The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.289 Exhibition Ln.A068-03et,-4 NupÂ°* 1Â· ' r ...7~ .. CASE NUMBER A068-03 PARCEL ID # 2735-143-16014 CASE NAME Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC Final PUD PROJECT ADDRESS 289 Exhibition Lane PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE Final PUD OWNER/APPLICANT Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC REPRESENTATIVE David Johnston DATE OF FINAL ACTION 01/28/04 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION ENFORCEMENT LTR BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 02/03/04 BY D DRISCOLL PARCEL ID: ~2735-143-16014 DATE RCVD: ~ 11/17/03 # COPIES: CASE NO ~A068-03 CASE NAME:~Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC Final PUD PLNR~James Lindt PROJ ADDR:~289 Exhibition Lane CASE TYP:~Final PUD STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Aspen Maroon Cree ADR.~289 Exhibition Lane C/S/Z: |Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:| REP:~David Johnston ADR:~418 Cooper Street Suit C/S/Z: ]Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~970/925-3444 FEES DUE:~ ' FEES RCVD~$1260.00 Rept 10300 STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:~ BY~ DUE: ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| / CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ pz: 11FRliBTffl4Mfii<xlefeir,144,1-204<., BOA: CLOSED:| BY:~ DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: (EkÂ·62,-c,~044'Mj Â£'28Â·21'' tv.i)Â¢,ept -- /,lch\/i T.9 GEnui /35)4~~~~ l?l/I,k L),tliNfC,1 7. _ 29 1- 9 )3> i< 1 16 1< A 6--3 (EV\& Acy ) v'6~ iA/1 4 41 ~ Appicifick 6 - C et .. January 28, 2004 Bo Vinton ASPEN/PITKIN C/o David Johnston David Johnston Architects COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'r DEPARTMENT 408 E. Cooper St, Suite 206B Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 289 Exhibition Lane Activity Envelope Violation Dear Mr. Vinton, I am writing this letter as a result of the Planning and Zoning Commissions action that denied your activity envelope request at 289 Exhibition Lane. As you are aware. two (2) large flagstone patio areas were built outside of the designated activity envelope. which is a violation of the Aspen Ilighlands Village PUD regulations. Given that the Planning and Zoning Commission denied your request to legalize the patios. the violation inust be remedied. In speaking with your representative; David Johnston, it was expressed that you would like to obtain a temporary Certificate of Occupancy conditioned upon removing the ' subject patio areas by May 1 St in order to properly re-vegetate the area. The Community Development Staff concurs that a compliance date of May 1St is appropriate to properly re-vegetate the area in which the patios were built. Staff also agrees that a letter of credit based on a contractor's cost estimate to remove the patios is appropriate to ensure that the patios are removed and the subject areas are re-vegetated prior to May 1 ht. rherefore, the Zoning Staff will approve a conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the residence upon receiving a letter of credit and a copy of a contractors cost estimate as was explained above. That being the case, this letter shall serve as notice that the patios must be removed and that the area from which the patios are to be removed must be properly re-vegetated to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to St May 1 . If you have any questions or comments in regards to this matter please call me at (970)920-5095. Regards, CÂ»Luk James Lindt. 0 Planner City of Aspen 130 SOUTH GALENA S'I'REET Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920,5090 FAx 970.920.5439 IPrinted on Recycled Paper .. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Aspen Community (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax Development Department 3X To: David Johnston From: James Lindt Fax: 920-2186 Pages: Phone: Date: 1/28/04 Re: 289 Exhibition Lane CC: [] Urgent U For Review C] Please Comment C] Please Reply C] Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: . .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals. described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Maroon Creek Aspen, LLC, 289 Exhibition Lane, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 14, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval to amend the building envelope to allow for a roof overhang to be maintained Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 1, Series of 2004 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) January 17,2004 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) January 17,2007 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) th Issued this 17 day of January, 2004, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. f >Â»Yr_.(f,0.0,<- Joyce Al]*aier. Conynunity Development Deputy Director .. PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public o f the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Lise Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 14, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD, by resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 1, Series of 2004. Approval was granted for a building envelope adjustment to allow for a building overhang that was constructed outside the building envelope to be maintained. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Publish iii The Aspen Times on January 17, 2004 .. RESOLUTION N(). 1 (SERIES OF 2004) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONINC; COMMISSION APPROVING A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PUD TO AMEND THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ON LOT 14, BLOCK G, OF THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE SUBDIVISION/PUD, 289 EXHIBITION LANE, TO ALLOW FOR A ROOF OVERHANG TO BE MAINTAINED OUTSIDE THE ORIGINALLY DESIGNATED BUILDING ENVELOPE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-143-16-014 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Mai-oon Creek Aspen LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects. requesting approval of a PUD amendment to tile Aspen Highlands Village PUD to amend the "activity envelope" and a "building envelope adjustment" on Lot 14. Block G. ofthe Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to allow for two (2) patio areas to be maintained outside the originally designated activity envelope: and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards. the Community Development Department recommended denial of the proposed PUD aniendinent. and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on January 6,2004. the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal and entertained a motion to approve both the requested "building envelope adjustment" and the "activity envelope adjustment"r and, WHEREAS, the motion to approve both the requested building envelope adjustment and the activity envelope adjustment failed by a vote of four to two (4-2): and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission subsequently considered a second motion to approve only the requested "building envelope adjustment", which was approved by a six to zero (6-0) vote: thereby approving the proposed "building envelope adjustment with the condition of approval contained herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal for the "building envelope adjustment" meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that tlie approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: .. Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.445, Planned Unit Development. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a PUD amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to amend the "building envelope' on Lot 14. Block G. of the Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to allow for the roof overhang to be maintained outside of the originally designated building envelope. with the following condition: 1. The Applicant shall record a plat identifying the amended building envelope within 180 days ofthis approval. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated iii such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as i f fully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. Xection 3: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section. subsection. sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction. such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 6th day of:knuary. 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 0 .2 â‚¬5Â£34. /1 Crulgic}le'/,ted RESOLUTION NO. < 8 1/ 4144 l/\ â‚¬C{ F>11 (SERIES OF 2004) Nof Appa/4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PUD TO AMEND THE ACTIVITY AND BUILDING ENVELOPES ON LOT 14, BLOCK G, OF THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE SUBDIVISION/PUD TO ALLOW FOR TWO (2) PATIO AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED OUTSIDE THE ORIGINALLY DESIGNATED ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND TO ALLOW FOR A ROOF OVERHANG TO BE MAINTAINED OUTSIDE THE ORIGINALLY DESIGNATED BUILDING ENVELOPE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-143-16-014 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Maroon Creek Aspen LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects, requesting approval o f a PUD amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to amend the activity envelope on Lot 14, Block G, of the Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to allow for two (2) patio areas to be maintined outside the originally designated activity envelope; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the proposed PUD amendment; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on January 6,2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein and approved this resolution, by a to (1-1) vote; approving the proposed requests with the conditions of approval contained herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.445, Planned Unit Development, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a PUD amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to amend the activity and building envelopes on Lot 14, Block G, of the Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD to allow for two (2) patio areas to be maintained outside the originally designated activity envelope and to allow for the roof overhang to be maintained outside of the originally designated building envelope, with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall re-vegetate the area to be removed from the existing activity envelope with a natural seed mix to be approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department within ninety (90) days of this approval. Additionally. the Applicant shall submit a landscape plan for approval by the Parks Department prior to re-vegetating the area to be removed from the activity envelope. Also, the Applicant shall remove the Blue Spruce trees that have been planted in this area and replace them with Engleman Spruce trees. 2. The Applicant shall retroactively apply for and obtain a change order to their building permit for the patios that were built without approval. The ..__ change order application shall include a revised drainage plan demonstrating that there will be no increase in the historic run-off on the property as a result of the construction ofthe patio areas. 3. The Applicant shall record a plat identifying the amended building and activity envelopes within 180 days of this approval. 4. Based on the findings of the Applicant's Engineer, the Applicant, his heirs, and assigns shall hold the City harmless from any damages that may result from an avalanche that encroaches upon the two (2) patios subject to this amendment. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now~ pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 6th day of January, 2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk .. 26 45- 0 604 A tutÂ« ; / 61Â©04-- f _R .. MEMORANDUM NON m to q nne Ve 1044 04 uu-~ogti* h Â£44 TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission THRU: Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director 1- ... FROM: James Lindt, Plannerc)' litolioJJ&.42 Al k.' RE: 289 Exhibition L:ine PI~~~mendment- Public Hearing_lo, 1 0 li 41~337 C?,3~optue DATE: January 6,2004 0 466,64/01 i *<91 'Eve 040 1 U.51- PROJECT: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT 6 9 c o .id 'tic REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD Amendment to allow -- for an activity envelope adjustment to allow for two (2) patios that were - |~4 (1Â¢)6it~ built outside the designated activity envelope to be maintained. LO (26.- CURRENT ZONING: R-15 PUD (Aspen Highlands Village PUD) LAND USE PUD Amendment REQUESTS: STAFF Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the RECOMMENDATION: proposed PUD amendment. BACKGROUND: Maroon Creek Aspen. LLC ("Applicant"), represented by David Johnston Architects is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for the existing activity envelope at 289 Exhibition Lane to be adjusted (no increase in the size of the envelope is requested) to encompass two (2) at grade ratios that were constructed outside of the existing activity envelope without first obtaining approval to do so. Additionally, the Applicant is requesting a building envelope adjustment to allow for a roof overhang that was constructed outside of the building envelope to be maintained. The property subject to this PUD amendment is located within the Aspen Highlands Village PUD and contains a new single-family residence that has yet to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy due to the patio and overhang encroachments outside of the designated activity and building envelopes. It should be noted that the Aspen Highlands Village PUD requires that all construction disturbance and regrading occur within the designated activity envelopes and that all structures be located within the designated building envelopes. LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED: The Applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to allow for the designated activity and building envelopes at 289 Exhibition Lane to be amended to encompass the two (2) patio areas and the roof overhang described above pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.090(B), pUL) /lmendmentsÂ· The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve, approve with conditions. or deny the proposed request after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Department. It should be noted that -1- .. the Applicant has the ability to appeal an adverse decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to City Council. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff does not condone developing outside of the designated envelopes and then asking for approval. Moreover. prior to developing the existing single-family residence on the site, staff was approached by the Applicant requesting the ability to develop outside of the building envelope iii the area where the patios currently exist. At that point. staff indicated to the Applicant that there would likely be avalanche concerns and recommended that they maintain their existing building and activity envelopes. In addition, the City Zoning Officer clearly marked that there is no disturbance allowed outside of the designated activity and building envelopes on the building permit plans (attached as Exhibit "C'Â°). Subsequently, the Applicant developed the ratios outside of their building and activity envelopes without approval. Setting aside the fact that these improvements were made without approval, staff believes that in this particular case, there were safety reasons for locating the building and activity envelopes where they were designated. In conducting a site visit. staff felt that avalanche chutes had the potential to empty out into the area located directly to the southwest of the existing building envelope, where the patios have been built. However, the Applicant has provided staff with a letter (attached as Exhibit "D") from a licensed engineer certifying that it is their belief that the patio areas are safe from avalanche concerns. That being the case. staff feels that the Applicant has appropriately addressed the avalanche concerns and that the City would not be liable for damages or safety issues related to possible avalanches given the findings of the engineering report. Staff believes that the proposed request is in contlict with the conditions set forth in the original PUD approval. Staff feels that the building envelope on this parcel was established to ensure the preservation of the natural meadow area to the southwest of the building envelope (please see site plan below for the location of the meadow). Staff further believes that allowing for the extension of the envelope into this area would defeat the purpose of establishing a building envelope on this lot. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the requested PUD amendment. ..i:. ..k.-.$. 9.1.= 1 Ptigr 6,90 + - Meadow Area , i- I ... ..2. , 1, L& ....': lA . 1 , $ .1 1 - I , 1 . A . 1, ...... ~ I. lili Activity Envelope - I .+ 1. -2- .. 1 f the Planning and Zoning Commission is inclined to approve the proposed request, staff would recommend that the Commission require the conditions or approval that are proposed iii the resolution. The conditions in the proposed resolution require that the Applicant obtain a change order to the original building envelope and that a revised drainage plan showing the ratios be submitted for approval by the Community Development Engineer. Additionally, a condition has been proposed that requires the Applicant to re-vegetate the areas that are proposed to be removed from the activity envelope with a native seed mix to be approved by the City Parks Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed request, finding that amending the activity envelope to encompass the two (2) patios is a change in the character of the original approval, which designated the building and activity envelopes in a manner that would preserve the natural meadow area that is located to the southwest of the existing activity envelope. This will require the Applicant to remove these improvements and return the area to its pre- construction condition. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS SHALL BE MADE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2004. approving with conditions, a PUD amendment to allow for an amendment to the designated activity and building envelopes at 289 Exhibition Lane to allow for the two (2) patio areas to be maintained as constructed and to allow for the existing roof overhang to be maintained." ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT A - REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS EXHIBIT B - APPLICATION EXHIBIT C - APPROVED BULDING PERMIT SITE PLAN EXHIBIT D - ENGINEERING LETTER RELATED TO AVALANCHE CONCERNS EXHIBIT E - REFERRAL COMMENTS 1 0 41 6 0,- 00/ C.tu -4Â·-LL- DJÂ·-~-~ 73 -3- .. EXHIBIT A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT Review Criteria & Staff Findings SECTION 26.445.050, REVIEW STANDARDS: PUD AMENDMENT Section 26.445.050 of the Regulations provides that development applications for a PUD amendment must comply with the following standards and requirements. A. General Requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding Activity envelopes were established in the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to prevent and limit the destruction of native areas during construction of residences on these properties that are located in sensitive environmental areas. That being the case, staff feels that it is unfortunate that the Applicant constructed the patios outside of their activity envelopes in an area that was supposed to be undisturbed. Therefore. staff does not believe that allowing the Applicant to maintain the patios is consistent with the AACP. Staff does not believe that this criterion is met. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding The proposal does not affect the single-family residential use of the property. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable to this application. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect thefuture development of the surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff does not believe that the proposal will adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area in any way. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, ir exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with,.final PUD development plan review. -4- .. Staff Finding The proposal would not have any GMOS implications in that a single-family residence already exists and there were GMOS allotments granted through the original subdivision approvals. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. B Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The.final PUD development plans shall establish the dimenxional requirements for all properties within the PUD. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the propo~ed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. 1.The proposed dimensional requirementsfor the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, exixting and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural and man-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Fi nding The application is not requesting to amend the dimensional requirements that were established through the Aspen Highlands Village PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, und quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character ot the proposed PUD and ofthe surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff does believe that the proposed amendment will affect the site coverage on the property. The area that is proposed to be reclaimed and re-vegetated did not have structure or ratio on it in the first place. Therefore, the area that is proposed to be added to the activity envelope to encompass the patios is allowing for them to be maintained and thereby increasing the impervious area within the property over what was originally approved. Thus. the proposed amendment allows for the residence to spread out more than was originally intended. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those tising the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. -5- .. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking A proposed c) The availability Of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding This application will not affect the number of off-street parking spaces available oil the site. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient in.frastructure capabilities. Specitically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure Jire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding This application is not requesting to reduce the allowable density within the PUD. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site .features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitablefor the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mudflow, rockfalls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail iii the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding The Applicant is not requesting to reduce the maximum allowable density within the PUD. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: -6- .. a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified iii subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase iii maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surl'ounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Staff Finding The Applicant is not requesting to increase the maximum allowable density within the PUD. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. B. Site Design: The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-madefeatures of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding Staff believes that the activity envelope on this lot was established in manner that would preserve the natural meadow area to the southwest of the existing activity envelope. And therefore, because the Applicant has disturbed this area, staff does not believe that the proposal preserves the existiiig natural features of the property. Thus. staff finds this criterion not to be met. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. Staff Finding There is only one structure on the property and thus clustering is not required. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or ruiÂ·al context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. Staff Finding The street orientation and the architecture of the existing residence are not proposed to be altered by the proposed amendment. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. -7- .. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Staff Finding The Aspen Fire Protection District reviewed the proposed amendment and found that the request did not adversely affect the emergency access to the site or the surrounding sites because the area subject to the proposed amendment is on the rear of the residence. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. Staff Finding The proposed amendment will not adversely affect pedestrian or handicapped access. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 6. Site drainage is accommodated ji,r the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding A change order to the building permit for the residence is required to be submitted retroactively in the proposed resolution. At the time iii which the change order is filed, a revised drainage plan shall be required for review by the Community Development Engineer, which shall demonstrate that there will be increase in the historic run-off on the property. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately de-signed to accommodate any programmatic .functions associated with the use. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to construct any non-residential land uses on the site. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. C. Landscape Plan: The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the sub.ject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserving existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. -8- .. Staff Finding Staff believes tliat the Applicant removed significant natural vegetation from the site outside of the designated activity envelope. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be 11'let. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding Staff believes that the Applicant encroached upon the natural meadow area that was to be preserved by the designation of the existing activity envelope. Staff finds this criterion not to be met. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding Please see response to Criterion (2( 1 ). Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Architectural Character: It is the purpose of this standard to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development und within the City while promoting efficient use O.f resources. Architectural character iN based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character Of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the .final development plan and architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the architecture of the existing residence. Thus, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access. shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. -9- .. Staff Finding The Applicant will be required to meet the energy code requirements for the addition of the patio area at the time of the change order submittal as is required in the conditions of approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Accommodate the storage and shielding qfsnow, ice, and water in a safe an appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Staff Finding The patio that was added contains snowmelt. Additionally. the roof of the residence accommodates the patio area through a gutter system that drains the water away from the patio area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Lighting: The purpose ofthis standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The.fi}ilowing standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed %0 as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any king to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding All outdoor lighting is required to meet the Aspen Highlands Village Lighting Code that was established in the Aspen Highlands Village PUD. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standardx unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting o.f site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property M prohibited -for residential development. Staff Finding Please see response to the previous criterion. Staff finds this criterion to be met. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area: If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area.for the mutual benefit of aH development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual reliet to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit o.f the various land uses and propeily users of the PUD. -10- .. Staff Finding The area subject to the proposed amendment does not contain common open space or recreational areas. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in al! common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. Staff Finding This application does not affect any common park or recreation areas. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared .facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or induxtrial development. Staff Finding This application does not affect any common park or recreation areas. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. H. Utilities and Public Facilities: The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose any undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public .facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. Staff Finding Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impose any undue burden on the existing infrastructure or utilities in the area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. Staff Finding Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impose any undue burden on the existing infrastructure or utilities in the area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. - 11 - .. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to install oversized utilities or public facilities and the City has not required that oversized utilities be installed. Staff does not find this criterion to be applicable to this application. I. Access and Circulation (Only standards 1&2 apply m Minor PUD applications): The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the fi}liowing criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through and approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. Staff Finding The property has adequate vehicular access and this amendment will not affect said access. Therefore. staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The propo~ed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. Staff Finding The existing vehicular access points and parking arrangement are not proposed to be affected by the amendment. Therefore. staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. J. Phasing of Development Plan. The purpose O.f these criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. ff phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the tollowing: 1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. 2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants Of initial phases from the construction of later phases. 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact .fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD. construction of any required aftordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. - 12 - .. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to phase the proposed construction and the patios that are subj ect to the amendment have already been built. Therefore, staff finds this criterion not to be applicable. -13- 0 0 66139 1% 4 DAVIDJOHNSTONARCHITECTS PC Â» e 'realgint. November 14,2003 Mr. James Lindt Community Development Department City of Aspen Re: 289 Exhibition Lane PUD Amendment Dear James, On behalf of the Owners of Lot 14, 289 Exhibition Lane, we are requesting a PUD Amendment to reestablish the parameters of the Activity Envelope for the subject Lot. Please note the enclosed site plan outlining the details of the proposal; i.e.975 SF of existing activity envelope area located on the northwest side ofthe lot will be removed as 'activity envelope' and kept in a natural state of landscaping. A new 975 SF portion of activity envelope will be established upon the south edge ofthe building envelope. This new portion will contain assorted hardscape and landscaping. As apparent throughout the Aspen Highlands neighborhood, building envelopes are small and compact. Care was given to establishing activity envelopes for any further development outside the building envelope, including exterior patios and/or driveways, landscaping, or other disturbances. In the case of Lot 14, the activity envelope was located between Lot 14 and Lot 12 on the northwest side (a dimension of 25 feet), a unrealistic position for any exterior uses other then landscaping and regrading. The southern portion of the building envelope is a logical location for outdoor hardscaping. Both private and hidden from all adjacent homes and development, the proposed activity envelope takes advantage of existing trail disturbance and site grading. Enclosed is our response to Section 26.445.050, Review Standards. Thank you for your time with this matter. Respectfully, David Johnston David Johnston Architects, pc. U:*~ w c~ +Aa_. c~J.At:.* ,-0~ â€ž u.re,t . 970 / 925 3444 1 www.djarchitects.com 7..2 / t.Â·20 2180 i 418 E Cooper Avenue Suite 206 Aspen CO 81611 concept@diarchitects.com .. Section 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures ofthis Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. - 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. The new development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed development is consistent with the character of existing land uses throughout the Aspen Highlands area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The proposed development does not adversely affect the future development of Aspen Highiand Maroon neighborhood. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. The proposed development is exempt from GMQS. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. The existing size of the activity is maintained, thereby being consistent with the land uses in the area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. The new activity envelope is located on a relatively flat grade adjacent to disturbed areas of construction, compatible with all existing development. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. The new activity envelope is appropriate to all existing characteristics of the property, away from any steep slopes or existing waterways, contains only on-grade improvements and landscaping, on a natural grassland plateau, independent of any significant landforms. . d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. The new activity envelope is compatible to all man-made characteristics of the property. The new area is hidden and independent from all public access or public circulation, including driveways, sidewalks, or parking, and does not contribute noise adversely with adjacent properties. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site - coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. The area of activity envelope will remain the same, consistent with the original PUD. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: Not applicable. a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non- residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum densily of a PUD may be reduced if: Not applicable. a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. 5. The maximum allowable densily within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: Not applicable. a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes hannful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if. Not applicable .. a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site' s physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Notes: a) Lot sizes for individual lots within a PUD may be established at a higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone district as long as, on average, the enlire PUD conforms to the maximum density provisions of the respective zone district or as otherwise established as the maximum allowable density pursuant to a Final PUD Development Plan. b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within the PUD are required to be reflected in the fmal PUD development plans. C. Site Design. â€¢ The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site' s natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public' s health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. The patios and landscaping designed within the new activity envelope compliment the existing home design and the surrounding development areas, by using natural stone materials, random shaping and contouring, and landscaping accentuating the natural environment. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. The new development preserves all open space originally designed. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. All new developable areas are hidden from alt public streets. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Not applicable. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. All development is on-grade. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Atl site drainage is accommodated as originally approved and designed. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Not applicable. .. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. All new development within the new activity envelope enhances the existing landscape character Of the site, creates a natural setting for patios, and enhances the man-made structure. AU new landscaping is suitablefor high-alpine environments. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. All existing features will be preserved. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. All existing features will be preserved and maintained. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building' s use, the building' s proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: Not applicable. 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing ofnearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property' s solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: No additional lighting is proposed as part of this application. 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lightmg of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate nnanner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: Not applicable. See descriptions above for enhancement of open space. 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property' s built form, and is available to the mutual benefit ofthe various land uses and property users ofthe PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of 1his standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City' s infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: Not applicable. 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. L Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1 &2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: Not applicable. 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. J. Phasing of Development Plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: The existing development enhancements and improvements are existing. NOV-10-2UUj nUN 11;12 Mn r na r,v. . . Ill- .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Pt.ANNER: .latnes Lindt, 920.5095 DATE: 11/10/03 PROJEC Y 289 Exhibition Lane Planned Unit Development Amendment REPRESENTATIVE: David Johnston Architects OWNER; Maroon Creek Aspen LLC TYI)E OF APPLICATION: PUD Amendment DESCRIPTIONÂ· Amending Building Envelope to allow for patios to be maintained that encroach outside the existing building envelope. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.445. PUD Review by: Staff for complete application, referral agencies for technical considerations, Planning and Zoning Commission for decision. Public 1]earing: Yes Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $1260 Total Deposit: $1260 for 6 hours of Staff Time (Billed at $210 per hour over the time that deposit covers) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of tho representative authorized to act on behal fofthe applicant. 3. Signed fec agreenient. 4. Pre-application Conference Summary. 5. An 8 1/2" x 11"vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. 6. Site Plan and Survey showing the encroachments beyond thc building envelope (please supply two 24" x 36" copies and ten ll"x 17"copies). On the survey, please show the area that is proposed to bc incorporated in the building envelope and the area of development envelope or building envelope that is proposed to bc removed so that the proposed building envc]ope is not any larger than the existing building envelope adjustment. 8. A written description of the proposal and a written cxplanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 10 Copies ofthc complete application packet (items 2-8) Process: Apply. Planner checks application for completeness. Stat'fthen reviews application against PUD Amendment Standards. After the Community Development Staff has determined that the application is complete, the Community Development staff will assign a hearing date. Planning and Zoning Commission reviews application at public hearing and makes linal decision. Ditlaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on Ihe City. The sumniary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The st,inmary clues not create a legal or ve~led righT. Nov 10 03 10:59a DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 971-920 2186 P.3 Â¥ NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:42 ~ FAX NO, ~ P, 06 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC I.ocation: 289 Exhibition Lane, Aspen, CO (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Aspen Highlands Village PUD Blk: G Lot: 14 - - - REPRESENTATIVE: Name: David Johnston Address: 418 Cooper Street, Suite 206 Aspen, CO 925-3444 Phone #: PROJECT: Name: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC Addzess: 289 Exhibition Lane Aspen, CO Phone#: 302-654-6611 TvrE OF ArrDCATION: (please check all that apply): El Conditional Use O Conceptual PUD O Conceptual Histotic Dcvt. O Special Review 311~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) O Final Historic Development O Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA O Minor Historic Devt. [3 OMQS Allotment O Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) O Historic Demolition 13 GMQS Exemption ~ O Subdivision O Historic Designation C ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream O Subdivision Exemption (includes O Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condommiumization) Expansion i Mountain View Plane C] Lot Split O Temporary Use O Other: O Lot Line Adjust,nent O Text/Map Amendment ExlsTBG CONmnows: (description of existingbuildings. uses. previousapprovals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (deSCIiption of proposed buildings, uses, modifications. etc) Have yon attached the following? FEES DUE: S E] Pre-Applicolion Conference Summary O Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement C Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requiremenu Form E Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements. Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" * 11"must be folded and a lloppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be mbmitted 1, part of the application. Nov 10 03 10:58a DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 979_920 2186 P.2 90- NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:41 j~ FAX NO. // P. 04 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AErcement for Pavment of City ei Aspeâ€¢ Development Application Ver, CrrY DFASPEN (hettinafter CrrY) and Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPL]CANT ]105 submmed to CITY an application for PUD Amendmant 289 Exhibition Lane (liereinaftcr, THE. PR()J}ECT). 2. APPLICANT undentands and agrees that City of Asren Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee struorme for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing iber is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and ClTY agrec that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not rossible ut this time M :lacerlitin the full extent of the costs involved ill proce55inK tile orplication, APPLICANT and ClTY further agree (hlit it is in Ihc imerest of the parties thut APPI.leANT make payment of an initial deposit and m thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APP].ICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their heorings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notificotion by the CITY when tlicy are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will bc benefited through the greater ccrtainty of recovering ils full costs to process APPI,ICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to coniplete processing or present 51}flicient inforniation to the Planning Commission and/tir City Com,cil lo enable (lic Planning Commission and/or City Council to inake legally required findings tor project consideration, unlcu current billings me paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefure, APPLICANT agrees thnt in considerationofthe CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to o detormination of applicatiqrt coinplctcne.vi, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of f -6~80 which im fur hours of Com,nunity Development stall time, and if aclual rceorde(i cos[, exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay addilional monthly billings to CITY lo reimburse fhe CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post aliproval review at a nk of $205.00 per plaimor hour over,]le initial deposil. Such petiodic paymn,rs shall be macie within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further Bgrnes that #bilure to pay sucli accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of proccssing. and in no cnic will building permits bc i55UCd unlil al] costs associated with cose processing have been pitid. crry oF ASPEN APPLICANT By; By: Jutie Anti Woods 11-11-03 Community Develnpment Director Date: Billing Addres, and Telephone Number: Required 3UU Water Street Suite 300 It;\.5 upplir,\forins,\agrpnya s.doc Wilmington, DE 19801 6/05/03 302-654-6611 â€¢r .. ASPEN MAROON CREEK, LLC 300 WATER STREET SUITE 300 WILMINGTON, DE 19801 November 10, 2003 Mr. James Lindt Planning & Zoning Commision City of Aspen Aspen, CO RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT Dear Mr. Lindt: This is to inform you that Aspen-Maroon Creek, LLC has authorized David Johnston, of 418 Cooper Street, Suite 206 Aspen, CO (phone: 925-3444) to act as our representative in the above referenced matter. Regards, 3=pE-40 Vj/\.1-w~_ B. Vinton Partner 302-654-6611 â€¢m NOV. 10.2003 1: 36PM SIEWAKI I]ILe AbrtN â€žV. V/lu 1. L T Â¥ OF ASPEN c=.N -617 PAID OATE REP NO. DATE 40-NO 44903 m * IS% 63 41416 + m# /5663 WARRANTY DZED 11:15Â»UÂ»,Mode# 30 440Â¢ April , 3002 .ber-- MIC,jam; 1. CRZO= AND ECH=1 0. MID. Ork -C-,01 -Date .4 1 WRROON CREEK 191*, UC, A COLORADOLâ„¢t~0 LIABILIM COMPA= OROOD.42 READâ€¢0 nx. Maw tuht#.0*.13720 d- 69 &*St -1 SUic of DELLIURE . E..4. -- dollar, ind othor good and I~luabl. coiuideration DOUARS, de rce*1 -0.16.1=y of which i,hs=ky ack-**ed, ./0.4//4 -40--Â¤â€¢d. =1*th- P.U. /. 0=.bâ€¢E- 111.51-V =Nic=Orm, -IN plilmt. hil Icbs -1 â€¢14,1 ree-. I~ Al 1011 0Mllq 00Ulâ€¢f â€¢I* 40â€¢alle-. W Ill. al,-le. 4*I mii Wiq i. Iht 9.1 Co-* 0, Pr,Int - Sme. Cok..1.de,Â£1*24 ..U-Â· Let 14, Block G, T= ASPEN VILLâ€¢ga P.U.D., according to thâ€¢ Pllt thlriot rloordid Octobar 15, 1590 11 Plat Book *7 *t Â»ag* 1 am -coption 110Â· 423275. COmITI 0, PITKIM. STATE Or COLORADO. 465890 .mgom/TIM ECEI,W N/M/2102 -,knio,lablmet:-4-nbe-: 02*5 nÂ»IDITION Lan. MIPEN. CO 81611 TOGOTIER .. - ... I - ./ .....1 62 ./.... -'a'ell-' Itmal"de,=al.'"Ii"An, '='.m- =d,manh~01, -1.,tÂ¥~uk,nA-,b==clm:'n -44-*,1-ht,- 100. of*0"'Â£0...1.v ort.i'*4 *"A Â» I..-ch~DI'/M#bxl;~thâ€¢h-hame=1-40<"".i TO HAV; AND TO BOLD *-Â§ /*9 *- *px -d.,*â€¢, 4 - K , ,--0--~*.0.... "Ii- *le'=. A.-m'.1,&*1d-K'ille:4.-Pe-~ 1 .. A-=Ve==..4.ik-*rec--.Nk ...me, Will#4 -,1-d-1.-d*- .*49 leâ€¢tple==a. hai,Â»cllidz,dollp,=i=*= c..ey.a,bul.I,B..e, p..i. -b-aolWireliN.e-~0~*heli-- In-, 1,*c aqit. -all/Zd*.*11 ha - h=-*-*blr,mE.,1~ hz=4 . I ..* 44-muW#--*Im tho,- .,oct/le m...tienâ€¢ =hmm on thi antachid 9 -ExaIBIÂ¥ 1â€¢. 171Â® Imm- 1- - 41 WARRANTY AND FORRVER DEM,v N ..... Al -L- 11Â·LJ 444 (49 - MIQUEL E. C*IDEN I -22 - # f PAULA i U ~ i LAMBER~ U Ileolo,ado i U. ..9 0..apfu A J 11, Câ€¢-,hâ€¢ Ill lm70. Â· .30(.my. , 2002 by . E. CRID- A- MIBIELI S. CRIDEN - coÂ·-no. ex,ket /2-17-2005 Wh-*Wal*I n ~ LNU&2~**Ii. Ne,14 h# 61Â» 40: an.uke 1.5 ma ./--/.1.1/- 5 01.lili.=- 04/04/2-2 19:27* ,. #9444 d . ple '4 4 - * 1 , a i 4 40 4 .3 111 + 4 8 P .0 9. 4 30 * 0 0.204%00 o Creek Dr poNâ€¢f . 71 % 4 Prit (.p 3 + 00 1 00 JO MI URI Â¢~ ' 0 1 3: ' a , 73* N m t '3 '.. &:./.. 9, I *00 f 01 11/7 % e 14.H 91: S .. 2 1/Al &39/ .9*4 #5 9/9.. i garoon Creek . 4.4, tz $ '0*04. 379 4 4 -Â·vlf.Â£Â·9> l,. 4 2Â» 7 'S , 1 1. -- A. 21Â· :. i ~ 3.Â·.C.kg -7 - ~4' Lazy Châ€¢ir Ranch Rd "00" ~'~ P : 1...1...,1 , 4 ....1.4.Â·,1 E : 1 O._ 8 Â¥0% 8 1 17 er# regÂ® Trait 4 'Irr . #44 + ,4 croek 0 -Or 16 \ .9 U Â·. Id Auouu,H . I 4 31Â·.N. .....9#f. 13 h 1 11/ 9 1 -. . V - Aspen Street Map 2 29 03 08:59a DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 970 920 2186 p 0 0 all 1,6,1 ARTHUR I. MEARS, RE., INC. Natural Hazards Consultants 555 County Road 16 Gunnison, Colorado 81230 Tel/Fax: 970-641-3236 artmears@rmii.com December 23,2003 Mr. David Johnston David Johnston Architects, P.C. 418 E. Cooper Ave., Suite 206 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Avalanche hazard to patio area, Vinton residence Dear Mr. Johnston: As you requested, I made a site visit to the Vinton residence, located on Lot 14 on December 22,2003. The purpose of my site inspection was to evaluate the potential snow-avalanche hazard to the south patio area which is shown on your plan which was faxed to me on 12/23/2003. This property is located south of the LowerStein ski run, which can also serve as an avalanche path during severe and unusual snowpack and weather conditions and can run out into the meadow area south of the house. My site inspection indicates that the Lower Stein avalanche, even during the rare design- magnitude avalanche conditionsl will flow completely to the south of the existing building and the completed south patio area (the "new activity envelopeD adjacent to this building. When this avalanche extends to its greatest width it will still pass approximately 30m to 40m (100 to 130 feet) to the south of the house. The new activity envelope is therefore roughly 70 to 100 feet to the north of the maximum limit of the avalanche, even during design-magnitude conditions. Because the new activity envelope will riot be affected by avalanches no mitigation of any type will be required. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, OdUl. \1 8 Arthur I. Mears, P.E. Avalanche-control engineer 1 In Pitkin County, the design-magnitude avalanche, an event with a magnitude and destructive potential that must be considered in land-use planning and engineering, has a return period of 100 years. Mas3 Wasting â€¢ Avalanches â€¢ Avalanche Control Engineering Brian Flynn. 11 :04 AM 12/1122003, DRC review of the PUD amend~289 exhibition 1... Page 1 of 1 Ed/li~lo iltÂ° X-Sender: brianf@commons X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:04:04 -0700 To: jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us From: Brian Flynn <brianf@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: DRC review of the PUD amendmet 289 exhibition lane X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean James, after review of the requested PUD amendment, the following conditions apply: 1) Supply the Parks Dpt with the current landscape plan for the portion of the existing enveloped proposed to return to natural conditions. The plan should detail the native seed mix. tree species, and exact locations. 2) Parks will review the plan and make decisions to the locations, species and total number o f plantings. 3) Landscaping shall take place and be inspected by the parks department for final approval. Brian Flynn. Parks & Open Space Coordinator 130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-6011(P) 970-920-5128(F) Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> 12/11/2003 .1. Daniel Labs, M.L~. 01:11~k! 12/26/2003 , Public Hearing January~004 Page 1 of 1 EX h ,64 54- "F 0 From: "J. Daniel Labs, M.D." <drdanl@gulfaccess.net> To: <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Public Hearing January 6,2004 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:11:28 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Dear Mr. Lindt: As the co-owner of Lot 16 Aspen Highlands Maroon Creek, we OPPOSE any changes to the activity and building envelopes on Lot 14, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision that impact Lot 16 IN ANY WAY. Kindly CONFIRM by return e-mail our written opposition. Thank you for your assistance, J. Daniel Labs Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> 12/29/2003 /// E-)1(14-Llk.&/ 1 Roe;*ujtic~ al ' losvic,LE pY P ~-4~te* 6, 1 pX ~~3 I ./ #1.-,2 .. . ..,r v I Â·U 611 .11 -- 02 7 4 i~ p . I y. 2 1 - I V .L .1 41 4. 4. 1. i 1 . . 1 1 ,/4 . ': . L.Â·. ... ~ 3 i 1 1 . 1 24 1/ i . I . 1 Â·f Â· ' 1 ~4 r ,% . 4 . / 1 - . ijÂ· ./. :IN . ' 4 7 14/ . - i Â». :.f/':= . N 11 - . i i 1. . - 4 1 Â£ 1 I . 16 1 11 4 3/ 1 0 . A 1 - 4<11 I .4 14 14 , 6% . 9 b ./Â£-- - ' 5 '. ;â‚¬. 4 :.2 3 . p /* . I 23 + ./.91*14,/AR.,2 ./ ' 0 i Â¥â‚¬ 169/4. 4 I 4 I .f â€¢_. 'A.I.J=-1./.** . 9606....1 .. A..1 1. -' 4 4* Â·7 Vt---T-f - ',. 0 -7*= U .52.Le_L-. CÂ¢ r 29 4 Â£9.f. : i.. 4..~.- .,-=-:* 3 , '4 . 71 /,At .. 1. .5..1 1~N. ./4 . .. ..â€ž .. .1 . . k 2 i. + 2 7/ , 7 , 4 ' .... + S yk/Â«62)'v':, .- . j. ....4 F. ~ 9, .l * . 34 h /./. '. . . , iKe.., F .Ne r *.2-= r =.- Â»~ .Â·=: ,- p. ,~: Â·:a. 44/2 t ' 1.73 . 't.,22240 -9",44'.'% ..... ... t. P 4 -*34 6.1.....349'64 irt ~ GAM . 04. &24 '13:' 1 +W .'. 4 - + f 'Â·. : 1 4,1, Â· / ..1 6 . I ' A 3J 4, . tri 1 1 1 55.1 0, . ./. ' , , 6.. 1 . , t-2. $ .k . 1 : /2 --- 1 4% , : I .. 1 1 h , i ti 144 E -1 1:1 1 , .,fÂ·,/b i / 91 - .UN - 24 ./ - --- -1 -- -0 ---, *. 4=-* 1 . i f..Â¢,11 .. .-/ 1 --1 -1~~ 3==0 44 -. . I - -- M . 1 I I ./I",r - - - AB-~ 0,4--0 .'---b - - - - 41. , - .....~ -I , I . ~iÂ¢.* 401 1 - % ..4.Â· - 1 49 - 0 - . . - p . 9,/.' ... 0 #. .. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Aspen Community (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax Development Department mX TO: David Johnston From: James Lindt Fax: 920-2186 Pages: Phone: Date: 12/31/03 Re: 289 Exhibition Lane Staff Memo CC: 33 Urgent C] For Review [3 Please Comment C] Please Reply C] Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi David, Here is the agenda and staff memo for the meeting on Tuesday evening. I would imagine that the item will come up about 6:30 PM or so. Also, please bring your notarized affidavit of mailing and posting notice with a picture of the posting and a copy of the mailing list to the hearing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jarnes . .. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Aspen Community (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax Development Department 3X To: David Johnston From: James Lindt Fax: 920-2186 Pages: Phone: Date: 12/4/03 Re: Notice for 289 Exhibition Lane CC: C] Urgent C] For Review C] Please Comment [3 Please Reply C] Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: Hi David, Here is the public notice to mail to property owners within 300 feet of 289 Exhibition Lane for the public hearing on January 6th You may obtain the mailing labels from our GIS department on the first floor of City Hall. Also, posting notice on the property is required. That being the case, I have filled out a notice sign for you to pick up at your convenience. Also, please find attached an affidavit of posting and mailing that I need you to fill out and bring to the meeting. Please attach a photo of the posting and a copy of the mailing list. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, James . .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE BUILDING AND ACTIVITY ENVELOPE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 6,2004 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. to consider an application submitted by Maroon Creek Aspen, LLC requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to amend the activity and building envelopes on Lot 14, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD. The subject property is legally described as Lot 14, Block G. Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision and is located at 289 Exhibition Lane. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5095, jainesl@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Jasmine Tygre, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on December 20,2003 City o f Aspen Account oaÂ¥230700 'N3dSV Â© SONV-IHOIH N3dSV '9>10018 'lpl 101 132211<4%343i:t,i,~''tiO 11 *feâ‚¬:fÂ·tist:'.4.:Â·s:'.1 4_, ' 91Â·jilliti<Â·iti~~f.-F. i ~ i, 'L,it-, .' -~ 2 1 10-1 N OOEIVIN | I ***Â£0ir, 7*~ Â£,...,AWk:#{2 1,9 0 â‚¬ - 4- , !42 -Â·Â·> Â·'. :i.:Ckkr,2 6 I 4, 1 FR OOZ 4 | -- - j U.1 O 13 9 . // <LLI al al 0652 /5 42 ; *26 = 1 3 2.Â» 7 4Â£ Jut r>/ 0 :I"- tij 1 'r:.-,., 49 Ld 0% a U-JI 65 2% I A a 0-li 4 E , 1 =h i 1 44 1 - \ 8 V- 1 b / 6- i' 'CUD ' 1 ; G 1 f Â¢ 1 6 i lit 1 / -O f 6/ i 42) f i / \\ - *, 1 / '94.+2-2-*-*- 95.N C 0 9// / /+ (-0 ' D \ 7-Â·)% (217 - ./ : ///1 0///547/P/rp 7.r\- 63 0 A :1 \ 4/ 2 3< 1 & -44% 9 + i 11 u 11 11 2<. -&41 2.94) 5 L ,1 047"%# 4. 11 11-- - I-%\, 11 11 - -2hk , / / /1 13'f--1. 31'' 0 6% k.Â«.. ../ 'p 3, 0 ' 1 4 6%1 \Y â‚¬ r I --1-- !\ lilli I \ /Â».RERÂ« j/- 6/7 ST n f 1 2,\ N f- - 1 i n / -d / 1! 1 Â·\Hhe C St,f~~Â»,gort ~ Mi 1, 1 FLE / 8 El \ j ./ Â»i 4 4 1 1%41/ \1L-7--3-/4-f ~ -3---, j{ / . ~ / \hit 1 1 - , 4 V.3 1 i " - 1. -In #11 U hu- 22 / // , 4/// / .Ob\4 ,~ 1 \L _IL___ 2, i :,6 ' 1.- g . P 52 Y.. i p <1-21 1 1 'IL ..11* , /- , / 0 1 1 11 /tr / i 'L/~Gi" :T \ ,Â·33*'-r.:ikR~~Â·Â·:If'~'.- y - ijp4r 4 1 Z .../ 11 1" I.4/1/-30~~~ %5, 1 -4.94:, 4 11 / / - ~. Â°Ii,1 0 4\ - i_4 .11*- r-Â« Hrv <-31_ 2 1-- 11 , t; 2.3~12**1?01- Â·,21%Â·t Â· -'J . 1 .:4: Ad'#11.,-;el 1 11 --1...1 /6 / Mii, I ///9 0 -/. ic. 4 * 11 1 PA H ; * <. / ,, i % f 1-- ..* u 4) f f' 4/10 /927 1 1 / f11 +05.7 Â·:M:/.. i , .4/2 / 1 jul /1 Â« 1111- \ / 0 :N i /1 241 . # -j:*F-~ / h -- / 4 2( :{Ii?, 1 WIÂ» ~9 Â»<I' #9 4 41 7' ~ %47 Pee- ' 9, 'llyr- \>2 / 11 j". 1 4 91L t.' r...... 1 :4.,il-:) / _24;) 1 1 ... \16.11 1 k%14- A / / 1 391;f- ' L N / j -,, tri/4 -1 11, 9, /43 / / 20/4/ 4 / 1 1 1 1 f / 4 kt. ' i|/1 | 7 43 - 4 9 2 , , 61 9 /2 /%,DJ V 4 11 / 0 42. \ 0 -- \4 4 14\ 4 1 i / 1 1 / 204 - --- - - 4 / / -1 61 V .ad' 1 j Ilf :02'.110* -1 0 0, 4 / 1 14 4 e. 40 0 4 .9 4/ , 9 1 11 TAI 04 1 + * t.\\ / // 9%41 ,4 1 / .9 -l iff//9 1 1/ 0 4. /9 1 9 /// 4/' 4? ~ O 4. / i ./ (0 / - 9 4, 02?%1 te / 1 1 '1 1 4 1 17Â« C / 1 1% 1 41 1 i / 7 f ........ /--/ '10 / 6 , g , 4.pp f ---- 4 9 ./ < 3% 4/ 1 93 4 1 4 2 / 4 0% 0 + 4 % :'I f / * 1 / /.4 411 1 L_ 11 - 9 4 4. 51; M ' 6 ( 11: 1 1 0-1 = .9/l 31Â¥09 .... IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ S88Â°03'53'E LOT 264.34'24 119.32 SUBDIVISION 264><2 &412Â« i-/ %-// 11 CD A BEARING OF N 00'Oor0O"W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC BASIS OF BEARING = LS#??7? AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR â€¢6 4,\-11 \ d<5 -:/~* 2 AND RPC LS#??77 FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND i* 3/ fij 47 2 SHOWN HEREON, F 4 33Â» 188IÂ°03'53"E .EGAL DESCRIPTION I ~i- 1 1 -t 1 1 1' ; 1~~' , r - i , 1 - - , A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS 1 1.. -1 - Mgolir:2*34,23/LOM 1, 1 -- -65.470' '~ 1-0 m E MON 1 -- -1 -a T--- 'r Â· Crowomcwg Awo FYMOVFD 9--U.=- --- Â»6 4(:mvirÂ« MvtuopE. P 6FreÂ® 703 sr + 2.70 gr / -Â»L. 919 9 / Legend 21 1 1 -1 1 r %12 411 1 / Â® - INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 41\1 Ur 1 0 1. . -103 1 ..01 01 I .K 1 r--4 * 6 F-GY'Sprluco *6Â· 1-UVEVDE 0, 9 / -- :~ Notes > 1 0.- AWÂ« 1 7?7 /7 Â· - INFO lATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY??), ORDER NO.????,POLICY NO.????, DATED 4. P 7??7 VAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. - UNL OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUSLIC AND PRIVATE 1 1 RIGÂ· OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE r : 10 PUR E OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING ~~44- ~ ~ i~Ch 2% UND. SROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES , INCLUDING BUT NOT UMITED TO WATER, 2. ELEC Ie, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND 1/ / 4 EGR < FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS WEL 3 THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILI17 0 0. , A COM JIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE ,Â» 7 09 RIGt DF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ENJe Â·HE GRANT HEREBY MADE. bcc, (/.52' 1 / C.0 -9 /0 0 03- /2 0 '. -'* .-Ij - *3 9- V- 11 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, STD , A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN 6-78Â°20'3/ .2, *------ - IMPRO dENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE ' ABOVE -SCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL IMPRO MENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND 156.51 14&*/ ACTh/rri- U UVUU>pE J -----~251 ENCRC HMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, 'TrAKÂ·' 97% eF CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE ~ i THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING ~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER Of THE COUNTY OF \ PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK, M. THIS DAY OF IN PLAT BOOK - AT PAGE__ AQECEPTION NUMBER -- STEVEN A. YELTON S * 33645 DATE: CLERK & RECORDER NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. DATE SU Â·EYED: 7?7?7?? any defectin this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. DATA FILE NAME: ??7???? In no event may any action based upon any defect In this survey be commenced more P.O. BOX 9 DATE E =TED: 7?77??? than teri years trim the date of the certification shown herein. DRAWN BY: SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 R SED: (970)923-2794 -J ZO/~r NalÂ·41'31Â·E .... IMPROVEMENT SURVEY LOT 143 BLOCK G, ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D., CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKI 4, STATE OF COLORADO ' Legend end No - Property Des tion: Lot 14. Block G, The Aspen Highlonds Viljoge P. U D. according to . plot thereof recorded October 15, 1998 in Plot Book 47, ot Poge 1 as eception No. 423275. County of Pitkin. State of Colorado. \ Wl/44 of Sect 14, T.lOS. R858,6-th P.M. is N89'39'34'W cs shown - Basis of eec :s- The record beonng between the Cl/4 corner and the ' ~ )- I on theplat g Mspen High/onds 07/00, P. U.0 " : .: 1. '.' - This map ho - Â·een prepored pursuant to client request for an improvement 12 7 survey of th, roperty l .04 - This survey o : not represent o litle search by this surveyor to determine W..4 information , Â·taining to ownership, eosements, or other encumbronces of : ..9, %4 211, 94%. ~ ownership or o discover eosements or other encumbrances of record All Â£ 4,/ 440% C .le, al ' record have en token from. The Aspen Mighlonds Vifloge P. U.D. according ' 4.03 to the plot ereof recorded October 15, 1998 41 Plot Book 47 ot Page 1 os Receptior o. 423275 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder. 4 4 1.*~4..... 1 ,54.;.4 1 1 49 61 : 2444Â· ~ County of P n. State of Colorado and Stewart 77#e of Aspen A L T.A. Order Number 000. 456-Cl schedule B-2, dated 31 May 2002. - ./#a4 %+43 : # - Addit,onal tok rophic doto added 8 Aprit 2002. 1 EXHIBITION LANE J 9.- -- -P/* 04. 4 2 (PRIVATE ROAD) %.: 4}43 / A - -- f ' Foul,O LI-*7 '; f - --- ----- & -- - -Â»~tr-- - - IONOMENT -Ls'.e"",3 i. e -1- 5 REBAR 'M TH CAP 1 PIPE h 38Â· N 1 - 3.-alf" 4 , 42Â§'2f 93 15 /- / - T j U -E.... 8;746' l \ ' SE.R 'AN.01Â£ N14'Drly, -Ch\\64 .liNE 0\PEÂ·Â·- ~ 169.73, E S56'01 55 T I -1 . \%0 1 \ \ 0 '11 / 1 42 6 2: STARW/ 1 LF\LA k 1.311% / 1 1 -1.44 4 /3229-1* 4. -Lng Lot /4 1 Lot 16 4%@ hi / 1 1 rr~ 4/ motform I $ L \. .Â· 0 6 93 4* fy -4\ f - .420-- t 1 t . f 1 A 0.814 Acres I \ 4\44 MI d \ 2- ppe Akeg J \4 -- 921â‚¬1!3 - ti}- \ E!*323 + 32 28-1. 3 00' 36 47 Surveyor'_ 3 ertificate Sol%t?'31"W 1, STEPHE L. EHLERS. being o Registered Lond Surveyor in the State of Colorado. do hereby to the be of my belief and knowledge 1 further certify that the improvements on the ~f Boundary Sign above de. bed parcel on this date, May 31 2002. except dity connections ore entirely certify th thus improvement survey wos mode under my supervision and M true and correct 1 m. 2 that ther, no apparent e,~U'0Wign of any eosement crossing or burdening any part the disc/ 3 premises by Improvements on any adp,ning premises except as indicated, and within thu oundories of the percel. except os shown, that there ore no encroochments upon, . of scid p et except os,~ Legend - -2 4 - -L#AL *...,e 7'OC>L GRAPHIC SCALE Q Sat Budd,ng Enveope Spike STEPHEN EHLERS L.~*)133"4 1*TE 20 \U 20 < ~ Found Monument Rebar w,th cop stomped -PLS 20133* 4 ~ Mlhone Pedest/ 411:22.1. ( IN FEET ) @ Ges Liâ€¢,e 447*, 1 inch = 20 ft Note. s topography map complies with National Map Accuracy Standards for i loter Service top.9 -uc maps Where checked 90% of points should be withwn 1/2 the contour *4 Woter Vo;le inter,. inci wejl defined points should be plotted within 1/50" of their true position. Â® S,wor Monhote Critico tsign shouM be based upon spot elevotions, please contact Schmueser Gordon - Â» Meyer for this spot elevotion information. O PVC Pipe b SS : PIC Pipe Notip: According to C.otorcdo Low, you must SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER se REVISION DATE 87 105 No. 2001 -254.001 commente or~ legal octim based up" any , 4......../.0 'fle/ Drown by. WBH Â¢1*feet .' this ..Aey within three yecrs Ifter 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 .4/08/02 7., LOT 4, Block G yow UN disco~er such defect In M event GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 4 "/ r 1,/ Im rovement Date. 12/12/01 moy ony le* "tion bas" up" eny de'ect m 's suleyÂ· De commenced mer' thon ten (970) 945- 1 004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Aspen Highlands Village 2 UPDATE MAP & DILE 4-3 ~ years from the date of the cartification snown SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER AspEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 Survey hereon EHGINEEII . SURVE'OAS E-mail: survey@igm-inc.com ADDroved oF 1 0.\2001\29Â·00./.\84.....ved lue. 04 Our ..7 ' 57,]rn P~otted Ue, 04 Jurl 2002 555'im sehblÂ· * Â»m ido,- iff:UM.Al .. lAi David Johnston Architects Letter of Transmittal Date: October 17, 2003 From: David Johnston To: Sarah Oates Company: City of Aspen Pages: (1) Site Plan Project: Lot 14, Aspen HigAlands Subject: Patio Plans Comments: Dear Sarah, Thank you in advance for your time on this. The plan should be clear as to the area in question. Our goal is to have an administrative review dealing with the limits of disturbance and the expanded activity envelope. Please call with questions or comments. David Johnston David Johnston Architects, PC 418 E Cooper Avenue Sulte 206 Aspen, Colorado 970 925.3444 970.9202186 fax 'www. djarchitects com DEC-04-2003 THU 09:55 AM FAX NO, P, 03 .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OFPROPERTY: 7-fil Ex'116;tioâ€¢, LAMâ‚¬' , Aspen. CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 34.... &tb- , 2001 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, _ W. J.L.. Hw-Cki,r -1*rn (name, please print) I being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26,304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: --~ publication of notice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofihepublication is attached hereto. \~__ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inchcs high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen ~15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 1 day of , 2003 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing OJ notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(lE)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service dislnct or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that Owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the properly subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the dam ofthe public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 1 - â‚¬. - -........ ., tr... 7~- '4-j- 1 \ i , A~* - 114 #/I.46- .al"...... Li . -*.. 6..ACM- 4..... -er,~-- ~ -- Al.,0.L PARKING NOT ALLOVIED 400 ..1.- :1â€ž.. . 4 i . .....2, k *.8462* 21'. iâ€¢,6 - t Wear'-1 , 2 . Â· 3 2Â·UÂ·.4 1. . 49 443. . M 'j - a ~a'.p , ../..5 1//14/-:4 , *Ju :1 ALL,Â·,Â·-Â· t. DEC-04-2003 THU 09:55 AM FAX NO, P. 04 .. j Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or a]nended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners ofreal property in the area oftlic proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has bccn available fur public inspection in the planning agency during all liusiness houi s for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments, Signature 114 foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was ocknowledged before me this 42 da_ of DO+unal; Â·20(ttby lk/r\\2(21''VML f 4 . Wil'NESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission ,expires: rd 13 ~300 6 t 4--h (Lul 2-ti aÂ»J 3- . - Notary l'ublic 4 g ~ RALENE ~ ~ 1. : PETERSON / / ATTACHMENTS: O rk, :98 . 94#' COPY OF THE PUBLICATION '.14'Q~-=iÂ£04~ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SJGN) hly Commission Explieb O 1/17/201'6 Ll ST OFT]-TE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICEI) BY MAIL .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3239 RE(n Tki.tte< I l..LA\ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 200_ i- 2 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ~~~i vul.. e G ~--Â·~ i~Iâ€ž1 0~0~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.3 04.060 (E) o f the Aspell Land Use Code in the following manner: ,3~-'- publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from th~ Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, , waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide * and twenty-six (26) inches high, and wlich was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time o f the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. , Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shaW be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 99.9...,......... 1 / i,0 w rh- Er. 9 2 Ch 'A D. 2 3% M A V, p : co o. 7 0 73 9 04= < Vt.... 4 A U 3 0, 8 Eeg 94 + rk aff, E 44*211 1 01 50 0 3 6-i P Er u = 8 NL E * - E i g4M Euu Cl. 0 U 1 72%3 CO .....emmm/Ammim//Ill izg11 H ~r *fA U.'laâ„¢$22 10,/1.11 - *A = 3 illj,J~LIaLIJILâ€¢I 0 2.9 00 o CO u M 8 icl .0 ,- 0 3 0 44 u L E M i /,im E68 PUBLIC NOT]CE E * 3 E . E OD -2 go-c g.Â¢ U 4 44 4 LOPE I u E \\ i x 2 4 8 V M NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing Â· E f 3 2 -8 9 4 4 2 0 ~ W Â£*" a F Er 0 OL 8 G. = 1 8/ di RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE BUILDING AND ACTIVITY ENVE- will be held on Tuesday, January 6. 2004 at a nieeting to begin at 4:30 p.m, before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities - t.- PUM aM E [/J Room. City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. to con- 92 -- 042=PE k %%4 sider an application submitted by Maroon Creek Aspen, LLC requesting a Planned Unit Develop- 9 4 g C E n. CU 83 0 -Â·2 2 R P E 1, Al <Ae and building envelopes on Lot 14, Block G, Aspen ment (PUD) Amendment to amend the activity 0 6?36* 3 W m .3 21 O 4 property is legally described as Lot 14, Block G, Highlands Village Sub,livision/PUD. The subject 00 Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision and is locat- ~MAEEILBi.Eff Z Â°! ed at 289 Exhibition Lane. d - 0 n,Uu CL 0 2 -( * U=e c Ku*+ 2 * UE, For further information. contact James Lindt at Il A u c a %3=3 2 9 0 , -0 X partment. 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO (970) 920- the City of Aspen Community Development De- US 3 7-33 5095, james!@ci.aspen.co.us, s/Jasmine Tygre. Chair bn SE-8 mr .3 i "ci g -2 *5> Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 0 4 0 6 Published in The Aspen Times on December 20, E >, E- C .2 g U 9 2 + < 3 1 31 2 0 33 3 -3 --P- -2 = =Â·g -3- â‚¬1058) .4-- .....0..... 50 , C A... 43 00 >2 4 g <-3 or text amendment. Whenever the official zonin district map is in d or amend ed incidental to 01 S part neral revision t of this Title is to whether such 0 to and listing of all business hour ys (NDIS) 31LLON GHISOd 3ILL aGIDIiON SaIONSIDV UV NOILY ~~*ilature 1-f31:215 was ackllawledged b Saturday-Sunday, December 20-21,2003 â€¢ The Aspen Times B25 PUBuc NonCE AS,ew PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTiCE PUBLIC NOTICE -1 PUBLIC NOTICE er items allowed by law. and will deliver to the NOTICE OF PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALE FOR ISSUANCE OF TREASURER'S DEED ~ RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT TO W NOTICE ]S HEREBY GIVEN TO THE GENERAL purchaser a Certificate of Purchase, all as provid- Public Trustee No. 0134 NOTICE OF PURCH.ASE OF REAL ESTATE AT TAX # AMEND THE BUILDING AND ACTIVITY ENVE- M PUBLIC OF THE FOLLOWING MATTERS OF IN- ed by law. To Whom it may Concern: This Notice is given Â¥ TEREST REGARDING THE PITKIN COUNTY CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI. LLC IS ACT- vith regard to the tollowing described Deed of c==1323122Â·20=~111%221322~~cae,~op~Shi~~eerhe~ir~~e~ QUEUUUZZLidarof Cdousnt~ ~~NN~~Oe~~~D~e~(D~~~~L~~~0L0E~3~F~RR~HNYAD~N~FOARRMEAS~IPON Trust: To Every Person in Actual Possession or will be held on Tuesday, January 6. 20(14 at a : Grantor (Borrower): Paul Scrivens Original Beneficiary: Name the same was Taxed or Specially Assessed, ; Room, City Hall. 130 S. Gatena St.. Aspen. to con- 1 i Commissioners, Plaza One Conference Room. 530 Thomas Carl Oken Encore Credit Corp. Public Trustee in and for the County of and to all Persons having an interest or Title of M sider an application submitted by Maroo,1 Creek *EMain St, Aspen Current Owner of the Evidence of Debt: Record in or to the said Premises and To Whom * Aspen, LLC requesting a Planned Unit Develop- ~â€¢ Unless otherwise notified, all items begin at Pitkin, Colorado Countrywide Home Loans,inc. It May Concern and more especially to ~ ment (PUD) Amendment to amend the activity . 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the conduct of by: Carol L. Foote, Deputy Date of Deed of Trust: May 16. 2003 business allows. First Publication: December 13,2003 :21 and building envelopes on Lot 14, Block G. Aspen 1 â€¢ Unless otherwise indicated, copies of the full Last Publication: January 10,2004 Recording Date of Deect of Trust: June 3.2003 G. B BrownÂ· Charles Bums; James C. Burger: L B. Â·t Highlands Village Subdivision/PUD. The subject * 2 text of any resolution(s) and ordinancels) refer- Name of Publication: The Aspen Times Original Principal Amount of Evidence of Debt: 0 -,M % Brown. Aspen Skiing Company, and Unknown .,Â·: property is legally described as Lot 14, Block G, ~ red to are available during regular business Attorney: Castle Meinhold & Stawiarski, LLC Outstanding Principal Amount of Evidence of Aspen Highlands Village Subdivision and is locat- * hours (8:30 - 4:30) in the Clerk and Recorder's ott Caren Jacobs Castle You and each of you are hereby notified ed at 289 Exhibition Lane. fice. 530 East Main Street, Suite 101, Aspen. Colo- 999 18th St. Suite 2201 Debt as of the date hereof: $306,()00.(M) that on the 5th day of November, A.D. 1992. the For further information. contact James Lindt at rado 81611 County of Recording: Pitkin then County Treasurer of the County of Pitkin. in the City of Aspen Community Development De... Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 865-1480 Book and Page No. or Reception No. of Recorded the State of Colorado. sold at public tax sale to partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-; NOTICE OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARINGS BE- Dewind / 03-10-14144 CONV Deed of Trust: at Reception No. 483554 Patricia A. Paro the following described real es- Legal Description of Real Property: tate situate in the County of Pitkin. State of Colo- 5095, jamest@ci.aspen.co.us. ~ FORE THE HEARING OFFICER: Published in The Aspen Times on December 13, 20. 27. 2003, January 3,10.2004. (1027) TOWNHOUSE UNIT 1102. THE COLUMBINES AT rado, to-wit: s/Jasmine Tygre, Chail'~ ELK RUN, THIRD FILING, ACCORDING TO THE Aspen Planning and Zoning Commissior~ JANUARY 20,2004 PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 33 AT PA- Big Four USMS #18453 R. R 45 Published in The Aspen Times on December 20~ COM DEV GES 79 AND 80 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PITKIN and said County Treasurer issued a certificate of 2003. (1058) .,.,Â·~*f# 39** i -â‚¬,11~r Beginning at 3:00 p.m. Rio Grande Conference PUBLIC NOTICE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, COUNTY OF purchase therefore to Patricia A. Paro Room (former Youth Center Building) 455 Rio NOTICE OF PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALE PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO That said tax sale was made to satisfy the PUBUC NOTICE Grande Place, Aspen. Colorado No. 03-31 THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ALL OF delinquent ad valorem taxes assessed against NOTICE OF PUBUC TRUSTEE SALE To Whom it May Concern: This Notice is given THE PROPER'IY ENCUMBERED BY THE LIEN OF said realestate fortheyear 1991: NO. 03-32 â€¢ An application submitted by Bob and Paige with regard to the following described Deed of THE DEED OF TRUSr. That said real estate was taxed or specially This Notice of Public Trustee Sale regard- Zangrillo to build a new 15,000 square foot home Trust: THE LIEN FORECLOSED MAY NOT BE A FIRST assessed in the name of Unknown Owners - Min- ing Deed of Trust described: and employee dwelling unit utilizing four TDR's. Original Grantor 02 Deed of Trust: Owen Minney LIEN. ing Claims for said year 1991: Original Grantor: The property is known Tract 4, West Buttermilk Original Beneficiary of Deed of Trust: That said Patricia A. Paro on the 7th day of DOUGLAS A. MICHALOWSKI Pfister Tracts. The State Parcel Identification Gwendolyn G. Thomas Countrywide Home Loans,Inc., the owner of the November. 2003, the present holder of said certil- Original Beneficiary: Number for the property is 2735-0914)14)01. The Current Owner of the Evidence of Debt secured Evidence of Debt secured by the Deed of Trust described herein, has filed written election and icate, has made request upon tbe Treasurer of WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA application is available for public inspection in by the Deed of Trust: Arthur D. Pease said County for a deed to said real estate: Date of Deed of Trust: the Community Development Department. City Date of Deed of Trust: June 1. 1998 demand for sale as provided by law and in said That a Treasurer's Deed will be issued for June 3. 1999 Hall. 130 S. Gatena St.. Aspen. CO 81611. For fur- Recording Date of Deed of Trust: August 2. 1998 Deed of Trust. ther information. contact Suzanne Wolff at County of Recording: Pitkin said real estate to the said Patricia A. Paro at Recording Date of Deed of Trust: THEREFORE, Notice Is Hereby Given that 2:00 0'clock P.M. on the 13th day of April, AD. June 29. 1999 (970)920-5093. Book and Page of Recorded Deed of Trust: I will. at 10:00 o'clock in the forenoon of Wed- 2004. unless the same has been redeemed. Said Recording info. Book No. N/A, Page No. N/A nesday, February 4,2004, At the South front property may be redeemed from said sale at any Book N/A, Page N/A. Reception 432788 NOTICE OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARINGS BE- Reception No. of Recorded Deed of Trust: FORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: door, PitkIn County Courthouse. 506 East Main, time prior to the actual execution of said Treasur- Re-recording Info.: N/A Reception No. 417651 ~ Aspen, Colorado. sell at public auction to the er's Deed YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the legal own- highest and best bidder for cash, the said real Witness my hand this 8th day of December. County of Recording: PITKIN JANUARY G, 2004 er of an Evidence of Debt, dated June 1. 1998, in property and at] interest of the said Grantor(s). A.D. 2003. Original Principal Amount: COM DEV the original principal amount of $150.000.00, $164.250.00 Grantorts)' heirs and assigns therein, for the pur- s/Carol L. Foote Beginning at 5:30 p.m., Third Floor of Aspen City which is secured by the Deed of Trust described pose of paying the indebtedness provided in said Deputy County Treasurer of Pitkin County Current Unpaid Principal: Hall. 130 South Galena Street, Aspen. Colorado above, has filed written Notice of Election and De- $158.185.50 Evidence of Debt secured by the Deed of Trust, Published in The Aspen Times on December 13. mand for Sale as provided in said Deed of Trust. plus attorneys' fees. the expenses of sale and oth- 20.27,2003. (1030) Property foreclosed is all of the property en. â€¢ An application submitted by David Nesslein. re- The outstanding principal balance (exclusive of cumbered by Deed of Trust: questing a 20 foot rear yard setback variance interest and any other charges properly allowa- er items allowed by law, and will deliver to the LOT B. FERGUSON SUBD[VISION EXCEP- where 30 feet is required for the construction of ble under the document(s) evidencing said debt) purchaser a Certificate of Purchase. all as provid PUBLIC NOTICE TION AND P.U.D. AMENDMENT PLAT, ACCORD- detached caretaker dwelling unit on this 55,852 due and owing upon the Evidence of Debt se- ed by law. CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI. LLC IS ACT- RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL square foot lot in the R-30 Zone District. The cured by the above-described Deed of Trust be- ING AS A DEBT COLLECTOR AND IS ATTEMPT CONSTRUCT]ON STAGING-515 S. GALENA 30.1986 IN PLAT BOOK 18 AT PAGE 56 AS RECEP- property is located at 0151 Herron Hollow. and is ing foreclosed was $150.000.00 as of June 1.2003. ING TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION STREET TION NO. 277623. COUNTY OF PITKiN, STATE OF also known as Lot 6. Block 2, Pitkin Green Subdi- The following-described property is all of the property encumbered by said Deed of Trust: , PROVIDED WIU BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing COLORADO. vision. Dated: December 11.2003 will be held on Thursday. January 8. 2004 at a PURPORTED COMMON ADDRESS: 1230 See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part s/Carol L Foote. Deputy meeting to begin at 4:0(3 p.m. beft,re the Aspen EAST COOPER AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO For further information contact Joanna Schaffner hereof. Public Trustee in and for the County of Board of Adjustment. at the Aspen City Hall. 130 THE UEN FORECLOSED MAY NOT BE A at the Pitkin Community Development Depart- South Galena Street. Aspen. Colorado in the City FIRST UEN. ment. (970) 920-5105, Exhibit A to Notice of Public Trustee'Â§ Sale (legal description of Property) Pitkin. Colorado Council Chambers Room, to consider an applica WHEREAS, WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK. First Publication: December 2(). 2(}(13 A parcel of land situated in Tract 88, Tract 61. tion submitted by Four Peaks LLC requesting the FA. the legal holder of the Note secured by the Jeanette Jones and Lot 29. Township 8 South. Range 87 West of Last Publication: January 17.2004 temporary location of two construction trailers above-described Deed of Trust has filed written Deputy County Clerk the 6th P. M. described as follows: Name of Publication: The Aspen Times for twenty-two (22) months on Lot 6 of Aspen Election and Demand for Sale as provided in said Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on Decem- BEGINNING at A. 2 3 Tract 88. which is monu- Attorney: Castle Meinhold & Stawiarski. LLC ber 20, 2003. (1057) Mountain PUD to be used in staging for construe- Deed of Trust: mented with a 1924 GLO Brass Cap: Caren Jacobs Castle lion on Lot 5 of Aspen Mountain PUD THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that I thence N 0 07'21'r E 281.76 feet to AP 2 Tract 88 999 18th St., Suite 2201 Fcâ€ž further informaticin. contact Sarah ()ates at will. on Wednesday, January 21, 2004. at 10:00 PUBLIC NOTICE which is monumented with a 1924 GLO Brass Denver. Colorado 80202 Of Cap: the Aspen/ Pitkin County Community Develop- a.m. at the SOUTH FRONT DOOR of the Pitkin f'*f,7 i '94 1 ~,RA .-,.,â€¢ _....-4 i.m e i,-i,-Â·. c. A..Â·- i'i~ -- rÂ·,18,17: ,%01,4[:I,IT ADDI,nt'At â€¢4 'r_.._ 4.0 ....... M 0,1,1VUL*5 1 Lt-U ../Ili.Lt...7 UJU LUBSiplULL NE J J.'UV ASPEN HIGHLANDS COMMERCIAL ~ CGW ASPEN LLC ASPEN HIGHIANDS MOUNTAIN LLC METRO DIST C/O AUSTIN PEIRCE & SMITH PO BOX 1248 715 W MAIN ST #304 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EXHIBITION LANE LLC CHOPIVSKY GEORGE JR CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE CO C/O KLEIN-ZIMET PC 3217 CATHEDRAL AVE N W 8460 NIEMAN RD 201 N MILL ST STE 203 WASHINGTON, DC 20008 LENEXA, KS 66214 ASPEN, CO 81611 LABS J DANIEL 50% GUENTHER JACK-TRUSTEE POC BOHN LLC STUBE KEITH 50% 153 TREELINE PARK STE 300 3737 LAPALCO BLVD 3110 GIN LN SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209-1880 HARVEY, LA 70058 NAPLES, FL 34102-7807 STUBE KEITH 50Â°/0 WILLOW 388 TRUST USFS FOREST SUPERVISOR 192 RIVER OAKS DR 830 S MADISON 900 GRAND AVE GRAND ISLAND, NY 14072 DENVER, CO 80209 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 LOT S88*03'53'E 119,32 14*My SUBDIVISION -*.. S88Â·03'53'E_--1 65.70 4/ . r <-Cl Avp-or 1 1 .lit - 4 . 31\ 39Â«\ \2\7657/1 2 2 4-rl- gil '9& . 2,4. L.L.\ \V/2 63' e ** .,Uff & 2 -T-6- 18403'53"E Ivt 19.N\4a' 1 -=W Go _ 11 1 .IC.tf#3~%491~*--ftkÂ»2~46 --7-4 r-:-2-4-._f~I:~.~.1 - 0..1.-I~.:7 - :~14.Â·.21~-0~kktÂ·,Â«*.:?*I~ Â· ~-Â· Â· -3-0 gVMen,I *11'4h; af DusÂ¢<0 EWVE 1-OF' . ?Â·-Â·-2----5-';:fi?iÂ·Â·4*043*4444~'-'Â¢6.-..1 ~-: 0 . '3--i{~~~ ~- -I-EÂ·Â·9~ri,i-7 -tr - *4*lt:0 fo 64,9-UWAL taL....~ti- 3~Uh*'t6;'44*-~Â·Ii;~*Â·T-Â»7 1 .-1 '. i . i.Â·Â·Â·Â·..Râ‚¬&4 -eÂ·-7~7~ i ; L.'t>U,/.-1 -4 Coworrlâ„¢% Ak,O Â¥3%MOV*ED :.:Â©*,gL.-22.i..Â·Â»2,'&8'Ir't#141 /56 *TY twvkwee. - Â£24Â·'.2.1-='.-41%Â·Â·Â·~'.reâ‚¬Mt, - 'Trem... 703 9~+ t70 f t--1*Â£45'75/%\ 1 11*PiL. -979 Slf' 1 4*1@r / - Â« y ft il 1 m j ./ 0// 1 4 I -d- 'm *Â·-Â·wwsnou- Al-wuMSÂ« % ./ !11 194 \ . 3 j g -4 /12 4 ISP. 1 1 4 b I LY:A .4. , 4 j /6 /6 93 W ./.. % 7 V L 344 1Â»f\\\ /311 -~- 46 \ 1 22 \\ // 1 J 'Ch 0 12 19*\ 40 4 V 1 )2 0 -3413 Â¥~6 -\* \,<f -Â» 311 11/0 Â» ~G,â€¢D . 4. IA- i / CL-al 8Â°20'37'4 4,*/ A-crwor -u>afes =~ - S-7 MT*<: 97% ef .... - 150...L AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE ...chir ctio,imv IM. .,AC A.rl"Per. Mn mi â€¢â€¢e- 337.70 N01Â·41Â·31'E ~30 48' N01Â°41'31'E 3.IE, I *.ION 042% 31 v 2 1 , I 2/ 691 0 229 06 0 2, , 6 Vi Lail â‚¬ A-, -11,4Â©A licto u 1. Pulb %Â»Â«j wt# vit - brvv,<ecd A-churl-y Fl(v,dep~< 40 v#14 kJaliA /64LL S - ~A *1*1464 ~At~C~j~"tfi> 6~Djuti(of<k fc 6,141 14-Mi Vl Fest \ it /3 O 1/Qv,dial/l CD El . tbe; c dpi j epul 1% A 9(,48 /64-U~e-5 fÂ»ke Sj re-#00, 4, vipj bucifs + blo Fl - v<Qi-, L/F \)1 \ 1 / \, ) a 4.s~ricit p ~ via 1-0 Lit 63 0[ \0 W i 7-M ) ul Â£10/1 V j f-y â‚¬ el U w <o p i] w-fb \j 2. Propostv\% 4-6 add 976 0 *O +Re- ackul-tr) â‚¬ u\\)iÂ£*j~)'e irc>M ba)405 (xvik 1/*~Â«144 97_63~ 1-\ j F'\ U)~ MOLtive- ~1~-ge*A,\0) 60 +11Â¤1 J k Mo lowsâ‚¬V' cÂ«10102-7 â‚¬Ll VAO, 4, f I ALU Auy 1 j f , Iic 1 , .Age, s &,01- co ul jocAL Clu-uelopi ut-Â£3 cout-sjoILE 42 v, ud opp â‚¬-5 A_ C f -2-. 1*emet, A Zo/ 1-0 cokisleuctnoli /10. rti)220.< to p Li _s 1/ \ Vi v\U 4-[ o pe-s hot ck 1 3>, 536~ Pf, 2,0<4_CCEct fial ;/ UJ#c uo 1 4 1\ 1 00002 10/4-c,L buCCRUSQi J)~auRAW(44 2 c-Ot,10â‚¬.f) 5 A 4. A pAC. C\UVI P 61 0 ~41 0 LAA 41 1/1 jo ra *cu L Â©11-4 0 n qtk</ EHMCAAâ‚¬ 4_VIONAWLâ‚¬_0 7 61~kv; C(f--, 1/lej gplx.1/1 6,10062 1/ p'l s Ulak< 43 4 Alkis â‚¬ 'j u. rloloQ-0 Â« 4 aff. bil fices; 81*. 64- Up 4-c) Ppel~Â£-t- +L,4-- wl4adouP civÂ« soc<14#Gl- 60-f~-flt,2 F fÂ«'21013 2 65. At lou.Â»,g /9 04' 9.5 to he iÂ«\al M:ki\yo.(9 Is depe Ef-HEâ‚¬ ftel e~fl SW\<41 aecu),Ctiv\â‚¬vd- AN\Nt,/1/Uh,ck u..as Â¥0 kee,Â·4-Â·/-4-5 t: at vE <Fir UC+In/2 - ACO B\Gly)01(-1 A ..,un .. 289 Exhibition Lane Notes This is a public hearing to consider an application submitted by Maroon Creek Aspen LLC requesting approval of a PUD amendment to amend the existing activity and building envelopes at 289 Exhibition Lane to allow for two (2) at-grade patio areas to be maintained outside the existing activity envelope and to allow for a roof overhang to be allowed outside o f the existing building envelope. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve, approve with conditions. or deny the proposed request after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director. Specifically, the Applicant is requesting to amend the designated activity envelope to allow for two (2) patios that were built outside the existing activity envelope without approval to be maintained at 289 Exhibition Lane in the Aspen Ilighlands Village PUD. Additionally, the Applicant is requesting to amend the existing building envelope to allow for a roof overhang to be maintained outside of the existing building envelope. The Aspen Highlands Village PUD requires that all non-native landscaping, patios. and retaining walls be located within the designated activity envelopes that were set in the PUD approval. The Applicant is proposing to add this area that encompasses the patios to the designated activity envelopes, and reduce the existing activity envelope by the same amount of square footage as can be seen on this plan. In the area that is to be removed from the activity envelope, the Applicant has proposed to revegetate this area with native vegetation. In reviewing the application, staff does not want to condone developing outside of the designated activity envelopes without first gaining approval. That being said, the Applicant previously requested the ability to allow for the building envelope to be expanded to the southwest prior to starting construction of the residence. At that time, staff expressed that we were concerned about the avalanehe chutes that empty into this area and that we would not support an amendmelyÂ· _ In response to the avalanche concerns. the Applicant has now provided a 16*.5 from a licensed engineer that concludes that the patios will not be affected by possible avalanches. Therefore, staff believes that the Applicant has sufficiently addressed the avalanche concerns that staff had. eem:ermety, iltaff also feels that the building and activity envelopes on this particular parcel were established to protect a natural meadow area that exists just to the southwest of the existing activity envelope where the Applicant has located the patios. Due to the fact that the proposed envelope adjustment would allow for the ratios to be maintained in this meadow area that was to be undisturbed, staff feels that allowing for the patios to be maintained is a considerable departure from the conditions and representations made in the original development plan that was approved in the County and staff does not believe that we can support the proposed change. Thus, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed amendment. mi .. DAVIDJOHNSTONARCHITECTS pC " eg?ZZÂ·4* i.2<242 ~*mil E.2 aÂ«Ale/m November 14, 2003 Mr. James Lindt Community Development Department City of Aspen Re: 289 Exhibition Lane PUD Amendment Dear James, Onbehalf ofthe Owners ofLot 14, 289 Exhibition Lane, we are requesting a PUD Amendment to reestablish the parameters of the Activity Envelope for the subject Lot. Please note the enclosed site plan outlining the details of the proposal; i.e.975 SF of existing activity envelope area located on the northwest side ofthe lot will be removed as 'activity envelope' and kept in a natural state of landscaping. A new 975 SF portion of activity envelope will be established upon the south edge ofthe building envelope. This new portion will contain assorted hardscape and landscaping. As apparent throughout the Aspen Highlands neighborhood, building envelopes are small and compact. Care was given to establishing activity envelopes for any further development outside the building envelope, including exterior patios and/or driveways, landscaping, or other disturbances. In the case of Lot 14, the activity envelope was located between Lot 14 and Lot 12 on the northwest side (a dimension of 25 feet), a unrealistic position for any exterior uses other then landscaping and regrading. The southern portion of the building envelope is a logical location for outdoor hardscaping. Both private and hidden from all adjacent homes and development, the proposed activity envelope takes advantage of existing trail disturbance and site grading. Enclosed is our response to Section 26.445.050, Review Standards. Thank you for your time with this matter. Re~_~ David Johnston David Johnston Architects, pc. 970 / 925 3444 t www.diarchitects.com 9/0 1 920 2 1 So f 418 E Cooper Avenue Suite 206 Aspen CO 81611 Concepi*:5Â·Giorcntlecls.coin b . Section 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures ofthis Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. - 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. The new development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community PIan. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed development is consistent with the character of existing land uses throughout the Aspen Hightands area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The proposed development does not adversely affect the future development of Aspen Highland Maroon neighborhood. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. The proposed development is exemptfrom GMQS. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compaible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. The existing size of the activity is maintained, thereby being consistent with the land uses in the area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. The new activity envelope is located on a relatively flat grade adjacent to disturbed areas of construction, compatible with all existing development. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. The new activity envelope is appropriate to all existing characteristics of the property, away from any steep stopes or existing waterways, contains only on-grade improvements and landscaping, on a natural grassland plateau, independent of any significant tandforms. .. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. The new activity envelope is compatible to all man-made characteristics of the property. The new area is hidden and independent from all public access or public circulation, including driveways, sidewalks, or parking, and does not contribute noise adversely with adjacent properties. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements pennit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site - coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the SUITOunding area. The area of activity envelope will remain the same, consistent with the original PUD. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: Not applicable. - a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non- residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, wheneverjoint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access an(For the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced ifthere exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: Not applicable a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: Not applicable a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because ofground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: Not applicable .. a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site' s physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Notes: a) Lot sizes for individual lots within a PUD may be established at a higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone district as long as, on average, the entire PUD conforms to the maximum density provisions of the respective zone district or as otherwise established as the maximum allowable density pursuant to a Final PUD Development Plan. b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within the PUD are required to be reflected in the final PUD development plans. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site' s natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public' s health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. The patios and landscaping designed within the new activity envelope compliment the existing home design and the surrounding development areas, by using natural stone materials, random shaping and contouring, and landscaping accentuating the natural environment. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. The new development preserves all open space originally designed. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. All new developable areas are hidden from alt public streets, 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Not applicable. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. All development is on-grade. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. All site drainage is accommodated as originally approved and designed. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Not applicable .. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. All new development within the new activity envelope enhances the existing landscape character of the site, creates a natural setting for patios, and enhances the man-made structure. All new landscaping is suitablefor high-alpine environments. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. All existing features will be preserved. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. All existing features will be preserved and maintained. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building' s use, the building' s proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: Not applicable. 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property' s solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use ofnon- or less-intensive mechanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: No additional lighting is proposed as part of this application. 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. .. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: Not applicable. See descriptions above for enhancement of open space. 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property' s built form, and is available to the mutual benefit ofthe various land uses and property users of the PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the pennanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose ofthis standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: Not applicable. 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. L Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: Not applicable. 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private Use. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create trafne congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. J. Phasing of Development Plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: The existing development enhancements and improvements are existing. NOV-l U-YUUJ nUN 11 : 12 Mn r na nu. . . VI- .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PI.ANNER: .laines Lindt, 920.5095 DATE: MAO/03 PROJEC T: 289 Exhibition Lane Planned Unit Development Amendment REPRESENTATIVE: David Johnston Architects OWNER: Maroon Creek Aspen LLC TYI)E OF APPLICATION: PUD Amendment DESCRIPTION: Amending Building Envelope to allow for patios to be maintained that encroach outside the existing building envelope. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.445. PUD Review by: Staff for complete application, referral agencies for technical considerations, Planning and Zoning Commission for decision. Public 1 learing: Yes Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $1260 Total Deposit: $1260 for 6 hours of Staff Time (Billed at $210 per hour ovcr the time that deposit covers) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Tomt Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telophonc number oftho representative mnhorized to act on behalf ofthc applicant. 3, Signed fec agreement. 4. Pre-application Conference Summary. 5. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. 6. Site Plan and Survey showing the encroachments beyond the building envelope (please supply two 24" x 36"copie.sand tenll"x 17"copies). Onthesurvey. pleaseshowtheareal}latisproposed tobc incorporated in the building envelope and the area of development envelope or building envelope that is proposed to be removed so that the proposed building envelope is not any larger than the cxisting building envelope adjustment. 8. A written description of'the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 10 Copies of the complete application packet (items 2-8) Process: Apply. Planner checks application for completeness. Staff then reviews application against PUD Amendment Standards. After the Community Development Staff has determined that the application is complete, the Community Development staff will assign a hearing date. Planning and Zoning Commission reviews application at public hcaing and makes final decision. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on Ihe Cily. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject w change in the future, and upon factual represenlations that may or may not be aCCUrare. The summary does not create a legal or vilted right. ... . u ~UMINSTOM ARCHITECTS 970 9&Q 2186 NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:42 AM ~ FAX NO, P, 06 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: =Ntene: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC 289 Exhibition Lane, Aspen, CO Location: (indicate street address, Iot & block number, legal description where appropriate Parcel ]D # Â¢REQUIRED} Aspen Highlands Village PUD Blk: G Lot: 14 REZIeURIAT]VE: David Johnston Name, Addrtss: 418 Cooper Street, Suite -206 Aspen, CO 925-3444 Phoa. #; PROJECT: Name: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC ~Address: 289 Exhibition Lane Aspen, CO r phone #- 302-654-6611 TYPE oF ArrUCATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use O Conceptual PUD O Conceptual Histodc Devl Special Review < Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) O Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal O Conceplual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. OMQS Allotment ~ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) O Historic Demolilion GMQS Exemption - O Subdivision O Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream O Subdivision Exemption (includes O Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane O Lot Split O Temporary Use O Other: O Lot Line Adjustment O Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONmTIONs: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (desgiption ofproposed buildings, uses. modifications. elc) Have yon attached the following? FEES DUE: S -El Pre-Applietion Conference Summary [1 Attachment 44 Signed Fcc A~gr,cment Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form O Response to Attachment #4, Submitta] Requirements- Including WIitten Responses 10 Review Standardg All plans thst are larger than 8.5" x ll" must be folded and â€¢ floppy disk with anelectronic copy of RU written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. -ob d cio [3 1. Nov 10 03 10:58a DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 970 920 2186 P.2 + NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:41 AM A FAX NO. P. 04 . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of City o[ Asben Develnpment Application Feet Crl'Y OFASPEN (hetein,fler CrrY) and Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has subnutted to CITY An application for PUD Amendmant 289 Exhibition Lane (Iwrebinfter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee strucrutÂ·c for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing iber is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3, APPJ.ICANT and CITY agree that because or the size, nature or suope of the pIOpOScd project, it D not Possible at this time to ascertuin {lic full extent of- the ens[S invelvcd ill processing the application, APPI.1CANT and CITY fuilher agree fhal kis in the interest of the pArlies thut APPI.ICANT make payment of an initial deposit and zo thefcafter permit additional costs to be billed to APP].ICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees addirional costs may zonle following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make ,additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they arc necessary as dolls are incurred. CITY agrees it will bc benefited through Lhc gre:,tur ccriainty of meuvering ils full costs to procc. 5 APPLICANTS aliplication. 4, ClTY and APPLICANT further Ogrec that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present flnicicnt information to the Planning Con,nlission and/er Cily Comici] to enable tlic planning Commixsion and/or City Council to irmke legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings arc paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideratlon oftile CITY's waiver of its righ[ to ' collect full fees prior to o determination of applicatiqr' complctcness, APPIJCANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $_81Â¢90 which is fur Â¢9 hours of Community Development stall thne, and if actual recon],0 costs exceed tho initial deposits APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billiligg to CITY lo reimburse Ihe CITY for the processiug of the application mentioned above, iRC]ilding post approval ruview at 2 ratv of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit Such petiodic pay,neurs shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPT.ICANT further pgred, that fallure to pay sitch accrued costs shall be grounds for suspenion ofprocessing. and in no casc will building permits bc issued unlit all costs associated with cose processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 6 1, ft--i- - By; . By: Julie Alm Wootls 11-11-03 Community Development Director Dnte: Billing Addred and Telephone Number: Required 3UU Water Street Suite 300 Wilmington, DE 19801 11:\support\forin-%\,grpayas.doc 4/0903 - 302-654-6611 .. ASPEN MAROON CREEK, LLC 300 WATER STREET SUITE 300 WILMINGTON, DE 19801 November 10, 2003 Mr. James Lindt Planning & Zoning Commision City of Aspen Aspen, CO RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT Dear Mr. Lindt: This is to inform you that Aspen-Maroon Creek, LLC has authorized David Johnston, of 418 Cooper Street, Suite 206 Aspen, CO (phone: 925-3444) to act as our representative in the above referenced matter. Regards, i:,EA o -V) 0UÂ»L-- B. Vinton Partner 302-654-6611 NOV. 10. 2003 1: 36PM S]EWAKI 111Lt AbrtN 1,Vâ€¢ Vi iu 1. L CITY OF ASP~~ WRETT PAID M'REIT PAD... L"Â°INC>. ~ DKIN REP No 40~03 m* )51 63 4f/la + nt# /5643 WARRANTY DZED 1111SDEED, 14.â€¢le 4%a 1Â£4 4 d April , 3000 . b/0.00 MICHAIL I. CRIDEN AND NICHEU 8. emram or fic .18 C-7 or ...#Ili . 8.-0-Or, =-a NiRCON CREEK 19]329, MC, A COLORADO-Lit'rle LIABILITY DE lae. 00 9*./.14.1.11.s: 4 CON/0-1.LRN GROUP.42 READ. 8 WAL NEW Â¢101:.*.DE.19720 4- U C-4 4 W State of DELAWARE .E-- WrneSSE!11.11.lhoma=r#- m Â· 4*w.*Ton dollar, ind othor good and Â¥blumbli con=ideration DOLLARS, dz rmdpi 8,4 -11Â¤11=4 of wh;ch & hc.cby drivkdged. hu t[-d. baltai-. 1014 - ME.tyâ€¢*1. uâ€¢ by 1- pmtâ€¢u doci grag bargam. icl. 90<Ii., aut comnim, unto k B... D. le. .4 ....s fo-er. m * mal Im,01:, m,~erâ€¢la*ovme=*. ifill. il.le. 3,1.--.it.*pid co..0, Prn[IN 30 Snleâ€¢f coh-der,ke M *110,1 Lot 14. Block G, NE ASPER â€¢IGHUNDS VILLAGE P.U.D.. according to thi Plat thâ€¢raot rloordad Octob~ 15, 1998 in Plat Book *7 St Dagl 1 aâ€¢ maeoption 110Â· 423275. comITY or PITKIM. STATE or COLORADO. 465890 lm15Fa SlmATI01 RENIE N/H/* *Atok-Iby.rets.......02â€¢9 =MIDITION LANE. 1822*. co 81611 - 1 .... Â¥ .. . ./ H- 16= m-- ud,0ortlons. ItmalÂ»denadle,-ders, 1-a. m=.amd,mati thenof. m,4d 14ees,me, naht, t*, i-~st, ch;-3,â€¢d .lo-~ wh.- -GÂ¥,reftâ€¢:g=-r. 6..inhâ€¢ ergu~.1.*ad Â» I,a.BI"id"/0*.1.* dbi.he-ha~e..9.'U"""IL 1O1All AND TO BOLD I= Mid 0=In ,-t *PHIA,<* 41:w-, 44 00 .. .........#hh...... 011*Im #zin. A.dilâ€¢,zwt-, 9~|.1-'ishei.*per-1 . . .0.8-*1-.p=.b,4,1*/"d/,1,C/l".Ila le,m,te. hishein- m;04 IRÂ¥,1- dmooldâ€¢ mise,114-6 allhe d theatpr-u. hcia idlicized efac p..im*ove c..eyed,ltum.1.-e, p.kcl. ahâ€¢ban-hâ€¢â€¢11#lialleâ€¢-/lahâ€¢tklite.Ja*â€¢, hke#,ple.amdh:#aodliEh[,Rdlpiâ‚¬r-1 thot- .plelfie Zic,Dtioni ihown on thi antaohid u -EXHIBIÂ¥ li. 1 . Th:m.--4*WAUANrf ANDIga=DEPRIO~**0â€¢tÂ·â€¢*-1 ,=,0 â€¢*.8,41,0~4Â®-i.Â· IN WInESE -PrÂ·,rl 14 4 IAA 1121Â£344 - MICM,EL I. CRIDEN 8: 8 i PAULA 1 1 11 3 LAMBEIGI U -- eolor=Jo 1 =-WA ruâ€¢-- 0.-rpgh. ) 4 C.-â€¢11= E,â€¢â€¢ gum,6 I .i... '- 1-3.69/ 4p=11 . 2002 by MICIAEL E. CRIDEN UU> MICHELE S. CRIDEN Myco......exp,re, ta-17-2003 Non,Y hbac Meto:_ an.gkz - 1.11.lili 465890 ..9.: 1 .r 4 *4/-12-2 09.270 R -* D 1- - 0 - 29Â£164 a Ptl 1 1 â€¢ UV M ' Lt ' . 4 . h 2 ' 00 Â£7 -' 1 3 Ill 4 0 ve e 4,/ 11 , I 0 0 6.0 or' 90,0 ; ~, jr : ,[0 4 8.15 F vjtit' a ; - 4 6$***14*4**d $3 ' 4'~~ '.. ' /. $ P,8 1:) 4 1 $ 0 + Â£ 0..9 kN :.c ":1 . v , I, ~~ 4 4'â€¢ 24(44%/7/3ir, 10.4 , 0 , C<%8*f ,~3Â·9.1 twkmardRK,545, 00 r J . i Â· 44 *20 0 .$.lisms*.41,7jbltifr, C e '4 .' 1.' 1~ : .,e. 4631, 13 .:'244/06(9.t,.:Â·i,11' W - ;<G. 4?JÂ©, i~ 424'Â§>i*,,~~,4- f r - , ' Illil , 1,8. 4 j Ad F ''i - Ibitfl $ f -9 14.roon Crer" , i lf; 04<V4*4 *etÂ· e 1 f/ 4, U j e * th >-, hi 2 2:ili,le& 11 .0.- 4 ? 04, 4 'C il 11 4.~ jÂ· ao ouR.48 1 11 42 7 , ' &4 01011 'Dr .4 E 44",6,:,db **VkÂ»1 I r. i Â· i . ....> Irl' -1-- 4 0 3 3 ~Â· :21 1. p ~.% ' 'v,a~....6'2Â·Â·-1- $2,4, Â®IAÂ·raff.Â·74 t -~--, .~ ---. 90*,/~6,-1 1 Ah'PWAÂ·i . 4111% SL.. ' 4,/ 45 2. 1 i A >..tlf N, 1 :r -91 . / pu DON CO 01 . 11 I -- Nt , 1 16 64 ..4. , l. -f,i:.r~:.0.,9,44;p..â€¢91.%4, ..*~,~ :y,Â·44Â¢ihbd:ti;?*44/,>*Â·*,TMW4 ve,423.0,5,jt,?~'0:,11,9,9 11*.*t 'Â¢Â·Â·â€¢4.-&4Â·~,2 t.,4,3 Â·MY,Â·hf#NtÂ·. 8.; . , .01, 49 B# <AJ , Â·14%8*#fgAJifM<~24Â·,f-' 04 'uâ€¢;, 1 "9 4,1.q~~.,ga"A#~WNV&%'4*415,9~'**,i?p.Â·et~:9Â·i*fÂ·1%60? y, c , # V, R' '4, A 4,9 4, Ill f ; 9 .... 4 - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ 988Â°03'53'E LOT 119.32 32 1.4-E SUBDIVISION 588*03'53Â·E 65.70' 3&35â‚¬ 100,6 .96 66/ \ A BEARING OF N 00Â°00'00"W BET-WEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC ~ 01~~=~~ b BASIS OF BEARING = LS#???? AT THE S. E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR 2 4% 41 SHOWN HEREON. AND RPC LS#???? FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND 4-Â·r L ,â€ž 388Â°03/53//E _EGAL DESCRIPTION . 19 G h 0- - T --' A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS i coworitews Awe Fat~40*D t.6 &(Byer /:WV/(Â·Opt, -- i --22 2 - -41 - '5,eÂ® 703 9~+2,70 9. 11 . ./4 1 lbâ„¢.-~ 7\19 Â·:Ef --j -- Legend /-/4 1-1 5 > Â® INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED LJ r - 1 I X Dia-Wuvelape, 4 *=I i 13 13 Â·4Â« 7 Notes -12 2 ~1~ i ??7? 1 \ X . INFC LATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY?7), ORDER NO.?1??,POLICY NO.????, DATED ~'6 ??77 VAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. T \ 14 ~0 43- - i \- 190 PUR >E OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING RIGH , OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILIn' COMPANIES FOR THE UNU 3 OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE 001 22 UNC GROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACLITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, LD /= 503\ \ \ / ELEC ICI, GAS. TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND l \ 1 EGRi . FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS WEL S THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTIL_Irr \7' 92 011 COM IES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WrTH THE USE OF THE u n RIGÂ· OF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ,Â·-'12=K..632< 1 / I ENk THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. 11 . j..f *%3- itto, Gypl- U 1 w / 0 o O CÂ»h. \ /3 V '30 ..- 043 \A- 10 7--7 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE O>< / Go 1, STS A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN \ 678Â°20'37'W T--- IMPRO lENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE -----.--~-~~ ABOVE SCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL 156.51 IMPRC MENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND -__WeA, ACT*FUL -EUV#-4Â¥E_:=C. 7 ENCRE 'HMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. Â«rÂ¢ 979. #FLJ ..--9...7 CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 1 THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FIUNG ~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF \ PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT__O'CLOCK,__M. THIS -DAY OF \ IN PLAT BOOK -AT PAGE __ AS RECEPTION NUMBER - STEVEN A. YELTON S.# 33645 CLERK & RECORDER DATE: NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based uporl HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. any defect in this surÂ·vey within three years after you fir'st discover such defect. DATE SU' 'EYED: ??????? DATA FILE NAME: .y77777 In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more P.O. BOX 9 DATE D .rrED:??????? than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. DRAWN BYÂ· SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 Rt :SED: (970)923-2794 -J zotHI 30 48 Â§FE>---- N01Â°41'31'E NO1Â°41'31" 26 9 l- 4 0 . - .. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY LOT 143 BLOCK G 3 ASPE-N HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D., CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PIT-Kl 4, STATE OF COLORADO Legend and No( - Property Des Dtion: Lot 14, Block G. The Aspen Higmends Village P.U.D. according to , plot thereof recorded Octoner 15, 1998 in Plot Book 47. of Poge 1 as eception No. 423275. County of Pitka. State of Colorado. , Wl/4 of Sec. 1 14. T.'101. R85W., 6th P.11., ts ~489*39'34'W as shown - Basis of Bed, ls-The record beonng between the Cl/Â·4 corner end the \ on the plat . e Aspen Highlonds Village P.U.0 1 ~...., Â· - This map has men prepared pursuant to client request for an improvement b.. .:b survey of thib >roperty. A ,-, - Thus survey c 3 not represent c title search by this surveyor to determine , ir ./.7 ... yfriÂ«,; ownership or .3 discover eosements or other encumbronces of record. All ' .r'.. Â¥15 9%31 I *: to the piat :ereof recorded October 15. 1998 in Plot Book 47 ct Age 1 information .. -taining to ownership. easements, or other eneumbronces of -- + ----7 ---- -- :3* 49 record hove ien taken tom: The Aspen Highlonds Village P. U.D. according i V 00Â·73ht;Â£ . os Receptior; 'o. 423275 in the Office of the Clerk ond Recorder. / ta . I I I. ~ I County of P. 1 State of Colorado ond Stewart Title of Aspen A.L.T. A. Order ' .' , ,/ Number 000. .56-02. schedule B-2. dated 31 May 2002. 1 . 1 .. -7.46457 4*-4 4)3 %1, - 40<jitionat top raphic doto added 8 April 2002 d .'' \ ir - - 291'721 EXHIBITION LANE <S'# (Â·PRIVATE ROAD) /.-2/2 . A i X39 NA. 1 -7-%111 6, , Al - - L/, --317.27--l / =Emar'EAP'-7\---.1 -xi ',.r~-f:--â„¢i f- Â«:1~~ ~~<62 ... 1. l. 1% ,~5**63' T Y *2 1~4 10 1 + 5 4177 - 1 i TI.-- \1 %-%). - / 0/ - O 1 - /44' 227 1, * 1- Z O X N ~\ \ \ Â»-011Â»-Â»Â«-Â«Â«\-/////// 4% ./ I -*4 - 1 6\41 4 STARW(Dll \ 2 2 6. M 'Â·7225-t ina )' I 1 Lot /if- 1 m Lot /4 .t 0.814 Acres 1 0% \1 - \ 42: 9% 1- sorÂ·knÂ·w ' 1 sOl.Â·41'31-1 7. Surveyor. ertificote -- -- - -4\- --*Ung-- 35972 -0 1, STEPH L. EHLERS. being o Registered Lond Surveyor in the State of Colorado. do hereby 4 sou~ sign \ a to the be of Pny belief ond knowledge. 1 further certify that the improvements on the 1 National Forest i 337.70' certify th this *mprovement survey wos made under my supervi*on ond & true ond correct above de. ;bed parcel on this date, Moy 31 2002, except utility connections ore entirely /1 4 -- 1 the descr j premies by impr<*g,Zpnts on any adjo:ning premises except as indicated. Ind within the Â·oundories of the parcel, except os shown, that there are no encroachments upon ./ t r' . ~ '-71' dÂ·, .4 i fi' /' 1 + thot there s no apparent eg ign of any egament crossing or burdening any part Of said P, .a, exclot OS .Im 5~ Legend - ---93.- 84*Â«Mu. 49 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 Sat Bujiding Enve~ope Sp~ke STEPHEN FLERS L.,~to;IFC 14%- , 700.I- 20 0 . 20 40 BO .lk> ie 4 ~~ Found Monument. Rebar with cop Nomped PLS 20133" m re~ephone Pedeste ...... C IN FFET ) ~ Glys L/0 Werkar 1 inch = 20 ft ~ Â®ter Sdry,De topog: nic mops. Where checked 90% of points shoufd be within 72 the contour Note: ,s topography mop complies with National Map Accuracy Standards for M. Weter WI intervu -2nd well defined points should be plotted within 1/50" of their true position. Â© Sawar Monheie Meyer, c. for this spot ejevation flformotion. Cntico -sign should be based upon spot elevotions, please contoct Schmueser Gordon -r- Sign O PIC Pipe 8 SS 4- PVC Pipt Notks: IUM- Accord.ng to Colorcdo Law, you must SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER pe REASio?4 DATE BY Job No 2001-254.001 commence any le'cl oct/n b"ed upon any 1 Additionâ‚¬1 7000 Aided 04/08/02 TKI' Drown oy. WBH detect k this survey within three years offer 118 W. 6-TH STREET, SUTTE 200 2 UPDATE MAP & RTLE NFO Ink rovement Date. 12/12/01 LOT 14, Block G yow first discover such defact k no event, moy ony egos oction based upon ony defect GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 in this sumey be commenced mom thon ten (970) 945- 1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Aspen Highlands Village Yeom from the dete d the cartaohon snown SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 L 4 48 02 &46 hereon ENGINEERS . SURVE.0/9 E-mail: suray@sgrn-ir""m neÂ· ..M J..7 Survey Approved: oF 1 .. DAVIDJOHNSTONARCHITECTS pC " =ima h /0!,ImR! riu,ima =a=ma. November 14,2003 Mr. James Lindt Community Development Department City of Aspen Re: 289 Exhibition Lane PUD Amendment Dear James, Onbehalfofthe Owners of Lot 14, 289 Exhibition Lane, we are requesting a PUD Amendment to reestablish the parameters ofthe Activily Envelope for the subject Lot. Please note the enclosed site plan outlming the details of lhe proposal; i.e.975 SF of existing activity envelope area located on the northwest side of the lot will be removed as 'activity envelope' and kept in a natural state oflandscaping. A new 975 SF portion of activity envelope will be established upon the south edge ofthe building envelope. This new portion will contain assorted hardscape and landscaping. As apparent throughout the Aspen Highlands neighborhood, building envelopes are small and compact. Care was given to establishing activity envelopes for any further development outside the building envelope, including exterior patios an(For driveways, landscaping, or other disturbances. In the case of Lot 14, the activity envelope was located between Lot 14 and Lot 12 on the northwest side (a dimension of 25 feet), a unrealistic position for any exterior uses other then landscaping and regrading. The southern portion of the building envelope is a logical location for outdoor hardscaping. Both private and hidden from all adjacent homes and development, the proposed activity envelope takes advantage of existing trail disturbance and site grading. Enclosed is our response to Section 26.445.050, Review Standards. Thank you for your time with this matter. Respectfully, David Johnston David Johnston Architects, pc. 970 / 925 3444 t www. diarchitects.com , Â·/20 2 1 86 i 418 E Cooper Avenue Suite 206 Aspen CO 81611 concept@diarchitects.com .. Section 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures ofthis Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. - 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. The new development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed development is consistent with the character Of existing land uses throughout the Aspen Highiands area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The proposed development does not adversely affect the future development of Aspen Highiand Maroon neighborhood. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. The proposed development is exempt from GMQS. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. The existing size of the activity is maintained, thereby being consistent with the land uses in the area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. The new activity envelope is located on a relatively flat grade adjacent to disturbed areas of construction, compatible with all existing development. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. The new activity envelope is appropriate to all existing characteristics of the property, away from any steep slopes or existing waterways, contains only on-grade improvements and landscaping, on a natural grassland plateau, independent of any significant landforms. - 0 0 d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. The new activity envelope is compatible to all man-made characteristics of the property. The new area is hidden and independent from all public access or public circulation, including driveways, sidewalks, or parking, and does not contribute noise adversely with adjacent properties. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements pennit a scale, massing, and quantily of open space and site - coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. The area of activity envelope will remain the same, consistent with the original PUD. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: Not applicable. a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non- residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, wheneverjoint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if. Not applicable a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: Not applicable a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if. Not applicable .. a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site' s physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of tile site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Notes: a) Lot sizes for individual lots within a PUD may be established at a higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone district as long as, on average, the entire PUD conforms to the maximum density provisions of the respective zone district or as otherwise established as the maximum allowable density pursuant to a Final PUD Development Plan. b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within tile PUD are required to be reflected in the final PUD development plans. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site' s natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public' s health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. The patios and landscaping designed within the new activity envelope compliment the existing home design and tile surrounding development areas, by using natural stone materials, random shaping and contouring, and landscaping accentuating the natural environment. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. The new development preserves all open space originally designed. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. All new developable areas are hidden from alt public streets. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Not applicable. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. All development is on-grade. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. All site drainage is accommodated as originally approved and designed. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Not applicable. 0 0 D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existmg significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. All new development within the new activity envelope enhances the existing landscape character of the site, creates a natural setting for patios, and enhances the man-made structure. All new landscaping is suitable for high-alpine environments. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. All existing features will be preserved. 3. The proposed method ofprotecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Atl existing features will be preserved and maintained. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the Cily while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building' s use, the building' s proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: Not applicable. 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property' s solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use ofnon- or less-intensive mechanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant mamtenance. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safely and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: No additional lighting is proposed as part of this application. 1. Alllighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate Inanner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for residential development. --0 0 G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: Not applicable. See descriptions above for enhancement of open space. 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property' s built form, and is available to the mutual benefit ofthe various land uses and property users ofthe PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City' s infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: Not applicable 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. L Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1 &2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following enteria: Not applicable. 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. J. Phasing of Development Plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: The existing development enhancements and improvements are existing. Nov 10 03 10:58a DAVI/IIJOHMSTON ARCHITECTS 970 92~2186 P.2 NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:lit AM ~ FAX NO. P. 04 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Aercement for PRV,nont or City o[ A;De), Development Application Fec, Crl-YOFASPEN (heteinafier CrrY) sntl Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CrTY an application for PUD Amendmant 289 Exhibition Lane (horeinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands ami agives thot City of Aspen Ordimnce No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes o fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of 011 processing fees is o condition precedent to a determinntion of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or gope of the pIOpOScd project, it is not ressible at thig time m ascer-luin the full extent of the costs involved in processing the atiplication, APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the imerest of the parlies that APPI.ICANT moke paymem of on initial deposit and m theteafter permit additional costs to be billed to APP].ICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accnie following thtir lienrings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining grenter C,5h liquidity and will mnke additional payments upon notification by the CITY when tlicy arc necessary 18 costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will bo benefited 1111-ough the greater cerlainty of recovering ily full 605Â£9 te process APPMCANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further ogrec that it is impractical,Ic R,r CJTY staff to complete processing or prc.fant 51,mcient infurniation to the Planning Commislion and/ur City Com,ci] to enable (lic Planning Commision and/or City Council to inhke legally required findings for project considclation, unlca current billings am paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees tlint in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver ofits right to ' collect full fees prior to o detÂ©rmination of opplication complctenc.pi, APPL] CANT shall pay an initial 1 deposit in the omount of !:*~EQ which is fur 8 hours of Community Development stall time, and if actual rccorde(l costs exceed Iho inilial deposit, APPUCANT shall pay addi,ional momhly billitiga to CITY 10 Teimburse rhe CITY for the processing of:he application mentioned above, including post approval n-vinvat a mic of $205.00 per planner hourover theinitial deposit Such peciodic pay,nen,3 shall bc made within 30 days of the billing dote. APPLICANT further ogrecs ihot failure to pay sucli act:rued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. and in no cake will building permits bc issued linlil all costS associated with cose processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT && 9 ) /9-7- - By; . By: Julie An:i Woods 11-11-03 Comml,nity Devell,pment Director Dnte: Billing Addrer, and TeleplionÂ¢ Number: Required juu Water Street Suite 300 g:\.supp,Ir,\forâ€ž,5,\agrpayps.doc Wilmington, DE 19801 6/05/03 302-654-6611 (RIONM 1,13NW,had MOd NIÂ¥Ighl Nov 10 03 10:59a DAVAIIA JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 970 ~ 2186 p.3 NOV-04-2003 TUE 10:42 AM ~ FAX NO. P, 06 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPUCATION APPLICANT: Name: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC Localion: 289 Exhibition Lane, Aspen, CO (Indicate street address, Iot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Aspen Highlands Village PUD Blk: G Lot: 14 RErREsENTATIVE: Name: David Johnston Address: 418 Cooper Street, Suite 206 Aspen, CO 925-3444 Phone #: pROjECT: Name: Aspen Maroon Creek, LLC Address: 289 Exhibition Lane Aspen, CO 302-654-6611 Phone #: TvrE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): O Conditional Use O Conceptual PUD O Conceptual Histotic DeVL Special Review < Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) O Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal O Conceplual SPA D Minor Historic Devt. OMQS Allotment O Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) O Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption O Subdivision O Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream [] Subdivision 13*emption (includes O Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bloff, condominiumization) Expansion , Mountain View Plane O Lot Split O Temporary UK O Other: O Lot Line Adjustment O TexUMap Amendment EXISTING CONmT]ONS: Glescription of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals, etc.) 1 PROPOSAL: *lescription ofpmposed buildings, uses, modifications. etc.) Have yon attached the following? FEES DUE: S O Pre-Applicution Conference Summary O Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form E Responsc to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger thâ€¢n 8.5" x 11" must be Tolded *nd a floppy disk with an electronic copy of RU written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted *5 pan ofthe application. RETAINFOR PERMANENT RECORD 00000 NOV-lu-ZUUj nUN 11;12 Mn r na riv. . i V.- .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Pl.ANNER: James Lindt, 920.5095 DATE: 11/10/03 PROJECT: 289 Exhibition Lane Planned Unit Development Amendment REPRESENTATIVE: David Johnston Architects OWNEit; Maroon Creek Aspen LLC TYPE OF APPLICATION: PUD Amendment DESCRIPTIONÂ· Amending Building Envelope to allow for patios to be maintained that encroach outside the existing building envelope. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.445. PUD Review by: Staff for complete application, referral agencies fortechnical considerations, Planning and Zoning Commission for decision. Public 1 learing: Yes Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $1260 Total Deposit: $1260 for 6 hours of StaITTime (Billed at $210 per hour over the time that deposit covers) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Tocal Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telophonc number oftho repirsentative authorized to act on behalf ofthe applioant. 3. Signed fec agreement. 4. Pre-application Conference Summary. 5. An 81/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City ofAspen. 6. Site Plan and Survey showing tile encroachments beyond thc building envelope (please supply two 24" x 36" copie.s and ten 11"x 17" copies). On the survey, please show the arcathal isproposed to bc incorporated in the building envelope and the area of development envelope or building envelope that is proposed to be removed so that the proposed building envelope is not any larger than the existing building envelope adjustment. 8. A written description o f the proposal and a written explanation o f how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 10 Copies of the complete application packet (items 2-8) Process: Apply. Planner checks application forcompleteness. Staffthen reviews application against PUD Amendment Standards. After the Community Development Staff has determined that the application is complete, the Community Development staff will assign a hearing date. Planning and Zoning Commission reviews application at public heaing and makes final decision. Divclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on ctinent zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representalions that may or may not be accurare. The summary does not crcale a legal or vested right, .. ASPEN MAROON CREEK, LLC 300 WATER STREET SUITE 300 WILMINGTON, DE 19801 November 10, 2003 Mr. James Lindt Planning & Zoning Commision City of Aspen Aspen, CO RE: 289 EXHIBITION LANE PUD AMENDMENT Dear Mr. Lindt: This is to inform you that Aspen-Maroon Creek, LLC has authorized David Johnston, of 418 Cooper Street, Suite 206 Aspen, CO (phone: 925-3444) to act as our representative in the above referenced matter. Regards, 36640 .\J j /U-JA.~ B. Vinton Partner 302-654-6611 NOV. 10. 2003 1: 36PM SI tWALL I 1 ILt AbrtN l,Vâ€¢ Vilu 1. L Â¥ Y OF ASPEN Cm~PEN~ WRETT PNO HRETT PAID OATE AEP NO. DATE r. 4~4~0, m* )5163 +pqo a. nt# /5063 WARRANTY DEBI) TUISD=Â», 1-emiâ€¢ 10 40, April , 2000 .blr-0 NICHls E. CRIDEN AND MICHEU â€¢. Curn= or k .1, c...01 -Dak"I .8.-r. 4 UROOD, CREEK lilne, MC, A COLORADO-LnhT- LIABILITY -Wn DE /,0.00 0.0.1.42 RER.,0 m. Waw daÂ¢1&*,DE.19720 844 Stâ€¢Ae of DELAVIARI WrnÂ«,2TH,Th.lhocx),1.rÂ®r-In of*p.*Ton dollar, Ind othor gead and .uu.bl. c./ideration DOLLUB, h=*0816.clcncy of -h igh.:cby achâ€¢.100. h. 0-d. blizai-. â€¢11 0 -v-. â€¢â€¢t hy ahâ€¢â€¢â€¢ 0â€¢=au d= gnat. bugma. id. cum.1, =.1 c..hm, .mo * 0-m. U hel= 104 -zin r~ever. all *1 10,1 040*0111 10~erâ€¢kh~-Inati. ifII. litâ€¢-, 1,4-Wqinâ€¢hrnâ€¢ Cow, 0, Pr,Kni -St:.â€¢fcolor-des,-011*~1-4Â· Let 14, Block G. TNE ASPEM i VILLAGE P.U.D., according to th. Plat thlric* rloord*d October 15, 1990 in Plat Book 47 *t Pago 1 *â€¢ Raeoption m. 433275. Colâ„¢TY O, P ITKIM. STATE or COLORADO. 465890 mNISFER ElmATION EEIVED H/M/2102 ak.knoi,~b,-ce,gd.,mber.: 0219 ZIMIBITION LAXE. MEnt. CO 81511 - Idâ€¢Inle* *mdiland 11,maiden, mi=. i-~ad,toils *4 -lil *maw, 0* tine, b=* clâ€¢;mi doidâ€¢Au- a.vuoill,c ,I,wr. ti~.m hw or..1/. 91, mandÂ»* .-c *01- polds<:, â€¢;* chehÂ®Nal,Ii,In=d,Opli,Iia-0,1. TO HAVE AND TO BOU *c -1 Bri.co -t *p,1,4 4 *tig-. 1;4 *0 4. ................ luti.,All, Id:ki#Mali<* mililed-of Ill mlul*la -Ict,of *exprl,-. heia=Ilicized of *cpmmi-*m ~ Mdb.joid,we, p.rk,1, Imt-- hilfa,Jllae-Of hhilka=.laill. 111*clqk. ald-:modligh[.full/litr i *W=.4.04 '9* =Ull -Vi".=10~.dhre.** ",1 0..'*=Me".2.OckÂ¥Re.al R~=r-le,licip=zbir/bi=In. Ii=z=. . all#libilims *VilifwkillÂ«o-*laiwir.-cm tho/. .piet/ie Zielptiona â€¢heâ€žn on thi aâ€¢taahid a. â€¢=NIBIÂ¥ P. 11â€¢1â€¢â€¢-ah,8-4/HU.MOK=VERDEM-**at- 9Â¥ â€¢~~*MI#Q.-b ..,grsh.1 '91"'ch,1,6 W,).**0,110'r.*0&5-â€¢Fiel*./6â€¢"hty#~Â¥6 1.111 - 1,1 Wrn/HYP'% *0.0,-ace.1-de#.the,61111**r /1 111.w 4(4 luU=-3 (-L_ 9- - MIr.1*L I. C*IDEN :C/'Illl ... 4 /1 f PAULA Â£0 1 sh-' dolorado ' )"L Paw r u ja- 4-,PAh. 1 4 C-ahâ€¢ 80/12mll"/ 1"0 3n<by.f April , 2002 by MIGUEL z. CRID- AND MIC:EKLE S. CRIDEN -coâ€¢.i.'01"08 11.17-2006 4-"h.'Meatt.L /D Nmfy P-C let&4. 40: Gin#All 2=2401= ...Cm:=ti= ..9.. 1 If 4 465890 04/04/21~2 09.27* R Ze.~ D 1- - 492/541 .. Aspen Street Map 2 ... . 'ya...le A-.*44*44;Â·.* 1:..'I.*':txtfwi 0 Â»Â· Â· J .fr-me: Â· 3 E 4*4+5 :XY.i.: -24.3/ 1 026Â·%1 9 ..Â«:1. 04 . 0.$.** 2=. 0 16'or 5 78#%Â·4_ 4 '~3 i 2., L -Â· Â»I/qhÂ·. pe =-tÂ·704*AL-lt:NFAN.*- 4/4-,ta -El~~}1 40. - 2.13.e-9-~~J-~~~72 0 EX 2 *44* f~* . .:2'1 : --~=:'fEEiM- -â€¢;-I:Â· i .Â·22Â·2kle- 4 4 i.,-,4 - 44 - m F y / - 9.449.3 13 4/4 t - = 3 1 Smospiâ€¢ St 1 . 4. --1 - i 1.4 1 Aspen 12 ./. - ..ari 'St -Â¥ .1443. . V 4 . .9-h Jig P A- err.-44 / Ii: * C ~ a -0,1 1 :027 J . lin... i .,1 10. 4. - aa \Â·A.E. 39 E-. el + 9 4 0 2 N + i 4 ..KEY f 8/ . 0 Aspen Highlands I 118 %Â£~~~&Â£m 4... I , '*i-. '4 --e/*1*4 J. I I Hormony M Maroon O â€¢*4 444,4,; ; .illrlibl 4, 1 1.1 - 1,3 :94Â©.13 2*: :f ~ int; 4, .... IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ 988*03'53'E LOT 264 4 119.32 SUBDIVISION 381442 588'03'53'E 65,70' 56'00'E 3455 CD â€¢r . R \11, A BEARING OF N 00Â°00'00"W BEIWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC 01. BASIS OF BEARING = LS#???? AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR 3- AND RPC LS#???7 FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND 4 0/ 47Â£ 4 " SHOWN HEREON. P\\ 1, 0% 988~003/53//E _EGAL DESCRIPTION . 4.>0 . r- m | JW- 1 ~1 Â»-- 44Â· 1 4 _ _ __ _ u-a.- 4~.-1,*1*>ftil 7 3 4> -Â·Â·Â· Â· - 1 . ,- / - \ A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS Arrim# oF E*,49 EUVEL.ope - - - AWeND 0 U'11115â€¢u Q J Co,JOrilow, Ave FenANED |r h' - Ae *CRWWN M/0 1 Â¢fax-Â· 753 9,F. 1704 Legend -TbILL. 915 v "/ -4 t~ @-INDICATES FouND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 1 *12 1 / Iti /Â» 1 b#KISOUG :a. 6-UvE(OYL ' 31 4- Â«Â« 1Â« 2120\3 Â»forÂ« 0 :5-- - - -- -- Â« / Notes i xi- tu /54 4/ co ~53~ -)7.-. AtiCK ~ i \ I D. INK LATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY??), ORDER NO.??7?,POLICY NO.????, DATED I .Â· i xa<929KS6 & A ' 1 lo ???3 /AS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 61 ~~~~ ta) - UNLL : OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIG} OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE L LO PUR ,E OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING \\ /CA 1 UNC :ROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, ~:~ ~ * EGR . FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS ELEC IC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND 6 Il *a - 804Â»Â«43'97 , WEI_ 3 THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UlÂ·ILITy I CON HES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGI DF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO .'. %I*.. -e- ENJC FHE GRANT HEREBY MADE. 'U 4.62" - /29 - - 1 \7' ' I. 34. //DC , . 0 07 X ) 8 0 4: 3\. , 3 V 00 l ./ia:/ I /09 - Â» SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 00 0/ 0 I, STE 1 A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN W. \An=7.-// \ 0 < " ABOVE iSCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL IMPRC MEI'~IT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE A.D IMPRO MENTS, EASEMENTS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND 156.51 WW Acrkrer t;UVEL,(blp15 4/ -----24 ENCRC HMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. MT'â„¢: 979 â‚¬f CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 1 THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING \ IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT__O'CLOCK,_M. THIS _DAY OF ~ IN PLAT BOOK - AT PAGE- AS RECEPTION NUMBER -. STEVEN A. YELTON S.# 33645 DATE: CLERK & RECORDER NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. DATE St EYFD: ??7???? DATA FILE NAME: 7777777 In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more P.O. BOX 9 DATEE 6:TED: ??????? DRAWN BY: than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon, SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 R. SED: (970)923-2794 -J zo/HZ 337,70 N01Â·41Â·31Â·E S1471'12'9 96,95' 314*01'12~W N01Â°41'31"E sts .... IMPROVEMENT SURVEY LOT 14, BLOCK G, ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D., CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKi 4, STATE OF COLORADO Legend ond Not - Property Des tion: Lot 14, Block G, The Aspen Highionds Wlage P U D occording to , plat thereof recorded October 15, 1998 in Plot Book 47, at Poge 1 as eception No. 423275. County of Pitkin, State of Cojorodo. Bosis of Bea .s-The record beoring between the C?/4 corner ond the e NA/4 of See 14, T. 103, R852., 6th P.IW.. is N8939'34"Wos shown Lot /3 i on the p/at 3 Aspen Highlonds V#foge P U.D . $ .th '61 k - This map ho een prepared pursuant to client request for an improvement survey of thi_ :perty, ~Â·76 - Thus survey c : not represent o title search by this surveyor to determine Â» I. ownership or o discover eosements or other encumbrances of record AN t.0 1% C . Â·p U Informotion Â· -taining to ownership, easements. or other encumbrances of to the plot ereof recorded October 15, 1998 in Plot Book 47 at Page 1 yfl~i .4: C record have en token from The Aspen Highlonds Wloge P.U,D occording tr@ .64 8 Receptior 0 423275 in the Office 01 the Clerk ond Recorder. i .14 Number 000. 456-(2, schedule B-2, dated 31 Moy 2002. 've '.,1 - 1 2?V, . County of F n, State of Colorado ond Stewart Title of Aspen A.L T.A. Order i tÂ» A...., 30 . '74,1 â‚¬'.:. - Additional toi 'aphic data added 8 April 2002. ~ L, 4.- 1 1,19,7Â©r _ EXHIBITION LANE f i24 (PRIVATE ROAD) 0<*44:49 r.ze' .1424 41,2 '' â„¢2*han - A. 2.* r - - --_ _ i.-,il/,7>'*==--- Eos,m,nt L.--7 1/ 1 , 221*NVEÂ¢ Â£ F;â€¢077,2 N..4. 72&19 ?WE j . PIPE -7 1 N .704.--1 k 2 PvC 1- 106'2~' - -9-=51#6 4Â· ~ ' x Â· ~ 94, "DiÂ·&3'H SE..MANMOLE I T 4 2,4.3 R. u. - /74 Â®' 4743' \163 3 4 Â· 72'U , &|J 4.- - A- 845 - *. 7690 2 1 1 39<07* 9 , . N x tteya,~.ac~>- uea=_,4 1.,< 2114 1 2 . 1 al r 5) 4: CO: * STARWOOD 1 01( ' 1' 3 (* 41 21 82224% - -1 ni LOC 10 Â¢K) 2- 6 4 . I & 1 N gy Â« 9 4% lot /4 : 4/# 0.814 AcresÂ· f 92 \ +31 \ 2- p,c p/pe J --------1 1- ------ % 1 \\\\ - -1221 500 JO. 47' _ . - 1 % 907 7 '31,4 soke _ 1-U?13537.1 -1 Survefor - -ertific'te 1 1 +tionol 'url:' . ~ Â·Â· cert/0/ th this mprovement survey was made under my supervision and is true and correct 1, STEPHE L EHLERS. being o Registered Lind Surveyor in the Stote of Colorcdo, do hereby Boundary S,/ to the bt of my belief ond knowledge. 1 further certify that the improvements on the p; above de: bed porce; on this date, May 31 2002, except utility connections ore entire/y 1 +Fith#) Me oundories 0/ the parce/, except os Shown, that there ore no encroochme,lts upon the descr 3 premises by Improvements on any odjoininq premises except as indicoted. ond ' I '.. thet ther. no apparent e,ji~~gn of any easefnent crossing or burdening ony port of sold p 8. except os #*O~/2<& Legend - r 04- J. 0 0 -LJ 4 4 1.-arr,1.-440" . 1~~Lk,f 7001 STEPHEN EHL ERS L.EkO1374,3 ~*TE GRAPHIC SCALE ~ Set 8/*ding Envefope Sp/e ~ aund loiument Rebar mul cip stampe 'PLS 20/13- m Twepâ„¢e peast' : ( IN FEET) ~ Gos Line 49*60 linch = 20 Note: ls topography map complies with Notionot Mop Accuracy Stondords for n 6 Wot// Ser/Ce topog hic maps Where checked 90% of points showid be within 1/2 the contour I* Voter Volve ' interve ind well defined points should be plotted withel 1/507 of their true position. Â© Sewer /who(e Meyer, , for this spot elevation informotion. Critico es,gn should be based upon spot elevotions. pleose contict Schmueser Gordon -.- Sign O PvC Pipe 5 55 4- PVC Pipe NUM- 1 98:rl' to Coiercdo ./. you mus' SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER BER REviSION DATE BY Job No. 2001-254.001 cornmence ony ..I 'ction b.se' upon Iny Acd,tiono, Toco Adied 04/08/02 rk./ LOT 14, Block G DraE. by WBH defect ,n th,6 su/ey within th/ee years ofter 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 you f.rst /,scover such defect M no event moy cny legot cotton bosed upon on' defect GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8 | 60 | 4 wre 02 SA" Im rovement Date. 12/12/01 in M $ suiey " commenced more thon ten (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Aspen Highlands Village 2 UPDATE MAP & Trh.E a,FO yeors from the d<Re of the ceruf cat,on shown, SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 3urvey Approved oF 1 beren. 6 ENG1NEE/S . SURVEYOIS E-mail: survey@sgm.inc.corn F,ie 04â€¢cO cy,0 0,%2001\254 .001\dwal~.TOP.dwg Soved fue 04 Jun 2002 357/m Pe{ted. rce' 04 Jus 77,2 5.5/m ,/eN/Â·.c 3,# FISS 1002 AHSIatdO) --. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY LOT 143 BLOCK G, %* xii r-1 71 n A T -r -r T /7 -r- 7- T A m T -,1 r+V 1r 7 7 -r T A ,-y TE P T OF COLORADO pen Highlonds Village P.U.D. ier 15, 1998 in Plat Book 47, of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 1 the Cl/4 corner and the is N89*39'34"W as shown A " U. . et request for an improvement by this surveyor to determine - encumbrances of record. All ,ts, or other encumbronces of ghlonds Village P.U.D. according 998 in Plat Book 47 at Page 1 e Clerk ond Recorder, vart Title of Aspen A.L.TA Order 31 May 2002. 92. 'll . . , ,d Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado, do hereby ; made under my supervision and is true and correct 1 further certify that the improvements on the y 31 2002, except utility connections ore entirely :pt as shown, that there are no encroachments upon on any adjoining premises except as indicated, and gn of any easement crossing or burdening any part 1.ILAL-Ze O 7 P rE ( IN FEET ) 6-4 1 inch = 20 ft. @ Water Serwbe topographic maps/ Where 'checked 90% of points should be within 1/2 the contour with National Mop Accuracy Standards for k( Water le/ve interval and well defined points should be- plotted within 1/50" of their true position. Â© Sewer Manhole Critical design should be based upon spot elevations, please contact Schrnueser Gordon -v- Sign Meyer, Inc. for this spot elevation information. O PVC Pipe 1 SS 4" PVC Pipe Notice: ' NUM- 01 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER sa REVISION DATE BY Job No. 2001-254.001 Acqording to Colorado Law, you must 1 Additbnol Topo Adds ' 04/08/02 TKM LOT 14, Block G - Drawn by: WBH commence ony Kegal action based upon ony defect in this survey within three years after 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 you first discover such defect. In no event may eny lego/ action based upon ony defect ~ in this survey be commenced more than ten (970) 945- I 004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Aspen Highlands Village 2 UPDATE MAP & TITLE INFO 4 June 02 SAH Improvement Date: 12/12/01 1 years from the date of the certification shown SCHMUESER | GORDON | MEYER ASPEN, CoLORADO (970) 925-6727 File: L14top.dwg hereon. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Email: survey@sgm-inc.corn , Survey Approved: oF 1 / 11 1 . ~ i .1 1 A < . 1 11 1 ..... . .. D I . ... . ...-... ...0- I.--Il . I . . :-I . .... A. .. 0 .: . 0 .. . 0 . ..-. I. . ..... .. ... ..i . -I - - - - . I . I ... . .-. .. . .. -0 -. ......... .- 0,0 ., . ..-. . , .. A .0., ./ 0 -- -0. .... .B 0, . ... .. . 9 a I. .. .. 0 - . . .. . 4 '. ..... f,f , f. i d 1 - I ':AA . .. . . I. . -0- 0 --. .. .. . 0 . 0. 0 . I . ... . - I.'-I- ... .. i . . . â‚¬-~1 - -.- 0-'.- - I I - '11 9 . . a .. .. . .,1. 7,1 3.4 1, 4 -Â· , ... A ~~-~" - ' - 1, 0 ... 1 - 0.. .. 0 -.- ... . . I .... I - ./ ..... 1% - 4.- . 4 1 . ~ 6-*- ','- â€ž4~*47*. IL* j~a;-: *- VVI'l t. - + 00:"u. - * ~*2 40 C 4- f . -Â·'N ... . - N .. ./ -94- #".4 - .* - tÂ» . I . 1 rE * - .... 1 0~ ) ,Â£14!4 . I 0 6 I I - 4 4 -1~ 4 . A/# - * 1 4 .- - -6 .4,1, . - * 424 4. vi. -- NA .1, f ' Â».~.34 I Irl-- i.44 . 4 E ~i , -t .. 1 -1 J I Zi f t Â£ 1 1, , I. , .1 1 , 4140 -a , -- 1 - --- - p -/ 30-1-Lifir:Tri--2 - .: - '1111~ c Â£ 2 7 "4.4 ....5 , . A-15 4 r %14' - r a: . - 4,- fe? , L r U / I - i - . t t 4-1 -- - 1.. - 44 1 -~ 1 - e- I. ........ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT S88Â°03'53"E LOT 864Â°34' 119,32 ~814?4*e SUBDIVISION S88*03'53'E 65,70' N o 0â‚¬e , R Â·96' T 46, ; AREA -ID BE 43600 4 4 ~~ ..Jk ' A BEARING OF N 00Â°00'00"W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC BASIS OF BEARING LS#???? AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR 4 AND RPC LS#???? FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND 'Sau ~88303/33//E LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12 2/ 2 47 L '11 9}60 SHOWN HEREON. . A Trtj r--1 ..(0. . eÂ« GO 011 h e ''0, I D - A 0.11Â·e:*44 - U .1 - -3- =71.2-=Hh. - 41 ..bUT 2 .'. A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS -':'': -49~3-39Â·*jiÂ· Â·3':2Â»*%+04'4Â·~62 .I- 1*-1 ~Â· ' Â· Â·... ~Â£ tr. â‚¬:2 â€¢~t~ ' ~ Â· 3 FbFRow or E><15Â¢G 8.JVE LOpE -lill"'Ii"litill///6/'llki 4 r '4 ---L_I- dIA1h- EXT---,I#=46--4--4-3-----j KfugUED 0 kÂ»91115â€¢L Coworilews Ah)0 Â¥menlovfc' - **04*j#*M=- 04*40*!1Â¥~-( 1 0, - :9& 2 --7--- .21.>-1Â»*1*.talm~./ 46. .. ' ke *COMTÂ¥ WYboFE. - 3 i .?111211~1212~6: ~ ~QÂ°' ~-1 â‚¬Fe*. 763 sr + 270 9. ODBO _- Ibl*L= 915 SF-7 -- ,%1 2.1.%~1, :1 , :,-4: '1 ..113 ad/*ad68,4idd .4 , Legend Ld ...04: b.*Â·D... , : - 0 ~ - INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. 9 h r h 12 1 - I M ,1 -- ..5 ~: CO hu / Or) 0 1 DECK x 2 ST x 0 52 DECK 0-42*19â„¢Ce EAS. 6-Uvela'E X X 1 z 1 80.53 X, N otes ECK X ~ 13 X X I - X X~D 7777 In 55 DECK - , 4 s ~ ~ _ INFORMATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY??), ORDER NO.????,POLICY NO.????, DATED XT X X s â‚¬*16 a DECK X ST 7 ????? WAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. x; DECK ~ Cl~ RIGHTS OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE 10 DECK 40 PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING 19 2 6 , 01 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, 03 C ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND f i EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS 0 -4 WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY 61 IG6 E- i 4 1 / ~~ COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE , RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO DEC 1: X ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. 1 â€ž0,-Gh<S X 661... DECK ( xiath~- X CK â€ž ~CK ~S~ L.283 , 12.RtiCKS XR KS KS ~'-*KS 0 X * KS E x1 alICKS O X R X 4 0 X XG~D 4 6 Q - SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE U' I ~ SoIl I, STEVEN A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPIC7S AN 73 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE 378Â°20'37 ' ,1 ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND -_14&*/ Acrk'Tr _ tuvuuÂ»_E--_ _ - ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. .PrÂ«.0 979 er-2.- - _21-1 iT AREA7D ADDED CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 1 THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING INTHEOFFICEOFTHECLERKANDRECORDEROFTHECOUNTYOF DATE: PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK,-M. THIS DAY OF ~ IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE AS RECEPTION NUMBER ~ STEVEN A. YELTON PLS. # 33645 ~~~~~ CLERK & RECORDER NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon HIRED GUM SURVEYING LTD. 996, DATE SURVEYED: ??????? any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. I P.O. BOX 9 DATE DRAFTED: ??????? In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more DATA FILE NAME: ??????? DRAWN BY: than ten years trom the date of the certification shown hereon. SNOWMA;S, COLORADO 81654 REVISED: (970)923-2794 . . . 0 . . . . 30,48' NO *41'31'E 0429 L /6 9 I IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ S88Â°03'53"E LOT S 38.~34-E S88*03'53'E 65.70' 'net 090. 1, AcrIVI17 EAP VELOP* -T M , . H B - 976,0 To hE ADDEA I X 0 X Z X -rb 609|IA;' EN V, I I la 436Â° B ~~ 00 ~~~Â£25 OUISI~~ASIS OF BEARING= LS#???? ATTHE S E PROPERTY CORNER ANDA FOUND REBAR A BEARING OF N 00Â°00'00"W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC 1 4 4 - AND RPC LS#???? FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND 0 - 4-rldit 64'u SHOWN HEREON. 2003 e#" PO un ee b ./-1 888~Â°03'53"E .,0, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AMÂ·Â· -0. ~4 ' -7- A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS -I:,1 Â·,,7 .. 1.-I ..... b<164 6, r>,re: 'E , ..~ 1 i 8'Firte er _1*192, Elovul=E - L 'SFUNe-O 0 kÂ»1.1.IZAL ColJOrilewâ‚¬ A,Jo FeMOV#D 1 1 < 47 . 9 -u -------I--li----*- . 1.litlritttl-f-6 5Â·,'7 OE--u- -=r j /546 *di\VIr<r kljvt{.0%, - t I ~.... / 671kx: 703 s~ + 2,70 â‚¬f 4 ' -- TOT,4-=915 9: fr- 4.26. *kee# r'Â·21 / Legend F - / Wi - 0 ~ 4 ~ - INDICATES FOUND ~UMENT AS DESCRIBED, ~ Lid - - -- \ 3 4.. - - - r- 244- -I- I I X . XVIST 0 18 m . .... 0 *D C. 1 Z 4 11 DkcK X 2 sT X 0 1 r-1 6 52 â€¢ DECK 0--5*mriuce DG. 6-UvELO?E 0, X z~* Notes X 52(K X x i 13 X x 1 X *70 1 03 5ECK X 5 GND 55 DECK ', - INFORMATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY??), ORDER NO.????,POLICY NO.????, DATED IT Wk x s (*# . DECK . sr ~93 ~?? WAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 4 , B - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE le A.0 49 PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING K "A RIGHTS OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE _ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND 00 Â« -30 ' RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO f\ WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY XGLD > 6 / COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE 'T 1 1 4 EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS 1, ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. ~~' DECK j X Â» \ ' f DECK C XinICKS, X xii KS -&1 \ O 03 S 1 *9*S BC X S *g o .gR (3114 Â£ CO X W *04 i,\ /3 V Â» 4 6 42~ /Â® Â»Â» SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE X:6 U, 2 7 B / 09 I, STEVEN A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN -. 4 1*3=1 1- - ~ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE 978Â°20'37"W XUD --% 4 / , ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND 156,51 ___ated ACTW\7~ _.%Â»tUW*_E/__--2 ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. frÂ¢: 979 el=2-1- -7-33 -- CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE ~ THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING ~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF ~ \ PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK,-M. THIS DAY OF IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE AS RECEPTION NUMBER STEVEN A. YELTON PLS.# 33645 DA,Â·E: CLERK & RECORDER HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon DATE SURVEYED: ??????? any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. DATA FILE NAME: ??????? In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more P.O. BOX 9 DATE DRAFTED: ??????? DRAWN BY: than ten years trom the date of the certification shown hereon. REVISED: SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 (970)923-2794 30,48' 042/9 - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY tÂ» -- LOT 143 BLOCK G, 4 CY T-3 FTÂ¥ 7%7- T T T /1 T -r T A A T n n ,Â» 7-rT T A Cy nE P.U.D., OF COLORADO Epen Highlonds Village P. U. D. ber Â·15, 1998 in Plot Book 47, of Pitkin, State of Colorado. r} the Cl/4 corner and the is N89'39'34"W as shown n" nt request for an improvement by this surveyor to determine r encumbrances of record. All its. or other encumbrcnces of ghtands Village P.U.D. according 998 in Plot Book 47 at Page 1 he Clerk and Recorder. wort Title of Aspen A.L.T.A. Order ' 31 May 2002. 02 1 -1.. i . ed Lond Surveyor in the State of Colorado, do hereby 9 made under my supervision and is true and correct I further certify that the improvements on the y 31 12002, except utility connections are entirely ept as shown, that there are no encroachments upon ' on any adjoining premises except as indicated, and ign of any easement crossing or burdening any port 69 *252'h t. Zoot - ,<*TE 9 4. . ( IN FEET ) . 119.e. ints Wpograpny mop compties with National Mop Accuracy Standards for 1 inch = 20 ft. @ Water Service topographic maps. Where checked 90% of points should be within 1/2 the contour )* Water 1/0/ve interval and well defined peints should be plotted within 1/50" of their true position, Critical design should be based upon spot. elevotions, plecqe contact Schmueser Gordon Â© Sewer Manhole -u- Sign Meyer, Inc. for this spot elevation information. O PVC Pipe 1 SS 4Â» PVC Pipe NUM- A~crd'hg to Colorado Law, you must ~ SCI-IMUESER GORDON MEYER SER REVISION DATE BY Job No. 2001-254.001 LOT 14, Block G commence any legal action based upon ony 04/08/02 TKM WBH 1 Additional Topo Adele Drawn by: defect in this survey within three years after 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 you first discover such defect. In no event may ony legal action based upon ony defect II]lI).I'OVeIrlent Date: 12/12/01 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160 | Aspen Highlands Village 2 UPDATE MAP & TITLE INFO 4 June 02 SAH in this survey be commenced more thon ten (970) 945- 1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 years from the date of the certification shown SCHMUESER | GORDON | MEYER ASPEN, CoLoRADO (970) 925-6727 Survey File L14top.dwg hereon. Approved: OF 1 ~ ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS E-mail: survey@agm-inc.corn 1/ I 01 , ...... . 0.- D ... .. I .0.- . . . . t. I . 0 Â£.. i.l- ... .. ....... ... - . - I. .... .. ...... ... . *I- - .... I . 0 -8 - I .-. 0 .. . 8 - .. . . . -0 -. . I ......... .- 00. ./ . i. -: 0.-I .... ...... ... .... = 0 . :4 4% .. 1 .0.1 ./ 0 01 . . .. , A . . 0 il ./ .. .. . .. a .. 0 - .... . f / /k f .1 k 9 10 -' 0: L . - 2 . 0, 0 -I- 0 .... ... i .- ...... .. * . 0. . ... . â‚¬--1 -- -.- 0-0.- -0 .0-- - I . . .. - 47 4.3 ~ ~'Â·. --Il a Â·4 Â· ./ , .A. A m 1 --- - . I. 4 1 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ 388Â°03'53"E LOT 364'54' 119,32 SUBDIVISION 30.14~4*E S88*03'53'E 65.70' N / 0 / oil T L/ 1 -4 H 0 i 0 * 1 . 2 1%50 68 & i k BASIS OF BEARING = A BEARING OF N 00Â°00'00"W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND RPC he. 1 LS#???? AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR 4 9- , AND RPC LS#???? FOUND AT THE N.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND <12 l SHOWN HEREON. l i , 1 i 388Â°03'53*E LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Avh / 1 ..N i U' 1 -:--,4/54 --- \234/ 119.32 A PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE IN THE WOODS 3 493.1- ....... S88Â°03/53"E 65,70/ 02/ Â· Legend 1 Ld 0*, , 1 0 ~ - INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. 96. 0-{lh ur xt pr) Z ,--1 ; 06 nic: , ft,06Â· BUV ST ~ DECK Â· ZJOD Notes X 53 x Ft cK X X 1 ST 54 v 70 x ' ST - 7771 -GND DECK $ Wi DECK ' s ' f - INFORMATION FURNISHED BY (??TITLE COMPANY??), ORDER NO.????,POLICY NO.????, DATED 1 .4 IR S l.~CK~O Kf DECK x ST -- 4 ~,U X T "X /-2 x47 x ????? WAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. Ill-) 4 DECK -- ~ CA - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE 15 1 DECK RIGHTS OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE i CO PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING m UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER, 1 19 7- 403 ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND 03 9= 4 EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS x 71 WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY w . RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO GND T / (1/ ft_j COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE \ ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. DECK $ X 62 x ECK DECK 19 Â» n 66 x ER IR W *R ~ EU r--4 CK D L// *R KS eAKS BC x Ks AX@CKS X SK 9 01 ~ IDE IR IR .:3,~ \ r46'S . i aap.. 0 ipK , - jU 7 4 \ V 4 1 x ~0 K 9CK 4 1 0/) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Â» 59 .,72 AGND l.*UPSC~U' 7(*s -12*17- (9*33~ 0 , ,CK Fzrrl U .4. XZP 501 i i 4Â»t *C:parc vi I, STEVEN A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON DATE???? OF THE 378*20'37"W x73 CK 6 -- ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL . j IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND | -------Â·~ ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ~~~~~~~~~~~~7333~E CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE I THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING , ~ ~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF ' PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK, M. THIS DAY OF ~ IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE AS RECEPTION NUMBER ~ STEVEN A. YELTON PLS.# 33645 DATE: CLERK & RECORDER NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon HIRED GUN SURVEYING LTD. any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. DATE SURVEYED: ??????? DATA FILE NAME: ??????? In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more P.O. BOX 9 DATE DRAFTED: ??????? DRAWN BY: than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. SNOWMASS, COLORADO 81654 REVISED: (970)923-2794 30,48'