HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.AM.375 N Spring St.A045-91SEYMOUR/VOLK INSUBSTANTIAL PLAT
2737-073-10-001 A45-91
5uwt vu� q/3
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303)920-5090
LAND USE APPLICATION
FEES
City
00113
-63250-134
GMP/CONCEPTUAL
-63270-136
GMP/FINAL
-63280-137
SUB/CONCEPTUAL
-63300-139
SUB/FINAL
-63310-140
ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS
-63320-141
ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
//3 . 0
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
00125
REFERRAL
-63340-205
FEES:
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Q
00123
-63340-190
HOUSING
00115
-63340-163
ENGINEERING
SUBTOTAL
County
00113
-63160-126
GMP/GENERAL
-63170-127
GMP/DETAILED
-63180-128
GMP/FINAL
-63190-129
SUB/GENERAL
-63200-130
SUB/DETAILED
-63210-131
SUB/FINAL
-63220-132
ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS
-63230-133
ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
-63450-146
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REFERRAL
FEES:
00125
-63340-205
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
-63340-190
HOUSING
00113
-63360-143
ENGINEERING
PLANNING OFFICE
SALES
00113
-63080-122
CITY/COUNTY CODE
-63090-123
COMP. PLAN
-63140-124
COPY FEES
-69000-145
OTHER
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Name:
U
r %l Phone:
%
Address: %
Ja'
OnGf(� Project:_�P
/-0
/ �--
'
�d
—ell
Check #
Date-
Additional billing:
#of Hours:
_
0 a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner
DATE: September 26, 1991
RE: Insubstantial Amendment to the Volk Lot Split Plat
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicant seeks to amend the Volk Lot Split Final
Plan for lots 1 and 2 Volk Lot Split to revise the approved access
easement, building envelopes, and Spring Street right-of-way
dedication.
APPLICANT: Richard Volk and Eugene Seymour as represented by Sunny
Vann
LOCATION: Lots 1 & 2, Volk Lot Split, Oklahoma Flats
ZONING: R-30, PUD
PROPOSAL: The Volk Lot Split was approved by City Council in 1989.
The final plat included a 30 foot access and utility easement
across the rear of Lot 1. A 20 foot area of Lot 1 adjacent to
Spring Street and a 24 foot area adjacent to Bay Street were
dedicated to the City for future roads improvements to widen the
existing streets. Although not required for a Lot Split the
applicant identified specific building envelopes for each lot.
A single family residence and detached accessory dwelling unit was
recently built north of Lot 1. The home owners, the Hamiltons,
received permission to from the City to improve a portion of the
Francis Street public right-of-way for access to their home. The
right -or -way is unimproved with the exception of the Hamilton's
driveway. With that improvement Mr. Volk and Mr. Seymour now wish
to utilize the partially improved Francis Street right-of-way for
access to Lots 1 and 2 of the Volk Lot Split. Use of Francis
Street would enable the elimination of the access easement with the
exception of a small portion that will be retained to avoid cutting
down several large cottonwoods that serve as a visual buffer
between the Hamiltons and Lot 2 of the Volk Lot Split.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Having reviewed the above and made a site
visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. We have no problem with a reduction in size of the access
easement to Lot 2. However, width and length dimensions for the
different width segments of the easement need to be shown on the
plat. Francis Street right-of-way needs to be shown and given a
width dimension so it can be shown that the total width of this
right-of-way and easement combined will equal at least 20 feet.
2. The proposed revisions to building envelopes on Lots 1 and 2 are
acceptable also.
3. The 5 foot encroachment into the reserved Spring Street right-
of-way needs to be shown on the plat. The existing improvements
need to be shown on the plat, however. The applicant needs to
understand that at any time in the future that the City needs to
utilize this right-of-way dedication reservation, he will have
either get a licence for or move this encroachment.
4. Bay Street needs to be given a width dimension and the end of
the right-of-way needs to be shown if it ends at or before the end
of Lot 2.
5. Construction in public right-of-way requires a separate permit
from a building permit. This permit is issued by the Streets
Department. For approvals of design details in the public right-
of-way, contact the Engineering Department.
6. A blueprint of the plat needs to be submitted to the Engineering
Department for approval before the final plat is submitted.
STAFF REVIEW: Pursuant to Section 24-7-1006, an insubstantial
amendment to an approved plat may be authorized by the Planning
Director provided it is a minor change to a plat which the Planning
Director finds has no effect on the conditions and representation
limiting the approved plat.
Pursuant to Section 24-7-908 A., an insubstantial amendment to an
approved planned unit development may also be approved by the
Planning Director. These two parcels have a mandatory PUD overlay
and the original lot split application was also considered within
a minor PUD context.
FINDINGS: The adjustment to the easement is being requested in
order to utilize the new Francis Street right-of-way. But as
requested, by the Engineering Department, the total width for
access will remain 20 feet. Although an access easement is
deducted for floor area purposes from buildable lot area use of
Francis Street will negate that deduction thus more lot area, for
floor area purposes, is available for Lot 1. However the total
floor area will not exceed the allowable floor area for the R-30
Zone District.
The adjustment to the Lot 1 building envelope is necessary because
the existing single-family home is being preserved for accessory
dwelling unit purposes. The plat shall be amended to illustrate
the 5 foot encroachment of the existing home into the dedicated
public right-of-way easement. The easement was granted during the
lot split review and was requested for the occasion that the street
would ever need to be improved. If for some reason the City needs
2
to use the easement the property owner would need to move the
encroachment or obtain an encroachment licence.
Setback variations available with a PUD review were employed for
establishing the building envelop of Lot 2. Amending the building
envelope for Lot 2 does not compromise the original approval for
that particular building envelope.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the insubstantial
plat amendment for Lots 1 & 2 Volk Lot Split, Oklahoma Flats, Aspen
with the following conditions:
1) Prior to recording the amended subdivision plat in the office
of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder, the Engineering Department
shall review and approve the plat; and
2) The plat shall be recorded within 180 days of approval by the
Planning Director and Engineering Department.
3) However, width and length dimensions for the different width
segments of the easement (on Lot 1) need to be shown on the plat.
Francis Street right-of-way needs to be shown and given a width
dimension so it can be shown that the total width of this right-
of-way and easement combined will equal at least 20 feet.
4) The 5 foot encroachment into the reserved Spring Street right-
of-way needs to be shown on the plat. The existing improvements
need to be shown on the plat, however. The applicant needs to
understand that at any time in the future that the City needs to
utilize this right-of-way dedication reservation, he will have
either get a licence for or move this encroachment.
5) Bay Street needs to be given a width dimension and the end of
the right-of-way needs to be shown if it ends at or before the end
of Lot 2.
6) Construction in public right-of-way requires a separate permit
from a building permit. This permit is issued by the Streets
Department. For approvals of design details in the public right-
of-way, contact the Engineering Department.
I hereby approve the insubstantial
subdivision plat amendment for Lots 1 &
2 Volk Lot Split, Oklahoma Flats, Aspen
pursuant to Section 24-7-1006 and 24-7-
908 A. of the Municipal Code with the
above cond' 'on .
6
Am Marg rum, Planning Director
3
0
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department
DATE: September 5, 1991
RE: Seymour/Volk Insubstantial Plat Amendment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Having reviewed the above and made a site visit, the Engineering
Department has the following comments:
1. We have no problem with a reduction in size of the access
easement to Lot 2. However, width and length dimensions for the
different width segments of the easement need to be shown on the
plat. Francis Street right-of-way needs to be shown and given a
width dimension so it can be shown that the total width of this
right-of-way and easement combined will equal at least 20 feet.
2. The proposed revisions to building envelopes on Lots 1 and 2 are
acceptable also.
3. The 5 foot encroachment into the reserved Spring Street right-
of-way needs to be shown on the plat. The existing improvements
need to be shown on the plat, however. The applicant needs to
understand that at any time in the future that the City needs to
utilize this right-of-way dedication reservation, he will have
either get a licence for or move this encroachment.
4. Bay Street needs to be given a width dimension and the end of
the right-of-way needs to be shown if it ends at or before the end
of Lot 2.
5. Construction in public right-of-way requires a separate permit
from a building permit. This permit is issued by the Streets
Department (920-5130). For approvals of design details in the
public right-of-way, contact the Engineering Department (920-
5080) .
6. A blueprint of the plat needs to be submitted to the Engineering
Department for approval before the final plat is submitted.
jg/seyvolk
cc: Chuck Roth
0
0
Mli243(0)ti41%zi �1V
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Fire Marshal
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
RE: Seymour/Volk Insubstantial Plat Amendment
Parcel ID# 2737-073-10-001
DATE: August 29, 1991
Please review and comment on the attached application. Please
return your comments to me no later than September 6, 1991. Thanks
�i�G..f /�-_
0
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Fire Marshal
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
RE: Seymour/Volk Insubstantial Plat Amendment
Parcel ID# 2737-073-10-001
DATE: August 29, 1991
Please review and comment on the attached application. Please
return your comments to me no later than September 6, 1991. Thanks
•
0-
VANN ASSOCIATES, INC.
manning Consuitants
August 14, 1991
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Leslie Lamont
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
AUG 2 1 yl
Re: Volk Lot Split Insubstantial Plat Amendment
Dear Leslie:
Please consider this letter an application for an insubstant-
ial amendment to the Volk Lot Split final plat (see Preappli-
cation Conference Summary attached hereto as Exhibit 1) . The
application is submitted pursuant to Sections 7-908.A. and 7-
1006.A. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations by Eugene Seymour
and Richard W. Volk, the respective owners of Lots 1 and 2 of
the Volk Lot Split (see Exhibit 2, Title Insurance Policy,
and Exhibit 3, Special Warranty Deed). Permission for Vann
Associates, Inc. to represent the Applicants is attached as
Exhibit 4.
Background
The Volk Lot Split was approved by the City Council on June
26, 1989. Vested rights status was granted to the project by
Ordinance No. 43, Series of 1989, on August 14, 1989. The
specific Council approvals included subdivision, planned unit
development and GMQS exemption. Stream margin review
approval was granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
May 30, 1989. The Planning Office's case summary outlines
the various conditions of the approvals and is attached as
Exhibit 5.
As the accompanying approved final plat illustrates, access
to Lot 2 was provided by a thirty (30) foot access and
utility easement across the rear of Lot 1. A twenty (20)
foot area of Lot 1 located adjacent to Spring Street, and a
twenty-four (24) foot area located adjacent to Bay Street,
was reserved for dedication should the City decide to widen
the streets in the future. Although not specifically
required as a condition of subdivision approval, site
specific building envelopes were designated for each lot.
2_30 East HcpKins avenue • .aspen. Coloraao 81611 •303, 925-6958
Ms. Leslie Lamont
August 14, 1991
Page 2
Proposed Amendment
The Applicants wish to revise the approved access easement,
building envelopes, and Spring Street right-of-way dedica-
tion. The revisions are dictated by recent changes in the
neighborhood, the City's adoption of new regulatory provi-
sions, and various site specific design considerations. All
the revisions, however, are believed to be consistent with
Mr. Volk's original representations and approval.
As the accompanying revised final plat illustrates, the
Applicants wish to reduce the size of the access easement to
Lot 2. Since the approval of the original application, a
single-family residence and a detached accessory dwelling
unit has been constructed on the property located immediately
north of Lot 1. The owners of the property, Skip and Ruth
Hamilton, apparently obtained permission from the City to
utilize a portion of the adjacent Francis Street right-of-way
for access purposes (see accompanying property survey). The
right-of-way is fifteen (15) feet in width and is presently
unimproved with the exception of the Hamilton's driveway.
As Francis Street is a public right-of-way, and is now
partially improved, the Applicants would also like to utilize
the street to access Lots 1 and 2 of the Volk Lot Split. The
use of Francis Street would allow the majority of the
approved access easement to be eliminated. A small portion,
however, would be retained to save several large cottonwoods
that are located within the right-of-way. The retention of
these trees will benefit both Mr. Volk and the Hamilitons, as
they presently provide a visual buffer between the proper-
ties. It should be noted that the Applicants' use of the
right-of-way is acceptable to the Hamiltons, and that all
three parties will share maintenance responsibilities.
With respect to the approved building envelopes, the revi-
sions to Lot 1 are dictated by the City's recent approval of
Mr. Seymour's detached accessory dwelling unit. Both lots
are required to provide an accessory unit as a condition of
subdivision approval. As you know, detached units were not
permitted when the subdivision was approved. The Council,
however, expressed a desire that the existing structure
located on Lot 1 be retained for affordable housing purposes.
Mr. Seymour has recently renovated the structure, and will
execute an accessory dwelling unit deed restriction prior to
issuance of a building permit for his single-family resi-
dence. As the structure is located outside the original
building envelope, the boundaries must be revised to accommo-
date the approved unit.
Ms. Leslie Lamont
August 14, 1991
Page 3
The proposed revisions to the building envelope on Lot 2 are
dictated by the architectural design of Mr. Volk's residence.
As the accompanying site plan prepared by Bill Poss and
Associates illustrates, the proposed residence generally fits
within the original envelope. Mr. Volk, however, wishes to
expand the envelope at the rear of the lot to accommodate the
landscape features planned for this area of the property.
Please note, however, that the expanded envelope avoids the
existing stands of mature cottonwood located along the rear
property line, as well as the steeply sloping hillside
located below Gibson Avenue. The lot's front yard setback
has been also been increased to more accurately reflect the
proposed building footprint.
The detached accessory dwelling unit located on Lot 1 is
located partially within the reserved Spring Street right-of-
way. The final plat, therefore, must be amended to reflect
a new reservation. As the available right-of-way in this
area measures sixty (60) feet, and the encroachment is
limited to approximately five (5) feet, sufficient area would
appear to remain to accommodate any future expansion of the
street. Given the limited amount of development in the
surrounding site area, it is unlikely that the entire right-
of-way would be required for expansion purposes.
Review Requirements
Pursuant to Section 7-1006.A. of the Code, an insubstantial
amendment to an approved plat may be authorized by the
Planning Director if the amendment would have no effect on
the original conditions of approval. As the Planning
office's attached case summary indicates, the proposed
amendment complies with all conditions imposed upon the
original Volk Lot Split approval. As a result, no purpose
would appear to be served in requiring City Council review of
the proposed plat amendment.
Section 7-908.A. also provides for Planning Director approval
of an insubstantial amendment to an approved planned unit
development. Although the property was designated mandatory
PUD, no variances from the strict application of the dimen-
sional requirements of the R-30 zone district were required
by the project. In fact, PUD review of the project amounted
to little more than a formality, as the subdivision regula-
tions essentially governed the design and approval of the lot
split application. The above notwithstanding, the Applicants
believe that the proposed plat amendment is consistent with
the application's prior PUD approval.
Ms. Leslie Lamont
August 14, 1991
Page 4
Upon approval of the requested amendment, the Applicants will
prepare a revised final plat for review by the Engineering
Department and recordation with the Clerk and Recorder. The
Applicants will also revise the approved subdivision improve-
ments agreement to reflect the amendment as may be required.
Should you have any questions, or require additional informa-
tion, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
VANN ASOCIATES, INC.
Sunny Vane/ AICP
SV:cwv
Attachments
cc: Eugene Seymour
Richard Volk
• CITY OF ASPEN • ��
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT: S� ��,-� EXHIBIT 1
APPLICANT'S REPRESENT TIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE:
OWNER'S NAME:
J�i�r
n
7
1. Type of Application:4V,J-j.yLUk-U'l C�
2. Describe action/type of development being requested:
3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond,
types of reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral Agent Comments
4. -Review is: (P&Z Only) (CC Only) (P&Z then to CC)
5. Public Hearing: (YES) (NO)
6. Number of copies of the application to be submitted:
7. What fee was applicant requested to submit:
8. Anticipated date of submission:
9. COMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS:
frm.pre_app
08-14-1991 20: 53 1 2 *4 8977 SALIVA D I AGNOS• SYSTEt1S P.01
Latwyers 'd
Insurance CIPO
ration
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RIGIIIIONO. VIRGINIA
OWNIA'Y POLICY NUMEER
113 - 00 - 021963
EXHIBIT 2
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND
THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the
Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated
in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured oy reason of:
1, Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein:
2, Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketability of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as Insured, but only to the extent
provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed, to be valid when Schedule A is countersigned
by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws.
j�d ) emTf le Ins u a Corporation
Attest: 8y: p� aµ/141�
Secretary. �J j President
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1 (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) resti regulating.
prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter
erected on the land: (iiD a separation In ownership or a change In the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that
a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land
has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, l,en or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy,
2 Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy but not excluding from coverage
any taking which has occurred prior to bate of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured clamant and not disclosed In writing
to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or
(a) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained it the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy
aaiEy 113M LIIr10 rn U.S.A.
M&O-1171Ya0006 soar MasiAITA ownny Fitter ftatl R1
08-14-1991 20:54 1 21*4 8977 SALIVA DIAGNOSOS\'STEHS P.02
-A19E MAR
PCT-3397
1. lum Of IIALm:
Lap)wrsoTitle
Iii0mce Co
go6ration
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIIIOINIA
SCHMUI E Aft I S POLICY
DATE Od POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
09/06/99 P 9:13 P.M. 4 498,000.00 113-00-021963
W=9 H . SlYf M Alm 3mn s x . SEYMOUlt , CO-TRusi ab!! 0! T!z 8zmm
FAMILY TMW LTA Iy1 W MAYM 1. IM
2. THE ESTATE OR IN!MW IN THE LAND HOMIN AND WiICH IS COVEW BY TRI9 POLICY IS:
n = SnIlw
3. THE ESTATE OR iN1'Wl W PWZMW TO HlFd= I9 AT DATE Olt POLICY VERM IN:
ZUMM R. WVMOUR AND JtMIM R. SEYMt M, OD-TR USITEE8 OF THE SEYM UR
FAMILY TNM UTA DATED M XZ 1. 1909
4. TIM LAND MWWD TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRXIM AS FOLLOW
LOT 1. VOIX LOT SPLIT, AQOQtD M TO THE PLAT TAP REOMW AUGI= 14. 1999 IN PLAT
IS: W 23 AT PAOR 24, COMM OF P17KIN. STATE 0P 00ECRADO.
P171= Octim TITI.B , INC.
r2� --f A r If I 601 B . HOPKINS AVE.
tem Au izipd AWnt ASPEN, OOLCMW 81611
(303) 925-1766
THE POLICY NUMW W Wl ON THIS BC== MUST AM= WITH TIM PREPRINTED NLMMffit ON TSE
OOVER S>iI 1 1.
Form 100 WhO In U &A•
Li
Illf l,l _':J al �� I Jr
-_- -- SIIEIlAl.11ARRA\Tl' UEEI) 7 6 7 2 E -11BIT 3
`s
M ar of the loth.l0 84 .
M J, „1 March
THIS DEED. 1t.Jt loa
bet.etn Richard ii. Folk, Russell D. Folk, Dasa A. Metzler. I LORE [TA DANNER
n and Denice C. Iteich I pliK- CTY. RECORDER
;J,Ix City and
i
. Sl+lt nl C,4,cw1,,. Plantar 1.1 +rwl I
f> L C,wM, of Denver I JUH 9 11 07 H 186
l_ tJ
L- 1 Richard W. Folk, Trustee UTA dated March 10, 198
F.. I
W-�°-
217 North Water Street, P-0. Box 1201
;. Qtr, rlr,.rkFataJJrcucl+
Wichita, Yansas 67201
I
2tr l..rca, �
' JtYYXXY.XXXXXXXXXFixll(7C YT.%x7tXXXX%XX%XXX1C7<XT�CX71"r F
1'
m nl Ten Dollars 5 ]n-DD) and other
WITIESSETII. That the FtaMon". 1,4 anJ In ct•n.,Jcntn,n ul the wXemu' I.
and valuable considerations patty.
I ve r ntcd.h,.F+tncJ.w4J +nd t„n.ncJ. anJMlh[.c ryescnl. J„ It
1' tht mell+lal,J sulhc,enc\nl rLlch 1. hertl')a:►Mr, IrJpeJ. h+ CIgF; ris I'
' LnFa,n. fell. eoncp anJ ar,hrn,, umn t1x FnnxcJ:. t115 SU IF; a a..IFn. Inrettl. all the Ral pltgert�. u¢rtlxr rIX7aOGInt* inch
.
tl au..7t9uta7EXa0.`��m�' 1
11c.crilKJ a lollor a. i
See Exhibit A attached Hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.
It being the express intention of the parties that this instrument
I� convey all real property interests transferred to grantors hereunder
tain Special Warranty Deed recorded in
under and by virtue of that cer
li Book5A2 at page 383 of the Pitkin County real property records.
,
DDCUMENTARY
I'
91966
J I
s = i
ii
ii
I
j: x>Ocxicaetxxf:tmtecXlxbcaatsr.X% '•
T'UGI:TIII.k uuh all arrl +,npul+, JK hrn: J,1+nKM. and arqwnct�R J. nJ,alhllw n�+1 �F� . u1M' 1111erP1t e'� nrranJlJtm+rl rl h+w,tcn nl ate .
Inet.rw.. Rat,+..watt alld rcri.—Jr... MM. l..ur• still ry ,
ppwrla. enhcl In tar a c4c, ,. o 1 In nwl w• Ih; a'r«, h+r F+uwJ rmnv t., r1u• qK nelcduu,xn.• anJ apputttn+n,e.. suerrS9srs
l(1 IIA11. A\II lU 11111.11 th, .+d (+rn1— al.«c n+rF+,IKJ +,nl JrvulvJ r nh Ih: +ppuntn+n,r. um,• 1iK FnnlctKx h i , Yacrr i „!
i a..,Fn.lM 1. 11K FI+n1101-Iw ttl-c'ivivec their hen. mJ prro•n+: Klrr.c..uu,t.w.w,t..w.. J•• „«ca+m +nJ acrtr th+:
they ,h I:anjr II1AAkk4 1
A�I1lltkl � Lk all.fL\UtlK+Ir«c•Iu1F+u,cJNcn.,.c.n,it. YuKI+,«IIc.,.c+blc(n,.,c..,un,•Itan Fr+nwrKy;
Xe.c.tu.1w•n. , I+nTI `r
115 sue Cpnrn•,n. aF+,n.1 all d,•r,c. p..w,w %SR J th,• J:cj'k 11I�•Ic ,•, am ryr: the rc,•I. h, Ou1wF1, nl uuJa thr Fr+..iw,.,
J,le let 1,411.
1� �\I1KL.\\ 1C11CRl UI. Un Fum,r••, h. vc.
L4 Uasa,.A• Metzler
Denicc C. Reich
Russell U. \'oak
City and •.1 Denver
c,„nn,d heaver
l hr kr. F.•11,1•In.trya..w ..l lr•r 1eJ�.J n•1.•r. Ill, ll, u„ Ci'c)•86 ..d•, Richard W. i'eli:, I:ussc•ll h. Volk.
„t<na,rwl .11. £ - d+. June
Dasa A. tiC'tzler, and Venice C. Reich. N,II,r•• n., 1,,W anJ ,•t,,. ,+r+;
• - •I;Irj'�
• h1. .wunu; .,o�. c,pm• J
.1.. ++
..............
•II Inl•Nll,l'1. „�.rll
w., Iw. k,•,. 7•94. hrit NI 1, \ka 1\1\ Will h.,.••-1'•*. ... r ..... ;., ... „' •, "•
EXHIBIT 4
August 13, 1991
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Kim Johnson
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Permission to Represent
Dear Ms. Johnson:
As the owners of Lot 1 and 2, respectively, of the so-called
Volk Lot Split (a Planned Unit Development), please consider
this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates,
Inc., Planning Consultants, to represent us with respect to
our application to amend the Volk Lot Split final plat. Mr.
Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect
to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforesaid
application.
Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any
further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Richard W. Volk
2929/ Buffa�o Speedway, Apt. 704
Houston, T. 77098
(713) 871-1410; -
Eugene Seymour'
1465 Monaco Dri�e
Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
(213) 478-0971
SV:cwv
EXHIBIT 5
CASE SUMMARY
August 15, 1989
Planner: Leslie Lamont
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 30, 1989: Approved the
conceptual PUD plan, stream margin review, and consented to a two
step consolidated review process for the Volk Lot Split with the
following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a individual building permit for Lot 1,
covenants to be approved by the Engineering Department, shall be
submitted with the final plat to ensure that the lowest floor of
all structures are located a minimum of 2 feet above the base
flood elevation, and that foundations are engineered to prevent
flotation, collapse or lateral movement.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the development on Lot
1 shall be required to have a foundation or basement constructed
to comply with the current FEMA regulations and to the approval
of the Engineering Department.
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 26, 1989: The Council approved the
consolidation, GMQS exemption, Lot Split/Subdivision, and Final
PUD review for the Volk property with the following conditions:
1. Prior to submittal of the final plat, the reserved dedication
of right of way easements, 24 feet along Bay Street and 20 feet
along Spring Street, shall be shown.
2. If a special improvement district is formed the applicant is
required to join for the improvement of the width of Spring
Street in the entire Oklahoma Flats Addition.
3. The side yard setback, on the west side of Lot 2, shall be
doubled.
4. Every attempt should be made to preserve the trees on Lot 1.
A thorough landscape plan is required, before a building permit,
demonstrating how development will mitigate the removal of the
mature vegetation on site.
5. A tree removal permit, pursuant to 13-76 of the Municipal
Code, is necessary for the removal of any tree with a 6" or
greater caliper.
The following are other conditions that pertain to final PUD in
addition to those approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission:
14
6. Prior to the issuance of a CO the dwellings shall have
complied with stove and fireplace regulations and will have to
obtain a permit for any stoves or fireplaces from the
Environmental Health Department. Any fireplaces must have gas
logs.
7. Prior to a building permit: the owner will determine whether
asbestos is present and will have to contact the Colorado Health
Department Air Pollution Control Division to find out what air
pollution permits, if any are needed; and measures such as
watering of disturbed dirt and prevention of mud -carryout onto
city streets will be required, techniques to be approved by the
Environmental Health Department.
8. During construction, owners will have to comply with the City
of Aspen's noise ordinance, which sets lower limits for noise
between 10 pm and 7 am.
9. Prior to the issuance of a CO, a separate service line for
each residence is required subject to the approval of the
Sanitation District.
10. Before the service lines are covered an inspection by the
Sanitation District is required as groundwater and infiltration
into the service lines can be a serious problem in this area.
11. Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to connection.
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, for both lots, a
detailed stormwater drainage plan will be submitted.
13. A final plat shall be filed prior to the issuance of a
building permit for either lot and shall include:
a. covenants that future purchasers and builders provide an
accessory dwelling unit per single family home; and
b. an indication that no further subdivision may be granted
for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt
of applicable approvals pursuant to Article 7 and growth
management allocation pursuant to Article 8.
14. Council urges the applicant to make every attempt to
preserve the existing structure on Lot 1, and have discussions
about incentives we might work with, like tap fee waivers or
whatever.
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1989: The Council unanimously
approved on first reading Ordinance 43. Ordinance 43 establishes
vested rights for the Volk Lot Split.
15
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 14, 1989: The Council unanimously
approved Ordinance 43 (Series 89) on Second Reading establishing
vested rights for the Volk Lot Split.
16
.9 d
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 8 21 91 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 2737-073-10-001 A45-91
STAFF MEMBER:— LL
PROJECT NAME: Seymour/Volk Insubstantial Plat Amendment
Project Address:
Legal Address: Lot 1, Volk Lot Split, Plat Book 23, Page 24
APPLICANT: Richard Volk/Eugene Seymour
Applicant Address: 1) 2929 Buffalo Spdway, Apt 704, Houston
77098 2) 1465 Monaco Drive, Pacific Palisades, 90272
REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates
Representative Address/Phone: 230 East Hopkins Avenue
Aspen, CO 81611 925-6958
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
PAID:(YES) NO AMOUNT: $203 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 4
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date
CC Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
VESTED RIGHTS: YES
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
VESTED RIGHTS: YES
Plann— Director Approval:
Insubstantial Amendm� or Exemption:
ffei
NO
NO
NO
Paid��~�
Date:
REF �ALS:
City Attorney Mtn Bell School District
City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas
Housing Dir. oly Cross State HwyDept(GW)
Aspen Water EEEFire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ)
City Electric Building Inspector
Envir.Hlth. Roaring Fork Other
Aspen Con.S.D. /Energy Center
DATE REFERRED: o/!% INITIALS: b'
-------------
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: 0 S INITIAL:`
N _
City Atty City Engineer
Housing Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
Zoning Env. Health
2
ALL OrHEK COeNERy wErz� `-= loo Y1Z, {LIKED PLAIN Ltf�!EZOM 1 re7 F. ,M.A. STc1�`(
F-bUNO KE.5/W W/ PLASTIC. C�,P
1-.0. 1270 7,
n A Y T IZ E T
ME?E5 0, r',L0uHr,S DeE5cKir- ION
A PAKCF_.L. OF LAND SfTUATED IN THE 50UTHWI.s-(' c-,ZUA9-rI~f-, OF �-GTICN 7,
TOWNSHIP 10 :�*DITF (H, KAi -GE 04 WEST OF CoTH f'KINCirAL i"tEKIiJ(�I, GI-Pf 01=gSFEN,
COUt-IT1 OF rf7KIN, ST^TF- GF COLOKA1XD/ MOi Z- PAK`NCUI AKL-4i AS FOLLOWS'
P�1=f�!NNIt� AT THE 50c3T1 iWEST CDt;NEK CF L6i 1, 5L,0xfK !!:), OKLAfIOMA'FLA7`5 A01DITICN
2AID CITI-1 OF 4SPF Ns THEhICJ= N 15°3o'Ci7")✓ 1710.00 FT, S 74°3"00"E 180.73 FT., N 77°'aD'GY�"E
1�555 FT, n5.corT, 20700FT, 1-474°30'00'V 110•CC>FT-, N IF3°30co"E
75-CO'pT, N74°�O'W 82.--1DFT, 51V30'W 75.00fT AQ2 i474°30'W IeO-COOT TO PO.15, CCX-,ITA(NIW, !"58Ac. ±,
5UiZVE'70FZ'S CEFZ'TIF(CATE'•
S, PAN I E.L F. M`KENZ-I A i F&(-7TE"KEt? LAND tJKVF-- 09-, t7o HE:KEI]�,q C- -r2,7 (1'" l
-THAT T fiAVE FKF-fAi E:P 7HI12 FIN/'.L. PLAT O TNF YOLK LOT SPLIT, THAT THE -
OF 71-F- oUT51DE I30UNPA6Z1'f, IN-FEK-1/4L I-O-T LINE, t'KIVA.Tf:- AGCI=�S
ANO UTIL ITo1 E.ASEME1,1717 ANT) OTt- Er?, FEATUKE15j AiKE, ACCUi-FE,L`1 / Nr2 COKzECTLK
SHOWN HE-KEON, TNAT -FkAE SAME A1KE dN FI-E:L_17 AN17 THAT
THE i-.ATTEt-2 I-OTS C,01�lFDKM O 4{(05E hTAKECJ ON-T� C�KOUf�!0, ACC,ORD(1-
-10 F(TtG(N CbL)NTl1 TITLE, INC,, -TITLE rOLIC'l NO. rC-F - 33597-IHF-Kt�- AKA NO
CASEMEr`tT5 OF REC OfZr7 AFF'E-rTINC--, rVCF✓%TY. TNI`) f-fA�5 A N, aTn-EMATHICA.-
CLLY�VKE WITH A LIMIT OF t IN ID000, -Ni= WA-j PI✓FOKMEU (N WITH C.R--2 (`f73,
TITLE 38 AKTIGLE 5(, AS AMtF-Nf7�D.
IN WITHF-� THEM) z HAVE SEZ 1 1H FICE FLAT44 PAID
� 1 18q
AL PI N� ,�vF�IS. Ih1C .
I}1'i r�ANiEL �'. M`KEi�IZ1�� L.S. 2.0(51
IF .ANN I NC7 ANO ZONING COMAMl e-�I ON APPROVAd- :
TPI,�q FINAL PLAT OF THE VOLK LOT SPLIT tS A.PPKO\/ED F51 TI-F- A`7PEN FLANNIN(,�,
AN17 ZOhlINC- COMM[-,-ION TH(S DA'1 Of Iq�(.
G HAI iZN4-aN
EN6,INEEFZ'�2 i -P('iZ0VAL-:
71AI'i FINAL_ PLAT OF T"E: VOLK LOT �2PLIT 1`7 Ai'PIZO/E17 (39 THE C(TK OF ASPEN
C7t-PA}ZTME-N OF EN&INEERING THIS - -__ DA'1 OF , 1-109,
CIT`t F-NGLNEEK—
C(T'-( COUNC(L. MP1<CVAL =
THIS F(1-lAL PLAT CF- T141:- YOLK LOT SPLIT ('7 APf KOYED r-,2Lt THE GIT`'l CODICIL OF
I-P E C (T'7 OF A5 PEN ON 7--4E _ r2,A-`i OF
EX E CUT>✓n OF_ _ __ , 1 `I 8q .
WILLIAM �TIKLINC�. (�tAKOt�
7.7TE'7T KATHiz`'lN tGOC}4, CITK CL E-rK
0
VOLK LOT SPLIT
(A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,)
Gi=RTIFIGATE OF OWNER�aF-IIY .AND p�t7tCATIQN:
Ktl()W ALL MFE, i" THE1 -`jE P�`�NTS, FFAT RIGI IAKP W /b! Imo, [�l�`TEE U/T/A
DATI✓D MA?GF-1 10, Ig84, I'✓EI NCB 1-HIE: KF-COflD OWh ZJ. OF THE L.N, PI 5 PfE P!CTjEf
WHICH LANDS AKI✓ MOZE rAKT(GV!"AKLN P fjCKIr;�)~l7 ACC FbLLOWY LOTS 1 -5,
AH17 1-07? It -20, iNCL05IVF-, 131 0CK 3, 0KLAH0I`,1A fLATS AMMO'N, CIT'( O('
p1T-KIN COU1�1Tq, COI ORA17b. t;XOEG HF-KEP--1 PLAT /-�(17 9UP)0IV112F- S./R0 !-ANDS INTO
LOrej I AND 2, VO!_K. L.0r SPLIT, A'�, SHOWN AND DE`zfKlt�EfJ i r-KEON, AND
HE f� EC�t1 COMMIT AN40 AGKF-E. A'? L �foDWS :
I, TF"IE �D -45" FZY7f W(Dfj .S.CGESS flN1"' Ut�t1-�;:.i�GKOUNb UTILIT% EA9ENl�l"> `^�t-1GWN
rat lid NOTEr LJEKFj t (5 NEKF-r5f PF-PJ CATE17 TCJ T141= FK'EtUAL, f'r-MATE•, ANr7 tIC'IlI-
F-XCLVS (`/E UgE. AN!2 t7E:H IE-F tT F -mr. FscDM --IMF- Tn TI Mt- ear :,A 7 I-CI5 i
ANV 2 ANr7 'rHE:(K, fink? ItJVITi~ES AND fOK -R4E-
t hlEFIT �F AL-L UTILITY C01Mi-ANiE"5_
-TN✓ WPICH It? TO f5r- CON�TKUCTF-0 ct� FACI-( bl" �,A!rl
L.OT`5 `lNALL CON-TAIN AN /'CCEoi`iOKH 17W{✓LL1N� UNIT, AS i"psmKEV Ut-IFr'r-m-
r�ECTfOF1
tO OF OiCDINANIG;_ 140. 47 C SEIKIt OF IR(b8), ANC? A9 t2EFINFjD 11-� SECTIC" 5 OF Tl iRi
Dlz C7INANGE.
3. TUE 24 FOOT WIi F- r0E--r(DN OF LOT ( .1\P0,ACE-t- T TO f�;,AH Sl KEET AND ME 10
FOCTI- WIDE POIZTIOt l OF 1--VT 1. A 0ACEi`,IT TO STrt✓Er, 4A t7I✓1'ICTEp H >✓CJt .
AKr (4E<EPP� KE,SEtKV�D FOK 17F-PICA-1710 I TO THE C(Te--( OF A2rE" AT 5Cx-H -r(mr- A,5 - t4r�
C(Tlf iKE-)OLVE� TO W(DI-N AM;) IMPKOVE SAID STCZEETS; WI-FHIN (O f7A r7 OF KECEIFT
OF A WtKITTEN KE(SZUE�T-F44F-KEf0K. FROM 74AE C", TNT. OWHE1i OF LOT" I SHALL
CIJNVE•'f Tb THE CI VI 13N QUITCLAIM PEEP TS 1�T PA1 T OF T"E Ki -,Er EM2 SCE? YYH (C,IL"t
K) K6C V (KE17 t3'1 THE. CITK EO Z STiKEET WIbEN 1 NG AN17 I MMOYF.N(EhiT FUKrOt-5EF),
4, D rUi'LTH�tZ P.?F- LbT"i, AND NO At'7bIT(O't,-A?-
VWELLING UNIT*i f,ikl PEE P�IUILT A WITH
AcCe-Y�e7!?�t DWtLLINC> UNIT ON ZAC-H LOT,, WITHOOT KECEP 17 OF A'PLIG/\rt E
a�E'tZCYAL PU�SUfWT to ?,KTICLE 'T OF T(4L ilSPE,N LAN17 (nl= i E/-u AT(ON5 AK (L7
�'cOWTH MA1.1/ C�t'_MEt�tT ALLOCAi 107,4`2 'FUK5UA1- T TD AKTtCLE 6 T�41E-K O✓
r__7 xEG:UTF--P TI ((`�- -- tWl OF-- --- _ _ , tlbfl
flu--1Ar-P W. VOLK, -Tnu�TEE L,/ T,,,,n,
PATi-D WV,,KL A 10, M04,
GCuNTK OF'__ _ - -- '2 S .
TiI)✓ rORE�C�(I�I� Cr-KTIF(CAT-Y-- WA`i ACKN0WLEtX-PC-P P7F-FCKE ME. THIS PA'9 OF
Pilt r21CHAiZP Vd YOLK. Tr-U2-1-F E. U/T/A DATED MAKCH ro, f (84.
WITNF-"7� M`I 11-Nr) A1-Ir Of FtC(Al-
M'1 GONiMIl�`tON CPIR�S•
NO-F^r-1 ruf5f-IC-
TI-CL1 = Ck-i 1-1F(G'.Tt✓--
i'I-TKIt4 GC)UN-Fcf TITLt NC,, A f7UL`f L1CI_N12Ei2 TITLE -ITiE
Of COLOKAr� HE1KE" Ci✓KT(F(E`� 114,AT KIC-HAKP W VOLK`( , KG)iTI*E U/T,�A,
lo, Iqgd-, IGl THE o\VHE- , 1N FEI✓ SIMPLIF- Of 144F- KEEAL PKOPEKT�I
'L • KI r'�1=V r-Ir> olc7 t7 ++ErZEON, SUt'jJECT TO > i°. EMEtJ t �, t�l�i 4T=5-OF" - K/
AND E.NCUMP�KANCE`J OF IZEC01K17,
ECL�,Lf 1H1`" CA`l Of
F(TKI'N COUNTII T(TLE, INC,
i3K VtNCEhrT � H(GF.Wj, PKlySlr�✓1IT
STATE 01� GOLOMAGO
S.y.
CO.UN-F1 OF FITt`tN
Ti-IE FOREGOFNC- CF-RTIF(CA--rE- WA�7 AD<NOWLEr-C,ED C3EFC?i2E ME THI�i_.__[>A'1
VViTt,)E M`f HAND AND DFFICl/'L` SEs�L
M`1 COMi�/1(�51ON EXPIi�)=�: __
f`IDTAK111 f Ut3L I G
CLE(ZK /',N17 FZFL01Zt7Et['S A��PT�7CFE
TH15 FINAL" PLAT OF THE VOLK LOT SPLIT W^.? ACCEPTED F09 F(LIN& IN THE-
OF'f= iCE OF THE CLERK, AND KF-COFKUF7-� OF THE. COUN-F11 OF FIT -KIN ✓TATE, OY
COLOKAti�, AT CyCLCxf` — M - THI`s 5;W`l OF , 141E59, ANr:� KEGOf�1JEt7
iN PLAT PJOOK AT I'^GE�- AS KECEPTION 1K0.
CLE.KK AND IZEUJIZt �EI`z
n-ri<IN COONvl, CDLOK,-.r,?D
NOTICE Accoro.no to CcIo-ao!,—,o, s: -,nfn ,,,, f,ci.,
t" 1d witn 3 y =s: f 1.,.
such ac,e .t 11 no t~venf rnaya yn
oe o...tlmore u,ar •e yea_from t.cc�.pf�-�I!rf , ,,..
,or —
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
Surveyed I (v 2,9 C- C . Revisions 7 t 7 S1
Drafted 7 " Co b'I tD F—' �3'11 811 FLOOD PLAIN
Title LOT
Job No 59 - 70
C- ient: V01_ f-'—
{i'.
;0 20 4-0 Coo FF_I✓T
III = 20'
LX_ FOUNT MONUMENTS
Ah 1tiQPICA-T I-P
5 74030'Co"E 0, 73'
74°30'CO"E ' f', T<E"AgA Lh -&�i51
v
1 � �
is
tIo25
-
1 1
i �I �r� r >'C! ,r� • •L INV
LOT 1
0
J
nI
'
V
— �v;Lnl sNv=�C�-a= L�rle
\ \�
QL
-�--r- \ -�\--c,�.\ -�-.. —�----------
---
\\ d < 17DICATIOI�I
\
100.1301
Four o rESs�Ie., NO co,P N 74' 30'00°W
iLL OTHEIC COKNEKS WrtjI _
Ft7UNU KEe3AK Wj' PI.AST IG C-Ar
L.�i. t2707,
METES A r-,0L)h47S D•E!�,CK IPTION
A PARCEL CF L -V SI TUATEr IN THE. SOUTH WE.s-T" QU/AKT_1f K C "W%{) OF T l q l 7,
132.50'
N 74- 30' 00 If W
TOWNSHIP 10 �UTl1, KAtN E. 04 WEST OF 6oTH FP_1NCIF,4L MEKIiD(MI, GIT°t OF ASPEN
COUNT`I OF PfTKtIN, STiaTE OF COLON; "0FZ_ F,4KtICC4ARLK A5 FOLLOWS
P2EC�INNIt AT -ME SOUTHWEST C,0KNEK (Dr LOT- 1, nLOC, n, OKLAt-iO"A, FLATS sZ�IDITICN
`"AID CIT11 nF ASPEN: T1AFE -CE, 'N 15930'A7"E. 17&,00 ;=T, -2 74°30'00"E 180.73 FT., N 77'30'00"E_
155.55 FT, 135,CO FT., 515'30'CYO" W 207.00 FT, N 74° 30'OO"W 110-CO FT, N 15°3o'Co"r✓
75-00'FT, N74o3dW 82.f�Ft, 51r:�P30'W 75.00FT: AUJV t4749o'W 120.CIDFT TO P.O.5, CCNTAINiI , 1.58AC T,
SUFVE110F,"5 GEPZTIFIGA.TE,
S, PANIEL F. A LAND SURVE`tOKZ, HEfe'Et-_,� L�fZTIF�I
T1af�T I HA\/E 7HIIi FINHL FL'tT OF -TPF_ FOLK LOT �r'LIT, THAT THF_
L-GCATICN OF THE CYUTS(QC_ r'SOUNDAKII, I NTEKNAI- LC5T LINE, rKI\/ATE ACCESS
Al UTIL IT4-1 ANn JITiErZ PEA-T UKE`) -ACE ACCUFATI✓L`I f'Nr2 COKKECTLc-f
SHOWN HEKE01-i. 1l t 7TIE AIeE ON FI4LLt� ANr7 Tl AT
THE FLATTE7"J 1_CI 7 C,0I--tF_C)K r TD TH05E Ctl TV{'E ACCOKf7tN�
-10 {'t iKG{N C(DUNTLt T(TLE_, INC,, TITLE POL-IC'{ No PC-T - 9397 '!H1=,KL ,4,KE NC)
! ASEMENTS CF FZEC0rZK7, AFFEC-7IT 1C. l _441`) +ice A MATT4-'C:MATHICAL__
CLOSUKF_ WITH A L-MIT OF I IN IDODO, ANt= WA5 r-EF0r_1)=.r�) lt-1 ACCC)KDAf E WITH C R-5 1973,
TITLP. 38 AKTICLE fit, AS ^MENDf_=b.
IN WI'fNF_� TNEKEj(-_F` _T HAYE SE-L M`7 ti°,Nr-) /qV OFF ICI.A,L sEPL T"I
C� I`18R
P� 1 r7AN 1 EL F M` KENz IE, L..S 20(51
Ot n°
` `,
8
z
• I IO.Q7'
N 74- 30' 00" W
" 100 0K 4-10CT) PLAIN "ROW 1987 F. E. M.A. 5-1-UP-1
PLANNING AND ZONING GOMMJ1xION APPKOVAJ
TP I`i FINAL PLAT OF THE VOLK LOT 51'L tT te2 r rFKL)\/E1? {341 TF-F- ASPEN FL AN N I NC
AMi7• zONIN}G GOMtvil�lON TT-Il`�_ ___l�h"l O� , I`18�I.
CG H,AI KNIA N
EN�INEER'� �PPRO'✓AL
71 (('-) F INAAL PLAT OF T(-IE VOL-t< LC7T 1-2 At'�RO\/Er F" 714E C(T1{ OF ^`2FEN
I"J�PA,)zTMJ=NT OF ENC�INEERINC� TI-115 _ pAH � , I°I�
c_ 1`T�1 >^NC�tNEE�
GIT11 GOUNCIL MPKCVe4q---
THII-7 FIt lAL FLAT C:F THE YOLK LOT SPLIT 1`7 A,PPROYED P24 THE GIT�1 COUNCIL OF
TPE CIT% OF ASPEN ON T(+E _ pA`t OF
ExE C.uTET2 TI+tS_ _ _*��( Of"_ —, i 110q ,
WILL,~ -t)T1r_LIN0>, MAHO►_
ATTEST KATI-1KLL N KOCH, CIT°t CLEXI,'
f�
FINAL PLAT OF
YOLK LOT SPLIT
(A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
,'k
G�2TtCIGAT� C� OWN£.RSHIP .AND t7Et7(CATt(?N:
z + THE`�E nKEiErrr�, -T KICf-VA r1 W ✓vl "=`
'. I ♦ !� Ti IE I�ECC�T> C}4^/k.lEiz G 7FiE L.1it?S t : .
:'WHIC" LANr22 ,° IE ✓ MOIeE
AW) LOT`) t l - ZO, INCLiJSrVE, Pal-OC_K 3 OKLAHDMA fLAr--, ; vC'C>ITiOt l - `:ITIi r 2- ,r•__
sir ;N GC?UNTK, GOL OfZAt POEM F-F_KF_ F!:� PLAT Alin 9Uf5D1Vlt�E I{� { .A� ,C
r-e,F-Er-* COWM{T A-41? ?&nf-E A°7 FOLLOWS
t. TiAE 15- .45 1`7X7r I.V(PE UT(LITh
,'.. ` (G'; L' - _F N {`., NEKFr5' -1 pLTI -_AK E-T7 T IT4! f'EK�F.'T U,A r'K' IV"a. Tf_. A.tr1 = '
t^E . L r " ... ti i E .iZ`� t✓1 ' t vl E T? -)Or- cr _
F
'r `1 ac'E-ji .4Nt tJYITf E At lr� "e r-
j?SEf `EF.r T. LlT9 CLMPAC ICES_
?1 C it �G1 E FA{vt l L T RESI r.?Et• E WPiCH t'; 10 ft�CL ! l`7i tz l;« F.r' .`X t t:_,q. .
�uaLL c't�i t;�iN AH f�CC Ee,'e,or-11 r7WE.1-LI h-Ca UNI-1, A,' Ff_
tO C)F DI_-GPJAN(fE 00 47 k' t,,F_9Ii1 7 DF 1-188) ANp ^h, r -, ' IE; : . ' 'i 7
c�c.^!1JANC.E .
THE 24 FAT Wff» rCF-,T fC)N (_f _UT- t .''POAC.E_N{
PC(Z7"IDt.:1 C)F- 1—VT 1 .e i ✓jAr_,EVT ID 5F'r? Ir .1G �P E`C r1i:�.
FOK t?EriCATI0N 7b `TPU Cfl<( L4
' `u ��',,_.``,�c� �'.' �i'✓Ir��-N At11:� tM� F'.("`l i= iS,(r; � c:-..r rp .
f"?F A �VK,TTEN tE 2UE`: ' T!4E-rZE♦ L)) . FfKON1 '::iE C.IT'l ilia_
J,/• N Via, "1�IE CI7`� t'H G'UtTCLAIM DEEP -IV_Wj fAK,7 r,,r, rPE G•.t -
E ti!>ZEf� Y 1 TT-tE. CITK FnK 6,)TKE:ET WIr;`' "I� 4C
r,5
:JNIT") t-t6N t{A�'i
_ _7 )Cf?ct ^W'f.LL: Ur' -IT J Et�C� I LUf, w(Tr l%)U r Kf (._b ; rT
7 ''F -PL a`7r'1`N df'
:4 TF Ur _._. __--_—__--.___ _
'7 'J
:cx�rJT� fir= — ..: _ _ _, -- -- _ 3
-T{IZ=0REGCO-� CF_KT1F{G°T_L, WAS tfE
------- I%09, FxA k1CHA P W. VOLK . PATE-r MAr�CH 'G, "
Wf`f NEB MN tTAt IrJ ,N_tt7 OFFICIAJ 5!~ ° L.
1�✓t'1 C.G�}vt M I `75l ON IrX P I � E� ____-- ..
TITLE CEIZiIFICAT�
k_It -'N1"1 T(_%_E., If-1C_., A r7VL_1j LICrtJSEC T"11"LE: 1W7Ur-,^ 10E ACalErCZ" ". -
i T Co-OK-A\M HEKIE 175,1 CEr<T(F1E`;, -T1 AT 1?I''H`�(:' ti = +`. T►ZtJ I� E 'c
I,�2 THE C)h41=fZ. tN EEE :71MPLF- r f = l K'cAl.
L;.'�;'?��!('?E_.ti' /°J 11. "'r:!'',_.i Et;' +-FEIZEG'N: �Vf'�JECT "TLC E��!✓ME1�t1�7, KIGHTr% �?F" l�T',...r
AW ENCIJMrt�KANCE`7 'F {zE4:-0Rn
PITf at1 CC' J�TtI Tt7LE, INC
_y
V 1 NGEhI7 _T H l C_ E
s
4245
COUNT'i OF
,14E rOREG01t-46- CEKZTIEI(-�A.TE. tti°`; .ACt�,,PfiVyLE..i
1
VVITMJE�7 \.11 FIAND rlNp OFFICIAL- �E�L
!�'�( COMt✓i1�5!C�T �Xt91tCE`� —._- -
!�tD T'A1��1 f UP�L I G
GL!✓2K C'•Nr7 IK'GOfZt71c17'-2 �.GG�PTFJ�C✓'
7 f INfAL rLA-1 OF THE �/Ot-K 1- 1 SPLIT W^'+) A C.EPTED FOB FILI" tN THE
C'1-FICF- ,:7f —;T(E :'LURK_ ANtJ KEC OFZr:)EPZ_ C'F-- -T14E a_)L -A-T-1t OF FITKVN, STATE (7r-
C.DL0_'Atr), AT_ .- dCLCr_f<, —M, [HIS _ tZA'l Dr__, t`109 /ANr7 KECL�rr<T-A,
:t4 PLAT 17CY'K -.-- AT I'A6-F_ _,._.-._�.�+5 KECE-FTION tJ0
CLEt�K ,AND IZEC��.r�E.t�
PtTKtt I COUN-C 61, GOL-Cr�At%i�
N I ICE A to o a to
1 i iJCh tl@te(.f_ In n0 erenl f1\21y 3flY gf,;tnH hTS2r1 i�lf. �.l Y.. f.., r t � ,. v .
' � be commented more than ter+ ye8rs Iro n mr. -tat., << r : �: t .-;� , I
Hereon.
.r s
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688ID
'
Surveyed �- I Io e,9 - Revisions 7 : 7 i3l Title LOT 5 F'L t-r Job No g59
Drafted 7 cv b'I tD . f-__ fs • 11 89 FLOOD pt,AIN Ghent l F�
J 0
0 O
FcDUN :
F:"8t1_ N0 CAP
N 740 30' 00•• W
NO _ E A,c9o,
b35Ptl.�u0na,rYo0 'n,his' vey with,.,n3 yP '-afje Y rc 1 q
>. J�o_te�t-anr:o-vent inay anY dcgori b3setl �i.pon a.Yr+ete<.i,
B
A
Y
S
Jl
R
TIn
E
T
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
0
FIRE HYD.
N 74" 30 00 W 110 00
Surveyed 16 MAY 1989
Drafted 18 MAY 1989
Revisions 19 MAY 1989
7 DEC. 1990
Q
. atN
0 10 20 40 60 Sp
SCALE: I°= 20
BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN
FND. = FOUND REBAR 441 PLAS. CAP LS 127.07
P.CT 3397 (TITLE COMMITMENT) PITKIN COUNTY TITLE; INC..
SURVEYORS cEaTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS NIAP ACCURkTE Y DEPICTS
A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION CAN MAY 16TH,1989
OF LOTS 1.-8 AND LOTS I I-20,6LK.3,OKLAHOMA FLATS,CI-r, 0 "
ASPEN, COLORADO. THE ONE STORY HOUSE WAS FOUND TO
BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN T114E BOUINDAR'Y LINES OFTHE
ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE LOCAT, ION AND DIMENSIONS
(')FALL BUILDINGS, I MPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -
OF -WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACH-
MENTS BY OR ON THESE PREP,ISES.
ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY. DANIEL Mc KkNi MAY 18TH, 1989 LS 20151
x.
aP'
SURVEYOWS-CERTI FICA
1 HEREBYCERTIFY THAT ON DECEMBER 6TH 1990 A '
VISUAL INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPiRVISION'
OF LOT I VOLK LOT SPLIT CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO.
NO CHANGES WERE FOUN6 EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY:p
DECEMBER_, 1990 LSD �,.
51 TE PLAN
X
������a
il-�A 4
�PQJJ�d� T, "IRT q.,14 � 2`11
A. E."' RD Ne QaQ➢IAQD��1���QD
SCHEMATIC DESIGN 50ALE: 1 20' - 011
a, o 20, 60,
Own