HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ca.Merger Provision.0052.2004
~
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
PARCELID#
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
0052.2004.ASL U
Code Interpretation, Merger Provision
James Lindt
~9il~Jpt~rpretation, Merger Provision
REPRESENTATIVE Robert C Podoll
DATE OF FINAL ACTION. 08/31/2004
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
. BY
Approved
09/20/04
D DRISCOLL
~
~~-e0p, <, <
'~mvd J!3!1oc;
~':
r1
CITY OF ASPEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
INTERPRET A TION
SUBJECT:
APPROVED
Applicability of City and County
merger provisions to two (2) metes
and bounds parcels adjacent to the
Aspen Grove Subdivision.
AUG 3 1 2004
EFFECTIVE DATE~UNrryOtvc:(.\..w"i~ci.' i-....
QTyr\ir -" ......Il.t\
vf-ASPEH
APPLICANT:
August 31, 2004
Olivia Jones
WRITTEN BY:
APPROVED BY:
r-~
James Lindt, Planner ::TL
Julie Ann Woods,
Community Development Director
COPIES TO:
John Worcester
SUMMARY:
Olivia Jones, represented by Podoll & Podoll P.C, has requested a code interpretation,
requesting a determination as to whether two (2) metes and bounds parcels (please see
vicinity map attached as Exhibit "A" for specific location) adjacent to the Aspen Grove
Subdivision each have development rights under the City's land use code. The subject
parcels were annexed into the City of Aspen in 1987 and have been under a common
ownership since 1967. The question thus becomes whether the lots were merged under
the applicable County land use code provisions before being annexed into the City. The
City Planning Staff solicited the County Attorney's opinion as to whether the subject
parcels were merged in the County prior to their annexation into the City. The County
Attorney did not respond to the request for determination because he indicated that it was
Qut of his jurisdiction to make such a determination since the lots are now located within
the City of Aspen.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this code interpretation is to determine whether two (2) metes and bounds
parcels adjacent to the Aspen Grove Subdivision are entitled to separate development
rights or were merged pursuant to County land use regulations before being annexed into
the City of Aspen.
INTERPRET A TION:
Given that the Applicant is requesting a determination as to whether the subject parcels
merged under both the City and County merger provisions, Staff believes that it is logical
~
to separate the analysis out into the affects of the City's merger provision on the subject
parcels and the affect of the County's merger provisions on the subject parcels.
Applicability of City's Merger Provision:
In reviewing whether the City's merger provision merged the parcels, Staff believes that
the City's merger provision did not merge the subject parcels. The City's merger
provision reads as follows:
Section 26.480.020(E)-If two (2) or more lots within the original Aspen
townsite or additions thereto have continuous frontage and are in single
ownership (including husband and wife) on October 27, 1975, the lots shall be
considered an undivided lot for the purposes of this title, and conveyance of
any portion shall constitute subdivision. An Aspen townsite lot or addition
thereto includes all lands depicted on the Aspen incorporation plat of record,
dated 1880, plus any lot or parcel al1nexed to the city since that time which
constitutes a nonconforming lot of record, plus any lot or parcel which has not
received subdivision approval by the City of Aspen or Pitkin County, but
excludes any subdivided lot in the City of Aspen which conforms to the
requirements of this title.
Staff Analysis:
Staff believes that the City's merger provision did not apply to the subject parcels in that
none of the properties subject to this interpretation were located within the City of Aspen
on October 27, 1975, and thus could not havell1erged under the City's merger provision.
Applicability of County's Merger Provision:
In reviewing whether the subject parcels- were merged under the County's merger
provisions prior to their annexation into the City of Aspen, the City Planning Staff is of
the opinion that the two (2) metes and bounds parcels, did merge under the County's
provIsIOns.
The City Planning Staff would like to make it clear that we do not feel extremely
comfortable interpreting regulations that are included in the Pitkin County Land Use
Code and as was previously stated, Staff solicited the Pitkin County Attorney's
interpretation but were told that the properties are within the City of Aspen and that the
County is not going to make a determination on properties that are not currently within
the County's jurisdictional boundaries. Therefore, the City of Aspen has no choice but to
make a determination as to whether the County's merger provisions have merged the
subject properties. However, it should be noted that the City Planning Staff did consult
with the County Planning Staff on this matter prior to making a determination on this
interpretation request.
Staff Analysis:
The County has two merger provisions. The first of the County's merger provisions
reads as follows:
~,
Section 6-50-020(A)- "Common ownership" o!contiguous substandard size
lots (defined in the Pitkin County Land Use Code as "any lot or parcel, no
matter what the size, which is held in separate ownership") or parcels shall
cumulate with the. exception that lots in subdivisions approved and signed by
the Board of County Commissioners shall not cumulate regardless of their
size. The aggregate area of the lots shall be considered as one (1) lot or parcel
regardless of diverse times of acquisition by the common owner and whether
or not the property was acquired before adoption of this regulation.
The second merger provision in the Pitkin County Land Use Code reads as follows:
Section 6-50-020(B)- If a public roadway which was in place prior to June 2,
1975 provides access to contiguous substandard size lots and separates such
lots, the lots shall not cumulate.
Staff believes that the two (2) metes and bounds parcels subject to this interpretation
merged because they are substandard lots by the County's definition,. which were not
included in a subdivision approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The City
Planning Staff feels that this interpretation is consistent with Pitkin County's praCtice of
merging other properties that have similar circunistances to that of these properties. The
above-referenced circumstances being that the parcels were in the same ownership prior
to the enactment of the County's merger provision and that the parcels are contiguous and
not. separated by a public roadway. Therefore, given Staff s findings, Staff believes that
the two (2) metes and bounds parcels did merge under the merger provisions established
in the Pitkin County Land Use Code prior to their annexation into the City of Aspen and
should contain only a single development right.
The Applicant's letter of request for interpretation argues that the County's merger
provisions are "ex post facto" laws and should not be applied. This argument primarily
attacks the legality of the County's merger regulations rather than the method in which
they apply to this particular situation. Provided that the legislation in question is not
legislation enacted by the City of Aspen, the City believes it appropriate to apply the
County's merger provisions as the County would and has applied them rather than
provide a determination as to whether the County's provisions are legally appropriate.
APPEAL OF DECISION:
As with any interpretation of the land use code by the Community Development Director,
an applicant has the ability to appeal this decision to the Aspen City Council. This can be
done in conjunction with a land use request before City Councilor as a separate agenda
item.
26.316.030(A) APPEAL PROCEDURES:
Any person with a right to appeal an adverse decision or determination shall initiate an
appeal by filing a notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Community Development
Director. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Director
and with the City office or department rendering the decision or determination within
r"\
fourteen (14) days ofthe date of the decjsion or determination being appealed. Failure to
file such notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of any
rights under this Title to appeal any decision or determination.
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"- Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B"- Letter of Request for Interpretation
-
-
<(
-
-
+-'
.c
.-
.c
><
UJ
a..
<C
~
>-
I-
Z
U
>
,.....,
1": .]
w
z-<roo
s
Q)
Q)o
ll..o
CD
...-
o
o
N
...-
o
o
CO
o
o
"<t
o
o
N
o
TELEPHONE: (303) 861-4000
TELECOPIER: (303) 861-4004
&h 11,'1- o/J II
E. celVED
R ..
AUG 2 6 2004
A~Pt.N
BUllDtNG OB'ARTMENT
~
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
TERRACE TOWER II
5619 DTC PARKWAY, SUITE 1100
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111-3064
RICHARD B. PODOLL
ROBEIIT C. PODOLL
SUSAN R. HARRIS
ROBEIIT A. KITSMILLER
RICHARD C. HOPKINS
KERRI L. KLEIN
AMY L. ELLIS
August 23,2004
James Lindt
Planning Dept.
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Olivia Jones' Properties
Dear James:
Please be advised that this office represents Olivia Jones, who was until recently, the owner
of two unplatted lots.in U.S. Mining Survey #6120, adjacent to the Aspen Grove Subdivision.
The first parcel contains 3.39 acres and was acquired by Olivia Jones on August 21, 1958 by
deed from the Benedict Land and Cattle Company.
The second parcel contains 1.4 acres and was acquired by Olivia Jones on June 8, 1967, also
from the Benedict Land and Cattle Company.
In May, 1979, the Pitkin County Land Use Code was amended by the County Commissioners
in Resolution 79-54. As part of the amendments, the definition of subdivision was amended to
include the event that "two or more contiguous parcels of land previously, separately conveyed (or
described) shall come under single ownership...." We believe that Ms. Jones' separate ownership
of the two un-platted parcels above...described existed prior to, a...lld was unaffected by th.e passage of
Resolution 79-54.
Referring to principles with which we are sure you are familiar, no ordinance or regulation
may operate retrospectively. A law is "retrospective" if it creates a new obligation, imposes a new
duty, or attaches a new disability in respect to transactions or considerations already passed.
Clearly, prior to 1979, Ms. Jones owned two parcels of properties which she had acquired
years earlier, and which could be encumbered, developed or sold separately. Resolution 79-54 could
not impose upon Ms. Jones the obligation to subdivide that which was already divided prior to its
enactment.
Ms. Jones remained the owner of these un-platted parcels when they were annexed into the
r'\
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
City of Aspen in 1987. The City has informed us that the annexation did not affect the "merger"
status of the parcels. We have asked that Pitkin County advise us of the status of the parcels prior
to annexation. The County Attorney however has declined to help with this issue.
However, you apparently recognize that the subject properties, being separately owned prior
to the merger regulations, would continue as separate if they had established separate residential
uses. This is the principle enunciated in numerous zoning cases which dealt with permitted uses
under a zoning code.
Although I am not ready to concede that these principles apply to ''merger'' regulations as
opposed to permitted uses in a zoning district (even noting that one division of the Court of Appeals
has analyzed the Pitkin County merger regulations in these terms in Wilkinson v. Board of County
Commlrs, 872 P.2d 1269, 1275 (Colo. Ct. App., 1993)), it doesn't seem to matter in the present
situation.
I believe we agree that one of the two adjacent parcels did have a residential use established
prior to 1979. Therefore, that parcel (even under the Wilkinson analysis) was not affected by the
subsequent merger regulations, and did not merge with the adjacent parcel. Since there were only
two parcels capable of merging, and one was not merged, the other, having nothing to merge with,
was un-merged as well.
We therefore request that on behalf of the City of Aspen, you confirm that the two parcels
were not merged as of 1987 before annexation into the City of Aspen.
Concerning the constitutional impediment precluding the retrospective application of
legislation to property rights, we enclose an abbreviated white paper for you review. However, I
repeat that we need not determine whether merger provisions are analogous to permissible zoning
uses, because two parcels cannot merge if one of those parcels is not subject to the merger
regulations.
Thank: you for your cooperation in this matter.
Yours very truly,
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
~.
By: ~~-<--
Robert C. Podoll
RCP/nf
cc: Ms. Olivia Jones
Chris Seldin, Esq.
John Worcester, Esq.
"
CITATION OF AUTHORITIES PERTAINING TO
RETROSPECTIVE APPLICA TIONOFREGULATIONS A.Nl)OlIDINANCES
The Colorado Constitution provides in Article 2 at Section 11 : "No ex post facto law, nor law
impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable
grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."
This fundamental protection "prevents unfairness that would result from changing the
consequences of an act after that act has occurred. Van Sickle v. Boyes, 797 P. 2d (1267 (Colo.
1990)." z.J. Gifts D-2, LLC v. City of Aurora, 2004 Colo. App. Lexis 869.
As interpreted by the courts of Colorado, a statute is retrospective ifit "takes away orimpairs
vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obli~ation, imposes a new duty, or
attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already passed." Continental
Title Company v. District Court, 645 P.2d 1310 (Colo. 1981). TheC()IoradoSupreme Court wrote
in Gates Rubber Co. V. South Suburban Metro. Dist., 183 Colo. 222 (Colo. 1973): "...vested rights
may not be impaired by the retroactive operation of a statute. [Citations omitted]."
It is clear that this prohibition applies to county regulation as well as state statute. "What the
legislature cannot do at the state level in this connection, the city council cannot do in municipal
affairs." Saur v. County Comm'rs of Larimer County, 525 P. 2d 1175, 1176 (Colo. App. 1974),
quoting Denver v. Denver Buick, 141 Colo. 121,347 P.2d 919 (Colo. 1959).
Factually, it is assumed that Olivia Jones acquired two adjacent unplatted lots in 1958 and
1967, respectively. Prior to 1979, Olivia Jones had the rights to sell, encumber or develop each lot
separately.
"The purpose of the constitutional ban on retrospective legislation, like the ban on ex post
facto laws, is to prevent the unfairness that results from changing the legal consequences of an act
after the act has occurred. Peoples natural Gas Div.v.Public.Util Comm, 197Colo..152, 590 P.2d
960 (1979)." Trailer Haven MHP v. City of Aurora, 81 P.3d 1132 (Colo.App. 2003).
The amendment to the Pitkin County Land Use Code would require the additional burdens
of subdivision before Ms. Jones could be restored to the same set of rights she enjoyed before the
amendment. Resolution 79-54 could not be applied retroactively to impose upon Ms. Jones
additional duties or obligations for the enjoyment of the same rights she possessed upon the
acquisition of the parcels.
~
~
VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC
Planning Consultants
September 2, 2004
,~.HAND DELIVERED
Mr. James Lindt, Planner
Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Lots 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15, Block 1, Aspen Grove Subdivision; Lots 1, 14
and 15, Block 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision; and Two Adjacent Meets and
Bounds Parcels.
Dear James:
,....."
As the attached c()mmitment for tit1~ insu:rliP,~~ jnQ.icat~s, Cohen Capital Corporation
is under contract to purchase Lots 10, 11 13, 14 and 15, Block land Lots 1, '14 and
15, Block 3, of the Aspen Grove Subdivision. Two adjacent meets and bounds
parcels, which are referred to as Parcels 1 ap,d2, are also to be acquired. The eight
subdivision lots and the twq ll.1~et$liIlQ. bqllJ1Q.S parcels (collectively the "McSkimming.
J.{oad Properties") are depicted on the BOllndary Survey Map which accompanies this
letter.
Background
m________._____._-'_._____The-platofBlbckLofthe,Aspen-Grove....Subdivision. was-approved..by-the..Board.of
County Commissioners on June 3, 1958 and is recorded In Dit~h Bool<: 2A .atpage
.246 in the office of the PitkiIl County Clerk and Recorder. The plat of Block 3 was
approved on July 1, 1963 and is recorded in DitchBoOk~A lit page 291. Blocks 1
and 3 of the Aspen Grove Subdivision and Parcels 1 ami. 2 we:r~liIln~:x:~d totheG!ty
along with the neighboring Eastwood and KnollwoodSllbd.ivj$ioIl$QIlJuly 13, 1987
(see Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987, attached hereto). The annexed area and the
McSkimming Road Properties were zoned R-15B, Moderate-Density Residential,
pursuant to Ordinance No.~8which wasal$9li,dopted on July 13, 1987. The
properties are undeveloped with the exteption of an existing single-family residence
which is located on Parcel 2.
,,-.,.
While Parcels 1 aIld.~lir~ separately described m~tes and bOundS parcels, it is my
understanding that the City has determined that they were merged at the time. they
230 East Hopkins Ave, . Aspen, Colorado 81611 . 970/925-6958 . Fax 970/920-9310
f*"1
Mr. James Lindt
September 2, 2004
Page 2
were annexed. This determination was apparently made by the City at the request of
the seller and based on a review of applicable County regulations. As a result, it is
also my understanding that the City considers the two parcels to presently constitute a
single parcel for development purposes, there separate legal descriptions notwithstand-
ing. .
Development Rights
Based on the above, I believe that nine single-family residences may be constructed on
the McSkimming Road Properties exempt from the City's growth management quota
system ("GMQS") regulations. More specifically, each of the eight subdivision lots is
entitled to. one single-family GMQS exemption pursuant to Section 26.470.070.B. of
the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations"). Lots 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15,
Block 1 and Lots 1, 14 and 15, Block 3 of the Aspen Grove Subdivision were legally
subdivided prior to November 14, 1977 and comply with the requirements of Section
26.480.020.E. Similarly, merged Parcels 1 and 2 were legally described prior to
November 14, 1977 and contain an existing single-family residence which may be
demolished and reconstructed exempt from GMQS as also provided for in Section
26.470.070.B. of the Regulations.
Affordable Housing Mitigation
The applicable GMQS exemptions are subject to affordable housing mitigation
pursuant to Section 26.470.070.E.1. As accessory dwelling units are prohibited in the
R-15B zone district, the mitigation options are limited to 1) the payment oLan
affordable housing impact fee, 2) the provision of an off-site deed restricted affordable
housing unit, or 3) the restriction of the new single-family dwelling unit to resident
.._______..______.._.___.___.__..._Q_GGJIP~9y,.- .A~s.lill1jng....1b-~1..,t11~...p~m~111..9f..1b~-E1ffg,~gf:121s~J1Q,!l:~!I1g.- imP_'!c::1..f~~.js... ..fu~__...._.__
purchaser's preferred option, it is my understanding that payment will be due at
building permit and wilrbe calcu.latedbased on the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority's
guidelines in effect at building permit application.
8040 Greenline Review
Section 3 of Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987 exempts the annexed area from the
City's regulations pertaining to 8040 Greenline review. As a result, 8040 Greenline
review will not be required to construct new residences on the McSkimming Road
Properties or to remodel, renovate, expand or reconstruct the existing residence
located on Parcel 2.
r",
~
Mr. James Lindt
September 2, 2004
Page 3
Residential Design Standards
Section 26.41O.01O.B. of the Regulations expressly exempts residential development
within the R-15B zone district from the City's Residential pesign Standards. As a
result, no review of the residences to be constructed on. the McSkiIJ:Jp;ling Road
Properties or of any remodeling, renovation, expansion or reconstruction of the
existing residence located on Parcel 2 will be required prior to building permit
issuance.
Allowable Floor Area
f""'\
Pursuant to Section 26.575.020. C., the calculation of allowable floor area in the R-
15B zone district does not require an adjustment for steep slopes. More specifically,
no reduction in alloW(lble floor area. is Jequired for slopes greater than twenty percent.
The allowable floor area on each of the McSkimrning Road Properties therefore will
be based on each lot or parcel's lot area as defined in Section 26,575.020.C. and the
external floor area ratio contained. in Section 2(j.71Q.Q7Q,J::),JQ,Qf!l:1eF-egulations.
While each lot or parcel's allowable floor area willbecalclll(ltedbased oIltl:1eF-egula-
tions in effect at building permit, the allowable floor areas based on the current
Regulations are as follows.
Note: The portion of the Skimming Lane easement encumbering Lots 10, 11,
13, 14 and 15, Block 1 and the McSicimrning Road easement encumbering Lot 14,
Block 3 has been deducted from each lot's (lrea prior to calculating its allowable floor
area. The floor areas exclude the five hllll4re4. square foot exemption for garages
which is contained in Section. 26.575.Q2Q.A.3.6ftheRegulations.
......__.__J31Q~lc.LAspenGrQye..SJl.b4iyis.iQJ:L.__. ....._
Lot 10
17,156 Sq. Ft. - 1,922 Sq. Ft. = 15,234 Sq. Ft.
15,234 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 234 Sq. Ft.
234 Sq. Ft. -:- 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 9.4 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 9 Sq. Ft. = 3,189 Sq. :pt.
Lot 11
17,712 Sq. Ft. - 2,561 Sq. Ft. = 15,151 Sq. Ft.
15,151 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 151 Sq. Ft.
.__.~- -1~-1 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. X 4 Sq. Ft. = 6.0, Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 6 Sq. Ft. = 3,186 Sq. Ft.
"
, ~-
r\
Mr. James Lindt
September 2, 2004
Page 4
Lot 13
35,393 Sq. Ft. - 2,438 Sq. Ft. = 32,955 Sq. Ft.
32,955 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 17,955 Sq. Ft.
17,955 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 718.2 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 718 Sq. Ft. = 3,898 Sq. Ft.
Lot 14
23,256 Sq. Ft. - 1,395 Sq. Ft. = 21,861 Sq. Ft.
21,861 Sq. Ft. - 15,OQO Sq. Ft. = 6,861 Sq. Ft.
6,861 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 274.4 Sq. Ft.
. 3,180 Sq. Ft. + 274 Sq. Ft. = 3,454 Sq. .Ft.
Lot 15
18,856 Sq. Ft. - 1,344 Sq. Ft. = 17,512 Sq. Ft.
17, 512 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 2,512 Sq. Ft.
2,512 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 100.5 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. = 3,280 Sq. Ft.
Block 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision
Lot 1
23,702 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 8,702 Sq. Ft.
8,702 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 348.1 Sq. Ft.
nn ..J,180Sq.Ft.+... 348Sq . Ft.. =_.3,528 Sq. ..Ft.._. ...
Lot 14
56,647 Sq. Ft. - 3,816 Sq. Ft. = 52,831 Sq. Ft.
52,831 Sq. Ft. - 50,000 Sq. Ft. = 2,831 Sq. Ft.
2,831 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 1 Sq. Ft. = 28.3 Sq. Ft.
. 4,580 Sq. Ft. + 28 Sq. Ft. = 4,608 Sq. Ft.
Lot 15
.,
93,102 Sq. Ft. - 50,000 Sq. Ft. = 43,102 Sq. Ft.
43,102 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 1 Sq. Ft. =431.0 Sq. Ft.
4,580 Sq. Ft. + 431 Sq. Ft. = 5,011 Sq. Ft.
VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC
Planning Consultants
July 19, 2004
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. James Lindt, Planner
Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Lots 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15, Block 1, Aspen Grove Subdivision; Lots 1, 14
and 15, Block 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision; and Two Adjacent Meets and
Bounds Parcels.
Dear James:
As the attached commitment for title insurance indicates, Cohen Capital Corporation
is under contract to purchase Lots 10, 1113, 14 and 15, Block 1 and Lots 1, 14 and
15, Block 3, of the Aspen Grove Subdivision. Two adjacent meets and bounds
parcels, which are referred to as Parcels 1 and 2, are also to be acquired. The eight
subdivision lots and the two meets and bounds parcels (collectively the "McSkimming
Road Properties") are depicted on the Boundary Survey Map which accompanies this
letter.
Background
The plat of Block 1 of the Aspen Grove Subdivision was approved by the Board of
County Commissioners on June 3, 1958 and is recorded In Ditch Book 2A at page
246 in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. The plat of Block 3 was
approved on July 1, 1963 and is recorded in Ditch Book 2A at page 291. Blocks 1
and 3 of the Aspen Grove Subdivision and Parcels 1 and 2 were annexed to the City
along with the neighboring Eastwood and Knollwood Subdivisions on July 13, 1987
(see Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987, attached hereto). The annexed area and the
McSkimming Road Properties were zoned R-15B, Moderate-Density Residential,
pursuant to Ordinance No. 28 which was also adopted on July 13, 1987. The
properties are undeveloped with the exception of an existing single-family residence
which is located on Parcel 2.
While Parcels 1 and 2 are separately described metes and bounds parcels, they are
believed to have merged prior to annexation as they were held in common ownership
230 East Hopkins Ave. . Aspen, Colorado 81611 . 970/925-6958 . Fax 970/920-9310
~
Mr. James Lindt
July 19, 2004
Page 2
by the seller in 1979, the year in which Pitkin County adopted its merger regulations.
As it has been the City's policy not to create additional development rights in
connection with annexation, the two parcels are believed to presently constitute a
single parcel for development purposes. It should be noted that Ordinances Nos. 26
and 28, which annexed and zoned the McSkimming Road Properties, contain no refer-
ence as to the individual properties annexed or to their development potential.
Development Rights
Based on the above, I believe that nine single-family residences may be constructed on
the McSkirnming Road Properties exempt from the City's growth management quota
system ("GMQS") regulations. More specifically, each of the eight subdivision lots is
entitled to one single-family GMQS exemption pursuant to Section 26.470.070.B. of
the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations"). Lots 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15,
Block 1 and Lots 1, 14 and 15, Block 3 of the Aspen Grove Subdivision were legally
subdivided prior to November 14, 1977 and comply with the requirements of Section
26.480.020.E. Similarly, merged Parcels 1 and 2 were legally described prior to
November 14, 1977 and contain an existing single-family residence which may be
demolished and reconstructed exempt from GMQS as also provided for in Section
26.470.070.B. of the Regulations.
Affordable Housing Mitigation
The applicable GMQS exemptions are subject to affordable housing mitigation
pursuant to Section 26.470.070.E.1. As accessory dwelling units are prohibited in the
R-15B zone district, the mitigation options are limited to 1) the payment of an
affordable housing impact fee, 2) the provision of an off-site deed restricted affordable
housing unit, or 3) the restriction of the new single-family dwelling unit to resident
occupancy. Assuming that the payment of the affordable housing impact fee is the
purchaser's preferred option, it is my understanding that payment will be due at
building permit and will be calculated based on the. Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority's
guidelines in effect at building permit application.
8040 Greenline Review
Section 3 of Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987 exempts the annexed area from the
City's regulations pertaining to 8040 Greenline review. As a result, 8040 Greenline
review will not be required to construct new residences on the McSkirnming Road
Properties or to remodel, renovate, expand or reconstruct the existing residence
located on Parcel 2.
~
Mr. James Lindt
July 19, 2004
Page 3
Residential Design Standards
Section 26.410.01O.B. of the Regulations expressly exempts residential development
within the R-15H zone district from the City's Residential Design Standards. As a
result, no review of the residences to be constructed on the McSkimming Road
Properties or of any remodeling, renovation, expansion or reconstruction of the
existing residence located on Parcel 2 will be required prior to building permit
issuance.
Allowable Floor Area
Pursuant to Section 26.575.020.C., the calculation of allowable floor area in the R-
15H zone district does not require an adjustment for steep slopes. More specifically,
no reduction in allowable floor area is required for slopes greater than twenty percent.
The allowable floor area on each of the McSkimming Road Properties therefore will
be based on each lot or parcel's lot area as defined in Section 26.57~.020.C. and the
external floor area ratio contained in Section 26.71O.070.D.1O. of the Regulations.
While each lot or parcel's allowable floor area will be calculated based on the Regula-
tions in effect at building permit, the allowable floor areas based on the current
Regulations are as follows.
Note: The portion of the Skimming Lane easement encumbering Lots 10, 11, 13, 14
and 15, Block 1 and the McSkimming Road easement encumbering Lot 14, Block 3
has been deducted from each lot's area prior to calculating its allowable floor area.
The floor areas exclude the five hundred square foot exemption for garages which is
contained in Section 26.575.020.A.3. of the Regulations.
Block 1, Aspen Grove Subdivision
Lot 10
17,156 Sq. Ft. - 1,922 Sq. Ft. = 15,234 Sq. Ft.
15,234 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 234 Sq. Ft.
234 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 9.4 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 9 Sq. Ft. = 3,189 Sq. Ft.
Lot 11
17,712 Sq. Ft. - 2,561 Sq. Ft. = 15,151 Sq. Ft.
15,151 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 151 Sq. Ft.
151 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. X 4 Sq. Ft. = 6.0 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 6 Sq. Ft. = 3,186 Sq. Ft.
Mr. James Lindt
July 19, 2004
Page 4
Lot 13
35,393 Sq. Ft. - 2,438 Sq. Ft. = 32,955 Sq. Ft.
32,955 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 17,955 Sq. Ft.
17,955 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 718.2 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 718 Sq. Ft. = 3,898 Sq. Ft.
Lot 14
23,256 Sq. Ft. - 1,395 Sq. Ft. = 21,861 Sq. Ft.
21,861 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 6,861 Sq. Ft.
6,861 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 274.4 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 274 Sq. Ft. = 3,454 Sq. Ft.
Lot 15
18,856 Sq. Ft. - 1,344 Sq. Ft. = 17,512 Sq. Ft.
17, 512 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 2,512 Sq. Ft.
2,512 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 100.5 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. = 3,280 Sq. Ft.
Block 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision
Lot 1
23,702 Sq. Ft. - 15,000 Sq. Ft. = 8,702 Sq. Ft.
8,702 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 4 Sq. Ft. = 348.1 Sq. Ft.
3,180 Sq. Ft. + 348 Sq. Ft. = 3,528 Sq. Ft.
Lot 14
56,647 Sq. Ft. - 3,816 Sq. Ft. = 52,831 Sq. Ft.
52,831 Sq. Ft. - 50,000 Sq. Ft. = 2,831 Sq. Ft.
2,831 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 1 Sq. Ft. = 28.3 Sq. Ft.
4,580 Sq. Ft. + 28 Sq. Ft. = 4,608 Sq. Ft.
Lot 15
93,102 Sq. Ft. - 50,000 Sq. Ft. = 43,102 Sq. Ft.
43,102 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 1 Sq. Ft. = 431.0 Sq. Ft.
4,580 Sq. Ft. + 431 Sq. Ft. = 5,011 Sq. Ft.
~
Mr. James Lindt
July 19, 2004
Page 5
Parcels 1 and 2
209,002 Sq. Ft. - 50,000 Sq. Ft. = 159,002 Sq. Ft.
159,002 Sq. Ft. + 100 Sq. Ft. x 1 Sq. Ft. = 1,590 Sq. Ft.
4,580 Sq. Ft. + 1,590 Sq. Ft. = 6,170 Sq. Ft.
As we discussed, I would appreciate it if you would review the conclusions contained
in this letter and verify my interpretation of the relevant regulatory provisions in the
space provided below. Should you have any questions, or if I have misinterpreted the
Regulations in any way, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours truly,
cc: Warren Cohen
Millard J. Zimet, Esq.
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
By: James Lindt
Date:
\.~
,~
73
,-
~..:
.
-,,,
','
f"'\
eooK54 7 f~GE191
ORDINANCE No. ~
(series c.f 1!l87)
AN ORDINJ\NCE OF THE CIT'l OF ASPE~' ZONING!.FP~O"I~':l'li:~X 79J;1.<::IU!:~
OF LAND KNOWN AS THE ASPEN GROVE SU~OIVISlqN, EAsTwt5dO SUBOtVI-
SION, KNOLLWOODSU13DIVISION EXG):.USIV,E O:F~qg.~Q.'cjD, BLOCK 4 MORE
PARTICUI.J\RLY DESCRIBED ON EXliIi3I':t' t1A".1\'.l"I'~CI!~[)I!'E~TO, ALSO KNOWN
AS THE ASPEN GROVE/EASTWOOD/KNOLLW,OODANNEXATION'~: .C;:e~ERJ>..gY
LOCATED EAST OF THE S1\LVAT:tON. DITCH. AND NOI.t':t'I!OF"..l:;.'.l'A.TE HIGHWAY
82, THE CITY OF A~PEN, PITKIN COUNTY ,COLORADO '1'0 R-isB .
WHE1:'.EAS 1 the property o~mers 0 f Aspen Grove, Eastwood and
Knollwood Subdivis~ons exclusive of Knollwood, Block 4 (herein-
after referred t.o as the ASL'~n Grove, Eastwood/Kno1.: wood Annexa-
tion Area specif~cally described in Exhibiit "A" attached hereto
~~C inco~rcrated herein and have petitioned the city of Aspen to
be annexed; and
~fflEREAS, the Aspen/pitkin Planning Office notified property
owners within the Aspen GrovejEastwood/Knollwood area of a public
meeting on M3Y 19, 1987, to discuss zoning for the area; and
WHEREAS, the As:pen' Planning and Zoning Commission held a
duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 1987 to consider the
creation of the R-15B Moderate Density Resid~ntial zone district
recommended by staff and the application of the zone district: to
the Aspen Grove/Eastwood/Kr:ollwood annexation area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation
of the Planning and zoning commission and has determin~d the
proposed zoning to be compatible with !':tirrounding ione districts
and land use 5,n the vicinity of the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CI'l'Y c:f50UNCIL OF THE
n ::'!! N
_ -i
:><
xv> to
<"JF=
:z:< W
2i -i-
-<)00
UJ ::000 ~.
Ql m~
C'>_ 0
"s:- o'"
,:x: ::.
ci!; CI c..r.
"'
...., ;Ie
CITY OF 2'S~EN, ,;CI,ORADO:
-~
[.\,
~
~:
..:
~_.
-'.
........
'.",."
~
COOK
547 PME19Z
section 1
1hat it does hereby zone to R-15B Moderate, Density Residen-
tial that area commonly know as the Aspen Grove/Eastwood/Knoll-
woc.d Annexation Area which area is epecifically descr.ibed in
Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Sect:ion 2
That the zoning District Map be amended to reflect the
zoning described in Secticn 1 and the City Engineer is hereby
authorized and directed to amend the map to reflect the zoning
change.
Section 3
Inasmuch as the area zoned by this ordinance consists of a
newly ~nncxcd nrea with existing structures, the remodeling,
renovation, reconstruction additions to existing structures and
new construction in the area described in Exhibit "A" shall be
deemed to have satisfied all requirements of Section 24-6.2 of
the Municipal Code pertaining to 8040 Greenline review.
Section 4
That the City Clerk is directed upon adoption of this
ordinance to record a copy in the office of the Pitkin County
Cl~rk and Recorder.
'Section 5
If any section, sUb-section, sentence, clause, phr'ase or
portion of this. ordinance i5 for any re.ason held inval1d or
unconstic:utional by and court of competent jurisdiction, such
2
.r
I:'
...........
,
... .
"-"",,
. .I
\
\
eoolt
547 rAli~1.9:3
...._",
portion shall be daemp.d c. :;eparate, distinct and independent
remaining portions thereof.
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
section G
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the
,~-::-"~"'~day of .l.. ~('_, 1987, at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council
.,'
Cha:r.\bers, Aspen city Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days
prior to which hearing notice of the ~arne shall be pUblished once
in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by law by
the City council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day
/
," .~
>' ..:'- '--;';"'._., c;.'" ,.. ...../ . (.:.,. L.._
,. _ ~r_ 'OJ. ........ I
William L. stirling, Mayor
1987.
of .June,
" , CF .0(.
.,."'.:;;.'\ u"'-,:,.
.. A........EST..'
i .... ..,.. /
.! ~Vr< ~ V ,~'Lf:eA / _
Kathryn.~,~och, City Clerk
('" "[/...'
J: j(.t~~j'1.ir..y, c,dopted, passed and approved this /=?\fl'~(jay of
~.:~~,CJ~
./ ,J
, 1987.
,,'1i.fr.:as'll:r . '_
. ,/0';.'0;;.i.'~f'" ", , / 1":" .
" !!::::f<--t..I'Ut4~.J l4. ~e.. .6.......-_
: ~~7l!.7:1. tGh, City Clerk
~
""H.EM.J:.{ ;:l
(<'r'" . J "
" . "~,,. \/,.'
,I'"
f~.(J
"',:,~""
-_/{ .' ,/'"'.. ~~ .~.(;.?'"
..-:.< -' /' .' ..,-:5
,,' /-;t:.-..-. ,".." ..1;:::-
William L. stirling, Mayor
3
.po
\
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
I.......
I
I
I
!
I
I
I~'~
-""'.
... ~ 6-
'" sl<
g 01 l
3 ~~
1 !(ll
'r-
in
~
0>
...
'"
~
;''''
\M
\'"
~~
"
"'-
'{
r- v.
. ~
Yl_
",,:0
N~
~~
"'~
$;>
)>
~
~
5.
'"
'"
g
"
~
\r- \ .-'i
'V') .)~ \ '<;3i \'M .
G OL'S" , ,"
'~1 \ g31 (
:I - 10 ';1 l'
I 006'
..0 .
N 08'058 '00" .E
330.$4' (Parcel I-Calc.)
33.e..93' (Parcel 2)
~~
~
f.O
~
)
If.
r'w-"
0)
~~
~
~~
Ii-
S 08'$0'00" IY 2.9.9.8.3' (Pield)
289.07' (Deed)
6 S
06' ~v.o't
. o.~
A""
'i1 ,_
\ ~
\, ~f"
) . ~ N
.' \ 0 \'
( ','o~ \'
~ ~\ ~',
tJ. .l~\.....
\"'~, \~ \,
\ ~
\ \_'~
10,
~ J.ng>
~ ",g
~:o ~~ ~lI)
ell- -n
(,,,,,' -0 ~~
['.. '_.1 ~~
.
~;'~. ~ :J/
~
.g ~ !l
) ""
Y>
If. ~
€1
'"
"
'"
~
J
,/
.141.D9'
7J?.f.S'
,
-........'.
r-Vl
~:t
~~
~~
"'~
"
,.
)>
--/30.00' ,
I
.tV //'08 '09" .E
470. 9$' (Calc.)
/3
}::
,iI'',,)
~,
471.$' (Piat)
g:
~~
~~
~
If.
..~
Yl~
~~
~~
~
787.79'
"''''iil
~!?10'
c$ d..,
.Jll.~"O
ago
q 1a
'ifi:<",
"''''
"'[;:
-~~
"', .
S~
!!
n~
3!>-
~- Sf)
",r
p~
~
~ ~
[;!'
~
~~
....
~ <:::,'
~ ~
::J. '
~ ~
'-
~
r~
YJ~
~~
-0
~~
{
~
~
~
~
~~
~
~
/J~
~~
~~
t~
N
15
~
~
f8
n~
ll"
~
.'-',
~
\
'",
\1>-
~~
o>l<
...
"'~
o
"
&;
~ ~
~ i/.~
'::J
'-
SoCTlO:: 1~
-So-;;ON 17
J:.
3~
~",
zr
Pit
~W
j~
==n
00
~."
"-
'0
g
~
;::
y,
'lli
;;;
~
c-
>--
>-
k
''1
'"
~J
~:
~
C
l-:t
<./.
~
"
")
:-.,
~
u
'-c
tr
1--
L.
.:-:;
../~
r
c
c
?
f-
e--
L
u
i-
:J:::
~
t:r
C
l-:t
~\'. ~
i)
8\
:';.':'
.,
~;':~
~..........'
'''.'.':'>: 'i
~
BOOK 97: p~GE191
ORDINANCE No. 2fL..
(Series elf 1!:l87)
AN ORDINANCE OF TilE CITY. OF ASPE:t!f .,~Cll>l'n~c:;; !.P:J?R,():l:q:~'1'l?:H:i.:?~:..~9~::;
OF LAND KNOWN ASTHEASPE:N' GR,ClYJJ:S!111I)IYJ:~:r:ON, EASTWoo15$UBOI(rj:-
SION, KNOU,WOOD SUI3D!V:rS:rONE:~Gtt1S:rYE:l?1f~g~!!9::~P, BLOCK 4. MOIm
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIB:r'l' nA"::,i\!,!,,i\9~I).J!E:E!!O, . ALSO KNOWN
AS THE ASPEN GROVE/EASTWOOD/KNOLLWOODAmiE>CA'l'IONAREA; GE:N'E:RALLY
LOCATED EAST OF THE : SAI"vA'l'ION'. 1):r-r~I:t1\l>l'1)l>l'9R'I.'ff()K.::;'l',i\'l'EJtJ:C:;;HWAY
82, THE CITY OF M2EN, PITKINCmrnTY, C6WRAOO"ifiOR-fsS'" ...., ,.'"
WHEJ?.EAS 1 the property owners of Aspen Grove, Eastwood and
Knollwood Subdivisions exclusive of l<nollwood, Block 4 (herein-
after referred t.o as the Aspen Grove, Eastwood/Knol:wood Annexa-
tionArea specifically described in Exhibiit "A" attached hereto
a~o incorForated herein and have petitioned the City of Aspen to
be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen/pitkin Planning Office notified property
owners within the Aspen Grove/Eastwood/Knollwood area of a public
meeting on May 19, 1987, to discuss zoning for the area; and
WHEREAS, the A:::pen' Planning and Zoning Commission held a
duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 1987 to consider the
creation of the R-15B Moderate Dl:;!npity Residential zone district
recommended by staff and the application o,fthe zO,De. di,lE;trict to
the Aspen Grove/Eastwood/Knollwood annexation arl:;!Cl.: and
WHEREAS, the city Council has cons.idered. 1:h.E! ;reCOmmE!l1clai:::ion
of the planning and Zoning commission and has dei:::e:rmJne.d . the
proposed zoning to be compatible with stirrounding zone districts
and land use in the vicinity of the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CITY ~OUNCIL
.... :l?
.... .....
~
zen
n;=
:z:<
-4-
-c:)oo
,.0
...,~
n_
0(1)
::.
co
"'
,.
c.n
OF
THE
N
c.o
W
,J:l,."
C>
CITY OF ~SPEN, CCr~RADO:
c;
Ul
CD
~
.:s::
m
-.a
..:'
?
J
~\
\
--J;
~t
---
.~.....\
_._-~._--. -~~_... _... .~. --....".-
section 1
That it does hereby zone to R-15B Moderate, Density Residen-
tial that area commonly know as the Aspen Grove/Eastwood/Knoll-
wood Annexation Area which area is specifically described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto.
section 2
That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the
zoning described in secticn 1 and the City Engineer is hereby
authorized and directed to amend the map to reflect the zoning
change.
section 3
:;'1,
t
;'
Inasmuch as the area zon~d by this ordinance consists of a
newly annexed area with existing structur.es, the remodeling,
'-', renovation, reconstruction additions to existing structures and
t' ,
'...._i
\
i
"-.:~
new construction in the area described in Exhibit "A" shall be
deemed to have satisfied all requirements of Section 24-6.2 of
the Municipal Code pertaining to 8040 Greenline review.
section 4
That the City Clerk is directed upon adoption of this
ordinance to record a copy in the office of the Pitkin county
\
Cl~rk and Recorder.
section 5
If any section, SUb-section, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or
unconstitutional by and court of competent jurisdiction, such
2
?
1<'
i
'" ~~~.
;...""'"
..~)...
'"",
~
4'
'\
\
f"'l
.."!;,.'t?
1"*\
BOOll 547 PAGE1.9:)
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
section 6
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be 11.~ld on ..th.e
/S':"~~'day ofCl..,.:Lt-f_, 1987, at 5:00 P.M. in the city Council
// . .. . .:;"'
Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, colorado, fifteen (15) days
prior to which hearing notice of the same shall l:>.e published once
in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by law by
the city Council of the city of Aspen on the 22pd day
" /.
_;,_..~" ..."",r . ...""J ,."/~
, ;:; ....'/ . '/'-
//-~~~,. (/)~'~v"L-= /
William L. stirling, Mayor
1987.
.""'\. '( CF As
/0::) '. "'~
..f' AT'l'EST: ...'.'" ;
U !&&!~\J >i/6~ / _
Kathryn : !<och, city Clerk
, ..tI~.:
(a:JA~~~~iLy, adopted; passed
/'~ .
~_ ':V<- <:. <-s---
" .1
, 1987.
city Clerk
of June,
. /"J'{~
and approved th~s /,~ day of
,/:/,./"- ///~
~'/ pz::-z::..... ''''i. /t?'
William L. stirling, Mayor
3
,,po
. .......
I
I~"
'-
'" ~...
, ~
i~
i
i
...
/':\
I ..;
",~,.~.'
,
~
;'-i
~
l
. ~
;
'\
,
f2"':11
~
~i;
~
I
I
. \
I
EXHIBIT "A"
EXTERNAT~ FLOOR AREA RATIO
LOT SIZE
(Sin9le-Fam;i.1y
Structure~~ )
800K 547 PAGE19S
\
..
(
I
<<
STANDARD ALLOWABLE SQ. FT.
t'"
0-3,000
80 s.f. for each .70X(0-~,400)
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
3,001-9,000
28 s.f. for each .70x(2,400-4,080)
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
9,001-15,000
7 s.f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
15,001-50,000
6 s.f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
50,000+
2 s.L for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
f',
,~;.,..
~...
.70x(4,080-4,500)
j:~
.70x(4,500-6,500)
:.... .',
.70x(6,500+)
,-
;~" 1
. . . J.:~
. ,~
; j
\
,
!
:...~..j
~~ ' (
~; ,.. I
f:,..:..... 1
, I
~.
~l
~
! I In.::.::.
. i I I~. .: 1::::"IH!
'1"1 , ..1 1, :""11"
. .., ';. . . I:; : if" '1'
A ~;l; :!HI;:i ! l ~!!, i'l ;~;i}:j!:
'j:I'l'i:..,', , ' I d I [."ll'"
' ; ;:;: ;! lil:j! i I 'jlj :, ,j;(I,i:i
..' ~ iiij~ ~:l;l!ll ; ; :';i il :::,:;:;1
f -- 'l!" ,!. i .' I. '''' " ~:II.ll',
~ ;i;~: ::[;l~'! ~{i\ ~~:'l:' !, I~:"~if!l
.. ~;:f\.. t~I'.. ;iti 1;! :... .:\i It "._!;;.:
" , I '" '", l'l I.;. I' . ~'I -j'1':'1
' · j"ll:1 i";;". '1"I"it',:i, 1: ill""
.: ~., h!:'r'll::! ':'1:' "I rill ~:ftl,l;"i
:::::: t P1H !olt1.'1 :~ri:f'i!lr ;~'J rr!. 'h~
I : ! 'i;, ~!H;',:';II;;::,,::~,!.:!. !~llI".i,i
' ,I". ,....,l..,.;!..".ilil,,,.,lill'rd..,,
a Z I.!." :'il~"rl"l'l"'"" IllI,'I;I. ~:..
o Q : h;;;l rl~:';~:I'I;~~;;i!;i~i;;H!:Uh:!!ttTI
o L- ;;;d. .I:i" :....
3= <t , ..
f-X
(/) w+
L5 ~ IA.: ~
I <l:~. _ ....
w ~ ~ _
~ -I -<'
1 ~ l~ ".
"
Attachment 1
i ~!:
I' :,;,
;~f :t:!
! l~ J ;i~
~j.! ~i~:
~!: .~;~~
'i. II"
':mmm!l!f i!ll
~!f;;;~!~~..fi a.~H
!HHii!~~!I;!};:!j
nHHiuli!!!!h..
Hi!
i:j~
.,.
!~~
!li\ \ BOOK
1!!1Ijj !
III ·
II.!
ll\
Iii
t'~
!!'
:;1\1
'fl
~!n
'!"
'i/;
1t!li
.:'~
,
.
.
,
d
, .
. ,
l;i
Iq
ih
Ii
h
Y"
~
.f
I;
Ii!
:h~:i
.itt"
t"..1,
;il ~~; ,
; ii~i:'
ll;ll:/~
lij~IH: 'il~t .(::.)
I::ii
1j:I;1
ii :'1,:'1 .
ii!iij: \1, .
:""1: \'::
'....-
,6
.~ . :1:1::';;
;;;;j;i;,:ii.
.~!~:
~ ~~I
,
~
+.:.
.'.
....
:;;~
.~:~.
\
\
~.~~.
.f
"~""'~""'~' ~".' I."
'-'-'C)_"''':W:;)_/''ii''''.''''~>;0<,
,""'-;;,
;M);H*,~-i&..<<Ji_'~ ..a)'
j"
~
547 PA5E194
-
^
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen CO 81611
(970) 920-5090
(970) 920-5439, fax
Aspen Community
Development
Department
Fax
To: John Ely From: James Lindt
Fax: 920-5198 Pages:
Phone: Date: 7/20/04
Re: Aspen Grove Subdivision Lots cc:
o Urgent
o For Review
o PIE!~sE!~()mm!nt.. 0 ~1!~~!...lleply
o Please Recycle
. Comments:
Hi John,
John Worcester has directed me to write thE) attached letter of request to you related to the applicability
of the County's merger provisions to several parcels in the Aspen Grove Subdivision. Please review
the attached documents.
Thanks,
James Lindt
Planner
City of Aspen
July 20, 2004
John Ely
Pitkin County Attorney
530 E. Main Street .
Aspen, CO 8161,1
AspEl''!" jPITl<::IN / .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: Request for Interpret~tion Rel~ted t'o Merger Provision
Dear John:
I am writing this letter of request for interpretation at the direction of the City Attorney in regards
to the applicability of the County's merger provisions as they relate to several parcels that were
annexed into the City in 1987. The City of Aspen Planning Staffwas approached by Sunny Vann
of Vann Associates, LLC regarding eight (8) lots in the Aspen Grove Subdivision aJ}d two (2)
adjacent metes and bOUIlds parcels located just north of the Aspen Grove Subdivision (please see
attached annexation map for location of parcels).
Mr. Vann has made an argument to City Staff (see attached' letter) that Lots 10, 11, 13, 14, and
15, Block 1 ofth,e Aspen Grove Subdivision; and LotS 1, 14, and 15, Block 3 ,of the Aspen Grove
Subdivision should be considered separate parcels and should not. have merged under Pitkin
County's merger provisions even though they were in the same ownership as of the merger dates
specified in the County Land Use Code beca).lse they were parcels located in a subdivision
approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Vanll.has further argued thatthe two.(2)
subject metes and bounds parcels should have merged because they were in the same ownership
in 1979 and were not located in a subdivision approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
/ ' .
,
In Mr. V ann's argument that was detailed above, he indicates that Blocl< l' of the Aspen Grove
Subdivision was approved and platted in 1958..However; in discussing Mr. Vann's argument
with members of the County Planning Staff, it was expressed by members of the County Staff
that Pitkin County did not begin doing official subdivision reviews until the 1960'5. Therefore,
the City of Aspen Planning Staff and Attorney's Office would like your written interpretation as
to whether the Comity's merger provisions should have applied to Lots 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15,
Block 1, Aspen Grove Subdivision; and Lots 1, 14, and IS, Block 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision/
(~ .
prior to their annexation into the City of Aspen in 1987.
Please feel free to contact me at 920-5095 or John Wor<;ester at920~5055 with 'comments or
. questions relating to this matter.
Regards, I
~
ames Lindt, Planner
City of Aspen
Cc: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
John Worcester, City of Aspen Attorney
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ' ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 . PHONE 970.920.5090 . FAX 970.920.5439
Printed on Recycled Paper
.~
Section 6-50
SUBSTANDARD SIZE LOTS (PC 6-5)
Subsections:
6-50-010 Development Permitted on Substandard Size Lots or Parcf)ls
6-50-020 Cumulation of Substandard Size Lots
6-50-030 Separation ofplatted Substandard Size Lots
6-50-010 Development Permitted on SubstandlmiSize Lots or Parcels
A single family dwelling unit is a permitted use on any legally created lot or parcel made substandard as
to size by the imposition ofthe initial adoption ofthe Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of195 5, or the adoption
of any relevant amendment thereto subject to compliance with the standards in thi~ section.
A. The development of any principal land use other than a single family dwelling unit on a substandard
size lot is prohibited.
B. Land uses and structures that are accessory to the single family dwelling are permitted. (Prior code 9
6-501)
6-50-020 Cumulation of Subst:mdard Si:l:~ Lots
A. "Common ownership" of contiguous substandard size lots or parcels shall cumulate with the
exception that lots in subdivisions approved and signed by the Board of County Commissioners shall not
cumulate regardless of their size. The aggregate area of the lots shall be considered as one (1) lot or parcel
regardless of diverse times of acquisition by the common owner and whether or not the property was acquired
before adoption of this regulation.
B. If a public roadway which was in place prior to June 2, 1975 provides access to contiguous
substandard size lots and separates such lots, the lots shall not cumulate. (Prior code S 6-502)
6-50-030 Separation of Platted Substandard Size L!"ds
The Planning Commission may permit the separation oflegally platted substandard size 10ts'Yl1ich have
not been approved by the Board of County Commissioners and which have. cumulated pursuant to Section 6-50-
020, subject to compliance with all of the standards in this section. In the ,case of m),lltiple, cumulated
. substandard size lots, the County may limit the number oflots which may be separated and require lot lines to
be reconfigured. Refer to Section 4-50 for procedures and Section 5-60 for submission contents.
A. The lots must be located in a legally platted subdivision.
B. 'The subdivision plat must have been legally recorded with the County Clerk in compliance with all
subdivision laws in eff~ct at the time of recording.
C. The Commission shall approve, deny, or limit the separation of cumulated substandard size lots
based upon consideration of the criteria in this section.
6
~
1. Which could be created by any court in this State pursuant to the law of emineIltclomain, or
by operation oflaw, or by order of any court in this State if the Board of County Commissioners
of the County in which the property is situated is given timely notice of any such pending action
by the court and given opportunity to join as a party in interest in such proceedings for the
purpose of raising the issue of evasion of the County's suhdivisionregulations prior to the entry
ofthe court order and ifthe)30arg ggesnotfile~l1 appropriate pleacling within twenty (20) days
after receipt of such notice by the court;
2. Which is created by a lien, mortgage, deed of trust, or any other security instrument;
3. Which is created by a security or unit ofinterest in any investment trust regulated under the
laws of this State or any other interest in any investment entity;
4. Which creates cemetery lots;
5. Which creates an interest or int(':restingil, gas, minerals, or water which is severed from the
surface ownership or real property; or
6. Which is created by the acquisition of an interest in land in the name ofthe hll~1J(l.l1cland
wife or other persons in joint tenancy, or as tenants in common, and any such interest shall be
deemed for the purpose of this definition as only one interest.
7. Which creates parcels ofland, each of which comprises thirty-five (35) or more acres of
land and none of which is i1l,tenged fgr use by multiple owners.
8. Which creates legally separate real estate interests through creation of condominiums
pursuant to C.R.S. Section 33-33.3-101, et seq. or Section 38-33-101, et seq., cooperatives
pursuant to CR.S. 33-33.3-101, et seq. or Section 33-33.5-101, et seq. and timeshares pursuant to
CR.S. Section 38-33-111, as those provisions may be amended or replaced from time to time.
The creation of these interests shall ngtr(':sllltinthe~ll1Jc:lJvi~igl}gn~g, the creation oflegally
separate lots, nor shall it be considered an eyentofsubdivision, .
SUBSTANDARD SIZELOT means any lot or parcel, no matter what the size, which is held in
separate ownership and which does no .m~et th(':. mi1l,imum requirements for lot width or area as
set forth in this Code, when a building permit is sought.
SUBURBAN means a predominantly low-density residential area and/or sm(llkscal.~c;()mtrl.ercial
area located immediately outside of and physically and socio-economically associated with an
urban area, municipality or a city.
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT m~ans (lnimprovement to a public road planned and scheduled on
the Pitkin County 20- Year Road Improvement Plan.
TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL :USES are commerci(ll usesgfproperty for seventy-two (72)
hours or less unless a longer duration is approved by the Board of County Commissioners atits
discretion.
38
Suzanne Wolff, 09:51 A~0/2004, Fwd: County Merger Fr6visn
Page 1 of 1
)(-Sender: suzannew@Ysam
)(-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version4~~~~
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:51:59 -0600
To: jamesl@Yco.pitkin.co.us
From: Suzanne Wolff <suzannew@Yci.aspen.co.us>
Subj ect: Fwd: County Merger Provisions
Sub-Section 6-50-020, Curnulationof Sllb~tgtllc:l.'!rc:l Siz;~1Qts ,
Article 8, Definition of "subdivision or subdivided lWld" -s':lbsegtiQl1C::
)(-Sender: lancec@Ysam
)( -Mailer: Q U ALCO MM WindQW~E11<;lQf'!PfQV~rsJ2114~1t..
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:38:28 -0600
To: Suzannew@Yci.aspen.co.us
From: Lance Clarke <lancec@Yci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Fwd: County Merger Provisions
Could you please give James the citations
)(-Sender: jamesl@sam
)(-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows ElldorC! PrQ VersiQn 4.2.0.58
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:08:45 -0600
To: lancec@Yci.aspen.co.us
From: James Lindt <jamesl@Yci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: County Merger Provisions
Hi Lance,
Could you please identify the county land use code sections that in~lude tl:1y JW9111,yrger provisions
you have. John Ely chose not make a determination as to whether some lots that were anne,x,ed .i..n.t,..o..".,
the City were merged prior to their annexation. . So,ll~\\' itisllpt~Ch;i~'~~dI:"""""""o"
Thanks,
James
James Lindt
Aspen Community. Development
920-5102
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
8/20/2004
~
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
TERRACE TOWER II
;;619 DTC PARKWAY. SCITF 1100
GREENWOOD VILLAGE. COLORADO 80111-3064
TELEPHONE: 1303) 861.4000
TELECOPIER: (03) 861.4004
RJ<'HARD H. 1'0001.1
ROBERT C. PODOLL
SUSA!'; R HARRlS
ROBERT A. KITSMILLF.R
RICHARD C HOPKI!'"
KERRI L KLEIN
.~M\' 1.. EI.LlS
August 23, 2004
James Lindt
Planning Dcpt.
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Olivia Jones' Properties
Dear James:
Please be advised thatthis()ftlf~xepresents Olivia Jones, who was until recently, the owner
of two unplatted lots in U.S. Mining Survey #6120, adjacent to the Aspen Grove Subdivision.
The first pared contains 3.39 a.eres and\vas. acquired by Olivia Jones on August 21, 1958 by
deed from the Benedict Land and Cattle Company.
The second parcel contains 1.4 acres and was acquired by Olivia Jones on June 8, 1967, also
from the Benedict Land an.d Ca,ttle Company.
In May, 1979. the Pitkin County Land Use Code was mnendedby the County Commissioners
in Resolution 79-54. As part of the amendments, the definition of subdivision. ""liS. amellci~(lto
include the event that "1\'iO or more contiguous parcels ofland previously, separately conveyed (or
described) shall come under single ownership...." We believe that Ms. Jones' separate ownership
of the two un-platted parcels above-described existed prior to, and was unaffect~d by the passage of
Rf:'solution 79-54.
Refening to principles with which we are sure you are familiar, no ordinance or regulation
may operate retrospectively. A law is "retrospective" if it creates a new obligation, imposes a new
duty, or attaches a new disability in respect to transactiol}s orc.Qns,iciel"aJiof1salr~~dy passed.
Clearly, prior to 1979, Ms. Jones owned two parcels of properties which she had acquired
years earlier, and which could b~ encumbered, developed or sold separately. Resolution 79-54 could
not impose upon Ms. Jones the obligation to subdivide that which ~a~ (ilready divided prior to its
enactment.
:vis. Jones remained the owner ofthese un-platted parcels when they were annexed into the
.........
1/. .......~
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.c.
City of Aspen in 1987. The City has informed us that the annexatiog dig notaffeft th~"l11er-?er"
status of the parcels. We have asked that Pitkin c:c)UIlty advise us of the status of the parcels prior
to annexation. The County Attorney however has declined to help with this issue.
However, you apparently recognize that the subject properties, being separately owned prior
to the merger regulatiol).s, would continue as separate if they had established separate residential
uses. This is the principle enunciated in ntlInerOUS zoning cases which dealt with permitted uses
under a zoning code.
Although I am not ready to concede that these principles apply to "merger" regulations as
opposed to permitted uses in a zoning district (even noting that one division of the Court of Appeals
has analyzed the Pitkin County merger regulations in these tenns in Wilkinson v. Board ofCo1.lIlty
~omm'rs, 872 P.2d 1269, 1275 (Colo. Ct. App., 1993)), it doesn't seem to matter in the present
situation.
J believe we agree that one ofthe tWQ adjacent parcels did have a residential use establisl1~9
prior to 1979. Therefore. that parcel (even under the WiJkinson analysis) was not affected by the
subsequent merger regulations. and did not merge with the adjacent parcel. Since there were only
. two parcels capable of merging, and one was not merged, the other, having nothing to merge with,
was un-merged as well.
We therefore request that on behalf of the City of Aspen, you confirm that the two parcels
were not merged as of 1987 before anne)(Clti()IlimQtl1~c:ity of Aspen.
Concerning the constitutional impediment precluding the retrospective application of
legislation to property rights, we enclose an abbreviated white paper for you review. However, I
repeat that we need not detennine whetl1<;;r merger provisions are analogous to permissible zoning
uses, because two parcels cannot merge if one of those parcels is not subject to the merger
regulations.
Thank you for your cooperation inthis matter.
Yours very truly,
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
------ .
BY:'~~~
Robert C. Podoll .
RCP'nf
cc: Ms. Olivia Jones
Chris Seldin, Esq.
John \Vorcester, Esq.
~
CIT A TION OF AUTHORITIES PERTAINING TO
RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS"AND'ORDINANCES"
"'.," , ,_".",: _,,:'-;"', :',- ": "",.,_ <"<-'_"/>;'X_"":i""~"'i'~>'""";,h;,:,,,~_,..,,\"'<<:<;( :;'+'<<<,'d,-,>j:;":',~:;,.':,;;, ;,;;;,::-,-;';~,"1S\:;-f:;:'?/;:::;:>;,::-~:::<,(:Y::::';:~:>::!,):,. ::;>
The Colorado Constitution provides in Articl~ 2at S~c:ticlI1 JJ:::Nq~x postfacto law, nor law.
impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective ~n its operation, or making any irrevocable
grant of special privileges,. franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly."
This fundamental protection "prevents unfairness that would result from changing the
consequences of an act aftyrthat act has occurred. Va.n. S......l.....c......k...I.,..e..,....v..........B......0. Y.. e...s....,....79.. 7 P. 2d (1267 (Colo.
1990)." z.J. G~fts D-2, LLC 1'. City~jA~;or~,20'64Colo:App. Lexls869. .
As interpreted by the courts of Colorado, a statute is retrospective ifit "takes away or impairs
vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or
attaches a newdisllpility, in respect to transactions orc:onsicierc:t!iQ!l~ll!r@,ll<:lY passed." Continental
Title Company v. District Court, 645 P.2d 1310 (Colo. 1982). The Colorado Supreme Court wrote
in Gates Rubber Co. V. SOlJth Suburban Metro. pis.!., 1 83c;olo}22 (Colo. 1973):. "...vested rights
may not be impaired by the retroactive Qperation of a statute. [Citations omitted]."
It is clear that thi~prohibition applies to county regulation as well as. state stil;tu~y.... "\Vhattp.~
legislature cannot do at the s~ate.Jev~UIlthis cormec:tion,tp.ecitj' council c~ot dQ in IIll,lIlicipal
affairs." Saur v. County Comm 'rs o.(La;i~;';c;;;j;;Y;525 P. 2d 1 i 75, 1176 (Colo. App. 1974),
quoting Denver v. Denver Buick, 141 Colo. 121,347 P.2d 919 (Colo. 1959).
Factually, it is assumed that Olivia Jones acquired two adjacent unplatted lots in 1958 and
1967, respectively. Prior to 1979, Olivia Jones had ~h~rights to sell, encumber or develop each lot
separately.
"The purpose of the constitutional ban on r~.trospective legislation, like the ban on expost
facto laws, is to prevent the unfairness that resultsf:r()lri~hill1ging the legal consequences of an act
after the act has occurred. Peoples natural Gas Div. v.P'y/?,Uf,(}XiLG()rrlm, 197 Colo. 152, 590 P .2d
960 (1979)." Trailer Haven MHP v. City of Aurora, 81 P.3d 1132 (Colo.App. 2003).
The amendment totl1e PitkiJ,1GOl.lIlty Land Use CodeWQuld ryquire the additional bl.ml~Ils
of subdivision before Ms. Jones cQ1.l1d P~J~~\Qr(;ci 1() th~~3;IIl~~~tgfrights she enjoyed before the
amendm~nt. Resolution 79-54. c()l.lldIl()LR(;applied retroactively to impose upon Ms. Jones
additional duties OJ obligations for the enjoyment of the same. rights she possessed upon the
acquisition of the parcels.
"1
'"
~
. -
.~ ~~,
~r ~~
ij,~:
~.~
~
f....
./
~
/$
'r...,s"
/
I
I
'~
~.;(_..~
,/\
./d-:i ,."p' - \
. // \--- .~;::,."
/// ~~\ -
,L ,,_ /fj \
':":~-.r:-#---' ,:11"'1. -\
~:~;:;:.\
- .,"- - "''''- ~ " .. .'\ ~ ."
. ."'" ,.
.,../....... \ ,,' , "...
_. \'" \ \ "...e' \
.-'- -' '
I,~"'=~ \; . ~
~, I; ~\ \. \ . \.._ -" ","''''!--''''./ i
, . !'\ ,.-.,\"'...... "-'J ~"~ I - !~I .+... ,..,
;,f.t=:. ,/~ ,_.."'.. ""." ,p.J.\-:' ,;. ;\ ' IIr>IJ' ~ -<\ I" ' /
I ~... \ (-, ,J \ \,.t,/ t ,,1 , "1/ "
Ii ~~ /~~ 'l~\t\lf----_. \~+ ~~~I.f .;;..,
, .-:;::::' \ "'-- ,/ ,..:.. A 1'1 .;'_.
! . /"y ", '\ . / 11, \ / .
I I ././ --;/ ~ 7 "",.n";..:-r-_ \.~./ -\"- 11;
t,;:;' "-' '.--, ". r L
;..-" /'___ _....__ ~ _ _ .:;;;-.._ .J
,/. .... .'~ .",-""oC'-
~ ~:; /
\ //'
\./
,.-.'
I
/
/
13
....~~tll
"
j
/~
.z.-.JjP'
/I
'I."~.
.
- ,
, .
,
I
I
i
1/
~'.
r..\
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:55:18 -0600
From: "Podoll" <Rob@podoll.net>
To: <JohnW@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Fwd: unplatted lots
X-MX-Spam: fina1=0.01000000QO; rbl~0.5000000000(0); stat=0.0100000000; spamtraq-
hem=0.5000000000(2004081802)
X-MX-MAIL-FROM: <rob@podoll.net>
X-MX-SOURCE-JP: [69.15.128.254]
X - Mai1Scanner- Information: Please contCl~ttheI~P Jor IIlore informati()n
X-MailS canner: Found to be clean
Hi John,
This e-mail was sent in response to some questions John E1y had about
the location of the lots.
Rob Podoll
303 861-4000 .
Rob@podo11.netDate: Wed, 28 Ju12004 11:48:04 -0600
From: "Podoll" <Rob@podol1.net>
Subject: unplatted lots
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content- Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="= _9BBl3F441 ,0061 0(;04"
Hi John,
Thanks for taking my call yesterday.
I have scanned pictures of:
a. the site as it relates to Aspen's geography,
b. Block 3 Aspen Grove Subdivision which is adjacent to the
unplatted lots, .
c. a survey of the unplatted lots (the adjacent lots .are
platted in B10ck~ 1 and 3 Aspen Grove Subciivision)
d. Aspen Ordinance 26, 1987 which zoned Aspen Grove to be
R-15B, Moderate Density Residential, when it was annexed.
I hope this begins to answer some of the questions you had about where
these lots were and wha.t.y.r~ y.r~r~4~Cl1ing with.
I don't know yet what the County zoning was prior to annexation, but I
am working on that, and hope to supplement this withlI1Qr~ iIlfC>l1llation.
Thank you for looking at this request.
Rob Podoll
303 861-4000
Rob@podoll.net
file://C:\DOCUME~ 1 \JOHNW ~ I.ASP\LOCALS~ 1 \Temp\eud111.htm
Page 1 of2
8/1812004
~
t?;:~~1E~~,'~:~' .~~~))~s\;fii/p:~~ii':::>~;:'
",~!':" " :"'~ ~:--:---:;,_,:,,:,!:,"~'"'''' -.....~ ,"~"c,.,;r"""~~~"'" .
t"~ '. ,'__"' - .' .,: \". "'" '. ":",,,,~.:., ,-",.. . .' ::C' .,:/ ;;..... . . .'
. \ . " . "." .. ,.. , "." "'.; ...... Y'" ,. .' ,;...='~" . . .
.~ >",.'::~::S;" ,;:,,';:;::'I,;<:.:<;;:;::';:'R\:~~~~~~\;" '. < . .
. ~?..-...~',.. .....*.w..c.'..'. .~.."..,..\!iJ;"._.J':5f. ..... ~... ..' _.::3-"\\<Vr'\"\~ ,."--' . ,.
.. .,,' ,,__' .,...., ,Ah ../;.. .. "" ,.' .... .:'\1, '" ,-...;..' /' ' ...... .' /
.~, ~,.",' ."...~_.... . . .. \' ..' :...... ." ," , .' ' ?~";I'''''' .' ..' . /'.-... - . .
1,:::::;2 ';z'.-,;:':i ~:',:=~; 'J.. ;, \ '~. .:. .::~:<~ ~:-../,.<.:,t ,;,:.:y." _c-:. ,.'/~ '.:" '..<' . ;::J"'~c"'. ,:~,:.,:. c' ..: .
, . . . ,"'. ..' ..... ' ,\.( l ., ' .'" ' ..*~;-:;,.. 'r"'/ . ."_ ._,' ..' /c'" .. ../- ,.._"'0-' .....
.' ..'. . _~ ',~,'~ ....,"'.:>r; ''; \ .~., .'. .-.... ';; '';':''- '-<"IJ':.;J ;..l..... '. ,...... :.<, c""'~" ....<........ ; ,,'C',
.,. .' I \' ," ,\". ',.' '" ,- ,," i"J( ,. ., '. (-.~...... .',' . .' . c/' ....,.--.,~... "," .....]
.:. .: '.:" 1 . 0 . ..:.:.:....~.~ . ~-o~:.. -- :>'l" ::t\ ...'f t. " ...~)' " ,.-~' ." ..... 'J;'.' l' .. .' ;c...".........--.,'... ·
,.' .. .; .,... . . .' ,.... _Co :_...:' ..' , -1'. ...&1.:' ..." I ......., ,". i ,.,. ./-'. \...' \~. ....,:--.-.,,-.- . \~
. .: . .;_ ::, . . '. .' ......>.~. '. :c. ,'..hI ,,:. ,:. ;;.'.///~7"'.':"".~ . ,'/." . < \., ..."...0:. . ..".;.,; ,.... .,"
..,.... ,~.,~..c,~". " ,'. . . ..'" ." ...,....., ..:.f-.''' ',.' '...: . ,.. ,,'. . . \--~:: .,':. ' .: ./1 , ..' : .' ',,, . 1 ".:- . .... .. . .. .
~:,,;r:':"'i;.;.; ~ i..:' . : \':". : -:.:. ."..' /: ~:f ~:;;*,\:':.'.\ '. ..:::'i:::..' ;..; i./;':': :.~=- r'/'j: :.: ":'-:'~-:~ ...:...::" ~;'.:'
j'.'"'''' ,. ;';o;,;J,..:",\ A '.. '\'; ,. 7'" ",. .'. ;'1';' i ,.~ .:t:~)'," '/;':}Il' :' - '<J ! \. ~"> . \ lo...a I . . '. / ....:/.q.:'::. -': ,:,'.' .' ... .t.:. '/.
.';"1' ..../'. .., '~sp ....... .., ,...... 1...., ~ '. .. 'S ../..' ..' ..' .'
" 'l,~~:,.:,~~"i.; ....... eni ;:. ''I- '_.... . <' '. ,~......~i.:('..:.:: ";:";~(" '~;,"',\"',;', "S;: I ..':,~'..J:.. "~.,:: '(.~;./" ,~:;::-:::--"'';_', .'/
_''':'~~l.~.4''';l:~.!.!,~~~';;! .tOM7$ro1'"1' .,:~",.. I '. ",..."....":.,,....~..'~y.,.. .,.....~. /'.' .E.... .;: ',:: ;1 ......::
'.~. .,.<';' ....v,,(-: ,',...:" . .,,'''' .... r;--' ..':"......... ~ ,.,.:: ,'" '. ,'.<M .' . ,"'" "~" "r.: - ;-;::.' . ,,-,,.....: /'- ..
,;.~.;,:'~.:~"'f.;~;.~.,...t,.,i,',...r..:...-.:;~::: ;\.tS~loJ;)t;..:':~,~.'.!p.'...~ <''), ,"~I,I...l\' ,il"\~::.~!h'~.:~.~~J. t:p~r'" .;..: ,;. ';," /,.,,: :_::,-/....J'._ .~~....:.
t.... ..,...,........" "... ..... ....... ,........~'~\." ."" un .1 "1' ,,' .-/,..'
,.... _.i''i,.,.,..Jd4.. ",_, ...c. \.. ~, _. r..i ". <,,~". : ./"".. '". ''''1i.... .n., ..... $.,... . "','" ...f .. -' .'. . ..' . ..
J..-... I,,' .. ....;<".,:~_..ffiI:L..~ \'.;' \ l.. '. -.1 r . · "... '. " . '..' ...".... .,,'.',' " . ",,-.,' ....... ..... ....... ./ '..:.
',-!"'f!'-" '.'.i"" ..q.;,..>,,~ "',' .,.".;'""'\ ",';;' .",...~4:J'A ~h'il'~.'./........-.:.'~.,.,-:,.".. ,'\ , . .-..:-.:. .,
.. ., .." "... C '., ._>,~,.....,..,..." '. . "".."..: · ',.. · \. .,'. .. "rioi, !',c.. ,.,," ... H.1r." "..,; ,; ,. ': /' '." ".' .": ." ,. '.'./..'
?::€,< ,.",'-';".... ,lI,......, .;. . '. .'N""":" ' . .,. ,Sh.. .'.\ ~~.,.:, '.: ' .t ~./ :I~'I,' ,.:.,.~:.Ij.:'":::-...~:~\ .:'.\, .... .-..' .-,,' . ~ . Jj..
B,;,S:" '. C."'" . ,.' . ,.,......' '" ," ,.-.' . :,". , I · ,.J '.' ;. '\... (f.:' '-..J / .<it~ ,."...... ... '.;'.. ..' : . ;.' ..... ." ,.
~~>~"; :~~~';..;~:lii.i.:t:?;:!t'f.;,;; :':.: ;3~/~i.~p~/~Z/I: ~:~;f':.:.I\.~,!'i. J.>;~{:~.:~}::::~:.~\...:.<~. '~~~\.;..~;~.<;~'>/. ).~:/.'~>/ : .' ,'/;,
,.}. ,.. ,.~ ."_ ..."'A~ .."..' .,. _...", . ". .' ... .,,~, '/' .. ~ ~'.' .. . ..y,\ . ....' , ." ,\ ..:' .' .'.' ' '. f ~ ,,' .
.?~J~<BW,;~.~,:"':iii.ZiE:'it:-'i: ,:;[: .,~' ~Git1~, >~'.~.. ;l~','~~{ \,' }\'.;.;;?:'.l.li'~:'~..:!~:;:\ ......,.......: \.:.:r:<---:' /"'''.:' I:' i.; (.... :..:!',
"...1.'." ......."'-'1..". _ ". .......... -. $..... ...'. "'" ",," " '. ""'11 \, ."~J I " . .. . '\ .', \ \' \" ' ., '\ . .' .' ,!,' .
'~'~"~:'~',:,' ~>~" ,.::, l~-:.-': -<:i ~... iM-i" '.:,:.,:. ..,!:....,.;~.,~id.'. ",;(i!J1[;).....'.'.,.c.: ': ~.:.: ,.... \'.:: '.\" . \.' ,(. '! ." .., . .:
" ....\'".. '.' ,J;'~"~ "';'.....;r.~ "'. '..~.t_1L.:t..~.,.'..F ... '.' '; . ~..~....::......:..~... ""\' l,p tll'';' :..:-:-:;..... .:....,...:' ....\ . "., i'" . . ~., ' ',~' .
: .)/~\'. '\ .: ........~... 'Ti ..~''''''''. ~.... I.",...:.-..,tj" ....... .~.:... ",'.' ,,: ,'.' "." ",. '. ., , \ I:' ", ," ,." l'" ;.
'\'"1''' '\'J~\ ..' ...,,1 .,.'..,...,;::-~..-: ~ ' ,...." "VI. .tl.:. r' _.~'c'" \ ,.'. " .......,.., . "'-; :'".,..' J "\\' I,' :. .'. '':> '.' )....' .
..., .. .... .... '. ,. ~., ....... _ .'" ....... .' ,'" N" ,....... ,. "." ..".." . '.' . 1 ., /'
,.:',:!'t>! I Yi\\'! 2~:.~.:.:0f:t,:t )~lt-?'1:;:~':f.~;~~~'~"i!r:f~ '\"~~ ,~\;, '8'B:'>'~"": ::. ~~::<~.~~)\ \~'I '1'1:' li;:I': I: I,,\~< .... \ '~". /'.
I"'''' .~..,.,~.,.." .,..-..... ,.,...,...., ...,,' .,....,....,.....~,. ",,"j' ,:..\.:..' ." ,
. ,,,,,.;'..\'''''- .""". ._, ,.~,~~.....,~.. ....'1.......".... ..... ,. "",,,,~,:,,""""" \,". ...f'......; ."'~. .:"'.' ,'. .."/..
'.". .,:.. ,\., ~!".;Io'" '.'1 ..' "'.I,~ .,,J ". .".{J", ..:.'>. .:' ..... '., . ",.' s.,,,' · '... ...... f. ., ":. , , ......".; ......, '. "..' . .'
~::.' -."'!'\'\\ I]' : ' {r':.w.it ,'.' ",1' ,,' \ '. ' . .~-.j ," ~,":': ~,'..\;"'~'" r~ 1'1 \1".\ ,.,~..., .'\'. c.'. ..;,.'r." .:". ,...,....... ...c..... 11' . .... · I..
v.~:-:;.,:'.,.", ..:.....u:......,.er/~..;:t:':~:... "f"'~"""" ~_.. fw'..I.., 'J..{<....', ...:,..",' :,("',:\ .~. '.::--"':-;' .,':. _.~ .' '.'j",
:"y::;,:,<::\\"""'i~'::'i'~' _'-(ax~,""'orj ,\, f "w::.;~ 'i.~:~. :.~~-:;-.r >'1'.'" ,,~.[::'.,:<~~.::-~\.~;..:.,,:~:::>:-:'~=-;;-:"};7';;~"::\' "',\.' ...)./'J :11/.;
... B:":' '..... \'.' . ~.~.'" . '. .p..::. 1:'" I' .' ".' ..,..... '. :..... "'.' . . ." .... ..... ,.. '.,.. .y.".." ,;'j" .".... ., . // 'I . ,
"".h",~"~"..;,!:,,,,,;,'--.""I""" <..".......i .....,.~.\.....;..... 1:1~".~.,\:P'.\'.':'";t',::,''''''~''7i,:,,::;\''I''' "J~"/'.-' I I;"
~." "i": ...,,'i;'" ,,"..:'" ,,;;~."" .' C. .c,;. _;.. . ...J . "..~ 'K'. ... . ,. ." ;.."....0..;..":,.':'.' .,'Y', ":i I ;.' .. ....-\'. ' . '.., .. " .. ..' I'.
.'>;t." ,..?' &,'"",." ~~"",. .' '." ',' ,.'..........~..::>" U.".... . . . ,". .,... c""~. . ,. , . ,.:,'." "':X ,.... "....('; , \, ' \. .,\'" \ (I' . I, : l.. ' .
. .,.{., (,;";,.".,:., ..",,=-,,;;,"-' J -;i'c' <," ~.",>.,:,.C""., .'. .'< I.',," :::., '. . .,,1 . ". .';;t":: \... '. c.. ...."t . . " .'.. '. "'; . , ". ,.' ...'-..',
"". ",;:":\;"fr"",\~,~tc'ti:............:,;:;:/<"".~;ic.~ ,,"., ~ :. ~ . >i;,' . "...C;.;' . ;';~>"~Sj.~.,.~. .;:>-o:,~.:\,...:\ ":\,." ,I~/' \ '. .' ",I -...::::. : '\
.~.). ...*." '. -:J#t=--'f"'~ "': _:"''!!!1. ..:,' (~,}".,.....,. ..:,........--".. ,,'\: . ','.',:)., ,... .~. ,. ,I. ..'t ~~ /lX'" . .-' . .,~:".~:. .\'. .. o()" \'" r" '
. -o;fi ;".,';7J': .'., ,; ;tl'..~4--f; 'i;e'" :;c,.,,,,"':,/' ;~ .;::;' ..-:, ,~ -::::::'. ,.:<''''' \. ".~;. \,<.:" .' .'. ~ ,'l....' ". .. '.. .y< .' ;:-C':, .. ...: . . . . .
.,..,;,1.."..:....0; :r", *'10" ..,...;: ."'-'..."'..M-"'I:"....,, . , '....... \ ,-. ;'("" . · .', .. .\. ,,'r' ,....' .. "'''''. .:\\. vh ... "'\\,\ ". .... \ ' .' " .~ ,
".::i,~...:~;Ai;//,I:'~~~~.:~I\.{;:/:;;,:.\-;.;:S{S:;:.:..~.,.:.~~.,/ ,..~( ./) :"<..",w;,,,""'~':.\" ....;1(''\.;.1 .: ;'...... . ;,. . \: '.: ....
.\ ..t:'" '. .,..0:.. ;\\~ ...~0:1'.:..;~:..... .,~: :.til-"'" ..~~.:.. .,,:;~.:'...' "'.',' .. ". .!. ".. !:~,~",,;,,~""'''''''''-' .,'.,. \' ,. ",..-.... ..l,'" ",. .
'.I':,s'::'~"_'j.v..:.s:~.~:--...'t'~::'//,'.':! ..:....'_..::::\\"~.,........, .'; .", ..~.,,2~ 0(-"'~"":""""'" ,':"\"'. \." :-,~~':'''''''''I:\ ',\' '.'
",,"::0.'C: ....1..V'"..~_...~'\ I'"'''' ..,.-,..,....... ...,'. .... ......- .... ...'..\.\..'.... .' "7',_.' :,
""","'n' '.' Ai:..:it.- ,._.'. /1"" ...." ....,!>ie.' ,.A . .... ' .. . ..... .-.,.., . ." ,. . "X" .. .~. .'.'
:~, ,~.'::O'....*.1.;Ji;a.:;;I.~;..;;:/0:?'.,.:'.\'~;;;'!i;,.,.?)),i..; "." . ! .' \. ...... 'i}< .,).:., .\':::> \:.,,:;,...<.>'0.;;:,2\/.' .' >,
. " ,.,.~\::::;;.....~. ".0 ~'\"I";' ""I;:'!'/-""" '0"".Si.,,,,>;;;:'r~.';"'" + .' \'..; ",..-.,.: '. ~"'II" .,\.' .0," '~" .~ '.': .:::-\<"\ '..d ,/~"-'-I'~
. <, . '::~ < '<;:Jli .~..' '~1';,;:.';;:;; :;::S;L'''\i<:;~';'~l*.li':>'''' .:F~:"" ~ ',". .....-.;.;i:::-. ! i.:i{: ,..\;:I<'A.;;, c }.c; 'r)).; .' ... .'l. i'
\. ';" ......./~i' . :. ,,\,4.;'~'~Y-" n J1c.f;,:,,,'i%?!'~' '''''. ,',,"''''' .~. c" >) p., .! ~. ~",;--.".., ,! ,'.' '''.' . ..V"'!... +'/, i"./ . ..' 9 .,.,,' ,
;.),~.: ~1\':: ,11,. :.:~..:8;c~!,..,j",;'i'" ....y:.\),... I',. ,.",,,,,,,y.)" ':/0'" .....1 ."".,'.""..."'7..;('.... i.I, ,'.'" .'. ;(-;.. .' " ..'
i.":;} (. "_ ~.(1"! t J"'i: ';:'...'':'It' '<;7.;.;;...:j1:\i:'\:" '~"'\~ <.;,~:"N"'~"';" <,)., . ~t'.'.. :i'k .,'" ~..:\ .\...'....S..' ",\\1 .',: (.')'
~:)' ,:s.~4II':!': in' ,; ,I ;-~':'~ (i,:; "J,;z",.:.;j::~:.~,:~:.\ .,~::y~;:.:,,~ :;:,~;i;,:\''''''' ; :... .. . ......:;;, .- ....\; ;:.::':1: .,:' ,.,,,. c'" ,'.\ :f':: .\.... ,'.'" "
''t. ':'Q-::'\ "',' '.,~,'...<.. .:;:..~.) 1:.\,.. ) .,\.:....~...'... s. c',," .,'.l..' .~it.. ." . ,~'I." ..~....'\... ,";,,, /7:.:...... ......\. :. )' .."
"I"'<'/~' . ""\,:~;,,,,~;,;,"'-':".CtYd:r' .'f. .."..,..,..","',\:",.....""",..,'.l:i;.. '. .' - " .. :..; " :......\'.,....,::..:...(.. . (, .
'::':' '::l,.',~,(,,,,,\;,".~I' l;',;-~, :'~. ...~,c j..':. :"\,:"';:'.:'i':,,,,,,,:...,,:.~..~;:.,,;;::,,,,,;.'. ..:> .' ,.....;:-:'..>:.;,-:...'\.'\..X...\."y.. : .'.'.; .'
.1',1 I " 'I' ,..\.1'0: :',. '.,',' .. ,..: ' .,.,,,,,",'. ,'. ''':' \",\:~~"::~,, ...&'.,~,...,. ~ ",. . '0::.:;)' '\ '\'. ..... . \' .. '::-'0' . -r.o.
'.' .. I" "...to....".. ..,.' 'I':i: ."." .. ..,. .' . \,..' ..." ..,' '.,," . . ~:.." ...,," .. ,. '
1.'6 '. .~;;.: \.., .:.::~. ;:.;. d.<;/;'~~'..i.:' ....,.>..:..\\.,:;- : ::::::\.::-. ~..\., .',,; ~~",' :,\;>:\;'......' ,:\.\. "'" :...f....... <".x"''''''' ::\ ..F, ." ..)
k o:.~<::s-.-:t '~\'.:'. ':}((/):;;;~~~{:;'~:J'0'j %'" .:........,,; '. <~':".:: .'f c \-:.~. '.i,\:":..'(\:;}. \ . · \ >', '" .:s;.?,:f"l;.. '. ';, ,( j,
>:;/?:J!S:<~~':- " ~'::~/0.:.!t;r0;;'. ..}: ....\:..:\;:,. ,:' \.,,;,\2':" \), :\ik:~" .? ;'\: I ".~\'I<".'\:"\ ..\..\~ ~~~""Y'::~" .'::'
'.'c'" .v.......\\" ,..' //A'.......' ,..(', ",'./"0' ..",\'.' .~\,..,.. .........\:,.;.,......X...:">.. ' .,',,\;.':-;; "':-::,~l..,....,.ll' j .
.,.p.:!, .;-., ,~,::...,::<::..'I:'..~/I.'&...''',..... '.'.',,:J .\..,,,......... \~" ,),:,,"..\i'\):;::':":"'~:>"" . """r;"~"':;""(":" (',/" .
-:;'<"'/'/10 J ...~..,..'. ../ ~"J'" I, .c~.,...... ' . 0.:1)' I I'" ;ili'.1' \,\" "",..' . "\"( "l" "1' \'1\ . ,.
,,~:-//~ },.1 ,I.,: ........~;.(o0.-:..,~., _ .... ,.:. 'J'~;'\I"I" ;". ;:./"'" "'1f.':"";":"'" ....;.... :.. .... .\'> ,..'\'; , r
,;'/..' ;' :.' 'II'" I ..._.. "~~0' '.if.R"'''' /'. ,,.. ..!.... ",. . ".. ".j ......;,: "f!'" ""v . .. ..., ,......\...1" 't.'. '.
, ...... ,':Ii :.~'.z.:i.:.. ~ "'~""~'/ 'f>' . .,:::-. -'.... \ \:..,'. . :\,1:' 'f' .,: ':;: I J .' /.(' '::~':' /:).:~ :c: : ... ;~-':' ~, ""\'" \' '. ,\'.... f.-I' Ii,". '.',:~' ~:.'..\\ ".
. .h'.."...... . .,'.,. .' ',.. .,', , .... .,.. .' ,.'" ,.",,'. "., ;,' ''',!'e::'' .;., .. .\. . ll'Y~' . ".;..' I)" ::
, .. . ,...... .... I' :'/'" . :'\~"l~' I .' ....... _,,,,",,,,,,"""\'"'''' '\' ,.......~.:.,;(:, ,". .
. .', \ " ' l~;' ': ;/ " .'". ,,' ... . ""'..' .:' ',f, ;,...",.""",,," '. ,','.-'., \..~ ;',1. 'I" . ~ . ;', \:.' :-:~
.1 I . ,:',,'. ,,"K .... .... ~I 'll"'.'~' ,\.\. ..... - \" .:r'.' :l" (... '\" ,. \" '.'
".. '. .:. ". '.:' ',,;' n....'. " . ,,\. ;:....' '. ..,,".;
..I. .,'1 . J" 'I' ., (':,,,\" .' .'
., . I -- t . "',,y' . \ ":' .'
\ .:.,1,"....::<.>>... .........--
. \ I' ) I :): I' t .1 1
" ,\ "
,,:-
..l(>!Jl'i?-r.;
~!.:.J'
,CRIPTION
VIciNITY - MAP
SCALE: 1" =
2000'
':;'::;:~-':'"
",::::.':!:>i~
;:.:::::,~:;.~0':;'>
r"\
.:?'/
.- -..--.
-.- -., -~.__.'..~..'.
...--~.,----_.-
l
\
\
I.
\.
'..
..;..
I
I
'.
'.
~~...,\'"
.....,
"
,-
j
..
,.."'....
"
-., \
.\
)
/
1
/
-_.~/
I .
1.\
L~l
.l),LOCJ..:.~ .3 ~v
ASF'EJV
PLAT 0/"-
LOr8 7<-"r 1/ fAAlEIVDEOJ..8LO<..:'/':
Gf(OV;:' ...~' IJ/]-DIVIS'/O/V
bd/J!l a porI 0/ I,~.:
Pi. ACEN - L/ $. /I,I/In.:'/"ol S'.:-o:.::r A/g. GI..:3'O
,:.,//".;11.:-(/ in II;..:;
L;
,'1/6i/L../.V..J
tI/li:. S'e:c,I;1 o/.d /'!..: E/.;-. S<tc /8. T.-IO-SJr.~-84 ..;1" ",/ p~..;' GCd'"U
Pi/J.;,in Cot/nl,v. Color,;ydo
Scv/&: I in . 50 /i.
/J...::.;' J/i. '.~//I,.-'/V.-
.1,....1....... .'~'.' '/'('.:1 V/ I,~..:.~": .v/"';::.':jI/:,,' itlJ.:lI.I/,.: .://.v'..:"$/<)'..~..:d. bJI/J;j i~~, o;..,o....~~;~.....,~.:,'O;~.9".-;..~.^/ ,t~.Ice..':"
u ,<'j \/, J ..i-'.:, _ ;\, oJ "'".'20, ),J:J" /J!~/ o~'1. Sl/tt..:/iiU/w::.,J "NI;/-.V/~//..:h:J ,~i..: ~~~'I",illlo 1f,)/~'. ~/v&< ~,/}d .;1-"/";. rOiJd (/;,1-:/~'"
I,.,~ .:/.i',:, ..://'_" .7':'/./1": o~.. ./f,',':I<: t.:J oJ'/);/ L.~/~~ 7~...J// ('./.,/.:;.,,:,,';.:,::/) 8/cJt!:1:. 2, A~:':;'./J ql"'iJ;'':;' ~-'.:/.;)..:.,1"r/",f;~vd, u/J.;/ o'oo<:.s
~:~~>::.~::~~ ;~~:~::~,,::~ {:ts,;:;;~}'.:~~ ';:';';~i~0;~:;~f;;~;!~ ;;!.~:r:'~:~:~~:(t;~~;:3i:1~~~,f~~~~. ~Sr'<'1
.,)/..;.:.,;,/ ,~':"'::~"/
.JII~~/"
fl,.:/J':;;";';: / L ,,';;d.,..f .;."'..:J/".::.... <:S. .:7 c~/o;.,,;;.:.;',;;) .~::w../:..:NO://..~V"
-;~:..!/(. '. Q. G,.. ./'.' /.... .,'
-_._-,~~--.l':"'~-if-- _.- - - -, PI'JOI/ v'?'7/
_(I t~: -f:__l.JL.li'-ii.J.J:~~ __ '. Yo< ,; r.;/"",
.~..I..Jl_.... ,:i,~'
( ~.:.'/.I/".
~.('/':',:~'J[)':~/ ;..;;
//I~ .I-:'.d -=~/~'/>'i" pial i.2/I.::/ (f..:; /'.;...;.-,/1/;)1'1 p/ .t,;.','.:;~/r. J PI?:7 1.01)# 7 ~/Id /1. (.';'~~.,t...,.y__// ..:./'/~)..;.{'..:c. .4,!.,;p....,./
:~~.:';:'!.;~',~:::<~:; ~~:~..:~:.:;~:~{:!l'i;:~;f:,; :I_.':t-::;;:.,,,,::}"'p~ /~ :ciif.'7/Z i~:;.:~t~i:T ;~/I~/ Y:'~-':;t (/;} ,4
. v I' It'''I/I''::}$ 0/)' h..NIJ eJ,'j.:/ ;;.r....i.~~/J/ s...;~/
____.;;:,..Q~L:.,._~,-l./_;r.:.,...:.-.... ,,'v!Jo' /1/2/;c
':f.':)'t ....,I,.'!..:i.. ~.-!//{:,.... .....)
;.,.,:... ~::;,~:.::y ,,;h,i;l);X)"./~~ ~:,~,." ,::~.,':;";::~::~'7 (:;',,~~:'a~~:J}~~ ~":;-~t~:~;.:'~:~:-l:.~ :t::Z,;~~:h;;./~J
"Il~/":~ ..~y /11'; .2.'1.'/ "/Ifl b_).(/~C/'~' ~tC.cd'~)/~ /..;,. ';'oU' ;b.:.s/ c.j/, h'.i ,(,.,..,.:.:J/;.....;y.: .:;~;/ ..:....://.:../.
'Q",:...:z.' -;'.2:' -.t;,..,~ y /) " . ,
..Y..t;;...!, ....:-... __..........:;...-'_~,,/__.. ..----' qr. L) or
,./..;: ,1,',.' >1-1:_.:/.;:;' o/~.O'.!I--'- ,1..7. Ij;;~
! :t.~.1- _' -.--.....--.. (/
/:?,r: (_~_~.. ..._.__.....-.Ao:;..'~......,/i-.;,:::.-
~~'-rr:~' ~-"' J:~.. .~ r
,t;..itl ~
~/_I;...../ .:J..~I .;,~':J/~" /';' ..7c.<.....;
~'I,-:''j' ~.,' :'1'/ c:,.1';.J.' -.: ,'~ ~r ( }~
.1,~ '.'_
.. 'r ."
'","I, ,....,.....,..:.....r'~ ."',J~"I 1...,.....-;.. ....l .~&.....:.' '-",.,.",....".... .....nll' ';'."""'''''''/' -t....",,(J/ oJ,!" .f..-;,~S .....J-'''';;/-;
',,,," ,,,.., . '.. ...'1" ...~ .'. 4_...."" ..~...,.. 0.1"..,', J.:..:./ .....>,e- J ..../f-.~."..I~~,J ~"r .AIr .:;'.!;./...."...;/...:j1 .It'.....,...... oJ,:, .....:.-...........'"
..,'''../ /..'" '."'~".i -!.........~..,/. ....1' ......,/l..'..' ".:,,;....'...,A- .;,~/~.::'_?~ 1'6J ~...~,N./ ..:;f/.....".".:.; ..!:'q...d~' ,,,,"'.:3 ,1".........'~"..
.J..
...~.... /. ....' ..'L
..L..../
/~ td-7C, J'lJ ._, if "U . .. ,.. .
--1..\.L..s.AJ.:{.-. _..1...._._.___ _ __ .y__ '.--'. - .,/'''<J'J;.I,/
_.._(J;".,;.., tI:...eLd5./...------_.. 0,,,,,,
3~J .. .. ..
J.~l _ T. - ~ ""
...;.....~o'.. .:.... "~" ......,...\/,/ (~'. I '~l>.-J"'9 :~,'~''lJI.i;..:O..,) 1.'i~.:.._':J_.J<Jr c../...J:J.J.tJ..AJ;...__~P":.Jf. \ P 'l.()-'.""
,., . 'kffi."";-,.2I:..-~_U",-, C-">'''mJn
cA'tJ.~...(..(....:.4... r . ,w...:....!....'-'L-~.:'....._._:.;e~N/,J..r
In~ <.;.....;:1....1../ .J.-.:I.t f.:o' ......~ ':.J.I~../ '(....... (f~....'9: .7,...1 ";-',n",J.";.....p 01' I.~..: ,,,0.:/ ....~..~~ 1$ ~':';"",",$I!.~d ;"'J' It:... .~~../o';,/ 01
"....1/,. ,.",.,.""..~..._"_,.,, .;",.~ j.:..l:.. dJ;' "L./.:.~.'( '~~___/~..;i: ."-'>J.:<JI "" ~/JJ """""'.":'~/I M.:I /1,; fWn-l". .,..;,,1/ /",,1
..u....,...,....t~. ......._,...,._........:... ".' "...:..,0;. lu.....;/ _."."..../ ....;.t..~.._.;;'..r, "......"."',........tI....? ...."".~/ ~i" ~;.}~...,oJ....r.' '
a.:JJ,. ,-h /1.. ..../1.1 .. Ii . . "'J."
_..(. ~ ...._.........__...J......L._.J__JJ.V.,-. .... ,r,,,,...,?
LZ:;.>...,.f7' 4~.1)__.~C.~'i~ ".
."~''';'.'''.-..;.J /;;.. ,:-.:-:.;/ dO' ....;,.; .~~/.t-:o (.,.,.../"./ _~{.'.....(.; .K.....:....'v:.......;.: ~...,,,-;..J ,......_ C'J... ~1' -'........:;.
..:.. -:~.' :;l_~;,:,r;..~~:.~:~_....~,(. '_~,.:: ..:;_..c.:.~~..:~.' .
~_;.l:):i"~, ":"_ I .
. 1.1..
/.t:C....:>_:4:.J.!..;~ ..
,......'J .l.......~_... .i!.d.__'..:.... .,~.1:(1.,_~
. ..'!'.~
."
.;"\ .
--..--..-.-------.-....'.....-..
.... /.
..~. ,
,"-;':../\
. '. \
... \
,\
\
i,
r
I'
.,
~~
i,
f
':i
~
i
tl \
~1 l'
1 I.
tl
1
f4
rl f
~ I.
'.1 t
JJ
n r~'
~i1 f
'; t;:.
, ,-.,.
~r'
r ", !.;.'
k t
1'.' ~
,/ ..
i L..
IP.' i:
/ :,1 . ~..'"
.1 ~
, - \
l
.; ~. t
f
I
;
t
I
}.
\
!
p.'
t. ..
I'. .
"
"t
.:
....
\.. ~....
./
11"'0
f ~
, d
'" .~,';"
,
::::::
I
oZ
00
0-
51;:!
I-X
lflW
<(z
Wz
\<(
UJ
~
6::
l?
Z
W
0-
lfl
<(
~
+,.
::.,
1""\
'\': i: ,.,"
'. .' ~!1I I I h " pit.-:"
, ' .' . : I. .:. ~: ' .. ,I'. 'i': I
, ! :, : Ii;!:;i ! ; ! i! :: ; i ~!i. ii;
. :; Ii':!,; ~:. ;: '! j' :! I ~ ~:: ,;
:n;: ;.:\,.p i i I:'! it i.~l;;'::
l,.' ,"'j"\' ..11" {:i"l";
l\\\; \1\\\l\; \i \( \~il \\ m%j:
~ . ,;:1 j.1: l"it :':' I: 1: Y' l~i.' "r:!'
~ q;ji l=i11:ii,):,:i r:i::';i\ ,~;;:iH:1
i ~I~'! '!i!~lhl'.:li,l:!liri'i l:,:ll;i.1
i : im \m~\m\i::\\~i;ir:i\/;itii\!:::
~~:L~:':\
.' ,,:" "
;~ ; . i ~ ; ,l":. ~ ii
.~..."
-.
^\tilchmcnt.
[l( :;:!
:It i ~~:
~jf !,~~l
~~~ .1;i~
. t~; ir.:~
'~~~:HH~i;I:. lal
;~g~;~~:~!~~! i:i'
'('it1';tff!fl:~:.I. ~
~i~itHii~~:~Hi~il
: i jH;j;!:~~; H~ i ~!
I".
,,\.
,..
".
.,.
U~
;~l~\
,
,
'"
''''p _~"','.i
t~. I
l!l\ \
,...
tl'l
\\\'1\ :
L.!
;!'\
~I
lh
'"
,I,
ill,
\1\\ '
~' \!~I \
. ,of \
t1;
1,,1,
I"
~I~;!i
,lu"
~~lil'
;h;;;. .
lP:i.
'II"'~
"... "-".
il\!I~!;: 'i~':"
;~ .; ~
~ltlU
\!;~il.
.,-."'. .
\ lif.!;; ~ ..
.f' ~lt.! '\;,' ~
~---,-
.r
eo OK
547 PA1jEt94
il
\
\
-......
.\
~!
I
H
~~
. .
...-,
,
\ Y
LOT SIZE
(Sin9Ie-Fa.'lIily
structures.', )
0-3,000
3,OOI-9,QOO
9,001-15,000
15,001-50,000
50,000+
, .
. "
EXHIBIT "A"
EXTERNAr. FLOOR AREA RATIO
STANDARD
80 s. f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
2B s.f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
., s.f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
6 s. f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
2 s.f. for each
add. 100 s.f. in
lot area
BOOK 547 PAGE195
..
ALLOWABLE SQ. FT.
.70x(0-2,400)
.70X(2,400-4,080)
.70x(4,080-4,500)
.70x(4,500-6,500)
.70X(6,500+)
,~:
. . ~ .
0,
,
............... i
:~
..
I
,1
, I
f. I
~
~...