The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.315 E Dean St.0004.2017.ASLU315 E DEAN ST 0004.2017.ASLU j-0 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION I 2737 182 85 033 CAAâ€ž-<A t.k'-2 -ll 17 19 R PATH: G/DRIVE /AD *TRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE C . 1/.1. DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0004. 2017.ASLU PROJECT ADDRESS 315 E DEAN ST 033 PARCEL ID 2737 182 85 bQi PLANNER BEN ANDERSON CASE DESCRIPTION WIRLESS TELECOMMUNICATION REPRESENTATIVE BRADJOHNSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 03.06.17 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 7.31.17 173-7 /9 29 5033 0604 -20 f 9- -A SLU 0 Permits -0X file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Iab Help '1,~ ~ lilÂ®068*9â€¢liN 4 B M nizli Jump L:*l i*flell Â» ge 51 3 301./i.1 0% a )9." .#*~.1%,4..Ad- -~an~ Custrn Fi.elds + Roubng Stats |Fee SummarY IACUons I Routhg History i Permit type 2 6 ~Aspen Land Use Permit # CCC4.2C17.ASLU ~, Address 315 DEAN |Â·' Apt/Suite , City ASPEN -=-L, zeÂ·-Le..--. State ~co I v ~ Zip 81611 - Penlilt Inlbrmaaori~~~~~OA~~~~~~~ Master permit 1Â·Â·Â· i , Routing queue aslul E Applied 01/182017 I- 1.1 k Project ~Â·Â·Â· Stabs pending Approved Descripton APPLICATION FOR VERIZON @ ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTELASPEN HIGLANDS Issued 1 Â¥ BRAD JOHNSON FOR BLACK & VEATCH CORP VERIZON WIRELESS Closed,Mnal Submitbed BRAD JOHNSON 3%2 229 4681 Clock |EIIii] Days E-al Expires Cl/11'201 8 pâ€¢, Submitted via I v + y ff'W . Owner 7~17/3/3/ Last name ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & :Â·Â·Â· First name 9CC2 SAN MARCO CT ORLANDO FL 32819 Phone ()- Address Applicant Il Owner is applicant? Il Contractor is applicant? Lastname BLACK&VEATCH CORP |Â·Â·Â· First name BRADJOHNSON 4600 S SYRACUSE ST 800 Phone (303) 229-4681 Cust # 30147 iÂ·Â·Â· Address DENVER CO 8C23,7 Email J0HNS0NBW2@BV.COM Lender Last name iÂ·Â·Â· First name Phone () - Address 1 [Displays the date the permit was issued . 1-Â£21Â£711--r_.._y ._-I AspenGold5 {server]_,ngelas ~ oil _, ,:i 016 4=F GS 1 6-7 )90 7 /Vo Refur 15 4 975 00 Pkn,wr: bert St ~-02-4 1/ 4 -2-300 seÂ»N 70!noll.loqlooll~ sdnoig~qeil ....<1 r.1 1 "'111 lilli lilli lilli lilli 1111111111111111 lili 1111111111111111111111111111 EPTION#: 636830, R: $38.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: APPROVAL Pg 1 of 6, 03/15/2017 at 02:47:13 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL FOR THE UPGRADE OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF OF 315 EAST DEAN STREET, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ST. REGIS HOTEL, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB AND HOTEL CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION AND PLAN OF CLUB OWNERSHIP FOR ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB AND HOTEL CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2005, AT RECEPTION NO. 506236, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME AND RECEPTION NO. 506237, AS SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME, ALL IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-85-033 PROPERTY OWNER: 315 East Dean Street Association 150 E. 58th Street, 14th Floor; New York, NY 10155 APPLICANT: Verizon Wireless 3131 S. Vaughn Way, Suite 550; Aurora, CO 80014 REPRESENTATIVE: Brad Johnson, Black and Veatch Corp, 4600 South Syracuse St., Suite 800; Denver CO 80237 SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Upgrade of wireless telecommunications equipment located at 315 E Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (St. Regis Hotel) LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: 26.575.130 - Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment If a proposed telecommunications equipment upgrade project meets specific review criteria, the application can be reviewed administratively. In this case, the height of the antennas exceeds the maximum height allowed by code and triggers a special review by Planning and Zoning Commission. However, in 2012, Section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Reform Act imposed restraints on local jurisdictions land use review processes for the replacement or upgrade of existing telecommunications equipment. After consultation with the Assistant City Attorney, it was determined that this review will remain administrative in nature and will not require the review of the Planning and Zoning Commission. As such, the Community Development Director is the final review authority. Page 1 of 3 SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval to upgrade and reconfigure existing wireless telecommunications equipment located on the rooftop ofthe St. Regis Hotel. The proposed project replaces twelve (12) existing panel antennas with nine (9) new panel antennas. Additionally, new remote radio heads (RRHs) will be located behind each of the panel antermas. The proposed antennas will be in a different configuration than existing, but will occupy the same portion of the St. Regis roof structure. Importantly, some of the new antennas will be nearly two feet taller than the existing antennas (from approximately 4.5 feet in height to 6.5 feet in height). The height of these proposed antennas is greater than the five (5) feet maximum above roofline height permitted by the Aspen Land Use Code. Antennas below five (5) feet can be approved administratively by the Community Development Director. Additionally, The Community Development Director can approve antennas that are higher than five (5) feet if the equipment is suitably screened or camouflaged. The application for the equipment upgrade included a ten feet high screen around the antenna site to shield the new antennas from view. After discussion amongst planning staff about the proposed screening, staff agreed that camouflaging the antennas with paint color was a preferred alternative to the proposed screening. Staff communicated this preference to the applicant. The applicant is agreeable to this change. Please refer to Exhibit A for a roof plan showing the existing and proposed configurations and a photo simulation of the existing and proposed facilities. STAFF EVALUATION: Section 6409 (referenced above) significantly limits local review authority over upgrades to existing telecommunications equipment. The FCC interpretation of the Federal law states that local j urisdictions review processes can proceed when existing facilities are expanded in height by 10% or 20 feet; whichever is greater. In this case, while the proposed taller antennas will have greater visual impact than the existing facilities, the two feet increase does not qualify as a "substantial" enlargement as defined by Federal agencies, most notably the FCC. Consequently, potential Staff concerns over impacts to a valued viewplane can be voiced, but the upgrades are permitted under Federal rules. Staffis concerned about the prominence ofthe St. Regis roofline and the additional impacts to viewplanes generated by the enlarged facilities. The City of Aspen has worked extensively to implement public desires to preserve designated viewplanes toward Aspen Mountain. Proposals (for non-telecommunications improvements) in this same area, that would have much less viewplane impact than the proposed antennas, have consistently been denied. In this context, Staff finds that the proposed antennas and equipment, painted to match the existing antennas (roughly the color of the St. Regis's stone work), meet the criteria for administrative review. Staff additionally finds that the proposed equipment upgrades meet the criteria for approval. Page 2 of 3 DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for Wireless Telecommunication Equipment to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby APPROVES the request subject to the two conditions stated below: 1) The new proposed equipment (panel antennas and remote radio heads) will be painted to match the existing equipment, which is roughly the same color as the stone work on the St. Regis Hotel. 2) The applicant will work with the City of Aspen Building Department to ensure that the proposed upgrades are compliant with current building codes. APPROVED BY: Uto (i Er A 1 A Ag ~ &< ch 9 t '70 37- V E L f ,1.. 1-2 ~ JeÂ¢sica Garrow ) Date Â·Cbmmunity i*)telopment Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Approved plans (recorded) Exhibit B - Review Criteria (not recorded) Exhibit C - Application (not recorded) Page 3 of 3 DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. 315 East Dean Street Association 150 E. 58th Street, 14th Floor; New York. NY 10155 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Verizon Wireless. Represented by Brad Johnson Black and Veatch Corp. 4600 South Syracuse St: Suite 800; Denver. CO 80237 Applicant's Name, Mailing Address Legal: Aspen Residence Club And Hotel Condominium. According To The Declaration And Plan Of Club Ownership For Aspen Residence Club And Hotel Condominium, Recorded January 21. 2005, At Reception No. 506236. As Amended From Time To Time And Reception No. 506237, As Supplemented From Time To Time, All In The Office Of The Clerk And Recorder For County Of Pitkin. State Of Colorado. Street: St. Regis Hotel. 315 E. Dean Street. Aspen. CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval for the replacement of and upgrades to existing telecommunications equipment on the roof of the St. Regis Hotel. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment (26.575.130), Administrative Approval. Reception #636830 (3/15/2017) Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 6,2017 Effective Date of Development Order (Same date as approval by Community Development Director) March 20,2020 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption .from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issutbthis 20th day of March, 2017, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 3/#4*LL Jdhtrffer Phe~ Deputy Planning Director on behalf of Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director j AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3/F E. Dze- Street 5 Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, J#ktQJC- S (- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the Chy'of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that Â· I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 03) of the Aspen I=icl Use Code in the following manner: v~0'000~ Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no latef than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 9 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal hot:ice section of an official paper or apaper of general circulation.in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy ofthe publication is attached hereto. -L- - Signa~ffire The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowleÂ¢ged before me this 33 day off-C~- , 20KL, by.~4u~~~-QU-- 9-- J PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL j WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of a site-speci fic approval, and the existence of a vest ed property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado My commission expires: 418 ) 4(3 Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following de- scribed property: Parcel ID 2737-182-85-033 le- gally described asÂ· Aspen Residence Club And Hotel Condominium, according to the Declaration A~N Q A 76*07?V- and Plan Of Club Ownership for Aspen Residence Club and Hotel Condominium, Recorded January 21, 2005, At Reception No. 506236, As amended Notary Public from time to time and Reception No. 506237, As supplemented from time to time, All in the Office Of The Clerk And Recorder for County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: commonly known as: The St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean Street. The Administrative Ap- KAREN REED PATTERSON proval allows the replacement of and upgrades to NOTARY PUBLIC existing wireless telecommunication equipment on 3 ATTACHMENTS: the roof of the hotel. The change is depicted in the STATE OF COLORADO land use application on file with the City of Aspen. The Notice of Approval was issued by the Commu- NOTARY ID #19964002767 nity Development Director on March 6 2017, Re- r ception # 636830 (3/15/17). For further informa COPY OFÂ·THE PUBLICA-TION MyCommission Expires February 15,2020 tion contact Ben Anderson at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, ben.anderson@cityofaspen.com, (970) 429-2765. City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on March 30, 2017. (12731897) 8&6tt verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVrES 3131 S VAUGHN WAY SUEE SOO AURORA CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS S[TEID 263 315 E.DEAN ST. ASPEN CO 81611 AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME EAST DURANT AVENUE ST. REGIS - ASPEN SITE ID 332094 CONSULTANT -- . E I--1 w 11 1 - A 10/0/. CD REVIEW QDN 3 n! 1 2 D 0 U) 1.3.00 L__ 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 1 ~ EAST DEAN AVENUE --b. 110 1 J (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS. .-7 -*:MNIne- REMOVE (3) AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS, ly.=-Ilial AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT AT ANTENNAS, VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT Ill'll/Â£,/JILMT'/MILI:///Iu'll'll' NEW 10'H SCREENWALL TO CONCEAL AREA ON ROOF RE A.2.00 ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT RE Al.10 - 1 01 rhx=, r--U=1Â° Â¤ 1 4 1 N 1 A3.0 1 i \ - L_y PARAPET WALL UTTLETON. COLORADO 80127 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET. SUITE 280 OFFICE 303932,9974 - PENTHOUSE - A VERIZON WIRELESS 6X12 | ~L LOWER ROO~ HYBRID CABLES FROM EQUIPMENT CABINET TO ANTENNA LOCATION ~ 1 NOT FOR (TYP) Itt 0 -1 CONSTRUCTION 0 1 + Al.0 SITE PLAN 1 - SITE PLAN 1 Â·Â· = 60Â·-0" MONARCH STREET APPROX PROPERTY LINE (TYP) 1!~i E-wkilctA- - SCUPPER AWS HB>(-6516DS-VTM - AWS (TYPOF 4) verizon' 2[9 EMOVE)-Â£3~~~ $ .Â·.V'S - BALLASTED OMNI VER[ZONWIRELESSSEFMCIES 1 / ANTENNAS (TYP OF 3, 3131 S VAUGHN WAY SUITE ~00 AURORA CO 80014 BY OTHERS) 4XX (REMCVE)~~ SITE NAME PROJECT INFORMATION - CABLE TRAY & COVER (TYP) 4* I - 850* ~ RRI ROOFTOP i '--- ~~ CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS SITE i D PENTHOUSE ] 263 - 850 LNX-6513DS-VTM 3152.DEAN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 . C AMERICAN TOWER CORP. OVP _ 0 # 850 (E) OSHA APPROVED TOWER SITE NAME ' SAFEEâ„¢ ANCHOR --21* -k/ - 700 LNX-651306-Al M ST. REGIS - ASPEN RRH 700 SITE ID (REMOVE) LADDER - 332094 Â¥â€ž -1 E~&.* ~*~"t -~ *:~OVE) 4~'~~4'~32-- CONSULTANT Ir -I-:- REMOVE EXISTING AWS ANTENNA FRAME '31==melm (TYP OF 3) AWS / AWS 700 (REMOVE) (REMOVE) . 10/04/16 C. REVIEW OON .-el!*:, - Rk AWS H BX-6516DS-Vâ„¢ ji NOTE& 1, REMOVE (3) 700 ANTENNAS 2. REMOVE (3) AWS ANTENNAS 3. REMOVE (3) ANTENNA FRAME MOUNTS 4. ALL ITEMS SHOWN ARE EXISTING U.N O. 1/ REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 4 - PHOTO OF ANTENNAS 2 -ANTENNA DEMO PLAN 3/37=1 -0" RELOCATED SECTOR OVP: 4â€ž 1.GENERAL -NEW 10'H FIBERGLASS MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW PROVIDE ALL LABOR. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR RECEIVING, PIPE MOUNT (TYPE OF 2) / SCREEN RE STRICT. INSTALL]NG, TESTING AND ADJUSTING ANTENNA CABLES FROM THE ANTENNA TO THE CONNECTORS AT THE BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM (BTS). THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL * ~ / -(2) 6*12 HYBRID CABLES FROM -0:MN.Se- EQUIPMENT SHOWN OR REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM. ANTENNA, TIFF TRAC TPO HEAT WELD - ANTENNA CABLES, CONNECTORS. AND FITTINGS SHALL BE THIRD PARTY FURNISHED WALKWAY WITH DIAMOND \ COMPONENTS AS SHOWN ON THE BILL OF MATERIALS. PLATE EMBOSSED PATTERN \,11 /~ /lii *'Ria'l~TMENINTAISAI~INI~ .111.11:. AND YELLOW SAFETY BORDER 1- -VU (DISC.) 1 / ROOFTOP CABLE TRAY 2. MATERIALS OR SIM CUT IN MAX 10'-or A. RE 2/Al.00 FOR HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM AND INFORMATION LENGTHS. ALLOW 6 MIN GAP , I ./ v '- 11 N--Ne,Np~-K*-1 B. CABLE HANGERSÂ· INSTALLED AT MAXIMUM 4' SPACING FOR ORAINAGE BETWEEN 1 700/AWS ,2/ -- RELOCATED ALU RRH-700260. C. GROUND EQUIPMENT PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECS RE A6.00 PANELS (TYP) 1 I . /7 1 ' MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW PIPE NEW 4, NEW 700/PCS HE)(656CW00DOG ~ --.- 700/PCS 866 ' MOUNT (TYPEOF 33 3. INSTALLATION '21:).1./4.....=1= A ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF CABLE. ANTENNA, MOUNT TO NEW PIPE MOUNT (TIP oF 3) ./11 ETON. COLORADO 80127 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET. SUITE 280 INSTALLER SHALL NOTIFY VERIZON WIRELESS OF THE OVERALL LENGTH REQUIRED. NEW ALU RRH-PCS 2160 - NEW 12"W CABLE TRAY (LOW) OfFICE 303932 9974 B CABLES SHALL BE LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERIZON WIRELESS SPECIFICATIONS. MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW Â·.700/PCS RE 5/A4.00 PIPE MOUNT (TYPE OF 3) C ALL OUTSIDE CABLE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COVERED WITH WEATHERPROOFING N[W 70077.00 HEX656CW0000G TAPE. REMOVABLE ACCESS PANEL - ANTENNA. MOUNT TO NEW PIPE MOUNT (TYP OF 3) D THE MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS FOR ALL. ANTENNA CABLES SHALL BE AS SHOWN BELOW PENTHOUSE 700/AWS 2 OR AS PER THE MANUFACTURER, WHICHEVER IS MORE CONSERVATIVE OSHAAPPROVED SAFETY - ANCHOR NOT FOR CABLE IN AIR/ CABLE TRAY IN CONDUIT - al X . '-~ i 24 -PARA~4 1/2Â· 9 10' NEW 42'H STL GUARDRAIL CONSTRUCTION 72Â· m' 18" RE: 1/A4.10 ~Â» 211 *LEW 15/8' 20" 28" ~NEW \ 55C\| 1 1X1 HYBRID 5 10- LADDER ~700/AWS_-1700/pcs_24-1- 6X12 HYBRID 17' le z ' ,! ~~RELOCATED 850 LNX.6513DS-VTM. NEW ALU RRH-AWS 2G0: MOUNT -' J MOUNT TO NEW PIPE MOUNT E. CABLES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF BENDS. CABLES SHALL TO BACK OF NEW P!PE MOUNT 11 \ 11 (TYPE OF 3) NOT BE LEFT UNTERMINATED IN THE FIELD- (TYPE OF 3) NOTES 021 -RELOCATED 850 LNX-6513DS-VTM. F. GROUNDING KITS.AFTER INSTALLATION OF GROUND STRAPS, THE CONNECTION SHALL 1. INSTALL NEW 10'H FIBERGLASS SCREEN MOUNTTO NEW PIPE MOUNT BE MADE WEATHER TIGHT USING WEATHERPROOFING KITS AS IDENTIFIED ABOVE. 2. REINSTALL ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT ON SCREEN WALL STRUCT. (TYPE OF 3) ANTENNA PLANS & GROUND PIGTAILS SHALL BE BROUGHT OUT IN THE DOWNWARD DIRECTION FROM THE 3. ADD (3) 700/AWS & (3) 700/PCS ANTENNAS MODEL # HEX656(WoooDG ra/g NOTES CONNECTIONS TO THE ANTENNA CABLE WITHOUT ANY SHARP BENDS (MINIMUM BEND 4. ADD (3) 2)<60 PCS RRHs & (3) 2% AWS 92 RADIUS 10") AND CONNECTION SHALL BE MADE TO GROUND]NG SYSTEM 5. DISCONNECT AND REMOVE (3) (E) AWS ANTENNAS 6. ALL ITEMS NOTED ARE EXISTING U. N.O. 7. COLORS ON DRAWING REPRESENT NEW WORK 8. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY (PENDING) DATED (PENDING) 9. GROUND EQUIPMENT PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECS RE: A6.00 10. ALL COAX TRAY AND COVERS MUST BE RELOCATED AND PROPERLY ATTACHED TO COAX TRAY 11 COAX BY OTHERS WILL BE ON ROOF AS-IS OUTSIDE SCREEN WALL + A2.10 3 -ANTENNA NOTES 1-NEWANTENNAPLAN 3/32" = 1 -0" PENEETRATIONS I RRH/BBU ANTENNAS ~ FI POWER/GROUNDING I HYBRID & COAX CABLESIIIII GENERAL CONSTRUCKNIIII 2414 6, A verizon' CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS VIEW 1 - LOOKING NORTHEAST , ht 4 :* n I -I 1 f -, 'I- :2. ; 1. - - .V f / Af .1 I. 1 -1 %- 34 e -.i 1 .- 9 -,r 4 0- I 1 .. AL 6. ..1AaÂ· Â¥ ZE> ~1Â»/ Wo<p ~ 4 <>n~, - ~ *} 4,Ja V... . wN, 40- -- z ' PROPOSED CONDITIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) '21:{â€¢i; IN":14111:4' Exhibit B Review Criteria and Staff Findings 26.575.130.F Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; ifthe following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district. the more restrictive standard shall apply. a) All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal LIVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. Staff Finding: The proposed new antennas are replacing existing roof-mounted antennas. The existing antennas are visually prominent, and are not screened. They are however concealed in that they are painted to match the color of the St. Regis stone work. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Staff Finding: The proposed antennas are not monopoles. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c) No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. Staff Finding: There are other, existing wireless facilities on the roof of the St. Regis. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff Finding: No portion of the proposed facilities extend beyond the property line. There are no guy wires proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a) Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Staff Finding: The proposed antennas are attached to a building. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. Staff Finding: Some of the proposed panel antennas are greater than five feet (75 inches). Staff finds this criterion to be not met. c) The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. Staff Finding: While larger, the proposed antennas will be painted to match the existing antennas. Staff is concerned about increased visual impacts, but finds that the new antennas will be camouflaged in a manner consistent with the existing facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). Staff Finding: Federal rule, Section 6409 limits local jurisdiction over upgrades to existing wireless facilities. If Section 6409 did not exist, the review of the new facilities would likely have been assigned to a special review with the Planning and Zoning Commission. e) Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can , be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Staff Finding: Beyond the upgraded panel antennas and RRHs, all new equipment will be located in existing cabinetry. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: Staff Finding: While the antennas (both existing and proposed) are visible on the roof, the effort made to paint them to match the St. Regis does contribute to reducing the visual impact of the antennas. Staff finds this criterion to be met. a) If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. Staff Finding: beyond the panel antennas and RRHs, no other new materials are proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Staff Finding: The applicant will paint the new equipment to match the existing equipment - roughly the same color as the stonework on the St. Regis. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. Staff Finding: Equipment is not mounted to the wall. Staff finds this criterion tobe not applicable. d) Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e) Staff Finding: The proposed antennas are not monopoles. Staff finds this criterion to be not-applicable. f) All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff Finding: The facilities are on the roof of a building. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: Staff Finding: a) If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. Staff Finding: The facilities are not located above the 8040 Greenline. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c) Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. Staff Finding: Roof equipment in this part of town has been a much debated topic. Due to Mountain Viewplane language in the Land Use Code, the height increase proposed by the new facilities would likely be denied. Due to Section 6409, the proposed height increase is not categorized as a substantial increase in the facility and therefore, local regulation is limited. d) All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff Finding: The applicant has submitted a radio frequency compliance letter. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: Staff Finding: The applicant proposed a 10 feet high screening wall to conceal the new antenna. Staff found the proposed screening to be more intrusive visually than the proposed antennas and directed the applicant to remove the screening from the proposal. The new antennas will be painted to match the existing antennas. Staff finds this criterion to be met. a) Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antermas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Staff Finding: No monopoles are proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c) Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. Staff Finding: Ali cabling shall be concealed as flush mounted on the roof, enclosed in existing cabinetry, or painted as part of the panel antenna assembly. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco; stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Staff Finding: The project will not include any physical screening. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also. in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff Finding: Per staff recommendation, the applicant is not proposing any screening or camouflaging beyond paint color of the antennas and RRHs. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be met. No signage or lighting is proposed. a) The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. Staff Finding: No lighting is proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Staff Finding: No lighting is proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c) The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. Staff Finding: No signage is proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. d) The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Staff Finding: 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a) No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs. the intent or functionality of the original design. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b) The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff Finding: The applicant has provided letters of support from the ownership of St. Regis. There are no proposed easements for ingress or egress. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. Janice K. Vos Caudill (~)*TKIN Transaction Receipt Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder Print Date: 03/15/2017 02:47:49 PM 534 East Hyman Avenue ' Gur,i~,1 Transaction #435386 Aspen, CO 81611 -@/-3.0\0 Transaction Type: Recording (970)429-2716 Receipt #2017001399 Cashier: Ingrid Grueter Cashier Date: 03/15/2017 02:47:13 PM Number of Documents Recorded: 1 Reception#636830 - APPROVAL - 6pg(s) Recording Surcharge: $3.00 Recording Fee: $35.00 $38.00 Total Fees $38.00 Payment Received: Check #65259456 $38.00 Change $0.00 Presented by: ASPEN CITY OF (CLERK) ATTN CITY CLERK ** .- :.,(11' E.,1 UÂ£~ BLACK & VL ]H IA./, Building a world of difference'. : Â¥ OF ASPEN 9 'frharver ; TY*AN ?tfft Ork'-m/*rilin. City of Aspen - Wireless Telecom (Administrative) - 12/1/16 Verizon Wireless - Antenna Modification - CO3 Aspen Highlands PCS (St. Regis) WIRELESS TELECOM - LETTER OF INTENT Property Owner Applicant Applicant's Representative 315 East Dean Street Association Verizon Wireless Black & Veatch Corp. th 150 E. 58 Street 3131 S. Vaughn Way, Suite 550 4600 South Syracuse St., Suite 800 14'h Floor Aurora, CO 80014 Denver, CO 80237 New York, NY 10155 Attn: Brad Johnson (303) 229-4681 JohnsonBW2@BV.com Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands PCS (St. Regis) Site Address: 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Equipment Area: 63 sq. ft. + Space on Penthouse Rooftop for Antennas Parcel Area: 121,626+/- sq. ft. Parcel #: 273718285033 Zoning: Lodge / Tourist Residential PUD (L/TR PUD) Process: Administrative Wireless Telecom Planner: Sara Nadolny Request: Administrative Wireless Telecom approval to allow equipment and antennas to be upgraded on an existing building rooftop in the L/TR PUD Zone District. New screen wall proposed around antennas. Request & Justification Verizon Wireless is a leading provider of wireless communications and is in need of upgrading its antennas at an existing facility located at the above referenced site in order to ensure that adequate and uninterrupted service is maintained at all times per their License Agreement with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as provide the residents, businesses, and traveling public in the area with new and faster voice and advanced data services such as 4G/LTE and Advanced LTE/AWS. This site remains a critical component to the overall network and carries a high volume of call traffic and data transfer every day making this an important site to receive these technological upgrades. Given this site is located on a building in the UTR PUD District, an administrative Wireless Telecom application shall be required to add antennas to the existing facility. Modification Design & Details The proposed installation shall consist of removing all twelve (12) existing panel antennas on the building rooftop and replace them with nine (9) new panel antennas. The existing antennas measure approximately 54" tall by 11" wide and the proposed new antennas measure approximately 54" tall by 11" wide, 75" tall by 12" wide, and 51" tall by 6" wide. All new antennas shall be located behind a new screen wall. Currently the antennas are visible but painted to match the building. New radio equipment is also proposed but will go inside the existing rooftop equipment cabinet and therefore will not be visible. Lastly, the six (6) existing Remote Radio Heads (RRH's) mounted behind the antennas will be removed and replaced with nine (9) new Remote Radio Heads (RRH's). All RRH's will be behind the antennas and new screen wall. In summary, the site currently has twelve (12) panel antennas and the proposal is to remove and replace all twelve (12) but reducing the total antenna count to nine (9). New equipment is also proposed but a new screen wall will conceal both the antennas as well as the equipment on the rooftop. Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 1 of 6 ~E,1 BLACK & ~ rCH i~, Building a world of differencet Compliance with the Citv Land Use Code Section 26.304. Common Development Review Procedures Sec. 26.304.010. General. A pre-application meeting was held with Sara Nadolny on 6/24/16. An application for Administrative Wireless Telecommunications has been enclosed and is submitted for review and approval by the City of Aspen. A Building Permit shall be applied for when the zoning approval has been received. Sec. 26.304.020. Pre-Application Conference. A pre-application meeting was held with Sara Nadolny on 6/24/16. Sec. 26.304.030. Application & Fees. The required application fee has been included as part of this application. The following items have been enclosed as part of this application: 1. Land Use Application 2. Dimensional Requirements Form 3. Agreement for Payment Form 4. Check for $975.00 5. Pre-Application Meeting Summary 6. Letter of Authorization from Verizon Wireless 7. Radio Frequency Compliance Letter 8. Assessor's Property Detail 9. Current 0&E Report / Proof of Ownership 10. Detailed Project Narrative (with responses to all review criteria) 11. Vicinity Map 12. Photo Simulation 13. Drawings with Elevations (11*17 & 24x36) 14. Passing Structural Analysis 15. HOA Compliance Form 16. Authorized Representative for Property Owner 17. Letter of Authorization from the Property Owner Sec. 26.304.040. Initiation of Application for Development Order. Black & Veatch Corp. is making this application, as authorized representative, on behalf of Verizon Wireless who has an active lease with the property owner of record that was entered into on Sept. 5, 2002 and amended on Sept. 11, 2012 and again on Aug, 26, 2015. Sec. 26.304.050. Determination of Completeness and Review by the Community Development Director. An application for Administrative Review has been enclosed for review by the Community Development Director. This request shall not require public hearing review but does require Community Development Director approval for an increase in height. Sec. 26.304.060. Review of a development application by decision-making bodies. An application for Administrative Review has been enclosed for review by the Community Development Director. This request shall not require public hearing review and is considered a permitted use in the L/TR PUD District. Community Development Director approval is required for an increase in height. Sec. 26.304.070. Development Orders. Sec. 26.304.075. Building Permit. A Building Permit shall be applied for once approval has been received from the Community Development Director. Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 2 of 6 UÂ£~ BLACK & VL ]H i/ Building a world of differencet Section 26.575.130 Wireless Telecommunications Services Facilities & Equipment A. Intent and purpose. The existing facility and proposed modifications shall be compatible with the surrounding development and sensitive to and in scale and harmony with the character of the area. This shall continue to be accomplished through minimizing the visual, aesthetic and safety impacts of the facility through careful design, siting and screening with the construction of a new screen wall. The existing facility makes use of a building in which the antennas have been attached to and the equipment has been placed on the rooftop behind the parapet wall. B. Applicability. The proposed modifications to an existing wireless telecommunications facility shall continue to comply with all requirements for such facilities as listed in Section 26.575.130 of the City's Land Use Code. All necessary permits and approvals shall be obtained. C. Procedure. A pre-application meeting was held with Sara Nadolny on 6/24/16. An application for Administrative Wireless Telecommunications has been enclosed and is submitted for review and approval by the City of Aspen. A Building Permit shall be applied for when the zoning approval has been received. This facility is not located on a building of historical significance. D. Application. The following items have been submitted for review with this application: 1) Site Plan drawings showing before and after conditions as they relate to the proposed modification to an existing wireless facility. 2) A site improvement survey is not required. Facility is on the building rooftop or contained within the existing building. 3) A landscape plan is not applicable. Facility is both on the building rooftop and contained within the existing building. 4) Elevation drawings have been provided. 5) A lighting plan is not applicable. No lighting is required for this facility. 6) A structural report/PE Letter has been provided. 7) The application shall comply with the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission with regard to maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. See enclosed letter from the Radio Frequency Engineer. 8) The existing facility makes use of a building in which the antennas and equipment are mounted to. 9) The existing facility makes use of a building in which the antennas and equipment are mounted to and therefore complies with highest siting preference. 10) A pre-application meeting was held with Sara Nadolny on 6/24/16. This site continues to be an important coverage site for Verizon Wireless. Without this site, Verizon Wireless would have a significant gap in coverage in the City of Aspen. E. General provisions and requirements. 1) The existing facility makes use of a building in which the antennas and equipment are mounted to and is an allowed use in the L/TR PUD Zone District. 2) The building mounted facility complies with the City's highest preference for facility siting. 3) Verizon Wireless operates in a licensed spectrum therefore minimizing the chances for interference. 4) The existing facility and proposed modification shall have no impact on airports or flight paths. 5) This facility is not located on a building of historic significance. 6) The existing facility is not located on a public building, structure or public right-of-way. 7) The existing facility is not collocated on a tower. 8) The facility is maintained in a safe and clean manner. 9) The facility shall be removed if the site is no longer needed. 10) Verizon shall comply with any modifications or conditions placed on this application. F. Review standards. 1) The existing facility has antennas located on a building penthouse rooftop with the equipment also located on the building rooftop and therefore complies with all setback requirements. Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 3 of 6 CEâ€ž BLACK & ~ rCH i-/, Building a world of difference'. 2) The proposed antennas shall be mounted approximately 2' taller than the existing antennas. Given taller antennas are required to better serve Aspen (going from 4' tall antennas to 6' tall antennas), Verizon is proposing a new screen wall to better integrate the antennas in with the over building design. All new antennas and equipment shall be mounted behind the new screen wall concealing the facility. The new screen wall would extend the building height from 69' to 79'-10" but would lend to a better overall design. While the code permits panel antennas to stick up no more than 5' above the rooftop, it allows the Community Development Director to approve a taller antenna height if the antennas are "suitably camouflaged". Therefore Verizon Wireless has proposed a new 10'-10" tall screen wall around all antennas on the upper rooftop concealing the design. 3) The existing and proposed antennas shall be architecturally compatible with the building they are mounted to. Currently the antennas are painted to match and are visible. Verizon is proposing a new screen wall to conceal the antennas from view. 4) The existing facility has antennas and the equipment located on a building rooftop and therefore compatible with the natural environment. 5) The existing antennas are painted to match the building that minimizes their visibility. Since Verizon is proposing taller antennas, a new screen wall is proposed. However if the City determines that painting the antennas is a better solution, Verizon can change the design to painting the antennas to match the building. 6) No lighting or signage is proposed with this request unless required by the FAA, FCC or other federal entity. 7) The existing facility has no impact on access ways. Section 26.710.190 Lodge (L) Zone District A. Purpose. The proposed modifications to an existing rooftop mounted wireless facility shall not change the current hotel use of the property. B. Permitted Uses. A building mounted wireless facility is an allowed use in the L/TR PUD Zone District. C. Conditional Uses. A building mounted wireless facility is an allowed use in the L/TR PUD Zone District. D. Dimensional Requirements. 1) Minimum Gross Lot Area. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the property's lot size. 2) Minimum Net Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the lot area per dwelling unit. 3) Minimum Lot Width. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the property's lot width. 4) Minimum Front Yard Setback. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current front yard setback. 5) Minimum Side Yard Setback. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current side yard setback. 6) Minimum Rear Yard Setback. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current rear yard setback. 7) Minimum Utility/Trash/Recycle Area. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current utility, trash or recycle area. 8) Maximum Height. The proposed modifications shall have only minimal impact on the current height of the building or rooftop antennas. Given taller antennas are required to better serve Aspen (going from 4' tall antennas to 6' tall antennas), Verizon is proposing a new screen wall to better integrate the antennas in with the over building design. All new antennas and equipment shall be mounted behind the new screen wall concealing the facility. 9) Minimum Distance Between Buildings. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the distance between buildings. 10) Public Amenity Space. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the public amenity space. Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 4 of 6 Qg~ BLACK & VL DH i./, Building a world of difference' 11) Floor Area Ratio. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current FAR. 12) Maximum Multi-Family Residential Dwelling Unit Size. The existing wireless facility and proposed modifications shall have no impact on the current dwelling unit size. Section 26.575.020(B)1(d) Calculations and Measurements d. Chimneys, antennas and other appurtenances. Antennas, chimneys, flues, vents or similar structures shall not extend over ten (10) feet above the specified maximum height limit, except for roofs with a pitch of 8:12 or greater, these elements may not extend more than two (2) feet above the ridge. Given taller antennas are required to better serve Aspen (going from 4' tall antennas to 6' tall antennas), Verizon is proposing a new screen wall to better integrate the antennas in with the over building design. All new antennas and equipment shall be mounted behind the new screen wall concealing the facility. The new screen wall would extend the building height from 69' to 79'-10" but would lend to a better overall design. As demonstrated above, the proposed modifications to an existing Verizon Wireless facility shall comply with the intent of the City's Land Use Code as it applies to modifications to wireless telecommunication facilities. Wireless Statistics As of Dec. 2014, there were approximately 355 million wireless subscribers or 110% of the total US population and in Dec. 2013, there were approximately 335.65 million wireless subscribers or 104.3% of the total US population. Up from 207.9 million or 69% in 2005. As of Dec. 2013, 41.0% of all households had only wireless phones and have discontinued their landline telephone. Up from 8.4% in 2005. 4 out of every 10 American adults live in wireless-only households. Â· The annual total wireless data traffic in 2015 was 9.6T MegaBites and 4.1T MegaBites in 2014 and 3.23T MegaBites in 2013 and 1.468T MegaBites in 2012 and 866.7B MegaBites in 2011. Mobile data use doubled from 2012 to 2013 and is expected to increase about 650% by 2018. Â· At the end of 2013, 45 million Americans were using mobile phones as their primary Internet access device. Â· At the end of 2013,1 out of every 10 Americans are using smartphones-only to access the Internet. Â· Wireless machine-to-machine (M2M) connections in the US are expected to increase from 36 million in 2013 to 263 million by 2018. Â· More than 90% of all US mobile device sales in 40 2013 were smartphones. At the end of 2015 there were 228 million smartphones in the US which was up almost 10% from 2014 70% of the population now owns a smartphone. Â· In 2014 the number of wearable wireless devices was approximately 32,323,000. This number is expected to grow to 188,150,000 by 2019. â€¢ The number of mobile-connected devices exceeded the world's population in 2014. â€¢ Because of increased usage on smartphones, smartphones will reach three-quarters of mobile data traffic by 2019. â€¢ Tablets will exceed 10 percent of global mobile data traffic by 2016. At the end of 2014 there were 35.4 million tablets in the US and 41 million in 2015. â€¢ LTE/4G traffic will be more than half of the total mobile traffic by 2017. Â· The total number of cell sites as of Dec. 2013 was 304,360 up from 301,779 in 2012, 283,385 in 2011, and 139,338 in 2002. Â· More than 400K E-911 calls generated per day on wireless phones. Up from 260K in 2005. Â· To meet the skyrocketing demand, wireless carriers invested more than $32 billion into the U.S. economy in 2014 capital expenditures. Over the last six years alone, wireless carriers invested $166 billion. Â· 6.5B people on the planet and 5B cell phones. Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 5 of 6 TCH i-/ Building a world of differencet Summarv As demonstrated above, the Verizon Wireless proposal shall comply with all standards and requirements as listed in the City's Land Use Code for granting administrative approvals for modifications to existing building mounted facilities in the L/TR PUD District per Section 26.304, Section 26.710.190, Section 26.575.020(B)1(d) as well as for wireless telecommunication facilities in Section 26.575.130. The integrity of the Verizon Wireless network continues to rely on this site and this site shall continue to comply with the intent of the City's Land Use Code. The proposed modifications shall not cause any visual or other negative impacts on the area and shall be extremely minimal in nature while at the same time, offering the residents, businesses, and traveling public with better and faster voice and data technologies. Brad Johnson Senior Site Acquisition & Zoning Manager Black & Veatch Corp. Consultant for Verizon Wireless Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 6 of 6 NATIONWIDE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT for the COLLOCATION OF WIRELESS ANTENNAS Executed by The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, The NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICERS and The ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION WHEREAS. the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) establishes rules and procedures for the licensing of wireless communications facilities in the United States and its Possessions and Territories; and, WHEREAS, the FCC has largely deregulated the review of applications for the construction of individual wireless communications facilities and, under this framework, applicants are required to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) in cases where the applicant determines that the proposed facility falls within one of certain environmental categories described in the FCC's rules (47 C.F.R. Â§ 1.1307), including situations which may affect historical sites listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places ("National Register"),- and, WHEREAS, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 470 et seq.) ("the Act") requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council) a reasonable opportunity to comment; and, WHEREAS, Section 800.14(b) ofthe Council's regulations, "Protection of Historic Properties" (36 CFR Â§ 800.14(b)), allows for programmatic agreements to streamline and tailor the Section 106 review process to particular federal programs; and, WHEREAS, in August 2000, the Council established a Telecommunications Working Group to provide a forum for the FCC, Industry representatives, State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs) and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs), and the Council to discuss improved coordination of Section 106 compliance regarding wireless communications projects affecting historic properties; and, WHEREAS, the FCC, the Council and the Working Group have developed this Collocation Programmatic Agreement in accordance with 36 CFR Section 800.14(b) to address the Section 106 review process as it applies to the collocation of antennas (collocation being defined in Stipulation LA below); and, WHEREAS, the FCC encourages collocation ofantennas where technically and economically feasible, in order to reduce the need for new tower construction; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto agree that the effects on historic properties of collocations of antennas on towers, buiidings and structures are likely to be minimal and not adverse, and that in the cases where ati adverse effect might occur, the procedures provided and referred to herein are proper and sufficient, consistent with Section 106, to assure that the FCC will take such effects into account; and WHEREAS, the execution of this Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement will streamline the Section 106 review of collocation proposals and thereby reduce the need for the construction of new towers, thereby reducing potential effects on historic properties that would otherwise result from the construction of those unnecessary new towers; and, WHEREAS, the FCC and the Council have agreed that these measures should be incorporated into a Nationwide Programmatic Agreement to better manage the Section 106 consultation process and streamline reviews for collocation of antennas; and, WHEREAS, since collocations reduce both the need for new tower construction and the potential for adverse effects on historic properties, the parties hereto agree that the terms of this Agreement should be interpreted and implemented wherever possible in ways that encourage collocation; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto agree that the procedures described in this Agreement are. with regard to collocations as defined herein, a proper substitute for the FCC's compliance with the Council's rules, in accordance and consistent with Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations found at 36 CFR Part 800; and WHEREAS, the FCC has consulted with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO) and requested the President of NCSHPO to sign this Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement in accordance with 36 CFR Section 800.14(b)(2)(ili); and, WHEREAS, the FCC sought comment from Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations regarding the terms of this Nationwide Programmatic Agreement by letters of January 11,2001 and February 8, 2001; and, WHEREAS. the terms of this Programmatic Agreement do not apply on 'tribal lands" as defined under Section 800.16(x) of the Council's regulations. 36 CFR Â§ 800.16(x) ("Tribal lands means all lands within the exterior boundaries of any Indian reservatioii and all dependent Indian communities."); and, WHEREAS, the terms of this Programmatic Agreement do not preclude Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations from consulting directly with the FCC or its licensees. tower companies and applicants for antenna licenses when collocation activities offtribal lands may affect historic properties of religious and cultural significance to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations; and. WHEREAS, the execution and implementation ofthis Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement will not preclude members of the public from filing complaints with the FCC or the Council regarding adverse effects on historic properties from any existing tower or any activity covered under the terms of this Programmatic Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, the FCC, the Council, and NCSHPO agree that the FCC will meet its Section 106 compliance responsibilities forthe collocation of antennas as follows. STIPULATIONS The FCC, in coordination with licensees, tower companies and applicants for antenna licenses, will ensure that the following measures are carried out. I. DEFINITIONS For purposes ofthis Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, the following definitions apply. A. "Collocation" means the mounting or installation of an antenna on an existing tower, building or structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes. 2 B. "Tower" is any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting FCC-licensed antennas and their associated facilities. C. "Substantial increase in the size of the tower" means: 1) The mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower would increase the existing height of the tower by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed tile size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or 2) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four, or more than one new equipment shelter; or 3) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph i f necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable; or 4) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve excavation outside the current tower site, defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site. II. APPLICABILITY A. This Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement applies only to the collocation of antennas as defined in Stipulation I.A, above. B. This Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement does not cover any Section 106 responsibilities that federal agencies other than the FCC may have with regard to the collocation of antennas. III. COLLOCATION OF ANTENNAS ON TOWERS CONSTRUCTED ON OR BEFORE MARCH 16,2001 A. An antenna may be mounted on an existing tower constructed on or before March 16,2001 without such collocation being reviewed under the consultation process set forth under Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800, unless: 1. The mounting ofthe antenna will result in a substantial increase in the size ofthe tower as defined in Stipulation I.C, above; or 2. The tower has been determined by the FCC to have an effect on one or more historic properties, unless such effect has been found to be not adverse through a no adverse effect finding, or if found to be adverse or potentially adverse, has been resolved, such as through a conditional no adverse effect determination, a Memorandum of Agreement, a 3 programmatic agreement, or otherwise in compliance with Section 106 and Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800; or 3. The tower is the subject of a pending environmental review or related proceeding before the FCC involving compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act: or 4. The collocation licensee or the owner of the tower has received written or electronic notification that the FCC is in receipt of a complaint from a member of the public, a SHPO or the Council, that the collocation has an adverse effect on one or more historic properties. Any such complaint inust be in writing and supported by substantial evidence describing how the effect from the collocation is adverse to the attributes that qualify any affected historic property for eligibility or potential eligibility for the National Register. IV. COLLOCATION OF ANTENNAS ON TOWERS CONSTRUCTED AFTER MARCH 16. 2001 A. An antenna may be mounted on an existing tower constructed after March 16,2001 without such collocation being reviewed under the consultation process set forth under Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800, unless: 1. The Section 106 review process for the tower set forth in 36 CFR Part 800 and any associated environmental reviews required by the FCC have not been completed, or 2. The mounting ofthe new antenna will result in a substantial increase in the size of the tower as defined in Stipulation I.C, above; or 3. The tower as built or proposed has been determined by the FCC to have an effect on one or more historic properties, unless such effect has been found to be not adverse through a no adverse effect finding, or i f found to be adverse or potentially adverse, has been resolved, such as through a conditional no adverse effect determination, a Memorandum of Agreement, a programmatic agreement, or otherwise in compliance with Section 106 and Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800; or 4. The collocation licensee or the owner of the tower has received written or electronic notification that the FCC is in receipt of a complaint from a member of the public, a SHPO or the Council, that the collocation has an adverse effect on one or more historic properties. Any such complaint must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence describing how the effect from the collocation is adverse to the attributes that qualify any affected historic property for eligibility or potential eligibility for the National Register. V. COLLOCATION OF A-NTENNAS ON BUILDINGS AND NON-TOWER STRUCTURES OUTSIDE OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS A. An antenna may be mounted on a building or non-tower structure without such collocation being reviewed under the consultation process set forth under Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800, unless: 1. The building or structure is over 45 years old; i or Suitable methods for determining the age of a building include, but are not limited to: (1) obtaining the opinion of a consultant who meets the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61) or (2) 4 2. The building or structure is inside the boundary of a historic district, or if the antenna is visible from the ground level of the historic district, the building or structure is within 250 feet of the boundary ofthe historic district; or 3. The building or non-tower structure is a designated National Historic Landmark, or listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based upon the review of the licensee, tower company or applicant for an anteniia license; or 4. The collocation licensee or the owner ofthe tower has received written or electronic notification that the FCC is in receipt of a complaint from a member of the public, a SHPO or the Council, that the collocation has an adverse effect on one or more historic properties. Any such complaint must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence describing how the effect from the collocation is adverse to the attributes that qualify any affected historic property for eligibility or potential eligibility for the National Register. B. Subsequent to the collocation of an antenna, should the SHPO/THPO or Council determine that the collocation of the antenna or its associated equipment installed under the terms of Stipulation V has resulted in an adverse effect on historic properties, the SHPO/THPO or Council may notify the FCC accordingly. The FCC shall comply with the requirements of Section 106 and 36 CFR Part 800 for this particular collocation. Vl. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS Neither execution ofthis Agreement, nor implementation of or compliance with any term herein shall operate in any way as a waiver by any party hereto, or by any person or entity complying herewith or affected hereby, of a right to assert in any court of law any claim, argument or defense regarding the validity or interpretation of any provision of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 470 et seq.) or its implementing regulations contained in 36 CFR Part 800. VII. MONITORING A. FCC licensees shall retain records of the placement of all licensed antennas, including collocations subject to this Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, consistent with FCC rules and procedures. B. The Council will forward to the FCC and the relevant SHPO any written objections it receives from members of the public regarding a collocation activity or general compliance with the provisions of this Nationwide Programmatic Agreement within thirty (30) days following receipt of the written objection. The FCC will forward a copy ofthe written objection to the appropriate licensee or tower owner. VIII. AMENDMENTS If any signatory to this Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement believes that this Agreement should be amended, that signatory may at any time propose amendments, whereupon the signatories will consult to consider the amendments. This agreement may be amended only upon the written concurrence ofthe signatories. consulting public records. 5 IX. TERMINATION A. If the FCC determines that it cannot implement the terms of this Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement, or ifthe FCC, NCSHPO or the Council determines that the Programmatic Agreement is not being properly implemented by the parties to this Programmatic Agreement, the FCC, NCSHPO or the Council may propose to the other signatories that the Programmatic Agreement be terminated. B. The party proposing to terminate the Programmatic Agreement shall notify the other signatories in writing. explaining the reasons for the proposed termination and the particulars of the asserted improper implementation. Such party also shall afford the other signatories a reasonable period of time of no less than thirty (30) days to consult and remedy the problems resulting in improper implementation. Upon receipt of such notice, the parties shall consult with each other and notify and consult with other entities that are either involved in such implementation or that would be substantially affected by termination of this Agreement, and seek alternatives to termination. Should the consultation fail to produce within the original remedy period or any extension, a reasonable alternative to termination, a resolution of the stated problems, or convincing evidence of substantial implementation of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, this Programmatic Agreement shall be terminated thirty days after notice of termination is served on all parties and published in the Federal Register. C. In the event that the Programmatic Agreemeiit is terminated, the FCC shall advise its licensees and tower construction companies of the termination and of the need to comply with any applicable Section 106 requirements on a case-by-case basis for collocation activities. X. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SIGNATORIES The signatories to this Nationwide Collocation Programmatic Agreement will meet on or about September 10,2001, and on or about September 10 in each subsequent year, to discuss the effectiveness of this Agreement, including any issues related to improper implementation, and to discuss any potential amendments that would improve the effectiveness of this Agreement. XI. DURATION OF THE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT This Programmatic Agreement for collocation shall remain in force unless the Programmatic Agreement is terminated or superseded by a comprehensive Programmatic Agreement for wireless communications antenna Execution ofthis Nationwide Programmatic Agreement by the FCC, NCSHPO and the Council, and implementation of its terms, evidence that the FCC has afforded the Council an opportunity to comment on the collocation as described herein of antennas covered under the FCC's rules, and that the FCC has taken into account the effects of these collocations on historic properties in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800. 6 . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Date: ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION Date: NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICERS Date: 7 â€¢t,~CAT,I Fe PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 445 12th St., S.W. Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Washington, D.C. 20554 TTY: 1-888-835-5322 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU OFFERS GUIDANCE ON INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 6409(a) OF THE MIDDLE CLASS TAX RELIEF AND JOB CREATION ACT OF 2012 DA 12-2047 January 25, 2013 On February 22, 2012, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Tax Act)1 became law. 1 Section 6409(a) of the Tax Act provides that a state or local government "may not deny, and shall approve" any request for collocation, removal, or replacement o f transmission equipment on an existing wireless tower or base station, provided this action does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the tower or base station.2 The full text of Section 6409(a) is reproduced in the Appendix to this Public Notice. To date, the Commission has not received any formal petition to interpret or apply the provisions of Section 6409(a). We also are unaware of any judicial precedent interpreting or applying its terms. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau has, however, received informal inquiries from service providers, facilities owners, and state and local governments seeking guidance as to how Section 6409(a) should be applied. In order to assist interested parties, this Public Notice summarizes the Bureau's understanding of Section 6409(a) in response to several of the most frequently asked questions.3 What does it mean to "substantially change the physical dimensions" of a tower or base station? Section 6409(a) does not define what constitutes a "substantial[] change" in the dimensions of a tower or base station. In a similar context, under the Nationwide Collocation Agreement with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, the Commission has applied a four-prong test to determine whether a collocation will effect a "substantial increase in the size of [a] tower."4 A proposed collocation that does not involve a substantial increase in ' Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112-96, H.R. 3630, 126 Stat. 156 (enacted Feb. 22, 2012) (Tax Act). 2 Id., Â§ 6409(a). 3 Although we offer this interpretive guidance to assist parties in understanding their obligations under Section 6409(a), see, e.g, Truckers United for Safety v. Federal Highway Administration, \39 Â¥.3d 934 (D.C.Cir. 1998), the Commission remains free to exercise its discretion to interpret Section 6409(a) either by exercising its rulemaking authority or through adjudication. With two exceptions not relevant here, the Tax Act expressly grants the Commission authority to "implement and enforce" this and other provisions o f Title VI of that Act "as if this title is a part ofthe Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.)." Tax Act Â§ 6003. 4 47 C.F.R. Part 1, App. B, Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas, Â§ I.C (Nationwide Collocation Agreement). 1 size is ordinarily excluded from the Commission's requjred historic preservation review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)7 The Commission later adopted the same definition in the 2009 Declaratory Ruling to determine whether an application will be treated as a collocation when applying Section 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934.6 The Commission has also applied a similar definition to determine whether a modification of an existing registered tower requires public notice for purposes of environmental review.7 Under Section I.C of the Nationwide Collocation Agreement, a"substantial increase in the size of the tower" occurs if: 1) [tlhe mounting of the proposed antenna on the tower would increase the existing height of the tower by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or 2) [tlhe mounting of the proposed antenna would involve the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four, or more than one new equipment shelter; or 3) [tlhe mounting of the proposed antenna would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable; or 4) [tlhe mounting of the proposed antenna would involve excavation outside the current tower site, defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site. Although Congress did not adopt the Commission's terminology of "substantial increase in size" in Section 6409(a), we believe that the policy reasons for excluding from Section 6409(a) collocations that substantially change the physical dimensions of a structure are closely analogous to those that animated the Commission in the Nationwide Collocation Agreement and subsequent proceedings. In light of the Commission's prior findings, the Bureau believes it is appropriate to look to the existing definition of "substantial increase in size" to determine whether the collocation, removal, or replacement o f equipment 5 See 16 U.S.C. Â§ 470Â£ see also 47 C.F.R. Â§ 1.1307(a)(4) (requiring applicants to determine whether proposed facilities may affect properties that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places). 6 See Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clari6 Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) to Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt Under Section 253 State and Local Ordinances that Classify All Wireless Siting Proposals as Requiring a Variance, WT Docket No. 08-165, Declaratory Ruling, 14 FCC Red. 13994,14012, para. 46 & n. 146 (2009) (2009 Declaratory Ruling), recon. denied, 15 FCC Red. 11151 (1010), pet. for review denied sub nom. City of Arlington, Texas v. FCC, 668 Â¥ .3d 119 (5tt Cir.), cert. granted, 113 S.Ct. 524 (2012); 47 U.S.C. 4 332(c)(7). 1 See 47 C.F.R. Â§ 17.4(c)(1)(B), National Environmental Policy Act Compliance for Proposed Tower Registrations, WT Docket No. 08-61, Order on Remand,16 FCC Red. 16700,16720-21, para. 53 (2011). 2 2 on a wireless tower or base station substantially changes the physical dimensions of the underlying structure within the meaning of Section 6409(a). What is a "wireless tower or base station"? A "tower" is defined in the Nationwide Collocation Agreement as "any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting FCC-licensed antennas and their associated facilities."8 The Commission has described a "base station" as consisting of"radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial cable, a regular and backup power supply, and other associated electronics."9 Section 6409(a) applies to the collocation, removal, or replacement of equipment on a wireless tower or base station. In this context, we believe it is reasonable to interpret a "base station" to include a structure that currently supports or houses an antenna, transceiver, or other associated equipment that constitutes part of a base station." Moreover, given the absence of any limiting statutory language, we believe a "base station" encompasses such equipment in any technological configuration, including distributed antenna systems and small cells. Section 6409(a) by its terms applies to any "wireless" tower or base station. By contrast, the scope of Section 332(c)(7) extends only to facilities used for "personal wireless services" as defined in that section.11 Given Congress's decision not to use the pre-existing definition from another statutory provision relating to wireless siting, we believe the scope of a "wireless" tower or base station under Section 6409(a) is not intended to be limited to facilities that support "personal wireless services" under Section 332(c)(7) May a state or local government require an application for an action covered under Section 6409(a)? Section 6409(a) states that a state or local government "may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request. " It does not say that a state or local government may not require an application to be filed. The provision that a state or local government must approve and may not deny a request to take a covered action, in the Bureau's view, implies that the relevant government entity may require the filing of an application for administrative approval. 8 See Nationwide Collocation Agreement, Â§ 1.B. 9 See Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, WT Docket No. 10- 133, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Mobile Wireless, Including Commercial Mobile Services, Fifteenth Report, 26Â¥CCRed. 9664,9481, para. 308 (2011). 10 See also 41 C.Â¥.R. Part 1, App. C, Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process, Â§ II.A.14 (defining "tower" to include "the on-site fencing, equipment, switches, wiring, cabling, power sources, shelters, or cabinets associated with that lower but not installed as part of an Antenna as defined herein"). 1 i 47 U.S.C. Â§ 332(c)(7)(A). "Personal wireless services" is in turn defined to mean "commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services." Id Â§ 332(c)(7)(C)(1). 3 3 Is there a time limit within which an application must be approved? Section 6409(a) does not specify any period of time for approving an application. However, the statute clearly contemplates an administrative process that invariably ends in approval of a covered application. We believe the time period for processing these applications should be commensurate with the nature of the review. In the 2009 Declaratory Ruling,the Commission found that 90 days is a presumptively reasonable period of time to process collocation applications.12 In light of the requirement of Section 6409(a) that the reviewing authority "may not deny, and shall approve" a covered request, we believe that 90 days should be the maximum presumptively reasonable period oftime for reviewing such applications, whether for "personal wireless services" or other wireless facilities. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau contact: Maria Kirby at (202) 418-1476 or by email: Maria.Kirby@fcc.gov. -FCC- For more news and information about the Federal Communications Commission please visit: www.fcc.gov 11 See 2009 Declaratory Ruling, 14Â¥CCRed. at 14012-13, paras. 46-47. 4 4 . APPENDIX SEC. 6409. WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT. (a) FACILITY MODIFICATIONS. (1) IN GENERAL. Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST. For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves - (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment, (3) APPLICABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 5 5 H.R. 3630 - pages 77 and 78 SEC. 6409. WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT. - (a) FACILITY MODIFICATIONS.- - (1) IN GENERAL.-Notwithstanding section 704 of the Tele- communications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modifica- tion of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST.-For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves- (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) APPLICABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.- Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission the National Historic Preservation ational Environmental Policy Act of 1969. SEC. 6409. WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT. (a) FACILITY MODIFICATIONS.- (1) IN GENERAL.-Notwithstanding section 704 of the Tele- communications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modifica- tion of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST.-For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves- (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) APPLICABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.- Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission the National Historic Preservation ational Environmental Policy Act of 1969. verizon' CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS VIEW 1 - LOOKING NORTHEAST 2.&Â« 4 A Q 9, - 434 f*?13 ./ I I 4. 7 i /Â· â‚¬ I I . 0 Â· %:1 1->. f *<: 4 9346 ~ . -I ./ I U., t4 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) â€ž;F: riÂ¥ 43 Y( 1 verizond C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS VIEW 1 - LOOKING NORTHEAST Nk .,4 ./ - 1 -Â·IT- f' -7 -242*Rk-4.4_ . - i J* 1 / â€¢*114 . -- - - - 1 1 --0 1 -6 234-1--va =-77 4/*er--- -- -I & I # I *t#Â£93 r .4-4 - EXISTING CONDITIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) *,$ %41* An - Customer Distribution Land Title' Our Order Number: QPR62008021 GUARAXrEE COMPANY -.St>,3.7 '967*- Date: 01-05-2017 Property Address: 315 EAST DEAN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Title Assistance KIM SHULTZ 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-927-0405 (phone) 970-925-6243 (fax) valleyresponse@Itgc.com PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS Lender - New Loan BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION Attention: DONALEE DUNBAR 4600 S SYRACUSE ST #800 DENVER, CO 80237 720-834-4200 (work) 720-834-4285 (work fax) dunbard@bv.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Land Title Order Number: 62008021 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.IT GC.COM This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION i This Report is dated: 12-23-2016 at 5:00 RM. Address: 315 EAST DEAN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: HOTEL UNIT AND COMMERCIAL UNIT, ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB AND HOTEL CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE DECLARATION AND PLAN OF CLUB OWNERSHIP FOR ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB AND HOTEL CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2005, AT RECEPTION NO. 506236, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND RECEPTION NO. 506237, AS SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME, ALL IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Record Owner: 315 EAST DEAN ASSOCIATES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 574026. 2. DEED OF TRUST DATED APRIL 07, 2015, FROM 315 EAST DEAN ASSOCIATES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY FOR THE USE OF GARFIELD SRA MORTGAGE INVESTMENT, LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $100,000,000.00 RECORDED APRIL 08, 2015, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 618815. SUBORDINATION, NON-DISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED APRIL 8, 2015 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 618816. ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION ********************** PARCEL NO.: 273718285032 2016 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 2016 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $637,710.00 2015 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,441.16. **************************************************************** ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION ********************** PARCEL NO.: 273718285033 Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Land Title Order Number: 62008021 GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW.LTGC.COM 2016 LAND ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 2016 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSED VALUE $23,399,320.00 2015 REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN THE AMOUNT OF $750,041.80. [ Â·RECEPTION#: 574026, 10/ .0 at 11:35:12 AM, 1 OF 3, 1.00 DF $7000.00 Janice K. Caudill, Pitkin County, CO This instrument prepared by: Kenton H. Walker, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP 300 North LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60654 After recording, return to: Jeffrey Usow, Esq. 22,2 el, a 6 Mayer Brown LLP 71 South Wacker Drive $91.66.-PE Â·$1,060 :t Chicago, IL 60606 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 02Â£~ day of September, 2010, between STARWOOD ASPEN REALTY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor by merger to SLT Aspen Dean Street LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Grantor"), and 315 EAST DEAN ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation, whose legal address is c/o OptAsia Capital Company Limited, 10th floor, CRC Tower, All Seasons Place, 87/2 Wireless Road, Lumpini, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand ("Grantee"): WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and no/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee and its heirs and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any (the "Premises"), situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, described as follows: Hotel Unit & Commercial Unit, Aspen Residence Club and Hotel Condominium, according to the Declaration and Plan of Club Ownership for Aspen Residence Club and Hotel Condominium, recorded January 21,2005, at Reception No. 506236, as amended from time to time, and to the Condominium Map, recorded January 21,2005, in Plat Book 7 at Page 85 as Reception No. 506237, as supplemented from time to time. all in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, Colorado. also known by street and number as: 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (for information purposes). Assessor's Parcel Numberts): 273718285032 2737]8285033 TOGETHER WITH all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right. title. interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaR*t,tand appurtenances; A.-- CON (..., ,. 1 1.,2. te,EN 648.21-f FA!O DATE REP NO. DAT= Hiif77: fiAID 034'077 1 . Rit, NO. K&E 17704050 4 40 lip 40 la 034 org RECEPTION#: 574026, 10/ .0 at 11:35:12 AM, 2 OF 3, Janice K. Vos Caudill, P in County, CO SUBJECT TO all real estate taxes not yet delinquent, covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights of way and other matters of record, applicable zoning, land use, and similar laws and regulations, and any and all matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey of the Premises. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and its heirs and assigns forever. Grantor. for itself, its heirs and personal representatives or successors, does covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND, the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, and its heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor. [The remainder of this page is blank; signatures on following page] 2 Special Warranty Deed Â·RECEPTION#: 574026, 10/ 0 at 11:35:12 AM, 3 OF 3, Janice K. Vos Caudill, P in County, CO IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. STARWOOD ASPEN REALTY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor by merger with SLT Aspen Dean Street LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., Its Sole Member By: CIDAA .dE Name: Susan Werth Title: Senior Vice President STATE OF MAO 016Â£-> 3 COUNTY OF -*A SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this2.(J~thy of September, 2010, by Susan Werth, as Senior Vice President of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., as Sole Member of Starwood Aspen Realty LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. an /Notary Publiâ‚¬ My Commission Expires: 76 liN, -1- MELANIE E.W. COLLIER NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF NEW YORK NO. 01005060039 OUAUFIED IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13, 201Â£~ 3 Special Warranty Deed Cr. . -F ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Nadolny, 970.429.2739 DATE: June 24, 2016 PROJECT: 315 E. Dean St. (St. Regis) REPRESENTATIVE: Brad Johnson, JohnsonBW2@bv.com, 303.229.4681 REQUEST: Wireless Telecommunication Services Facilities and Equipment Upgrade DESCRIPTION: The applicant (Verizon Wireless) is seeking approval to update the existing cellular antennas on the roof of the St. Regis Residence Club and Hotel Condominiums. The equipment currently on-site includes 12 mounted panel antennas with associated equipment located on a lower rooftop and screened behind a parapet wall. Verizon is proposing to remove 6 of the 12 panel antennas and replace them with new antennas. The existing antennas are approximately 6' tall and would be replaced with a taller antenna. The Code limits panel antennas and associated support system to a height of 5' above the highest portion of the roof, including parapet walls. The proposed antennas will extend to approximately 7' above the highest portion of the roof. According to subsection 26.575.130.F(1)(d) of the Code, the Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height if it is determined that the antenna is suitable camouflaged. If this cannot be determined, the applicant may apply for Special Review, which is a Planning & Zoning application. This building is located in the City's Lodge (L) zone district and is therefore exempt from the requirements of the moratorium. Staff will review the application administratively. The applicant is required to respond to the criteria found in subsection 26.575.130.F, 1-7 of the Land Use Code. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%208 pp%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http:Uwww.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.130 Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment 26.575.130.F Review Standards Review by: Staff for complete application Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: $975 for 3 hours of Staff review time Referral Fees: None Total Deposit: $975 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) ASLU Wireless Telecommunication Services Upgrade 315 E. Dean St. PID #273718285033 1 To apply, submit the following lili ormation: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â£ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. El HOA Compliance form (Attached) m A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Il A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Il Written responses to all review criteria. 0 An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Il 1 Complete Copy of all application materials. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 1 additional copy of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. Il Total deposit for review of the application. 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 ~-1 BLACK & V- CH lf. Building a world of differencd City of Aspen - Wireless Telecom (Administrative) - 12/1/16 Verizon Wireless - Antenna Modification - CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) VICINITY MAP f G E Plalia *Ala,n St W Maih St L~* 2 4 6 0., s. z W Bleeker St Â® 5 f- p South A' g te 4 2 E Frar,OI St 6, 4% (44 Tyrolean 1- E Bieeker sl ~ 5 16 f. %4 W Hopkits Ave E Hopkins Ave ~ E Hopkins Ave R,0 0,fand'-,/ 93$; 9 2 1 E Ma,n St f 03 1440 P * pkins Ave pkins Ave 319.Yont G Paepcke Mahwhisa Yl 11 4 Pakin Counly Q E 64,49 0 -~ _ Park PlaZa 0 W Hyman Ave g S - E Wairt St Â® C.% / Ct..9 d Wheeler K/nict. 11 0 Opera Hise 0 4 Linielient 4 1 &5 Lodge s m ,-4-* I Site Location 3 E *mat, A ve f 5 E Coope? Aw E Coopef Ave E Cooper to Wagner 0 Â® E Hyinan Ave $ lit Ore A _ g our~|1~e park Condominiums 0 Y Be44- up i Mr~bal* Juan ST 4' Cha,et Al~r 00 ASVen Ski 9 Ave e Mrartain E Durant Ave G,4,St f -9 Ast:en 5 Se highan* 6 0 3 0 80 The Gart 4 Snark St 0 1~741 46 e 11* 0% .Â¥6 % 11 3% 0 46 & 0 9 41 0 6, 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page lof 1 S h St S 'St s 5 *e A*09 Parcel ID: 273718285033 Pitkin County Parcel Report Report Created: 11/30/2016 11:51:20 AM 18'll.i IiL W v'.Ma,1.1// w'.f.:=1 -IliallililimillilililliliMigAifillil~lill:Nuilliviliks,U11 ~ ~*DUR*NJ~ 3? 9-- -[313-RANiTI fs 8 4 0.1 .,viii-.I.,0:14$- -Irod.* * illA~ 4.2,24'03~E-All:illlli*'Ilie"'I . ////294tbt,â€¢M201*AJ~ -,7/I/// * - * 585 E . DEMI 1,11 4 ~ 4 DUZAN -'0~ â€¢AVE, ,~~6Â£11 Â¢ DEANSâ‚¬T,/5,I~214~~4& e. r Agm./9/171/*AF.WH 0 â€¢ f- 4 . -44,0 6..~ 9. E JOAIWTA ST Eft ~ 5 Â¥rm AG . . Â¢6 NARK sT 1,31 '* ~~0,~~<~~~7~ 170 -fl~ . NARC LE Property Information Address (Assessor's Records) 315 E DEAN ST Address (GIS Points) 315 DEAN ST Account R019445 Owner 315 EAST DEAN ASSOC INC Owner Address 150 E 58TH ST 14TH FL NEWYORK, NY 10155 GIS Parcel Size 2.58 Acres Jurisdiction Aspen Township, Range, Section T: 10, R:84, S: 18; T: 10, R:85, S: 13 Assessor's Information Land Use Category 2215: Commercial-Lodging Legal Description Subdivision: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL Unit: HOTEL Improvements 243040 Sq. Feet Services Sewer System Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Water District City of Aspen Water Service Area Fire District Aspen Fire Protection District School District Aspen School District No. 1 (RE) Boundaries Caucus Not within a Caucus Area Master Plan Area AACP Zone District Check with your municipality. Historic District Not within a Historic District. Watershed Drainage Upper Roaring Fork River Watershed Subbasin Roaring Fork River above Aspen Tax Information Illuthor~1~1~~udi~11111IT~,B,waw,.,p :,mâ€žmounillfpÂ·-- ---,1,"-- --mâ€¢r,i PITKIN COUNTY GENERAL FND 2.476 $55,085.86 COUNTY TV&FM TRANSLATORS 0.289 $6,429.65 COUNTY ROADS & BRIDGES 0.182 $4,049.12 COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 0.065 $1,446.12 HEALTHY COMMUNITY FUND 0.802 $17,842.84 ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRICT 0.4 $8,899.17 OPEN SPACE & TRAILS 3.75 $83,429.74 PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY 1.49 $33,149.42 CITY OF ASPEN 5.817 $129,416.21 ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION $32,837.95 ASPEN SANITATION DISTRICT 0.13 $2,892.23 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 2.818 $62,694.67 ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 9.297 $206,839.01 COLORADO MTN COLLEGE 3.997 $88,924.98 COLORADO RIVER WATER CONS 0.253 $5,628.73 ASPEN HISTORIC PARK & REC 0.3 $6,674.38 Total 32.066 $746,240.08 Voting Information Voting Precinct 2 State House District 61 State Senate District 5 Board of County Commissioners District(s) 1 U.S. House of 3 Representatives District Public Amenities Parks Nearby (1/2 Mile) Wagner Park Pioneer Park Koch Lumber Park Wheeler Park Conner Memorial Park Clapper Park Francis Whitaker Park Veterans Park Paepcke Park Yellow Brick School Park Willoughby ParK Library Plaza Lift One A Park Aspen Alps Park Glory Hole Park Anderson Ajax Park Rio Grande Skate Park Rio Grande Park John Denver Sanctuary Herron Park Newbury Park Cooper Park Hyman Park Silver Circle Ice Rink Mary B Trails Nearby (1/2 Mile) W Hallam St Trueman Recycle Center Rio Grande Park Summit St Cutoff Post Office Ajax Park E Hallam St Courthouse Oklahoma Flats No Problem Joe Ajax - Little Cloud connector John Denver Sanctuary Puppy Smith E Hopkins Ave Little Cloud Clarendon Scotties Anan On,rae klaa,hi, 11/9 Rllital 4444 TI lE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: January 17.2017 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant. DOOÂ¥. 201'p. Atl-d We have received your land use application for 315 E. Dean St. Wireless telecommunications and have reviewed it for completeness. %6 Your Land Use Application is complete: Tiplease submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdfofthe entire application. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. T~k-You. ~(Â«AA--\ VU - nifer Phe*n, Deputy Planning Director City of AÂ¢tÂ¢n, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes - NO_~,- Subdivision, or PD (creating more than I additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No 1<- Commercial E.P.F. Lodging CH ~â€ž Building a world of difference'. January 9, 2017 0 . . Â·0 :a :113/ Attn: Sara Nadolny Jak (0 .' City of Aspen, Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena, .,EN Aspen, CO 81611 fRAO?.1 . RE: Wireless Telecom Application Site Address: 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO / Parcel #: 273718285033 Verizon Wireless Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Dear Sara, I am writing to you on behalf of Verizon Wireless which has a wireless communications facility located on or within the Property at the above referenced location. Verizon Wireless would like to modify its antennas on the existing site and enclosed 2 copies of the necessary application and submittal requirements per a pre-application meeting held via phone on 6/24/16. I have enclosed the following: 1. Land Use Application 2. Dimensional Requirements Form 3. Agreement for Payment Form 4. Check for $975.00 5. Pre-Application Meeting Summary 6. Letter of Authorization from Verizon Wireless 7. Radio Frequency Compliance Letter 8. Assessor's Property Detail 9. Current O&E Report / Proof of Ownership 10. Detailed Project Narrative (with responses to all review criteria) 11. Vicinity Map 12. Photo Simulation 13. Drawings with Elevations (llx17 & 24x36) 14. Passing Structural Analysis 15. HOA Compliance Form 16. Letter of Authorization from the Property Owner Please let me know if you need anything else in order to process this application. I can be reached at 303-229-4681 or via email at JohnsonBW2@BV.com. Sincerely, VIAL- Brad Johnson Senior Site Acquisition & Zoning Manager Black and Veatch Corporation Consultant to Verizon Wireless Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page 1 of 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Homeowner Association Compliance Policy j All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: 315 East Dean Associates Inc. Property Owner ("1") Email Stephane@optasiacapital.coWP one No.: 970-987-4575 -6 ,-â€¢, - Address of 44 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO Property: 1 11 ' FTÂ· (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) El This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. Â® This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. - x Owner signature: \1 /20 /tb 4 - Owner printed name: 3$ 0(kont 52 970.33 Managing Partner 315 E Dean Street Associates I or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: i October, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 RECE October 7, 2016 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Verizon Wireless Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Located at 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Dear City of Aspen Community Development Department, As owners of property located at 315 E. Dean Street in Aspen, Colorado, we hereby consent to Verizon Wireless submitting the necessary land use application(s) with the City to permit the antenna and equipment modifications to their installation on The St Regis rooftop. Sincerely, 315 East Dean Association Inc. --C--- Printed Name: ~ 2 07 4/2 Â°C % C--a i Date: ~/10/{ 6 Title: Managing Partner 315 E Dean Street Associates Site Name: CO3 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Page l of l verizon' November 30, 2016 To: City of Aspen RE: Verizon Wireless C03 Aspen Highlands (PCS) Site Located at: 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO To Whom It May Concern, We write to inform you that Verizon Wireless has performed a radio frequency (RF) compliance pre-construction evaluation for the above-noted proposed site and based on the result ofthe evaluation, the site will be compliant with FCC Guidelines. The FCC has established safety guidelines relating to potential RF exposure from cell sites, The FCC developed the standards, known as Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits, in consultation with numerous other federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The FCC provides information about the safety of radio frequency (RID emissions from cell towers on its website at: https://www. fcc.gov/engineering- technology/electromagnetic-compatibility-division/radio-frequency-safety/faq/rf-safety. Please refer to the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 for information on RF exposure guidelines. Policy questions should be directed to VZWRFCompliance@verizonwireless.com. Contact your local Verizon Wireless resource below if you have additional site-specific questions, Contact Name Contact Email Contact Phone Bryan Eicens Bryan.Eicens@verizonwireless.com +1 303-873-2704 ./7 Sincerely, Travis Griffin // Manager-RF System Design Verizon Wireless STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BY OTEGUI STRUCTURAL SERVICES, LLC Â£03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 315 E DEAN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 216211 'Kp 0 + 02 4 t ~41 trrl 6 10/ 9 jar- m ,511~7> OTE[Eul STRU RAL SERVICES, LLC , PROJECT CO3 Aspen Highlands PROJECT NO. 216211 _1 SUBJECT PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET DATE 11/16/2016 BY MAO ~I~ CLIENT CSAi SHEET OF C:\Otegui Structural Services\Job Files\216211-C03 Aspen Highlands Screen\[Project Info Sheet-Steckly.xls]PIS PROJECT START DATE: Client Information Owner Information Name Charles Steckly Architecture Inc Name Verizon Wireless Address 5935 S Zang St Address 3131 S Vaughn Way Suite 280 Suite 550 Littleton, CO 80127 Aurora, CO 80014 Phone 303-932-9974 Phone Fax Fax Project Information Project Type Roof Screen Geotech Engineer INA | Report # Building Code 2009 IBC Wind Speed (V3s) 90 mph Vasd Exposure B Seismic Category B Live Loading Other Loading First Floor NA Footings All Allow Brg Press Min Dead Load Second Floor NA All Caissons Min Embed Third Floor NA Allow End Brg Min End Brg Allow Side Shear Roof Snow 75 psT Frost Depth General: Design a new screen wall to be attached to an existing concrete roof deck .Â«1 ,=1. ' 0.1 â‚¬2 OTEGUI STRUCTURAL SERVICES, LLC Â¥.2- . &9: PROJECT CO3 Aspen Highlands PROJECT NO. 216211 C r.4 -: SUBJECT Roof Screen DATE 10/9/2016 BY MAO '0 lh:â€¢ CLIENT CSAi SHEET OF CÂ·\Otegui Structural Services\Job Files\216211-CO3 Aspen Highlands Screen\[216211- 003 Aspen Highlands Calculations.xls]Sheetl New Roof Screen New Roof Screen is located on top of existing St Regis Design Criteria 2009 IBC Snow Load = 75 psf Wind Speed = 90 mph (Vasd) 3-sec gust Exposure B R=LE=an Screen is being design for a wind load of 25 psf, from IBC "Freestanding Signs" (see attached) Wind load to be applied to each face, and load to transfer to existing concrete roof. Mechanical penthouse is framed from CMU and concrete cast in place columns and beams. See attached RISA Model for screen Framing Connections: Typical steel beam connection is a 4kip max load. By observation a (2) 3/4" bolt shear tab is adequate. Typical fiberglass kicker axial load = 2 kips Capacity of 3/4" fiberbolt = 1,550 lbs in single shear Capacity of 1/4" FG with 3/4" bolt = 4,219 lbs in bearing Therefore use one 3/4" bolt on each end, Double Shear Chevron-Brace Maximum Axial force in X brace is 2 kips Capacity of 3/4" fiberbolt = 1,550 lbs in single shear Capacity of 1/4" FG with 3/4" bolt = 4,219 lbs in bearing Therefore use (2) 3/4" bolt on each end. Wall anchorage / Hold Down Up/Dwn load at corner = 0.8 kips For 3/4" steel bolts on 1/4" FG wall, allowable load = 1,406 lbs x2= 2,812 lbs double shear Therefore Number of steel bolts required at hold down = 1 bolts 44~-A OTEGUI STRUCTURAL SERVICES, LLC ~k,9 PROJECT C03 Aspen Highlands PROJECT NO. 216211 .3%.i:,Â·.4 SUBJECT Lateral Design DATE 10/9/2016 BY MAO -;*1** CLIENT CSAi SHEET OF C:\Otegui St,uctural ServicesUob Files\216211-C03 Aspen Hightands Screen\[216211- CO3 Aspen Highlands Calculationsids]Sheetl Tvoical Screen Wall Member Calculation Provide a standard conservative calculation for the typical fiberalass roof top screen wall panel. Assume the following: 110 mph Exposure "C" at elevation 60ft; C&C worst case pressure = 37 psf 12ft high screen 4'-8' fiberglass panels Verticals spaced at 32" on center, blocking spaced at 24" on center. Vertical Members Try a 3x3xl/4 typical fiberglass member at 32" on center. Use the Strongwell EXTREN 500 series framing E-2.6x104 psi Allowable bending stress = 1/(2.5) x (E/(16*/t)AO.85)) = 0.4 x 2.6*10A6/(16 x (3.5"/0.25")AO.85+ = 17,244 psi or 17.244 ksi Allowable Shear Stress = 1,500 psi For typical member, M=wl'2/8 = 37psf x 2.67' (12'2)/8 - 1,778 lb-ft = 21.3 k-in fb = M/Sx = 21.3 k-in/2.01 inS =10.61 ksi < 17.244 ksi OK fv = Ry/A = 1/2 x 98.4 pif x 12ft / 2.44 ine = 242 psi < 1,500 OK Typical Bolted Member to Member Connections Typical vertical connection = 295 lbs For a 1/4" fiberglass, allowable bearing load for 5/8" Strongwell Strong Bolt = 1,172 lbs For a 1/4" fiberglass, allowable shear capacity load for 5/8" Strongwell Strong Bolt = 950 lbs single shear, 1,875 lbs double shear. Therefore for all 1/4" angle to 3x3xl/4 FG tube connections, limiting capacity = 1,172 lbs *Â«~~ 01-EGUI STRUCTURAL SERVICES, LLC 11'le> PROJECT (03 Aspen Highlands PROJECT NO. 216211 lid jl,j.. SUBJECT Existing Roof DATE 11/16/2016 BY MAO fe & 1% CLIENT CSAi SHEET OF C:\Otegui Structural Semices\Job Files\216211-CO3 Aspen Highlands Screen\[216211- C03 Aspen Highlands Calculations.xls]Sheetl Existing Roof Existing roof is an 8.5" thick two way flat slab Required snow load = 75psf Assumed DL = 10 psf Slab Weight = 107 psf Span = 30ft For a uniformly loaded plate Factored load = 1.6 x 75 psf= 120 psf 1.2 x 117 psf = 141 psf Total 216 psf Total load moment max = 8.25 k-ft at center Capacity of #5 at 12" O.C = Mn = 0.3 Iin'2 x 60000psi (8-0.59 x (0.31 x 60,000/(3500 x 12) = 11.99 k-ft OK Max load from new screen = 6.8 kips Max DL = 6.2 kips max WL = 1 kip Factored Load = 1.2 x 6.2 + 1.6 x1= 9.04 kips Point loads are bcated 3 fifrom wa# enda Total new maximum moment = 9.365 -ft < 11.99 k-ft OK Punching shear Factores shear =9 kips /4 x 10 x 8 = 0.028 ksi or 28 psi OK by observation. 6.5.14 Design Wind Load on Solid Freestanding Walls and Solid Signs Per ASCE 7-05 1/ / F = Clh G Cf As (6-27) ~| B =23.00 qz= .00256 Kz lit Kd \/21 (6-15) - 5 - -74- Exposure coefficient Kz = Exposure ~~___~~ : , Topography factor Itt = 1.00 (6.5.7.2) s = 10.00 i Directionality factor Kd = 0,85 (6.5.4.4) Otos sto 2s ' Wind Speed V= 90 Importance factor I= 1.00 (6.5.5), T-6-1 --3 qz= 17.63 Kz Gust Effect factor G = 0.85 (6.5.8) b = 70.00 ft Di = 0.00 ft Balance - B/s= 2.30 ,< Cf =1.81 s/h = 0.13 .- Case A & B, Cf= 1.81 Fig 6-20 Since B/s 2 2 Case C must also be considered Total # of Segment with width = s Vert. location of resultant force L2 = O.00 ft 02 = 0.00 ft =2 See Table I -9<- Balance, see Fig 6-20 = 3.00 ft Total h =80.CO Case C, Cf for Region 0 to s, = 2.36 s to 23, = 1.56 4 = O.00 A ~ = 0.00 ft IifF Case C, Multiples factor (if applicable) Horizontal dim of return corner Lr = 0.0 ft when s/h > 0.8, 01.8-s/h) = 1.00 ~ 771, 73555R for Lr/s = 0.00,= 1.00 %openning = 0.0% Reduction factor = 1.00 d = 51.60 ft Method A&B Sign h area A. Cf Kz Ih F (lbs) M (ft-lbs) 80.00 230.0 1.81 0.93 16.4 5792.3 434423.4 Pole 70.00 0.0 1.2 0.89 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.2 0.57 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.2 0.57 10.0 0.0 0.0 2.00ft ~ Total 5,792.3 434,423.4 H = 75.00 ft Method C Sign h area A, Cf Kz qh F (lbs) M (ft-lbs) PSF Balance, see Fig 6-20 = 80.00 30.00 1.81 0.93 16.4 755.5 56663.9 25.18 0 tos,= 80.00 100.00 2.36 0.93 16.4 3281.2 246092.3 32.81 s to 2s, = 80.00 100.00 1.56 0.93 16.4 2173.6 163016.5 21.74 0.93 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.93 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.93 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.93 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.93 16.4 0.0 0.0 Pole 70.00 0.0 1.2 0.89 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.2 0.57 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.2 0.57 10.0 0.0 0.0 Total 6,210.3 465,772.7 H = 75.00ft IBC 1807.3: Design Employing Lateral Load Bearing Total Lateral Load, P = 10000.0 lbs Dist from ground to point of P, H = 200.00 ft *Allowable lateral soil-bearing, S = 100.00 lbs/sq Wft 1- 9 111 . -1- -1- B.....1 Allowable Increase = 1.33 x 100.00 lbs/sq ft/ft Dia of footing or diagonal of sq. footing, b = 2.00 R Constrained at ground = Yes WIND Ll_r-T- q F S3 = 1596 PSF s 12 X1.33X100 O.K. F| F~ CASE C d = [4.25(Ph/S3b)]M ,<-1 FT i (Obtain by iteration 20 times), d = 51.60 ft I. 1 -1 *-02E 1,u/,Irce 1 4 1 0 0 1 .P .1. 11. 11 BliGE CASE B h i 4 ~ 7-Â£- Gr- IF 1 Â°ow, ' Fl AKA= - 672 0 2. GAOUND SUFÂ¥-ACCI 941 -:1 211.-1 PLAN VIEWS CROSS-SECTION VIEW www.hilti.us Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 1 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: C03 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No.: Phone I Fax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com Specifier's comments: 1 Input data 1 1 . 1 -I'll.'. . - Anchor type and diameter: Kwik Bolt TZ - SS 304 1/2 (2) ./ill........du"*WAW*kil" Effective embedment depth: hef = 2.000 in., hnom = 2.375 in. Material: AISI 304 Evaluation Service Report: ESR-1917 Issued I Valid: 5/1/2013 I 5/1/2015 Proof: design method ACI 318 / AC193 Stand-off installation: eb - 0.000 in. (no stand-off); t = 0.500 in. Anchor plate: 4 xlyxt= 10.000 in. x 10.000 in. x 0.500 in., (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated) Profile: Round HSS, Steel pipe (AISC); (L xWxT)= 4.500 in. x 4.500 in. x 0.337 in. Base material: cracked concrete, 2500, f.' = 2500 psi; h = 8.000 in. Reinforcement: tension: condition B, shear: condition B; no supplemental splitting reinforcement present edge reinforcement: none or < No. 4 bar Seismic loads (cat. C, D, E, or F) no Geometry [in.] & Loading [lb, in.lbl Z 4 cr- Â« U 1 - 'y- 0 /, 325.-4 .., fo-Ii---- .4.1 0.5 -- Â·1 4 ::- I <'l 9- e U ./ 44 01 q, . 7,-, '0 .... 1. r. . - I X Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Hilt, AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan www.hilti.us Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 2 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: CO3 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No.: PhoneIFax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com 2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces Load case: Design loads 03 04 ay Anchor reactions [lb] Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression) Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y 1 0 1131 800 800 2 0 1131 800 800 8 2x 3 0 1131 800 800 Compression 4 0 1131 800 800 max. concrete compressive strain: 0.03 [960] max. concrete compressive stress: 109 [psi] resulting tension force in Ody)=(0.000/0.000): 0 [lb] resulting compression force in (fy)=(0.000/0.000): 10880 [lb] 01 ~ 2 3 Tension load Load Nua Ilb] Capacity *Nn Ilb] Utilization BN = Nua1*Nn Status Steel Strength* N/A N/A N/A N/A Pullout Strength* N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Breakout Strength** N/A N/A N/A N/A * anchor having the highest loading **anchor group (anchors in tension) Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditjons and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Him AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilli AG, Schaan U-Fil www.hilti.us _ Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 3 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: C03 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No.: Phone I Fax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com 4 Shear load Load Vua Ilb] Capacity *Vn Ilb] Utilization pv = Vua/+Vn Status Steel Strength* 1131 4472 26 OK Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A Pryout Strength" 4525 9504 48 OK Concrete edge failure in direction ** N/A N/A N/A N/A * anchor having the highest loading **anchor group (relevant anchors) 4.1 Steel Strength Vsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ESR-1917 Â¢ Vsteel 2 Vua ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-2) Variables n Ase,V [in.2] futa [psi] 1 0.10 115000 Calculations Vsa Ilb] 6880 Results Vsa Ilb] *steel tvsa Ilb] Vua [lb] 6880 0.650 4472 1131 4.2 Pryout Strength Vcpg = 14 [(S wec,N wed.N 4/c,N wip.N Nb] ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-31) Â¢ V.9 2 Vul ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-2) ANc see ACI 318-08, Part D.5.2.1, Fig. RD.5.2.1(b) ANd - 9 hif ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-6) 1 Wee.N = (I-*i) S 1.0 ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-9) -9-min.j 51.0 Wed,N - 0.7 + 03 ~1.5hef 1 ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-11) Fcp,N =MA.X~EMR! 1.5hef, - 1 51.0 ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-13) Cac ' Cac / Nb = 1<c X VE 112 ACI 318-08 Eq. (D-7) Variables kcp hef [in.] ecl.N [in.] 8c2,N [irl.] C,,m* [in.1 1 2.000 0.000 0.000 CO Wc,N 1 4 Ipsi] 1.000 4.500 24 1 2500 Calculations ANc [in.21 ANco [in.21 Wecl,N 4/ec2,N 41/ed.N 4'Cp,N Nb [lb] 144.00 36.00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3394 Results Vci)9 Ilb] Â¢concrete 0 vcpg Ilb] Vua Ilb] 13576 0.700 9504 4525 Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Him AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilli AG, Schaan L: -ER www.hilti.us _ Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 4 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: CO3 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No. Phone I Fax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com 5 Warnings Â· Load re-distributions on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered. The anchor plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the loading! Â· Condition A applies when supplementary reinforcement is used. The * factor is increased for non-steel Design Strengths except Pullout Strength and Pryout strength. Condition B applies when supplementary reinforcement is not used and for Pullout Strength and Pryout Strength. Refer to your local standard. Â· Refer to the manufacturer's product literature for cleaning and installation instructions. Â· Checking the transfer of loads into the base material and the shear resistance are required in accordance with ACI 318 or the relevant standard! Fastening meets the design criteria! Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Himi AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan www.hilti.us Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 5 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: CO3 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No. Phone I Fax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com 6 Installation data Anchor plate, steel: - Anchor type and diameter: Kwik Bolt TZ - SS 304 1/2 (2) Profile: Round HSS, Steel pipe (AISC); 4.500 x 4.500 x 0.337 in. Installation torque: 480.001 in.lb Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 0.563 in. Hole diameter in the base material: 0.500 in. Plate thickness (input): 0.500 in. Hole depth in the base material: 2.625 in. Recommended plate thickness: not calculated Minimum thickness of the base material: 6.000 in. Cleaning: Manual cleaning of the drilled hole according to instructions for use is required. .y 5.000 5.000 I + U C ~3 ~4 C -1$:npiPÂ»~... / 33*r- I . X kt 1 / 49 / fit> 1 O2 I C 1.500 7.000 1.500 I n I Coordinates Anchor in. Anchor x y C. C+X c.y Ly 1 -3.500 -3.500 - - - 2 3.500 -3.500 - - - 3 -3.500 3.500 - - - - 4 3.500 3.500 - - - Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Him AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hiltj is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan 009 L 001)-Z 0094 000 9 000 9 www.hilti.us Profis Anchor 2.4.7 Company: Otegui Structural Services, LLC Page: 6 Specifier: Mike Otegui Project: CO3 Aspen Highlands Address: 8842 West Powers Place Littleton, CO 80123 Sub-Project I Pos. No. Phone I Fax: 720-981-5333 I Date: 11/17/2016 E-Mail: mikeo@oteguieng.com 7 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties Â· Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you. Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a specific application. Â· You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you. Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Anchor (c) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilli is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan I Â» / Ific 94 7 .40 1 /04'f# 4 .W .Â»Â» 3 Vt 1 9, V /1 i %6 17 i 1 - /Â¥,7 ._c- _Dz Lk 46#Lâ€ž---V--3 ==[-Ph 3~557V Nek /1/ U#V 8 Otegui Structural Services..~. SK-1 Mike Otegui CO3 Aspen Highlands [_~py 17, 2016 at 8:53 AM I 216211 ~ 216211 (03 Aspen Highlands.dd 11IRISA Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Designer : Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number : 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name - CO3 Aspen Highlands (Global) Model Settings pi#play_Sectionsfor Member Calcs 5 Max Internal Sections for Member Calcs 97 i Include Shear Deformation? Yes Increase Nailing Capacity for Wind? Yes Include Warping? Yes Trans Load Btwn Intersecting Wood Wall? Yes Area Lopil\Â®sh (inA2) 144 Merge Tolerance (in) .12 _F-Delta Arilys_Â§ Iplerance 0.50% Include P-Delta for Walls? Yes Autorpatically Iterate-St#frless for Walls? No Max Iterations for Wall Stiffness 3 Gravity Acceleration (ft/secA2) 32.2 Wall Mesh Size (in) 12 Eigensolution Convergence Toi. (1.E-) 4 Vertical Axis Y Global Member Orientation Plane XZ Static Solver Sparse Accelerated 1Qynamic Solver Agcelecated_Solver Hot Rolled Steel Code AISC 9th: ASD RISAConnection Code AISC 13th(360-05): ASD Cold Formed Steel Code AISI S100-10: ASD Wood Code AWC NDS-12: ASD .Wood Temperature < 100F Concrete Code ACI 318-11 .Masonry Code AC1530311: ASD Aluminum Code AA ADM1-10: LRFD - Building Nwnber of Shear Regions 4 Region Spacing Increment (in) 4 -Bi@Â®91 Column Method Exact Integration Parme Beta Factor (PCA) .65 Concrete Stress Block Rectangular Use Cracked Sections? Yes Use Cracked Sections Slab? Yes Bad Framing Warnings? No Unused Force Warnings? Yes Min 1 Bar Diam. Spacing? No Concrete Rebar Set REBAR SET ASTMA615 Min % Steel for Column 1 MaX % St?9! tr Column 8 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.dd] Page 1 1!IRISA Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name CO3 Aspen Highlands (Global) Model Settings. Continued 'Seismic Code ASCE_7-10 Seismic Base Elevation (ft) Not Entered Add Base Weight? Yes 'Ct X .02 Ct Z .02 8T X (sec) Not Entered T Z (sec) Not Entered RX 3 RZ 3 Ct Exp. X 75 Ct Exp. Z 75 SD1 1 SDS 1 Sl 1 TL (sec) 5 1 Risk Cat I or 11 Om Z 1 Om X 1 Rho Z 1 iRho X 1 Hot Rolled Steel Properties Label E_[kall __Glkai] ___ _Nu__ Iherm (\1.-- Densityik/fra] __Yield[ksil - By _Fulkai] Rt__ 1 A36 Gr.36 29000 11154 .3 .65 .49 36 1.5 58 1.2 2 A572 Gr.50 29000 11154 .3 .65 .49 50 1.1 65 1.1 3 A992 29000 11154 .3 .65 .49 50 1.1 65 1.1 4 A500 Gr.42 29000 11154 .3 .65 .49 42 1.4 58 1.3 5 A500 Gr.46 29000_ 11154 .3 .65 .49 46 1.4 58 1.3 6 Fiberglass 2600 425 .3 .65 .11 10 1.5 19.6 1.2 General Material Properties Label _E [ksi] G [ksil Nu _Therm 01E1) 8 -Density[N/ft91__J 1 gen Conc3NW 3155 1372 .15 .6 .145 2 gen_Conc4NW 3644 1584 .15 .6 .145 3 aen Conc)LW 2085 906 .15 .6 .11 4 gen_Conc4LW 2408 1047 .15 .6 .11 5 gen Alum 10600 4077 .3 1.29 .173 6 gen_Steel 29000 11154 .3 .65 .49 7 RIGID le+6 .3 0 0 8 FG 2600 425 .3 .65 .11 Hot Rolled Steel Section Sets Label Shape Tvpe Design List Material Design Rules A [in21 IVY [in4] Izz [in41 J [in41 1 | HR1A W8xl 0 1 Beam I Wide Flange ~A36 Gr.36 ~ Typical 1 2.96 1 2.09 ~ 30.8 ~ .043 l Joint Boundarv Conditions Joint Label X [k/inl Y [Idinl Z [k/in] X Rot.lk-ft/radl Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Rot.[k-ft/radl Ill N3 Reaction Reaction Reaction 12 1 N4 Reaction Reaction Reaction 13 N2 Reaction Reaction Reaction 14 Nl Reaction Reaction Reaction 5 Nll7 Reaction Reaction Reaction RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 2 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 11!RISA Designer ' Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number . 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name : CO3 Aspen Highlands Joint Boundarv Conditions (Continued) Joint Label X [k/inl Y fk/inl Z [k/inl X Rot.[k-ft/radl Y Rot.[k-ft/radl Z Rot.lk-ft/radl 6 -_N115 Reaction Reaction Reaction 7 N116 -_Reaction Reaction _ Reaction 8 N118 Reaction Reaction Reaction 9 N146 Reaction Reaction_ __ Reaction Rigid Diaphragms Joint Label Plane Inactive No Data to Print... Member Point Loads Member Label Direction Maanitude[k.k-ftl Location[ft,%] No Data to Print... 1 Joint Loads and Enforced Displacements (BLC 1 : Dead) Joint Label L,D,M Direction Magnitude[(k,k-ft), (in,rad), (k*sA2/f. 1 N 131 L Y -.1 2 N132 L Y ..1 3 N133 L Y ..1 4 N134 L Y ..1 5 N138 L Y -.1 6 N130 L Y -.1 7 N137 L Y ..1 8 N129 L Y -.1 9 N136 L Y -.1 10 N128 L Y ..1 11 N135 L Y ..1 12 N127 L Y -.1 13 N122 L Y ..1 14 N126 L Y ..1 15 N121 L Y ..1 16 N 125 L Y ..1 17 N120 L Y -.1 18 N124 L Y -.1 19 N119 L Y ..1 20 N123 L Y ..1 21 N138A L Y ..1 22 N142 L Y -.1 23 N139 L Y -.1 24 N93 L Y -.1 25 N140 L Y ..1 26 N144 L Y ..1 27 N141 L Y ..1 28 N 145 L Y -.1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) Mernbef Label Direction___Start Magnitude[15/ft F] End Magnitude[k/ft,F] Stan Location[ft.%1 End-LogationiftiyoL 1 Ml Y -.03 -.03 1.72le-15 7 24 1 2 MS Y -.03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 131 M13 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 I 41 M14 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 4 5 --_ - M14 _~~ Y__ _ __ z.084 _ ..124 _- --- -1 2 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 3 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Designer : Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number : 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name . C03 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudelk/ft,Fl End Maanitude[Idft,Fl Start Location[ft,%1 End Location[ft,%1 6 M14 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 7 M14 Y ..124 -.124 3 4 8 M14 Y ..124 -.124 4 5 9 M14 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 10 M14 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 11 M14 Y ..124 ..124 7 8 12 M14 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 13 M14 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 14 M15 Y ..004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 15 M15 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 16 M15 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 _17 M15 Y ..124 ..124 3 4 18 M15 Y ..124 -.124 4 5 19 M15 Y ..124 -.124 5 6 20 M15 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 21 M15 Y -.124 ..124 7 8 22 M15 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 23 M15 Y ..084 ..004 9 10 24 M16 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 25 M17 Y ..004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 26 M17 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 27 M17 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 28 M17 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 29 M17 Y ..124 ..124 4 5 30 M17 Y ..124 -.124 5 6 31 M17 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 32 M17 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 33 M17 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 34 M17 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 35 M18 Y ..004 ..084 5.55le-16 1 36 M18 Y ..084 -.124 1 2 37 M18 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 38 M18 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 39 M18 Y ..124 -.124 4 5 40 M18 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 41 M18 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 42 M18 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 43 M18 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 44 M18 Y ..084 -.004 9 10 45 M19 Y -.08 ..08 1 9 46 M20 Y -.004 -.084 8.882e-16 1 47 M20 Y ..084 ..124 1 2 48 M20 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 49 M20 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 50 M20 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 51 M20 Y -.124 ..124 5 6 52 M20 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 53 M20 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 54 M20 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 55 M20 Y ..084 -.004 9 10 56 M21 Y ..004 -.084 1.1le-16 1 57 M21 Y ..084 -.124 1 2 58 M21 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 59 ' M21 Y -.124 ..124 3 4 60 M21 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 61 I M21 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 62 M21 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.dd] Page 4 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 111 RISA Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name CO3 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[Idft,F] End Magnitudelk/ft,F] Start Location[ft,%1 End Location[ft,%1 63 M21 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 64 M21 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 65 M21 Y ..084 -.004 9 10 66 M22 Y ..08 ..08 1 9 67 M2 Y ..03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 68 M10 Y ..03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 69 M23 Y ..004 -.084 0 1 70 M23 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 71 M23 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 72 M23 Y ..124 -.124 3 4 73 M23 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 74 M23 Y ..124 -.124 5 6 75 M23 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 76 M23 Y ..124 -.124 7 8 77 M23 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 78 M23 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 79 M24 Y -.004 -.084 4.44le-16 1 80 M24 Y ..084 -.124 1 2 81 M24 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 82 M24 Y ..124 -.124 3 4 83 M24 Y ..124 -.124 4 5 84 M24 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 85 M24 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 86 M24 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 87 M24 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 88 M24 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 89 M25 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 90 M26 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 91 M26 Y ..084 -.124 1 2 92 M26 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 93 M26 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 94 M26 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 95 M26 Y ..124 -.124 5 6 96 M26 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 97 M26 Y ..124 -.124 7 8 98 M26 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 99 M26 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 100 M27 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 101 M27 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 102 M27 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 103 M27 Y ..124 -.124 3 4 104 M27 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 1Q5_ M27 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 106 M27 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 107 M27 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 108 M27 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 109 M27 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 110 M28 Y ..08 ..08 1 9 111 M29 Y -.004 ..084 5.55le-16 1 112 M29 Y ..084 -.124 1 2 113 M29 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 114 M29 Y ..124 -.124 3 4 115 M29 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 116 M29 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 117 M29 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 118I M29 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 119 M29 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 5 11!RISA Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name . CO3 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudelk/ft,Fl End Maqnitudelk/ft,Fl Start Locationlft,%1 End Locationm.%1 120 M29 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 121 M30 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 122 M30 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 123 M30 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 124 M30 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 125 M30 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 126 M30 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 127 M30 Y -.124 ..124 6 7 128 M30 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 _129 M30 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 130 M30 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 131 M31 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 132 M4 Y -.03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 _133 M12 Y -.03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 134 M40 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 135 M41 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 136 M41 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 137 M41 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 138 M41 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 139 M41 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 140 M41 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 141 M41 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 142 M41 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 143 M41 Y ..124 -.084 8 9 144 M41 Y -.084 ..004 9 10 145 M42 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 146 M42 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 147 M42 Y -.124 ..124 2 3 148 M42 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 149 M42 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 150 M42 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 151 M42 Y ..124 -.124 6 7 152 M42 Y -.124 ..124 7 8 153 M42 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 154 M42 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 155 M43 Y -.08 -.08 1 9 156 M44 Y -.004 -.084 5.55'le-16 1 157 M44 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 158 M44 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 159 M44 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 160 M44 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 161 M44 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 162 M44 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 163 M44 Y -.124 ..124 7 8 164 I M44 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 165I M44 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 166 1 M45 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 167 M45 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 168 M45 Y -.124 ..124 2 3 169 M45 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 170 M45 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 171 M45 Y -.124 ..124 5 6 172 M45 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 173 M45 Y -.124 ..124 7 8 174 M45 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 175 M45 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 176 M46 Y -.08 ..08 1 9 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 6 11*RISA Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM TECHNOLOGIES Model Name CO3 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[left,Fl End Magnitude[k/ft,Fl Start Locationfft,%1 End Location[ft,%1 177~ M47 Y -.004 -.084 4.44le-16 1 1781 M47 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 179 M47 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 180 M47 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 181 M47 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 182 M47 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 _183 M47 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 184 M47 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 185 M47 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 186 M47 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 187 M48 Y -.004 -.084 0 1 188 M48 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 189 M48 Y ..124 -.124 2 3 190 M48 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 191 M48 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 192 M48 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 193 M48 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 194 M48 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 195 M48 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 196 M48 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 197 M3 Y -.03 -.03 1.721 e-1 5 ~ 24 198 Mll Y -.03 -.03 1.72le-15 24 199I M32 Y -.004 -.084 1.1le-16 1 2001 M32 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 201_ M32 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 202 M32 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 203 MU Y -.124 -.124 4 5 204 M32 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 205 M32 Y ..124 :124 6 i 7 206 M32 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 207 M32 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 208 M32 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 209 M33 Y -.004 ..084 8.882e-16 1 210 M33 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 211 M33 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 212 M33 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 213 M33 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 214 M33 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 215 M33 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 216 M33 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 217, M33 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 218' M33 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 219 M34 Y -.08 -.08 2 9 220 M35 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 221 6/135 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 222 M35 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 223 M35 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 224 M35 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 225 M35 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 226 M35 Y -.124 ..124 6 7 227 M35 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 228 M35 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 229 M35 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 230 M36 Y -.004 -.084 5.55'ie-16 1 231 M36 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 232 M36 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 1233 M36 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 7 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 |!IRISA Job Number : 216211 Checked By: MAO Designer : Mike Otegui 8:54 AM TECHNOLOGIES Model Name : C03 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : BLC 1 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Maanitude[Idft,Fl End Maqnitude[k/ft,Fl Start Location[ft,%1 End Location[ft,%1 234 M36 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 235 M36 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 236 M36 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 237 M36 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 238 M36 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 239 M36 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 240 M37 Y -.08 ..08 1 9 241 M38 Y -.004 ..084 5.55le-16 1 242 M38 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 243 M38 Y -.124 -.124 2 3 244 M38 Y -.124 -.124 3 4 245 M38 Y -.124 -.124 4 5 246 M38 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 247 M38 Y -.124 -.124 6 7 248 M38 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 249 M38 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 250 M38 Y -.084 -.004 9 10 251 M39 Y -.004 -.084 5.55le-16 1 252 M39 Y -.084 -.124 1 2 253 M39 Y -.124 ..124 2 3 254 M39 Y -.124 ..124 3 4 255 M39 Y -.124 ..124 4 5 256 M39 Y -.124 -.124 5 6 257 M39 Y -.124 ..124 6 7 258 M39 Y -.124 -.124 7 8 259 M39 Y -.124 -.084 8 9 260 M39 Y -.084 ..004 9 10 _261 M84 Y -.16 -.16 .998 1.5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : BLC 2 Transient Area Loads) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[Idft, Fl End Magnitude[k/ft,F] Start Location[ft,%] End Location[ft,%1 1 M31 X .025 .025 3.886e-16__I 10 2 M32 X .075 .075 1.1le-16 I 10 3 M33 X .075 .075 6.661 e-16 ~ 10 4 M34 X .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 5 M35 X .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 6 M36 X .075 .075 5.55le-16 10 7 M37 X .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 8 M38 X .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 9 M39 X .075 .075 9.992e-16 10 10 M40 X .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 11 M13 X .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 12 M14 X .075 .075 9.992e-16 10 13 M15 X .075 .075 4.441 e-16 10 14 M16 X .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 15 M17 X .075 .075 5.55le-16 10 16 M18 X .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 17 M19 X .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 18 M20 X .075 .075 6.66le-16 10 19 M21 X .075 .075 1.1le-16 10 20 M22 X .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : BLC 3 Transient Area Loads) Member Label Direction Start Magnitudelk/ft,Fl End Magnitude[Idft, Fl Start Location[ft,%] End Location[ft,%] 1 M13 Z .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 2 M40 Z .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.dd] Page 8 Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM TECHNOLOGIES Model Name CO3 Aspen Highlands Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : BLC 3 Transient Area Loads) (Continued) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[klft,Fl End Magnitude[k/ft,Fl Start Location[ft,%] End Location[ft,%1 3 M41 Z .075 .075 5.55le-16 ~ 10 4 M42 Z .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 5 M43 Z .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 6 M44 Z .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 7 M45 Z .075 .075 5.55le-16 10 8 M46 Z .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 9 M47 Z .075 .075 1.1le-15 10 10 M48 Z .075 .075 0 10 11 M22 Z .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 12 M23 Z .075 .075 0 10 13 M24 Z .075 .075 1.1le-15 10 14 M25 Z .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 15 M26 Z .075 .075 5.55le-16 10 16 M27 Z .075 .075 4.441 e-16 10 17 M28 Z .05 .05 3.886e-16 10 18 M29 Z .075 .075 4.44le-16 10 19._ M30 Z .075 .075 5.Â®le-16 10 20 M31 Z .025 .025 3.886e-16 10 Member Area Loads (BLC 1 : Dead) Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D _Direction__ Distribution Magnjtudelkst] 1 N43 N41 N5 N7 Y Two Wav -.04 2 N41 N42 N6 N5 Y Two Way -.04 3 N43 N44 N8 1%-7 Y_Two Way -.04 4 N44 N42 N6 N8 Y Two Way -.04 Member Area Loads (BLC 2 : Wind X) Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D Direction Distribution Magnitude[kif] 1 N44 N42 N6 N8 1~ 17 -Ai- - .025 1 2 N43 N41 N5 N7 X A-B .025 Member Area Loads (BLC 3 : Wind Z) Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D Direction Distribution Magnitude[kst] 1 N43 N44 N8 N7 2 7 A-B T .025 J 2 N41 N42 N6 N5 Z A-B .025 Plate Surface Loads Plate Label _ Direction Magnitu*[kaLEl No Data to Print... --1 Basic Load Cases BLC_Description _-Category X Gravity Y Gmvity-Z Gravity__ Joint Point -Distributed_Area{Me-Surface(Pu 1 Dead DL -1 28 4 I 2 Wind X WLX 21 3 Wind Z WLZ 2 4 BLC 1 Transient Area.. None 261 -5 [BLC 2 Transient Area.., None 20 6 BLC 3 Transient Area... None 20 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.dd] Page 9 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17,2016 Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name C03 Aspen Highlands Moving Loads Tag ____Pattern Increme..Both ... 1st Joint 20-d Joint 3rd Joint 4tb_Joint_5th Joint 6th-Joint_lth Joint 8th Jgint 90 Joint 10th Joint No Data to Print... - 1 Load Combinations Description So...P... SRSS BLC Fac...BLC Fac...BLefac..BLC Fac...BLC Fac...BLC Fac...BLC Fac...BLC Fac..BLC Fac...BLC Fac.. 1 DL+WLX Yesl Y 1- 1-3 2 1 2 DL+WLZ Yesl Y 1131 3 DL Yes Y 1 1 4 DL+0.5W...Yes% Y 1 1 2 .5 3 .5 Load Combination Design Description ASIF CD ABE _Service_Hot_Rolled Cold For... Wood _ Concrete - Masonry Footings -Aluminum Connecti- 1 DL+WLX 7 Yes YesÂ« Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 DL+WLZ Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 DL Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes i Yes Yes Yes 4 DL+0.5WLX.. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Spectra Scaling Factor 29@!ing Factor Z: 1 1 Sc#ling Factor X. 1 7 Dvnamics Input Number of-Modes 0 Load Combination Number 1 - DL+WLX -Ac@leration of Gravity 22.2 (ft/secA2) Convergence Tolerance 0.0001 Envelope Joint Reactions Joint- --X [kl_ 1=C- _Y [14 _ LC__ Z_[k] _LC _MX [kzft] _10 - MY rk-ft] _ LC -_MZÂ»ft]_LC 1 N3 max 1.963 2 6.79 2 -1.412 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 min .952 1 4.477 1 -2.756 2010101 3 N4 max -1.526 3 6.764 2 -1.406 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 min -2.268 1 5.576 3 -2.815 2010101 5 N2 max -1.527 2 5.801 1 1.076 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 min -2.617 1 2.631 2 -.647 2 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 7 Nl max 1.627 3 5.59 3 1.384 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 8 min .69 1 4.641 2 .03 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 N117 max .009 1 6.222 3 .145 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 10 min .002 2 5.113 1 -3.056 2010101 11 N115 max .033 3 2.542 2 .01 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 12 min -.518 1 1.233 3 -.5212010101 _13 Nll6 max .008 1 6.102 1 .438 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 14 min -.001 3 5.036 2 -2.25 2010101 15 N118 max -.215 3 6.48 2 .007 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 16 min -4.543 1 1 6.089 3 -.002 1010101 17 N146 max .476 2 6.157 3 .008 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 18 min -3.713 1 5.663 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 19_ Totals: max 0 3' 46.627 2 0 1 20 min -12 1 ~ 46.627 3 -12 2 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 10 Company : Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 11!RISA Designer Â· Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number . 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name : CO3 Aspen Highlands Envelope AISC ASD Steel Code Checks Member _Shape_Codell.. Lic[ft] LC Shear C..loc[ft] Dir LC_Fa [Isal] ft-Iksi] _Eb y-yl.. Fb z-z[.... Cb CmÂ£-Cmz_ASD Egn 1 M1 \8(8x 18 .354 12 ~1 .099 12 12-19Â·411 30 37.5 26605 I C.84~85__H 1 -2 2 M2 W8x18 .500.12 I2 .116 12 y 1 19.411 30 37.5 26.605 1 .902 .85 Hl-2 3 _ _M3 W8x18 .339 12 1 .087 12 v 1 19.41_1_ 30___37.5_26.605 1 .786 .85 Hl-2 4 M4 W8x18 .547 12 ~ 2 .129 12 y 1 19.411 30 37.5 26.605 1 .912 .85 Hl-2 5 M5 PIPE_4.0X ,684 0 2 .109 0 2 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-2 6 M6 PIPE_4.OX 709 0 12 .114 0 2 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-2 7 M7 PIPE_4.0X .462 0 3 .072 0 3 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-2 8 M8 PIPE_4.0X ,595 0 1 .095 0 1 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 H 1-2 9 M9 HSS3x3x4 .700 3.75 ' 1 .086 0 z 1 4.922 6 6.6 6.6 1 .896 .85 Hl-2 10 M10 HSSjx3x4 .460 0 1 .073 8 y 1 4.922 6 6.6 6.6 1 .443 .85 Hl-2 11 Mll fISS*3x4 __723--12 1-=092_ 10.75 v 1 4.922 6 6.6 6.6 1 .864 .851#2-1 12 M12 HSS3x3x4 .805 17.25 2 .113 16 z 1 4.922 6 6.6 6.6 1 .906 .85 H2-1 13 M13 HSS3x3x4 312 1208 i 1 .044 0 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 14 M14 HSS3x3x4 .896 I5.104 I 1 .091 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 15 M15 HSS3x3x4 .891 5.104 1 .081 10 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 16 M16 HSS3x3x4 .580 ~5.104 f 1 .061 0 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 17 M17 HSS3x3x4 .859 5.104 1 .070 10 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 18 M18 HSS3x3x4 .858 5.104 i 1 .072 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 Hl-3 19 M19 HSS3x3x4 .568 I 5.104 1 .054 Ovl 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 20 M20 HSS3~ax4 .888 5.104il .080 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 21 i M21 HSS)x3x4 .892 5.104 1 .082 10 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 22 ~ M22 HSS3x3x4312 5.208ll .039 0 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 23 M23 HSS3x3x4 .900 5.104' 2 .074 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 24 M24 HSS3x3x4 .868 5.104 2 .071 0 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 25 M25 HSS3x3x4 .614 4.896 2 .046 0z2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 H2-1 26 M26 HSS3x3x4 .895 5.104 2 .071 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 27 M27 HSS3x3x4 .898 5.104 i 2 .071 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.-1 1 .6 Hl-3 28 M28 HSSax3*4 .573 5.104 I 2 .047 0z2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 29 IV129_ HSS3x3â‚¬_.865 5.104 2_ _.076_ 10 z 2_5.739 6 6.6 _ 6.6 1....1 .6 Hl-3 30 M30 HSS3x3x4 .894 5.104 1 2 .073 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 31 M31 HSS3*3x4_312_5.208 2 .033 _0z2 5.739 6 6.6 _ 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 32 M32 HSS))<3)(4 .893 5.104 I 1 .067 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 33 M33 HSS3x3x4 .886 5.104 1 .080 10 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 Hl-3 34 M34 HSS3x3x4 .392 1.563 ~ 1 .050 1.563 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 I 1 .6 1 H2-1 35 M35 HSS3x3x4 .952 5.104 1 .078 10 v 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 Hl-3 36 M36 HSS3x3x4 .951 5.104 I 1 .090 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 Hl-3 37 M37 _HSS*3)<4 _.579_-4.896 1 1.065__ 0_ y_3 5139 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 H2-1 38 M38 HSS3x3x4 .887 5.104' 1 .068 10 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 39 M39 HSS3~<3x4 .897_.5.104 ~ 1 .091 10 y _1_ 4.922 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-3 40 M40 HSS)x3x4 .313 5.208 ,2 .050 0 y 1 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 41 M41 HSS3x,x4 .889 5.104 i 2 .068 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 42 M42 HSS3)<3)<4 .922 I5.104 12 J .072 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 43 M43 HSS3x3x4 .573 5.104 2i .069 0 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.1 1 .6 Hl-3 44 M44 HSS3)<30 .887 5104 2 881 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1...4 1 .6 Hl-3 45 M45 HSS3x3x4 885 _5.104 2 1 .087 10 _z 2_ 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 46 M46 HSS3*3x4 .619 I 5.104 2 1 .069 0 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 47 M47 HSS3x3x4 ,943 5.104' 2 -069 oz2 5.739- 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 48 M48 HSS3x3x4 .887 5.104 2 .068 10 z 2 5.739 6 6.6 6.6 1.... 1 .6 Hl-3 49 M49 _W8x 1 0 .679 17.25 2 .036 6.75_ v 2 15.368 30 36.762 8.531 1 .6 1 Hl-3 50 M50 W8x10 .757 19 2 .042 6.75 y 2 15.368 30 36.762 8.531 1 .6 1 Hl-3 51 M51 W8x 10 .233 3.701 2 .025 6.833 v 1 15.261 30 36.762 22.347 1 .6 1 Hl-3 52 M52 W8x10 .019 5.167 1 .002 0 y3 6.857 30 36.762 11.055 1.61 Hl-3 53 M53 W8x 10 .025 3.416 1 .004 0 v 2 15.261 30 36.762 22.347 1 .6 i 1 Hl-3 54 M54 L4x4x4 .106 7.425 2 .047 7.248 y 2 7.849 21.6 -Code ... I Hl-1 55 M55 L4x4x4 _.029_ 20.25 2 .036 6.75 v 2 11.883_ 21.6 -Code... i Hl-1 56 M56 L4x4x4 .029 8.125' 2 .020 12 y 3 4.415 21.6 - Code ... Hl-1 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 11 Company Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 111 RISA Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO Designer Mike Otegui 8:54 AM TECHNOLOGIES Model Name C03 Aspen Highlands Envelope AISC ASD Steel Code Checks (Continued) Member Shape__Code C... Loc[ftl LC Shear C... Loclftl Dir LC Fa [ksi] Ft [ksi] Fb v-v L Fb z-z [... Cb CmÂ¥ Cmz ASD Eqn 57 M57 L4x4x4 .003 .172 3 ~ .059 0 v 1 9.278_21.6 _-Code... i H2-1 58 M58 L4x4x4 .287 13.612 2 .020 7.601 z 2 2.208 21.6 -Code... Hl-1 59 M59 L4x4x4 .125 ' 9.75 2 .019 20.25 z 1 1.104 21.6 - Code... Hl-1 60 M62 HSS3x3x4 .527 6.56 2 .002 Oyl .785 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-1 61 M63 HSS3x3x4 .148 6.181 2 .006 12.11 v 4 .785 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 ' 1 I32-1 62 M64 HSS3x3x4 .580 6.433 1 .009 0 y 2 .785 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 81-1 63 M65 HSS3x3x4 .408 -6.214 2 .007 0 v 2 .908 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 Hl-1 64 M66 HSS3x3x4 .529 6.56 1 .011 12.112 y 2 .784 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 81-1 _65 M67-_ _HSS3x3x4 .141 5.93 1 .013 Ovl .784 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 H2-1 66 M68 L3x3x4 .197 0 2 .002 0y2 3.305 6 - Code... 81-1 67 M69 L4x4x4 .280 0 1 .002 12.806 v 2 4.237 6 - Code... 81-1 68 M70 L4x4x4 .112 12.806 2 .002 0 y2 4.237 6 -Code.â€ž I32-1 69 M71 L4x4x4 .186 0 2 .004 12.806 v 1 4.237 6 - Code... 81-1 70 M72 L4x4x4 .317 0 1 .004 12.806 y 2 4.237 6 - Code... 81-1 _71 M73 L4x4x4 .107 0 2 ~004 _12.806 v 2 4.237 6 - Code... Hl-1 72 M74 L4x4x4 .078 0 1 .004 12.806 y 2 4.237 6 - Code... 81-1 _73 _ M75 L4x4x4 .184 0 2 .004 12.806 y 1_ 4.237 6 - Code... Hl-1 74 M76 L4x4x4 .042 0 2 .006 0 y 1 7.849 21.6 - Code ... H2-1 75 M77 L4x4x4 .111 0 1 .006 ' 0 v 1 7.849 21.6 - Code ... Hl-1 76 M78 L4x4x4 .134 0 2 .006 16.971 y 1 7.849 21.6 -Code ... Hl-1 77 M79 L4x4x4 .303 0 1 .020 .11 z 2 2.28 6 - Code... Hl-1 78 M80 L4x4x4 .137 0 2 .003 0 y 2 .759 6 - Code.., Hl-1 79 M81 L4x4x4 .052 0 1 .003 9.615 v 2 2.28 6 - Code... H2-1 80 M82 L4x4x4 .292 0 1 .003 0 y 1 2.28 6 - Code... Hl-1 81 M83 PIPE_4.0X ,640 0 2 .103 0 2 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 L. .6 .6 H1-2 82 M84 PIPE_3.0... .113 0 2 .015 0 2 20.777 21.6 23.76 23.76 1....537.526 Hl-2 83 M85 PIPE 4.*Â§ .478 0 2 .076 0 2 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1. 84 M86 PIPE_4.0X .919 0 1 .153 0 1 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 Hl-2 6 ~ -6 Hl-2 85 M87 HSS3x3x4 .873 1.167 2 .083 0z2 5.082 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 H2-1 86 M88 HSS3x3x4 .593 1.472 2 .053 1.5 z 2 5.082 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 H2-1 87 M89 HSS3x3x4 .363 1.167 1 .050 Ovl 5.082 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-1 88 M90 HSS3x3x4 .441 1.5 2 .047 1.5 z 2 5.082 6 6.6 6.6 1.61 Hl-2 89 M91 PIPE-2.0 .045 10 3 .063 0 2 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1- .6 .6 Hl-1 90 M92 PIPE_2.0 ,020 10 2 .030 0 1 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 91 M93 PIPE_2.0 .039 10 1 .018 0 1 6.375 21.6 _23.76_ 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 92 M94 PIPE_2.0 ,040 10 2 .068 0 2 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 93 M95 PIPE_2.0 .003 10 3 .017 0 2 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1... .6 .6 Hl-1 94 M96 PIPE_2.0 .051 10 3 .025 0 2 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 95 M97 PIPE-2.0 .014 10 2 .012 0 2 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 96 M98 PIPE_2.0022 10 1 .003 0 1 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 97 M97A L4x4x4 .082 16.664 2 .035 20.25 v 2 1.55 21.6 -Code... 8-1-1 98 M98A PIPE_2.0 .006 10 3 .006 0 1 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1-1 .6 .6 Bl-1 _99___M99 PIPE_2.0 .005 10 3 .029 0 3 _6.375_21.6 23.76 23.76 1- .6 .6 Hl-1 100 M100 PIPE_2.0088 10 1 .043 0 1 6.375 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.-1 .6 .6 Hl-1 101 M101- PIPE-2.0 .003 10 2 .062 0 1 -6.375_ 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-1 102 M103 L3x3x4 .026 0 1 .001 3.899 y 3 2.093 6 - Code... H2-1 103 M104 L3x3x4 .030 0 3 .002 0 v 2 2.259 6 - Code... Hl-1 104 M104A L3x3x4 .027 0 2 I .003 5.15 y 1 1.2 6 - Code... H2-1 105 M105 L3x3x4 .160 0 2 .002 0 v 1 1.373 6 - Code... Hl-1 106 M106 HSS3x3x4 .710 1.333 1 1 .059 0 y 1 5.082 6 6.6 6.6 1 .6 1 H2-1 107 M107 PIPE-4.0X _163_ 0 1 .125 _0 1 21.046 21.6 23.76 23.76 1.... .6 .6 Hl-2 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 12 Company : Otegui Structural Services, LLC Nov 17, 2016 1|@RISA Designer - Mike Otegui 8:54 AM Job Number 216211 Checked By: MAO TECHNOLOGIES Model Name : CO3 Aspen Highlands Warning Log Messaae No Data to Print... 1 RISA-3D Version 14.0.2 [C:\...\...\...\216211 CO3 Aspen Highlands.r3d] Page 13 CITY OF ASPEN C0MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET 912 p'. 7-73 ~ItiL CUY ov AstrN gm$9..Â«I"-r CITÂ¥ i j , -' e tr.N *74.~ 5 30Â¢ELOPET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuanI zo The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All Application are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.citvofaspen.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code, and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to yourtype of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Use Regulations. March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 . 4 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy forthe processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on thetype of application submitted. A flat fee iscollected by Community Development forapplications which normallytake a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must be pay the sum of those flat fee. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged againstthe deposit. Various City staff may also charge theirtime spent on the case in additiontothe case planner. Depositamount may be reducesif, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less timeto process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made duringthe pre-application conference bythe case planner. Hourly billingshall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment includingthe deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed forthe additional costs incurred bythe City when the processing of an application bythe Community Development Department takes moretime or expense than is covered bythe deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for bythe deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee tothe applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined bythe Director forsimplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and past due invoices shall be paid priortothe Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit atthe rate in effect atthe time of final submission. Upon final approval all billingshall beagain reconciled priorto the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 daysor more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.7% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned bythe Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid priorto issuance of a Development Orderor recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, and unpaid invoice of 90 days or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representingthe owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 RF vu FOR PERMANENÂ¥'LES CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees Â«340 - *%,1 coe)4 Â· 2017 A - 2 2.& An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Applicant, Brad Johnson Phone No.: 303-229-4681 Owner ("1"): for Black & Veatch Corp. Email: JohnsonBW2@BV.com 971 1 En Address of 315 E. Dean Street Billing Black & Veatch Corp.~ Z ~ Property: Address: Attn: Brad Johnson - (Subject of (send bills here) 4600 S. Syracuse Street application) Suite 800, Denver, CO 80237 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that asthe property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees forthis development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. / $ 975.00 flatfeefor 3 hours of Staff $ flat fee for review time $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible atthis time to know the full extent ortotal costs involved in processingthe application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered bythe City as being received by me. 1 agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of stafftime. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, 1 agree to payadditional monthlybillingstothe City to reimbursethe City for the processing of myapplication atthe hourly rates hereinafter stated. $975.00 depositfor 3 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ depositfor hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Brad Johnson, Applicant Jessica Garrow, AICP t>/( AL- Community Development Director Name: City Use: Title: Fees Due: $'il_yetâ‚¬Nete:fÂ·)* J Senior Site Acquisition Manager March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 4; ' . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Verizon @ Aspen Residence Club & Hotel (C03 Aspen Highlands) 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (Parcel ID: 273718285033) Location: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Name: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 3131 S. Vaughn Way, Suite 550, Aurora, CO 80014 Address: Phone#: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: Brad Johnson for Black & Veatch Corp. Black & Veatch Corp., Attn: Brad Johnson, 4600 S. Syracuse Street Address: Suite 800, Denver, CO 80237 Phone#: 303-229-4681 / JohnsonBW2@BV.com El GMQS Exemption Fl Conceptual PUD E-1 Temporary Use //l GMQS Allotment El Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision U Conceptual SPA Fl ESA - 8040 Greentine, Stream Fl Subdivision Exemption (includes U Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) Â£ Mountain View Plane ~ Final SPA (&SPA U Commercial Design Review ~ Lot Split Amendment) ~1 Residential Design Variance j Lot Line Adjustment F-1 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion 0 Conditional Use Other: E<ISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) St. Regis Residence Club & Hotel and Rooftop Telecommunications Facility PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Modification to existing rooftop equipment and antennas and new screen wall. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 975.00 ~ Pre-Application Conference Summary UU Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form UD Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards % 3-D Model for large project Photo Simulation All plansthat are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2.9. 1%. r c + it! 4~r 1 1'. ATTACHMENT 3 J. 4 1,"7 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM CITY OF ASPEN 301,41 t?try r/f'/%1 ('81ENT Verizon @ Aspen Residence Club & Hotel (C03 Aspen Hii}hlandsJ" ProJect: Applicant: Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (Parcel ID: 273718285033) Location: Zone District: Lodge (L) Zone District 2.58 acres Lot Size: Lot Area: 243,040 sq. feet (Forthe purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easement, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed. NO CHANGE Number of residential units: Existing: ProposedÂ· NO CHANGE Numberof bedrooms: Existing: Proposed. NO CHANGE Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): N/A DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed NO CHANGE Principal bldg. height: Existing: 74 ' -0 " Allowable: 74' -0" Proposed 791-8,1 Access. Bldg. height: Existing: Allowable. Proposed NO CHANGE On-Site parking: Existing: Required: proposed NO CHANGE % Site coverage: Existing: Required. Proposed NO CHANGE % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed NO CHANGE Front Setback: Existing: Required Proposed NO CHANGE Rear Setback: Existing: Required. Proposed NO CHANGE Combined F/F: Existing: Required Proposed NO CHANGE Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed NO CHANGE Side Setback: Existing: Required Proposed NO CHANGE Combined Sides: Existing: Required Oroposed NO CHANGE Distance between Bldgs. Existing: Required: Oroposed NO CHANGE Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Unknown Variations requested: Per Section 26.575.130.F.2.b)a variation from the max height limit is requested. Per code, panel antennas are allowed to extend above the roof by only 5 feet (or 74' in this case). The existing antennas are currently at 74' but taller antennas are needed. Code allows the Director to approve taller antennas if found to be suitably camouflaged. Therefore a March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 screen wall is proposed to conceal the antennas. 0 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4 - MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collected packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App Submission Process Type (See Process Number of Required Requirements Description in Att.5) Submittal Packets (See key on page 9.) 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7, 8-10, 35 P & Z 10 8040 GREENLIN EXEMPTION 1-7, 8-10, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE 2 FOR 0 ADMIN., 10 FOR (based on location) P&Z STREAM MARGIN 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 EXEMPTION HALLAM LAKE BLUFF 1-7, 13 , 14, 35 P & Z 10 REVIEW MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7,15,16,35 P & Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7, 9, 17 P & Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. P & Z 10 depend on nature of the Special Review Requested. SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21, 35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35 Cl ITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7,22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4, 7, 23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35 ADMIN, OR P&Z 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN, OR P&Z 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR DIAMETER P&Z RES. DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7, 9, 28, 29, 30 P & Z OR DRAC 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. ADMIN., OR P&Z AND/OR 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR depend on nature of the Exemption CC (BASED ON EXEMPTION P&Z, 20 FORP&ZANDCC Request. TYPE) CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND 20 FOR P&Z AND CC CC FINAL -P&Z, AND CC (Submit Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7, 35 P & Z, AND CC 20 March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4 - MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED) PUDAMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 FOR Admin., 10 (BASED ON AMENDMENT for P & Z, 20 FOR P TYPE) &ZANDCC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7, 35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 2 FOR Admin., 20 (SPA) FINAL -P&Z, AND CC for P&Z AND CC AMENDENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 20 for DURATION TIME) P & Z and CC TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN OR P&Z (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 10 for DURATION TIME) City Council ACCESSORY DEWELLING 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P&Z (BASED ON IF 2 for UNIT THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW Administrative STANDARDS) Review REZONING 1-7 P & Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL 1-7, 34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 REQUIREMENTS VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. .Â· .... : ./ 34/ f 8 .77- 2,117 4 2* Vt .41. 4 SPEN r ...,9 1: March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4 - CONT'D - SUBMITTAL KEY 1. Land Use Application with Applicant's 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to mean sea Subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city name, addressandtelephone number, level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of and the street system in the area of the contained within a letter signed bythe all new or substantially improved structures; a proposed subdivision. The contents of the plat applicant stating the name, address and verification and recordation of the actual shall be of sufficient detail to determine whether telephone numberof the reprehensive elevation in relation to mean sea level to which the proposed subdivision will meet the design authorized to acton behalf of the applicant. any structure is constructed; a demonstration standards pursuantto Land Use Code Section that all new construction or substantial 26.480.060(3).20. Subdivision GIS data. 2. The Street address and legal description improvements will be anchored to prevent of the parcel on which development is flotation, collapse or lateral movement of any 20. A Landscape plan showing location, size proposed to occur. structure to be constructed or improved, a andtype of proposed landscape features. demonstration that all new construction or 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on substantial improvements will be anchored to 21. A subdivision plat which meets the terms of which development is proposed to occur, prevent floatation, collapse or lateral movement this chapter, and conform tothe requirements consisting of a current certificate from a title of any structure to be constructed or improved; of this title indicating that no furthersubdivision insurance company, or attorney licensed to a demonstration that the structure will the may be granted forthese lots nor will additional practice in the State of Colorado, listing the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to at units be built without receipt of applicable names of all owners of the property, and all least two (2) feet above the base flood elevation, approvals pursuantto thischapter and growth mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, all as certified by a registered professional managementallocation pursuantto Chapter contacts and agreements affectingthe parcel, engineerorarchitect. 26.470. and demonstratingthe owner's right to apply forthe Development Application. 13. A Landscape plan that includes native 22. The precise wording of any proposed vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) amendment. 4. An 8 14" X 11" vicinity map locating the percent of the development as views from the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative 23. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of one screeningshall be maintained in perpetuityand (1")inch equals ten (10") feet or one (1") inch 5. A site improvement survey including shall be replaced with the same orcomparable equals twenty (20 ') feet, including before and topography and vegetation showingthe material should it die. "after" photographs (simulations) specifying the currentstatus of the parcel certified bya location of antennas, support structures, registered land surveyor, licensed in the State 14. Site sections drawn by registered architect, transmission buildingsand/orother necessary of Colorado. (This requirement, orany part landscape architect, orengineershall be uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, thereof, may be waived by the Community submitted showing all existing and proposed site landscaped areas ad all adjacent land uses within Development Department if the project is elements, the top of slope, and pertinent on-hundred fifty(150') feet. determined not to warrant a survey.) elevations above sea level. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this 6. A site plan depicting the proposed layout 15. Proposed elevations of the development, Section. and the project's physical relationship tothe includingany rooftop equipmentand how it will land and its surroundings. be screened. 24. FAA and FCC Coordination. Statements regardingthe regulations of the Federal Aviation 7. A written description of the proposal and 16. Proposed elevations of the development Administration (FAA) and the Federal a written explanation of how a proposed and how it will be screened. Communications Commission (FCC). development complies with the review standards relevant to the development 17. A sketch plan of the site showing existing 25. Structural Integrity Report from a application. and proposed features which are relevanttothe professional engineer licensed in the State of review. Colorado. 8. Plan with Existing and proposed grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot intervals for 18. One (1) inch equals fourhundred (400) feet 26. Evidence that an effort was made to locate grades over ten (10) percent. scale City Map showing the location of the an existing wireless telecommunication services proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned facility site including coverage/ interference 9. Proposed elevations of the development byor under option to the applicant, commonly analysisand capacityanalysisand a brief known landmarks, and the zone district in which statement as to other reasons for success or no 10. A description of proposed construction the proposed subdivision and adjacent success. techniques to be used. properties are located. 28. Neighborhood block plan at 1"=50' 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain line 19. A plat which reflects the layout of the lots, (available from City Engineering Department) andthe high waterline. blocks and structures in the proposed Graphically show the front portions of all subdivision. The plat shall be drawn at a scale of existing buildingson both sidesof the blockand one (1)equalsone hundred ( 100) feet or larger. theirsetback from the street in feet. Identify Architectural scales are not acceptable. Sheet parking and frontentry for each buildingand size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six locate any accessorydwelling units alongthe (36) inches. If necessaryto placethe platon alley. Indicate whether any portion of the more than one (1) sheet, an index shall be houses immediately adjacenttothe subject included on the firstsheet. A vicinity map shall parcel are one story Corily one living level). also appear on the first sheet showing the (Continued on next page.) March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 28. Roof Plan. 34. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the location, height, type and luminous intensity of each above 29. Photographic panorama. Show grade fixture. Estimate the site illumination as elevations of all buildingson bothsides of measured in foot candlesand include minimum, the block, including present condition of the maximum, and average illumination. subject property. Label photos and mount Additionally, provide comparable examples on a presentation board. already in the communitythat demonstrate technique, specification, and/ or light level if they 30. A Condominium subdivision exemption exist. platdrawn with permanent inkon reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24 inches bythirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half C 1 %) inches on the left hand side f the sheetand one-half (1/2) inch margin around the other three (3 ) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 31. A description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved bythe PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, of-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 32. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale and orientation of the proposed buildings. 33. A written description of the variance being requested. March, 2016 Citv of Atoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5050 . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies toyourdevelopment proposal and will identifythe materials necessaryto review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submitthe requested number of copies of the complete application and the application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whetherthe application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whetherthe information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviews by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written bythe staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date forthe application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The applicant will be required to nail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 30 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days priorto the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staffs memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation bythe Planning Staff, a presentation bythe Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. (Continued on next page) March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. Duringthistime, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 0 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and surrounding landowners. Following is a summary of the public notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completingthe notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation on the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days priortothe hearing. The legal notice will be written bythe Community Development Department and will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibilityto obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit) 3. Mailing- Mailing of notice is to be madeto all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel bythe applicant. It isthe applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearingthat the mailing took place (use the attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certifythat the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those in the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no morethan sixty (60) days priorto the date of public hearing. March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: , Aspen, CODE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy Of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the cert\fied mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Wheneverthe official zoning district map is in any wayto be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title isto be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C. R.S Â§24-65.5-103.3 March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 . verizond C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS VIEW 1 - LOOKING NORTHEAST . '44 r..5 . .4- I .. Â·?A I , , 7 I ' I - k . r 'h#m t. 1 1.-5. . Ad. I - & 7-3*zin,1 - Â·Â·~Â·pry .1 - -24----I-L...22-ir# 9./t .- ~- G 27 - -1 4. 'i I P 414 '- 1 %- - 1 --.....,Ill-/IK-y.imi-/:1."- --------- 7-" * Â» Â»431 Â« I -, *<6 '~10. - - .1 B . Â« I - - I< . , . We.,4 1 *1. Ill:&124"80'I fy - .. 4- 11.1 ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) Ul h~ ill" =L~~ Râ€¢~ C ~ P 436 '*i verizond CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 48Â« VIEW 1 - LOOKING NORTHEAST Â° Tv j ~ 6Â£0- v..iÂ©,44 Â® atew O-1 4. : Zok (61\ lfJAit , r. .) . . 4 - t:ZZ. - . ~ 1 : 47. r 41 + 1, 0 , .. - at, iÂ· b . i -~ .14,1 8 1 >4 =7'~ .4 -1. a , I . 1 . ,Â«Il .-I'll/-*P- 1 ' r Â·Â·-4 1 1 K - JR. 1 -I#/.-/&/:.I< -///I'llf=* JE.#I.C.*....~~*r"<&Â£*I...$V#= Â·51.- ---- 7. CA)6 'im-.-'Ipp 1~. immal/**I '4?0 -4 j -'-1:U n- --r---- .. L PROPOSED CONDITIONS (This photo simulation is for illustrative purposes only) Ul :i'16/1/ 2) 14 24 - l. verizon' SITE NAME: CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES verizond SITE ADDRESS: 315 E. DEAN ST SITE I.D AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT SMR - 700/AWS/PCS PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME SITE I.D.#: 263 C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 263 ASPEN, CO 81611 315 E. DEAN ST. ASPEN1 CO 81611 PHOTOSIMULATION VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME SHEET DESCRIPTION ST. REGIS - ASPEN --, Tl.00 TITLE SHEET SITE I D Â· DENVER -1 332094 Gl.00 GENERAL NOTES .= .4 ~ CONSULTANT Al.00 SITE PLAN I Al.10 ROOF PLAN & HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM , A A2.00 EQUIPMENT SHELTER PLANS TA#i 494 i A2.10 ANTENNA PLANS & NOTES CE A3.00 ELEVATIONS i ... C A3.10 SOUTH PENTHOUSE ELEVATION 1.1 Â¢ -Â· A4.00 DETAILS A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN E. MAIN ST. A4.10 DETAILS i - (0.3 MILES) G - A5.00 HAZMAT RACK ELEVATION 1/ <, 1, 6 m N g A51O RACK ELEVATIONS 9, ..., 1.1 3 ZE A6.00 GROUNDING SCHEMATIC 9, & r E. DEAN ST. ~11 $2.00 SCREEN FRAMING PLAN (LOW) ED . W* O - - - Sl .00 STRUCTURAL & INSPECTION NOTES 'D Â·-:/ . 32.10 SCREEN FRAMING PLAN (HIGH) SITE - 1 S3.00 ANTENNA SCREEN SECTION A 7* ~ NOT TO SCALE S4.00 DETAILS 1 st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP N 3 DIRECTIONS 7 FROM DENVER, CO 1 Â· EXIT ON 1-70 W TOWARD GRAND JCT. (145 MILES) Â· EXIT 116 FOR CO-82 TOWARD GLENWOOD SPRINGS/ASPEN (40 MILES) ' Â· SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO N. 7TH ST/CO-82. (0.7 MILES) ATTACHMENT: Â· LEFT ONTO W. MAIN ST/CO-82 (0.6 MILES) STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 92&9 - Â· RIGHT ONTO S. ASPEN ST. (0.3 MILES) BY: OTEGUI STRUCTURALS, LLC. Â· LEFT ONTO E. DEAN ST. (350 FT) f DATED: (PENDING) Â· SITE WILL BE ON THE RIGHT i ' 111 1 . 11111.1 11 1 1 .. 11. 1 1. . 1,1./~ . m 1 1101.1 4111. 1 1 11 - ;9 - .1 44.' . 1, 1 11 . 11- Ir hi- 11 S 1 1 yh -- PROJECT DATA 41 N.:1.....11 24= - 1. Â· ' JURISDICTION CITY OF ASPEN 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 APN 273718285033 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 OFFICE: 303.932.9974 ZONING DESIGNATION PUD - L/TR PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXISTING BUILDING OCCUPANCY GROUP R-1 Â· REMOVE EXISTING ANTENNA FRAME MOUNTS ON EXISTING PENTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION TYPE 11-B Â· INSTALL NEW 10'H ANTENNA SCREEN W ITH NEW AND EXISTING PANEL ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT Â· ADD NEW EQUIPMENT AT ANTENNAS AND IN EXISTING EQUIPMENT CABINET FULLY SPRINKLERED YES NO. STORIES 4 NOT FOR EQUIPMENT SHELTER OCCUPANCY GROUP R-1, ACCESSORY USE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE 11-B FULLY SPRINKLERED N/A, OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT NO. STORIES N/A, OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT GOVERNING CODES: 2009 IBC, 2009 IFC, 2009 IMC, 2009 IECC, 2014 NEC AD.A. COMPLIANCE THIS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION TITLE SHEET PROJECT TEAM OWNER TOWER MANAGEMENT CUENT SITE ACQUISITIONIST RF ENGINEER ARCHITI CT ST. REGIS HOTEL AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION VERIZON WIRELESS BLACK & VEATCH CORP. VERIZON WIRELESS CHARLES STECKLY,AIA BEN BRADWAY CHRISTOPHER NIXON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER BRADJOHNSON BRYAN EICENS CSAi 315 E. DEAN STREET 1658 COLE BLVD., SUITE 205 MIKE HICKEY 4600 S. SYRACUSE STREET 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY 5935 S. ZANG STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKEWOOD, CO 80401 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY SUITE 800 SUITE 550 SUITE 280 PHONE: 970.920.7300 DESK:303.274.6568 x2551 SUITE 550 DENVER CO 80237 AURORA, CO 80014 LITTLETON, CO 80127 Tl.00 CELL: 303.570.3222 AURORA, CO 80014 PHONE:303.229.4681 PHONE: 617.835.2690 CELL: 303.210.8972 CELL: 951.413.9704 OFFICE: 303.932.9974 PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU 1331?~ ANTENNAS POWER/GROUNDING COAX CABLES I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ' ' HU '141 Â¢~Â«â‚¬ ABBREVIATIONS BATTERY SPECIFICATION: 1. DRAWINGS ARE , u . "'* TEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, AND THIS SET OF PLANS IS INTENDED I U UC ...O FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY, @ AT H.M. HOLLOW METAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK SHALL (MARATHON M12V155FT) EACH CELL HAS AN IMMOBILIZE ELECTROL-YTE CAPACITY OF 8.19 GALLONS EACH, (12) CELLS IN THIS OCCUPANCY RESULTING IN AN verizoni CENTERLINE HORZ. HORIZONTAL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND ANYTHING ELSE AGGREGATE ELECTROLYTE VOLUME OF 98.28 GALLONS Â° DEGREES HR. HOUR DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATIONS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. REFER TO VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 0 DIAMETER HT. HEIGHT BID PACKAGE FOR MORE DATA. 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 A. STATIONARY LEAD-ACID BATTERY SYSTEM AND VALVE-REGULATED LEAD-ACID AURORA, CO 80014 NC AIR CONDITIONER llC INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER BATTERY SYSTEMS CONTAINING MORE THAN 50 GALLONS OF ELECTROLYTE SHALL 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE PROJECT INFORMATION APPROX. APPROXIMATE INT. INTERIOR COMPLY W ITH IFC 608. JOB SITE AND FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE SITE NAME ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSED PROJECT WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR L.F. LINEAR FEET SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS A.F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE LTE LIMIT TO EXTEND PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR ~ ALU ALCATEL LUCENT 1. IFC 608.5 SPILL CONTROL & NEUTRALIZATION DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE SITE I.D ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH MAX. MAXIMUM A. SPILL CONTROL: IFC 608.5 EXCEPTION: VRLA, LITHIUM-ION, LITHIUM METAL ARCHITECT/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER IN WRITING. 263 AWS ADVANCED WIRELESS SYSTEM MECH. MECHANICAL POLYMER OR OTHER TYPES OF SEALED BATTERIES W ITH IMMOBILIZED 315 E. DEAN ST MFGR. MANUFACTURER ELECTROL-YTE SHALL NOT REQUIRE SPILL CONTROL 3, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED ASPEN. CO 81611 BBU BASE BAND UNIT MGB MAIN GROUND BAR B. IFC 608.5.2: RECOMBINANT BATTERY NEUTRAL-IZATION: FOR VRLA OR OTHER WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED AMERICAN TOWER CORP. BCEM BASE CHANNEL ELEMENT MODULE MIN, MINIMUM TYPES OF SEALED BATTERIES WITH IMMOBILIZED ELECTROLYTE, THE METHOD BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. TOWER SITE NAME MSDS MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET AND MATERIAL SHALL BE CAPABLE OF NEUTRALIZING A SPILL OF 3.0 PERCENT OF BLDG. BUILDING MTL. METAL THE CAPACITY OF THE LARGES BLOCK IN THE ROOM (SEE CHART) TO A PH 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. ST. REGIS - ASPEN B.O. BOTTOM OF MTS MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH BETWEEN 5.0 AND 9.0. PROVIDE: ENER-SYS EMERGENCY SPILL KIT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, MODELS:853620-853615 (OR EQUAL) METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL SITE I.D. CLG. CEILING N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 332094 COL. COLUMN TOTAL ACID GAL. 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 CONC. CONCRETE O.C. ON CENTER 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO CONSULTANT O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER 3% 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 36 MANUFACTURER'S, VENDOR'S, & VERIZON WIRELESS SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED DBL, DOUBLE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE NOTIFY DIA. DIAMETER PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS 2. IFC 608.3 PROVIDE UL LISTED THERMAL RUNAWAY DETECTION DEVICE: EAGLE EYE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER. DIM, DIMENSION SERVICE BTM SERIES THERMAL RUNAWAY MONITOR (OR EQ.) CONNECT TO ALARM BLOCK. DISC. DISCONNECT 6. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT DN. DOWN RAD. RADIUS 3. IFC 608.6 CONTINUOUS VENTILATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A RATE OF NOT LESS ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. DWG. DRAWING R.O. ROUGH OPENING THAN (1) CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE PER SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR AREA OF THE ROOM. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN (E) EXISTING SHTG. SHEATHING 4. IFC 608.7. DOORS INTO ROOMS AND BUILDINGS CONTAINING STORED EMERGENCY AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL EA. EACH SIM. SIMILAR POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH APPROVED SIGNS. THE SIGNS CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ELEV. ELEVATION SPEC. SPECIFICATION SHALL STATE: ELEC. ELECTRICAL S.S. STAINLESS STEEL A. THE ROOM CONTAINS ENERGIZED BATTERY SYSTEMS 7. THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THIS PROJECT SITE/FACILITY ARE NOT TO BE EQ. EQUAL STL. STEEL B. THE ROOM CONTAINS ENERGIZED ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EXT. EXTERIOR STRUCT. STRUCTURAL C. THE BATTERY ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS ARE CORROSIVE LIQUIDS. 8. NEW TOWERS ARE UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSIST F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER T.C. TEMPERATURE CONTROL ANTENNA INSTALLATION SUBCONTRACTOR IN TERMS OF COORDINATION AND SITE FIN. FINISH TELCO TELECOMMUNICATIONS 5. IFC 608.8 SEISMIC PROTECTION. BOLT DOWN / ANCHOR BATTERY BASE W/ (4) 5/8" ACCESS. ERECTION SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF FLR. FLOOR T.O. TOP OF MASONRY ANCHORS, MIN 4" EMBED INTO CONCRETE FLOOR. MODULAR STEEL PERSONNEL AND PROPERTY FROM HAZARDOUS EXPOSURE TO OVERHEAD DANGERS. FUT. FUTURE TYP. TYPICAL SEISMIC FRAME PROVIDED WITH BATTERIES. 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AT THE PROJECT SITE A FULL SET OF 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP GA. GAUGE U.G. UNDERGROUND 6. "NO SMOKING SIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON DOORS LEADING INTO BATTERY PERMITTED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS AND GALV. GALVANIZED U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ROOMS. PLACARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ADDENDA OR CLARIFICATIONS FOR THE USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE GEN. GENERATOR ASSOCIATION STANDARD 704. PLACARDS POSTED ON THE INTERIOR OF THE FACILITY PROJECT. GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM VERT. VERTICAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM 10 INCHES EACH SIDE AND PLACARDS POSTED ON THE GWB. GYPSUM WALLBOARD V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD EXTERIOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM 15 INCHES EACH SIDE. RE: A5.00 10. DETAILS INCLUDED HEREIN ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB CONDITIONS OR SITUATIONS, SYMBOLS LEGEND w/ WITH AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. - - - - - - - EASEMENT 122 11. THE FACILITY IS CELLULAR RADIO EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, & SUPPORTING UTILITIES. 9108&62 LEASE LINE "r---7 9(8>/r 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING | ENLARGED VIEW~ IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION UPON - - - - PROPERTY LINE COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE n L-_) (DANGER) OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. WOODEN FENCE MARKER LEAD ACID BAmmES HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH 41 2{H :1.. =C. .11 54 = x CHAIN LINK FENCE ~-ELEVATION 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE GENERAL WORK AREA IS KEPT CLEAN AND AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY, PREMISES CO-SM UQUIDS (EUCTROLYTE} 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET SUITE 280 OH SPOT UIERS[ZED ElECTRICAL =A SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 (E) OVERHEAD UTILITY ~ ELEVATION OFFICE: 303.932,9974 NO SMOKING SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. -.Ill-/ &.. 1.-Il#.I OHE (E) OVERHEAD ELEC. A 14. THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK. i X ~ SECTION CUT ~ SS -Â·Â·Â·- Â·----" (E) SANITARY SEWER ~~\Â¤33~ 3 - BATTERY HAZMAT REVIEW CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN W (E) WATER LINE ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING (IN WRITING) THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER OF ANY NOT FOR T (E) TELCO CABLE 1xx.)04 EXTERIOR ELEVATION THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTOR'S DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME, PROPOSAL. CONSTRUCTION FIBER (E) FIBER CABLE THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO SCALE WHEN PLOTTED ON 11X17 SHEET. 15. SPECIAL INSPECTION TESTING REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT SPECIAL INSPECTOR PER SECTION 1704 OF THE E (E) ELECTRICAL CALL BEFORE YOU DIG - COLORADO LAW REQUIRES 3 WORKING DAYS NOTICE FOR INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) FOR ITEMS NOTED ON Sl.00 IF INCLUDED IN ~**-560 INTERIOR ELEVATION CONSTRUCTION PHASE, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE INSPECTOR SHALL BE HIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR & COAX (E) COAX CABLE ~ COORDINATION SHALL BE ARRANGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REQUIRED THESE DRAWINGS MAY NOT SHOW ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES. THE INSPECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CARE DURING ALL EXCAVATION AND OTHER 1 REVISION NUMBER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. NEW WORK COLOR LEGEND UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO - 1-800-922-1987 GENERAL NOTES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SOW T 1.9/. *9* ./ UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT HYBRID & COAX CABLES ::., .1 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES AND UTILITY RELOCATIONS UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO DC POWER j REQUIRED FOR THIS INSTALLATION. THE CONTRACTOR WILL SCHEDULE AND COORDINATE 1-800-922-1987 FIBER ~ ALL WORK WITH THE OWNER TO ENSURE NO DISRUPTION TO OWNERS OPERATIONS. WWW.UNCC.ORG ANTENNAS Illillillilill/0#g//././/#9TfE~ SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON 3 WORKING DAYS UTILITY NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO RRH/BBU -*liall'll...../40*W~h#*bl THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION Gl.00 PENETRATIONS ~ DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME 4 - ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND LEGEND 2 - GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES 1 -GENERAL NOTES PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU F.M-,1.1. ANTENNAS ~ FIBERI POWER/GROUNDING;~ HYBRID & COAX CABLES GENE L CONSTRUCTION verizoni VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS SITEID. 263 315 E. DEAN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME EAST DURANT AVENUE ST. REGIS -ASPEN SITEID 332094 CONSULTANT -- W - 1_1 A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN I 1, 01 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP ~\3.00~ I --- --7 / 0 ky EAST DEANAVENUE 1 1 1 Flij (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, \ REMOVE (3) AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS. AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT AT ANTENNAS, VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT 1 NEW 10'H SCREENWALL TO CONCEAL < AREA ON ROOF RE: A2.00 ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT RE: Al.10 1 dJ- C 1 +-1,+lili 1-11-11-1 11 IA3.0011> J -41-ll#*#1 1\ LY={01:1......124= m -1 \ H \\Â« 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 PARAPET WALL LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 OFFICE: 303 932 9974 ~- - PENTHOUSE ~ ~12'1'1OANBLn~:NESMS 6X12 A3.10 EQUIPMENT CABINET TO ANTENNA LOCATION | | ~\\- LOWER ROOF-4 1 NOT FOR l CONSTRUCTION L \ 1 @1 1 1 X % SITE PLAN + Al.00 1 - SITE PLAN 1" = 60'-0" PENETRATIONS RRH/BBU 0/#F/*49*1144* ANTENNAS , FIBER ' POWER/GROUNDINGI HYBRID & COAX CABLESI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION I MONARCH STREET 133hI1S 1-Il IN HlAOS ERTY LINE (TYP) verizond El 5151 1 kil RACK OVP @ CABINET TO MAIN OVP @ ANTENNAS MAIN OVP TO RRH CONNECTION (E)PDF Col ] 01 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 01 o %1 U .1.21 3131 S VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 500 3BU (E) BL U RACK OVP 6X12 HYBRID CABLE MAIN OVP @ 700 850 PCS AWS 1X1 HYBRID CABLE AURORA, CO 80014 ANTENNAS RRH RRH RRH RRH PROJECT INFORMATION SECTOF QTY LENGTH QTY TOTAL QTY LENGTH QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY SITE NAME WEIGHT CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS X NA N/A N/A N/A N/A 14'-0" (2) N/A NA (1) (1) SITE I.D. 263 Y N/A N/A NA N/A N/A 14'-0" (2) N/A N/A (1) (1) 315 E. DEAN ST. Z N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30'-0" (2) N/A N/A (1) (1) AMERICAN TOWER CORP. ASPEN, CO 81611 TOWER SITE NAME (E) RACK OVP ~ NOTE: (TYP OF 2) , RE: 1/A2.20 FOR ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND MAIN OVP LOCATIONS ST. REGIS - ASPEN SITE I.D EQUIPMENT CABINET - - - - 332094 CONSULTANT 6X12 HYBRID CABLE - 2- HYRBID CABLE CHART (2) (E) 1/2" COAX ~~ # _72 222.--~ (E) 850 1 A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN (1) RET CABLE r~--- (1) RET CABLE i (4) 1/2" LDF4 r 1 Yl 1- 700/ ~ -- HYBRID CABLE ~ r CS RRH â€¢ E pCS Ig 1 1 ' (2) (E) 14" COAX ~% | ~ ~ ~=--~1) RET CABLE L (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, (E) MAIN OVP - (E) 1X1 (E) 700 'F- REMOVE (3) AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS, AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT AT ANTENNAS. HYBRID CABCE 1 RRH I _G) (E) 1/2" COAX , 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP NEW 10'H SCREENWALL TO CONCEAL 700/ ANTENNAS, FRAME, AND EQUIPMENT. -1 (4) 1/2" LDF4 ~ AWS 1 1/ Â·Â· / Fi I--~-, 10\- LOWER ROOF < 1 1xl ~ AWS 1 / -NEW 12"W CABLE TRAY VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT- HYBRID CABLE ~ RRH, 1 b X / (LOW) RE: 5/A4.00 AREA ON ROOF RE: A2.00 0 1 11 ' ' 3Â»L 2, LADDEr --==2- ~ 021%11 Â· 9*EkEP 11111Ir--1 L#1~t''tt~ - PENTHOUSE ~ MOUNTED TO PARAPET WALL ~- (6) VERIZON WIRELESS 1-5/8" COAX ~- PARAPET WALL 1\ 1 - \ 1 ~-- (2) VERIZON WIRELESS 6X12 HYBRID 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 (21 (E) 112" COAX LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 CABLES FROM EQUIPMENT CABINET TO -- -- ---- YIE) 850 ANTENNA MOUNTED TO PARAPET WALL OFFICEÂ· 303 932.9974 24-0" \ . I (1) RET CABLE p.-1 ' ' i TUFF TRAC TPO HEAT WELD WALKWAY (1) RET CABLE ~ WITH DIAMOND PLATE EMBOSSED PATTERN AND YELLOW SAFETY BORDER i (4) 1/2" LDF4 r# OR SIM CUT IN MAX 10'-0" LENGTHS, 1X1 2 700/ ~- LOWER ROOF ~ res nni ~ : ALLOW 6" MIN GAP FOR DRAINAGE HYBRID CABLE , PCS BETWEEN PANELS (TYP) NOT FOR .1 --1 ~ (2) (E) 1/2" COAX ~ E-2 (1) RET CABLE ~ 8 CONSTRUCTION (E) 1X1 (E) 700 W HYBRID CABLE RRH | (2) (E) 1/2" COAX f. e N 700/ I (4) 1/2' LDF4 1,9 AWS 1X1 AWS : 1 HYBRID CABLE RRH Â· t. V ROOF PLAN & HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOTED ARE EXISTING U.N.0. 2. COLOR ON DRAWINGS REPRESENTS NEW ~ WORK. Al.10 3 - HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM 1 - ROOF PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONS RRH/BBU ANTENNAS FIBERI POWER/GROUNDING I HYBRID & COAX CABLES, GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ~ 021'1 OL XOblddV) M3813 ~ 3MIAA 00 V99 (3) 83&113 (=13 L 3 63381=! CEIT~~ 'X' & 'Y' SECT 24' - 0" verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS - 480V MAIN DISCONNECT Fy SITE I.D. 1 % % % 111 111 ASPEN, CO 81611 263 315 E. DEAN ST. Eli 111 . 22Â© 22222.4222222*222 FIRE EXTINGUISHER, =accuzz= ---7 - i MSDS.&FIRSTAID KIT UL______-_LIL_-~ AMERICAN TOWER CORP. 1 N ./ .--! VENT --Inut====22==ME-3 1 I E-- - 1 -rn-- TOWER SITE NAME L_ (0 ST. REGIS - ASPEN 50KVA TRANSFORMIP, - ,, hi EYE WASH 111 111 , SITE I.D 111 111 -/' "-- < | | | | | | 332094 1 ELECTRICAL PANEL ~ ~ ~ 111 11 IM +4-------a CONSULTANT ..~ BATTERY AND I U gE RECTIFIER 111 111 -@L COMPARTMENT STEEL STRUCTURAL VERIZON WIRELESS ~ ~ ~----- HVAC EQUIPMENT 111 MEMBERS ABOVE \ 111 - t*C'AluABINET ON (TYP) . J.--- ..9----4- 11 ~,fÂ«=Ant\\1- 111 \ 111 / 7- ....1.9--- - 1 1 1- i Ill 111 A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN 111 SC4812T 1 lic# Ill F~ ~' g.---~~~--~~----- UL--1 1 Ke 2 Er==tit Otit==IntliEIL -7 1-7 ------------------71[--------' ~ 6 - 4. i H~ -.-.--X-111 111 1 LE 32499*50 HVAC EQUIPMENT / 4 -i-Â·Â· 4 111 1 1 1 -Il-... :=*=tz= 111 111 /////- i 1 1 1 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP STEEL EQUIPMENT Ill 111 ~4*Â» -.6 PLATFORM ACROSS ~ I 1I -- MECHANICAL SPACE 111 111 VENT - ~1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SC4812T A/C 1 \ 1 Ill Ill 111. HVAC DUCT ~ 39 111 lll Ill â‚¬44Â«1 Ill Ill Ream UJU====22==22=22=22==31 E===== f - - ------ -------- ---- --------' -*-4 -_ 4 ___UL_-______UL_- -TET------------------1 1 E----- LE==Mt=I==22==Mt -2 TELCO 111 111 IL Ill 11 1 - 699 1 - .-- - -- -- - 111 11 1 - 6,2.1 :1......1 21= 111 111 1 I-1 111 - --... ADD (1) NEW BBU IN - CONCRETE (E)RACK 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 111 1 111 FC' 7 ) LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 | | | (6) 1/2" COAX JUMPERS MOUNTED TO (E) | | | -- CONCRETE STEP UP -41-1/ 1 OFFICE: 303 932.9974 STEEL (ABOVE) FROM POLYPHASER K. 4'. 0" I I I RACK 4 4 111 ==JAL | | | (6) 1/2" COAX JUMPERS MOUNTED /N Ill (TYP) I (E) 3'x2'xl'D POLYPHASE9 1 1 111 TO (E) STEEL (ABOVE) FROM POLYPHASER CABINET CABINET 111 111 l 1l 111 NOT FOR ~---C18~ISTING WALL SPM (INSIDE-PARAPET W~AL~l~ | | | MOUNTED 1~" COAX < CONSTRUCTION -7-FT-- ------J E--- 14 I L_221212..._____8223 i J 3 -113--7_- - - -- 7~.7.- ILIJ 2ND POLYPHASER RACK (12) COAX 1ST POLYPHASER RACK INSIDE CABINET (2) 6X12 HYBRID CABLES (6) ACTIVE (12) COAX - hÂ« (6) ACTIVE (2) 6X12 HYBRID CABLES ALONG EQUIPMENT SHELTER EXISTING STRUCTURAL MEMBER , TO ADJACENT WALL PLANS NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOTED ARE EXISTING U.N.O. A2.00 2. COLOR ON DRAWINGS REPRESENTS NEW WORK \~~~â€ž/ 1 - EQUIPMENT CABINET FLOOR PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU'---9 ANTENNAS 1 POWER/GROUNDINGI HYBRID & COAX CABLESI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 1 17' - 91/2" '~.:L' AWS HBX-6516DS-VTM - AWS 1<- (TYP OF 4) verizon' SCUPPER lili -7 AWS 4 4 - BALLASTED OMNI VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L (REMOVE)*6 h~ ANTENNAS (TYP OF 3, 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 91 , 7>covp AURORA, CO 80014 BY OTHERS) PROJECT INFORMATION 43, (REMCV E)* ~.7'kRH - CABLE TRAY & COVER (TYP) SITE NAME 02 1 850 ~ ~ RRH (03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS ROOFTOP SITE I.D. - PENTHOUSE, 263 j 034//---0 -Es-|1 / 1| 850 315 E. DEAN ST. - 850 LNX-6513DS-VTM ASPEN, CO 81611 - .0. AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME (E) OSHA APPROVED SAFETY ANCHOR ST. REGIS - ASPEN 700 72~' 0~- 700 LNX-6513DS-Al M RRH 4 9 # 700 SITE I D. (REMOVE) 332094 F': =flf' =11Â® LADDER - 700 -3.86- AWS# RRH 4 RRH~ _~~,- % li AWS CONSULTANT (REMOVE) '424ilkplip ./ 10:) Aws 41 \ %. REMOVE EXISTING L ANTENNA FRAME & 1 -1 -Sri 850 n jÂ»144 (TYP OF 3) 11 / 11 AWS / AWS 700 - (REMOVE) (REMOVE) A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN - Ola -- 02 AWS HBX-6516DS-VTM Hu + ~ "" NOTES: 1. REMOVE (3) 700 ANTENNAS 2. REMOVE (3) AWS ANTENNAS 3. REMOVE (3) ANTENNA FRAME MOUNTS \-19 4. ALL ITEMS SHOWN ARE EXISTING U.N.O. 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 4 - PHOTO OF ANTENNAS 2 -ANTENNA DEMO PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0" RELOCATED SECTOR OVE 1. GENERAL: NEW 10'H FIBERGLASS MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW PROVIDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR RECEIVING, PIPE MOUNT (TYPE OF 2) INSTALLING, TESTING AND ADJUSTING ANTENNA CABLES FROM THE ANTENNA TO THE CONNECTORS AT THE BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM (BTS). THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL ~~TU~PNMNEANTASBHL~SWNCOONRNREECOTUOIRRSEDAVOTIEssHALLyfHIRIGPARTTYFURZYHNED' 2%1YUJ'IRmnaD - ~\ 941' SCREEN RE: STRUCT. (2) 6x12 HYBRID CABLES FROM ~ OVPs @ EQUIPMENT CABINET 9?088 COMPONENTS AS SHOWN ON THE BILL OF MATERIALS. PLATE EMBOSSED PATTERN \.11 / / 11 TO OVPs @ ANTENNAS IN NEW AWS AND YELLOW SAFETY BORDER ROOFTOP CABLE TRAY (DISC.) / OR SIM CUT IN MAX 10'-0" RW-=-aMÂ»=2- / -ve.0-'St*-. 2. MATERIALS- â€ž' A RE: 2/Al.00 FOR HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM AND INFORMATION LENGTHS. ALLOW 6" MIN GAP LU ~41,7 - RELOCATED ALU RRH-700 2x60; m B. CABLE HANGERS: INSTALLED AT MAXIMUM 4' SPACING FOR DRAINAGE BETWEEN NEWV 700/AWS C. GROUND EQUIPMENT PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECS RE: A6.00 PANELS (TYP) // MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW PIPE NEWÂ£----1~.- 9. 1 / NEW 700/PCS HEX656CW0000G 700/PCS .rk --1 MOUNT (TYPE OF 3) 41 2"4:1.1 4...1 21 = 3. INSTALLATIONÂ· ANTENNA: MOUNT TO NEW PIPE 11 A. ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS SHALL BE FIELD MEASURED PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF CABLE. , MOUNT (TYP OF 3) 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 INSTALLER SHALL NOTIFY VERIZON WIRELESS OF THE OVERALL LENGTH REQUIRED. LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 NEW ALU RRH-PCS 2x60 -- 850 r.cf~NEW IT~-NEW 12"W CABLE TRAY (LOW) OFFICE 303 932.9974 B. CABLES SHALL BE LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERIZON WIRELESS SPECIFICATIONS. MOUNT TO BACK OF NEW -1.J.700/pCS RE: 5/A4.00 PIPE MOUNT (TYPE OF 3) 11----------- 1 1 C. ALL OUTSIDE CABLE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COVERED WITH WEATHERPROOFING 1 - NEW 700/AWS HEX656CW0000G TAPE. REMOVABLE ACCESS PANEL - 1 | _ ANTENNA: MOUNT TO NEW PIPE . ROOFTOP L.Â¥NEW I MOUNT (TYP OF 3) D. THE MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS FOR ALL ANTENNA CABLES SHALL BE AS SHOWN BELOW -141 PENTHOUSE 7001rNS OR AS PER THE MANUFACTURER, WHICHEVER IS MORE CONSERVATIVE- OSHA APPROVED SAFETY -/, 1 1 11 ANCHOR NOT FOR 0. 14 Â»100 CABLE IN AIR/ CABLE TRAY IN CONDUIT 1/2" 9 10" NEW 42"H STL. GUARDRAIL --~ 4 U 2 - -6 1 94 K I 7/8" 10" 18" RE: 1/A4.10 - PARAPET CONSTRUCTION NEW NEW ~ ,850\~ ~ 1X1 HYBRID 5" 10" LADDER 700/AWS-]700/PCS_24_1 - 6X12 HYBRID 12" 16" - - -â‚¬ Â£- RELOCATED 850 LNX-6513DS-VTM; NEW ALU RRH-AWS 2~0; MOUNT --j- MOUNT TO NEW PIPE MOUNT E. CABLES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF BENDS. CABLES SHALL TO BACK OF NEW PIPE MOUNT ~ ~ 1 Il (TYPE OF 3) NOT BE LEFT UNTERMINATED IN THE FIELD. (TYPE OF 3) NOTES: e -RELOCATED 850 LNX-6513DS-VTM; F. GROUNDING KITS - AFTER INSTALLATION OF GROUND STRAPS, THE CONNECTION SHALL 1. INSTALL NEW 10'H FIBERGLASS SCREEN ~ MOUNT TO NEW PIPE MOUNT BE MADE WEATHER TIGHT USING WEATHERPROOFING KITS AS IDENTIFIED ABOVE. 2. REINSTALL ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT ON SCREEN WALL STRUCT. ~ u (TYPE OF 3) ANTENNA PLANS & GROUND PIGTAILS SHALL BE BROUGHT OUT IN THE DOWNWARD DIRECTION FROM THE 3. ADD (3) 700/AWS & (3) 700/PCS ANTENNAS MODEL #: HEX656CW0000G 9,3 NOTES CONNECTIONS TO THE ANTENNA CABLE W ITHOUT ANY SHARP BENDS (MINIMUM BEND 4. ADD (3) 2X60 PCS RRHs & (3) 2)80 AWS N/D RADIUS 10'7 AND CONNECTION SHALL BE MADE TO GROUNDING SYSTEM 5. DISCONNECT AND REMOVE (3) (E) AWS ANTENNAS 6. ALL ITEMS NOTED ARE EXISTING U.N.O. 7. COLORS ON DRAWING REPRESENT NEW WORK 8. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY (PENDING) DATED (PENDING) 9. GROUND EQUIPMENT PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECS RE: A6.00 10. ALL COAX TRAY AND COVERS MUST BE RELOCATED AND PROPERLY ATTACHED TO COAX TRAY ~~ I ~ ~ 11. COAX BY OTHERS WILL BE ON ROOF AS-IS OUTSIDE SCREEN WALL 3 - ANTENNA NOTES 1 - NEW ANTENNA PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0" pFNETRATIONS RRH/BBU "- ANTENNAS POWER/GROUNDING HYBRID & COAX CABLESI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, REMOVE (3) - AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS, AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT WITHIN NEW 10'H SCREENWALL PAINT \ verizon' TO MATCH (E) BUILDING TRIM METAL COLOR VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 15'H OMNI ANTENNA (OTHERS) PAINT - PROJECT INFORMATION TO MATCH NEW FIBERGLASS SCREEN _T.O. FG SCREENS ~ COLOR 0 mon 79' - 10" SITE NAME - VERIZON WIRELESS RAD CE~;~' ~ C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS WALL MOUNTED ANTENNAS 1 1 UU NEW 42"H STL. GUARDRAIL (OTHERS, TYP) I -17+FM- 3 -~-3~Lk - SITE I.D RE: 1/A4.10 _I.O. PENTH~,US~, ~ 263 PARAPET WALL 315 E. DEAN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 1 1 1 , AMERICAN TOWER CORP. |~ TOWER SITE NAME - ST. REGIS - ASPEN SITE I.D 332094 2/*0 440 440 4 ," =1= CONSULTANT * 1 * -2-2 ~ 2- 2-2- -2 & -21 ~ 2 2-#I- A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN fill[*lia,Â® a = am~i~111[glillÂ® m Â® Iii~Iiii Â®Iiii io~~Iiii~oi~IlllÂ® Illl=1111Â® = Â®1~=11111Â® = ~=~ Il-IlllIOIIIIIIIHI[Ilmill.*Al'INE TIO=GRADE-.3 1 st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 1 -0-0 j -rhr r7- 2 - NORTHEAST ELEVATION 3/64" = 1'-0" - (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, REMOVE (3) AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS, AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT W#EkEP WITHIN NEW 10'H SCREENWALL PAINT TO MATCH (E) BUILDING TRIM METAL COLOR 0 19 7 SCREENS - REMOVABLE ACCESS PANEL Hnn.- VERIZON WIRELESS RAD. CENTER / 1| U Ul [ t - NEW 42" H STL. GUARDRAIL 76' - 2" --- RE: 13410 ~ ~- ~ENT.HOUSE ~- - i ,: LADDER LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET SUITE 280 PARAPET WALL - *~ ~ - PENTHOUSE OFFICEÂ· 303 932 9974 1 1 -1 1- - - 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION =21 Illigi5ifilll-Iiag<Ii- 2 ~ Jilil JillÂ£ 2 22 le/EL /U il il~11 7 m Immr Imp liTUTT[ Imil[ M ~ a ~ "mlo "inlmlllll"niWI"nll|'!I!!01 IlllIill BIlli Ililimillimlq~liwlwn"Illlmil"I"IBMIHIIMIIIII"olllilll~all~~~""Ill,[1-~ Il~w""Illlolll l"lam" In"Ill"*Enilm Ilmll11[111811IllII@Ill[gÂ®Il IllII@111,1*Illil"In "I.I ~rll ~ ELEVATIONS A3.00 0 ~.~~pRADE _ --i. -.i=-Il--- 1 - NORTHWEST ELEVATION 3/64" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONS RRH/BBU 1#M*E?*EFF: ANTENNASI POWER/GROUNDING I HYBRID & COAX CABLES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION I 4 04\\\ verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME (12) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, REMOVE (3) CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS AND REPLACE (6) ANTENNAS, AND ADD NEW EQUIPMENT WITHIN NEW 10'H SCREENWALL PAINT SITE I D TO MATCH (E) BUILDING TRIM METAL COLOR 263 _T.O. FG SCREENS ~ 315 E. DEAN ST. 0 79'-10" ASPEN, CO 81611 AMERICAN TOWER CORP. -! 1 TOWER SITE NAME 1 1 1 1 ri --- ST. REGIS - ASPEN 1 11 SITE If) 332094 _ VERIZON WIRELESS RAD. CENTER 76' - 2" 11 CONSULTANT i I-- El -- --- -- - LJ LJ 42"H STL. GUARDRAIL A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN RE: 1/A4.10 FACE MOUNTED ANTENNAS (TYP) BY OTHERS ]1 /#4 _ T.O. PENTH~~'S~, ~ L lu_____________________________143J_jl,mkt SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT (TYP) -~n 1 st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP ROOF LINE BEYOND -~ 1 1 Z= STAIRWELL - T~ 1 45 - PENTHOUSE - - - CE) COAX ROUTE TO ANTENNA StukEP -1 PARAPET LINE BEYOND - LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 --------------- 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 OFFICE: 303.932.9974 11 11 U NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FlbLBOOF EtyÂ°7 ~ SOUTH PENTHOUSE ELEVATION NOTES: 1.-ALL-Ii-EMS NOTED ARE EXISTING U.N.O. 2. COLOR ON DRAWINGS REPRESENTS NEW WORK 3. FASCIA SHEATHING NOT SHOWN 4. PAINT NEW ANTENNAS & EQUIPMENT TO MATCH EXISTING ANTENNAS & MOUNTING HARDWARE 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL BY (PENDING) DATED: (PENDING) A3.10 1 -SOUTH PENTHOUSE ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" MaN verizoni VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 1. REMOVE EXISTING ROOFING MATERIALS DOWN TO (E) DECKING OR AS REQUIRED FOR =E PROJECT INFORMATION PENETRATIONS. SITE NAME 2. RE-ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING ROOFING. INSTALL FLASHING & LAPPED JOINT TO C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS EXISTING ROOFING AS REQ. AND PER SPECIFIC ROOFING SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS. SITE I D. 2-3/8"0 SCHEDULE 40 3. INSTALL FLASHING AND ROOFING SYSTEM PER THE MANUFACTURER'S CURRENTLY GALVANIZED PIPE MOUNT 263 315 E. DEAN ST. PUBLISHED DETAILS AND NRCA DETAILS. ASPEN, CO 81611 4. SUBMIT ROOFING DETAILS AND SPECS TO PROJECT MANAGER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO AMERICAN TOWER CORP. INSTALLATION. - PANEL ANTENNA TOWER SITE NAME 5. RE-ROOF, FLASH AND SEAL ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO LEAVING THE JOB SITE. DO NOT ST. REGIS - ASPEN LEAVE ROOFING PEIâ‚¬TRATIONS OPEN OVERNIGHT OR UNATTENDED. SITEID 6. SCHEDULE ROOFING OPEFUVIONS TO AVOID INCLEMENT WEATHER. 332094 MOUNTING BRACKET BY - 7. PROVIDE PROTECTION AS REQUIRED TO AVOID LEAKAGE AND DAMAGE TO INTERIOR. MANUFACTURER (TYP) CONSULTANT 8. MAINTAIN EXISTING ROOFING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 9. MAINTAIN EXISTING ROOFING WARRANTY. CALL FOR REQUIRED INSPECTION. USE 14=4 ROOFING COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR WARRANTY. CONTACT OWNER. 10. ALL METAL FLASHING SHALL BE PRIMED AND PAINTED OR GALVANIZED PER PLANS & DETAILS. A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN 11. PROTECT EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM DURING NEW CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION *=4 - 1/2"0 COAX TO WITH SURFACE SHEATHING CONTINUOUS THROUGHOUT WORK AREAS. RRH RE: PLAN 12. IDENTIFY ALL LEAK LOCATIONS AND REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL WET MATERIALS TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. NOTES: 1. REFER TO ANTENNA MANUFACTURER SPEC FOR QUANTITY OF MOUNTING BRACKETS REQUIRED. 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 2. GROUND PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECS RE: A6.00 6 - NOT USED 4-ROOFING NOTES 2 - ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL N.T.S. CONDUIT SIZE & COUNT PER PLAN (ATTACH TO CABLE TRAY RUNGS @ Er 4'-0" W/ STAINLESS STEEL 988&9 CLIPS) - SHT. METAL- COVER ATTACHED TO RAILS WITH TEK SCREWS AT 12" O.C. - RRH2X60-PCS B COLUMN Â· L ~ RE: PLAN -n MOUNTING 12"W X 4"D CABLE TRAY RE: STRUCTURAL BRACKET PROVIDED BY CII= =- _I~ C~ ~-zz---11--PY YC%-tditYBIOLTEAE~H CONT. SEAL-ANT (-TYP) ~~~ LITTLETON, COLORADO 8012 MANUFACTURER ....1 24 = 14 2-1 ar{.:1.1 EZ====J (TYP. OF 2) CI~~22] 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET. SUITE 280 DRAWBAND (- OFFICE: 303.932 9974 111/2" SIDE 7 - 0" FULLY ADHERED MEMBRANE ~~--~ W8x10 CABLE TRAY COUNTER MARCHING SUPPORT @ 48" O.C. (BEYOND) REMOVE (E) SPM & - ; MIN. 2-3/8"0 - 1 1 1 1 Prrililili7iliklillill N INSULATION AT A SCHEDULE 40 ~ FULLY ADHERED MEMBRANE B Â§ BASEPLATE ~ FLASHING GALVANIZED PIPE/ 1 z LOCATIONS, REPLACE \ (E) ANTENNA PIPE SECTION A-A - 1/2" WALK-PAD BELOW NOT FOR 6 W/ FOAM INSULATION \ 1| NEOPRENE PAD ON - ~ ~=Zi3 CONSTRUCTION ROOF (DO NOT ~ CONC. DECK - cc@=Â© [==:==23 1 A /1 1\ C===23 ADHERE TO ROOF) A n_~' - 11-------\ 4 Ul 1 1 - NEOPRENE PAD, ADHERE TO'~ 7 Â¥ W.F. SUPPORT WITH 1 11 .1. 1/ t/// APPROVED ADHESIVE NOTES: 1. ALL ROOFING WORK MUST BE COMPLETED BY: CE) ROOF NOTESÂ· CEI ROOFING (TECTAAMERICA) '1111111.!177711111111111 1 DIMENSIONS ARE FOR 12"W PHONE: 303.573.5953 DETAILS 1 -A TRAY 2. ROOF PATCHING SHALL HAVE STAGGERED 2. NEOPRENE PAD MUST BE 2" LAYERS TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURES SECTION B-B LARGER THAN 1-BEAM PATCHING DETAILS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FOOTPRINT (CENTER AND FIRE PROOFING PATCHING AND PROVIDE ADHERE TO BOTTOM OF W.F. INSPECTION RECORD TO KEEP THE INTEGRITY OF 3. PRIME AND PAINT OR HOT DIP THE STRUCTURAL MEMBER FIRE PROTECTION AND GALV. W.F. NOTES: RATING. 4. DO NOT ADHERE PAD TO ROOF. 1. GROUND RRH PER VERIZON WIRELESS SPECIFICATIONS RE: A6.00 2. OTHER RRH MOUNTING SIMILAR. A4.00 5 - ROOFTOP CABLE TRAY DETAIL N.T.S. 3-PIPE BOOT FLASHING DETAIL N.T.S. 1 -RRH MOUNTING DETAIL N.T.S. PENETRATIONS RRH/BBU 3-/ ANTENNASI FIBERI POWER/GROUNDING I HYBRID & COAX CABLESI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION I verizon' f 1, I 4" 1" VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 5 /: 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION I. I. SITE NAME 1/2'YO'-6'YO'-6" - STL BASEPLATE - O 0 . (03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS SITE I D. 263 HSS 1 1/2"x0.25" PIPE COL 315 E DEAN ST. - - ASPEN CO 81611 4 b AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME ST. REGIS - ASPEN = SITE ID. 3/16" | / 4 0 TO XI 332094 CONSULTANT 3/4"0 HOLE FOR 1/2"0x4" EMBED EXP. ANCHOR INTO CONCRETE PAVER 3 - NOT USED 2 - BASPLATE DETAIL N.T.S. A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN 7' - 6" 3' - 9" 3' - 9" 1 st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP '' . 11/2"0 SCHED. 40 HANDRAIL & 988&62 POSTS W/ COPED AND MITERED JOINTS (TYP) CD 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 OFFICE: 303.932.9974 20 . I 39 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6 REMOVE (E) ROOFING @ NEW BASEPLATES. RE: 3/A4.00 FOR NEW FLASHING (TYP) - (E) ROOFING (VARIES) 24 24 I I DETAILS SASEPLATE RE 2JA4.10 CE) 8 1/2" CONC. TOPPING A4.10 1-GUARDRAILDETAIL 1" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU ./ ANTENNAS . ' FIBER I POWER/GROUNDING ' HYBRID & COAX CABLES I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION verizon' POWER SYSTEM L GE INFINITY NE-M VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES SYSTEM: 27.24V, 329A 3131 S VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 SUB SYS: 52.OV, 40.3A (6) RECTIFIERS AC/24V, 100A PROJECT INFORMATION (8) RECTIFIERS DC/48V, 30A SITE NAME C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS SITE I D 263 315 E. DEAN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 2 TON - - (2) SPACES NC AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME ST. REGIS - ASPEN SITE I.D 332094 CONSULTANT A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN - BATTERIES - - - MARATHON M12V155FT (12) BATTERIES TOTAL INSTALL DATE: 08/02/10 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP til 13 9~ekE2 BATTERY & RECTIFIER NOTES: 1. ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY COMPARTMENT 2. ALL ITEMS ARE EXISTING U.N.O. 2 - HAZMAT RACK ELEVATION 3/4" = 1'-0" LL . 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 Y 'M I OFFICEÂ· 303.932.9974 F C 3-7. FIRE EXTINGUISHER ' ' 1----*HAZMAT SIGNAG -- ~241 - C / 1, 2 ** 1 FIRST AID NOT FOR /1 1 1 2,= -tÂ·I i , i , 1 M MSDS CONSTRUCTION ,..4 1 4 1 Vt:' EXHAUST FAN HAZMAT RACK ELEVATION A5.00 1 - HAZMAT RACK PHOTOS PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU Â«'77'* ANTENNAS 1 POWER/GROUNDING 1 HYBRID & COAX CABLES I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 1 verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 500 J-BOX El AURORA, CO 80014 \--tk SUPERLINK [U PROJECT INFORMATION j): SITE NAME SMOKE DETECTOR (01 C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS +24 TO 48VDC - CABLE MNGR. SITE I.D. LIGHTNING EDGE 263 ADC FMT 315 E DEAN ST. EAMI ASPEN, CO 81611 - AWS BBU 2 TON AMERICAN TOWER CORP. ADD BCEM CARDS RIC TOWER SITE NAME AS REQUIRED CABLE MNGR. ST. REGIS - ASPEN ALARM BLOCK (TYP) - ROUTER SITE I.D CABLEMNGR. 332094 - CONSULTANT RACK OVP Wi (6) WIRED FIS CPRI - INTERFACE - - - FIBER DUCT (TYP) - - - A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN RACK OVP W/ (6) Â· S S S'jiSis SPAREal --- INSTALL PCS TECHNOLOGY ~ L CADEFORijM- - - - MOVE (E) CABLE MNGR UP TO MAKE ROOM --- FOR NEW ALU BBU & FINGER TRAY IN AVAILABLE SPARE SLOTS - - - (TYP EA. OVP) - - - NEW ALU BBU CABLE MNGR. - - _ NEW FINGER TRAY BASE 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP COAX ENTRY 94--0(0(0(0 1 13 NOTES: 92&62 FIBER, TELCO, & FILTER 1. ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY COMPARTMENT 2. ALL ITEMS ARE EXISTING U.N.O. 3. COLOR IS DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY 2 - RACK ELEVATION 3/4" = 1'-0" LL ........ I U 2{~ ~I~~ ~â€¢* ~1] 24 = . 4- 1 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 . LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 ' OFFICEÂ· 303 932 9974 . 4 9 06* 1 f I .1. NOT FOR ) # 4 4 *7.9 14 4 .' 1. mal ars --.//4 CONSTRUCTION I . .1 F . 'f t.- .i I * 0 4 . 1 4 1 Raycap 2Â«4 . , IC - :i. , , /U 49 9 RACK ELEVATIONS 4 00: 1 1 L 9 4 I ' 4:44 0 le â„¢iMMI,-pt 44 1 2 Jiff i -1Â» . A5.10 ale \~ * 3*L 0 1 - EQUIPMENT RACK PHOTOS PENETRATIONS ' RRH/BBU ANTENNAS 1 POWER/GROUNDING 1 HYBRID & COAX CABLES 1 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION KEY NOTES: 1. COPPER GROUND BAR OR APPROVED EQUAL, 1/4" x 4" X 12".HOLE TYPICAL ANTENNA SECTOR ~ verizoni GROUNDING NOTES: CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION. 2. SPACERS AS REQUIRED 1. REFER TO VERIZON WIRELESS GROUNDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL 3.5/8" LOCKWASHERS ONLY NEEDED WHEN YOU ARE VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 4. WALL MOUNTING BRACKET - 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS. INSTALLING A NEW GROUND BAR RRI I INTERNAL- 2. BOND AND GROUND ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL, CONCRETE 5. 5/8" -11 H.H.C.S. BOLTS (VERIFY LENGTH) AURORA, CO 80014 GROUNDING KIT PER REINFORCING AND OTHER METALLIC BUILDING ELEMENTS, REFER TO VERIZON 6. USE TAMPER RESISTANT MOUNTING HARDWARE SPECS. (TYP) SITE NAME t MANUFACTURER PROJECT INFORMATION WIRELESS SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL BONDING AND GROUNDING .- 0 OVP TO THE SITE'S OUTER GROUNDING SYSTEM DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE 5--1 z CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS OFTHE BUILDING. - ~ 2 5 4. CONTRACTOR IS TO CONDUCT FREQUENT INSPECTIONS DURING THE O - GROUND OVP METAL SITE I D CONSTRUCTION PHASE TO ENSURE THAT ALL GROUNDING ARRANGEMENTS ARE 4 2 MOUNTING STAND W/ 263 0 MADE ACCORDING TO THE GROUNDING DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. WEATHERPROOF KIT 315 E. DEAN ST. 5. DO NOT RETROFIT (OR UPGRADE) ESTABLISHED SITES THAT DO NOT MEET ALL -f (TYP) ASPEN1 CO 81611 THE REQUIREMENTS OF VERIZON WIRELESS GROUNDING STANDARD UNLESS AMERICAN TOWER CORP. @ THERE ARE DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF EQUIPMENT DAMAGES AND/OR O 0 ~- PIPE GROUND CLAMP TOWER SITE NAME SERVICE AFFECTING CONDITIONS, 000 6. USE ONLY VERIZON WIRELESS-APPROVED MATERIALS SUCH AS COPPER FOR ~~k~kz~ah oO00O0oO o oo #6 THWN GREEN ONLY NEEDED FOR NEW ST. REGIS - ASPEN MOST ELECTRICAL WORK AND ALUMINUM FOR CERTAIN APPLICATIONS FOR SITE GROUNDING SYSTEM, ELECTRICAL PROTECTION COMPONENTS AND AC WIRING. ~19) 00 0000 INSULATED INTERIOR EQUIPMENT O SITE I.D. 0 7. USE THE SAME METAL THROUGHOUT THE GROUND SYSTEM WHEN POSSIBLE. ~ RACKS - 7 332094 8. IF DIFFERENT METALS MUST BE CONNECTED, BOND THEM BY EXOTHERMICALLY 1 #*P02O0 CONSULTANT BATTERY RACK - 1 WELDING THEM TOGETHER. 9. USE TINNED COPPER WHEN CONNECTING TO GALVANIZED STEEL. '4: O./ 10. DO NOT BOND COPPER AND ALUMINUM TOGETHER UNLESS USING 1 EQUIPMENT RACK SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED EXOTHERMIC MATERIALS DESIGNED FOR THIS APPLICATION ARE USED OR A BIMETALLIC TRANSITIONAL CONNECTION IS UTILIZED. 6 GROUND EQUIPMENT RACK tn_â€ž 1 11. MAKE ALL BONDING ATTACHMENTS TO CLEAN, UNPAINTED METAL SURFACES OR OR BATTERY CONNECTION USE APPROVED PAINT PIERCING WASHERS. 12. PAINTED SURFACES MUST BE SCRAPED, CLEANED, AND LIGHTLY COATED WITH A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN THE APPLICABLE COMPOUND. #6 THWN GREEN O 0 13. ALL INDOOR OR OUTDOOR POWER OR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE NOTE: INSULATED PROTECTED AGAINST CORROSION BY USE OF A THIN COATING OF ANTI- THE DISTANCE BETWEEN COAXIAL CABLE SHIELD CIGBE BARS SHALL OXIDATION COMPOUND. A COPPER COSMOLINE GREASE BASED COMPOUND (NO NOT EXCEED 100'. THIS MAY REQUIRE BONDING AT THE TOP, BOTTOM --SECTOR GROUND BAR OX-ID) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COPPER TO COPPER CONNECTIONS. A ZINC AND TWO LOCATIONS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TOWER FOR TALLER ,--/ RE: 3/A6.00 BASED (GREY COLORED) COMPOUND SHALL BE USED ON ALL COPPER TO STEEL TOWERS. EACH RF CABLE SHIELD SHALL BE BONDED AT A MINIMUM OF .........Wo 00000000000 CONNECTIONS. WHERE OTHER COMPOUNDS SUCH AS KOPPER-SHIELD ETC TWO (2) POINTS ON THE TOWER (TOP AND BOTTOM). Â° GROUND BAR AT Â° EXIST, THEY MAY BE'GRANDFATHERED' IN PLACE. PENTROX GREASE OR AN ~~~~~~~~~~~ INTERIOR OF EQUIPMENT \100000010 APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE USED ON ALUMINUM CONNECTIONS. SHELTER 14. DO NOT WELD GROUNDING CONDUCTORS TO THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF 3 - GROUND BAR DETAIL RE: 2, & 3/A6.00 TOWERS, INCLUDING DOWN GUYS AND ANCHOR RODS. (3~ #2 AWG SOLID BTCW (TYP) - 15. BOND ALL METALLIC OBJECTS (SUCH AS WATER PIPES, CONDUITS, METAL FUEL 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP TANKS WITHOUT CATHODIC PROTECTION, METAL FENCES, HVAC, ETC.) THAT c~*- MIN. 16 AWG GROUND BAR AT EXTERIOR n ARE WITHIN 6 FEET (1.8 M) OF THE GROUND RING, OR FROM ANY OTHER GROUNDED CONDUCTOR, TO GROUND RING OR TO THE GROUNDED MIN. #6 AWG STRANDED --~ STRANDED OF EQUIPMENT SHELTER \,~ CONDUCTOR. HARDWARE GREEN COPPER GREEN COPPER ~~ RE: 2,3/A6.00 16. ALL OUTDOOR HARDWARE (BOLTS, SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS) SHALL BE 18-8 CONDUCTORS TO EACH CONDUCTOR TO 0/0000000/0 00000000000 STAINLESS STEEL TYPE GRADE. INDOORS, GRADE 5 STEEL HARDWARE MAY BE EQUIPMENT RACK (TYP \~-~ INTERIOR HALO . nooloooloon I ~000000000~ 0 0 USED. CHOOSE BOLT LENGTH TO ALLOW THE EXPOSURE OF AT LEAST TWO (2) LEADS PER CABINET - THREADS. 988kp 17. WHEN BONDING TO A METALLIC OBJECT WHERE ACCESS IS LIMITED TO ONLY L GROUND BAR AT ONE SURFACE, USE DRILLING & TAPPING OR SELF DRILLING SCREWS. DO NOT BASE OF TOWER USE SHEET METAL SCREWS. OR POLE 18. ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHOULD PRESERVE A DOWNWARD TO RE: 2, & 3/A6.00 GROUND BAR AT - HORIZONTAL COURSE AND BE AS STRAIGHT AS POSSIBLE AND AVOID SHARP EXTERIOR OF o OU0 0000 0090 0 #2 AWG -- TURNS. o SOLID BTCW 2 SHELTER 90000000009 19 DO NOT USE U-SHAPED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR RUNS (U-TURNS IN THE ONLY NEEDED (TYP) WIRING) OR BONDING LAYOUTS TO REDUCE ARC-OVERS WHEN YOU ARE 20. ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTS MUST BE RUN IN NONMETALLIC CONDUIT. ROUTE INSTALLING NEW p- -1 T. -1.-= U ={1:1. 1 ....1,24 = ALL CONDUCTORS THROUGH NONMETALLIC SLEEVES WHEN PENETRATING EQUIPMENT RACK < 5935 SOUTH ZANG STR SUITE 280 FLOORS, CEILINGS, AND WALLS. OR CABINET -- UNDERGROUND GROUND ~ LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 21. IF THE USE OF METALLIC CONDUIT CANNOT BE AVOIDED, BOND BOTH ENDS OF OFFICE: 303.932 9974 RING THE CONDUIT TO THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR BEING ROUTED THROUGH THE MIN. #2 AWG -~ CONDUIT 22. KEEP LENGTHS OF CONDUCTORS TO A MINIMUM SOLID BTCW ~ 23. USE MULTIPLE CONDUCTING PATHS. PARALLEL PATHS ARE ONLY DESIRABLE GROUND WHEN SENSITIVE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IS NOT PART OF THE CONDUCTOR NOTES RING PATH 24. KEEP BENDS IN CONDUCTORS TO A MINIMUM. 1. VERIFY EXISTING INTERIOR GROUNDING IS SUFFICIENT FOR NEW EQUIPMENT 25. THE MINIMUM INSIDE BENDING RADIUS IS: INSTALLATION AND GROUND ALL NEW INSTALLED EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY NOT FOR A. 6 INCHES (0.15M) FOR CONDUCTORS UP TO #6 GAUGE. VERIZON WIRELESS STANDARDS L J B. 12 INCHES (0.3M) FOR CONDUCTORS #6 TO #4/0 GAUGE. 2. CONNECT THE EQUIPMENT FRAMES TO THE MGB/FGB, USING A MINIMUM OF #6 AWG C. 24 INCHES (0.6M) FOR CONDUCTORS #4/0 GAUGE AND LARGER STRANDED COPPER, GREEN-INSULATED CONDUCTOR. TO ASSURE A GOOD CONSTRUCTION 26. GROUND CONDUCTORS MUST NEVER BE ENCIRCLED WITH FERROUS METAL CONNECTION AT THE FRAME, CLEAN THE CONNECTION POINT ON THE FRAME TO BARE << , CLAMPS, PLACED THROUGH METAL WALLS, METAL PLATES, OR SHORT METAL, APPLY AN ANTI-OXIDATION COMPOUND, AND CONNECT USING A TWO-HOLE, SECTIONS OF METAL CONDUIT, AND MUST NEVER BE PLACE IN THE SAME CABLE LONG-BARREL COMPRESSION LUG. SOME EXISTING SITES MAY BE USING SINGLE HOLE ------- ------ ------ RACK AS DC POWER CABLES, HIGH FREQUENCY CABLES, ETC. LUGS FOR THESE PURPOSES. THESE CONNECTIONS SHOULD NOT BE REPLACED "IF" 27. WHEN ATTACHING PVC CONDUITS TO ANY SURFACE UTILIZE NONCONDUCTIVE THE RUNS ARE TO SHORT AND THERE IS NO LIKELIHOOD OF MECHANICAL STRESS ON FASTENERS OR NONFERROUS FASTENERS ONLY. THE CABLE THAT WOULD LOOSEN THESE CONNECTIONS. 28. IF CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS AND STEEL OBJECTS 3. DC DISTRIBUTION PANELS, CHASSIS, BATTERY RACKS, FRAMES AND CHASSIS OF MUST BE MADE, TINNED LUGS AND PENTROX SHALL BE USED. WHERE THERE RECTIFIERS AND RECTIFIERS SHOULD BE BONDED DIRECTLY TO THE MGB/FGB. WHEN I COMPRESSION TYPE NOTE: ARE CONCERNS THAT THE PENTROX MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE UTILIZING AN INTEGFU\TED DC/DC CONVERTER SYSTEM, THE 48-VOLT RETURN CONNECTION GROUNDING SCHEMATIC IS DIAGRAMMATIC INTERFACING, THEN A BIMETAL SPLICE BETWEEN THE ALUMINUM CONDUCTOR DISTRIBUTION BAR SHALL BE BONDED TO THE 24-VOLT RETURN DISTRIBUTION BAR AND DOES NOT REFLECT ACTUAL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING AND A SHORT LENGTH OF COPPER CONDUCTOR MAY BE USED. WITH A MINIMUM CONDUCTOR SIZE OF A #2, STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTOR, IN A I EXOTHERMIC WELD LAYOUT ORIENTATION. REFER TO PLANS FOR SCHEMATIC 29. ALL OF THE BONDING AND GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SPECIFIED FOR ROOFTOP WIRELESS SHELTER WITH A DEDICATED 48-VOLT PLANT, THE 48-VOLT RETURN DIRECTION. CELL AND MICROWAVE SYSTEMS IS BARE WIRE. INSULATED WIRE SHALL NOT BE DISTRIBUTION BAR SHALL BE BONDED TO THE MGB. ALL BATTERY FRAMES SHALL BE SPECIFIED OR SUBSTITUTED FOR THE BONDING AND GROUNDING CONDUCTORS BONDED TO THE MGB WITH A #6 GREEN THWN INSULATED CONDUCTOR. (ONLY OF ROOFTOP INSTALLATIONS. APPLICABLE WHEN MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO THE BATTERY OR POWER PLANT.) 4. VERIFY (E) SYSTEM IS PER ATTACHED NOTES AND DETAILS AND IF NOT NOTIFY P.M. FOR REQUIRED UPGRADES. A6.00 4 - GROUNDING NOTES 2-INTERIOR GROUNDING 1 -GROUNDING SCHEMATIC PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU lit*81*90*31 ANTENNAS POWER/GROUNDINGI HYBRID & COAX CABLESI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION' SPECIAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FIBERGLASS FRAMING SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES FRAMING MEMBERS 1. ALL FIBERGLASS SHAPES (WIDE FLANGE, TUBE, CHANNEL, AND INSPECTIONS TESTING 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 ANGLES) SHALL BE STRONGWELL EXTREN 500 SERIES. 1. This structure has been designed using the 2009 International AURORA, CO 80014 2. TYPICAL MEMBER (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) : TUBES 3x3xl/4, Building Code. Loading used in the design are as follows: STRUCTURAL STEEL Y/N STRUCTURAL STEEL Y/N ANGLES 3x3xl/4 Snow Loads PROJECT INFORMATION Visual insp. of material and member installation Y Non-Destructive Weld testing NA 3. ALL MEMBER TO MEMBER CONNECTIONS TO BE BONDED AND Ground Snow Load, Pg.... ...30 psf SITE NAME BOLTED. Flat Roof Snow Load, Pf....... .30 psf Visual Insp. of bolts Y Bolt Pre-Tension testing N/A Snow Exposure Factor, Ce... ...1 C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS Visual insp. of welds NA Shear Stud Hammer test NA Snow Importance Factor, Is.......1 SITE I.D. Thermal Factor, Ct... .1 Visual insp. of shear studs NA CONCRETE FIBERGLASS SHEETS 1. ALL FIBERGLASS SHEETS SHALL BE STRONGWELL EXTREN 500 W ind Loads 263 SERIES, 3/16" THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 315 E. DEAN ST. Basic Wind Speed, Vasd... .120 mph ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCRETE Slump Test Y 2, ALL SHEETS ARE TO BE BONDED AND FASTENER CONNECTED Vult............150 mph AMERICAN TOWER CORP. Visual insp. of steel placement Y Air Entrainment N Occupancy Category... .11 TO FACING MEMBER. SEE PLANS FOR FASTENING. 3. A 1" EDGE DISTANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR MECHANICAL Visual insp. of embedded bolts and plates Y Temperature Y FASTENERS. Wind Importance Factor, Iw.......1 TOWER SITE NAME Exposure.........................B Verify mix design Y Compression Strength Y ST. REGIS - ASPEN FIBERGLASS BOLTS 1, ALL FIBERGLASS BOLTS SHALL BE STRONGWELL FIBERBOLT. Components and Cladding (Walls)..25psf Visual insp. of placement methods Y Post Tension Elongation NA SEE DETAILS FOR SIZE. SITEID 2, Structural Tests and Special Inspections CONCRETE MASONRY 2. REQUIRED TORQUE ON BOLTS AS FOLLOWS: 3/8" = 4ft-lbs a) Special Inspections are required in accordance 332094 Visual insp. of block installation Y Grout Test N to IBC Section 1704 and tables: 1/2" = 8 ft-lbs 1704.3....Steel Construction CONSULTANT Visual insp, of steel reinforcing placement Y Mortar Test N 5/8" = 16 ft-lbs b) Contractor shall coordinate with the Owner the OTEGUISTRUCTURAL 3/4" = 24 ft-LBS Visual insp. of grout placement Y Prism Test N 3. DO NOT OVER TORQUE BOLTS. hiring of an appropriate testing agency to SERVICES, LLC Visual insp. of bolt and plate embedment Y 4. ALL BOLTS TO HAVE FIBERGLASS WASHERS EACH SIDE. perform Special Inspections. P.O. BOX 620341 5. ALL FIBERGLASS BOLTS TO HAVE STEEL WASHERS WHEN c) Quality Assurance for Wind Requirements: LITTLETON,CO 80162 FIBERGLASS Contractor shall abide by the quality assurance PHONE: 720.981.5333 CONNECTING TO STEEL MEMBERS. plan for wind force resisting systems as defined FAX 720.922.7935 Visual framing inspection Y 6. SPOIL BOLT THREADS, OR OTHERWISE MAKE BOLTS in IBC Section 1706. INCAPABLE OF BEING REMOVED AFTER PROPER Visual shear wall inspection Y A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN INSTALLATION. Visual epoxy inspection if epoxy in field Y 3. Structural Steel GENERAL PROVISION 1. NO MATERIAL, CONNECTION, FRAMING SIZE, DETAIL CHANGES a) Steel construction, fabrication, and erection shall comply NOTES: OR SUBSTITUTIONS ARE ALLOWED WITHOUT WRITTEN with the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 1. Special Inspections and Site Observations shall comply with section 1704 of the CONSENT FROM BOTH PROJECT ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER "Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings", International Building Code and tables 1704.3, 1704.4, 1704.511704.5.3 as they apply OF RECORD. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY REQUIRE RE- "RCSC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 2. Contractor shall coordinate with the Owner to hire a special inspection and testing INSTALLATION AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. or A490 Bolts", and "Code of Standard Practice for Steel - agency. Contractor shall contact testing and inspection agency as often as required to 2. ALL FIBERGLASS CONNECTIONS (PLATES OR FRAMING) ARE Buildings and Bridges". meet the above inspection requirements. TO BE COMBINATION ADHESIVE BONDING AND MECHANICAL b) Carbon Materials shall conform to: 3. RE: ACI 318 Section 5.6.2 for frequency of Concrete Testing FASTENERS. FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS FROM STRONGWELL 1)Pipes........... . A35,35 ksi SECTION 19 "FABRICATION" FOR FASTENERS AND BONDING. IF 2) HSS Round. A500-B, 42 ksi A CONFLICT ARISES BETWEEN THESE INSTRUCTIONS AND 3) HSS Square or Rectangle.......... A500-B, 46 ksi 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP DETAIL ON THESE DOCUMENTS, CONTACT ARCHITECT 4) Wide Flange Shapes and Tees.............. A992,50 ksi ABBREVIATIONS IMMEDIATELY. 5) S, M, and HP Shapes, Tees, and Channels.. A572,50 ksi 3. FIELD BONDING IS NOT PERMITTED. 6) Angles, Plates and All Others............ A36,36 ksi A.B. ANCHOR BOLTS 4. THIRD PARTY INSPECTION OF ALL FRAMING TO BE DONE AT c) Welding Materials: Conform to AWS Code and AWS Filler Metal ARCH. ARCHITECT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, AND A COPY OF REPORT TO Specifications. Select materials which are suitable for use BOT. BOTTOM BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT. with types of steel to be joined. Unless otherwise indicated, BRG. BEARING 5. IF ANY PART OF THE FRAMING IS DAMAGED, CONSULT WITH connections are designed for 3/16" all around E70XX electrode. C.J. CONTROL JOINT THE "FABRICATION AND REPAIR MANUAL" BY STRONGWELL d) Fasteners: ..1 . - -. r- t. CONC. CONCRETE FOR A SUGGESTED REPAIR, THEN CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR 1) High Strength Bolts and Hardened Was hers: CONT. CONTINUOUS WRITTEN DIRECTION. ASTM A325 3/4" minimum diameter. 2) Anchor Bolts: ASTM A307. ~1 cur\LY DWN. DOWN 3) Shear studs: ASTM A 108, Grade 1015 through 1020, (E) EXISTING headed-stud type, cold-finished carbon steel, ELEV. ELEVATION AWS Dll Type B. E.O.S. EDGE OF SLAB 4. Coordination EXT. EXTERIOR a) All dimensions shall be coordinated with the architect. G.L. GLUE LAM b) Any conflicts with other trades shall be brought to the HORIZ. HORIZONTAL attention of the Architect Immediately. 51 2{01:1.......1,4 = JST. JOIST c) If any existing conditions are not as assumed on these drawings, 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 MAX. MAXIMUM contact Otegui Structural Services, LLC immediatley. LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 MIN. MINIMUM 5. Means and Methods OFFICEÂ· 303 932.9974 OC. ON CENTER a) These drawings do not provide necessary components for construction PL PLATE safety. RE: REFER TO b) All temporary bracing and shoring shall be designed and provided REINF. REINFORCING by others. SIM. SIMILAR 6. Shop Drawings T.O. TOP OF a) Shop drawings shall be prepared by fabricator. Copying these T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL documents for use as shop drawings are not permitted. TYP. TYPICAL b) Shop Drawing shall be submitted to Contractor for review. NOT FOR U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Contractor to submit those drawings to architect for reviw and comments, then those reviewed drawings are to be submitted to Engineer. CONSTRUCTION VERT. VERTICAL w/ WITH 11/2-7 â€ž 11/2\ 2" W/O WITH OUT A 62 , h '1 ' ,/\ f '' 1-- _LL 0 914 SHEARTAB BEAM CONNECTION W8, W10 SHEAR TAB BEA --4 rn USE (2) L3-1/2x3-1/2xl/4x0'-9" WITH (3) 3/4" 4- 9 CONNECTION. USE (2) DIA. BOLTS OR 3/16" FILLET WELD ALL h 6 L3-1/2*3-1/2*1/4~0'-6" WITH (2) 3/4"DIA. STRUCTURAL & h AROUND. -\- < 2 BOLTS OR 3/16"FILLETWELDALL -t AROUND. INSPECTION NOTES TYPICAL SHEAR TAB DETAIL NOTES: 1) ALL PLATES AND ANGLES ARE A36 2) ALL BOLTS ARE 3/4"DIA. A325 3) ALL WELDING IS E70XX Sl.00 4) BOLTING AND WELDING ARE INTERCHANGEABLE U.O.N. 5) DETAILED CONNECTIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THESE DETAILS 0 0 verizon' 9" 30' - 9" VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES .. 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 .. AURORA, CO 80014 2'-11" 23' - 8" 2'-11" PROJECT INFORMATION D .4 , I SITE NAME ' ' ' ' ' ' C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 6' - 101/2" 4' - 8" 5' - 3" 3' - 2" 3' - 81/2" . I . . . . (TYP) SITE I D 263 315 E. DEAN ST - ASPEN, CO 81611 - I V... - Â® AMERICAN TOWER CORP. h TOWER SITE NAME BASE PLATE RE: 5/S4.00 (TYP) N ST. REGIS - ASPEN W8x10 -1 .W 1 4 : I. SITE I. D -n-'; L 332094 CONSULTANT n .9 OTEGUISTRUCTURAL 6/1 o SERVICES, LLC 655/ P.O. BOX 620341 LITTLETON,CO 80162 4./ <AP PHONE: 720.981.5333 1 %457 , %#fbea ~ 0 ~ FAX: 720.922.7935 1 2// A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN / 2 - b ' 2-3/8-0 SCHED. 40 GALV. 2 6 ATTACHED T&B TO L W/ 1/2" 0- â„¢ - I U-BOLTS (TYP) w 0 1 1 1 37 MITER ENDS FOR F.G. SCREEN d - #5 @ 12" BOT m 1St REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP h ABOVE, TACK WELD TOW.F. C EACH WAY . D (TYP) W8x10 . J- - Bii] .0----S, - -o. co -----,1--- . 1 1Â® 1 2 - O O 1,21-1 1 NEW 42"H STL. GUARDRAIL ~ & & RE: ARCH R (E) OSHA APPROVED - R \ SAFETY ANCHOR 2 (E) BUILDING PARAPET @8 - (E) 8 1/2" 0 1 REINFORCE CONC. - : 3.0 41 2{01:1.1 =Ill.11 1 = I- 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 37 OFFICE- 303.932 9974 6" L4x4xl/4" x 19'-7 1/2" +f- I ~54Â£5> U U U U //'0~, = % /4,4 1 /A 0 *Â« SHEAR TAB RE: Sl.00 (TYP) CeÂ» LO N i NOT FOR 5' - 10" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 5'-10" CONSTRUCTION '' h W8*10 ~/ ... 1 ./ \ 1 N - Â® 1 1 Z SCREEN FRAMING PLAN (LOW) NOTE: ALE-ITEMS NCTED ARE NEW U.N.O S2.00 2 - FRAMING PLAN (LOW) 1/4" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONS' RRH/BBU gge'% ~ a ANTENNAS I FIBERI POWEIVGROUNDINGI HYBRID & COAX CABLES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION I 6' - 101/2" 11'-71/2" 1,2 - 181 (TYP) a. 0 ED verizon' VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 24' - 0" , , SITE ID. Â¥ e FIBERGLASS 263 2' - 8" (7) SPACES @ 2'-8" O.C. = 18' - 8" 2' - 8" , , , , 315 E. DEAN ST, ' ' ' ' ASPEN, CO 81611 - - - - - - - - ~ AMERICAN TOWER CORP. TOWER SITE NAME ST. REGIS - ASPEN - W.F. BELOW RE: S2.10 0 1, . 11 0. 11 I . 11 0 11 0 11. 0 11 0 1 1 61 % 0 SITE I.D 332094 F.G. 3/16" PL SHTG. FULLY - ' W8x10 1 $ m BONDED AND SCREWED TO ~~-~-Â·h.~ CO POSTS RE 2/S4 00 N OTEGUI STRUCTURAL N\<40 1 CONSULTANT 121 ~ SERVICES, LLC li 9, 05>/ - % P.O. BOX 620341 - I 0 04 LITTLETON,CO 80162 PHONE: 720.981.5333 FAX: 720.922.7935 4't/5/ Â»o# 1 0347 0 A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN F.G. L3xk3/16" W/ 5/8"0 THRU- - - *li BOLTS @ EA. END (TYP) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS *1: & EQUIPMENT RE: ARCH CONT. HSS 3x3x3/16" SILL ATTACHED TO W.F. BELOW W/ | L4*4xl/4" T&B, WELD BOTTOM L TO 5/8"0 THRU BOLT @ 32" O.C. W.F. & BOLT TOP L TO HSS TOP PLATE EA. END REÂ· $3.00 9 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP MAX RE: 5/S5.00 0 23 I DE . BOLT L4x4*1/4" TO F.G. 0 0 FRAMING EA. END T&8 ' 0 0 I. ---------4 O 0 N Qy H N Lu 6 3. m -R 9 - e E F. LE) 2 988&0 CO REMOVABLE ACCESS - 1 NO BLOCKING MEMBER ~ PANEL MID HEIGHT THIS PANEL 2-3/8"0 SCHED. 40 GALV. ATTACHED - - T&8 TO L W/ 1/2" U-BOLTS (TYP) 1 30 - o U."1:1.....11 24= - 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 F.G. 3)3x3/16" FRAMING TOP, | -li 5/8"0 THRU-BOLT TO HIGH 1 8* Â» J OFFICE: 303.932.9974 CENTER, AND BOTTOM (TYP) AND LOW DIAG. L (TYP OF 6) 0 1 aw Ne /-j4 0 0 F.G.3*3xl/4" POST (TYP) #4 17* 0 : NOT FOR ul- \\ - TYP /5/<9:' e 0 4 \/ 1 a I // 2 1 CONSTRUCTION Ec> hi BOLT F.G. PANEL CORNER W 8x10 o POSTS W/ 5/8"0 FG THRU- m - 11 0 0 11 0 11 6 11 0 .1 00 11 0 11 0 : \ BOLTS, T&C (TYP) /NYP I 419 S4.00 LL 0 TYP ----- ---~ SCREEN FRAMING PLAN (HIGH) + S2.10 1 - SCREEN FRAMING PLAN (HIGH) 1/4" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONSI RRH/BBU lifilp"rm' ANTENNAS FIBERI POWER/GROUNDINGI HYBRID & COAX CABLES I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION E 0011 . verizoni VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 AURORA, CO 80014 PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NAME C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS SITE I D 263 6 315 E. DEAN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 - HSS 3*3x3/16" Â© kn BOLT L TO TOP W/ 5/8"0 - AMERICAN TOWER CORP. A - r =fr THRU BOLT _ TOWER SITE NAME T.O. FG SCREENS ~ I O/7 Il Il || Il 79' - 10" ST. REGIS - ASPEN CIL E-3 / LJ 11 z Â·En L-- FULLY BONDED F.G. TRIM STE ID L4x4xl/411 (TYP T&8) / 1 Il / 332094 BOLT TO ANGLE W/ - 1 -3 0 kn 1/2"0 U-BOLTS | ~J VERIZON WIRELESS CONSULTANT ANTENNA ATTACHED TO OTEGUISTRUCTURAL 2,1-1 1 - - - MOUNT PIPE RE: ARCH. SERVICES, LLC i LJ ~ P.O. BOX 620341 LITTLETON,CO 80162 | 2-3/8"0 SCHED. 40 GALV. | | PHONE: 720.981.5333 FAX: 720.922.7935 PIPE MOUNT (TYP OF 12) VERIZON VaELESS RAD. CENTER AD | | |-7 761 -2. Cl/ A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r--1 1 1 | -- | E----1 | VERIZON WIRELESS- 1 1 L_2 Â© ~-7 '1 1.-1 4- BLOCK EA. BAY RE: 5/S5.00 ~ ~ ~ EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO -4 11 1 ~ ~ MOUNT PIPE RE: ARCH. 1 \\1 F.G. 3X3X1/4" MID-SPAN L- 1 - 1 l_ J 1 1 L -1 L _-1 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 42",-1 OSHA GUARD FAILING RE.' ARCH. F.G. SHEATHING ATTACHED TO FRAME RE: 2/S4.00 ~hTYP 3-\ TYP - CONT. HSS 3x3x3/16' SILL L4x4xl/4", TACK WELD EA. END - ATTACHED TO W.F. BELOW w/ | | / S4 00 S4.00 O 97 ANTENNA U | 1 1 \\\\\ 5/8"0 THRU BOLT @ 32" O.C. MAX 5/8"0 THRU-BOLT DIAG. L TO - .- HSS 3.5"0Â£.25" STUB COL. LJELJ LJ Nt== eli - (TYP) T.O. STEEL ~ 69' - 10" O1 L.Ul\L I W8x10 W/ SHEAR TAB RE: Sl.00 W8x10 (BEYOND) RE: PLAN T.O. PENTHOUSE - ~/WELD PIPE (E) ROOFING (VARIES) |/3/16"\DIRECTLY TO W.F. 1 69' - 0" T- - 11 -1 T.0. CONCRETE SLAB ~ 68'- 1" 41=708:I'I=[Ilill:4= n 1 4 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 (E) CONC. TOPPING LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 ~- CONTRACTOR SHALL VFY. REMOVE (E) ROOFING @ NEW OFFICEÂ· 303.932,9974 DEPTH OF ROOF INSULATION BASEPLATES. RE: ARCH. FOR PRIOR TO FABRICATION & NEW FLASHING (TYP) NOTIFY ARCHITECT (MIN. 8" FLASHING @ EA. STUB COLUMN) BASE PLATE RE: 1/S4.00 (C) BUILDING WALL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ANTENNA SCREEN SECTION NOTE: RE S4.00 FOR FRAMING CONNECTION DETAILS S3.00 1 -SCREEN SECTION 3/8" = 1'-0" maNI . I FULLY BONDED F.G. TRIM PAINT verizon' TO MATCH (E) BUILDING PARAPET FG L3-1/2x3-1/2x3/16 FULLY VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES FLASHING COLOR - 1/4" X 4" ROUND HEAD BONDED OR L3-1/2x3-1/2 22GA 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 500 ISOPLAST BOLTS & NUTS, STL TRIM ATTACHED Wl #12 TEK AURORA, CO 80014 ,â‚¬1 # #, " 12Â»- . SCREWS (TYP) PROJECT INFORMATION ~ ROUND HEAD TO OUTSIDE FACE, NUT TO INSIDE FACE, FG 3*3xl/4 POST (TYP) SITE NAME (TORQUE/#12 TEKS TO STL. FG PANEL - FG/HSS 3X3X3/16 2-3/8" X 0'-8" PIPE CO3 ASPEN HIGHLANDS 4 FRAMING) INSERT 11 EDGE (TYP) POST PLaxl/4](0'-6" W/ 13/16"0 - SITE ID HOLES 263 r // // II/g FG/HSS 3X3X3/16 315 E. DEAN ST. HSS 3x3x3/16" ~ / BLOCKING CONT. HSS3x3xl/4 SILL - ASPEN, CO 81611 1"EDGE | 2 U ~EBTANCE (TYP) 44 AMERICAN TOWER CORP. â€ž TOWER SITE NAME 43131: 0 -ILL._~34 9- 00=2Â©10 ST. REGIS - ASPEN 0 0 0-4 SITE I D Ec> i / T 332094 F.G. SHEATHING ATTACHED TO | | - 3/16" EXTREN 500 I FRAME b 4'X8' SHEATHING ON HSS & PIPE\ F 31/101 . FULL SEAL-ANT BED TO SILL / 3/16" CONSULTANT - 11 PER MER'S SPECS ' OTEGUI STRUCTURAL FG 3x3xl/4 POST (TYP) SERVICES, LLC ll P.O. BOX 620341 NOTESi LITTLETON,CO 80162 -, 01 1. CONNECTION ANGLES AND 5/8" BOLT @ 32" O C W/ - PHONE: 720.981.5333 FAX: 720.922.7935 BOLTS NOT SHOWN FOR HARDENED WASHERS 1 1/2" t /2 -Up_ CLARITY. RE: PLAN I 4/ 2. REFER TO STRONGWELL A 10/04/16 CD REVIEW QDN SECTION 19 FABRICATION SPEC. W.F. FRAMING BELOW A I , , PAGE 4/14, SECTION 1, LAST (TYP) %'' PARAGRAPH FOR ADHESIVE APPLICATION SPECS. NOTE: FIBERGLASS TO FIBERGLASS PANEL CONNECTION WILL REQUIRE PIPE INSERTS @ EA. PANEL END 1st REVIEW SSB 2nd REVIEW SGP 6 -FIBERGLASS TRIM DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" 4- SHEATHING CONNECTION DETAIL & ADHESIVE NOTES N.T.S. 2 -CORNER SILL CONNECTION DETAIL - PLAN 11/2" = 1'-0" r-7 rm -Â«r_ FG L3*3xl/4x0'-3" CLIP L W/ 5/8" WHEkEP STRONGWELL FIBERBOLT W/ FG 3x3xl/4 TOP PLATE 1/16 FT.-LB. TORQUE, VINYL WASHERS AND FG NUTS, FULL FU~L~DHESEATEMBNED~~ALCLHFE~OMING T.-24Â«\.11 FULLY BONDED FG BOND TO FRAMING 1' - 0" MEMBERS AND W/ FG 3/8"0 FIBER L3)<3xl/4x0'-3" CLIP L FG 3x3xl/4 BLOCKING - ' ' BOLT AT 12" O.C. RE: PLAN (TYP) 2' 8" 2 - ' ' ' ' 3x3*1/4 POST RE: PLAN ' ' ' - - --- - 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 3x3x3/16 POST RE: PLA 44 ' LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 OFFICEÂ· 303 932.9974 --~1 a {1:1.1 -- 6 2-3/8" X O'-8" PIPE INSERT - - -9 0 0 \ N HSS 3x0.25" PIPE COL - PL3xl/4)<0'-6" W/- 5/8"0 STRONGWELL FIBERBOLT - - FG 3x3xl/4 POST 13/16"0 HOLES W/ 16 FT.-LB. TORQUE, VINYL ITYPh b HSS TOHSS\ WASHERS AND FG NUTS (TYP) /V-P 80 i SILL AT HSS / 3/16" - POSTS (2) 5/8"0 THRU BOLTS Â«4112Â§+E CONSTRUCTION I/3/16" 0 PL3xl/4Â£-6" W/ 11/16"0 HOLES - 1--3 NOT FOR 5/8" THRU BOLT @ 32" O.C. MAX - ,9 A_ 4 2 3/4" THRU BOLT @ 32" O.C. -- â‚¬ 22=3 1 -. 34 - - MAX 1 11 1/2"xi'-0"xl'-0" - . I STL. BASEPLATE ~ 3/16" |/ ~TYP) ' V {-21_ __- 11/16"0 HOLE FOR 5/8"0xl" < CONT. HSS3xkl/4 --~ CONT HSS DETAILS EMBED EXP. ANCHOR SILL 3x3xl/4" SIU- ~ W.F. FRAMING ~ INTO CONCRETE PAVER RE: PLAN W.F. FRAMING REÂ· PLAN 1 S4.00 5 - BASEPLATE DETAIL 11/2" = 1'-0" 3-CORNER SILL CONNECTION DETAIL - ELEVATION 11/2" = 1'-0" 1 - FG CONNECTION DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0" PENETRATIONS 1 RRH/BBU 33%#1~*/m'a/*3y ANTENNAS - FIBERI POWER/GROUNDING HYBRID & COAX CABLES I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION I 11/2~ 3- 1