
2. The CMPAG recommends that City Council direct relevant public agencies public space is of paramount importance in the Civic planning effort initially limited
to curing drainage pmblems,the'fix'for this ailing public space could Cream a very
and private parties to collaboratively geneam a proposal to design,fond interesting and successful public place..."
and implement a plan for the improvement of North MW SL,to focus on the
following: RIO GRANDE MASTER PLAN: Although Galena Plata is shown as pan of Site
B in the 1993 RGMP.there art no recommendations for the use of this site.Under
A wider buffer between pedestrians and traffic for the purpose ofimproving "Goals:'the RGMP amen."Satisfy wansporution related needs first when considerivj
the pedestrian experience,consistent with Aspen's historiW streetscape the use of Site B."
Pattern;
RELEVANT CORE PRINCIPLES:
Accommodating existing traffic Row:
Improving safety for pedestrians and vehicles; 1. Civic and abs uses belong in hearttown.
2. Mixed-use buildings and mined-usee asaes raeu memorable places.
Coordination with the local pedestrian-bikeway system:
Improving the visual sesthetic of the area 3. Focus on great people places.
4. Affordable Housing and Affordable Commercial apace manses the viability of
civic functions and vitality of town
5. Civic planning most address need for parking while not inducing additional
traffic.
6. Public-private partnerships can be very advantageous in achieving public
goals.
7. Improving pedestrian orientation.
S. The pursuit of excellence in the arta.
TAis documminelsa availaLle online al wwa.aspenpiGin.com, I 39
City cf Aspen Cwnmunay N,,elapmmt Department I Lang Range Planning
FINDINGS: LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. The repair and replacement of the roof of the Ilio Grande Parking Garage is 7. The CMPAG supports an expansion of the Pitkin County Library,to
needed to avoid further damage to the structure and costs to the City.(CPk5) the east.The CMPAC recommends that the design of the building be
2. The use of easily replaceable materials on Galena Plaza will reduce the cost coordinated with other built edges around Galena Plaza,m the extent
of future construction on the site.(CPl1,t2,f3) possible.
3. The accommodation of tents at Galen Plaza as pan of an interim open space 8. The CMPAG recommends that a mating room be located oo the ground
solution could increase vitality at the site.(CP►I,n,03,t6,V.t8) level of the library expansion,to allow for public access to the mating room
4. The groundplaa at the center of Galena Plaza is an opportunity to animate at any time,and to increase the use and vitality of Galena Playa
the site in relation to future built edges. 9. The CMPAG recommends that the north edge of Galena Plaza be considered
5. An expansion of the Pitkin County Library is appropriate for this downtown in the future for a shared-use arts facility,with the bulk of the building
site,and in combination with other new built"edges'at Galena Plaza would extending down to Rio Grande Place,pending the outcome of the Aro Sector
contribute to a vibrant and memorable mixed-use area.(CPSI,f7,#3) Facilities Analysis. (Please are section titled:Arts in Aspen:Painting the Big
6. A ground-level mating room as par[of the library expansion would allow Picture.)
for public access to the mating room at any time,and would increase the 10. If a shared-use ant,facility is not constructed at Galena Plaz t/Rio Grande
use end vitality of Galena Plaza.(CPCI,62,d3) Place,a building at the north edge of Galena Plaza could be a welcoming
7. A built north edge,with a medium-high intensity use,would increase vitality and interactive destination point that capitalizes on the vism.creates vitality
at Galena Plaza(CP-ALL) and could feature a range of civic and/or cultural uses.
S. The former Youth Center building was designed as a Youth Center and is 11. The CMPAG recommeads that the former Youth Center building be
relatively inflexible in accommodating new uses.The future renovation or considered for renovation or replacement in the future.A new or renovated
replacement of this building could allow for new uses that could increase building could be a welcoming and interactive destination point dist
vitality at Galena Plaza The size of the building was limited by funds capitalizes on the visor,creates vitality and could include mixed uses and/or
available,ad a future structure could be larger,if funds are available to a range of civic and/or cultural uses.
address engineering issues related to topography. 12. In conjunction with the future renovation or replacement of the former Youth
9. A built east edge as pan of a potential future renovation or replacement Center,the CMPAG memoranda that the east edge of Galena Plaza be
of the former Youth Center,extending to and encompassing the existing considered in the future as a built edge,extending to the existing stairwell/
elevator/stairwell features,could increase vitality at Galena Plaza through elevator feature,and including compelling architectural elements intended to
new was,and draw pedestrians across Main Street through the use of draw pedestrians across Main Street
compelling architectural elements.(CP$l,t3,t7) 13. In conjunction with future built edges at Galena Plaza,the CMPAG
10. A dramatically improved pedestrian way from Main Street,through the recommends the desigo of a dramatically improved pedestrian way from
Galen S[Extension,Galena Plaza and the stairway down to and through Main Street,through the Galena St Extension,Galena Plaza and stairway
Rio Grande Park will help form a connection between the downtown and the down to and through Rio Grande Park.
north side of Main Street.(CPi7) 14. In conjunction with future built edges at Galena Plaza,the CMPAG
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: recoromemds that the open apace at the center of Galena Plaza be designed to
animate the site in relation to new uses.
1. The CMPAG supports the repair of the roof of the Rio Grande Parking
Garage as soon as possible.
2. The CMPAG recommends that as pan of the garage roof repair and
replacement,the design of the new Galena Plaza use materials that are easily
removed in the future,especially in areas anticipated for built edges.
3. The CMPAG recommends that the Parks Department work with the Asset
Management and Parking departments to design an interim open space use
for Galena Plaza that is consistent with the values and philosophy of the
Aspen commwiry,to be implemented following the replacement of the
garage roof.
4. The CMPAG recommends that the City consider methods for
accommodating tents at Galena Plaza as pan of the replacement of the
garage root,to increase vitality at the sire.
5. As pan of planning for the garage roof repair,the CMPAG recommends that
City staff explore potential infiastructure improvements related to future
uses,especially along potential built edges.
6. The CMPAG recommends that staff representatives of the Pitkin County
library,Pitkin County and the City of Aspen mat to discuss the Library e
short-term infrastructure planning and long-term facility goals,and identify
an appropriate public review process that will address both shod-term and
long-term goals.
40 IThisdxumenthalwmllableolimrtwama npitkin.00m,
CRY of Aspen Community Dwelopra at Department/lung Range Planning
Ail
r1.I, rT ey f
A �� �•ter
i f. - !F'.Dui
Include:photo of existing buses at Rio Grande Transit Center, Galena Plaza Open Space
V Rio Grande Parcel
*Which Funds were used to Purchase Rio Grande Parcel—Rio Grande Parcel A&B-Lot 1& Lot 2
-7 th Penny Transportation Tax
-6th Penny Open Space Funds
*For what Purpose was Rio Grande Property Purchased
*Ordinances, Resolutions, Public Hearings supporting Purchase of Property for
Transportation/Parking/Rail
*City of Aspen Vote to Purchase Property—approving 7`h Penny Transportation—Sales Tax Revenue
Parking Garage Surface Parking Lots Paving Rio Grande Place,Galena Plaza I"CkANSVOO-A+;d
*City of Aspen Vote for Issuance of Bonds derived from Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of Parking
Garage,Transportation Center, Library(Certificates of Participation issued) - Lot 1& Lot 2
-
* OLOiNRNcAF� &ESD(uEivn111 I99C;(- ffyAK-?ivy JV fyeOP.HX! t 0ti�k�i�
�C
Galena Plaza Open Space, Plaza. Park
*Open Space requirement under Land Use Code in for parking garage
*City Charter—Change in Use of open Space requires vote