Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.20170207Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission February 7, 2017 1 Mr. Skippy Mesirow, Chair, called the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting to order for February 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM with members Skippy Mesirow, Ryan Walterscheid, Brian McNellis, Jasmine Tygre, Keith Goode, Spencer McKnight and Jesse Morris. Kelly McNicholas Kury arrived late to the meeting. Rally Dupps was not present for the meeting. Also present from City staff; Andrea Bryan, Jennifer Phelan, Hillary Seminick, and Ben Anderson. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms. Tygre noted she agrees with the term “mobility enhancements” and would like it to include better snow removal and dealing with the slush lakes at the bulb-out corners. She feels businesses and residences need to clear the snow and would like to see something added to address these concerns. Mr. Goode noted “Lake Aspen” that develops near Wagner Park. Mr. Mesirow noted Ms. McNicholas Kury arrived at the meeting. Mr. Mesirow feels these concerns speak to a broader infrastructure where it has rained in January. STAFF COMMENTS: There were no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments. MINUTES There were no draft minutes. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST There were no declarations. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing – 1419 Crystal Lake Rd – Stream Margin and Special Review Mr. Mesirow opened the hearing and turned the floor over to staff. Ms. Hillary Seminick, Planner, introduced Mr. Mitch Haas at the applicant’s representative. Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission February 7, 2017 2 She then stated property is located in the Moderate-Density Residential R15 zone district and within the stream margin review area on the Roaring Fork River. It also has an existing single family home. The applicant is proposing new top of slope designation which requires a special review. The top of slope establishes a protected area where no development beyond native vegetation is permitted. The existing top of slope cuts through the home on the property and the applicant is proposing to shift it towards the river. The proposed top of slope was confirmed on-site by City Engineering Staff in the fall of last year. Based on Engineering’s support of the proposed new designation, Planning Staff then used the proposed top of slope to review the proposed improvements as a part of this project. She then pointed out the location of the proposed top of slope on a site map of the property. Ms. Seminick noted there are a few existing nonconformities on the property including a staircase and a putting green within the 15 ft setback. In addition, a portion of the roof and second story of the home project into the 45-degree progressive height limit as measured from the top of slope extending away from the river. She continued stating in addition to the top of slope designation, the applicant is proposing a few improvements to the existing residence. They would like to change the fenestration, replace the existing siding with more modern materials, relocate the existing deck area, install a patio and spa, remove the nonconforming putting green and stairs. The nonconforming 2nd story portion of structure will not be removed. They also plan to revegetate the area below the 15 ft top of slope boundary in addition to some stormwater improvements. She added the nonconforming portion of the 2nd floor will not be increasing. She finished stating the project is pretty straight forward and Engineering is supportive with relocating the top of slope designation. Staff is recommending approval with conditions as outlined in the draft resolution which are typical for a project like this. Mr. Mesirow asked for questions of staff. Mr. Mesirow asked Staff to confirm if the original setting of the top of slope was done on a larger scope and not specific to this property and Ms. Seminick replied it was originally set by viewing a map as part of a project in 2004. Mr. Mesirow then turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning, introduced Mr. Matthew Smith, CCY Architects, as the architect and Gyles Thornely, Connect One Design, as the landscape architect for the project. Mr. Haas stated the mapping was done while the house was already there and it seemed clearly the mapping was off. He stated Mr. Smith went on the property with the City Engineering Department and staked out the adjusted top of slope which they used going forward with the proposal. They have also worked with Planning, Parks and Engineering to revise the plans to respond accordingly to their comments. At this time, they have no issues with Staff’s recommendation. Mr. Mesirow asked for questions of the applicant. There were none, so he closed this portion of the hearing. Mr. Mesirow then opened for public comment. There were none, so he closed this portion of the hearing. Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission February 7, 2017 3 Mr. Mesirow then opened for commissioner’s discussion. Mr. Goode feels it is pretty clear cut. His only concern is if he owned property and in 5-10 years from now he wanted to redefine his top of slope. What is to prevent him from getting a few dump trucks and making it what he wants it to be. Mr. Morris stated he hoped Staff would catch this. Mr. Goode noted P&Z is seeing three similar applications within the past couple of weeks. Mr. Morris moved to approve Resolution 6, Series 2017 and was seconded by Ms. Tygre. Mr. Mesirow then requested the roll call vote. Mr. McNellis, yes; Ms. McNicholas Kury, yes; Mr. Goode, yes; Mr. Morris, yes; Mr. Mesirow, yes; Ms. Tygre, yes; and Mr. Walterscheid, yes for a total of seven Yes votes to zero No votes (7-0), motion carried. Mr. Mesirow then closed the hearing. Public Hearing – 1470 Red Butte Dr – Stream Margin and Special Review Mr. Mesirow opened the hearing and turned the floor over to staff. Mr. Ben Anderson, Planner, introduced the applicant’s representatives including Ms. Christine Shine, Connect One Design, and John Galambos, Galambos Architects. Mr. Anderson described the location of the property as well as the location of the house, river, stream margin review area and the existing top of slope. The existing top of slope cuts through the middle of the house. He stated this property went through a stream margin review in 2001 and a top of slope was determined at that time. A new map established top of slope, but did not reflect site conditions. He stated the applicant is requesting a reconsideration of the top of slope. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed change and adjustments were made based on Engineering’s comments. He identified the nonconforming patio, raised beds and an earthen platform proposed for demolition because they are located in the top of slope setback. Staff is requesting the applicant exercise care for the demolition to protect the quality of the water and vegetation going down to the river. Mr. Anderson reviewed the proposed changes including a new patio and in-ground hot tub. He noted there is also a fair amount of remodel planned for the rear façade of home including reconfiguring the staircase; pushing out a portion of the building; reconfiguring the fenestration, a chimney and gable. He added no additional height is proposed. The height of the chimney is proposed to be reduced and pushed back into the building. He then clarified only the deck form is being pushed forward, not the gable itself. Mr. Anderson closed stating Staff recommends approval. The Engineering Parks Departments also support the application with conditions. Mr. Mesirow asked for questions of Staff. Mr. Goode asked if the Parks Department recommended the deck to not wrap around the NE corner. Mr. Anderson stated since the application was received, drawings have been resubmitted showing the patio ending at the deck edge. This has been included as a condition and acknowledged by the applicant. Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission February 7, 2017 4 Mr. Anderson wanted to note he received a phone call from Ms. Margo Pendleton, representing a neighbor to the west at 1500 Red Butte Dr. She stated the owner was concerned of the possibility of trees being removed and screening being undermined. Mr. Anderson responded stating there would be a landscape plan and there are no trees planned for removal. Mr. Mesirow turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. John Galambos, architect for the applicant, stated he designed original home in 2000 and it went through stream margin review at that time. Mr. Gyles Thornely then introduced himself and Ms. Christine Shine from Connect One Design. He stated the process started a year ago and it has been a lengthy and frustrating process. He is grateful to be at this stage and would love to have a reduction in fees or an expedited permit process. Mr. Mesirow asked for questions of the applicant. Mr. Mesirow then opened for public comment. There were none, so he closed this portion of the hearing. Mr. Mesirow then opened for commissioner’s discussion. Ms. Tygre motioned to approve Resolution 7, Series 2017. Ms. McNicholas Kury seconded the motion. Mr. Mesirow requested a roll call. Roll Call: Mr. Goode, yes; Ms. Tygre, yes; Mr. McNellis, yes; Mr. Walterscheid, yes; Mr. Mesirow, yes; Ms. McNicholas Kury, yes; and Mr. Morris, yes; for a total seven Yes votes and zero No votes (7-0). The motion passed. Mr. Mesirow then closed the hearing. OTHER BUSINESS None. Mr. Mesirow then closed the meeting. Cindy Klob City Clerk’s Office, Records Manager