Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.101-17 RESOLUTION NO. 101 (SERIES OF 2017) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S SIGN REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF REED V. TO WN OFGILBERT, ARIZ., 2015. WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.310.020(A), a Policy Resolution is required to initiate the process of amending the City of Aspen Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS,the United State Supreme Court found in the case of Reed v. Tou,n of Gilbert, Ariz. (2015) (Reed) that commercial and non-commercial signage are forms of speech protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department and consultants White & Smith,LLC conducted research into national best practices regarding sign code compliance with Reed to aid in the drafting of revised sign regulations; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.310.020(B)(1), the Community Development Department conducted Public Outreach with community members and stakeholders, the Planning &Zoning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission, and City Council regarding the amendments to the sign code; and, WHEREAS,amending the Land Use Code to comply with the requirements of Reed will ensure the ongoing effectiveness and viability of the sign regulations within the City of Aspen Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the proposed code amendment policy direction, and finds it meets the criteria outlined in Section 26.310.040; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.310.020(13)(2), during a duly noticed public hearing on July 10, 2017, the City Council approved Resolution No. 101, Series of 2017, by a 4 to 0 vote,,requesting code amendments to the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, this Resolution does not amend the Land Use Code, but provides direction to staff for amending the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Code Amendment Objective Reed Compliant Sign Code Amendments Resolution No. 101, Series 2017 Pagel of 3 The goals and objectives of these code amendments are to: 1. Comply with the requirements of First Amendment (free speech) caselaw; and, 2. Ensure the appropriate balance of signage and community aesthetics; and, 3. Maintain public health, safety, and welfare by preventing sign clutter, distractions. from roadways and obstructions from signage; and, 4. Provide opportunities for commercial and non-commercial signage in commercial and residential zone districts; and, 5. Limit the proliferation of excessive signage in commercial and residential zone districts; and, 6. Ensure that sign regulations meet the informational, advertising, wayfinding and speech needs of residents, businesses and visitors. Section 2: Sign Code Amendment Direction from Council City Council provided the following general direction in work sessions related to these code amendments: 1. To the extent possible, maintain the status quo when it comes to sign quality and design, particularly regarding the size, quantity, and types of signs available. 2: Develop a licensing system for the use of city property (e.g. light poles and banners over Main Street) for the display of signs. 3. Develop a single, government-required, comprehensive construction sign inclusive of public safety and related copy for display on permitted construction sites. 4. Continue to allow temporary signs on properties in residential areas. 5. Ensure the continued, limited availability and use of sandwich board signs in appropriate commercial zone districts while preventing the proliferation of such signs. To the extent possible, use sandwich board signs to support Council's second tier space policies. . 6. Limit the time that vehicle signage may be displayed to ensure that Street Blimps and other forms of vehicle signage is controlled, while not precluding commercial speech on vehicles that is incidental to the primary use of the vehicle. 7. Ensure that marijuana businesses are provided a means other than full-coverage window wraps to comply with State of Colorado requirements for the separation of displays and sales areas from rights-of-way. 8. Limit the use of window wrap signs to the following zone districts: CC, C-1,NC, SCI, L, CL, EBO. Ensure that an appropriate proportion of such signs is available for copy. 9. Continue to allow for the display of televisions, such as televisions in bars, while preventing the proliferation of those displays. 10. Eliminate the special allowance for signs in Paepcke Park, and include Paepcke Park in the process for sign permitting in other parks in association with a special event. 11. Ensure that halo lighting and other backlit signs do not create a public health nuisance by controlling the brightness of such signage in accordance with the City's existing lighting regulations and industry best practices. Section 3: Reed Compliant Sign Code Amendments Resolution No. 101, Series 2017 Page 2 of 3 This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the resolutions or ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior resolutions or ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted this 10°i day of July, 2017. n Steven Skad on, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Linda Manning,City Cler aures R True, City Attorney Reed Compliant Sign Code Amendments Resolution No. 101, Series 2017 Page 3 of 3