HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.an.Loma Alto.1982
...,;"'.
~
1""\
.-,
(j ,.;)1,/'
~'~f~ .'
.1iv~.f "Lu
/":.;:",t.P\
~'"
, JEFFREY H. SACHS
~HERBERT S..KL.EtN
L/7'" JON DAVID SEIGLE
JAMES H. DELMAN
8, JOSEPH KRABACHER
SACHS, KLEIN &- SEIGLE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 NORTH MILL. STREET
ASPEN. COLORADO e 16 t 1
TELEPHONE
1303) 92.5-8700
February 22, 1982
,':~:\.'r:-r:-)
Paul Taddun,e
City Attorney
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
hI I:
Re:
Lorna Alto Petition for Annexation
Dear Paul,
This letter is to follow up the conversations that I had
with you in connection with the resolution for annexation which
is to be presented to the City Council at their' meeting of
February 22, 1982.
At the City Council meeting held on February 8, 1982, Lorna
Alto Corporation agreed that in connection with the annexation of
the, property described in its Petition for Annexation that it
will convey all of its water rights appurtenant to the subject
property which are ditch rights in the Riverside Ditch to the
City of Aspen. However, the City has represented to myself and
my client that it will lease back the water rights to Lorna Alto
for a nominal sum in perpetuity for use by Lorna Alto Corporation,
its heirs, successors and assigns in connection with irrigation
on the property subject to the annexation.
Further" Lorna Alto Corporation has prepared a quitclaim deed
from Pitkin County Co~nissioners to the City of Aspen conveying
what is commonly known as Chipeta Avenue. As I represented to
Council, Sandy Stuller has indicated to me that the County has no
problem with making such a conveyance and shall consider the
conveyance at their February 22 meeting.
Also, Lorna Alto Corporation agrees that the covenants and
'agreements regarding the employee housing on the subject property
between Lorna Alto Corporation and the pitkin County
corrunissioners, shall be binding on Lorna Alto Corporation upon
eompletion of the annexation,
Finally, it is Lorna Alto's understanding that .the Planning
Office shall make a recommendation and commence the appropriate
proceedings for rezoning of the property so that upon its
annexation, the property will be zoned pursuant to the Municipal
Code. City Council and Lorna Alto Corporation agreed that the
property shall be subject to any use designations, setbacks,
EXHIBIT B
"
/"
,- "'\:.-
(""'\
.1"'\
Paul Taddune
Page Two
February 22, 1982
floor area ratios, or other miscellaneous zoning matters of
whatever zoning designation is ultimately selected by the
Planning Office and P & Z in connection with the rezoning of said
property.
I am in the process of redrafting a water lease agreement
for the subject property and shall deliver the same to your
office in the next few days.
If this letter does not accurately reflect the
representations and agreements made at the City Council meeting
on February 8, 1982, would you please contact me so that we can
clarify any miscommunications or misunderstandings.
Sincerely yours,
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
BY~
. on . avid Seigle
JDS/ap
cc: Walter Hampel
.
, /'
,
-
-
~
lfOl 0 ij;!ta)~~~L~~
n r' >-"-", -
.rlW "'",' '" .,
!!i~ MA R291QQ? :;1
l(i~ !'il. Ivv..... l~U
U<;~_;,.._.... ,_ ' ',~.~'
ASPEN / PITKIN CO,
DLANNING OFFICE
March 29, 1982
Jon David Seigljl, Esq.
Sachs, Klein &. Seigle
201 Nor~ M111 Street
Aspen, Colorado 81'1'1
ReI Loma Alto Annexation
Dear Jon:
Enelosee liierewith 113 a copy of a IIIE!llIO frolll the City's water ooun-
5e!, .:JQhn l!tusi~k, with aLe COllllllents on the r_.lsed draft (February
23, 1982) or the water J.eQ& a<]J:'ee.ment in \he above-referenced
annelta'tion.
Please In(!9.:rporate all of Mr.
draft of the lease a9r.ement.
gested lanquaCje or amtitional
cuss yourobjec:t!ons.
I believe we are still, awaitlnq your submission of the eJUlcCt le9'41
desoription ,of the rel,eVi!\l1t water t:1ghts and it deaft deed relatin<;J_
thereto.. .'
Musick's suggestions into. a final
If yo.u obj aot to any of his 8119-
provi$ions, Please call me to dis-
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contaot me.
.very truly yours,
Gary S. Esary , c
Assis~aDt City A~torney
GSl!::IlIC
Ene"
,eel Co,lette PennEl,"';"----
'. )
:!'
.~ .
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Proposed Zoning of Loma Alto Annexation (Ferguson Plat)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, Apri.1 6, 1982 at a meeting
to begin at 5:00 P.M, in the City Council 'Chambers, City Hall, 130 S, Galena,
Aspen, to consider the zoning of the proposed Loma Alto Annexation (also
known as the Ferguson Plat, lots 1 through 4) to R-15A or some similar
residential zone, The property is located northeast of the intersection of
Highway 82 and Midland Avenue, For further information regarding the zoning
of this proposed annexation, contact the P1an~ing Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen,
925-2020, ext. 223,
sl 010f Hedstrom
Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on March 18, 1982,
City of Aspen Account
IIIi
\)
- r;;..
i Ci
-
\Ictal
:it
z~8
~~~
oJ ~ 0
L '.J
~UlO
Z ~ U.
:;a-Z
o ~
~ tll
~A
a
~ :
~ Q
~.."
~....=
..
~
~
l<
I-
o
;;:
~
~
<(
VI
(])
+'
ttS
,~
U
o
VI
(/J C1Jr-
<<I: '" r-
<::<<>
U (])r-
or-- >00
....<<1:
'800
""'r-'U
a.. ....
,~ .
cue
(])ttSal
0.0.. 0.
VI VI
<<I: ...... <<I:
---.~-
/ -1'>.
'? ~I~Th '~,
o 1:'\ /
, '7
"'"""".....,,,/
,
1 ,
i i
I i
!, I
~', \
,
\
\ 1
I
! I
,
/
If
/ .'
,
~
~.
,-,
-{.'/C-
No. 10-! ~
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE CERTIFIED COMPLETE:
2. APPLICANT: ('~~ ~ F\~.MJ
3. REPRESENTATIVE: 3"t\V\ 'bJ ,lie{ ~Ije.- ) SQ.W ,'k)e,VI Y SefJI~)
,01/)1 J'iJrJh l~)')I-1; lJJr~ 907S- g7df)
:: ::~:~N:,"E,~m~~~~:~~~~~~
~ro l(~~ D~'~ '-kit 'I J-ntJ 1 -th'r6t~h ~
6. TYPE~ APPLICATION:
STAFF: rote-lie ~nh~
4 Step:
GMP (
PUD (
)
)
Subdivision
2 Step:
Subdivision Exception (
GMP Exception ( )
-X--.zoning ( t1~' irl1h~*d ToYi/I1Q )
SPA ' d
)
1 Step:
Use Determination
Conditional Use
Specia 1 Review (
)
HPC
No. of Steps: Other:
7, REFERRALS
tAttorney _Sanitation District
Engineering Dept, _____Mountain Bell
;
_Housing ~Parks
_Water _____Holy Cross Electric
_City Electric -Yire Marshal/Building Dept,
8. DISPOSITION :-to p~ Otk'I.} Apr: I (P {to 1>/1_
P & Z / Approved Denied Date
~HIU1~n\ec!Q-15A zar;"(J"
_____School District
_Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
_State Highway Dept,
.--.Fire Chief
_Other
I"'"
,.-.,
~
f
~
Council
J
/
Approved .../
Denied
Date
OrzliM",O,,, ~1~ ~~4~~
t-Jo. I~ (/'182:)
9. PRELIMINARY PLAT REFERRALS:
Attorney
Engineering Dept,
Housing
-,
_Water
City Electric
Sanitation District
Mountain Bell
Parks
_Holy Cross Electric
Fire Marshal/Building Dept.
_School District
Rocky Mtn, Nat. Gas
____State Highway Dept,
_Other
10. PRELIMINARY PLAT - PUBLIC HEARING
P & Z Approved Denied
Date
11, FINAL PLAT
Council
Approved
Denied
Date
12. ROUTING:
~ttorney
Building
~;neering ,
Other
,~
I~
,.-..,
'-"
~
14.... '.....Ii(
).c.,'"
("'"\
"""'"
MEMORMDUI~
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
Recommendation for Rezoning of the Loma AHa proper~} ergUS?n~l!~)
DATE: April 12, 1982 APPROVED AS TO FORM: :;'(L~V /;!.~~A../
! '//
At their regular meeting of April 6, the Aspen Planning ancj zjning COllliil1{~ion
recommended a zoni ng of R-15A for the Loma Alto annexati oni pa rce 1. T{he/ maj or
criteria considered included compatibility with surrounding/zoning di'S'tricts/
land use, impacts upon traffic, parking and utility service and compatibility
with the goals, policies and land use locations of the Aspen Area General Plan
of 1966, as amended,
RE:
The intention of the R-15A zone category is "to provide areas for residential
purposes with customary accessory uses," Conditional uses are the same as
those in the R-6 zone, Permitted uses are the "same as R-6 except that two-
family dwellings shall be allowed only if 50 percent of the units (one unit)
are restricted to low, moderate or middle income price range pursuant to
adopted price guidelines,"
Present zoning surrounding this parcel is R-6 across Midland Avenue and R-15
PUD in the east of the property as well as across Highway 82, The. R-15A zone
is a consistent zone to be placed in this location, as it is consistent with
R-6 zoning, yet assures provision of deed restricted housing if duplex structures
are built and is a logical interface between R-6 and R-15 PUD zones,
.'
,
t""""\
.~
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Corrmission
FRCM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: proposed Zoning of IDma Alto Annexation (Ferguson Annexation plat)
DATE: April 6, 1982
location:
Applicant's
Request:
Referral
Comnents:
Planning
Office
Review:
Ferguson Plat, lots 1 through 4, Northeast of the intersection
of Highway 82 and Midland Avenue
This zoning application is being initiated by the City in con-
junction with the annexation to the City of these four lots.
Engineering Department has no comments,
The City Attorney's office has no comments on the zoning action,
.per se. "For your information on the annexation portion of this
application, the water rights deed and leaseback documents are
being prepared (third draft) and reviewed but not yet ready for
execution. The Chipeta Avenue quitclaim deed has been reviewed
by this office and theEngineering office and is in proper form
and has been recorded."
Resolution No. 3 (series of 1982) was adopted by the City Council
on February 22, 1982. That resolution found the IDma Alto annexa-
tion petition to be in substantial compliance with the provisions
of Section (1) of Section 31-12-107, C.R.S. 1973 concerning
annexation and directed the initiation of zoning procedures for
the land to be annexed. State regulations mandate that the zoning
action be made within 90 days of armexation. Following P & Z
action on the zoning hearing, the City Council will initiate the
ordinance adoption process to zone the property and formalize its
armexation.
The criteria which the Planning Office is recomnending be adopted
for rezoning applications provide a useful guideline for your
action tonight. In this case, the rrost pressing concerns are
corrq;>atibility, with surrounding zoning districts/land use; impacts
upon traffic, parking and utility service and compatibility with
the goals" policies and land use locations of the Aspen Area
General Plan of 1966, as amended.
The zoning we are recomnending for this property is R-lSA. The
intention of the R-lSA zone category is "to provide areas for
residential purposes with customary accessory uses". Conditional
uses are the same as those in the R-6 zone. permi tted uses are
the "same as R-6 except that two-family dwellings shall be allowed
only if SO percent of the units (one unit) are restricted to low,
rroderate or middle incorre price range pursuant to adopted price
guidelines" .
Present zoning surrounding this parcel is R-6 across Midland Avenue
and R-lSPUD tp the east of the property as well as across Highway 82.
The R-lSA is a consistent zone to be placed in this location, as it
is consistent with R-6 zoning, yet assures provision of deed re-
stricted housing if duplex structures are built and is a logical
interface between R-6 and R-lS'rUD' zones. Development on these
lots will be limited to single-family or duplex structures and if
the duplex option is chosen, an errployee unit is assured as the
second unit.
proposed Zoning for,ma Alto Annexation (Ferguson ~,.xation Plat)
Page Two
April 6, 1982
Planning
Office
Recammenda-
tion:
Only one of the four lots is undeveloped. Lots 1 and 2 both
have newly constructed single-family homes on them. Lot 3 is
vacant. Lot 4 has two structures on it, a single-family recently
renovated house and a second structure which will be sold under
enployee price restricmoJ;lS,
This zoning action is corrpatible with the Aspen Area General
Plan in that an enclave of County land will be brought into
the City with a zoning that is in keeping with the zoning and
uses in the surrounding neighborhood.
A letter is attached from Jon Seigle, legal counsel for the
applicant, to Paul Taddune, City Attorney, outlining actions to
be taken by the applicant as required in Resolution 3. This is
for your information and to document that the conditions of the
annexation are being rret. We have also attached a file llEITO
outlining the annexation procedure so that you may better under-
stand where we are in the entire annexation process,
The Planning Office recammends that you recomrrend to City Council
that Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Ferguson Annexation plat be zoned
R-15A at the tirre of annexation of these parcels.
.1""\
r-.
.
I
I
I
'I
L;J
,
')
JEFFREY H. SACHS
HERBERT S. KLEIN
JON DAVID SEIGLE
JAMES H. DELMAN
e. JOSEPH KRABACHER
SACHS, KLEIN & ,SEIGLE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 NORTH MILL STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81 61 1
TELEPHONE
(3031 925.6700
.
February 22, 1982
~.~;;::~1\r~D
Paul Taddune
City Attorney
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
,~
..
Re:
Lorna Alto Petition for Annexation'
Dear Paul,
This letter is to follow up the conversations that I had
with you in connection with the resolution for annexation which
is to be presented to the City Council at their meeting of
Februar~ 22, 1982.
At the City Council meeting held on February 8, 1982, Lorna
Alto Corporation agreed that in connection with the annexation of
the' property described in it~ Petition for Annexation that it
will convey all of its water rights appurtenant to the subject
property which are ditch rights in the Riverside Ditch to the
City of Aspen. However, the City has represented to myself and
my client that it will lease back the water rights to Lorna Alto
for a nominal sum in perpetuity for use by Lorna Alto Corporation,
its heirs, successors and assigns in connection with irrigation
on the property subject to the annexation.
Further, Lorna Alto Corporation has prepared a quitclaim deed
from Pitkin County Commissioners to the City of ' Aspen conveying
what is commonly known as Chipeta Avenue. As I represented to
Council, Sandy stuller has indicated to me that the County has no
problem with making such a conveyance and shall consider the
conveyance at their February 22 meeting.
/
^
Also, Lorna Alto Corporation agrees that the covenants and
agreements regarding the employee housing on the subject property
between Lorna Alto Corporation and the Pitkin County
Commissioners, shall be binding on Lorna Alto Corporation upon
completion of the annexation.
Finally, 'it is Lorna, Alto's understanding that the Planning
Office shall make a recommendation and commence the appropriate
proceedings for rezoning of the property so that upon its
annexation, the, property mill be zoned pursuant to the Municipal
Code. City Council and~oma Alto Corpor~tionagreed that the
property shall be subject t.o any ''l,lse designations, setbacks,
EXHIBIT B
"
.
..
'1l!:
~
~,
t
'-"'"
,
.. :"~
'f""",
\
;/
)
Paul Taddune
Page Two
February 22, 1982
"
floor area ratios, or other miscellaneous zoning matters of
whatever zoning designation is ultimately selected by the
Planning Office and P & Z in connection with the rezoning of said
property.
I am in the process of redrafting a water lease agreement
for the subject property and shall deliver the same to your
office in the next few days.
If this letter does not accurately reflect the
representations and 'agreements made at the City Council meeting
on February 8, 1982, would you please contact me so that we can
clarify any miscommunications or misunderstandings.
Sincerely yours,
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
JDS/ap
BY~
on avid Seigle
cc: Walter Hampel
.
...
f
I
I
,,!,
I
1
!
,
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
"
I
I
!
1""".
~
AGENDA
1-..
, ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 6. 1982 - Tuesday
5:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
"
/"
I.
COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
/
II. MINUTES
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Proposed Code Amendment to Section 24-12 - Creating Criteria for
Evaluating Rezoning Applications
B. Loma Alta Annexation - Zoning
'IV, NEW BUSINESS
A. MOuntain Edge/PUD - Conceptual Review
B. City Plaza Office Building - FAR Bonus Special Approval and GMP
Exemption for Employee Housing
~
V. RESOLUTIONS
A. Andrews/McFarlin Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
VI. ADJOURN MEETING
",.."
.-.
/'
...,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Office Files
FROM: Alan Richman
RE: Annexation Review Procedure
DATE: February 24, ,1982
Introduction
Since the entire procedure for review of annexation petitions
is not established in the Municipal Code but instead is set by
state enabling legislation, this process has not been well
understood in the past. Therefore, the purpose of this memo
is to explain to all involved how annexation petitions should
be handled in the future.
Review Procedure
Typically, several copies of an annexation petition will be
filed with the City Clerk so that they may be acted upon by
the City. The City Clerk has agreed that from here on ~n,
these copies will be sent to the Planning Office for our re-
ferral.
Copies of the annexation petition and annexation map should
be referred to the City Attorney and City Engineer. Comments
should be received from these departments within a normal re-
ferral time period ( 2-3 weeks) so that we can put together a
memo for Council identifying any outstanding legal, engineering
and planning issues. Typically, these issues will result in
a determination as to whether or not to annex the parcel in
question and what conditions' to attach to the annexation. If
the applicant accepts the conditions of annexation, the City
Attorney will draft a resolution of annexation by whieh Concil
sets out the conditions under which annexation will oecur. If
the applicant rejects the conditions, an eleption for annexation
must be held and our role in the review procedure would be
temporarily suspended.
Presuming the applicant accepts the conditions and Council
approves the resolution, the next step in, the procedure is to
set a P&Z public hearing to zone the property. We do not charge
a fee for this process since the state regulations mandate that
we zone the property within 90 days of its annexation.
Following P&Z action on a zoning hearing, the final step in
the process is for City Couneil to adopt an ordinance zoning
the property and formalizing its annexation. As always, this
is a two reading procedure which we work on in cooperation with
the City Attorney. Once the zoning ordinance is approved, we
should make sure that the6rdinance and plat are recorded by
the City Clerk wi thin 30 days or our zoning action is null and 'void,
Planning Office Considerations
The basic rol~ of the Planning Office in annexation is that of
a clearinghouse. Since there is not an adopted annexation
policy but instead a belief that review should be on a cape~
by-case basis, we have no established criteria to follow in
our analysis. Nevertheless, it seems clear that our comments
should include an evaluation of the impact on urban form in
terms of sprawl or leapfrogging. We would be expected to make
a zoning recommendation on the basis of the surrounding pattern
and our adopted plans. We should be prepared to comment on any
density inerease whieh occurs as a result of annexation, We
should also consider whether tl18rGl' will be any fiscal, environ-
mental or other impacts associated with annexation. Finally,
we should be prepared to write the cover memos to P&Z and Council
by which we shepard the annex,ation through the review process,
.~
~
PEN
130
asp
J.<SPEN /
PLA:f,~;JJNGi OFFtG~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 29, 1982
TO: Colette Penne
FROM: Gary ESary~
RE: Zoning of Proposed Lorna Alto Annexation (Ferguson
Plat)
We have no comment on the zoning action, per se.
For your information on the annexation portion of this
application, the water rights deed and leaseback
documents are being prepared (third draft) and reviewed
but are not yet ready for execution. The Chipeta Avenue
quitclaim deed has been reviewed by this office and the
engineering office and is in proper form and has been
recorded.
GSE:mc
'.
f"""\
''1;1'~
R9~,
PUBLIC NOTICE MAR. 2 ',,}?
4 10r.;> /1/
\ ASPftv 'v~_ U
RE: Proposed Zoning of Lorna Alto Annexation (Ferguson PlfIr4iVN:;:motv Co ;,
G OFI'lc. '
,NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub 1 i c heari ng wi 11 be hel d before {he
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 6, 1982 at a meeting
to begin at 5:00 P.M., in the City Cpuncil Chambers, City Hall, 130 S, Galena,
Aspen, to consider the zoning of the proposed Lorna Alto Annexation (also
known as the Ferguson Plat, Lots 1 through 4) to R-15A or some similar
residential zone, The property is located northeast of the intersection of
Highway 82 and Midland Avenue, For further information regarding the zoning
of this proposed annexation, contact the Planning Office, 130 S, Galena, Aspen,
925-2020, ext. 223.
sl Olof Hedstrom
Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on March 18, 1982
City of Aspen Account
.~
, MEMORANDUM
~
TO: Gary Esary, City Attorney's Office
Lou Beuttner, City Engineering Department
PROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: Zoning of Proposed Lorna Alto Annexation (Ferguson Plat)
DATE: March 16, 1982
f:le.
--
April 6 is a scheduled Public Hearing at City P & Z for the proposed zoning
of the Lorna Alto Annexation (Ferguson Plat) to R-15A, The annexation and
the zoning would then occur si.multaneously at City Council following P & Z
action. If you have any comments regarding the proposed zoning of this
property, please send them my way by Thursday, March 25,
Thank you.
-
1"""\
1"""\
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
JEFFREY H. SACHS
HERBERT S. KLEIN
JON DAVID SEIGLE
JAMES H. DELMAN
B. JOSEPH KRABACHER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 NORTH MILL STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO B 161 1
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-8700
February 23,
mW(fJt;";;Jli7C?prc;J
1982 n.. r;t-<=:lL::2t oJ,! <JY1,' 9 ,
nH ~\~ {.
!;:; -'il l
lL~ F10~ 2C. ,..., "'" '!:i I
'1~1 cts .J 1uQ/ .iI tii
dt:;",,--:_~_ _ l...,v,_ ,,;,;jJ ',;':!.
J.\SPfN / PfrKlN co' '-..o.J'
fiLANNi"',r 0''''/''-'
dvU . r vI;.
Alan Richmond
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Lorna Alto Annexation
Dear Alan,
At the City Council meeting of February 22, 1982, City
Council adopted Resolution No.3, Series of 1982. The resolution
generally deals with the annexation of the Lorna Alto property
known as the Ferguson Exemption Plats, Lots 1 through 4.
The resolution provides that the Director of Planning for
the City of Aspen shall institute the appropriate zoning
procedures for the property. By this letter, request is made
upon the Director of Planning of the City of Aspen and yourself
to initiate the zoning procedures for the annexation property.
I would request that you place this matter on the next
available agenda of the Planning & Zoning Commission. I
acknowledged in our conversations last night, that you indicated
that there is a significant backlog on the P & Z agenda. I would
appreciate anything you could do to expedite this matter. Both
my client and myself will be available in the event there is a
cancellation of any other matter to proceed on a very short
notice. We have a feeling that this should be a relatively
simple matter for both the P & Z and Council and we wish to
consummate the zoning as quickly as possible.
Thank you for your consideration and cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
JDS/ap
~v"
Seigle
cc: Walter Hampel
f'
:t:=o""t:Jnc...
(I). t:l1-r.
-0 c> c+ a:
CD' ::r
~ '" <.n
v to '"'5' ::i
,",._~__~' . 0 ,..l"'-<
"...,. ~g-
00 "'S'.
O"H,," .
OOW.
~
0'> <.n
~ ~
N '<
Q.
'"
""S
1""', n
:j
~ ~
" n
~..g
nUlZ
OO~
r91"
~ Gl I"'
)0:1>>
Or Z
o ~ :?;
CD :r> ~
..
01 0
.. ."
- !l
(';
III
,
I
SB
i
..
-<
M" C
.. 0 "
il .,
:: .,
1'""'\
i"""
.
PUBLI C NOn CE
~"""
'RE: Proposed Zoning of Loma Alto Annexation (Ferguson Plat)
,NOnCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub 1 i c hearing wi 11 be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 6, 1982 at a meeting
to begin 'at 5:00 P.M. in the City Cpuncil Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena,
Aspen, to consider the zoning of the proposed Loma Alto Annexation (also
known as the Ferguson Plat, Lots 1 through 4) to R-15A or some similar
residential zone, The property is located northeast of the intersection of
Highway 82 and Midland Avenue, For further information regarding the zoning
of this proposed annexation, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen,
925-2020, ext. 223.
s/.Olof,Hedstrom
Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on March 18, 1982
City of Aspen Account
F
1""'\.
1""'\
,,~. ""
Certificate of Mailing
\V~
I hereby certify that on this seveRteel,tll day of March, 1982, a true and
correct copy of the Notice of Public Hearing regarding the zoning of the
proposed Lorna Alta Annexation (Ferguson Plat) was deposited into the U,S.
mails, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following:
-f JkSJrL
&k/rJkJJf/Ju
J
See attached list.
~
"""".
List of Property Owners
Within 300 feet of Ferguson Exemption Plat
Lots 1 - 4
George Parke
Margaret' Parke
William Parke
P,O. Box 3307
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Timothy W. Terral
P,O. Box 3595
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Ramble Noe
Bonnie plattner
4607 Airflight Drive
Apt. 129
st. Louis, Missouri 63134
stephen Heater
301 South Midland
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Robert Burgard
Sharon Burgard
P.O. Box 8384
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Geraldine Hobgood
370 Lorey Drive
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
Jim Snyder
Catherine S. Snyder
P.O. Box 863
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Claudia L. Ketcher
P.O. Box 988
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Anthony J. Mazza
Frank J. Woods
434 East Cooper
Aspen, Colorado 81611
"
.
i I
,-
Page 2
List of Property Owners
Johann G. Reiger
Sharon Cabrey Reiger
P.O. Box 716
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Aspen Pacific Associates
7 Pacific Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81612
James J. Costley
P.O. Box 884
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Guido Paul Meyer
P.O. Box 1799
Aspen, Colorado 81612
,~
.
~,
~
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
March 1, 1982
LEF'HONE
925.8700
JEFFREY H. SACHS
HERBERT S. KLEIN
JON DAVID SEIGLE
JAMES H. DELMAN
B. JOSEPH KRABACHER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 NORTH MILL STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1
Alan Richmond
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
....,<"'~:
Re:
Lorna Alto Annexation
Dear Alan,
Please find attached a list of property owners within 300
feet of the Lorna Alto property, If you need any other
information regarding the annexation petition and the zoning
ordinance, please do not hesitate to contaet me.
Sincerely yours,
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
By ~aVid Seigle
JDS/ap
Enclosure
cc: Walter Hampel
-