HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.19961113 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13, 1996
Meeting was called to order by chairman Jake Vickery with Suzannah Reid,
Donnelley Erdman, Sven Alstrom, Mark Onorofski and Roger Mayer present.
Excused were Melanie Roschko and Susan Dodington.
MOTION: Donnelley moved to approve the minutes of Oct. 23rd; second by
Roger. All in favor, motion carried.
MOTION: Roger moved to add 330 Gillespie to the agenda; second by
Mark. All in favor, motion carried.
Jake stated he would like 550 Gillespie (Beck) added to the awards lists for
replacing the siding. The project was exceptional.
706 W. MAIN - VESTED RIGHTS, PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Jake Vickery opened the public hearing.
Sven stepped down from voting.
Assistant Attorney David Hoefer stated that the proof of notice has been
presented to the Clerk' s office and HPC has jurisdiction to proceed.
MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve Reso. /¢3, 1996 granting vested
property rights for three years starting from the date of approval of the site
specific development place for 706 W. Main, August 28, 1996; second by
Donnelley. All in favor, motion carried.
939 E. COOPER UNIT E - EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL
APPROVAL
Jake stepped down.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13~ 1996
MOTION: Roger moved to extend conceptual approval for 939 E. Cooper
Unit E until November 9, 1997; second by Suzannah. All in favor, motion
carried.
330 GILLESPIE - MINOR
Amy stated that the amendment is for a dormer on the north side. It is not a
landmark and HPC reviewed the project two years ago. This is a minor
alteration at the back of the structure. It would be considered partial
demolition but no historic fabric is actually being affected.
Scott Lindeau, architect stated that the proposal is to push out the upper level
to the rear on the north eight feet by twelve feet to make an office for the
owner. The same materials and roofing materials will be incorporated and the
same color. We are allowed 210 sqfl. FAR and this proposed is adding 96
sqfl. The garage on the property is historic.
MOTION: Donnelley moved that the partial demolition and addition at 330
Gillespie be approved as presented by Scott Lindeau today; second by
Roger. All in favor, motion carried.
HPC 1997 GOALS
1. Sven stated that HPC needs coordination with City Council in a meeting
form.
2. Ordinance #30 revision.
3. Public relations. There is a sense in the community for hostility.
4. Legal issue i.e. Iglehart and Kanan. Threshold issues with applicants.
The Building Department implements the action of a contractor.
The HPC implements public policy goals toward fitting into the
community. Just because you submit the same drawings it doesn't
mean the same thing.
5. Adjacent parcel designations.
2
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13~ 1996
6. Designation in Pitkin County.
7. Entrance to Aspen.
8. Small lodge conversion designation. What if a developer came in to do
lodge conversions instead of speck houses. What can the lodge
conversion turn into. We currently do not have any jurisdiction. We
need to talk with Council to find out what goals they want as a
community. Right now we can have lodge conversion next to an
historic house. Small lodges should be addressed as a contextual issue,
character of the neighborhood.
1. Roger also reiterated City Council coordination with ordinance #30. The
(stuccoing of Aspen). The first building is the complex on Cooper and
Spring. The second one completed was the town house East. He feels
this will be a major problem and a danger of it continuing to an overkill
like Grand Junction. Stuccoing would occur to those buildings
constructed in the 40's and 50's. He also stated that maybe stuccoing
could be included in ordinance #30 and that if a building is being
stuccoed only a portion can occur on that building without approval.
Suzannah stated Ord. #30 was trying to be (no-material style).
2. Roger also stated that there was a concern about adjacent property owners.
If you have an historic landmark you jump through hoops but your
neighbor can building the biggest abortion that they want next to the
historic landmark and HPC has nothing to say about it unless the
building they are dealing with is historic.
3. Lack of enforcement. HPC finds a violation and no enforcement can
Occur.
4. A history of HPC should be compiled, maybe hiring an intern next year.
When did it start, what was the philosophy, how the philosophy
changed and a record of gains and losses. Once that is established we
need public education and give a presentation to the different clubs.
This could also be a learning tool for new board members.
5. Donnelley stated that if funding was available a plaque could be made for
every project that came before HPC and that was completed to HPC's
satisfaction. When the Historic Society does their walk the houses
would then be identified.
Amy Amidon stated at the annual awards maybe we should give out plaques
instead of certificates.
3
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13~ 1996
Sven stated since HPC is 20 years old possibly we should do an honor award.
Donnelley stated that if HPC desires to include buildings from the 50's and
we find justification it can be presented to council.
Sven stated another issue would be documenting houses in the county that are
historic.
Sven also stated that contractor license issues should be addressed with
council.
Jake stated that Main Street needs addressed through zoning to support
entrepreneur businesses. Reinforce it as a secondary neighborhood
commercial space. If we loose that this town is in serious trouble as a
viable community. Local people have gone down valley and their
businesses have exited also. Pitkin County opened a satellite office
down valley. He also stated that he would like to see real good zoning
work done to help or change the nature of the office zone to support
neighborhood commercial use and concurrently encourage
development that would enhance and enforce Main Street as a
pedestrian situation. Buses have been incredibly destructive to Main
Street as far as pollution etc. Possibly the train will have a more
calming effect. The entire GMQS for historic properties i.e. exaction's
etc. has incredible impacts on historic structures regarding mass and
scale. Relief needs to be given to historic structures on Main Street.
Roger also stated that he fears Main Street will end up being stucco. Stucco
still has to be painted or coated.
Amy stated that one of the obstacles on Main Street is that the P&Z has not
wanted to see commercial activity continue down Main Street. There
was an application made by the McDonald's to have kids clothing and
add that to the conditional use for landmarks. P&Z said no partially
due to traffic impacts and also that it is our office zone district and if
we turn those into businesses then more office space will go down
valley.
Roger stated that office is moving down valley because the rent is too high.
Aspen has a staggering amount of office space available.
Amy stated that with the new long range planner maybe Main Street can be
looked at.
4
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13~ 1996
Jake stated that a minimum size square footage is needed to make it work.
Suzannah stated that maybe it could become an accessory type of use. A
little grocery store near the Hickory House would be great.
Jake also had a thought of limiting every other cross street so you can't drive
across them. The alternate cross street would then become a dead end.
By doing so you would create little pockets of parking. It would
change the nature of the way the street works. You would then have
clear areas where people could cross the street. As it is now, it is very
dangerous.
Sven stated that a little more retail where streets cross would possibly turn the
town into a more pedestrian friendly area. Possibly a mixed use to
break up the application on Main Street.
Jake stated economically small businesses can survive in the core due to the
rent structure. The SCI zone works. Valuable people have gone from
the area.
Sven stated that with alternative H people are benefited on one diagonal and
not on the other and businesses are concerned.
Sven also stated that he is concerned about alley revitalization.
MOTION: Donnelley moved to adjourn; second by Roger. All in favor,
motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
5
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOV. 13~ 1996
706 W. MAIN - VESTED RIGHTS, PUBLIC HEARING .................................................................... 1
939 E. COOPER UNIT E - EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL ..................................... 1
330 GILLESPIE - MINOR .................................................................................................................... 2
HPC 1997 GOALS ................................................................................................................................. 2
6