The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.331 Midland Ave.0099.2016.ASLU4/ 33 \ Fwk\0 41 AJ-t 1,= 0099.2016.ASLU 331-338 MIDLAND AVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2737 074 05 801 SCA A A-4 A , Sl'-7 2 --f- lx#w 43),10Â£% ''4 â‚¬ le . R ... External Media Located Here M-007758 it M-007759-~ 1 i RMMI PATH: G/DRIVE /ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CaoE DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0099.2016.ASLU PROJECT ADDRESS 331-338 MIDLAND AVE PARCEL ID 2737 074 05 801 PLANNER SARA NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTION AFFORDABLE HOUSING REPRESENTATIVE BENDONADAMS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 02.06.17 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 8.1.17 0044. 00 1 (*SUL 1%/? 4 , 03-4 - DO Do ( - bOE 93%3-- 2 4 - E . yo c Â¤ Permits - 0 X Elle Edit Record Navigate Fnrm Reports Fcrmat Iab Help v * (* 0< '* ./ 4 41 v QI 6 13 25 e- . R 4 B M m *1 1 lump 1 *~* * ~ 0 - 0 0 -Â®2@ 13 â€¢. .99 02:241 I' . Main Custom Fjelds Royting Status Fee Summae Actions Routing History Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # 0099.2016.ASLU Address 331-338 MIDLAND AVE Apt/Suite City ASPEN State ~ CO Zip 81611 Permit Information M aster permit | Â· 8 outing queue aslul 5 Applied 11/1 7/2016 Project Status pending Approved Description ASPEN HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING Issued Closed/Final Submitted BENDON ADAMS clock [Enmngl Days F--61 E xpires |11 /12/2017 Submitted via Owner Last name BOEHRINGER First name BILL 257 PARK AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone {31 0) 963-5007 Addiess Applicant ~ Owner is applicant? El Contractor is applicant? Last name BOEHRINGER Â·Â· First name BILL 257 PAR K AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone [31 0] 963-5007 Cust # 30515 0, Address Email Lender Last name ~ - First name Phone [) - Address AspenG old5 {served nicoleh I 2 01 25 Mb *Ut .f 1 47-01% <fti/1 se:ON Moint] xoqiool sdnoig gel DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Heidi and Patrick Gorbitz (#331 Midland Ave). Jean Delynn (#332 Midland Ave). Drew Goodman (#333 Midland Ave). Matt Grubbs (#334 Midland Ave), Margaret Jane MeGavock Trust (#335 Midland Ave). Alix SamueIson (#336 Midland Ave).337 Midland Ave LLC (#337 Midland Ave). and Sharon Elizabeth Wells (#338 Midland Ave). Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Aspen Hills Subdivision Units A-1 through A-8, commonly known as 331-338 Midland Avenue. Citv of Aspen. Pitkin County, Colorado, PID#'s 273707405801,273707405001.273707405008, 273707405002, 273707405007, 273707405003, 273707405006, 273707405004 and 273707405005. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval to convert two, one-bedroom units into two-bedroom units. and convert all eight. two-bedroom free-market units into affordable housing units in exchange for 18 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit at a Category 3 rate. Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. and Dimensional Variance approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission via Resolution No. 5, Series of 2017 on January 31, 2017. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) February 9.2017 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) February 10.2020 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 6th day of February, 2017, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 1 *40 41 lÂ· bur-Â·t u Jessica Garrow, tfbmmunity Development Director L// 91Â» Al Â· AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 33!-'335 RIAL.4 A+L Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, *Ac* <1~--Â» (name, please print) being or represendng an Applicant to the City eflspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (IE) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V'~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnonce: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. yignature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this C O day of E--e,br 141/-1 , 20(11'by AbÂ«c--y-eteL S- r---2 -- - WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE ~ Of I DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL My commission expires: 9 PÂ© Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Ar'ticle 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- K~ LA Ro-Â£-4 a--44Â©cut- ing to the following described properties: Aspen Hills Subdivision, Units A-1 through A-8, common- Notary Public ly known as 331 - 338 Midland Avenue, City of As- ~ pen, Pitkin County, Colorado, Parcel ID#s 273707405801,273707405001,273707405008, i 273707405002,273707405007,273707405003, 273707405006,273707405004 and , KAREN REED PATTERSON 273707405005. NOTARY PUBLIC Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certifi- ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO cates of Affordable Housing Credit, and Dimen- sional Variance approvals were granted through ~ NOTARY ID #19964002767 Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution #5, Se- ries of 2017, approved on January 31,2017. The changes are depicted in the land use application on COPY OF THE PUBLICATION - My Commission Expires FeBruary 15, 2020 file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Com- munitv Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., As- pen, Â¢olorado, (970) 429-27939. City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on February 9, 2017.(12641598) PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described properties: Aspen Hills Subdivision, Units A-1 through A-8, commonly known as 331 - 338 Midland Avenue, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, Parcel ID#s 273707405801, 273707405001, 273707405008, 273707405002, 273707405007,273707405003, 273707405006,273707405004 and 273707405005. Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, and Dimensional Variance approvals were granted through Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution #5, Series of 2017, approved on January 31,2017. The changes are depicted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-27939. City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on February 9,2017. 11"1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 RECEPTION#- 636494, R. $123.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 23, 03/01/2017 at 03:38:48 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 5 (SERIES OF 2017) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, A DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE, AND THE ISSUANCE OF CERTFICATES OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING CREDIT FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ASPEN HILLS SUBDIVISION, UNITS A-1 THROUGH A-8, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 331 - 338 MIDLAND AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel IDs: 273707405801,273707405001,273707405008,273707405002,273707405007, 273707405003,273707405006,273707405004,273707405005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from WEB Capital LLC (Applicant), represented by Chris Bendon of Bendon Adams, requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission approve Growth Management Reviews for Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. and a Dimensional Variance related to parking requirements at 331 - 338 Midland Ave; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.050(B) of the Land Use Code, Growth Management for affordable housing allotments may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.070(4), Affordable Housing may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.070, the number of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.314, a dimensional variance related to varying on- site parking may be combined with other reviews and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Director has recommended continuation of the application and the denial of the request for a dimensional variance allowing for the conversion of two one-bedroom housing units into two two-bedroom affordable housing units; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority, Engilieering. Building, and Environmental Health Departments, and has taken and considered public comment; and. WHEREAS, during a public hearing on January 31, 2017, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 5, Series of 2017 by a six to zero (6-0) vote, approving the applicant' s requests for Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, and Dimensional Variance; and, 1 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Affordable Housing. Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request to develop Affordable Housing via the conversion o f eight free-market units (six two-bedroom units and two one-bedroom units) into eight affordable housing udits (all two-bedroom units) with the following conditions as outlined herein. A. A development agreement shall be formulated between Aspen Pitkin Housing Authority and the Applicant incorporating the conditions that the APCHA board recommended in its letter dated January, 19, 2017(Exhibit A). No building permits may be accepted for improvements to this property until a development agreement is approved and signed' between the Aspen Pitkin Housing Authority and the Applicant. B. A building permit shall be submitted to complete the work necessary to upgrade the units to meet the requirements of APCHA's Supplemental Guidance requirements approved by the APCHA Board on July 6,2016. The permit shall include the following information: a. The Applicant shall provide the information, studies, and reports required in the report by Phil Vaugh Construction Management, Inc, dated January 13, 2017 (Exhibit B), to provide the information required by the Supplemental Guidance requirements approved by the APCHA Board on July 6,2016. b. The Applicant shall remedy any and all deficiencies identified by the information, studies, and reports submitted. c. A scope of work shall be developed by the Applicant and shall be approved by the City addressing any and all deficiencies that are identified by the information, studies, and reports submitted. C. A Letter of Completion for each unit (as well as a core and shell if necessary) shall be required to verify completion of the scope of work to the city's satisfaction. Section 2: Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. The applicant has been approved to receive 18 Housing Credits in exchange for eight two- bedroom affordable housing units. The units will be deed-restricted as for-sale or rent Category 3 units with the Housing Department. Prior to issuing the credits, an appropriate deed restriction shall be approved by APCHA and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder for each dwelling unit. If the units are finalized at a mix of for-sale and rental units, a legal instrument in the form acceptable to the City Attorney must be presented to ensure the permanent affordability of the rental units. Additionally, a Letter of Completion shall be required to be issued for each dwelling unit (as well as a core and shell if necessary) prior to the issuance of any credits. Section 3: Dimensional Variance. The on-site parking is currently eight spaces, with anÂ· existing deficit. Conversion of the one- bedroom units to two-bedroom units requires addition of two parking spaces per the current land use code. The applicant has received approval for a reduction in required on-site parking by two-spaces, maintaining eight spaces on-site for this specific land use request. Any future redevelopment of the property shall comply with the off-street parking code in place at the time of that application. Section 4: Non-conformities. The trash/recycling area and mail pedestal is located off-site, on property owned by the adjacent Midland Park Condominium Association. These elements must be relocated on to the subject parcel in a place approved by the Planning Department. Alternatively, if the applicant is able to secure an easement from the property owner, the trash/recycling and mail area may continue in their current respective locations. The tandem parking is located on land owned by the Midland Park Condominium Association. This parking condition should cease or an agreement and encroachment easement must be obtained. The walkway accessing the building's southern decks encroaches onto the neighboring property. The applicant must obtain an encroachment easement for this condition, move the walkway on to the site, or find another method of resolution that is code-compliant and is approved by the Planning Department, The aforementioned issues involving the trash/recycling area, mail pedestal, tandem parking, and walkway must be resolved prior to approval o f ally Letter o f Completion. Section 5: Trash/Reeveling. The trash/recycling area is substandard in size and must be improved to the satisfaction of the Environmental Health Department. Verification of such improvement shall be required as a condition of any Letter of Completion. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. 3 Section 8: If any section, subsection: sentence, clause, phrase, or portion ofthis Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission ofthe City of Aspen on this 31St day of APPROVEJ To FORM: PA it ?GAr44*~i 24*1-sWint hty-Attorney ATTEST: Cindy klob, Records Manager Exhibit A: APCHA Board Recommendation Exhibit B: PVCMi Report 4 8*ibit A Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority 99 lof to AÂ·PÂ·ct HA MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Nadolny, Community Development Planner FROM: APCHA Board of Directors THRU: Mike Kosdrosky, Executive Director DATE: January 19, 2017 RE: Proposed Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing Project 331-338 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO PROJECT The applicant for WEB2 Capital LLC is seeking approval to convert an existing 52-year old residential free market multifamily building into deed restricting affordable housing under the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit (Housing Credits) program (Chapter 26.540 City of Aspen Land Use Code) BACKGROUND The Aspen Hills Condominiums are located at 331-338 Midland Avenue, The building was constructed in 1965 with eight two-bedroom units later converted into condominiums in 1969. The site is 15,160 square feet and is located in the Residential Multi-Family (RIVIF) zone. The applicant is requesting growth management approvals, recognition of existing non- conformities, exemption Â·from the City's Residential Design Standards, a variance for one parking space, and authorization forthe issuance of Housing Credits. Under Part 111, Section 3B of the Housing Guidelines, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) is authorized to inspect affordable housing projects under construction or- conversion for compliance with APCHA Guidelines. APCHA adopted Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) found in the Housing Guidelines on July 6, 2016, for the purpose of identifying physical capital needs and improvements (immediate, short-term, and long-term) for existing free market structures/units before accepting them into the affordable housing inventorÂ¢. Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing I.and Use Review Page 1 179 Zof lo Previously, Marketability Standards had been broadly interpreted to include building, livability, and marketability standards under APCHA Guidelines. Existing Marketability Standards within the Housing Guidelines, however, provide insufficient guidance for staff and decision makers to successfully evaluate proposed conversion or buy-down projects, particularly older structures and dwelling units. In response, APCHA developed SGMS to help decision makers more effectively evaluate conversion and buy-down projects for mitigation or Housing Credits projects. The Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing Project is the first conversion project brought forward under the Housing Credit program (Chapter 26.540). This is also the first conversion project evaluated under the SGMS adopted last year by APCHA. Both APCHA staff and the applicant are working through this type of conversion process for the first time. Housing Guidelines Marketability Standards (Part 111, Section 5) Part 1!1 of the Housing Guidelines establishes policies and procedures for affordable housing development and redevelopment. Part 111, Section 5A of the Housing Guidelines further establishes Net Minimum Livable Square Footage for affordable housing units for construction and conversion as listed below: TABLE VII MINIMUM NET LIVABLE SQUARE FEET (SF) for Affordable housing Per Unit Size (standardized) Unit Size Minimum Square Footaqe Studio 500 1-Bedroom 700 2-Bedroom 900 3-Bedroom 1,200 Single-Family Detached 1,500 The Housing Guidelines also permit a reduction in square footage if and onlv if an applicantcan demonstrate a compelling reason for doing so, and if certain livability criteria and/or amenities will be met. Specifically: â€¢ Significant storage space located outside unit; â€¢ AboveÂ·average natural light (i.e. more windows than required by code); â€¢ Efficient, flexible layout with limited hall and staircase space; â€¢ Availability of site amenities, such as pool or proximity to park or open space; â€¢ Unit location within the development (i.e. above ground location vs. ground level or below grade; and/or â€¢ Possibility that project can achieve higher density of deed-restricted units with a reduction variance. Aspen IÂ·lills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 2 n 30â‚¬ 10 The Housing Guidelines state that "under no circumstances shall a reduction of more than twenty percent (20%) of the square footage required for the applicable category be permitted." The Housing Guidelines require that all new affordable housing development must include a capital reserve study as part of the initial HOA documents, as well as a separate capital reserve fund; and that all HOA documents require the establishment and maintenance of a ,capital reserve fund. APCHA requires a written pre-occupancy inspection by a certified building inspector, architect and/or engineer confirming that any construction or conversion is compliant with applicable codes. The Housing Guidelines' Marketability Standards, Part Ill, Section 68, also require new and converted housing units to be in marketable condition and approved by APCHA prior to rental or sale: "The applicant shall bear the costs and expenses of any required upgrades to meet the standards below, as well as any structural/engineering reports required by APCHA to assess the suitability for occupancy, as follows: â€¢ All interior walls must be freshly painted; â€¢ Interior appliances must be less than five years old and in good condition and repair; â€¢ Carpets must be less than five years old, in good condition and repair, or replaced if in lesser condition; â€¢ Windows, heating, plumbing ond electrical systems, fixtures and equipment must be in good condition and working order and brought up to the current code utilized by the Community Development Department; â€¢ All exterior walls must be freshly painted within the previous year; â€¢ Landscaping and yard must be in satisfactory condition; â€¢ Roof must be in good repair with remaining useful life of at least ten (10) years; and â€¢ HOA documents; i.e., Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and Condominium Declarations, must be approved by APCHA." Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) The Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) were adopted in July 2016 by the APCHA Board of Directors for affordable housing conversion and buy-down projects either for mitigation. As the name suggests, the SGMS is in addition to and reaffirms the Housing Guidelines Marketability Standards CPart 111, Section 5) mentioned above. The SGMS expects conversion or buy-down projects to achieve a reasonable remaining useful life, an acceptable level of affordability, and an appropriate level of health and safety, Aspen 1-lills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 3 ?84 of lo particularly for older residential projects. The SGMS established the following evaluation criteria for conversion/buy-down projects before final: â€¢ Should be structurally sound; â€¢ Meetoriginal buildingcodes, at minimum; â€¢ Achieve and overall general phYsical condition rating of very good" by a certified construction inspector; â€¢ Obtain an effective age no more than 10 or 15 years old for major components (the estimated age of a building component that considers actual age as affected by maintenance history, location, weather conditions, and other factors. Effective age may be more or less than actual age. ASTM E2018-15 Section 2.3.14); â€¢ Have an expected useful life (EUL) of 75% or more for all major and essential items, components and systems (EUL is the average amount of time in years that an item, component or system is estimated to function without material repair when installed new and assuming routine maintenance is practiced. ATSM E2018-15 Section 2.3.15); â€¢ Meet minimum net livable square footage requirements found in Table VII of the Housing Guidelines <Part Ill) The overarching goals listed above are meant to give APCHA and decision makers some objective criteria to evaluate conversion and buy-down projects. To meet these goals, APCHA created a list of requirements - or check list - for applicants interested in redeveloping projects for Housing Credits. 1. Completing a Physical Needs Assessment (PCNA) - also known as a Property Condition Assessment (PCA). According to ASTM International, the objective or purpose of a PCA is to observe and report, to the extent feasible, on the physical condition of a subject property. 2. 3rd Party Energy Audit (e.g. Community Office for Resource Efficiency - CORE) 3. Engineer's Report commenting on the structural integrity of the project and expected useful life of the major building systems and components. The engineer's report should include these type of items: â€¢ Overall General Description of Site Ce.g. topography, storm and water drainage, access and egress, paving and parking, etc.); â€¢ Structural Frame and Building Envelope (e.g. foundation, building frame and facades, roof and roof drainage); â€¢ Mechanical and Electrical Systems (e.g. plumbing and heating systems, HVAC, and electrical systems); â€¢ Vertical Transportation Ce.g. conveyance systems); ' â€¢ NFPA - Life Safety Systems Ce.g. sprinklers and alarm systems); â€¢ Interior Elements (e,g. common areas, tenant spaces/dwelling units); â€¢ Additional/Out of Scope Considerations (e.g. code and environmental issues, accessibility issues, owner proposed improvements); â€¢ Repair and Reserve Study. Aspen H ills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 4 8 50* 0 4, Capital Reserve Study and Savings Plan prepared by a certified, independent professional reserve specialist or engineer, establishing: â€¢ A capital reserve fund balance containing the depreciation or replacement cost of any major components listed within the capital reserve study prior to approval; â€¢ That all critical and non-critical repairs have been identified; â€¢ A corrective action plan for any accessibility deficiencies identified; â€¢ Funds to cover the total cost of any items identified in the reserve study or engineer's report that need to be replaced within 5 years from the date of the study must be deposited in the HOA'5 reserve account, in addition to the amount stated immediately above; and â€¢ A utility contingency of at least 10% of the previous year's utility costs if the utilities are not separately metered. Finally, the SGMS requires that any conversion project applicant correct deficiencies identified by the various inspections above, or at the discretion of the APCHA Board and/or the City of Aspen, and that all conversion rehabilitation work is completed in a professional and acceptable manner. DISCUSSION Existing Conditions The existing project consists of a total eight units (seven two-bedroom units and one one- bedroom unit (illegally non-conforming)) requiring 15 or 16 parking spaces with a deficit of 7 or 8 spaces. The SGMS recommends adequate on-site parking for- all units. The units, as built, are: S.F. Difference Between Min. Unit Beds Baths Net Livable S.F. and Actual 331 1 1 852 48 SF or 5.3% 332 2 1 807 93 SF or 10.3% 333 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 334 2 1 861 39 SE or 4.3% 335 2 1 861 39 SE or 4.356 336 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 337 2 1 866 34 SF or 3.7% 338 2 1 866 34 SF or 3.7% APCHA Guidelines state that the minimum square footage for a two-bedroom is 900 square feet. All units are below the current minimum square footage requirements, but less than the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 5 ?1 (O Of' 1O 20% maximum square foot reduction allowed under Part 111, Section 5A based on specified conditions and board approval, as mentioned previously. Proposal The applicant proposes converting all eight free market units into permanently deed restricted for-sale and rental affordable housing. The applicant is asking that several of the current owners remain in their units as renters for an unspecified period of time. According to the standards of Growth Management, Section 26.470.100.A.2, Employee Generation, the building could house 18 employees (8 units X 2.25 FTE's/unit). APCHA Review . APCHA reviewed the applicant's application and any due diligence reports submitted under the Guidelines and SGMS. APCHA appreciates the applicant's due diligence and efforts to date, but deems that it has not yet met the necessary requirements for a full and effective evaluation of the project. As required underthe Housing Guidelines and SGMS, the applicant submitted a PCNA (Physical Needs Assessment - Aspen Hill Condos by RD3) and a 3rd Party Energy Audit (Energy Audit of the Aspen Hills Building by Confluence). The applicant, however, did not submit a reasonable or comprehensive scope of work and third party engineering report evaluating the integrity and remaining useful life of the project's essential and major components. To help review the Aspen Hills Condo Affordable Housing Project, APCHA contracted the services of a construction management professional, Phil Vaughan Construction Management Â· Company, Inc., or (PVCMI). Attached to this memo is PVCMI's official report to APCHA reviewing and recommending minimum standards for the project. Without repeating PVCMI's official report here, staff requests that that the APCHA Board of Directors take the time to read, review and understand its recommendations before next Wednesdav's board meeting. As expected with a 52-year old building, the applicant's PCNA and 3rd Party Energy Audit have generated more questions than answers. APCHA recognizes that not all questions will be answered before a full evaluation and scope of work is completed. In order to move the project forward and give the applicant an opportunity to purchase the units under contract and complete his due diligence, APCHA will recommend conditional approval based strictly upon certain future expectations and approvals as outlined and detailed underthe "Recommendations" section of this memo. The board should also be aware that in addition to the concerns expressed by APCHA and its paid consultant, both the City's Community Development and Building Departments have expressed concerns about certain health and safety and buildingcode elements. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 6 81 of lo Category of the Units The applicant proposes that the converted units be Category 2 or Category 3, or a combination thereof. Part 111, Section 4C of the Housing Guidelines, however, does not permit anything below a Category 3: Conversion/buy-down requests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the City, County and/or APCHA and shall be considered and approved only for Category 3 or higher units located in an existing free market-development. Notwithstanding the Housing Guideline rules, it is helpful to understand that qualified Category 2 income households may bid on and purchase for-sale Category 3 units. Number of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits and Estimated Minimum Market Value The applicant is requesting the use of the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits for the project. These units would create the following number of FTE's: Two-Bedroom: 8 units X 2.25 - 18 FTE's Under Section 26.540 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, Certificates Of Affordable Housing Credit, a credit can be established for Category 4 and lower units. However, as indicated, the Housing Guidelines do not permit the creation of Category 1 and 2 units by converting or buying-down existing free market dwelling units. The estimated minimum market value for credits is based on the established Fee-In-Lieu (FIL) rates per Full-Time Equivalent employee (FTE) found in the land use code. Fee-In-Lieu (per FTE): Category 1: $356,433 Category 2: $320,186 Category 3: $286,495 Category 4: $223,072 Using Category 3 designation for this project, for example, the following calculation shows an estimated minimum market value for the 18 FTE's in the Housing Credit market: Category FTEs X FIL Rate = Est. Minimum Market Value Al] Category 3 18 FTEs X $286,495/FTE = $5,156,910 Because of regulatory limitations set by the land use code for mitigating affordable housing using FIL, plus the high cost of mitigating affordable housing through on- and off-site development within the City of Aspen, it is not unreasonable to assume that the market value for any Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit will be higher, Aspen IIills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 7 8 ~ Of I o RECOMMENDATIONS The APCHA Board reviewed the application at their regular meeting held January 18, 2017, and recommends approval of the Aspen Hills Condo Affordable Housing Project. The APCHA Board also recommends that the Planning and Zoning Committee approve this project for the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit program based strictly on the following conditions. Final acceptance of this project must be approved by APCHA and the City of Aspen prior to and as a condition Of issuance of a Development Order and Building Permit by the City of Aspen. A Development Order shall not be issued by the City of Aspen until the APCHA and the applicant enter into a binding development agreement containingthe following requirements: 1. Final acceptance and approval is subject to APCHA's and the City of Aspen's complete satisfaction of the scope of work based on additional reports and standards spelled out in the Housing Guidelines, the SGMS, and PVCMI's report of recommendations to APCHA dated JanuarÂ¢ 13, 2017. 2. Approval is further subject to the applicant providing to APCHA sufficient third party reports detailing the current physical conditions of the building and units and proposed upgrades necessary to satisfy APCHA requirements in APCHA's sole subjective discretion, which requirements will later be specified by APCHA for the applicant. 3. Any amended or additional reports shall be reviewedÂ·by APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen. Any third party consultant hired by APCHA to review or make recommendations on this project shall be reimbursed by applicant. 4. The APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen, shall work with the applicant to establish agreeable technical specifications for the required upgrades. 5. The applicant shall reimburse APCHA for any third party inspections and reports, including legal consultation associated with drafting and approving a Development Agreement. This shall be incorporated into the Development Agreement. 6. The building permit for the required upgrades shall not be issued by the City of Aspen unless the permit demonstrates the required upgrades are in accordance with the agreed-upon specifications, which will necessitate a third party construction consultant to review the building permit application on behalf of APCHA. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy or Letter of Completion for the required upgrades and rehabilitation work shall not be issued unless the improvements have been made in accordance to the scope of work and specifications agreed to prior to Building Permit. APCHA will rely on third party consultant and the City's Building Department to inspect and accept the improvements and standards set forth by APCHA for affordable housing conversion at the expense of the applicant. Aspen I-lills Affordable Housing Land LIse Review - Page 8 f'390â‚¬ID 8. Prior to APCHA formally accepting the units and authorizing the City of Aspen to issue Housing Certificates, the applicant must complete upgrades to the building and units and establish new Association documents and appropriately fund reserves in order to meet the satisfaction of APCHA staff. 9. Per the Housing Guidelines and applicant's request, all converted units will be Category 3. 10. Applicant shall convert Unit #331 (one-bedroom unit) that is illegally non- conforming to a two-bedroom unit. 11. A final Capital Reserve Study completed by a certified third party will be required upon acceptance of the project after any rehabilitation and construction for HOA designated common area components and systems. The report shall be given to the HOA and to APCHA by a certified reserve specialist at the time of Certificate of Occupancy or a Certificate of Completion, or within one month of either. Housing Credits shall not be Ssued by the City of Aspen until the Capital Reserve Study is completed and accepted by APCHA. 12. The applicant and the APCHA shall enter into a development agreement outlining the use of and cost allocation for any third party reviews or inspections. APCHA reserves the right to bill applicant for direct costs attributable to project review and legal fees with no additional administrative charge. Housing Credits shall not be issued by the City of Aspen Community Development Department until all outstanding costs and fees are reimbursed to or paid on behalf of APCHA for third party review services. 13. The applicant has the option of retaining the units as rental units or selling the units through the lottery system. Once a unit has been sold to a qualified employee, the unit will remain as an ownership unit and shall be sold through APCHA has stated in the deed restriction. 14. The applicant has the option of maintaining three of the units for current owners, either as rentals or ownership. The current owners shall be allowed to remain in the units, shall not be required to meet the minimum occupancy requirements, and shall not be required to meet the maximum assets. However, at such time the current owner (which shall be known as an Exempt Tenant or Exempt Owner) makes the decision to sell or vacate their unit, it shall be opened up to fully qualified, top priority households only per the Housing Guidelines. Also, the applicant shall only be eligible to collect 1.75 FTE Housing Credits for any two- bedroom unit occupied by a single-person household. The applicant may be issued the outstanding balance of .5 FTE Housing Credits once the unit has been occupied by a qualified 2-person household. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 9 7% 1 0 of 10 15. If at any time a rental unit is found to be out of compliance, and upon completion of APCHA's Notice of .Violation (NOV) process, any remaining units occupied as rentals shall be listed for sale with APCHA and sold through the lottery system. 16. The developer shall obtain approval of all condominium documents to APCHA for review prior to acceptance. These shall include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. Articles of Incorporation b. By-Laws c. Condominium Declaration d, Condo Plat Map e. Nine required governance policies required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA). f. Budget 17. At the closing on all units, the developer shall provide to each new homeowner a binder that will include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. All condominium documents stated above; b, All mechanical warranties, all warranties for appliances, etc., that are available from any additional work completed by the developer 18. The Development Order shallÂ·provide the APCHA the reasonable right to not accept the project into the affordable housing inventory if the applicant fails to prove to APCHA's complete satisfaction that the physical condition is safe and acceptable under the standards agreed to, and/or has sufficient capital reserve funds to help safeguard the future affordability and replacement cost of common area components by the Association and its homeowners. Aspen Hills AITordable Housing Land Use Review Page 10 E*W 6 f)31 49 'V,U WFV ANU*H AmbE WWU January 13,2017 Mr. Mike Kosdrosky Executive Director Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority 210 E. Hyman Ave. Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Kosdrosky, APCHA has contracted with Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc, to review the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO and to provide advice to APCHA in relation to this project. This project is a proposed conversion of an existing eight unit free-market residential building into affordable housing and the creation of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Documents Reviewed/Site Visit/Meeting 1 have reviewed the following documents submitted by Mr. Chris Bendon, A]CP of BendonAdams representing the applicant WEB2 Capital, LLC. 1 A. October 24,2016- Application materials and exhibits prepared by Mr. Bendon B, December 9, 2016- Application addendum from Mr. Bendon with two documents attached: i. Confluence Energy Audit of the Aspen Hill Building dated October 19,2016 ii. RD3 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21, 2016 I conducted a site visit on Wednesday, January 1 1, 20 17 with Mike Kosdrosky to the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO. We viewed the site and the exterior of the structure. The site and building were both covered in snow, thus many features were obscured. Page 1 0 f 9 O C~ ~11[ilfbedâ€ž.,.~,â€ž,. 23249 I attendee! a meeting on Thursday, January 12,2017 at 0900 hours at tile Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority offices in Aspen, CO. Attendees included Mike Kosdrosky- APCHA Executive Director, Cindy Christiansen- APCHA Deputy Director, Sara Nadolny, A]CP- City of Aspen Planner, Stephen Kanipe, CBO, LEED AP, City of Aspen Chief Building Official, Bill Boehringer, CEO- WEB2 Capital, LLC, Chris Bendon, AICP-Principal- BendonAdanis, Jordan Nemirow: President- Aspen Hills Condominiums Homeowners Association and Phil Vaughan- President- PVCMI. Joining by phone was Robert de Grasse, PE- President- RD), Inc. I havereviewed the Supplemental Guidance to the Macketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). This document,vas approved by the APCHA Board on July 6, 2016. It is helpful to utilize additional accepted industry standards in regards to evaluating older properties. It has been represented by WEB2, Capital, LLC that the structure was built in 1965. Please find below additional guidance given by HUD Notice H 2012-27. ASTM E2018-15 Section 2.3.49 defines a walk-through survey as "2.3.49 walk-through smÂ·rey, n-conducted dinÂ·ing the field observer's site visit of the subject propelÂ·ty, fhal consists of nonintrusive visital observations. survey ofreadily accessible, easilv visible components and systems of the subject property. This surrey is described Dilly in Section 8. Concealed physical deficiencies are excluded. It is the iment of this guide thai sitch a survey sliould not be considered technically exhalistive. It exchides the operation of equipment by the field observer and is to be conducted without the aid of special protective clothing, exploratory probing, removal or relocation Of materials, testing, or the lise ofequipment, such as ladders (except as requiredfor roof access), stools, scaliolding, metering/testing equipment, or devices of any kind, etc. It is literally the field obsemer's vistial obserrations while walking through the subject properly," HUD Notice H 2012-27 "Revised Requirements for Project Capital Needs Assessments. Estimated Reserves For Replacements and Remedies for Accessibility Deficiencies", section Vl.C.3. Intrusive tests and examination ....An "int,-usive test ", as used hereint describes cin examinqtion appropriate to observed circumstances and relying i'Jrn standard diagnostic techniques, tools, probes, thermal imagery, and other equipmenl , commonly used by relevam construction t}Â·ades to evaluate the condition and serviceability of particular bmiding components. The intent is to describe methods thal are teclmically sitfficient to make recisoned estimales of the durability and seiwiceability of building components as well as requisite repair costs, but not "technically exhaustive" except to the extent thal evide,if risks to health and safety may require. The word intrusive does not mean destructive, although in some ilistances a mininially destructive technique may be required. When this is the case, care should betoken to select the least destructive approach in locations least detrimental to ongoing operation of the property." HUD Notice H 2012-27 section VI.E. further directs "Intrusive Tests at Older Properties. For older structures the needs assessor and tender should consider intrusive Page 2 of 9 8349 tests, or examinations, of primary building systems, including but not limited to structural, building envelope, conveyance, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, where visual 01- non-invasive examination alone may not be sidficient to support a conchision about the condition or remaining usefitl life of system components. While recognizing that age and condition Of structures are not always related, a guidelinefor lise of intrusive mefliods in sfrliclures 30 or more years of age. (Emphasis Added) N is the responsibility of the lender to assinÂ·e that the needs assessor employs investigalive melhods appropriate m the age, condition, physical composilion of the properly and the local environment. In general, lenders should not recommend a maximum mortgage term .for structures 30 or more years of age witliout conducting appropriate intrusive lests Of primary building systems to confirm the condilion mici remaining useful life offlie bitiiding (s). When imdertaken, an intrusive test or examination should resitit in a written repoil, attached to the PCNA, which report should inchide at a minimum the following: 1. A statement of the examiner 's particular experience, education, technical or trade certifications or other qi,alifications establishing the examiner's expertise relevant to the matter examined. 2. A description of the physical componen!(s) or system examined inchiding the portions, quantities, and/or locations examined and the relevant products and materials found iii stalled. 3. A description of the trade or industry recognized techniques, tests 01- analytical methods of examination used. 4. A stimmary of the estintated age, condition, and serviceability ofthe products, materials or system examined. 5. The examiner's recommendation of any repairs and/or replacements, 6. The examiner's estimate of the remaining useful life of the system or compoilent assuming any recommended repairs or replacements are completed." 1 4 PVCMI Recommended Mini'mum Standards for the Aspen Hills Affordable ' Housing Proiect Please note that many o f the requested studies, inspections and investigations noted below are considered intrusive. This is intended as the structure is approximately 52 years old and will require additional investigation greater than those provided in the ASTM E2018-15 report, As requested, please find below a list of recommended minimum standards for the Aspen Hins Affordable Housing project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO. Page 3 of 9 2944'9 These recommended minimum standards are intended togenerally conform with the Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (20!6) as approved by the APCHA Board on July 6,2016. (SGMS-07-06-16) 1. Site A, Site accessibility review via conformance with ICC/ANSI All 7.1 and the most current City of Aspen Building Codes adopled via Ordinance No. 40- Series 2016, This revie,v and assessment may conclude that an accessible parking space/spaces and associated ramp may need to be constructed on-site to gain accessibility to the dwelling unit(s) B. Camel-a the existing sanitary sewer line to determine size. material, current condition and exact location on-site. C. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment conducted as per ASTM E 1527- Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. D. Evaluation of the -brick chilnney" noted on the Improvement Survey Plat at the Northeast corner of the site to determine its ilse and efficacy from a inechanical systems standpoint. E. Evaluation and recommendation o f removal of existing wood stall* treads and installation of new cast-in-place concrete stairways as identified on page 11 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. F. Evaluation and recommendation ofimprovement ofrouting of roof drainage away from the structure as identified on page 17 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. G. Evaluation and recommendation of improvement of exterior decks and railings as identified on pages 18-19 of the RD) Physical Needs Assessment. Please note that a portion of, or all: of these railings may nee4 to be renovated to become guardrails versus railings 1 2. Structure A. Evaluations/Reports i. Structural evaluation o f the roo f system as required via the SGMS-07- 06-16 and the R133 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21,20 16. ii. Radon investigation. This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in a mitigation plan that would be inciuded in the scope o f work for the upcoming renovation. Page 4 of 9 0 549 iii. Lead-based paint (LBP) investigation and compliance with the US EPA Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Program. This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in the preparation of an LBP Operations and Maintenance Plan. iv. Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) investigation, This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in a remediation plan and/or an ACM Operations and Maintenance Plan. v. Dwelling unit accessibility review via conformance with iCC/ANSI Al 17.landthemost current City of Aspen Building Codes adopted via Ordinance No. 40- Series 2016. This review and assessment may conclude that dwelling unit or units require upgrades to meet ANSI Type A- accessible or ANSI Type B- adaptable dwelling units. vi. Prepare a code analysis report, conducted by a Colorado licensed Architect, to address conformance with the City of Aspen Building Codes adopted via Ordinance No, 40- Series 2016. Please note that this code analysis should also address conformance with the International Fire Code as adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District via Resolution No. 6-1 Series of 2016. vii. Review of the existing electrical system including balanced loads to subpanels, existing wiring systems, existing grounding systems and compliance with the National Electrical Codes in regards to OFCI and other life safety issues. This evaluation should be prepared by a licensed Colorado Electrical Professional Engineer. viii. Review ofthe existing mechanical and plumbing systems in the building. This evaluation should be prepared by a licensed Colorado Mechanical Profepsional Engineer. ix. Review ofthe exterior and interior of the structuk to determine any areas of moisture infiltration and the presence of inold. This report should include a mold mitigation strategy and recommended repairs. x. Prepare a detailed scope of work, and associated drawings as needed, after completion of at! evaluations and reports. xi. Prepare a detailed 3rd party renovation cost estimate that comports with the scope of work and associated drawings. This renovation budget should be detailed, and shduld be provided in Construction Specifications Institute Masterformat 2014. The renovation budget should be prepared by Page 5 of9 PS 4 49 a 3rd paily who is knowledgeable and experienced in construction and current construction costs in Aspen/Pitkin County: CO. xii, Revise the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21,20 16 to incorporate both requirements of E2018-15 mid new ' information received via additional evaluations and lepolls. Specific revisions include: a. Include qualifications of the consultant as noted in section 6 of E2018-15 '6 The Consultant 6. 1 Qi,Ii} i.fications of Ihe Consullonl-This guide recognizes thai che competency of the consiiltant is highly dependent on many .factors tliat may inchide professional education, training, experience, certification, or professional licensing/regisliation, of both the consititaiit 's.field observers and the PCR reviewer. Ir is the intern of this guide m identijkfactors tlial should be considered by the user when retaining a consul{ant to conduct o PCA and by tile consultant in selecting the appropriale field observer ancl PCR reviewer. No standard can be designed {o eliminale the role Of professional judgment competence, andthe value and need for experience during the walk-liuÂ·ough smÂ·vey cmci to conduct the PCA. Consequently, the qualificalions of the field obse:wer and the PCR reviewer are critical to the performance of the PCA and the resulting PER. This guidefiti-ther recognizes thai the consultant has the responsibility to select, engage, or employ the.lieid observer and the PCR 7'(21'ifit'er. Therefore, each PER should include as an exhibit a statement of qualifications of both the.field obsen'er and the PCR reviewer." b. Page 3 of lhe Physical Needs Assessment under Scope, indicates '-interviews with various persons." Provide information in the report as to the pre-survey questionnaire, interviews conducted and information gained as per Section 7.7 Interviews of E2018-15. '7.7 Intel-views-Prior to the site visit. the consultant should ask {he owner or user to identib, the POC. The consullant 4 should contact the DOC to fonvard the pre-sun,ey questionnaire so as to inquire about the subject property's historical repairs anct replacements and thei)Â· costs, level of preventive maintenance exercised, pending repairs and improvements, D-equency of repairs and replacements. and existence of ongoing or pending litigation related to subject property's physical condition, 1,1 connection with the consultant's research or walk-through survey, the consultant may also question others who are knowledgeable of the subject property's physical condition ond operation. I! is within the discretion of the consultant to decide which questions to ask before, during. or after tlie site visit. Page 6 of 9 P1749 7.7.1 Method-Questions to be asked pitiÂ·suant {o this section are at the discretion ofthe consullant and may be asked in person, by telephone, or iii writing. 7.7.2 Incomplete Answers-While the consultant should make inquiries in accordance with this section, the persons to whom the questions are addressed may have no obligation to cooperate. Sholild die POC owner, or the property manager, bitilding/jacility engineer, or maintenance supervisor not be available for an imeniew, whether by intern or inconvenience, 01Â· not respond infull or in part lo questiohs posed by the consultam, the constiltant should disclose such within the.PCR. Fitrthermore, shoitld any patÂ·ty not grant such amhorization to intel view, restrict such authorization, or should the pelÂ·Soil to whom the questions ore addressed not be knowledgeable about the subject properly, this shoilld be disclosed within the PER." c. Re-evaluate the Category Cost Table and Planning Horizon Cost Table as these cost estimates seem to be lower than current Aspen/Pitkin County construction costs. d. Update the Capital Reserve Study and Savings Plan as necessary to account for new information received via additional evaluations and reports. B. Exterior i. Renovationsas recommended in the Confluence 10/19/16 report. a. "Heat trace with timer/temperature controllers b. Window replacement of units listed as "clear glass and high emissivity" c. A new roof; remove all skylites, remove heat tape, add additional rigid insulation. Possibly install TDDs (Titbular Daylighting Devices) through roof near ridge," ii. Determination of the adeqilacy of the roofing system and whether repair or replacement is desired as identified on pages 14-16 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. iii. Door replacement/weather-proofing. iv. Exterior siding and trim replacement/repair and coating as necessary. v. Renovations as necessary to bring all interior finishes to a level of 'Very Good" as stated on page 3 of the Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). Page 7 of 9 23 f49 Vi. Renovations as identified and recommended in the above-noted evaluations/reports. C.Interior i. Renovatioiis as recommended iii the Confluence 10/19/16 report. -a. New high-efticacy lighting stat'ting wi//l the unils irith tile highes I amount of inslalled waitage h. New high-efficiency appliances, where indicated on incliridiial mul assessments. c. 1115(011 programmable Ihermostms. d. Undergo air seciling measures: tile units are leaking hro to eight times more air than recommended. Air scaling has the pole}ilial to scive more gas than any other illectsure. Typical air leakage sites inchicle; ceiling beams, ceiling, lop plate, omiets, windows and doors. If the infiltration rate is significanlly reduced, Ilien inslall high-qi,ality bathroom exhaust fans, controlled by a wall switch with built in hygrometer and timer. Exhanst to otitdoors with damper. e. Mechanical 1-00111; hisitiale ali Of the hot water pipes that can be iÂ·cached. Install an insulated hatch cover. Remove the abandoned combustion air intake ducts and.fill the hole with rin insulated plug. Seal passageways thal lead into units. f Install low-fjow fancet aerators, shower heads and [oilets." ii. Potential wet-pipe fire sprinkler system and associated monitoring systeni dependent upon the outcome of the code analysis and consultation with the City o f Aspen Community Development Department and the Aspen Fire Protection District. iii. Potential monitored fire alarm system dependent upon the outcome of the code analysis and consultation with the City of Aspen Community Devdopment Department and the Aspen Fire Protection District. iv. Determination of the placement and R-value ofroofand wall insdation. Lack ofroofand wall insulation may require remoA of a portion, or all, interior gypsuin board to allow for installation of new insulation and associated vapor barrier. v, Repairs and replacement of materials as designated "Repair" or -Replace'~ in the Unit-by-Unit Inspection section located on pages 26 to 31 of RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. vi. Renovations as necessary to bring all interior finishes lo a level of -Very Good" as stated on page 3 of the Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). Page 8 0 f 9 1% 1 49 vii, Retiovations as identified and recommended in the above-noted evaluations/reports. It is important that APCHA, City of Aspen and PVCM! have an opportunity to review and comment on each of the reports and items noted above after receipt from WEB2 Capital, LLC. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, %\4(2444Â»a Philip B. Vaughan President Phil Vaughan Construction Management, inc. 970-625-5350 Email: phil@pvcnii.coin Website: www,pvcmi.com Attachments: None END OF REPORT ' 1 Page 9 0 f 9 I I MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner THROUGH: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Director MEETING DATE: January 24, 2017 RE: 331-338 Midland Ave, aka Aspen Hills Condominiums APPLICANT /OWNER: Heidi and Patrick The applicant is proposing to convert the two one Gorbitz (#331), Jean Delynn (#332), bedroom units into two-bedroom units, and is Drew Goodman (#333), Matt Grubbs requesting to vary the additional parking space that is (#334), Margaret Jane MeGavock Trust required with the addition of the bedrooms. (#335), Alix Samuelson (#336), 337 Midland Ave LLC (#337), and Sharon STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial Elizabeth Wells (#338). of the parking variation and continuation of the hearing for additional information related to parking and trash REPRESENTATIVE: William Boehringer, location. WEB2 Capital LLC LOCATION: 331- 338 Midland Avenue CURRENT ZONING & USE: Residential .. Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District with J . eight free-market residential multi- family units. PROPOSED LAND USE: Conversion to deed-restricted multi-family housing. 1- - SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing .. to convert the eight existing multi- .1 117 1. p family residential units that make up the Aspen Hills Condominiums into eight Figure A: Recent image of subject property. affordable housing units in exchange for Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. There are currently six 2- bedroom units and two 1-bedroom units. LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Commission: 1 â€¢ Affordable Housing per Section 26.470.070(4) related to the creation of eight affordable housing units; â€¢ Growth Manazement per Section 26.470.050(B) for growth management allotments related to the creation of affordable housing units; â€¢ Affordable Housing Credit per Section 26.540.070 for the number of affordable housing credits generated by the units; â€¢ Dimensional Fariance per 26.3 14.040(A) to vary the amount of parking required on-site. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final authority for all above reviews. LOCATON/BACKGROUND: The . subject site is located in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) zone district, at the intersection of Midland Avenue and Midland Park Place. The development consists of a multi- family residential building containing i * eight free-market residential units that 6 4 was constructed in 1965. t Â¥ 1, 4 5 br.4- EXISTING CONDITIONS: The 4 1.1, ,1 1 - 1 .1.t eight residential units range in size i t rÂ· w * from 807 sq. ft. to 866 sq. ft. with an ' average size of 854 sq. ft. Each unit is 9... 1 1-et . VIF split level with the kitchen and living :.1 .: room areas above grade, and the Figure B: Location of subject site. bedroom(s) and bathroom below grade. Six of the eight units are two-bedroom; one unit was legally converted from a two- to a one-bedroom in the 1990's, while another unit was converted to a one-bedroom unit at some unknown time. No building permit was found for this second unit, which may be a result of conversion without a permit or due to the purging o f historic records. Over the years, owners have made improvements to their individual homes, so each unit has unique characteristics. For instance, one unit has electric in-floor heating in the bathroom, another has a gas fireplace, and some units have skylights. At least three units have upgraded the size of the egress windows from the subgrade bedrooms. Unit 332, the smallest of all units, lacks storage space, while the other seven units have 45 sq. ft. of storage on the upper level. There are numerous non-conforming conditions related to the structure and the site. Portions of the building extend to the rear property line, where the RMF zone district requires a five-foot rear yard setback. There is also a sidewalk on the property's south side that is used to access the decks and units which is beyond the property line. Staff has no knowledge of any existing encroachment easement to allow for this condition. The mail pedestal and trash area are located on a portion of land belonging to Midland Park Condominiums, the multi-family units that are located directly north of the subject site. Neither element has an existing encroachment easement for placement in their current location. 2 Lastly, there are eight parking spaces at the front of the site. The residents have historically parked in tandem style, allowing a second car to be parked for each unit; however, the tandem parking is not on the site but rather is primarily located on land owned by the Midland Park Condominiums. Tandem parking does not count towards parking requirements. Staff recognizes the on-site parking as eight spaces, with a six space deficit that may be maintained upon the proposed conversion to affordable housing based on the current conditions. Figure C: Site plan. ~ -1.~ 1, , â€¢ Orange = property line . . i â€¢06Â·:. -~ ' 1 ' .' ,-- '7 2, //h< â€¢ Red = area owned by 1.--7 / S ..â€ž. * 1.8. 1- -- 5 - p- W ' 0-*:/ U&4 % Condominiums (to orange line) - 6 -6 " <t< 1-2 11 ) 0 --s. \- era> t,Â·- 3% CÂ¥*44.Â»-6, V 0,4.-47 1-&' .tn â€¢ Yellow= area of on-site l I %' 4& F =' p 11 zed&41 -t parking. - 1\ ~ 01 - ur,731 11 \11 1 1 Ultul=C~> - -/.i-- a.,2 --~f--W.- - 6--21.--1 5\U ,#171*--*~t-*ir--LIE---SEdEJ#.i------ â€¢ Blue = trash/recycling ~ 1 and mail pedestal '" -f-vn,1,#2,11 â‚¬81 3.14 , 1 -11=/6 1 . 1 14 1 â€¢ Green dashed line - 1 1 :E 1 .Nk. ic_ ,-' /4 p I edge of walkway = Â·'l \, - 1 Ill 1 \ 'il j r. Bi L â€ž .44/P .-9.P i-We I . - Am. IL:*r / GRJPEZ 3.112 PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to convert the eight free-market residential units into Category 2 or 3 affordable housing units in exchange for 18 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, at the approved category rate. The applicant has proposed a mix of rental and for-sale units. The following table outlines the affordable housing credits generated based on current and proposed conditions. Unit Unit Size Number of Associated Number of Proposed Number (sq. ft.) Bedrooms, Housing Bedrooms Housing existing Credits Proposed Credits 331 852 1 1.75 2 2.25 332 807 2 2.25 2 2.25 333 861 2 2.25 2 2.25 334 861 2 2.25 2 2.25 335 861 2 2.25 2 2.25 336 861 1 1.75 2 2.25 337 866 2 2.25 2 2.25 338 866 2 2.25 2 2.25 Totals 14 17 16 18 3 The following table indicates the monetary worth of a credit or Full-Time Equivalent at APCHA's different categorical rates. Category 2 rate Category 3 Category 4 1 Credit or FTE $320,186 $286,495 $223,072 The applicant is requesting to memorialize the non-conformities on the site associated with the mail, trash, and sidewalk locations. The applicant is proposing to convert both one-bedroom units to two-bedroom units, and is seeking a variance from the additional parking space that is required by the addition of the second bedrooms. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has evaluated the applicant's requests against the relevant review criteria, as discussed by topic, below. The criteria associated with each subject can be reviewed in Exhibit A, Staff Findings. Reviews for Affordable Housing. The applicant is proposing to add a 52-year-old multi-family residential building into the City's affordable housing inventory. APCHA has provided a referral for this proposal, but the P&Z is the final authority that will decide whether the housing proposed meets the criteria for conversion to affordable housing (a Growth Management Review), as well as grant housing credits for the proposal. The proposed affordable housing meets the criteria of being at least 50% above finished grade, it is not a requirement of mitigation, and it is compatible with the uses on the surrounding parcels. There is no limit on the amount of affordable housing that may be developed yearly within the city. The units, however, are substandard in size. The applicant is proposing all eight units as two bedroom units. At 807 - 866 sq. ft. none meet the 900 sq. ft. size requirement. APCHA guidelines allow for a reduction up to 20% of the required unit size should the applicant successfully demonstrate at least some of the following criterion are met: â€¢ Significant storage space located outside unit; â€¢ Above average natural light (i.e. more windows than required by code); â€¢ Efficient, flexible layout with limited hall and staircase space; â€¢ Availability of site amenities, such as pool or proximity to park or open space; â€¢ Unit location within the development (i.e. above ground location vs. ground level or below grade; and/or â€¢ Possibility that project can achieve higher density of deed-restricted units with a reduction variance. APCHA requires a minimum of 700 sq. ft. for a one-bedroom unit. The APCHA Board, in their January 18tli meeting, recommended approval of the conversion to two-bedroom units, despite the substandard size. In 2016 the APCHA Board adopted a document entitled "Supplemental Guidance - Marketability Standards APCHA Guidelines (2016)" (Exhibit I). This document outlines guidance for converting and 4 improving older free market dwelling units into newly renovated deed restricted affordable housing. These guidelines are intended to supplement the APCHA standards already in place. Based on the requirements outlined in the guidelines the applicant has submitted a Physical Needs Assessment (Exhibit G) and Energy Audit (Exhibit H) for the site; however, an engineer's report is still required to provide a complete image of the building's condition. Both submitted reports provide visual inspections of the building with recommendations. An engineer report(s) is a more intrusive review which better assesses the condition of the major components and systems of the building. As an Engineer' s Report was not submitted by the applicant, the Housing Authority contracted with Phil Vaughan from PVCMi Construction Management, Inc. to provide a complete scope of work outlining investigations that must be performed to clearly understand the current condition of the building. Mr. Vaughan's report is attached as Exhibit K to this memo. Staff is concerned with the potential deferred maintenance and life safety issues associated with the building. Additionally, this is proposed as new affordable housing stock so significant improvements may be required to bring the units up to current standards. Included as conditions of approval is a requirement that the applicant enter into an agreement with APCHA to address the issues raised in the various reports. A building permit will be required to rectify all issues required by APCHA's Supplemental Guidance, and Housing Credits cannot be issued until a Letter of Completion for all required work is issued. Creation of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. The proposed affordable housing is not a requirement of mitigation, and the applicant intends to deed-restrict these units as for-sale and for-rent with APCHA to qualified buyers. The applicant has not indicated which units will be for-sale and which may be rental units, nor is there a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure permanent affordability of the units. The applicant is required to provide such an instrument prior to any units being accepted as affordable rental or for-sale units. Staff suggests the project maintain the two one-bedroom units (see the parking discussion, below). If the units are not converted to 2 bedrooms, 17 credits would be approved. If they are converted to 2 bedrooms then 18 credits could be approved. Parking Variance. As previously discussed, there are eight parking spaces at the front of the property. Unit owners have historically parked in a tandem fashion to gain one extra parking space per unit; however, the code does not recognize tandem spaces towards meeting the parking requirements for multi- family housing (see Figure A and Figure C, above). The code requires the lesser of one parking space per bedroom, or two parking spaces per unit. There are six two-bedroom and two one-bedroom units on the site, creating a parking requirement of 14 spaces. With eight on-site parking spaces there is an existing deficit of six spaces that may be maintained. The applicant is proposing to convert the two one-bedroom units to two-bedroom units. The addition of these new bedroom triggers the code's requirement to increase the on-site parking by one space per bedroom, or two total spaces. The applicant is requesting a variance from this parking requirement, stating there is no reasonable way to implement additional parking on the site, and that the site has operated with eight parking spaces historically. 5 Approval of the applicant's request requires the Commission to find that a variance is the only reasonable method by which the applicant can be afforded relief, and furthermore to deny the variance would cause unnecessary hardship such that the property would be rendered practically undevelopable, rather than merely an inconvenience. Staff finds that the need for additional on-site parking to be a self-created hardship only necessary due to the addition of the extra bedrooms to existing one-bedroom units. If the units were to remain one- bedroom, no additional parking is required. Denial of the variance does not create unnecessary hardship, nor does it render the property practically undevelopable. Staff recommends the Commission deny the applicant's request for a parking variance and maintain the one-bedroom units. Non-conformities. Staff does not support memorializing the existing non-conformities. As previously discussed, the mail station and trash/recycling area are current~ff-site. The area where they are located is owned by the Midland Park Condominium Association.-There is no agreement in place to allow this condition. Staff finds these elements should be moved onto the site. Furthermore, the trash/recycling area is substandard in size, according to the Environmental Health Department, and should be updated to reflect the size required for the density on the lot. The applicant should work with the Environmental Health Department to achieve a code-compliant trash/recycling area for the site. The tandem parking is also on property belonging to Midland Park Condominiums, and there is no known agreement or encroachment license that permits this activity to occur (See Figure C, above). The tandem parking condition should discontinue unless supported by the Midland Park Condominium Association through a formalized agreement. Lastly, the application depicts a walkway on the property's south side that is located on the adjacent property. The applicant should either move the walkway onto the site or pursue an encroachment easement for this condition. REFERRALS: The following is a summary of referral comments received from various departments. Please refer to Exhibit B for referrals in their entirety. â€¢ APCHA: APCHA has granted a conditional referral of approval for eight two-bedroom units at a Category 3 rate. The Housing Authority contracted with Phil Vaughan of PVCMi Construction Management, Inc. who provided a detailed scope of work that will need to be completed prior to APCHA accepting the building into the City' s affordable housing inventory. The recommendations are extensive, and the report is attached as Exhibit K to this memo. APCHA outlines 18 specific recommendations, including completion of the work outlined in the aforementioned PVCMi report. â€¢ Building: The Chief Building Officer has worked in conjunction with Housing's consultant Phil Vaughan of PVCMi to create an acceptable scope of work (Exhibit K) which must be finalized as part of the conditional acceptance of this project. The Building Dept. will review the plans to ensure the satisfaction of the scope of work is complete. â€¢ Engineering: If the trash enclosure is enlarged or modified it is required to be moved onto private property. If the trash enclosure remains untouched, the Engineering Department still strongly suggests it be moved onto private property. All parking should also be moved onto the site. 6 â€¢ Environmental Health: The current trash area is too small to adequately serve the waste needs of residents. It detracts from the visual appearance of the property and is accessible to wildlife. Since the applicant is proposing to add this to the inventory of the City's affordable housing, it should conform to standards to the extent possible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recognizes the benefits of affordable housing, but is concerned with potential unresolved issues arising from this circa 1965 development. The housing stock that the City accepts and issues housing credits for should be of acceptable quality and competitive with new development. The referral comments from APCHA and the Building Department also recognize this issue and are incorporated as conditions. Staff recommends denial of the requested parking variance, and maintenance of the two existing one- bedroom units, which negates the need for a parking variance and would generate 17 housing credits. In addition, staff recommend continuation to address the existing non-conformities and parking, specifically: a) Upgrade the trash/recycling area to meet current standards; b) Move the trash/recycling and mail pedestal onto the site and show their proposed locations;9 c) Move the wal]~way onto the site or procure an encroachment easement to allow its current locationÂ·< 83 a &661.-ka.#441. ekÂ»p C..0*JibkYL - cuot 96 91- Lige,*J- The Resolution has been written in the affirmative, requiring the applicant to address these issues as a condition of receiving a Letter of Completion and the associated Affordable Housing Credits. RECOMMENDED MOTION (AN motions are worded in the affirmative): "1 move approval of Resolution No _, Series 2017 the request for Affordable Housing, Growth Management, Affordable Housing Credits, and Parking Varianceat 331 -338 Midland Ave, aka Aspen Hills Condominiums." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Staff Findings - Growth Management Exhibit B - Staff Findings - Affordable Housing Exhibit C - Staff Findings - Affordable Housing Credit Exhibit D - Staff Findings - Variance Exhibit E - Referral Comments Exhibit F - Application Exhibit G - Physical Needs Assessment Exhibit H - Energy Audit Exhibit I - APCHA Marketability Standards Exhibit J - APCHA Memo Exhibit K - PVCMi Report 7 .1 Exhibit A Staff Findings Growth Management 26.470.050.B General requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Sta# Response: There is no limit to the amount of affordable housing growth management allotments that may be granted in a year's time. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Stajf Response: The development is currently free-market multi-family residential and the applicant is proposing to change this property to affordable housing multi-family residential. The same units will be utilized without demolition and replacement. The surrounding development is also multi-family residential housing. The proposed use is found to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Staff Response: There are two non-conformities associated with the existing building, which include not meeting the rear yard setback, and a walkway along the building's south side that is over the property line, and which is used to access the decks and unit entrances. These are existing conditions that do not conform with the JUMF zone district's setback requirements. Upon redevelopment of the structure or that particularfeature, the building will need to meet all setback requirements. Staff recommends the applicant be required to either move the walkway on the site or obtain an encroachment easement to allow the walkway to continue in its current location. Additional non-conformities associated with the parcel include the trash/recycling and mail pedestal's location off of the parce!, within the right-of-way. Staff is requiring these elements to be moved onto the subject site. Staffjinds this criterion to not be met. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Planned Development - Project Review approval, as applicable. 1 Staff Response: The site is not subject to HPC nor Commercial Design Review approval, and is not a Planned Development. Stafffinds this criterion to be not applicable. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. Staff Response: There is no commercial or lodge development associated with this project. Sta#jinds this criterion to be not applicable. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. Staff Response: The proposed project involves the conversion of every free-market unit into affordable housing. There are no other uses associated with the site. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Staff Response: Since all of the multi-family housing units exist, Staff does not anticipate any additional demand on public infrastructure. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2 Exhibit B Staff Findings Affordable Housing 26.470.070.4 Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. Staff Response: The proposed project does not currently comply with APCHA's Marketability Standards. The Housing Dept. has contracted with Phil Vaughan of PVCMi Construction Management Inc. to complete a scope of work that includes requirement for a more invasive investigation into the major systems and components of the building. APCHA has provided a referral of approval conditioned upon the applicant's completion of the recommendations, and have created a development agreement. Staff jinds this criterion to be conditionally met. b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. If the mitigation requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a fee- in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one (1) or more units, a fee-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. Staff Response: The proposed affordable housing units are not a requirement of mitigation. Staff.finds this criterion to be not applicable. c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Staff Response: The finishedfirst level of each unit is at least 50% above finished. Grade. Sta#jinds this criterion to be met. 3 d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, ifa legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. Staff Response: The applicant has stated the intent to deed-restrict the units as for sale units to be sold to APCHA qualified buyers, with the possibility of some units remaining rentals. The applicant has not indicated which units will be for-sale and which may be rental units, nor is there a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The applicant is required to provide such an instrument prior to any units being accepted as affordable rental units. Staff finds this criterion to be conditionally met. e. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. Staff Response: The proposed affordable housing units are not requiredfor mitigation and have been found to meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d), as answered previously. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 4 . Exhibit C Staff Findings Affordable Housing Credit 26.540.070 Review criteria for establishing an affordable housing credit An Affordable Housing Credit may be established by the Planning and Zoning Commission if all of the following criteria are met. The proposed units do not need to be constructed prior to this review. A. The proposed affordable housing unit(s) comply with the review standards of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). Staff Response: Staff has found the proposed affordable housing units to comply with these review standards, as answered previously. Sta#finds this criterion to be met. B. The affordable housing unit(s) are not an obligation of a Development Order and are not otherwise required by this Title to mitigate the impacts of development. Staff Response: The proposed units are not an obligation of a Development Order and are not a mitigation requirement of any sort. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 5 . Exhibit D Staff Findings Variance 26.314.040.B Standards applicable to variances. In order to authorize a variance from the permitted uses of Title 26, the appropriate decision- making body shall make a finding that all of the following circumstances exist: 1. Notice by publication, mailing and posting of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Subparagraphs 26.304.060.E.3.a.-. Staff Response: Proper notice has been provided by the applicant. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 2. A variance is the only reasonable method by which to afford the applicant relief, and to deny a variance would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship such that the property would be rendered practically undevelopable, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. Staff Response: The need for an additional on-site parking is a self-created hardship that is triggered by the applicant's proposal to convert two one-bedroom units into two-bedroom units. Denial of the requested variance does not cause unnecessary hardship or hinder the use of the property. Staffjinds this criterion to not be met. 3. The temporary o ff-site storage or construction staging can be undertaken in such a manner so as to minimize disruption, if any, of normal neighborhood activities surrounding the subject parcel. Staff Response: This proposal does not involve the demolition and/or reconstruction of any structure on the site. Stafffinds this criterion to be not applicable. 4. If ownership of the off-site parcel subject to the proposed variance is not vested in the applicant, then verified written authorization of the parcel's owner must be provided. Staff Response: There is no off-site parcel involved in this proposal Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 5. Adequate provision is made to restore the subject parcel to its original condition upon expiration of the variance, including the posting of such financial security as deemed appropriate and necessary by the appropriate decision-making body to ensure such restoration. Staff Response: The applicant's request involves a variance from the addition of required on-site parking. There is not restoration of the subject parcel required. Staff jinds this criterion to be not applicable. 6 Exhibit E Referral Comments A. APCHA: Final acceptance of this project must be approved by APCHA and the City of Aspen prior to and as a condition of issuance of a Development Order and Building Permit by the City ofAspen. A Development Order shall not be issued by the City of Aspen until the APCHA and the applicant enter into a binding development agreement containing the following requirements: 1. Final acceptance and approval is subject to Al?CHA's and the City of Aspen's complete satisfaction of the scope of work based on additional reports and standards spelled out in the Housing Guidelines, the SGMS, and PVCMI's report of recommendations to APCHA dated January 13, 2017. 2. Approval is further subject to the applicant providing to APCHA sufficient third party reports detailing the current physical conditions of the building and units and proposed upgrades necessary to satisfy APCHA requirements in APCHA's sole subjective discretion, which requirements will later be specified by APCHA for the applicant. 3. Any amended or additional reports shall be reviewed by APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen. Any third party consultant hired by APCHA to review or make recommendations on this project shall be reimbursed by applicant. 4. The APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen, shall work with the applicant to establish agreeable technical specifications for the required upgrades. 5. The applicant shall reimburse APCHA for any third party inspections and reports, including legal consultation associated with drafting and approving a Development Agreement. This shall be incorporated into the Development Agreement. 6. The building permit for the required upgrades shall not be issued by the City of Aspen unless the permit demonstrates the required upgrades are in accordance with the agreed-upon specifications, which will necessitate a third party construction consultant to review the building permit application on behalf o f APCHA. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy or Letter of Completion for the required upgrades and rehabilitation work shall not be issued unless the improvements have been made in accordance to the scope ofwork and specifications agreed to prior to Building Permit. APCHA will rely on third party consultant and the City's Building Department to inspect and accept the improvements and standards set forth by Al?CHA for affordable housing conversion at the expense of the applicant. 8. Prior to APCHA formally accepting the units and authorizing the City of Aspen to issue Housing Certificates, the applicant must complete upgrades to the building and units and establish new Association documents and appropriately fund reserves in order to meet the satis faction of APCHA staff. 9. Per the Housing Guidelines and applicant's request, all converted units will be Category 3. 1 10. Applicant shall convert Unit #331 (one-bedroom unit) that is illegally non-conforming to a two-bedroom unit. 11. A final Capital Reserve Study completed by a certified third party will be required upon acceptance of the project after any rehabilitation and construction for HOA designated common area components and systems. The report shall be given to the HOA and to APCHA by a certified reserve specialist at the time of Certificate of Occupancy or a Certificate of Completion, or within one month of either. Housing Credits shall not be issued by the City of Aspen until the Capital Reserve Study is completed and accepted by APCHA. 12. The applicant and the APCHA shall enter into a development agreement outlining the use of and cost allocation for any third party reviews or inspections. APCHA reserves the right to bill applicant for direct costs attributable to project review and legal fees with no additional administrative charge. Housing Credits shall not be issued by the City of Aspen Community Development Department until all outstanding costs and fees are reimbursed to or paid on behalf of APCHA for third party review services. 13. The applicant has the option of retaining the units as rental units or selling the units through the lottery system. Once a unit has been sold to a qualified employee, the unit will remain as an ownership unit and shall be sold through APCHA has stated in the deed restriction. 14. The applicant has the option of maintaining three ofthe units for current owners, either as rentals or ownership. The current owners shall be allowed to remain in the units, shall not be required to meet the minimum occupancy requirements, and shall not be required to meet the maximum assets. However, at such time the current owner (which shall be known as an Exempt Tenant or Exempt Owner) makes the decision to sell or vacate their unit, it shall be opened up to fully qualified, top priority households only per the Housing Guidelines. Also, the applicant shall only be eligible to collect 1.75 FTE Housing Credits for any two-bedroom unit occupied by a single-person household. The applicant may be issued the outstanding balance of.5 FTE Housing Credits once the unit has been occupied by a qualified 2-person household. 15. If at any time a rental unit is found to be out of compliance, and upon completion of APCHA's Notice of Violation (NOV) process, any remaining units occupied as rentals shall be listed for sale with APCHA and sold through the lottery system. 16. The developer shall obtain approval of all condominium documents to APCHA for review prior to acceptance. These shall include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. Articles of Incorporation b. By-Laws c. Condominium Declaration d. Condo Plat Map 2 e. Nine required governance policies required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA). Â£ Budget 17. At the closing on all units, the developer shall provide to each new homeowner a binder that will include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. All condominium documents stated above; b. All mechanical warranties, all warranties for appliances, etc., that are available from any additional work completed by the developer 18. The Development Order shall provide the APCHA the reasonable right to not accept the project into the affordable housing inventory if the applicant fails to prove to APCHAÂ°s complete satisfaction that the physical condition is safe and acceptable under the standards agreed to, and/or has sufficient capital reserve funds to help safeguard the future affordability and replacement cost of common area components by the Association and its homeowners. A. Building Dept: The Housing Authority's Marketability Standards document is intended to create a scope of work for this project. Once the scope of work is created and the applicant has submitted for a building permit this department will then become involved in the plans to satisfy the intent of the housing board. At this time the department defers to the Housing Department's expert consultant to identify the information required to fulfill the requirements of the APCHA guidelines. B. Engineering: The engineering department will require that the trash enclosure be relocated to private property if the project enlarges it. If the trash enclosure does not get touched, the engineering department strongly suggests the trash enclosure be relocated to private property. We also strongly suggest the parking be relocated onto private property as well. C. Environmental Health: The current trash and recycling area is not only in the right of way, but it is far too small to adequately serve the waste needs residents, detracts from the visual appearance of the property, and is exposed to access by wildlife. All of these conditions do not meet the current code standards and would not be approved if the development were being proposed today. Since the applicant would like to add this property to the inventory of affordable housing in the City, we believe it should conform as much as possible to the standards the City requires. 1. The area designated for trash and recycling containers should be located within the property boundaries. This location must be ADA accessible, as well as provide access to the waste haulers. 2. The area should be delineated to indicate it is a space dedicated to the storage of waste and no other materials. Ideally5 this would result in a wildlife secure enclosure. 3 3. The code requires 120 square feet fortrash and recycling (Municipal Code 12.10.050 (A)a) for this size of multi-family development, but we recognize the constraints of this property may result in a smaller area. Although there is a high need for affordable housing in the upper valley, residents in the employee housing system should be provided the same safety and quality of life in their housing circumstance as those on the free market. The existing conditions discourage waste diversion (i.e. recycling) by not providing adequate space or easy access to the containers. There is a consistent hazard presented by the open storage o f the waste receptacles in the right of way, both by impeding traffic and attracting wildlife. Finally, the exposed waste receptacles are an eyesore. Until these conditions are remedied, our recommendation would be to deny accepting this property into the City's inventory. 4 f*W-Â§ 1 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT -ASPEN HILL CONDOS Â¥. 72;,4 940 . -r 11 I ./ 4*'. PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos 331-338 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO Report Generated on: 10/21/2016 RDS-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 1 of 52 ---... PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS October 21, 2016 RD3, Inc. 9871 E Progress Circle Greenwood Village, CO, 80111 Mr. Chris Bendon, SUBJECT: Phvsical Needs Assessment - Aspen Hill Condos This project summary is not to be used alone. The attached report is intended to be read In its entirety. Definitions of the terms used in the Report Overview to describe average or overall conditions include the following: - Excellent - In "like new" condition and/or high quality materials used. - Good - no remedial work is recommended. - Fair - system is aging and/or minor remedial work may be recommended. - Poor - replacement or major remedial work is recommended. - Repair / Replace - immediate remedial work is recommended. COST TABLES The tables display estimated repair and/or replacement costs. The estimated costs are preliminary and are based upon the Assessor's Inspector's experience in conducting similar projects. The actual cost will be affected by factors such as duration of time to correction, site access, market conditions, and other contingencies applied by Owner or not necessarily aware to the Assessor. CONVENTIONS For your convenience, the following conventions have been used in this report. 1) Emergency: a system or component which is considered significantly deficient or is unsafe. Significant deficiencies need to be corrected and, except for some safely items, are likely to cause further asset / infrastructure damage If remediation is not acted upon immediately (no delays). Emergencies can involve significant costs. 2) Urgent: denotes a condition that is unsafe or if not addressed can cause further asset / infrastructure damage. Urgent items need prompt remediation attention in the current fiscal period. 3) Expedited: denotes a system or component which is missing or which needs corrective action in the next fiscal period to assure proper and reliable function. 4) Routine: denotes a system or component that is in the routine planning cycle for prioritization and scheduling. Routine items may also be items that need further investigation and / or monitoring in order to determine if repairs or corrective actions are necessary. 5) Deferred: denotes items that are outside of the 'physical asset life cyde considerations' and need to be review and prioritized into the other items by the Owners executive team. Deferred items could also be items that are beyond the planning horizon of the assessment. The assessment is to identify the physical asses systems that will need repair, replacement or corrective / remediation action of five (5) year ' planning horizon. PLANNING HORIZON BREAKOUT The planning horizon periods are broken down into: - "0" indicating immediate action is recommended in the current fiscal period. - "1" indicating action is recommended in the the next fiscal year over the five year planning horizon. - "2" indicating action is recommended In the the 2nd fiscal year over the five year planning horizon. - "3" indicating action Is recommended in the the 3rd fiscal year over the five year planning horizon. - "4" indicating action is recommended in the the 4th fiscal year over the five year planning horizon. - "5' Indicating action is recommended in the the 5th fiscal year over the five year planning horizon. 1 - RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 2 of 52 THE SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT It is the goal of the assessment to put a building in a better position to make business decisions surroundjng the prioritization and allocation of capital funds. Not all improvements will be identified during the inspection. Unexpected repairs should still be anticipated and budgeted. The inspection should not be considered a definitive plan, a guarantee, or warranty of any kind. The Limitations section of each component of the report should be thoroughly examined as many issues arise within the course of the inspection which limits the visual inspection. PURPOSE The purpose of this assessment was to provide an observation and report on the physical condition and maintenance of the property and its improvements. This report addresses items that we believe are significant for the continued operation of this facility in its current usage and occupancy, consistent with comparable properties of similar age. Enhancements or other non-PNA capital item changes, can be added by Owner and prioritized with all other items in the report. The Capital Planning tool will allow the Owner's team to submit their own items, if desired, for integration into an overall Capital Plan into over the planning horizon. The RD3 capital planning tool can be a 'living document' allowing it to be continuously updated and items made 'inactive'. SCOPE RD3 scope of services for this assessment included a visit to the property with observations of the property and its improvements, reviews of available construction and maintenance documents, and interviews with various persons. The purpose of these observations was to assess the general physical condition and deferred maintenance status of the properly and to recommend repair and operation and/or to be restored to a good condition consistent with comparable properties of similar age. The assessment was performed in general accordance with ASTM E 2018-15, Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments: Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process. OPINIONS Opinions of cost for recommended repairs have been prepared and posted with each description and In the site and overall cost summary tables in the report. Items ranked "Repair/Replace" will be indicated In the "0" years column and should be considered for Immediate or near future attention. Items ranked "Repair/Replace" with a future year (other than "0") indicates a recommendation that the item can be prioritized between year "0" and the recommended year. Items with a "0" planning horizon indicates it should be considered for immediate or near future attention. Items ranked Poor are those items needing repair or replacement to remedy physical deficiencies, such as deferred maintenance, that are beyond the scope of regular maintenance that should be undertaken on a priority basis within one to two years. Items or areas which are ranked Excellent, Good and Fair conditions will be posted in years typically the second planning horizon year and beyond. RD3 has prepared one comprehensive Facilities Condition Assessment Report which includes pertinent information from building(s) present on the subject property. RD3 has provided the standard Property Summary Table normally utilized in RD3 Physical Needs Assessment Reports, RD3 has provided suggestions for repairs and upgrades of selected systems that are not considered 'deferred maintenance' or that the deferral of maintenance has made the deterioration beyond what would be a maintenance item. These suggestions have been provided to assist the Owner in identifying certain maintenance issues that may prolong the life of the respective systems. Suggestions for repairs and upgrades have been provided for selected conditions and should not be considered all-inclusive. RD3 has provided general information pertaining to out of scope issues including ADA Compliance and potential microbial or other growth issues. No comment is offered on environmental conditions or asbestos containing materials. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Aspen Hill Condos is a Multi-Family low rise condominium complex with eight (8) units that is targeted for 'employee housing' with Aspen Housing Authority located at 331 to 338 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO. The Aspen HIll building exteriors are wood lap board siding. For the age of the building the exterior siding is In good condition. The wood lap board has spots of that need repairs that are not Included in this report because they are general maintenance. Interiors are in fair to very good condition with spot problems. See below description of identified capital Issues. The assessor entered and viewed 100% of the unit interiors. SITE VISIT RD3 representative, Rob de Grasse, PE / PEng, PMP, LEED AP, CEM, CDSM, CxA, conducted the subject site assessment on Thursday, October 13, 2016. INTERVIEWS At the time of the site visit, the Assessor interviewed the complex HOA President conducted discussions with Mr. Chris Bendon and Mr. Bill Boehring. about any known issues at the property. LIMITATIONS OF STRUCTURE INSPECTION RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 3 of 52 nn3 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS ~ PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Structural components concealed behind finished surfaces could not be inspected. Â· Only a representative sampling of visible structural components were inspected. Â· Furniture and/or storage restricted access to some structural components. Â· Engineering or architectural services such as calculation of structural capacities, adequacy, or integrity are not part of a building inspection. LIMITATIONS OF ROOFING INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Not all of the underside of the roof sheathing is inspected for evidence of leaks. Â· Evidence of prior leaks may be disguised by interior finishes. Â· Estimates of remaining roof life are approximations only and do not preclude the possibility of leakage. Leakage can develop at any time and may depend on rain intensity, wind direction, ice buildup, and other factors. Â· Antennae, chimney/flue Interiors which are not readily accessible are not inspected and could require repair. Â· Roof inspection may be limited by access, condition, weather, or other safety concerns. LIMITATIONS OF EXTERIOR INSPECTION This Is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· A representative sample of exterjor components was inspected rather than every occurrence of components. Â· The Inspection does not include an assessment of geological, geotechnical, or hydrological conditions, or environmental hazards. Â· Screening, shutters, awnings, or similar seasonal accessories, fences, recreational facilities, outbuildings, seawalls, break walls, docks, erosion control and earth stabilization measures are not inspected unless specifically agreed-upon and documented in this report. LIMITATIONS OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION This Is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Electrical components concealed behind finished surfaces are not Inspected. â€¢ Only a representative sampling of outlets and light fixtures were tested. Â· Furniture and/or storage restricted access to some electrical components which may not be inspected. Â· The inspection does not include remote control devices, alarm systems and components, low voltage wiring, systems, and components, ancillary wiring, systems, and other components which are not part of the primary electrical power distribution system. LIMITATIONS OF HEATING INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· The adequacy of heat supply or distribution balance is not inspected. Â· The interior of nues or chimneys which are not readily accessible are not inspected. Â· The furnace heat exchanger, humidifier, or dehumidifier, and electronic air filters are not inspected. Â· Solar space heating equipment/systems are not Inspected. LIMITATIONS OF COOLING / HEAT PUMPS INSPECTION This is a visual Inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Window mounted air conditioning units are not inspected. â€¢ The cooling supply adequacy or distribution balances are not inspected. LIMITATIONS OF INSULATION / VENTILATION INSPECTION RD3-005 - Aspen Hm condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 4 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Insulation/ventilation type and levels in concealed areas are not inspected. Insulation and vapor barriers are not disturbed and no destructive tests (such as cutting openings in walls to look for insulation) are performed. Â· Potentially hazardous materials such as Asbestos and Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) cannot be positively identified without a detailed inspection and laboratory analysis. This is beyond the scope of the inspection, Â· An analysis of indoor air quality is not part of our inspection unless explicitly contracted-for and discussed in this or a separate report. Â· Any estimates of insulation R values or depths are rough average values. LIMITATIONS OF PLUMBING INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Portions of the plumbing system concealed by finishes and/or storage (below sinks, etc.), below the structure, or beneath the ground surface are not inspected. Â· Water quantity and water quality are not tested unless explicitly contracted-for and discussed in this or a separate report. Â· Clothes washing machine connections are not inspected. Â· Interiors of flues or chlmneys which are not readily accessible are not inspected. Â· Water conditioning systems, solar water heaters, fire and lawn sprinkler systems, and private waste disposal systems are not inspected unless explicitly contracted-for and discussed in this or a separate report. LIMITATIONS OF INTERIOR INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Furniture, storage, appliances and/or wall hangings are not moved to permit inspection and may block defects. â€¢ Carpeting, window treatments, central vacuum systems, building appliances, recreational facilities, paint, wallpaper, and other finish treatments are not inspected. LIMITATIONS OF MOLD INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited In scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Materials concealed behind finished surfaces could not be inspected. LIMITATIONS OF ADA REVIEW This is a visual inspection only. The Inspection was limited by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· Limited review does not consist of a full American with Disabilities Act inspection. LIMITATIONS OF FIRE PROTECTION INSPECTION This is a visual inspection limited in scope by (but not restricted to) the following conditions: Â· No equipment operated or tested. Sincerely, Robert de Grasse President cc. Bill Boehring RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 5 of 52 nnil PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL NEEDS Site / Landscaping The landscaping is in fair to good condition no areas that need to be addressed other than regular landscape maintenance. The sidewalks stairs are 4" x 4" wood timber structure which are deteriorated and due for replacement. Building Exteriors The building exteriors are good condition with the exception of the wood lap board, its associated caulking / sealing between the brick and other disslmilar adjacent materials. There are signs of water damage to the trim and transitional strips at the bottom of or transition of the wood lap board to other surfaces. Any repairs should be coordinated to be at the same time or after the painting project(s). Structure / Foundation No visible problems with the foundations. The roof joists that are exposed on the exterior of the building are 'twisting'. It Is recommended that the condition is study by a structural engineer to determine any action required. Roofing The single ply roofing systems has numerous deficiencies that need to be addressed. A pool of funds was allocated for the various repairs / corrections but the Owner should assess whether a full replacement is a prudent corrective measure (cost, useful life, etc.) Gutters & Downspouts The roofing gutters need to be put on a regular cleaning maintenance cycle. We were informed that they were already being cleaned twice a year. the cleaning of the gutters needs to Include the clean out of the downspouts (several were observed to be blocked). Roadways and Sidewalks The sidewalks themselves are in good condition. the stairs leading from the parking lot to the sidewalks are past their useful life and need to be replaced. One set of stairs area potential trip hazard. HVAC / Mechanical No issues were observed at the time of the assessment for the HVAC / mechanical / plumbing systems. Electrical No electrical Issues were observed. All receptacles tested were wired properly and GFCI functional. Interiors The Assessor conducted an Interior Inspection of 100% of the apartment units and common area spaces. The majority of the units were tidy / clean and in good condition with few to no capital issues of note. Many of the units have had their interiors upgraded (i.e., flooring, kitchens, appliances, etc.). Two of the units converted their two (2) bedrooms into one (1) larger bedroom suites. The identified capital issues were items that would typically be handled at the turn of the units or by regular maintenance. Therefore it is assumed that any interior needs will be handled during the units' next turn; there Is not an interiors replacement program added to the capital plan. There are minor costs allocated for the identified repairs that are shown in the cost tables under year 1 "Units". OVERALL COST SUMMARY PLANNING HORIZON COST SUMMARY TABLE 012345 PLUMBING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 30 ~ BUILDING ENVELOPE $0 $29,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 -743*19- ~NIT COST $0 $2,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total ; $0 -'-: (-$42,230 - 19-- $0 -lf $0 1 $0 The above summary cost table shows the main system roll up costs that were identified during the site visits. RD3 005 Aspen HUI Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 6 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS The total unit related costs are shown In the table in year 1. A details cost table can be found between the individual capital needs that follow and the Unit-by-Unit Inspection section. RD3-005 - Aspen HM Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 7 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS SITE PHOTOS & IDENTIFIED CAPITAL NEEDS RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 8 of 52 RD PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS SITE Location: Aspen Hill Condos - CapEx-00373 - SITE - Site Signage Description: Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 ASPEN HILLS 331 - 338 Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - CapEx-00374 - SITE - General Pictures Description: Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos - Created: 10/21/2016 Page 9 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS r 7.722Â«i â€¢1,- ,-7,â€¢ - fuâ€ž.,TY |Â£ ~*-drt#f'~~ *. 4'ENT" .Tre*EnTMEâ‚¬ l.=4 1 ...b~ 2 1411#44~92Â·14 ...13:9;5,1 1.1".Il.I- I. /1*-,li~'-- - --- 7,f: 1322,-Â· f - 1.. t -A -42*1~. W. ........91...... . 1* ~ 2,Â¢.wim.... .~1- ... 9% rir,aa~ A ./I#w. fmillillillillippli*r, 111,11 1 illifillilillilli r. i ~~li~111 I . 4 1 .1 -' 2: . .r.*Â¢ I. fÂ·'4 >41'' , 1 m,f , . i :Fl:, 2 " 1. J 1 62 . Submitted by: Robert de Grasse RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 10 of 52 D; 41- PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Location: Aspen Hill Condos - (YGFi) 4: Routinel CapEx-00376 - SITE - Sidewalks 1 Description: Would tread stairs are passed 75% of useful life. Recommend replacement. RS MEANS. Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 Structural concrete, in place, stairs (3500 psi), 3'-6" wide, free standing, includes forms(4 uses), Grade 60 rebar, concrete (Portland cement Type I), placing and finishing, excludes safety treads - $40.87/LF Category Asset Integrity Nose Cost $ 1,720.00 1 01' ~ 4 1,42 1, '07&*d~ r.. --uu= N:Timqw- r x ..1=r---'---1*uilitrfq U:lE#Zil 'Â·Â·'Â·Â·'-Â·Â·Â·~Â· ~-~7/= ji,L:4. L,-1.1 Al"i wi I --...1,u5 ip 1 4 1 'tr .1 '.rek . -' MAW///88:,immilill'le 0. Ard=49.~~~~ 2 -r 1. r,r . 4.1 - rr, -9 t- T 4- s . â€ž.4 .-â€¢,42 PIG- . JSUMM .. fr~JI~91*kia . . b ,) . , a t. , f. ' -271.&24"..1.1&44&31,4..= 1.9 ... 'jl<2'2 4 , LAIBil:Alligrit<im . - -4 W== A few of the treads have deteriorated to a point where it is a potential trip hazard Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - Year: 1 4: Routine CapEx-00375 - SITE - Retaining Walls C~ Description: Replace Retaining wall. RS MEANS. Selective demolition, retaining walls, concrete Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 retaining wall, 6' high, excludes reinforcing - $13.98/LF. Retaining wall fastening, timber, 6" x 6" - Category Asset Integrity $6.26/LF. Retaining walls, timber, 6" x 6" - Retaining wall accessories, gravel backfill, place and spread by hand - 37.31/CY. Cost $ 8,460.00 ...ta . V-2.-/a..1............................= 1/1/"Illill/)5///MIL#iwi,1,/1/"Illilli////ill nw=*Smi<#f~Â£4'.0,al# - ./ 1 .....1 60' of low retaining wall 50' of 3' high retaining wall Submitted by: Robert de Grasse RD3 005 Aspen Hm Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 11 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Location: Aspen Hill Condos - 4: Routine CapEx-00378 - SITE - Fencing Description: Fencing is not owned by the Aspen Hill Condos. Therefore no bwdget is allocated for the Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 identified deficiencies. -1-- -' --' Il-/'!9IN//1 .Er,1 1 7 11 1 37 1 '0 I 1~ 1 A - 1 ' f. JIL.; j. : tÂ· 1 1 , 1 \ 1- te.. r ~ !.1 " 1 1 5 t . 4" 7. '91 ..13 :92'' - --1. , , 1 .490.14' '. ... i. 4|e Additional pictures Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - (War:-1 1 1 4: Routine CapEx-00377 - SITE - Fencing *D Description: Fencing is not owned by the Aspen Hill Condos. Therefore no budget is allocated for the Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 identified deficiencies. Category Asset Integrity RD3 005 Aspen Hm Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 12 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS - w<j I 'Iit . 7 Ft.~~1'.'1 1 -Vlli -fli*filha; lillnli li~. %1!..1 .2 31. I I. * * I .*-lk % -- 1 iÂ· 4 K 74 ; . e ki l -I. ,% '1 1 1.1.111~ - M .. m.jilia 41 - Submitted by: Robert de Grasse RD)-005 -Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 13 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS BUILDING ENVELOPE Location: Aspen Hill Condos - Year: 1 4: Routine CapEx-00385 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Roof Description: Single ply fully adhered roofing membrane over insulated deck. Although the existing Identified on: Oct 21, 2016 owner's Representative indicated that the roof Is relatively recently installed, the roof has a number of Category Asset Integrity Issues that must be noted and corrected to allow its proper useful life to be achieved. A pool of repair funds has been allocated for the corrective measure. It is recommended that a cost benefit analysis Cost $ 15,000.00 between the cost of repairs vs. the replacement cost be conducted to ensure the most appropriate and best long-term use life decision. The roof is approximately 47 Squares. . ~[,- - L.~le".11<.7,-/4 /Â£ f-----7.ji-2 .. /90/It/lill...Ill"lill /81:21.~ir,it 1 EFâ„¢--'Ii.HI'll- 4: 4 li~li General Roof picture 1 . -- Improper patch work of hole in membrane. This should be a proper patch per the manufacturefs recommended best practices, and most manufacturers guidelines, with a minimum of 4" of patch sealing around the hole. RD3-005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 14 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Ul -4*96----I-- .Al-- . ..24:96 4 11Â£2.1 :.~k..,42â€¢Ak, 3-~Â«, r t.4, 47 44 'iÂ·47â€¢iV~ . ..Il .27~ Wk:*11;24Â£6:dilli -Pr"rea /19/dillifel ..73//1/1991 !222..dfatlaill, 247-.9- - d~~ tt~ /.~ il /7,1 - - - - 21*76're.-1"'-- ..,=39- . i Numerous holes found in the roofing Hey number of the roof deck fasteners have HeyThe Installing contractoir left "Sharps" membrane. This is a sample picture. punctured through the roofing membrane [pebble or other sharp objects] under the causing damage / holes. Either the wrong roofing membrane at the time of installation fasteners were used or improperly installed. and has caused a punctures / holes. . 1 \ ,~= ~ f C. I'llaall I"""killiwill illillizl 2 1Â». Â·Â·~~7~21'.97 IN .. f....... 1 /t ly . ifill/=1 ...Bil - I. -'p'.. :1~ ,@j~.. -./.289 '' - i 0Â·Â·, .r 4 1 ... b .tRi k .......1 '...9.El Â·,"b I /- 2.7r 4 ..,hÂ£-.AS A il *04. , 9- 31= -191 1 . . Mat m Ill,- sri ~ W , 4. U -MI/'"=/1-1/=2 4* 1 ~tht. 4 Wil Patch materials for newer smokestack is Patch materials on the field of the roof is Gutters overflowing with leaves and debris. suspect as not being per the manufacturer's suspect as not being per the manufacturer's Downspouts were observed to be fully specifications. Likely not appropriate patch specifications. Likely not appropriate patch clogged. It is the assessofs opinion that the material used. The rate of deterioration material used. The rate of deterioration overflow of the gutters has caused the roof (cracking, etc.) of the patch materials will (cracking, etc.) of the patch materials will truss / structure twisting / distortion issues result in early failure. result in early failure. reported in the report. Correcting the overflow issue will stop further structure issues. RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos RD ; Created: 10/21/2016 Page 15 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS ---- f ...U. .I....................1.-; I , . A.,7,0**I /1. ,-- Â· 6 - - I.-'"=-- .~ .9'b=9" ~ .14 El//),9,#-. 3/ , pill-.te. :41- - .....MYVV- * a.yeELI 4 *111>411,(Fdom< Severe bubbling of seams in the roofing Patch materials on the field of the roof is Patch materials used on the repairs to teh system. This is due to causes: leaking suspect as not being per the manufacturer's skylights are suspect as not being per the seams, bubbling not corrected at time of specifications. Likely not appropriate patch manufacturer's specifications. Likely not installation, etc. It is recommended that all material used. The rate of deterioration appropriate patch material used. The rate of bubbling, in particular under the seams / (cracking, etc.) of the patch materials will deterioration (cracking, etc.) of the patch joints, be corrected. result in early failure. materials will result in early failure. Submitted by: RobeR de Grasse ' Location: Aspen Hill Condos- (Year:1) 4: Routine ~: CapEx-00381 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Roof Drainage Repair/Replace Description: A number of the roof downspouts are not directing the rain water away from the building Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 structure, foundation and deck structure. recommend correcting to reduce water related damage / Category Asset Integrity deterioration. Cost $ 800.00 RDS 005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 16 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS i-/---- 7-/-~efl W i :\141 1/IMI//wi/'I//I&'/1/i//B i ill 3 ,<1 1Â·li i,1.vi- A re:Jul By#- Example 6f properly diverted roof dralnage water away from building Jil .. 14 . Ir. i FC 'tj ..97.14 L Extend to direct away building foundation. Extend to direct away from deck foundation and columns. a 1 ; : E- Li= 1 F.~#*Ab1ZLI.,~ n lf[Di' I Downspout on south side of building runs Â£9/6/A~ into window well. Correct to have roof water runoff diverted away from building structure. Downspout on south east comer of building butts up against wooden fence with no free : flow drainage capability Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - 1 Year: 0 3. Expedited J CapEx-00386 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Windows Repair/Replace Description: New owners to investigate the requirements for added Egress from lower / sub-grade unit Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 windows. This is not a current capital deficiency therefore no cost is Included In the capital budget. Category Safely / Code RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 17 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - Year: 1 4: Routine CapEx-00382 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Decks with railings Repair/Replace Description: Decks and deck railings. The decks have deferred maintenance (painting and minor Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 repairs). recommend that all deck damage (railings - snow related), minor wood damage, and railing Category Asset Integrity securing be completed and thereafter the entire wood deck structure be prepped and refinished / painted. -2500 SF / 30 LF. RS MEANS. Porch / decking framing, treated lumber, posts and columns, Cost $ 11,500.00 4"x4" - $3.48/LF Wood surface preparation, exterior, scrape and sand, heavy - $1.02/sf. Paints & Coatings, wood, prime + 1 Coat - $1.25/SF. -al /1.--- 1~ 1 7 Â»- . PE# 1 Irlit t. 9 ..../...........( -w:. 1~1.NIB I 4 1 1 1 91{4,~,~7 //~r r., : r --7 :/4, : 1 u-- .24 2" . -1 . 4. f.t.:7 -h t/ I .. ~,%-a 't T 4. .. .. 44 Pl}*61. Sample picture of surface condition. Sample picture of surface condition. Sample picture of surface condition. RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Cond. RD 1 Created: 10/21/2016 Page 18 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS 1-=.Ile 1 *r~ Ai~ 1 1%191 -9. 1 - :41 -1-" 1 Ii'littlit 1,1'11*~m 4 1 1 1 11 f! 1-I Illid*%42 '11 'tati, 1,1/1 ..1 .St/Er,Zia .A 1 _-12!22~~1~ . 4,~//d ~' , ., -L..- â€¢Â·11. ~I ".1 lit \ '1 1 7 SLY' JL-i-JI/ ./. 40 151. I - Damage to railing likely due to snow fall off Damage to railing likely due to snow fall off t ---- =59,1,-#-0 -11 ofthe roof oftheroof -S Moisture is not extensive. 11*9 ..11" &44 al,WWâ€ž'~ 03' 1 .-S/,-A'dil= ' 1"'ll'll'lli .X-J A -/.-7-'Xgl 41 LA i .3 K. 1 Sample picture of surface condition. Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - Year'._1 3: Expedited CapEx-00379 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Structure Description: The exposed roof structural members of the beginning the signs of water damage / wood Identified on: Oct 21, 2016 rot at the top of some of the structural members and other structural members are twisted/distorted. Category Asset Integrity Recommend that the gutter overflowing water be corrected immediately (assessor's opinion of the source of the problem). It is recommended that an assessment by a structural engineer be conducted. A Cost $ 2,000.00 suggested correction is to add a structural member running between each of the existing members (-1' under the soffit) to create a structural space frame between all members and stop further twisting. The only cost in this capital plan is for a structural engineer assessment. RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 19 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS 1. Sample picture - the~ weight of the bike is I - not causing of distortion ;-) ti~ :-Â·~ ati~ f 1 jr *1 2 6 Sample picture of structural roof member Sample picture. Note that the wood siding is twistinp.._ * . ---- cracked due to the structural man fortwist - L -//A + - -~.I .1 ~~~ '4'f~ - M VI- 1 - -1. K- - 1-- ---,~ 1 41. Start of water infiltration the top of structural Evidellce of water damage evidence of Evidence of the beginning of water damage member water damage on the top of the structural member RD3 005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 20 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Submitted by: Robert de Grasse RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 21 of 52 nn; PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS PLUMBING Location: Aspen Hill Condos - CapEx-00384 - PLUMBING - Water Service ~ Description: Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 - I,/gal . . .1 t. 4. -7 -0 ,/6. Ell,BA< 1/lill- - Â£>4 1 1 '* 4,-7,1 :27 73 * .2 + k , 1 6 9.-1- .4/ '' ./.. ...a t. . 4 1 /1. 4 - ... f v 0 -F f 4. ti /4 1 8 â‚¬ P L.' i -0 tz .1 39 â‚¬ ./ r I Jâ‚¬20* I > .r.- . :Â¥79- I & i, +1 f ../. ./ I Submitted by: Robert de Grasse Location: Aspen Hill Condos - CapEx-00383 - PLUMBING - DHW Systems - Water Heaters (Central) Excellent Description: Newly installed (no more than a couple years old) Identified on: Oct 13, 2016 Category Asset Integrity RD3-005 - Aspen HUI Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 22 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS millimp-1./.lirl'll... Im WATER ~U 51. 11- - t-, *A le 1 J .>49 r.. 0 Â· Â·-Â»4 I - /"~I :i~74 "00,H F- 1,141â€¢71. 22 t 12. --1, 0*,CCI VENT #11**C,UI,lf/114 ~ag#*~7 *f. 60,183 ~~LA 1 C.ft 0Â·el,UAI)031001~111.-1,4 IÂ® '*MAL OU .-- ..1, 6- -I. * =-441*01â€ž.cOMflViWIiIl UER"."/IM.*0/0/~/. . V,O/'<*~c'~le ,9 4% ~L- ht RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 23 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Submitted by: Robert de Grasse CATEGORY COST TABLE OVERALL COST SUMMARY Safety / Asset Cost Accessibility Reduction Enhancement Code Integrity elliBalI $10,180 ~%8-F-'-i~'t~5~ $10,180 Wi~ . Site Signage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .4,.-fo,==_ General Pictures $0 $0 $0 $0 $O - 1~02Â¥ , 42> Sidewalks $0 $1,720 $0 $0 $0 [ 1:14=' Fencing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Ik *M*lf Retaining Walls $0 $8,460 $0 $0 $0 ~$814609 Ilimi#Â£glilli*ilmjft.'2'r:tilliba1Jillihilialaqf 3 -2 1 $O DHW Systems - Water Heaters (Central) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 â€¢ Fit' Water Service $0 $0 $0 80 $0 ~F" 2*~ 0t,j]RE)11'I, Ati#Ng&â€¢14r #/6 -., 'F h'% L ..4 -{**ViS//) _*/* :*'i*jll) j till: 4/ $29,300 Roof Drainage $0 $800 $0 $0 $0 L-'~ Windows $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Decks with railings $0 $11,500 $0 $0 $0 â‚¬$11,500 Structure $0 $2,000 $0 $0 Roof $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dtai $0 $39,480 $0 $0 $0 $39,480 RD3-005 - Aspen HM Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 24 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS PLANNING HORIZON COST TABLE OVERALL COST SUMMARY 012345 ...#.'74 -rn..... f..Fl/~V,.I..--=.=-Il.I..-p'll-h# *....--I~ .-IrÂ£/& Site Signage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1, Â·Â· i.9,= General Pictures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 at.. .r Sidewalks $0 $1,720 . $O $O $O $O t,Mole'l~ Fencing ~0 $0 00 $0 $0 $0 $0 '2 lii. : Retaining Walls $0 $8,460 $0 $0 $0 tl:UMBING 9...'I.I..~lmll.lI#6.I $~I-#I'll~E.e * 1~i!-'21:1$0 DHW Systems - Water Heaters (Central) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 4 1EF 1 Water Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '3. ~.jl~ bmrmi~*~ ,~$O~1r $29,308'~" â‚¬--; $6.-â€ž-MFO~~~~~~~=~~~- ~ Roof Drainage $0 $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 1,149 - m Windows $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Decks with railings $0 $11,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 . I i.. Structure $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Roof $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total 1 $0 $39,480 | $0 1 $0 $0 $0 ~ $39,480 RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 25 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS UNIT-BY-UNIT INSPECTION RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 26 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS UNIT-BY-UNIT INSPECTION Conditions: ~N = NEW~ G = GOOD ~ F = FAIR ~ Rc = REPLACE ~ Rr= REPAIR~ Apartment Number 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 337 338 Floor Plan #of Bedrooms 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 #of Bathrooms 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Occupied / Vacant /No Entry O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wall GG G GGG Floor N G NGG Ceiling G G GGG Light G G GGGG Sink G G GNGG Faucet N G GNGG Garbage Disposal G G G G Diswasher N G GN N Refrigerator N G NNN N Stove N G NNN N Microwave G G GGG G Cabinets N N NNN Countertops N G GNG Doors G G GGG HVAC G G G G Water Heater G G G G Water Heater Pan G G G G Walls GF G Blinds GG G Ceiling GG G Flooring GGF G Entry Way Tile G G G G Light G GG G Faucet GGG G Patio / Balcony G G G G Patio Door/ Glass Door G G G G Entry / Exterlor Door G G G G Ceiling Fans G G G G Fireplace GG G Washer GG G Dryer G G G Sink N G N G Faucet N G N G Mirror GG N G Exhaust / Venting G G G G Walls GG N G Ceiling G G N G Tub/Shower N G N G Tub / Shower Faucet G Rr N G Tub/Shower-Tile/Surround G Rr Rr N G Rr Lighting Fixture G G G G G G G Cabinets NFG G N G N RD3-005 -Aspen HM Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 27 of 52 Bathroor 1 1 Common Areas, Kitchen m m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q g Z O 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 -6 N G)zOO-â€¢-â€¢ QUQQG)06)6)G)QOG)G) Q.OG)6)9006)100636)6)GOQQO=G) Z G) G) Q Q G) G) G) G) Q G) Q 0 6) 61 Q Q G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZG)QG)OOz CS u.(90000000(900(90(90(90(98000(900(90 O G) O 0 G) G) Q G) G) Q G) G) G) G) G) 6) G) O 0 63 0 G) O Q G) ZZQZZG)G)ZZ Z Z 0 0 0 0 G) O Q G) G) Q O Q Q Q PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Countertops GGGGGGGGG Flooring N F Rr Rr G N N G Rr ToiletGGGGGNGG Doors GGG GNG Walls GFGG NGG Closet Doors G G G NGG Flooring G F Rr NNG Ceiling GGG NGG Windows GGG GGG Blinds GGG GNG Doors GGG GNGG Light/Ceiling Fan G G G GGGGG Walls GFG G GGG Closet Doors G G G G G G G Flooring G F Rr G G GGG Cei]ing GGG G GGG Windows GGG G GGG BlindsGGG G GGG Doors GGG G GGG Light / Ceiling Fan G G G G G G G Number of Dogs Number of Cats Other Pets? Pest Control Issues Moisture Concern # of Sprinkler Heads w/paint on glass Unit Inspection Report # Apartment Number 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 337 338 Floor Plan # of Bedrooms 1 2 2 2 2 1 2. 2 2 # of Bathrooms 1 1 1 111111 Occupied / Vacant / No Entry O 0 0000000 Wall Floor Ceiling Light Sink Faucet Garbage Disposal Diswasher Refrigerator Stove Microwave Cabinets Countertops Doors HVAC RD) 005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 28 of 52 P.itchen Other Bedroom 2 Bedroom 1 UI-00124 Q Q G) O 0 Q Q 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 6Z L00-In UI-00122 D Q Q Q O O 9 9 9 9 0 0 9 9 9 UI-00123 G)G)G}G)G)G)QG) UI-00128 UI-00121 UI-00127 UI-00126 UI-00125 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS ~ Water Heater 111 Il lillI Water Heater Pan Walls V m Blinds 6- Ceiling 0 Flooring E E Entry Way Tile 0 0 Light Faucet Patio / Balcony Patio Door / Glass Door Entry / Exterior Door Ceiling Fans Fireplace Washer Dryer Sink Faucet Mirror Exhaust / Venting Walls Ceiling Tub/Shower Tub /Shower Faucet Tub/Shower - Tile/Surround 400 400 400 Lighting Fixture Cabinets Countertops Flooring 400 400 400 Toilet Doors Walls Closet Doors Flooring 350 Ceiling Windows Blinds Doors Light / Ceiling Fan Pest Control issues Moisture Concern Repair Costs $0 $400 $1,150 $400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 Replacement Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL UNIT COST $0 ' $400 ' $1,150 ' $400 $0 $0 ' $0 ' $0 ~$800 RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 29 of 52 Other Bedroom ' Bathroor, 1 PHYSICAL NEE[5% ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS NEW GOOD FAIR REPAIR REPLACE REPAIR $ REPLACE $ 'UTOT#~L Wall Floor 5 1 Ceiling 9*.IM.A Light Sink 1 Faucet 2 Garbage Disposal Diswasher 4 Refrigerator 5 Stove 5 Microwave Cabinets 5 2 Countertops 2 .1 ...U Doors HVAC %4 '8 Water Heater 91 ~ 1 .t b#/ ,fÂ¢ Water Heater Pan .6 4 Walls 1 *g. Blinds 1 4.- Ceiling Flooring 1 , .2 8 1 a'J Entry Way Tile Light Faucet E -.3.5.1 Patio / Balcony .--#A/. Patio Door / Glass Door 1 9 Entry / Exterior Door L-/ Ceiling Fans E=*31 Fireplace *L: 6 :.1-9 Washer Dryer Sink 3 Â·Â·# Faucet 3 i.k~/;:/I Mirror 2 Exhaust / Venting 1 ..1 -1;1 Walls 1 . 1 Ceiling 1 Tub/Shower 3 =L .Â·-9/ .Â·Â·. Â· A Tub / Shower Faucet 2 1 Tub/Shower - Tile/Surround 2 3 $1,200 6,1,20-Oy Lighting Fixture 1 liu: Cabinets 4 1 Countertops 6.:T Flooring 3 1 3 $1,200 E}:$1,*oo. Toilet 1 Doors 1 Walls 1 1 Closet Doors 1 Flooring 2 1 1 $350 94$350 RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 30 of 52 ons Irocm 1 Bathroom 1 Common Area. Kitc,en *,r- M.%*MÂ¢Â¥Â¢93 44 .k :r,>13?,~ PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Ceiling 1 Windows 1. Blinds 1 Doors 1 0 4? Light/Ceiling Fan %;. Walls 1 -9 Closet Doors f Flooring 1 1 lk -2 Ceiling E ..40 Windows Blinds 1 10'. Doors 0 Light / Ceiling Fan Number of Dogs t Number of Cats k $' Other Pets? Pest Control Issues ~ Moisture Concern :~- # of Sprinkler Heads w/paint on glass 65 0 11 9 0 $2,750 $0 ~*2.740** 76% 0% 13% 1 1Â°' /0 0% RD3 005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 31 of 52 0:her Bedroom 2 Bed ..4... , PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS UNIT PHOTOS & COMMENTS APARTMENT NUMBER 331 ....+ :-- Il 1.14 'lit 44 1 7 !13, L, 9 , 1 . -I U' . . 10 12'll- r 2 , - 0 0 * 4 3 4 10=m . .l Vill:lillillriqilli 14 19 VillillilillillillileLl.JIIIIIIIIIF/ Illi -9 4,J- - - 1 .l ., r ~*, .1 1 1 Fl~ .i -1 1 Â£-r Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 332 UI-00128 RD3-005 - A~en Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 32 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS 4 t . 4,10 1 . 0 i:â€¢1 I.In-"6 ,~p.- ir 4%*e~ Area: Common Areas li. . -1 1 1, mu 11% 1 6 Â·'i- ' ij 'i \ 1 - f 1 Â£5.1 I.Jrvil I ..C.J... ; .. 1 - 1441 .1....1 4% 1 lillillillwlillillihil~thilli/1,/ Ill'Impe#lill; 0-lill Al ~ 17â€¢- tj/lill'll'll'llill'll'll'll:'llill'llilill//0/lillf .......1// RD3-005 - Aspen Hm Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 33 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS ' . Â· 4 .' *.*24 i '+ r I .. 17 *.ri ..3 r i 4 7:.1 Area: Bathroom 1 Area: Bedroom 2 Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 333 UI-00121 4~T 11.1 1 . 1 p + 1 7 i %. RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 34 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS /M//*Frip// rp it /4 -4- 1,--,M J-JE-~ -nx f : ...,6- V 1/31'll == ~1>144,~il/dbg/672/A ~~F~ 414 . Area: Kitchen 1 - 9 6.4 - ........ -- 1-Z - 12 - I * 4. ' 9- " - /. -#fiff* 3 . a â€¢1/4 Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 334 UI-00127 RD3 005 Aspen H\11 Condos < Created: 10/21/2016 Page 35 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS fr-~11 ~ -\931 1 It -I.-Ii Ilill,XY,t--4.i"'ll'll'll'll"Frillillil- :.f .. . 91 1 .i Ceiling two skylights , ~ ve,46 * 11 1 .1 :rl - 9.7 'Flll :lipll'W./Flik - 9//4 1 4 / , 1 *l.@ I - ' Â£ 1 1.5 1?L.'. ' 1 Â· Stair treads need replacement Area: Common Areas Area: Bathroom 1 5 years old Minor repairs lower level next to the washer and dryer RD)-005 -Aspen HIll Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 36 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Area: Kitchen Submitted by: Robert dc Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 335 UI-00122 ..2 - I <al- ..1 t. /7 1%4 i <iÂ·; 1 i i. 7, -- 11 i,ill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll//1 lill'll'll'll'll'll'lill k A L 14,~a . -%/. I . 4/: 6,1/ 1 Ah/l//tar AL. I 1/' . older cast-iron tub RD3 005 Aspen HM Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 37 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS N I 'Il 4.- 1- 1 .illiv .' --J-21&4 1 ~1 r - I Area: Bedroom 1 Area: Bedroom 2 Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 336 UI-00124 , r 1 1 1 1 hi I . . 1 1 -1 Â¥ . 6 ; ;~ 1 4 4~ 'S ., ..LE ..4 . FL % la 4 Area: Common Areas RDS 005 Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 38 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Â¥m , 11 3, f I ------Â«-I ill' 1_1 _Ll_lL .....M*.~'lifi.'Ill'RES"'91'imal 4 -- 9 -.4': Area: Common Areas .1 2/ I'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll//1 17.k .. 2 ..04. . : 1% I - J ........ :- 'llillillillillillillillill 1 lilli -L 1 At Ny ,<f - i- V Ill, /*t --:1=-Ily .. 1 ' RD3-005 - Aspen HW Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 39 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS . f l;..$: . 4.1~ 1-Â¥t Â·'-' .- Area: Common Areas Wall / window unit in LR Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 337 UI-00123 . 1 1.1 1 alÂ· lil g. -2 . I~- No access at specified time RD3-005 - Asp. Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 40 of 52 PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS - I --~ 1,/--1,- lillililillillilillillilill' 1 l././.................0,Â£(Fm, Alli - ................ 1- *.2.- 4 Area: Bedroom 1 Area: Bedroom 2 Area: Bathroom 1 , 11 I 'I.u I . 1,1,1 .1, - 1 14 1 - 11~..1~Al.~ - ,=r . -, El 9 4, I /*i,YLL'. * ~-; it 4 V. 1 , 41 . AL 1 - â€¢t , 1 0 4 Al k Â· ' i. , 1 1'.i/ . *1 -! I~- \ 4' - iE -r.R -* i i.i.~ 11'/:i J 1 Jh . .-I-u,! 41"IRI- Submitted by: Robert de Grasse APARTMENT NUMBER 338 UI-00125 RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 41 of 52 rl PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS , .s -&- ..I - %.,8'. 1 0/r@ P , 1 t 14;-t ~ ~,1 N~' f i& l i 14 l . -'.:- .h. T â€¢1 Â£ #31 .' ... --Il.~m-flyJ r. 4 N * '. -1.- 1 ii,Trriririi;irijiiiiiiiiiQIi.....9 .LU / J k rq .' .4 a 7-1///.I ./ 049 L ' 94/.40 19 - 2 a~.'-- 4'f 1 I i ~ 71~4*52:2 F ..... W .- 7/i 1 , I -:,% / 1 -43 . '-ilti".Ri 9-4,1- I 4 , 4 / 1 1, -\ ~'.. J U.'' 4. t' 1 40 'dwi . *Â· i frl--- 1 . Niti"i. I -' Â·1~ : C,W- RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 42 of 52 .. PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS Vm..... -r 11 Area: Kitchen Submitted by: Robert de Grasse RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos Created: 10/21/2016 Page 43 of 52 .. PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS REPLACEMENT RESERVE ANALYSIS RD3-005-Aspen Hill Condos Created: 11/01/2016 Page 44 of 52 .. PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT -ASPEN HILL CONDOS REPLACEMENT RESERVE ANALYSIS Purpose The purpose of this Replacement Reserve Analysis is to provide Aspen Hill Condos with an inventory of the common community facilities and infrastructure components that require periodic replacement; not already included in the Physical Needs Assessment (PNA) / Properly Condition Assessment (PCA). The replacement reserve is a fund kept by each housing sponsor / owner under the terms of its operating agreement. The reserve is used to replace or repair what are known as capital items. The replacement reserve is funded from a sponsofs operating budget through an annual or monthly transfer to the reserve. The amount to be transferred, which is an eligible operating expense, is the amount set out in the operating agreement or otherwise approved. The replacement reserve identifies and estimates the when and the cost of capital items over the planning horizon. Capital items typically have long term life spans that are often missed or omitted in the annual planning and operating budget cycles. Capital items generally have an expected useful lifespan that will vary according to quality and project conditions. The useful life of capital items comes to an end when the cost of repairs or maintenance is no longer worthwhile because they will not extend the useful life by a reasonable length of time. Major repairs or renovations, the benefits of which extend beyond the current fiscal period and cannot easily be paid for out of annual operating budgets, can also be considered as capital items (i.e.,.major capital components, major building services, basic facilities, safety features, and others). Examples of these kinds of repairs are major roof repairs or window caulking of high-rise projects where extensive scaffolding must be erected. Basis of Assessment The data contained in this Replacement Reserve Assessment is based upon the following: â€¢ The Request for Proposal submitted and executed by the City of Aspen. Â· RD3's visual evaluation and measurements on September 13, 2016. RD3's assessor has visually inspected the common elements of the properly In order to ascertain the remaining useful life, replacement timeframe, and estimated replacement costs of these components. Engineering Drawings No architectural or engineering drawings or site plans were available for review in connection with this study. We recommend the the Ownership assemble a library of site and building plans of the entire building. Reproducible drawings should be stored/kept in a secure fireproof location. The Ownership will find these drawings to be a valuable resource in planning and executing future projects. CASH FLOW METHOD The CASH FLOW METHOD minimum annual funding of replacement reserves was the approach used for the analysis, The Cash Flow Method (CFM) calculates Minimum Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves that will fund Projected Replacements identifled In the Replacement Reserve Inventory from a common pool of Replacement Reserves and prevent Replacement Reserves from dropping below a Minimum Recommended Balance. CFM - The Minimum Annual Funding remains remains constant at $9,520 / Year throughoot the entire 30-year Analysis Perlod. Study Period The Replacement Reserve Analysis evaluates the funding of Replacement Reserves over a 30-year Analysis Period that begins on October 1, 2016. Beginning Balance A $0.00 beginning balance was assumed due to the pending acquisition. ADJUSTMENTS AND INFLATION The short term consequences of 2.25% inflation and no constant annual increase in Reserve funding on the Cash Flow Method. Other calculations in this Analysis do not account for inflation or a constant annual increase. The calculations in this Analysis do not account for interest earned on Replacement Reserves. RD3-005 - Aspen Hill Condos RD 3 Created: 11/01/2016 Page 45 of 52 .. PHYSICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - ASPEN HILL CONDOS PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS The Aspen Hills Replacement Reserve Inventory identifies 32 Projected Replacements with a one-time Replacement Cost of $262,917 and replacements totaling $186,990 in the 30-year Study Period. Projected Replacements are the replacement of commonly-owned items that: require periodic replacement and whose replacement is to be funded from Replacement Reserves. The accuracy of the Aspen Hills Replacement Reserve Analysis is dependent upon expenditures from Replacement Reserves being made ONLY for the 32 Projected Replacements specifically listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. The Cash Flow Method (also referred to as the Straight Line Method) is founded on the concept that the Replacement Reserve Account is solvent if cumulative receipts always exceed cumulative expenses. The Cash Flow Method calculates a MINIMUM annual deposit to Replacement Reserves that will: - Fund all Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory - Prevent Replacement Reserves from dropping below a minimum recommended balance (lowest reserve balance) - Allow a constant annual funding level between peaks in cumulative expenditures RD3-005-Aspen Hill Condos Created: 11/01/2016 Page 46 of 52 ~:14#4998Â¢â€¢~ 30 Year Replacement Schedule Ir.IU-.te: 225% 1: ' ~'+ . 0 - Misin, Accou*Croâ€¢/Ral, Tot/NumberfUnli Uâ€¢â€¢M - TOW th* Lili sch,dule /1 Yr 2 .3 Y, 4 Y,5 .1 .7 ./ Y, 9 Â¥410 Y, 11 .12 Yr13 Y. 14 M*,bier.... 11- Cail (yrl, R.Plicâ€¢d PROJECT INTERIQR 03,;IiNF..7--- -- a. 0 ~,Ir- gliuw-7'EnÂ·h?: T . Ja:-4- L m.col 17~ 4 - I . . ./- - - Ra//'/6/_ ~ ~â€¢m~,~~ R.. Ce.* -7-.- h.m- .1.-1.k U - - 14 D. â€¢ - iIEITTIT- B ..t I 8-.C,brACe'I - , ~. -T,"....//I--.9..~-IIFT...ir- KÂ£d.- 0,~~â€¢1Â©Fâ€¢ Ce.2, -- __ - - - - - - - ~ - ..41~ ... '1'11* U. ~.....illi#. ......~ = . 7. -"taill-"- ....bor.. 7129 - . . - IN ~ r-/r-.7"'Irpi=,I-.p 8'./Ke....'I.i [hts r-- ..... -- s....It,-I __ - k. . I -il=-5.-...I- alia, ... S~-Tub Co- iri ==56 - I~ . a-3-k - 1..,Ill-- ....."....... . Ilia... To~Cort - - - Â· Â· - - . 437 - - â€¢ =-I:-.:.,11~ i../-- *-/I.. ./.I~/ I : .IL ./:.4 L.I.,4-'mo:.1 mi - I - . . . - . + 0. all!*Cela'Coat. r.- I * i - + - - ipl IP.r'.40.* - . 3555 - . 3 0, . 4 0. . . 3,3 . 4.3 I.L.. 1 1 - 61,=D=â€¢Casti 1.- =ML--- - - . 171 - . 183 Tolal Prolectifkdal $ 3.477 1 3,655 $ 171 $ 451 $ 3.9.0 $ 1,3 $ .$ 4,00 $ 1,6 5 2072 $ 4,043 $ 4.271 $ Â· $ 4,43 PROJECT EXTERIOR .A#. -./*.-.-*-1.:*' -I; 1~26* - 24!64 - ... ., ... . .0Â§ @ Ir,Altion M,1, 12/511 R....Acco.dor=Â¥.Rals: T...unbar'Unks â„¢al US,NI .. Total '.M Ule Schldu~ Â¥,1 .2 .3 .4 .5 Y. .7 .1 Vt' -10 ./ ./ ./ .1, .*'Mr-t 1- .ms co' 07â€¢) Re,ilced ............. Ceck Co,1, - m . I - - . . . . 7 859 - . Total Pr*CIERI.rlor $ 1.010 $ .$ 2,612 $ .$ . 1 4.771 $ .$ - $ 1.610 s 32,310 $ .$ |TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 3.477 $ 3,555 $ 8189 S 492 S 6,483 $ 183 5 -S 9.379 $ 195 S 24,672 $ 13,923 $ 36.651 5 - S 4,843 Reserve for Replacement Arnall'.ate~.cce .-m ./20 SIU. 51~m 573011 22.704 $35489 $45055 Ulelt 5â€ž $4320 WDJU $18.726 SIg,957 tal@Z R,0,c,rn,ral./.d 0)477, ..'.4 .47' 116't,} 2 52 9 = m $112 .72 5101 .201 $111 3135 5/7 07,1.&) IS13ml 1.Me,,1 50 <./. lic,tonReser.1 to':6 |Ruerve Cummulative Bilance 16,044 112,059 $13,521 J$22.004 525.949 135,545 $45,421 $46,010 - $55,800 Â· $41207 *37216 $10447 $20,072- *25,1501 ......~ i 1 1.Â· E 1.2- . I 3-4 ,~n. Accownlarv,In .1,1 0121 1.-b. i of t.'.. Â¥rs. Y, 17 Yill Yrtâ€¢ .20 Y, 21 .22 . n Y,2. .23 .20 .27 .21 .2, Y, 30 I'll./Int.rn Garb,;I ./coul lcd -lil- 1 6621-----17.:.~Â£-m--M----;.....I~,~..~.....-'"I-=-'.1.-0-/1.---'-'-'.I..'-I--I--I----' Ircro.. -.ITil....F7./.Tia..... 441 IF.;-- . I--3/..../.Ill-Ill--1 Rare,Co,ls .. . 1 - . - 4 9 i~ _2- -pi~r---~ /*Ir Cc~S - Â· - 6 242 - - - . - - - - e 1.- :j~ :...0024 =15 COIb + I - â€¢* . - - - - Shgâ‚¬0!006aL........._ .- L . '. 8,Ducc, Co>*5 - - 6 1405, . -2-142~-~ 8*NÂ·Ket~,WF=*S Co,/ . e.â€¢*-coll I m ....... - - .AL- <at..... 030 - 0-34Â¢â€¢..X. 4-1 1/ Tou C.cs - - - Â· - 1 - - - Â· 1.831 - Â· - Â· -1 -0 E,Â¥,-F#CA~h - - * ~~ti.~.~ 'L'I.I.'Ill:...&W#.1- *".:I-'-.-6â€žg;,Â£.JI-"I'-i-&/I',&" - I - - - . . 1 8,4 - . i 11 -2=~ ./.Bl Â· Â· 4063 - - 5305 Â· . 5/2 ..2 - C%,mto='CÂ¢44 - â€¢ - - - - â€¢ â€¢ â€¢ - - - - - 1- r- ===---- I De . . 'm - 768 --- Â¥*g_Â©Cl'UQD_ d y1,i ~Ii=.=Ii=,11Â£7--11.3.I *coon Co. m . 2. - . 7'55 - . 2,2 . . . 22 . - Tot,1 Projâ€¢clklk!/2, $ 23,120 $ 142 $ 4.943 $ 4,411 1 - $ 217/ $ 255 5 Â·S 6.172 1 1.041 $ 3.645 $ 6,064 1 - $ 1,137 1 ..482 $ 1.510 p. Pidm 00* - . - 1,445 - . - 53Â¢18 - - . Rgdro .... - ----~ *li ,I Red/4 -I *tkon'.1/: mr., Acc-10...... 0111 1~mbe I Umns .15 Y, i. Yil? Yill Y, 19 Â¥,20 Â¥,21 .22 .. Yr24 .25 Â¥,24 .1,27 . 21 Yrn V, 30 ...menll/m ~VÂ·'Â·r~.2058 . 34. -.".-.--,--,--'.~--Mle------ L./. - 'Irldz....., C.* CÂ¢r=.1, Vt'* CO,t' I'll . 22.- ..........................................9/.............lilli~ AC P2.*.1 Call TO!,IP'*Jectble'or S 3.426 $ 21"6 S - S 11.6 $ -8 -$ -1 15.014 $ Â·$ -S 4.210 $ 13.171 1 -$ -$ OTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 23880 $ 4.069 $ 26,859 $ 4.418 $ 11,446 $ 21,769 $ 255 $ -$ 20,686 $ 1.041 S 3.645 3 10,344 $ 13.678 $ 1,137 $ BA82 $ 1,560 temerve for Replacement A...........= 534.670 S20.752 525.325 . 154 ST4252 S12.373 $,03 $9.324 $to.eliz 57,Ma 310 2-11 sn.173 32t.475 $171439 SM.,0, .29.101 Rapl,-,les R~,Â»nd 10063 11$.rr,1 0. 09 r. 415; 011,445) ..I (S/* SO .20.:) ... (11 "U (110=1 .... {$'.,37} :7., 8 '.te herest.RHaM ./1 G112 .168 0,40 $47 %2% G.4 ./ 593 01â€¢} 667 $127 St. /g .. teserve Cummulative 8,11 $11,242 S *10.805 (Sagot $4,732 $2,853 1$,jon 1$1941 39,322 1 111.7611 UZ(Â©f 10,711 ~' ~$12,053 $11,950 $7,919 *18,381 $19,683 $27.739 1 Replacement Reserve Cash Flow $80,000 $60,000 -/1 $40,000 --- = 520,000 4 4:+M AAÂ« 5- $0 0 0 0 , 1 Yr Yr YM Yr YM Yr Yr Yll Yr Y Y~ Y Yr Yr Yll Yr Y Yr Y '1~4r Yr Y~ Yr Yr YI Y~ Yr Y; Yr 123456 7 8 9 1( 11 1: 13 14 1~ 16 1~ 18 19 2~ 21 22 2]| 24 25 26 21 28 29 30 ($20,000) --- ($40,000) ($60,000) IAnnual Deposit/Balance i Replacements Required -Interest on Reserve - - Reserve Cummulative Balance 44Â»10-6 -14 'ni- innt,n d W I L U 11 U W 515 Clystal Circle Corbo,idale. CO 81673 architecture â€¢sustainability 970.963.9720 VIWÂ·Al.(01 li|tl Ent:t,IrC| 1!11!Ctill't! 20111 October 19'h 2016 Bill Boehringer Chief Executive Officer WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company PO Box 3807 Aspen, CO 81612 (917) 977.0541 WilliamB@WEBCapLLC.com .. "* f. 5,:. V 0 e lid3 0, 1 /--* Â£. u : Energy Aud# of the Aspen Hills Building 160 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 This applies to all units, unless noted otherwise: Approximately 854 square feet Approximately 7686 cubic feet Manual thermostats Two big skylites of varying size and quality All fixtures have high flow rates. All toilets are at least 1.6 gallons per flush. 0 8 1, Individual Unit Assessments: Unit 331: Glazing Sliding glass door medium emissivity Front door clear glass Side windows low emissivity Lighting CFL 200 w Appliances all newish Infiltration rate 3200 CFM50 X 60 / 7686 cf = 25 ACH50 Notes One bedroom Programmable thermostat Electric in-floor heat in bed and bath Wood burning fireplace This unit uses the most electricity of all the units; almost double the average. Possibly because of a very high infiltration rate and the electrically heated floor. The electric mal floor is installed on a concrete slab that (almost certainly) has no insulation under or around it. Unit 332: Glazing clear glass Lighting CFL 200 w Appliances all newish Notes Air conditioning window unit, reportedly seldom used No skylites Unit 333: Glazing Front door high emissivity Windows, upstairs clear glass Windows, downstairs low emissivity Lighting incandescent 300 w Appliances replace Infiltration rate 1960 CFM50 X 60 / 7686 cf = 15 ACH50 Notes Bath fan damper not working Unit 334: Glazing clear glass Lighting incandescent 750 w Appliances replace Notes Air conditioning window unit Unit 335: Glazing low emissivity Lighting halogen 350 w Appliances borderline Infiltration rate 1700 CFM50 X 60 / 7686 cf = 13 ACH50 Unit 336: Glazing low emissivity Lighting halogen 750 w Appliances borderline Notes One bedroom Electric in-floor heat bath Unit 337: Glazing low emissivity Lighting halogen 750 w Appliances Refrigerator borderline Dishwasher borderline Clothes washer replace Clothes dryer replace Notes Programmable thermostat Gas fireplace appliance, separately metered from gas used for common heat Unit 338: Glazing high emissivity or clear glass Lighting mixed 250 w Appliances borderline Notes Mechanical room: Two 95% AFUE Triangle Tube boilers Two hot water storage tanks Water recirculation line with timer Notes Abandoned combustion air intake ducts stuffed with batt insulation Utilities: Electric; Holy Cross High kWh Low kWh Average kWh Association meter 1,800 170 630 331 660 380 475 332 360 315 335 333 500 210 395 334 405 195 260 335 320 230 290 336 470 190 260 337 620 310 405 338 380 150 260 Totals 5,515 2,150 3,310 Water; City of Aspen Billing for each unit is included in the HOA dues, however, the average water bill for the building is approximately $2040 annually, or $21 per unit per month. Gas Costs for the complex varied from $122 -$547 per month in 2015. Recommendations: 1. New high-efficacy lighting, starting with the units with the highest amount of installed wattage. 2. New high-efficiency appliances, where indicated on individual unit assessments. 3. Install programmable thermostats. 4. Heat tape... if the association continues to use heat tape- be sure it is controlled by a timer and/or thermostat. Heat tape uses about 7 watts per foot, which can really add up. 5. Undergo air sealing measures: the units are leaking two to eight times more air than recommended. Air sealing has the potential to save more gas than any other measure. Typical air leakage sites include: ceiling beams. ceiling, top plate, outlets, windows and doors. See photos later in report. If the infiltration rate is significantly reduced, then install high-quality bathroom exhaust fans, controlled by a wall switch with built in hygrometer and timer. Exhaust to outdoors with damper. 6. Replace windows listed as clear glass and high emissivity. 7. Install solar PV on southern half of roof. 8. A new roof: remove all skylites, remove heat tape, add additional rigid insulation. Possibly install TDDs (Tubular Daylighting Devices) through roof near ridge. 9. Mechanical room; Insulate all of the hot water pipes that can be reached. Install an insulated hatch cover. Remove the abandoned combustion air intake ducts and fill the hole with an insulated plug. Seal passageways that lead into units. 10. Install low-flow faucet aerators, shower heads and toilets. , Typical alr Inflltratlon points: These infrared images were taken at a time when inside and outside temperatures were not much different, so air leaks are more significant than they appear. 151=!IM,1,/B- ~r Z. - 4, y. Â«474* - 99 ./1--i. 32 1 L These IR images show the same condition from the inside and outside: a roof beam penetrating the exterior wall to support the overhangs. .Aill-I. 0 80 ~2/11--- 4** li 0* t - 14 - --- *4 , I- 1....... 2 - J 1 ...1. : Air leaks around the beam and at the top of wall are allowing air to move throughout the tongue and groove ceiling. If the air cannot be stopped at the wall, it may be necessary to drywall over the tongue and groove ceiling. r. -1/=- 1' *,0 + ltv -- M,1111~ '4. '42 4//b 1- rill 55 ~. r-----=#---r - r -mk Basement level windows I Door thresholds Cm'*dEL.*.3*22"61/MPUTL: 6/a" i ... 1 Il **44* ' ' ~lil~ .l ././~ /,kE~..fl Y - f fl' -B -1 1 1 e. Holes in drywall .2,1.'6*..- 4-* #f 4 4 332 li~1* Â·' 0.361 13% - I. 9,=4 '4' 1.4 i:**:1 + ./3. 3 14 tri -1 v ..1 if- - IF ..... Map of units. The mechanical room is on the east, basement level, accessed by a hatch. I ' I U./+I.I Insulation anomles: * .+11Lflti 1*)7111lP~~~- Wlpl-61.124 fl i & , - N. rvÂ· . i. I 1.5,1 A k 1/ky'll./.9p9A........... 121 + r k 4 - .r 11- -- .111-~ A stud bay missing insulation in the lower floor of unit 332. I was unable to check every wall because of sunlight. The image on the right is a basement wall- the interior insulation seems to be compromised. Heat loss was evident outside the concrete basement wall. No exterior insulation installed on basement walls. Mark Mclain Architect & Sustainability Consultant mark@confluencearchitecture.com 970-963-9720 , 006 1 J SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE APPROVED BY APCHA BOARD ON JULY 6, 2016 Marketability Standards APCHA Guidelines (2016) Purpose The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) and the City of Aspen (CoA) seek to provide supplemental guidance to the Housing Guideline's existing Marketability Standards (Part 111, Section 6 (B)) required for converting free market single family, duplex, and multi-family dwelling units into affordable deed restricted workforce housing through the use of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit (Housing Credits) and/or buy-downs. Policy Issue The Housing Guidelines' Marketability Standards lack minimum guidance forconverting and improving older free market dwelling units into newly renovated deed restricted affordable housing. Marketability standards are broadly interpreted to mean building, livability, and marketability standards. Policy Goal To ensure that older free market dwelling units renovated and converted to newly deed restricted workforce affordable housing should meet basic building code requirements from original Certificate of Occupancy, along with upgrades to improve livability, life safety, environmental, energy, and sustainability standards. To also ensure that any free market developer attempting to develop affordable housing through the Housing Credits program or through buy-downs provide newly renovated affordable housing that is affordable, long-term, and appropriate in value with respect to the Certificates or Credits received from the City of Aspen. Background and Regulatory Authority Recent changes to Fee-In-Lieu (FIL) mitigation requirements have increased private sector interest for converting older free market dwelling units into newly deed restricted workforce affordable housing through Housing Credits. At its regular board meeting on March 2, 2016, the APCHA Board of Directors asked staff to propose new minimum standards under the Housing Guidelines for conversion projects using Housing Credits. Part 111 of the Housing Guidelines establishes policies and procedures foraffordable housing development and redevelopment. For example, Part 111, Section 5 of the Housing Guidelines establishes Net Minimum Livable Square Footage for affordable housing units for construction and conversion. 1 TABLE VII MINIMUM NET LIVABLE SQUARE FEET (SF) for Affordable housing Per Unit Size (standardized) Unit Size Minimum Square Footage Studio 500 1-Bedroom 700 2-Bedroom 900 3-Bedroom 1,200 Single-Family Detached 1,500 The Housing Guidelines also permit a reduction in square footage if an applicant can demonstrate a compelling reason for doing so and if certain livability criteria and/or amenities are provided, specifically: â€¢ Significant storage space located outside unit; â€¢ Above average natural light (i.e. more windows than required by code); â€¢ Efficient, flexible layout with limited hall and staircase space; â€¢ Availability of site amenities, such as pool or proximity to park or open space; â€¢ Unit location within the development (i.e. above ground location vs. ground level or below grade; and/or â€¢ Possibility that project can achieve higher density of deed-restricted units with a reduction variance. The Housing Guidelines state, however, that "under no circumstances shall a reduction of more than twenty percent (20%) ofthe square footage required for the applicable category be permitted." The Guidelines require that all new affordable housing development must include a capital reserve study as part of the initial HOA documents, as well as a separate capital reserve fund; and that all HOA documents require the establishment and maintenance of a capital reserve fund. The APCHA requires a written 'pre-occupancy inspection' by a certified building inspector, architect and/or engineer confirming that any construction or conversion is compliant with applicable codes. However, the Guidelines are silent on what a written inspection report should include. The Housing Guidelines' Marketability Standards require new and converted housing units to be in "marketable condition" prior to sale. Part Ill, Section 68 states: 1 The applicant shall bear the costs and expenses of any required upgrades to meet the standards below, as well as any structural/engineering reports required by APCHA to assess the suitability for occupancy, as follows: â€¢ Allinterior walls must be freshly painted; â€¢ Interior appliances must be less than five years old and in good condition and repair; â€¢ Carpets must be less than five years old, in good condition and repair, or replaced if in lesser condition; 2 â€¢ Windows, heating, plumbing and electrical systems, fixtures and equipment must be in good condition and working order and brought up to the current code utilized by the Community Development Department; â€¢ All exterior walls must be freshly painted within the previous year; â€¢ Landscaping and yard must be in satisfactory condition; 1 â€¢ Roof must be in good repair with remaining useful life of at least ten (10) years; and i â€¢ HOA documents; i.e., Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and Condominium Declarations, \ must be approved by APCHA. Unfortunately, these standards are insufficient because they do not guarantee the long-term useful life, affordability, and safety of converted affordable housing. Overarching Goals for Building, Livability and Marketability Standards ~ Responding to the lack of guidance found in the Housing Guidelines, in addition to the development requirements stated herein, the following proposed recommendations are intended to strengthen and 9 improve APCHA's existing building, livability and marketability standards, The APCHA staff recommends that Housing Credits proposals to convert existing free market units into deed restricted employee housing should be: 1) Structurally sound; ~ 2) Meetoriginal building codes; and 3) Achieve an overall general physical condition rating of "very good" by a certified construction ~ inspector. The "effective age" of a Housing Credits conversion project should be no older than ten or fifteen (10 or 15) years old (as defined by Marshall & Swift Residential Cost Handbook, 2014) and should have a minimum "Remaining and/or Estimated Useful Life" (RUL/EUL) of seventyjive_percent (75%) foral! -~Â¥318-rand essentia-[Edi-ii#6-nenh. F Conventional 30-year fixed loan requirements may also require the project to not have a Remaining 1 ~ Useful Live (RUL) of less than 30 years. -/ i Housing Credits conversion or buy down projects should also satisfy original building codes at the time ~ of the original building permit; meet minimum net livable square footage provided for in Table VII of the ~ Housing Guidelines; and any additional requirements set forth by the City. 1 Non-conforming dwelling units, buildings, or sites should be eligible on a case-by-case basis. 3 1 t Supplemental Guidance for Redevelopment Requirements APCHA recommends that any Housing Credits or Buy-Down affordable housing conversion project must: â€¢ Conduct a Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA) by an independent, 3rd party certified construction inspector (e.g. a credentialed Building Performance Institute professional) and provide to CoA and APCHA for review and comment: o The PCNA shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM E-2018-08 Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments: Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) Guide, Chapters 5 and 6, revised November 23, 2011, the Housing Notice 2012-27, and the Mortgagee Letter 2012-25 Revised Requirements (including FAQ-PCNA Guidance) for Project Capital Needs Assessments; â€¢ Receive a 3rd Party Energy Audit (e.g. CORE) and Report and provide it to CoA and APCHA; â€¢ Provide structural integrity and sufficient modernization as recommended by CoA Building Department and/or HUD Minimum Property Standards; â€¢ Have a minimum 75% "Remaining and/or Estimated Useful Life" for all major and/or essential components; â€¢ Provide an up-to-date reserve study prepared by a qualified, independent professional reserve specialist or engineer, accompanied by an engineer's report, or functional equivalent. The report must comment favorably on the structural integrity of the project and the remaining useful life of the major and essential project components, such as: o Overall General Description of Site (e.g. topography, storm and water drainage, access and egress, paving and parking, etc.); o Structural Frame and Building Envelope (e.g. foundation, building frame and facades, roof and roof drainage); o Mechanical and Electrical Systems (e.g. plumbing and heating systems, HVAC, and electrical systems); o Vertical Transportation (e.g. conveyance systems); o NFPA - Life Safety Systems (e.g. sprinklers and alarm systems); o Interior Elements (e.g. common areas, tenant spaces/dwelling units); o Additional/Out of Scope Considerations (e.g. code and environmental issues, accessibility issues, owner proposed improvements); o Repair and Reserve Study. â€¢ Provide a capital reserve study and savings plan establishing: o A capital reserve fund balance containingthe depreciation or replacement cost of any major components listed within the capital reserve study prior to approval; o That all critical and non-critical repairs have been identified; 3* A corrective action plan for any accessibility deficiencies identified; o Funds to cover the total cost of any items identified in the reserve study or engineerts report that need to be replaced within 5 years from the date of the study must be deposited in the HOAk reserve account, in addition to the amount stated immediately above; and o A utility contingency of at least 10% of the previous year's utility costs if the utilities are not separately metered; 4 â€¢ All deficiencies determined by the inspections listed above shall be rectified and/or addressed in full or at the discretion of the APCHA Board and the City of Aspen, â€¢ All rehabilitation work for a conversion project must be completed in a professional manner. Regulatory Considerations and Requirements â€¢ Affordable housing conversion projects, and any additional requirements resulting from the project Scope of Work, should consult the most recent edition of the International Existing Building Code (IEBC) published by the International Code Council, Inc. The IEBC establishes minimum regulations for existing buildings using prescriptive and performance-related provisions. The IEBC is designed to meet the need for a modern, up-to-date code addressing repair, alteration, addition or change of occupancy in existing buildings through model code regulations that safeguard the public health and safety in all comnlunities, large andsmall. â€¢ HUD's Physical Needs Assessment (PNA) of public housing authorities uses a 20-year planning horizon. â€¢ According to HUD, Physical Needs Assessments (PNAs) have been the standard method for determining capital needs in the real estate industry, and remains a vital way for property managers to plan for necessary capital improvements. â€¢ HUD believes it is important for property owners with significant public housing inventories to make such assessments. â€¢ Consulting HUD's Green Physical Needs Assessment (GPNA) Tool: â€¢ Components are divided into five categories: 1. Site 2. Building Exterior 3. Building Systems 4, Common Areas 5. Units â€¢ Aggregated capital needs can be identified in several areas: 1. Replacement needs 2. Refurbishment needs 3. Accessibility needs 4. Marketability/livability needs 5. Sustainability needs â€¢ Basic Code Requirements: â€¢ CO detector â€¢ Smoke detector â€¢ Must meet requirements from original Certificate of Occupancy (CO): 1. Minimum and legal egress 2. No bandit units 3. Separate utility metering 4. Occupancy separation 5. Fire resistive construction â€¢ Beyond basic code requirements and life and safety improvements, the project should attempt to provide adequate: â€¢ On-site parking 5 i â€¢ Sto rage â€¢ Outdoor living space ' Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) 1. Fresh and clean indoor air 2. Quite space and privacy between units 3. Daylighting into primary living spaces 4. Security 5. Accessibility 6. Efficient ME, PL and EL Systems Key Terms Buy-Down Unit: A free market unit that the government (City of Aspen, Pitkin County, or APCHA) and/or private sector acquires and deed restricts to affordable housing in accordance with these Guidelines. Capital Needs Assessment (CNA): A Capital Needs Assessment is a road map to understanding the life expectancy and cost of major items needed to maintain a property. A CNA provides an inspection of a property giving an estimate of maintaining it over a 5 to 20 year time span. The CNA sets up a budget for the projected amountof years and also informs of immediate needs of the property. This data determines the remaining useful life (RUL) of major items. A Capital Needs Assessment is a plan to address existing deferred maintenance within a multifamily property and what is required to modernize and rehabilitate it in order to ensure that all the needs of the property are addressed well into the future. Measures of Capital Needs: â€¢ Existing Needs are the costs of repairs and replacements beyond ordinary maintenance required to make the housing decent and economically sustainable. â€¢ Accrual Needs are the costs needed each year to cover expected ongoing repairs and replacements beyond ordinary maintenance assuming that all existing needs are met. Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit (Housing Credits), Chapter 26.540 City of Aspen Land Use Code: A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit is issued to the developer of affordable housing that is not required for mitigation. Another entity can purchase such a Certificate and use it to satisfy housing mitigation requirements. Establishing this transferable Certificate creates a new revenue stream that can make the development of affordable housing more economically viable. Establishing this transferable Certificate also establishes an option for mitigation that reflects built and occupied affordable housing, thereby offsetting the impacts of development before those impacts are felt. Depreciation: the loss in value due to any cause. It is the difference between the market value of a structural improvement or piece of equipment and its reproduction or replacement cost as of the date of valuation. (Source: Residential Cost Handbook, Marshall & Swift; 2014) Categories of Depreciation: â€¢ Physical depreciation is loss in value due to physical deterioration. 6 â€¢ Functional or technical obsolescence is loss in value due to lack of utility or desirability of part or all of the property, inherent to the improvement or equipment. Thus a new structure or piece of equipment may sufferobsolescence when built. e External, locational or economic obsolescence is loss in value due to causes outside the property and independentof it, and is not included in the tables. Effective Age of a property is its age as compared with other properties performing like functions. It is the actual age less any years that have been taken off by face-lifting, structural reconstruction, removal of functional inadequacies, etc. (Source: Residential Cost Handbook, Marshall& Swift; 2014) Use the following steps to determine the effective age of a residence: e Typical Life: Determine the residence's Typical Life, based on its type, exterior wall type and quality, using the "Typical Lives" table contained in Section E of the Residential Cost Handbook (and duplicated in the help for Typical Life). â€¢ Remaining Useful Life: Estimate the building's remaining useful life, based on an evaluation of its condition, construction quality, actual age and any renovations or repairs that have been made. â€¢ Effective Age: Subtract the remaining useful life from the Typical Life to obtain the Effective Age. Example of determining effective age: For a good quality, single-family residence built 30 years ago with frame exterior walls, the following renovations and repairs have been completed: e The electrical system was replaced 10 years ago. â€¢ The heating plant was replaced 4 years ago. â€¢ The roof was repaired 8 years ago. â€¢ The interior was completely renovated 10 years ago, with new floor : covering, wall finish and plumbing fixtures. â€¢ Based on the dwelling's current good condition and a subjective evaluation : of the effect of these changes, you estimate that the remaining useful life is now 45 years. The Typical Life forthis residence is 55 years (see Tvpical Life). Therefore, the effective age is: Typical Building Life 55 years Minus: Remaining Useful Life -45 years Effective Age 10 years The entry of Effective Age is optional, except if you select either of the following options for calculating Physical and Functional Depreciation: 7 â€¢ Using Marshall& Swift Tables: With this option, Residential Estimator calculates the amount of normal physical and functional depreciation using the depreciation schedule in the Residential Cost Handbook, based on the occupancy, construction class and quality in addition to effective age. â€¢ Age/Life (Straight Line): With this option, Residential Estimator. calculates the amount of physical and functional depreciation by dividing the Effective Age by the Typical Life. Gut rehabilitation: refers to the renovation of a property down to the shell of the structure, including the replacement of all HVAC and electrical components (unless the HVAC and electrical components are up to current code). Project Capital Needs Assessment: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires Project Capital Needs Assessments (PCNAs) for rehabilitation construction. 8 --11 9#bilif Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority AÂ·PÂ·rÂ· WA MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Nadolny, Community Development Planner FROM: APCHA Board of Directors THRU: Mike Kosdrosky, Executive Director DATE: January 19, 2017 RE: Proposed Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing Project 331-338 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO PROJECT The applicant for WEB2 Capital LLC is seeking approval to convert an existing 52-year old residential free market multifamily building into deed restricting affordable housing under the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit (Housing Credits) program (Chapter 26.540 City of Aspen Land Use Code). BACKGROUND The Aspen Hills Condominiums are located at 331-338 Midland Avenue. The building was constructed in 1965 with eight two-bedroom units later converted into condominiums in 1969. The site is 15,160 square feet and is located in the Residential Multi-Family (RIVIF) zone. The applicant is requesting growth management approvals, recognition of existing non- conformities, exemption from the City's Residential Design Standards, a variance for one parking space, and authorization forthe issuance of Housing Credits. Under Part 111, Section 3B of the Housing Guidelines, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) is authorized to inspect affordable housing projects under construction or conversion for compliance with APCHA Guidelines. APCHA adopted Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) found in the Housing Guidelines on July 6, 2016, for the purpose of identifying physical capital needs and improvements (immediate, short-term, and long-term) for existing free market structures/units before accepting them into the affordable housing inventory. Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 1 Previously, Marketability Standards had been broadly interpreted to include building, livability, and marketability standards under APCHA Guidelines. Existing Marketability Standards within the Housing Guidelines, however, provide insufficient guidance for staff and decision makers to successfully evaluate proposed conversion or buy-down projects, particularly older structures and dwelling units. In response, APCHA developed SGMS to help decision makers more effectively evaluate conversion and buy-down projects for mitigation or Housing Credits projects. The Aspen Hills Condos Affordable Housing Project is the first conversion project brought forward under the Housing Credit program (Chapter 26.540). This is also the first conversion project evaluated under the SGMS adopted last year by APCHA. Both APCHA staff and the applicant are working through this type of conversion process for the first time. Housing Guidelines Marketability Standards (Part 111, Section 5) Part 111 of the Housing Guidelines establishes policies and procedures for affordable housing development and redevelopment. Part 111, Section 5A of the Housing Guidelines further establishes Net Minimum Livable Square Footage for affordable housing units for construction and conversion as listed below: TABLE VII MINIMUM NET LIVABLE SQUARE FEET (SF) for Affordable housing Per Unit Size (standardized) Unit Size Minimum Square Footaqe Studio 500 1-Bedroom 700 2-Bedroom 900 3-Bedroom 1,200 Single-Family Detached 1,500 The Housing Guidelines also permit a reduction in square footage if and only if an applicant can demonstrate a compelling reason for doing so, and if certain livability criteria and/or amenities will be met. Specifically: â€¢ Significant storage space located outside unit; â€¢ Above average natural light (i.e. more windows than required by code); â€¢ Efficient, flexible layout with limited hall and staircase space; â€¢ Availability of site amenities, such as pool or proximity to park or open space; â€¢ Unit location within the development (i.e. above ground location vs. ground level or below grade; and/or â€¢ Possibility that project can achieve higher density of deed-restricted units with a reduction variance. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 2 The Housing Guidelines state that "under no circumstances shall a reduction Of more than twenty percent (20%) of the square footage required for the applicable category be permitted." The Housing Guidelines require that all new affordable housing development must include a capital reserve study as part of the initial HOA documents, as well as a separate capital reserve fund; and that all HOA documents require the establishment and maintenance of a capital reserve fund. APCHA requires a written pre-occupancy inspection by a certified building inspector, architect and/or engineer confirming that any construction or conversion is compliant with applicable codes. The Housing Guidelines' Marketability Standards, Part 111, Section 6B, also require new and converted housing units to be in marketable condition and approved by APCHA prior to rental or sale: "The applicant shall bear the costs and expenses of any required upgrades to meet the standards below, as well as any structural/enqineerinq reports required by APCHA to assess the suitability for occupancy, as follows: â€¢ All interior walls must be freshly painted; â€¢ Interior appliances must be less than five years old and in good condition and repair; â€¢ Carpets must be less than five years old, in good condition and repair, or replaced if in lesser condition; â€¢ Windows, heating, plumbing and electrical systems, fixtures and equipment must be in good condition and working order and brought up to the current code utilized by the Community Development Department; â€¢ All exterior walls must be freshly painted within the previous year; â€¢ Landscaping and yard must be in satisfactory condition; â€¢ Roof must be in good repair with remaining useful life of at least ten (10) years; and â€¢ HOA documents; i.e., Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and Condominium Declarations, must be approved by APCHA." Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) The Supplemental Guidance to Marketability Standards (SGMS) were adopted in July 2016 by the APCHA Board of Directors for affordable housing conversion and buy-down projects either for mitigation. As the name suggests, the SGMS is in addition to and reaffirms the Housing Guidelines Marketability Standards (Part Ill, Section 5) mentioned above. The SGMS expects conversion or buy-down projects to achieve a reasonable remaining useful life, an acceptable level of affordability, and an appropriate level of health and safety, Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 3 particularly for older residential projects. The SGMS established the following evaluation criteria for conversion/buy-down projects before final: â€¢ Should be structurally sound; â€¢ Meetoriginal building codes, at minimum; â€¢ Achieve and overall general physical condition rating of "very good" by a certified construction inspector; â€¢ Obtain an effective age no more than 10 or 15 years old for major components (the estimated age of a building component that considers actual age as affected by maintenance history, location, weather conditions, and other factors. Effective age may be more or less than actual age. ASTM E2018-15 Section 2.3.14); â€¢ Have an expected useful life (EUL) of 75% or more for all major and essential items, components and systems (EUL is the average amount of time in years that an item, component or system is estimated to function without material repair when installed new and assuming routine maintenance is practiced. ATSM E2018-15 Section 2.3.15); â€¢ Meet minimum net livable square footage requirements found in Table VII of the Housing Guidelines (Part Ill). The overarching goals listed above are meant to give APCHA and decision makers some objective criteria to evaluate conversion and buy-down projects. To meet these goals, APCHA created a list of requirements - or check list - for applicants interested in redeveloping projects for Housing Credits. 1. Completing a Physical Needs Assessment (PCNA) - also known as a Property Condition Assessment (PCA). According to ASTM International, the objective or purpose of a PCA is to observe and report, to the extent feasible, on the physical condition of a subject property. 2. 3rd Party Energy Audit (e.g. Community Office for Resource Efficiency - CORE). 3. Engineer's Report commenting on the structural integrity of the project and expected useful life of the major building systems and components. The engineer's report should include these type of items: â€¢ Overall General Description of Site (e.g. topography, storm and water drainage, access and egress, paving and parking, etc.); â€¢ Structural Frame and Building Envelope (e.g. foundation, building frame and facades, roof and roof drainage); â€¢ Mechanical and Electrical Systems (e.g. plumbing and heating systems, HVAC, and electrical systems); â€¢ Vertical Transportation (e.g. conveyance systems); â€¢ NFPA - Life Safety Systems (e.g. sprinklers and alarm systems); â€¢ Interior Elements (e.g. common areas, tenant spaces/dwelling units); â€¢ Additional/Out of Scope Considerations (e.g. code and environmental issues, accessibility issues, owner proposed improvements); â€¢ Repair and Reserve Study. Aspen 1-]ills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 4 4. Capital Reserve Study and Savings Plan prepared by a certified, independent professional reserve specialist or engineer, establishing: â€¢ A capital reserve fund balance containing the depreciation or replacement cost of any major components listed within the capital reserve study prior to approval; â€¢ That all critical and non-critical repairs have been identified; â€¢ A corrective action plan for any accessibility deficiencies identified; â€¢ Funds to cover the total cost of any items identified in the reserve study or engineer's report that need to be replaced within 5 years from the date of the study must be deposited in the HOA's reserve account, in addition to the amount stated immediately above; and â€¢ A utility contingency of at least 10% of the previous year's utility costs if the utilities are not separately metered. Finally, the SGMS requires that any conversion project applicant correct deficiencies identified by the various inspections above, or at the discretion of the APCHA Board and/or the City of Aspen, and that all conversion rehabilitation work is completed in a professional and acceptable manner. DISCUSSION Existing Conditions The existing project consists of a total eight units (seven two-bedroom units and one one- bedroom unit (illegally non-conforming)) requiring 15 or 16 parking spaces with a deficit of 7 or 8 spaces. The SGMS recommends adequate on-site parking for all units. The units, as built, are: S.F. Difference Between Min. Unit Beds Baths Net Livable S.F. and Actual 331 1 1 852 48 SF or 5.3% 332 2 1 807 93 SF or 10.3% 333 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 334 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 335 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 336 2 1 861 39 SF or 4.3% 337 2 1 866 34 SF or 3.7% 338 2 1 866 34 SF or 3.7% APCHA Guidelines state that the minimum square footage for a two-bedroom is 900 square feet. All units are below the current minimum square footage requirements, but less than the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 5 20% maximum square foot reduction allowed under Part 111, Section 5A based on specified conditions and board approval, as mentioned previously. Proposal The applicant proposes converting all eight free market units into permanently deed restricted for-sale and rental affordable housing. The applicant is asking that several of the current owners remain in their units as renters for an unspecified period of time. According to the standards of Growth Management, Section 26.470.100.A.2, Employee Generation, the building could house 18 employees (8 units X 2.25 FTE's/unit). APCHA Review APCHA reviewed the applicant's application and any due diligence reports submitted underthe Guidelines and SGMS. APCHA appreciates the applicant's due diligence and efforts to date, but deems that it has not yet met the necessary requirements for a full and effective evaluation of the project. As required under the Housing Guidelines and SGMS, the applicant submitted a PCNA (Physical Needs Assessment - Aspen Hill Condos by R[)3) and a 3rd Party Energy Audit (Energy Audit of the Aspen Hills Building by Confluence). The applicant, however, did not submit a reasonable or comprehensive scope of work and third party engineering report evaluating the integrity and remaining useful life of the project's essential and major components. To help review the Aspen Hills Condo Affordable Housing Project, APCHA contracted the services of a construction management professional, Phil Vaughan Construction Management Company, Inc., or (PVCMI). Attached to this memo is PVCMI's official report to APCHA reviewing and recommending minimum standards for the project. Without repeating PVCMI's official report here, staff requests that that the APCHA Board of Directors take the time to read, review and understand its recommendations before next Wednesdav's board meeting. As expected with a 52-year old building, the applicant's PCNA and 3rd Party Energy Audit have generated more questions than answers. APCHA recognizes that not all questions will be answered before a full evaluation and scope of work is completed. In order to move the project forward and give the applicant an opportunity to purchase the units under contract and complete his due diligence, APCHA will recommend conditional approval based strictly upon certain future expectations and approvals as outlined and detailed underthe "Recommendations" section of this memo. The board should also be aware that in addition to the concerns expressed by APCHA and its paid consultant, both the City's Community Development and Building Departments have expressed concerns about certain health and safetyand building code elements. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 6 Category of the Units The applicant proposes that the converted units be Category 2 or Category 3, or a combination thereof. Part 111, Section 4C of the Housing Guidelines, however, does not permit anything below a Category 3: Conversion/buy-down requests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the City, County and/or APCHA and shall be considered and approved only for Category 3 or higher units located in an existing free market development. Notwithstanding the Housing Guideline rules, it is helpful to understand that qualified Category 2 income households may bid on and purchase for-sale Category 3 units. Numberof Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits and Estimated Minimum Market Value The applicant is requesting the use of the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits for the project. These units would create the following number of FTE's: Two-Bedroom: 8 units X 2.25 = 18 FTE's Under Section 26.540 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, a credit can be established for Category 4 and lower units. However, as indicated, the Housing Guidelines do not permit the creation of Category 1 and 2 units by converting or buying-down existing free market dwelling units. The estimated minimum market value for credits is based on the established Fee-In-Lieu (FIL) rates per Full-Time Equivalent employee (FTE) found in the land use code. Fee-In-Lieu (per FTE): Category 1: $356,433 Category 2: $320,186 Category 3: $286,495 Category 4: $223,072 Using Category 3 designation for this project, for example, the following calculation shows an estimated minimum market value for the 18 FTE's in the Housing Credit market: Category FTEs X FIL Rate = Est. Minimum Market Value All Category 3: 18 FTEs X $286,495/FTE = $5,156,910 Because of regulatory limitations set by the land use code for mitigating affordable housing using FIL, plus the high cost of mitigating affordable housing through on- and off-site development within the City of Aspen, it is not unreasonable to assume that the market value for any Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit will be higher. Aspen Ilills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 7 I I RECOMMENDATIONS The APCHA Board reviewed the application at their regular meeting held January 18, 2017, and recommends approval of the Aspen Hills Condo Affordable Housing Project. The APCHA Board also recommends that the Planning and Zoning Committee approve this project for the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit program based strictly on the following conditions. Final acceptance of this project must be approved by APCHA and the City of Aspen prior to and as a condition of issuance of a Development Order and Building Permit by the City of Aspen. A Development Order shall not be issued by the City of Aspen until the APCHA and the applicant enter into a binding development agreement containing the following requirements: 1. Final acceptance and approval is subject to APCHA's and the City of Aspen's complete satisfaction of the scope of work based on additional reports and standards spelled out in the Housing Guidelines, the SGMS, and PVCMI's report of recommendations to APCHA dated January 13, 2017. 2. Approval is further subject to the applicant providing to APCHA sufficient third party reports detailing the current physical conditions of the building and units and proposed upgrades necessary to satisfy APCHA requirements in APCHA's sole subjective discretion, which requirements will later be specified by APCHA for the applicant. 3. Any amended or additional reports shall be reviewed by APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen. Any third party consultant hired by APCHA to review or make recommendations on this project shall be reimbursed by applicant. 4. The APCHA, its consultants, and the City of Aspen, shall work with the applicant to establish agreeable technical specifications for the required upgrades. 5. The applicant shall reimburse APCHA for any third party inspections and reports, including legal consultation associated with drafting and approving a Development Agreement. This shall be incorporated into the Development Agreement. 6. The building permit for the required upgrades shall not be issued by the City of Aspen unless the permit demonstrates the required upgrades are in accordance with the agreed-upon specifications, which will necessitate a third party construction consultant to review the building permit application on behalf of APCHA. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy or Letter of Completion for the required upgrades and rehabilitation work shall not be issued unless the improvements have been made in accordance to the scope of work and specifications agreed to prior to Building Permit. APCHA will rely on third party consultant and the City's Building Department to inspect and accept the improvements and standards set forth by APCHA for affordable housing conversion at the expense of the applicant. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 8 8. Prior to APCHA formally accepting the units and authorizing the City of Aspen to issue Housing Certificates, the applicant must complete upgrades to the building and units and establish new Association documents and appropriately fund reserves in order to meet the satisfaction of APCHA staff. 9. Per the Housing Guidelines and applicant's request, all converted units will be Category 3. 10. Applicant shall convert Unit #331 Cone-bedroom unit) that is illegally non- conforming to a two-bedroom unit. 11. A final Capital Reserve Study completed by a certified third party will be required upon acceptance of the project after any rehabilitation and construction for HOA designated common area components and systems. The report shall be given to the HOA and to APCHA by a certified reserve specialist at the time of Certificate of Occupancy or a Certificate of Completion, or within one month of either. Housing Credits shall not be issued by the City of Aspen until the Capital Reserve Study is completed and accepted by APCHA. 12. The applicant and the APCHA shall enter into a development agreement outlining the use of and cost allocation for any third party reviews or inspections. APCHA reserves the right to bill applicant for direct costs attributable to project review and legal fees with no additional administrative charge. Housing Credits shall not be issued by the City of Aspen Community Development Department until all outstanding costs and fees are reimbursed to or paid on behalf of APCHA for third party review services. 13. The applicant has the option of retaining the units as rental units or selling the units through the lottery system. Once a unit has been sold to a qualified Jk employee, the unit will remain as an ownership unit and shall be sold through APCHA has stated in the deed restriction. 4 4. The applicant has the option of maintaining three of the units for current owners, either as rentals or ownership. The current owners shall be allowed to remain in the units, shall not be required to meet the minimum occupancy requirements, and shall not be required to meet the maximum assets. However, at such time the ~~~ makes the decision to sell or vacate their unit, it shall be opened up to fully current owner (which shall be .known as an Exempt Tenant or Exempt Owner) qualified, top priority households only per the Housing Guidelines. Also, the applicant shall only be eligible to collect 1.75 FTE Housing Credits for any two- ~6 bedroom unit occupied by a single-person household. The applicant may be issued ~0 the outstanding balance of.5 FTE Housing Credits once the unit has been occupied %2 bya qualified 2-person household. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 9 1. .. 15. If at any time a rental unit is found to be out of compliance, and upon completion of APCHA's Notice of Violation (NOV) process, any remaining units occupied as rentals shall be listed for sale with APCHA and sold through the lottery system. 16. The developer shall obtain approval of all condominium documents to APCHA for review prior to acceptance. These shall include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. Articles of Incorporation b. By-Laws c. Condominium Declaration d. Condo Plat Map e. Nine required governance policies required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA). f. Budget 17. At the closing on all units, the developer shall provide to each new homeowner a binder that will include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. All condominium documents stated above; b. All mechanical warranties, all warranties for appliances, etc., that are available from any additional work completed by the developer 18. The Development Order shall provide the APCHA the reasonable right to not accept the project into the affordable housing inventory if the applicant fails to prove to APCHA's complete satisfaction that the physical condition is safe and acceptable under the standards agreed to, and/or has sufficient capital reserve funds to help safeguard the future affordability and replacement cost of common area components by the Association and its homeowners. Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Land Use Review Page 10 ~pÂ¥'A/t & 211%*5910mltum051*Wall *' |018 Colra Rd }2}11%4 RifIE, CO 81650 January 13,2017 Mr. Mike Kosdrosky Executive Director Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority 210 E. Hyman Ave.. Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Kosdrosky, APCHA has contracted with Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. to review the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO and to provide advice to APCHA in relation to this project. This project is a proposed conversion of an existing eight unit free-market residential building into affordable housing and the creation of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Documents Reviewed/Site Visit/Meeting 1 have reviewed the following documents submitted by Mr. Chris Bendon, AICP of BendonAdams representing the applicant WEB2 Capital, LLC. , A. October 24,2016- Application materials and exhibits prepared by Mr. Bendon B. December 9, 2016- Application addendum from Mr. Bendon with two documents attached: i. Confiuence Energy Audit of the Aspen Hill Building dated October 19,2016 ii. RD3 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21,2016 1 conducted a site visit on Wednesday, January 11,2017 with Mike Kosdrosky to the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO We viewed the site and the exterior of the structure. The site and building were both covered in snow. thus many features were obscured. Page 1 0 f 9 I attended a meeting on Thursday, January 12,2017 at 0900 hours at the Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority offices in Aspen, CO. Attendees included Mike Kosdrosky- APCHA Executive Director, Cindy Christiansen- APCHA Deputy Director, Sara Nadolny, AICP- City of Aspen Planner, Stephen Kanipe, CBO, LEED AP, City of Aspen Chief Building Official, Bill Boehringer, CEO- WEB2 Capital, LLC, Chris Bendon. AICP-Principal- BendonAdams, Jordan Nemirow. President- Aspen Hills Condominiums Homeowners Association and Phil Vaughan- President- PVC]MI. Joining by phone was Robert de Grasse, PE- President- RD), Inc. I have reviewed the Supplemental Guidance to the Mai-ketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). This document was approved by the APCHA Board on July 6, 2016. It is helpful to utilize additional accepted industry standards in regards to evaluating older properties. It has been represented by WEB2, Capital, LLC that the structure was built iii 1965. Please find below additional guidance given by HUD Notice H 2012-27. ASTM E2018-15 Section 2.3.49 defines a walk-through survey as ';2.3.49 walk-through smÂ·vey, n-conducted during the Deld observelÂ·'s site visit of the subject property, that consists of nonintrusive visual observations, survey of readily accessible, easily visible components and systems of the subject property. This surrey is described fully in Section 8. Concealed physical deficiencies are excluded. 11 is the intent of this gil i de 1 hal such a s un,ey s hould no t be co ns i dere d t e ch ni c al ly exhatist ive . It excl u des t he operation of equipment by the field observer and is to be conducted without the aid of special protective clothing, exploratory probing. removal or relocation of materials, testing, or the use Of equipment, such as ladders (except as requiredfor roof access), stools, scaffolding, metering/testing equipment, or devices of any kind, etc. It is literally the field observer's visual observations while walking through the subject properly. " HUD Notice H 2012-27 "Revised Requirements for Project Capital Needs Assessments. Estimated Reserves for Replacements and Remedies for Accessibility Deficiencies", section Vt.C.3. Intrusive tests and examination "..,An "intrusive test", as used herein, describes an examinqlion appropriate to observed circumstances and relying i,Aon standard diagnostic techniques, tools, probes, thermal inlagery. and other equipment 1 comnionly used by relevant construction trades to evaluate the condition and serviceability of particular building components. The intent is to describe methods that are technically sldficient to make reasoned estimates of the durability and sen,iceability of building components as well as requisite repair costs, but not "technically exhaustive" except to the extent thal evident risks to health and safety may require. The word intrusive does not mean destructive, although in some instances a minimally destructive technique may be required, When this is the case, care should be taken to select the least destructive approach in locations least detrimental to ongoing operation of the pi-operty. " HUD Notice H 2012-27 section VLE. further directs "Intrusive Tests at Older Properties. For older structures the needs assessor and lender should consider intrusive Page 2 0 f 9 tests, or examinations, of primary building systems, including but not limited to structural, building envelope, com,eyance, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, where visual or non-invasive examination alone nicty not be slifficient to support a conclusion about the condition or remaining useful life of system components. Willie recognizing that age and condition of structures are not always related, a guideline for use of intrusive methods in structures 30 or more years of age. (Einphasis Added) 11 is the responsibility of the lender to assure thal the needs assessor employs investigative methods appropriate jolhe age, condition, physical composition of the property and the local environment. In general, lenders shoidd not reconiniend a maximum mortgage term for structures 30 or more years of age without conducting appropriate intrusive tests of priniary building systems to confirm the condition and reniaining ilseftd life of the building(s). When widertaken, an intrusive test or examination should result in a written report, attached to the PCNA, which report should inchide at a minimitni the following: 1. A statement ofthe examiner's particular experience, education, technical or trade cerlifications or other qualifications establishing the examiner's expertise relevant to the matter examined. 2, A description of the physical component(s) or system examined inchiding the portions, quantities, and or locations examined and the relevant products and materials found installed. 3, A description of the tracie or industry recognized techniques, tests or analytical methods of examination used. 4. A summary of the estiniated age, condition, and serviceability of the products, materials or system examined. 5. The examiner's recommendation of any repairs and/or replacements, 6. The examiner 's estimate Of the remaining usefid life of the system or component assuming any recommended repairs or replacements are conipleted." 4 PVCMI Recommended Mini+mum Standards for the Aspen Hills Affordable ' Housing Proiect Please note that many o f the requested studies, inspections and investigations noted below are considered intrusive. This is intended as the structure is approximately 52 years old and will require additional investigation greater than those provided in the ASTM E2018-15 report. As requested, please find below a list of recommended minimum standards for the Aspen Hills Affordable Housing project located at 331-338 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO. Page 3 of 9 These recommended minimum standards are intended to generally conform with the Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016) as approved by the APCHA Board on .July 6,2016. (SGMS-07-06-16) 1. Site A. Site accessibility review via conformance with ICC/ANSI All 7.1 and the most current City of Aspen Building Codes adopted via Ordinance No. 40- Series 2016. This review and assessment may conclude that an accessible parking space/spaces and associated ramp may need to be constructed on-site to gain accessibility to the dwelling unit(s). B. Camera the existing sanitary sewer line to detennine size, material, current condition and exact location on-site. C. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment conducted as per ASTM E 1527- Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. D. Evaluation of the -brick chimney" noted on the Improvement Survey Plat at the Northeast corner of the site to determine its ilse and efficacy from a mechanical systems standpoint. E. Evaluation and recommendation o f removal of existing wood stair treads and installation of new cast-in-place concrete stairways as identified on page 11 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. F. Evaluation and recommendation of improvement of routing of roof drainage away from the structure as identified on page 17 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. G. Evaluation and recommendation of improvement of exterior decks and railings as identified on pages 18-19 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. Please note that a portion of, or all. of these railings may nee4 to be renovated to become guardrails versus railings. 1 2. Structure A. Evaluations/Reports i, Structural evaluation of the roof system as required via the SGMS-07- 06-16 and the RI)3 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21,2016. ii. Radon investigation. This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in a mitigation plan that would be included in the scope of work for the upcoming renovation. Page 4 of 9 iii. Lead-based paint (LBP) investigation and compliance with the US EPA Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Program. This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in the preparation ofan LBP Operations and Maintenance Plan. iv. Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) investigation. This investigation may be conducted in conjunction with the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. This investigation may result in a remediation plan and/or an ACM Operations and Maintenance Plan. v. Dwelling unit accessibility review via conformance with ICC/ANSI A 1 17.1 and the most current City of Aspen Building Codes adopted via Ordinance No. 40- Series 2016. This review and assessment may conclude that dwelling unit or units require upgrades to meet ANSI Type A- accessible or ANSI Type B- adaptable dwelling units. vi. Prepare a code analysis report, conducted by a Colorado licensed Architect, to address conformance with the City of Aspen Building Codes adopted via Ordinance No. 40- Series 2016. Please note that this code analysis should also address conformance with the International Fire Code as adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District via Resolution No. 6-1 Series of 2016. vii. Review of the existing electrical system including balanced loads to subpanels, existing wiring systems, existing grounding systems and compliance with the National Electrical Codes in regards to GFCi and other life safety issues. This evaluation should be prepared by a licensed Colorado Electrical Professional Engineer. viii. Review ofthe existing mechanical and plumbing systems in the building. This evaluation should be prepared by a licensed Colorado Mechanical Profepional Engineer. ix. Review of the exterior and interior of the structu#e to determine any areas of moisture infiltration and the presence of mold. This report should include a mold mitigation strategy and recommended repairs. x. Prepare a detailed scope of work, and associated drawings as needed, after completion ofall evaluations and reports. xi. Prepare a detailed 3rd party renovation cost estimate that comports with the scope of work and associated drawings. This renovation budget should be detailed, and should be provided in Construction Specifications Institute Masterformat 2014. The renovation budget should be prepared by Page 5 of 9 a 3rd party who is knowledgeable and experienced in construction and current construction costs in Aspen/Pitkin County, CO. xii. Revise the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment- Aspen Hill condos dated October 21,2016 to incorporate both requirements of 22018-15 and neu information received via additional evaluations and reports. Specific revisions include: a. Include qualifications of the consultant as noted in section 6 of E2018-15.'06. The Consultant 6.1 QuaN.fications of the Consititant-This guide recognizes that the competency of the consimant is highly dependem on many factors thal may inchide professional education, training, experience, cerlification, or professional licensing/registration, of both the consultant 's.field observers and the PCR reviewer. It is the intent of this guide to identifyfactors that should be considered by the ilser when retaining a consultant to conduct a PCA and by the consultant iii selecting the appropriate field observer and PCR reviewer. No standaid call be designed to eliminate the }Â·ole of professional judgment, competence, and the valite and need for experience ditiing the walk-through survey and to conduct the PCA. Consequently, the qualilications ofthefield observer and the PCR reviewer are critical to the performance of the PCA and the resulting PCR. This guide further recognizes thai the consultant has the responsibility to select, engage, or employ the field observerandthe PCR revieiver. Therefore, each PCR should include as an exhibit a statement of qualifications of both the field obserrerand the PCRreviewer." b, Page 3 of the Physical Needs Assessment under Scope, indicates 'interviews with various persons." Provide infonnation in the report as to the pre-survey questionnaire, interviews conducted and information gained as per Section 7.7 interviews of E2018-15. '7.7 Interviews-Prior to the site visit, the consultant should ask the owner or user m identify the POC. The consultant 4 4 should contact the POC to fonvard the pre-survey questionnaire so as to inquire about the subject property's historical repairs and replacenients and their costs, level of preventive maintenance exercised, pending repairs and improvements, frequency of repairs and replacements, and existence of ongoing or pending litigation related to subject property's physical condition. In connection with the consultant's research or walk-through suivey, the consultant may also question others who are knowledgeable of the subject property's physical condition and operation. It is within the discretion of the consultant to decide which questions to ask before, during. or after the site visit. Page 6 of 9 7.7.1 Method-Questions to be asked pursuant to this section are at the discretion of the consultant and may be asked in person, by telephone, or in writing. 7.7.2 Incomplete Answers-IVilile the consititam should make inquiries in accordance with this section, the persons to whom the questions are addressed may hare no obligation to cooperate. Should the POC owner, or the properly manager, building/facility engineer, or maintenance supervisor not be available for an interview, whether by intent or inconvenience, or not respond in full or in part to questions posed by tile constiltant, the consultant should disclose such within the PCR. Furthermore, should any party not grant such authorization to interview, restrict such authorization, or should the person to whom the questions are addressed nol be knowledgeable about the subject property, this should be disclosed within the PCR." c. Re-evaluate the Category Cost Table and Planning Horizon Cost Table as these cost estimates seem to be lower than current Aspen/Pitkin County construction costs. d. Update the Capital Reserve Study and Savings Plan as necessary to account for new information received via additional evaluations and reports. B. Exterior i. Renovations as recommended in the Confluence 10/19/16 report. a. "Heat trace with timer/temperature controllers b. Window replacenient of units listed as "clear glass and high emissivity" c. A new roof; remove all skylites, remove heat tape, add additional rigid insulation. Possibly install TDDs (Tubidar Daylighting Devices) through roof near ridge. " 4 ii. Determination of the adeqdacy of the roofing system and whether repair or replacement is desired as identified on pages 14-16 of the RD3 Physical Needs Assessment. iii. Door replacement/weather-proofing. iv. Exterior siding and trim replacement/repair and coating as necessary. v. Renovations as necessary to bring all interior finishes to a level of 'Very Good" as stated on page 3 ofthe Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). Page 7 0 f 9 vi. Renovations as identified and recommended in the above-noted evaluations/reports. C. Interior i. Renovations as recommended in the Confluence 10/19/16 report. "a. New high-efficacy lighting, starting with the units ;i,i/h the highest aniount of insialled wattage. h. New high-efficiency appliances, where indicated on indiridital unil assessments. c. Install programmable thermostats. d. Undergo air scaling measures; the units are leaking two m eight limes more air than recommended. Air scaling has the potential to st/i'e more gas than any other meastire. Typical air leakage sites inchide: ceiling beams, ceiling, top plate, outlets, windows and doors. ifthe infiltration rate is significantly reduced, then install high-quality bathroom exhaust fans, controlled by a wall switch with built in hygrometer and timer. Exhaust to Outdoors with damper. e. Mechanical room; Insidate all of the hot water pipes thal can be reached. Install an insulated hatch cover. Remove the abandoned combustion air intake ducts and fill the hole with an insulated plug. Seal passageways that lead into units. f Install low-flow fatice! aerators, shower heads and toilels." ii. Potential wet-pipe fire sprinkler systeni and associated monitoring system dependent upon the outcome of the code analysis and consultation with the City of Aspen Community Development Department and the Aspen Fire Protection District. iii. Potential monitored fire alarm system dependent upon the outcome of the code analysis and consultation with the City of Aspen Communit) Development Department and the Aspen Fire Protection District. iv. Determination of the placement and R-value of roof and wall insulation. Lack ofroofand wall insulation may require reinov% of a portion, or all, interior gypsuin board to allow for installation of new insulation and associated vapor barrier. v. Repairs and replacement of materials as designated "Repair" or -Replace" in the Unit-by-Unit Inspection section located on pages 26 to 31 of RI)3 Physical Needs Assessment. vi. Renovations as necessary to bring all interior finishes to a level of -Very Good" as stated on page 3 ofthe Supplemental Guidance to the Marketability Standards- APCHA Guidelines (2016). Page 8 0 f 9 vii. Renovations as identified and recommended in the above-noted evaluations/reports. It is important that APCHA, City of Aspen and PVCM1 have an opportunity to revieK and comment on each of the reports and items noted above after receipt from WEB2 Capital, LLC. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, 6440 44Â»-s Philip B. Vaughan President Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. 970-625-5350 Email: phil@pvcmi.com Website: ww-w.pvcnii.com Attachments: None END OF REPORT 1 1 Page 9 0 f 9 Scet EXHIBIT -1 1 L B",0.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 361 - 3.*S- hu.3 L,AD 1>2_. , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -Qu JuR \1, e 4:30frn , 20 / 7 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 40Â·v*1Â·~A EL,4--7 (name, please print) being or rebresenting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L/'0'0~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. -A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the ,Â· property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of Â· M !.r; Â· property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description o f, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. t.4/1,71 - Signade The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 3 day of 1a~vÂ·Â·Â·~ , 201~,by ArvÂ·nek <ScerÂ·â‚¬A-1 NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: Aspen Hills Condominiums WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Public Hearing: January 17,2017 @ 4.30 pm Meeting Location: Cit'y Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 331 - 338 Midland Avenue Legal Description: PID # 273707405001, My commission expires: 49 -30 273707405006,273707405002,273707405008, 273707405007,273707405003,273707405005, 273707405004, and 273707405801 (common ar- ea) legally described as Aspen Hills Subdivision, more fully described as follows: A parcel of land in Pitkin County, State of Colorado, described as be- ginning at a point whence corner number three of Notary Public the 99 Lode claim bears 571 degrees 49' 06' east 347.08'; thence 585 degrees 44' 33" west 20.87'; thence south 4 degrees 15' 27" east 3.42': thence south 85 degrees 44' 33' west 7.77': thence north 4 1.....'ll/'-1 ..1 4 -.1/7 -X., degrees 15' 27" west 3.42'; thence 585 degrees 44* KAREN REED PATTERSO:, 33" west 38.63': thence south 4 degrees 15' 27 east 3.42': thence south 85 degrees 44' 33" west NOTARY PUBLIC 7.77; thence north 4 degrees 15' 27" west 3.42 thence south 85 degrees 44' 33" west 78.26% STATE OF COLORADO thence north 6 degrees 26' west 110.48': thence 4CHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: NOI-ARY ID #1996400271 7 south 89 degrees 46' east 157.88', thence south 4 degrees 15' 27' east 48.65% thence north 85 de- ICA TION My Commission Expires Fet*ualy 15,2020 1 arees 44' 33" east. OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) bescription The applicant is proposing to convert the eight free-market condominium units into al fordable housing units in exchange for Certificates TNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED of Affordable Housing Credit. Land Use Reviews Reg: Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, and Variance and Special Review RTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE for Parking. Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning Com- mission Applicant: WEB2 Capital LLC, PO Box 3807, As- ~~ Cl-R..St Â§24-65.5-103.3 pen CO 81612 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of As- pen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, Sara Na- , dolny@cityofaspen.com. Published in the Aspen Times on December 29, LE?16 (12564732) CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 331-338 Midland Avenue; Aspen Hills CondominiumpAspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: T Q L S. January 17 , 20 17 . RECEIVEU dit, 1 0 2017 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. CITY OF ASPEN county of pitkin ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPENT i Chris Bendon (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days priortothe public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. V~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 2 day of January , 2017 . to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: 4 Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method Of public notification and a copy Of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March, 2016 Citv of Aoen 1130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. BY the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours foyfifteen (15) days prior tothe public hearing on such amendments. 0Â»Â»44 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit Notice" was acknowledged before me this ~~ day of danwary . 20-lt, by (@1 6 Nvic#K WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TARA L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: NOTARY ID 20014030017 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09/25/201.7LJ /Â»SIÂ®*Pul Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S Â§24-65.5-103.3 March, 2016 Citv of ADenl130 S. Galena St. I(970) 920 5050 .. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: Aspen Hills Condominiums Public Hearing: January 17, 2017 @ 4:30 pm Meeting Location: City Hall - 130 S. Galena St., Sister Cities Room Project Location: 331 - 338 Midland Avenue Description: The applicant is proposing to convert the eight free-market condominium units that make up the Aspen Hills Condominiums into affordable housing units in exchange for Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Land Use Reviews Requested: Growth Management, Affordable Housing, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, Special Review and Variance for Parking. Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning Commission Applicant: WEB2 Capital LLC, PO Box 3807, Aspen CO 81612 on behalf of the homeowners More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, Sara.Nadolnv@citvofaspen.com. t *fl PUBLIC NOTICE: Date: January 17.2017 Â¢ Time: 4 30 0 Place: Cily liall, t3O S Gaigr3 St Si*or CÂ®e* Room 2 Purpose: WE82 C*tWL.1.C. PO BoxÂ»]7 LLS Aspen CO 81612, as rel:re,Frtatwe 8 hee marke unds on the 91Â» nt LA aftordable housing wrats tra*haMe for AflordaMe Housing Cied,ls lard use reviews Maude GÂ»th Mgmt, 2 Affordable Hougng Cebf<ates 01 AH Cred:l, Special Review & Pal, ng j Vanance For lurlher IMIO Cof'Zact ire Plannin De t. at 976Â·920*}93 -1 3-- 9-E!,!9.3 . 4 33 . . .2 4. > I U .*.' 4 ./ '41 Â¥ .7 * . 44 k.."- ' , ...it . 5.14 -' 4Â»' Â· -- â€ž I : LAI Â· â€¢-~ " ~7~.. ~ 1 4 . V , .- 4 , .5<44,4,4~ 1 i. ~ , ... 3117 11 - . 6, 4 1 11Â£ I .4 4,1 1.',4 lb - + lili I . ly . 1 . , I ' 9 -4, ...1 ' t. e -94. C., 1 it; - 4 6-1 1 .... -' PAC 0 ' + 4/ 0 -1 .#fgar 1*'483' k 5 1 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273707405801 on 09/30/2016 ),THIN ' Cou ~F fir 14 (Â©/3.0\Q) Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com BROWN RUTH H BEYER ALAN R BERNARD RANDY 410NMILLST#Bll 410NMILLST#Bll 18 PLATEAU RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 COLORADO MTN NEWS MEDIA PIERCE ROBERT KING MERZBACH NINA PO BOX 1927 PO BOX 3118 195 SHEFFIELD DR CARSON CITY, NV 89702 ASPEN, CO 81612 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 SILVER LAKE FAMILY TRUST GOLDBERG DANIEL J HUA VINH 424 PARK CIR TH 1 424 PARK CIR # 3 PO BOX 2439 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LUU VINH SCHUR JACOB A MOYER MARY PO BOX 8513 424 PARK CIRCLE #TH5 424 PARK CIR #6 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816112498 ASPEN, CO 81611 HEYMAN BRUCE QPR TRUST HEYMAN VICKI QPR TRUST ROCKY MTN PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 5000 MS-10 2035 N MAGNOLIA 73 SMUGGLER GROVE RD OGDENSBURG, NY 13669 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81611 FAT CITY APARTMENTS LLC BIBBIG DIETER HEMMING GREGG S & KAREN S 402 MIDLAND PARK 333 PARK AVE 311 MIDLAND AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN SALLIE 1208 EAST HOPKINS LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORI1 325 PARK AVE 623 E HOPKINS AVE 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KNUTSON RODNEY D SNELL NANCY L WELLS SHARON ELIZABETH PO BOX YY PO BOX YY PO BOX 3100 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81612 BASALT, CO 81621 GREENHILL MICHAEL LOUIS REV TRUST GREENHILL DEBRA MERLE REV TRUST CITY OF ASPEN 30 RIPARIAN RD 30 RIPARIAN RD 130 S GALENA ST HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035-1909 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 CASTLE PEAK ASPEN LLC TAYLORJOHNIAN DELYNN JEAN J 600 E MAIN ST #104 331 MIDLAND AVE 331 MIDLAND AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRUBBS MATT SAMUELSON ALIX DEVANNY EARL H 111 & ELIZABETH H 333 MIDLAND AVE #3 PO BOX 4324 177 HAMBOLDT ST ASPEN, CO 81611-2412 BASALT, CO 81621 DENVER, CO 80218 DUNIGAN PATRICK A CHAZEN DAVID FRANKLIN 11 HTM PROPERTIES LLC 4245 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY STE 460 150 E 58TH ST 27TH FL 43 A SMUGGLER GROVE RD DALLAS, TX 75205 NEWYORK, NY 10155 ASPEN, CO 81611 337 MIDLAND AVE LLC MCGAVOCK MARGARET JANE TRUST HERMELIN ASPEN LLC PO BOX 559 PO BOX 533 32205 BINGHAM RD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 KALTENBOCK ERNST IBARA RON MEBEL GREGORY E 1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD PO BOX 776 30 KUPONO ST TORONTO ONTARIO CAYUCOS, CA 93430 PAIA, HI 967799723 CANADA M4B 3A4, COERDT CLINTON CLAUSS ARNAL ALVARO JOSE VICENZI HEATHER L TRUST 726 VINE ST 726 VINE ST PO BOX 2238 ASPEN, CO 816111595 ASPEN, CO 816111595 ASPEN, CO 81612 MCDONALD FRANCIS B WHITE WILLIAM P TUSHINGHAM DARREN PO BOX 4671 326 MIDLAND AVE #204 326 MIDLAND AVE #205 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 OLDFIELD BARNEY F PHILLIPS ARTHUR R & HELEN B MOHWINKEL CLIFF 2701 MIDLAND AVE #8312 PO BOX 8245 PO BOX 9457 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 RESTAINO BECKER TRUST KELLEY BRAD BUCKLEY & SHARI L PITKIN COUNTY 72 ALDER AVE 1736 N 6250 E 530 E MAIN ST #302 SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 EDEN, UT 84310 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH JACK L & DIANE M ASPEN ASSET LLC FERLISI MARY SANDRA LIVING TRUST 434 COTTONWOOD DR 2701 MIDLAND AVE #8312 326 MIDLAND AVE #307 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAVE DERYK GORBITZ HEIDI & PATRIC K & W PROPERTIES I LLC 1195 E COOPER #B PO BOX 647 PO BOX 744 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLACKSBURG, VA 24060 LOUTHIS PETER NAGLE MELINDA LEE EPLER ANDI E PO BOX 4254 PO BOX 914 PO BOX 785 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MUNROE KRISTIN EPLER TRUST CALAMARI MICHAEL NARAT APSARA PO BOX 785 317 RUE SAINT ANN 415 PARK CIR #5 ASPEN, CO 81612 METAIRIE, LA 700053469 ASPEN, CO 81611 KEARN ROBERT & ORENE FAMILY TRUST DAVIS D STONE RUSSELL LYNN C 1831 WILLOW RD PO BOX 8904 PO BOX 8904 HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MANUEL CATHERINE & LINCOLN AES INVESTMENTS LLC ANDRULAITIS FIONA MCWILLIAM & TIMOTH' 409 PARK CIR #2 500 PARK CIR 409 PARK CIR #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GARTON SARA B JOHNSTON PEGGY REV TRUST BROOKS KERRI L 110 MIDLAND PARK PL 111 MIDLAND PARK PL 112 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LACROIX TIMOTHY STEAR RONALD A & MARIA F BIRACH KAREN 113 MIDLAND PARK PL 121 MIDLAND PARK PL #A21 122 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-2414 HAGEN CATHERINE ANNE HOUBEN CYNTHIA MICHELE WINKLERJILLC 210 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 9616 212 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HUMPHREYJESS HANSEN BETH DODINGTON SUSAN M PO BOX 1775 PO BOX 1775 221 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPONAR ANTON K & JUDY BESTIC JEFFREY B FUENTES DAVID & KATHARINE D 222 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 2267 302 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611-2486 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGGINS PAUL KOCH KATHRYN S & JOHN F MCPHEE JAMES MICHAEL & ANNE MARIE 303 MIDLAND PARK PL #C-3 304 MIDLAND PARK PL C-4 401 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FORNELL PETER J MACCRACKEN SCOTT R & MARISA POST CHAUNER RONALD & JACKIE 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 403 MIDLAND PARK PL #D3 PO BOX 8782 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KOLBERG JUDITH A SMITH DONALD NELSON CUNNINGHAM PAMELA M 501 MIDLAND PARK PL 501 MIDLAND PARK PL 502 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WELDEN TODD E & DEBORAH C GRIFFITHS THOMAS W BAKKEN JOHN & LIZA N 503 MIDLAND PARK PL #E3 504 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 12064 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLOMQUISTJENIFERL PERLEY PAUL S NICHOLS SCOTT A PO BOX 12155 PO BOX 12155 PO BOX 3035 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 BIRRFELDER BRIGITTE T STEIN DEBORAH JEFFERSON GREG PO BOX 3035 710 MIDLAND PARK PL 711 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLEASON AMY EVERETTE JOHN JOHNSON SHAEL 712 MIDLAND PARK PL 712 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3549 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEBSTER DAVID H CALK LAURA E WILLCOX DENNIS PO BOX 10362 722 MIDLAND PARK PL 722 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2472 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATTEN DAVID N LEVIN AMY HECK JAMES C 810 MIDLAND PARK PL 811 MIDLAND PARK PL#Hll PO BOX 8416 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SEMPLE SASHA L GRAHAM MARGOT WERTZ LIMOR 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 2254 PO BOX 9227 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOLLINGER JONATHAN MCLAUGHLIN KEVIN HENDRICKS LYNDELL B 403 PARK AVE #3 403 PARK AVE #4 PO BOX 11152 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 . BALLOUJONATHAN HELBING ATHENA MCINTYRE GEOFF & LEE AMORY 403 PARK AVE #6 403 PARK AVE #6 403 PARK AVE #7 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BURGESS HILARY KURNOS TIMOTHY A MCKNIGHTSPENCER 1020 E COOPER AVE 403 PARK AVE #9 403 PARK AVE #10 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MCPHERSON GREGORY J HACH STEPHEN C AMES MARTHA E PO BOX 2073 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHILLIPS JESSICA VANGARDEREN TEJAY LOWE SARA M & CORY J 407 PARK AVE #A 407 PARK AVE #A 407 PARK AVE #B ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FEINSTEIN JEROME FAM TRUST KROMELOW BASIL M & LAUREANNE L LEE JONATHAN O TRUST 1211 GULF OF MEXICO DR #901 55 W DELAWARE PL 35 FISHER AVE LONGBOAT KEY, FL 34228 CHICAGO, IL 60610 BROOKLINE, MA 02445 LEE BARBARA C TRUST TERKUN MARK HITCHCOCK SAMANTHA 35 FISHER AVE PO BOX 329 PO BOX 329 BROOKLINE, MA 02445 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN VIEW CONDO ASSOC TAILINGS CONDO ASSOC 315-317 PARK AVE CONDO ASSOC 326 MIDLAND AVE 424 PARK CIR COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 315 PARK AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 328 PARK/327 MIDLAND CONDO ASSOC MIDLAND PARK PLACE CONDO ASSOC JACOBIE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 328 PARK AVE 112 MIDLAND PARK PL PARK CIR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMUGGLER GROVE CONDO ASSOC MARTHINSSON NOSTDAHL CONDO ASSOC PARK AVENUE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 403 PARK AVE COMMON AREA 23 SMUGGLER RD ASPEN, CO 81611 102 PARK AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PARK AVENUE TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSO( EPSTEN BRADFORD M QPR TRUST EPSTEN VIRGINIA H QPR TRUST 407 PARK AVE UNIT A 5038 WALNUT ST 1030 W 66TH TERRACE ASPEN, CO 81611 KANSAS CITY, MO 641122757 KANSAS CITY, MO 64113 MOONEY TIMOTHY DPASPEN LLC GOODMAN DREW I PO BOX 8931 300 ROBBINS LN 5721 GREEN OAKS DR ASPEN, CO 81612 SYOSSET, NY 11791 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121-1336 SUNIER ALAIN SHERIDAN MARGARET 165 PARK CIRCLE CONDO 29 VILLAGE LN 29 VILLAGE LN COMMON AREA BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 ASPEN, CO 81611 04/bit M Aspen Planning and Zoning Commissioners Walterscheid. Goode. MeNellis, MeNicholas. Mesirow. Tygre. and Morris RE: Aspen Hills Affordable Housing. 331-338 Midland Avenue DATE: January 16, 2016 It is my understanding that the hearing scheduled for the Aspen Hills Condominium application has or will be tabled and continued until January 24 as there are apparently conditions the Planning Department and Building Department have that have not yet been met. Having read the application to convert this complex from free-market to affordable housing there are several items I would ask you to consider as you contemplate your ruling: 1. Parking - This is the inevitable elephant in the room these days. especially it seems, with the redevelopment of existing parcels to affordable housing. We saw this recently with 404 Park Avenue. It will be an issue with the Aspen Affordable Housing Partnership projects. And it is now an issue with Aspen Hills. It appears the rule of thumb is now to offer one parking space per unit. not per bedroom. although according to this application narrative. this project does have approval for one space per bedroom. While it is a noble undertaking in trying to limit automobile use within close proximity to mass transportation or alternative transportation options. at some point a resident of one of these project will need to go to Glenwood. Denver. Moab. etc. I dont believe Aspen's car share program goes much beyond Glenwood. but I could be wrong. So while a renter or homeowner may not use their vehicle often. they most likely are not going to give it up. This then begs the question. where will the extra vehicles be stored? I fully understand and witness first hand every day (I live in Midland Park). how Aspen Hills has handled their parking situation and applaud their creativity. It has not created any issues for us but we also. like the Planning Department. have been told the easement access for the parking lot granted to Aspen Hills years ago, cannot be found. So the additional question is, on whose property does the current parking lot reside'? 2. Possible Future Expansion on the Northern Vacant Section - It is my hope that 1) this is not part of the January 24.2017 application approval (or not); 2) when it comes time for approval that the expansion application is required to go through the proper PUD process (regardless of it being 100% affordable housing) BECAUSE, it may be that this project needs to either be built into the existing berm. and Midland Park's property line runs right along the top and middle of this berm separating Midland Park and Aspen Hills or the height of the building has an allowable (by code) height of 28' which will adversely impact Midland Park. and we would like the opportunity review the project and . 11 . ,- I . I A h 4..'.1 0: .2 - 1:2 6 16 1 . voice possible concerns: and 3) whether this is a single affordable housing unit or multiple units. how will the parking generated by this unit then be handled? 3. The Existing Trash/Recycle/Mailbox Area - It is noted in the application that this area is located -within the right-of-way but outside the roadway." These receptacles also sit on Midland Park property. We are in the process of drawing up a licensing agreement to be presented to the Aspen Hills Condominium Association or new owner. whoever is appropriate. but should the City require the applicant to relocate these receptacles, where exactly is that to be and does that possibly result ill the loss of existing parking spaces? Ali. the elephant is getting restless! 4. Capital Reserve Fund - If these units revert to rentals. the possibility of which was mentioned in the application (perhaps with the option of becoming owned housing in the future). how will a capital reserve fund be handled since there is no ownership assessment? Will the new owner/developer be required to establish such an account/fund prior to approval? This issue may have been handled in the applicant's recent meeting with APCHA: the minutes of that meeting have not yet been made public. Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns. I look forward to reviewing the supporting documentation when it is posted next week and attending the next scheduled P&Z hearing on this project on January 24.2017. r#OULL Judith A. Kolberg (your favorite neighborhood homeowner) 501 Midland Park Place Aspen. CO 81611 970-319-6250 Kolb7926@gmail.com Sara Nadolny From: Cindy Klob Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 3:08 PM To: Sara Nadolny Subject: FW: Public hearing January 17, 2017 Sara, Jen asked me to forward this to you because Ms. Hagen includes comment regarding the Aspen Hills addresses (paragraph 2). Thanks, Cindy Cindy Klob Records Manager I City Clerk 1 970.429.2686 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena I Aspen, CO 81611 www.aspenpitkin.com From: Catherine Hagen [mailto:seaweedzg@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 5:19 PM To: Cindy Klob <cindy.klob@cityofaspen.com> Subject: Public hearing January 17, 2017 To the Planning & Zoning Commission: I am a 40-year Aspen resident, have resided at Midland Park Place (MPP) since 1979 and am writing to express my thoughts about projects envisioned for my neighborhood. Peter Fornell's project at 404 Park Avenue was swiftly swept through the approval process without regard for the concerns voiced by neighbors at the meeting. MPP has been a very quiet area, and lighting is kept to a minimum to protect the views of the night sky. I request that this attitude be continued. From the drawings, it appears that the east side of 404 Park Avenue has a sheer wall facing MPP and provides no light shielding. As part of the Pitkin County Commissioners' approval for MPP, dogs were prohibited at the MPP complex. I request that measures be taken so that the new projects do not allow any pets to roam freely, potentially and probably ending up at MPP and that barking dogs be controlled. We have a finite number of parking places at MPP, and residents and visitors of 404 Park Avenue have on many occasions parked in our complex over the years, reducing the spaces allocable to MPP. 1 Though my comments mention 404 Park Avenue, they apply to the proposed conversion of 331- 338 Midland Avenue (331-338), immediately to our south. MPP has berm property between MPP and 331-338, and I request that steps be taken so that new or current owners refrain from allowing dogs to use that area to drop their feces. Children play there, and the health hazards are obvious. When properly monitored, employee housing can have great benefits to the community. Infringing on the long-standing habits and comfort of current residents breeds ill will, ruins the quality of the neighborhood and would be anything but beneficial. Thank you for your consideration. Catherine Hagen 2 14 ' .. , d ..i f. : I . 4, 4 4. r# , 4. _ 5. I- y '1 D . t ...94 7* 0 00*1 2 1/~-3.t:t, .2~49%1* :4 16*:* *.C t'r/ i=l ' 1...j:" 14.(;LtYÂ®.,"3.t, 1.1~U~:~ 0 '2'Ar:Lt, P.,1'' Tp' ~- , ,& i ~1 . tÂ·Kâ‚¬>c~jv~f lhAP'~'j>*;1~1 ., , , k T \,4 2 MP J =Â»r ~4 i ~1 I , , 1 ~Â¥/44, - 94-4 Â·Â«if' I . \f ' ' Â«uÂ¥ 1, ..1 2, . A . z Â£ L ; ;/f i '.\ill - ~ # .1.,7. ) 4 frt< 604/ . .,1 . . 4 2 *' 4~ - 1- - .. ' ir f. . , %. 1., , . , , lr$-t ..w .Â· P ':'..-14 eiÂ·J ti. 4.11, -LOil-Ii, ~.'* . fÂ» 2 . , ' 44''.Â·4179Â° 12&,#11%.1.1ij, .., 0 ,/ . 'r, 1 j' f . a.e,=1 -'~ Â·1Â¢tm'*f .1. j '. ,,0 ;L L,5 f . ~{ji/ju~:26Â°~tj~ 0Â¥iÂ·32 4,4 , 4 }07~*+ : ~A ~ , fl 1./ .. 1011 '#ti~;*,ik431.- fuL-14..4. 9*,1Â£: 2 -, 'rvEZE> 1-12*'s:4,41 Ir - Â·-i, <Ar .isl,Â£ 447,1,Â· 021. , I ACkw'* 1 V + . 4,21 1 - 1. - . ... . ,\ '4 4 \ 41.- 4 4 4 k - ;- i {;f . ' '1 I 9-4*2.10 . 4 ; 2, 1 1 iM' 0 . e * -' illlA 1/2 -2. 1/ 6 , '/Â· b=... 0 j i , 4'4 4/ .. -1 1 . r - i '26,16. I ~' - //%4 ikim.mÂ·kÂ¥ f.?*,1~~ Aft~* M Jf .. \ 1/4 1/5.* J~i <3' --: ./ ~ 6.1* \. 11-44' e.* 4-91 ell:~9-Â·,Â·1Â· , '. 1, Â·Ft ..:U,4.3- 4 - r. I .. 1 *lit -*. Â· - 1 U.4 ....0 4 M:*1,2. 4,< t r.gL / 4 - . a. I , WÂ¥ ., Â·I- r 2 4 2 4 1- I--- 1 4 ' 1- 2 -: ... 1...Â·vuip .~ ..~iI0 ~ f.rop>- ./.~/11/1~ 1 - - 1-22- ni' 4..0 449 alÂ· 0 14%0/i//itif <{bilitit. PÂ¥2 2% L - Firicia/1/I- x ~ ' T/li.Â·3 Â°12 . 1- 1~. ''.0 ~ AlwÂ¢x x 9 ~ 929Â« % 0% N . 11 1-=......I- . -I.~./.: I / a . "a || ~ AilÂ·.' 7> - Â« ~.11 2~ l 1 4 0 P. 4. ..--=. I 1---- L - ' 1......2 - 4 r.. I 4.?tol.. % Q?*i 4 4 a . Ill W 1- - 't.4, 6-4.6 1 â€ž 1. .t 'ks,#I *:< -I . m--: t., 9 4/ I' : I1/6.:J... . ' - 1, 1 4. 3.N k. + , 1- I. I -i \11!L 9, ~i . t:,4, 21' ... r ./r f..: -r - \).4 MAÂ· 4 ~ CBMY. 'Â·. 1.34 i Â· t '.Ld./i ., , 1,jl \6, d .. ..t 2 'ttb.I.,49 4 t z 4<>~ i\ I '14.- Â·k,!"P ./ :,1:3*it;4,~ ..4 J'.4\ 1.1.01 14% '11' 1.12 /Â«-'.-:4Â·- I 1~4.-f. :4#*P " 'lle ./r : i.4.-02. > .U, . nity 9, I ' r. .' int' 1. I , ' - 4 Ar *0 2 .i.b. - d a :ilf' 1 7 4 *1150 6.30 1,- lit 't it .l- --1-/*.- ..44 4% - I :,6 : ,/ 1 .4 18. ....1 2",#h.* ' .1 ./ --& - 1 -6.7.#*. - 'i.t '14. 1.1 < ~q,pj jt ,7, ,pr ...J'~,Yi 19,\/1 --â€ž ,Â¥ ..1 9.% ./ ~ r 'B..4 Ue .* 4 ~ J , i,1\4..Cla .0.*r-~4 //7 t* 1.- *i'..*- 16 1-t, 4.2 . i W... - All.,lk 1.- - '19 -,43:Â£4-34 93 --1-'46"L'N. ?Â»/6 4 1 - 69-Ve, - a~ + C y .- ,.: A. . 16 W.. Itil..... 6 Â¥ â‚¬43%4FC ,/.Ir , I , 1 4//6.V f 4,0. 1 42*t blkt~ Â¢ - - I .I, f +r 1 1/ a .. 2 1 a 7*1./6% I ../I = 99% E , A 1. 1 '1 i .6, Vin ~ b Â·Â· 4 77/ 4 2-Â·4 -ad i - ~222 r ift. Â·Â· f L * 1 4 -, -- 5.i , ..2 r 1 Â¢ t : , ' ... . -1.. 1.t- /...6.. $22 24 7 + e. $ I. ; t. J . 1 -1 - .1 --- -* m -7=eaâ€¢'Â· %% , t. - - - - ak.. r..1.- - V 1//4. V.Aff 4.1 -I-Â·4- -.-- - .% b Â·. -ele Â· I ... 8 -_ I ..2 â‚¬*-1 - .e - + 421 . .*.4- b 'w.19.- -'4'*.:47. . ...i- i , B +5' 9, 1 4 - t r 1 , 11&- 4 .1 % FL . , . 9 i I. / 34 - 0 a - .t 1 Iii '1111'llze#'E,F. -I. ill/.Il- * -1/ a + Â·47iÂ» . Â·44 -4 f .Al A, .-&01,7 - - j.: 1 Ir - 11 .4 9.-:=77- 7-7 1 - 4 1 E. e r .1/1/0 49./.p-&< ' \ 2-/A ' Â· I -.4-~.CL+2_ ___-1 . e I â€¢40'. 4lt , 9 - ' r: - 4 +7,9 / 29,4. f lili ./. 142 1 -T- .f y#. . r',a,gi-.~Â·~ Â·.t:E.M. Â·15Â»fl #'-. . 1 1 , I A - -e J ~' I .11..# : I . . IX Â· 1.4, It- 4 -Â·. ,/L. r 2-100- . 4. 92 3436.0 - t'.2.,ea .9.,Â»,1...9-, .24,4, '.1 ' /4..,~94:- V ' 4*9~.:..$%1. ~~.titi'#~.#/.0/ r . :.V /t:* / *-' Je v - --11 / 4 e , I qi Lajap~la,- ....{ .ft: 4% e ..i. ' 4--. : 9 447/8#74@-..4, -'..l ...1 .k i -~ 1,1.;..t.4 t I- -AVA. I. r I 1- --* Â·5$..,Â·74~'-1~" Twrift-,-,2 *' ~- Li Â·liÂ«g~ '<. 1 Fl,4,94 -~ ' - JZ i, 7,.4 i/<1*/F i rifir' 0 9-14%~': fir- . ip lf.tful#â€¢ - 6-- Â· .t 1 2 4* .A.- - Ijal ---- . i<i 2.rÂ¥.. , i.- 4,-Â¢,1-Â·~Â·~ " -L'41 .. 4 - : 46Â·4* f ty-kfi;4141~il 'f ~.I .. 2 1 :4 ,Â·J.f. 3' t-:Â·9 j. - -I m .r 4 -..1.12$:. 1..2-#*Lcd''f + 1,4 1/4- I 1- 21- *' fi'.1 + " 1 gr/,19 '. 4 . A 4Â·.771 u ' 7-Â·-:-77..94â‚¬jdkâ€ž44Â«-ilf,Â°46- Ll *ifilisÂ»==* ' .6, Ely:/., * 'f.i--. 77~*Q~4,~~~~~A#..,I#$ i.*444 1---2fi-Â·li,-1~ef t.1-1,,7~- ~J-7-Pff V ".U % h Â» D --tÂ» %i.1.7 4 ; !1 4 22Â¢*,1 2'*ae Â·Â·'2â‚¬ 4Â·' 1~Â· â€¢ 1 11 1 J kÂ»52Â¥Xff u. --~~.=1<-,~-bv,.vati.*=='i,Ji~~~~~ll~f/-4 e . 1 ' 14 - * :Â·:Ill- -- 1-6--Lk-glf. - -4---'.-.*----*...,4-*"-li 1 ...bLD - t /44 Rt 1. dd Â· I 11 . . I 111 . \ 5- .1 7/ 'at/%29/2........\ 4 1. L "41,2 .11<-"%-Il'/Ill"'/Â£1 *-s.6/3Â¥, . - -1 fT faa 1 Â»- gs? ......4 1 -kid~*UÂ·Â·' t.\ 1 2.41 -I - ~tric,- 1 A Â® BendonAdams October 24, 2016 Mr. Justin Barker, AICP Senior Planner City of Aspen NOV 0 8 2016 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Aspen Hills Affordable Housing 331-338 Midland Avenue Mr. Barker: Please accept this application to convert this existing eight-unit free-market residential building into local affordable housing and the creation of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. The Aspen Hills Condominiums is an existing eight-unit MEEF"2~'42,44257*~ 7*fi~:It:iff~69 -44 residential building located in the Smuggler neighborhood ,Re*:9~2*r':89%â„¢i--iÂ£4â‚¬gm44 along Midland Avenue. It is addressed as 331-338 *4*t~~3 '*2*8~ Midland Avenue. The building was constructed in 1965 34*~4-4-I 9~tej'22M~*egolb.*WI with all two-bedroom units and condominiumized in 1969. 0*44%430Â®924~*21~ The 15,160 s.f. property is located in the RMF Zone ~tag District. The building is not onthe City of Aspen Inventory .~ of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Although free-market, the units have served a population as either owner-occupied or rental units. It is ~~'~2~ exactly these types of units that slowly drift out of the local -- -- '- Â«~ housing inventory as property values increase and employees are priced-out. This application utilizes the City's award-winning Credits program to intervene and permanently secure these units as employee housing. WEB2 Capital, LLC, is the contract purchaser of all eight units and has been granted authority to submit this application by the owners and by the Aspen Hills Condominiums homeowner's association. Bill Boehringer is the Chief Executive Officer of WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and has authorized BendonAdams to represent his interests. This application requests growth management approvals, including allotments for eight affordable housing units, recognition of existing non-conformities, exemption from the City's Residential Design Standards, a variance for one parking space, and authorization for the issuance of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority has recently adopted "Marketability Standards" on July 6, 2016, which clarify and provide guidance on physical capital needs for existing units to be accepted into the affordable housing inventory. A Physical Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA) and an Energy Audit have been performed and will be provided under separate cover. These reports will enable APCHA and the owner to determine what improvements must be accomplished in the near term and the extent of initial funding for a capital reserve account. This application is submitted pursuant to the following sections of the Aspen Land Use Code: â€¢ 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures â€¢ 26.410 Residential Design Standards â€¢ 26.470.070.2 Growth Management - Change-in-Use â€¢ 26.470.070.4 Growth Management - Affordable Housing â€¢ 26.515 Parking â€¢ 26.540 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit â€¢ 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements â€¢ 26.710.080 Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District The application is divided into three sections: Section I describes the existing conditions of the project site and environs. Section 11 outlines the applicant's proposed development and Section 111 addresses the proposed development's compliance with review criteria. Exhibits are provided as follows: â€¢ Exhibit 1: Land Use Application and Dimensions Form â€¢ Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map â€¢ Exhibit 3: Pre-Application Conference Summary â€¢ Exhibit 4: Proof of the Applicant's Ownership and Authority â€¢ Exhibit 5: HOA Compliance Form â€¢ Exhibit 6: Authorization for BendonAdams LLC to represent the applicant â€¢ Exhibit 7: Fee Agreement â€¢ Exhibit 8: Mailing addresses for property owners within 300 feet of the property â€¢ Exhibit 9: Existing conditions drawings â€¢ Exhibit 10: Site improvement survey The applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Code and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application. Upon request, BendonAdams will gladly provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the review. Sincerely, 040Â« Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC 300 So. Spring St. #202 Aspen, CO chris@bendonadams.com 970.925.2855 Page 2 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Section I: Existing Conditions The Aspen Hills property is a 15,160 square foot site on Parcel ID Numbers Midland Avenue in the Smuggler neighborhood. The Parcel ID property is developed with one building containing eight - residences and eight on-site parking spaces. The building *Il 2737-074-05-001 has been condominiumized into eight separate ownership +9* 2737-074-05-006 interests, plus a common area. The property is posted as .r/7/ 2737-074-05-002 331-338 Midland Avenue. ..84. 2737-074-05-008 The property was originally part of the Mascotte and "99" ~.A5~ 2737-074-05-007 lode claims. A roughly 1-acre portion was conveyed by 1 A6-I 2737-074-05-003 deed to the Aspen Construction Company in 1965. The ~ A7 ~ 2737-074-05-005 entire 1-acre property was conveyed to John Villari in 1969. ~A8 1- 2737-074-05-004 The southern portion of the property, roughly 28,622 square ~ 1 2737-074-05-801 feet, was conveyed back to the Aspen Construction &, Area 6. Company in 1970, creating the basis for the property boundary today. The property to the South is developed with a multi-family building commonly known as Aspen View. The building was constructed in 1965, originally as all two-bedroom units. One of the units, Unit 336, was converted into a one-bedroom unit according to permit records on file with the City of Aspen Building Department. Other improvements on record are typical interior upgrades and egress window improvements. Another unit appears to have been converted to a one-bedroom without a building permit. This application proposes reverting the illegal improvements to reinstate a two-bedroom unit. Two parcels, noted on the survey as parcel 1 and parcel 2, were conveyed to the Board of Commissioners of the Pitkin County Housing Authority in 1978 for "roadway purposes." This conveyance appears to have been in-lieu of condemnation proceedings. For the purposes of this application, these parcels have been considered public right-of-way. Access to the property is from Midland Avenue. i.4':UQ~~P .*311:1==e,xe;fatehla Eight on-site parking spaces are located in front of 14:â‚¬*4*i the structure, entirely within the property. Each -.4.....Â®*.1 J-//- parking space hasasecond, tandem space located 11'lipalwall. within the right-of-way. For purposes of this 2Â£)El application, only the eight on-site spaces have ~ been counted as legitimate existing parking. ; - Parking requirements for this property, according to F - Chapter 26.515 of the City's land use code, are the p , -.0: ,me- - /-4*G i=.991*:115 lower of one unit per bedroom or two per unit. ~1â‚¬01-J ... 4 h07- A.te)...&/EM,6/ Seven two-bedroom units and 1 one-bedroom unit 81&414#.67/.1,63//i#LE#irirmie#ame,#int#do&./- therefore require 15 parking spaces. The existing 2~ 1~ condition, counting only those spaces entirely on-site, represents an existing parking deficit of 7 spaces. A few of the units have been upgraded with newer windows/doors and larger egress windows for the lower level bedrooms. Other units maintain vintage conditions and will likely require upgrades Page 3 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing by the applicant prior to acceptance into the housing inventory. Clarification on these conditions will be contained in the pending PCNA and Energy reports. The property was originally part of the Mascotte Lode and 99 Lode (mining claims) which extend onto the face of Smuggler Mountain. Transfer by warrantee deed of approximately 1 acre to the Aspen Construction Corporation in 1965 pre-dated County subdivision standards, as did the transfer by warrantee deed to John Villari of the entire one-acre parcel in 1969. Villari condominiumized the 8-unit building and the property in 1969 and conveyed at least one unit. Transfer back to the Aspen Construction Company of the southern, approximately 28,622 s.f., portion of the 1-acre parcel occurred in 1970, also pre-dating City/County subdivision standards. This is the basis for the property today. The title commitment documents these transfers. -'' 7Â·1.-,49, R .7 .'Â·Â·~- . SURVEY DEMONSTRATES 5 J5 - / *<- 2= EX:SI.NON COÂ»-0!0.IllY 1 <~2~GfÂ·/Â· .. .Â· 7 The 1970 transfer established the southern and eastern 4 , W.' BUILDING DIRECTLY ON '. 1Â· i.71~- : ~Â·Â·- boundaries along the edge of existing irnprovet-r~ents as 432;~:-~ar~ PROPERIYLINEBEYOND ~~~ ~ * kl. reflected in the survey. The southern boundary traces **r 26-1 - the balcony, including the stairs. The eastern boundary Â¢ 1 **"~* *- i --l 1 1-'. .~1~*~fiÂ¢L traces the building footprint, including the below grade i.si- Â¥Â·Â·- L#-1_---4---*1~-0 r. - 0 *---7 Â®mr 1 1 -- 111 K- A utility area. These property boundaries created non- id:. 2'91 -- 1 11 - IMil -1 ./// 8 conforming setback conditions, diagrammed in the -0 ~ d, ___j _ A._e-.._.- 11 . ,â€ž attached drawing set and highlighted to the right. 29-- -=% - Thu-~ J ' --- t~-Â£25255+-EFE-9-Wil72 22.32â‚¬:=74 --- CaA'/2 ..0/ Floor Area and Net Livable measurements have been provided by Alius Design according the Calculations Aspen Hills As-Built Information and Measurements section (26.575.020) of the City of Unit 1 Beds Baths Net Livable s.f. Aspen Land Use Code. The Floor Area of the building i is approximately 5,040, well below the allowable of 331 2 1 852 approximately 11,369 s. f. (not accounting for potential 332 2 1 807 slope reduction). 333 2 1 861 334 2 1 861 The existing trash/recycle area is accessed off Midland at the corner of the property. It is within the right-of-way 335 2 1 861 but outside the roadway. This is also the location of the 336 2 1 861 mail pedestal and several utility connection pedestals. 337 2 1 866 338 2 1 866 Page 4 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Section 11: Proiect Description/The Proposal The application proposes repurposing the Aspen Hills building as affordable housing. Eight two- bedroom affordable housing units, according to the standards of Section 26.470.100.A.2, will house eighteen employees. (2.25 FTEs/unit). The application proposes these units to be rentals and for sale units, restricted to affordable rental rates and sale prices. The rental/sale mix is to respect ongoing purchase discussions and account for potential hold-over owners/tenants. The applicant is suggesting these units be Category 2 or Category 3, or combination thereof. This property, while free-market, serves as local employee housing and vacation rentals. It is exactly these types of units that slowly transition out of local usage due to escalating prices, increasing demands on the affordable housing inventory. This proposal counters this trend by utilizing the City's Credits program and permanently securing these units as affordable housing. All forms of affordable housing are desperately needed in the upper valley. Affordable rentals are in significant demand. The proposal locates affordable housing within an existing neighborhood, walking/biking distance to downtown, with great access to transit, and with very little construction impacts. The building and its units are in good working order and minimal improvements will be necessary. Interior work contemplates improvements to systems, fixtures, finishes, and appliances. Each unit is different, so some units will maintain current status or have minimal upgrades while other units will be more-substantially overhauled. Energy improvements contemplate window, door, and sealing/insulation upgrades. Exterior work contemplates refurbishment or potential replacement of the existing decks, and installing larger egress window wells for the lower level bedrooms. Installing larger window wells will have a marginal impact on Floor Area. But the property is currently well below the maximum allowance. Units average approximately 854 s.f. of net livable area each. This is only 5% below the APCHA standard of 900 s.f. for a two-bedroom unit but well within the 20% tolerance for acceptance. The units provide comfortable living conditions with the living/dining/kitchen areas on the main level and bedrooms below. Each unit has ample natural light, is 50% or more above grade, and has a washer/dryer. Each unit enjoys storage and one dedicated on-site parking space. The site is walking/biking distance to downtown, parks and recreation amenities, and is well-served by transit. The applicant has previously presented this opportunity to the APCHA Board on March 2 and August 3, 2016; at both meetings, the Board expressed their support of the project. The applicant is requesting APCHA accept these units at their current size. Allowing these units to be slightly below the 900 s.f. requirement enables them to be two-bedroom units (instead of one-bedroom units) thereby providing more local housing towards a significant community need. The application proposes correcting the illegal construction by reinstating a two-bedroom unit. The one unit that was legally converted into a one-bedroom is proposed to be returned to a two- bedroom unit. An extensive capital assessment and an energy audit is being performed and will have been completed prior to review by the Housing Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The results of this analysis will indicate the required upgrades to be accomplished prior to deed restriction and acceptance into the affordable housing inventory. The analysis will provide a capital improvement schedule for future improvements and a basis for initial funding of a capital reserve account for the property. Page 5 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing The applicant is requesting the capital assessment and energy audit information be translated into a pre-occupancy work program and capital reserve fund to be reviewed by APCHA staff, endorsed by the Housing Board, and ultimately adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a series of conditions that must be met prior to APCHA accepting the units into the affordable housing inventory. The project fully complies with the RMF Zone District, excepting those existing setback non- conformities stated above. The applicant is requesting that the Planning and Zoning Commission recognize the existing non-conformities, grant the requested growth management approvals, exempt the project from the City's Residential Design Standards, and authorize issuance of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit for 18 FTEs at the Category rate finally set by the applicant. The applicant is contemplating a future expansion utilizing the northern vacant section of the property. This expansion would be a separate free standing building of affordable housing. At this time, no specific designs are proposed and the applicant is not requesting consideration or approval. If an expansion is proposed, the applicant understands the expansion must comply with the requirements effective at the time of submission and be reviewed according to the then process. Pursuant to prior discussions with the APCHA Board, the applicant is willing at this time to commit that the future phase be 100% affordable housing, and with the Category designation to be determined by the applicant at the time of application for that approval. Page 6 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Section 111: Review Requirements A. Common Development Review Procedures This land use application is submitted pursuant to and subject to the requirements of Chapter 26.304 - Common Development Review Procedures - of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. B. Residential Design Standards RDS This application is subject to the City's Residential Design Standards and the applicant is seeking exemption under exemption provision 26.410.010.C.1 - An addition or remodel to an existing structure that does not change the exterior of the building; and, provision 2-A remodel of a structure where the alterations proposed change the exterior of the building, but are not addressed by any of the residential design standards. Expected interior improvements will be to fixtures, finishes, and equipment to meet the expectations of the Aspen/Pitkin County housing authority and their Marketability Standards adopted July 6, 2016. These interior improvements clearly fall under exemption 1. Exterior improvements are expected to be some recladding of the deck surface, upgrades to windows and doors for energy efficiency, upgrades to egress windows for life/safety, and other minor improvements for aesthetic and durability purposes. The minor level of exterior changes do not afford the opportunity to re-orient the building or make major changes to the mass of the building. And, the changes are not addressed by the Standards, falling under exemption provision 2. C. Growth Management Review. The project proposes to refurbish and re-use the existing Aspen Hills building. Demolition is not proposed to be triggered. Upgrades include interior renovations, building envelope improvements for energy efficiency, and improvements to aesthetics and existing egress conditions. The eight existing residences are free-market (unrestricted) and the application proposes these units be deed restricted as affordable housing, rental and/or for sale, Category 2 or Category 3. Responses to relevant growth management criteria are as follows: 26.470.040.3 Remodeling or expansion of existing multi-family residential development. The remodeling of existing multi-family residential dwellings shall be exempt from growth management provided that no additional Floor Area is added to the property and provided demolition of a unit or structure does not occur. When an expansion of Floor Area occurs, see Section 26.470.060, subsection 2. When demolition occurs, see Paragraph 26.470.070.6, Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing. (Also see definition of demolition, Section 26.104.100.) Response - The application proposes refurbishment of these existing units and conversion to affordable housing. A minimal increase to the property's Floor Area may occur as a result of improving egress conditions from subgrade bedrooms. As the property is proposed as affordable housing, the mitigation requirements do not apply. Page 7 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing 26.470.050.B General Requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions, ordeny an application forgrowth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year allotments, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Response - This application requests eight allotments of affordable housing. According to section 26.470.030.D, no annual limit applies to affordable housing. 2. The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Response - This multi-family residential building is intended to be re-used with minimal changes to its aesthetic character. The neighborhood is a mix of single-family, duplex and multi-family housing - both free-market and affordable housing. The property is consistent with this mix and the conversion from free-market to affordable represents minimal if any change to its compatibility with the neighborhood. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Response - The development conforms to the RMF Zone District, except for existing non- conforming setback conditions along the south and east property boundaries. These appear to be a result of the ownership conveyance which affected a subdivision of the property in 1970. (Please refer to the conveyance deed rescored at 143387 with Pitkin County Clerk.) The proposal maintains and does not worsen these setback conditions. Contained in this application is a request for a one-space parking variance. This would allow one unit that was officially converted to a one-bedroom unit to be officially returned to a two-bedroom configuration. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval, and the Planned Development - Project Review approval, as applicable. Response - The development proposed is a re-use of an existing building and has not been required to be reviewed as a Planned Development. The property is 100% residential and is not historically designated. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Page 8 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. Response - Not applicable. The development contains no commercial or lodging components and does not generate employees according to section 26.470.100.A. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. Response - Not applicable. The proposal is to re-purpose all eight free-market residential units as affordable housing. No additional free-market residential square footage is proposed. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Response - The proposal re-purposes and an existing residential building that is already served. Minimal interior upgrades are proposed and no changes to service requirements are expected. No changes to existing fixture counts are proposed. The applicant commits to mitigating any additional demands on the public infrastructure as required by City Codes. 26.470.070.2 Change in use. A change in use of an existing property, structure or portions of an existing structure between the development categories identified in Section 26.470.020 (irrespective of direction), for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued for at least two (2) years and which is intended to be reused, shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050. No more than one (1) free-market residential unit may be created through the change-in-use. Page 9 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Response - See below for response the general requirements. The proposal does not involve creation of an additional free-market unit. 26.470.070.4 Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. Response - A complete capital assessment and energy audit of the building is underway, the results of which will be used to address the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority's recently adopted "Marketability Standards." These standards were adopted as an extension of the Guidelines by the Housing Board to ensure existing housing units proposed for deed restriction are of a sufficient quality and have a sufficient capital reserve for long-term success. The proposed units are high quality but are expected to require upgrades to meet the Marketability Standards. A recommendation from APHCA regarding these studies and the newly adopted standards is expected. The units are slightly below the minimum net livable size specifications stated in the Guidelines but well within the acceptable tolerance. The Housing Guidelines allow for up to a 20% reduction in size. b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. Ifthe mitigation requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a fee-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one (1) or more units, a fee-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. Response - The proposed affordable housing units utilize an existing eight-unit building, "buying-down" the units to affordable status in exchange for affordable housing certificates. c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Page 10 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Response - The eight existing units were developed in a townhome configuration with the entry, living room and kitchen on the upper level, and with two bedrooms, a bathroom, and laundry on the lower level. The units along the front of the building (facing Midland) are developed with walk-out capability on the lower level. One of the two units on this end has been retrofitted with a sliding door. The lower level of the units along the rear of the property (east side) are nearly subgrade, making the units come close to the 50% limitation. Please refer to the drawing set which shows site and building sections. d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County orother similargovemmental orquasi- municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. Response - These units are proposed as affordable rentals and/or for sale units. The rental/sale mix is to respect ongoing purchase discussions and account for potential hold- over owners/tenants. The applicant is suggesting these be limited to a mix of Category 2 and 3. e. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required formitigation, but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. Response - The application proposes these non-mitigation units in exchange for Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. The eight two-bedroom units house 18 employees, according to Section 26.470.100.A.2. (2.25 employees housed for each two- bedroom unit). The application requests the issuance of a Certificate in the amount of 18 Category 2 or Category 3 FTEs upon completion of the required improvements and APCHA's acceptance of the units into the affordable inventory. Page 11 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing 26.470.070.5 Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing. The City's neighborhoods have traditionally been comprised of a mix of housing types; including those affordable by its working residents. However, because of Aspen's attractiveness as a resort environment and because of the physical constraints of the upper Roaring Fork Valley, there is constant pressure for the redevelopment of dwellings currently providing resident housing for tourist and second-home use. Such redevelopment results in the displacement of individuals and families who are an integral part of the Aspen work force. Given the extremely high cost of and demand for market-rate housing, resident housing opportunities for displaced working residents, which are now minimal, will continue to decrease. Preservation of the housing inventory and provision of dispersed housing opportunities in Aspen have been long-standing planning goals of the community. Achievement of these goals will serve to promote a socially and economically balanced community, limit the number of individuals who face a long and sometimes dangerous commute on State Highway 82, reduce the air pollution effects of commuting and prevent exclusion of working residents from the City's neighborhoods. The Aspen Area Community Plan established a goal that affordable housing for working residents be provided by both the public and private sectors. The City and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority have provided affordable housing both within and adjacent to the City limits. The private sector has also provided affordable housing. Nevertheless, as a result of the replacement of resident housing with second homes and tourist accommodations and the steady increase in the size of the workforce required to assure the continued viability of Aspen area businesses and the City's tourist-based economy, the City has found it necessary, in concert with other regulations, to adopt limitations on the combining, demolition or conversion of existing multi-family housing in order to minimize the displacement of working residents, to ensure that the private sector maintains its role in the provision of resident housing and to prevent a housing shortfall from occurring. The combining, demolition, conversion or redevelopment of multi-family housing shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on compliance with the following requirements (see definition of demolition.): 1. Requirements for combining, demolishing, converting or redevelopinq free-market multi- familv housing units: Only one (1) of the following two (2) options is required to be met when combining, demolishing, converting or redeveloping a free-market multi-family residential property. To ensure the continued vitality of the community and a critical mass of local working residents, no net loss of density (total number of units) between the existing development and proposed development shall be allowed. a. One-hundred-percent replacement. In the event of the demolition offree-market multi- family housing, the applicant shall have the option to construct replacement housing consisting of no less than one hundred percent (100%) of the number of units, bedrooms and net livable area demolished. The replacement units shall be deed- restricted as resident occupied affordable housing; pursuant to the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Each replacement unit shall be approved pursuant to Subsection 4, Affordable housing, of this Section. Page 12 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing When this one-hundred-percent standard is accomplished, the remaining development on the site may be free-market residential development with no additional affordable housing mitigation required as long as there is no increase in the number of free-market residential units on the parcel. Free-market units in excess of the total number originally on the parcel shall be reviewed pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.3, Expansion of free-market residential units within a multi-family or mixed- use development. b. Fifty-percent replacement. In the event of the demolition of free-market multi-family housing and replacement of less than one hundred percent (100%) of the number of previous units, bedrooms or net livable area as described above, the applicant shall be required to construct affordable housing consisting of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the number of units, bedrooms and the net livable area demolished. The replacement units shall be deed-restricted as Category 4 housing, pursuant to the guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Each replacement unit shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing. When this fifty-percent standard is accomplished, the remaining development on the site may be free-market residential development as long as additional affordable housing mitigation is provided pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.3, Expansion of free- market residential units within a multi-family or mixed-use project, and there is no increase in the number of free-market residential units on the parcel. Free-market units in excess of the total number originally on the parcel shall be reviewed pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.7, New free-market residential units within a multi-family or mixed-use project. c. One-hundred percent affordable housing replacement. When one-hundred-percent of the free-market multi-family housing units are demolished and are solely replaced with deed-restricted affordable housing units on a site that are not required for mitigation purposes, including any net additional dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.470.070.4, Affordable Housing; all of the units in the redevelopment are eligible for a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit, pursuant to Section 26.540 Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit. Any remaining unused free market residential development rights shall be vacated. 2. Requirements fordemolishing affordable multi-family housing units: In the event a project proposes to demolish or replace existing deed-restricted affordable housing units, the redevelopment may increase or decrease the number of units, bedrooms or net livable area such that there is no decrease in the total number of employees housed by the existing units. The overall number of replacement units, unit sizes, bedrooms and category of the units shall be reviewed by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority and a recommendation forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. Fractional unit requirement. When the affordable housing replacement requirement of this Section involves a fraction of a unit, cash-in-lieu may be provided only upon the review and approval of the City Council, to meet the fractional requirement only, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3, Provision of required affordable housing via a cash-in-lieu payment. 4. Location requirement. Multi-family replacement units, both free-market and affordable; shall be developed on the same site on which demolition has occurred, unless the owner shall demonstrate and the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that replacement Page 13 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing of the units on site would be in conflict with the parcel's zoning or would be an inappropriate solution due to the site's physical constraints. When either of the above circumstances result, the owner shall replace the maximum number of units on site which the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the site can accommodate and may replace the remaining units off site, at a location determined acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Commission. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be considered for this standard. 5. Timing requirement. Any replacement units required to be deed-restricted as affordable housing shall be issued a certificate of occupancy, according to the Building Department, and be available for occupancy at the same time as, or prior to, any redeveloped free- market units, regardless of whether the replacement units are built on site or off site. 6. Redevelopment agreement. The applicant and the City shall enter into a redevelopment agreement that specifies the manner in which the applicant shall adhere to the approvals granted pursuant to this Section and penalties for noncompliance. The agreement shall be recorded before an application for a demolition permit may be accepted by the City. 7. Growth management allotments. The existing number of free-market residential units, prior to demolition, may be replaced exempt from growth management, provided that the units conform to the provisions of this Section. The redevelopment credits shall not be transferable separate from the property unless permitted as described above in Subparagraph d, Location requirement. 8. Exemptions. The Community Development Director shall exempt from the procedures and requirements of this Section the following types of development involving Multi-Family Housing Units. An exemption from these replacement requirements shall not exempt a development from compliance with any other provisions of this Title: a. The replacement of Multi-Family Housing Units after non-willful demolition such as a flood, fire, or other natural catastrophe, civil commotion, or similar event not purposefully caused by the land owner. The Community Development Director may require documentation be provided by the landowner to confirm the damage to the building was in-fact non-willful. To be exempted, the replacement development shall be an exact replacement of the previous number of units, bedrooms, and square footage and in the same configuration. The Community Development Director may approve exceptions to this exact replacement requirement to accommodate changes necessary to meet current building codes; improve accessibility; to conform to zoning, design standards, or other regulatory requirements of the City; or, to provide other architectural or site planning improvements that have no substantial effect on the use or program of the development. (AIso see Chapter 26-312 - Nonconformities.) Substantive changes to the development shall not be exempted from this Section and shall be reviewed as a willful change pursuant to the procedures and requirements of this Section. b. The demolition of Multi-Family Housing Units by order of a public agency including, but not limited to, the City of Aspen for reasons of preserving the life, health, safety, or general welfare of the public. c. The demolition, combining, conversion, replacement, or redevelopment of Multi- Family Housing Units which have been used exclusively as tourist accommodations Page 14 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing or by non-working residents. The Community Development Director may require occupancy records, leases, affidavits, or other documentation to the satisfaction of the Director to demonstrate that the unit(s) has never housed a working resident. All other requirements of this Title shall still apply including zoning, growth management, and building codes.) d. The demolition, combining, conversion, replacement, or redevelopment of Multi- Family Housing Units which were illegally created (also known as "Bandit Units"). Any improvements associated with Bandit Units shall be required to conform to current requirements of this Title including zoning, growth management, and building codes. Replaced or redeveloped Bandit Units shall be deed restricted as Resident Occupied affordable housing, pursuant to the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority e. Any development action involving demising walls or floors/ceilings necessary for the normal upkeep, maintenance, or remodeling of adjacent Multi-Family Housing Units. f. A change order to an issued and active building permit that proposes to exceed the limitations of remodeling/demolition to rebuild portions of a structure which, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, should be rebuilt for structural, safety, accessibility, or significant energy efficiency reasons first realized during construction, which were not known and could not have been reasonably predicted prior to construction, and which cause no or minimal changes to the exterior dimensions and character of the building. Response - The applicant is not proposing demolition of the structure; rather, conversion of the units from free-market housing to affordable housing. The applicant is proposing replacement option C - "One-hundred percent affordable housing replacement." No net loss of density will occur and all units will be deed restricted as affordable housing. As the units are not required for mitigation purposes, they are eligible for issuance of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit, pursuant to Section 26.540 (criteria address below). The free-market residential redevelopment rights will not be replaced. D. Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit 26.540.070 Review criteria for establishing an affordable housing credit. An Affordable Housing Credit may be established by the Planning and Zoning Commission if all of the following criteria are met. The proposed units do not need to be constructed prior to this review. A. The proposed affordable housing unit(s) comply with the review standards of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). Response -These standards are addressed above. B. The affordable housing unit(s) are not an obligation of a Development Order and are not otherwise required by this Title to mitigate the impacts of development. Response - The proposed units are not committed by a Development Order and are not needed to satisfy mitigation requirements for any other development. Page 15 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing E. Parking Code Section 26.515.030 states the on-site parking requirement as the lesser of one space per bedroom or two per unit. The existing 7 two-bedroom units and 1 one-bedroom unit require 15 parking spaces. The existing development has eight on-site spaces along the front of the building, head-in accessed from Midland Avenue. Each space has a second, tandem space located within the right-of-way. This second row of parking has served the property without conflicting with travel patterns. For the purposes of this application, only the first eight on-site spaces have been counted as meeting the parking requirement. This leaves the property with a seven space deficit. This deficit will be carried-forward with the repurposing of the building as affordable housing. The reconfiguration of one unit (#336) back to a two-bedroom unit requires the addition of one parking space on-site. This is not physically practical or logistically needed. The project was originally constructed with eight two-bedroom units and eight parking spaces. Each unit will continue to have one official on-site space and be eligible for neighborhood parking according to City policy. The property is easy walking distance to downtown via the Hopkins Avenue pedestrian bridge and the Hunter Creek bus stop is one block away. The property is ideally situated for minimal daily auto needs and the existing parking is currently typically used for long-term car storage. E. Variance for One Parking Space 26.314.040. Standards applicable to variances. A. In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a) There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or Page 16 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing b) Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the terms of this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. B. In order to authorize a variance from the permitted uses of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that all of the following circumstances exist: 1. Notice by publication, mailing and posting of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Subparagraphs 26.304.060.E.3.a.-c. 2. A variance is the only reasonable method by which to afford the applicant relief, and to deny a variance would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship such that the property would be rendered practically undevelopable, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. 4. The temporary off-site storage or construction staging can be undertaken in such a manner so as to minimize disruption, if any, of normal neighborhood activities surrounding the subject parcel. 5. If ownership of the off-site parcel subject to the proposed variance is not vested in the applicant, then verified written authorization of the parcel's owner must be provided. 6. Adequate provision is made to restore the subject parcel to its original condition upon expiration of the variance, including the posting of such financial security as deemed appropriate and necessary by the appropriate decision-making body to ensure such restoration. Response: The property was originally developed with eight two-bedroom units, according to the development standards at the time. The property was developed with and still has eight head- in on-site parking spaces and another eight tandem spaces located in the public right-of-way. This second set of spaces are out of the travel way and do not infringe on traffic movements. The applicant understands these spaces exist at the City's discretion. The property functioned this way for roughly 40 years. Roughly 10 years ago one unit was officially converted (via building permit) into a one-bedroom unit by removing a demising wall between bedrooms. The application seeks to return the two-bedroom status to the unit, thereby triggering the technical additional parking space requirement. There's no reasonable, practical way to implement this additional space. Furthermore, there does not appear to be a significant achievement to be gained. The project will essentially be the same project. The impact of not approving the variance, however, is to restrict this one unit to a one- bedroom, housing fewer employees locally, and causing another commuter car on the highway. Many of the condominium complexes in this neighborhood do not have on-site parking or have inadequate on-site parking. This is an outcome of the development standards at the time of initial construction. Overall, the neighborhood parking situation has reached an equilibrium. There are adequate street parking spaces available on any given day. The variance would allow continuation of the original development scenario for this property - eight two-bedroom units, each with one legal parking space and a second informal space currently in the right-of-way. Page 17 of 17 Aspen Hills Affordable Housing Exhibit 1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Aspen Hills Condominiums Location: 331-338 Midland Avenue; Aspen, CO 81611 Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Units: 2737-074-05-001 through 008. Common area: 2737-074-05-801. APPLICANT: Name: WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, William Boehringer, CEO. AddressÂ· PO Box 3807; Aspen, CO 81612 Phone#: 917.977.0541 REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: Chris Bendon, AICP; BendonAdams Address: 300 So. Spring Street St. 202; Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.2855 Phone#: Ej GMQS Exemption Change in use, replacement Fl Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use ~ GMQS Allotment r-1 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision Â£ Conceptual SPA 1 ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream r"-1 Subdivision Exemption (includes U Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) D Mountain View Plane U Final SPA (&SPA E Commercial Design Review I Lot Split Amendment) Â£ Residential Design Variance Â£ Lot Line Adjustment 1~1 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Certificates of AH Credit, 2 Conditional Use 4 Other: parking variance EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Seven 2-bedroom, One 1-bedroom individually-owned, free-market residences in one multi-family building. PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Maintain existing building, aesthetic and capital improvements as required by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. Conversion to affordable housing for certificates of AH credit. Haye you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 5,200 Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. March, 2016 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Aspen Hills Affordable Housing WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Applicant: Bill Boehringer, Chief Executive Officer Location: 331-338 Midland Avenue; Aspen, CO Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District: 15,159 s.f. Lot Size. Lot Area: 15,159 s.f. (Forthe purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easement, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: O Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing: 8 Droposed: 8 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 15 Proposed: 16 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 5,040 Allowable: 11,369 Proposed 5,040 Principal bldg. height: Existing: -25' Allowable: 25' Proposed no change na Access. Bldg. height: Existing: na Allowable. 25' Proposed On-Site parking: Existing: 8 Requireck. 15 Proposed 8 % Site coverage: Existing: approx. 24% Required: na Proposed no change % Open Space: Existing: approx 50% Required: na Proposed no change Front Setback: Existing: approx. 30' Required 9 Proposed no change Rear Setback: Existing: 0-5' Required: 5 Proposed no change Combined F/F: Existing: 0-30' Required na Proposed no change Side Setback: Existing: 0' Required: 5 Proposed no change Side Setback: Existing: approx. 30' Required 5 Proposed no change Combined Sides: Existing: 0-30' Required na Â°roposed no change Distance between Bldgs. Existing: na Required: na on)posed no change Existing: yep Required: nope Proposed: no change Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 0' side and rear yard along south and east property lines. Under-parked by 7 spaces. Variations requested: Acknowledgment of existing side/rear yard and parking conditions. Variance for one parking space to allow reinstatement of two- bedroom unit March, 2016 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 Exhibit 2 Aspen Hills Condominiums 331-338 Midland Avenue - Vicinity Map --*~ CITY OF ASPEN Exhibit 3 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 DATE: 8/25/16 PROJECT: 331-338 Midland Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Bill Boehringer, 917.977.0541 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is interested in converting an existing structure into affordable housing units to create Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. The property is located at 331-338 Midland Avenue (Aspen Hills Condominiums) and is zoned as Residential Multi-family (RMF). The structure currently contains 8 existing two-bedroom free-market condominium units. It appears that the existing structure may contain non-conformities. Any non-conformities may be maintained or reduced as long as demolition is not triggered, but may not be expanded. No new non-conformities may be created as a result of this project, The conversion of residential multi-family to affordable housing requires growth management review by P&Z, pursuant to Chapter 26.470.070.5, Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing, and Chapter 26.470.070.2, Change in use. The development of affordable housing units will need to meet the criteria as outlined in Chapter 26.470.070.4, Affordable Housing. The creation of Credits also requires review by P&Z. APCHA will need to approve units as both APCHA and the City have minimum design standards. It appears that some of the units are located subgrade. The standards require affordable housing to be a minimum of 50% above grade, or approved through Chapter 26.430, Special Review. As a 100% affordable housing project, the units may be either for-sale or for-rent. All of these are one- step reviews with P&Z and may be consolidated at the same public hearing. If any exterior changes are proposed to the building, they will need to comply with the multi-family development requirements of Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. If proposed exterior changes do not meet the RDS, a variation from P&Z will be required. Additional considerations include off-street parking requirements and trash/recycle storage. An existing deficit of parking may be maintained. The proposed site plan will clearly need to indicate all parking spaces and the designated trash/recycle area that will be used to meet the required standards. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.430 Special Review 26.470.070.2 Change in use 26.470.070.4 GMQS - Affordable Housing 26.470.070.5 GMQS - Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing 26.515 Off-Street Parking 26.540 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.080 Residential Multi-family (RMF) zone district Municipal Code Section ASLU 331 Midland Growth Management 273707405801 1 12.10 Space allotment for Trash and Recycling Storage Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20Iand%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations APCHA, Environmental Health for referrals P&Z for GMQS and Creation of AH Credits. Special Review and RDS (if necessary) Public Hearing: Yes, at P&Z Planning Fees: $3,250 Deposit for 10 hours of staff time (additional planning hours are billed at a rate of $325/hour) Referral Fees: $975 Flat fee for APCHA $975 Flat fee for Environmental Health Total Deposit: $5,200 To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â¤ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Â¤ HOA Compliance form (Attached) Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Il Scaled drawings of the proposed site plan and all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. El Net livable square footage and proposed Category Designation of sale or rental restriction for each unit. Â¤ If applicable, the conditions under which reductions from net minimum livable square footage requirements are requested according to Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. 0 Proposed employees housed by the affordable housing units in increments of no less than one one-hundredth (0.01) according to Section 26.470.100.2. 2 O A site improvement survey (no older than a vear from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Il An 81/2"by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. C] 1 Complete Copy of all application materials. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: Â¤ 5 additional copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. 0 Total deposit for review of the application. Â¤ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 3 Exhibit 4 1 IME'/ Title Insurance Commitment 6 0 l U#:AdE?*4 First American Title ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Commitment INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS The Title Insurance Commitment is a legal contract between you and the Company. It is issued to show the basis on which we will issue a Title AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY 1 Insurance Policy to you. The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the limitations shown in the Policy. CONDITIONS 2 The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you ask. SCHEDULE A Insert The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of 1. Commitment Date either the Company or you as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www. alta.om/. 2. Policies to be Issued, Amounts The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date. Any and Proposed Insureds changes in the land title or the transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy. 3, Interest in the Land and Owner The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions and Conditions. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE INSURANCE 4, Description of the Land COMMITMENT. YOU SHOULD READ THE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. SCHEDULE B-1- REQUIREMENTS Insert If you have any questions about the Commitment, contact: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B-11 - EXCEPTIONS Insert 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707 AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY We agree to issue policy to you according to the terms of the Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: â€¢ The Provisions in Schedule A. â€¢ The Requirements in Schedule B-1. â€¢ The Exceptions in Schedule B-11. â€¢ The Conditions on Page 2. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and Il of SCHEDULE B. First American Title Insurance Company / 1 - Ir /t....2,042...S. \ e : n i *4-â€ž~ 6 Ri~ AnÂ»-7 i Z i IEPIEMBER 24, i 2 6%... 1968 / ' ,,,.64"0,13> Dennis J. Gilmore Timothy Kemp President Secretary (This Commitment is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached) This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5011000 (6-22-10) Page 1 of 2 | ALTA Plain Language Commitment (6-17-06) 144 CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records" means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title according to the state statutes where your land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section 11 may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B - Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I or Eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section 11. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms. Form 5011000 (6-22-10) Page 2 of 2 ~ ALTA Plain Language Commitment (6-17-06) American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No. 16003559 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: October 3, 2016 at 07:45 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Owners Policy (06/17/06) $5,600,000.00 $4,845.00 Proposed Insured: WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Certificate of Taxes Due $200.00 Endorsements: CO-110.1 (Delete 1,2, 3,4) $75.00 Additional Charges: $ 700.00 B. ALTA Loan Policy (06/17/06) $4,480,000.00 $150.00 Proposed Insured: TBD, its successors and/or assigns as their interests may appear Endorsements: ALTA Endorsement 4.1-06 (Condominium) $802.00 ALTA Endorsement 6-06 (Variable Rate Mortgage) $30.00 ALTA Endorsement 8.1-06 (Environmental Protection Lien) $50.00 CO-100 (Comprehensive Improved Land) $50.00 Additional Charges: $0 Total $6,902.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee simple. 4. Title to the Fee simple or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Jean J. Delynn and John lan Taylor (as to Unit: A-1), The Margaret Jane McGavock Trust dated January 15, 2016 (as to Unit: A-2), Matt Grubbs (as to Unit: A-3), Heidi Gorbitz and Patric Gorbitz (as to Unit:A-4), Drew I. Goodman (as to Unit: A-5), Alix Samuelson (as to Unit:A-6), 337 Midland Ave LLC (as to Unit: A-7) and Sharon Elizabeth Wells (as to Unit:A-8) 5. Theland referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO For informational purposes only, the property address is: 331-338 Midland Avenue, Units: Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, AL A8, Aspen, CO 81611. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA I jcensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. ASSOCIAIH}N All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 16003559 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC By: Fttte** Winter VanAIstine Authorized Officer or Agent FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC, 715 West Main Street, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, Phone: 970 925-7328, Fax: 970 925-7348. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITU The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. ABSOCIATION All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. dRot 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B 1. Requirements: 1. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded. 4. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 5. Payment of all taxes, charges and assessments, levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. 6. A Certification of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or an authorized agent (pursuant to Senate Bill 92-143, CRS 10-11-122). 7. Receipt by the Company of the appropriate affidavit as to new construction and indemnifying the Company against any unfiled materialmen's or mechanic's liens. 8. Deed of Trust from WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of TBD, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $4,480,000.00. 9. Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 10. A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review. 11. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 12. Evidence to the Company that all assessments and liens due under the Declaration referred to in Schedule B have been paid. 13. This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. I'llillilli AMERICAN LAND TITU The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. AP M.}Cl<1 14}N Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. - 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) Requirements 14-15 below affect Unit: A-1 only. 14. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Jean J. Delynn and John lan Taylor to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 15. Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. Requirements 16-20 below affect Unit: A-2 only. 16. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from The Margaret Jane McGavock Trust dated January 15, 2016, to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 17. Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. 18. A true and correct copy of the Trust Agreement which creates The Margaret Jane McGavock Trust dated January 15, 2016, providing, among other things, the designation of the trustee(s) and specification of the trustee(s) powers under that trust. 19. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of The Margaret Jane McGavock Trust dated January 15, 2016, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 20. Evidence furnished by the Office of the Director of Finance, City of Aspen, that the following real estate taxes have been paid, or that conveyance is exempt from said taxes: (1) The "Wheeler Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant to Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and; (2) The "Housing Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant to Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990); pursuant to the Quit Claim Deed recorded March 10, 2016, as Reception No. 627681. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. 1:""""i::i" AMI RICAN LAND T ITU The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. 4% 5{}CIA I K)N All other uses are prohibited. RepAnted under license from the American Land Title Association. G, 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) Requirements 21-24 below affect Unit: A-3 only. 21. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Matt Grubbs, to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 22. Release of the Deed of Trust from Matt Grubbs to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Washington Mutual Bank, FA, a federal association, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $327,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated April 9,2003, and recorded April 18, 2003, as Reception No. 481610, and Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust, dated March 14, 2014, and recorded March 20, 2014, as Reception No. 608768. 23. Release of the Deed of Trust from Matthew F. Grubbs to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of David G. Sweiderk and Robert Bystrowski, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $50,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated June 24,2004, and recorded September 10, 2004, as Reception No. 501794. 24. Evidence furnished by the Office of the Director of Finance, City of Aspen, that the following real estate taxes have been paid, or that conveyance is exempt from said taxes: (1) The "Wheeler Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant to Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and; (2) The "Housing Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant to Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990), pursuant to the Personal Representative's Deed, dated January 17, 2001, and recorded March 22, 2001, as Reception No. 452641, and Quit Claim Deed dated February 14, 2001, and recorded March 22, 2001, as Reception No. 452642. Requirements 25-27 below affect Unit: A-4 only. 25. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Heidi Gorbitz and Patric Gorbitz, to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 26. Release of the Deed of Trust from Heidi Gorbitz and Patric Gorbitz, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Pinnacle Mortgage Group Inc. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $272,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated February 2, 2012, and recorded February 7, 2012, as Reception No. 586552, and re-recorded February 9, 2012, as Reception No. 586633. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN tAND TITH The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. A) 51.,C IAT EUN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ~EF-: -/ 00 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 27. Release of the Deed of Trust from Patric Gorbitz and Heidi Gorbitz to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Alpine Bank, a Colorado Banking Corporation, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $50,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated March 13, 2012, and recorded March 30, 2012, as Reception No. 587876. Requirements 28-30 below affect Unit: A-5 only. 28. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Drew I. Goodman to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 29. Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. 30. Pay 2nd half of 2015 taxes. Requirements 31-32 below affect Unit: A-6 only. 31. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Alix Samuelson to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 32. Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. Requirements 33-37 below affect Unit: A-7 only. 33. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from 337 Midland Avenue, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 34. Release of the Deed of Trust from Jordan Nemirow to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Ally Bank Corp. Uk/a GMAC Bank to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $374,262.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated February 23, 2011, and recorded March 3,2011, as Reception No. 578037. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. 8- AMERICAN LAND TITL[ The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. 05â‚¬}CIATION All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. al ** 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 35. Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for 337 Midland Avenue, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 36. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of 337 Midland Avenue, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 37. A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for 337 Midland Avenue, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review. Requirements 38-41 below affect Unit: A-8 only. 38. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Sharon Elizabeth Wells, to WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 39. Release of the Deed of Trust from Sharon Elizabeth Wells, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $338,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated May 1, 2006, and recorded May 18, 2006, as Reception No. 524179, and Assignment of Mortgage dated November 29, 2013, and recorded December 2, 2013, as Reception No. 606004. 40. Release of the Open-End Deed of Trust from Sharon Elizabeth Wells, an Unmarried Person, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $50,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated November 20, 2006, and recorded December 11, 2006, as Reception No. 532062, and Modification to Home Equity Line of Credit, dated April 5, 2007, and recorded May 4,2007, as Reception No. 537391, and Modification to Home Equity Line of Credit, dated July 31, 2007, and recorded August 27,2007, as Reception No. 541345. 41. Release of Notice of Election and Demand for Sale by Public Trustee as Sale No. 12-033, filed in regard to the Deed of Trust dated May 1, 2006, and May 18, 2006, as Reception No. 524179, encumbering an original principal amount of evidence of debt of: $338,000.00, with a current outstanding Principal Balance of: $316,890.68, recorded May 3, 2012, as Reception No. 588762. 2. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITU The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. A 5 51.1 LC I A T ION All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.. 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 7. Taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and 2016, and subsequent years, a lien not yet due or payable. 8. All mineral rights underlying the subject property. 9. The premises hereby granted, with the exception of the surfact, may be entered by the proprietor of any other veil'~ lode or ledge, the top or apex of which lies outside of the boundary of said granted premises, should the same in its dip be found to penetrate or intersect or extent into said premises for the purpose of extracting and removing the ore from such other vein, lode or ledge; and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent, recorded June 28, 1892, in Book 39 at Page 78, as Reception No. 047892, and in the United States Patent, recorded May 20,1949, in Book 175 at Page 170, as Reception No. 096346. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations and rights of ingress and egress, specified under the Warranty Deed, dated January 21, 1965, and recorded April 12,1965, in Book 212 at Page 322, as Reception No. 120355. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated February 17, 1969, and recorded February 18, 1969, in Book 239 at Page 441, as Reception No. 134173, and in the Warranty Deed dated July 30, 1969, and recorded September 12,1969, in Book 243 at Page 246, as Reception No. 136991, and in the Warranty Deed dated November 25, 1970, and recorded December 3, 1970, in Book 252 at Page 218, as Reception No. 143387, and in the Warranty Deed dated December 30, 1971, and recorded January 12, 1972, in Book 260 at Page 712, as Reception No. 149529. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Condominium Declaration for Aspen Hills (a Condominium) dated July 2, 1969, and recorded July 2, 1969, in Book 241 at Page 877, as Reception No. 136011, and First Amendment to Condominium Declaration for Aspen Hills (a Condominium) dated September 2, 1969, and recorded September 5,1969, in Book 243 at Page 83, as Reception No. 136864. 13. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Condominium Map of Aspen Hlils Plat, recorded July 15, 1969, in Plat Book 4 at Page 8, as Reception No. 136131. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITIr The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. *551}CIAI ItyN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 16003559 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 14. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Aspen Hills Annexation Plat, recorded June 14, 1971, in Plat Book 4 at Page 200, as Reception No. 146061. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement, dated July 10, 1978, and recorded July 12, 1978, in Book 351 at Page 229, as Reception No. 205645. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Decree Quieting Title, dated December 5,1983, and recorded December 27, 1983, in Book 457 at Page 888, as Reception No. 255947. NOTE: This exception affects Unit: A-2 only. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Grant of Easement, dated April 1, 2006, and recorded May 22,2006, as Reception No. 524387. 18. Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All right reserved. - AMERICAN <AND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. *35051 ATION All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 16003559 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: Condominium Units A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 and A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, according to the Map thereof recorded July 15, 1969 in Plat Book 4 at Page 8 as Reception No. 136131 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Aspen Hills, a Condominium, recorded July 2, 1969 in Book 241 at Page 877 as Reception No. 136011 and First Amendment thereto recorded September 5, 1969 in Book 243 at Page 83 as Reception No. 136864, Pitkin County, Colorado; EXCEPT that portion of the common area conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners of the Pitkin County Housing Authority by Agreement dated July 10, 1978, and recorded July 12, 1978, in Book 351 at Page 229, as Reception No. 205645. ALTA Commitment 16003559 Exhibit A Ill ....,â‚¬ - 7 f ~ FirstAmerican Titleâ„¢ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. NOTE If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that 'Every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title commitment, other than the effective date of the title commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owner's policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed- Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its owners policy or owner's policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until R has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authonzed agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary The subject property may be located in a special taxing district A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor- NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas. other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-1. Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction. improvements or major repairs undenaken on the propeny to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller. the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. First American Title Insurance Company American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment No.: 16003559 SCHEDULE B (Continued) NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right. NOTE: C.R.S. 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grnntee. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128{6)(ah It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment. fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied- First American Title Insurance Company ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 West Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V. of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through it affiliates, from sharing non-public personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: â€¢ Information we receive from you, such as on application or other forms. â€¢ Information about your transactions we secure from out files, or from our affiliates or others. â€¢ Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. â€¢ Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customer to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: â€¢ Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. â€¢ Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. TELEPHONE 970 925-7328 .AA FACSIMILE 970 925-7348 Exhibit 5 71 I. 1 -1//87 . im 'i"l' i-'y-:Â· i -4. L E l. ..2 . S .. I --1 Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies- The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: Bill Boehringer, Chief Executive Officer Property WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Owner (Â«13: Email: WilliamB@WEBCapLLC.com Phone NoK (917) 977.0541 Address of Aspen Hills Condominiums Property: 331-338 Midland Avenue (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 application) I certify as follows: Wick one) C] This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. ~ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws- 1 understand that this document is a public document- 7 Owner representative: /-0- 7-x-\N date. 10-21-2016 Bill-BaeMinger,Chieftxecutive Officer Printed name: WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company QL Attorney signature: datel. Attorney printed name: Â®BendonAdams Ojobet 21,2016 % 1% 32**<* 3"0* 1,.- 60 1,.,.,11., 7 4 100Â§,0'*Fre'*Dâ„¢*Cr + 4 4 A**% N 30. Gatenâ€¢ St Agn: Co*,00 8'611 RE , Al#en Hitls Col omah*- (231-330 *Aldtane AÂ¥-,1 Ms 6*8Â» The *r4pm-***43â€¢*ges descnt,ed *1 9,4 Fand 4** 4&0 i :0 sube;Anit by 80%140Â¢01#*M,# on Wallr of WE82 Cap.* .tc a, 1:.9â€¢M#noâ€¢, u Â·-' 62*eâ‚¬A<t,Ve o~k* LLC h*.0 b-Â» agm- 4 the HeiRIB.. Asu*al. of Â¥* AM)*n Hih CÂ«*â€¢Nnum. M Irefe are mily ***le.s â€¢4*41 1%* 9*29#19 0 j# 4 2P *Edit #448* Â® rÂ©Â¢ heâ€¢ute m coinact me Ked R*~00~:4'1~ --2Â·iÂ© 7 / UÂ·,94 - , V â‚¬. 0% ~2044/ mwaan NA,â€¢dfuw Preslow ASP- H* Condomeam &*sea.*LM 331,3,/4/".*L*"'Â£* 48â€¢ CO 0 1611 jordon#*ent*maR Â¢*m 970948 7297 3*t S.â€¢ 6 --Â· t. /1 * 90* ) At *5 / 49' # Â·tll 043<.ADAâ€¢5 C :Â·M Exhibit 6 Â® BendonAdams October 21, 2016 Ms. Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Aspen Hills Condominiums (331-338 Midland Avenue) Ms. Garrow: Please accept this letter authorizing BendonAdams, LLC, to represent our ownership interests in Aspen Hills Condominiums and act on our behalf on matters reasonably associated in securing land use approvals for the property. If there are any questions about the foregoing or if I can assist, please do not hesitate to contact me. Aspen Hills Condominiums Units: Al - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-001 A2 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-006 A3 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-002 A4 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-008 A5 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-007 A6 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-003 A7 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-005 A8 - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-004 Common Area - Parcel ID: 2737-074-05-801 Kind Regards, 3William-Boehringer Chief Executive Officer WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company PO Box 3807 Aspen, CO 81612 (917) 977.0541 WilliamB@WEBCapLLC.com 300 SO SPRING ST I 202 I ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 1 BENDONADAMS.COM Exhibit 7 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property WEB2 Capital LLC, Phone No.: (917) 977.0541 Owner ("1"): a Colorado limited liability company; Email: WilliamB@WEBCapLLC.com William Roehringer, Chief Fxecutive Officer Address of Billing WEB2 Capital LLC property: Aspen Hill Condominiums Address: PO Box 3807 (Subject of 331-338 Midland Avenue (send bills here) Aspen, CO 81612. application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that asthe property ownerthat I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. 975 flat fee for APCHA . $. flat fee for $. 975 flat fee for Env. Health $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. Ihave read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, 1 agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 3,250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director Name.:%252~~~-2 -II- -William_Boehrinqer_-3 City Use: Title: Chief Executive Officer Fees Due: $ Received $ WEB2 Capital LLC, a Colorado limited liability company March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 Exhibit 8 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273707405801 on 09/30/2016 4),THIN ' COUNT * Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http:Uwww.pitkinmapsandmore.com 4 BROWN RUTH H BEYER ALAN R BERNARD RANDY 410NMILLST#Bll 410NMILLST#Bll 18 PLATEAU RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASHEVILLE, NC 28805 COLORADO MTN NEWS MEDIA PIERCE ROBERT KING MERZBACH NINA PO BOX 1927 PO BOX 3118 195 SHEFFIELD DR CARSON CITY, NV 89702 ASPEN, CO 81612 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 SILVER LAKE FAMILY TRUST GOLDBERG DANIEL J HUA VINH 424 PARK CIR TH 1 424 PARK CIR # 3 PO BOX 2439 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LUU VINH SCHUR JACOB A MOYER MARY PO BOX 8513 424 PARK CIRCLE #TH5 424 PARK CIR #6 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816112498 ASPEN, CO 81611 HEYMAN BRUCE QPR TRUST HEYMAN VICKI QPR TRUST ROCKY MTN PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 5000 MS-10 2035 N MAGNOLIA 73 SMUGGLER GROVE RD OGDENSBURG, NY 13669 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81611 FAT CITY APARTMENTS LLC BIBBIG DIETER HEMMING GREGG S & KAREN S 402 MIDLAND PARK 333 PARK AVE 311 MIDLAND AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN SALLIE 1208 EAST HOPKINS LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORI1 325 PARK AVE 623 E HOPKINS AVE 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KNUTSON RODNEY D SNELL NANCY L WELLS SHARON ELIZABETH PO BOX YY PO BOX YY PO BOX 3100 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASALT, CO 81621 GREENHILL MICHAEL LOUIS REV TRUST GREENHILL DEBRA MERLE REV TRUST CITY OF ASPEN 30 RIPARIAN RD 30 RIPARIAN RD 130 S GALENA ST HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035-1909 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 CASTLE PEAK ASPEN LLC TAYLOR JOHN IAN DELYNNJEANJ 600 E MAIN ST #104 331 MIDLAND AVE 331 MIDLAND AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRUBBS MATT SAMUELSON ALIX DEVANNY EARL H 111 & ELIZABETH H 333 MIDLAND AVE #3 PO BOX 4324 177 HAMBOLDT ST ASPEN, CO 81611-2412 BASALT, CO 81621 DENVER, CO 80218 DUNIGAN PATRICK A CHAZEN DAVID FRANKLIN 11 HTM PROPERTIES LLC 4245 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY STE 460 150 E 58TH ST 27TH FL 43 A SMUGGLER GROVE RD DALLAS, TX 75205 NEW YORK, NY 10155 ASPEN, CO 81611 337 MIDLAND AVE LLC MCGAVOCK MARGARET JANE TRUST HERMELIN ASPEN LLC PO BOX 559 PO BOX 533 32205 BINGHAM RD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 KALTENBOCK ERNST IBARA RON MEBEL GREGORY E 1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD PO BOX 776 30 KUPONO ST TORONTO ONTARIO CAYUCOS, CA 93430 PAIA,HI 967799723 CANADA M4B 3A4, COERDT CLINTON CLAUSS ARNAL ALVARO JOSE VICENZI HEATHER L TRUST 726 VINE ST 726 VINE ST PO BOX 2238 ASPEN, CO 816111595 ASPEN, CO 816111595 ASPEN, CO 81612 MCDONALD FRANCIS B WHITE WILLIAM P TUSHINGHAM DARREN PO BOX 4671 326 MIDLAND AVE #204 326 MIDLAND AVE #205 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 OLDFIELD BARNEY F PHILLIPS ARTHUR R & HELEN B MOHWINKEL CLIFF 2701 MIDLAND AVE #8312 PO BOX 8245 PO BOX 9457 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 RESTAINO BECKER TRUST KELLEY BRAD BUCKLEY & SHARI L PITKIN COUNTY 72 ALDER AVE 1736 N 6250 E 530 E MAIN ST #302 SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 EDEN, UT 84310 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH JACK L & DIANE M ASPEN ASSET LLC FERLISI MARY SANDRA LIVING TRUST 434 COTTONWOOD DR 2701 MIDLAND AVE #8312 326 MIDLAND AVE #307 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAVE DERYK GORBITZ HEIDI & PATRIC K & W PROPERTIES I LLC 1195 E COOPER #B PO BOX 647 PO BOX 744 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLACKSBURG, VA 24060 LOUTHIS PETER NAGLE MELINDA LEE EPLERANDI E PO BOX 4254 PO BOX 914 PO BOX 785 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MUNROE KRISTIN EPLER TRUST CALAMARI MICHAEL NARAT APSARA PO BOX 785 317 RUE SAINT ANN 415 PARK CIR #5 ASPEN, CO 81612 METAIRIE, LA 700053469 ASPEN, CO 81611 KEARN ROBERT & ORENE FAMILY TRUST DAVIS D STONE RUSSELL LYNN C 1831 WILLOWRD PO BOX 8904 PO BOX 8904 HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MANUEL CATHERINE & LINCOLN AES INVESTMENTS LLC ANDRULAITIS FIONA MCWILLIAM & TIMOTH' 409 PARK CIR #2 500 PARK CIR 409 PARK CIR #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GARTON SARA B JOHNSTON PEGGY REV TRUST BROOKS KERRI L 110 MIDLAND PARK PL 111 MIDLAND PARK PL 112 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LACROIX TIMOTHY STEAR RONALD A & MARIA F BIRACH KAREN 113 MIDLAND PARK PL 121 MIDLAND PARK PL #A21 122 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-2414 HAGEN CATHERINE ANNE HOUBEN CYNTHIA MICHELE WINKLER JILL C 210 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 9616 212 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HUMPHREYJESS HANSEN BETH DODINGTON SUSAN M PO BOX 1775 PO BOX 1775 221 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPONAR ANTON K & JUDY BESTIC JEFFREY B FUENTES DAVID & KATHARINE D 222 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 2267 302 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611-2486 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGGINS PAUL KOCH KATHRYN S & JOHN F MCPHEE JAMES MICHAEL & ANNE MARIE 303 MIDLAND PARK PL #C-3 304 MIDLAND PARK PL C-4 401 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FORNELL PETER J MACCRACKEN SCOTT R & MARISA POST CHAUNER RONALD & JACKIE 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 403 MIDLAND PARK PL #D3 PO BOX 8782 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KOLBERG JUDITH A SMITH DONALD NELSON CUNNINGHAM PAMELA M 501 MIDLAND PARK PL 501 MIDLAND PARK PL 502 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WELDEN TODD E & DEBORAH C GRIFFITHS THOMAS W BAKKEN JOHN & LIZA N 503 MIDLAND PARK PL #E3 504 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 12064 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLOMQUISTJENIFERL PERLEY PAUL S NICHOLS SCOTT A PO BOX 12155 PO BOX 12155 PO BOX 3035 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 BIRRFELDER BRIGITTE T STEIN DEBORAH JEFFERSON GREG PO BOX 3035 710 MIDLAND PARK PL 711 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 GLEASON AMY EVERETTE JOHN JOHNSON SHAEL 712 MIDLAND PARK PL 712 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3549 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEBSTER DAVID H CALK LAURA E WILLCOX DENNIS PO BOX 10362 722 MIDLAND PARK PL 722 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2472 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATTEN DAVID N LEVIN AMY HECK JAMES C 810 MIDLAND PARK PL 811 MIDLAND PARK PL#Hll PO BOX 8416 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SEMPLE SASHA L GRAHAM MARGOT WERTZ LIMOR 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 2254 PO BOX 9227 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOLLINGERJONATHAN MCLAUGHLIN KEVIN HENDRICKS LYNDELL B 403 PARK AVE #3 403 PARK AVE #4 POBOX 11152 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BALLOUJONATHAN HELBING ATHENA MCINTYRE GEOFF & LEE AMORY 403 PARK AVE #6 403 PARK AVE #6 403 PARK AVE #7 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BURGESS HILARY KURNOS TIMOTHY A MCKNIGHTSPENCER 1020 E COOPER AVE 403 PARK AVE #9 403 PARK AVE #10 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MCPHERSON GREGORY J HACH STEPHEN C AMES MARTHA E PO BOX 2073 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHILLIPS JESSICA VANGARDEREN TEJAY LOWE SARA M & CORY J 407 PARK AVE #A 407 PARK AVE #A 407 PARK AVE #B ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FEINSTEIN JEROME FAM TRUST KROMELOW BASIL M & LAUREANNE L LEE JONATHAN O TRUST 1211 GULF OF MEXICO DR#901 55 W DELAWARE PL 35 FISHER AVE LONGBOAT KEY, FL 34228 CHICAGO, IL 60610 BROOKLINE, MA 02445 LEE BARBARA C TRUST TERKUN MARK HITCHCOCK SAMANTHA 35 FISHER AVE PO BOX 329 PO BOX 329 BROOKLINE, MA 02445 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN VIEW CONDO ASSOC TAILINGS CONDO ASSOC 315-317 PARK AVE CONDO ASSOC 326 MIDLAND AVE 424 PARK CIR COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 315 PARK AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 328 PARK/327 MIDLAND CONDO ASSOC MIDLAND PARK PLACE CONDO ASSOC JACOBIE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 328 PARK AVE 112 MIDLAND PARK PL PARK CIR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMUGGLER GROVE CONDO ASSOC MARTHINSSON NOSTDAHL CONDO ASSOC PARK AVENUE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 403 PARK AVE COMMON AREA 23 SMUGGLER RD ASPEN, CO 81611 102 PARK AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PARK AVENUE TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC EPSTEN BRADFORD M QPR TRUST EPSTEN VIRGINIA H QPR TRUST 407 PARK AVE UNIT A 5038 WALNUT ST 1030 W 66TH TERRACE ASPEN, CO 81611 KANSAS CITY, MO 641122757 KANSAS CITY, MO 64113 MOONEY TIMOTHY DPASPEN LLC GOODMAN DREW I PO BOX 8931 300 ROBBINS LN 5721 GREEN OAKS DR ASPEN, CO 81612 SYOSSET, NY 11791 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121-1336 SUNIERALAIN SHERIDAN MARGARET 165 PARK CIRCLE CONDO 29 VILLAGE LN 29 VILLAGE LN COMMON AREA BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN HILLS ~?\~ EXISTING CONDITIONS ALIU 1-5,3* . DR NOV 0 8 2016 COPÂ¥/1-!.0.1/1 'SDES ON CORPS'.C ALL RIGHTSRESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EX STING CON[VIONS 9,30,2016 TITLE SHEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT No 1614 DRAWN BY. MTE 1.1 SllIH N3dSV 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONV101IAI REE-LEE LA ASPEN HILLS A SYMBOL & MATERIAL LEGEND GENERAL NOTES DRAWING INDEX 10 Al] exiling cond,tions must beÂ¥.Ffred by the gontrac./In the fre' U.nown and varred...........u~d Not,# the structu.I./1..r and~or....... , i TITLE SHEET ALIUS ASSEMBLYDETAILCUT ~---- REFERENCE GRID LINE ~- - - structur,lorarchitectural-tions found'vary from-ildicated flamthedraw-~gs Des,glievision,imaybefequired,andarelobee*pectedas,proce,saffemodel ' work , GENERAL INFORMATION 4 13 FLOORAREA CALCULATIONS TO RDGE 20 All Aew wo,k. de'lls. ;uffaces or finish. ;hall match *act. ex,5ting surfaces unls noted o d,rectrd otheiwise I the owner or i.l or de~gn. Co.r,c or I yer,4 -th ....tany./.flict .iween .*ir, and new conditions 1 4 NET 'VABLE CALCULATIONS 1 BEAM 20 'h SECTION CUT SPOT ELEVATION 30 Allelectr,glmodification5and"addmonstobe,sdifectedbyowne,/hg/Ingde5,gne,duringconstruction Co~actor/lightingdesJg~toverifyelectric,Icap*city~dreview 2 1 SITE PLAN f 123'-6 new des/n' oralterations with architect, lio~ to implmentation â€¢0 Allinte,loiticetnealf,xtures, plumbingfixture~Wdtrimicabinelde..Mdotherfinishe~tobellhed,rectiveoftheowntrori~terierdes,gneruniess~ctedothe~1. Inthe SURVEY dr~wings Cont~ctor to p~vid~ all necessa~y piep wol forinitallabon of a~y materials as requlicd EXTERIOR ELEVATION t--1 WINDOW MARK 50 Structurale~giming-,fanymodification'lle*,sting~uctur,Ismemare.emedneces.*mndthe;esho~n,/~hedrawings.8]luist~gconditions,retobevenfled ~, 1 4- LOWER LEVEL PLAN 6 Inthefieldbyaregistered.tructuraleng,neerbeforeproceeding ThNrch,tectwill~otberesponsibleforinvit,uctGralmodifications~otver,fiedo, appiovedbYâ€¢*uctural engineer 1 4 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 32 rih n 60 Contracto, willverlf..coord,nate.open,$,hicug'Foors ced,~g~,andwallswilhallarchitectural,;tructuial,me,~h.nal.plumb,ng andelectficaldes,gnand 3.3 1 4 ROOF PLAN DETAIL CALLOUT | DOOR MARK ([)333 COn~tfUCtlan U 41 14" ELEVATIONS ROOM 42 14 ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATION <81>, ROOM NUMBER = 3 51 :BUILDING SECTIONS 6.1 SITEE PHOTOS DRAWING REVISION 62 SITE PHOTOS Â£11 \_-/~ 6 3 SITE PHOTOS CD Cr) i()PYRIGH! 201AALUSDESGN CORPSLL' ALLIGHFSRESERVED 0) DRAWING SET ISSUE ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT DIRECTORY O EXISTiNGCOND"DNS 9302{Wh CLIENT HI,pl. g UNTAL U) 11'JF) .LFOP'AT!ON A.-ElÂ·:TE 1/11 Z A14 ON CEÂ·,-E# ARCHITECT BA,1 BfAI.1 BM .r BEAM 0, Â·LI PL ...)[ .elt,_0 8 6 ' ~ pp P , iri. PPO:PERTY LINE GENERAL INFORMATION PE,r JFORCe,iEN- =EC .IPED NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Pen?ED PROJECT No 1614 SIM MILAP CEN-EFÂ·-11,9 -â€¢.UARE FEET CLEAâ€¢ *' VICINITY MAP DRAWNI BY MTE C.-11 [Nk -~ Z 00/CPETE Tp .~ N E TON TL Fi. (22) 1 CONN CONT *../-'I'-/f.'-/."Liav-- R .~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. I .AL Lt>' 1.NES .THER*JEE Alle,an.,r,~c,cAE./ III 'el......1...ILa= T.â€¢p'.1 .1 :2 .â€¢ r' ........u./â€¢u=Crrc. el -cr. 3/c~ledher.In l,lt. .....18...=--bil 0 ~EmF IN f IELID rhpcâ€ž.Ibilll I'*'nricty'Â¤cn.â€¢Cl~0 ,-ric, ~,Â£/1=.F+ I C~]elin enâ€¢ .12'ZE.Wq~~All'I-= AL. C. gra,~ L.2 3......Â·/..h.n.,17/ror,â€¢~ -Ir ir.Â·,cni,tlul. tv inehiropilor.yc,â€¢Il," .Ilil.cr '.'le/'he )//* IN.ConÂ«â€¢ci I.I.â€¢Â«nan~~0â€¢rec.-rguâ€¢,4.â€¢-I,i, ...I.rl .bre....nver/, ..I, I. Inr., â€¢-c,r or.cnillor 9 /95*/'Â·2,Â·r'.......0,+. 7Â·Â·csÂ·++r.0 neÂ·:.â€¢.r,Iâ€ž:.IcÂ· 4 -.i... 1,!IlÂ©2 ]F.'.I./ic.de.r~rd,r//cp N& .<.,H...wee'i=c~erej jr ile,â€žd LÂ·' STâ€¢Â·EC -9 ....=- ~Â·' c.;cc.,06 .ra ,*e:3 d. ji~:lifion. iâ€¢ed/li.1/t~ ~preÂ·aoâ„¢'*#kÂ· rhe ~~~ Z FOUNDATION 3 f~-Plâ€¢I 'â€¢rl.er'cticnE...'IllÂ»I?ell..rd/leprapâ€¢'r"ur'~I.A['11â‚¬..Â·.Illte.....=~'â€¢~i..â€žI : ,/ Zer..J h.; -.. . ']rn Ibillerac2 IMâ€žCg9ifi,clorn/Â·0-â€¢,ec~Â·ear~ae~~ere'-e,~=~h~Duld,i, 1 Al â€¢0 1,~I Drrpy * f $!I taeand "c Ic'dp ir . e JIP woi it i dI~ cu cr~ 0,1 . J uâ€¢ic , r. .; w C â€¢clâ€¢ a'.c,~ n~~ :cn Al Ki eL, jeneov ,2,0,1. urie., limilill"/illiti.hig/laillillililiwilmlgilillilillililiwilill G~PGUMWALLBOAPC .*r'*'hehighe./.1.nowax'r=.altbmannipo~.Il'r~#.1 'bri [eg. r= _.2 bhÂ»Inet:e.r=. Mâ€¢,0~--'hâ€¢dc,~.*# Il h.!IA!,li~Ill. /. LLC mel.e~e:/.ir~efrary~. er .,~rul..â€ž-ac.tor,-M:r,â€¢e~c.7 thro*ouâ€¢ 4.6]rillâ€¢ 4// MA 1.0 %jr i. il, :Jin' =c.rve :1 1.<. 6.Â§! fux. =h~gl ind /-*/0.n :,9,â€¢ cr : a; 2 -Â· c c,Tr a :, I. -I'-I.'-2,*..".i::Ip' Z I. ..~.*... 6 ..* -- r./reen'â€¢.fle:J â€¢n,3+Jm 'h' I. d;n*c,iâ€žâ€¢r.......zo- â€¢T,~~, ..*'cr I.I.r~,Illlâ€¢Illâ€¢/1.â€¢ U) n~c, IrÂ¥'COF~~I,llhm if/~ur~:czr:Er.CC~ Uer=+=â€ž ' Â·2Â·- ~t.â€¢M-â€¢r~=1..â€¢Er/Â·98~=iÂ·~=~1ec'=r,inny,â€¢icud,In~,câ€¢Ir,MINâ€¢ lIMV *t~ Ir:KE-:Vilrg-â€¢ect.â€¢t~p~eM'-rn~â€¢Licâ€¢cr ~e:.i~. râ„¢k=cd Â·et-r'r ~e~,iâ‚¬m,eG 1-,Dced,i,~01 =. 0 /r IN ~01. C..C __ _-r ~ra Â·k.e â€¢es-Â»1 r -eon 't, 5*~1- I Ir .â€¢I Â£â€¢cr 'r .% /10. orec. Â·ar #* ri-Inr t.v I p .p' 12.- ., IC. - p .2 X U..ee- â€¢r/0.4.. # ..,*- 6 V....I-/Â£ Â·' - *.2/ 'A-ED 'r/pn 3 ~,In lor,9 mu+Ip. I. 11~~ -v~ri, i'.3 'reD tr c. Ill 3,ner, IcnE â€¢he -rch recl loGId . '/ .I' 97....'fll., A:I~,rnÂ£ *.Iraw,~g b.libler// .*"l./â€¢I./V.In 'lall :In ~reâ€¢arc,;ghir*mingcr,~cll E 1.2 pRLECILOCATON SllIH N3dSV 00'NadSV 3nN3AV ONV1CHIAI 8â‚¬â‚¬-LEâ‚¬ 12 sqft ~~ b 1,754 sq ft deck , Â· 3 + :â€¢.. t~. .Ir,m,~,Â¢ill'; 11 16- 1-1 ... /== ALIUS 402 sq ft 408 sq ft 1 FAR CALCULATIONS UN11- 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 405 sqft 402 sq ft LOT SIZE: 15,159 sq.ft. ./\ STORAGEAREAAEO.T~ ' 48 sq ft 48 sqft 47 sq ft~ ALLOWABLE FAR: 11,369 sq.ft. SFAIR.IYP E N 46 sq ft 48 sq n 48 54 ft 47 sq f19 LEVEL GROSS NET NOTES ~ 406 sq ft 0 403 sq ft 403 sq ft 414 sq ft 4 UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 7 - ' '11 MAI N 3,575 3,575 DECK 1,754 49 15% OF ALLOWABLE FAR = EXEMPT DECK AREA (.15*11,369) i 01 ' LI -1 LOWER 3,632 1,416 39% OF LL WALLS EXPOSED (3,632*.39) II'l 12 sq ft.~~ TOTAL 8,961 5,040 TOTAL ~~ '-~ ""-'- I Z LU Â® MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA ~ SCALE. 1/8" = 1-0. 0 4 8Â· 9 310 sq ft 1 L-F I Ff) 1 L_f-] 787 TOTAL WALL AREA {.(JPYRMIN 21}luli Ir. CEF ON {XJHPS ILL ALL R;:HIS RESERVED 1 1. ~ DRAWING SET ~ ISSUE ~ ~ Â· n STING CONDITIONIS 9/30/2016 UNIT 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 arp. 4E 4 sq-IL -450 sq ft 450 sq ft 462 sq ft r*Â»'0*-1 rin r.b 1 1 Fr 1 1 4., 993') ' EAST WALL 334 sq ft & i FULLY BURIE) I 1 :/Al -* 7*%4 1 412 TOTAL v'ALL Al 6 i FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS ~ 1 - 1 .IT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ .6Aq R+-Â»451 sq h-15 sq ftÂ»*- -:158 sq 1 PROJECT No 1614 UNIT 1 UNIT 1 JNIT 5 UNIT 7 DRAWN BY MTE | "11 ' 34%4~ 1-4 .: ...hz %9f2h 4, E--------------------- ~-Ill'll/-1/3/-~ 412 TOTAL WALL AREA 1 ift 1,144*31 [313 sq 11_3 L_] L._3 787 TOTAL WALL AREA --1 Â® LOWER LEVEL AREA SCALE. 1/8Â· = 1-00 048 1.3 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONV1CHIN 88â‚¬-LEâ‚¬ 8 sqft 8 sqft 8 sqft r-1 191 1 - %9 ~ M; - U NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS ALIUS LJ ob\'H MAIN LEVEL NLA : 3,385 sq.ft. 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 389 sq ft f LOWEL LEVEL NLA : 3,450 sq.ft. UNIT 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 TOTAL PROJECT NIA : 6,835 sq.ft. 45 sq R 45 sq ft 45 sqft| 45 sq ft 45 sq ft 45 sq ft 45 sq n **** 36 sq.ft. of area found in exterior storage areas are not addressed in the calculation 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 389 sq ft Â·St as their necessary allocation is unknown **** UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 7 4 U) U -1 12 sqft - I Z LU Â® MAIN LEVEL NET LIVABLE O- SCALE: 1/8" = 1-0 0 4' 8' 'E co NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS UNIT BREAKDOWN ('PYR Cil ! . AL US CL.GN CORPS.C ..L RIGH[SRESERVED ififf./.* -2 -III-0.-----------i ---- UNIT i. . DRAWING SET ISSUE UNIT 1 852 Exs'INGCONDiTIONS 9,30/2016 UNIT 2 Â· UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 UNIT 2 807 4i 5 sql 434 sq ft 434 sq ft 432 sq ft 1 :-8 h Cl n rl>Â· r*Â»*1 Ah Ft.. 3..:,1/ 11 . UNIT 3 861 .,1 U - 01 1 1 199~ 0.9 137 - 1;? 03'09 90 UNIT 4 861 i 1 1 1 UNIT 5 861 1 : Y~ Q NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS UNIT 6 861 ' ~ Lv-u~~l JI UNIT 7 866 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 43z. sa ft 432 sq ft ~ - .. 9 PROJECT No 1614 1: UNIT 8 866 UNIT 1 UNIT ; ' JNIT 5 UNIT 7 DRAWN BY M-E 1*&4. 4 - 2&&42- 3 Â® LOWER LEVEL NET LIVABLE SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4 8 16Â· 1.4 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONVI(]IM 8Â£Â£-lee \ I li j \1 IMPROVEiJENTSURPEJOLAT .1 1 \\ 1 \-1 1, 1 1 J S . le 1 \ \ 1 \ 12 7 0 Aspen Hills Condominiums r 1 <374 ,~~ / c - 1.-1 | 3 ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JULY 15,1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS - CONDOMINIUM UNITS A- 1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 AND A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, / 1 millut'. , f Â».24-"I..:3~- A -- -2. \ --ec>==.-7954.57%-Glj ' --~ x-= -Av -< --- -<~ --3-7 A -'g,-.0/-<,dcÂ£ - =uâ‚¬14-14 9 - ~fiÂ·Â·Â·- - .~232\\ \. ' / ,, i< / RECE ION NO. 136131 AND AS DEF NED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR al4\1\WEW* .4 r-V-Â»-er- 1 I ~-- <<-Â·:pll' ,/)~ -' , / .--- - 42- r - ---<-- ---= / ~437-----,IL~~--LI~2-2%2I \*E-OF SETBACKzf 5 /~--1ft- ~ ~ - ' ~144*Esse ASPEN HILLS, ACONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JULY 2,1969 INBOOK:241 ATPAGE 877 ASRECEPTION NO. ALIU S LFil -- --0 /3'89-46'90 34 /â‚¬488'< 66- -- - -- . - -- '\~ 3<--- - - 6-â‚¬~~Â·~jK;,~46'00 E 2,5.Q~ - / Â»+_136011 AND FIRSTAMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1969 INBOOK 243ATPAGE 83 AS 'SE=-- ~3 -*.11 1 / â‚¬ / ' 0 \ <412-0 - Â»t --- w RECEPTION NO. 136864, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; - ~,1-W- nÂ«LfÂ»Wy/3 ~ RE UND REFERRED TO IN IMIS FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMIâ„¢ENT DATED JULY A C,4 .J- 11=11- ____ _< . g.0 - i i ,kIV'. . 7 -0-/0 --- f IRâ‚¬10' ' - - ~ 4 14 2016 1.9 LOCâ€¢lla W RE COUNTY Cy-,1770,~ STA IE- ar COLORADO AND IS A,GRE PAR;7CUARL Y 7% 0. . - -/Â»r ---- --r-(pâ‚¬ I y _----rhn \ 3 -<400\ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~ ~.~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMWIâ„¢ENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONDOMINRUM UNITS A-1, A-2, 8 0 p.- 9 1 V - W=â„¢ I U 7 1 - ~ 7 -- -- --- - -~ h.e. A 1 + 4 \\ f /41\\ \ h. A-1 A-4, A-5. A-6. A-7 AND A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF 1/UA_A./O/Zbt/ JV . ~ 2 '\ RECORDED JULY 15, 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS RECEPTION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND , di, DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARAT?ON FOR ASPEN HILLS. A CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JULY Z '~ Bushes i 1*~Il 1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEPTION NO. 136011 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED / 1 - t R*l SEPTEMBER 5, 1969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS RECEPTION NO. 136864, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; ' N \ Ed 7/M EXCEPT THAT PORWON OF 1HE COMMON AREA CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF 5 SURVEY DEMONSTRATES i> <22 - \\ i -\ ~- K~ ~~, <~=~ 5-0 ,Â«'â€ž~ THE MTKIN COUNTY HOUSNG AUTHOR,TY BY AGREEMENT DATED JULY 14 1974 AND RECORDED J,Ly 12, -0 8-0 j / SUBECT TO 776Â£ FOLLOH,NG EXCEPNOVS PER SAID nlZE COVA#/MENT NO. 160Â£U559 10' 'i40,=10' 50.4' / 1 7 -NE XÂ«1~1~\2\ - 1974 IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229. AS RECEPnON NO. 205645. COUNTY OF PinaN, STATE OF COLORADO. ' 7 ./// W & ALL MINERAL RIGHTS UNDERLYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. (Nothing to show) (9(:49 EXIST. NON-CONFORMITY ~ f .~ p*7 f /-- 9. THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, WITH THE EXCEPnON OF THE SURFACT, MAY BE ENTERED BY THE i ' PROF'RIETOR OF ANY OTHER VEIN, LODE OR LEDGE, THE TOP OR APEX OF WHICH UES OUTSIDE OF THE 1, L BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANTED PREMISES, SHOULD THE SAME IN ITS DIP BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR / V\# BUILDING DIRECTLY ON . v ki,4*k- m INTERSECT OR EXTENT INTO SAID PREMISES FOR lHE PURPOSE OF: EXTRACnNG AND REMOVING THE ORE \ ' FROM SUCH OTHER VEIN, LODE OR LEI)GE; AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY OÂ»14272 6. 0 4\1% V , 1 -\Ph.)\ - 6. 1 1,1 10.0 9.0 THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT, RECORDED JUNE 28, N PROPERTY LINE BEYONDA-- 4 _2-4.-~,p;r ~1~ \ 1\ Ch \ 1 1 \\\ 1892, IN BOOK 39 AT PAGE 78, AS RECEPTION NO. 047892, AND IN â„¢E UNITED STATES PATENT, \ 3.0 101 ' 10. TERMS, CONDInONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS AND RIGHE INGRESS AND -1 RECORDED MAY 20. 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 170, AS RECEPTION NO. 096346i~Nothing to show) ----- - -'Lu \ , ' EGRESS, SPECIFIED UNDER THE WARRANTY DEED, DATED JANUARY 21, 1965, AND RECORDED APRIL 12, 5' SETBACK42 .a.Â·,- ' ~ ~nney / Detal) 1965, IN BOOK 212 AT PAGE 322, AS RECEPTION NO. 120355. (Tract of land aa shown hereon In Parcel I f 1 <\f ' jI, I / 11. lERMS, CON[)InONS, PROWSIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS SPECIFIED UNDER lHE CONDOMINIUM DECLARAnON FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED JULY 2, 1969, AND RECORDED JULY 2, 1969, IN ~ ;Ax :0 <1\ I i DECLARAnON FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 1969, AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER LU BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877, AS RECEPTION NO. 136011, AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO CCÂ»IDOMINIUM 5.1969, IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83. AS RECEPTION NO. 136864. (As shown hereon) CL 1% i Unlt A-8 1. 1 1 HateN ~~ 1-# ~~ ~ 7958.510 ~ 1~iti,t -1- Unit A-Â·-2 ~Â·Â·Â· Â· 1 Utility / \ Unit A-4 Unit A-6 , 12. ANY AND ALL NOTES. EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP 111 14 OF ASPEN HULS PLAL RECORDED JULY 15, 1969, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8, AS RECEPTION NO. N,lilli, 9-0 4.0, Eavi CondomIntums 136131. (As shown hereon.) < ANNE)(AnON PLAT, RECORDED JUNE 14, 1971, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 200, AS RECEPTION NO. -Ill=.j ; 1 1.1 A:pen Hms 80 1 1 j 3 14. lERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS. AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER lHE AGREEMENT, ' 1Â· (8 Unite) 48. ____zI.:26:EJ.* L'.9 ~ 1 g~ \ 1 ~ 146081.(Tract of land 08 ihown hereon M Parcel Det(0) h 4 110-1,1;1 205645. (Nothing to ihow) 13. ANY AND ALL NOTES, EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED ASPEN HILLS 81-Boaked--331=.111 -----------star 15,159.5 Sq Ft (Typical 15. TERMS, CONDInONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPEaFIED UNDER THE DECREE R-1=15.0 1 4 0.348 Ac Â· DATED JULY 10, 1978. AND RECORDED JJLY 12, 1978, IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTION NO. 1 Â· b,'Â· 111, NE),1 888. AS RECEPTION NO. 255947. NOTE THIS EXCEPTION AFFECTS UNIT: A-2 ONLY. (Nothing to show) CD . , Unit *-7 1 Unit A-1 Unit A-5 QUIETING TITLE. DATED DECEMBER 5,1983. AND RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1983, IN BOOK 457 AT PAGEE Unit A-3 44 6 , i~ 2 i j 16. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAMONS SPECIFIED UNDER THE GRANT OF 0...4 - 1 11 \ 3 ~~ EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 1. 2006. AND RECORDED MAY 22, 2006. AS RECEPTION NO. 524387. (Nothing to 17. ANY ED(ISING LEASES OR TENANGES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER 10 i , ahow) SAID LESSEES. (Nothing to show) / '41. - ---1.-I _._ _._._.._._.--4.-Â·-4.5*al. , : ~Â· ~ LEGEND AND NOTES: ' 92- 3PYR GHT 2016 AL US DES GN '--1 1 \ 13 r| 1 2011'SUC ~41-SREs~~D \ 1 - S INDICATES SET NO.5 REBAR WITH A 1 1/4* RED PLASE CAP LE NO. 33638 p# 4 --. ~ ~ - 0 NOC,1 729 FOUND NO.5 REBAR -77/ A 1 1/4- >ZZLOW PLASUC CAP LS Na 9018 DRAWING SET ISSUE ~ R.re R . 1 2 Ila I LX - UNIT OF MEASUREMENT: US SUFMY FOOT - .1 7 / R R-5 4 - DATE OF- SURVEY: NOVEMBER 09 2014 EX,SIÂ·ING CONDITIONS 9/30/2016 FLOODPLAIN) PER FEMA MAP PANEL NO. 08097C0203C DATED JUNE 04,1987 TAKEN ~ - THE PROPERTY E LOCATED IN ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED m BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR GPS PNT. #1 1 ' 1- --- - U FROW â„¢E FEMA MAP SERMCE CENTER AND lHE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING Dev.-7945.54' DEPARâ„¢ENT VEBSITE THIS PROF'ERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A MUDFLOW HAZARD I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ACCÂ¢WD/NG 7D mE c/zy , ASPEN 27.UNLIFING DEPAR7UENT ASPEN MOUNDI/N ( \ 6-NtÂ¢,17f-7' ~ \ -2Lm4~~~~___ ~ MUD,ZON' /,A,ZMD UAP. 77,Z- PR~977,84Sa,EFACCESS 711Â£>ISTH~*SNS,kEM,r - - - ELEVATIONS BASED UPON aTY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENTAMON CONTROL POINT NUMBER 4 / ~ A DEDICATED PUBLIC STREET. AND lHERE IS NO RECORDING INFORMATION FOR A DEDICATED ALLEY ACCESS WAY PER GRAPHIC SCALE aTY OF ASPEN El_EVATION AT 792&42 FEET (GM/al Common Element) Lle Table GCELI I S 8943'10~ E I 11.920 NO. 9018 ON THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR \\ UNE BEARING LENGTH - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON FOUND NO.5 REBAR WTH A 1 1/4Â» YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L. S SCEU | N 4'34*42* W 1 2.54 1 1/4' YELLOW PLASHC CAP STAMPED TRICO AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAJO SITE PLAN /1 - FU I N 85Â·44'33~ E 1 36.op ASPEN HILLS CONDO 81< 4, PG 4 USING A BEARING OF S 21'39'50" E BEâ„¢EEN THE TWO \ C n'.ET) GCEL4 1 S 4'54'55' E I 10.10 1 1 - \ - THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A nTLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE %OT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 tioh - 10 fl GCE1-5 I N 83Â·44'33~ E I 107.740 DESCRIBED MONUMENTS - LEGENQ OWNERSHIP OR m DISCOVER EASEDWENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD. AU 03 - Electric Meter 1 UNE I 8EARING 1 LENGTH PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMIâ„¢ENT DATED JULY 14, 2016 DRAWN BY M TE PROJECT No 1614 UNE TABLE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OMVERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD * = Scott Ar 111 N 0'250- W 1 00.460 FILE NO. 16003559 E 215.00' 4~1 - Electric Meter ~ = Runian Olive ~ 1 Il S 4Â·34'42. E 1 65.47' Ill N 89Â·43'10- W I 11,92 A. 1 ~~Er Ml - Telephone Box 14| S 85Â·44'33- W | 10.17 1 \01 Parcel Detail 49# El (23 LSI . 0,3Â·0Â· W 1 44.02 = Fruit Tree 1 181 S 09 46'0- E 1 37.07' - Electric Box I L7| S 94'42' E | 19.30 51/Rkf-yCR'i CER77*70,17E.Â· U-â€¢ 12. SCALE: 1" = 560' A - Irrigation valve e - A.pen 1 Lal S 85 44'3r W 1 20.87 1 Lgl S 415'27* E 1 3.42 &8 - Irrigation Control Box SprUCe 011 N 413'27- W I 142 TO FIRST AMERICAN nTLE INSURANCE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL 00| S 85Â·44'33- W I 777' 1. EFFREY ALLEN 11)771Â£ BE}NG A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO 00 HEREBY CERTIFY I L12| 5 00'44 33Â» W I 38.83' MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY Of THE PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS. BOTH FOUND AND SET. UNDER MY DIRECT IDAI':fly $-rld'=Lk L--1 12=9 81> Nl - Gas Meter 0 = Cottonwood 1 /31 S 415'2/E 1 142 SUPERVISION AND CHECKING; THAT IT E CORRECT TO RE BEST OF MY BEUEF AND KNOMEDGE AND THAT ALL Tract 81< 212, PG 322 1 M N 4-13'2r W I 142 1 OIl S 65'44'3Y W I lit-r DIMENSIONS. 80â„¢ UNEAR AND ANGULAR WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY IN â„¢E FIELD WHICH * HII Ann-tim 9 E MI. /h\4$034%4 ----, 6~ih~~0*2 e'-4/'ZISFi81=aaE @ = Cleanout & -Scrub Oak I USI S 415'27~ E 1 48.05 BALANCED AND CLOSED VATHIN A UMIT OF 1 IN 15,000 ('HICH COMPUES NTH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS 814:mâ‚¬*In~#BAR#*miL...1â‚¬E~â‚¬4 ,# -7 ip= 1 I l.171 N 854433~ E I 14.03' FOR A LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND nILE SURVEYS): I Lod, 99 e = Utility Pole -I - Wooden gate I LMI S 415'l/E 1 22.57 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVD,ENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2016, ~~ 4-1: A UQI S 85Â·44'33" W I 1403 EXCEPT UnUTY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY VATHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL EXCEPT AS SHOWN AND THAT - Guy Wire Overhead Power LIne I L:01 s flogr F I 18.10' THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAL PARCEL. S he.r~a.45' I I.211 N 85 44'33~ F I 21 4 / 4 41 â€¢-d #5 R~. JM --t,iFf. 1, [.1-,07W9-,7/ 9 .d& 4/ VA = Reciprood 0 - Santtary ME~hole I t.24[ . 415'27~ E I 1.84 z - Mattox czz==z=Z=nz. = Ralroad tte Retaining wall I L22I S 415 27- E 1 6.58Â· EXCEPT AS NOTED. I t.23| S 85 44'33~ W I 2.14 A~0-" 61 71 1/4Â· Y.00â€¢ Plaâ€¢tic Cap .t-p.d - 9ll ~to & P.O.8. of Troct N 09Â·46'0- W 121.27 1 bk 212, p, 322 S 89Â·46'0~ E 255.59' -~ NfÂ¥9Â£54*71926/.0/,079./ - . - .2./elL.&,= CURVE TABLE I 215.000 CURVE I LENGTH ~ RADIUS ~ CHORD ~ BEARING I IFTREY ALLEN TUTTLE LS 33638 DATE cl 137.30' 1 22.50' 33.22' 1 S 42Â·39'39~ Wl 2.1 - 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV aNV-lalIN 8â‚¬â‚¬-I.Â£â‚¬ ' i j * -. IMROVEMENTSU.. FEKPL,47 1 \ \ ' 1 1 ~,~_ ,</ 9 Aspen Hills Condominiums \ .1 \.1 \ 1 lei 1 \ \ . 1 1.. 7 J 14 1 j //\ -7, \ 1 3- CONDOMINIUM UNITS A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 AND A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, -1 t --- , ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JULY 15,1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS , 77 4 -/1 - /3.- g~ , g / ./ / / ~ , RECEPrION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR / Â·Â· / . 0 1,f,4* ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JULY 2,1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEFTION NO. 1 6X J I \./- 4 , / S 837-*'09 :14*8' .- 4 -- ~~19-1- - 9779=Â«-1,;.1,15.02 / \I .-.13601 1 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS J %712Â·0 /- 7 / \--- / ,-06. -CSÂ« . E F RECEFrION NO. 136864, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; 7 / 77Â¢E LAND REFERRS) m /N ;MS FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMIWENT DATED Uff 14. 2016 /S LOCATED N THE COUNTY OF PmaN, STATE OF COLORADQ AND E A,ORE PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: --9\ -I ' A-3, A-4 A-4 A-6, A-7 AND A-4 ASPEN HILLS. A CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING T[) THE MAP THEREOF 1 3 - RE UIND REFERED WIN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONDOMINIUM UNITS A-1. A-2. 2 -- turvc... - W $ - --- 07-Er -- \ RECORDED JULY 14 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS RECEPTION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND k. % , DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARAT}ON FOR ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM. RECORDED .ULY 2, Bushes ~ < 1969 W 806* 241 A T PAGE 877 AS RECEPRON NO. 136011 *VD f7957 *VE,Val/EVT 77Â£?E-70 RECIDED \ \ / 1 j ~L--X - 81,~2\ -~Â·% \ \ x m R. .527Et,80?4 1969/A/8002#JATPAGEBUASRECEPNOVNC 136864; AnGNCOUNn. COLÂ®ID@ 6 EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE COMMON AREA CONVEYED TO â„¢E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF- THE PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BY AGREEMENT DATED JULY 10. 1978. AND RECORDED JULY 11 \.~ \~ R- ~~ -_ HIS 87095;Fly /S SUBECT 70 77/E FULOH,Ve Â£Â¥CEPROWS PER SeD 77'ZE Cal/,4//71/ENT NO. 16001559 \\ I-- 0 Â«0 9.k- c 1974 IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTION NO. 205645. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. . 2" 4.-10' 52.4 8. ALL MINERAL- RIGHTS UNDERLYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. (Nothhg to show) \,O (GCE> J , , 42 9. THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SURFACT, MAY BE ENTERED BY THE -h \/0/ N ir , ~ PROPRIETOR OF ANY OTHER VE]N, LODE OR LEDGE, THE TOP OR APEX OF WHICH LES OUTSIDE OF THE % 2,4 WIMV - 40 43 7 INTERSECT OR EXTENT INTO SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRAC11NG AND REMOVING THE ORE 1 FROM SUCH OTHER VEN LODE OR LEDGE; AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY . )~ -~ BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANTED PREMISES, SHOULD THE SAME IN ITS DIP BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR 11- 1 Â·1%. Â· ' -\ I<_1 .rd 1892. IN BOOK 39 AT PAGE 78. AS RECEPTION NO. 047892. AND IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT, RECORDED .UNE 28, A 1/4 4 i , 5 \.1 \ RECORDED MAY 20, 1949. IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 170, AS RECEPTION NO. 096346. (Nothing to show) 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS. PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND --T \\ 1. 1 1 1\1\\ / .TA .i i% Ii\ 1 EGRESS, SPECIFIED UNDER THE WARRANTY DEED, DATED JANUARY 21, 1965, AND RECORDED APRIL 12, ; -v-41-21-1.1~ 6----q- 1965, IN BOOK 212 AT PAGE 322, AS RECEPTION NO. 120355. (Tract of land as ahown hereor, In Parcel Detail) , DECLARATION FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED JULY 2 1969 AND RECORDED JULY 2, 1969, IN ri ' Chimney i\\\ 2 \ \\ \ 1\ \4ji lf, 4 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPEamED UNDER THE CONDOMINIUM ~ BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877, AS RECEP11ON NO. 136011, AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM ~4% , 104 1 0 i Leveli~ : \ 1~ ~1j ~' ~E 12. ANY AND All- NOTES, EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON â„¢E RECORDED CONOOMINIUM MAP \ 0/' , .1 15 Ill111 1 11 92. ' 1& M X \\\\ \ \\\\ 4 1 low 5 5. 1969. IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83, AS RECEPTION NO. 138864. (As ahown hereon) DECLARATION FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 1969, AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER Hatcli , 138131. (As shown herein.) 1\ \ 1 14 )-1 UnR A-4 d.n A-0 Unit A-8 . 1 Utility / I h' N ]0 9 Unit A-2 1,1, OF ASPEN HULS PLAT, RECORDED JULY 15, 1969. IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8. AS RECEPTION NO. . 1 y W '1 (aCES-... 1 7958.51' * |f r & 4 t (GCE) / Aipm Hm. 13. ANY AND ALL NOTES. EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED ASPEN HILLS \ - . 1 t \L/9 ANNEXAnON PLAT. RECORDED JUNIE 14, 1971, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 200, AS RECEPTION NO. 146061.(Tract of land as shown hereon in Parcel Detail) (8 Units) 4'xE Er. 1 1 4.0' Ecve Condornlnlums ~ ~ DATED Ally 10. 1978, AND RECORDED JULY 12, 1978, IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTON NO. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPEaAED UNDER THE AGREEMENT, 9 - 15,159.5 Sq Ft (Typleal Â¢â‚¬ 11,1 1 205645. (Nothing to ,how) 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROMSIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS SPECIFIED UNDER THE DECREE 0.348 Ac. Unit A--7 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~~2;~ Â· QUIETING TITLE. DATED DECEMBER 5, 1983, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1983. IN BOOK 457 AT PAGE 1 R.W.*'.0 4 1 >$ 4 . i\ ~ 'N ~ 111 / 888, AS RECEPTION NO 255947. NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION AFFECTS UNIT: A-2 ONLY. (Nothing to show) 1 /0 8\7~=120 -J . Untt A-5 >08> + 16. TERMS, CONDInONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER THE GRANT OF I , ' H 4 6\ 1\\ ; EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 1, 2006, AND RECORDED MAY 22, 2006, AS RECEPTION NO. 524387. (Nothing to Unit A-3 \1 1 3 - Â·. 1% I 3-0 ~ ' 17. ANY E)OSTING LEASES OR TENANCIES. AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY. THROUGH OR UNDER .how) i Â·it# 4.42 . f, I 1 61 RÂ« 11 ; SAID LESSEES. (Nothing to show) \ 1 4 LEGWD AND NolES> i 4 0-111'il'' 1 1 / t -7 \ 1 \ 4.5' Eave c__z' L ~ ~ - 0 INDICATES SET NO.5 REBAR WTH A 1 1/4* RED PLASTIC CAP La NO. 33638 L 2-%5~20 ~ \1 I , 2 -37-y--*~-_-ref__-_27j 1 ~/ 0 .0 -- \1111 11; L -- L *#Fi" - '. i -- -90 - - 0 INDICA,ES FOUND NO.5 REBAR *1771 A 1 1/4- yELLOW PLAS710 CAP La Na 9018 R=5'4 , i | - DA 7Er OF SURMFI NOW)EER 09, 2014 R Â· .11 - UNIT Of MEASUREMENT: US SURVEY FOOT -*EN-73~~ 430 1 / ' nt h 11 1 S 8544' 3Â» Â¥ 78. N 85Â·25 * E 1 1 ~ R-101 \ , ~ < - 77#5 8-0Â¥Ty /S LOCA 7ED IN ZaVE X URE=AS MBm/NED 7D BE OU73@DE SOO YEAR City of Aspen --_.J I FROM THE FEMA MAP SERVICE CENTER AND THE a Pr OF ASPEN ENGINEERING FLOODPLAIN) PER FIMA MAP PANEL NO. 08097C0203C DATED JUNE 04. 1987 TAKEN GPS PNT. 01 \ + m 4 2.0' IM.Fon--~-~-2- i / Fi l 8 \ \ \ ' t L ---1 -1 DEPARTMENT WEBSITE. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A MUDFLOW HAZARD / DESIE,NG TO THE OXâ‚¬ CE ASPEM ENGINEERING DEPARâ„¢ENT ASPEN MOUNTAIN MUDFLOW HAZARD MAP. THE PROPERTY HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO EAST HOPKINS AVENUE A 022*:47ED PUBUC SIREE?. AND /HERE /5 NO RECO95Â¥NG /W-MU,4 7704 FOR A 1 r,-4 - . 1 Acor - DEDICATED ALLEY ACCESS WAY PER Rim=7954.24' 1 - ELEVAT]ONS BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENTATION CONTROL PaNT NUMBER 4 Inv. In=7946.96'~ 4 e -- - --- \ GRAPHIC SCALE aTY OF ASPEN ElEVKnON AT 7925.42 FEET (General Commort Elcment) Une Table Inv.Out=794* . ~fff, 2 10 LINE BEARING LENGTH - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON FOUND NO.5 REBAR WTH A 1 1/C YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS. I .0 . GCED I S 89-43'10- E I 11.92 NO. 9018 ON THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR \\ @CEL.2 1 N 4'54'4/ W ! 2-54 1 1/C YELLOW PLASne CAP STAMPED TRICO AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID }// 1 - - -I.-- -Wil) \ GCEU I N 85-44'33~ E 1 38.00' ASPEN HILLS CONDO BK 4, PG 8, USING A BEARNG OF S 21 '39*50' E BET,EEN THE TWO GCEL4 1 S 434'/C E 1 10.10' IM I N 65Â·44'33' E 1 107.74 DESCRIBED MONUMENTS. -- 1 inch -10 n. - THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A 7111Â£ SEARCH BY 7HIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE 3- LEGEND OWNERSHIP OR TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OfR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES Of RECORD. ALL LINE TABLE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OWNERSHIP. EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD EC - Electric Meter UNE I .*NG 1 LENGTH PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMIâ„¢ENT DATED AILY 14, 2016 â€¢* = Scott Fir li| N 6250- W 1 08.46' FILE NO. 16003559 S 89*464 E 215.00' ~ - Electric Meter Â© = Russian Olive LI| S 4,447 E 65.47 Ul N 89*431(r W 1 11.92' ...1 1.7.88' k 1 3 - Telephone Box LII S 854433- W 1 10.17 1Y K Parcel Detail 8 1. re m - Electric BOX ~EkEZQES..CZEZZEZGME- 0 - Fruit Tree N ~ 24%-1 ' 44.02' 3472/4 821<9 SCALE: 1" = 500' LBI S 854433~ W 1 20.87 E / ~ME-.-1-* R - - A - Irrigation Valve VI S 4,527- E 1 3.47 L71 S 4Â·54 42* E 19.30 e = Aspen LJOI 5 85Â·44'33- W | 777 1. EFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, BEING A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY ~ i./ r 91/6,â€¢2'r'&~113*A- Â¤ - Irrigation Control Box Â® = Spruce oil N 415'27- W I 3 42' TO ARST AMERICAN Imf INSURANCE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL tri ~ %221 ~~130*4FJ U21 S 85Â·44'31 / 1 30.Sy MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS, BOTH FOUND AND SET, UNDER WY DIRECT ~ = Cottonwood '131 s 415'27 6 1 3Â·42 SUPERVISION AND CHECKING; THAT IT IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE AND THAT ALL Â£9 - Gas Meter 04| S 85Â·44'Jr W 1 777' DNENSIONS. BOTH UNEAR AND ANGULAR WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY IN THE FED WHICH 1Â· Tract SK 212, Pe 322 Ull N 41527- W 3.42 BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A UMIT OF 1 IN 15,000 (WHICH COMPUES WITH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Alm HIll Ann,xatien @ - ae.out <0 -Scrub Oak *1% ./- I lm W A 1 37.070 -*#.il- LUI S 415'27 E 1 49.65 22 5.*a--42**4 07| N 8544'33- E 1 14.03 FOR A LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSW LAND TITLE SURVEYS): j e - Utility Pole â€¢-Â·--- - Wooden gate U 81 S 4-15'27" T | 22.87 FURTHER CERTFf RAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON â„¢E ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2016, Lode 99 L-1QI S 85Â·44'33~ W 1 14.03' EXCEPT UTIUTY CONNECTIONS ARE ENTIRELY VITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL. EXCEPT AS SHOWN AND THAT A portion of Miscotte bk 4, p, ViV - Guy Wire - = Overhead Power Une .01 5 41'27 6 1 18.10' THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL ~ C Lode acirn m = Mailbox Ull N 85Â·44%,r E 1 214 ~r Rec. No. 120355 f--=q--BA -mwawEA,#*1*6983#2Â¥.*49*,ve-9 Â£ 34/9~07*JI~.6. c====, = Railroad tie Retaining wall WI S 415'27- E | 6.58' EXCEPT AS NOTED. ly I S 85Â·44*W- W 1 11 4 ~ - Reclprocal @ - Sanitary Manhole L24I S 415'27 E Ill84' X N 89Â·48'0- W 121.21 1 bk 212, pg 322 S 89-46'0~ E 25539' I CUR. 1 LING. I RADIUS I CHORD ! BEARING I Â£77=REY ALLEN R/nZE LS ,13638 DATE CURVE TABLE I N 89'46'0~ W 215.000 1 Cl | 37.36' |22.5(r | JJ22' 1 6 42Â·39'J@~ WI **eÂ· TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES 160 Midland D-:09/27/2016 0-,n by: DMC 727 Blake Avenue *y -Ut.,6 --9 9-tâ€¢r VOU Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT Aspen Colorado. 81611 2 \2014\ASPENHILLS ~inf *SCe-- rucA */bet /9 no -Gly CONDO\160AUDLAND. DWG anÂ¥ Upat och- 6-=0 ~pon ma, *M (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) 7'rom *A, cid, 0/ i. c-Â¢0'91*0â€ž d~ou,11 TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES Emall- le#Ot"-us. com OF ~ ALIUS 1 O 97 1 387 rih 1 7 --- - I - - _ _11Â·==c =11-_ f f 2 - J J_ i -11 =-jyglf f _ _ _ . _ _ _ ly- _i 1.- -4 - _ f f - _- L 30 it Off f _ _ _ _ 14.- E f----2-1---I---JILL.---4. -Â·z Â·Â·iÂ·i -iÂ·_ r:_P=i:-_-hz'Â·"r- '- Â® 11 9 - 11 UNIT 2 UNIT 6 4 ~1u1 4 - 1 UNIT 4 UNIT 8 00-111 0~ 1 1 WIW + 11Â· 7-n--1 ]Iup UP Ptl 4 1 1 /1111111 ,/111-1 Lili# 1 1 11 11 V folt, i :It ~11 2-3 L [Lt- I '' '' ' '' i I 1 1 11 f.-14 1 2 i / \ / 1.11 2 1 11[1-115] ff Y 13 -12=4 - 6 \1111- 1-rp 711 1 1 r- \11 up A \H// c 1 -4.------8 .-OP,R..11.1 1:SCEIGN / UP 1[ 1/ . \.-1 UP 0/ 16/ 1 L up -11 417 SORPSLL' ALLRGHTSRESERVED Fl~ M DRAWING SET ISSUE C IIi 11 Ex 3- NG CONDIT ONS 9/30/2016 Â»Â» TR----7 L=Â»j 407 10-01 1/ LO Al e -- C If I I i L UNIT 1 s UNIT 3 - D UNIT 5 < UNIT 7 1 1 LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1 Ill .... - - 11 1 - I' -' 11Â»~1-V---117-1=11 46t~-+-fr~ ~l .c , 7Jvi-=i -- -- ----11--6--2-Ii Z Â® NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | PROJECT Nlo 1614 DRAWNI BY Ml E Â® LOWER LEVEL PLAN SCALE. 1/4" = 1Â·-0- . 2 4Â· 8 3.1 SllIH N3dSV 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV aNV1(]IIAI BEE-LEE 928 A L I U S C- 3 Lil 4*-/7% 9*V' 1 LJ l.1 11 11~ 11 IJ L I ll 10:~ ~Â· 1, 11 1 : 11 1, 11 DECK E-Â»j ni Ib 7.. ___ Il ' ' 1 1 4 1 - IF--11 lb=====n ~Jf ILzr--=====-ir 2 1,11 11 Â® co I Z LU UNIT 2 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 60 61 1 f < S TORAGE ABOVE E'' ''1 ~ ~~. -STARS,YF 1 4- 1 4 j 1 1 - - -1 ON -m 1 I j ~ --r - a 1 -44 , : 7 i HI ON m z 1---- ~ p 9 9 DECK --- 11 0, 1 1 2 - 1 DN [-1- 121 -- 1 1-1.-1 DN 1 1 2 11 L. - 1 DN,1[1 li li E~ 1'' 2 7- U 31 -11- F'-1 % 1 LI-~1[-~1 111==4=-1 r---- 1(~, .X:PYRIC;11120â„¢ALUSDENION KITCHEN l.2LkiliÂ·~I KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN 1,1 1 0 2{)RP!611/ ALL~iOHEREELRVED DRAWING SET ISSUE - 04 FXISTINGCONDITIONS 9/30/2016 UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 7 i LIVING ROOM - L MAIN LEVEL PLAN ~ NNOOTT FFOORR CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIiOONN f Ir--11 r-- --1 1 Ik - 1-Â»P ~ PROJECT No 1// I E-11 -NEY M-E DECK U l-1 1 Il Il' ~-1 in,i c. n li [I li ri ni, 11 ri - (2 0 il [I 1==t I A 2 Â® MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 1-0' 0 2 4 8 3.2 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONV-1(]HAI 888-LEE ALIUS 9 l 13-9 co - 1 1 Il L. 917 - I Z LU ] . - 0- CO 1 -1 /3\ - 3 / 1:12/ r . I ~1:12~. 1 - L r ~1:12/ 1. r 1 COPYRIC)!i '01,6A IJSDESGN - V 00/]SLIC All RIGHTSRESERVED - ' - DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDITIONS 9.30/2016 -J 1 - 1 - r 1 -- -- - - -- -. - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - - PROJECT No 1614 1- - 1 DRAWN Bv MTE - 1 - 1 ~ ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/ln = 1,-0 0 2 4' 8 3.4 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONVIC]IIN 9â‚¬Â£-LEE 1111"1 - 11 1- 9 (i) ~\\ ALIUS .1 lilli 11111,1 1108Â·-0Â· 0 01 LINEASSUMEDGRAOE WALL -- - -- - -- - - - -- -41 -- 1 -- -- -- 1- -- ___ _-- _-_ ___ __- --- ___N-_ ___ -__ ___ _-_ _- ___ .1001.0 L'rOND 7MAN-LEE- 1 | i~ p - , -- HATCHEDARLA ----- ------------ OFEXPOSEDLL *A!19 SE[SHLL! 13 | 1 1 189 0 -'FLOWERLEVEL 1 - ~ 1 ) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" I,Â·OPÂ¥...:"rili 1. DtboN I * |CORPS UC ALL IGHISRESERvED | ~DRAWING SET ~ ISSUE ~ ~EXISTINGCONDITIONS' 9/30/2016 1 1108Â·-0 ||L|| J L 3 Â¥UFFER-LEVEL ~ NORTH &SOUTH ELEVATIONS ~ mi'Im Eli E n==]lillin=111 111 11 111 11~11 111 11 111 12611_=1 FT FOR CONSTRUCTION I 'PROJECT /0 1614/ i I ~DRAVABY MTE | - - i lEif INDOW BEYOND I ~---- L NE OF GRADI: - - - -- --- ---- ,/ \ 0 1 OWER L EVEI WAH BEYOND -7GAINIEVEL GRADE aKIDEWAILK - HAICHEDAUR,A~ 1 . OPEC> IRADL | | | ~ OFEXPOSED. WAIS : BEYOND 1) -- -- SEESHE,113 1 1 1 1 1 ----m E-1 uSQUIH-ELEMATION ~ ~ j SCALE 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· 911IH N3dSV 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONÂ¥-101181 8â‚¬Â£-1.â‚¬Â£ 9 0 / ALIUS 108.-0.,h UPPER LEVELI UPPER LEVEL *108'-0 11 -f-- - 1 NE ASSUMED (:MIC - 100'-0-6 r MAIN LEVELT | V/## / A - - URl 1 MAIN LEVEL CEll HAT./.ARLA l 891-01'Ch . EXPOSED U *Al IS - LOWER LEVELT IOWER LEVEL SLL SULET 1'3 --- ~ C-) WEST ELEVATION ' ~ ' SCALE 104" = 1'-0 0 2Â· 4' 8' 3 + ( .15YRIGH. 01/ /'6DLION ORPELIC All RICHISHESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EX]STING CONDITIONS 9,30/2016 108.-0.Ch UPPER LEVELT UPPER LEVEL *108'-0 1 00 [flfl EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS - 1 N. ASSUMED GMDE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1001-0211 4100'-0 PROJECT No 1614 MAIN LEVELT f -- -- -- - 7.2*384 MAIN LEVEL DRAWN BY MTE - Â»321 89-0"ch LOWER LEVELT LOWER LEVEL Â¢89 0 Â® EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4'Â· = 1-0 0248 4.2 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONÂ¥10IIAI 8â‚¬84â‚¬2 SllIH N3dSV 3 9 1 1 1 ALIUS - 1081-9219 S *108'-0" UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVELT 100'.0'6 ' 400'.0 MAIN LEVELT | | MAIN LEVEL 1 [ LI.. 89'-0'ch LOWER LEVELT LOWER LEVEL ~89'-0 ~ SECTION'A' SCALE. 1/4" = 1Â·.0 0/4 8 O Ot-;+412(1$t,AL:~EDLS,GN i ORPS'/ AL'R..SRES. RVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDII IONS 9/30/2016 1 1 d b U U L U U I J N N U U U U U LI - fit 108-0" UPPER LEVEL~ rI SECTIONS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTNo 1614 DRAWN BY MTE 100-0'1 2 ~ . MAIN LEVELT | - - -4> U'-+ 0 0 89'-O"d, LOWER LEVELT - gh SECTION 'B' SCALE 1/4- = 1'-0Â· 0 2 4Â· 8 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONÂ¥lalIN 888-LEâ‚¬ 911IH N3dSV 7Â»1 --' Â£ I 9/* . I j., 4 1 + ..60*1 V i 3, ' i: 4. .: '. 2' t 5 4 1 z i . 0 = -. k ~*. 1. ' ' 9444 ... pat b tlic 6=41&Â·*Â» â‚¬-R , W / -a-t.2 I J' * :\ 14*<1. 2 -- 1 * ri , ~\44 * -1/ 2. '1.Â¥.... .... I. 1 I * . '1 I. 9 ' 1, . I.'.< 2 1 3 I' 4 1% C # i J , , '11':1.4 --2 .1 0, CÂ» ~ k A -r. )- %' 114: Â·~ '116 1 ' , 1 4 r . 1 41 . . . 1 - 4; I -'Â·Â·r=-3/*.- 4 - f A - : - Â· Â·: M tÂ·.612 : f 4 4 4 I- .1 e , g k=*18= is.2 ----- I.....I .... U.. i 2 -Â«:f>244.13 ~~ #$4- I :%-V . X-\ - . e .0, 4 - Â¢ 1 11 V . W 0 & * .'r V / ./.A- 1% - I 'l.' . 4 .., 3 Â·4 ,:7't * C & 6- .. . ~*4~2066,=U . 1... Al 4 4- - P ./ ..:' I I .*.97... 2,9 ..1.4 1, 39 4- - I \0 - -:9Â·2 r 1.'.1.. /2.-:04:ki' ' 31*Ag~-3- 4 I -- 9%:/Stt,% '.1 ... 7..... -Â»jit'i*24â‚¬y' Ir&74.-:0 Qt p.g.,- r - 1 ) '61*frk.Ir.- .41;.4.1 f ke I -'. â€ž r 79.-r''k.k.44>Nk-1'.1 - ., - 2&.*f>.y... ....7:24 ~ 1 .....Li. 0.01.- .... Inv.9 11.- . ....../ - - Â¥44:9$â‚¬Â· ~1 ': Â· 1Â·9*Â¢t'4Â·Â·'~-1.-% - S MS*60% - /&022 K '~ -114 u.4- * jBTA*hy>472Â£~1 r: 7 - .... 1 2....4/1/1/Ett:/7/~ =Mr#.560 -4 # . /#9*:=...3.3.=55 t. ...P *, i 92&46/d 7 2. I. 8,4/NO#ib.. r - a . . :t I .,1.4.Ct I le. ..1 - i.~2., 6 & Â¢1 14 2.4 =* 9.M: -Ir/ 't--7 â‚¬M'liZ-Â·Illab ...:*........M.... Â· 4 *.24,d' I , * Â« P. + ... 2113*Ii:431/1.:2:i:,ill. - 4%... I =62. 41Â£. '/2/ p .. . ~ ~~ ~ ~~'~'42Vf~ w.p,? f~;- ~t.*pt~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ; 1 1 U . 4 1... 0 1~~ 1 40- W/9 9 . 7 E 3 90 6 bt- C) 430 3 . re 2 < CO r- O 1 0 = OZ .2 0% 2 9 0 &6 - 9 m ts ASPEN HILLS -W â€¢ 0 -1 1 ER 5 Z Im'. C ///.i- 331-338 MIDLAND AVENUE ASPEN, CO LA Â·Â·' U C 52 0 m a CD 'll"1 Ild i r "0% i % - .. 11 1 1 f Ill 1-/ - 5 1-~ 4 1, ALIUS 11 .1 .. b . ! I . c * I '16' e - 1 1 I ...:i.1 .1 I.Lifil. ' , -1 a iii ililli'M,1 ~ -' Rtt:7;t:t... ~ 44%*04Â·: ~.. ~Â·ikicit?. A,- 1 2 - 2 L--114?LE C . p. - â€¢ .Ummm , '.e 7. lilly'll--/% . --84 0 .. --,1 1 .Â¥4 7 V 4 /4 /- A - e. 0 1 1 1%111 7 44 L OPYR:GHT .1 t; AL US DLI ON LORPSIC All RGHISPÂ«/RVED DRAWING SET ISSUE . EXEDING CONDIT ONS 9 30'2016 | I *l .. CL*f Â·~ iÂ· r 1 .,i 1 t.or ip 1 .... 7 j & 119 11. ?4 - Â·4Â¥. 3 L tl~1 1 rh , SITE PHOTOS - .91-, i 11111'K NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT No 1614 , t ,!! MTE DRAWN BY $ 't 2, I L.=t:' f= A 1 51 r 1 / 11-- . J I .1 &1.2- -41'Â·'=L V ;45 " UE - T 6.2 611IH N3dSV 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONÂ¥1(111AI 8â‚¬Â£-1.Â£Â£ 4494 t. 1% 1 --1.- ...1.1... 316*k. * .. + : 9Â¥: .r r Â·.0 ' UL, ... / i#91* . -- . 9. Â»; 4#: ./ 6 .j, 4 ./ a. f,x:.1 'I . Â· ALIUS . I. 1 .Z. '1 : I.* '1 4 .. 1. 4 .4 cO - . . t -IJ ' 9 ..& I 1449 ' Z ,T- LU a. 4 ..,3 ? CO . 11 < 'Aillili 4.M"MI. . 9.=I ':.- 44*J 1.6*L Â£ 0,1 1 1.41--Il#~ =mb 412- .4//Wi.'ll ..11, , 4 (Ji]Â¥RCHT :Diri ALIJS DIS ON ... - ORPSLLC ALLIGHTSRLSERVED 4 3,7. DRAWING SET ISSUE 7*blt, .- EXIS-ING CONDITIONS 9 30 2[118 -- .illi,- -:.1//.I- * -1,1. 4,*911'.1,1-â€ž-- 1,-*1 U 1 . .vil... ,#. 1 1, , 1... t.>-fÂ¥44- r.f ..24 111. Ilitkill-1 . -2,! ~1 ~, 4.1 ji ,~' ~ I' -5. ....:, . 9 0 44 1 Â· .â€ž*.1,9.â€¢r n,-7' SITE PHOTOS 1, 1 -- ~OT FOR CONSTRUCTION LE &44< 1 {~ '; ~1 - PROJECT No 1614 f. 11111.1 ; 111 . v .... BY MTE I -1,11.......**fvl- 7................ 11 .113.8- i 1 ..1 .1 . lili lili Dll).1 11 1~11 i 'V. 11.141,14,1 ) 1 1 1 7 1. .11 11 -1 130*4*Â» 94%9 {44 6.3 4/4 k. W, t .,2 r 1 2Â¥} 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONV-101018Â£Â£-1.â‚¬E EXHIBIT ASPEN HILLS EXISTING CONDITIONS ALIUS DESIGN CORPS OCT 2 4 2016 Ct>P~ mdl IT 2216 ALIUS ['FbluN CORPS L_/ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTINGCONITIONS 9/302.16 TITLE SHEET â€¢ 901 FOR CONSTRUCTION I PRE>JECT No 1614 DRAWN BY MTE 1.1 911IH N3dSV 00 'NEIdSV 3nN3AV ONV101018Â£Â£-LEE ASPEN HILLS 1 SYMBOL & MATERIAL LEGEND GENERAL NOTES DRAWI NG I NDEX 1 1 TITLESHEET ALIUS 10 Alle*Istingcond~tiommustbever,ficdbytheconITactorinthe~Id Unknownandvaedconditionsmaybefound Notifythes~ucturaleng,necra//orafch,tectofanY ASSEMBLY DETAIL CUT <ty--- REFERENCE GRID LINE ~-- strucws'ofarchitecturalcond"lomfoundtowlyfrom "tind'cated"omthedrawings De,ign revislonsmayberequired, andaretobeexpectedas,prmÂ£of remodel 12 GENERAL INFORMATION DESIGN /DIPS work 13 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS T. O. RIDGE 2 0 Ii I new wol detils suffacas, or fir,shes shall rnatch ad,acent existing surface; unless noted or directed otherve by the owner c f inter,or designer Contractor to veay with 14 NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS architect anycon* between e*15,1. a~d ne*cor~,-r5 Â£.8 A 21 SITE PLAN SECTION CUT SPOT ELEVATION Â¢ BEAM 123 -6 ' ,Â· 30 Aelectricalmodificat,ons/nd/of addi[,orMtobea~der~ctedbyo,mer/Ilghtingdes,gr~rdu,ingconstructe Contractof/lightingdes,gnertover,frelectricalcapacityandreview new designs oralteTations with archutect ' to implementation 40 Allinter,orelectricalfixt-splumbillgfixtur.Indtfirn.cablnetdesign. andotheFf,nishestobeatthedi'ect~oftheownerorinter,ord.ignefunlennotedother-,se,nthe SURVEY drâ„¢p Contractortoprovidcall~eÂ¢Msaryprepworkforinstallatio~ofanymnatefials~srequi.ed EXTERIOR ELEVATION WINDOW MARK 0 50 Structurale.R.ing - ifanymlificationstothe.,stingstructura! swemaredeemednece~.764rdthes'*wninthedraw,5,@|la..dil.~retobeverified 3 1 1 4Â· LOWERLEVELPLAN in the field by a qered structural engineer be fore p~oceeding The a.Rect /1, not be responsible for any structural mod, fGborM not ief Ified Di approved bY a ;tructural engineer 32 T 4 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 60 Cont,actor will verifyirld coordinate allopeningsthrough fIGors, ce,lingk and walls with all architectural. structuial. mechanical. plumbing. @.d electrlcal des,gnar.3 3 3 T 4- ROOF PLAN DETAIL CALLOUT 1 DOOR MARK (0331 con'truct,on .-I .i 14 ELEVATIONS 42 1 4- ELEVATIONS A ROOM INTERIOR ELEVATION ' < 8.1 , 2 ROOM NUMBER [29 5 1 W BUILDING SECTIONS 6 1 SITEPHOTOS DRAWING REVISION 62 SITEPHOTOS 6 3 SITE PHOTOS CD r- (\1 A COP*HT/01GALIUSDESIGN COR. L-C ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CD DRAWING SET ISSUE ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT DIRECTORY O EXISTING (:INDITIONS 9/30.2016 CLIENT U) A,r A@iDVE;INISM FLOOP ~loWIZ HORIZONTA BendonAdams ADJ ADJUSTABLE IN#o INFORMATION 300SSpfingSrmetâ€¢202 ALT ALTERNATE ##ON :221 Aste/,COB~611 AB ANCHOR BOLTS JS- 970.5 2855 8 AND NC NOTINCONTRACT chril.*nad3msÂ¢om ARCHITECT.91 00 ONCENTEP O I AT OPP OPPOSITE ARCHITECT B. BEAM PEAF PERFORATED Al ./. COÂ·P5 BM PKT BEAMPOCKET . PLATE - I.IEaMSÂ®MO-Ad BRI BEARING PLY .-0. A Ba~all CO 8161Â· GENERAL INFORMATION BLKG PROP LINE PROPERTYLINE 80 7,9 33 T 9211 REINF REINFORCEMENT Michaelaa[,ugccom - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BLDG BUILDING PEQ RE-e O 80 ....NER RE/SED CLG Calâ€¢.3 SIM SiM~LAR PROJECT No 1614 a CENTEP LINE S F SOUAPE FEET VICINITY MAP DRAWN BY: MTE CLEAR ST[ STANCARD /2/ Col COLUMN THK THICâ€¢ CONC {x)NORETE Ts ToPgPLAY E O CONN CONNECTION TOPOF LEDGE CONT CONTINUOUS TW TOPOFWALL CONSTRUCTION NOTES DTL DETAILS TOT TOTAL DOWE TYÂ° TYPICAL , T. C..1Â·1<:+Cl'-mpl, %,ude I. ge.er/".. [2] ....t..a' meehan'cal alls'ul. aldrall'.5 Alladd:L...Isp<d/ations d.el'Is d.'-Ing/ ..Wilill./1 0 EW EACH WAY UNO UNLESSNOTEDUTHERWSE ,~f,N-, .chan,*5* W-alcNI,hee-I- /1. Contrac,Decumeats Al,d,~creD,re, bet-n anycomponon,sof a~yof Ihedriwings.hall 7 TIC-muct...amen,Gare.......4.laulÂ» ..... I.-f irds-w...qu.%,02Â©mpleiealâ€¢./.descritedhere,r, It/lhe E.EV ELEVATION VIF ./.1. r,ELD m-*1. CortracloitÂ© bn~ !2'-tior 6( t~ A.eM~Car~ cond-, *h<h -Il ne :Â»- constrJcÂ»n acco*g 'ethes#1n E>]STO EaSTING Documen!/ 2 Al.....Coms L........blu./.1.lor prg-rs-h'.Ae'l,mf....an,(bl....,al-leell/Coleral e/'elowthe ~ CD EXT EXTEAIOR des,n plans The Conim- s.11 01,0,/ andil a-.1 g,i.le <# A ..s [Â».99 CcED ~ th respec: /*-M -e,~Al .-sit~,ces or cornicts I 8 .....#per.torshall.....he'knt,ctof ./1Â§-0/an,nipeck,â€¢ls/.Â·.b,lnel'C orb,~r..01,/de.Old.ance FLR FLOOR unclar Inflr-Â·all. .rch ./ be d,$c...d of ./led 2 J=.. 3 Tne PIn' al.%,filot,~â„¢ *elhe int'llectual .nd olher Â©roce~./ the Anch~ecla. /all~ * t,Me -. 1. ...Ig. 1/ 9 *Ls:Trizfriz:irirc:'.7:25:ZId..inz.Z~LZZIE~eci:Â·=Tric Z GA G,1,l JGF te.,I~~* sl- hedra~r~gla'!Age,c~va~lon All~Â©r~lobudgn# d 5ur~e>tr GL GLU LAM . Al'~onshallcom..thi'...ridlecll......m.85 fule. I.ulaÂ·lonsandlaws' I.........li.~e./..Ing,~A.... A..... -" --=a~ GWE GYPSUMWALiBOARD De De olmed.lheh,hestard/rd~gr'rallsmanshipbyalltradesmai N,u/DeeÂ·gi,Ce.ps LLC ..In'.reÂ®oW& .- ee *0.-I,k . RECORD.....S ..,acll...airtainac-/.s/!01.-black..n/3/contractdra. rgsardshopor-r~ge'/reclamJrkuupur~.es no-sh,I'Al,usDes,Corp~ LLC belble foranND-,s5,0ns' ihirdpa~lesy.Kope.fn.~o.kontheeru,ect ~r W*.71â€žault~me M~kupdr~~Ingsdu~ngcouIseltâ€¢le~ofkshall/) ang/5 andac~Ja'Ins~ailaioncc~d,ilas . ttofÂ©~acom#I , ""Ii-!040 â€¢ 9 -0~ b 0-*.## U) 5 ./..acID.um-ts,~es/nliN/ms/d/rucluie Theydonot,nd.ateÂ·hemethodolconsruc~ioil Thelonlr@cÂ·or;hallor'widealmeas/- neces~~,0-Wi.*-durâ€¢r,constr,a, OtserwwlÂ©n~~steine'llebylhe51~câ€¢uiar E. eera.A.ch~ectshallrotinclude~5pect,%/lhe 11 SOILS.J.CONCRETE T.Ge:~/Orract,-~War,/for/.â€¢swalle.speloralle'Impl=/excaval./.'01/Ing,nu~r andlhe Â» '1 FW-*(-Wu.*-eeÂ·Nipons,%/1.c~tractorsme,ni melh~d,techn,que5 secuenceslorprocedurel *1,!red co~c~/sing prtrlcany Icwcall â€¢ork co~struct~ro,#*i-,0-dce,~31-,chr~weEse~enceibp*Teof Â¢onstrilc~Â«on .awalely,ecaullons The.iâ€žaciorandnenhe ----- * 1.2 Arcn~ecis~al're~p:-~~,a~Fe,~ial~OS,~~gi.aÂ»s 12 ProoelylinesÂ»I+Iesannpograph~E-veni,5-~ti~~inl-,~~11*masu-, Con4@"'t~1,~4'A~,t'~.ct~anydi~repincy'r / D-WINGS-RENOTTOBES-LED *rm-d,mer--u~ 1----r-itheA-hlee~eld-1-* \ LU ./1~kirrlÂ»rificabon Alld,meni,~mienl~,dra*ng,ikellbeweaf,da,-91-0â€¢,c~â‚¬-4~ Aid:.,-crE,reâ€¢o=o.gh.m.go, 1..~ concrele wrle53 noled *se PRMOT -OCATION SllIH N3dSV 00'NadSV 3AN3AV aNV-lallAI 8Â£â‚¬-LEE 12 sqft 12 sqft 12 sqft 1 1,754 sq ft deck rÂ·, r~ 1--1 Ult li - P ALIUS FAR CALCULATIONS 405 sq ft 402 sq ft 402 sq ft 408 sqft II UNIT 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 NOSTORAGEHER., 1 1 LOT SIZE: 15,159 sq.ft. 48 sq ft 48 sq ft ~47 sq ft~ STOFU\.EAR~ABOVE F.1 : ALLOWABLE FAR: 11,369 sq.ft. SIAIR TYP. r ' | ~ ~46sqft Â·Â· . 48sqft 48 sqft 47 sq ft I LEVEL GROSS NET NOTES 406 sq ft 403 sq ft 403 sq ft 414 sq ft UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 7 11 MAIN 3,575 3,575 = ==/L- 1-1 DECK 1,754 49 15% OF ALLOWABLE FAR = EXEMPT DECK AREA (.15*11,369) Â· la . co -Il LOWER 3,632 1,416 39% OF LL WALLS EXPOSED (3,632*.39) =--1 12 sq #0 - TOTAL 8,961 5,040 TOTAL I Z LLI rh MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CL '1 , 11-0 0 4 8 16 310 sq ft 1 E--2.-]-1 -1 --1 .31 787 TOTAL WALL AREA COPh RINIT 2016 ALIUS PESION COR. LLC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISIING CONDI-IONS 9 30 20 16 1 11 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 1 UNIT 2 46 4 sq L -450 sq ft 450 sq ft 462 sq ft ~ Â»'013 r'- 37 rn r.7.; S-An r. 1 F EAST WALL 334 sq ft 3 FULLY BURIED 1 11 2 412 TOTAL MALL AF FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS -J'Z) L - J 41/ L _ 1 Ulj L .- | 90- FOR CONSTRUCTION irN--456 sq frÂ»- -451 sq ftÂ»-- \1151 sq ft+- .4/458 sq frAÂ·/ : PROJECT No 1614 i UNIT 1 UNIT ; JNIT 5 UNIT 7 DRAWN BY MTE -1 412 TOTAL WALL AREA -7 P-~ -. 2- 3. F -7 p---3 ,\, 1 3%7*il 313 Sq T 1 1 787 TOTAL WALL AREA Â© LOWER LEVEL AREA SCALEÂ· 1/8Â·Â· = 1-0 0 4 8 16 1.3 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONVIallAI 82Â£-LEE A 8 sqft 8 sqft 8 sqft n n 1 V O ALIU Lpp NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS DESIGN COR MAIN LEVEL NLA : 3,385 sq.ft. 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 389 sq ft LOWEL LEVEL NLA . 3,450 sq.ft. UNIT 2 UNIT 4 - UNIT 6 UNIT 8 TOTAL PROJECT NLA : 6,835 sq.ft. 45 sqft 45 sq ft 45 sq ft~ 45 sq R 45 sq ft 45 sq E 45 sq ft~ **** 36 sq.ft. of area found in exterior storage areas are not addressed in the calculation 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 382 sq ft 389 sq ft as their necessary allocation is unknown UNIT 1 UNIT 3 **** UNIT 5 - ;. UNIT 7 1 -7-1 UL,=-1 U -1 12 sqft - I Z LU Â® MAIN LEVEL NET LIVABLE CL SCALE 1/8" = 14.0 0 4 8 16 co NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS UNIT BREAKDOWN COPYRICIIT 2016ALIUS DESIGN CORPS L-C ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 ----------------------------- 7--2 -----3----2---. -----Il I - UNIT i 1 DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING COND[-IONS 9/30 2016 UNIT 1 852 1 ~ UNIT 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 UNIT 2 807 ./.N 42 5 sq 4 _434 sq ft 434 sq ft 432 sq ~t~~ UNIT 3 861 ' i_-_un r--- ~-"h nn r- ~-~'h r-03 - r .1 UNIT 4 861 7 51 11 ~~ ~ ~ - ~~ NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS UNIT 5 861 I UNIT 6 861 EIrLR,,7 1- JYJ littj L,~,,-,.~u...3 VI-7 I A~'~*..1 LI17 l...~~/~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNIT 7 866 ~ 42 5 sq ft 434 sq R 434 sa ft 432 sq ft ~ PROJECT No 1614 UNIT 1 UNIT ; JNIT 6 UNIT 7 DRAWN BYÂ· MTE UNIT 8 866 ~ ------------1 Â© LOWER LEVEL NET LIVABLE 0 4' 8 16 SCALE 1/8" = 1 -0. 1 1.4 lA 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONV10!IN 8â‚¬Â£-LEE IMPROVEiwEl\IT SURVEY h,AT \-1 1 . j .110: 6 1% - : 0 1 S 1. 1 1 ' 1.7 ':. ./1.1 Aspen Hills Condominiums t.- CONDOMINIUM UNITS A- 1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 AND A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, r---l i ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JULY 15, 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS ; RECEPTION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR fik--7*441 ,,AÂ·-3 -1 '' _9*EZ~ ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JULY 2, 1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEPTION NO. ALIU S rop>Â£7 , ~ - ' - / *-- 6k- < -- . . .t~ - Â·Â·-1 - , LINE OF SETBACK=:1 2.3- *---4 -Â»---2 1 -7 / S 8946'0Â» 8 14.88'904-- .*Â· <. \ , r of- - "9Â·46,0. 0 216.001 --* / 1 ----1-3601 1 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED SEFIEMBER 5, 1 969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS )ESICI COAPS \ -k ., th:râ€¢ - ~ ~ RECEPTION NO. 136864, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; t . ~ 1_ _0--232*0f'---'3963 72;5 -- --2 --,0~j?fjl~-- -7 --9 --,_ iR"~0, ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~L / ~ 77,ELAM, mEmafD 70#V 77*SAVS,AA,Â£7*:,W 777U-#e,ZAWar Cal#,INr Calm,7;12~/TOA,ED .Ur .IR . 14. 2016 IS LOCATED IN RE COUNTY OF PmON, STATE OF COLORADO, AND IS UORE PARICULARLY . I DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: /. "h. jp?-4 4 _ . 1 01 , . \~ â„¢E LAND REFEi~ED m IN â„¢/S COMM/n,ENT IS DESCR/BED AS FOLLOWS. CONDOM/NIUM UNITS A-1. A-Z 0-" . 171, ./ 1 - --r r-- ie -, 1 o A L.-flud/ir' A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 AND A-4 ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINRUM, ACCORDING TO THE MAP 7HEREOF \ 1 RECORDED JULY 15, 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS RECEPTION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND -r k 21 -\ i, DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR ASPEN HILLS. A CONDONINIUM. RECORDED JULY 2 / Bushes 1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEPION NO. 136011 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED N/Illt 1 ---LIA / -NIN 4% SEPTEMBER 5, 1969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS RECEPION NO. 136864. PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; ' ... Â£0 EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE COMMON AREA CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF 2 SURVEY DEMONSTRATES i ~ _~ -222.y:11.X.. \ M 5"0 R=.705' THE PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BY AGREEMENT DATED JULY 10, 1974 AND RECORDED JULY 12, ./ \ 7 L -8.0 8.0 - HIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS PER SAID TITLE COMMIâ„¢ENT NO. 16003559 : : R-633* U 1974 IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTION NO. 205645. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADQ 52.4' t.2, ~~~ ' ='~-----m70 -22222- \ 4 -* ti dE.1. W EXIST. NON-CONFORMITY 1 4 , 'r- 9. THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, WITH THE EXCEPnoN OF THE SURFACT, MAY BE ENTERED BY THE 8. ALL MINERAL RIGHTS UNDERLYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. (Nothing to show) 1. -'---- - 84*.910 i \\ 1 ' I PROPRIETOR OF ANY OTHER VEIN, LODE OR LEDGE, THE TOP OR APEX OF WHICH UES OUTSIDE OF THE W/ BUILDING DIRECTLY ON . 3 Il } ~LMOT g ~~1~YiliWDMPOpd~ki~'UF RM~P~REO2 P ~~Z~2"lhcP=~=:11:'RE ~ 1 7 ' | FROM SUCH OTHER VE]N. LODE OR LEDGE; AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY 1 THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT, RECORDED JJNE 28. 2 1,~>~ - ~ . 1892. IN BOOK 39 AT PAGE 78, AS RECEPTION NO. 047892, AND IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT, I . ,1 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS AND RIGHTS OF INGRES AND II' , 2414-1 {47 3.0 -4-trat'c.'=:=3 PROPERTY LINE BEYOND--1- RECORDED MAY 20, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 170, AS RECEPnON NO. 096346. (Nothing to show) i:",97**/ / \ -4*~VACE#Aff- Z-3____. EGRESS, SPECIFIED UNDER THE WARRANTY DEED, DATED JANUARY 21, 1965, AND RECORDED APRIL 12, 44~ 9ai,~0-5.Â»2-;)-.~~;4-2.--I TZ--- ---- rl* ~Chimney j.~ 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS SPEaAED UNDER THE CONDOMINIUM --- 5' SETBACK .Â· 9 - M DECLARATION FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED JULY 2, 1969, AND RECORDED .ULY 2, 1969, IN ~ 1965, IN BOOK 212 AT PAGE 322, AS RECEPTION NO. 120355. (Tract of land as shown hereon In Parcel I 12222321'19~*~Ip-=---- z#4 9-- Detoil) l 407*?1 F - . BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877. AS RECEPnON NO. 136011, AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM 1 4 LU 92. ~ Â· Â· 4 ' 6 1 2 1 1 1 ; DECLARKnON FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DAIED SEPTEMBER 2. 1969. AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1 5, 1969, IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83, AS RECEPTION NO. 136864. (As shown hereon) CL 12. ANY AND ALL NOTES, EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP I . 11,\Gil 1 IT Unit A-6 Hatcll door ~ OF ASPEN HUIS PLAT, RECORDED JULY 15. 1969, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8, AS RECEPTION NO. U) 9 1.1 U Â·Â· Unit A-4 ' Unit A-8 136131. (As shown hereon.) Â«â€ž 10 -- Unlt A--2 \1 (GCEj~Â·Â·\ B \ 7958.51' ;0,~4 . A- Hil \ ~ 146061.(Tract of land as shown hereon In Parcel Detail) H -eÂ·'t~22 jt t 4.9 Eaw i 13. ANY AND ALL NOTES. EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED ASPEN HILLS M ANNEXATION PLAT, RECORDED JUNE 14, 1971, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 200, AS RECEPTION NO. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGA-n ONS SPEaFl ED UNDER THE AGREEMENT. 15,169,5 59 Ft UNP , , ~~ ~ ' ~ DATED JULY 10. 1978, AND RECORDED JULY 12. 1978, 1N BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPnON NO. 111 205645. (Nothing to show) 0.348 M. h. 1 1 ' billi 15. TERMS CONDITIONS PROVISIONS AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER THE DECREE 7 QUIETING TITLE. DATED 'DECEMBER 5; 1983, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1983, IN BOOK 457 AT PAGE Unlt A-1 . 1 9. 0 92&#R-12' Unlt A-5 Unlt A-7 . 1, b .1 ~3 ~ ~ ~ t~ 1 1 ; 888, AS RECEPTION NO. 255947. NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION AFFECm UNIT: A-2 ONLY. (Nothing too show) t ~ 1 % 16. TERMS, CONMONS, PROVISONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAMONS SPECIAED UNDER THE GRANT OF Ct) 01 11 1 2~;IENT, DATED APRIL 1, 2006, AND RECORDED MAY 22, 2006, AS RECEPnON NO. 524387. (Nothing to Unit A-3 V "46 . 1 17. ANY EDOSTING LEASES OR TENANaES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SAID LESSEES. (Nothing to ahow) H 1 1 1 CoÂ»/Gi,MLIUSCESIGN i .. , - -4--1 02. LEGEND AND NOTES: <1 P' \ ' - 8 /NO/CA7ES SET NO.5 RWAR 1,7H A 1 1/4- RED PLASUC CAP LS NO 33638 CORPS L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - 0 IND/CAla FOUND NO.5 REBAR 11,7H A 1 1/4' YELLOW PLASFC CAP L.& NO. 9018 DRAWING SET ISSUE - DATE OF SURVEY: NOVEMBER 09. 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONIS 930 2016 - UNIT OF MEASUREMENT: US SURVEY FOOT R R=5' 4 ~ 1 \, 14-10. \ 1' \ - THIS PROFâ‚¬RlY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X (AREAS DE1ERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR 4 i _~~___S85~44'~~ / 78. 3 ' FlOO{)PLAIN) PER FEMA MAP PANEL NO. 08097C0203C DATED JUNE 04.1987 TAKEN 1 - L=ZE==22 0- GPS PNT. #1 -lij~*--+I- - il-< -- - L \ 1 \ 1 \ ~ ' .- ~ FRaw mE- FE],4 AMP SERWa- CENE? AND ME C,Tr Or ASPEN ENG/NER/NG j Bev.=7945.54' \1 ,\11 1 -~ DEPARâ„¢ENT WEBSITE. 1HIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED Nâ„¢IN A MUDFLOW HAZARD BARd v- *--kqk%<-ki< - 1 . 1 1 1 ~ i ~..~_~ '1000?DING 70 772 07)' Gy AyÂ£7,/ E)VGNEPe/NG DEPARNENT ASPEN MOU/,7*N 2.0' wide Pan MUDFLOW HAZARD MAP. THE PROPERTY HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ----- - 1 A DEDICATED PUBUC STREET. AND THERE IS NO RECORDING INFORMATION FOR A , Val(XED MhEY ABWAYPER GRAPHIC SCALE - ELEVAnONS BASED UPON aTY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENTATION CONTROL POINT NUMBER 4 (Gener' Comrnon Element) Lic Table CITY OF ASPEN ELEVAMON AT 79242 FEET ) f . . . . I LINE BEARING LENGTH - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON FOUND NO.5 REBAR -TH A 11/4' Ya-LOW PLASTIC CAP La ' 9(1 I S 89'43'10- E 1 8.91 NO. 9018 ON THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SUBICT PROPERTY AND A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR N- Gea-2 1 N 4Â·:Prlr W 1 2.54' 1 1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED TRICO AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SITE PLAN -I 5CELI | N 85Â·44'33. E 1 38.00' ASPEN HILLS CONDO BK 4, PG 4 USNG A BEARING OF S 2139'50Â» E BETWEEN THE TWO = - C nimir) GCE14 1 S 454'55. E 1 10.10' Â·~ Â· GCELS [ N 85Â·44'53' E l 107.74 DESCRIBED MONUMENTS -. 1 inoh -10 n - THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION *Ii- .l / + #IE-- . LEGEN[1 OWNERSHIP OR TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD. ALL PROJECT Ne 1614 * - ~ UNE TABLE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD - W. E~ = Electric Meter * - Scott FIr ul N 6Â·23'q W 1 88.44 FILE NO. 16003559 UNE I BEARING 1 LENGTH PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMIâ„¢ENT DATED JULY 14 2016 DRAWN BY MTE 5 215.00 W~ = Electric Meter Â© ul N 8943'10~ W 11.92 = Russian Olive -1 5 434'42- E | 65.47 A.\ 2 = Telephone Box '41 S 85Â·44'33' W 1 10.17 L51 N 6'23': 1 44.020 red i Parcel Dc'taii .. . ~ m - Electric Box (2; = Fruit Tree ul S 89'46'0' E | 37.67' L71 S 4Â·54'47 E I 19,30' SEME12*--LEREEKkuil SCALE: 1" = 500 ~%14.,114Â©4,-322..1 ..1.(:~ A - Irrigation voive 0 -Aspen 51 S 85Â·44'3/ W 1 20,87' l| S 475'27 E 1 3.4. , 1101 S 85Â·44'33' W I 7.77 1, JEFFREY ALLEN TUTILL BONG A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY A -- *.' : A *r' Â« 7â„¢b/Al ' 7 - Irrigation control ami g = Spruce uil N 415'27- W 1 142' TO ARST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL L12| S 85-44'33~ W | 38.830 MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS, BOTH FOUND AND SET. UNDER MY DIRECT hot BK 212. PG 322 &0 = Gas Meter ~ = Cotter,wood LiM S 4152r E 1 3.42' SUPERVISION AND CHECKIN#, 1HAT IT IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE AND lHAT ALL N 475'27- W 1 3.42' L14 I S 85 44'33- W | 7JT DIMENSIONS, BOTH UNEAR AND ANGULAR WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY IN THE FIELD WHICH Alpin Hm Annexation Q = Clearlout â‚¬0 - Scrub Od, U61 S 4767 E | 48.65' BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A UMIT OF 1 IN 15.000 (WHICH COMPLIES NTH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS A,pen HIlls A - 4. W Lgl N 85'44'V E | ~~ FOR A LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND nTLE SURVEYS): I Lode 99 Llgls 85Â·44'33- W EXCEPT UnUTY CONNECnONS, ARE ENTIRELY WTHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL EXCEPT AS SHOWN AND THAT Â¢01 = Utility Pole - = Wooden gate L181 S 415'Ir E | 14.03 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2016, = Guy WIre Overhead Power Line L201 S 415'2r E I 18.10 THERE IS NO APPARENT EWDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAND PARCa. L231 S 85Â·44'33- W | 2.14 ZARD/ORÂ¢ /7 -pw = = Mailbox Ull N 85~44'V E I 2.14 EXCEPT AS NOTED. ~40 4, po zoc~ 1 CZZ~ZIZZZII - Railroad tie Retaining wall L22I S 49*27 E 1 0.0 ~ - Rectprocal Â® = Scnitary Manhole L 24I S 4752/ E | 184' ~|1â„¢100 & P.aB. of Tract CURVE TABLE 1 N 89'46'0' W 121.27 1 bk 212. pg 322 S 89Â·46'0- E 255.59' - CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I CHORD I BEARING 1 IFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE LE 33538 DATE p Â·' 1 - 7443 jrÂ·/LB //A.rÂ· ed AN:f .- * 121==* 215.00 Cl | 37.360 | 22.50' | 31/ | S 42-39'39-WI I - ... 2.1 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONV1(111AI 8Â£ 205.00' IM ROVEMENT SU. - rEY PLAT i. 1. i i 1 1 F ..' Aspen Hills Condominiums 1 1 41. 1 CONDOMINIUM UNITS A-1, A-2. A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 AND A-8, ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED JULY 15, 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS :- RECEPTION NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR -- I .1, E-WUPEE.1 - AOV~ p,-' ~ /~-<77---- --1 -Â·-%35-13 - ------2.-23-3IZ7I>-'3*-CZE~fre=p _\ vi\ ' 0*.-795447 AW ''' 4-~11 ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, RECORDED JULY 2,1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEMION NO. / S #96'0" E /â‚¬488' . '~ -- 2- V- / \4 --_136011 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS - .' '4. 4 Â· QI*11'.Â·240. 2 ~712-0 . ~>4 --* ./- 1 ' 1--1 - Â· RECEPTION NO. 136864, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; --7 4% A. E r-+Lt- -- -42 - -. 7-0 1 â„¢9~ ~ ~ h- '\ \ ., RELANDREF77AED 70/N 77#SHRSTAMEN,CAN 777126Â¥SURANCE-Cal,PANY mWA#7],ENT DAMED.ULY - - - 14 2016 IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF PllKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AND IS MOREE PAR11CULARLY * ~- -- - 0Â£3098Â£5 AS FULOWSÂ· R=10' . L/ly -- pq'. 1 Â° 3<~Â· W *- -- * I / IX -- 3 \- RE LAND REFERRED m W â„¢/S COAN/â„¢EMT Â£ DESCREED AS FOLLOWSÂ· CONDOA#MUM UNITS A-1. A-2 A-3, A-4, A-4 A-6, A-7 AND A-4 ASPEN HILLS, A CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING n) 1HE MAP THEREOF- M 7 1\ 'F 1 RECORDED JULY 14 1969 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8 AS REEF)11ON NO. 136131 AND AS DEFINED AND I h - Bushes ~ - n . . \478 , lawn DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOWINIUM DECLARANON FOR ASPEN HILLS A CONDOMNIUM, RECORDED JULY Z ' 3-*2& 1969 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877 AS RECEP'nON NO. 136011 AND FlRST AMENDMENT PERETO RECORDED \ Rg#~ EPTEMBER 5. 1969 IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83 AS RECEPTION NO. 136864 AWN COUNTr. COLORADO; 2<39 1 j - x \. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ EXCEPT THAT POR71ON OF RE COMMON AREA CON,EYED TO 7HE BOARD OF- COUNTy COMISSIONERS OF 4 i :3,0 < 85 876.0.77 /9 SUB.ECT 70 RE FULON,NG EPUP77GNS PER SA/0 7717.E COW,/7]WENT NO. 16003559 6 ~ .~ THE PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BY AGREEMENT DATED DLY 10. 1974 AND RECORDED JULY 11 771 71=.0 8.0 1~ 44Â«49 Q F ..NG /010' #**10Â· 50.4' 1974 IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTION NO. 20564& COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. .m \ , - . i- - ..% \ - 1 PROPRIETOR OF ANY OTHER VEN, LODE OR LEDGE, THE TOP OR APEX OF WHICH UES OUTSIDE OF THE I 1 1 BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANTED PREMISES. SHOULD THE SAME IN ITS DIP BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR =10' - 2 1 INTERSECT OR EXTENT INTO SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING AND REMOVING THE ORE / \ , 1 FROM SUCH OTHER VEIN, LODE OR LEDGE; AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UN11ED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT, RECORDED JUNE 28, *0~ ,Â· ~ 8. ALL MINERAL RIGHTS UNDERLYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. (Nothing to show) 7402 / /k 9. THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SURFACT, MAY BE ENTERED BY THE *=Ms=.=IM=====f=-:-10 1892, IN BOOK 39 AT PAGE 78. AS RECEPTION NO. 047892, AND IN THE UNITED SWES PATENT, 1. Â»\ -$ &6* _Al' 1 RECORDED MAY 20, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 170, AS RECEPTION NO. 096346. (Nothing to ahow) | 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS, SPECIFIED UNDER THE WARRANTY DEED, DATED JANUARY 21, 1965, AND RECORDED APRIL 12, 1\ 1965, IN BOOK 212 AT PAGE 322, AS RECEPTION NO. 120355. (Tract of land as ehown hereon In Parcel __ _, :, 11. TERMS CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPEamED UNDER THE CONDOMINIUM 4.5' Eave rl ' Chimney t\ 1 Detail) 12 ",1- ---- - 1 ZE=Ill. DECLARAnON FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED JULY 2, 1969, AND RECORDED .ULY 2. 1969, IN N--- 10 - I ' BOOK 241 AT PAGE 877, AS RECEPTION NO. 136011. AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM Â·-a.i.-'40Â· - ..,1131 1 # \ ~ 5,1969, IN BOOK 243 AT PAGE 83, AS RECEPTION NO. 136864. (As shown hereon) 2 tb,4 1 \\\ \ 1 .\11 DECLARAnON FOR ASPEN HILLS (A CONDOMINIUM) DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 1969, AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER t Â· 0 Level ~ liLli' 4 12. ANY AND All NOTES, EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORbED CONDOMINIUM MAP 1 Low \ i 4,1, 4,0. . 1\51 1 .lilli f 136131. (As shown hereon.) Unk A-5 Untt A-4 Unit A-8 Unit A-2 Â· Hal , ,$11! oF ASPEN HULS PLAT, RECORDED JJLY 15, 1969, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 8, AS RECEPnON NO. F 192/ 13. ANY AND All NOTES, EASEMENTS AND RECITALS AS DISCLOSED ON THE RECORDED ASPEN HILLS (GCE) ~Â· 7958.51' |E ~ 4 ANNE)(AnON PLAT, RECORDED JUNE 14, 1971, IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 200, AS RECEPTION NO. tz/9 \ 1 21~15 1 146061.(Tract of land as shown hereon In Parcel Detail) wer i 4.0 \ 9-0 4.0' Ecve ..23*0. .0.â€¢ 1 â‚¬ I'll 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS SPEGFIED UNDER THE DECREE 0 4. 8-0 ! 1 '10?f% 12-Â·10' trw 205645. (NoD,Ing to ahow) C , -------'.I- --- ----------1 --*---~---lt 14. TERMS, CONDInONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGATIONS SPECIF]ED UNDER THE AGREEMENT, DATED JILY 10, 1978, AND RECORDED JULY 12, 1978, IN BOOK 351 AT PAGE 229, AS RECEPTION NO. / %. 4'11t 15.15@.S Sq Ft 9,0 =. 79 Â· , 0.348 AGÂ· + 1 QUIETING TITLE, DATED DECEMBER 5,1983, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1983, IN BOOK 457 AT PAGEE R=12&$*tym0 888, AS RECEPTION NO. 255947. NOTE: 1HIS EXCEPTION AFFECTS UNIT: A-2 ONLY. (Nothing to show) // CO Unit A-7 P. / i\ til~~Jj 1 16. TERMS, CONDITONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBUGAnONS SPECIF]ED UNDER THE GRANT OF EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 1, 2008, AND RECORDED MAY 22,2006, AS RECEPTION NO. 524387. (Nothing to Unt A-1 Â· Unit A , 1 show) 1 Â· 3'0 1 17. ANY EXISTING LEASES OR TENANGES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER ' O.1'2 ' ' ~=10' ~SAID LESSEES. (Nothing to show) 1 . 1 1 - '. 4.5 Eave LEGEND AND NOTES __----T--- _--_ Le __~ - a INDICATES SET NO.5 REBAR MTH A 1 1/4' RED PLASNC CAP LS NO. 33638 City of Aspen ~ f (4 4.0 ------------rj-z -- C GPS PNT.1 -______-W _ 1 ~ 7. ' ..1 40_ ' ~ I i - 0 INDICATES FOUND NO.5 REBAR WTH A 1 1/4* YELLOW PLASFC CAP La NO. 9018 Bev.-7925. 2' , 2 %4 1 -1 5 9 R-6,6 R . - 8-0 ' =12' 1 1 1 10 11 1 - DATE OF SURVEr NOVEMBER 09. 2014. R=50 44 ~E1L4 - =/ ---â€ž014>9 / ~Ar@,41\11 \1 - THIS PROPERTY E LOCATED IN ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR - UNIT OF MEASUREMENT: US SURVEY FOOT 3-0 City of Aspen FLOODPLAIN) PER FBAA MAP PANEL NO. 08097002030 DATED JUNE 04,1987 TAKEN ~ ~ \ \ . - \El mal, 77Â£- FE]64 MAP ~9?Wa- aN,ZER AND 7705 077 , ASPEN DIGNEJEENG N 85Â·25' ~E s 85'34' 3/7 , 78. 2 -1~__-____ ~4-0 1---~ DEPARn#ENT WEBSITE 11*S PROPERTY G NOT LOCATED MTHIN A MUDFLOW HAZARD GPS PNT. #1 Dev.=7945.54' f rv ------:- / ' I t< ~~ ACCCe/NG 70 77Â¢Earra,-AFENENONED?INGDEPAR,MENTASPENUOUNTAW 1 MUDFLOW HAZARD MAP. THE PROPERTY HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO EAST HOPKINS AVENUE A DEDICATED PUBLIC STREET. AND THERE E NO RECORDING INFORMAnON FOR A . DEDICATED ALLEY ACCESS WAY PER 20' wide Pon -- - ---1.----- Rim=7954.24' - ELEVATIONS BASED UPON aTY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENTATION CONTROL POINT NUMBER 4 'U-cti-=7799~9% 4. /1 [Itxf-f>~ ~ 7. GRAPHIC SCALE (Ge'/01 Comrnon E]â‚¬'nent) L~a Table CITY OF ASPEN ELEVATON AT 792&42 FEET BEARING I I I I UNE LENGTH - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON FOUND NO.5 REBAR WITH A 1 1/â€¢r YEUOW PLASTIC CAP La GCEU I S 80'43'V E 1 11.92 NO. 9018 ON THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SUBICT PROPERTY AND A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR IN GCEL.2 | N 474'47 W 1 254' 1 1/4= YELLOW PLASUC CAP STAMPED TRICO AT THE SOUREASTERLY CORNER OF SAJD 1. 1 GOEU I N 85'44'33- E 1 36.00' ASPEN HILLS CONDO BK 4, PG 4 USING A BEARING OF S 21'39'50* E BETÂ¥,EEN 1HE TWO Ij ( IN IZZr) GCELI I S 434'55- E I 10.10 -X 1 hoh -10 i GCELS I N 85Â·44'33~ E I 107.74 DESCRIBED MONUMENTS - THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE \ -~. LEGEND OWNERSHIP OR TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD. ALL -- -Â· \ UNE TABLE INFORMATION PERTMNING TO O*ERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD i. UNE BEARjNG LENGTH PER ARST AMERICAN BTLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT DATED J.ILY 14 2016 Â· [~ = Electric Meter * - Scott Fir U N 6'23'0Â» W 05.46 FILE NO. 16003559 S 894600- E 215.00' ~ = Electric Meter e U N 89.43.10. w 11.92' = Russian Olive U 5 4Â¥42~ E 68.4y \./ P 09â€¢480/ E 157.88' 2+~# fxpot,-.14Â« i -46<4,42 ~ 14, + 13 IEE . Electric Box 11 = Telephone Box 133 = Fruit Tree I S 89Â·46'9~ E 37.07 LI N 6'23'0~ W 44.02' A - Irrigation valve w s 415'2r E . 42 sJ47 7,940 /3 W S 85'44'* W 10.17 O S 434'42~ E 19.30' SURI,E-)9?27 (EJ? 7Â¥7CA 7EÂ· @ -Aapen la S 85Â·44'33- W 20.87' / 1\19. Ici U0 S 85'44'33~ W 7.77 1 EFREY ALLEN TUTTLE. BEING A PROFESSIONAL LAND SUREfOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY LL / Â¤ - Irrigation Control Box ~ 8 Spruce Lii N 415'27~ W 3.42 TO ARST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE THAT THIS IMPROEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL tri ;~Â· L12 $ 05Â·44'33, W 38Â·63' MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS, BOTH FOUND AND SET. UNDER WY DIRECT 1'93 1% Troct BK 212. PG 322 9@lf#G~;8*49*.-9%'FO,prz N = Gas Meter L14 S 85'44'33* W 7.77 DIMENSIONS, BOTH UNEAR AND ANGULAR WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY IN THE FIELD *ICH CD = cottonwood L13 $ 495'27 E 3.42' SUPERWSION AND CHECKING; THAT IT IS CORRECT 10 THE BEST OF MY BEUEF AND KNOWLEDGE AND THAT ALL @ = Cleanout â‚¬8 - Scrub Oak N 415'27- W 3.4, 9.0.8. of E-6.->Vt,L/t/F'*6.jA,Â£4-4/ Â· 1 2.04 2 1 77.- N 85Â·44'33. E 14.03 FOR A LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TmE SURIYS): 1 1 E S 415'27 E 48.65 BALANCED AND CLOSED MTHIN A UMIT OF- 1 IN 14000 (WHICH COMPUES NTH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS 9, = Utility Pole = Wooden gate s 475'27- E 22.87' FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPRO,EMENTS ON lHE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2016, Mi# AAMT-- 4/ 70*;7. 350. ~--,-A portion of Miscotte bk 4. pg 940' \ ~1 -31. Lode 99 L19 . 88 44'33. W 14.03 EXCEPT UmITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENNRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL EXCEPT AS SHONV AND lHAT 9 li '/ = Guy Wire Overhead Power Une IC S 475'21- E 18.10' RERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL. ~|~ < perd'R~"Wo. 120355 //.....7Â©i=iNA . 3%6- E %24Â¥214.14 m = Mailbox L21 N 8544'W E 2.14' EXCEPT AS NOTED. g kjqi Found #5 R~bar vnth Â£*~749.#5Â· .87922*4 l:Â·1~Wrt'Y 44 :1; 43 A ~Â£47/01 Railroad tie Retatning wall m S 415'27 E 8.58' 1=.aY=Mn"...ped - %?:11. 944//5*â€¢ME re.,-:79*df#442\ Â£%23/.627Â· @ = Santtary Manhole m S 415'2/E 1Â·84 - Redprocal " 5 85-44'13- W 7.14' CURVE TABLE / N 89'46'0' W 121.27 1 bk 212, pg 322 S mr#VV E 2=51 -- CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I CHORD I BEARING ETREY ALLEN TUTTLE LS. 33638 DATE N 8946'0- W 215.000 -Â·- Â·---Â· - --1 Â· : .,fks ' . (1 1.37 36' 1 22.50' 1 3322' 15 42Â·39'39Â· w TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES 160 Midland 0-09/27/2016 Dr- 4% DMC Acco,dÂ·,â„¢, to Colorado law. VOU WIU,t COW~*WT,te any Iâ€¢gat ae*,d upon anÂ¥ deÂ·ct M 727 Blake Avenue N sur=y u,thin thwgi *m of:ir wou Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 A# ./lot.r n./ 41*/ AÂ» no -,n~ may 2 \2014\ASPENHILLS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT Aspen Colorado. 81611 *at ac*i,A *pon anÂ¥ *n CONDO\16OMiDLAND.DWG tA~ 4â„¢,1-, 6~ comm,no~d mar~ Man * *ar= (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES OF ~ j,orn U. dic// of U. c,rw'call. shoum Emaâ‚¬Z- iâ€¢770198-us. com g .toÂ·o-u-.s riii- - 8 '4/9 116 3 100-lid 205.00' 1 ALIUS DESIGN Jo/P 5 0 "17 1 1 (f) I 1 V 09 r------------------------------------------------------ --- - --------------------- - QD - i :t..4.Ja-'11 -2,=Â·'2Â·"61=EemEr-@-= -Â·'4-2Â»'97/ *73--4---26..................4~--~j-..=~ r. 4,~421j 44444444-2=Ini~~rri~_iÂ·L-Â·uÂ·flk=U-e-N 1 1 1 : i 1% 1 11 - . 1,1 1 1 f 1 1 1.1 i If I E - ~ 2//r\Â» Yht/Y%7 r]In r 1 \.61 1 UNIT 2 -4-0\-- UNIT 4 A UNIT 6 UNIT 8 1 ,/71 1 1 upr-A- Â«1-1-1 up uP pr-tl-* I ' 8 IrÂ·,Illym~MI,Ill,hY.,~W~W,m,~inli 6A 4,MI'lm'. 1~*~.-H. * n .â€¢.â€žâ€ž-â€ž f~ ~Â¥-f# = Tl=r===9 9- 2 -43 014% i - L.1-1~ ALLI LLI_14 /th 1 1 1 ; P U c~J 1' 1 N I .r 1 1> 1 11 11 Iii 1 1 ut Â·-1-1,T/ 10â€¢Allut rEt>IGN 0 jm FF VI 9 F 9 2 /\ 0 %' 49 ELEI 1 -%1 'Zy/ i.CRPSL.C ALLRIGHTSRESERVED UP A \%/ L UPFFF /\F \ L 3 2 I DRAWING SET ISSUE w ,9/ u III . ....w..'.-r,aw==mum-..1 Fl, 1 117 L Â· EXISTINIG CONDITIONS 9/30.2016 -I U--- < lk . '61 1 r f I / E 1 1 2 1 1 i i ~ UNIT 1 â‚¬ UNITS jNIT 5 2 UNIT 7 ~ li I 111 2 - 0 1. 1 11 1 - $ & 1 4 1 11 3 1 1 1 1 = C . 93 11. 1 0 4 m f f I 3 : LOWER LEVEL PLAN Â®r=A---i=--- Gi==igfi,106/6---9---r =9. 3-:-----0'f-Jffrui;fr=3'CJY=Pff?f_*7~-: - Â® NOT FORCONSTRUCTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROJECT No 1614 DRAWN BY. MTE 0 Â® LOWER LEVEL PLAN 0 2 4 8 SCALE 1/4 = 1-0 1 3.1 244*'Â·964~;,'2696964 IMW,969 ' Â·Â·Â· i r'WAr*rV,WAWNT Â· '7 ' ' 1 00 'NE]dSV 3nN3AV ONÂ¥101IN 8EE-LEE 911IH N3dSV ALIUS ESION rDAP , A CL----4-â‚¬] @ - 3 11 11 11 11 IIi 11 11 1 1 11 11 Ij ll 11 11 !1 11 11 11 1 11 1) 11 iJ DECK n .u,#Im./.My!&- mm89696.,41-Â·Â·-Â· 1,VAW,9;.;9699.I rÂ·â€¢â€¢~W.W v.66.,W'"1 1 â€ž9 â€ž699,69,11 rn -.WWOA,64,6411 .-1,6.4Â· mmi, 6 9/0'1'MAN,%91:- Im UWAV,761 I 49.'.'.'.9 149MI _ _ 1 1 Â® UNIT 2 UNIT 4 UNIT 6 UNIT 8 .ORAGEABOVE Iii INIEEPEEBEI2ESE AllifYal4my//mill= 1 21 E-19=.4-MVM- STAIRSTYP. 1 -11& f] li 1 1 ;Fultr tiI- 3*â‚¬ 1 <~ loofool L 00100 ./// ///4 "/-2 -4-,-,M/,C:,e, 0:155' 1 pemoo oofoo rCL~Lr-LL_m /4,... / DN - - DN 4.1.Ti>4716.2.1 09 EJ i GO . . /1 ./. 7 /- I C L 'C 5 @ 4-1 1--7 4 i 11//1 1 ' 1,4 0, , 6 DECK , 111, lilli ~~ ~p~ ~~~~ 1--- - ON ON 1 DN [73 - CPI 11 11 1111 2 ~ i 17 33 >-1-41 I 1/- 0 0%0 01 111~ 43 CORPS LLC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED KITCHEN 1016*oloi KITCHEN r- 2 L-7 KITCHEN 00%00 KITCHEN 1- m | | | - DRAWING SET ISSUE 1 = EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/30 2016 UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 7 LIVING ROOM 3 / 1 3 MAIN LEVEL PLAN r.-.\ -WA'AWmAWAYM-Aklm:Imeq/~~'- l,NWAW#mml 1.,ii,ii,i. â€¢'ivi'Â·'Â·'Â·' 'Â·'.' Ipmm;~ V mimvr/murn,1- Iw~rryÂ·'YYV,Â·al â€¢AvmyrnÂ·nvrrill 1-w.... wl'~nÂ·,Â·,9,ir-------â€¢~ ~ 90'r FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT No 1614 DRAWN m MTE DECK Il n 11 ti~ r] I n .1 1-1 rl n n o li 11 1-1 1-1 n I Q ~ I n 11 11 tÂ« Fr 4, MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE. 1/4- = 1-0- 0 2 4' 8 3.2 "Â·Â· 'Â·Â·Â·Â·vÂ·'6~Wmmm#Mm,9,9644Â¥ Â¢#M , ' 69#69496 V#,WA:*MmrY? 96'r'V' 1' 4' W.4WAW##m Â·,4 M#M,/My?,4???/,4/ /4/â€ž044/????,???f?#?â€¢??tf#?,?,+ 64 W69 604*'IM Â¥Whie,m#,WmmAY,4WAWAW#hY,WmmWmmm,YAWYW Â¥4'V,r'W,Y~WA, ~ Â·â€¢, 1 IC *44'm,6W.WW269,WN.Â¥#AW,V,W,WrW#66~4WWW'# i 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV aNV1011AI 89Â£-LEE SllIH N3dSV nmAW,W.Wnit] e-'.--- 39 3" 1Â§1 ALIUS 5.2 %9 1 1 Â® 2 - ~~ ~Ill;] _[ 1_ ~.E I_ E - 2 -- ~ ~~ ~~~ [ - - ----- - E I '2-f E E- [ - E -- - - I --- -~--- - --i- I -tri -- - - T ---1 ~ e I - - I I LLITT' I - E~ - - --1- 2 5/1121 E ~ - - - E - - El~ 5 -A ~ 1:12 /i Â· 2 I - - - - - -|| SCRns L_C ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOD 'gill 20t. A[IUS DFSIGN L - DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDI-IONS 9/30~2016 - - ' - - - ROOF PLAN I Z I I~- 2 - I - - ~ - ~ PROJECT No 16'4 . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L DRAWN BY. MTF I Â· I Â· Â· - - I - I - - -4 - -1 1 ~ ROOF PLAN SCALE 1/4Â· = 1-0. 0 2 4 8 3.4 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONÂ¥101181 8â‚¬E-LEE 911IH N3dSV IÂ· I l-I l-I lÂ·I l-, I-, TÂ·, 11 r-1 r, il m r--1, I r-1 M f. m m rÂ·, i l l-I l-, ri ,-i, I ,-1 @ O A ALIUS - -t - - 1 â‚¬ .2. L -L..2 Â· Â· - - - ~ -th.. 1 9.-. DESIGN CORPS fl~I 'llt< 1Ip I ij~ 1~J LI 1 i Ui ~ p r I~; 1 1 #lul~~U i 4~ i~1 ~.u Y U *108-0 ~~ i~ I ~! I | 1 | | ~ UPPER LEVEL 11. 1111 1 111 -- lilli 11 F 11111111 1.lilli 1 1 r--1-r LINE ASSUMED GRADE i i EYOND - i P 1 1.11-= 11[- 111111 1 ---417 - E '11 1.lim, fi !1IE?IrF?1 | Al ' f 1--I - I !! IL -!WI 11 GPAy n \ WALL , , -~ l iLli I L'..|I ILLLi Ill I ll=I~~Ii" ~ I L~ ILU I IJL-- ~ ~LI ILILI ILL I UU I ~1 -- 11' -u i db I ULI I dil'i 0-11 --_i UU i ILID i ull _11 ILL i Â·U- ULI ~L _Jilt, -- ~ 1- -~~i L ILI_11 libi lliI L ILILI L I ILL Iii-7-- ie=m:=1< 4100'-0 [YOND - MAIN LEVEL 10-nU===6==1 - '-7-----~ .~.<L=~~~_t~__1~ #4/~..< r: 1~~rl-in--~~~ ~if~ 7..3,~ .,4'' l1fei1f .>~ff 7~~ >Â»f -9r+4f< ~~/ 2-~t717~~~Lf/le: ~F~711 '~,'.*,~ -0-0--- 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 HATCHED AREA -.- OFEXPOSEDLLÂ¥.ALLS lili 1 1 1 SEE SHEET 1.3 1 1 1 111 1 lilli 1 --- --------- -- --- il - - -- ---- *89'4 LOWER LEVEL Â® NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4Â·' = 0 2 4Â· 6 Ct'Â·9131]T 2516 AL1US DESIGN O ap2S L.C AIL RIGHTS RESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/30,2016 - u ... i *f 2,9 1 , - i HA' 4- I . u -11 .741 4 4 - 1 --- " 1 1 1 11 U li id I / 'PiM 1 1 91 1 It 1 I lill 1-[[EL 1 11 1 1,1 ~UPPER LEVEL NORTH &SOUTH ELEVATIONS 108:0 1 1 Ill=14 1 f--â€¢ i P in-- ~~ F-- I li [LI-~ = NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION lEi PROJECT No 1614 11 1 1 1 1 1 : . DRAWN BY MTE 11 11 1 IL'k- 1111 - ~ 1 ==. 11'3' R.! 1 d 4- 1 --Â» 11: 1 l' I ' --7 1 IT 1 1.11.1 1 11--4 , m.!p 11 11 -'4 11 LINEOFWIN. VOND LINEDF GRACE ll __ -ii -_ Litiuitibllulll-U LIE Ld :l_l,u- L i 1,-u 1: 5:Â·-Â·:-Â·: Â·Â·ji I.-H]ll'lilll__ lull _[' LU _- Ill_' 16 _'2 Ell- IJEEU~ Ii-,Il[.Il 21 -_ --Il-- -L -L jit-ai --lili_illl, 1-lilull Il~ 1100'.0 [ LOWER L~EL ~ALL ~M/UN LEVEL 1 /\ 1 1 -St GRADE@SIDEWAL<- t,/4/.4':.<' u 7, ,[52,/2/Â», /2,~4/011- =r- _Li~'~ t---u'/ 34.,/ ; r-----r, 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 - 1 r7:=tr===11'' ' i i PATCHED'REA | | | OF EXPOSE.L.WALLS -11 1 1 1 SLOPED'RADE ~9~//t~~1----- BEYOND 1 1 1 ] | SEE SHEET U 1 1 ---- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 11 -- -- ----1 -----1 1 .0--- ----7 Â© SOUTH ELEVATION 0248 4.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-7 1 141Â¥f: 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV aNV-lallAI 9â‚¬Â£-LEE 911ll-1 NEIdSV tu 2 2 4 4 6 m 2 9 1 Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 1 @ 1 0 1 1 F \ 1 112 .- == 6 -- 1 11.4- 1 r 1 . . 11[-- 4 1 j - h Â· Â· 1..... - ff-127-4 1- - -- -- 1 97 - 4 -- - 1 1/ - i i ---- Lb - 1 1 1 . . .- -4 . . ....... ....... 7 > 1\ It. -- 1 *- 1 t.\ 11\11 ,-- 1 - 11 1 1 --- 1 1 N *\1 1 1 14 1 1 u ..1 U ..... 1 1 m 1 1 0 1 1 1 21 129 0 4 zen- 2 0 :@ : 4 :4 5 m r-MN r 0, m < m 01 EN 33 3% 6 0% ASPEN HILLS 0 Z Â»A O 0 9 " - 4 4 . : rÂ·1 .m k) 4 w .6 0 331-338 MIDLAND AVENUE ASPEN, CO ~' K I 0 13A31 MaM ~ ~-laA31 33MO 13A31 NIVIN *13A3-1 h!3/dn LOWER LEVEL.-~ SEE SHEET 1 3 NOI1VA313 1SV3 0-,L = i.* 3-3VDS L NOI1VA313 193AA ~ MAIN LEVEL~ / UPPER LEVEL-~ O E.XEED LL I i i tppER LEVEL ~MAIN LEVEL NOILOflkiSNOO ~03 LON SNO11VA313 193/A 9 19Â¥3 InSSI 139 IM -I 0 0 ALIUS DESIGN CORPS ME ===.1 I 108'-0 UPPER LEVEL~ 1 UPPER LEVEL Â¢108'4 1 1 4 1 i ~ ~I Â·-to ~d : 4 : ' 100'-0" 100'-0'* yl: EE 11 + MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL ~ \N \ X '1 \' 4111|'I~[4'1141'1101144~ 1 1 5 "2'11'iltili,irrb44, 11(l'43Â£11,1'44& '01111(11111,111+J# a r 44Â«4,4.0 %14Â»*. Aph. "141'11110 J I -3= /1/1/lill! lÂ·,, ..1 l;l'j' Â· ~Â·~ -s Â·--- Uly LOWER L~VEL~ ~LOWER LEVEL ~ SECTION'A' 0 2 4Â· 8 SCALE 1/4" = 1-0 cc. /IJHT.16AllUSDESIGÂ·~ CO~PS LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/30 2016 1] luuuUUMUU HUJUE[JUUU'& IL , y k 108'-0"* ~- UPPER LEVEL i * I S E ~ SECTIONS f 14 f - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 r i it al_ 0 'l m PROJECT No 1614 - DRAWN m MTE r i i E 100'-0 r, 7 MAIN LEVELÂ¢ F : Â·Â·I-Â·4.1...f~F,qdil[:- .-7 ST ~. _. 1 liLE{kI ! 1 1 1 1.- Aks:492.tÂ· 0 19i 1 1 3/*#,tulit/441 i % 1.3/02/~4* * '4441'til 1 /1 89'-0 0,4Â«4 - i E R LOWER LEVEL.~ ~ ~ ~ SECTION'B' 5.1 0 2 4 8 SCALE 1/41" = Do" 1 27.-Â·'.Â·Â·Â·â€¢'Â·" ''44'".62"?2# 00 'N3dSV 3AN3AV ONVIC]IIN 8Â£Â£-LEÂ£ 911IH N3dSV r.mir'*TA Â·t 'r % p r ), Â¥ 6 43: 1. *i~ 2'Â£ I~-~.jillfno. Â»9Â·'8:7~. ~*191-4.0:. ~ 42.(42 I. 4%Â£. Â· et !, 6.tÂ·ti vÂ·Â·i ...74'i - j -:~.~4*~2.} ~h~t,9~Â·Â· ....~u*Â·*gÂ· 1 /3102... t,/v z., 0~ ;/ 3 - &20 11 )4 4 J y...1 ..,4,4.i#'. .-' M?:Pfi*FL 4t~..1:6~14 4 A 63.â€¢ 1. *. f. '<ZÂ¢ 241(5+144' .~~015;~~i~~prf<*p~~I , 1 - 1. - ' 1. Â£14Â·, 11 4 .I.,Â· 1~::1724:9'.2,~49-.2.14..3*'~.---2.L4I# ib:j* k 9 1 - 4 - 1 ' r r â‚¬. - . b 40 'I * 6.- 6 1 . . i, 1 , , Â· - '44 *t'8,/ 7 2 . e . I . - I .... #V:'-*Â·4:t. t#Â«73,Â·14=B I ./ - L.29' . itt 4/Alâ€¢ 11 ALIUS , 1 47,7 0 ::2 , . 2 167 ~9.4 A.4 I. ' ... I ' 2*/ 4 4 1 11. t 1.:lili 4.7 it -~: '/ tk '1 ., - 41#~~~:;* %12, â‚¬-Iâ‚¬~ --1-~ Z -IL + D-* Â¥ ~f 111 . . 03 .bi - ..Cl " W.~ 0 1 12 17 r 1 V: 4 ..9 7. I I 0. lili#111'~17.1 4. 11.1 '11 91.14 , ... - 11 1 I.-11 , I &% 9; '' 7''AL,4.3 Â·4' ,Â·.,>, ..... 4,4.:41,1. 7,11?,p.. ..1,1 LU Ir"/9,1/'19,1,(.5 _Clk#'/I"ill"Mil:j//1/Willil/'22'p 2,@6<42.*x 1 7. C & 2~ 1 1 1.11.. 11' 4,2Cr 4. rh .c, + I. "ti i CO....:Elb ALIUSPEblt,~1 44*4 2 3 ,.9 -:*1,3--Ar ED:~i; f,Â·.. ru...Z~lte, '. .... .- I - CORPS L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVE[, ./ 4 .' I. I ../ 'I . I. 7"4*/ 2#7*:5 DRAWING SET ISSUE b lu- 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/30 2016 481//0 4 ., 5 ; 7.Â· a.2.1.t U.-19 4 '' . ...Â¥C-Â¥r !# I . '56 . . 1. Â· .. /2 1 1 6 11 4-1 9 kiil'' Â· -7-~' 1, ';1' 1 01. 1 41 I - /, 11 1 2 - . 41 : Â· ri Â· Ii,i 1 ' 1 I I -t 1, %4 / :/, 4 il#.1 IL.. ~:t 1 .... lilli SITE PHOTOS .i9*41,4 .Â· 1.- '' . 1 jul â€¢A.- ; i 1,i -1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION . 4 - 24 - PROJECI No 1614 . 24.1.'Â·'fi Â·'ji:K'i ,1, -fi'Â·'1 r::2:2 Â· -F. Â· --- DRAWN A MTE 4..11 1. . P 1 44 .1-* Â· '"t 7 j Â· '151 .:: - I .-..%1% ; 4.'. .1.6.t i 1 3. . .01 5522 I , A I: 4 I 7 IflilÂ·Â· /, Â· F../.1 ,&11'll 45 :1,; i /:Il ~ 70#. |I '1 1 14 w 1//2/Wm/</ ./ ~38 r 1%1 j , lilli $ , . 2 + -- ..21'F . 1 '11 81."* 1 e vk Jill.,1./.9. 1 * < u .14 ./mudjul b.:1~ . w. l , 1 - A X 2, i. , 11 fix 9/ 4/ i l t- ii K Vild~1 "111 1 . -1 / .1 0 1 - I. , 4.7. , â€ž .4 7. - ... , / / 4 - 1....0.8 .. C ...431, 1 .f.3 -3 ff ~ ~ ky' m Â»f/1- ~; s 1 1 - ft:lia . 6.1 00'NadSV 3nN3AÂ¥ ONÂ¥10IIN 8Â£Â£-LEE 1. .1 . 11 ... : .111-â€ž -N. 4- 1,1 s I CÂ·Â· 1 I :..'Â·I . Fl#*19*JA ... ' . ...: 1 . .1 -1 -./.. l. yÂ© ..4Â¢... J. ALIUS .d e .>r 44 - - , --1Â¥1514 -12.F . 4 ' $ I ,!N r nufÂ·J f ..7 4- I I : 111 1 kit> Â« i!11 1 -1 1 j 1 1 . A ,-!li I -i , '0*.ti 4.2 471 -1 37 1 ti I 2 1 4 11=1 i , .1 , U 29-i 4 I.'. 1 I I i 7 . -- . 1. 1 1.0 < .. 1 2'* *=3 - i. iiiii~-OB i .IWIL I f ..2 44445. I'll ' .- 4.-P-3 C,- - P D - . ...â‚¬e, I ..1 . lilli .Di '11.~ t 9298'r- 1 =.r - 30/ /2.2 lt>ALIUS.... CORPSLLC ALLRIGHTS RESERVED DRAWING SET ISSUE EXISTING CONDI-IONS 9,30 2016 Â·.,2 f'lk.17'. t. - f ~--' 040 1.29 1,,11,11'11: h 12'.1-e -1 -,1...1111*, ,?' i/. 194 74,11,1 %14( 0,11 - 2 -ipper.B# . % 1 .1/ -*-I 9 -Ti. 4. 1.4 - f~:~~ 1 lilli 1 1 9 ..UEI,; Â·6Â·Â·Â·-Â·- - :'. - '. , , , SITE PHOTOS 1 . 22- . I . 4% I 1 I . f NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 10 -- . =' . ~~ . ~ PROJECR IC 1614 DRAWN BY: MTF 1 1 1 1 1 # 11. 11 11 i --1 - j 11. j. ' 1111 1 k - : Â· ... 1 W. 1 SJ d *. '1 . 1: .---2:. 74*-4- ff.1 44.7 .3: 3 939 9404 .. I. (fll-./ I- : t~*Â·+ + - p Â¥22*.4-7,- AE'A~**S .- - 2-922-* a 6.2 fyÂ» . 1 - t- e N : 2; .;-74:ekk * ' 1- -'.2 1 .#LK q .4.- ~~Â·22 02 7,71,2 00 'NadSV 3AN3AV CINvlalvy 98Â£-1.â‚¬Â£ 911IH N3dSV 11 . ./M..16~ *1Â·H/' 0 I * . /. :. .,4 0% 17 .lpw.'.r ./ 1 - --1 - --4â€ž,4. . r...34 W. 1. ,#01 410 ... .*I: ;Â¢7 h /: . : .C RE= *~ITYWMA#94. . 4- Th 0 . f / '.6 9, .4 + %-a,41 - i.~c'-'A.~*2-/'Â·.; tA . 14/ '.... i . t . .4, <- . . 46)- ., . D . - 0 33. .: -' .% ./-/ ./* .fl 12 1 , , 4 - 4 / ..,.. * 4.Â·-7,0 30' A L I US k . .... . 4 .9 Â· t. -'-3 .399 .: , â€ž0 38/ 1 1 -14.Z-wa 1 , % - uff. 4 44Â» . *49.:.' . I 'br P iii - ... 1. 1 . 4 ti I -- ..'.9 4 t. -1 14 . .2/ -0 4.Â·. u /17Â«*re' I I *M. AL ." . ef-:-Â·:.961 - .. 2- 4, , ./.ille.. Â· - 3,â„¢r Â· -A :~e-~#:* ' -1 . . la ** Â·. ? . .9. Â·t, t 4 ..<,1.- $*t - A Ge RIGHT,2102.11.SCESION 7. t>7-Â· CO;PS L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED . . Y ' -- i Â· DRAWING SET ISSUE , 1 .,14 ...... . 7% - ad: EXISTING CONDITIONS 9/30<2016 - 4 1. - 1 2% 16'A:. .R . . 1 l.....; 1. .:r.72.27 . . . Fl '.,Â¥ . '. 3 ./ 2 f'. 3 1 /tr~ i . ,~Â£ r -~1*, 7.~ , . ; .,2.2 .9, J.Â· 4. 41 U-/ . -9 16.1 0 1, NU,dip -Â» ~S J U U., , SITE PHOTOS NLL.1-%. Â·Â· 0 - r #,6 id':'<... ~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION h . â€¢ ~ ' ' PROJECT No 1614 DRAWNI BY MTE Â·Â·t .t pi - ' .4 . 'a 4 â€žLT-7 , 1 , - 6.3 4 04â‚¬1}> %01* 00 'N3dSV 3nN3AV ONÂ¥101IN 89Â£-LEE 911IH N3dSV . 4-_ ' 6.u.44 101@2*31 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: October 31,2016 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 331-338 Midland Ave Affordable Housing Certificates and reviewed it for completeness. O Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction o f the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Uf''Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. â€¢ 5 additional complete copies â€¢ $5,200 deposit Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2741 if you have any questions. Thank You, 4 - 1 9.L ,Pfil14 pk, Planner City . I Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging