HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.an.Woerndle.1972
",/'
,/"'Of-
^'
~
,-,
.,;
PETITION FOR ~...>;NEX1\.'~1IO?~ Or'rERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF ,'\.,lI'.E~, CQUJRiIDO
We. the undersigned. being lando,qners within the esterior
bcrundaries of the territory he!.lcina:fter c83crj"bed~ do hereby respect-
fully petition the C5-ty CouncHof tDe City of Aspen. Colorado,
to armex said te1.'ritory to -the C;i-cy in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 139 . Colorado Revised 3tatltes. 1963. as amended. and
allege as follo',,,s;
1. That is is desirable aDd necessary tllat such territory
be annexed to the ~funiciptality.
2. That the requirements of Sections 139-21-3, CRS. 163. as
amended. and 139-21-4-. CRS. 163. as amended, exist or are met.
3. That the signers of the Petition comprise the landowners
of more than 50% of the territ:ory i.nFll.lded in the area proposed
to be armexed. exclusive of streets and alleys.
4-. That the legal description of the area to be annexed is as
follows:
Survey description for annexation of property for Woerndle
Subdivision
A tract of land being part of Riverside Addition, Riverside
Placer MS 3905 &~. containing of Block 18. Riverside
Addition less parcel conveyed to Colo. Department of Highways.
described as follows:
Beginning at thecmost Southerly corner of Lot 22. Block 17.
Riverside Addition.
thence N52002"E 129.88 ft. a.long the SE'strly line of Lot 22.
Block 17 to tile centerline of an unnamed street.
thence N02000'W 134-.06 ft. along the centerline of unnamed
street to the SW'strly right or way line of East Circuit Ave.,
thence N75000'E 25.97 ft. to the centerline of East Circuit
_Ave..
thence S34-021'E 4-74-.11 ft. along the centerline of East Circuit
Ave.. also. being the SW'strly line of Lots 1 and 2 Block 1
Aspen Grove Sub-Division.
thence on a curve to the right, r-adius of 275 ft.. a. distance of
431.4-9 ft., to a point 1012.37 ft. NIOoq.6'3OW from Cor. 1. Riverside
Placer HS 3905 Ai':!.
thence N24-oS3'W 345.51 ft...
thence N31003'W 4-6.60 ft..
thence N3704-5'W 181.30 ft. to a point on the SW'str1y line of
Lot 18 Block 18 Riverside Addition.
o
thence N34- 21'W 4-2.95 ft. to a point on the centerline of Aene Par], Ave..
Riverside Addition.
thence N34-038'W 25.02 ft. to the point of beginning~ contai_1ling
3.236 acres more or less.
Legal Description of Land Owned by Anton a1ld rIse Woerndle
to be annexed to City of Aspen
i'",
,
"-',
.
pa.gE' 2 of 2
Woerndle Descriptb:n. Cont.
Job No. 314- g)l
All of Lots 1 thru 35 inclusive Block 18 in Riverside Addition.
adjacent to the City of and To~nsite of Aspen. Pitkin County.
Colorado. less a parcel of lal"ldcontaining approximately 0.835
acre conveyed to the Colorado Deparbnent of Hi~n~ays described
indeed of conveyance recorded in Book 176 at page 3.69 of the
records for_Pitkin County. Colorado
AND an irregular tract of land located in the Riverside
Placer MS 3905 AM in the NE~ of Sec. 18 TIOS R84-W. 6PM being
more fully described as. follows:
Beginning at a point whence corner no. 14- of tract no. 2
of the Riverside Placer (as shown upon plat in Pitkin County
Clerk and-Recorders office bearing document no. 1014-25)
bears N30047'W 30.00 ft..
thence S3!f.oOH'E 180.00 ft..
thence N65045'W 105.00 ft.,
thence N02000'W 125 ft. to the point of beginning. containing
0.18 acre of land more or less.
~-
OWNERS NAME Anton Woerndle
OWNERS NAME Isle. Woerndle
Box 137. Red River. New Mexico 87558
Mi\ILING ADDRESS
DATE OF SIGNATURE
;f!"
.' -
p/-\-
;,~ ..~
.,..,
,~~
TO: City Manager
FROM: Planning Office
SUBJECT: Woerndle Annexation
DATE; April 8. 1974
Woerndle property consists of approximately 2.4 acres on
the north side of Highway 82 at McSkimming Rd., east of
town.
When a development proposal was presented to the County, the
County P & Z suggested to the developer that the ~it~2mtght
properly be annexed to the city. It was decided that the
city P & Z should review a proposal for the site prior to
annexation. A preliminary subdivision plat and a PUD outline
development plan was approved in concept by the P & Z last
summer. Approval was given, conditional on l)annexation;
2) resolving a problem of water supply; 3) correcting minor
subdivision problems. The city engineer, on the basis of
the recent water service study, states that at least some
of the project can be served by autumn, 1974. At this time
the developer is requesting City Council consideration of
an annexation petition.
Summary
The P & Z Commission has given conceptual approval of the
proposed use of the land.
The ~conomist finds no significant costs to the city would
result from annexation, and that the PIF is sufficient to
cover an extension of water service to the project.
fl~
-",,---
-
June 22, 1972
Mr. Larry F. Fergusoan
Ferguson. Hedrick & Smith
6210 North Central Expressway
Dallas, Texas 75205
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
u
I am in receipt of your letter of June 16, 1972,
pertaining to the Woerndle Subdivision which has been
presented to the City for possible annexation. '
I do believe the City will require that any con-
flicts in property lines relating to property under con-
sideration for annexation be settled prior to annexation.
o
I am also sending a copy of your letter to the
City Engineer for his examination and review. I am
certain that your comments relating to the narrowing of
streets within the Subdivision will weigh heavily on the
recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Yours very truly,
ALBERT KERN
City Attorney
llK/pk
cc.: Mr. L.
Mr. C.
Mr. C.
Wurl, City Manager ,.----."
MeY1:ing, Building Inspector
Gilkey. City Engineer &/plat
'"
,
-'.
'.'
'1
"
I
,~;
~
'-"".
.-'.
~
'.
"
..
,if ,lf~
":'..' ,
,f
t;,. ,_ /!I' e. t.
""" . .,0 ;.. t'
Fergus~~~,tl;~~Els:kN~ Smifh'j
:.1
'~
.~" ;,
0, , ".'
. '1\ ~
~
fi; (214)368-1331
CERTIF"IEO PUBLIC ACCOU'NTA,NTS
6210 NORT.... ~ENJR.,AL EXPR'ESSWAV
,.
,
"\;,
'!I
r
/~
P.9. BOX 8105
~
.
".....
Dalla~. Texas 75205
Mr. Albey Kern
City Attorney
Aspen. Colorado
~~ ":r!>'~~;.
.J'
"',
Dear Mr. Kern:
I am wr~ting to you about the Woerndle S~pdivision,
a copy of the ~th preliminary plat which I have before me. I am
an adjoining property owner to the north and west and I am deeply
. concerned about .-this. sundivision. . P
(1) Encroachihguponmy property and..
(2) Changing a 90' dedicatedstree-l:;into a 30'
subdivision turnaround.
In 196~ I had my .property.surveyed as well as the
Alpine Inn and a portion of the present subject subdivision. I
am enclosing a cOpy of that survey. Thi~ survey was made in two
parts by G. E. BuchaIl,;'ln. and for ready re:s,erencl" I J1jilye pieced the
two parts togethe:. ...
,;.
With re:spec't to the';;O' street, that. the-subdivision
proposlis to. reduce t,b -3D' and incorporate. in its rtlats, this is
to adv~se that I am opposed to any such change. I have-" gate
on my property abutting, this thoroughfare and it j;s.llsed by me
or the family-that liv~s -on my property periodically. _
'i . ~.
I. am also ..>'<lUoe.rned that the proposed subdivision plat
lines appear to be at .v;~rianc:,e with the ~urvey executed by Mr. '.' . ,;
Buchanan in 196~~- You~~y be further aware th~e -are discrepancies
in surveys of rhis are,! and I~eel.SurvElY Engi:rlll;er~, Inc. have".
compounded the prohlem"bytrying 'to draw' a plat using 8: 75' drdp
line to a curve. +his'W0er~d~e subhivision plat .i~ als,o- ~oticeably
negligent in f;tiliiig to deUge the. exact l~cationof'1;he Alpine
Lodge, its llUildtn~s- arid: fences e:hther direcfly wii::lrirl'~the plat
or adjoining thereto:. .;'IJ i" also '* concempto.-.me ,.thatupon 'ree.ent
inspection ~ my',Propet\tywhich adii$ins theno'l;'thcornler of th:LS'
subdivision that.sm'vey markers ~a.sed in 1':hE,-gliound by Mr. IBl\chanan
have bl"en,. removed .sipce last Augil'~t-wheh' I:;.mad'l.:'an 'inSpE!ction . of. that
particular.-areafn locatin~'thosei,~ill'ke:rsfoi: '1':Il}-:pa~t'l'er in Aspen.
. ," ;t- . "~: ": ".' ,.'~
~;, '. '.': i', ->I.i . '~
" -,.
'......-r-r'
,. ~;,
-'
,
,.,
.,
... ;~
,
,
.
,,, ;
;.;
<J
:,:~:~
:""
',i."':
:, ,~:,~:l:~
-'li.:
..f: '"ill;
;:.'{",'f::";"
,.
~'!
~~
;
"i~
i.,'.
"'~
i.'-"
...rl
,.~
t
'~. ." "
j
. ~
~
lj
t;
i:
.
/~".;.
'"
"C)
,":
:4,
"
;
\
:~
~
"','
,
::,:",74It':.~,,,;1 J':"
'j~~, ~~\')'1A:~:; ~:;:
?J :1'{~
;'h;
't~,,:
",-
.
,
,
1
Mr. Albey Kern
Page 2
June 16. 1972
,-...
.".
,-,
,
'':;''
''l..'
Thepe'are other items in the WQe~ndle Subdivision plat
that indicate p:ossible seJ?ious discrepancies in the plat with
respect as to how it. may' lie upon the ground. The ~orth line of
Lot 6 discloses 135 feet plus or minus running between the
turnaround circlelind the corner of salvation ditch. . I seriously
doubt this lineWouQd measure on the ground more than 120 feet.
Of co'!rse.. I am, also concerned that only one of the lots
meet the area requirement for R-15 and I seriously doubt that Lot 5
will meet this requirement when the 50' public access road is
plotted. ."
I chatted b~iefly with Mr. Bartell about my anxiety and
requested that approval;of any subdivision of this property
recognize existing fence ],ines and Public.;thoroughfares.
"
I further indicated to Mr. BarteQl that should any
change or abandonment of public thoroughf~:res in this. area be
required. in Mr. Woerndle '.s behalf I would be happy to cooperate
but that I must be protected from enc~oachment by erroneous
surveys.
LFF :carn
Encs.
~el', /
erguson
cc: Mr. Herb Bqrtell. City of Aspen
Robin Molny. .Chairman of Aspen Plan and Zone Corrunission
June 16. 1972
,
"
-,
,(;)
':',.\,
04
-'
.~!l>.;.
'.
'"
. .
:~r,
"
,
.,
""-
/:.
, ,
.'-
.-
'. ;,
,~.
.
~
. '\
.~
I
. ,c/;Pf^
L.i- '-
,~"
fY
Mr. Leon A. Wurl
City Manager
City of Aspen. Box V
Aspen, Colorado 81611
POST OFFICE BOX 51
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
6210 N. Central Expressway
Dallas, Texas 75206
Dear Mr, Wurl:
Thank you for your letter of May 2, 1972 and preliminary
plat of the Woerndle Subdivision.
As an adjoining landowner, I object to this subdivision
as pertains to our common boundry lines on the northwest side of
the subdivision.
The plat fails to disclose existing fence lines and
structures on this northwest side, such structures and fences having
been in existence more than thirty years I am informed.
The plat also subdivides an existing public road which I
presently use to gain access to my property.
The plat is also at variance with a survey by Mr. G. E.
Buchanan that was made for me October 29, 196~.
The plat also surveys from a marker that requires a 75 foot
drop line to a plotted curve being an obscure point in the public
roadbed.
I suggest the northwest section of this plat be redrawn
to disclose the public thoroughfare, the existing fences and structures
prior to its being approved.
Mr. Walter F. Hampel, Jr. in Aspen is familar with my property
and assists me in its management. I would appreciate your feeling free
to discuss any problems with him or questions he may have.
LFF:cam
Encl. - Woerndle Subdivision Plat
yours,
~
cc: Walter F. Hampel, Jr.
May 9, 1972
*"
-,~"'-"'",...,,_.,...-,...":,.,".- .
/
._.~~
-
I""",
~
..
.......,,,_';..~M
~
-
"
;~
,~"
;'"
C'C~ t>.::; iJ:L
;.:t:,.~ ::'"
;-'.::;-
::.Y"".;o.
~) ',":,,~'.' ~ ';;:..: '~f
, ,-, '~"'-;
':,:,;;''',-:; }....;... "C',' I ,.--;",,.~
,
,
.~ :.-.::L."
.'\-:r
"',', ~~ ",,~'/.:', "': -"
::':'::'
.".',
j..
;;...
',....,.
,., ..::..1: .t
,- ~..
Hay 5. 1912
,: ~': c. ,,~...::
',. U~: '~
" h
" ,- ~~ .~:,' ,',
{.; ,~
-:<-:'C ;'::..";t':~;' "
,~" '~':i1~ Lt ,;
.',
';.c i. t {~ "t: ,( '-:: C :;;' :"_>,:~
,~\::"
Mr. Gerard R. Pesman
Survey Engineering, I.nc.
P..-/O. . Box 2506
Aspen, Cilorado
;./. "~:":;.ci\'~',~~i, L::"';t.,,~,
(.>
,'-",,';"
" .. ~~
-", ,:~, r(:..;'i\'.::.~ ;~,;'" t.:::::. ,:,:?; ~'^
;.f,\'
~, ',~. ,.... "
~ :,-, ; \-:..,
t'-'~:"jC~:,-. ;",~\~.i,o:1
',,:.<.',
",3:0 f'-'""
.DesrMr. PesmaD-:
<;()L3::! t 'i.l
:;'~1"./~< {::.~! "'--
...(\
.;" ,~"
':':<~ ~~I",,; '\',-
At: its meeting on Tues<iay, May 2nd the Aspen City . Planning
ad Zoning CoImnission reviewed the preliminary plat of Woerndle
Subdivision for compliance with the City I s Subdivision Regula-
.t:1on. As a result of the discussion several concerns regarding
t:be present plat were raised and are listed below:
;~?;;b\':"t.'~
C;1:d. :::J.... Only one of the seven lots meets the minimum lot area
/5p0t,~ement for the city's R-l5 residential zone.
2.. The Commission felt that a private road serving as
access to three lots should not connect directly with
. state highway and that this particular ingress/egress
point is potentially unsafe.
3. Salvation l>itch presents problems with regard to
preservation, access and maintenancfi! of thfi! ditch and
establishment of a permanent easement for thfi! ditch.
Ditch seepage and toptgraphy raise questions regarding
the development feasibility of the area not platted as
lots 5, 6 Eo 7.
. -
~
,__ ~~T
_ :>,; ,.,;, ._, ,:"<~:;,:,,,;;: ',,"r,,;,;~~,,~~;"i~kl:~';, ';;~~'^,";,"0' ;/,,,:,,;,<.~*!i;;.;,~';"~tJ;:;.,;1i,J'>i<i~.;..:;:::>.:.,,-..... . - "0-'" ,'. ',' ." ,t'
.. ;;;,;;; ;_ :::;_" R ...__=. ___"'.' 8_~_.... .u__...~. ~ ;.;;.;;,~I;,;.~:;':.;.,.. ".;.';;..,'"
\,.,':,~"."'~
<_.~"c:,;;".i.:, .. '__/ ..~'*,._.,., .... ;.,',.;.:,.~':.~, ,," i.'''.;
1'i'
~ ~., ,'-
'//
//
/,
,,1'-,
.,~~""-^.,,,..,.
-,
.
1""'.
f"""'"
"
-,
I
Pesman
Page 2
4. McSkimming Road, as shown on the plat, creates align-
ment and safety problems where it enters the highway,
however it is probably the responsibility of the public
sector to correct these.
:J, S..The30' radius indicated in both-cul-de-sacs is inade-
quate for service vehicle turnaround.
The Commission indicated that it felt a PUD treatment of the
, property to allow flexibility in building site placement and
'_, building height would be the most practical method of allowing
illl8Xilnum density while creating a more suitable residential
rdevelopment for this particular tract.
:PUDtreatmentto:ould require. R-l5 (PUD) zoning after annexation
to the city. The city zoi1ing code should beconsul.ted for details
Aof_ the application procedure.
_c.,
;..'~), .,n::;'1~' -:; : ";L: t'f.
,;.:
f,Cordially,
:'.L '"j~iC '~~" \/.!...:::n -- 't,,,,.,
1 :'~;
'_ ...r..~
- .
-':7,'7:1.
c; r: .,:.F "~ ; ,;-
t:c ':;.": (\ ).. B', i~: L::J, :s.....} n
:l:",'l,. C-C-n<::61.,'-:-i.>B
',:':~L~)t:;,:';,
~ t ~./ :;':~ (~ or 0. :L3 !2,-~
tr.\.t::: p't~e~::::"."t{:: r'
) ""'" ''',
Robin Molny
Chairman
Aspen Planning
2", _.,'.."
".:;~:' t:j'~li': ~;-?V.e'~1 t,C:~;'j':~~;~:~;':i';
- l~_!__',~~)'~~ ~~ ~S ~~f~
". '~J.J,
,
._4..
~."",..,c" .'",
4" ~'"'. ,.- ..... ....
& Zoning Commission
~:,-;:~r\-';..;;;_,:;; ";,?
'.,t'-L)'.;:U:J::
s ,;" ~~)~l ';":.:~, '. ,,'.
';'~LY th
3:~:/L ';,7d8$
aC:C2<::I-S~ ~>J L:Y~:::':'6 1()t2 ,!
g 5 t:.r:;.te, h,:i.g)~,;-;ay eit:l tr;.:~,t
.f ..... . .., '.. ........ '''''''1'':'''; ... l' .,. '''.;' ""-',!~ ~
p0~.nL ~b 1~~~~~. ~~~1,'LJ ~.._J_
;:, ::::~: ::;'C!: :t:;>:~ t
, L~:\1~
3.. Sal\lat:L~)n
t, ~ ti 'I;' rf: 1; ~~;' ~1C ~:t
"''''.<
""-.:;'
1':0
rY:::"::~ se t'VR t~~O:t ~
es cab Iis;'^2'.:te")";~
,::~: C Cf5 D
t::;: ;.~ [:.,'t~ t,:, :'~: ~:)
e, f t';.l~
c fer: t:he ~'_:~t(:h'l
(; :-: 3. p ;;.;.r:~:\ li. t!'::D ~.
!.;~; t'3 e.
';;,C{:"..t rC-1~~f: ,.
11,0 t r> "l-:,~\; ':..
,:'I.r:
Dftc'h.
t.:y (,; 1.7 t~:-4i:~
t,be: :3.";,2\1(,-
'l: ._.... ~ 1..";.(
;.v::'"b..., .;,11
,..
~:'u;':(:,::lt. .i.::{""
~;f i",
---
rrH ..
t\~1fil'i~;>:'i:::~;biii:~'6<:;";,~;d~~~'::;.\:flj;J";}>:
. . ,. . . . . ''', .... - .. ;':.:tJ;':'<-'~;I;.,:;,j:'M'i<i,~S;';;'d;'i;:'~::",>,..,i,L:..,;,:;[;,'&2t;;"d..';':.;:-;,_,->ff.:-.':"j'>::";"__'~'<;~~";_:;.:::-:':?:;;';'.)-2:};'::;,\b..\;,;:_,'_', i,;';'~~'f'.'!~
:'~t'o:~,>:!:,:::<,,;;",}~-;:'-'~i'ii:G';~~<-'-i':~'!:~-'~~';;':;;:;'~:;,;,i;",:;;6;i;~~,in;;:..;;,,i;;:{,.,A;;:,\!,).(,::o{..l"':-',:;;,; '. .. ..... ~.".""..' ;:.::;.;:;;; ~ . .... ';:';. ;~';:;;; ~';::;:-=";;; ..' . -';;- .....;'. ~.....:;;;:,'$t -