Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.19940810 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COM}{ITTEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 10, 1994 Meeting was called to order by first vice-chairman Donnelley Erdman with Linda Smisek, Les Holst, Martha Madsen, Tom Williams, Jake Vickery and Roger Moyer present. Karen Day and Joe Krabacher were excused. COMMITTEE AND STAFF COMMENTS Roger: Planet Hollywood has yet to paint the trim on the roof and why is that after all this time. What can we do if they do not honor their commitments. Amy: I will contact them but it was a condition of approval. Amy: Scott Samborski has resigned and Karen has been absent for four months and I am concerned about their replacements due to the fact if the special review comes about the HPC should not be short of members. Donnelley: We should advertise for two openings and Karen can always get back on after things slow down. Amy: 939 E. Cooper has been pulled off the agenda due to some personal conflicts with the owner of the property. The Langley's are trying to rectify that. Jake stepped down. 420 E. MAIN STREET - GALENA PLAZA EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL Kim Weil, architect: I represent the owners Lowell Meyers, Andy Hecht, Ron Garfield and this is the central bank corner. It has been a year ago that we have been here and in that time they have been concenetrating on the apartment building in the back and have upgraded it significantly and brought things up to code. Their time is running out and they are requesting a six month extension and during this time we will apply for a final development plan. They are motivated to begin builidng in the spring and we need the six month extension to finish the design work and do the documentation. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant a six month extension of conceptual approval for 420 E. Main Street; second by Les. Ail in favor, motion carries. Jake seated. TEMPORARY OVERLAY Amy: We went to council with the ideas of the application procedure and instead we spent 2 1/2 hours convincing them. We have had a brown bag lunch and there are five different view points about what a monster home is and what we should do about it. We all need to go in the same direction. John Bennett would like to have a three day charet to discuss issues. Leslie and I do not feel that is enough time to figure out what is needed when we have been working seven months. We want to get the special review up and going as there are people waiting. I have been working on an application packet and the cases that I am most concerned about are HPC cases where we have a project that we are already reviewing and they are exceeding the 80%. I do not want to see them excused of review as we have always said additions etc. are getting too big. At the same time I do nto want to make it a complicated process. The only idea that I have come up with is that the special review board would attend the HPC meeting so that the boards do not contradict each other and everyone can come to an agreement in one review. Jake has come up with an objective scoring system where you have a criteria. JAKE: I have been in favor of not having a dual review for historical projects whether they are on the inventory or in the districts. I felt the HPC could incorporate guidelines in their review.