HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Cemetery Ln-City Employee #1.32-80
."
No. 3)..-90
CASE LOAD SUMMARY SHEET
. City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBmTTEO: JUhe.. /4BO STAFF: Jole~e Vruko-k..
2. APPLICANT: e,~J &~f(M.P1dtril1V(4M~Clu~6. .
[O+#-/ J )4-sF~ Fnvp /Ojee !!uU5/~ f'/oj~()h,
3. REPRESENTATIVE: f201A- SiD c k- .
---
4. PROJ ECT NAME: Lo -/--4F I; A-srE "'{l'J t' <' /-6, v S'/-Lcb 5;ff'o.J kW~e-<..J
5. LOCATION: Ce~'le-~/'J L-2~
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Subdivision
Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
Stream Margin
____8040 Greenline
____View Plane
Conditional Use
Other
Rezoning
P.U.D.
~Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
7. REFERRALS:
. V' Attorney
V Engineering Dept.
V Housi n9
Water
____City Electric
Sanitation District ____School District
Fire Marshal ____Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Parks ____State Highway Dept.
Holy Cross Electric ____Other
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: P::-?::-) L C- $feu~{ !?~V/eMJ o-f.
J2fl!1upIJrr;n {Yaf't1. 6v~ wiL
..(7Pr Utfn.l/~Yt'.e. haus/~
c:Y'
116m ~'/u~~
:24 /tJ, 2- (h ~
""".:
~.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
at')d Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdoniiniumization of the proposed duplex. Before
you today is a'private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Section 24-1O.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include II all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section24~10.10c" {which allows for low,
mOoaerate and middle income housing units) IIsubject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning arid zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of COrnml.mity need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of thedevelopment.f1
The attached 1 etter, submi tted by the app 1i cants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.
..
(I' -..,..
: ,
.~," ~ 4~{ .
,y"
.Jif.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kathleen McCormick, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex Special Review
DATE: June 13, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exception, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the proposed duplex' condominiumization. Before you
now is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their low and moderate income housing
project, also known as the City Duplex.
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
Sys tem", hous i ng un its exempted from the Quota System i nc 1 ude II all hous i ng
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10,"(which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units),"subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning
commission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed,
the type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
- outlines plans for construction, deed restricti6n and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this appl icatlon arid finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommendation concerning this application will be
presented at the P & Z meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 1980; Sunny Vann had
been out of town and has not been able to review the application.
~
~
J
~1EMORANDUM
TO:
l\~penCi
Council
FROM: Sunny Vann~-Pl annin] Offi ce
RE: City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption/Exception
DATE: February 28, 1980
The City of Aspen QWns .ajparcel of vacant land located on Cemetary Lane
which it wishes to subdivide for the purpose of constructing two duplexes
to be used for employee housing. In addition, the City wishes to condom-
iniumize the proposed duplex structures to permit their sale to individual
city personnel. The parcel is zoned R-15 and totals approximately 40,000
square feet in size. Consistent withithe area and bulk requirements of the
R-15 zone, the City proposes to create two duplex lots of approximately
20,000 square feet each.
The Planning Office, having reviewed the City's request for subdivision
exemption/exception, recommends the following:
1. That the City be granted an exception from compliance with full
subdivision procedures for purposes of subdividing the parcel
in question, subject to the Engineering Department's recommen-
dations which are attached for your review. Specifically, the
City should be excepted from conceptual approval before Council
and preliminary plat approval before P & Z.
2. That the City be granted an exemption from the definitimn of
subdivision for purposes of condominiumization of the proposed
duplex structures.
The subdivisions of the City's parcel and the subsequent construction of
four deed restricted employee housing units is exempt from growth manage-
ment competition. The employee housing units, however, are subject to the
special approval of the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning
and Zoning Commission. The City intends to request special review approval
upon finalization of its building program.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office's
recommendations at their regular meeting held on March 4, 1980.
It
.
\)
~~
t>'..
~\I\
\Y
.,..,?
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - - Special Review
(Lot #1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision)
DATE: July 1, 1980
The Aspen City Council has previously approved a subdivision exemption
permitting the separation of City Lots #1 and #2 on Cemetery Lane, a
subdivision exception permitting the condominiumization of one proposed
duplex on each lot, and Special Review approval for price-restricted
employee units to be constructed on Lot #2 with exemption from Growth
Management.
The application before you is for special review approval for the design
of two price-restricted employee units to be constructed on Lot #1 (which
are exempted from Growth Managment restrictions according to Section
24-10.2(h) of the Aspen Code).
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), IIExceptions to the Growth Management Quota
Systemll, housing units exempted from the Quota System include 'Iall housing
un its cons tructed pursuant to Secti on 24-10.10 II (wh i ch allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units) IIsubject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
missi.on which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development.1I
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated June 30, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and recommends approval
given the middle income price restrictions.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
~/8l80
p+:c ~c-~ '512 c<--rrcrv-zJ!... ~V"t~
--ftJ .A~'a-( t:J-~ ~JVZ~
~ '-i--L-e- SaJ<-.JL ~ ~ 1.-..0+-*2 <<>
PQ~,f,~i.-d ~~ ~ -' ~ s-~ ~d-fb.-
.- /J I ,~~ c.cJYu--~(.,h.-( ~f-.J .
~ l/l~ '
1/14
cc !-'-'-~.~ -10 j~ol.z., cv+ A/;hJ -r;rn,,-Cl)At~.le.J /,a"w<..._ ~
~f2Pfr"7v~e -<A~QiJ .:fJ)e/~ ?Z.c-~opJ.._,~
S/rcJ, 2. q / L '1- A )~d f\Qd! 'n':;i/I?-L;~1 < :;" . .
aree , c'-_c-~ JiroK! alJ~))~~-"=:J
. f";::>,\;i~ ~~;., :~.:;:)~~<j. ';\:~.:'~.~:~'.'~:\.~{'V .~t~.
~ '''\:~...;,._-") ...., ...'..1'.".'......,.. .1,.(#
""........::.:!... j' '" ~ ....~,'< . ~.'.. ...~,. ',A,... ~~~___.
..fl.>' ",
Co ...;iI"
y.~"""
'-::~~7." .
".:: i
I.f.
"\
d,;.
, ~.."." ~
. ,
"
June 30, 1980
The City Council and
Planning and Zoning Co~ission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Mouerate
Income Housing Project under the G.M.P.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 24-10. 2 (h) of the Munic ipal Code of the ~~.__ ;<..o..B
of Aspen, Colorado, Daniel A. McArthur and Snaron .y~y: ato€k, ereby he
submit to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission this cCL/J1t4
written application for special review approval of a low and mod-
erate income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemp-
tion from the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the following-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
..
Lot 1, Aspe n Emp loyee ~~us~ng"_'~~~:.0~~~~~;=:=~~~n,_;".,.c;'~'~~c~<; JJk~k~
The :-eal J?roperty containS'~~.9pl square. feet and is zoned(:R-:l:.?>..vA.4f~
(Resl.dentl.al). $,.1-tREfi:. -
The applicants intend to construct _a residential;,QlJplex on the eJzB$"CP
real property. Unit 1 will be a~)bedroom,C2L30]5squarec-r6oEo'.' $ol..A:{2.IV~
structure \vit.l1>a 530 square footV garage. UniJ(2 will Dea .three
bedroom, (:r:3q,P......square foot stru...c. ture.. vitha. 240 square foot gar-
~,._-~~~,.. . '. '., ',' ....... ." '.' '. . ...... .... .............. .. '.' .
age. The duplex structure-~ill be two stories with the ga~a.!;1es
providing.a common \lall, (25'jfeet high, 96 Et;:t::t;wide, with 3QJfeet
in depth. . As designed, tV duplex stru.c. ture complies \vith nl:~l. of
the area and bulk regulatiFR:s of the R-15 (Residential) zo'L:;
The applicants agree to de~~estrict the property within t~,~~
~iadr~income housing price guidelines and the applicable occu-
pancy imitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-l0.4(b)(3) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado. .
....\:T, ~ ::~.~
-T'~~
i'.~ ,
. r"":"~f'" .".FP ..~." 'j..
'! i .:-,~. .. : .' . ,
~: . i ~....'::. A. ,.
....t, ..'.... 1 '.~ ~ '
~~.~.. .......,.....,.......,......
..' t' .
~::m- '; . \'~r;1~' '~'~r? p' ::,~.~:,., .~.~..~
C i'. . m
'i
~
, .., il
!,.~r. <r;~~',;>o-.~':~r~~/'--.""S I'
,. .....,.~.l. (.';; 'i "; ,.. ,. .. ( I.
. ~.~. \!: '11J; / . ',I/t j
f; I, -:. /.' ..:, 1
1 ' . ,. . ,~ . '. (
... .... Lt i~ . .:....~...... ;,_____t.~..~..:~
. .
.:. . ' .;
';
.l'
.", '.
,~ t", t ' "".., ..
't' .t.. . _ ,
I..:'.
... . '-
. .
i
I,' "
I,
. :~.;
,
\ 'l'~ll
~. .,',
:\:'q ~. :.
..
,
". "I
. 1:" .
1\.
. ".. .." ....'
. I.". ,
"i .\
; "\:\., .
~,'( f ~"'\
. \ .\1 \.
'1 .
, .
.. ';.% .' I
1 ~l. j' .
j
. \. ":. ~
\.'\
'. ','f
,.
1 !
~ f . ·
i '
\ ';
.'
..
...,..."'IIIflo\......'\.
..,.- ......,.....'., ........ ,....:'
...- ;
..
,,..
....
..
'(
..~~~4
.
>
City Council and PlanniQ<j and Zoning Commlssion
June 30, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being eligible employees, intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City of Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the Con-
struction of such ownership housing.
The applicants respectfully request special review approval to
commence immediate construction.
/_---..Resl:?:ctfully S~Ubmi tted,.
\)~ :......-. .-.-..... ,;
'. ~.
... .0 -.".
... v-,_
Ronald W. Stock
Attorney for applicants
-.
-.
~ (ILl?:: :r(BIgO ~ #t' )
Iw ",&XiJ,X (c~J . t'~ ~? 1;
f~d ~-&-- l
.~.
..IJrv~ .
... ~r
. -,.
fl.
."r: ..:?;-" . .1l~~"B' 1(7'" '"1?: "17:;: ','~r
, ., ; :.
: ,~.~ '. ~'.
I:.,
j..,.
~~:~I;r; !~. ~.~.'~
< .,
"\
. .
..:c ;,~ +;;.;;;;., .~.:.. ~;,." . -, r-~':;.'- ~
.,'.<.." . 'l'(';.?~ .... :~./
..--"""""""""1' .
. .' ._'~"-
.' t
. 'f
t t
. \ ,- ~,
. .:.~'). ..
~. .. l ';
": ':\1 \
.,
~
::;1.. .
. ,
. .
, . ,.;'~ ~, .
.r '
i'
::1:1
~ '. .
_. ".,.
.: l"~.' .
. ~
I ..
/.:,.:A....
", '.~' r
", i ~.
. ~
~ ',\
: I .'
..
..
I
r.~r'. ~~f"--""''''~ ~r~.:~('~:.~f .
,I' 'A1 ,"L.",.,.,~ }'.,...... ......_~,."I.1. l
..~....(......r ~;.r.y' .f<t:'.<:. .....: '. ..'< ..'.
,'. .. '.. ..' .. Jl.' .~., ... '1... r~/'>! ".'::-:~{' I,
- ,'" .... .' ;..j{;' /.' .. I
~ l-. " ",~;.?:x : ,-':;:{~;;;\;~;f ~~.
. _..."'- ._"".>~""'J f
...
..
. t.,:, .';,': }~~.i~~~l~~~:'::~:J.."~t:r::~.~~.{."':~Tr-'
~ i.,., ,.........., . . ') .',' ,. ., . " ...'. or) .
~:.~lt~-~' ~.1~:~(,'t(., ~.'.:.' ~~4 ,.1 \:,~.... ~ ~f>~~
,.~..........,.... \:
,..". ...." .-:.. _.. ....~.. I....
.".
,
""
.
~~
};~,
~
!" .~
("'~.,.,'
CITY OF "i\SPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, co 10 ra d ,.'816 t 1
"";~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 20, 1980
TO: Members/,~~_.J~";i,5Y Council
FROM: Ron ~~OCk/~
RE~ City Attorney Report
LADA VM~y'.V.CIT~
.
.
I am attaching for your review our answer and counter-claim filed
on August 5, 1978, in the above-entitled litigation. Under the
Fourth Cross-complaint, page 5, we advised the court that we have
paid more than $14,000 in excess .of the maximum contract price for
the third floor construction. The City has a clear and absolute
right to repayment of this amount. At this point Mr. Vrany has
not prosecuted his claim for $70,000 in additional fees. His
failure to act is, I believe, a recognition of the fact that we
can win on that issue.. Esgentially, Mr. Vrany is claiming twice
the contract price for performance of 98% of the contract ser-
v ices.
The reason for this update is to request of the Council authori-
zation to proceed in the litigation of this Fourth Cross-complaint
irregardless of the fact that Mr. Vrany has not prosecuted his
original . t.
CHAPMAN/FREERS HOUSING
On Tuesday 1. the Planning Commission reconunended special
review of the ChapmanjF s duplex. You have on your agenda the
P cond reading of Ordinance Nos. 24 and 25
which ordinances would approve the sale to these two parties of
the land. If you decide to approve these sales, you will, without
a doubt, grant special review approval under the Growth Management
Plan. Thereforet although we could not vut this matter on your
agenda because we were not sure that the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission would cOIllplete their actions recommending the same, we now
ask that you add this matter to your agenda just after your public
hearings and second readings so as to avoid a two week delay in
the start of construction.
~ '"
"'"\.{'Ckv~..
\ 1"1
..
~'<l:"-'
.~L
.....
",.4<
Memo to City Council
June 20, 1980
Page 2
Attached hereto are the documents that would have been included in
your agenda packet, specifically a memo from the Planning Office
together with the application of the individuals requesting spe-
cial review approval.
RWS ~ me
cc~ Wayne Chapman
Kathryn Koch
.
.
f;"'P
,',;'
"-')........l~l
t
t
... h~
,..
r-'~
.. 1-80... .
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBt~ITTEO: February, 1980 STAFF: Sunny Vann
2. APPLICANT:-.fity o1-~spen / ~AY'c1sa/4/Z/4A/E; ANA/&. r~
/
Lot #2, Aspen Employee Housing No.. 1 Subdivision
3. REPRESENTATIVE: Ron Stock
4. PRO,JECT NAME: City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption and Special Review
5. LOCATION: ~~XY't.A#e
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
____yezoning
P.U.D.
_~Subdivision
---2\'_Excepti on
__~_Exempt ion
70:30
_.~_Special Review
__,__Growth ~lanagement
HPC
Residential Bonus
_Stream Margi n
8040 Greenline
View Plane
Conditional Use
Other
cx~CX/ ~ c:..or~~~..8(a./r7/C'<< .ren
~N~/---///V/LiL#d(77~N ~&;/Ac- ~&=/ E/-,I/&:!.)'~Ee
-,..--~----. .. ...0"J/.-...-r--;=-:-~-
,../(t.........,.,.......""'... ...../.......'. ......><\'/>..~C'6/A/9
7. REFERRALS: ;//. .
0ttorney ,/'(.,.. ~5a.nitation DiStrict School Dist.rict
/ Engi neerin9'.-Dept. __Fi Y'e Marshal>, __-______ROcky Mtn. Nat. Gas
~lousing,/ __~arks ~State Highway Dept.
,
___Ho ly Cross Electri c __~Othc'r
fv10untai n Bell
Water
Hy El ectri c
8. REVIEW REQUIREfvIENTS: r4z. ~c-YV'C/L
, / -
.-.<"~
.,.,.1>
^~
.". j
9. DISPOSITION:
p & Z ~
--
Date~/Cb ~1~
c;;)/ 7/co ~-4L. IJ.GV/6
, ,.- #
~Gi:::/-4L /fEV/~-'<,4'nny---tL- a.:x/77Nc$~ ~)-^/
~e:::X/~ALL ~~X/CT/c~ .e/\/~ ~
/~U..(~.. ".~ ~, ~E/f',L///.
Approve9 V
Denied
Council V Approved v Denied Date ~~~/C!X~.
ei/zo/CY5~1t- ~~/6
~~O/R'~~//1z ~~#-~8/0~7/0N
/
10. ROUTING:
__Attorney
~uilding
Engineering
Other
"'ct"s. > ' ..,.. .,"':1;
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: City Duplex Special Review: (McArthur/HcClung)...lst Reading
Lot #1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision
DATE: July 7, 1980
The Aspen City Council has previously approved a subdivision exemption per-
mitting the separation of City Lots #1 and #2 on Cemetery Lane, a subdivision
exception permitting the condominiumization of one proposed duplex on each
lot, and given special review approval for price-restricted employee units
to be constructed on Lot #2 with exemption from Growth Management.
Two ordinances are before City Council for first reading. They would grant
permission to Dan McArthur and Rob McClung to purchase the units in the
duplex on Lot #1. Prior to approving this sale of City property, the Council
must grant special review approval of the employee housing units (as desig-
nated in the covenants signed at the time of subdivision and condominiumi-
zation).
The attached application is for special review approval for the design of
two price -restricted employee units to be constructed on Lot #1 (which
are exempted from Growth Management restrictions according to Section
24-10.2(h) of the Aspen Code).
Pursuant to that Section 24-10.2(h), IIException to the Growth Management
Quota Systemll, housing uni.t exempted from the Quota System include "all
housing units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10" (which allows for
low, moderate and middle income housing units) "sub6iect to the special appro-
val of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning
commi ssion whi ch approval shall incl ude a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed,
the type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated June 30, 1980,
outlines plans for constnuction and deed restriction, and also points to
the need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and recommends approval
given the middle income price restrictions previously agreed to.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will examine the Special Review appli-
cation on July 8, 1980 and make its recommendation. The Planning Office
will present that recommendati on at your meeting.
""
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sunny Vann, Planning Office
Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering Department ~
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Employee Housing No. 1
DATE:
February 28, 1980
After having reviewed the survey plat for the above subdivision
exemption and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Depart-
ment recommends the following:
1. Conceptual approval be approved subject to owner/applicant
agreeing to enter into a sidewalk, curb and gutter improvement
district when one is formed.
2. The improvement survey as submitted by the owner/applicant
be accepted as a conceptual plat.
3. The owner/applicant follows section 20-14 on the final plat
procedures and submit a final plat for review by the Engineering
Department as per section 20-15 prior to being placed on the
City Council agenda.
TO:
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM:
Jim Reents, Housing Director i:
DATE:
February 12, 1980
SUBJECT:
City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption/Exception
_-'~,.f_......,;.,.
The City of Aspen owns a parcel of land fronting on Cemetary Lane
which has been propOSed to provide housing for key city personnel.
The current zoning on tl1~^~^^property is R-15 and there are approximately
40,000 square feet. Under current zoning, a duplex is allowed on
each 20,000 square foot lot. The City proposes to subdivide this
4 O,O() 0 sq. ft. parcel into tW9 separate lots.. On each lot-L-.t11eCity.
... .....l.n.'..c6tlJtinctToW-Wlt1i-rncilv.t~cftY-pers6n.nel'propos~s to develop a
duplex structure.
Each duplex would be exempt from growth management as designated employee
units.
Subdivision exception is requested by the City. The request is made
for the waiver of full subdivision requirements, more specifically,
conceptual subdivision before Council and preliminary plat before the
Planning and Zoning COmmission.
In addition, subdivision exemption is requested from the definition of
subdivisIon for the purpose of condominiumization of each duplex into
individual deed restricted units.
r
.'
..
JR:ds
'-/:}~~~:::-1~._'--"- '-:':--'~"''f'':o1:'''''':'~'''~'-'____''
~
PEN
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
July 7, 1980
TO;
Jolene VrcJ;1o:ta.,
..#- "
Ron S;~ck <js
Stock/McArthur Duplex Special Review - Employee
Housing
FROM:
RE:
The letter submitted to you for special review is
incorrect in one regard in that my clients, who are
petitioning for special review approval, are Daniel A.
McArthur and Robert A. McClung and not as contained in
the letter. In all other respects the application was
correct.
RWS :mc
~
TO:
Jolene Vrchota
('"
Jim Reent -...-..."..,"?
FROH:
DATE:
July 1, 1980
SUBJECT:
McCarther Duplex
The Housing Office recommends approval of the above mentioned
duplex. Because of the special resale agreement between the
principles and the City, I recommend the middle income designation.
JR:ds
~
<.. :"'"
June 30, 1980
The City Council and
Planning and Zoning Commission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Moderate
Income Housing Project under the G.M.P.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 24-l0.2(h) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, Daniel A. McArthur and Sharon Kay Stock hereby
submit to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission this
written application for special review approval of a low and mod-
erate income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemp-
tion from the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the following-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
Lot 1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision
The real property contains 20,000 square feet and is zoned R-15
(Resident ial) .
The applicants intend to construct a residential duplex on the
real property. Unit 1 will be a two bedroom, 2,300 square foot
structure with a 530 square foot garage. Unit 2 will be a three
bedroom, 2,300 square foot structure with a 240 square foot gar-
age. The duplex structure will be two stories with the garages
providing a convnon wall, 25 feet high, 96 feet wide, with 36 feet
in depth. As designed, the duplex structure complies with all of
the area and bulk regulations of the R-15 (Residential) zone.
The applicants agree to deed restrict the property within the
middle income housing price guidelines and the applicable occu-
pancy limitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-l0.4(b)(3) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado.
~
~
... -
City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
June 30, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being eligible employees, intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City of Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the con...
struction of such ownership housing.
The applicants respectfully request special review approval to
commence immediate construction.
~~_-Reg!2~;::UllY S:.~~..~.t)d'
"."" S. \~
. . ..~.<r~"--..) . v- . ~
Ronald W. Stock
Attorney for applicants
--
,~
,y,r
May 22, 1980
The City Council and
Planning and Zoning Commission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Moderate
Income Housing Project under the G.M.P.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 24-l0.2(h) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers hereby submit to
the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission this written
application for special review approval of a low and moderate
income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemption from
the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the following-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
Lot 2, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision
The real property contains 20,000.61 square feet and is zoned R-15
(Residential).
The applicants intend to construct a residential duplex on the
real property. Unit 1 will be a four bedroom, 2,000 square foot
structure with a 560 square foot garage. Unit 2 will be a three
bedroom, 1,500 square foot structure with a 505 square foot
garage. The duplex structure will be two story with aU-shaped
configuration, 22 feet high, 98 feet wide, with 56 feet in depth.
As designed, the duplex structure complies with all of the area
and bulk regulations of the R-15 (Residential) zone.
The applicants agree to deed restrict the property within the
middle income housing price guidelines and the applicable occu-
pancy limitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-l0.4(b)(3) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado.
,~
~
. ,
~.
City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
May 22, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being eligible employees.. intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City of Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the con-
struction of such ownership housing.
'llhe applicants respectfully request special review approval to
commence immediate construction.
Respectfully submitted,
~.~
a d W. Stock
Attorney for the applicants
r\
1'\
MEMORANDUM
TO:
SUNNY VANN, PLANNING OFFICE
/{6
FROM:
FRITZ BRUGGEMEIER, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RE: FINAL SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT FOR ASPEN EMPLOYEE
HOUSING No.1
DATE: MARCH 17, 1980
After having reviewed the final survey plat for the above
subdivision exception the Engineering Department recommends
approval for the above exception as long as the following
improvements are added to the final survey plat:
1. Title box with date of preparation
2. Certificates of approval for City
Engineer and Director of Parks and
Recreation
3. Varification of control survey with
closure of 1/10,000
".c.."...... ..,...........,,-....:,.,..'..,.,-,..,
-~....._,.^.G"~.~;ic"-.-... ..
,....,' ',. ./- <,: ~/0",<; .. /J.,;,<;..j;~,:;i:/.:.;,,'i
1l1r. Mayor andCounc:i.l>l~embers:
I speak in respO!lsErto an. arti.cle in the Jl1arch6th Aspen
Times, Page 11-A.
TIle article re:f~:r~ .'to . approYal of..sll.bcr:i.v:lE3:l0nof .a.40, 000
square fo.ottra.q'1;.,9+:.J9-:n<1.9:n.O~m(3i;ery Lane into 2. go,ooo
squQe lots for the.. P1l:r.;:pose of building and selling two
condominiumized duplexes.
There se(3ms t()be .Cl.A~mpression O!l. tg(32g1lnc;ilth9-t (inly;
the Golf Cou:t'E3eW'a.13P1tt'chased for Open Space. Instead, the
entireu:asubd}.yia..Ei.a..ac:r€?gge and some. of therema~ninf!;already
subdivided lotswerepurcha'sed at one time for Open Space.
The parcel i:n question '''as:nota.su.bdiv;ided lot, but a
part of the.unsubdivj.tied acreage, and I suggest you research
the zo.ningIITlI!leufiite'I,"y'forIowlrigthe" pU:2cli'as 19..
There has been no time OV~I'the vreelfe:ncl. to organize any
opposition, but I ca:na.l3,~'q:t':E3.Y'(5uthat .'t:h~,E3Cl.t'tempt to put
Open Space to such use wIll be opposed 'by every means
possible. 'B~ ~
Francis Whitaker
Dear Mayor Edel and
,
F:r()1'l1....r'\s.mg:t'kel..~If!..~ by you and at
least onedther Councilman,i t s~em$ tha.1;;y~\)1..l' fP:'~u~4er the
impression that the resident:i..al propt9rty ... o"ffi~.~sa.:t"~..
obj.ecting to housing employees in tEe 'residential z()~e.
Far from it, to. mykJ.'10wl.eage no one. objects to the
social or economiq statusof(iny resident. 9u+, o"bjection
is based on thepJ.1opose<iinc;'~$,se:i.:n.<it9;tleltty beyond th$,thi
effect since the North Annexation aria t.he" "'i:iCioption of the
Aspen Area Mast..er 1?l~n.
Please pass this on to (J(iunoil, as there was not time
to make copies,
Silq,oe:t'ely,
-.=c .,.. . () ;-'::t',w n
'F;~~.. W4-v ~
Fr.ancis WEi taker
,'" .".......;d.;....,"';.;".,:.,...,.
-,,;.;.. .,',>\'i,;,!"_": ,~~,';;, ' ,:,;;'"';~, .'"n:;", c''';;' ,; ,'i-,g,;; :>"A!;,<':,,,;;,_:;':,>;';;':,:;,\:/;;,,,,:,,-,~, , ',.'--', '::';':i;;t:;';:;;i(:.$J,s"t~j@.;;~~:;'*J:;C 'i. i');;/XtYl?'i,;:lh;~:)::J::\;F:i~:5:;[~<;:;>";;";s"i-,L';:i.fu~_';>;i;;3i<:,:bi>,;/>;U::ti;jk
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Ci ty Counci 1
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdominiumization of the proposed duplex~ Before
you today is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include Ilall housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10,11 (which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units), "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.
;'4'<'
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Counci 1
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdominiumization of the proposed duplex. Before
you today is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10," (which allow~ for low,
moderate and middle income housing units), "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval s~bject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.