The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.432 E Hyman Ave.HPC5-95~ 432 E. Hyman Ave. Minor Devt. _~ ~ 2737-073-39-013 HPC5-95 --- 8Â«52, CcL- -1(21~z,~47 â‚¬*~_ \ 1 C 1 1 G H 0- 5-- F H P .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 03/15/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC5-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-39-013 PROJECT NAME: 432 E. Hyman Minor Development Project Address: Lots R & S, Block 88 APPLICANT: Ransom Woods 925-5459 Applicant Address: 432 E. Hyman Ave. REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Koutsoubos 920-2959 925-7072 Representative Address/Phone: 419 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: CODIMENTS: 1~~~~ IA:+ s..., &41.1.1.42, . FBot'* &16+ Guilk 0 04.6 Â·* MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 432 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen Drug building- Minor Date: March 22, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to enclose an existing deck on the third level of the Aspen Drug building and to replace existing windows in this unit as well. Please see the attached inventory form on this structure. It is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. " The building was constructed in 1887, and the second floor was destroyed by fire in 1918. A second and third floor which are incompatible with the remaining portion of the structure (the first floor) were subsequently added. APPLICANT: Ransom B. Woods, represented by Ted Koutsoubos. LOCATION: 432 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots R and S, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The applicant wishes to enclose an existing deck with sliding glass doors and to replace existing windows. Staff finds that the proposal has little additional impact on the streetscape or on the historic structure. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the i parcel proposed for development. J Response: The upper story floors of this building are already inconsistent with the neighborhood in terms of (~ their setback. .. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The current proposal does not create any greater impact on the cultural value of any adjacent historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) r 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: j l ~ 1 .. .. ~ LAND USE APPLICAEal NEM I . 1) bâ‚¬,534,=se U Gooll 1/ 01.3 - 2) 'e,SA'llrnatleâ€¢i 411 1~ . t~ v/n a ,~ Aggrv Co . <c (G,r t 1 0 -r **S 'Illock <'t tr- V (il~icate street'ahdress, lot & block omber, legal description where awl-griate) 3) Present Zoning .. 4) Iat Size 5 473 2 5) k?Aig:=t>S r#HB, laaess & 2=e # ?2â‚¬- Câ‚¬ 4-9 - 92 0 -29 09 KA#soNÂ© 1. Weaots 412 L AlmAWÂ· Asprâ€¢j,. Co< %(GrC 6) Representative's Name, Address & phone # 7) Fpd of 4plication (please check all that gply): . 4 aiditional Use _ Concepttial SPA -ill-li- Cono~~al Histodc Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. Â·4 8040 Greelline Comeptual PUD /~ Minor Histaric Dev. Stream Margin Â· Â·. Final RID Historic rkinlition M,mtain View Plane - Sdxlivisicn - Historic Designation Ted:/M,Â®, Alne~nent . -- (Rus Allotme<It Int Â®lit/Iot Iine - (2439 Ehoemption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses Â· (I,=ber and - type of ecisting structures; approocinate sq. ft.; n=ber of bedrocins; any pra,icus approvals granted to the property). U a Ak 10 1 Â£ ct o w .r e w RÂ£ s : cl a- W f ; A 1 0 8.61 + 10'/ A Luild 'do r 9) Description of Develognent 4plication nlov,S slidi,/0 a IA.49 ~ooft- 4 W ~ W &* M ows 6ue . f iye- -C ~02,60*fli u,vdrn, Fy;6-f,%n/~ F'*0044 1%.Ep),>cir w ; -,L Â£ . R n ird i* 4 50~ f AirJ (3 /.95 , 1 '~ f leoR & CARprt. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attadment 2, Minimm Suâ„¢ission Contents Response to Attad=mt 3, Specific Sdinission oodtents Response to Attadment 4, Review Standards far Your *plication I'll'll 1 =pri' uwho 1/1 0 . 414 . , I I . . 9-20 - 9Â¢7 40 A* 1 -~ f' 10 MINOR DEVELOPMENT/OF HISTORIC RESOURCES Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1.1 Application Form 2.4- Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application /. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your 3. Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application /79 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to . the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the. Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover r DIEw Â·Ilitul, 41.Ail TO P>EFLACE F\<ED 41â€¢16lÂ£ fANE N f- -- . I I.- dâ‚¬- < -~7 ~ft-Ar < 9 409-44 W1N DO w + DW k n 11 l' a p 114 4 - 4Â· /:n 69 1 - - 11 - r 1 0 - 0 o r.2 f - 0 0 -1 11 I LE 1 2- J U Q , â‚¬ U ,-1 Ch 24|k i 2 4 A.1 1~ - tilgÂ·1461 1 8 - KITCHEN 00 4 1 w 63 \ ~i-1 8 2 L.1 J I 0 L ; 6,1 143 20 0 Al W 03 - 1.- 1 1 - 1 1 91% li 11!! 9 1 11 11 \\Al - -r~Â«Â»4 \2\ 11714-- ,Er- ----r-!~ 4Â»F-F---- 41902Â» t. RE*-7144ULÂ· WINQDWS Mel-ACE EXISTING <INGLE PANC> ~ : F TED KoUTiooeDS Ab 4,9 E. 14Â¥/AAN *L 4'1= "o" 3/'l9â‚¬ I, 911 d/N.94 61 4 1 tiVW ) Â»04 0/ALL â€¢Ne 6<AZJ, .. ~ED<ISTING 6 S A#1 5 hNO CO LUM MS - 1 \\lilli 1 - , 1 1 / /4/ 2 9 11 t> , Fa li Nrw 8* A-ef â‚¬ 66 47*-- Neâ€¢.1 2)04 8 0 4.46.01 *6, i j '. -I 1 II 1 11 Il Ill 11 1 EXICÂ¥\N6 PE> 6 LC :4, u y rBONT ELEVATION '/4," = I (-O <' I . I 1/ 2/ ., '. ,/ ''.. \ / Â»fer, 1 % E 1 N (=â€¢... ,. . R 0 0 16 1 2 15, + 68 z I van<b I CO L U ht U RENOUO NCIAI INSOL 6(149 1 4>HErrPÂ·OCIL %(1Â£,r, 01NCIC Nr tal':fr- 081 6 Â· Wk'u_ 8/YOUD Itew 4Lt O ING 4, 064 6 0 oof_ , El(1%1-ING WALL ANO --- -- ~ -6LAZING..ACMOVCU___ _~..~. ) K// WINOOw gENT eÂ·YOUG EfXirING ~ 1 r I 6UAN)al L % 4 il 4 2 {Fl ' NEW SOBFIA ow SUreas ~ ~ 1 .f 2,---IT- n 1. 1/1 1 1. b< \%-r lk) ,Â»j p. LOOP, ,Â¢-=' f-'ll- . -*$/7 - -.I.I./7.7 - - 7 - . iECTION 4 4 / 0 / /. O 4 - -- I I.-Ii...... TED KOUTiouttoâ‚¬ Pe, -49 6 INMAN AN. â‚¬ 1/9'7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MARCH 22, 1995 Donnelley: I would like them to come before us one more time. Les: Also it is visible from the Jerome Hotel and people are paying $300. a night and they do not want to see a satellite dish. That is my feeling in the historic district. MOTION: Roger made the motion to table 232 E. Main Street to the next meeting and to request further information and possible relocation; second by Donnelley. Motion carries 5 - 1. Les opposed. Martha: Why are you tabling it instead of denying it. Jake: We are tabling because the applicant is not here to answer pertinent questions. Donnelley: We have no idea what that roof overhang is and it does cause a hazard in the alley and it is a public way. 432 E. HYMAN - ASPEN DRUG - MINOR Amy: It is listed on the historic inventory and the upper most floors of the building burnt down in 1918 and at sometime more recently the second and third floors as we see them now were built. The proposal is on the third floor where there is an existing deck to enclose it and to change a few of the existing windows. My finding was that we approve this as submitted. I find that the second and third floor addition are extremely incompatible with the historic structure and this proposal does not increase that situation. MOTION: Les made the motion that HPC approve the minor development application of 432 E. Hyman Avenue; second by Martha. All in favor, motion carries. Les: The proposal will not change any of the visuals at all. Ted Koutsabous, owner: The overhang is seven feet and we are only coming out four feet. You can't see it. Visually there is no impact at all. 205 W. MAIN, CHISOLM - WORKSESSION Amy: We approved lightwells and a shed in the past and they would like to build a garage and need a recommendation from HPC before going to Board of Adjustment for variances. They do not wish to pursue landmark designation.j ' Richard Klein: This house is on the corner of Main and First 9